1
|
Xiong S, Ghebre R, Kulasingam S, Mason SM, Pratt RJ, Lazovich D. Exploring factors associated with preferences for human papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling among racially- and ethnically-diverse women in Minnesota: A cross-sectional study. Prev Med Rep 2023; 34:102243. [PMID: 37234567 PMCID: PMC10206196 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2022] [Revised: 05/05/2023] [Accepted: 05/10/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Pap tests are still underutilized by minority women due to limited awareness of cervical cancer screening (CCS), inadequate health care access, and cultural or religious beliefs. Human papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling, a new CCS tool, has demonstrated potential to overcome some of these barriers. In 2021, women aged 30-65 years old were recruited across Minnesota to complete an online survey. The survey assessed five outcome measures related to HPV self-sampling: (1) awareness of test; (2) self-efficacy to conduct test; (3) location preference of test (clinic vs. home); 4) collector preference (self vs. clinician); and (5) preference of CCS strategy (HPV self-sampling vs. Pap test). Modified Poisson regressions tested associations between sociodemographic variables and outcomes. A total of 420 women completed the survey, of which 32.4% identified as Non-Hispanic white, 22.2% as Hispanic, 12.6% as Black/African-American, 28.3% as Asian, 1.9% as American Indian/Alaskan Native, and 1.4% as more than two races. Few women had heard of HPV self-sampling (6.5%), but a majority reported high self-efficacy to perform self-sampling (75.3%). Women also reported higher preferences for completing an HPV test in the clinic (52.2%) and for performing a self-collected HPV test themselves (58.7%), yet would choose a traditional Pap test over HPV self-sampling (56.0%). The low level of HPV self-sampling awareness, across all racial/ethnic groups, suggests a strong opportunity to promote widespread educational efforts around this new tool. Future HPV self-sampling research efforts should examine educational interventions targeted at healthcare providers to educate and encourage women on the importance of self-collection options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Serena Xiong
- Department of Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, 600 S Taylor Avenue, St. Louis, MO 63110, United States
| | - Rahel Ghebre
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women’s Health, University of Minnesota Medical School, 420 Delaware St SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States
- Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, 425 East River Parkway, Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States
| | - Shalini Kulasingam
- Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, 425 East River Parkway, Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States
- Department of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, 1300 S 2nd Suite 300, Minneapolis, MN 55454, United States
| | - Susan M. Mason
- Department of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, 1300 S 2nd Suite 300, Minneapolis, MN 55454, United States
| | - Rebekah J. Pratt
- Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, 425 East River Parkway, Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States
- Program in Health Disparities Research, University of Minnesota Medical School, 717 Delaware Street SE, Suite 166, Minneapolis, MN 55414, United States
| | - DeAnn Lazovich
- Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, 425 East River Parkway, Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States
- Department of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, 1300 S 2nd Suite 300, Minneapolis, MN 55454, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lofters A, Khalil I, Sopcak N, Shea-Budgell M, Meaney C, Fernandes C, Moineddin R, Campbell-Scherer D, Aubrey-Bassler K, Manca DP, Grunfeld E. Opportunities to improve quality of care for cancer survivors in primary care: findings from the BETTER WISE study. Support Care Cancer 2023; 31:430. [PMID: 37389679 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-023-07883-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2023] [Accepted: 06/12/2023] [Indexed: 07/01/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The BETTER WISE (Building on Existing Tools to Improve Chronic Disease Prevention and Screening in Primary Care for Wellness of Cancer Survivors and Patients) intervention is an evidence-based approach to prevention and screening for cancers and chronic diseases in primary care that also includes comprehensive follow-up for breast, prostate and colorectal cancer survivors. We describe the process of harmonizing cancer survivorship guidelines to create a BETTER WISE cancer surveillance algorithm and describe both the quantitative and qualitative findings for BETTER WISE participants who were breast, prostate or colorectal cancer survivors. We describe the results in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS We reviewed high-quality survivorship guidelines to create a cancer surveillance algorithm. We conducted a cluster randomized trial in three Canadian provinces with two composite index outcome measured 12 months after baseline, and also collected qualitative feedback on the intervention. RESULTS There were 80 cancer survivors for whom we had baseline and follow-up data. Differences between the composite indices in the two study arms were not statistically significant, although a post hoc analysis suggested the COVID-19 pandemic was a key factor in these results. Qualitative finding suggested that participants and stakeholders generally viewed BETTER WISE positively and emphasized the effects of the pandemic. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS BETTER WISE shows promise for providing an evidence-based, patient-centred, comprehensive approach to prevention, screening and cancer surveillance for cancer survivors in the primary care setting. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN21333761. Registered on December 19, 2016, http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN21333761 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aisha Lofters
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, 500 University Ave, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1V7, Canada.
- Peter Gilgan Centre for Women's Cancers, Women's College Hospital, 76 Grenville St, Toronto, ON, M5S 1B2, Canada.
| | - Ielaf Khalil
- Sinai Health, 600 University Ave, Toronto, Canada
| | - Nicolette Sopcak
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Alberta, 6-10 University Terrace, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2T4, Canada
| | - Melissa Shea-Budgell
- Charbonneau Cancer Institute and Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, 3280 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4Z6, Canada
| | - Christopher Meaney
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, 500 University Ave, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1V7, Canada
| | - Carolina Fernandes
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Alberta, 6-10 University Terrace, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2T4, Canada
| | - Rahim Moineddin
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, 500 University Ave, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1V7, Canada
| | - Denise Campbell-Scherer
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Alberta, 6-10 University Terrace, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2T4, Canada
- Office of Lifelong Learning & Physician Learning Program, University of Alberta, 2-590 Edmonton Clinic Health Academy, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1C9, Canada
| | - Kris Aubrey-Bassler
- Discipline of Family Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, 300 Prince Phillip Drive, St. John's, Newfoundland, A1B 3V6, Canada
| | - Donna Patricia Manca
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Alberta, 6-10 University Terrace, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2T4, Canada
- Office of Lifelong Learning & Physician Learning Program, University of Alberta, 2-590 Edmonton Clinic Health Academy, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1C9, Canada
- Covenant Health, Grey Nuns Community Hospital, 1100 Youville Drive Northwest, Edmonton, Alberta, T6L 5X8, Canada
| | - Eva Grunfeld
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, 500 University Ave, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1V7, Canada
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, 661 University Avenue, Suite 510, Toronto, ON, M5G 0A3, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Alam Z, Cairns JM, Scott M, Dean JA, Janda M. Interventions to increase cervical screening uptake among immigrant women: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0281976. [PMID: 37267330 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281976] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2022] [Accepted: 02/05/2023] [Indexed: 06/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Numerous intervention studies have attempted to increase cervical screening uptake among immigrant women, nonetheless their screening participation remains low. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to summarise the evidence on interventions to improve cervical screening among immigrant women globally and identify their effectiveness. Databases PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, PsycINFO, ERIC, CINAHL and CENTRAL were systematically searched from inception to October 12, 2021, for intervention studies, including randomised and clinical controlled trials (RCT, CCT) and one and two group pre-post studies. Peer-reviewed studies involving immigrant and refugee women, in community and clinical settings, were eligible. Comparator interventions were usual or minimal care or attention control. Data extraction, quality appraisal and risk of bias were assessed by two authors independently using COVIDENCE software. Narrative synthesis of findings was carried out, with the main outcome measure defined as the cervical screening uptake rate difference pre- and post-intervention followed by random effects meta-analysis of trials and two group pre-post studies, using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software, to calculate pooled rate ratios and adjustment for publication bias, where found. The protocol followed PRISMA guidelines and was registered prospectively with PROSPERO (CRD42020192341). 1,900 studies were identified, of which 42 (21 RCTS, 4 CCTs, and 16 pre-post studies) with 44,224 participants, were included in the systematic review, and 28 with 35,495 participants in the meta-analysis. Overall, the uptake difference rate for interventions ranged from -6.7 to 96%. Meta-analysis demonstrated a pooled rate ratio of 1.15 (95% CI 1.03-1.29), with high heterogeneity. Culturally sensitive, multicomponent interventions, using different modes of information delivery and self-sampling modality were most promising. Interventions led to at least 15% increase in cervical screening participation among immigrant women. Interventions designed to overcome logistical barriers and use multiple channels to communicate culturally appropriate health promotion messages are most effective at achieving cervical screening uptake among immigrant women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zufishan Alam
- Centre for Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | | | - Marissa Scott
- School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Judith Ann Dean
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Monika Janda
- Centre for Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Albers B, Auer R, Caci L, Nyantakyi E, Plys E, Podmore C, Riegel F, Selby K, Walder J, Clack L. Implementing organized colorectal cancer screening programs in Europe-protocol for a systematic review of determinants and strategies. Syst Rev 2023; 12:26. [PMID: 36849979 PMCID: PMC9969690 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-023-02193-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2022] [Accepted: 02/16/2023] [Indexed: 03/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND With a high mortality of 12.6% of all cancer cases, colorectal cancer (CRC) accounts for substantial burden of disease in Europe. In the past decade, more and more countries have introduced organized colorectal cancer screening programs, making systematic screening available to entire segments of a population, typically based on routine stool tests and/or colonoscopy. While the effectiveness of organized screening in reducing CRC incidence and mortality has been confirmed, studies continuously report persistent program implementation challenges. This systematic review will synthesize the literature on organized CRC screening programs. Its aim is to understand what is currently known about the barriers and facilitators that influence the implementation of these programs and about the implementation strategies used to navigate these determinants. METHODS A systematic review of primary studies of any research design will be conducted. CENTRAL, CINAHL, EMBASE, International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Scopus will be searched. Websites of (non-)government health care organizations and websites of organizations affiliated with authors of included studies will be screened for unpublished evaluation reports. Existing organized CRC screening programs will be contacted with a request to share program-specific grey literature. Two researchers will independently screen each publication in two rounds for eligibility. Included studies will focus on adult populations involved in the implementation of organized CRC screening programs and contain information about implementation determinants/ strategies. Publications will be assessed for their risk of bias. Data extraction will include study aim, design, location, setting, sample, methods, and measures; program characteristics; implementation stage, framework, determinants, strategies, and outcomes; and service and other outcome information. Findings will be synthesized narratively using the three stages of thematic synthesis. DISCUSSION With its sole focus on the implementation of organized CRC screening programs, this review will help to fill a central knowledge gap in the literature on colorectal cancer screening. Its findings can inform the decision-making in policy and practice needed to prioritize resources for establishing new and maintaining existing programs in the future. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO (CRD42022306580).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bianca Albers
- Institute for Implementation Science in Health Care (IfIS), Medical Faculty, University of Zurich, Universitätstrasse 84, 8006, Zurich, Switzerland.
| | - Reto Auer
- Institute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Mittelstrasse 43, 3012, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Laura Caci
- Institute for Implementation Science in Health Care (IfIS), Medical Faculty, University of Zurich, Universitätstrasse 84, 8006, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Emanuela Nyantakyi
- Institute for Implementation Science in Health Care (IfIS), Medical Faculty, University of Zurich, Universitätstrasse 84, 8006, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Ekaterina Plys
- Center for primary care and public health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Rue de Bugnon 44, 1010, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Clara Podmore
- Center for primary care and public health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Rue de Bugnon 44, 1010, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Franziska Riegel
- Institute for Implementation Science in Health Care (IfIS), Medical Faculty, University of Zurich, Universitätstrasse 84, 8006, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Kevin Selby
- Center for primary care and public health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Rue de Bugnon 44, 1010, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Joel Walder
- Institute for Implementation Science in Health Care (IfIS), Medical Faculty, University of Zurich, Universitätstrasse 84, 8006, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Lauren Clack
- Institute for Implementation Science in Health Care (IfIS), Medical Faculty, University of Zurich, Universitätstrasse 84, 8006, Zurich, Switzerland.,Department of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, University Hospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Moss JL, Stoltzfus KC, Popalis ML, Calo WA, Kraschnewski JL. Assessing the use of constructs from the consolidated framework for implementation research in U.S. rural cancer screening promotion programs: a systematic search and scoping review. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:48. [PMID: 36653800 PMCID: PMC9846667 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08976-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2022] [Accepted: 12/16/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer screening is suboptimal in rural areas, and interventions are needed to improve uptake. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) is a widely-used implementation science framework to optimize planning and delivery of evidence-based interventions, which may be particularly useful for screening promotion in rural areas. We examined the discussion of CFIR-defined domains and constructs in programs to improve cancer screening in rural areas. METHODS We conducted a systematic search of research databases (e.g., Medline, CINAHL) to identify studies (published through November 2022) of cancer screening promotion programs delivered in rural areas in the United States. We identified 166 records, and 15 studies were included. Next, two reviewers used a standardized abstraction tool to conduct a critical scoping review of CFIR constructs in rural cancer screening promotion programs. RESULTS Each study reported at least some CFIR domains and constructs, but studies varied in how they were reported. Broadly, constructs from the domains of Process, Intervention, and Outer setting were commonly reported, but constructs from the domains of Inner setting and Individuals were less commonly reported. The most common constructs were planning (100% of studies reporting), followed by adaptability, cosmopolitanism, and reflecting and evaluating (86.7% for each). No studies reported tension for change, self-efficacy, or opinion leader. CONCLUSIONS Leveraging CFIR in the planning and delivery of cancer screening promotion programs in rural areas can improve program implementation. Additional studies are needed to evaluate the impact of underutilized CFIR domains, i.e., Inner setting and Individuals, on cancer screening programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer L Moss
- Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Department of Public Health Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine, The Pennsylvania State University, 90 Hope Drive, #2120E, MC A172, P.O. Box 855, Hershey, PA, 17033, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kim J, Estabrooks P, Aggarwal A, McMillan A, Alshehri K. Developing a co-production strategy to facilitate the adoption and implementation of evidence-based colorectal cancer screening interventions for rural health systems: a pilot study. Implement Sci Commun 2022; 3:131. [PMID: 36514119 PMCID: PMC9745718 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-022-00375-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2022] [Accepted: 11/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evidence-based colorectal cancer screening (CRCS) interventions have not been broadly adopted in rural primary care settings. Co-production of implementation strategies through a bundled approach may be promising in closing this gap by helping rural healthcare practitioners select and implement the best fitting CRCS interventions to the local context. This paper describes the process and outcomes of co-development and delivery of the bundled implementation strategy to improve adoption and implementation of CRCS interventions with two rural clinics. METHODS We used a bundle of implementation strategies with a core focus on academic-clinical partnership development (strategy 1) and Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles (strategy 2) to identify clinical partner interests/preferences on delivery methods and content needed to facilitate intervention identification and implementation that improves CRCS. We also developed an implementation blueprint for each clinic (strategy 3) through an online blueprinting process based on adapted "Putting Public Health Evidence in Action" (PPHEA) training curriculum. Clinic physicians and staff (n = 7) were asked to evaluate the bundled approach based on overall reactions and perceptions of innovation characteristics using 5-point Likert scale. After completing the bundled approach, we collected implementation outcomes and limited intervention effectiveness of the CRCS evidence-based interventions (EBIs) developed through the process. RESULTS Our co-production strategy yielded a prototype online blueprinting process consisting of 8 distance-learning PPHEA modules that guide selection and implementation of EBIs tailored to CRCS. Modules were delivered to clinic participants with minor adaptations, using PDSA cycle to improve quality of module contents and formats. Overall, participants in both clinics reported positive reactions toward the bundled approach. Both clinics reported improvements in how they perceived the characteristics of the innovation (the bundled approach) to tailor selected CRCS EBIs. As a result of the bundled strategies, each clinic selected and adopted specific EBI(s) with the varying degrees of implementation and CRCS outcomes. CONCLUSIONS The bundle of implementation strategies used were feasible and acceptable in rural primary care practices to facilitate the use of EBIs to improve CRCS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jungyoon Kim
- Department of Health Services Research and Administration, University of Nebraska Medical Center, College of Public Health, 984350 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, 98168, USA.
| | - Paul Estabrooks
- Department of Health & Kinesiology, College of Health, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA
| | - Alisha Aggarwal
- Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson and Johnson, Horsham, USA
| | - Analisa McMillan
- College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, USA
| | - Khalid Alshehri
- Department of Health Services Research and Administration, University of Nebraska Medical Center, College of Public Health, 984350 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, 98168, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Maes‐Carballo M, García‐García M, Gómez‐Fandiño Y, Estrada‐López CR, Iglesias‐Álvarez A, Bueno‐Cavanillas A, Khan KS. Systematic review of shared decision-making in guidelines about colorectal cancer screening. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2022; 31:e13738. [PMID: 36254840 PMCID: PMC9786598 DOI: 10.1111/ecc.13738] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2022] [Revised: 09/15/2022] [Accepted: 09/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We aimed to systematically evaluate quality of shared decision-making (SDM) in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) and consensus statements (CSs). METHODS Search for CRC screening guidances was from 2010 to November 2021 in EMBASE, Web of Science, MEDLINE, Scopus and CDSR, and the World Wide Web. Three independent reviewers and an arbitrator rated the quality of each guidance using a SDM quality assessment tool (maximum score: 31). Reviewer agreement was 0.88. RESULTS SDM appeared in 41/83 (49.4%) CPGs and 9/19 (47.4%) CSs. None met all the quality criteria, and 51.0% (52/102) failed to meet any quality items. Overall compliance was low (mean 1.63, IQR 0-2). Quality was better in guidances published after 2015 (mean 1, IQR 0-3 vs. mean 0.5, IQR 0-1.5; p = 0.048) and when the term SDM was specifically reported (mean 4.5, IQR 2.5-4.5 vs. mean 0.5, IQR 0-1.5; p < 0.001). CPGs underpinned by systematic reviews showed better SDM quality than consensus (mean 1, IQR 0-3 vs. mean 0, IQR 0-2, p = 0.040). CONCLUSION SDM quality was suboptimal and mentioned in less than half of the guidances, and recommendations were scarce. Guideline developers should incorporate evidence-based SDM recommendations in guidances to underpin the translation of evidence into practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marta Maes‐Carballo
- Department of General Surgery, Breast Cancer UnitComplexo Hospitalario de OurenseOurenseSpain,Department of General SurgeryHospital Público de VerínOurenseSpain,Department of Preventive Medicine and Public HealthUniversity of GranadaGranadaSpain
| | - Manuel García‐García
- Department of General Surgery, Breast Cancer UnitComplexo Hospitalario de OurenseOurenseSpain
| | - Yolanda Gómez‐Fandiño
- Department of General Surgery, Breast Cancer UnitComplexo Hospitalario de OurenseOurenseSpain
| | | | - Andrés Iglesias‐Álvarez
- Department of General SurgeryUniversity of Santiago de CompostelaSantiago de CompostelaSpain
| | - Aurora Bueno‐Cavanillas
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Public HealthUniversity of GranadaGranadaSpain,Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria IBSGranadaSpain,CIBER of Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP)MadridSpain
| | - Khalid Saeed Khan
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Public HealthUniversity of GranadaGranadaSpain,Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria IBSGranadaSpain
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Chin SS, Jamonek Jamhuri NA, Hussin N, Md Zubir NL, Tan JR, Chan SCW. Factors Influencing Pap Smear Screening Uptake among Women Visiting Outpatient Clinics in Johor. MALAYSIAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE ACADEMY OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS OF MALAYSIA 2022; 17:46-55. [PMID: 35949992 PMCID: PMC9357417 DOI: 10.51866/oa.35] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Despite the benefits of cervical cancer screening, Pap smear uptake remains variable in Malaysia, with Johor previously reported as the state with the lowest uptake. This study aims to fill the gap in epidemiological knowledge and assess factors affecting the uptake of Pap smear screening among women in Johor. METHODS A cross-sectional study was conducted in several government and private clinics across Johor, including Pagoh, Muar, Batu Pahat, Kulai, and Johor Bahru districts. Data was collected from 452 women using self-administered questionnaires, and logistic regression was performed to determine factors associated with Pap smear uptake. RESULTS Findings showed that 48.5% of the women reported having undergone Pap smear screening in the previous 3 years, and 40.0% and 51.3% of respondents accurately answered questions on symptoms and risk factors of cervical cancer, respectively. Increasing age (ORad. 2.322, 95% CI 1.708-3.158), being married (ORadj 4.860, 95% CI 1.100-21.476), parity of ≥5 (ORadj 8.381, 95% CI 1.326-52.958), young age at first pregnancy (ORadj 0.932, 95% CI 0.877-0.991), knowledge of cervical cancer symptoms (ORadj. 1.745, 95% CI 1.065-2.857), support from family (ORadj 3.620, 95% CI 2.081-6.298), and contraception use (ORadj 2.220, 95% CI 1.314-3.750) were significantly associated with increased Pap smear uptake among women visiting outpatient clinics in Johor. CONCLUSION Pap smear uptake remains suboptimal in Johor, and broad-based awareness campaigns tailored towards improving knowledge of cervical cancer with family involvement are crucial to improving uptake among women in Johor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suzane Shiyun Chin
- MD (UI), FRACGP (Australia), Klinik Kesihatan Bakri, Muar, Johor, Malaysia.
| | | | | | | | - Jih Ren Tan
- MBBS (MAHE), Policlinic Chu, Kulai, Johor, Malaysia
| | - Stanley Chun Wai Chan
- MD (Canada), MPH (USA), Department of Family Medicine, International Medical University, Seremban, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hoeck S, Van Roy K, Willems S. Barriers and facilitators to participate in the colorectal cancer screening programme in Flanders (Belgium): a focus group study. Acta Clin Belg 2022; 77:37-44. [PMID: 32552612 DOI: 10.1080/17843286.2020.1783906] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE In Flanders (Belgium), a population-based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programme offers a faecal immunochemical test (FIT) biennially to Flemish citizens aged 50-74 years. A FIT uptake of only 51,5% in 2018 is significantly lower among men, lower income groups and among people with other than the Belgian nationality.The objective of this study was to identify attitudes, barriers and facilitators to participate in the Flemish CRC screening programme. METHODS Qualitative study using focus group discussions (FGDs) with non-participants in the Flemish CRC screening programme. Four FGDs were held with non-migrant Flemish population groups, and four were held with Turkish migrants (41 participants). RESULTS Feeling healthy, fear of cancer and embarrassment to talk about CRC screening emerged as common barriers in all FGDs. Having other priorities (non-migrant group) and a lack of understanding mainly due to a language barrier (Turkish migrants) differed between the two groups. Providing face-to-face information, information in group and GP recommendation were perceived as important facilitators to CRC screening in both groups. More publicity and making CRC screening more of a routine (non-migrant group) and offering translated information (Turkish migrants) were the suggested facilitators that differed between the groups. CONCLUSIONS Several common and some group-specific barriers and facilitators appeared to play a role in the decision to participate in the CRC screening programme. In order to improve informed decision making and participation in the CRC screening programme in Flanders, the options of more GP involvement, targeted information events, and adapted reminder letters are currently being explored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Hoeck
- Centre for Cancer Detection, Bruges, Belgium
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Social Epidemiology and Health Policy (SEHPO), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Kaatje Van Roy
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Sara Willems
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Schliemann D, Ramanathan K, Matovu N, O'Neill C, Kee F, Su TT, Donnelly M. The implementation of colorectal cancer screening interventions in low-and middle-income countries: a scoping review. BMC Cancer 2021; 21:1125. [PMID: 34666704 PMCID: PMC8524916 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-08809-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2021] [Accepted: 09/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) experienced increasing rates of colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence in the last decade and lower 5-year survival rates compared to high-income countries (HICs) where the implementation of screening and treatment services have advanced. This review scoped and mapped the literature regarding the content, implementation and uptake of CRC screening interventions as well as opportunities and challenges for the implementation of CRC screening interventions in LMICs. METHODS We systematically followed a five-step scoping review framework to identify and review relevant literature about CRC screening in LMICs, written in the English language before February 2020. We searched Medline, Embase, Web of Science and Google Scholar for studies targeting the general, asymptomatic, at-risk adult population. The TIDieR tool and an implementation checklist were used to extract data from empirical studies; and we extracted data-informed insights from policy reviews and commentaries. RESULTS CRC screening interventions (n = 24 studies) were implemented in nine middle-income countries. Population-based screening programmes (n = 11) as well as small-scale screening interventions (n = 13) utilised various recruitment strategies. Interventions that recruited participants face-to-face (alone or in combination with other recruitment strategies) (10/15), opportunistic clinic-based screening interventions (5/6) and educational interventions combined with screening (3/4), seemed to be the strategies that consistently achieved an uptake of > 65% in LMICs. FOBT/FIT and colonoscopy uptake ranged between 14 and 100%. The most commonly reported implementation indicator was 'uptake/reach'. There was an absence of detail regarding implementation indicators and there is a need to improve reporting practice in order to disseminate learning about how to implement programmes. CONCLUSION Opportunities and challenges for the implementation of CRC screening programmes were related to the reporting of CRC cases and screening, cost-effective screening methods, knowledge about CRC and screening, staff resources and training, infrastructure of the health care system, financial resources, public health campaigns, policy commitment from governments, patient navigation, planning of screening programmes and quality assurance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Désirée Schliemann
- Centre for Public Health and UKCRC Centre of Excellence for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
| | - Kogila Ramanathan
- Global Public Health, Jeffrey Cheah School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Monash University Malaysia, Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia.,South East Asia Community Observatory (SEACO), Jeffrey Cheah School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Monash University Malaysia, Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia
| | - Nicholas Matovu
- Centre for Public Health and UKCRC Centre of Excellence for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Ciaran O'Neill
- Centre for Public Health and UKCRC Centre of Excellence for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Frank Kee
- Centre for Public Health and UKCRC Centre of Excellence for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Tin Tin Su
- Global Public Health, Jeffrey Cheah School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Monash University Malaysia, Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia.,South East Asia Community Observatory (SEACO), Jeffrey Cheah School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Monash University Malaysia, Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia
| | - Michael Donnelly
- Centre for Public Health and UKCRC Centre of Excellence for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Hirsch EA, Barón AE, Risendal B, Studts JL, New ML, Malkoski SP. Determinants Associated With Longitudinal Adherence to Annual Lung Cancer Screening: A Retrospective Analysis of Claims Data. J Am Coll Radiol 2021; 18:1084-1094. [PMID: 33798496 PMCID: PMC8349785 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2021.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Lung cancer screening (LCS) efficacy is highly dependent on adherence to annual screening, but little is known about real-world adherence determinants. We used insurance claims data to examine associations between LCS annual adherence and demographic, comorbidity, health care usage, and geographic factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS Insurance claims data for all individuals with an LCS low-dose CT scan were obtained from the Colorado All Payer Claims Dataset. Adherence was defined as a second claim for a screening CT 10 to 18 months after the index claim. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to define the relationship between annual adherence and age, gender, insurance type, residence location, outpatient health care usage, and comorbidity burden. RESULTS After exclusions, the final data set consisted of 9,056 records with 3,072 adherent, 3,570 nonadherent, and 2,414 censored (unclassifiable) individuals. Less adherence was associated with ages 55 to 59 (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.80, 99% confidence interval [CI] = 0.67-0.94), 60 to 64 (HR = 0.83, 99% CI = 0.71-0.97), and 75 to 79 (HR = 0.79, 99% CI = 0.65-0.97); rural residence (HR = 0.56, 99% CI = 0.43-0.73); Medicare fee-for-service (HR = 0.45, 99% CI = 0.39-0.51), and Medicaid (HR = 0.50, 99% CI = 0.40-0.62). A significant interaction between outpatient health care usage and comorbidity was also observed. Increased outpatient usage was associated with increased adherence and was most pronounced for individuals without comorbidities. CONCLUSIONS This population-based description of LCS adherence determinants provides insight into populations that might benefit from specific interventions targeted toward improving adherence and maximizing LCS benefit. Quantifying population-based adherence rates and understanding factors associated with annual adherence are critical to improving screening adherence and reducing lung cancer death.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin A Hirsch
- Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Anna E Barón
- Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Betsy Risendal
- Department of Community and Behavioral Health, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Jamie L Studts
- Division of Medical Oncology and Cancer Prevention and Control Program, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Melissa L New
- Pulmonary Section, Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical Center, Aurora, Colorado; Division of Pulmonary Sciences and Critical Care Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Stephen P Malkoski
- Division of Pulmonary Sciences and Critical Care Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado; Department of Medicine, University of Washington, WWAMI-Spokane, Spokane, Washington; Sound Critical Care, Sacred Heart Medical Center, Spokane, Washington.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Mandrik O, Tolma E, Zielonke N, Meheus F, Ordóñez-Reyes C, Severens JL, Murillo R. Systematic reviews as a "lens of evidence": Determinants of participation in breast cancer screening. J Med Screen 2021; 28:70-79. [PMID: 32517538 PMCID: PMC8167916 DOI: 10.1177/0969141320930743] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2020] [Revised: 04/25/2020] [Accepted: 05/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the determinants of the participation rate in breast cancer screening programs by conducting a systematic review of reviews. METHODS We conducted a systematic search in PubMed via Medline, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane identifying the literature up to April 2019. Out of 2258 revealed unique abstracts, we included 31 reviews, from which 25 were considered as systematic. We applied the Walsh & McPhee Systems Model of Clinical Preventive Care to systematize the determinants of screening participation. RESULTS The reviews, mainly in high-income settings, reported a wide range for breast cancer screening participation rate: 16-90%. The determinants of breast cancer screening participation were simple low-cost interventions such as invitation letters, basic information on screening, multiple reminders, fixed appointments, prompts from healthcare professionals, and healthcare organizational factors (e.g. close proximity to screening facility). More complex interventions (such as face-to-face counselling or home visits), mass media or improved access to transport should not be encouraged by policy makers unless other information appears. The repeated participation in mammography screening was consistently high, above 62%. Previous positive experience with screening influenced the repeated participation in screening programs. The reviews were inconsistent in the use of terminology related to breast cancer screening participation, which may have contributed to the heterogeneity in the reported outcomes. CONCLUSIONS This study shows that consistent findings of systematic reviews bring more certainty into the conclusions on the effects of simple invitation techniques, fixed appointments and prompts, as well as healthcare organizational factors on promoting participation rate in screening mammography.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- O Mandrik
- School of Health and Related Research, Health Economic and Decision Science (HEDS), The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Section of Early Detection and Prevention, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | - E Tolma
- Faculty of Public Health, Kuwait University, Jabriya, Kuwait
| | - N Zielonke
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - F Meheus
- Section of Early Detection and Prevention, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | - C Ordóñez-Reyes
- Centro Javeriano de Oncología, Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - JL Severens
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Institute for Medical Technology Assessment (iMTA), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - R Murillo
- Section of Early Detection and Prevention, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
- Centro Javeriano de Oncología, Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogotá, Colombia
- Faculty of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Abu SH, Woldehanna BT, Nida ET, Tilahun AW, Gebremariam MY, Sisay MM. The role of health education on cervical cancer screening uptake at selected health centers in Addis Ababa. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0239580. [PMID: 33027267 PMCID: PMC7540882 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239580] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2019] [Accepted: 09/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Cervical cancer is one of the most common causes of morbidity and mortality among women in developing countries including Ethiopia. Unlike other types of cancers, the grave outcomes of cervical cancer could be prevented if detected at its early stage. However, in Ethiopia, awareness about the disease and the availability of screening and treatment services is limited. This study aims to determine the role of health education on cervical cancer screening uptake in selected health facilities in Addis Ababa. Methods Two-pronged clustered randomized controlled trial was conducted in 2018 at eight public health centers that provide cervical cancer screening services using visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Each of the eight health centers were randomly assigned to serve as either an intervention or a control center. A two-pronged clustered randomized controlled trial was conducted in eight public health care centers. All the selected facilities provided cervical cancer screening services using visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA). Four health centers were randomly assigned to the intervention and control arms. The study participants were women aged 30–49 years who sought care at maternal and child health clinics but who had never been screened for cervical cancer. In the intervention health centers, all eligible women received one-to-one health education and educational brochures about cervical cancer and cervical cancer screening. In the control health centers, participants received standard care. Baseline data were collected at recruitment and follow-up data were collected two months after the baseline. For the follow-up data collection, participants (both in the intervention and control arms) were interviewed over the phone to check whether they were screened for cervical cancer. Result From the 2,140 women who participated in the study, 215 (10%) screened for cervical cancer, where 152(71%) were from the intervention health centers. Seventy-four percent of these participants reported that they learned about the benefits of screening from the one-to-one health education or the brochure. Women from the intervention health centers had higher odds of getting screened (AOR = 2.43,95%CI;1.58–2.90) than the controls. Women with the educational status of the first degree and those who have a history of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) had higher odds of getting screened (AOR = 2.03,95%CI;(1.15–2.58) and (AOR = 1.55,95%CI;1.01–2.36), respectively. Conclusion and recommendation Providing focused health education supported by printed educational materials increased the uptake of cervical cancer screening services. Integrating one-to-one health education and providing a take-home educational material into the existing maternal and child health services can help increase cervical cancer screening uptake.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Selamawit Hirpa Abu
- School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
- * E-mail:
| | - Berhan Tassew Woldehanna
- School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Etsehiwot Tilahun Nida
- School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | | | | | - Mitike Molla Sisay
- School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Riordan F, Racine E, Smith SM, Murphy A, Browne J, Kearney PM, Bradley C, James M, Murphy M, McHugh SM. Feasibility of an implementation intervention to increase attendance at diabetic retinopathy screening: protocol for a cluster randomised pilot trial. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2020; 6:64. [PMID: 32426158 PMCID: PMC7216495 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-020-00608-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2019] [Accepted: 04/23/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Diabetic retinopathy screening (DRS) leads to the earlier detection of retinopathy and treatment that can prevent or delay the development of diabetes-related blindness. However, uptake continues to be sub-optimal in many countries, including Ireland. Routine management of type 2 diabetes largely takes place in primary care. As such, there may be an opportunity in primary care to introduce interventions to improve DRS uptake. However, few studies test the feasibility of interventions to enhance DRS uptake in this context. Our aim is to investigate the feasibility of an implementation intervention (IDEAs (Improving Diabetes Eye screening Attendance)) delivered in general practice to improve the uptake of the national DRS programme, RetinaScreen. METHODS The IDEAs study is a cluster randomised pilot trial with an embedded process evaluation and economic evaluation. Following stratification by practice size, eight general practices (clusters) will be randomly allocated to intervention (n = 4) or wait-list control groups (n = 4). The intervention will be delivered for 6 months, after which, it will be administered to wait-list control practices. The intervention is multi-faceted and comprises provider-level components (training, audit and feedback, health care professional prompt, reimbursement) and patient-level components (GP-endorsed reminder with information leaflet delivered opportunistically face-to-face, and systematically by phone and letter). Patient inclusion criteria are type 1 or type 2 diabetes and DRS programme non-attendance. A multi-method approach will be used to determine screening uptake, evaluate the trial and study procedures and examine the acceptability and feasibility of the intervention from staff and patient perspectives. Quantitative and qualitative data will be collected on intervention uptake and delivery, research processes and outcomes. Data will be collected at the practice, health professional and patient level. A partial economic evaluation will be conducted to estimate the cost of delivering the implementation intervention in general practice. Formal continuation criteria will be used to determine whether IDEAs should progress to a definitive trial. DISCUSSION Findings will determine whether IDEAsis feasible and acceptable and will be used to refine the intervention and study procedures. A definitive trial will determine whether IDEAs is a cost-effective intervention to improve DRS uptake and reduce diabetes-related blindness. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03901898. Registered 3rd April 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fiona Riordan
- School of Public Health, University College Cork, Western Gateway Building, Western Rd, Cork, Ireland
| | - Emmy Racine
- School of Public Health, University College Cork, Western Gateway Building, Western Rd, Cork, Ireland
| | - Susan M. Smith
- Department of General Practice, Royal College of Surgeons of Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Aileen Murphy
- Department of Economics, Cork University Business School, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - John Browne
- School of Public Health, University College Cork, Western Gateway Building, Western Rd, Cork, Ireland
| | - Patricia M. Kearney
- School of Public Health, University College Cork, Western Gateway Building, Western Rd, Cork, Ireland
| | - Colin Bradley
- Department of General Practice, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - Mark James
- Medical Education Unit, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - Mark Murphy
- Department of General Practice, Royal College of Surgeons of Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Sheena M. McHugh
- School of Public Health, University College Cork, Western Gateway Building, Western Rd, Cork, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Aby ES, Winters AC, Lin J, Bui A, Kawamoto J, Goetz MB, Bhattacharya D, Pisegna JR, May FP, Patel AA, Benhammou JN. A Telephone and Mail Outreach Program Successfully Increases Uptake of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Surveillance. Hepatol Commun 2020; 4:825-833. [PMID: 32490319 PMCID: PMC7262281 DOI: 10.1002/hep4.1511] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2019] [Revised: 02/18/2020] [Accepted: 03/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer‐related death worldwide. Society guidelines recommend surveillance with abdominal ultrasound with or without serum alpha‐fetoprotein every 6 months for adults at increased risk of developing HCC. However, adherence is often suboptimal. We assessed the feasibility of a coordinated telephone outreach program for unscreened patients with cirrhosis within the Veteran’s Affairs (VA) health care system. Using a patient care dashboard of advanced chronic liver disease in the VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, we identified veterans with a diagnosis of cirrhosis, a platelet count ≤ 150,000/uL, and no documented HCC surveillance in the previous 8 months. Eligible veterans received a telephone call from a patient navigator to describe the risks and benefits of HCC surveillance. Orders for an abdominal ultrasound and alpha‐fetoprotein were placed for veterans who agreed to surveillance. Veterans who were not reached by telephone received an informational letter by mail to encourage participation. Of the 129 veterans who met the eligibility criteria, most were male (96.9%). The most common etiology for cirrhosis was hepatitis C (64.3%), and most of the patients had compensated cirrhosis (68.2%). The patient navigators reached 32.5% of patients by phone. Patients in each group were similar across clinical and demographic characteristics. Patients who were called were more likely to undergo surveillance (adjusted odds ratio = 2.56, 95% confidence interval: 1.03‐6.33). Most of the patients (72.1%) completed abdominal imaging when reached by phone. Conclusion: Targeted outreach increased uptake of HCC surveillance among patients with cirrhosis in a large, integrated, VA health care system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth S Aby
- Vatche and Tamar Manoukian Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine University of California Los Angeles Los Angeles CA
| | - Adam C Winters
- Vatche and Tamar Manoukian Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine University of California Los Angeles Los Angeles CA
| | - Jonathan Lin
- Vatche and Tamar Manoukian Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine University of California Los Angeles Los Angeles CA
| | - Aileen Bui
- Vatche and Tamar Manoukian Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine University of California Los Angeles Los Angeles CA
| | - Jenna Kawamoto
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Parenteral Nutrition VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System Los Angeles CA
| | - Matthew B Goetz
- Division of Infectious Diseases VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System Los Angeles CA.,David Geffen School of Medicine University of California Los Angeles Los Angeles CA
| | - Debika Bhattacharya
- Division of Infectious Diseases VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System Los Angeles CA.,Division of Infectious Diseases Department of Medicine David Geffen School of Medicine University of California Los Angeles Los Angeles CA
| | - Joseph R Pisegna
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Parenteral Nutrition VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System Los Angeles CA
| | - Folasade P May
- Vatche and Tamar Manoukian Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine University of California Los Angeles Los Angeles CA.,Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Parenteral Nutrition VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System Los Angeles CA
| | - Arpan A Patel
- Vatche and Tamar Manoukian Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine University of California Los Angeles Los Angeles CA.,Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Parenteral Nutrition VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System Los Angeles CA
| | - Jihane N Benhammou
- Vatche and Tamar Manoukian Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine University of California Los Angeles Los Angeles CA.,Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Parenteral Nutrition VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System Los Angeles CA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Lal N, Singh HK, Majeed A, Pawa N. The impact of socioeconomic deprivation on the uptake of colorectal cancer screening in London. J Med Screen 2020; 28:114-121. [PMID: 32295488 DOI: 10.1177/0969141320916206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Screening programmes based on the faecal occult blood test (FOBT) can reduce mortality from colorectal cancer (CRC). However, a significant variation exists in uptake of the test within the UK. Disproportionate uptake risks increasing inequity during staging at diagnosis and survival from CRC. This study aims to evaluate the impact of socioeconomic deprivation on the uptake of CRC screening (FOBT) in London. METHODS A retrospective review of the "Vanguard RM Informatics" database was performed to identify eligible individuals for CRC screening across all general practices across London over 30 months (2014-2017). The postcodes of the general practices were used to obtain the deprivation data via the "Indices of Deprivation" database. A Spearman's rho correlation was performed to quantify the impact of the deprivation variables on FOBT uptake. RESULTS Overall, 697,402 individuals were eligible for screening across 1359 London general practices, within 5 Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs); 48.4% (range: 13%-74%) participated in CRC screening with the lowest participation rates in North West (46%) and North East (47%) London CCGs. All indices of deprivation had a significant correlation with the uptake of FOBT (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION This is the largest study across London to date demonstrating a significant positive correlation between deprivation indices and FOBT uptake, highlighting areas of particular risk. Further studies are imperative to quantify the impact of deprivation on CRC morbidity and mortality, together with focused strategies to reduce socioeconomic inequalities in screening in these high risk areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikhil Lal
- Sheffield Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Harpreet Ksi Singh
- Colorectal Surgical Department, West Middlesex University Hospital, Chelsea and Westminster NHS Foundation Trust, Isleworth, UK
| | - Azeem Majeed
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Nikhil Pawa
- Colorectal Surgical Department, West Middlesex University Hospital, Chelsea and Westminster NHS Foundation Trust, Isleworth, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Lovell RC, Botfield JR, Cheng Y, Tilley DM, Fazio A, Estoesta J. Promoting cervical screening among women experiencing homelessness and socio-economic disadvantage in Sydney. Health Promot J Austr 2020; 31:357-368. [PMID: 31978250 DOI: 10.1002/hpja.322] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2019] [Revised: 01/16/2020] [Accepted: 01/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
ISSUE ADDRESSED Australia's national cervical screening program has reduced rates of cervical cancer morbidity and mortality. However, these benefits have not been experienced by all women. A Cervical Cancer Screening Project was implemented with lay health educators to address inequitable screening access by women experiencing socio-economic disadvantage. METHODS Resources and a training program were developed and piloted with the specialist homelessness services workforce in Sydney, NSW. Data was collected to inform their development and evaluation through interviews, focus groups, self-administered surveys and analysis of NSW Pap Test Register data. RESULTS Women reported low familiarity with the term 'cervical screening'. They identified a good patient-doctor relationship, and seeing a female practitioner, as screening enablers. While the majority reported having cervical screening before, NSW Pap Test Register data showed only 74% had screened previously and of those, 69% were overdue. Homelessness service workers expressed interest in talking with clients about cervical screening, and reported increased knowledge and confidence following training. CONCLUSION The homelessness sector is an appropriate venue to access women who are disadvantaged and under-screened. However, increasing workforce capacity to discuss screening does not lead to increased screening for women accessing these services. Further efforts are required. SO WHAT?: Access to cervical screening by women experiencing disadvantage remains a challenge. Sustained multi-faceted health promotion efforts are required to increase access. These should be informed by additional research exploring barriers and enablers for this group of women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renee C Lovell
- Women's Health, Community Health, Sydney Local Health District, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Yan Cheng
- Family Planning NSW, Ashfield, NSW, Australia
| | - Donna M Tilley
- Women's Health, Community Health, Sydney Local Health District, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Alice Fazio
- Family Planning NSW, Ashfield, NSW, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Tinmouth J, Patel J, Austin PC, Baxter NN, Brouwers MC, Earle CC, Levitt C, Lu Y, MacKinnon M, Paszat L, Rabeneck L. Directly Mailing gFOBT Kits to Previous Responders Being Recalled for Colorectal Cancer Screening Increases Participation. J Can Assoc Gastroenterol 2019; 3:197-203. [PMID: 32905094 PMCID: PMC7464595 DOI: 10.1093/jcag/gwz012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2018] [Accepted: 04/29/2019] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening with guaiac fecal occult blood test (gFOBT) reduces CRC-related death. Average risk individuals should be recalled for screening with gFOBT every 2 years in order to maximize effectiveness. However, adherence with repeated testing is often suboptimal. Our aim was to evaluate whether adding a gFOBT kit to a mailed recall letter improves participation compared with a mailed recall letter alone, among previous responders to a mailed invitation. Methods We conducted a cluster randomized controlled trial, with the primary care provider as the unit of randomization. Eligible patients had completed a gFOBT and tested negative in an earlier pilot study and were now due for recall. The intervention group received a mailed CRC screening recall letter from their primary care provider plus a gFOBT kit (n = 431) while the control group received a mailed CRC screening mailed recall letter alone (n = 452). The primary outcome was the uptake of gFOBT or colonoscopy within 6 months. Results gFOBT uptake was higher in the intervention group (61.3%, n = 264) compared with the control group (50.4%, n = 228) with an absolute difference between the two groups of 10.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.4 to 20.2%, P = <0.01). Patients in the intervention group were more likely to complete the gFOBT compared with the control group (odds ratio [OR] = 1.4; 95% CI: 1.1 to 1.9). Conclusion Our findings show that adding gFOBT kits to the mailed recall letter increased participation among persons recalled for screening. Nine gFOBT kits would have to be sent by mail in order to screen one additional person.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jill Tinmouth
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jigisha Patel
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Peter C Austin
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nancy N Baxter
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Surgery and Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Craig C Earle
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Cheryl Levitt
- Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Yan Lu
- Critical Care Services Ontario, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Lawrence Paszat
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Linda Rabeneck
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Modica C, Lewis JH, Bay C. Colorectal Cancer: Applying the Value Transformation Framework to increase the percent of patients receiving screening in Federally Qualified Health Centers. Prev Med Rep 2019; 15:100894. [PMID: 31198660 PMCID: PMC6556543 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2019.100894] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2018] [Revised: 05/07/2019] [Accepted: 05/12/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death in the U.S. and third-most common cancer in both men and women. Colorectal cancer screening (CRCS) rates remain low, particularly among vulnerable patients receiving care at federally qualified health centers. Through its Value Transformation Framework, the National Association of Community Health Centers provides a systematic approach to improving CRCS by transforming health center infrastructure, care delivery, and people systems—to improve health outcomes, patient and staff experiences, and lower costs (Quadruple Aim). Methods We combined the Value Transformation Framework, evidence-based CRCS interventions, and the Learning Community Model to drive system improvements and implement evidence-based practices. Multi-disciplinary teams at 8 health centers in Georgia and Iowa participated for 1-year with Primary Care Association support. Results Pre−/post- 1-year-intervention data showed, within health centers, raw percentage of eligible patients screened for CRC increased from 33.2% (13.5%–61.7%) in January 2017 to 46.5% (14.2%–81.5%) in December 2017, with an overall 13.3 percentage point average increase. This translates into an average increase of 3.3 (95% CI: 1.7, 5.0) eligible patients screened per month per health center over the year or 317 additional patients meeting CRCS guidelines. Specific interventions associated with higher CRCS rates included standing orders, sharing performance data, and electronic health record alerts. Conclusion Findings support a three-pronged approach for improving CRCS: The Value Transformation Framework's evidence-based recommendations, with actionable CRC interventions, offered in a learning community. These results guide methodological approaches to improving CRCS in health centers through a multi-level, multi-modality quality improvement and transformation approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cheryl Modica
- National Association of Community Health Centers, 7501 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 1100W, Bethesda, MD 20814, United States of America
| | - Joy H Lewis
- A.T. Still University, School of Osteopathic Medicine in Arizona, 5850 E. Still Circle, Mesa, AZ 85206, United States of America
| | - Curt Bay
- Department of Interdisciplinary Health Sciences, Arizona School of Health Sciences, A.T. Still University, 5850 E. Still Circle, Mesa, AZ 85206, Mesa, AZ 85206, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Stoffel S, Benito L, Milà N, Travier N, Binefa G, Vidal C, Espinosa J, Moreno V, Garcia M. Testing behavioral interventions to optimize participation in a population-based colorectal cancer screening program in Catalonia, Spain. Prev Med 2019; 119:58-62. [PMID: 30594532 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.12.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2016] [Revised: 12/08/2018] [Accepted: 12/24/2018] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
The aim of the study was to measure the effect of three cost-neutral behavioral interventions on participation compared to the standard invitation letter in a population-based colorectal cancer screening program in 2014. For that purpose, a four-arm randomized field trial was conducted among 5077 individuals aged 50 to 69 years. Over an 8-week period, each week was randomly allocated to the intervention or the control conditions. Individuals assigned to the intervention conditions additionally received a prompt to write down the date to pick up the screening test in a pharmacy. Two of the three intervention groups also included an additional paragraph in the invitation letter on either: 1) the high proportion of individuals participating regularly (social norms condition) or 2) the importance of regular participation (benefit condition). We measured screening participation before and after receiving a reminder letter six weeks after the screening invitation. An overall 8.0 percentage point increase in CRC screening was achieved as a direct result of receiving a reminder letter; however none of the intervention strategies influenced participation. The only significant difference was found for newly invited individuals. There, participation rates decreased from 34.9% to 24.2% when the invitation mailing mentioned the importance of regular participation (OR: 0.60; 95% CI: 0.38-0.95). While none of the intervention strategies improved participation rates we found that praising the benefit of regular screening may discourage individuals who have never been invited before as the continuous behavior may be perceived as a large request. Nevertheless, the reminder letter boosted participation rates independently of the intervention assigned.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Stoffel
- Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - L Benito
- Department of Fundamental Care and Medical-Surgical Nursing, University of Barcelona, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08907 Barcelona, Spain
| | - N Milà
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology, IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08908 Barcelona, Spain; Consortium for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBEResp), 28029 Madrid, Spain
| | - N Travier
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology, IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08908 Barcelona, Spain
| | - G Binefa
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology, IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08908 Barcelona, Spain
| | - C Vidal
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology, IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08908 Barcelona, Spain
| | - J Espinosa
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology, IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08908 Barcelona, Spain
| | - V Moreno
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology, IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08908 Barcelona, Spain
| | - M Garcia
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology, IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08908 Barcelona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Perestelo-Perez L, Rivero-Santana A, Torres-Castaño A, Ramos-Garcia V, Alvarez-Perez Y, Gonzalez-Hernandez N, Buron A, Pignone M, Serrano-Aguilar P. Effectiveness of a decision aid for promoting colorectal cancer screening in Spain: a randomized trial. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2019; 19:8. [PMID: 30630487 PMCID: PMC6327535 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-019-0739-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2017] [Accepted: 01/02/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening has shown to reduce incidence and mortality rates, and therefore is widely recommended for people above 50 years-old. However, despite the implementation of population-based screening programs in several countries, uptake rates are still low. Decision aids (DAs) may help patients to make informed decisions about CRC screening. METHODS We performed a randomized controlled trial to assess the effectiveness of a DA developed to promote CRC screening, with patients from two primary care centers in Spain who never had underwent CRC screening. Contrary to center B (n = 24), Center A (n = 83) attended patients from an area where the population-based screening program was not implemented at that moment. Outcome measures were decisional conflict, knowledge of the disease and available screening options, intention to uptake the test, and concordance between patients' goals/concerns and intention. RESULTS In center A, there were significant differences favoring the DA in decisional conflict (p < 0.001) and knowledge (p < 0.001). The absolute differences favoring DA group in intention to undergo fecal occult blood test (10.5%) and colonoscopy (13.7%) were significant only before correction for attenuation. In center B the differences were significant only for knowledge (p < 0.001). Patients' goals and concerns regarding the screening did not significantly predict their intention, and therefore we could not calculate a measure of concordance between the two constructs. CONCLUSIONS A DA improved the decisional process of participants who had never been invited to participate in the Spanish public CRC screening program, replicating previous results in this field. Future research is needed to identify subgroups that could benefit more from these interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION International Standard Registered Clinical/social Study Number: ISRCTN98108615 (Retrospectively registered on 27 December 2018).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lilisbeth Perestelo-Perez
- Evaluation Unit of the Canary Islands Health Service (SESCS), s/n. 38109. El Rosario. S/C de Tenerife, Tenerife, Spain.
- Health Services Research on Chronic Patients Network (REDISSEC), Tenerife, Spain.
- Center for Biomedical Research of the Canary Islands (CIBICAN), Tenerife, Spain.
- Canary Islands Foundation of Health Research (FUNCANIS), Tenerife, Spain.
| | - Amado Rivero-Santana
- Health Services Research on Chronic Patients Network (REDISSEC), Tenerife, Spain
- Center for Biomedical Research of the Canary Islands (CIBICAN), Tenerife, Spain
- Canary Islands Foundation of Health Research (FUNCANIS), Tenerife, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Nerea Gonzalez-Hernandez
- Health Services Research on Chronic Patients Network (REDISSEC), Tenerife, Spain
- Research Unit. Hospital Galdakao-Usansolo, Bilbao, Bizkaia, Spain
| | - Andrea Buron
- Health Services Research on Chronic Patients Network (REDISSEC), Tenerife, Spain
- Epidemiology and Evaluation Unit. Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Pedro Serrano-Aguilar
- Evaluation Unit of the Canary Islands Health Service (SESCS), s/n. 38109. El Rosario. S/C de Tenerife, Tenerife, Spain
- Health Services Research on Chronic Patients Network (REDISSEC), Tenerife, Spain
- Center for Biomedical Research of the Canary Islands (CIBICAN), Tenerife, Spain
- Canary Islands Foundation of Health Research (FUNCANIS), Tenerife, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Tailor TD, Choudhury KR, Tong BC, Christensen JD, Sosa JA, Rubin GD. Geographic Access to CT for Lung Cancer Screening: A Census Tract-Level Analysis of Cigarette Smoking in the United States and Driving Distance to a CT Facility. J Am Coll Radiol 2019; 16:15-23. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2018] [Revised: 06/15/2018] [Accepted: 07/05/2018] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
|
23
|
Adams SA, Rohweder CL, Leeman J, Friedman DB, Gizlice Z, Vanderpool RC, Askelson N, Best A, Flocke SA, Glanz K, Ko LK, Kegler M. Use of Evidence-Based Interventions and Implementation Strategies to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening in Federally Qualified Health Centers. J Community Health 2018; 43:1044-1052. [PMID: 29770945 PMCID: PMC6239992 DOI: 10.1007/s10900-018-0520-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
While colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates have been increasing in the general population, rates are considerably lower in Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs), which serve a large proportion of uninsured and medically vulnerable patients. Efforts to screen eligible patients must be accelerated if we are to reach the national screening goal of 80% by 2018 and beyond. To inform this work, we conducted a survey of key informants at FQHCs in eight states to determine which evidence-based interventions (EBIs) to promote CRC screening are currently being used, and which implementation strategies are being employed to ensure that the interventions are executed as intended. One hundred and forty-eight FQHCs were invited to participate in the study, and 56 completed surveys were received for a response rate of 38%. Results demonstrated that provider reminder and recall systems were the most commonly used EBIs (44.6%) while the most commonly used implementation strategy was the identification of barriers (84.0%). The mean number of EBIs that were fully implemented at the centers was 2.4 (range 0-7) out of seven. Almost one-quarter of respondents indicated that their FQHCs were not using any EBIs to increase CRC screening. Full implementation of EBIs was correlated with higher CRC screening rates. These findings identify gaps as well as the preferences and needs of FQHCs in selecting and implementing EBIs for CRC screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Swann Arp Adams
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics & Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Arnold School of Public Health & College of Nursing, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA
| | - Catherine L Rohweder
- UNC Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, CB #7424, Carrboro, NC, 27510, USA
| | - Jennifer Leeman
- School of Nursing, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, CB #7460, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - Daniela B Friedman
- Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior & Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
| | - Ziya Gizlice
- UNC Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, CB #7426, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - Robin C Vanderpool
- Department of Health, Behavior & Society, University of Kentucky College of Public Health, 2365 Harrodsburg Road, Ste. A230, Lexington, KY, 40504, USA
| | - Natoshia Askelson
- Department of Community & Behavioral Health, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, 145 N. Riverside Drive, 100 CPHB, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA
| | - Alicia Best
- Department of Community and Family Health, College of Public Health, University of South Florida, 13201 Bruce B. Downs Blvd, MDC 56, Tampa, FL, 33612-3805, USA
| | - Susan A Flocke
- Family Medicine and Epidemiology & Biostatistics, The Prevention Research Center for Healthy Neighborhoods, Case Western Reserve University, 11000 Cedar Ave, Suite 402, Cleveland, OH, 44106-7136, USA
| | - Karen Glanz
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, George A. Weiss University Professor, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, 801 Blockley Hall, 423 Guardian Drive, Philadelphia, PA, 19104-6021, USA
| | - Linda K Ko
- Department of Health Services, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, University of Washington, 1100 Fairview Ave. N. M3-B232, Seattle, WA, 98109-1024, USA
| | - Michelle Kegler
- Department of Behavioral Sciences and Health Education, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory Prevention Research Center, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Road NE Rm 530, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Bacal V, Blinder H, Momoli F, Wu KY, McFaul S. Is Immigrant Status Associated With Cervical Cancer Screening Among Women in Canada? Results From a Cross-Sectional Study. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA 2018; 41:824-831.e1. [PMID: 30361160 DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2018.07.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2018] [Revised: 06/24/2018] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Cervical cancer accounts for the highest mortality rate from cancer in women worldwide. Despite widespread availability of cervical cancer screening programs in Canada, immigrant women are largely underscreened. The most recently published Canadian-wide study evaluated screening uptake from 2001 to 2002. The objectives included identifying the prevalence of underscreened women in Canada, determining the risk of underscreening for cervical cancer among immigrant women, and providing an update on Canadian screening practices. METHODS This study included women aged 20 to 69 who completed the Canadian Community Health Survey 2012. The prevalence of underscreening among Canadian-born and immigrant women was estimated. A log-binomial model was fit to estimate the relative risk (RR) of underscreening for immigrant women while controlling for age, income level, visible minority status, smoking status, and access to a regular physician. A secondary analysis compared immigrants residing in Canada for greater or less than 10 years to Canadian-born women. RESULTS Of the 17 854 women eligible for this study, 18.6% of Canadian-born women and 28.9% of immigrant women were underscreened (P < 0.05). Immigrant women were at significantly higher risk of being underscreened compared with Canadian-born women (RR 1.32; 95% CI 1.20-1.45). The relative risk did not change when stratifying by length of time since immigration (RRrecent immigrant 1.32; 95% CI 1.16-1.50; and RRlong-term immigrant 1.32; 95% CI 1.19-1.47). CONCLUSION Immigrant status continues to be associated with a significantly higher risk of underscreening, irrespective of time in Canada. Social and educational programs targeted towards immigrants are needed to mitigate the disparity in cervical cancer screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vanessa Bacal
- School of Epidemiology, Public Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON; Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON.
| | - Henrietta Blinder
- School of Epidemiology, Public Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON; Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, ON
| | - Franco Momoli
- School of Epidemiology, Public Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON; Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON; Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, ON
| | - Kai Yi Wu
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON
| | - Susan McFaul
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Allgood KL, Hunt B, Kanoon JM, Simon MA. Evaluation of Mammogram Parties as an Effective Community Navigation Method. JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER EDUCATION 2018; 33:1061-1068. [PMID: 28290092 PMCID: PMC5840031 DOI: 10.1007/s13187-017-1206-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/19/2023]
Abstract
Women of color do not have the same level of access to mammography services as their White counterparts, and this inequity may be one of the contributing factors to the documented racial disparity in breast cancer mortality in the US. The present study sought to assess the effectiveness of the mammogram party, a promising, but under-studied approach to increasing mammography uptake, particularly among under-served populations. The program targeted mammogram-eligible women in community settings on the west and southwest sides of Chicago, gathering basic demographic information, mammography history, and interest in assistance obtaining a mammogram. Women were navigated either through traditional one-on-one navigation or to a mammogram party. Seven outcome metrics were calculated for each type of navigation. We compared navigation outcomes for those who attended to those who did not attend a mammogram party using two-tailed t tests and chi-square tests. We found that the mammography completion rate for mammogram parties was comparable to that for standard one-on-one navigation (65.8 vs. 63.7%), which is more labor-intensive as evidenced by the number of contacts needed to successfully navigate a woman to mammography (10.9 vs. 15.0). Mammogram parties offer a unique opportunity for fellowship and support for clients who are particularly fearful of mammograms or identifying breast cancer. Programmatically, mammogram parties are an efficient way to complete several mammograms in 1 day. Having the option to both navigate women to mammogram parties or one-on-one navigation allows for more flexibility for scheduling and may ensure a completed a mammogram.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristi L Allgood
- Sinai Health System, Sinai Urban Health Institute, 1500 S. Fairfield Avenue, K435, Chicago, IL, 60608, USA.
| | - Bijou Hunt
- Sinai Health System, Sinai Urban Health Institute, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Jacqueline M Kanoon
- Sinai Health System, Sinai Urban Health Institute, 1500 S. Fairfield Avenue, K435, Chicago, IL, 60608, USA
- Sinai Health System, Sinai Urban Health Institute, Chicago, IL, USA
- Office of Community Engaged Research and Implementation Science (OCERIS), University of Illinois Cancer Center, Chicago, IL, USA
- University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Melissa A Simon
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, IL, USA
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Influences on Polish migrants' breast screening uptake in Lothian, Scotland. Public Health 2018; 158:86-92. [DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2017.11.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2017] [Revised: 11/08/2017] [Accepted: 11/24/2017] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
27
|
Enhancing capacity among faith-based organizations to implement evidence-based cancer control programs: a community-engaged approach. Transl Behav Med 2018; 7:517-528. [PMID: 28733726 DOI: 10.1007/s13142-017-0513-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Evidence-based interventions (EBIs) to promote cancer control among Latinos have proliferated in recent years, though adoption and implementation of these interventions by faith-based organizations (FBOs) is limited. Capacity building may be one strategy to promote implementation. In this qualitative study, 18 community key informants were interviewed to (a) understand existing capacity for health programming among Catholic parishes, (b) characterize parishes' resource gaps and capacity-building needs implementing cancer control EBIs, and (c) elucidate strategies for delivering capacity-building assistance to parishes to facilitate implementation of EBIs. Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted. Key informants concurred about the capacity of Catholic parishes to deliver health programs, and described attributes of parishes that make them strong partners in health promotion initiatives, including a mission to address physical and mental health, outreach to marginalized groups, altruism among members, and existing engagement in health programming. However, resource gaps and capacity building needs were also identified. Specific recommendations participants made about how existing resources might be leveraged to address challenges include to: establish parish wellness committees; provide "hands-on" learning opportunities for parishioners to gain program planning skills; offer continuous, tailored, on-site technical assistance; facilitate relationships between parishes and community resources; and provide financial support for parishes. Leveraging parishes' existing resources and addressing their implementation needs may improve adoption of cancer control EBIs.
Collapse
|
28
|
Bobridge A, Price K, Gill TK, Taylor AW. Influencing Cancer Screening Participation Rates-Providing a Combined Cancer Screening Program (a 'One Stop' Shop) Could Be a Potential Answer. Front Oncol 2017; 7:308. [PMID: 29322029 PMCID: PMC5733549 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2017.00308] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2017] [Accepted: 11/28/2017] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Participation in established cancer screening programs remains variable. Therefore, a renewed focus on how to increase screening uptake, including addressing structural barriers such as time, travel, and cost is needed. One approach could be the provision of combined cancer screening, where multiple screening tests are provided at the same time and location (essentially a ‘One Stop’ screening shop). This cohort study explored both cancer screening behavior and the acceptability of a combined screening approach. Methods Participants of the North Western Adelaide Health Study (NWAHS), South Australia were invited to participate in a questionnaire about cancer screening behaviors and the acceptability of a proposed ‘One Stop’ cancer screening shop. Data were collected from 10th August 2015 to 18th January 2016, weighted for selection probability, age, and sex and analyzed using descriptive and multivariable logistic regression analysis. Results 1,562 people, 52% female (mean age 54.1 years ± 15.2) participated. Reported screening participation was low, the highest being for Pap Smear (34.4%). Common reasons for screening participation were preventing sickness (56.1%, CI 53.2–59.0%), maintaining health (51%, CI 48–53.9%), and free program provision (30.9%, CI 28.2–33.6%). Females were less likely to state that screening is not beneficial [OR 0.37 (CI 0.21–0.66), p < 0.001] and to cite sickness prevention [OR 2.10 (CI 1.46–3.00), p < 0.001] and free program [OR 1.75 (CI 1.22–2.51), p < 0.003] as reasons for screening participation. Of those who did not participate, 34.6% (CI 30.3–39.1%) stated that there was nothing that discouraged them from participation, with 55- to 64-year olds [OR 0.24 (CI 0.07–0.74), p < 0.04] being less likely to cite this reason. 21% (CI 17.2–24.8%) thought they did not need screening, while a smaller proportion stated not having time (6.9%, CI 4.9–9.7%) and the costs associated with screening (5.2%, CI 3.5–7.7%). The majority of participants (85.3%, CI 81.9–88.2%) supported multiple screening being offered at the same time and location. Conclusion Identified screening behaviors in this study are similar to those reported in the literature. The high support for the concept of combined cancer screening demonstrates that this type of approach is acceptable to potential end users and warrants further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kay Price
- University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Soares MBO, Silva SRD. Interventions that facilitate adherence to Pap smear exam: integrative review. Rev Bras Enferm 2017; 69:404-14. [PMID: 27280579 DOI: 10.1590/0034-7167.2016690226i] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2015] [Accepted: 12/26/2015] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
RESUMO Objetivo: identificar produções científicas que apresentem intervenções relevantes para implementar o Programa de Prevenção do Câncer Cérvico-Uterino, aumentando a adesão à realização do exame. Método: revisão integrativa da literatura, realizada por busca on-line, nas bases de dados: LILACS, SciELO e Pubmed®, abrangendo artigos publicados de 2009 a 2014. Resultados: trinta e oito artigos compuseram a amostra final do estudo. Estes indicaram as seguintes intervenções: utilização de gerente de caso, contato telefônico, carta-convite, atividades educativas, divulgação na mídia, agentes de saúde da comunidade, parcerias, rastreamento de base populacional e múltiplas intervenções. Conclusão: as pesquisas concentram-se entre mulheres provenientes de países em desenvolvimento, e estas intervenções são eficazes no aumento da adesão e do conhecimento destas mulheres em relação à prevenção do câncer cérvico-uterino.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maurícia Brochado Oliveira Soares
- Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Atenção à Saúde, Uberaba MG , Brazil, Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Atenção à Saúde. Uberaba-MG, Brasil., Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro
| | - Sueli Riul da Silva
- Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Atenção à Saúde, Uberaba MG , Brazil, Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Atenção à Saúde. Uberaba-MG, Brasil., Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Calanzani N, Cavers D, Vojt G, Orbell S, Steele RJC, Brownlee L, Smith S, Patnick J, Weller D, Campbell C. Is an opportunistic primary care-based intervention for non-responders to bowel screening feasible and acceptable? A mixed-methods feasibility study in Scotland. BMJ Open 2017; 7:e016307. [PMID: 29025829 PMCID: PMC5652541 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We aimed to test whether a brief, opportunistic intervention in general practice was a feasible and acceptable way to engage with bowel screening non-responders. DESIGN This was a feasibility study testing an intervention which comprised a brief conversation during routine consultation, provision of a patient leaflet and instructions to request a replacement faecal occult blood test kit. A mixed-methods approach to evaluation was adopted. Data were collected from proformas completed after each intervention, from the Bowel Screening Centre database and from questionnaires. Semi-structured interviews were carried out. We used descriptive statistics, content and framework analysis to determine intervention feasibility and acceptability. PARTICIPANTS Bowel screening non-responders (as defined by the Scottish Bowel Screening Centre) and primary care professionals working in five general practices in Lothian, Scotland. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES Several predefined feasibility parameters were assessed, including numbers of patients engaging in conversation, requesting a replacement kit and returning it, and willingness of primary care professionals to deliver the intervention. RESULTS The intervention was offered to 258 patients in five general practices: 220 (87.0%) engaged with the intervention, 60 (23.3%) requested a new kit, 22 (8.5%) kits were completed and returned. Interviews and questionnaires suggest that the intervention was feasible, acceptable and consistent with an existing health prevention agenda. Reported challenges referred to work-related pressures, time constraints and practice priorities. CONCLUSIONS This intervention was acceptable and resulted in a modest increase in non-responders participating in bowel screening, although outlined challenges may affect sustained implementation. The strategy is also aligned with the increasing role of primary care in promoting bowel screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalia Calanzani
- The Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, Centre for Population Health Sciences, Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Debbie Cavers
- The Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, Centre for Population Health Sciences, Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Gabriele Vojt
- Department of Psychology, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Sheina Orbell
- Department of Psychology, University of Essex, Colchester, Essex, UK
| | - Robert J C Steele
- Department of Surgery and Molecular Oncology, Ninewells Hospital, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | | | - Steve Smith
- University Hospitals of Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Midlands and NW Bowel Cancer Screening Hub, Rugby, UK
| | | | - David Weller
- The Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, Centre for Population Health Sciences, Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Christine Campbell
- The Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, Centre for Population Health Sciences, Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Davis MM, Renfro S, Pham R, Hassmiller Lich K, Shannon J, Coronado GD, Wheeler SB. Geographic and population-level disparities in colorectal cancer testing: A multilevel analysis of Medicaid and commercial claims data. Prev Med 2017; 101:44-52. [PMID: 28506715 PMCID: PMC6067672 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 83] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2016] [Revised: 04/25/2017] [Accepted: 05/07/2017] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Morbidity and mortality from colorectal cancer (CRC) can be attenuated through guideline concordant screening and intervention. This study used Medicaid and commercial claims data to examine individual and geographic factors associated with CRC testing rates in one state (Oregon). A total of 64,711 beneficiaries (4516 Medicaid; 60,195 Commercial) became newly age-eligible for CRC screening and met inclusion criteria (e.g., continuously enrolled, no prior history) during the study period (January 2010-December 2013). We estimated multilevel models to examine predictors for CRC testing, including individual (e.g., gender, insurance, rurality, access to care, distance to endoscopy facility) and geographic factors at the county level (e.g., poverty, uninsurance). Despite insurance coverage, only two out of five (42%) beneficiaries had evidence of CRC testing during the four year study window. CRC testing varied from 22.4% to 46.8% across Oregon's 36 counties; counties with higher levels of socioeconomic deprivation had lower levels of testing. After controlling for age, beneficiaries had greater odds of receiving CRC testing if they were female (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.08), commercially insured, or urban residents (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.07-1.21). Accessing primary care (OR 2.47, 95% CI 2.37-2.57), but not distance to endoscopy (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.92-1.03) was associated with testing. CRC testing in newly age-eligible Medicaid and commercial members remains markedly low. Disparities exist by gender, geographic residence, insurance coverage, and access to primary care. Work remains to increase CRC testing to acceptable levels, and to select and implement interventions targeting the counties and populations in greatest need.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melinda M Davis
- Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States; Oregon Rural Practice-based Research Network, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States; OHSU-PSU School of Public Health, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States.
| | - Stephanie Renfro
- Center for Health Systems Effectiveness, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States.
| | - Robyn Pham
- Oregon Rural Practice-based Research Network, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States.
| | - Kristen Hassmiller Lich
- Department of Health Policy & Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
| | - Jackilen Shannon
- OHSU-PSU School of Public Health, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States.
| | - Gloria D Coronado
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente, Portland, OR, United States.
| | - Stephanie B Wheeler
- Department of Health Policy & Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States; Center for Health Promotion & Disease Prevention, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Martini A, Morris JN, Preen D. Impact of non-clinical community-based promotional campaigns on bowel cancer screening engagement: An integrative literature review. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2016; 99:1549-57. [PMID: 27270183 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.05.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2015] [Revised: 04/25/2016] [Accepted: 05/14/2016] [Indexed: 05/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This paper reviewed the relationship between non-clinical, client-oriented promotional campaigns to raise bowel cancer awareness and screening engagement. METHOD An integrative literature review using predefined search terms was conducted to summarise the accumulated knowledge. Data was analysed by coding and categorising, then synthesized through development of themes. RESULTS Eighteen of 116 studies met inclusion criteria. Promotional campaigns had varying impact on screening uptake for bowel cancer. Mass media was found to moderately increase screening, predominately amongst "worried well". Small media used in conjunction with other promotional activities, thus its effect on screening behaviours was unclear. One-on-one education was less effective and less feasible than group education in increasing intention to screen. Financial support was ineffective in increasing screening rates when compared to other promotional activities. Screening engagement increased because of special events and celebrity endorsement. CONCLUSION Non-clinical promotional campaigns did impact uptake of bowel cancer screening engagement. However, little is evident on the effect of single types of promotion and most research is based on clinician-directed campaigns. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Cancer awareness and screening promotions should be implemented at community and clinical level to maximize effectiveness. Such an approach will ensure promotional activities are targeting consumers, thus strengthening screening engagement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angelita Martini
- Center for Health Services Research, School of Population Health, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Hwy, Crawley 6009, Western Australia, Australia.
| | - Julia N Morris
- Center for Health Services Research, School of Population Health, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Hwy, Crawley 6009, Western Australia, Australia.
| | - David Preen
- School of Population Health, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Hwy, Crawley 6009, Western Australia, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Outcome evaluation of an educational program for Japanese midwives to promote breast awareness for women. Women Birth 2015; 28:e164-70. [DOI: 10.1016/j.wombi.2015.04.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2014] [Revised: 04/20/2015] [Accepted: 04/21/2015] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
34
|
Senore C, Inadomi J, Segnan N, Bellisario C, Hassan C. Optimising colorectal cancer screening acceptance: a review. Gut 2015; 64:1158-77. [PMID: 26059765 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 76] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2014] [Accepted: 03/09/2015] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
The study aims to review available evidence concerning effective interventions to increase colorectal cancer (CRC) screening acceptance. We performed a literature search of randomised trials designed to increase individuals' use of CRC screening on PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects. Small (≤ 100 subjects per arm) studies and those reporting results of interventions implemented before publication of the large faecal occult blood test trials were excluded. Interventions were categorised following the Continuum of Cancer Care and the PRECEDE-PROCEED models and studies were grouped by screening model (opportunistic vs organised). Multifactor interventions targeting multiple levels of care and considering factors outside the individual clinician control, represent the most effective strategy to enhance CRC screening acceptance. Removing financial barriers, implementing methods allowing a systematic contact of the whole target population, using personal invitation letters, preferably signed by the reference care provider, and reminders mailed to all non-attendees are highly effective in enhancing CRC screening acceptance. Physician reminders may support the diffusion of screening, but they can be effective only for individuals who have access to and make use of healthcare services. Educational interventions for patients and providers are effective, but the implementation of organisational measures may be necessary to favour their impact. Available evidence indicates that organised programmes allow to achieve an extensive coverage and to enhance equity of access, while maximising the health impact of screening. They provide at the same time an infrastructure allowing to achieve a more favourable cost-effectiveness profile of potentially effective strategies, which would not be sustainable in opportunistic settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlo Senore
- Centro di Prevenzione Oncologica (CPO Piemonte), AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - John Inadomi
- Digestive Disease Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Nereo Segnan
- Centro di Prevenzione Oncologica (CPO Piemonte), AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Cristina Bellisario
- Centro di Prevenzione Oncologica (CPO Piemonte), AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Cesare Hassan
- Unit of Gastroenterology, Ospedale Nuovo Regina Margherita, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Jones M, Ross B, Cloth A, Heller L. Interventions to reach underscreened populations: a narrative review for planning cancer screening initiatives. Int J Public Health 2015; 60:437-47. [PMID: 25712244 DOI: 10.1007/s00038-015-0666-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2014] [Revised: 02/10/2015] [Accepted: 02/13/2015] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This review was conducted to support knowledge translation (KT) and implementation of interventions to increase participation in organized cancer screening programs in the province of Ontario, Canada. METHODS A rigorously designed literature search yielded over 900 references which were then subjected to exclusion criteria. The remainder was organized according to type of intervention, based on the categories applied in two authoritative systematic reviews and an analysis of the level of evidence. Emerging themes in the literature were then identified to provide a bridge between high-level evidence and on-the-ground practice. RESULTS We identify three promising types of KT interventions: community-based health education; lay or peer health education; and targeted or tailored interventions. Each is summarized with illustrative examples and a summary of key themes and considerations. CONCLUSIONS The authors conclude with a summary the types and a decision tool designed to help KT and implementation teams select interventions which could be adapted to their own context.
Collapse
|
36
|
Islami Parkoohi P, Zare H, Abdollahifard G. An experience of qualified preventive screening: shiraz smart screening software. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES 2015; 40:51-7. [PMID: 25648047 PMCID: PMC4300481] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2013] [Revised: 07/01/2013] [Accepted: 08/24/2013] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Computerized preventive screening software is a cost effective intervention tool to address non-communicable chronic diseases. Shiraz Smart Screening Software (SSSS) was developed as an innovative tool for qualified screening. It allows simultaneous smart screening of several high-burden chronic diseases and supports reminder notification functionality. The extent in which SSSS affects screening quality is also described. METHODS Following software development, preventive screening and annual health examinations of 261 school staff (Medical School of Shiraz, Iran) was carried out in a software-assisted manner. To evaluate the quality of the software-assisted screening, we used quasi-experimental study design and determined coverage, irregular attendance and inappropriateness proportions in relation with the manual and software-assisted screening as well as the corresponding number of requested tests. RESULTS In manual screening method, 27% of employees were covered (with 94% irregular attendance) while by software-assisted screening, the coverage proportion was 79% (attendance status will clear after the specified time). The frequency of inappropriate screening test requests, before the software implementation, was 41.37% for fasting plasma glucose, 41.37% for lipid profile, 0.84% for occult blood, 0.19% for flexible sigmoidoscopy/colonoscopy, 35.29% for Pap smear, 19.20% for mammography and 11.2% for prostate specific antigen. All of the above were corrected by the software application. In total, 366 manual screening and 334 software-assisted screening tests were requested. CONCLUSION SSSS is an innovative tool to improve the quality of preventive screening plans in terms of increased screening coverage, reduction in inappropriateness and the total number of requested tests.
Collapse
|
37
|
Tinmouth J, Patel J, Austin PC, Baxter NN, Brouwers MC, Earle C, Levitt C, Lu Y, Mackinnon M, Paszat L, Rabeneck L. Increasing participation in colorectal cancer screening: Results from a cluster randomized trial of directly mailed gFOBT kits to previous nonresponders. Int J Cancer 2014; 136:E697-703. [DOI: 10.1002/ijc.29191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2014] [Revised: 08/18/2014] [Accepted: 08/21/2014] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jill Tinmouth
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre; Toronto ON Canada
- Institute of Health Policy; Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto; Toronto ON Canada
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; Toronto ON Canada
- Cancer Care Ontario; Toronto ON Canada
| | - Jigisha Patel
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre; Toronto ON Canada
| | - Peter C. Austin
- Institute of Health Policy; Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto; Toronto ON Canada
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; Toronto ON Canada
| | - Nancy N. Baxter
- Institute of Health Policy; Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto; Toronto ON Canada
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; Toronto ON Canada
- Department of Surgery and Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute; St. Michael's Hospital; Toronto ON Canada
| | | | - Craig Earle
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre; Toronto ON Canada
- Institute of Health Policy; Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto; Toronto ON Canada
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; Toronto ON Canada
| | - Cheryl Levitt
- Department of Family Medicine; McMaster University; Hamilton ON Canada
| | - Yan Lu
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; Toronto ON Canada
| | | | - Lawrence Paszat
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre; Toronto ON Canada
- Institute of Health Policy; Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto; Toronto ON Canada
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; Toronto ON Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health; University of Toronto; Toronto ON Canada
| | - Linda Rabeneck
- Institute of Health Policy; Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto; Toronto ON Canada
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; Toronto ON Canada
- Cancer Care Ontario; Toronto ON Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health; University of Toronto; Toronto ON Canada
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Chambers JA, O'Carroll RE, Cook A, Cavanagh J, Archibald D, Millar R. A pilot telephone intervention to increase uptake of breast cancer screening in socially deprived areas in Scotland (TELBRECS): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMC Public Health 2014; 14:824. [PMID: 25106506 PMCID: PMC4143584 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-824] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2014] [Accepted: 06/19/2014] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Breast cancer accounts for almost 30% of all cancers and is the second leading cause of cancer deaths in women in Scotland. Screening is key to early detection. The Scottish Breast Screening Programme is a nationwide, free at point of delivery screening service, to which all women aged between 50 and 70 years are invited to attend every 3 years. Currently over three-quarters of invited women regularly attend screening. However, women from more deprived areas are much less likely to attend: for example in the 3 years from 2010–2012 only 63% of women in the most deprived area attended the East of Scotland Breast Screening programme versus 81% in the least deprived. Research has suggested that reminders (telephone or letter) and brief, personalised interventions addressing barriers to attendance may be helpful in increasing uptake in low-income women. Methods/Design We will employ a brief telephone reminder and support intervention, whose purpose is to elicit and address any mistaken beliefs women have about breast screening, with the aim that the perceived benefits of screening come to outweigh any perceived barriers for individuals. We will test whether this intervention, plus a simple anticipated regret manipulation, will lead to an increase in the uptake of breast cancer screening amongst low-income women who have failed to attend a first appointment, in a randomised controlled trial with 600 women. Participants will be randomly allocated to one of four treatment arms i.e. 1) Letter reminder (i.e. Treatment as usual: CONTROL); 2) Telephone reminder (TEL), 3) Telephone reminder plus telephone support (TEL-SUPP) and 4) Telephone reminder plus support plus AR (TEL-SUPP-AR). The primary outcome will be attendance at breast screening within 3 months of the reminder letter. Discussion If this simple telephone support intervention (with or without AR intervention) leads to a significant increase in breast screening attendance, this would represent a rare example of a theoretically-driven, relatively simple psychological intervention that could result in earlier detection of breast cancer amongst an under-served group of lower socio-economic women. Trial registration Current Controlled trials: ISRCTN06039270. Registered 16th January 2014.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie A Chambers
- Psychology, School of Natural Sciences, Stirling University, Stirling FK9 4LA, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Förberg U, Wallin L, Johansson E, Ygge BM, Backheden M, Ehrenberg A. Relationship Between Work Context and Adherence to a Clinical Practice Guideline for Peripheral Venous Catheters Among Registered Nurses in Pediatric Care. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs 2014; 11:227-39. [DOI: 10.1111/wvn.12046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/02/2014] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Ulrika Förberg
- Education Manager, Pediatric division; Karolinska University Hospital; Stockholm Sweden
- School of Education, Health and Social Studies; Dalarna University; Falun Sweden
- Department of Women's and Children's Health; Karolinska Institutet; Stockholm Sweden
| | - Lars Wallin
- Professor, School of Education; Health and Social Studies; Dalarna University; Falun Sweden
| | - Eva Johansson
- Associate Professor, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society; Division of Nursing, Karolinska Institutet; Stockholm Sweden
| | - Britt-Marie Ygge
- Director of Quality Development; Pediatric division, Karolinska University Hospital; Stockholm Sweden
- Department of Women's and Children's Health; Karolinska Institutet; Stockholm Sweden
| | - Magnus Backheden
- Senior Lecturer, Department of Learning; Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet; Stockholm Sweden
| | - Anna Ehrenberg
- Professor, School of Education; Health and Social Studies, Dalarna University; Falun Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Escoffery C, Rodgers KC, Kegler MC, Ayala M, Pinsker E, Haardörfer R. A grey literature review of special events for promoting cancer screenings. BMC Cancer 2014; 14:454. [PMID: 24942822 PMCID: PMC4082274 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-454] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2014] [Accepted: 06/10/2014] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer remains the second leading cause of mortality in the United States. Special events such as health fairs, screening days or cultural festivals are employed often for community education about cancer screening. A previous systematic review of the published literature was conducted in 2012-2013. The purpose of this study was to conduct a grey literature component of special events that promote breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening in the U.S. METHODS We conducted a grey literature search of dissertations/theses and conference abstracts. The theses/dissertations were restricted to those: 1) written in English, 2) published from January 1990 to December 2011, 3) examined at least one of the predefined categories of special events, 4) involved cancer screening for breast, cervical, and/or colorectal cancer, 5) included outcome data, and 6) conducted in the United States. A review of U.S. public health and cancer conference abstracts, that were readily available and had focused on at least of 3 cancer types and included outcome data, was conducted. Data were abstracted on the purpose, location, primary audience(s), activities conducted, screening provided onsite or referrals, and evaluation results. RESULTS The grey literature review found 6 special events. The types of events found added to the numbers found in the systematic review, especially receptions or parties and cultural festivals/events. All focused on increasing breast and cervical cancer screening except one that focused on breast cancer only. The reach of these events was targeted at mostly minorities or underserved communities. Common evidence-based strategies were group education, small media, and reducing structural barriers. Group education involved presentations from physicians, lay-health advisors, or cancer survivors, while reducing structural barriers included activities such as providing screening appointment sign-ups at the event or providing transportation for event participants. Mammogram screening rates ranged from 6.8% to 60% and Pap tests from 52% to 70%. CONCLUSIONS Further evaluation of special events to promote cancer screening will prove their effectiveness. A grey literature review can augment a systematic review of published literature. Additional data about these events through the grey literature offered additional insights into the goals, intervention components and outcomes of interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cam Escoffery
- Department of Behavioral Sciences and Health Education, Rollins School of Public Health, 1518 Clifton Road, 5th Floor, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Escoffery C, Rodgers KC, Kegler MC, Haardörfer R, Howard DH, Liang S, Pinsker E, Roland KB, Allen JD, Ory MG, Bastani R, Fernandez ME, Risendal BC, Byrd TL, Coronado GD. A systematic review of special events to promote breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening in the United States. BMC Public Health 2014; 14:274. [PMID: 24661503 PMCID: PMC3987802 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2013] [Accepted: 03/06/2014] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Special events are common community-based strategies for health promotion. This paper presents findings from a systematic literature review on the impact of special events to promote breast, cervical or colorectal cancer education and screening. Methods Articles in English that focused on special events involving breast, cervical, and/or colorectal cancer conducted in the U.S. and published between January 1990 and December 2011 were identified from seven databases: Ovid, Web of Science, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Sociological Abstract, Cochrane Libraries, and EconLit. Study inclusion and data extraction were independently validated by two researchers. Results Of the 20 articles selected for screening out of 1,409, ten articles on special events reported outcome data. Five types of special events were found: health fairs, parties, cultural events, special days, and plays. Many focused on breast cancer only, or in combination with other cancers. Reach ranged from 50–1732 participants. All special events used at least one evidence-based strategy suggested by the Community Guide to Preventive Services, such as small media, one-on-one education, and reducing structural barriers. For cancer screening as an outcome of the events, mammography screening rates ranged from 4.8% to 88%, Pap testing was 3.9%, and clinical breast exams ranged from 9.1% to 100%. For colorectal screening, FOBT ranged from 29.4% to 76%, and sigmoidoscopy was 100% at one event. Outcome measures included intentions to get screened, scheduled appointments, uptake of clinical exams, and participation in cancer screening. Conclusions Special events found in the review varied and used evidence-based strategies. Screening data suggest that some special events can lead to increases in cancer screening, especially if they provide onsite screening services. However, there is insufficient evidence to demonstrate that special events are effective in increasing cancer screening. The heterogeneity of populations served, event activities, outcome variables assessed, and the reliance on self-report to measure screening limit conclusions. This study highlights the need for further research to determine the effectiveness of special events to increase cancer screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cam Escoffery
- Department of Behavioral Sciences and Health Education, Rollins School of Public Health, 1518 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Sánchez-Lezama AP, Cavazos-Arroyo J, Albavera-Hernández C. Applying the Fuzzy Delphi Method for determining socio-ecological factors that influence adherence to mammography screening in rural areas of Mexico. CAD SAUDE PUBLICA 2014; 30:245-58. [PMID: 24627054 DOI: 10.1590/0102-311x00025113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2013] [Accepted: 09/04/2013] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
In Mexico, regular participation in mammography screening is low, despite higher survival rates. The objective of our research is to highlight healthcare procedures to be optimized and target areas to encourage investment and to raise awareness about the benefits of early diagnosis. Those socio-ecological factors (community, interpersonal and individual) were collected through a review of literature and based on the spatial interaction model of mammography use developed by Mobley et al. The opinion of diverse groups of experts on the importance of those factors was collected by survey. The Fuzzy Delphi Method helped to solve the inherent uncertainty of the survey process. Our findings suggest that population health behaviors, proximity-density to facilities/ physicians and predisposing factors are needed to increase the screening rate. Variations in expert group size could affect the accuracy of the conclusions. However, the application of the enhanced aggregation method provided a group consensus that is less susceptible to misinterpretation and that weighs the opinion of each expert according to their clinical experience in mammography research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Paola Sánchez-Lezama
- Universidad Popular Autónoma del Estado de Puebla, Puebla, México, Universidad Popular Autónoma del Estado de Puebla, Puebla, México
| | - Judith Cavazos-Arroyo
- Universidad Popular Autónoma del Estado de Puebla, Puebla, México, Universidad Popular Autónoma del Estado de Puebla, Puebla, México
| | - Cidronio Albavera-Hernández
- Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Cuernavaca, México, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Cuernavaca, México
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
King NR, Kasper KM, Daggy JK, Tucker Edmonds B. Current practice patterns in cervical cancer screening in Indiana. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 210:265.e1-8. [PMID: 24412744 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2013] [Revised: 11/23/2013] [Accepted: 01/02/2014] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study is to describe current health care provider cervical cancer screening practice patterns for average-risk women in the state of Indiana in comparison to the 2012 guidelines as well as earlier guidelines. We also aim to describe what factors are associated with increased adherence to guidelines, and what factors may impede adherence. STUDY DESIGN We conducted a vignette-based survey among a convenience sample of obstetricians, gynecologists, midwives, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants attending the Indiana American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Section meeting in January 2013. RESULTS Questionnaires were returned by 51% (112/218) of attendants. Of the 111 providers with completed surveys, 42 (38%) follow current guidelines. Of providers, 86% start screening at age 21 years. Of providers, 33% screen women aged 21-29 years every 3 years. Of providers, 33% follow recommendations for cotesting every 5 years for patients 30-65 years of age. The majority of providers follow guidelines to stop screening after a benign hysterectomy or age 65 years (75% and 51%, respectively). CONCLUSION The majority of providers follow the 2012 guidelines for the initiation and cessation of cervical screening; however, most providers screen more frequently than currently recommended for patients between ages 21-65 years.
Collapse
|
44
|
Honein-AbouHaidar GN, Kastner M, Vuong V, Perrier L, Rabeneck L, Tinmouth J, Straus S, Baxter NN. Benefits and barriers to participation in colorectal cancer screening: a protocol for a systematic review and synthesis of qualitative studies. BMJ Open 2014; 4:e004508. [PMID: 24578543 PMCID: PMC3939661 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004508] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2013] [Revised: 02/07/2014] [Accepted: 02/10/2014] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Colorectal cancer (CRC) poses a serious health problem worldwide. While screening is effective in reducing CRC mortality, participation in screening tests is generally suboptimal and social inequities in participation are frequently reported. The goal of this review is to synthesise factors that influence an individual's decision to participate in CRC screening, and to explore how those factors vary by sex, ethnicity and socioeconomic status. DATA SOURCES A primary search of Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and a secondary search of grey literature and articles taken from references of included articles (from inception to July 2013). DESIGN A systematic review and Meta-study synthesis of qualitative studies that address perceived benefits and barriers to participation in CRC screening tests among adults 50 years of age or older. REVIEW METHODS The two-staged Meta-study methodology by Paterson will be used to conduct this review. In stage 1, similarities/differences, patterns and themes will be identified across three levels of analysis while preserving the context of original studies. In stage 2, synthesis will extend beyond the analysis to generate new theory of the phenomenon through a process called Meta-synthesis. DISCUSSION This review offers to generate a framework to better understand benefits and barriers that affect decision-making to participate in CRC screening among different sectors of the population. This framework will be a relevant tool for policy makers in framing educational materials, for patient-centered communication, and for researchers interested in the science of equity. This review is registered in PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42013005025).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gladys N Honein-AbouHaidar
- Department of Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Monika Kastner
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Vincent Vuong
- Department of Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Laure Perrier
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Linda Rabeneck
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Vice-President, Prevention and Cancer Control, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jill Tinmouth
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Scientist at Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sharon Straus
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nancy N Baxter
- Department of Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Pinto R, Flynn S, Jorge F, Virani T. Lay health educator role in improving cancer screening rates in underserved communities. Health (London) 2014. [DOI: 10.4236/health.2014.65048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
46
|
Gan DEH, Dahlui M. Cervical screening uptake and its predictors among rural women in Malaysia. Singapore Med J 2013; 54:163-8. [PMID: 23546031 DOI: 10.11622/smedj.2013047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cervical cancer is the third most common cancer among Malaysian women. However, the uptake of cervical cancer screening--Pap smear--by women in Malaysia has been low and remains a challenge. This study was conducted to assess the cervical screening practices of rural women in Malaysia and to examine the factors associated with such practices. METHODS A cross-sectional survey was conducted in five rural districts in Perak, Malaysia. 1,000 households were selected through multistage random sampling. Women aged 20-64 years were interviewed by trained enumerators using structured questionnaires. Binomial logistic regression was used to identify predictors of cervical screening through univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS Among the 959 respondents, only 48.9% had undergone Pap smear at least once in the past three years. Women in the age group 40-49 years (odds ratio 3.027, 95% confidence interval 1.546-5.925; p < 0.005) were found to be significantly more likely to attend cervical cancer screening as compared to those in the age group 20-29 years. Other significant predictors were being married with children, having knowledge of cervical cancer symptoms, receiving relevant information regarding cervical cancer from health personnel or campaigns, being engaged in family planning and receiving encouragement from husbands. CONCLUSION Efforts to boost the uptake of Pap smear screening among the rural population should be targeted toward the predictors of positive uptake.
Collapse
|
47
|
Tinmouth J, Ritvo P, McGregor SE, Patel J, Guglietti C, Levitt CA, Paszat LF, Rabeneck L. ColonCancerCheck primary care invitation pilot project: patient perceptions. CANADIAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN MEDECIN DE FAMILLE CANADIEN 2013; 59:e541-9. [PMID: 24336559 PMCID: PMC3860944] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe the perceptions of those who received invitations to the ColonCancerCheck Primary Care Invitation Pilot (the Pilot) about the mailed invitation, colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in general, and their specific screening experiences. DESIGN Qualitative study with 6 focus group sessions, each 1.5 hours in length. SETTING Hamilton, Ont; Ottawa, Ont; and Thunder Bay, Ont. PARTICIPANTS Screening-eligible adults, aged 50 years and older, who received a Pilot invitation for CRC screening. METHODS The focus groups were conducted by a trained moderator and were audiorecorded and transcribed verbatim. The transcripts were analyzed using grounded-theory techniques facilitated by the use of electronic software. MAIN FINDINGS Key themes related to the invitation letter, the role of the family physician, direct mailing of the fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) kit, and alternate CRC screening promotion strategies were identified. Specifically, participants suggested the letter content should use stronger, more powerful language to capture the reader's attention. The importance of the family physician was endorsed, although participants favoured clarification of the physician and program roles in the actual mailed invitation. Participants expressed support for directly mailing FOBT kits to individuals, particularly those with successful previous test completion, and for communication of both negative and positive screening results. CONCLUSION This study yielded a number of important findings including strategies to optimize letter content, support for directly mailed FOBT kits, and strategies to report results that might be highly relevant to other health programs where population-based CRC screening is being considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jill Tinmouth
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Ave, Room HG40, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Saraiya M, Steben M, Watson M, Markowitz L. Evolution of cervical cancer screening and prevention in United States and Canada: implications for public health practitioners and clinicians. Prev Med 2013; 57:426-33. [PMID: 23402963 PMCID: PMC4515308 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.01.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2012] [Revised: 01/26/2013] [Accepted: 01/30/2013] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Declines in cervical cancer incidence and mortality in Canada and in the United States have been widely attributed to the introduction of the Papanicolaou (Pap) test. This article reviews changes in screening and introduction of HPV vaccination. METHOD Sentinel events in cervical cancer screening and primary prevention through HPV vaccination in the US and Canada are described. RESULTS Despite commonalities, cervical cancer screening and prevention differ between the two countries. Canada has a combination of opportunistic and organized programs at the provincial and territorial level, while the US has opportunistic screening and vaccination systems. In the US, the HPV test along with the Pap test (co-testing) is part of national recommendations for routine cervical cancer screening for women age 30 and older. Co-testing is not being considered anywhere in Canada, but primary HPV testing is currently recommended (but not implemented) in one province in Canada. CONCLUSION Many prevention strategies are available for cervical cancer. Continued public health efforts should focus on increasing vaccine coverage in the target age groups and cervical cancer screening for women at appropriate intervals. Ongoing evaluation will be needed to ensure appropriate use of health resources, as vaccinated women become eligible for screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Saraiya
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Epidemiology and Applied Research Branch, Atlanta, GA, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Digby J, McDonald PJ, Strachan JA, Libby G, Steele RJC, Fraser CG. Use of a faecal immunochemical test narrows current gaps in uptake for sex, age and deprivation in a bowel cancer screening programme. J Med Screen 2013; 20:80-5. [DOI: 10.1177/0969141313497197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Objectives To investigate the characteristics of participants screened for bowel cancer using a faecal immunochemical test for haemoglobin (FIT). Setting Scottish Bowel Screening Programme. Methods 65909 men and women in two NHS Boards, aged 50 to 74, were invited to participate in an evaluation of FIT as a first-line test. Uptake was calculated by sex, age in quintiles, and deprivation in quintiles, and compared with a group who had completed a guaiac faecal occult blood test (gFOBT) and for whom details of sex, age and deprivation were well documented. Results FIT kits from 38672 participants were tested. The overall uptake of 58.7% was significantly higher than the 53.9% for gFOBT (p < 0.0001). Uptakes in the two NHS Boards were 57.6% and 54.4% for men and 63.2% and 59.1% for women, higher than the 49.5% and 58.1% completing gFOBT. Uptake was higher for FIT than gFOBT in all age and deprivation quintiles for both men and women in both NHS Boards. The difference in uptake fell with age for men but rose for women; the increase in uptake was greater for men than women. Uptake fell as deprivation decreased for both sexes, and was similar in both NHS Boards. Conclusions Use of FIT increases uptake over gFOBT, and the greatest increases are seen in men, younger participants, and more deprived individuals, groups for which an increase in uptake is likely to be beneficial. The results support a move to FIT as a first-line screening test for those countries still using gFOBT.
Collapse
|
50
|
Abstract
Oesophageal cancer is a global health problem with high mortality due to the advanced nature of the disease at presentation; therefore, detection at an early stage significantly improves outcome. Oesophageal squamous-cell cancer is preceded by dysplasia and oesophageal adenocarcinoma is preceded by Barrett's oesophagus, which progresses to cancer via intermediate dysplastic stages. Screening to detect these preneoplastic lesions has the potential to substantially reduce mortality and morbidity. However, the risks and benefits of such programmes to individuals and to society need to be carefully weighed. Endoscopic screening is invasive, costly and error prone owing to sampling bias and the subjective diagnosis of dysplasia. Non-endoscopic cell-sampling methods are less invasive and more cost effective than endoscopy, but the sensitivity and specificity of cytological assessment of atypia has been disappointing. The use of biomarkers to analyse samples collected using pan-oesophageal cell-collection devices may improve diagnostic accuracy; however, further work is required to confirm this. The psychological and economic implications of screening as well as the feasibility of implementing such programmes must also be considered.
Collapse
|