Managing symptoms during cancer treatments: evaluating the implementation of evidence-informed remote support protocols

Expectations for gynaecological cancer nursing guidance development: A qualitative exploration: Part 1 - Creating foundational support

PURPOSE

Nurses are acknowledged as essential in the delivery of best practice gynaecological cancer care however previous studies have identified challenges in these nursing roles. Recommendations include the development of nursing guidance focused on supporting people with a gynaecological cancer. This study aimed to explore perceptions and expectations for the development of a gynaecological cancer nursing guidance resource in Australia and investigate preferred design and content inclusion. This paper presents the findings on expectations for the resource purpose.

METHODS

Utilising an exploratory qualitative descriptive design, 20 nurses and seven people with lived experience of gynaecological cancer participated in focus groups or interviews following a semi-structured interview guide. Transcripts underwent inductive content analysis.

RESULTS

All 27 participants identified as female, lived in one of 5 Australian states, included representation from regional locations (n=9, 33%), and mostly identified as Australian or mixed Australian ethnicity (n=25, 93%). The major theme, "Foundational support resource for nurses", described how participants require a resource to support the delivery of gynaecological cancer nursing care. Participants articulated their goals for the resource through four subthemes: reducing variation in care; acknowledging diversity in nursing roles; addressing barriers; supporting development.

CONCLUSION

The development of a guidance resource for gynaecological cancer nursing is supported by Australian gynaecological cancer nurses and people with cancer lived experience. It is expected its implementation will assist to improve cancer outcomes, equitable access to quality care and support the development and sustainability of the gynaecological cancer nursing workforce.

Feasibility of a nurse-initiated brief cognitive behavioral strategy intervention program for symptom clusters experienced by patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Objective

To assess the feasibility of a nurse-initiated brief cognitive behavioral strategy (CBS) intervention program targeting pain and fatigue symptoms among the pain and fatigue/anorexia symptom clusters experienced by patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

In this single-group, pre-post test study, 15 NSCLC outpatients undergoing medical treatment participated. After providing informed consent, participants completed a baseline questionnaire and received a booklet detailing brief cognitive-behavioral techniques (e.g., relaxation, symptom-management strategies), exercise therapy, and related tools. Follow-up calls were made five times over a 10-week period to monitor adherence and assess symptom severity changes.

Results

Ten participants (66.7%) completed the program. For pain management, 86.7% of participants chose deep breathing as a relaxation technique, and 80.0% used exercise to alleviate fatigue. Median symptom severities decreased from baseline to week 10 as follows: pain (2.00 to 1.00), sadness (1.00 to 0.00), and anxiety (1.00 to 0.50).

Conclusions

The naurse-initiated brief CBS intervention program is feasible and clinically relevant for patients with advanced NSCLC undergoing standard treatment in Japan.

A nurse versus a chatbot ‒ the effect of an empowerment program on chemotherapy-related side effects and the self-care behaviors of women living with breast Cancer: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The high levels of unmet needs in relation to provision of self-care information reported by women living with breast cancer suggests that pre-chemotherapy education is suboptimal. Chatbots are emerging as a promising platform to provide education to patients helping them self-manage their symptoms at home. However, evidence from empirical studies on the effect of chatbots education on women living with breast cancer self-care behaviors and symptoms management are scarce.

METHODS

This three-arm randomized controlled trial was performed in a chemotherapy day care center within an oncology center in Egypt. A total of 150 women living with breast cancer were randomly selected and randomized into three groups: the ChemoFreeBot group (n = 50), the nurse-led education group (n = 50), and the routine care group (n = 50). In the ChemoFreeBot group, women were given a link to interact with ChemoFreeBot and ask questions about their symptoms and self-care interventions by typing questions or keywords at any time. On the same day as their first day of chemotherapy, the nurse-led education group received face to face teaching sessions from the researcher (nurse) about side effects and self-care interventions. The routine care group received general knowledge during their chemotherapy session about self-care interventions. The self-care behaviors effectiveness and the frequency, severity and distress of chemotherapy side effects were measured at baseline and postintervention for the three groups. The ChemoFreeBot's usability was assessed.

RESULTS

The mixed design repeated measures ANOVA analyses revealed a statistically significant both group effect and interaction effect of group*time, indicating a significant difference between the three groups in terms of the physical symptoms frequency (F = 76.075, p < .001, F = 147, p < .001, respectively), severity (F = 96.440, p < .001, F = 220.462, p < .001), and distress (F = 77.171, p < .001, F = 189.680, p < .001); the psychological symptoms frequency (F = 63.198, p < .001, F = 137.908, p < .001), severity (F = 62.137, p < .001), (F = 136.740, p < .001), and distress (F = 43.003, p < .001, F = 168.057, p < .001), and the effectiveness of self-care behaviors (F = 20.134, p < .001, F = 24.252, p < .001, respectively). The Post hoc analysis with Bonferroni adjustment in showed that women in the ChemoFreeBot group experienced a statistically significant less frequent, less severe and less distressing physical and psychological symptoms and higher effective self-care behaviors than those in the nurse-led education and routine care groups (p > .001).

CONCLUSION

ChemoFreeBot was a useful and cost-effective tool to improve increase self-care behavior and reduce chemotherapy side effects in women living with breast cancer through the provision of personalized education and the improvement of the accessibility to real-time and high-quality information compared to "one size fits all" approach used by nurses to provide the information. ChemoFreeBot can be an empowering tool to assist nurses to educate women with breast cancer and allow women to take an active role in managing their symptom.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was retrospectively registered in the University hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN) Center, Clinical Trials Registry on 26/09/2022; Registration No:R000055389,Trial ID:UMIN000048955.

Cultural adaptation of the Italian version of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event (PRO-CTCAE®)

INTRODUCTION

US National Cancer Institute's (NCI) Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE^®) is a library of 78 symptom terms and 124 items enabling patient reporting of symptomatic adverse events in cancer trials. This multicenter study used mixed methods to develop an Italian language version of this widely accepted measure, and describe the content validity and reliability in a diverse sample of Italian-speaking patients.

METHODS

All PRO-CTCAE items were translated in accordance with international guidelines. Subsequently, the content validity of the PRO-CTCAE-Italian was explored and iteratively refined through cognitive debriefing interviews. Participants (n=96; 52% male; median age 64 years; 26% older adults; 18% lower educational attainment) completed a PRO-CTCAE survey and participated in a semi-structured interview to determine if the translation captured the concepts of the original English language PRO-CTCAE, and to evaluate comprehension, clarity and ease of judgement. Test-retest reliability of the finalized measure was explored in a second sample (n=135).

RESULTS

Four rounds of cognitive debriefing interviews were conducted. The majority of PRO-CTCAE symptom terms, attributes and associated response choices were well-understood, and respondents found the items easy to judge. To improve comprehension and clarity, the symptom terms for nausea and pain were rephrased and retested in subsequent interview rounds. Test-retest reliability was excellent for 41/49 items (84%); the median intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.83 (range 0.64-0.94).

DISCUSSION

Results support the semantic, conceptual and pragmatic equivalence of PRO-CTCAE-Italian to the original English version, and provide preliminary descriptive evidence of content validity and reliability.

Telehealth Readiness Assessment of Perinatal Nurses

OBJECTIVE

To assess telehealth readiness among perinatal nurses in New Jersey.

DESIGN

Cohort survey study.

SETTING/LOCAL PROBLEM

New Jersey was one of the hardest hit areas in the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic. Telehealth represented an opportunity to provide continuity of perinatal care at a time when health care was significantly disrupted.

PARTICIPANTS

Perinatal nurses in New Jersey.

INTERVENTION/MEASUREMENTS

The intervention was a five-part, 90-question online survey provided via e-mail invitation to New Jersey State Nursing Association members. Data were collected from June 25 to July 9, 2020. Descriptive statistics, frequency analyses, a Mann-Whitney test on nonparametric measures of groups by age, and a one-tailed t test were completed. Results of the Telehealth Readiness Assessment tool were calculated. Open-text responses were organized and used to illustrate the findings.

RESULTS

Fifty-two perinatal nurses responded to the survey. Twenty-two (42%) completed all 90 questions. Partial answers were accepted. Synchronous live telehealth expanded 66% in the wake of COVID-19. Results showed that 37% (n = 15) of participants used telehealth at work, and 27% (n = 11) used it in getting care for themselves or a family member (M = 2.0, SD = 0.86; one-tailed t test, p = .25). In comparing nervousness in using technology with age, scores for those younger than 45 years (Mdn = 3) and those older than 45 years (Mdn = 2) showed no statistically significant difference, U(n_<45years = 15, n_{≥45 years} = 17) = 11, z = -0.02, p < .83. Overall, 46% (n = 26) indicated that telehealth could be extremely helpful or very helpful in reducing health care disparities and improving quality. Overall, telehealth readiness was ranked almost ready.

CONCLUSION

A telehealth readiness assessment may identify barriers and opportunities that can predict success and failure. Nurses generally accept technology and believe that telehealth could be useful in reducing poor maternal health outcomes and health care disparities.

The Gut Microbiome and Cancer Immunotherapy: Can We Use the Gut Microbiome as a Predictive Biomarker for Clinical Response in Cancer Immunotherapy?

Simple Summary

The current review assessed the effects of the gut microbiome on clinical outcomes of immunotherapy and related adverse events (AEs) in cancer patients. Studies (n = 10) consistently reported that the gut microbiome prior to administering immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) was associated with enhanced efficacy of ICIs and reduced AEs. Recent fecal microbiome transplant (FMT) studies demonstrated the modulatory effects of FMT on the composition and diversity of the gut microbiome in patients with refractory cancers and the potential to improve the efficacy of ICIs.

Abstract

Background: Emerging evidence suggests that gut microbiota influences the clinical response to immunotherapy. This review of clinical studies examines the relationship between gut microbiota and immunotherapy outcomes. Method: A literature search was conducted in electronic databases Medline, PubMed and ScienceDirect, with searches for “cancer” and “immunotherapy/immune checkpoint inhibitor” and “microbiome/microbiota” and/or “fecal microbiome transplant FMT”. The relevant literature was selected for this article. Results: Ten studies examined patients diagnosed with advanced metastatic melanoma (n = 6), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (n = 2), non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) (n = 1) and one study examined combination both NSCLC and renal cell carcinoma (RCC) (n = 1). These studies consistently reported that the gut microbiome profile prior to administering immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) was related to clinical response as measured by progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Two studies reported that a low abundance of Bacteroidetes was associated with colitis. Two studies showed that patients with anti-PD-1 refractory metastatic melanoma experienced improved response rates and no added toxicity when receiving fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) from patients with anti-PD-1 responsive disease. Conclusions: Overall, significant differences in the diversity and composition of the gut microbiome were identified in ICIs responders and non-responders. Our findings provide new insights into the value of assessing the gut microbiome in immunotherapy. Further robust randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining the modulatory effects of the gut microbiome and FMT on ICIs in patients not responding to immunotherapy are warranted.

Nurse-Led Telephonic Symptom Support for Patients Receiving Chemotherapy

PROBLEM STATEMENT

The use of evidence-informed symptom guides has not been widely adopted in telephonic support.

DESIGN

This is a descriptive study of nurse-led support using evidence-based symptom guides during telephone outreach.

DATA SOURCES

Documentation quantified telephone encounters by frequency, length, and type of patient-reported symptoms. Nurse interviews examined perceptions of their role and the use of symptom guides.

ANALYSIS

Quantitative data were summarized using univariate descriptive statistics, and interviews were analyzed using directed descriptive content analysis.

FINDINGS

Symptom guides were viewed as trusted evidence-based resources, suitable to address common treatment-related symptoms. A threshold effect was a reported barrier of the guides, such that the benefit diminished over time for managing recurring symptoms.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Telephone outreach using evidence-based symptom guides can contribute to early symptom identification while engaging patients in decision making. Understanding nurse activities aids in developing an economical and high-quality model for symptom support, as well as in encouraging nurses to practice at the highest level of preparation.

Use of Text Messaging (SMS) for the Management of Side Effects in Cancer Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy Treatment: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Cancer patients are often not sufficiently oriented to manage side effects at home. Sending text messages with self-care guidelines aimed managing side effects is the main objective of this randomized controlled trial. Patients who started outpatient chemotherapy treatment between March and December 2017 at a hospital in southern Brazil were invited to participate in this study and were allocated to the intervention or control group (ratio 1: 1). Each patient in the intervention group received a daily SMS (short message service) with some guidance on management or prevention of side effects. All text messages were sent to the intervention group patients in an automated and tailored way by our app called cHEmotHErApp. Side effects experienced by patients were verified using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core-30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). Results showed intervention group patients experienced fewer side effects compared to the control group in cycle 1 (p < 0.05), in general. In addition, intervention group experienced less nausea in relation to the control group, in the cycle 1 and cycle 2 (p < 0.05). This study indicate text messaging may be a tool for supporting side effect management in patients receiving chemotherapy. This study was enrolled in ClinicalTrials.gov with the identification number NCT03087422. This research was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Distress screening and supportive care referrals used by telephone-based health services: a systematic review

PURPOSE

People affected by chronic diseases such as cancer report high levels of distress and a need for psychosocial support. It is unclear whether telephone-based services for people affected by chronic disease are a practical setting for implementing distress screening, referral protocols and rescreening to direct supportive care where it is needed. This systematic review aimed to describe the published literature regarding distress screening and supportive care referral practices in telephone-based services for people affected by chronic diseases such as cancer.

METHODS

A systematic literature search of MEDLINE, Embase, PsycInfo, CINAHL, Cochrane and Scopus was conducted in February 2018. Included quantitative studies involved: patients or caregivers affected by chronic diseases including cancer and describe a health service assessing psychosocial needs or distress via telephone. Extracted data included the type of cancer or other chronic disease, sample size, screening tool, referral or rescreening protocols, and type of health service.

RESULTS

The search identified 3989 potential articles with additional searches returning 30 studies (n = 4019); fourteen were eligible for full-text review. Of the 14 studies, 13 included cancer patients. Studies were across multiple settings and identified nine distress screening tools in use.

CONCLUSION

The reviewed studies indicate that validated distress-screening tools are being used via telephone to identify distress, particularly in relation to cancer. Screening-driven supportive care referrals are also taking place in telephone-based services. However, not all services use an established referral protocol. Ongoing rescreening of callers' distress is also limited despite it being an important recommendation from psycho-oncology guidelines.

Implementing Practice Guides to Improve Cancer Symptom Management in Homecare: A Comparative Case Study

Symptoms experienced by clients with cancer often occur at home and can become life-threatening, posing serious safety concerns. This study evaluated implementation of evidence-informed symptom practice guides to enhance quality of cancer symptom support by homecare nurses. A comparative case study was conducted using the Knowledge to Action Framework. Case were created for each of six agencies providing nursing care within a regional homecare authority. A team of researchers and knowledge users (e.g., managers, educators, family member): (1) assessed factors influencing practice guide use (survey, interviews) at six agencies, (2) adapted 15 practice guides for local use, (3) implemented with interventions to address barriers, and (4) monitored use. Analysis was within and across cases. Of six nursing agencies, one withdrew and five participated. In the baseline survey, 51% of nurses reported using guidelines but nurses did not describe using them in their current practice during the interviews. To overcome barriers, 489 nurses in five agencies were trained in how to use the practice guides, principles were established for documenting cancer symptom management, and practice guides were made available in various formats. Success with implementation varied across the participating cases. Chart audits conducted in three agencies revealed evidence of practice guide use for 16%, 22%, and 70% client visits, respectively. Implementation of evidence-informed practice guides in nursing required an approach tailored for each agency. Training, integration in documentation, and easy access to practice guides increased use for some nurses but ongoing support and reinforcement from nurse leaders is required.

Managing Symptoms During Cancer Treatments: Barriers and Facilitators to Home Care Nurses Using Symptom Practice Guides

Nurses are instrumental in helping clients safely manage at home and triage potentially life-threatening symptoms from cancer. The purpose of this study was to assess factors influencing home care nurses’ use of 15 evidence-informed symptom practice guides for providing telephone or in-home nursing services to clients with cancer. A mixed-methods descriptive study was guided by the Knowledge-to-Action Framework. All six nursing agencies within a regional home care authority participated. Data collection included retrospective audit of symptom management in 50 patient records, 14 interviews, and barriers survey from 150 of 243 (61.7%) registered nurses and registered practical nurses providing cancer symptom support in home care. Chart audit revealed more than 80% of clients were on chemotherapy and common symptoms were nausea/vomiting (44%), constipation (32%), fatigue (32%), loss of appetite (32%), and pain (20%). Nurses had positive intentions ( M = 5.4 out of 7; SD = 1.3) and felt capable of using the symptom practice guides ( M = 5.4; SD = 1.0), held strong beliefs about the consequences ( M = 5.8; SD = 1.1) and moral norms of using them ( M = 5.7; SD = 1.1), and identified neutral to low social influence ( M = 3.0; SD = 1.6). Common barriers were inadequate time in practice, learning curve, need to integrate into documentation, and competing system changes. Common facilitators were being comprehensive, an evidence-based resource for use in practice, and having consistent symptom management guides across settings. Overall, the symptom guides were well received by the nurses. Interventions nurses identified to overcome barriers were education, clear organizational mandate for implementation, and integration with documentation.

Triage des appels de gestion des symptômes avec et sans guides de pratique : étude de cas

La présente étude de cas fait la démonstration de l’utilisation des guides de pratique d’évaluation des symptômes élaborés par l’équipe pancanadienne de triage des symptômes et aide à distance en oncologie (COSTaRS : Pan-Canadian Oncology Symptom Triage and Remote Support) pour améliorer la qualité des services infirmiers téléphoniques. Le cas cité en exemple a été préparé à partir d’une évaluation des dossiers de consultations téléphoniques réalisées auprès de 299 patients suivis dans le cadre de programmes d’oncologie ambulatoire. On y décrit les appels qui ont eu lieu entre une femme de 49 ans souffrant d’un cancer du côlon avec métastases et les trois infirmières autorisées lui ayant répondu. La patiente était en traitement de chimiothérapie par intraveineuse (jour 1) et par voie orale (jours 1 à 14). Les jours 3, 5 et 6, elle a téléphoné à son infirmière pour signaler des nausées et des vomissements. Les deux premières infirmières lui ont conseillé de prendre des antiémétiques sans documenter leur évaluation. La troisième infirmière a utilisé un guide COSTaRS pour procéder à une évaluation approfondie, passer en revue la médication prise et discuter de stratégies d’autogestion des symptômes.

Triaging symptom calls with and without practice guides: A case exemplar

This case exemplar demonstrates use of COSTaRS symptom practice guides for enhancing quality of telephone-based nursing services. The case is based on findings from an audit of nurse-led telephone consultation documentation from 299 patients' health records in ambulatory oncology programs. Phone calls between a 49-year-old woman with metastatic colon cancer and three registered nurses (RNs) are described herein. The patient received chemotherapy intravenously (day 1) and orally (days 1-14). On days three, five and six she telephoned her RN to report nausea and vomiting. The first two RNs advised her to take her antiemetics with no assessment documented. The third RN used a COSTaRS symptom guide to conduct a thorough assessment, medication review, and discussed strategies for self-management.

Implementation of Symptom Protocols for Nurses Providing Telephone-Based Cancer Symptom Management: A Comparative Case Study

Background

The pan‐Canadian Oncology Symptom Triage and Remote Support (COSTaRS) team developed 13 evidence‐informed protocols for symptom management.

Aim

To build an effective and sustainable approach for implementing the COSTaRS protocols for nurses providing telephone‐based symptom support to cancer patients.

Methods

A comparative case study was guided by the Knowledge to Action Framework. Three cases were created for three Canadian oncology programs that have nurses providing telephone support. Teams of researchers and knowledge users: (a) assessed barriers and facilitators influencing protocol use, (b) adapted protocols for local use, (c) intervened to address barriers, (d) monitored use, and (e) assessed barriers and facilitators influencing sustained use. Analysis was within and across cases.

Results

At baseline, >85% nurses rated protocols positively but barriers were identified (64‐80% needed training). Patients and families identified similar barriers and thought protocols would enhance consistency among nurses teaching self‐management. Twenty‐two COSTaRS workshops reached 85% to 97% of targeted nurses (N = 119). Nurses felt more confident with symptom management and using the COSTaRS protocols (p < .01). Protocol adaptations addressed barriers (e.g., health records approval, creating pocket versions, distributing with telephone messages). Chart audits revealed that protocols used were documented for 11% to 47% of patient calls. Sustained use requires organizational alignment and ongoing leadership support.

Linking Evidence to Action

Protocol uptake was similar to trials that have evaluated tailored interventions to improve professional practice by overcoming identified barriers. Collaborating with knowledge users facilitated interpretation of findings, aided protocol adaptation, and supported implementation. Protocol implementation in nursing requires a tailored approach. A multifaceted intervention approach increased nurses’ use of evidence‐informed protocols during telephone calls with patients about symptoms. Training and other interventions improved nurses’ confidence with using COSTaRS protocols and their uptake was evident in some documented telephone calls. Protocols could be adapted for use by patients and nurses globally.

Knowledge Tools for Cancer Treatment–Related Symptom Management by Home Care Nurses

A mixed methods descriptive study explored 38 nurses’ perceptions of usability and factors influencing the use of 13 symptom management protocols when caring for patients with cancer in the home. Descriptive analysis of the usability survey revealed protocols had high readability, right amount of information, appropriate terms, and were self-evident to complete. Thematic analysis of transcripts identified barriers to using the protocols including lack of time, paper-based documentation systems, and length of the protocols. Facilitating factors included high usability of the protocols, integration of a remote symptom support nursing role, and the usefulness for education and training. In summary, the protocols were described as a useful resource and beneficial for nursing orientation but required support to overcome some barriers and improve fit with clinical workflow.

Patient and family experiences with accessing telephone cancer treatment symptom support: a descriptive study

PURPOSE

Assess patient and family member experiences with telephone cancer treatment symptom support.

METHODS

Descriptive study guided by the Knowledge-to-Action Framework. Patients and family members who received telephone support for a cancer treatment symptom within the last month at one of three ambulatory cancer programs (Nova Scotia, Ontario, Quebec) were eligible. An adapted Short Questionnaire for Out-of-hours Care instrument was analyzed with univariate statistics.

RESULTS

Of 105 participants, 83 % telephoned about themselves and 17 % for a family member. Participants received advice over the telephone (90 %) and were advised to go to emergency (13 %) and/or the clinic (9 %). Two left a message and were not called back. Participants were "very satisfied" with the manner of nurse or doctor (58 %), explanation about problem (56 %), treatment/advice given (54 %), way call was handled (48 %), getting through (40 %), and wait time to speak to a nurse or doctor (38 %). The proportion "dissatisfied" or "very dissatisfied" for the above items was 4, 5, 9, 11, 10, and 14 %, respectively. Suggestions were shorter call back time, weekend access to telephone support, more knowledgeable advice on self-care strategies, more education at discharge, and shared documentation on calls to avoid repetition and improve continuity.

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients and family members who responded to the survey were satisfied with telephone-based cancer treatment symptom support. Programs could improve telephone support services by providing an estimated time for callback, ensuring that nurses have access to and use previous call documentation, and enhancing patient education on self-care strategies for managing and triaging treatment-related symptoms.

Screening, evaluation, and management of cancer-related fatigue: Ready for implementation to practice?

Answer questions and earn CME/CNE Evidence regarding cancer-related fatigue (fatigue) has accumulated sufficiently such that recommendations for screening, evaluation, and/or management have been released recently by 4 leading cancer organizations. These evidence-based fatigue recommendations are available for clinicians, and some have patient versions; but barriers at the patient, clinician, and system levels hinder dissemination and implementation into practice. The underlying biologic mechanisms for this debilitating symptom have not been elucidated completely, hindering the development of mechanistically driven interventions. However, significant progress has been made toward methods for screening and comprehensively evaluating fatigue and other common symptoms using reliable and valid self-report measures. Limited data exist to support the use of any pharmacologic agent; however, several nonpharmacologic interventions have been shown to be effective in reducing fatigue in adults. Never before have evidence-based recommendations for fatigue management been disseminated by 4 premier cancer organizations (the National Comprehensive Cancer, the Oncology Nursing Society, the Canadian Partnership Against Cancer/Canadian Association of Psychosocial Oncology, and the American Society of Clinical Oncology). Clinicians may ask: Are we ready for implementation into practice? The reply: A variety of approaches to screening, evaluation, and management are ready for implementation. To reduce fatigue severity and distress and its impact on functioning, intensified collaborations and close partnerships between clinicians and researchers are needed, with an emphasis on system-wide efforts to disseminate and implement these evidence-based recommendations.

Development and validation of a medical chart review checklist for symptom management performance of oncologists in the routine care of patients with advanced cancer

CONTEXT

Oncologists perform a range of pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions to manage the symptoms of outpatients with advanced cancer.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to develop and test a symptom management performance checklist (SyMPeC) to review medical charts.

METHODS

First, the content of the checklist was determined by consensus of an interprofessional team. The SyMPeC was tested using the data set of the SAKK 96/06 E-MOSAIC (Electronical Monitoring of Symptoms and Syndromes Associated with Cancer) trial, which included six consecutive visits from 247 patients. In a test data set (half of the data) of medical charts, two people extracted and quantified the definitions of the parameters (content validity). To assess the inter-rater reliability, three independent researchers used the SyMPeC on a random sample (10% of the test data set), and Fleiss's kappa was calculated. To test external validity, the interventions retrieved by the SyMPeC chart review were compared with nurse-led assessment of patient-perceived oncologists' palliative interventions.

RESULTS

Five categories of symptoms were included: pain, fatigue, anorexia/nausea, dyspnea, and depression/anxiety. Interventions were categorized as symptom specific or symptom unspecific. In the test data set of 123 patients, 402 unspecific and 299 symptom-specific pharmacological interventions were detected. Nonpharmacological interventions (n = 242) were mostly symptom unspecific. Fleiss's kappa for symptom and intervention detections was K = 0.7 and K = 0.86, respectively. In 1003 of 1167 visits (86%), there was a match between SyMPeC and nurse-led assessment. Seventy-nine percent (195 of 247) of patients had no or one mismatch.

CONCLUSION

Chart review by SyMPeC seems reliable to detect symptom management interventions by oncologists in outpatient clinics. Nonpharmacological interventions were less symptom specific. A template for documentation is needed for standardization.

Cognitive interviewing of the US National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE)

PURPOSE

The National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) is a library of question items that enables patient reporting of adverse events (AEs) in clinical trials. This study contributes content validity evidence of the PRO-CTCAE by incorporating cancer patient input of the relevance and comprehensiveness of the item library.

METHODS

Cognitive interviews were conducted among patients undergoing chemotherapy or radiation therapy at multiple sites to evaluate comprehension, memory retrieval, judgment, and response mapping related to AE terms (e.g., nausea), attribute terms (regarding frequency, severity, or interference), response options, and recall period. Three interview rounds were conducted with ≥20 patients completing each item per round. Items were modified and retested if ≥3 patients exhibited cognitive difficulties or if experienced by ≤25% patients.

RESULTS

One hundred and twenty-seven patients participated (35% ≤high school, 28% non-white, and 59% female). Most AE terms (63/80) generated no cognitive difficulties. The remaining 17 were modified without further difficulties by Round 3. Terms were comprehended regardless of education level. Attribute terms and response options required no modifications. Patient adherence to recall period (7 days) was improved when the reference period was incorporated.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides evidence confirming comprehension of the US English language versions of items in the PRO-CTCAE library for measuring symptomatic AEs from the patient perspective within the context of cancer treatment. Several minor changes were made to the items to improve item clarity, comprehension, and ease of response judgment. This study helps to establish the content validity of PRO-CTCAE items for patient reporting of AEs during cancer treatment.

Cancer distress screening data: Translating knowledge into clinical action for a quality response

Objectives:

The purpose of this paper is to summarize the use of the knowledge to action framework for adapting guidelines for practice and the evidence for effective implementation interventions to promote a quality response to cancer distress screening data.

Methods:

We summarize progress in screening implementation in Ontario, Canada and the application of a systematic approach for adapting knowledge to practice and use of evidence-based knowledge translation interventions to ensure the uptake of best practices to manage distress.

Results:

While significant progress has been made in the uptake of distress screening it is less clear if this has resulted in improvements in patient outcomes, i.e., reduced distress. The use of evidence-based knowledge translation strategies tailored to barriers at many levels of care delivery is critical to facilitate the uptake of distress screening data by the primary oncology team.

Significance of results:

There is a wealth of knowledge about the approaches that can be applied to translate knowledge into practice to improve psychosocial care and promote evidence-based distress management by the primary care oncology team. However, further implementation research is needed to advance knowledge about the most effective strategies in the context of cancer care.