1
|
Agbadje TT, Pilon C, Bérubé P, Forest JC, Rousseau F, Rahimi SA, Giguère Y, Légaré F. User Experience of a Computer-Based Decision Aid for Prenatal Trisomy Screening: Mixed Methods Explanatory Study. JMIR Pediatr Parent 2022; 5:e35381. [PMID: 35896164 PMCID: PMC9490528 DOI: 10.2196/35381] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2022] [Revised: 07/22/2022] [Accepted: 07/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mobile health tools can support shared decision-making. We developed a computer-based decision aid (DA) to help pregnant women and their partners make informed, value-congruent decisions regarding prenatal screening for trisomy. OBJECTIVE This study aims to assess the usability and usefulness of computer-based DA among pregnant women, clinicians, and policy makers. METHODS For this mixed methods sequential explanatory study, we planned to recruit a convenience sample of 45 pregnant women, 45 clinicians from 3 clinical sites, and 15 policy makers. Eligible women were aged >18 years and >16 weeks pregnant or had recently given birth. Eligible clinicians and policy makers were involved in prenatal care. We asked the participants to navigate a computer-based DA. We asked the women about the usefulness of the DA and their self-confidence in decision-making. We asked all participants about usability, quality, acceptability, satisfaction with the content of the DA, and collected sociodemographic data. We explored participants' reactions to the computer-based DA and solicited suggestions. Our interview guide was based on the Mobile App Rating Scale. We performed descriptive analyses of the quantitative data and thematic deductive and inductive analyses of the qualitative data for each participant category. RESULTS A total of 45 pregnant women, 14 clinicians, and 8 policy makers participated. Most pregnant women were aged between 25 and 34 years (34/45, 75%) and White (42/45, 94%). Most clinicians were aged between 35 and 44 years (5/14, 36%) and women (11/14, 79%), and all were White (14/14, 100%); the largest proportion of policy makers was aged between 45 and 54 years (4/8, 50%), women (5/8, 62%), and White (8/8, 100%). The mean usefulness score for preparing for decision-making for women was 80/100 (SD 13), and the mean self-efficacy score was 88/100 (SD 11). The mean usability score was 84/100 (SD 14) for pregnant women, 77/100 (SD 14) for clinicians, and 79/100 (SD 23) for policy makers. The mean global score for quality was 80/100 (SD 9) for pregnant women, 72/100 (SD 12) for clinicians, and 80/100 (SD 9) for policy makers. Regarding acceptability, participants found the amount of information just right (52/66, 79%), balanced (58/66, 88%), useful (38/66, 58%), and sufficient (50/66, 76%). The mean satisfaction score with the content was 84/100 (SD 13) for pregnant women, 73/100 (SD 16) for clinicians, and 73/100 (SD 20) for policy makers. Participants thought the DA could be more engaging (eg, more customizable) and suggested strategies for implementation, such as incorporating it into clinical guidelines. CONCLUSIONS Pregnant women, clinicians, and policy makers found the DA usable and useful. The next steps are to incorporate user suggestions for improving engagement and implementing the computer-based DA in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Titilayo Tatiana Agbadje
- VITAM - Centre de recherche en santé durable, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec, QC, Canada
| | - Chantale Pilon
- VITAM - Centre de recherche en santé durable, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec, QC, Canada
| | | | - Jean-Claude Forest
- Department of Molecular Biology, Medical Biochemistry, and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada
| | - François Rousseau
- Department of Molecular Biology, Medical Biochemistry, and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada
| | - Samira Abbasgholizadeh Rahimi
- Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Yves Giguère
- Department of Molecular Biology, Medical Biochemistry, and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada
| | - France Légaré
- VITAM - Centre de recherche en santé durable, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec, QC, Canada.,Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fujimoto S, Ogawa T, Komukai K, Nakayama T. Effect of education on physical and occupational therapists’ perceptions of clinical practice guidelines and shared decision making: a randomized controlled trial. J Phys Ther Sci 2022; 34:445-453. [PMID: 35698556 PMCID: PMC9170488 DOI: 10.1589/jpts.34.445] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2022] [Accepted: 03/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Shuhei Fujimoto
- Department of Graduate School of Public Health, Shizuoka Graduate University of Public Health: 4-27-2 Kita-ando, Aoi-ku, Shizuoka city, Shizuoka 420-0881, Japan
| | - Tatsuya Ogawa
- Kio University Graduate School of Health Science, Japan
| | - Kanako Komukai
- Department of Graduate School of Public Health, Shizuoka Graduate University of Public Health: 4-27-2 Kita-ando, Aoi-ku, Shizuoka city, Shizuoka 420-0881, Japan
| | - Takeo Nakayama
- Department of Health Informatics, Kyoto University Graduate School of Public Health, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Koumakis L, Schera F, Parker H, Bonotis P, Chatzimina M, Argyropaidas P, Zacharioudakis G, Schäfer M, Kakalou C, Karamanidou C, Didi J, Kazantzaki E, Scarfo L, Marias K, Natsiavas P. Fostering Palliative Care Through Digital Intervention: A Platform for Adult Patients With Hematologic Malignancies. Front Digit Health 2021; 3:730722. [PMID: 34977857 PMCID: PMC8718505 DOI: 10.3389/fdgth.2021.730722] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2021] [Accepted: 11/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are an emerging paradigm in clinical research and healthcare, aiming to capture the patient's self-assessed health status in order to gauge efficacy of treatment from their perspective. As these patient-generated health data provide insights into the effects of healthcare processes in real-life settings beyond the clinical setting, they can also be viewed as a resolution beyond what can be gleaned directly by the clinician. To this end, patients are identified as a key stakeholder of the healthcare decision making process, instead of passively following their doctor's guidance. As this joint decision-making process requires constant and high-quality communication between the patient and his/her healthcare providers, novel methodologies and tools have been proposed to promote richer and preemptive communication to facilitate earlier recognition of potential complications. To this end, as PROs can be used to quantify the patient impact (especially important for chronic conditions such as cancer), they can play a prominent role in providing patient-centric care. In this paper, we introduce the MyPal platform that aims to support adults suffering from hematologic malignancies, focusing on the technical design and highlighting the respective challenges. MyPal is a Horizon 2020 European project aiming to support palliative care for cancer patients via the electronic PROs (ePROs) paradigm, building upon modern eHealth technologies. To this end, MyPal project evaluate the proposed eHealth intervention via clinical studies and assess its potential impact on the provided palliative care. More specifically, MyPal platform provides specialized applications supporting the regular answering of well-defined and standardized questionnaires, spontaneous symptoms reporting, educational material provision, notifications etc. The presented platform has been validated by end-users and is currently in the phase of pilot testing in a clinical study to evaluate its feasibility and its potential impact on the quality of life of palliative care patients with hematologic malignancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lefteris Koumakis
- Institute of Computer Science, Foundation for Research and Technology–Hellas (FORTH), Heraklion, Greece
- *Correspondence: Lefteris Koumakis
| | - Fatima Schera
- Institute for Biomedical Engineering, Sulzbach, Germany
| | | | - Panos Bonotis
- Institute of Applied Biosciences, Centre for Research and Technology Hellas, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Maria Chatzimina
- Institute of Computer Science, Foundation for Research and Technology–Hellas (FORTH), Heraklion, Greece
| | - Panagiotis Argyropaidas
- Institute of Computer Science, Foundation for Research and Technology–Hellas (FORTH), Heraklion, Greece
| | - Giorgos Zacharioudakis
- Institute of Computer Science, Foundation for Research and Technology–Hellas (FORTH), Heraklion, Greece
| | | | - Christine Kakalou
- Institute of Applied Biosciences, Centre for Research and Technology Hellas, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Christina Karamanidou
- Institute of Applied Biosciences, Centre for Research and Technology Hellas, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Jana Didi
- Center for Molecular Medicine, Central European Institute of Technology, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia
| | - Eleni Kazantzaki
- Department of Hematology, University Hospital of Heraklion, Heraklion, Greece
| | - Lydia Scarfo
- Universita Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Kostas Marias
- Institute of Computer Science, Foundation for Research and Technology–Hellas (FORTH), Heraklion, Greece
| | - Pantelis Natsiavas
- Institute of Applied Biosciences, Centre for Research and Technology Hellas, Thessaloniki, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lawani MA, Turgeon Y, Côté L, Légaré F, Witteman HO, Morin M, Kroger E, Voyer P, Rodriguez C, Giguere A. User-centered and theory-based design of a professional training program on shared decision-making with older adults living with neurocognitive disorders: a mixed-methods study. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2021; 21:59. [PMID: 33596874 PMCID: PMC7888116 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-021-01396-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2020] [Accepted: 01/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We know little about the best approaches to design training for healthcare professionals. We thus studied how user-centered and theory-based design contribute to the development of a distance learning program for professionals, to increase their shared decision-making (SDM) with older adults living with neurocognitive disorders and their caregivers. METHODS In this mixed-methods study, healthcare professionals who worked in family medicine clinics and homecare services evaluated a training program in a user-centered approach with several iterative phases of quantitative and qualitative evaluation, each followed by modifications. The program comprised an e-learning activity and five evidence summaries. A subsample assessed the e-learning activity during semi-structured think-aloud sessions. A second subsample assessed the evidence summaries they received by email. All participants completed a theory-based questionnaire to assess their intention to adopt SDM. Descriptive statistical analyses and qualitative thematic analyses were integrated at each round to prioritize training improvements with regard to the determinants most likely to influence participants' intention. RESULTS Of 106 participants, 98 completed their evaluations of either the e-learning activity or evidence summary (93%). The professions most represented were physicians (60%) and nurses (15%). Professionals valued the e-learning component to gain knowledge on the theory and practice of SDM, and the evidence summaries to apply the knowledge gained through the e-learning activity to diverse clinical contexts. The iterative design process allowed addressing most weaknesses reported. Participants' intentions to adopt SDM and to use the summaries were high at baseline and remained positive as the rounds progressed. Attitude and social influence significantly influenced participants' intention to use the evidence summaries (P < 0.0001). Despite strong intention and the tailoring of tools to users, certain factors external to the training program can still influence the effective use of these tools and the adoption of SDM in practice. CONCLUSIONS A theory-based and user-centered design approach for continuing professional development interventions on SDM with older adults living with neurocognitive disorders and their caregivers appeared useful to identify the most important determinants of learners' intentions to use SDM in their practice, and validate our initial interpretations of learners' assessments during the subsequent evaluation round.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moulikatou Adouni Lawani
- Laval University, Pavillon Ferdinand-Vandry, Room 2881, 1050 avenue de la Médecine, Quebec, QC G1V 0A6 Canada
| | - Yves Turgeon
- CISSS de la Gaspésie – Service externe de gériatrie ambulatoire, 455 rue Mgr Ross Est, Chandler, QC G0C 1K0 Canada
| | - Luc Côté
- Laval University, Pavillon Ferdinand-Vandry, Room 1323, 1050 avenue de la Médecine, Quebec, QC G1V 0A6 Canada
| | - France Légaré
- VITAM Research Centre on Sustainable Health, Pavillon Landry-Poulin, Pavillon Landry-Poulin, Door A-1-2, 4th floor, Room 4578, 2525 Chemin de la Canardière, Québec, QC G1J 0A4 Canada
| | - Holly O. Witteman
- Laval University, Pavillon Ferdinand-Vandry, Room 2881, 1050 avenue de la Médecine, Quebec, QC G1V 0A6 Canada
| | - Michèle Morin
- Laval University, Pavillon Ferdinand-Vandry, room 4211, 1050 avenue de la Médecine, Quebec, QC G1V 0A6 Canada
| | - Edeltraut Kroger
- Quebec Excellence Centre in Aging, St-Sacrement Hospital, 1050 chemin Ste-Foy, Quebec, QC G1S 4L8 Canada
| | - Philippe Voyer
- Pavillon Ferdinand-Vandry, Room 3445, 1050 avenue de la Médecine, Quebec, QC G1V 0A6 Canada
| | - Charo Rodriguez
- Departmentof Family Medicine, McGill University, 5858 chemin de la Côte-des-Neiges, 3rd floor, Montreal, QC H3S 1Z1 Canada
| | - Anik Giguere
- VITAM Research Centre on Sustainable Health, Pavillon Landry-Poulin, Door A-1-2, 2nd floor, Room 2416, 2525 Chemin de la Canardière, Québec, QC G1J 0A4 Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bogza LM, Patry-Lebeau C, Farmanova E, Witteman HO, Elliott J, Stolee P, Hudon C, Giguere AMC. User-Centered Design and Evaluation of a Web-Based Decision Aid for Older Adults Living With Mild Cognitive Impairment and Their Health Care Providers: Mixed Methods Study. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22:e17406. [PMID: 32442151 PMCID: PMC7468645 DOI: 10.2196/17406] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2019] [Revised: 04/07/2020] [Accepted: 04/15/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is often considered a transitional state between normal and pathologic (eg, dementia) cognitive aging. Although its prognosis varies largely, the diagnosis carries the risk of causing uncertainty and overtreatment of older adults with MCI who may never progress to dementia. Decision aids help people become better informed and more involved in decision making by providing evidence-based information about options and possible outcomes and by assisting them in clarifying their personal values in relation to the decision to be made. Objective This study aimed to incorporate features that best support values clarification and adjust the level of detail of a web-based decision aid for individuals with MCI. Methods We conducted a rapid review to identify options to maintain or improve cognitive functions in individuals with MCI. The evidence was structured into a novel web-based decision aid designed in collaboration with digital specialists and graphic designers. Qualitative and user-centered evaluations were used to draw on users’ knowledge, clarify values, and inform potential adoption in routine clinical practice. We invited clinicians, older adults with MCI, and their caregivers to evaluate the decision aid in 6 consecutive rounds, with new participants in each round. Quantitative data were collected using the Values Clarity and Informed subscales of the Decisional Conflict Scale, the System Usability Scale, the Ottawa Acceptability questionnaire, and a 5-point satisfaction rating scale. We verified their comprehension using a teach-back method and recorded usability issues. We recorded the audio and computer screen during the session. An inductive thematic qualitative analysis approach was used to identify and describe the issues that arose. After each round, an expert panel met to prioritize and find solutions to mitigate the issues. An integrated analysis was conducted to confirm our choices. Results A total of 7 clinicians (social workers, nurses, family physicians, psychologists) and 12 older (≥60 years) community-dwelling individuals with MCI, half of them women, with education levels going from none to university diploma, were recruited and completed testing. The thematic analysis revealed 3 major issues. First, the user should be guided through the decision-making process by tailoring the presentation of options to users’ priorities using the values clarification exercise. Second, its content should be simple, but not simplistic, notably by using information layering, plain language, and pictograms. Third, the interface should be intuitive and user friendly, utilize pop-up windows and information tips, avoid drop-down menus, and limit the need to scroll down. The quantitative assessments corroborated the qualitative findings. Conclusions This project resulted in a promising web-based decision aid that can support decision making for MCI intervention, based on the personal values and preferences of the users. Further ongoing research will allow its implementation to be tested in clinical settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura-Mihaela Bogza
- Laval University Research Centre on Community-Based Primary Health Care, Quebec, QC, Canada.,Quebec Centre for Excellence on Aging, Québec, QC, Canada.,Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Laval University, Québec, QC, Canada
| | - Cassandra Patry-Lebeau
- Quebec Centre for Excellence on Aging, Québec, QC, Canada.,Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Laval University, Québec, QC, Canada
| | - Elina Farmanova
- Quebec Centre for Excellence on Aging, Québec, QC, Canada.,Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Laval University, Québec, QC, Canada.,Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Holly O Witteman
- Laval University Research Centre on Community-Based Primary Health Care, Quebec, QC, Canada.,Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Laval University, Québec, QC, Canada
| | - Jacobi Elliott
- School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
| | - Paul Stolee
- School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
| | - Carol Hudon
- School of Psychology, Laval University, Québec, QC, Canada
| | - Anik M C Giguere
- Laval University Research Centre on Community-Based Primary Health Care, Quebec, QC, Canada.,Quebec Centre for Excellence on Aging, Québec, QC, Canada.,Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Laval University, Québec, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lawani MA, Côté L, Coudert L, Morin M, Witteman HO, Caron D, Kroger E, Voyer P, Rodriguez C, Légaré F, Giguere AMC. Professional training on shared decision making with older adults living with neurocognitive disorders: a mixed-methods implementation study. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2020; 20:189. [PMID: 32787829 PMCID: PMC7424655 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-020-01197-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2020] [Accepted: 07/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Shared decision making with older adults living with neurocognitive disorders is challenging for primary healthcare professionals. We studied the implementation of a professional training program featuring an e-learning activity on shared decision making and five Decision Boxes on the care of people with neurocognitive disorders, and measured the program's effects. METHODS In this mixed-methods study, we recruited healthcare professionals in family medicine clinics and homecare settings in the Quebec City area (Canada). The professionals signed up for training as a continuing professional development activity and answered an online survey before and after training to assess their knowledge, and intention to adopt shared decision making. We recorded healthcare professionals' access to each training component, and conducted telephone interviews with a purposeful sample of extreme cases: half had completed training and the other half had not. We performed bivariate analyses with the survey data and a thematic qualitative analysis of the interviews, as per the theory of planned behaviour. RESULTS Of the 47 participating healthcare professionals, 31 (66%) completed at least one training component. Several factors restricted participation, including lack of time, training fragmentation into several components, poor adaptation of training to specific professions, and technical/logistical barriers. Ease of access, ease of use, the usefulness of training content and the availability of training credits fostered participation. Training allowed Healthcare professionals to improve their knowledge about risk communication (p = 0.02), and their awareness of the options (P = 0.011). Professionals' intention to adopt shared decision making was high before training (mean ± SD = 5.88 ± 0.99, scale from 1 to 7, with 7 high) and remained high thereafter (5.94 ± 0.9). CONCLUSIONS The results of this study will allow modifying the training program to improve participation rates and, ultimately, uptake of meaningful shared decision making with patients living with neurocognitive disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moulikatou Adouni Lawani
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Laval University, Pavillon Ferdinand-Vandry, room 2881, 1050 avenue de la Médecine, Quebec, QC G1V 0A6 Canada
| | - Luc Côté
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Laval University, Pavillon Ferdinand-Vandry, room 1323, 1050 avenue de la Médecine, Quebec, QC G1V 0A6 Canada
| | - Laetitia Coudert
- Quebec Excellence Centre on Aging, St-Sacrement Hospital, 1050 chemin Ste-Foy, Quebec, QC G1S 4L8 Canada
| | - Michèle Morin
- Laval University, Pavillon Ferdinand-Vandry, room 4211, 1050 avenue de la Médecine, Quebec, QC G1V 0A6 Canada
| | - Holly O. Witteman
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Laval University, Pavillon Ferdinand-Vandry, room 2881, 1050 avenue de la Médecine, Quebec, QC G1V 0A6 Canada
- VITAM Research Centre on Sustainable Health, Pavillon Landry-Poulin, Door A-1-2, 2nd floor, Room 2416, 2525 Chemin de la Canardière, Québec, QC G1J 0A4 Canada
| | - Danielle Caron
- VITAM Research Centre on Sustainable Health, Pavillon Landry-Poulin, Door A-1-2, 2525 Chemin de la Canardière, Québec, QC G1J 0A4 Canada
| | - Edeltraut Kroger
- Quebec Excellence Centre on Aging, St-Sacrement Hospital, Office L-2, 1050 chemin Ste-Foy, Quebec, QC G1S 4L8 Canada
| | - Philippe Voyer
- Pavillon Ferdinand-Vandry, room 3445, 1050 avenue de la Médecine, Quebec, QC G1V 0A6 Canada
| | - Charo Rodriguez
- Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, 5858 chemin de la Côte-des-Neiges, 3rd floor, Montreal, QC H3S 1Z1 Canada
| | - France Légaré
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Laval University, Pavillon Ferdinand-Vandry, room 2881, 1050 avenue de la Médecine, Quebec, QC G1V 0A6 Canada
- VITAM Research Centre on Sustainable Health, Pavillon Landry-Poulin, Door A-1-2, 4th floor, Room 4578, 2525 Chemin de la Canardière, Québec, QC G1J 0A4 Canada
| | - Anik M. C. Giguere
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Laval University, Pavillon Ferdinand-Vandry, room 2881, 1050 avenue de la Médecine, Quebec, QC G1V 0A6 Canada
- VITAM Research Centre on Sustainable Health, Pavillon Landry-Poulin, Door A-1-2, 2nd floor, Room 2416, 2525 Chemin de la Canardière, Québec, QC G1J 0A4 Canada
- Quebec Excellence Centre on Aging, St-Sacrement Hospital, Office L-2, 1050 chemin Ste-Foy, Quebec, QC G1S 4L8 Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Italian Health Care Workers' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Regarding Human Papillomavirus Infection and Prevention. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2020; 17:ijerph17155278. [PMID: 32707867 PMCID: PMC7432815 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17155278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2020] [Revised: 07/17/2020] [Accepted: 07/20/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Objective: To assess healthcare workers’ knowledge and attitudes about human papillomavirus (HPV) infection, related diseases, and prevention. Methods: A cross-sectional multicenter survey about HPV and its prevention, targeted to healthcare workers involved in HPV vaccine counseling, was performed from May 2017 to December 2018. Results: The overall median knowledge and attitude scores were 69.2% (25–75, p = 61.5–84.6) and 5 (25–75, p = 4–5), respectively. Both knowledge and attitudes statistically significantly differ between physicians and healthcare professions. The median propensity score before and after the educational intervention was stable and high, at 10 (25–75, p = 9–10). The predictors of statistically significantly high knowledge scores are to be a physician, general practitioner, or pediatrician, attending courses/congresses, and consulting technical product characteristics and scientific literature to obtain information about the HPV vaccine. Being a physician and consulting scientific literature to obtain information about the HPV vaccine were found also as predictors of statistically significantly different attitude scores among study participants. Conclusions: Although healthcare workers showed overall positive attitudes towards the relevance of HPV burden and prevention tools, demonstrated knowledge was largely suboptimal, particularly that shown by healthcare professions. Obtained results allow highlighting knowledge gaps, and thus improving counselling to HPV vaccine targets.
Collapse
|
8
|
Co-Creation with Older Adults to Improve User-Experience of a Smartphone Self-Test Application to Assess Balance Function. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2020; 17:ijerph17113768. [PMID: 32466484 PMCID: PMC7312460 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17113768] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2020] [Revised: 05/21/2020] [Accepted: 05/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
This co-creation study aimed to develop a smartphone self-test application for balance and leg strength in collaboration between older adults and the research team. The paper describes older participants’ preferences for, and their contribution to, the application design. Technology to assess movements is available in smartphones with built-in sensors, and one of the challenges is to develop a valuable self-test for older adults. The participants contributed to the design of the application’s instructions and user interface. Multiple data collection methods were used: user-test with Think aloud method, mock-ups, homework assignment as co-researcher, audio and video recordings. Qualitative content analysis with a deductive-inductive approach was used, guided by the Optimized Honeycomb model for user experience (UX) as a categorization matrix. The analysis resulted in 17 subcategories within the seven facets of the UX Honeycomb model (findable, accessible, usable, desirable, credible, useful, and valuable), and describes the older participants’ preferences and experiences. The main results were participants’ desire to know why, to get clear and appropriate information, and expectations of the self-test to be useful. It was feasible and valuable to develop the self-test application in co-creation with the intended user-group, in order to get direct feedback and suggestions for the development.
Collapse
|
9
|
Matsen CB, Ray D, Kaphingst KA, Zhang C, Presson AP, Finlayson SRG. Patient Satisfaction With Decision Making Does Not Correlate With Patient Centeredness of Surgeons. J Surg Res 2020; 246:411-418. [PMID: 31635834 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.09.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2019] [Revised: 08/09/2019] [Accepted: 09/13/2019] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND High-quality decision making is important in patient-centered care. Although patient involvement in decision making varies widely, most patients desire to share in decision making. The Press-Ganey Patient Satisfaction survey includes questions that measure patients' perceptions of their providers' efforts to involve them in decision making (PGDM). We hypothesized that higher PGDM scores would correlate with higher scores on a validated measure of patient centeredness. MATERIALS AND METHODS Surgical providers at a university hospital who routinely receive Press-Ganey scores received a survey that included the Patient-Practitioner Orientation Scale (PPOS), a validated tool that measures the provider's orientation toward patient centeredness on a continuous six-point scale: score ≥5 = high, 4.57-5 = moderate, and <4.57 = low and includes nine-item "caring" or "sharing" subscales. We compared PPOS scores to PGDM scores, averaged from April 2015 to January 2016. RESULTS Eighty-six of 112 (75%) of surgical providers responded to the survey. Fifty-two (46%) had PGDM scores available and 26% achieved a perfect score on the PGDM. The overall PPOS scores were low, with a mean of 4.2 (SD = 0.5). The PPOS was not correlated with the PGDM, correlation coefficient (rs) = -0.07 (CI: -0.34-0.21, P = 0.63). Similarly, the two subscales of the PPOS did not correlate with the PGDM with rs = -0.15 (CI: -0.41-0.13, P = 0.29) for "caring" and rs = -0.04 (CI: -0.31-0.23, P = 0.76) for "sharing". CONCLUSIONS Although surgical providers scored low in patient centeredness using the PPOS, over one-quarter (26%) of them rank in the top 1% on the PGDM. No correlation was found between providers' patient centeredness and their patients' perceptions of efforts to include them in decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cindy B Matsen
- Department of Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
| | - David Ray
- Department of Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Kimberly A Kaphingst
- Department of Communication, University of Utah College of Humanities, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Chong Zhang
- Division of Epidemiology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Angela P Presson
- Division of Epidemiology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kennedy K, Adelson P, Fleet J, Steen M, McKellar L, Eckert M, Peters MDJ. Shared decision aids in pregnancy care: A scoping review. Midwifery 2019; 81:102589. [PMID: 31790856 DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2019.102589] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2019] [Revised: 09/11/2019] [Accepted: 11/23/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Shared decision making in pregnancy, labour, and birth is vital to woman-centred care and despite strong evidence for the effectiveness of shared decision making in pregnancy care, practical uptake has been slow. DESIGN AND AIM This scoping review aimed to identify and describe effective and appropriate shared decision aids designed to be provided to women in the antenatal period to assist them in making informed decisions for both pregnancy and birth. Two questions guided the enquiry: (i) what shared decision aids for pregnancy and perinatal care are of appropriate quality and feasibility for application in Australia? (ii) which of these decision aids have been shown to be effective and appropriate for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, culturally diverse women, or those with low literacy? METHODS The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) was used to conduct the review. Five key databases and selected grey literature sources were examined. English language evidence from Australia, Europe, Canada, United Kingdom, New Zealand, and United States of America produced from 2009 was eligible for inclusion, checked against apriori inclusion criteria, and assessed for quality and usability using the International Patient Decision Aid Standards. RESULTS From a total of 5,209 search results, 35 sources of evidence reporting on 27 decision aids were included following title/abstract and full-text review. Most of the decision aids concerned decisions around birth (52%, n = 14) or antenatal screening 37% (n = 10). The quality of the decision aids was moderate to high, with most communicating risks, benefits, and choice pathways via a mix of Likert-style scales, quizzes, and pictures or graphs. Use of decision aids resulted in significant reductions in decisional conflict and increased knowledge. The format of decision aids appeared to have no effect on these outcomes, indicating that paper-based are as effective as video- or audio-based decision aids. Eleven decision aids were suitable for low literacy or low health literacy women, and six were either developed for culturally diverse groups or have been translated into other languages. No decision aids found were specific to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE The 27 decision aids are readily adoptable into westernised healthcare settings and can be used by midwives or multidisciplinary teams in conjunction with women. Decision aids are designed to support women, and families to arrive at informed choices and supplement the decision-making process rather than to replace consumer-healthcare professional interaction. If given before an appointment, high quality decision aids can increase a woman's familiarity with medical terminology, options for care, and an insight into personal values, thereby decreasing decisional conflict and increasing knowledge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kate Kennedy
- Rosemary Bryant AO Research Centre, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Division of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Australia. GPO Box 2471, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia.
| | - Pamela Adelson
- Rosemary Bryant AO Research Centre, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Division of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Australia. GPO Box 2471, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia; Mothers, Babies and Families: Health Research Group, Rosemary Bryant AO Research Centre, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Division of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Australia
| | - Julie Fleet
- Mothers, Babies and Families: Health Research Group, Rosemary Bryant AO Research Centre, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Division of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Australia
| | - Mary Steen
- Mothers, Babies and Families: Health Research Group, Rosemary Bryant AO Research Centre, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Division of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Australia
| | - Lois McKellar
- Mothers, Babies and Families: Health Research Group, Rosemary Bryant AO Research Centre, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Division of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Australia
| | - Marion Eckert
- Rosemary Bryant AO Research Centre, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Division of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Australia. GPO Box 2471, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
| | - Micah D J Peters
- Rosemary Bryant AO Research Centre, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Division of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Australia. GPO Box 2471, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Abbasgholizadeh Rahimi S, Archambault PM, Ravitsky V, Lemoine ME, Langlois S, Forest JC, Giguère AMC, Rousseau F, Dolan JG, Légaré F. An Analytical Mobile App for Shared Decision Making About Prenatal Screening: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study. JMIR Res Protoc 2019; 8:e13321. [PMID: 31596249 PMCID: PMC6913686 DOI: 10.2196/13321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2019] [Revised: 05/09/2019] [Accepted: 05/25/2019] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Decisions about prenatal screening to assess the risk of genetic conditions such as Down syndrome are complex and should be well informed. Moreover, the number of available tests is increasing. Shared decision making (SDM) about testing could be facilitated by decision aids powered by mobile technology. OBJECTIVE In this mixed methods study, we aim to (1) assess women's needs and preferences regarding using an app for considering prenatal screening, (2) develop a decision model using the analytical hierarchy process, and (3) develop an analytical app and assess its usability and usefulness. METHODS In phase 1, we will assess the needs of 90 pregnant women and their partners (if available). We will identify eligible participants in 3 clinical sites (a midwife-led birthing center, a family practice clinic, and an obstetrician-led hospital-based clinic) in Quebec City and Montreal, Canada. Using semistructured interviews, we will assess participants' attitudes toward mobile apps for decision making about health, their current use of apps for health purposes, and their expectations of an app for prenatal testing decisions. Self-administered questionnaires will collect sociodemographic information, intentions to use an app for prenatal testing, and perceived importance of decision criteria. Qualitative data will be transcribed verbatim and analyzed thematically. Quantitative data will be analyzed using descriptive statistics and the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method. In phase 2, we will develop a decision model using the AHP whereby users can assign relative importance to criteria when deciding between options. We will validate the model with potential users and a multidisciplinary team of patients, family physicians, primary care researchers, decision sciences experts, engineers, and experts in SDM, genetics, and bioethics. In phase 3, we will develop a prototype of the app using the results of the first 2 phases, pilot test its usefulness and usability among a sample of 15 pregnant women and their partners (if available), and improve it through 3 iterations. Data will be collected with a self-administered questionnaire. Results will be analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS Recruitment for phase 1 will begin in 2019. We expect results to be available in 2021. CONCLUSIONS This study will result in a validated analytical app that will provide pregnant women and their partners with up-to-date information about prenatal screening options and their risks and benefits. It will help them clarify their values and enable them to weigh the options to make informed choices consistent with their preferences and values before meeting face-to-face with their health care professional. The app will be easy to update with the latest information and will provide women with a user-friendly experience using their smartphones or tablets. This study and the resulting app will contribute to high-quality SDM between pregnant women and their health care team. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/13321.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samira Abbasgholizadeh Rahimi
- Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Patrick M Archambault
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.,Centre de recherche, Centre intégré en santé et services sociaux de Chaudière-Appalaches, Lévis, QC, Canada.,Centre de recherche sur les soins et les services de première ligne de l'Université Laval, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada
| | - Vardit Ravitsky
- Programmes de bioéthique, Département de médecine sociale et préventive, École de santé publique de l'Université de Montréal, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Marie-Eve Lemoine
- Programmes de bioéthique, Département de médecine sociale et préventive, École de santé publique de l'Université de Montréal, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Sylvie Langlois
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Jean-Claude Forest
- Centre de recherche, Centre hospitalier universitaire de Québec, Québec, QC, Canada.,Department of Molecular Biology, Medical Biochemistry and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada
| | - Anik M C Giguère
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.,Canadian Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Québec, QC, Canada
| | - François Rousseau
- Department of Molecular Biology, Medical Biochemistry and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada
| | - James G Dolan
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, United States
| | - France Légaré
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.,Centre de recherche sur les soins et les services de première ligne de l'Université Laval, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Martin Y, Braun LA, Janggen MA, Tal K, Biller-Andorno N, Ducros C, Selby K, Auer R, Rohrbasser A. Offering patients a choice for colorectal cancer screening: a quality improvement pilot study in a quality circle of primary care physicians. BMJ Open Qual 2019; 8:e000670. [PMID: 31673642 PMCID: PMC6797289 DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000670] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2019] [Revised: 09/15/2019] [Accepted: 09/21/2019] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Guidelines recommend primary care physicians (PCPs) offer patients a choice between colonoscopy and faecal immunochemical test (FIT) for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Patients choose almost evenly between both tests but in Switzerland, most are tested with colonoscopy while screening rates are low. A quality circle (QC) of PCPs is an ideal site to train physicians in shared decision-making (SDM) that will help more patients decide if they want to be tested and choose the test they prefer. Objective Systematically assess CRC screening status of eligible 50–75 y.o. patients and through SDM increase the proportion of patients who have the opportunity to choose CRC screening and the test (FIT or colonoscopy). Methods Working through four Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles in their QC, PCPs adapted tools for SDM and surmounted organisational barriers by involving practice assistants. Each PCP included 20, then 40 consecutive 50–75 y.o. patients, repeatedly reported CRC status as well as the proportion of eligible patients with whom CRC screening could be discussed and patients’ decisions. Results 9 PCPs initially included 176, then 320 patients. CRC screening status was routinely noted in the electronic medical record and CRC screening was implemented in daily routine, increasing eligible patients’ chance to be offered screening. Over a year, screening rates trended upwards, from 37% to 40% (p=0.46) and FIT use increased (2%–7%, p=0.008). Initially, 7/9 PCPs had no patient ever tested with FIT; after the intervention, only 2/8 recorded no FIT tests. Conclusions Through data-driven PDSA cycles and significant organisational changes, PCPs of a QC systematically collected data on CRC screening status and implemented SDM tools in their daily routine. This increased patients’ chance to discuss CRC screening. The more balanced use of FIT and colonoscopy suggests that patients’ values and preferences were better respected.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yonas Martin
- Institute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.,Department of General Internal Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Leo Alexander Braun
- Institute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Marc-Andrea Janggen
- Institute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Kali Tal
- Institute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Nikola Biller-Andorno
- Institute for Biomedical Ethics and History of Medicine (IBME), University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Cyril Ducros
- Foundation for Cancer Screening of the Canton of Vaud (FVDC), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Kevin Selby
- Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Reto Auer
- Institute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.,Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Bilodeau G, Witteman H, Légaré F, Lafontaine-Bruneau J, Voyer P, Kröger E, Tremblay MC, Giguere AMC. Reducing complexity of patient decision aids for community-based older adults with dementia and their caregivers: multiple case study of Decision Boxes. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e027727. [PMID: 31072861 PMCID: PMC6528048 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027727] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2018] [Revised: 02/19/2019] [Accepted: 03/14/2019] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To identify patient decision aids' features to limit their complexity for older adults with dementia and their family caregivers. DESIGN Mixed method, multiple case study within a user-centred design (UCD) approach. SETTING Community-based healthcare in the province of Quebec in Canada. PARTICIPANTS 23 older persons (aged 65+ years) with dementia and their 27 family caregivers. RESULTS During three UCD evaluation-modification rounds, participants identified strengths and weaknesses of the patient decision aids' content and visual design that influenced their complexity. Weaknesses of content included a lack of understanding of the decision aids' purpose and target audience, missing information, irrelevant content and issues with terminology and sentence structure. Weaknesses of visual design included critics about the decision aids' general layout (density, length, navigation) and their lack of pictures. In response, the design team implemented a series of practical features and design strategies, comprising: a clear expression of the patient decision aids' purpose through simple text, picture and personal stories; systematic and frequent use of pictograms illustrating key points and helping structure patient decision aids' general layout; a glossary; removal of scientific references from the main document; personal stories to clarify more difficult concepts; a contact section to facilitate implementation of the selected option; GRADE ratings to convey the quality of the evidence; a values clarification exercise formatted as a checklist and presented at the beginning of the document to streamline navigation; involvement of a panel of patient/caregiver partners to guide expression of patient priorities; editing of the text to a sixth grade reading level; UCD process to optimise comprehensiveness and relevance of content and training of patients/caregivers in shared decision-making. CONCLUSIONS The revised template for patient decision aids is designed to meet the needs of adults living with dementia and their caregivers better, which may translate into fewer evaluation-modification rounds.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriel Bilodeau
- Laval University Research Centre on Primary Care and Services, Centre integre universitaire de sante et de services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Holly Witteman
- Laval University, Family and Emergency Medicine, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - France Légaré
- Knowledge Transfer and Health Technology Assessment Research Group, Research Center of Centre hospitalier universitaire de Québec (CRCHUQ), Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
- Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Universite Laval Faculte de medecine, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | | | - Philippe Voyer
- Faculte des Sciences Infirmieres de l'Universite Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Edeltraut Kröger
- Laval University Research Center on Primary Care and Services, Centre integre universitaire de sante et de services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Marie-Claude Tremblay
- Laval University Research Centre on Primary Care and Services, Centre integre universitaire de sante et de services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
- Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Universite Laval Faculte de medecine, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Anik M C Giguere
- Laval University Research Centre on Primary Care and Services, Centre integre universitaire de sante et de services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
- Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Giguere AMC, Lawani MA, Fortier-Brochu É, Carmichael PH, Légaré F, Kröger E, Witteman HO, Voyer P, Caron D, Rodríguez C. Tailoring and evaluating an intervention to improve shared decision-making among seniors with dementia, their caregivers, and healthcare providers: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2018; 19:332. [PMID: 29941020 PMCID: PMC6019313 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-018-2697-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2016] [Accepted: 05/17/2018] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The increasing prevalence of Alzheimer’s disease and other forms of dementia raises new challenges to ensure that healthcare decisions are informed by research evidence and reflect what is important for seniors and their caregivers. Therefore, we aim to evaluate a tailored intervention to help healthcare providers empower seniors and their caregivers in making health-related decisions. Methods In two phases, we will: (1) design and tailor the intervention; and (2) implement and evaluate it. We will use theory and user-centered design to tailor an intervention comprising a distance professional training program on shared decision-making and five shared decision-making tools dealing with difficult decisions often faced by seniors with dementia and their caregivers. Each tool will be designed in two versions, one for clinicians and one for patients. We will recruit 49 clinicians and 27 senior/caregiver to participate in three cycles of design-evaluation-feedback of each intervention components. Besides think-aloud and interview approaches, users will also complete questionnaires based on the Theory of Planned Behavior to identify the factors most likely to influence their adoption of shared decision-making after exposure to the intervention. We will then modify the intervention by adding/enhancing behavior-change techniques targeting these factors. We will evaluate the effectiveness of this tailored intervention before/after implementation, in a two-armed, clustered randomized trial. We will enroll a convenience sample of six primary care clinics (unit of randomization) in the province of Quebec and recruit the clinicians who practice there (mostly family physicians, nurses, and social workers). These clinics will then be randomized to immediate exposure to the intervention or delayed exposure. Overall, we will recruit 180 seniors with dementia, their caregivers, and their healthcare providers. We will evaluate the impact of the intervention on patient involvement in the decision-making process, decisional comfort, patient and caregiver personal empowerment in relation to their own healthcare, patient quality of life, caregiver burden, and decisional regret. Discussion The intervention will empower patients and their caregivers in their healthcare, by fostering their participation as partners during the decision-making process and by ensuring they make informed decisions congruent with their values and priorities. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.org, NCT02956694. Registered on 31 October 2016. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-018-2697-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anik M C Giguere
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Laval University, Pavillon Ferdinand-Vandry, room 2881-C, 1050 avenue de la Médecine, Quebec, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada. .,Quebec Centre for Excellence on Aging, St-Sacrement Hospital, Room L2-21, 1050, chemin Sainte-Foy, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada. .,Laval University Research Centre on Primary Care and Services, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada. .,Research Axis of Population Health and Practice-Changing Research Group, CHU de Quebec Research Centre, Quebec city, QC, Canada.
| | - Moulikatou Adouni Lawani
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Laval University, Pavillon Ferdinand-Vandry, room 2881-C, 1050 avenue de la Médecine, Quebec, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada.,Quebec Centre for Excellence on Aging, St-Sacrement Hospital, Room L2-21, 1050, chemin Sainte-Foy, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.,Laval University Research Centre on Primary Care and Services, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Émilie Fortier-Brochu
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Laval University, Pavillon Ferdinand-Vandry, room 2881-C, 1050 avenue de la Médecine, Quebec, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada.,Quebec Centre for Excellence on Aging, St-Sacrement Hospital, Room L2-21, 1050, chemin Sainte-Foy, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.,Laval University Research Centre on Primary Care and Services, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Pierre-Hugues Carmichael
- Quebec Centre for Excellence on Aging, St-Sacrement Hospital, Room L2-21, 1050, chemin Sainte-Foy, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - France Légaré
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Laval University, Pavillon Ferdinand-Vandry, room 2881-C, 1050 avenue de la Médecine, Quebec, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada.,Faculty of Nursing Sciences, Laval University, Pavillon Ferdinand-Vandry, room 2881-C, 1050, avenue de la Médecine, Quebec, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada
| | - Edeltraut Kröger
- Quebec Centre for Excellence on Aging, St-Sacrement Hospital, Room L2-21, 1050, chemin Sainte-Foy, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.,Research Axis of Population Health and Practice-Changing Research Group, CHU de Quebec Research Centre, Quebec city, QC, Canada.,Faculty of Pharmacy, Laval University, St-Sacrement Hospital, Room L2-30, 1050, Chemin Sainte-Foy, Québec, QC, G1S 4L8, Canada
| | - Holly O Witteman
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Laval University, Pavillon Ferdinand-Vandry, room 2881-C, 1050 avenue de la Médecine, Quebec, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada.,Quebec Centre for Excellence on Aging, St-Sacrement Hospital, Room L2-21, 1050, chemin Sainte-Foy, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.,Research Axis of Population Health and Practice-Changing Research Group, CHU de Quebec Research Centre, Quebec city, QC, Canada
| | - Philippe Voyer
- Quebec Centre for Excellence on Aging, St-Sacrement Hospital, Room L2-21, 1050, chemin Sainte-Foy, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.,Faculty of Nursing Sciences, Laval University, Pavillon Ferdinand-Vandry, room 2881-C, 1050, avenue de la Médecine, Quebec, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada
| | - Danielle Caron
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Laval University, Pavillon Ferdinand-Vandry, room 2881-C, 1050 avenue de la Médecine, Quebec, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada
| | - Charo Rodríguez
- Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, 5858 chemin de la Cote-des-Neiges, 3rd floor, Suite 300, Room 328, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Five shared decision-making tools in 5 months: use of rapid reviews to develop decision boxes for seniors living with dementia and their caregivers. Syst Rev 2017; 6:56. [PMID: 28298241 PMCID: PMC5353791 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-017-0446-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2016] [Accepted: 02/28/2017] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Decision support tools build upon comprehensive and timely syntheses of literature. Rapid reviews may allow supporting their development by omitting certain components of traditional systematic reviews. We thus aimed to describe a rapid review approach underlying the development of decision support tools, i.e., five decision boxes (DB) for shared decision-making between seniors living with dementia, their caregivers, and healthcare providers. METHOD We included studies based on PICO questions (Participant, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) describing each of the five specific decision. We gave priority to higher quality evidence (e.g., systematic reviews). For each DB, we first identified secondary sources of literature, namely, clinical summaries, clinical practice guidelines, and systematic reviews. After an initial extraction, we searched for primary studies in academic databases and grey literature to fill gaps in evidence. We extracted study designs, sample sizes, populations, and probabilities of benefits/harms of the health options. A single reviewer conducted the literature search and study selection. The data extracted by one reviewer was verified by a second experienced reviewer. Two reviewers assessed the quality of the evidence. We converted all probabilities into absolute risks for ease of understanding. Two to five experts validated the content of each DB. We conducted descriptive statistical analyses on the review processes and resources required. RESULTS The approach allowed screening of a limited number of references (range: 104 to 406/review). For each review, we included 15 to 26 studies, 2 to 10 health options, 11 to 62 health outcomes and we conducted 9 to 47 quality assessments. A team of ten reviewers with varying levels of expertise was supported at specific steps by an information specialist, a biostatistician, and a graphic designer. The time required to complete a rapid review varied from 7 to 31 weeks per review (mean ± SD, 19 ± 10 weeks). Data extraction required the most time (8 ± 6.8 weeks). The average estimated cost of a rapid review was C$11,646 (SD = C$10,914). CONCLUSIONS This approach enabled the development of clinical tools more rapidly than with a traditional systematic review. Future studies should evaluate the applicability of this approach to other teams/tools.
Collapse
|
16
|
Armstrong MJ, Gronseth GS, Dubinsky R, Potrebic S, Penfold Murray R, Getchius TSD, Rheaume C, Gagliardi AR. Naturalistic study of guideline implementation tool use via evaluation of website access and physician survey. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2017; 17:9. [PMID: 28086771 PMCID: PMC5237306 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-016-0404-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2016] [Accepted: 12/21/2016] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Clinical guidelines support decision-making at the point-of-care but the onus is often on individual users such as physicians to implement them. Research shows that the inclusion of implementation tools in or with guidelines (GItools) is associated with guideline use. However, there is little research on which GItools best support implementation by individual physicians. The purpose of this study was to investigate naturalistic access and use of GItools produced by the American Academy of Neurology (AAN) to inform future tool development. Methods Website accesses over six months were summarized for eight AAN guidelines and associated GItools published between July 2012 and August 2013. Academy members were surveyed about use of tools accompanying the sport concussion guideline. Data were analyzed using summary statistics and the Chi-square test. Results The clinician summary was accessed more frequently (29.0%, p < 0.001) compared with the slide presentation (26.8%), patient summary (23.2%) or case study (20.9%), although this varied by guideline topic. For the sport concussion guideline, which was accompanied by a greater variety of GItools, the mobile phone quick reference check application was most frequently accessed, followed by the clinician summary, patient summary, and slide presentation. For the sports concussion guideline survey, most respondents (response rate 21.8%, 168/797) were aware of the guideline (88.1%) and had read the guideline (78.6%). For GItool use, respondents indicated reading the reference card (51.2%), clinician summary (45.2%), patient summary (28.0%), mobile phone application (26.2%), and coach/athletic trainer summary (20.2%). Patterns of sports concussion GItool use were similar between respondents who said they had and had not yet implemented the guideline. Conclusions Developers faced with resource limitations may wish to prioritize the development of printable or mobile application clinician summaries, which were accessed significantly more than other types of GItools. Further research is needed to understand how to optimize the design of such GItools.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa J Armstrong
- Department of Neurology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA. .,University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| | - Gary S Gronseth
- Department of Neurology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Richard Dubinsky
- Department of Neurology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Sonja Potrebic
- Department of Neurology, Kaiser Permanente - Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | - Anna R Gagliardi
- Toronto General Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Delanoë A, Lépine J, Turcotte S, Leiva Portocarrero ME, Robitaille H, Giguère AM, Wilson BJ, Witteman HO, Lévesque I, Guillaumie L, Légaré F. Role of Psychosocial Factors and Health Literacy in Pregnant Women's Intention to Use a Decision Aid for Down Syndrome Screening: A Theory-Based Web Survey. J Med Internet Res 2016; 18:e283. [PMID: 27793792 PMCID: PMC5106559 DOI: 10.2196/jmir.6362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2016] [Revised: 09/27/2016] [Accepted: 09/28/2016] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Deciding about undergoing prenatal screening is difficult, as it entails risks, potential loss and regrets, and challenges to personal values. Shared decision making and decision aids (DAs) can help pregnant women give informed and values-based consent or refusal to prenatal screening, but little is known about factors influencing the use of DAs. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to identify the influence of psychosocial factors on pregnant women's intention to use a DA for prenatal screening for Down syndrome (DS). We also added health literacy variables to explore their influence on pregnant women's intention. METHODS We conducted a survey of pregnant women in the province of Quebec (Canada) using a Web panel. Eligibility criteria included age >18 years, >16 weeks pregnant, low-risk pregnancy, and having decided about prenatal screening for the current pregnancy. We collected data based on an extended version of the Theory of Planned Behavior assessing 7 psychosocial constructs (intention, attitude, anticipated regret, subjective norm, descriptive norm, moral norm, and perceived control), 3 related sets of beliefs (behavioral, normative, and control beliefs), 4 health literacy variables, and sociodemographics. Eligible women watched a video depicting the behavior of interest before completing a Web-based questionnaire. We performed descriptive, bivariate, and ordinal logistic regression analyses. RESULTS Of the 383 eligible pregnant women who agreed to participate, 350 pregnant women completed the Web-based questionnaire and 346 were retained for analysis (completion rate 350/383, 91.4%; mean age 30.1, SD 4.3, years). In order of importance, factors influencing intention to use a DA for prenatal screening for DS were attitude (odds ratio, OR, 9.16, 95% CI 4.02-20.85), moral norm (OR 7.97, 95% CI 4.49-14.14), descriptive norm (OR 2.83, 95% CI 1.63-4.92), and anticipated regret (OR 2.43, 95% CI 1.71-3.46). Specific attitudinal beliefs significantly related to intention were that using a DA would reassure them (OR 2.55, 95% CI 1.73-4.01), facilitate their reflections with their spouse (OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.05-2.29), and let them know about the advantages of doing or not doing the test (OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.05-2.24). Health literacy did not add to the predictive power of our model (P values range .43-.92). CONCLUSIONS Implementation interventions targeting the use of a DA for prenatal screening for DS by pregnant women should address a number of modifiable factors, especially by introducing the advantages of using the DA (attitude), informing pregnant women that they might regret not using it (anticipated regret), and presenting the use of DAs as a common practice (descriptive norm). However, interventions on moral norms related to the use of DA should be treated with caution. Further studies that include populations with low health literacy are needed before decisive claims can be made.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Agathe Delanoë
- Populations Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Group, CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada
| | - Johanie Lépine
- Populations Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Group, CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada
| | - Stéphane Turcotte
- Populations Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Group, CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada
| | | | - Hubert Robitaille
- Populations Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Group, CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada
| | - Anik Mc Giguère
- Populations Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Group, CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada.,Quebec Centre of Excellence on Aging, CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada.,Office of Education and Continuing Professional Development, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada
| | - Brenda J Wilson
- School of Epidemiology, Public Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Holly O Witteman
- Populations Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Group, CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada.,Office of Education and Continuing Professional Development, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada.,Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada
| | - Isabelle Lévesque
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada
| | - Laurence Guillaumie
- Populations Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Group, CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada
| | - France Légaré
- Populations Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Group, CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada.,Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada.,Tier 1 Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Lépine J, Leiva Portocarrero ME, Delanoë A, Robitaille H, Lévesque I, Rousseau F, Wilson BJ, Giguère AMC, Légaré F. What factors influence health professionals to use decision aids for Down syndrome prenatal screening? BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2016; 16:262. [PMID: 27596573 PMCID: PMC5011951 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-016-1053-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2016] [Accepted: 08/25/2016] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Health professionals are expected to engage pregnant women in shared decision making to help them make informed values-based decisions about prenatal screening. Patient decision aids (PtDAs) foster shared decision-making, but are rarely used in this context. Our objective was to identify factors that could influence health professionals to use a PtDA for decisions about prenatal screening for Down syndrome during a clinical pregnancy follow-up. Methods We planned to recruit a purposive sample of 45 health professionals (obstetrician-gynecologists, family physicians and midwives) involved in the care of pregnant women in three clinical sites (15 per site). Participating health professionals first watched a video showing two simulated consecutive prenatal follow-up consultations during which a pregnant woman, her partner and a health professional used a PtDA about Down syndrome prenatal screening. Participants were then interviewed about factors that would influence their use of the PtDA. Questions were based on the Theoretical Domains Framework. We performed content analyses of transcribed verbatim interviews. Results Out of 42 eligible health professionals approached, 36 agreed to be interviewed (86 % response rate). Of these, 27 were female (75 %), nine were obstetrician-gynecologists (25 %), 15 were family physicians (42 %), and 12 were midwives (33 %), with a mean age of 42.1 ± 11.6 years old. We identified 35 distinct factors reported by 20 % or more participants that were mapped onto 10 of the 12 of the Theoretical Domains Framework domains. The six most frequently mentioned factors influencing use of the PtDA were: 1) a positive appraisal (n = 29, 81 %, beliefs about consequences domain); 2) its availability in the office (n = 27, 75 %, environmental context and resources domain); 3) colleagues’ approval (n = 27, 75 %, social influences domain); 4) time constraints (n = 26, 72 %, environmental context and resources domain); 5) finding it a relevant source of information (n = 24, 67 %, motivation and goals domain); and 6) not knowing any PtDAs (n = 23, 64 %, knowledge domain). Conclusions Appraisal, PtDA availability, peer approval, time concerns, evidence and PtDA awareness all affect whether health professionals are likely to use a PtDA to help pregnant women make informed decision about Down syndrome screening. Implementation strategies will need to address these factors. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12884-016-1053-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johanie Lépine
- Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation and Research Axis of Population Health and Practice-Changing Research, CHU de Québec Research Centre, Quebec, Canada
| | - Maria Esther Leiva Portocarrero
- Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation and Research Axis of Population Health and Practice-Changing Research, CHU de Québec Research Centre, Quebec, Canada
| | - Agathe Delanoë
- Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation and Research Axis of Population Health and Practice-Changing Research, CHU de Québec Research Centre, Quebec, Canada
| | - Hubert Robitaille
- Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation and Research Axis of Population Health and Practice-Changing Research, CHU de Québec Research Centre, Quebec, Canada
| | - Isabelle Lévesque
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec, Canada
| | - François Rousseau
- Department of Molecular Biology, Medical Biochemistry and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, and MSSS/FRQS/CHUQ Research Chair in Health Technology Assessment and Evidence Based Laboratory Medicine, Quebec, Canada
| | - Brenda J Wilson
- School of Epidemiology, Public Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anik M C Giguère
- Quebec Centre of Excellence on Aging, CHU de Québec Research Centre, Quebec, Canada.,Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec, Canada
| | - France Légaré
- Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation and Research Axis of Population Health and Practice-Changing Research, CHU de Québec Research Centre, Quebec, Canada. .,Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec, Canada. .,CHU de Québec Research Centre (CRCHUQ), Hôpital Saint-François d'Assise, Université Laval, 10 rue de l'Espinay, Local D6-737, Quebec, QC, G1L 3L5, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Karamanidou C, Dimopoulos K. Greek health professionals' perceptions of the HPV vaccine, state policy recommendations and their own role with regards to communication of relevant health information. BMC Public Health 2016; 16:467. [PMID: 27260348 PMCID: PMC4891886 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-016-2831-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2014] [Accepted: 02/04/2016] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Every year in Europe 60,000 women develop cervical cancer and 30,000 die from the disease. HPV vaccines are currently believed to constitute an important element of cervical cancer control strategy. Currently in Greece, the HPV vaccine is given on demand after prescription by a healthcare professional. Health care professionals’ role is key as they are in a position to discuss HPV vaccination with parents, adolescents and young women. This study is aiming to explore health care professionals’ perceptions of the HPV vaccine, state policy recommendations and their own role with regards to communication of relevant health information. Methods This was an in-depth, qualitative study, employing a stratified, purposeful sampling. Fifteen face-to-face, semi-structured interviews were conducted with health care professionals from a variety of disciplines: pediatrics, obstetrics and gynecology, infectious diseases, pharmacy, dermatology, general practice. Thematic qualitative analysis was used to analyze participants’ accounts. Results Five major themes were identified: health care professionals’ perceptions towards the HPV vaccine (recognition of importance, concerns about safety, effectiveness and impact of long-term use), animosity between medical specialties (territorial disputes among professional bodies, role advocacy, role limitations), health care professionals’ perceptions of the public’s attitudes (effects of cultural beliefs, health professionals’ attitudes, media and family), the role of the state (health policy issues, lack of guidance, unmet expectations) and their own role (provision of health information, sex education). Conclusions Health professionals’ concerns, lack of role definition and uniform information provision have led to territorial disputes among professional bodies and distrust among different medical specialties. Positive and negative judgements deriving from a multitude of sources have resulted in the confusion of the general public, as manifested by low vaccination rates. Due to the lack of clear regulation of vaccination prescription, administration and mode of delivery, factors such as lack of knowledge, cultural beliefs and personal attitudes have shaped the vaccination landscape. These factors have neither been explored nor addressed prior to the initiation of this public health effort and as such there is an evident less than efficient use of resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Karamanidou
- Department of Social and Educational Policy, University of Peloponnese, Damaskinou & Kolokotroni Str, 20100, Corinth, Greece.
| | - Kostas Dimopoulos
- Department of Social and Educational Policy, University of Peloponnese, Damaskinou & Kolokotroni Str, 20100, Corinth, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Selby K, Cornuz J, Gachoud D, Bulliard JL, Nichita C, Dorta G, Ducros C, Auer R. Training primary care physicians to offer their patients faecal occult blood testing and colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening on an equal basis: a pilot intervention with before-after and parallel group surveys. BMJ Open 2016; 6:e011086. [PMID: 27178977 PMCID: PMC4874168 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2016] [Revised: 03/23/2016] [Accepted: 04/01/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Primary care physicians (PCPs) should prescribe faecal immunochemical testing (FIT) or colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening based on their patient's values and preferences. However, there are wide variations between PCPs in the screening method prescribed. The objective was to assess the impact of an educational intervention on PCPs' intent to offer FIT or colonoscopy on an equal basis. DESIGN Survey before and after training seminars, with a parallel comparison through a mailed survey to PCPs not attending the training seminars. SETTING All PCPs in the canton of Vaud, Switzerland. PARTICIPANTS Of 592 eligible PCPs, 133 (22%) attended a seminar and 106 (80%) filled both surveys. 109 (24%) PCPs who did not attend the seminars returned the mailed survey. INTERVENTION A 2 h-long interactive seminar targeting PCP knowledge, skills and attitudes regarding offering a choice of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening options. OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was PCP intention of having their patients screened with FIT and colonoscopy in equal proportions (between 40% and 60% each). Secondary outcomes were the perceived role of PCPs in screening decisions (from paternalistic to informed decision-making) and correct answer to a clinical vignette. RESULTS Before the seminars, 8% of PCPs reported that they had equal proportions of their patients screened for CRC by FIT and colonoscopy; after the seminar, 33% foresaw having their patients screened in equal proportions (p<0.001). Among those not attending, there was no change (13% vs 14%, p=0.8). Of those attending, there was no change in their perceived role in screening decisions, while the proportion responding correctly to a clinical vignette increased (88-99%, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS An interactive training seminar increased the proportion of physicians with the intention to prescribe FIT and colonoscopy in equal proportions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin Selby
- Department of Ambulatory Care and Community Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Jacques Cornuz
- Department of Ambulatory Care and Community Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - David Gachoud
- Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Education Unit, Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Jean-Luc Bulliard
- Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University Hospital of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Cristina Nichita
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Gian Dorta
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Cyril Ducros
- Canton of Vaud Foundation for Cancer Screening, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Reto Auer
- Department of Ambulatory Care and Community Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Institute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Grudniewicz A, Bhattacharyya O, McKibbon KA, Straus SE. User-Centered Design and Printed Educational Materials: A Focus Group Study of Primary Care Physician Preferences. THE JOURNAL OF CONTINUING EDUCATION IN THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS 2016; 36:249-255. [PMID: 28350305 DOI: 10.1097/ceh.0000000000000112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION It is challenging for primary care physicians (PCPs) to review and apply the growing amount of clinical evidence available. Printed educational materials (PEMs), which synthesize evidence, are often ineffective at improving knowledge, possibly due to poor design and limited uptake. In this study, we collected PCP preferences for the design and content of physician-oriented PEMs and determined key attributes that may increase their usability and uptake. METHODS We held 90-minute focus groups with PCPs in Toronto, ON, Canada. Focus groups included discussion about whether and how participants use PEMs, feedback on three examples of PEMs, and a discussion on general format and design preferences in PEMs. We analyzed focus group transcripts using a thematic analysis and summarized results in a list of user preferences. RESULTS Four focus groups were held with 13 PCPs. We found that participants only read PEMs relevant to their patients and prefer short, concise documents, with links to sources that can provide more detailed information. Simplicity of materials was important, with many participants preferring PEMs without lengthy backgrounds or scientific explanations. Most participants wanted to see key messages highlighted to easily assess the relevance of the materials to their practice. Some participants shared physician-oriented PEMs with patients. DISCUSSION This study shows that PCPs may prefer shorter, simpler, and more concise documents that have less scientific detail but provide references to further information sources. It is important to understand end user preferences for the design and content of these materials to enhance their uptake.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Agnes Grudniewicz
- Dr. Grudniewicz: Assistant Professor, Telfer School of Management, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. Dr. Bhattacharyya: Senior Scientist, Frigon-Blau Chair in Family Medicine Research, Family Physician, Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, Associate Professor, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, and Assistant Professor, Institute of Health Policy, Management & Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Dr. McKibbon: Past Director MSc in eHealth, Health Information Research Unit, Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University Faculty of Health Sciences, Communications Research Laboratory, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. Dr. Straus: Director and Scientist, Knowledge Translation Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, Deputy Physician in Chief, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, and Professor, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Coxeter P, Del Mar CB, McGregor L, Beller EM, Hoffmann TC. Interventions to facilitate shared decision making to address antibiotic use for acute respiratory infections in primary care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; 2015:CD010907. [PMID: 26560888 PMCID: PMC6464273 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd010907.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 99] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Shared decision making is an important component of patient-centred care. It is a set of communication and evidence-based practice skills that elicits patients' expectations, clarifies any misperceptions and discusses the best available evidence for benefits and harms of treatment. Acute respiratory infections (ARIs) are one of the most common reasons for consulting in primary care and obtaining prescriptions for antibiotics. However, antibiotics offer few benefits for ARIs, and their excessive use contributes to antibiotic resistance - an evolving public health crisis. Greater explicit consideration of the benefit-harm trade-off within shared decision making may reduce antibiotic prescribing for ARIs in primary care. OBJECTIVES To assess whether interventions that aim to facilitate shared decision making increase or reduce antibiotic prescribing for ARIs in primary care. SEARCH METHODS We searched CENTRAL (2014, Issue 11), MEDLINE (1946 to November week 3, 2014), EMBASE (2010 to December 2014) and Web of Science (1985 to December 2014). We searched for other published, unpublished or ongoing trials by searching bibliographies of published articles, personal communication with key trial authors and content experts, and by searching trial registries at the National Institutes of Health and the World Health Organization. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) (individual level or cluster-randomised), which evaluated the effectiveness of interventions that promote shared decision making (as the focus or a component of the intervention) about antibiotic prescribing for ARIs in primary care. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently extracted and collected data. Antibiotic prescribing was the primary outcome, and secondary outcomes included clinically important adverse endpoints (e.g. re-consultations, hospital admissions, mortality) and process measures (e.g. patient satisfaction). We assessed the risk of bias of all included trials and the quality of evidence. We contacted trial authors to obtain missing information where available. MAIN RESULTS We identified 10 published reports of nine original RCTs (one report was a long-term follow-up of the original trial) in over 1100 primary care doctors and around 492,000 patients.The main risk of bias came from participants in most studies knowing whether they had received the intervention or not, and we downgraded the rating of the quality of evidence because of this.We meta-analysed data using a random-effects model on the primary and key secondary outcomes and formally assessed heterogeneity. Remaining outcomes are presented narratively.There is moderate quality evidence that interventions that aim to facilitate shared decision making reduce antibiotic use for ARIs in primary care (immediately after or within six weeks of the consultation), compared with usual care, from 47% to 29%: risk ratio (RR) 0.61, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.55 to 0.68. Reduction in antibiotic prescribing occurred without an increase in patient-initiated re-consultations (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.03, moderate quality evidence) or a decrease in patient satisfaction with the consultation (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.30, low quality evidence). There were insufficient data to assess the effects of the intervention on sustained reduction in antibiotic prescribing, adverse clinical outcomes (such as hospital admission, incidence of pneumonia and mortality), or measures of patient and caregiver involvement in shared decision making (such as satisfaction with the consultation; regret or conflict with the decision made; or treatment compliance following the decision). No studies assessed antibiotic resistance in colonising or infective organisms. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Interventions that aim to facilitate shared decision making reduce antibiotic prescribing in primary care in the short term. Effects on longer-term rates of prescribing are uncertain and more evidence is needed to determine how any sustained reduction in antibiotic prescribing affects hospital admission, pneumonia and death.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Coxeter
- Bond UniversityCentre for Research in Evidence‐Based Practice (CREBP)Gold CoastQueenslandAustralia4229
| | - Chris B Del Mar
- Bond UniversityCentre for Research in Evidence‐Based Practice (CREBP)Gold CoastQueenslandAustralia4229
| | - Leanne McGregor
- Griffith UniversityCentre of National Research on Disability and Rehabilitation (CONROD), Menzies Health Institute Queensland | School of Allied HealthParklands DriveSouthportQLDAustralia4215
| | - Elaine M Beller
- Bond UniversityCentre for Research in Evidence‐Based Practice (CREBP)Gold CoastQueenslandAustralia4229
| | - Tammy C Hoffmann
- Bond UniversityCentre for Research in Evidence‐Based Practice (CREBP)Gold CoastQueenslandAustralia4229
- The University of QueenslandSchool of Health and Rehabilitation SciencesBrisbaneQueenslandAustralia
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Tsulukidze M, Grande SW, Gionfriddo MR. Assessing Option Grid® practicability and feasibility for facilitating shared decision making: An exploratory study. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2015; 98:871-877. [PMID: 25841546 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.03.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2014] [Revised: 03/03/2015] [Accepted: 03/13/2015] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the feasibility of Option Grids(®)for facilitating shared decision making (SDM) in simulated clinical consultations and explore clinicians' views on their practicability. METHODS We used mixed methods approach to analyze clinical consultations using the Observer OPTION instrument and thematic analysis for follow-up interviews with clinicians. RESULTS Clinicians achieved high scores on information sharing and low scores on preference elicitation and integration. Four themes were identified: (1) Barriers affect practicability of Option Grids(®); (2) Option Grids(®) facilitate the SDM process; (3) Clinicians are aware of the gaps in their practice of SDM; (4) Training and ongoing feedback on the optimal use of Option Grids(®) are necessary. CONCLUSION Use of Option Grids(®) by clinicians with background knowledge in SDM did not facilitate optimal levels of competency on the SDM core concepts of preference elicitation and integration. Future research must evaluate the impact of training on the use of Option Grids(®), and explore how best to help clinicians bridge the gap between knowledge and action. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Clinicians proficiently imparting information in simulations struggled to elicit and integrate patient preferences - understanding this gap and developing strategies to close it are the next steps for implementing SDM into clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maka Tsulukidze
- The Dartmouth Center for Health Care Delivery Science, Dartmouth College, Hanover, USA.
| | - Stuart W Grande
- The Dartmouth Center for Health Care Delivery Science, Dartmouth College, Hanover, USA
| | - Michael R Gionfriddo
- The Dartmouth Center for Health Care Delivery Science, Dartmouth College, Hanover, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
The contribution of conceptual frameworks to knowledge translation interventions in physical therapy. Phys Ther 2015; 95:630-9. [PMID: 25060959 PMCID: PMC4384052 DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20130483] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2013] [Accepted: 07/13/2014] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
There is growing recognition of the importance of knowledge translation activities in physical therapy to ensure that research findings are integrated into clinical practice, and increasing numbers of knowledge translation interventions are being conducted. Although various frameworks have been developed to guide and facilitate the process of translating knowledge into practice, these tools have been infrequently used in physical therapy knowledge translation studies to date. Knowledge translation in physical therapy implicates multiple stakeholders and environments and involves numerous steps. In light of this complexity, the use of explicit conceptual frameworks by clinicians and researchers conducting knowledge translation interventions is associated with a range of potential benefits. This perspective article argues that such frameworks are important resources to promote the uptake of new evidence in physical therapist practice settings. Four key benefits associated with the use of conceptual frameworks in designing and implementing knowledge translation interventions are identified, and limits related to their use are considered. A sample of 5 conceptual frameworks is evaluated, and how they address common barriers to knowledge translation in physical therapy is assessed. The goal of this analysis is to provide guidance to physical therapists seeking to identify a framework to support the design and implementation of a knowledge translation intervention. Finally, the use of a conceptual framework is illustrated through a case example. Increased use of conceptual frameworks can have a positive impact on the field of knowledge translation in physical therapy and support the development and implementation of robust and effective knowledge translation interventions that help span the research-practice gap.
Collapse
|
25
|
Giguere AM, Labrecque M, Légaré F, Grad R, Cauchon M, Greenway M, Haynes RB, Pluye P, Syed I, Banerjee D, Carmichael PH, Martin M. Feasibility of a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the impact of decision boxes on shared decision-making processes. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2015; 15:13. [PMID: 25880757 PMCID: PMC4350632 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-015-0134-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2014] [Accepted: 01/27/2015] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Decision boxes (DBoxes) are two-page evidence summaries to prepare clinicians for shared decision making (SDM). We sought to assess the feasibility of a clustered Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) to evaluate their impact. Methods A convenience sample of clinicians (nurses, physicians and residents) from six primary healthcare clinics who received eight DBoxes and rated their interest in the topic and satisfaction. After consultations, their patients rated their involvement in decision-making processes (SDM-Q-9 instrument). We measured clinic and clinician recruitment rates, questionnaire completion rates, patient eligibility rates, and estimated the RCT needed sample size. Results Among the 20 family medicine clinics invited to participate in this study, four agreed to participate, giving an overall recruitment rate of 20%. Of 148 clinicians invited to the study, 93 participated (63%). Clinicians rated an interest in the topics ranging 6.4-8.2 out of 10 (with 10 highest) and a satisfaction with DBoxes of 4 or 5 out of 5 (with 5 highest) for 81% DBoxes. For the future RCT, we estimated that a sample size of 320 patients would allow detecting a 9% mean difference in the SDM-Q-9 ratings between our two arms (0.02 ICC; 0.05 significance level; 80% power). Conclusions Clinicians’ recruitment and questionnaire completion rates support the feasibility of the planned RCT. The level of interest of participants for the DBox topics, and their level of satisfaction with the Dboxes demonstrate the acceptability of the intervention. Processes to recruit clinics and patients should be optimized. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12911-015-0134-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anik Mc Giguere
- Research Centre for Excellence in Aging, CHU de Quebec, Saint-Sacrement Hospital, 1050 chemin Ste-Foy, Québec, Québec, G1S 4L8, Canada. .,Department of Family and Emergency Medicine, Laval University, Pavillon Ferdinand-Vandry, 1050 avenue de la Medecine, Quebec City, Quebec, G1V 0A6, Canada.
| | - Michel Labrecque
- Department of Family and Emergency Medicine, Research Center of the CHU de Quebec, Saint-Francois d'Assise Hospital, Laval University, 10 rue de l'Espinay, D6-730, Quebec City, QC, G1L 3L5, Canada
| | - France Légaré
- Department of Family and Emergency Medicine, Research Center of the CHU de Quebec, Saint-Francois d'Assise Hospital, Laval University, 10 rue de l'Espinay, D6-730, Quebec City, QC, G1L 3L5, Canada
| | - Roland Grad
- Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Herzl Family Practice Centre, 3755 Cote Sainte Catherine, Montreal, QC H3T 1E2, Canada
| | - Michel Cauchon
- Department of Family and Emergency Medicine, Laval University, Pavillon Ferdinand-Vandry, 1050 avenue de la Medecine, Quebec City, Quebec, G1V 0A6, Canada
| | - Matthew Greenway
- Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, 118 Lake Street, St. Catharines, ON, Canada
| | - R Brian Haynes
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, CRL-125, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada.,Department of Medicine, DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, CRL-125, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada
| | - Pierre Pluye
- Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, 5858 Côte-des-neiges, 3rd Floor, Suite 300, Montreal, QC, H3S 1Z1, Canada
| | - Iqra Syed
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, CRL-125, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada
| | - Debi Banerjee
- The University of Toronto, Faculty of Medicine, 1 King's College Circle, Medical Sciences Building (Rm. 2109), Toronto, ON, M5S-1A8, Canada
| | - Pierre-Hugues Carmichael
- Research Centre for Excellence in Aging, CHU de Quebec, Saint-Sacrement Hospital, 1050 chemin Ste-Foy, Québec, Québec, G1S 4L8, Canada
| | - Mélanie Martin
- Research Centre for Excellence in Aging, CHU de Quebec, Saint-Sacrement Hospital, 1050 chemin Ste-Foy, Québec, Québec, G1S 4L8, Canada.,Department of Family and Emergency Medicine, Laval University, Pavillon Ferdinand-Vandry, 1050 avenue de la Medecine, Quebec City, Quebec, G1V 0A6, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Entwicklung von Aufklärungsmaterialien für die „Deutsche Prostatakrebsstudie PREFERE“. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EVIDENZ FORTBILDUNG UND QUALITAET IM GESUNDHEITSWESEN 2015; 109:28-39. [DOI: 10.1016/j.zefq.2015.01.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2014] [Revised: 01/30/2015] [Accepted: 01/30/2015] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
27
|
Giguere AMC, Labrecque M, Haynes RB, Grad R, Pluye P, Légaré F, Cauchon M, Greenway M, Carmichael PH. Evidence summaries (decision boxes) to prepare clinicians for shared decision-making with patients: a mixed methods implementation study. Implement Sci 2014; 9:144. [PMID: 25280742 PMCID: PMC4201673 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-014-0144-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2014] [Accepted: 09/19/2014] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Decision boxes (Dboxes) provide clinicians with research evidence about management options for medical questions that have no single best answer. Dboxes fulfil a need for rapid clinical training tools to prepare clinicians for clinician-patient communication and shared decision-making. We studied the barriers and facilitators to using the Dbox information in clinical practice. Methods We used a mixed methods study with sequential explanatory design. We recruited family physicians, residents, and nurses from six primary health-care clinics. Participants received eight Dboxes covering various questions by email (one per week). For each Dbox, they completed a web questionnaire to rate clinical relevance and cognitive impact and to assess the determinants of their intention to use what they learned from the Dbox to explain to their patients the advantages and disadvantages of the options, based on the theory of planned behaviour (TPB). Following the 8-week delivery period, we conducted focus groups with clinicians and interviews with clinic administrators to explore contextual factors influencing the use of the Dbox information. Results One hundred clinicians completed the web surveys. In 54% of the 496 questionnaires completed, they reported that their practice would be improved after having read the Dboxes, and in 40%, they stated that they would use this information for their patients. Of those who would use the information for their patients, 89% expected it would benefit their patients, especially in that it would allow the patient to make a decision more in keeping with his/her personal circumstances, values, and preferences. They intended to use the Dboxes in practice (mean 5.6 ± 1.2, scale 1–7, with 7 being “high”), and their intention was significantly related to social norm, perceived behavioural control, and attitude according to the TPB (P < 0.0001). In focus groups, clinicians mentioned that co-interventions such as patient decision aids and training in shared decision-making would facilitate the use of the Dbox information. Some participants would have liked a clear “bottom line” statement for each Dbox and access to printed Dboxes in consultation rooms. Conclusions Dboxes are valued by clinicians. Tailoring of Dboxes to their needs would facilitate their implementation in practice. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13012-014-0144-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
|
28
|
Athale A, Giguere A, Barbara A, Krassova S, Iorio A. Developing a two-sided intervention to facilitate shared decision-making in haemophilia: decision boxes for clinicians and patient decision aids for patients. Haemophilia 2014; 20:800-6. [PMID: 25273544 DOI: 10.1111/hae.12495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/09/2014] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND People with haemophilia face many treatment decisions, which are largely informed by evidence from observational studies. Without evidence-based 'best' treatment options, patient preferences play a large role in decisions regarding therapy. The shared decision-making (SDM) process allows patients and health care providers to make decisions collaboratively based on available evidence, and patient preferences. Decision tools can help the SDM process. The objective of this project was to develop two-sided decision tools, decision boxes for physicians and patient decision aids for patients, to facilitate SDM for treatment decisions in haemophilia. METHODS Development of the decision tools comprised three phases: topic selection, prototype development and usability testing with targeted end-users. Topics were selected using a Delphi survey. Tool prototypes were based on a previously validated framework and were informed by systematic literature reviews. Patients, through focus groups, and physicians, through interviews, reviewed the prototypes iteratively for comprehensibility and usability. RESULTS The chosen topics were: (i) prophylactic treatment: when to start and dosing, (ii) choosing factor source and (iii) immunotolerance induction: when to start and dosing. Intended end users (both health care providers and haemophilia patients and caregivers) were engaged in the development process. Overall perception of the decision tools was positive, and the purpose of using the tools was well received. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates the feasibility of developing decision tools for haemophilia treatment decisions. It also provides anecdotal evidence of positive perceptions of such tools. Future directions include assessment of the tools' practical value and impact on clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Athale
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Health Information Research Unit, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Vickers AJ, Edwards K, Cooperberg MR, Mushlin AI. A simple schema for informed decision making about prostate cancer screening. Ann Intern Med 2014; 161:441-2. [PMID: 25222389 PMCID: PMC4412472 DOI: 10.7326/m14-0151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
|
30
|
Premji K, Upshur R, Légaré F, Pottie K. Future of family medicine: role of patient-centred care and evidence-based medicine. CANADIAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN MEDECIN DE FAMILLE CANADIEN 2014; 60:409-412. [PMID: 24828995 PMCID: PMC4020635] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Kamila Premji
- Family physician in Ottawa, Ont, and a clinician scholar trainee in the Department of Family Medicine at the University of Ottawa
| | - Ross Upshur
- Canada Research Chair in Primary Care Research and Professor in the Department of Family and Community Medicine at the University of Toronto in Ontario
| | - France Légaré
- Family physician in Quebec city, Que, and Full Professor in the Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine at Laval University in Quebec city
| | - Kevin Pottie
- Associate Professor in the Department of Family Medicine and the Department of Epidemiology and Community Health at the University of Ottawa and Principal Scientist at the Institute of Population Health and the C.T. Lamont Centre for Primary Care Research in Ottawa.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Grande SW, Faber MJ, Durand MA, Thompson R, Elwyn G. A classification model of patient engagement methods and assessment of their feasibility in real-world settings. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2014; 95:281-287. [PMID: 24582473 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.01.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2013] [Revised: 12/19/2013] [Accepted: 01/26/2014] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Examine existing reviews of patient engagement methods to propose a model where the focus is on engaging patients in clinical workflows, and to assess the feasibility of advocated patient engagement methods. METHODS A literature search of reviews of patient engagement methods was conducted. Included reviews were peer-reviewed, written in English, and focused on methods that targeted patients or patient-provider dyads. Methods were categorized to propose a conceptual model. The feasibility of methods was assessed using an adapted rating system. RESULTS We observed that we could categorize patient engagement methods based on information provision, patient activation, and patient-provider collaboration. Methods could be divided by high and low feasibility, predicated on the extent of extra work required by the patient or clinical system. Methods that have good fit with existing workflows and that require proportional amounts of work by patients are likely to be the most feasible. CONCLUSION Implementation of patient engagement methods is likely to depend on finding a "sweet-spot" where demands required by patients generate improved knowledge and motivate active participation. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Attention should be given to those interventions and methods that advocate feasibility with patients, providers, and organizational workflows.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stuart W Grande
- The Dartmouth Center for Health Care Delivery Science, Dartmouth College, Hanover, USA
| | - Marjan J Faber
- Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Rachel Thompson
- The Dartmouth Center for Health Care Delivery Science, Dartmouth College, Hanover, USA
| | - Glyn Elwyn
- The Dartmouth Center for Health Care Delivery Science, Dartmouth College, Hanover, USA; The Cochrane Institute for Primary Care and Public Health, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK; The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Giguere A, Labrecque M, Grad R, Cauchon M, Greenway M, Légaré F, Pluye P, Turcotte S, Dolovich L, Haynes RB. Barriers and facilitators to implementing Decision Boxes in primary healthcare teams to facilitate shared decisionmaking: a study protocol. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2012; 12:85. [PMID: 22867107 PMCID: PMC3472191 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-85] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2012] [Accepted: 07/23/2012] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Decision Boxes are summaries of the most important benefits and harms of health interventions provided to clinicians before they meet the patient, to prepare them to help patients make informed and value-based decisions. Our objective is to explore the barriers and facilitators to using Decision Boxes in clinical practice, more precisely factors stemming from (1) the Decision Boxes themselves, (2) the primary healthcare team (PHT), and (3) the primary care practice environment. METHODS/DESIGN A two-phase mixed methods study will be conducted. Eight Decision Boxes relevant to primary care, and written in both English and in French, will be hosted on a website together with a tutorial to introduce the Decision Box. The Decision Boxes will be delivered as weekly emails over a span of eight weeks to clinicians of PHTs (family physicians, residents and nurses) in five primary care clinics located across two Canadian provinces. Using a web-questionnaire, clinicians will rate each Decision Box with the Information Assessment Method (cognitive impacts, relevance, usefulness, expected benefits) and with a questionnaire based on the Theory of Planned Behavior to study the determinants of clinicians' intention to use what they learned from that Decision Box in their patient encounter (attitude, social norm, perceived behavioral control). Web-log data will be used to monitor clinicians' access to the website. Following the 8-week intervention, we will conduct semi-structured group interviews with clinicians and individual interviews with clinic administrators to explore contextual factors influencing the use of the Decision Boxes. Data collected from questionnaires, focus groups and individual interviews will be combined to identify factors potentially influencing implementation of Decision Boxes in clinical practice by clinicians of PHTs. CONCLUSIONS This project will allow tailoring of Decision Boxes and their delivery to overcome the specific barriers identified by clinicians of PHTs to improve the implementation of shared decision making in this setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anik Giguere
- Health Information Research Unit, Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, CRL-139, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4 K1, Canada
| | - Michel Labrecque
- Research Center of the CHUQ, Saint-Francois d'Assise Hospital, 10 rue de l'Espinay, D6-730, Quebec City (QC), G1L 3 L5, Canada
| | - Roland Grad
- Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, 515-517 Pine Avenue West, Montreal (QC), H2W 1 S4, Canada
| | - Michel Cauchon
- Dept. of Family and Emergency Medicine, Laval University Laval, Pavillon Ferdinand-Vandry, 1050 avenue de la Médecine, Local 4617, Québec (QC), G1V 0A6, Canada
| | - Matthew Greenway
- Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, 118 Lake Street, Saint-Catharines, ON, Canada
| | - France Légaré
- Research Center of the CHUQ, Saint-Francois d'Assise Hospital, 10 rue de l'Espinay, D6-730, Quebec City (QC), G1L 3 L5, Canada
| | - Pierre Pluye
- Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, 515-517 Pine Avenue West, Montreal (QC), H2W 1 S4, Canada
| | - Stephane Turcotte
- Research Center of the CHUQ, Saint-Francois d'Assise Hospital, 10 rue de l'Espinay, D6-730, Quebec City (QC), G1L 3 L5, Canada
| | - Lisa Dolovich
- Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, McMaster Innovation Park, 175 Longwood Road South, Hamilton, ON, L8P 0A1, Canada
| | - R Brian Haynes
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics and Department of Medicine, DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, CRL-125, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|