1
|
Gliedt JA, Spector AL, Schneider MJ, Williams J, Young S. Disparities in chiropractic utilization by race, ethnicity and socioeconomic status: A scoping review of the literature. JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE MEDICINE 2023; 21:159-167. [PMID: 36841750 DOI: 10.1016/j.joim.2023.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2022] [Accepted: 11/14/2022] [Indexed: 02/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chiropractic is the largest complementary and alternative medicine profession in the United States, with increasing global growth. A preliminary literature review suggests a lack of widespread diversity of chiropractic patient profiles. OBJECTIVE There have been no prior studies to comprehensively integrate the literature on chiropractic utilization rates by race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status. The purpose of this scoping review is to identify and describe the current state of knowledge of chiropractic utilization by race, ethnicity, education level, employment status, and income and poverty level. SEARCH STRATEGY Systematic searches were conducted in PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Index to Chiropractic Literature from inception to May 2021. INCLUSION CRITERIA Articles that reported race or ethnicity, education level, employment status, income or poverty level variables and chiropractic utilization rates for adults (≥18 years of age) were eligible for this review. DATA EXTRACTION AND ANALYSIS Data extracted from articles were citation information, patient characteristics, race and ethnicity, education level, employment status, income and poverty level, and chiropractic utilization rate. A descriptive numerical summary of included studies is provided. This study provides a qualitative thematic narrative of chiropractic utilization with attention to race and ethnicity, education level, income and poverty level, and employment status. RESULTS A total of 69 articles were eligible for review. Most articles were published since 2003 and reported data from study populations in the United States. Of the race, ethnicity and socioeconomic categories that were most commonly reported, chiropractic utilization was the highest for individuals identifying as European American/White/non-Hispanic White/Caucasian (median 20.00%; interquartile range 2.70%-64.60%), those with employment as a main income source (median utilization 78.50%; interquartile range 77.90%-79.10%), individuals with an individual or household/family annual income between $40,001 and $60,000 (median utilization 29.40%; interquartile range 25.15%-33.65%), and individuals with less than or equal to (12 years) high school diploma/general educational development certificate completion (median utilization 30.70%; interquartile range 15.10%-37.00%). CONCLUSION This comprehensive review of the literature on chiropractic utilization by race, ethnicity and socioeconomic status indicates differences in chiropractic utilization across diverse racial and ethnic and socioeconomic populations. Heterogeneity existed among definitions of key variables, including race, ethnicity, education level, employment status, and income and poverty level in the included studies, reducing clarity in rates of chiropractic utilization for these populations. Please cite this article as: Gliedt JA, Spector AL, Schneider MJ, Williams J, Young S. Disparities in chiropractic utilization by race, ethnicity and socioeconomic status: a scoping review of the literature. J Integr Med. 2023; Epub ahead of print.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jordan A Gliedt
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA.
| | - Antoinette L Spector
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Technology, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI 53201, USA
| | - Michael J Schneider
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15219, USA; Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
| | - Joni Williams
- Department of Medicine, Division of Internal Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA
| | - Staci Young
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
The Effects of 4 Weeks of Chiropractic Spinal Adjustments on Motor Function in People with Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Brain Sci 2021; 11:brainsci11060676. [PMID: 34064209 PMCID: PMC8224305 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci11060676] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2021] [Revised: 05/19/2021] [Accepted: 05/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Chiropractic spinal adjustments have been shown to result in short-term increases in muscle strength in chronic stroke patients, however, the effect of longer-term chiropractic spinal adjustments on people with chronic stroke is unknown. This exploratory study assessed whether 4 weeks of chiropractic spinal adjustments, combined with physical therapy (chiro + PT), had a greater impact than sham chiropractic with physical therapy (sham + PT) did on motor function (Fugl Meyer Assessment, FMA) in 63 subacute or chronic stroke patients. Secondary outcomes included health-related quality of life and other measures of functional mobility and disability. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, 4 weeks (post-intervention), and 8 weeks (follow-up). Data were analyzed using linear mixed-effects models or generalized linear mixed models. A post-hoc responder analysis was performed to investigate the clinical significance of findings. At 4 weeks, there was a larger effect of chiro + PT, compared with sham + PT, on the FMA (difference = 6.1, p = 0.04). The responder analysis suggested the improvements in motor function seen following chiropractic spinal adjustments may have been clinically significant. There was also a robust improvement in both groups in most measures from baseline to the 4- and 8-week assessments, but between-group differences were no longer significant at the 8-week assessment. Four weeks of chiro + PT resulted in statistically significant improvements in motor function, compared with sham + PT, in people with subacute or chronic stroke. These improvements appear to be clinically important. Further trials, involving larger group sizes and longer follow-up and intervention periods, are required to corroborate these findings and further investigate the impacts of chiropractic spinal adjustments on motor function in post-stroke survivors. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT03849794.
Collapse
|
3
|
Nicol R, Yu H, Selb M, Prodinger B, Hartvigsen J, Côté P. How Does the Measurement of Disability in Low Back Pain Map Unto the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health?: A Scoping Review of the Manual Medicine Literature. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2021; 100:367-395. [PMID: 33141774 DOI: 10.1097/phm.0000000000001636] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT The objective of this study was to catalog items from instruments used to measure functioning, disability, and contextual factors in patients with low back pain treated with manual medicine (manipulation and mobilization) according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. This catalog will be used to inform the development of an International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health-based assessment schedule for low back pain patients treated with manual medicine. In this scoping review, we systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and CINAHL. We identified instruments (questionnaires, clinical tests, single questions) used to measure functioning, disability, and contextual factors, extracted the relevant items, and then linked these items to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. We included 95 articles and identified 1510 meaningful concepts. All but 70 items were linked to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Of the concepts linked to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health, body functions accounted for 34.7%, body structures accounted for 0%, activities and participation accounted for 41%, environmental factors accounted for 3.6%, and personal factors accounted for 16%. Most items used to measure functioning and disability in low back pain patient treated with manual medicine focus on body functions, as well as activities and participation. The lack of measures that address environmental factors warrants further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Nicol
- From the ELiB (et liv i bevegelse), Oslo, Norway (RN); UOIT-CMCC Centre for Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada (HY, PC); ICF Research Branch, Nottwil, Switzerland (MS); Swiss Paraplegic Research, Nottwil, Switzerland (MS); Department of Applied Health and Social Sciences, University of Applied Sciences Rosenheim, Rosenheim, Germany (BP); Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark (JH); Nordic Institute of Chiropractic and Clinical Biomechanics, Odense, Denmark (JH); and Faculty of Health Sciences, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada (PC)
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Foley H, Steel A, McIntyre E, Harnett J, Sibbritt D, Wardle J, Adams J. Complementary medicine practitioner consultations amongst 1,314 individuals with chronic conditions: Characteristics of users, reasons for and predictors of use. Complement Ther Clin Pract 2020; 40:101194. [PMID: 32891274 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2020.101194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2020] [Revised: 04/23/2020] [Accepted: 04/28/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The complexity of chronic conditions challenges health systems and patients. Patients with chronic conditions often consult complementary medicine (CM) practitioners. Optimal care of chronic conditions requires understanding of the characteristics and consultation behaviours of these patients. METHODS Cross-sectional survey (n = 2025 adults), broadly representative of the Australian population. Measures included sociodemographics, health status and health service utilisation. Data from participants with chronic conditions were analysed. RESULTS Of the 1314 participants reporting chronic conditions, 38.4% consulted a CM practitioner. Significant differences were observed between participants who did/did not consult CM practitioners, across all sociodemographics and some health status items. The most reported reason for consultation was to support wellbeing. Predictors of consultation were younger age, employment, and private health insurance coverage for CM, however, predictors varied by profession consulted. CONCLUSION CM consultations amongst those with chronic conditions appear to be influenced by sociodemographic and economic factors, and quality of life needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hope Foley
- Australian Research Centre in Complementary and Integrative Medicine, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, Australia; Office of Research, Endeavour College of Natural Health, Brisbane, Australia.
| | - Amie Steel
- Australian Research Centre in Complementary and Integrative Medicine, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, Australia
| | - Erica McIntyre
- Australian Research Centre in Complementary and Integrative Medicine, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, Australia
| | - Joanna Harnett
- Australian Research Centre in Complementary and Integrative Medicine, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, Australia; The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Pharmacy, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - David Sibbritt
- Australian Research Centre in Complementary and Integrative Medicine, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, Australia
| | - Jon Wardle
- Australian Research Centre in Complementary and Integrative Medicine, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, Australia
| | - Jon Adams
- Australian Research Centre in Complementary and Integrative Medicine, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Beliveau PJH, McIsaac MA, Mior SA, French SD. An Investigation of Chiropractor-Directed Weight-Loss Interventions: Secondary Analysis of O-COAST. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2019; 42:353-365. [PMID: 31262578 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2018.11.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2018] [Revised: 06/20/2018] [Accepted: 11/02/2018] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to investigate weight-loss interventions offered by Canadian doctors of chiropractic to their adult patients. METHODS This paper reports a secondary analysis of data from the Ontario Chiropractic Observation and Analysis STudy (Nc = 42 chiropractors, Np = 2162 patient encounters). Multilevel logistic regression was performed to assess the odds of chiropractors initiating or continuing weight management interventions with patients. Two chiropractor variables and 8 patient-level variables were investigated for influence on chiropractor-directed weight management. In addition, the interaction between the effects of patient weight and comorbidity on weight management interventions by chiropractors was assessed. RESULTS Around two-thirds (61.3%) of patients who sought chiropractic care were either overweight or had obesity. Very few patients had weight loss managed by their chiropractor. Among patients with body mass index equal to or greater than 18.5 kg/m2, guideline recommended weight management was initiated or continued by Ontario chiropractors in only 5.4% of encounters. Chiropractors did not offer weight management interventions at different rates among patients who were of normal weight, overweight, or obese (P value = 0.23). Chiropractors who graduated after 2005 who may have been exposed to reforms in chiropractic education to include public health were significantly more likely to offer weight management than chiropractors who graduated between 1995 and 2005 (odds ratio 0.02; 95% CI [0.00-0.13]) or before 1995 (odds ratio 0.08; 95% CI [0.01-0.42]). CONCLUSION The prevalence of weight management interventions offered to patients by Canadian chiropractors in Ontario was low. Health care policy and continued chiropractic educational reforms may provide further direction to improve weight-loss interventions offered by doctors of chiropractic to their patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter J H Beliveau
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Michael A McIsaac
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Silvano A Mior
- University of Ontario Institute of Technology-Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Simon D French
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada; School of Rehabilitation Therapy, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada; Department of Chiropractic, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
The Prevalence, Patterns, and Predictors of Chiropractic Use Among US Adults: Results From the 2012 National Health Interview Survey. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2017; 42:1810-1816. [PMID: 28459779 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000002218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Secondary analysis of a national survey. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence, patterns, and predictors of chiropractic utilization in the US general population. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Chiropractic is one of the largest manual therapy professions in the United States and internationally. Very few details have been reported about the use of chiropractic care in the United States in recent years. METHODS Cross-sectional data from the 2012 National Health Interview Survey (n = 34,525) were analyzed to examine the lifetime and 12-month prevalence and utilization patterns of chiropractic use, profile of chiropractic users, and health-related predictors of chiropractic consultations. RESULTS Lifetime and 12-month prevalence of chiropractic use were 24.0% and 8.4%, respectively. There is a growing trend of chiropractic use among US adults from 2002 to 2012. Back pain (63.0%) and neck pain (30.2%) were the most prevalent health problems for chiropractic consultations and the majority of users reported chiropractic helping a great deal with their health problem and improving overall health or well-being. A substantial number of chiropractic users had received prescription (23.0%) and/or over-the-counter medications (35.0%) for the same health problem for which chiropractic was sought and 63.8% reported chiropractic care combined with medical treatment as helpful. Both adults older than 30 years (compared to younger adults), and those diagnosed with spinal pain (compared to those without spinal pain) were more likely to have consulted a chiropractor in the past 12 months. CONCLUSION A substantial proportion of US adults utilized chiropractic services during the past 12 months and reported associated positive outcomes for overall well-being and/or specific health problems for which concurrent conventional care was common. Studies on the current patient integration of chiropractic and conventional health services are warranted. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3.
Collapse
|
7
|
Beliveau PJH, Wong JJ, Sutton DA, Simon NB, Bussières AE, Mior SA, French SD. The chiropractic profession: a scoping review of utilization rates, reasons for seeking care, patient profiles, and care provided. Chiropr Man Therap 2017; 25:35. [PMID: 29201346 PMCID: PMC5698931 DOI: 10.1186/s12998-017-0165-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 147] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2017] [Accepted: 10/31/2017] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Previous research has investigated utilization rates, who sees chiropractors, for what reasons, and the type of care that chiropractors provide. However, these studies have not been comprehensively synthesized. We aimed to give a global overview by summarizing the current literature on the utilization of chiropractic services, reasons for seeking care, patient profiles, and assessment and treatment provided. Methods Systematic searches were conducted in MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Index to Chiropractic Literature using keywords and subject headings (MeSH or ChiroSH terms) from database inception to January 2016. Eligible studies: 1) were published in English or French; 2) were case series, descriptive, cross-sectional, or cohort studies; 3) described patients receiving chiropractic services; and 4) reported on the following theme(s): utilization rates of chiropractic services; reasons for attending chiropractic care; profiles of chiropractic patients; or, types of chiropractic services provided. Paired reviewers independently screened all citations and data were extracted from eligible studies. We provided descriptive numerical analysis, e.g. identifying the median rate and interquartile range (e.g., chiropractic utilization rate) stratified by study population or condition. Results The literature search retrieved 14,149 articles; 328 studies (reported in 337 articles) were relevant and reported on chiropractic utilization (245 studies), reason for attending chiropractic care (85 studies), patient demographics (130 studies), and assessment and treatment provided (34 studies). Globally, the median 12-month utilization of chiropractic services was 9.1% (interquartile range (IQR): 6.7%-13.1%) and remained stable between 1980 and 2015. Most patients consulting chiropractors were female (57.0%, IQR: 53.2%-60.0%) with a median age of 43.4 years (IQR: 39.6-48.0), and were employed (median: 77.3%, IQR: 70.3%-85.0%). The most common reported reasons for people attending chiropractic care were (median) low back pain (49.7%, IQR: 43.0%-60.2%), neck pain (22.5%, IQR: 16.3%-24.5%), and extremity problems (10.0%, IQR: 4.3%-22.0%). The most common treatment provided by chiropractors included (median) spinal manipulation (79.3%, IQR: 55.4%-91.3%), soft-tissue therapy (35.1%, IQR: 16.5%-52.0%), and formal patient education (31.3%, IQR: 22.6%-65.0%). Conclusions This comprehensive overview on the world-wide state of the chiropractic profession documented trends in the literature over the last four decades. The findings support the diverse nature of chiropractic practice, although common trends emerged.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jessica J. Wong
- UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), Toronto, Canada
- Department of Research, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, 6100 Leslie St, Toronto, ON M2H 3J1 Canada
| | - Deborah A. Sutton
- UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), Toronto, Canada
| | - Nir Ben Simon
- Department of Research, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, 6100 Leslie St, Toronto, ON M2H 3J1 Canada
| | - André E. Bussières
- School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montréal, Canada
- Département chiropratique, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, Canada
- Centre de recherche interdisciplinaire en réadaptation (CRIR), Montréal, Canada
| | - Silvano A. Mior
- UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), Toronto, Canada
- Department of Research, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, 6100 Leslie St, Toronto, ON M2H 3J1 Canada
| | - Simon D. French
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Queen’s University, Kingston, Canada
- School of Rehabilitation Therapy, Queen’s University, Kingston, Canada
- Department of Chiropractic, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Engel RM, Beirman R, Grace S. An indication of current views of Australian general practitioners towards chiropractic and osteopathy: a cross-sectional study. Chiropr Man Therap 2016; 24:37. [PMID: 27822360 PMCID: PMC5088656 DOI: 10.1186/s12998-016-0119-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2016] [Accepted: 08/08/2016] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Background While the role of complementary medicine therapies such as chiropractic and osteopathy is yet to be clearly delineated in the Australian context, demand for these services remains high. The attitudes of general practitioners towards chiropractors and osteopaths may have played a part in producing this outcome. However, this view is based on data that were more than 10 years old. Current anecdotal evidence suggests that the previous level of support may be declining in sections of the Australian medical profession. An assessment of the current views of general practitioners towards chiropractors and osteopaths is called for. The results being reported here represent the first stage of this assessment. Methods This cross-sectional study was designed as a quantitative descriptive study using an anonymous online survey that included closed and open-ended questions with opportunities provided for free text. The target population was Australian general practitioners. Inclusion criteria included current medical registration, membership of the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners and currently practicing as a general practitioner in Australia. The data being reported here were collected between May and December, 2014. Results There were 630 respondents to the online survey during this period representing a response rate of 2.6 %. Results were not uniform for the two professions. More general practitioners believed chiropractic education was not evidence-based compared to osteopathic education (70 % and 50 % respectively) while scope of practice was viewed as similar for both professions. A majority of general practitioners had never referred a patient to either profession (chiropractic: 60 %; osteopathy: 66 %) with approximately two-thirds not interested in learning more about their education (chiropractors: 68 %; osteopaths: 63 %). Conclusions This study provides an indication of the current views of Australian general practitioners towards chiropractors and osteopaths. The findings suggest that attitudes may have become less favourable with a growing intolerance towards both professions. If confirmed, this has the potential to impact health service provision. The results from this cross-sectional study suggest that obtaining representative general practitioner views using online surveys is difficult and another approach is needed to supplement or replace the current recruitment strategy.' Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12998-016-0119-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roger M Engel
- Department of Chiropractic, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109 Australia
| | - Robyn Beirman
- School of Medical and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Sandra Grace
- School of Health & Human Sciences, Southern Cross University, Lismore, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Blanchette MA, Rivard M, Dionne CE, Hogg-Johnson S, Steenstra I. Workers' characteristics associated with the type of healthcare provider first seen for occupational back pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2016; 17:428. [PMID: 27756318 PMCID: PMC5069865 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-016-1298-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2016] [Accepted: 10/14/2016] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Few studies have compared the factors that drive patients' decision to choose a chiropractor, physician or physiotherapist as their first healthcare provider for occupational back pain. The purpose of this study is to identify characteristics associated with the choice of first healthcare provider seen for acute uncomplicated occupational back pain. METHODS We analyzed data collected by the Workplace Safety and Insurance Board from a cohort of workers with compensated back pain in 2005 in Ontario (Canada). Multivariable logistic regression models were created to identify factors associated with the type of first healthcare provider seen (chiropractor, physician, or physiotherapist). Adjustments to the final models were evaluated using the area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve (ROC). RESULTS According to the 5520 analyzed claims, 85.3 % of the patients saw a physician, 11.4 % saw a chiropractor, and 3.2 % saw a physiotherapist. Longer job tenure (odds ratio (OR) = 1.02, P = 0.004), higher gross personal income (OR = 1.06, P = 0.018), mixed-manual job (OR = 1.35, P = 0.004) and previous similar injury (OR = 1.60, P < 0.001) increased the odds of seeing a chiropractor rather than a physician, while the size of the community (>500,000 inhabitants) and the availability of an early return to work program in the workplace (OR = 0.77, P = 0.035) decreased it. The odds of seeing a physiotherapist rather than a physician increased with increasing age (OR = 1.19, P = 0.019), previous similar injury (OR = 1.71, P < 0.001) and severity of injury (OR = 2.03, P = 0.010). Increased age (OR = 1.28, P = 0.008) and size of community (>1,500,000 inhabitants; OR = 2.58, P = 0.002) increased the odds of seeing a physiotherapist rather than a chiropractor, while holding a mixed-manual job significantly decreased those odds (OR = 0.63, P = 0.044). The area under the ROC curve of our multivariable models varied from 0.62 to 0.64. CONCLUSION The type of first healthcare provider sought for occupational back pain is influenced by injury-and work-related factors and by the worker's age, income and community size. Contrary to previous studies, the workers who first sought a physician did not have higher odds of having a severe injury.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc-André Blanchette
- Public Health PhD Program, School of Public Health, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
| | - Michèle Rivard
- Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Public Health Research Institute, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Clermont E Dionne
- Department of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Québec City, QC, Canada.,Axe Santé des populations et pratiques optimales en santé, Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec (CHUQ), Québec City, QC, Canada
| | - Sheilah Hogg-Johnson
- Institute for Work & Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ivan Steenstra
- Institute for Work & Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Amorin-Woods LG, Parkin-Smith GF, Nedkoff L, Fisher C. Outcomes of a pilot study in chiropractic practices in Western Australia. Chiropr Man Therap 2016; 24:34. [PMID: 27766145 PMCID: PMC5056531 DOI: 10.1186/s12998-016-0116-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2016] [Accepted: 08/01/2016] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This paper reports the quantitative outcomes of a mixed-methods pilot study of the characteristics and demographics of chiropractic practices and patients in Western Australia. METHODS This was a mixed-methods data transformation model (qualitative to quantitative) pilot study. A non-random sample of chiropractic practices across Western Australia was recruited and data collected anonymously from consecutive new patients using an online platform. Data covered practice and patient demographics and characteristics, alongside quality of life measures. A descriptive quantitative analysis characterised the sample, and the patient population was stratified by main reason for presentation to compare characteristics according to the presence of secondary complaints. Odds ratios were calculated to estimate the odds of a secondary complaint for various combinations of main complaints, from univariate logistic regression models. RESULTS Of the 539 registered practitioners in WA in July 2014, 33 agreed to participate, from 20 different practices. Ten participating practices provided data on 325 adult new patients. The recruited practices (metropolitan n = 8, regional n = 2) had a positive response rate of 79.7 % (n = 301 metropolitan and n = 24 regional patients), mean age 36.3 years (range 18-74) (53.2 % female). Spinal problems were reported as the main reason for consultation by 67 % and as secondary reasons by 77.2 % of patients. People presented primarily for health maintenance or a general health check in 11.4 %, and as a secondary reason 14.8 %. There were 30 % of people below societal norms for the SF-12 Physical Component Score (mean 47.19, 95 % CI; 46.27-48.19) and 86 % for the Mental Component Score (mean 36.64, 95 % CI; 35.93-37.65), Pain Impact Questionnaire mean scores were 54.60 (95 % CI; 53.32-55.88). CONCLUSIONS Patients presented to chiropractors in Western Australia with a fairly wide range of conditions, but primarily spinal and musculoskeletal-related problems. A significant proportion of patients had associated, or found to be at risk of, depression. Consequently, there are responsibilities and opportunities for chiropractors with respect to providing care services that include health promotion and well-being education related to musculoskeletal/spinal and mental health. This pilot study supports the feasibility of a future confirmatory study where the potential role of chiropractors in spinal/musculoskeletal health management may be explored. TRIAL REGISTRATION ACTRN12616000434493: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR), Registered 5 April 2016, First participant enrolled 01 July 2014 Retrospectively Registered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lyndon G Amorin-Woods
- Senior Clinical Supervisor, School of Health Professions (Discipline of Chiropractic) Murdoch University, Perth, WA Australia
- Murdoch University Chiropractic Clinic, South Street Campus, 90 South Street, Murdoch, WA 6150 Australia
| | | | - Lee Nedkoff
- Research Fellow, School of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway (M431), Crawley, Perth, WA 6009 Australia
| | - Colleen Fisher
- Head of School, School of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway (M431), Crawley, Perth, WA Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Charity MJ, Britt HC, Walker BF, Gunn JM, Forsdike-Young K, Polus BI, French SD. Who consults chiropractors in Victoria, Australia?: Reasons for attending, general health and lifestyle habits of chiropractic patients. Chiropr Man Therap 2016; 24:28. [PMID: 27588168 PMCID: PMC5007813 DOI: 10.1186/s12998-016-0110-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2016] [Accepted: 06/21/2016] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background COAST (Chiropractic Observational and Analysis STudy) reported the clinical practices of chiropractors. The aims of this study were to: 1) describe the chiropractic patient demographic and health characteristics; 2) describe patient-stated reasons for visiting a chiropractor; 3) describe chiropractic patient lifestyle characteristics; 4) compare, where possible, chiropractic patient characteristics to the general Australian population. Methods Fifty-two chiropractors in Victoria, Australia, provided information for up to 100 consecutive encounters. If patients attended more than once during the 100 encounters, only data from their first encounter were included in this study. Where possible patient characteristics were compared with the general Australian population. Results Data were collected from December 2010 to September 2012. Data were provided for 4464 encounters, representing 3287 unique individuals. The majority of chiropractic encounters were for musculoskeletal conditions or for wellness/maintenance. The majority of patient comorbidities were musculoskeletal, circulatory or endocrine/metabolic in nature. Eight hundred chiropractic patients (57 %, 95 % CI: 53–61) described their self-reported health as excellent or very good and 138 patients (10 %, 95 % CI: 8–12) as fair or poor. Seventy-one percent of adult male patients (18 years and older), and 53 % of adult female patients, were overweight or obese. Fourteen percent (n = 188, 95 % CI: 12–16) were current smokers and 27 % (n = 359, 95 % CI: 24–31) did not meet Australian alcohol consumption guidelines. Less than half of the chiropractic patients participated in vigorous exercise at least twice per week. Approximately 20 % ate one serving of vegetables or less each day, and approximately 50 % ate one serve of fruit or less each day. Compared to the general Australian population, chiropractic patients were less likely to smoke, less likely to be obese and more likely to describe their health in positive terms. However, many patients were less likely to meet alcohol consumption guidelines, drinking more than is recommended. Conclusions In general, chiropractic patients had more positive health and lifestyle characteristics than the Australian population. However, there were a significant proportion of chiropractic patients who did not meet guideline recommendations about lifestyle habits and there is an opportunity for chiropractors to reinforce public health messages with their patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melanie J Charity
- Department of General Practice, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia ; Institute of Sport Exercise and Active Living, Victoria University, Melbourne, Australia ; School of Health Sciences, Federation University, Ballarat, Australia
| | - Helena C Britt
- Family Medicine Research Centre, Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Bruce F Walker
- School of Health Professions, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Australia
| | - Jane M Gunn
- Department of General Practice, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | - Barbara I Polus
- Research and Innovation, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Simon D French
- Department of General Practice, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia ; School of Health Professions, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Australia ; School of Rehabilitation Therapy, Queen's University, Louise D. Acton Building, 31 George St, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6 Canada
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Stuber KJ, Langweiler M, Mior S, McCarthy PW. Assessing patient-centered care in patients with chronic health conditions attending chiropractic practice: protocol for a mixed-methods study. Chiropr Man Therap 2016; 24:15. [PMID: 27162609 PMCID: PMC4860769 DOI: 10.1186/s12998-016-0095-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2015] [Accepted: 04/01/2016] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The management of chronic health conditions increasingly requires an organized, coordinated, and patient-centered approach to care. The Chronic Care Model (CCM) has been adopted in primary care to improve care delivery for those with chronic health conditions. Chiropractors manage chronic health conditions; however, little is known if such care is patient-centered. The primary aim of this study is to determine to what extent chiropractic patients with chronic health conditions perceive their care is patient-centred. We will assess concordance with the CCM using the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) survey in study patients. We will also explore perception of how patient-centered the care provided by chiropractors is for those with chronic health conditions according to patients and chiropractors. Methods/design We will use a sequential mixed methods design with quantitative priority. In the quantitative component patients will complete a written questionnaire providing sociodemographic, health status, and health care interaction information, all of which will serve as the independent variables. Patients will also complete a modified version of the PACIC; the average overall score will be the dependent variable. In the qualitative component semi-structured interviews and focus groups with patients and chiropractors will be conducted. A pilot study will be conducted to determine if the modified PACIC will perform adequately in measuring concordance with the CCM for chiropractic care. Pilot testing will also allow for assessment of the interview and focus groups guides. Variables found to be significantly associated will be included in a multivariate linear regression analysis to identify significant predictors of the dependent variable. Qualitative data will be analyzed using an inductive thematic analysis to provide meaning to the quantitative results. Discussion There is a paucity of research describing the extent to which chiropractic care for patients with chronic health conditions is concordant with the CCM. This study will examine this relationship and the perceptions and experiences of patients and chiropractors regarding how patient-centered chiropractic care is for these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kent Jason Stuber
- Division of Graduate Education and Research, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, Ontario Canada ; Faculty of Life Sciences and Education, University of South Wales, Treforest, Wales
| | - Mark Langweiler
- Faculty of Life Sciences and Education, University of South Wales, Treforest, Wales
| | - Silvano Mior
- Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, Ontario Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Eklund A, Jensen I, Lohela-Karlsson M, Leboeuf-Yde C, Axén I. Absence of low back pain to demarcate an episode: a prospective multicentre study in primary care. Chiropr Man Therap 2016; 24:3. [PMID: 26893824 PMCID: PMC4758002 DOI: 10.1186/s12998-016-0085-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2015] [Accepted: 01/06/2016] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background It has been proposed that an episode of low back pain (LBP) be defined as: “a period of pain in the lower back lasting for more than 24 h preceded and followed by a period of at least 1 month without LBP”. Previous studies have tested the definition in the general population and in secondary care populations with distinctly different results. The objectives of this study (in a primary care population) were to investigate the prevalence of 1) the number of consecutive weeks free from bothersome LBP, 2) the prevalence of at least four consecutive weeks free from bothersome LBP at any time during the study period, and 3) the prevalence of at least four consecutive weeks free from bothersome LBP at any time during the study period among subgroups that reported >30 days or ≤30 days of LBP the preceding year. Method In this prospective multicentre study subjects with LBP (n = 262) were consecutively recruited from chiropractic primary care clinics in Sweden. The number of days with bothersome LBP was collected through weekly automated text messages. The maximum number of weeks in a row without bothersome LBP and the number of periods of at least four consecutive weeks free from bothersome LBP was counted for each individual and analysed as proportions. Results Data from 222 recruited subjects were analysed, of which 59 % reported at least one period of four consecutive weeks free from bothersome LBP. The number of consecutive pain free weeks ranged from 82 (at least one) to 31 % (9 or more). In subjects with a total duration of LBP of ≤ 30 days the previous year, 75 % reported a period of 4 consecutive weeks free from bothersome LBP during the study period whereas this was reported by only 48 % of subjects with a total duration of LBP of >30 days the previous year. Conclusion Prevalence of four consecutive pain free weeks is found in the majority of subjects in this population logically reflects duration of LBP within the sample and may be applied on patients in primary care to demarcate a LBP episode.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Eklund
- Unit of Intervention and Implementation Research, Karolinska Institutet, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Nobels v 13, S-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Irene Jensen
- Unit of Intervention and Implementation Research, Karolinska Institutet, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Nobels v 13, S-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Malin Lohela-Karlsson
- Unit of Intervention and Implementation Research, Karolinska Institutet, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Nobels v 13, S-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Charlotte Leboeuf-Yde
- Research Department, Spine Center of Southern Denmark, Institute for Regional Health Research, Hospital Lillebælt, University of Southern Denmark, Østre Hougvej 55, DK-5500 Middelfart, Denmark
| | - Iben Axén
- Unit of Intervention and Implementation Research, Karolinska Institutet, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Nobels v 13, S-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden ; Research Department, Spine Center of Southern Denmark, Institute for Regional Health Research, Hospital Lillebælt, University of Southern Denmark, Østre Hougvej 55, DK-5500 Middelfart, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Draper B, Rigoni N. Prescription medication use in a chiropractic training clinic: Cause for vigilance. Complement Ther Clin Pract 2016; 22:59-63. [PMID: 26850807 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2015.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2015] [Accepted: 11/26/2015] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The concurrent use of CAM therapies with traditional allopathic medical practice is increasing. This study investigates the concurrent use of prescription medication in patients attending a chiropractic student teaching clinic for the first time. The need for practitioners to be aware of the side effects of prescribed medication patients are using is discussed. METHODS Cross-sectional study of 1008 new patient consultations at a university chiropractic teaching clinic. RESULTS 549 prescription medications being used by 330 patients were included in the analysis. A total of 104 individual medications were identified of which 69 listed headache as a potential side effect of their use. 57 of 116 (49%) of patients seeking care for the treatment of headache were concurrently using these medications. CONCLUSIONS Patients presenting to the university chiropractic teaching clinic may be seeking care for symptoms attributed to prescription medication. The requirement that practitioners be aware of the side effects of prescribed medication patients are using is raised.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barry Draper
- RMIT University, Department of Health Sciences, Plenty Rd, Bundoora 3083, Australia.
| | - Nereo Rigoni
- RMIT University, Department of Health Sciences, Plenty Rd, Bundoora 3083, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Petrozzi MJ, Leaver A, Jones MK, Ferreira PH, Rubinstein SM, Mackey MG. Does an online psychological intervention improve self-efficacy and disability in people also receiving Multimodal Manual Therapy for chronic low back pain compared to Multimodal Manual Therapy alone? Design of a randomized controlled trial. Chiropr Man Therap 2015; 23:35. [PMID: 26692259 PMCID: PMC4683746 DOI: 10.1186/s12998-015-0080-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2015] [Accepted: 12/03/2015] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Various interventions are available for the treatment of chronic low back pain (LBP), including Manual Therapy and Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT). The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether the addition of an internet-based CBT program leads to better outcomes in patients who are treated with multimodal manual therapy for chronic LBP. METHODS/DESIGN A randomized controlled trial comparing a combined intervention, consisting of internet-based CBT utilising MoodGYM plus multimodal manual therapy, to multimodal manual therapy alone for patients with chronic LBP. Multimodal manual therapy will be delivered by experienced chiropractors and physiotherapists. Treatment sessions will consist of a combination of joint and soft tissue mobilisation; spinal manipulation as well as muscle and fascia massage; education and reassurance; and rehabilitative exercise prescription. In total, 108 adult participants will be recruited from multiple chiropractic and physiotherapy private practices in Australia. Participants older than 18 years of age and diagnosed with chronic non-specific LBP will be included in the trial, where chronic LBP is defined as continuous or fluctuating pain for a minimum of three months. The Keele STarT Back screening tool will be used to screen for potential participants who are in the medium risk category. The primary outcomes are self efficacy and disability measured by the Patient Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ) and Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) respectively. Secondary outcome measures will assess pain, catastrophising, depression, anxiety, stress and work ability. Participants will be randomly allocated into one of two groups. Both groups will receive an upper limit of 12 multimodal manual therapy sessions over a period of 8 weeks. The intervention group will also receive five weeks of MoodGYM covering five modules in total. Assessment will be conducted at pre-treatment, post-treatment 8- and follow-up at 26- and 52 weeks. In addition, a verbal pain measure will be completed by the treating practitioner at time of treatments on an 11-point VAS. The primary data analysis will be by intention to treat using a linear mixed model for each outcome. DISCUSSION This paper outlines the design of a randomised controlled trial that investigates the potential benefits of adding a widely available and inexpensive internet-based psychological intervention to standard multimodal manual therapy for the management of chronic low back pain. TRIAL REGISTRATION ACTRN12615000269538.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M. John Petrozzi
- />Research Student, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Andrew Leaver
- />Discipline of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Mairwen K. Jones
- />Discipline of Behavioural and Social Sciences in Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Paulo H. Ferreira
- />Discipline of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Sidney M. Rubinstein
- />Faculty of Earth and Life Sciences, Institute of Health Sciences, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Martin G. Mackey
- />Discipline of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Eklund A, Bergström G, Bodin L, Axén I. Psychological and behavioral differences between low back pain populations: a comparative analysis of chiropractic, primary and secondary care patients. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2015; 16:306. [PMID: 26483193 PMCID: PMC4617861 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-015-0753-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2015] [Accepted: 10/05/2015] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Psychological, behavioral and social factors have long been considered important in the development of persistent pain. Little is known about how chiropractic low back pain (LBP) patients compare to other LBP patients in terms of psychological/behavioral characteristics. Methods In this cross-sectional study, the aim was to investigate patients with LBP as regards to psychosocial/behavioral characteristics by describing a chiropractic primary care population and comparing this sample to three other populations using the MPI-S instrument. Thus, four different samples were compared. A: Four hundred eighty subjects from chiropractic primary care clinics. B: One hundred twenty-eight subjects from a gainfully employed population (sick listed with high risk of developing chronicity). C: Two hundred seventy-three subjects from a secondary care rehabilitation clinic. D: Two hundred thirty-five subjects from secondary care clinics. The Swedish version of the Multidimensional Pain Inventory (MPI-S) was used to collect data. Subjects were classified using a cluster analytic strategy into three pre-defined subgroups (named adaptive copers, dysfunctional and interpersonally distressed). Results The data show statistically significant overall differences across samples for the subgroups based on psychological and behavioral characteristics. The cluster classifications placed (in terms of the proportions of the adaptive copers and dysfunctional subgroups) sample A between B and the two secondary care samples C and D. Conclusions The chiropractic primary care sample was more affected by pain and worse off with regards to psychological and behavioral characteristics compared to the other primary care sample. Based on our findings from the MPI-S instrument the 4 samples may be considered statistically and clinically different. Trial registration Sample A comes from an ongoing trial registered at clinical trials.gov; NCT01539863, February 22, 2012.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Eklund
- Karolinska Institutet, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Unit of Intervention and Implementation Research, Nobels väg 13, S-171 77, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Gunnar Bergström
- Karolinska Institutet, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Unit of Intervention and Implementation Research, Nobels väg 13, S-171 77, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Lennart Bodin
- Karolinska Institutet, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Unit of Intervention and Implementation Research, Nobels väg 13, S-171 77, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Iben Axén
- Karolinska Institutet, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Unit of Intervention and Implementation Research, Nobels väg 13, S-171 77, Stockholm, Sweden. .,Research Department, Spine Center of Southern Denmark, Hospital Lillebælt and Institute of Regional Health Research, Østre Hougvej 55, DK-5500, Middelfart, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Adams J, Steel A, Chang S, Sibbritt D. Helping address the national research and research capacity needs of Australian chiropractic: introducing the Australian Chiropractic Research Network (ACORN) project. Chiropr Man Therap 2015; 23:12. [PMID: 25834727 PMCID: PMC4381492 DOI: 10.1186/s12998-015-0057-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2014] [Accepted: 02/03/2015] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Chiropractic is a popular health care choice in Australia and yet major gaps in our empirical understanding of this area of practice remain. Furthermore, while some research excellence exists, a largely uncoordinated approach to research activity and development has in effect led to silos of interest and a lack of strategic ‘big-picture’ planning essential to producing a sustainable research culture and capacity for the profession. This commentary identifies the significance of a number of key features - including a national, coordinated focus, and a rich engagement with the practitioner and patient base amongst others – arguably important to the future development of research and research capacity within Australian chiropractic. The design features and phases of the Australian Chiropractic Research Network (ACORN) project are also outlined. ACORN is one contemporary initiative specifically developed to address chiropractic’s research and research capacity building needs and help grow a broad evidence-base to inform safe, effective patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jon Adams
- Australian Research Centre in Complementary and Integrative Medicine, Faculty of Health, University of Technology, Sydney, Australia
| | - Amie Steel
- Australian Research Centre in Complementary and Integrative Medicine, Faculty of Health, University of Technology, Sydney, Australia ; Office of Research, Endeavour College of Natural Health, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Sungwon Chang
- Australian Research Centre in Complementary and Integrative Medicine, Faculty of Health, University of Technology, Sydney, Australia
| | - David Sibbritt
- Australian Research Centre in Complementary and Integrative Medicine, Faculty of Health, University of Technology, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|