1
|
Helander M, Fredriksson M, Lohela-Karlsson M. Exploring stakeholders' perceived problems associated with the care and support of children and youth with mental ill health in Sweden: a qualitative study. J Health Popul Nutr 2024; 43:30. [PMID: 38378621 PMCID: PMC10880220 DOI: 10.1186/s41043-024-00520-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2023] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 02/22/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Care and support for children and youth with mental ill health have become more specialized and are provided by an increasing number of stakeholders. As a result, services are often fragmented, inefficient and unco-ordinated, with negative consequences for the service user and their family. Enhanced collaboration could lead to improved care and support but requires a shared understanding and a joint problem formulation between involved stakeholders to commence. The aim of this study was to explore different stakeholders' perceived problems associated with delivering care and support to children and youth with mental ill health and to discuss how the perceived problems relate to collaboration. METHODS A qualitative descriptive study was conducted, using short statements of perceived problems written by stakeholders involved in the care and support of children and youth with mental ill health during an inter-organizational workshop. The 26 stakeholders represented school and student health, primary health care, specialist care, social services, and different service user organizations. Data were collected during February 2020. Inductive content analysis with a summative approach was used when analysing the data. RESULTS The perceived problems were summarized in a model consisting of four main categories: Resources and governance; Collaboration and co-ordination; Knowledge and competence; and Stigma and confidence, containing 24 subcategories. These categories and subcategories were distributed over three levels: Societal level, Organizational level and Individual level. The perceived problems were shared on the category level but to some extent varied between stakeholder groups on the subcategory level. The perceived problems were either directly or indirectly related to collaboration. CONCLUSIONS The perceived problems often acted as barriers to achieving successful collaboration. The problems were distributed on all three levels in the developed model, indicating a complex problem. Even though the perceived problems were shared by stakeholders on an overall level, the findings indicate that the stakeholders did not have a completely shared understanding of the perceived problems, as they tended to focus on aspects most relevant to their own organization or perceptions. The challenge is to find which perceived problems are appropriate for inter-organization problem-solving and which can be solved within individual organizations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Malin Helander
- Centre for Clinical Research, Västmanland Hospital Västerås, Uppsala University, 721 89, Västerås, Region Västmanland, Sweden.
- Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
| | - Mio Fredriksson
- Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Malin Lohela-Karlsson
- Centre for Clinical Research, Västmanland Hospital Västerås, Uppsala University, 721 89, Västerås, Region Västmanland, Sweden
- Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Göras C, Lohela-Karlsson M, Castegren M, Condén Mellgren E, Ekstedt M, Bjurling-Sjöberg P. From Threatening Chaos to Temporary Order through a Complex Process of Adaptation: A Grounded Theory Study of the Escalation of Intensive Care during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2023; 20:7019. [PMID: 37947575 PMCID: PMC10649734 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20217019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2023] [Revised: 11/01/2023] [Accepted: 11/02/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023]
Abstract
To ensure high-quality care, operationalize resilience and fill the knowledge gap regarding how to improve the prerequisites for resilient performance, it is necessary to understand how adaptive capacity unfolds in practice. The main aim of this research was to explain the escalation process of intensive care during the first wave of the pandemic from a microlevel perspective, including expressions of resilient performance, intervening conditions at the micro-meso-macrolevels and short- and long-term consequences. A secondary aim was to provide recommendations regarding how to optimize the prerequisites for resilient performance in intensive care. A grounded theory methodology was used. First-person stories from different healthcare professionals (n70) in two Swedish regions were analyzed using the constant comparative method. This resulted in a novel conceptual model (including 6 main categories and 24 subcategories), and 41 recommendations. The conclusion of these findings is that the escalation of intensive care can be conceptualized as a transition from threatening chaos to temporary order through a complex process of adaptation. To prepare for the future, the components of space, stuff, staff, system and science, with associated continuity plans, must be implemented, anchored and communicated to actors at all levels of the system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camilla Göras
- Department of Caring Sciences, Faculty of Health and Occupational Sciences, University of Gävle, SE-801 76 Gävle, Sweden;
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Falu Hospital, SE-791 31 Falun, Sweden
| | - Malin Lohela-Karlsson
- Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Health Services Research, Uppsala University, SE-752 37 Uppsala, Sweden;
- Centre for Clinical Research Västmanland, Uppsala University, SE-721 89 Västerås, Sweden;
| | - Markus Castegren
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, SE-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden;
- Centre for Clinical Research Sörmland, Uppsala University, SE-631 88 Eskilstuna, Sweden
| | - Emelie Condén Mellgren
- Centre for Clinical Research Västmanland, Uppsala University, SE-721 89 Västerås, Sweden;
| | - Mirjam Ekstedt
- Department of Health and Caring Sciences, Linnaeus University Kalmar/Växjö, SE-392 31 Kalmar, Sweden;
- Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, SE-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Petronella Bjurling-Sjöberg
- Centre for Clinical Research Sörmland, Uppsala University, SE-631 88 Eskilstuna, Sweden
- Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Caring Science, Uppsala University, SE-752 37 Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bjurling-Sjöberg P, Göras C, Lohela-Karlsson M, Nordgren L, Källberg AS, Castegren M, Condén Mellgren E, Holmberg M, Ekstedt M. Resilient performance in healthcare during the COVID-19 pandemic (ResCOV): study protocol for a multilevel grounded theory study on adaptations, working conditions, ethics and patient safety. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e051928. [PMID: 34880017 PMCID: PMC8655346 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051928] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2021] [Accepted: 11/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Since early 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic has challenged societies and revealed the built-in fragility and dependencies in complex adaptive systems, such as healthcare. The pandemic has placed healthcare providers and systems under unprecedented amounts of strain with potential consequences that have not yet been fully elucidated. This multilevel project aims to explore resilient performance with the purpose of improving the understanding of how healthcare has adapted during the pandemic's rampage, the processes involved and the consequences on working conditions, ethics and patient safety. METHODS An emerging explorative multilevel design based on grounded theory methodology is applied. Open and theoretical sampling is performed. Empirical data are gathered over time from written narratives and qualitative interviews with staff with different positions in healthcare organisations in two Swedish regions. The participants' first-person stories are complemented with data from the healthcare organisations' internal documents and national and international official documents. ANALYSIS Experiences and expressions of resilient performance at different system levels and times, existing influencing risk and success factors at the microlevels, mesolevels and macrolevels and inter-relationships and consequences in different healthcare contexts, are explored using constant comparative analysis. Finally, the data are complemented with the current literature to develop a substantive theory of resilient performance during the pandemic. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This project is ethically approved and recognises the ongoing strain on the healthcare system when gathering data. The ongoing pandemic provides unique possibilities to study system-wide adaptive capacity across different system levels and times, which can create an important basis for designing interventions focusing on preparedness to manage current and future challenges in healthcare. Feedback is provided to the settings to enable pressing improvements. The findings will also be disseminated through scientific journals and conferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petronella Bjurling-Sjöberg
- Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
- Centre for Clinical Research, Uppsala University, Region Sörmland, Eskilstuna, Sweden
| | - Camilla Göras
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Falun Hospital, Region Dalarna, Falun, Sweden
- School of Health and Welfare, Dalarna University, Falun, Sweden
| | - Malin Lohela-Karlsson
- Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
- Centre for Clinical Research, Uppsala University, Region Västmanland, Västerås, Sweden
| | - Lena Nordgren
- Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
- Centre for Clinical Research, Uppsala University, Region Sörmland, Eskilstuna, Sweden
| | - Ann-Sofie Källberg
- School of Health and Welfare, Dalarna University, Falun, Sweden
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Falun Hospital, Region Dalarna, Falun, Sweden
| | - Markus Castegren
- Centre for Clinical Research, Uppsala University, Region Sörmland, Eskilstuna, Sweden
- CLINTEC, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Mats Holmberg
- Centre for Clinical Research, Uppsala University, Region Sörmland, Eskilstuna, Sweden
- Department of Health and Caring Sciences, Linneuniversitet, Kalmar/Växjö, Sweden
| | - Mirjam Ekstedt
- Department of Health and Caring Sciences, Linneuniversitet, Kalmar/Växjö, Sweden
- LIME, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Keus van de Poll M, Nybergh L, Lornudd C, Hagberg J, Bodin L, Kwak L, Jensen I, Lohela-Karlsson M, Torgén M, Bergstrom G. Preventing sickness absence among employees with common mental disorders or stress-related symptoms at work: a cluster randomised controlled trial of a problem-solving-based intervention conducted by the Occupational Health Services. Occup Environ Med 2020; 77:454-461. [PMID: 32291291 PMCID: PMC7306872 DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2019-106353] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2019] [Revised: 03/20/2020] [Accepted: 03/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Objectives Common mental disorders (CMDs) are among the main causes of sickness absence and can lead to suffering and high costs for individuals, employers and the society. The occupational health service (OHS) can offer work-directed interventions to support employers and employees. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect on sickness absence and health of a work-directed intervention given by the OHS to employees with CMDs or stress-related symptoms. Methods Randomisation was conducted at the OHS consultant level and each consultant was allocated into either giving a brief problem-solving intervention (PSI) or care as usual (CAU). The study group consisted of 100 employees with stress symptoms or CMDs. PSI was highly structured and used a participatory approach, involving both the employee and the employee’s manager. CAU was also work-directed but not based on the same theoretical concepts as PSI. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, at 6 and at 12 months. Primary outcome was registered sickness absence during the 1-year follow-up period. Among the secondary outcomes were self-registered sickness absence, return to work (RTW) and mental health. Results A statistical interaction for group × time was found on the primary outcome (p=0.033) and PSI had almost 15 days less sickness absence during follow-up compared with CAU. Concerning the secondary outcomes, PSI showed an earlier partial RTW and the mental health improved in both groups without significant group differences. Conclusion PSI was effective in reducing sickness absence which was the primary outcome in this study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marijke Keus van de Poll
- Division of Intervention and Implementation Research in Worker Health, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden .,Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, Department of Occupational Health Sciences and Psychology, University of Gävle, Gävle, Sweden
| | - Lotta Nybergh
- Division of Intervention and Implementation Research in Worker Health, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Caroline Lornudd
- Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics (LIME), Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jan Hagberg
- Division of Intervention and Implementation Research in Worker Health, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Lennart Bodin
- Division of Intervention and Implementation Research in Worker Health, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Lydia Kwak
- Division of Intervention and Implementation Research in Worker Health, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Irene Jensen
- Division of Intervention and Implementation Research in Worker Health, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Margareta Torgén
- Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Gunnar Bergstrom
- Division of Intervention and Implementation Research in Worker Health, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.,Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, Department of Occupational Health Sciences and Psychology, University of Gävle, Gävle, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Eklund A, Jensen I, Lohela-Karlsson M, Hagberg J, Leboeuf-Yde C, Kongsted A, Bodin L, Axén I. The Nordic Maintenance Care program: Effectiveness of chiropractic maintenance care versus symptom-guided treatment for recurrent and persistent low back pain-A pragmatic randomized controlled trial. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0203029. [PMID: 30208070 PMCID: PMC6135505 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2017] [Accepted: 08/02/2018] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Background For individuals with recurrent or persistent non-specific low back pain (LBP), exercise and exercise combined with education have been shown to be effective in preventing new episodes or in reducing the impact of the condition. Chiropractors have traditionally used Maintenance Care (MC), as secondary and tertiary prevention strategies. The aim of this trial was to investigate the effectiveness of MC on pain trajectories for patients with recurrent or persistent LBP. Method This pragmatic, investigator-blinded, two arm randomized controlled trial included consecutive patients (18–65 years old) with non-specific LBP, who had an early favorable response to chiropractic care. After an initial course of treatment, eligible subjects were randomized to either MC or control (symptom-guided treatment). The primary outcome was total number of days with bothersome LBP during 52 weeks collected weekly with text-messages (SMS) and estimated by a GEE model. Results Three hundred and twenty-eight subjects were randomly allocated to one of the two treatment groups. MC resulted in a reduction in the total number of days per week with bothersome LBP compared with symptom-guided treatment. During the 12 month study period, the MC group (n = 163, 3 dropouts) reported 12.8 (95% CI = 10.1, 15.5; p = <0.001) fewer days in total with bothersome LBP compared to the control group (n = 158, 4 dropouts) and received 1.7 (95% CI = 1.8, 2.1; p = <0.001) more treatments. Numbers presented are means. No serious adverse events were recorded. Conclusion MC was more effective than symptom-guided treatment in reducing the total number of days over 52 weeks with bothersome non-specific LBP but it resulted in a higher number of treatments. For selected patients with recurrent or persistent non-specific LBP who respond well to an initial course of chiropractic care, MC should be considered an option for tertiary prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Eklund
- Karolinska Institutet, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Unit of Intervention and Implementation Research for Worker Health, Stockholm, Sweden
- * E-mail:
| | - Irene Jensen
- Karolinska Institutet, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Unit of Intervention and Implementation Research for Worker Health, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Malin Lohela-Karlsson
- Karolinska Institutet, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Unit of Intervention and Implementation Research for Worker Health, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jan Hagberg
- Karolinska Institutet, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Unit of Intervention and Implementation Research for Worker Health, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Charlotte Leboeuf-Yde
- Institute for Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Alice Kongsted
- Nordic Institute of Chiropractic and Clinical Biomechanics, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Lennart Bodin
- Karolinska Institutet, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Unit of Intervention and Implementation Research for Worker Health, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Iben Axén
- Karolinska Institutet, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Unit of Intervention and Implementation Research for Worker Health, Stockholm, Sweden
- Institute for Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lohela-Karlsson M, Nybergh L, Jensen I. Perceived health and work-environment related problems and associated subjective production loss in an academic population. BMC Public Health 2018; 18:257. [PMID: 29444651 PMCID: PMC5813431 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-018-5154-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2017] [Accepted: 02/05/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The aim was to investigate the prevalence of health problems and work environment problems and how these are associated with subjective production loss among women and men at an academic workplace. An additional aim was to investigate whether there were differences between women and men according to age group, years at current workplace, academic rank or managerial position. Methods A questionnaire was sent in 2011 to all employees at a Swedish university (n = 5144). Only researchers and teachers were included in the study (n = 3207). Spearman correlations were performed to investigate differences in health and work environment problems. Employees who reported having experienced work environment or health problems in the previous seven days (n = 1475) were included in the analyses in order to investigate differences in subjective production loss. This was done using Student’s t-test, One-way Anova and generalized linear models. Results The response rate was 63% (n = 2022). A total of 819 academic staff (40% of the population) reported experiencing either health problems, work environment problems or both during the previous seven days. The prevalence of health problems only or a combination of work environment and health problems was higher among women than men (p-value ˂0.05). This was especially the case for younger women, those in lower academic positions and those who had worked for fewer years at their current workplace. No difference was found for work environment problems. The majority of the employees who reported problems said that these problems affected their ability to perform at work (84–99%). The average production loss varied between 31 and 42% depending on the type of problem. Production loss due to health-related and work-environment related problems was highest among junior researchers and managers. No significant difference between men and women was found in the level of production loss. Conclusion Subjective production loss in academia can be associated with health and work- environment problems. These losses appear similar for women and men even though younger female academics, women in lower academic ranks and those with fewer years of employment in their current workplace report a higher prevalence of health problems and combined work-environment and health problems than men.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Malin Lohela-Karlsson
- Unit of Intervention and Implementation Research for Worker Health, Institute of Environmental Medicine (IMM), Karolinska Institutet, 171 77, Stockholm, SE, Sweden.
| | - Lotta Nybergh
- Unit of Intervention and Implementation Research for Worker Health, Institute of Environmental Medicine (IMM), Karolinska Institutet, 171 77, Stockholm, SE, Sweden
| | - Irene Jensen
- Unit of Intervention and Implementation Research for Worker Health, Institute of Environmental Medicine (IMM), Karolinska Institutet, 171 77, Stockholm, SE, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Aboagye E, Hagberg J, Axén I, Kwak L, Lohela-Karlsson M, Skillgate E, Dahlgren G, Jensen I. Individual preferences for physical exercise as secondary prevention for non-specific low back pain: A discrete choice experiment. PLoS One 2017; 12:e0187709. [PMID: 29244841 PMCID: PMC5731740 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187709] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2017] [Accepted: 10/24/2017] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Exercise is effective in improving non-specific low back pain (LBP). Certain components of physical exercise, such as the type, intensity and frequency of exercise, are likely to influence participation among working adults with non-specific LBP, but the value and relative importance of these components remain unknown. The study’s aim was to examine such specific components and their influence on individual preferences for exercise for secondary prevention of non-specific LBP among working adults. Methods In a discrete choice experiment, working individuals with non-specific LBP answered a web-based questionnaire. Each respondent was given ten pairs of hypothetical exercise programs and asked to choose one option from each pair. The choices comprised six attributes of exercise (i.e., type of training, design, intensity, frequency, proximity and incentives), each with either three or four levels. A conditional logit regression that reflected the random utility model was used to analyze the responses. Results The final study population consisted of 112 participants. The participants’ preferred exercise option was aerobic (i.e., cardiovascular) rather than strength training, group exercise with trainer supervision, rather than individual or unsupervised exercise. They also preferred high intensity exercise performed at least once or twice per week. The most popular types of incentive were exercise during working hours and a wellness allowance rather than coupons for sports goods. The results show that the relative value of some attribute levels differed between young adults (age ≤ 44 years) and older adults (age ≥ 45 years) in terms of the level of trainer supervision required, exercise intensity, travel time to exercise location and financial incentives. For active study participants, exercise frequency (i.e., twice per week, 1.15; CI: 0.25; 2.06) influenced choice of exercise. For individuals with more than one child, travel time (i.e., 20 minutes, -0.55; CI: 0.65; 3.26) was also an influential attribute for choice of exercise, showing that people with children at home preferred to exercise close to home. Conclusions This study adds to our knowledge about what types of exercise working adults with back pain are most likely to participate in. The exercise should be a cardiovascular type of training carried out in a group with trainer supervision. It should also be of high intensity and preferably performed twice per week during working hours. Coupons for sports goods do not appear to motivate physical activity among workers with LBP. The findings of the study could have a substantial impact on the planning and development of exercise provision and promotion strategies to improve non-specific LBP. Providers and employers may be able to improve participation in exercise programs for adults with non-specific LBP by focusing on the exercise components which are the most attractive. This in turn would improve satisfaction and adherence to exercise interventions aimed at preventing recurrent non-specific LBP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emmanuel Aboagye
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Unit of Intervention and Implementation Research for Worker Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- * E-mail:
| | - Jan Hagberg
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Unit of Intervention and Implementation Research for Worker Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Iben Axén
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Unit of Intervention and Implementation Research for Worker Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Lydia Kwak
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Unit of Intervention and Implementation Research for Worker Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Malin Lohela-Karlsson
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Unit of Intervention and Implementation Research for Worker Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Eva Skillgate
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Unit of Cardiovascular Epidemiology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Gunilla Dahlgren
- Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Unit of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Irene Jensen
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Unit of Intervention and Implementation Research for Worker Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kongsted A, Hestbaek L, Ammendolia C, Côté P, Southerst D, Schneider M, Budgell B, Bombardier C, Hawker G, Raja Rampersaud Y, Minder C, Peterson C, Kim Humphreys B, Gíslason HF, Salminen JK, Sandhaugen L, Storbråten AS, Versloot R, Rouge I, Newell D, Aartun E, Yu H, Côté P, Poulsen E, Goncalves GH, Roos EM, Thorlund JB, Juhl C, Eklund A, Jensen I, Lohela-Karlsson M, Hagberg J, Bodin L, Lebouf-Yde C, Kongsted A, Axén I, Dissing KB, Hartvigsen J, Williams C, Kamper S, Boyle E, Wedderkopp N, Hestbæk L, Meier ML, Schweinhardt P, Humphreys K, Miller A, Miller J, Miller A, Miller J, Miller A, Miller J, Taylor A, Way S, Wirth B, Schweinhardt P, Humphreys K, Alvarenga BAP, Botelho MB, Lara JPR, Veloso AP, Bergström C, Persson M, Mogren I, Janine Thöni B, Peterson C, Kim Humphreys B, Guillén D, Peterson C, Kim Humphreys B, Heritage D, Miller J, Byfield D, Newsam A, Byfield D, Toprak M, Alptekim HK, Turhan D, Mellars H, Miller J, Rix J, Dewhurst P, Rix J, Cooke C, Newell D, Alcantara J, Ohm J, Alcantara J, Alcantara J, Ohm J, Alcantara J, Field J, Newell D, Hanson H, Miller J, Mandy H, Derek L, Zicheng M, Han TY, Joyce M, Fuglkjær S, Dissing KB, Hestbæk L, Schweinhardt P, Wirth B, Peterson G, Humphreys BK, Raven TL, Lothe LR, Eken T, Serola R. ECU convention 2017 research presentations. Chiropr Man Therap 2017. [PMCID: PMC5773907 DOI: 10.1186/s12998-017-0166-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
|
9
|
Strömberg C, Aboagye E, Hagberg J, Bergström G, Lohela-Karlsson M. Estimating the Effect and Economic Impact of Absenteeism, Presenteeism, and Work Environment-Related Problems on Reductions in Productivity from a Managerial Perspective. Value Health 2017; 20:1058-1064. [PMID: 28964437 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.05.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2016] [Revised: 04/06/2017] [Accepted: 05/14/2017] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to propose wage multipliers that can be used to estimate the costs of productivity loss for employers in economic evaluations, using detailed information from managers. METHODS Data were collected in a survey panel of 758 managers from different sectors of the labor market. Based on assumed scenarios of a period of absenteeism due to sickness, presenteeism and work environment-related problem episodes, and specified job characteristics (i.e., explanatory variables), managers assessed their impact on group productivity and cost (i.e., the dependent variable). In an ordered probit model, the extent of productivity loss resulting from job characteristics is predicted. The predicted values are used to derive wage multipliers based on the cost of productivity estimates provided by the managers. RESULTS The results indicate that job characteristics (i.e., degree of time sensitivity of output, teamwork, or difficulty in replacing a worker) are linked to productivity loss as a result of health-related and work environment-related problems. The impact of impaired performance on productivity differs among various occupations. The mean wage multiplier is 1.97 for absenteeism, 1.70 for acute presenteeism, 1.54 for chronic presenteeism, and 1.72 for problems related to the work environment. This implies that the costs of health-related and work environment-related problems to organizations can exceed the worker's wage. CONCLUSIONS The use of wage multipliers is recommended for calculating the cost of health-related and work environment-related productivity loss to properly account for actual costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carl Strömberg
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Unit of Intervention and Implementation Research for Worker Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Emmanuel Aboagye
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Unit of Intervention and Implementation Research for Worker Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jan Hagberg
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Unit of Intervention and Implementation Research for Worker Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Gunnar Bergström
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Unit of Intervention and Implementation Research for Worker Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Malin Lohela-Karlsson
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Unit of Intervention and Implementation Research for Worker Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bergström G, Lohela-Karlsson M, Kwak L, Bodin L, Jensen I, Torgén M, Nybergh L. Preventing sickness absenteeism among employees with common mental disorders or stress-related symptoms at work: Design of a cluster randomized controlled trial of a problem-solving based intervention versus care-as-usual conducted at the Occupational Health Services. BMC Public Health 2017; 17:436. [PMID: 28494753 PMCID: PMC5427578 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-017-4329-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2017] [Accepted: 04/26/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Common mental disorders (CMDs) are among the leading causes of sick leave in Sweden and other OECD countries. They result in suffering for the individual and considerable financial costs for the employer and for society at large. The occupational health service (OHS) can offer interventions in which both the individual and the work situation are taken into account. The aim of this paper is to describe the design of a study evaluating the effectiveness of an intervention given at the OHS to employees with CMDs or stress-related symptoms at work. In addition, intervention fidelity and its relation to the outcome will be assessed in a process analysis. METHODS The study is designed as a cluster randomized trial in which the participating OHS consultants are randomized into either delivering the intervention or performing care as usual. Employees with CMDs or stress-related symptoms at work are recruited consecutively by the OHS consultants. The intervention aims to improve the match between the employee and the job situation. Interviews are held individually with the employee and the nearest supervisor, after which a joint meeting with both the employee and the supervisor takes place. A participatory approach is applied by which the supervisor and the employee are guided by the OHS consultant and encouraged to actively take part in problem solving concerning the work situation. Outcomes will be assessed at baseline and at six and 12 months. A long-term follow-up at 3 years will also be performed. The primary outcome is registered sickness absence during a 1-year period after study inclusion. Secondary outcomes are mental health and work ability. The intervention's cost effectiveness, compared to treatment as usual, both for society and for the employer will be evaluated. A process evaluation by both the OHS consultants and the employee will be carried out. DISCUSSION The study includes analyses of the effectiveness of the intervention (clinical and economic) as well as an analysis of its implementation at the participating OHSs. Possible methodological challenges such as selection bias and risk of contamination between OHS consultants delivering the experimental condition and consultants giving usual care are discussed. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials NCT02563743 Sep 28 2015.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Bergström
- Division of Intervention and Implementation Research in Worker Health, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, SE-171 77, Stockholm, Sweden. .,Centre for Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Stockholm County Council, SE-113 65, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - M Lohela-Karlsson
- Division of Intervention and Implementation Research in Worker Health, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, SE-171 77, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - L Kwak
- Division of Intervention and Implementation Research in Worker Health, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, SE-171 77, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - L Bodin
- Division of Intervention and Implementation Research in Worker Health, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, SE-171 77, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - I Jensen
- Division of Intervention and Implementation Research in Worker Health, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, SE-171 77, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - M Torgén
- Department of Medical Science, Uppsala University, SE-751 85, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - L Nybergh
- Division of Intervention and Implementation Research in Worker Health, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, SE-171 77, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Martinsson C, Lohela-Karlsson M, Kwak L, Bergström G, Hellman T. What incentives influence employers to engage in workplace health interventions? BMC Public Health 2016; 16:854. [PMID: 27552912 PMCID: PMC4995638 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-016-3534-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2015] [Accepted: 08/17/2016] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To achieve a sustainable working life it is important to know more about what could encourage employers to increase the use of preventive and health promotive interventions. The objective of the study is to explore and describe the employer perspective regarding what incentives influence their use of preventive and health promotive workplace interventions. METHOD Semi-structured focus group interviews were carried out with 20 representatives from 19 employers across Sweden. The economic sectors represented were municipalities, government agencies, defence, educational, research, and development institutions, health care, manufacturing, agriculture and commercial services. The interviews were transcribed verbatim and the data were analysed using latent content analysis. RESULTS Various incentives were identified in the analysis, namely: "law and provisions", "consequences for the workplace", "knowledge of worker health and workplace health interventions", "characteristics of the intervention", "communication and collaboration with the provider". The incentives seemed to influence the decision-making in parallel with each other and were not only related to positive incentives for engaging in workplace health interventions, but also to disincentives. CONCLUSIONS This study suggests that the decision to engage in workplace health interventions was influenced by several incentives. There are those incentives that lead to a desire to engage in a workplace health intervention, others pertain to aspects more related to the intervention use, such as the characteristics of the employer, the provider and the intervention. It is important to take all incentives into consideration when trying to understand the decision-making process for workplace health interventions and to bridge the gap between what is produced through research and what is used in practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camilla Martinsson
- Intervention and Implementation Research Unit, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Malin Lohela-Karlsson
- Intervention and Implementation Research Unit, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Lydia Kwak
- Intervention and Implementation Research Unit, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Gunnar Bergström
- Intervention and Implementation Research Unit, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Therese Hellman
- Intervention and Implementation Research Unit, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Aboagye E, Jensen I, Bergström G, Hagberg J, Axén I, Lohela-Karlsson M. Validity and test-retest reliability of an at-work production loss instrument. Occup Med (Lond) 2016; 66:377-82. [PMID: 26933065 DOI: 10.1093/occmed/kqw021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Besides causing ill health, a poor work environment may contribute to production loss. Production loss assessment instruments emphasize health-related consequences but there is no instrument to measure reduced work performance related to the work environment. AIMS To examine convergent validity and test-retest reliability of health-related production loss (HRPL) and work environment-related production loss (WRPL) against a valid comparable instrument, the Health and Work Performance Questionnaire (HPQ). METHODS Cross-sectional study of employees, not on sick leave, who were asked to self-rate their work performance and production losses. Using the Pearson correlation and Bland and Altman's Test of Agreement, convergent validity was examined. Subgroup analyses were performed for employees recording problem-specific reduced work performance. Consistency of pairs of HRPL and WRPL for samples responding to both assessments was expressed using Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) and tests of repeatability. RESULTS A total of 88 employees participated and 44 responded to both assessments. Test of agreement between measurements estimates a mean difference of 0.34 for HRPL and -0.03 for WRPL compared with work performance. This indicates that the production loss questions are valid and moderately associated with work performance for the total sample and subgroups. ICC for paired HRPL assessments was 0.90 and 0.91 for WRPL, i.e. the test-retest reliability was good and suggests stability in the instrument. CONCLUSIONS HRPL and WRPL can be used to measure production loss due to health-related and work environment-related problems. These results may have implications for advancing methods of assessing production loss, which represents an important cost to employers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Aboagye
- Department of Environmental Medicine, Unit of Intervention and Implementation Research, Karolinska Institutet, SE-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - I Jensen
- Department of Environmental Medicine, Unit of Intervention and Implementation Research, Karolinska Institutet, SE-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - G Bergström
- Department of Environmental Medicine, Unit of Intervention and Implementation Research, Karolinska Institutet, SE-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - J Hagberg
- Department of Environmental Medicine, Unit of Intervention and Implementation Research, Karolinska Institutet, SE-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - I Axén
- Department of Environmental Medicine, Unit of Intervention and Implementation Research, Karolinska Institutet, SE-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - M Lohela-Karlsson
- Department of Environmental Medicine, Unit of Intervention and Implementation Research, Karolinska Institutet, SE-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Eklund A, Jensen I, Lohela-Karlsson M, Leboeuf-Yde C, Axén I. Absence of low back pain to demarcate an episode: a prospective multicentre study in primary care. Chiropr Man Therap 2016; 24:3. [PMID: 26893824 PMCID: PMC4758002 DOI: 10.1186/s12998-016-0085-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2015] [Accepted: 01/06/2016] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background It has been proposed that an episode of low back pain (LBP) be defined as: “a period of pain in the lower back lasting for more than 24 h preceded and followed by a period of at least 1 month without LBP”. Previous studies have tested the definition in the general population and in secondary care populations with distinctly different results. The objectives of this study (in a primary care population) were to investigate the prevalence of 1) the number of consecutive weeks free from bothersome LBP, 2) the prevalence of at least four consecutive weeks free from bothersome LBP at any time during the study period, and 3) the prevalence of at least four consecutive weeks free from bothersome LBP at any time during the study period among subgroups that reported >30 days or ≤30 days of LBP the preceding year. Method In this prospective multicentre study subjects with LBP (n = 262) were consecutively recruited from chiropractic primary care clinics in Sweden. The number of days with bothersome LBP was collected through weekly automated text messages. The maximum number of weeks in a row without bothersome LBP and the number of periods of at least four consecutive weeks free from bothersome LBP was counted for each individual and analysed as proportions. Results Data from 222 recruited subjects were analysed, of which 59 % reported at least one period of four consecutive weeks free from bothersome LBP. The number of consecutive pain free weeks ranged from 82 (at least one) to 31 % (9 or more). In subjects with a total duration of LBP of ≤ 30 days the previous year, 75 % reported a period of 4 consecutive weeks free from bothersome LBP during the study period whereas this was reported by only 48 % of subjects with a total duration of LBP of >30 days the previous year. Conclusion Prevalence of four consecutive pain free weeks is found in the majority of subjects in this population logically reflects duration of LBP within the sample and may be applied on patients in primary care to demarcate a LBP episode.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Eklund
- Unit of Intervention and Implementation Research, Karolinska Institutet, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Nobels v 13, S-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Irene Jensen
- Unit of Intervention and Implementation Research, Karolinska Institutet, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Nobels v 13, S-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Malin Lohela-Karlsson
- Unit of Intervention and Implementation Research, Karolinska Institutet, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Nobels v 13, S-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Charlotte Leboeuf-Yde
- Research Department, Spine Center of Southern Denmark, Institute for Regional Health Research, Hospital Lillebælt, University of Southern Denmark, Østre Hougvej 55, DK-5500 Middelfart, Denmark
| | - Iben Axén
- Unit of Intervention and Implementation Research, Karolinska Institutet, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Nobels v 13, S-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden ; Research Department, Spine Center of Southern Denmark, Institute for Regional Health Research, Hospital Lillebælt, University of Southern Denmark, Østre Hougvej 55, DK-5500 Middelfart, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Lohela-Karlsson M, Hagberg J, Bergström G. Production loss among employees perceiving work environment problems. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2014; 88:769-77. [PMID: 25432297 PMCID: PMC4508363 DOI: 10.1007/s00420-014-1003-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2014] [Accepted: 11/19/2014] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Objectives
The overall aim of this explorative study was to investigate the relationship between factors in the psychosocial work environment and work environment-related production loss. Methods Employees at a Swedish university were invited to answer a workplace questionnaire and were selected for this study if they reported having experienced work environment-related problems in the past 7 days (n = 302). A stepwise logistic regression and a modified Poisson regression were used to identify psychosocial work factors associated with work environment-related production loss as well as to identify at what level those factors are associated with production loss. Results Employees who reported having experienced work environment problems but also fair leadership, good social climate, role clarity and control of decision had significantly lower levels of production loss, whereas employees who reported inequality and high decision demands reported significantly higher levels of production loss. Never or seldom experiencing fair leadership, role clarity, equality, decision demands and good social climate increase the risk of production loss due to work environment problems, compared to those who experience these circumstances frequently, always or most of the time. Conclusions Several psychosocial work factors are identified as factors associated with a reduced risk of production losses among employees despite the nature of the work environment problem. Knowledge of these factors may be important not only to reduce employee ill-health and the corresponding health-related production loss, but also reduce immediate production loss due to work environment-related problems.
Collapse
|
15
|
Brodin N, Lohela-Karlsson M, Swärdh E, Opava CH. Cost-effectiveness of a one-year coaching program for healthy physical activity in early rheumatoid arthritis. Disabil Rehabil 2014; 37:757-62. [DOI: 10.3109/09638288.2014.940429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
|
16
|
Eklund A, Axén I, Kongsted A, Lohela-Karlsson M, Leboeuf-Yde C, Jensen I. Prevention of low back pain: effect, cost-effectiveness, and cost-utility of maintenance care - study protocol for a randomized clinical trial. Trials 2014; 15:102. [PMID: 24690201 PMCID: PMC3984260 DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2013] [Accepted: 03/21/2014] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Low back pain (LBP) is a prevalent condition and a socioeconomic problem in many countries. Due to its recurrent nature, the prevention of further episodes (secondary prevention), seems logical. Furthermore, when the condition is persistent, the minimization of symptoms and prevention of deterioration (tertiary prevention), is equally important. Research has largely focused on treatment methods for symptomatic episodes, and little is known about preventive treatment strategies. Methods/Design This study protocol describes a randomized controlled clinical trial in a multicenter setting investigating the effect and cost-effectiveness of preventive manual care (chiropractic maintenance care) in a population of patients with recurrent or persistent LBP. Four hundred consecutive study subjects with recurrent or persistent LBP will be recruited from chiropractic clinics in Sweden. The primary outcome is the number of days with bothersome pain over 12 months. Secondary measures are self-rated health (EQ-5D), function (the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire), psychological profile (the Multidimensional Pain Inventory), pain intensity (the Numeric Rating Scale), and work absence. The primary utility measure of the study is quality-adjusted life years and will be calculated using the EQ-5D questionnaire. Direct medical costs as well as indirect costs will be considered. Subjects are randomly allocated into two treatment arms: 1) Symptom-guided treatment (patient controlled), receiving care when patients feel a need. 2) Preventive treatment (clinician controlled), receiving care on a regular basis. Eligibility screening takes place in two phases: first, when assessing the primary inclusion/exclusion criteria, and then to only include fast responders, i.e., subjects who respond well to initial treatment. Data are collected at baseline and at follow-up as well as weekly, using SMS text messages. Discussion This study investigates a manual strategy (chiropractic maintenance care) for recurrent and persistent LBP and aims to answer questions regarding the effect and cost-effectiveness of this preventive approach. Strict inclusion criteria should ensure a suitable target group and the use of frequent data collection should provide an accurate outcome measurement. The study utilizes normal clinical procedures, which should aid the transferability of the results. Trial registration Clinical trials.gov; NCT01539863, February 22, 2012. The first patient was randomized into the study on April 13th 2012.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Eklund
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Unit of Intervention and Implementation Research, Karolinska Institutet, Nobels v13, S-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Björklund C, Jensen I, Lohela-Karlsson M. Is a change in work motivation related to a change in mental well-being? Journal of Vocational Behavior 2013. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jvb.2013.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|