1
|
Senevirathna P, Pires DEV, Capurro D. Data-driven overdiagnosis definitions: A scoping review. J Biomed Inform 2023; 147:104506. [PMID: 37769829 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2023.104506] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2023] [Revised: 09/17/2023] [Accepted: 09/22/2023] [Indexed: 10/03/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Adequate methods to promptly translate digital health innovations for improved patient care are essential. Advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) have been sources of digital innovation and hold the promise to revolutionize the way we treat, manage and diagnose patients. Understanding the benefits but also the potential adverse effects of digital health innovations, particularly when these are made available or applied on healthier segments of the population is essential. One of such adverse effects is overdiagnosis. OBJECTIVE to comprehensively analyze quantification strategies and data-driven definitions for overdiagnosis reported in the literature. METHODS we conducted a scoping systematic review of manuscripts describing quantitative methods to estimate the proportion of overdiagnosed patients. RESULTS we identified 46 studies that met our inclusion criteria. They covered a variety of clinical conditions, primarily breast and prostate cancer. Methods to quantify overdiagnosis included both prospective and retrospective methods including randomized clinical trials, and simulations. CONCLUSION a variety of methods to quantify overdiagnosis have been published, producing widely diverging results. A standard method to quantify overdiagnosis is needed to allow its mitigation during the rapidly increasing development of new digital diagnostic tools.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Prabodi Senevirathna
- School of Computing and Information Systems, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, 3053, Victoria, Australia
| | - Douglas E V Pires
- School of Computing and Information Systems, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, 3053, Victoria, Australia; Centre for Digital Transformation of Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, 3053, Victoria, Australia.
| | - Daniel Capurro
- School of Computing and Information Systems, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, 3053, Victoria, Australia; Centre for Digital Transformation of Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, 3053, Victoria, Australia; Department of General Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, 3053, Victoria, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pons-Rodriguez A, Forné Izquierdo C, Vilaplana-Mayoral J, Cruz-Esteve I, Sánchez-López I, Reñé-Reñé M, Cazorla C, Hernández-Andreu M, Galindo-Ortego G, Llorens Gabandé M, Laza-Vásquez C, Balaguer-Llaquet P, Martínez-Alonso M, Rué M. Feasibility and acceptability of personalised breast cancer screening (DECIDO study): protocol of a single-arm proof-of-concept trial. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e044597. [PMID: 33361170 PMCID: PMC7759966 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Personalised cancer screening aims to improve benefits, reduce harms and being more cost-effective than age-based screening. The objective of the DECIDO study is to assess the acceptability and feasibility of offering risk-based personalised breast cancer screening and its integration in regular clinical practice in a National Health System setting. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The study is designed as a single-arm proof-of-concept trial. The study sample will include 385 women aged 40-50 years resident in a primary care health area in Spain. The study intervention consists of (1) a baseline visit; (2) breast cancer risk estimation; (3) a second visit for risk communication and screening recommendations based on breast cancer risk and (4) a follow-up to obtain the study outcomes.A polygenic risk score (PRS) will be constructed as a composite likelihood ratio of 83 single nucleotide polymorphisms. The Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium risk model, including age, race/ethnicity, family history of breast cancer, benign breast disease and breast density will be used to estimate a preliminary 5-year absolute risk of breast cancer. A Bayesian approach will be used to update this risk with the PRS value.The primary outcome measures will be attitude towards, intention to participate in and satisfaction with personalised breast cancer screening. Secondary outcomes will include the proportions of women who accept to participate and who complete the different phases of the study. The exact binomial and the Student's t-test will be used to obtain 95% CIs. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The study protocol was approved by the Drug Research Ethics Committee of the University Hospital Arnau de Vilanova. The trial will be conducted in compliance with this study protocol, the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice.The results will be published in peer-reviewed scientific journals and disseminated in scientific conferences and media. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT03791008.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Pons-Rodriguez
- Eixample Basic Health Area, Catalan Institute of Health, Lleida, Spain
- Health PhD Program, University of Lleida, Lleida, Spain
| | - Carles Forné Izquierdo
- Basic Medical Sciences, University of Lleida, Lleida, Spain
- Research Group on Statistics and Economic Evaluation in Health (GRAEES), University of Lleida, Lleida, Spain
| | | | - Inés Cruz-Esteve
- Primer de Maig Basic Health Area, Catalan Institute of Health, Lleida, Spain
| | | | - Mercè Reñé-Reñé
- Radiology Department, Arnau de Vilanova University Hospital, Lleida, Spain
| | - Cristina Cazorla
- Primer de Maig Basic Health Area, Catalan Institute of Health, Lleida, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Montserrat Martínez-Alonso
- Basic Medical Sciences, University of Lleida, Lleida, Spain
- Research Group on Statistics and Economic Evaluation in Health (GRAEES), University of Lleida, Lleida, Spain
- IRBLleida, Lleida, Spain
| | - Montserrat Rué
- Basic Medical Sciences, University of Lleida, Lleida, Spain
- Research Group on Statistics and Economic Evaluation in Health (GRAEES), University of Lleida, Lleida, Spain
- IRBLleida, Lleida, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Impact of mammographic screening and advanced cancer definition on the percentage of advanced-stage cancers in a steady-state breast screening programme in the Netherlands. Br J Cancer 2020; 123:1191-1197. [PMID: 32641863 PMCID: PMC7524754 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-020-0968-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2020] [Revised: 06/09/2020] [Accepted: 06/18/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background To estimate the percentages of advanced-stage breast cancers (BCs) detected during the course of a steady-state screening programme when using different definitions of advanced BC. Methods Data of women aged 49–74 years, diagnosed with BC in 2006–2015, were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry and linked to the screening registry. BCs were classified as screen-detected, interval or non-screened. Three definitions of advanced BC were used for comparison: TNM stage (III–IV), NM stage (N+ and/or M+) and T size (invasive tumour ≥15 mm). Analyses were performed assuming a 10% overdiagnosis rate. In sensitivity analyses, this assumption varied from 0 to 30%. Results We included 46,734 screen-detected, 17,362 interval and 24,189 non-screened BCs. By TNM stage, 4.9% of screen-detected BCs were advanced, compared with 19.4% and 22.8% of interval and non-screened BCs, respectively (p < 0.001). Applying the other definitions led to higher percentages of advanced BC being detected. Depending on the definition interval, non-screened BCs had a 2–5-times risk of being advanced. Conclusion Irrespective of the definition, screen-detected BCs were less frequently in the advanced stage. These findings provide evidence of a stage shift to early detection and support the potential of mammographic screening to reduce treatment-related burdens and the mortality associated with BC.
Collapse
|
4
|
Napolitano G, Lynge E, Lillholm M, Vejborg I, van Gils CH, Nielsen M, Karssemeijer N. Change in mammographic density across birth cohorts of Dutch breast cancer screening participants. Int J Cancer 2019; 145:2954-2962. [PMID: 30762225 PMCID: PMC6850337 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.32210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2018] [Revised: 01/15/2019] [Accepted: 01/31/2019] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
High mammographic density is a well‐known risk factor for breast cancer. This study aimed to search for a possible birth cohort effect on mammographic density, which might contribute to explain the increasing breast cancer incidence. We separately analyzed left and right breast density of Dutch women from a 13‐year period (2003–2016) in the breast cancer screening programme. First, we analyzed age‐specific changes in average percent dense volume (PDV) across birth cohorts. A linear regression analysis (PDV vs. year of birth) indicated a small but statistically significant increase in women of: 1) age 50 and born from 1952 to 1966 (left, slope = 0.04, p = 0.003; right, slope = 0.09, p < 0.0001); 2) age 55 and born from 1948 to 1961 (right, slope = 0.04, p = 0.01); and 3) age 70 and born from 1933 to 1946 (right, slope = 0.05, p = 0.002). A decrease of total breast volume seemed to explain the increase in PDV. Second, we compared proportion of women with dense breast in women born in 1946–1953 and 1959–1966, and observed a statistical significant increase of proportion of highly dense breast in later born women, in the 51 to 55 age‐groups for the left breast (around a 20% increase in each age‐group), and in the 50 to 56 age‐groups for the right breast (increase ranging from 27% to 48%). The study indicated a slight increase in mammography density across birth cohorts, most pronounced for women in their early 50s, and more marked for the right than for the left breast. What's new? Women with dense breast tissue are at increased risk of breast cancer. Here, changes in mammographic density were investigated across birth cohorts in women enrolled in a breast cancer screening program in the Netherlands. The findings reveal an increase in the average fraction of dense tissue in the breast across cohorts. In particular, greater breast density was observed in a higher proportion of women in later‐born than earlier‐born birth cohorts. The increase was most significant among women in their early 50s and may be linked to a reported shift toward older age at menopause among women in Europe.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- George Napolitano
- Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Elsebeth Lynge
- Nykøbing Falster Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Martin Lillholm
- Department of Computer Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ilse Vejborg
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Carla H van Gils
- Department of Epidemiology, Julius Center for Health, Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Mads Nielsen
- Department of Computer Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Nico Karssemeijer
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University, Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Use of Mastectomy for Overdiagnosed Breast Cancer in the United States: Analysis of the SEER 9 Cancer Registries. J Cancer Epidemiol 2019; 2019:5072506. [PMID: 30804999 PMCID: PMC6362466 DOI: 10.1155/2019/5072506] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2018] [Revised: 11/24/2018] [Accepted: 12/23/2018] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim We investigated use of mastectomy as treatment for early breast cancer in the US and applied the resulting information to estimate the minimum and maximum rates at which mastectomy could plausibly be undergone by patients with overdiagnosed breast cancer. Little is currently known about overtreatments undergone by overdiagnosed patients. Methods In the US, screening is often recommended at ages ≥40. The study population was women age ≥40 diagnosed with breast cancer in the US SEER 9 cancer registries during 2013 (n=26,017). We evaluated first-course surgical treatments and their associations with case characteristics. Additionally, a model was developed to estimate probability of mastectomy conditional on observed case characteristics. The model was then applied to evaluate possible rates of mastectomy in overdiagnosed patients. To obtain minimum and maximum plausible rates of this overtreatment, we respectively assumed the cases that were least and most likely to be treated by mastectomy had been overdiagnosed. Results Of women diagnosed with breast cancer at age ≥40 in 2013, 33.8% received mastectomy. Mastectomy was common for most investigated breast cancer types, including for the early breast cancers among which overdiagnosis is thought to be most widespread: mastectomy was undergone in 26.4% of in situ and 28.0% of AJCC stage-I cases. These rates are substantively higher than in many European nations. The probability-based model indicated that between >0% and <18% of the study population could plausibly have undergone mastectomy for overdiagnosed cancer. This range reduced depending on the overdiagnosis rate, shrinking to >0% and <7% if 10% of breast cancers were overdiagnosed and >3% and <15% if 30% were overdiagnosed. Conclusions Screening-associated overtreatment by mastectomy is considerably less common than overdiagnosis itself but should not be assumed to be negligible. Screening can prompt or prevent mastectomy, and the balance of this harm-benefit tradeoff is currently unclear.
Collapse
|
6
|
Lu G, Li J, Wang S, Pu J, Sun H, Wei Z, Ma Y, Wang J, Ma H. The fluctuating incidence, improved survival of patients with breast cancer, and disparities by age, race, and socioeconomic status by decade, 1981-2010. Cancer Manag Res 2018; 10:4899-4914. [PMID: 30464592 PMCID: PMC6215921 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s173099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer and the leading cause of cancer-related deaths among women worldwide. However, the data on breast cancer incidence and survival over a long period, especially the dynamic changes in the role of race and socioeconomic status (SES), are scant. Materials and methods To evaluate treatment outcomes of patients with breast cancer over the past 3 decades, the data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registries were used to assess the survival of patients with breast cancer. Period analysis was used to analyze the incidence and survival trend; survival was evaluated by the relative survival rates (RSRs) and Kaplan-Meier analyses. The HRs for age, race, stage, and SES were assessed by Cox regression. Results A total of 433,366 patients diagnosed with breast cancer between 1981 and 2010 were identified from the original nine SEER registries. The incidences of breast cancer in each decade were 107.1 per 100,000, 117.5 per 100,000, and 109.8 per 100,000. The 10-year RSRs improved each decade, from 70.8% to 81.5% to 85.6% (P<0.0001). The lower survival in black race and high-poverty group is confirmed by Kaplan-Meier analyses and RSRs. Furthermore, Cox regression analyses demonstrated that age, race, SES, and stage are independent risk factors for patients with breast cancer in each decade. Conclusion The current data demonstrated a fluctuating incidence trend with improving survival rates of patients with breast cancer over the past 3 decades. In addition, the survival disparity exists among different races, ages, SESs, and stages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guanming Lu
- Department of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Youjiang Medical University for Nationalities, Baise, Guangxi 533000, China
| | - Jie Li
- Department of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510080, China
| | - Shuncong Wang
- Department of Oncology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, Guangdong 519000, China,
| | - Jian Pu
- Department of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Youjiang Medical University for Nationalities, Baise, Guangxi 533000, China
| | - Huanhuan Sun
- Department of Oncology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, Guangdong 519000, China,
| | - Zhongheng Wei
- Department of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Youjiang Medical University for Nationalities, Baise, Guangxi 533000, China
| | - Yanfei Ma
- Department of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Youjiang Medical University for Nationalities, Baise, Guangxi 533000, China
| | - Jun Wang
- Department of Oncology, General Hospital, Jinan Command of People's Liberation Army, Jinan, Shandong 250000, China,
| | - Haiqing Ma
- Department of Oncology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, Guangdong 519000, China,
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Gocko X, Leclerq M, Plotton C. [Discrepancies and overdiagnosis in breast cancer organized screening. A "methodology" systematic review]. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique 2018; 66:395-403. [PMID: 30316554 DOI: 10.1016/j.respe.2018.08.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2017] [Revised: 08/03/2018] [Accepted: 08/24/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The risk-benefit ratio of breast cancer organized screening is the focus of much scientific controversy, especially about overdiagnosis. The aim of this study was to relate methodological discrepancies to variations in rates of overdiagnosis to help build future decision aids and to better communicate with patients. METHODS A systematic review of methodology was conducted by two investigators who searched Medline and Cochrane databases from 01/01/2004 to 12/31/2016. Results were restricted to randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies in French or English that examined the question of the overdiagnosis computation. RESULTS Twenty-three observational studies and four RCTs were analyzed. The methods used comparisons of annual or cumulative incidence rates (age-cohort model) in populations invited to screen versus non-invited populations. Lead time and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) were often taken into account. Some studies used statistical modeling based on the natural history of breast cancer and gradual screening implementation. Adjustments for lead time lowered the rate of overdiagnosis. Rate discrepancies, ranging from 1 to 15 % for some authors and around 30 % for others, could be explained by the hypotheses accepted concerning very slow growing tumors or tumors that regress spontaneously. CONCLUSION Apparently, research has to be centered on the natural history of breast cancer in order to provide responses concerning the questions raised by the overdiagnosis controversy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- X Gocko
- Faculté de médecine générale de Saint-Étienne, université Jacques-Lisfranc, campus santé innovations, 10, rue de la Marandière, 42270 Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, France; Laboratoire SNA-EPIS EA4607, 42055 Saint-Etienne cedex 2, France; Health Services and Performance Research (HESPER), EA7425, 42055 Saint-Etienne cedex 2, France.
| | - M Leclerq
- Faculté de médecine générale de Saint-Étienne, université Jacques-Lisfranc, campus santé innovations, 10, rue de la Marandière, 42270 Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, France
| | - C Plotton
- Faculté de médecine générale de Saint-Étienne, université Jacques-Lisfranc, campus santé innovations, 10, rue de la Marandière, 42270 Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, France
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
de Munck L, Fracheboud J, de Bock GH, den Heeten GJ, Siesling S, Broeders MJM. Is the incidence of advanced-stage breast cancer affected by whether women attend a steady-state screening program? Int J Cancer 2018; 143:842-850. [PMID: 29574967 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.31388] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2017] [Revised: 02/26/2018] [Accepted: 02/28/2018] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
In this cross-sectional population-based study, we assessed the incidence of advanced breast cancer based on screening attendance. Women from the Netherlands Cancer Registry were included if aged ≥49 years and diagnosed with breast cancer between 2006 and 2011, and data were linked with the screening program. Cancers were defined as screen-related (diagnosed <24 months after screening) or nonscreened (all other breast cancers). Two cut-offs were used to define advanced breast cancer: TNM-stage (III-IV vs 0-I-II) and T-stage alone (≥15 mm vs <15 mm or DCIS). The incidence rates were adjusted for age and logistic regression was used to compare groups. Of the 72,612 included women diagnosed with breast cancer, 44,246 (61%) had screen-related breast cancer. By TNM stage, advanced cancer was almost three times as likely to be at an advanced TNM stage in the nonscreened group compared with the screen-related group (38 and 94 per 100,000, respectively; OR: 2.86, 95%CI: 2.72-3.00). By T-stage, the incidence of advanced cancer was higher overall, and in nonscreened women was significantly higher than in screened women (210 and 169 per 100,000; OR: 1.85, 95%CI: 1.78-1.93). Data on actual screening attendance showed that the incidence of advanced breast cancer was significantly higher in nonscreened women than in screened women, supporting the expectation that screening would cause a stage shift to early detection. Despite critical evaluations of breast cancer screening programs, our data show that breast cancer screening is a valuable tool that can reduce the disease burden in women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda de Munck
- Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Department of Epidemiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Jacques Fracheboud
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Geertruida H de Bock
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Gerard J den Heeten
- Dutch Reference Centre for Screening, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sabine Siesling
- Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Department of Health Technology & Services Research, MIRA Institute for Biomedical Technology and Technical Medicine, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Mireille J M Broeders
- Dutch Reference Centre for Screening, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Clèries R, Ameijide A, Buxó M, Martínez JM, Marcos-Gragera R, Vilardell ML, Carulla M, Yasui Y, Vilardell M, Espinàs JA, Borràs JM, Galceran J, Izquierdo À. Long-term crude probabilities of death among breast cancer patients by age and stage: a population-based survival study in Northeastern Spain (Girona-Tarragona 1985-2004). Clin Transl Oncol 2018; 20:1252-1260. [PMID: 29511947 PMCID: PMC6153860 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-018-1852-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2018] [Accepted: 02/23/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Background We provide population-based long-term survival indicators of breast cancer patients by quantifying the observed survival, and the probabilities of death due to breast cancer and to other causes by age and tumor stage at diagnosis. Methods We included a total of 10,195 female patients diagnosed before 85 years with invasive primary breast cancer in Girona and Tarragona during the periods 1985–1994 and 1995–2004 and followed-up until December 31st 2014. The survival indicators were estimated at 5, 10, 15 and 20 years of follow-up comparing diagnostic periods. Results Comparing diagnostic periods: I) the probability of death due to other causes did not change; II) the 20-year survival for women diagnosed ≤ 49 years increased 13% (1995–2004 = 68%; 1985–1994:55%), whereas their probability of death due to breast cancer decreased at the same pace (1995–2004 = 29%; 1985–1994 = 42%); III) at 10 years of follow-up, decreases in the probabilities of death due to breast cancer across age groups switched from 11 to 17% resulting in a risk of death reduction of 19% after adjusting by stage. During 1995–2004, the stage-specific 10-year probabilities of death due to breast cancer switched from: 3–6% in stage I, 18–20% in stage II, 34–46% in stage III and surpassed 70% in stage IV beyond 5 years after diagnosis. Conclusions In our study, women diagnosed with breast cancer had higher long-term probability to die from breast cancer than from other causes. The improvements in treatment and the lead-time bias in detecting cancer in an early stage resulted in a reduction of 19% in the risk of death between diagnostic periods. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s12094-018-1852-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Clèries
- Pla Director d'Oncologia (GENCAT), IDIBELL, Hospital Duran i Reynals, Gran Via 199-203 1ª planta, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08908, Barcelona, Spain.
- Departament de Ciències Clíniques, Universitat de Barcelona, Campus de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - A Ameijide
- Registre de Càncer de Tarragona, Fundació Lliga per a la Investigació i Prevenció del Càncer (FUNCA)-IISPV, Reus, Tarragona, Spain
| | - M Buxó
- Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Girona, IDIBGI, C/Dr.Castany s/n, Edifici M2, Parc Hospitalari Martí i Julià, 17190, Salt, Spain
| | - J M Martínez
- MC MUTUAL, Departamento de Investigación y Análisis de Prestaciones, C/Provenza, 321, 08037, Barcelona, Spain
| | - R Marcos-Gragera
- Unitat d'Epidemiologia i Registre del Càncer de Girona (UERGG), Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica Girona Josep Trueta (IDIBGI), Girona, Spain
- Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO), Girona, Spain
- Departament d'Infermeria, Universitat de Girona (UdG), Girona, Spain
| | - M-L Vilardell
- Unitat d'Epidemiologia i Registre del Càncer de Girona (UERGG), Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica Girona Josep Trueta (IDIBGI), Girona, Spain
- Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO), Girona, Spain
| | - M Carulla
- Registre de Càncer de Tarragona, Fundació Lliga per a la Investigació i Prevenció del Càncer (FUNCA)-IISPV, Reus, Tarragona, Spain
| | - Y Yasui
- Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Control, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, 38105, USA
| | - M Vilardell
- Sección de Estadística del Departamento de Genética, Microbiología y Estadística de la Facultad de Biología, Universidad de Barcelona, 08028, Barcelona, Spain
| | - J A Espinàs
- Pla Director d'Oncologia (GENCAT), IDIBELL, Hospital Duran i Reynals, Gran Via 199-203 1ª planta, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08908, Barcelona, Spain
| | - J M Borràs
- Pla Director d'Oncologia (GENCAT), IDIBELL, Hospital Duran i Reynals, Gran Via 199-203 1ª planta, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08908, Barcelona, Spain
- Departament de Ciències Clíniques, Universitat de Barcelona, Campus de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - J Galceran
- Registre de Càncer de Tarragona, Fundació Lliga per a la Investigació i Prevenció del Càncer (FUNCA)-IISPV, Reus, Tarragona, Spain
- Departament de Medicina i Cirurgia, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Reus, Tarragona, Spain
| | - À Izquierdo
- Unitat d'Epidemiologia i Registre del Càncer de Girona (UERGG), Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica Girona Josep Trueta (IDIBGI), Girona, Spain
- Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO), Girona, Spain
- Departament d'Oncología Médica, Institut Català d'Oncologia, Hospital Universitari Doctor Josep Trueta, Girona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Current Issues in the Overdiagnosis and Overtreatment of Breast Cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2018; 210:285-291. [DOI: 10.2214/ajr.17.18629] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
|
11
|
Ripping TM, Ten Haaf K, Verbeek ALM, van Ravesteyn NT, Broeders MJM. Quantifying Overdiagnosis in Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review to Evaluate the Methodology. J Natl Cancer Inst 2017; 109:3845953. [PMID: 29117353 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djx060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2016] [Accepted: 03/10/2017] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Overdiagnosis is the main harm of cancer screening programs but is difficult to quantify. This review aims to evaluate existing approaches to estimate the magnitude of overdiagnosis in cancer screening in order to gain insight into the strengths and limitations of these approaches and to provide researchers with guidance to obtain reliable estimates of overdiagnosis in cancer screening. Methods A systematic review was done of primary research studies in PubMed that were published before January 1, 2016, and quantified overdiagnosis in breast cancer screening. The studies meeting inclusion criteria were then categorized by their methods to adjust for lead time and to obtain an unscreened reference population. For each approach, we provide an overview of the data required, assumptions made, limitations, and strengths. Results A total of 442 studies were identified in the initial search. Forty studies met the inclusion criteria for the qualitative review. We grouped the approaches to adjust for lead time in two main categories: the lead time approach and the excess incidence approach. The lead time approach was further subdivided into the mean lead time approach, lead time distribution approach, and natural history modeling. The excess incidence approach was subdivided into the cumulative incidence approach and early vs late-stage cancer approach. The approaches used to obtain an unscreened reference population were grouped into the following categories: control group of a randomized controlled trial, nonattenders, control region, extrapolation of a prescreening trend, uninvited groups, adjustment for the effect of screening, and natural history modeling. Conclusions Each approach to adjust for lead time and obtain an unscreened reference population has its own strengths and limitations, which should be taken into consideration when estimating overdiagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theodora M Ripping
- Affiliations of authors: Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (TMR, ALMV, MJMB); Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (KtH, NTvR); Dutch Reference Centre for Screening, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (MJMB)
| | - Kevin Ten Haaf
- Affiliations of authors: Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (TMR, ALMV, MJMB); Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (KtH, NTvR); Dutch Reference Centre for Screening, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (MJMB)
| | - André L M Verbeek
- Affiliations of authors: Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (TMR, ALMV, MJMB); Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (KtH, NTvR); Dutch Reference Centre for Screening, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (MJMB)
| | - Nicolien T van Ravesteyn
- Affiliations of authors: Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (TMR, ALMV, MJMB); Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (KtH, NTvR); Dutch Reference Centre for Screening, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (MJMB)
| | - Mireille J M Broeders
- Affiliations of authors: Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (TMR, ALMV, MJMB); Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (KtH, NTvR); Dutch Reference Centre for Screening, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (MJMB)
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Assessing predicted age-specific breast cancer mortality rates in 27 European countries by 2020. Clin Transl Oncol 2017; 20:313-321. [PMID: 28726040 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-017-1718-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2017] [Accepted: 07/13/2017] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We assessed differences in predicted breast cancer (BC) mortality rates, across Europe, by 2020, taking into account changes in the time trends of BC mortality rates during the period 2000-2010. METHODS BC mortality data, for 27 European Union (EU) countries, were extracted from the World Health Organization mortality database. First, we compared BC mortality data between time periods 2000-2004 and 2006-2010 through standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) and carrying out a graphical assessment of the age-specific rates. Second, making use of the base period 2006-2012, we predicted BC mortality rates by 2020. Finally, making use of the SMRs and the predicted data, we identified a clustering of countries, assessing differences in the time trends between the areas defined in this clustering. RESULTS The clustering approach identified two clusters of countries: the first cluster were countries where BC predicted mortality rates, in 2020, might slightly increase among women aged 69 and older compared with 2010 [Greece (SMR 1.01), Croatia (SMR 1.02), Latvia (SMR 1.15), Poland (SMR 1.14), Estonia (SMR 1.16), Bulgaria (SMR 1.13), Lithuania (SMR 1.03), Romania (SMR 1.13) and Slovakia (SMR 1.06)]. The second cluster was those countries where BC mortality rates level off or decrease in all age groups (remaining countries). However, BC mortality rates between these clusters might diminish and converge to similar figures by 2020. CONCLUSIONS For the year 2020, our predictions have shown a converging pattern of BC mortality rates between European regions. Reducing disparities, in access to screening and treatment, could have a substantial effect in countries where a non-decreasing trend in age-specific BC mortality rates has been predicted.
Collapse
|
13
|
Nelson HD, Pappas M, Cantor A, Griffin J, Daeges M, Humphrey L. Harms of Breast Cancer Screening: Systematic Review to Update the 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation. Ann Intern Med 2016; 164:256-67. [PMID: 26756737 DOI: 10.7326/m15-0970] [Citation(s) in RCA: 263] [Impact Index Per Article: 32.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In 2009, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommended biennial mammography screening for women aged 50 to 74 years and selective screening for those aged 40 to 49 years. PURPOSE To review studies of screening in average-risk women with mammography, magnetic resonance imaging, or ultrasonography that reported on false-positive results, overdiagnosis, anxiety, pain, and radiation exposure. DATA SOURCES MEDLINE and Cochrane databases through December 2014. STUDY SELECTION English-language systematic reviews, randomized trials, and observational studies of screening. DATA EXTRACTION Investigators extracted and confirmed data from studies and dual-rated study quality. Discrepancies were resolved through consensus. DATA SYNTHESIS Based on 2 studies of U.S. data, 10-year cumulative rates of false-positive mammography results and biopsies were higher with annual than biennial screening (61% vs. 42% and 7% vs. 5%, respectively) and for women aged 40 to 49 years, those with dense breasts, and those using combination hormone therapy. Twenty-nine studies using different methods reported overdiagnosis rates of 0% to 54%; rates from randomized trials were 11% to 22%. Women with false-positive results reported more anxiety, distress, and breast cancer-specific worry, although results varied across 80 observational studies. Thirty-nine observational studies indicated that some women reported pain during mammography (1% to 77%); of these, 11% to 46% declined future screening. Models estimated 2 to 11 screening-related deaths from radiation-induced cancer per 100,000 women using digital mammography, depending on age and screening interval. Five observational studies of tomosynthesis and mammography indicated increased biopsies but reduced recalls compared with mammography alone. LIMITATIONS Studies of overdiagnosis were highly heterogeneous, and estimates varied depending on the analytic approach. Studies of anxiety and pain used different outcome measures. Radiation exposure was based on models. CONCLUSION False-positive results are common and are higher for annual screening, younger women, and women with dense breasts. Although overdiagnosis, anxiety, pain, and radiation exposure may cause harm, their effects on individual women are difficult to estimate and vary widely. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heidi D. Nelson
- From the Pacific Northwest Evidence-based Practice Center, Oregon Health & Science University; Veterans Affairs Portland Health Care System; and Providence Cancer Center, Providence Health & Services, Portland, Oregon
| | - Miranda Pappas
- From the Pacific Northwest Evidence-based Practice Center, Oregon Health & Science University; Veterans Affairs Portland Health Care System; and Providence Cancer Center, Providence Health & Services, Portland, Oregon
| | - Amy Cantor
- From the Pacific Northwest Evidence-based Practice Center, Oregon Health & Science University; Veterans Affairs Portland Health Care System; and Providence Cancer Center, Providence Health & Services, Portland, Oregon
| | - Jessica Griffin
- From the Pacific Northwest Evidence-based Practice Center, Oregon Health & Science University; Veterans Affairs Portland Health Care System; and Providence Cancer Center, Providence Health & Services, Portland, Oregon
| | - Monica Daeges
- From the Pacific Northwest Evidence-based Practice Center, Oregon Health & Science University; Veterans Affairs Portland Health Care System; and Providence Cancer Center, Providence Health & Services, Portland, Oregon
| | - Linda Humphrey
- From the Pacific Northwest Evidence-based Practice Center, Oregon Health & Science University; Veterans Affairs Portland Health Care System; and Providence Cancer Center, Providence Health & Services, Portland, Oregon
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Bae JM. Overdiagnosis: epidemiologic concepts and estimation. Epidemiol Health 2015; 37:e2015004. [PMID: 25824531 PMCID: PMC4398975 DOI: 10.4178/epih/e2015004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2015] [Revised: 02/10/2015] [Accepted: 02/10/2015] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Overdiagnosis of thyroid cancer was propounded regarding the rapidly increasing incidence in South Korea. Overdiagnosis is defined as 'the detection of cancers that would never have been found were it not for the screening test', and may be an extreme form of lead bias due to indolent cancers, as is inevitable when conducting a cancer screening programme. Because it is solely an epidemiological concept, it can be estimated indirectly by phenomena such as a lack of compensatory drop in post-screening periods, or discrepancies between incidence and mortality. The erstwhile trials for quantifying the overdiagnosis in screening mammography were reviewed in order to secure the data needed to establish its prevalence in South Korea.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jong-Myon Bae
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Jeju National University School of Medicine, Jeju, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ripping TM, Verbeek ALM, Fracheboud J, de Koning HJ, van Ravesteyn NT, Broeders MJM. Overdiagnosis by mammographic screening for breast cancer studied in birth cohorts in The Netherlands. Int J Cancer 2015; 137:921-9. [PMID: 25612892 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.29452] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2014] [Accepted: 01/13/2015] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
A drawback of early detection of breast cancer through mammographic screening is the diagnosis of breast cancers that would never have become clinically detected. This phenomenon, called overdiagnosis, is ideally quantified from the breast cancer incidence of screened and unscreened cohorts of women with follow-up until death. Such cohorts do not exist, requiring other methods to estimate overdiagnosis. We are the first to quantify overdiagnosis from invasive breast cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in birth cohorts using an age-period-cohort -model (APC-model) including variables for the initial and subsequent screening rounds and a 5-year period after leaving screening. Data on the female population and breast cancer incidence were obtained from Statistics Netherlands, "Stichting Medische registratie" and the Dutch Cancer Registry for women aged 0-99 years. Data on screening participation was obtained from the five regional screening organizations. Overdiagnosis was calculated from the excess breast cancer incidence in the screened group divided by the breast cancer incidence in presence of screening for women aged 20-99 years (population perspective) and for women in the screened-age range (individual perspective). Overdiagnosis of invasive breast cancer was 11% from the population perspective and 17% from the invited women perspective in birth cohorts screened from age 49 to 74. For invasive breast cancer and DCIS together, overdiagnosis was 14% from population perspective and 22% from invited women perspective. A major strength of an APC-model including the different phases of screening is that it allows to estimate overdiagnosis in birth cohorts, thereby preventing overestimation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T M Ripping
- Department for Health Evidence, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - A L M Verbeek
- Department for Health Evidence, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Dutch Reference Center for Screening, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - J Fracheboud
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - H J de Koning
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - N T van Ravesteyn
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M J M Broeders
- Department for Health Evidence, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Dutch Reference Center for Screening, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Carter JL, Coletti RJ, Harris RP. Quantifying and monitoring overdiagnosis in cancer screening: a systematic review of methods. BMJ 2015; 350:g7773. [PMID: 25569206 PMCID: PMC4332263 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.g7773] [Citation(s) in RCA: 124] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the optimal method for quantifying and monitoring overdiagnosis in cancer screening over time. DESIGN Systematic review of primary research studies of any design that quantified overdiagnosis from screening for nine types of cancer. We used explicit criteria to critically appraise individual studies and assess strength of the body of evidence for each study design (double blinded review), and assessed the potential for each study design to accurately quantify and monitor overdiagnosis over time. DATA SOURCES PubMed and Embase up to 28 February 2014; hand searching of systematic reviews. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES English language studies of any design that quantified overdiagnosis for any of nine common cancers (prostate, breast, lung, colorectal, melanoma, bladder, renal, thyroid, and uterine); excluded case series, case reports, and reviews that only reported results of other studies. RESULTS 52 studies met the inclusion criteria. We grouped studies into four methodological categories: (1) follow-up of a well designed randomized controlled trial (n=3), which has low risk of bias but may not be generalizable and is not suitable for monitoring; (2) pathological or imaging studies (n=8), drawing conclusions about overdiagnosis by examining biological characteristics of cancers, a simple design limited by the uncertain assumption that the measured characteristics are highly correlated with disease progression; (3) modeling studies (n=21), which can be done in a shorter time frame but require complex mathematical equations simulating the natural course of screen detected cancer, the fundamental unknown question; and (4) ecological and cohort studies (n=20), which are suitable for monitoring over time but are limited by a lack of agreed standards, by variable data quality, by inadequate follow-up time, and by the potential for population level confounders. Some ecological and cohort studies, however, have addressed these potential weaknesses in reasonable ways. CONCLUSIONS Well conducted ecological and cohort studies in multiple settings are the most appropriate approach for quantifying and monitoring overdiagnosis in cancer screening programs. To support this work, we need internationally agreed standards for ecological and cohort studies and a multinational team of unbiased researchers to perform ongoing analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jamie L Carter
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94110, USA
| | - Russell J Coletti
- Division of General Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| | - Russell P Harris
- Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Bleyer A. Were our estimates of overdiagnosis with mammography screening in the United States "based on faulty science"? Oncologist 2014; 19:113-26. [PMID: 24536052 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2013-0383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Archie Bleyer
- St. Charles Health System, Central Oregon, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
López-Abente G, Mispireta S, Pollán M. Breast and prostate cancer: an analysis of common epidemiological features in mortality trends in Spain. BMC Cancer 2014; 14:874. [PMID: 25421124 PMCID: PMC4251688 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-874] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2014] [Accepted: 11/12/2014] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast cancer in women and prostate cancer are the first and second leading tumour respectively in terms of incidence world-wide. Our objective is to ascertain the similarities and differences between mortality trends in breast cancer among women and prostate cancer in Spain using age-period-cohort models, and analyse the correlation between incidence of breast and prostate cancer at cancer registries locally and world-wide. METHODS We analysed the independent effects of age, period of death and birth cohort on mortality rates for breast cancer in women and prostate cancer in Spain across the period 1952-2011. Segmented regression analyses were performed to detect and estimate changes in period and cohort curvatures. Correlation among age-adjusted incidence rates at 246 population cancer registries world-wide was analysed for the period 2003-2007. RESULTS The mortality trend displayed common characteristics in terms of the annual number of deaths due to these tumours, their adjusted mortality rates and the change points detected in the cohort and period effects. The trend in incidence was very different to that in mortality, due to early detection and progressive improvement in survival. Correlation between the incidence rates of both tumours recorded by registries around the world proved to be a generalised phenomenon. CONCLUSIONS This study shows that breast cancer mortality in women and prostate cancer mortality and their trends in Spain display visible similarities in terms of the number of deaths due to these tumours, their adjusted mortality rates and the changes experienced by mortality over time. The effects of advances in the diagnosis of both tumours correspond to a decline in mortality which becomes evident after a lag of approximately eight years. Correlation between breast and prostate cancer incidence rates is very high in Spain and at registries on all continents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gonzalo López-Abente
- />Environmental and Cancer Epidemiology Unit, National Centre for Epidemiology, Carlos III Institute of Health, Monforte de Lemos 5, 28029 Madrid, Spain
- />Consortium for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
| | - Sergio Mispireta
- />Environmental and Cancer Epidemiology Unit, National Centre for Epidemiology, Carlos III Institute of Health, Monforte de Lemos 5, 28029 Madrid, Spain
- />Preventive Medicine Service, La Paz University Hospital, P° de la Castellana 261, 28046 Madrid, Spain
| | - Marina Pollán
- />Environmental and Cancer Epidemiology Unit, National Centre for Epidemiology, Carlos III Institute of Health, Monforte de Lemos 5, 28029 Madrid, Spain
- />Consortium for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Vilaprinyo E, Forné C, Carles M, Sala M, Pla R, Castells X, Domingo L, Rue M. Cost-effectiveness and harm-benefit analyses of risk-based screening strategies for breast cancer. PLoS One 2014; 9:e86858. [PMID: 24498285 PMCID: PMC3911927 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086858] [Citation(s) in RCA: 101] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2013] [Accepted: 12/16/2013] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
The one-size-fits-all paradigm in organized screening of breast cancer is shifting towards a personalized approach. The present study has two objectives: 1) To perform an economic evaluation and to assess the harm-benefit ratios of screening strategies that vary in their intensity and interval ages based on breast cancer risk; and 2) To estimate the gain in terms of cost and harm reductions using risk-based screening with respect to the usual practice. We used a probabilistic model and input data from Spanish population registries and screening programs, as well as from clinical studies, to estimate the benefit, harm, and costs over time of 2,624 screening strategies, uniform or risk-based. We defined four risk groups, low, moderate-low, moderate-high and high, based on breast density, family history of breast cancer and personal history of breast biopsy. The risk-based strategies were obtained combining the exam periodicity (annual, biennial, triennial and quinquennial), the starting ages (40, 45 and 50 years) and the ending ages (69 and 74 years) in the four risk groups. Incremental cost-effectiveness and harm-benefit ratios were used to select the optimal strategies. Compared to risk-based strategies, the uniform ones result in a much lower benefit for a specific cost. Reductions close to 10% in costs and higher than 20% in false-positive results and overdiagnosed cases were obtained for risk-based strategies. Optimal screening is characterized by quinquennial or triennial periodicities for the low or moderate risk-groups and annual periodicity for the high-risk group. Risk-based strategies can reduce harm and costs. It is necessary to develop accurate measures of individual risk and to work on how to implement risk-based screening strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ester Vilaprinyo
- Basic Medical Sciences Department, Biomedical Research Institut of Lleida (IRBLLEIDA), Lleida, Catalonia, Spain
- Basic Medical Sciences Department, University of Lleida, Lleida, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Carles Forné
- Basic Medical Sciences Department, Biomedical Research Institut of Lleida (IRBLLEIDA), Lleida, Catalonia, Spain
- Basic Medical Sciences Department, University of Lleida, Lleida, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Misericordia Carles
- Economics Department and Research Centre on Industrial and Public Economics (CREIP), Rovira i Virgili University, Reus, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Maria Sala
- Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation, Institut Municipal d'Investigació Mèdica-Parc de Salut Mar, Mar Teaching Hospital, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Health Services Research Network in Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Spain
| | - Roger Pla
- Surgery Department, Rovira i Virgili University, Reus, Catalonia, Spain
- General and Digestive Surgery Department, Joan XXIII Teaching Hospital, Tarragona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Xavier Castells
- Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation, Institut Municipal d'Investigació Mèdica-Parc de Salut Mar, Mar Teaching Hospital, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Health Services Research Network in Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Spain
| | - Laia Domingo
- Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation, Institut Municipal d'Investigació Mèdica-Parc de Salut Mar, Mar Teaching Hospital, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Montserrat Rue
- Basic Medical Sciences Department, Biomedical Research Institut of Lleida (IRBLLEIDA), Lleida, Catalonia, Spain
- Basic Medical Sciences Department, University of Lleida, Lleida, Catalonia, Spain
- Health Services Research Network in Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Spain
- * E-mail:
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Immediate and delayed effects of mammographic screening on breast cancer mortality and incidence in birth cohorts. Br J Cancer 2013; 109:2467-71. [PMID: 24113141 PMCID: PMC3817344 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2013.627] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2013] [Revised: 09/17/2013] [Accepted: 09/17/2013] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Trend studies investigating the impact of mammographic screening usually display age-specific mortality and incidence rates over time, resulting in an underestimate of the benefit of screening, that is, mortality reduction, and an overestimate of its major harmful effect, that is, overdiagnosis. This study proposes a more appropriate way of analysing trends. METHODS Breast cancer mortality (1950-2009) and incidence data (1975-2009) were obtained from Statistics Netherlands, 'Stg. Medische registratie' and the National Cancer Registry in the Netherlands for women aged 25-85 years. Data were visualised in age-birth cohort and age-period figures. RESULTS Birth cohorts invited to participate in the mammographic screening programme showed a deflection in the breast cancer mortality rates within the first 5 years after invitation. Thereafter, the mortality rate increased, although less rapidly than in uninvited birth cohorts. Furthermore, invited birth cohorts showed a sharp increase in invasive breast cancer incidence rate during the first 5 years of invitation, followed by a moderate increase during the following screening years and a decline after passing the upper age limit. CONCLUSION When applying a trend study to estimate the impact of mammographic screening, we recommend using a birth cohort approach.
Collapse
|
21
|
Cribados: una propuesta de racionalización. GACETA SANITARIA 2013; 27:372-3. [DOI: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2013.03.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2013] [Revised: 02/26/2013] [Accepted: 03/19/2013] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
22
|
Marmot MG, Altman DG, Cameron DA, Dewar JA, Thompson SG, Wilcox M. The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review. Br J Cancer 2013; 108:2205-40. [PMID: 23744281 PMCID: PMC3693450 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2013.177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 602] [Impact Index Per Article: 54.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- M G Marmot
- UCL Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, UCL Institute of Health Equity, 1-19 Torrington Place, London WC1E 7HB,
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
|
24
|
Voogd AC. The impact of mammography screening on breast cancer incidence. J Comp Eff Res 2013; 2:113-6. [DOI: 10.2217/cer.13.3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Evaluation of: Bleyer A, Welch HG. Effect of three decades of screening mammography on breast-cancer incidence. N. Engl. J. Med. 377, 1998–2005 (2012). Mammography screening must advance the time of diagnosis of breast cancer to be able to reduce the rate of death from breast cancer. This article examined the temporal effects of mammography on the stage-specific incidence of breast cancer in the USA from 1976 through to 2008. Despite substantial increases in the number of cases of early-stage breast cancer, only a marginal reduction was observed in the number of cases presenting with late-stage breast cancer. These results provide convincing evidence that mammography screening entails a substantial risk of detecting tumors that would not have become symptomatic during a woman’s lifetime if no screening had taken place. To improve the effectiveness of screening mammography, more knowledge is needed on the natural history of breast cancer, especially the risk of progression from in situ to invasive breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adri C Voogd
- Department of Epidemiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Puliti D, Duffy SW, Miccinesi G, de Koning H, Lynge E, Zappa M, Paci E. Overdiagnosis in mammographic screening for breast cancer in Europe: a literature review. J Med Screen 2013; 19 Suppl 1:42-56. [PMID: 22972810 DOI: 10.1258/jms.2012.012082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 279] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Overdiagnosis, the detection through screening of a breast cancer that would never have been identified in the lifetime of the woman, is an adverse outcome of screening. We aimed to determine an estimate range for overdiagnosis of breast cancer in European mammographic service screening programmes. METHODS We conducted a literature review of observational studies that provided estimates of breast cancer overdiagnosis in European population-based mammographic screening programmes. Studies were classified according to the presence and the type of adjustment for breast cancer risk (data, model and covariates used), and for lead time (statistical adjustment or compensatory drop). We expressed estimates of overdiagnosis from each study as a percentage of the expected incidence in the absence of screening, even if the variability in the age range of the denominator could not be removed. Estimates including carcinoma in situ were considered when available. RESULTS There were 13 primary studies reporting 16 estimates of overdiagnosis in seven European countries (the Netherlands, Italy, Norway, Sweden, Denmark, UK and Spain). Unadjusted estimates ranged from 0% to 54%. Reported estimates adjusted for breast cancer risk and lead time were 2.8% in the Netherlands, 4.6% and 1.0% in Italy, 7.0% in Denmark and 10% and 3.3% in England and Wales. CONCLUSIONS The most plausible estimates of overdiagnosis range from 1% to 10%. Substantially higher estimates of overdiagnosis reported in the literature are due to the lack of adjustment for breast cancer risk and/or lead time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donella Puliti
- Statistician, Clinical and Descriptive Epidemiology Unit, ISPO – Cancer Research and Prevention Institute, Florence, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Rapid increase in incidence of breast ductal carcinoma in situ in Girona, Spain 1983–2007. Breast 2012; 21:646-51. [DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2012.01.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2011] [Revised: 01/23/2012] [Accepted: 01/24/2012] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
|
27
|
Vilaprinyo E, Puig T, Rue M. Contribution of early detection and adjuvant treatments to breast cancer mortality reduction in Catalonia, Spain. PLoS One 2012; 7:e30157. [PMID: 22272292 PMCID: PMC3260221 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030157] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2011] [Accepted: 12/11/2011] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Reductions in breast cancer (BC) mortality in Western countries have been attributed to the use of screening mammography and adjuvant treatments. The goal of this work was to analyze the contributions of both interventions to the decrease in BC mortality between 1975 and 2008 in Catalonia. Methodology/Principal Findings A stochastic model was used to quantify the contribution of each intervention. Age standardized BC mortality rates for calendar years 1975–2008 were estimated in four hypothetical scenarios: 1) Only screening, 2) Only adjuvant treatment, 3) Both interventions, and 4) No intervention. For the 30–69 age group, observed Catalan BC mortality rates per 100,000 women-year rose from 29.4 in 1975 to 38.3 in 1993, and afterwards continuously decreased to 23.2 in 2008. If neither of the two interventions had been used, in 2008 the estimated BC mortality would have been 43.5, which, compared to the observed BC mortality rate, indicates a 46.7% reduction. In 2008 the reduction attributable to screening was 20.4%, to adjuvant treatments was 15.8% and to both interventions 34.1%. Conclusions/Significance Screening and adjuvant treatments similarly contributed to reducing BC mortality in Catalonia. Mathematical models have been useful to assess the impact of interventions addressed to reduce BC mortality that occurred over nearly the same periods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ester Vilaprinyo
- Evaluation and Clinical Epidemiology Department, Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Teresa Puig
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Public Health, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau IIB-Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
- Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Catalonia, Spain
| | - Montserrat Rue
- Basic Medical Sciences Department, Biomedical Research Institut of Lleida (IRBLLEIDA)-University of Lleida, Lleida, Catalonia, Spain
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Gøtzsche PC, Jørgensen KJ. The breast screening programme and misinforming the public. J R Soc Med 2011; 104:361-9. [PMID: 21881087 DOI: 10.1258/jrsm.2011.110078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The information provided to the public by the NHS Breast Screening Programme has been criticized for lack of balance, omission of information on harms and substantially exaggerated estimates of benefit. These shortcomings have been particularly evident in the various invitation leaflets for breast screening and in the Programme's own 2008 Annual Review, which celebrated 20 years of screening. The debate on screening has been heated after new data published in the last two years questioned the benefit and documented substantial harm. We therefore analysed whether the recent debate and new pivotal data about breast screening has had any impact on the contents of the new 2010 leaflet and on the 2010 Annual Review. We conclude that spokespeople for the Programme have stuck to the beliefs about benefit that prevailed 25 years ago. Concerns about over-diagnosis have not been addressed either and official documents still downplay this most important harm of breast cancer screening.
Collapse
|
29
|
[Assessment of results in the early diagnosis of breast cancer program in Asturias Community]. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2011; 27:38-43. [PMID: 22024048 DOI: 10.1016/j.cali.2011.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2011] [Revised: 06/20/2011] [Accepted: 07/11/2011] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate and disseminate the intermediate results of a breast cancer early detection program in the Asturias Community. MATERIAL AND METHODS We report the results of screening examinations performed between 2005 and 2009, using the indicators proposed in the European Guidelines on Quality Assurance in Mammography Screening. The information sources for breast cancer cases diagnosed were the pathology information system and the information on the characteristics of the tumour from the pathology report. The classification of the diagnostic features of the program was from its own information system. RESULTS A total of 1,384 breast cancers were diagnosed in the program target population during the study period, of which 49% were diagnosed in the program, 13% were interval cancers, 17% were diagnosed in women who chose not to participate in the program, and 22% in women who for various reasons had not been invited to participate. The most advanced diagnoses were made in the group of interval cancers and the earliest diagnoses were made in the uninvited population. CONCLUSIONS When the healthcare system is directed towards the asymptomatic population to provide a measure of prevention, it must ensure that there is a favourable balance. The results of this evaluation are consistent with accepted standards and with those found in other assessments.
Collapse
|
30
|
Junod B, Zahl PH, Kaplan RM, Olsen J, Greenland S. An investigation of the apparent breast cancer epidemic in France: screening and incidence trends in birth cohorts. BMC Cancer 2011; 11:401. [PMID: 21936933 PMCID: PMC3188513 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-11-401] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2011] [Accepted: 09/21/2011] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Official descriptive data from France showed a strong increase in breast-cancer incidence between 1980 to 2005 without a corresponding change in breast-cancer mortality. This study quantifies the part of incidence increase due to secular changes in risk factor exposure and in overdiagnosis due to organised or opportunistic screening. Overdiagnosis was defined as non progressive tumours diagnosed as cancer at histology or progressive cancer that would remain asymptomatic until time of death for another cause. METHODS Comparison between age-matched cohorts from 1980 to 2005. All women residing in France and born 1911-1915, 1926-1930 and 1941-1945 are included. Sources are official data sets and published French reports on screening by mammography, age and time specific breast-cancer incidence and mortality, hormone replacement therapy, alcohol and obesity. Outcome measures include breast-cancer incidence differences adjusted for changes in risk factor distributions between pairs of age-matched cohorts who had experienced different levels of screening intensity. RESULTS There was an 8-fold increase in the number of mammography machines operating in France between 1980 and 2000. Opportunistic and organised screening increased over time. In comparison to age-matched cohorts born 15 years earlier, recent cohorts had adjusted incidence proportion over 11 years that were 76% higher [95% confidence limits (CL) 67%, 85%] for women aged 50 to 64 years and 23% higher [95% CL 15%, 31%] for women aged 65 to 79 years. Given that mortality did not change correspondingly, this increase in adjusted 11 year incidence proportion was considered as an estimate of overdiagnosis. CONCLUSIONS Breast cancer may be overdiagnosed because screening increases diagnosis of slowly progressing non-life threatening cancer and increases misdiagnosis among women without progressive cancer. We suggest that these effects could largely explain the reported "epidemic" of breast cancer in France. Better predictive classification of tumours is needed in order to avoid unnecessary cancer diagnoses and subsequent procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bernard Junod
- FORMINDEP, Roubaix, France. Previous position: Department of Epidemiology, Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sante Publique Rennes, France
| | | | - Robert M Kaplan
- UCLA Schools of Public Health and Medicine, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Jørn Olsen
- Department of Epidemiology, UCLA School of Public Health, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Sander Greenland
- Department of Epidemiology, UCLA School of Public Health, Los Angeles, USA
- Department of Statistics, UCLA College of Letters and Science, Los Angeles, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
de Gelder R, Heijnsdijk EAM, van Ravesteyn NT, Fracheboud J, Draisma G, de Koning HJ. Interpreting overdiagnosis estimates in population-based mammography screening. Epidemiol Rev 2011; 33:111-21. [PMID: 21709144 PMCID: PMC3132806 DOI: 10.1093/epirev/mxr009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 155] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Estimates of overdiagnosis in mammography screening range from 1% to 54%. This review explains such variations using gradual implementation of mammography screening in the Netherlands as an example. Breast cancer incidence without screening was predicted with a micro-simulation model. Observed breast cancer incidence (including ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive breast cancer) was modeled and compared with predicted incidence without screening during various phases of screening program implementation. Overdiagnosis was calculated as the difference between the modeled number of breast cancers with and the predicted number of breast cancers without screening. Estimating overdiagnosis annually between 1990 and 2006 illustrated the importance of the time at which overdiagnosis is measured. Overdiagnosis was also calculated using several estimators identified from the literature. The estimated overdiagnosis rate peaked during the implementation phase of screening, at 11.4% of all predicted cancers in women aged 0–100 years in the absence of screening. At steady-state screening, in 2006, this estimate had decreased to 2.8%. When different estimators were used, the overdiagnosis rate in 2006 ranged from 3.6% (screening age or older) to 9.7% (screening age only). The authors concluded that the estimated overdiagnosis rate in 2006 could vary by a factor of 3.5 when different denominators were used. Calculations based on earlier screening program phases may overestimate overdiagnosis by a factor 4. Sufficient follow-up and agreement regarding the chosen estimator are needed to obtain reliable estimates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rianne de Gelder
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, Room AE-137, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Carles M, Vilaprinyo E, Cots F, Gregori A, Pla R, Román R, Sala M, Macià F, Castells X, Rue M. Cost-effectiveness of early detection of breast cancer in Catalonia (Spain). BMC Cancer 2011; 11:192. [PMID: 21605383 PMCID: PMC3125279 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-11-192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2010] [Accepted: 05/23/2011] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Breast cancer (BC) causes more deaths than any other cancer among women in Catalonia. Early detection has contributed to the observed decline in BC mortality. However, there is debate on the optimal screening strategy. We performed an economic evaluation of 20 screening strategies taking into account the cost over time of screening and subsequent medical costs, including diagnostic confirmation, initial treatment, follow-up and advanced care. Methods We used a probabilistic model to estimate the effect and costs over time of each scenario. The effect was measured as years of life (YL), quality-adjusted life years (QALY), and lives extended (LE). Costs of screening and treatment were obtained from the Early Detection Program and hospital databases of the IMAS-Hospital del Mar in Barcelona. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was used to compare the relative costs and outcomes of different scenarios. Results Strategies that start at ages 40 or 45 and end at 69 predominate when the effect is measured as YL or QALYs. Biennial strategies 50-69, 45-69 or annual 45-69, 40-69 and 40-74 were selected as cost-effective for both effect measures (YL or QALYs). The ICER increases considerably when moving from biennial to annual scenarios. Moving from no screening to biennial 50-69 years represented an ICER of 4,469€ per QALY. Conclusions A reduced number of screening strategies have been selected for consideration by researchers, decision makers and policy planners. Mathematical models are useful to assess the impact and costs of BC screening in a specific geographical area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Misericordia Carles
- Basic Medical Sciences Department, Biomedical Research Institut of Lleida (IRBLLEIDA)-University of Lleida, Catalonia, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|