Clinical review: the Israeli experience: conventional terrorism and critical care

Lessons learned from terror attacks: thematic priorities and development since 2001-results from a systematic review

Purpose

The threat of national and international terrorism remains high. Preparation is the key requirement for the resilience of hospitals and out-of-hospital rescue forces. The scientific evidence for defining medical and tactical strategies often feeds on the analysis of real incidents and the lessons learned derived from them. This systematic review of the literature aims to identify and systematically report lessons learned from terrorist attacks since 2001.

Methods

PubMed was used as a database using predefined search strategies and eligibility criteria. All countries that are part of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) were included. The time frame was set between 2001 and 2018.

Results

Finally 68 articles were included in the review. From these, 616 lessons learned were extracted and summarized into 15 categories. The data shows that despite the difference in attacks, countries, and casualties involved, many of the lessons learned are similar. We also found that the pattern of lessons learned is repeated continuously over the time period studied.

Conclusions

The lessons from terrorist attacks since 2001 follow a certain pattern and remained constant over time. Therefore, it seems to be more accurate to talk about lessons identified rather than lessons learned. To save as many victims as possible, protect rescue forces from harm, and to prepare hospitals at the best possible level it is important to implement the lessons identified in training and preparation.

Imaging findings in patients after the bomb explosion in Somalia on December 28, 2019

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to present the radiological findings of injuries in victims as a result of a suicide bombing in Mogadishu, Somalia.

METHODS

Of the 82 injured cases admitted to the emergency department within the first six hours after the explosion, those who were radiologically evaluated were included in this retrospective and descriptive study. To analyze and identify the distribution of primary, secondary, and tertiary injuries, they were classified according to the body areas as head-neck, thorax, abdominopelvic, extremity, and vertebra.

RESULTS

The mean age (mean ± SD) of 63 patients included in the study was 28.6 ± 10.2 years. Twenty-four (38.1%) of the injured patients were female and 39 (61.9%) were male. Secondary blast injury was the most common type of injury in the study group with a rate of 39/63 (62%). The total number of bomb fragments was 235, of which 113 (47.8%) were seen in the head and neck region, followed by 86 (36.5%) in the extremities. There were 10 patients (15.9%) with lung injury and 13 (20.6%) with tympanic membrane perforation due to the primary blast mechanism.

CONCLUSION

Radiological imaging plays an important role in identifying specific findings and patterns of explosive injuries. Therefore, we consider that patients with stable hemodynamics should be radiologically examined for a fast and accurate diagnosis or treatment.

Primary Blast Lung Injury: The UK Military Experience

INTRODUCTION

Primary blast lung injury occurs when an explosive shock wave passes through the thorax and transits through tissues of varying densities. It requires close proximity to an explosion and presents quick with respiratory distress in survivors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The Joint Theatre Trauma Registry and the Defence Statistics (Health) Database were interrogated for casualties injured as a result of an explosion during the conflict in Afghanistan. The case notes and imaging of casualties meeting the criteria for diagnosis were reviewed. Demographic and clinical data on casualties with primary blast lung injury were analyzed.

RESULTS

848 blast-exposed casualties survived to discharge from intensive care, and 238 blast-exposed casualties were killed in action. Following exclusions, 111 case notes and all postmortem reports were reviewed in detail. About, 25 casualties had isolated primary blast lung injury (2.9% of casualties surviving to discharge from intensive care) and 31 nonsurvivors (13% of nonsurvivors) had the disease documented at postmortem. Severe cases of primary blast lung injury required an estimated average of 4.5 days of conventional mechanical ventilation.

CONCLUSIONS

8.1% of blast exposed casualties suffered primary blast lung injury. It was a less severe disease than other nontraumatic forms of acute lung injury and did not cause deaths once a casualty had reached a combat support hospital. It was well managed with a relatively brief period of conventional mechanical ventilation.

[Terrorist attack trauma - an individual entity of polytrauma : A 10-year update]

The incidence of terrorist attacks is increasing worldwide, and they have also become a permanent threat in European cities. Due to its complexity, terrorist attack trauma places high demands on the strategy of surgical treatment. The combination of various mechanisms, explosions and gunshot injuries, with the characteristic pressure (blast) damage and a high proportion of penetrating trauma with simultaneous burns are characteristic features. Unlike in military conflicts, injuries to people of all ages and without ballistic body protection (body armor) are to be expected. The mechanism of the attack and its local conditions are of relevance for the assessment of the situation and the expected injury patterns. Thus, suicide attacks result in several times higher numbers of fatalities and casualties. Explosions on free ground lead to different types of injury than those in closed or semi-enclosed spaces. The treatment principles of the Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS®) are based on the intrahospital care of casualties as well as damage control strategies with trigger factors. In order to prepare and educate clinics and surgeons in Germany for such scenarios, various course formats of the professional societies, the German Society for General and Visceral Surgery (DGAV) and the German Society for Trauma Surgery (DGU) have now been established.

Blast injures to the thorax

One out of 10 of military casualties and 6-9 out of 10 civilian victims of terror incidents suffer pulmonary blast injuries when the attackers use explosives as weapon. No specific therapy exists for the primary, shock-wave injury to the lung. The treatment protocols are based on mechanical ventilation, intensive therapy and supportive care. Secondary and tertiary blast structural injuries to the thorax require damage control surgery, dominated by pleural space management (drainage) and haemorrhage control (thoracotomy if needed). Parenchyma resection of irreversibly destroyed lung is rarely needed, and non-anatomical resections are to be preferred. Delayed chest wall reconstruction follows haemodynamic stabilisation and completion of demarcation process. Blast injury to the chest requires a multidisciplinary approach, where the outcome is strongly influenced by the concomitant injuries.

A New Triage Support Tool in Case of Explosion

Deafness frequently observed in explosion victims, currently following terrorist attack, is a barrier to communication between victims and first responders. This may result in a delay in the initial triage and evacuation. In such situations, Paris Fire Brigade (Paris, France) proposes the use of assistance cards to help conscious, but deafened patients at the site of an attack where there may be numerous victims. Yavari-Sartakhti O , Briche F , Jost D , Michaud N , Bignand M , Tourtier JP . A new triage support tool in case of explosion. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2018;33(2):213-214.

Primary Blast Brain Injury Mechanisms: Current Knowledge, Limitations, and Future Directions

Mild blast traumatic brain injury (bTBI) accounts for the majority of brain injury in United States service members and other military personnel worldwide. The mechanisms of primary blast brain injury continue to be disputed with little evidence to support one or a combination of theories. The main hypotheses addressed in this review are blast wave transmission through the skull orifices, direct cranial transmission, skull flexure dynamics, thoracic surge, acceleration, and cavitation. Each possible mechanism is discussed using available literature with the goal of focusing research efforts to address the limitations and challenges that exist in blast injury research. Multiple mechanisms may contribute to the pathology of bTBI and could be dependent on magnitudes and orientation to blast exposure. Further focused biomechanical investigation with cadaver, in vivo, and finite element models would advance our knowledge of bTBI mechanisms. In addition, this understanding could guide future research and contribute to the greater goal of developing relevant injury criteria and mandates to protect our soldiers on the battlefield.

Civilian casualties of terror-related explosions: The impact of vascular trauma on treatment and prognosis

OBJECTIVES

A high prevalence (10%) of vascular trauma (VT) was previously described in terror-related trauma as compared with non-terror-related trauma (1%), in a civilian setting. No data regarding outcome of VT casualties of improvised explosive device (IED) explosions, in civilian settings, are available. The aim of the current study is to present the prognosis of civilian casualties of IED explosions with and without VT.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of the Israeli National Trauma Registry was performed. All patients in the registry from September 2000 to December 2005 who were victims of explosions were included. These patients were subdivided into patients with VT (n = 109) and non-VT (NVT) (n = 1,152). Both groups were analyzed according to mechanism of trauma, type and severity of injury, and treatment.

RESULTS

Of 1,261 explosion casualties, there were 109 VT victims (8.6%). Patients with VT tended to be more complex, with a higher injury severity score (ISS): 17.4% with ISS 16 to 24 as compared with only 10.5%. In the group of critically injured patients (ISS, 25-75), 51.4% had VT compared with only 15.5% of the NVT patients. As such, a heavy share of hospitals' resources were used-trauma bay admission (62.4%), operating rooms (91.7%), and intensive care unit beds (55.1%). The percentage of VT patients who were admitted for more than 15 days was 2.3 times higher than that observed among the NVT patients. Lower-extremity VT injuries were the most prevalent. Although many resources are being invested in treating this group of patients, their mortality rate is approximately five times more than NVT (22.9% vs. 4.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

Vascular trauma casualties of IED explosions are more complex and have poorer prognosis. Their higher ISS markedly increases the hospital's resource utilization, and as such, it should be taken into consideration either upon the primary evacuation from the scene or when secondary modulation is needed in order to reduce the burden of the hospitals receiving the casualties.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic/epidemiologic study, level V.

[Civilian blast injuries: an underestimated problem? : Results of a retrospective analysis of the TraumaRegister DGU®]

BACKGROUND

Blast injuries are a rare cause of potentially life-threatening injuries in Germany. During the past 30 years such injuries were seldom the cause of mass casualties, therefore, knowledge and skills in dealing with this type of injury are not very extensive.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective identification of all patients in the TraumaRegister DGU® of the German Trauma Society (TR-DGU) who sustained blast injuries between January 1993 and November 2012 was carried out. The study involved a descriptive characterization of the collective as well as three additional collectives. The arithmetic mean, standard deviation and 95 % confidence interval of the arithmetic mean for different demographic parameters and figures for prehospital and in-hospital settings were calculated. A computation of prognostic scores, such as the Revised Injury Severity Classification (RISC) and the updated version RISC II (TR-DGU-Project-ID 2012-035) was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 137 patients with blast injuries could be identified in the dataset of the TR-DGU. Of the patients 90 % were male and 43 % were transported by the helicopter emergency service (HEMS) to the various trauma centres. The severely injured collective with a mean injury severity scale (ISS) of 18.0 (ISS ≥ 16 = 52 %) had stable vital signs. In none of the cases was it necessary to perform on-site emergency surgery but a very high proportion of patients (59 %) had to be surgically treated before admittance to the intensive care unit (ICU). Of the patients 27 % had severe soft tissue injuries with an Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) ≥ 3 and 90 % of these injuries were burns. The 24 h in-hospital fatality was very low (3 %) but the stay in the ICU tended to be longer than for other types of injury (mean 5.5 ventilation days and 10.7 days in the intensive care unit). Organ failure occurred in 36 % of the cases, multiorgan failure in 29 % and septic events in 14 %. Of the patients 16 % were transferred to another hospital during the first 48 h. The RISC and the updated RISC II tended to underestimate the severity of injuries and mortality (10.2 % vs. 6.8 % and 10.7 % vs. 7.5 %, respectively) and the trauma associated severe hemorrhage (TASH) score underestimated the probability for transfusion of more than 10 units of packed red blood cells (5.0 % vs. 12.5 %).

CONCLUSION

This article generates several hypotheses, which should be confirmed with additional investigations. Until then it has to be concluded that patients who suffer from accidental blast injuries in the civilian setting (excluding military operations and terrorist attacks) show a combination of classical severe trauma with blunt and penetrating injuries and additionally a high proportion of severe burns (combined thermomechanical injury). They stay longer in the ICU than other trauma patients and suffer more complications, such as sepsis and multiorgan failure. Established scores, such as RISC, RISC II and TASH tend to underestimate the severity of the underlying trauma.

Management of Vascular Trauma during the Paris Terrorist Attack of November 13, 2015

BACKGROUND

On November 13, 2015, Paris and Saint-Denis were the targets of terrorist attacks. The Public Hospitals of Paris Organization and the Percy Armed Forces Instruction Hospitals were mobilized to face the mass casualty situation. The objective of this study is to analyze the management of the victims presenting with a nonthoracic vascular trauma (NTVT).

METHODS

All the data relating to the victims of NTVT who required a specific vascular open or endovascular treatment were analyzed retrospectively. A 6-month follow-up was obtained for all the patients.

RESULTS

Among the 351 wounded, 20 (5.7%) patients had an NTVT and were dispatched in 8 hospitals (11 men of average age 32). NTVTs were gunshots in 17 cases (85%) or due to a handmade bomb in 3 cases (15%). Twelve patients (60%) received cardiopulmonary resuscitation during prehospital care. NTVT affected the limbs (14 cases, 70%) and the abdomen or the small pelvis (6 cases, 30%). All the patients were operated in emergency. Arterial lesions were treated with greater saphenous vein bypasses, by ligation, and/or embolization. Eleven venous lesions were treated by direct repair or ligation. Associated lesions requiring a specific treatment were present in 19 patients (95%) and were primarily osseous, nervous, and abdomino-pelvic. Severe postoperative complications were observed in 9 patients (45%). Fourteen patients (70%) required blood transfusion (6.4 U of packed red blood cells on average, range 0-48). There were no deaths or amputation and all vascular reconstructions were patent at 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The effectiveness of the prehospital emergency services and a multisite and multidisciplinary management made it possible to obtain satisfactory results for NTVT casualties. All the departments of vascular surgery must be prepared to receive many wounded victims in the event of terrorist attacks.

Triage: care of the critically ill and injured during pandemics and disasters: CHEST consensus statement

BACKGROUND

Pandemics and disasters can result in large numbers of critically ill or injured patients who may overwhelm available resources despite implementing surge-response strategies. If this occurs, critical care triage, which includes both prioritizing patients for care and rationing scarce resources, will be required. The suggestions in this chapter are important for all who are involved in large-scale pandemics or disasters with multiple critically ill or injured patients, including front-line clinicians, hospital administrators, and public health or government officials.

METHODS

The Triage topic panel reviewed previous task force suggestions and the literature to identify 17 key questions for which specific literature searches were then conducted to identify studies upon which evidence-based recommendations could be made. No studies of sufficient quality were identified. Therefore, the panel developed expert opinion-based suggestions using a modified Delphi process. Suggestions from the previous task force that were not being updated were also included for validation by the expert panel.

RESULTS

The suggestions from the task force outline the key principles upon which critical care triage should be based as well as a path for the development of the plans, processes, and infrastructure required. This article provides 11 suggestions regarding the principles upon which critical care triage should be based and policies to guide critical care triage.

CONCLUSIONS

Ethical and efficient critical care triage is a complex process that requires significant planning and preparation. At present, the prognostic tools required to produce an effective decision support system (triage protocol) as well as the infrastructure, processes, legal protections, and training are largely lacking in most jurisdictions. Therefore, critical care triage should be a last resort after mass critical care surge strategies.

Terror attacks increase the risk of vascular injuries

Objectives: Extensive literature exists about military trauma as opposed to the very limited literature regarding terror-related civilian trauma. However, terror-related vascular trauma (VT), as a unique type of injury, is yet to be addressed.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of the Israeli National Trauma Registry was performed. All patients in the registry from 09/2000 to 12/2005 were included. The subgroup of patients with documented VT (N = 1,545) was analyzed and further subdivided into those suffering from terror-related vascular trauma (TVT) and non-terror-related vascular trauma (NTVT). Both groups were analyzed according to mechanism of trauma, type and severity of injury and treatment.

Results: Out of 2,446 terror-related trauma admissions, 243 sustained TVT (9.9%) compared to 1302 VT patients from non-terror trauma (1.1%). TVT injuries tend to be more complex and most patients were operated on. Intensive care unit admissions and hospital length of stay was higher in the TVT group. Penetrating trauma was the prominent cause of injury among the TVT group. TVT group had a higher proportion of patients with severe injuries (ISS ≥ 16) and mortality. Thorax injuries were more frequent in the TVT group. Extremity injuries were the most prevalent vascular injuries in both groups; however NTVT group had more upper extremity injuries, while the TVT group had significantly much lower extremity injuries.

Conclusion: Vascular injuries are remarkably more common among terror attack victims than among non-terror trauma victims and the injuries of terror casualties tend to be more complex. The presence of a vascular surgeon will ensure a comprehensive clinical care.

Application of high-intensity focused ultrasound to the study of mild traumatic brain injury

Though intrinsically of much higher frequency than open-field blast overpressures, high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) pulse trains can be frequency modulated to produce a radiation pressure having a similar form. In this study, 1.5-MHz HIFU pulse trains of 1-ms duration were applied to intact skulls of mice in vivo and resulted in blood-brain barrier disruption and immune responses (astrocyte reactivity and microglial activation). Analyses of variance indicated that 24 h after HIFU exposure, staining density for glial fibrillary acidic protein was elevated in the parietal and temporal regions of the cerebral cortex, corpus callosum and hippocampus, and staining density for the microglial marker, ionized calcium binding adaptor molecule, was elevated 2 and 24 h after exposure in the corpus callosum and hippocampus (all statistical test results, p < 0.05). HIFU shows promise for the study of some bio-effect aspects of blast-related, non-impact mild traumatic brain injuries in animals.

Abdominal blast injuries: different patterns, severity, management, and prognosis according to the main mechanism of injury

PURPOSE

To review the frequency, different patterns, anatomic severity, management, and prognosis of abdominal injuries in survivors of explosions, according to the main mechanism of injury.

METHODS

A MEDLINE search was conducted from January 1982 to August 2013, including the following MeSH terms: blast injuries, abdominal injuries. EMBASE was also searched, with the same entries. Abdominal blast injuries (ABIs) have been defined as injuries resulting not only from the effects of the overpressure on abdominal organs, but also from the multimechanistic effects and projectile fragments resulting from the blast. Special emphasis was placed on the detailed assessment of ABIs in patients admitted to GMUGH (Gregorio Marañón University General Hospital) after the Madrid 2004 terrorist bombings, and in patients admitted to HYMC (Hillel Yaffe Medical Centre) in Hadera (Israel) following several bombing episodes. The anatomic severity of injuries was assessed by the abdominal component of the AIS, and the overall anatomic severity of casualties was assessed by means of the NISS.

RESULTS

Abdominal injuries are not common in survivors of terrorist explosions, although they are a frequent finding in those immediately killed. Primary and tertiary blast injuries have predominated in survivors from explosions in enclosed spaces reported outside of Israel. In contrast, secondary blast injuries causing fragmentation wounds were predominant in suicide bombings in open and/or semi-confined spaces, mainly in Israel, and also in military conflicts. Multiple perforations of the ileum seem to be the most common primary blast injury to the bowel, but delayed bowel perforations are rare. Secondary blast injuries carry the highest anatomic severity and mortality rate. Most of the deaths assessed occurred early, with hemorrhagic shock from penetrating fragments as the main contributing factor. The negative laparotomy rate has been very variable, with higher rates reported, in general, from civilian hospitals attending a large number of casualties.

CONCLUSIONS

The pattern, severity, management, and prognosis of ABI vary considerably, in accordance with the main mechanism of injury.

What the Intensive Care Doctor Needs to Know about Blast-Related Lung Injury

Explosions are currently the primary cause of military combat injuries. A minority of civilian trauma is also caused by explosions. People hurt by explosion are likely to present with complex injuries. The aim of the article is to explain the mechanism underlying these injuries and the associated physiology to help the intensive care clinician manage these casualties properly. The generic term ‘blast injury’ is applied to a collection of injuries caused by explosion. Components of blast injuries have precise definitions relating to the elements of the explosion that caused the injuries: primary blast injury is due to a shock wave, secondary blast injury is caused by fragments and debris colliding with the victim and tertiary blast injury is due to the casualty being thrown against solid objects. Primary blast injury results in damage principally in gas-containing organs, eg the lungs (blast lung) and can lead to impaired pulmonary gas transfer and hypoxaemia. Secondary blast injuries are often penetrating and can lead to haemorrhage while tertiary blast injuries are often blunt and involve substantial tissue damage. Survivors of explosions in confined spaces are more likely to exhibit primary blast injury than those injured in open spaces. The current military approach to immediate management is to apply the C ABC principle (arrest catastrophic haemorrhage first and then deal with airway, breathing and circulation) to achieve Damage Control Resuscitation. Early administration of blood products (plasma as well as red cells) is advocated for those suffering significant haemorrhage. Initial resuscitation is hypotensive to minimise risk of dislodging nascent clots. However, if evacuation is protracted (longer than one hour) then consideration should be given to improving blood flow / oxygen delivery by adopting a revised normotensive blood pressure target to reverse the deleterious consequences of the hypotensive shock state. Animal studies have shown that titrating FiO2 to a target SaO2 of 95% can improve survival and ‘buy time’ during hypotensive resuscitation. Ventilator strategies should use a lung-protective approach with permissive hypercapnia if necessary. Blast casualties are often a challenging group of patients needing expert, tailored, care. Outcome can be good especially in young, otherwise fit, casualties with more than 96% surviving to ICU discharge, although this figure may be lower with a mixed civilian group.

Indicators of the need for ICU admission following suicide bombing attacks

INTRODUCTION

Critical hospital resources, especially the demand for ICU beds, are usually limited following mass casualty incidents such as suicide bombing attacks (SBA). Our primary objective was to identify easily diagnosed external signs of injury that will serve as indicators of the need for ICU admission. Our secondary objective was to analyze under- and over-triage following suicidal bombing attacks.

METHODS

A database was collected prospectively from patients who were admitted to Hadassah University Hospital Level I Trauma Centre, Jerusalem, Israel from August 2001-August 2005 following a SBA. One hundred and sixty four victims of 17 suicide bombing attacks were divided into two groups according to ICU and non-ICU admission.

RESULTS

There were 86 patients in the ICU group (52.4%) and 78 patients in the non-ICU group (47.6%). Patients in the ICU group required significantly more operating room time compared with patients in the non-ICU group (59.3% vs. 25.6%, respectively, p=0.0003). For the ICU group, median ICU stay was 4 days (IQR 2 to 8.25 days). On multivariable analysis only the presence of facial fractures (p=0.014), peripheral vascular injury (p=0.015), injury≥4 body areas (p=0.002) and skull fractures (p=0.017) were found to be independent predictors of the need for ICU admission. Sixteen survivors (19.5%) in the ICU group were admitted to the ICU for one day only (ICU-LOS=1) and were defined as over-triaged. Median ISS for this group was significantly lower compared with patients who were admitted to the ICU for >1 day (ICU-LOS>1). This group of over-triaged patients could not be distinguished from the other ICU patients based on external signs of trauma. None of the patients in the non-ICU group were subsequently transferred to the ICU.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that following SBA, injury to ≥4 areas, and certain types of injuries such as facial and skull fractures, and peripheral vascular injury, can serve as surrogates of severe trauma and the need for ICU admission. Over-triage rates following SBA can be limited by a concerted, focused plan implemented by dedicated personnel and by the liberal utilization of imaging studies.

[Blast lung injuries]

In armed conflicts and during terrorist attacks, explosive devices are a major cause of mortality. The lung is one of the organs most sensitive to blasts. Thus, today it is important that every GP at least knows the basics and practices regarding treatment of blast victims. We suggest, following a review of the explosions and an assessment of the current threats, detailing the lung injuries brought about by the explosions and the main treatments currently recommended.

Imaging utilization during explosive multiple casualty incidents

BACKGROUND

Emergency radiology is a vital tool in the evaluation of victims of explosive multiple casualty incidents (MCIs). Prior reports estimate that approximately 50% of explosive MCI patients required imaging, including 7% to 22% who required computed tomography (CT) studies. This report describes the contemporary utilization of emergency radiology during the evaluation of explosive MCI victims in a modern US military trauma hospital in Iraq. We hypothesized that a much higher number of patients received imaging than has been reported previously in the literature.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective chart review of records from 3 MCIs managed at the US Air Force Theater Hospital, Balad AB, Iraq between February and April 2008. All three incidents were the result of improvised explosive devices.

RESULTS

Overall, 50 patients had a mean Injury Severity Score of 19 and a mortality of 8%. Ninety-two percent received imaging during their emergency department evaluation, including 90% who received CT, 70% who received X-rays, and 38% who received extended focused abdominal sonography for trauma ultrasound examinations. Overall, patients had a mean of 3.5 CTs and 1.9 X-rays during their initial assessment. Of the CTs, 93% were part of a trauma pan-scan, and 49% of the CT results were clinically significant.

CONCLUSION

These results are significantly different from previous reports and indicate that victims of explosive MCIs will require more imaging, especially CT, than previously anticipated. These data will allow improved integration of radiology staffing and resource allocation into disaster management plans designed to prepare for future explosive MCIs.

Neurological effects of blast injury

Over the last few years, thousands of soldiers and an even greater number of civilians have suffered traumatic injuries due to blast exposure, largely attributed to improvised explosive devices in terrorist and insurgent activities. The use of body armor is allowing soldiers to survive blasts that would otherwise be fatal due to systemic damage. Emerging evidence suggests that exposure to a blast can produce neurologic consequences in the brain but much remains unknown. To elucidate the current scientific basis for understanding blast-induced traumatic brain injury (bTBI), the NIH convened a workshop in April 2008. A multidisciplinary group of neuroscientists, engineers, and clinicians were invited to share insights on bTBI, specifically pertaining to: physics of blast explosions, acute clinical observations and treatments, preclinical and computational models, and lessons from the international community on civilian exposures. This report provides an overview of the state of scientific knowledge of bTBI, drawing from the published literature, as well as presentations, discussions, and recommendations from the workshop. One of the major recommendations from the workshop was the need to characterize the effects of blast exposure on clinical neuropathology. Clearer understanding of the human neuropathology would enable validation of preclinical and computational models, which are attempting to simulate blast wave interactions with the central nervous system. Furthermore, the civilian experience with bTBI suggests that polytrauma models incorporating both brain and lung injuries may be more relevant to the study of civilian countermeasures than considering models with a neurologic focus alone.

Injury patterns from major urban terrorist bombings in trains: the Madrid experience

BACKGROUND

Terrorist urban mass casualty incidents (MCI) in the last 3 years have targeted commuter trains at rush hour, producing large numbers of casualties. Civilian care providers are usually not familiar with the types of blast injuries sustained by victims of these MCI.

METHODS

We focus on the injury patterns sustained by casualties of the Madrid, 11 March 2004, terrorist bombings, at the seven hospitals that received most victims. Data were gathered of casualties who had injuries other than superficial bruises, transient hearing loss from barotrauma without eardrum perforation, and/or emotional shock. The degree of severity in critical patients was assessed with the ISS.

RESULTS

The bombings resulted in 177 immediate fatalities, 9 early deaths, and 5 late deaths. Most survivors had noncritical injuries, but 72 (14%) of 512 casualties assessed had an Injury Severity Score (ISS) >15. The critical mortality rate was of 19.5%. The most frequently injured body regions were the head-neck and face. Almost 50% of casualties had ear-drum perforation, and 60% of them were bilateral. There were 43 documented cases of blast lung injury, with a survival rate of 88.3%. Maxillofacial and open long-bone fractures were most prevalent. Gustillo's grade III of severity predominated in tibia-fibular and humeral fractures. Upper thoracic fractures (D1-6 segment) represented 65% of all vertebral fractures and were associated with severe blast to the torso. Severe burns were uncommon. Eye injuries were frequent, although most were of a mild-to-moderate severity. Abdominal visceral lesions were present in 25 (5%) patients. A multidisciplinary approach was necessary in most operated patients, and orthopedic trauma procedures accounted for 50% of the caseload in the first 24 h.

CONCLUSIONS

Ninety-three percent of the fatalities of the Madrid trains terrorist bombings were immediate, and most survivors had noncritical injuries. Closed doors increased the immediate fatality rate in the trains. Severely wounded casualties presented specific patterns of injuries, some of them life-threatening and unusual in other types of trauma mechanisms. Ear-lobe amputations and upper thoracic spine fractures were markers of critical injuries.

Clinical review: the role of the intensive care physician in mass casualty incidents: planning, organisation, and leadership

There is a long-standing, broad assumption that hospitals will ably receive and efficiently provide comprehensive care to victims following a mass casualty event. Unfortunately, the majority of medical major incident plans are insufficiently focused on strategies and procedures that extend beyond the pre-hospital and early-hospital phases of care. Recent events underscore two important lessons: (a) the role of intensive care specialists extends well beyond the intensive care unit during such events, and (b) non-intensive care hospital personnel must have the ability to provide basic critical care. The bombing of the London transport network, while highlighting some good practices in our major incident planning, also exposed weaknesses already described by others. Whilst this paper uses the events of the 7 July 2005 as its point of reference, the lessons learned and the changes incorporated in our planning have generic applications to mass casualty events. In the UK, the Department of Health convened an expert symposium in June 2007 to identify lessons learned from 7 July 2005 and disseminate them for the benefit of the wider medical community. The experiences of clinicians from critical care units in London made a large contribution to this process and are discussed in this paper.

Blast physics and central nervous system injury

The effect of blast on biological tissue is well documented for particular organ systems such as the lung. This is not the case for the CNS, where the mechanism of CNS injury following a detonation and blast wave is unclear. The effect of blast on traumatic brain injury (TBI) has come into particular focus with the Global War on Terror and Operation Iraqi Freedom, and Operation Enduring Freedom where TBI has become known as the signature injury of these conflicts. The reason for the prominence of TBI in these particular conflicts as opposed to others is unclear, but may result from the increased survivability of blast due to improvements in body armor. In this review, we trace the historical context of blast injury and develop current concepts from this framework, in addition to highlighting many remaining unsolved questions.

Drotrecogin alpha (activated): the treatment for severe sepsis?

Severe sepsis is common and increasing in incidence. Mortality rates remain high. Discovery of the link between the coagulation system and the inflammatory response to sepsis led to the development of drotrecogin alpha (activated). This recombinant form of the natural anticoagulant, activated protein C, was shown to reduce 28-day mortality from severe sepsis in a large, randomised, placebo-controlled, multi-centre Phase III study. Although subsequent studies have demonstrated that drotrecogin alpha (activated) is not of benefit to all patients with severe sepsis, it does reduce mortality rates in patients at a high risk of death. Drotrecogin alpha (activated) is associated with an increased risk of bleeding. Recent studies have shed light on its mode of action, which is primarily attributed today to cytoprotective effects especially on the endothelium with improved microcirculation. Ongoing studies will help define which patients are most likely to benefit, perhaps with the help of biochemical markers.

Terrorismus – Eine neue Dimension des Polytraumas

Bomb attacks on the civilian population are one of the primary instruments of global terrorism. Confronted as we are with the increasingly real threat in Europe too, we now have to be constantly prepared for the mass casualties and new injury patterns in trauma care that are caused by terrorist bombings. This is extraordinarily challenging, on both medical and logistical levels, for the hospitals involved. In this review the basic mechanisms of blast injuries are clarified. In addition, the fundamental principles of triage and the management of multiple trauma are presented; these are oriented on ATLS (advanced trauma life support) and DCS (damage control surgery) guidelines. These treatment concepts, which have proved their worth in both military and civilian environments, involve ongoing triage and constant situational assessment and are the basis of improved treatment results in the care of multiply traumatized victims of terrorist bombings.

The Approach to Suicide Bombing Attacks: Changing Concepts

Suicide bombing attacks have emerged as a lethal weapon in the hands of terrorist groups. Our aim was to review the medical experience acquired in Israel, Spain, the United Kingdom and the United States in managing terrorist attacks, and prepare medical systems for the difficult task of managing these events. EMS protocols are amended to deal with a large number of victims in an urban setting who must be rapidly evacuated to a medical center where resuscitative as well as definitive care is delivered. A combination of extensive soft tissue damage caused by penetrating injuries, blast injury to the lungs and tympanic membranes, and burns are common among survivors. Preparation must include establishment of a clear chain-of-command lead by a general surgeon who manages the event and is responsible for decisions regarding OR preferences and ICU admissions. The emergency department is re-organized to handle the influx of numerous severely injured casualties. Professional personnel and resources are recruited and re-directed away from routine tasks towards treating the victims. This is achieved by deferring non-urgent operations, procedures and imaging studies. Victims are frequently re-assessed and re-evaluated to control chaos, minimize missed injuries and ensure delivery of an adequate level of care.

Critical care delivery: the experience of a civilian terrorist attack

It has been recognised for some time that a terrorist incident was threatened in the U.K. and it has been noted previously in the JRAMC that the locations for terrorist atrocities are likely to be more diverse than previously experienced. July 7th 2005 witnessed the first terrorist suicide bombing on the U.K. mainland, targeting the public transport system in London. These attacks were unprecedented in both scale and intensity but they were anticipated in London. However there were clear difficulties, relating to multiple sites, their location underground and early problems with communication (2). This article highlights some of the experiences and learning points of the Intensive Care Medicine Service at the Royal London Hospital (RLH) in the wake of the July 7th bombings. The RLH was the single biggest receiver of casualties (195); seven of whom were admitted to the Intensive Care Unit. The Defence Medical Services have tri-service representation (both regular and reserve) at the RLH in Emergency Medicine and Pre-hospital Care, Surgical Services and Intensive Care Medicine.