[AKTIN - The German Emergency Department Data Registry - real-time data from emergency medicine : Implementation and first results from 15 emergency departments with focus on Federal Joint Committee's guidelines on acuity assessment]

Hintergrund

Die Notfallversorgung befindet sich im Umbruch. In Notaufnahmen werden Patienten ausgehend von Symptomen und Dringlichkeit versorgt; dies bildet sich jedoch in den etablierten Routinedaten der gesetzlichen Sozialversicherung nicht ab. Ziel des AKTIN-Projekts war der Aufbau einer datenschutzkonformen Registerinfrastruktur zur Nutzung von klinischen Routinedaten aus Notaufnahmen.

Methoden

Über eine standardisierte Schnittstelle werden aus den verschiedenen Dokumentationssystemen kontinuierlich Daten der Notaufnahmebehandlung in ein lokales Data Warehouse exportiert. Dort stehen sie sowohl für lokale Nutzungen, wie interne Berichte und Qualitätsmanagement, als auch gleichzeitig datenschutzkonform für multizentrische Auswertungen zur Verfügung.

Anhand der Registerpopulation wird die Ersteinschätzung sowie die Erhebung von Vitalparametern in Abhängigkeit von Vorstellungsgründen für einen 12-Monats-Zeitraum analysiert.

Ergebnisse

Für den Zeitraum 04/2018 bis 03/2019 wurden 436.149 gültige Fälle aus 15 Notaufnahmen übermittelt. In 86,0 % der Fälle ist eine Ersteinschätzung dokumentiert.

Diese fand in 70,5 % innerhalb von 10 min nach Ankunft des Patienten statt. In 10 Kliniken wird regelhaft (82,3 %) ein Vorstellungsgrund erfasst. Die Erfassung von Vitalparametern variiert plausibel zwischen den Vorstellungsgründen.

Schlussfolgerung

Das AKTIN-Notaufnahmeregister bietet einen zeitnahen Einblick in das Versorgungsgeschehen der Notaufnahmen ohne zusätzlichen Dokumentationsaufwand und unabhängig vom primären IT-System, Kostenträger, Fallart und Abrechnungsmodus. Die Vorgaben des Gemeinsamen Bundesausschusses zur Ersteinschätzung werden weitgehend umgesetzt. Durch die Etablierung von standardisierten Vorstellungsgründen werden symptombasierte Analysen und Gesundheitssurveillance ermöglicht.

Zusatzmaterial online

Die Onlineversion dieses Beitrags (10.1007/s00063-020-00764-2) enthält die Abb. S1 und S2. Beitrag und Zusatzmaterial stehen Ihnen auf www.springermedizin.de zur Verfügung. Bitte geben Sie dort den Beitragstitel in die Suche ein, das Zusatzmaterial finden Sie beim Beitrag unter „Ergänzende Inhalte“.

[Acute treatment of pregnant women after severe trauma-a retrospective multicenter analysis]

BACKGROUND

For the medical team, the management of pregnant trauma patients is a particular challenge. The aim of this study is to compile this data and to determine differences between pregnant and not pregnant trauma patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We carried out a retrospective data analysis from the TraumaRegister DGU® with a comparison of 102 pregnant and 3135 not pregnant women of child-bearing age (16-45 years) from 2016-2018 who were treated in a trauma center. All patients were delivered to the resuscitation room and received intensive care treatment.

RESULTS

In Germany, Austria and Switzerland 3.2% of all trauma patients (102 women) were pregnant. Women with an average age of 29 years suffered most often trauma as a result of a road traffic accident. Major trauma (Injury Severity Score [ISS] ≥16 points) was seen in 24.5% of the pregnant women and 37.4% of the nonpregnant women. A computer tomography (whole body computer tomography) was carried out in 32.7% of all pregnant women but in 79.8% of the nonpregnant women. As a result of the trauma, 2.9% of the pregnant and 3.5% of the not pregnant women died. The standardised mortality rate (SMR) was 0.42 in pregnant women and 0.63 in nonpregnant women.

CONCLUSION

For the first time there is data regarding incidence, trauma mechanism, prehospital and in-hospital care as well as intensive care of pregnant trauma patients in Germany, Austria and Switzerland. Further research regarding foetal outcome and trauma-related injuries in pregnant women is needed to develop an adjusted management for these patients ready to implement in trauma centres. Gynaecologists and obstetricians should be implemented in the trauma room team when needed.

[Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta : Option for incompressible trunk bleeding?]

Hemorrhage is the single largest cause of avoidable death in trauma patients, whereby in civil emergency medicine in Europe most life-threatening hemorrhages occur in the abdomen and the pelvis. This is one reason why endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (EBOA), a procedure especially established in vascular surgery, is increasingly propagated for rapid bleeding control in these patients. This review article provides a comprehensive overview of the technique, indications, contraindications and complications of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA). Additionally, outcomes reported in in the currently available literature are summarized and discussed. From this practical and user-oriented consequences for future successful introduction of REBOA in the field of emergency medicine are deduced.

[Prehospital application of tourniquets for life-threatening extremity hemorrhage : Systematic review of literature]

INTRODUCTION

The effectiveness of a tourniquet in the case of life-threatening hemorrhages of the extremities is well recognized and led to the recommendations on "Tourniquet" of the German Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (DGAI) in 2016. The aim of this systematic review was to re-evaluate the current medical literature in relation to the published DGAI recommendations.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Based on the analysis of all studies published from January 2015 until January 2018 in the PubMed databases, the publicized recommendations for action on "Tourniquet" of the DGAI were critically re-evaluated. For this purpose, 17 questions on 6 subjects were formulated in advance. The systematic review followed the PRISMA recommendations and is registered in PROSPERO (International prospective register of systematic reviews, Reg.-ID: CRD42018091528).

RESULTS

Of the 284 studies identified with the keywords tourniquet and trauma in the period from January 2015 to January 2018 in PubMed, 50 original papers discussing the prehospital application of tourniquet for life-threatening hemorrhage of the extremities were included. The overall level of evidence is low. No article addressed any of the formulated questions with a prospective randomized interventional study. Scientific deductions could be found only in an indirect way in a descriptive manner.

CONCLUSION

The 50 original articles included in this qualitative, systematic review revealed that the recommendations "Tourniquet" of the DGAI published in 2016 are mostly still up to date despite an inhomogeneous study situation. A deviation occurred in the conversion of a tourniquet but due to the short prehospital treatment time in the civilian setting this is of little importance; however, in the future a strict distinction should be made between tourniquets which were placed for tactical reasons and those placed as a medical necessity.

[Empirical evaluation of quality indicators for severely injured patients in the TraumaRegister DGU®]

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

A systematic assessment of the quality of medical treatment by using key indicators has been required in Germany for many years. These quality indicators (QI) have to satisfy many requirements. Besides an expert review an empirical data-based evaluation is also necessary. The TraumaRegister DGU® (TR-DGU) has reported QI in the annual reports from the beginning. The objective of this study was to validate 40 QI for the treatment of severely injured patients reviewed by experts using data from the TR-DGU.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The association of the 40 QI with hospital mortality was verified using healthcare data from the TR-DGU from a 5‑year period (2012-2016). Of these 26 QI consider events while the remaining 14 QI are key indicators, such as time spent in the trauma room. To compensate differences in injury severity, adjusted mortality rates were calculated using the revised injury severity classification (RISC) II score. For this two different approaches were chosen: the hospital-based approach classifies all hospitals into three categories and analyzes the grade of fulfilment of the indicator. The indicator-based approach considers the adjusted mortality depending on the grade of fulfilment of the indicator.

RESULTS

The analysis was based on 111,656 cases documented in the TR-DGU (mean age 50 years; 70 % male). The data analysis showed an obvious correlation with mortality for half of the QI, including only three procedural times. A clear correlation in both approaches was shown for two QI: prehospital capnometry in intubated patients and sonography used for patients without whole body computed tomography (CT) scans. Of the 20 QI with a positive result 15 were also positively rated by the experts. Of the 14 QI reported annually since 2017 in the TR-DGU report, 8 (57%) showed a clear correlation with mortality.

CONCLUSION

There is no doubt regarding the necessity of scientifically assessing QI. Approximately half of the evaluated QI showed an empirical association with mortality. Interventions and events showed better results than measurements of procedural times; however, many QI may require a refined definition. The interpretation of the results is still challenging due to differences in the patient groups. Secondary endpoints, such as hospital length of stay and quality of life after trauma were not considered here.

Changes in trauma management following the implementation of the whole-body computed tomography: a retrospective multi-centre study based on the trauma registry of the German Trauma Society (TraumaRegister DGU®)

OBJECTIVES

Whole-body computed tomography (WBCT) plays an increasingly important role in the diagnostic assessment of trauma room patients. It is still unclear whether its use has led to changes of trauma room procedures and patient outcomes.

METHODS

In a retrospective multi-centric study based on the trauma registry of the German Trauma Society (TraumaRegister DGU^®), we analysed patients with an ISS ≥ 9 between 2002 and 2013. Two periods of time, i.e. up to 3 years preceding (pre-WBCT) and up to 3 years following the introduction of the WBCT (WBCT-group), were assessed separately for every hospital (TR-DGU Project ID 2014-020).

RESULTS

19,838 patients underwent treatment in 77 hospitals. Of these, 5621 were assigned to the pre-WBCT group and 11,307 to the WBCT group. Basic data did not differ relevantly. The time spent in the trauma room decreased from 77.9 min (pre-WBCT) to 63.3 min (WBCT). Following the introduction of the trauma scan, the number of diagnoses per patient increased from 4.6 to 5.1. The percentage of patients who underwent surgery immediately after the completion of trauma room procedures decreased from 44.5 to 39.1%. There was an increase in mortality from 15.7 to 15.9%.

CONCLUSIONS

Routine use of WBCT is not superior to a combination of conventional radiography, ultrasound and focused CT in terms of mortality. The entire process involving the introduction of the trauma scan and the further development of algorithms has caused changes that can be observed in the trauma room setting.

[Civilian blast injuries: an underestimated problem? : Results of a retrospective analysis of the TraumaRegister DGU®]

BACKGROUND

Blast injuries are a rare cause of potentially life-threatening injuries in Germany. During the past 30 years such injuries were seldom the cause of mass casualties, therefore, knowledge and skills in dealing with this type of injury are not very extensive.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective identification of all patients in the TraumaRegister DGU® of the German Trauma Society (TR-DGU) who sustained blast injuries between January 1993 and November 2012 was carried out. The study involved a descriptive characterization of the collective as well as three additional collectives. The arithmetic mean, standard deviation and 95 % confidence interval of the arithmetic mean for different demographic parameters and figures for prehospital and in-hospital settings were calculated. A computation of prognostic scores, such as the Revised Injury Severity Classification (RISC) and the updated version RISC II (TR-DGU-Project-ID 2012-035) was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 137 patients with blast injuries could be identified in the dataset of the TR-DGU. Of the patients 90 % were male and 43 % were transported by the helicopter emergency service (HEMS) to the various trauma centres. The severely injured collective with a mean injury severity scale (ISS) of 18.0 (ISS ≥ 16 = 52 %) had stable vital signs. In none of the cases was it necessary to perform on-site emergency surgery but a very high proportion of patients (59 %) had to be surgically treated before admittance to the intensive care unit (ICU). Of the patients 27 % had severe soft tissue injuries with an Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) ≥ 3 and 90 % of these injuries were burns. The 24 h in-hospital fatality was very low (3 %) but the stay in the ICU tended to be longer than for other types of injury (mean 5.5 ventilation days and 10.7 days in the intensive care unit). Organ failure occurred in 36 % of the cases, multiorgan failure in 29 % and septic events in 14 %. Of the patients 16 % were transferred to another hospital during the first 48 h. The RISC and the updated RISC II tended to underestimate the severity of injuries and mortality (10.2 % vs. 6.8 % and 10.7 % vs. 7.5 %, respectively) and the trauma associated severe hemorrhage (TASH) score underestimated the probability for transfusion of more than 10 units of packed red blood cells (5.0 % vs. 12.5 %).

CONCLUSION

This article generates several hypotheses, which should be confirmed with additional investigations. Until then it has to be concluded that patients who suffer from accidental blast injuries in the civilian setting (excluding military operations and terrorist attacks) show a combination of classical severe trauma with blunt and penetrating injuries and additionally a high proportion of severe burns (combined thermomechanical injury). They stay longer in the ICU than other trauma patients and suffer more complications, such as sepsis and multiorgan failure. Established scores, such as RISC, RISC II and TASH tend to underestimate the severity of the underlying trauma.

[Consideration of guidelines, recommendations and quality indicators for treatment of stroke in the dataset "Emergency Department" of DIVI]

BACKGROUND

The dataset "Emergency Department" of the German Interdisciplinary Association of Critical Care and Emergency Medicine (DIVI) has been developed during several expert meetings. Its goal is an all-encompassing documentation of the early clinical treatment of patients in emergency departments. Using the example of the index disease acute ischemic stroke (stroke), the aim was to analyze how far this approach has been fulfilled.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this study German, European and US American guidelines were used to analyze the extent of coverage of the datasets on current emergency department guidelines and recommendations from professional societies. In addition, it was examined whether the dataset includes recommended quality indicators (QI) for quality management (QM) and in a third step it was examined to what extent national provisions for billing are included. In each case a differentiation was made whether the respective rationale was primary, i.e. directly apparent or whether it was merely secondarily depicted by expertise. In the evaluation an additional differentiation was made between the level of recommendations and further quality relevant criteria.

RESULTS

The modular design of the emergency department dataset comprising 676 data fields is briefly described. A total of 401 individual fields, divided into basic documentation, monitoring and specific neurological documentation of the treatment of stroke patients were considered. For 247 data fields a rationale was found. Partially overlapping, 78.9 % of 214 medical recommendations in 3 guidelines and 85.8 % of the 106 identified quality indicators were primarily covered. Of the 67 requirements for billing of performance of services, 55.5 % are primarily part of the emergency department dataset. Through appropriate expertise and documentation by a board certified neurologist, the results can be improved to almost 100 %.

CONCLUSION

The index disease stroke illustrates that the emergency department dataset of the DIVI covers medical guidelines, especially 100 % of the German guidelines with a grade of recommendation. All necessary information to document the specialized stroke treatment procedure in the German diagnosis-related groups (DRG) system is also covered. The dataset is also suitable as a documentation tool of quality management, for example, to participate in the registry of the German Stroke Society (ADSR). Best results are obtained if the dataset is applied by a physician specialized in the treatment of patients with stroke (e.g. board certified neurologist). Finally the results show that changes in medical guidelines and recommendations for quality management as well as billing-relevant content should be implemented in the development of datasets for documentation to avoid duplicate documentation.

[Potential for the survey of quality indicators based on a national emergency department registry : A systematic literature search]

BACKGROUND

Emergency department processes are often key for successful treatment. Therefore, collection of quality indicators is demanded. A basis for the collection is systematic, electronic documentation. The development of paper-based documentation into an electronic and interoperable national emergency registry is-besides the establishment of quality management for emergency departments-a target of the AKTIN project. The objective of this research is identification of internationally applied quality indicators.

METHODS

For the investigation of the current status of quality management in emergency departments based on quality indicators, a systematic literature search of the database PubMed, the Cochrane Library and the internet was performed.

RESULTS

Of the 170 internationally applied quality indicators, 25 with at least two references are identified. A total of 10 quality indicators are ascertainable by the data set. An enlargement of the data set will enable the collection of seven further quality indicators. The implementation of data of care behind the emergency processes will provide eight additional quality indicators.

CONCLUSION

This work was able to show that the potential of a national emergency registry for the establishment of quality indicators corresponds with the international systems taken into consideration and could provide a comparable collection of quality indicators.

Initial assessment and treatment of refugees in the Mediterranean Sea (a secondary data analysis concerning the initial assessment and treatment of 2656 refugees rescued from distress at sea in support of the EUNAVFOR MED relief mission of the EU)

Background

As a part of the European Union Naval Force – Mediterranean Operation Sophia (EUNAVFOR Med), the Federal Republic of Germany is contributing to avoid further loss of lives at sea by supplying two naval vessels. In the study presented here we analyse the medical requirements of such rescue missions, as well as the potential benefits of various additional monitoring devices in identifying sick/injured refugees within the primary onboard medical assessment process.

Methods

Retrospective analysis of the data collected between May – September 2015 from a German Naval Force frigate. Initial data collection focused on the primary medical assessment and treatment process of refugees rescued from distress at sea. Descriptive statistics, uni- and multivariate analysis were performed. The study has received a positive vote from the Ethics Commission of the University of Ulm, Germany (request no. 284/15) and has been registered in the German Register of Clinical Studies (no. DRKS00009535).

Results

A total of 2656 refugees had been rescued. 16.9 % of them were classified as “medical treatment required” within the initial onboard medical assessment process. In addition to the clinical assessment by an emergency physician, pulse rate (PR), core body temperature (CBT) and oxygen saturation (SpO₂) were evaluated. Sick/injured refugees displayed a statistically significant higher PR (114/min vs. 107/min; p < .001) and CBT (37.1 °C vs. 36.7 °C; p < .001). There was no statistically significant difference in SpO₂-values. The same results were found for the subgroup of patients classified as “treatment at emergency hospital required”. However, a much larger difference of the mean PR and CBT (35/min resp. 1.8 °C) was found when examining the subgroups of the corresponding refugee boats. A cut-off value of clinical importance could not be found. Predominant diagnoses have been dermatological diseases (55.4), followed by internal diseases (27.7) and trauma (12.1 %). None of the refugees classified as “healthy” within the primary medical assessment process changed to “medical treatment required” during further observation.

Conclusions

The initial medical assessment by an emergency physician has proved successful. PR, CBT and SpO₂ didn’t have any clinical impact to improve the identification of sick/injured refugees within the primary onboard assessment process.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13049-016-0270-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

[Patients with Acute, Non-Traumatic Abdominal Pain in German Emergency Departments: A Prospective Monocentric Observation Study]

Background: Up to 11 % of patients in an Emergency Department (ED) present with non-traumatic acute abdominal pain. Based on this presenting symptom, this study aimed to analyse how residents (surgery, internal medicine, anaesthesiology and other fields) working in an ED during their second and third year of education treat these patients. Material and Methods: We performed a prospective, monocentric observation study in an ED in accordance with the STROBE recommendations, following the recommendations from the Ethics Committee of the University of Ulm (application no. 335/12) and the Declaration of Helsinki. The hospital's data protection officer approved the study. During a 12-month period (Dec. 2012 to Dec. 2013), a random sample of patients with non-traumatic abdominal pain was obtained in the ED of a major German acute care hospital by an independent observer, who was not part of the ED team. In addition to demographic data, the study focused on analysing processes and patient care (including medical history taking and physical examinations). In addition, subgroups were defined (clinical background of the treating physician, severity pursuant to the Manchester Triage Score [MTS]). Results: 143 patients met the inclusion criteria. The clinical background of the physician had no influence on the reviewed processes such as medical history taking, initial examinations, the request of consultative examinations or diagnostic procedures. Patients triaged as "urgent" were treated significantly earlier than patients triaged as "non-urgent" (time to first physician contact 26 ± 24 vs. 46 ± 34 min, p < 0.001). However, the overall time spent in the ED was equal (210 ± 79 vs. 220 ± 114 min, p = 0.555). Yet the initially estimated urgency was correlated with the need for hospitalisation (share: 57 %). Conclusion: The overall compliance with standards of care was high. The clinical background (surgery, internal medicine, anaesthesiology, other fields) of the physician in charge of initial treatment had no influence on the reviewed processes.

[National data set "emergency department": development, structure and approval by the Deutsche Interdisziplinäre Vereinigung für Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin]

BACKGROUND

The Deutsche Interdisziplinäre Vereinigung für Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin (DIVI) is divided into sections one of which is the "Sektion Notaufnahmeprotokoll" (emergency department protocol section) founded in 2007. The main task was to create a national data set for the documentation of patients in emergency departments (ED).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In order to create such a data set a careful look was taken at the current state of documentation in many different hospitals throughout Germany. In addition, existing registries and international requirements were also taken into consideration. The content of the dataset "ED documentation" was developed in interdisciplinary and interprofessional expert rounds.

RESULTS

The dataset "ED documentation" forms the first basis for documentation in German EDs. The modular data set contains 676 fields and covers all relevant information of the whole clinical process in the ED. Legal issues as well as several aspects for internal and external quality management are also included. For this reason the data of several German quality registries (e.g. TraumaRegister DGU® of the German Society of Trauma Surgery) are part of the data set. Furthermore, the data set forms the basis for several financial and billing aspects. A set of six forms was created in accordance with the developed modular data set. In 2010 the data set was approved by the executive committee of the DIVI. Several German medical associations (e.g. German Association for Emergency Medicine/Deutsche Gesellschaft Interdisziplinäre Notfall- und Akutmedizin, DGINA) recommend its use. Currently 80 hospitals are using the data set.

CONCLUSION

Beside the ability to exchange information the presented data set is the basis for internal and external quality assessment in the ED even if most of the available scoring and benchmarking tools are not validated for the German medical system. Implementing an ED register in Germany which is planned in the future, could close this gap.

[The TraumaRegister DGU® as the basis of medical quality management. Ten years experience of a national trauma centre exemplified by emergency room treatment]

BACKGROUND

The trauma register of the German Society of Trauma Surgery (TraumaRegister DGU®/TR-DGU) has been proven to be a valuable tool for external assessment of quality in the treatment of patients with major trauma. This publication shows for the first time how the quality of trauma treatment in a level I trauma centre could be improved over a period of almost ten years with the help of continuous quality management, i.e. recognizing a problem, developing a solution and evaluating its effect.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Tracer parameters and indicators of quality are presented in four periods over a total study period from 1st January 1989 to 31st March 2007. The division into four periods is due to major changes in the trauma treatment algorithms or structural changes in the trauma room. The results are displayed for all patients treated in the trauma room and for those patients with an injury severity score (ISS)≥16.

RESULTS

Over all four periods a total number of n=2,239 patients were admitted to the trauma room. Based on the results of the trauma register a number of changes were made, not only structural changes, such as the introduction of point-of-care diagnostics, initially conventional X-ray, then digital X-ray and finally multislice computed tomography (CT) scanning in the trauma room but also changes in the way personnel participating in the trauma treatment are trained. Advanced trauma life support (ATLS®) has become the standard training for doctors and prehospital trauma life support (PHTLS®) for nurses. Time efficient treatment algorithms were introduced. All measures led to changes in several parameters which are chosen as indicators for good treatment quality. It was for instance possible to reduce the average total trauma treatment time for patients with an ISS≥16 from initially 90.9±48.6 min to 37.4±18.  min in the final study period.

CONCLUSIONS

The external quality management performed by the TR-DGU has proved to be a constant source of inspiration. The effects of the changes made can be scientifically proven. It is to be discussed to what extent a sole external quality management can be useful.

[Trauma management under military conditions. A German field hospital in Afghanistan in comparison with the National Trauma Registry]

BACKGROUND

The German armed forces run a role-III field hospital in Kabul, Afghanistan. Emergency room (ER) management is of utmost importance as a link between pre- and in-hospital treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Prospective data were acquired of all patients admitted to the ER over a 3-month period. The quality of ER management was tested using established audit filters and comparing the results with those of the National Trauma Registry.

RESULTS

A total of 353 patients were admitted to the ER (48.4% trauma cases). Fifty-nine patients were major trauma cases, and the proportion of combat-related injury was 33.2%. In comparison to the National Trauma Registry, significant differences were observed regarding age (25.2 vs 41.7 years, P<0.0001) and injury severity (NISS 18.8 vs 28.8, P<0.0001). The demands on the quality of ER management have increased. Using the audit filters of the National Trauma Registry, significant differences were observed regarding ER management.

CONCLUSION

In a military setting, medical treatment of major trauma victims is influenced by multiple adverse factors significantly affecting the quality of trauma management.

[Advanced Trauma Life Support. A training concept also for Europe]

Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) is a concept for rapid initial assessment and primary management of an injured patient, starting at the time of injury and continuing through initial assessment, lifesaving interventions, re-evaluation, stabilization and, when needed, transfer to a trauma centre. Despite some shortcomings, it is the only standardized concept for emergency room management, which is internationally accepted. Because of its simple and clear structure, it is flexible and can be universally integrated into existing emergency room algorithms under consideration of local, regional as well as national and international peculiarities in the sense of a "common language of trauma". Under these aspects ATLS also seems to be a valid concept for Europe.

[How to assess the severity of the multi-system trauma in the emergency-room -- a critical review]

For more than 30 years various scoring systems have been used as a method to asses the injury severity of multi-system trauma. They have been used as a tool for triage, for emergency-room quality management, for educational reasons or, nowadays, in order to evaluate the cost effectiveness of either a complete hospital or a single department. This review provides the knowledge to score multi-system traumatized patients after their first treatment in the emergency-room. It shows advantages, disadvantages, and limitations of various traumascores which includes knowledge about the used parameters, the type of validation, the medical system in their country of origin, and of course their mathematical background. Relevant examples like physiological trauma scores (GCS, RTS, MEES), anatomic, injury pattern based scores (ISS, NISS, ICISS), biological aspects, mixed scoring systems (PTS, TRISS, ASCOT) and future developments ("Rixen-pattern", RISC) are illustrated. These scores are explained in detail and discussed as to their practicability.