1
|
Haldar A, Oza VH, DeVoss NS, Clark AD, Lasseigne BN. CoSIA: an R Bioconductor package for CrOss Species Investigation and Analysis. Bioinformatics 2023; 39:btad759. [PMID: 38109675 PMCID: PMC10749757 DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btad759] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2023] [Revised: 10/30/2023] [Accepted: 12/16/2023] [Indexed: 12/20/2023] Open
Abstract
SUMMARY High-throughput sequencing technologies have enabled cross-species comparative transcriptomic studies; however, there are numerous challenges for these studies due to biological and technical factors. We developed CoSIA (Cross-Species Investigation and Analysis), a Bioconductor R package and Shiny app that provides an alternative framework for cross-species transcriptomic comparison of non-diseased wild-type RNA sequencing gene expression data from Bgee across tissues and species (human, mouse, rat, zebrafish, fly, and nematode) through visualization of variability, diversity, and specificity metrics. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION https://github.com/lasseignelab/CoSIA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anisha Haldar
- The Department of Cell, Developmental and Integrative Biology, Heersink School of Medicine, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, United States
| | - Vishal H Oza
- The Department of Cell, Developmental and Integrative Biology, Heersink School of Medicine, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, United States
| | - Nathaniel S DeVoss
- The Department of Cell, Developmental and Integrative Biology, Heersink School of Medicine, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, United States
| | - Amanda D Clark
- The Department of Cell, Developmental and Integrative Biology, Heersink School of Medicine, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, United States
| | - Brittany N Lasseigne
- The Department of Cell, Developmental and Integrative Biology, Heersink School of Medicine, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Haldar A, Oza VH, DeVoss NS, Clark AD, Lasseigne BN. CoSIA: an R Bioconductor package for CrOss Species Investigation and Analysis. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2023:2023.04.21.537877. [PMID: 37163017 PMCID: PMC10168259 DOI: 10.1101/2023.04.21.537877] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/11/2023]
Abstract
High throughput sequencing technologies have enabled cross-species comparative transcriptomic studies; however, there are numerous challenges for these studies due to biological and technical factors. We developed CoSIA (Cross-Species Investigation and Analysis), an Bioconductor R package and Shiny app that provides an alternative framework for cross-species transcriptomic comparison of non-diseased wild-type RNA sequencing gene expression data from Bgee across tissues and species (human, mouse, rat, zebrafish, fly, and nematode) through visualization of variability, diversity, and specificity metrics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anisha Haldar
- The Department of Cell, Developmental and Integrative Biology, Heersink School of Medicine, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Vishal H. Oza
- The Department of Cell, Developmental and Integrative Biology, Heersink School of Medicine, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Nathaniel S. DeVoss
- The Department of Cell, Developmental and Integrative Biology, Heersink School of Medicine, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Amanda D. Clark
- The Department of Cell, Developmental and Integrative Biology, Heersink School of Medicine, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Brittany N. Lasseigne
- The Department of Cell, Developmental and Integrative Biology, Heersink School of Medicine, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Farina L, Paci P. A feature-based integrated scoring scheme for cell cycle-regulated genes prioritization. J Theor Biol 2018; 459:130-141. [PMID: 30261169 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2018.09.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2018] [Revised: 08/03/2018] [Accepted: 09/23/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
Prioritization of cell cycle-regulated genes from expression time-profiles is still an open problem. The point at issue is the surprisingly poor overlap among ranked lists obtained from different experimental protocols. Instead of developing a general-purpose computational methodology for detecting periodic signals, we focus on the budding yeast mitotic cell cycle. The reason being that the current availability of a total of 12 datasets, produced by 6 independent groups using 4 different synchronization methods, permits a re-analysis and re-consideration of this problem in a more reliable and extensive data domain. Notably, budding yeast is a model organism for studying cancer and testing new drugs. Here we propose a novel multi-feature score (called PERLA, PERiodicity, Regulation and Lag-Autocorrelation) that integrates different features of cell cycle-regulated gene expression time-profiles. We obtained increased performances on a wide range of benchmarks and, most importantly, a substantially increased overlap of the top ranking genes among different datasets, thus proving the effectiveness of the proposed prioritization algorithm. Examples on how to use PERLA to gain new insight into the biology of the cell cycle, are provided in a final dedicated section.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorenzo Farina
- Department of Computer, Control and Management Engineering "A. Ruberti", Sapienza University of Rome, Italy; Institute for Systems Analysis and Computer Science "A. Ruberti", National Research Council, Rome, Italy.
| | - Paola Paci
- Institute for Systems Analysis and Computer Science "A. Ruberti", National Research Council, Rome, Italy; SysBio Centre for Systems Biology, Rome, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Regev A, Teichmann SA, Lander ES, Amit I, Benoist C, Birney E, Bodenmiller B, Campbell P, Carninci P, Clatworthy M, Clevers H, Deplancke B, Dunham I, Eberwine J, Eils R, Enard W, Farmer A, Fugger L, Göttgens B, Hacohen N, Haniffa M, Hemberg M, Kim S, Klenerman P, Kriegstein A, Lein E, Linnarsson S, Lundberg E, Lundeberg J, Majumder P, Marioni JC, Merad M, Mhlanga M, Nawijn M, Netea M, Nolan G, Pe'er D, Phillipakis A, Ponting CP, Quake S, Reik W, Rozenblatt-Rosen O, Sanes J, Satija R, Schumacher TN, Shalek A, Shapiro E, Sharma P, Shin JW, Stegle O, Stratton M, Stubbington MJT, Theis FJ, Uhlen M, van Oudenaarden A, Wagner A, Watt F, Weissman J, Wold B, Xavier R, Yosef N. The Human Cell Atlas. eLife 2017; 6:e27041. [PMID: 29206104 DOI: 10.1101/121202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2017] [Accepted: 11/30/2017] [Indexed: 05/28/2023] Open
Abstract
The recent advent of methods for high-throughput single-cell molecular profiling has catalyzed a growing sense in the scientific community that the time is ripe to complete the 150-year-old effort to identify all cell types in the human body. The Human Cell Atlas Project is an international collaborative effort that aims to define all human cell types in terms of distinctive molecular profiles (such as gene expression profiles) and to connect this information with classical cellular descriptions (such as location and morphology). An open comprehensive reference map of the molecular state of cells in healthy human tissues would propel the systematic study of physiological states, developmental trajectories, regulatory circuitry and interactions of cells, and also provide a framework for understanding cellular dysregulation in human disease. Here we describe the idea, its potential utility, early proofs-of-concept, and some design considerations for the Human Cell Atlas, including a commitment to open data, code, and community.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aviv Regev
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, United States
- Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, United States
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, United States
| | - Sarah A Teichmann
- Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, United Kingdom
- EMBL-European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, United Kingdom
- Cavendish Laboratory, Department of Physics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Eric S Lander
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, United States
- Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, United States
- Department of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
| | - Ido Amit
- Department of Immunology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
| | - Christophe Benoist
- Division of Immunology, Department of Microbiology and Immunobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
| | - Ewan Birney
- EMBL-European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, United Kingdom
| | - Bernd Bodenmiller
- EMBL-European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, United Kingdom
- Institute of Molecular Life Sciences, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Peter Campbell
- Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, United Kingdom
- Department of Haematology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Piero Carninci
- Cavendish Laboratory, Department of Physics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Division of Genomic Technologies, RIKEN Center for Life Science Technologies, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Menna Clatworthy
- Molecular Immunity Unit, Department of Medicine, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Hans Clevers
- Hubrecht Institute, Princess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology and University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Bart Deplancke
- Institute of Bioengineering, School of Life Sciences, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Ian Dunham
- EMBL-European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, United Kingdom
| | - James Eberwine
- Department of Systems Pharmacology and Translational Therapeutics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
| | - Roland Eils
- Division of Theoretical Bioinformatics (B080), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department for Bioinformatics and Functional Genomics, Institute for Pharmacy and Molecular Biotechnology (IPMB) and BioQuant, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Enard
- Department of Biology II, Ludwig Maximilian University Munich, Martinsried, Germany
| | - Andrew Farmer
- Takara Bio United States, Inc., Mountain View, United States
| | - Lars Fugger
- Oxford Centre for Neuroinflammation, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, and MRC Human Immunology Unit, Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Berthold Göttgens
- Department of Haematology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Wellcome Trust-MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Nir Hacohen
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, United States
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, United States
| | - Muzlifah Haniffa
- Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Martin Hemberg
- Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, United Kingdom
| | - Seung Kim
- Departments of Developmental Biology and of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, United States
| | - Paul Klenerman
- Peter Medawar Building for Pathogen Research and the Translational Gastroenterology Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Arnold Kriegstein
- Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regeneration Medicine and Stem Cell Research, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
| | - Ed Lein
- Allen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, United States
| | - Sten Linnarsson
- Laboratory for Molecular Neurobiology, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Emma Lundberg
- Science for Life Laboratory, School of Biotechnology, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
| | - Joakim Lundeberg
- Science for Life Laboratory, Department of Gene Technology, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - John C Marioni
- Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, United Kingdom
- EMBL-European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, United Kingdom
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Miriam Merad
- Precision Immunology Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, United States
| | - Musa Mhlanga
- Division of Chemical, Systems & Synthetic Biology, Institute for Infectious Disease & Molecular Medicine (IDM), Department of Integrative Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Martijn Nawijn
- Department of Pathology and Medical Biology, GRIAC Research Institute, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Mihai Netea
- Department of Internal Medicine and Radboud Center for Infectious Diseases, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Garry Nolan
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
| | - Dana Pe'er
- Computational and Systems Biology Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, New York, United States
| | | | - Chris P Ponting
- MRC Human Genetics Unit, MRC Institute of Genetics & Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Stephen Quake
- Department of Applied Physics and Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
- Chan Zuckerberg Biohub, San Francisco, United States
| | - Wolf Reik
- Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, United Kingdom
- Epigenetics Programme, The Babraham Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Centre for Trophoblast Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | | | - Joshua Sanes
- Center for Brain Science and Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, United States
| | - Rahul Satija
- Department of Biology, New York University, New York, United States
- New York Genome Center, New York University, New York, United States
| | - Ton N Schumacher
- Division of Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Alex Shalek
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, United States
- Institute for Medical Engineering & Science (IMES) and Department of Chemistry, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, United States
- Ragon Institute of MGH, MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, United States
| | - Ehud Shapiro
- Department of Computer Science and Department of Biomolecular Sciences, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
| | - Padmanee Sharma
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, Department of Immunology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston, United States
| | - Jay W Shin
- Division of Genomic Technologies, RIKEN Center for Life Science Technologies, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Oliver Stegle
- EMBL-European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, United Kingdom
| | - Michael Stratton
- Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, United Kingdom
| | | | - Fabian J Theis
- Institute of Computational Biology, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Helmholtz Center Munich, Neuherberg, Germany
- Department of Mathematics, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany
| | - Matthias Uhlen
- Science for Life Laboratory and Department of Proteomics, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
- Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Biosustainability, Danish Technical University, Lyngby, Denmark
| | | | - Allon Wagner
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science and the Center for Computational Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, United States
| | - Fiona Watt
- Centre for Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jonathan Weissman
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, United States
- Department of Cellular & Molecular Pharmacology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
- California Institute for Quantitative Biomedical Research, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
- Center for RNA Systems Biology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
| | - Barbara Wold
- Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, United States
| | - Ramnik Xavier
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, United States
- Center for Computational and Integrative Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, United States
- Gastrointestinal Unit and Center for the Study of Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, United States
- Center for Microbiome Informatics and Therapeutics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, United States
| | - Nir Yosef
- Ragon Institute of MGH, MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, United States
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science and the Center for Computational Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, United States
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Regev A, Teichmann SA, Lander ES, Amit I, Benoist C, Birney E, Bodenmiller B, Campbell P, Carninci P, Clatworthy M, Clevers H, Deplancke B, Dunham I, Eberwine J, Eils R, Enard W, Farmer A, Fugger L, Göttgens B, Hacohen N, Haniffa M, Hemberg M, Kim S, Klenerman P, Kriegstein A, Lein E, Linnarsson S, Lundberg E, Lundeberg J, Majumder P, Marioni JC, Merad M, Mhlanga M, Nawijn M, Netea M, Nolan G, Pe'er D, Phillipakis A, Ponting CP, Quake S, Reik W, Rozenblatt-Rosen O, Sanes J, Satija R, Schumacher TN, Shalek A, Shapiro E, Sharma P, Shin JW, Stegle O, Stratton M, Stubbington MJT, Theis FJ, Uhlen M, van Oudenaarden A, Wagner A, Watt F, Weissman J, Wold B, Xavier R, Yosef N. The Human Cell Atlas. eLife 2017; 6:e27041. [PMID: 29206104 PMCID: PMC5762154 DOI: 10.7554/elife.27041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1178] [Impact Index Per Article: 168.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2017] [Accepted: 11/30/2017] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The recent advent of methods for high-throughput single-cell molecular profiling has catalyzed a growing sense in the scientific community that the time is ripe to complete the 150-year-old effort to identify all cell types in the human body. The Human Cell Atlas Project is an international collaborative effort that aims to define all human cell types in terms of distinctive molecular profiles (such as gene expression profiles) and to connect this information with classical cellular descriptions (such as location and morphology). An open comprehensive reference map of the molecular state of cells in healthy human tissues would propel the systematic study of physiological states, developmental trajectories, regulatory circuitry and interactions of cells, and also provide a framework for understanding cellular dysregulation in human disease. Here we describe the idea, its potential utility, early proofs-of-concept, and some design considerations for the Human Cell Atlas, including a commitment to open data, code, and community.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aviv Regev
- Broad Institute of MIT and HarvardCambridgeUnited States
- Department of BiologyMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyCambridgeUnited States
- Howard Hughes Medical InstituteChevy ChaseUnited States
| | - Sarah A Teichmann
- Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome CampusHinxtonUnited Kingdom
- EMBL-European Bioinformatics InstituteWellcome Genome CampusHinxtonUnited Kingdom
- Cavendish Laboratory, Department of PhysicsUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUnited Kingdom
| | - Eric S Lander
- Broad Institute of MIT and HarvardCambridgeUnited States
- Department of BiologyMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyCambridgeUnited States
- Department of Systems BiologyHarvard Medical SchoolBostonUnited States
| | - Ido Amit
- Department of ImmunologyWeizmann Institute of ScienceRehovotIsrael
| | - Christophe Benoist
- Division of Immunology, Department of Microbiology and ImmunobiologyHarvard Medical SchoolBostonUnited States
| | - Ewan Birney
- EMBL-European Bioinformatics InstituteWellcome Genome CampusHinxtonUnited Kingdom
| | - Bernd Bodenmiller
- EMBL-European Bioinformatics InstituteWellcome Genome CampusHinxtonUnited Kingdom
- Institute of Molecular Life SciencesUniversity of ZürichZürichSwitzerland
| | - Peter Campbell
- Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome CampusHinxtonUnited Kingdom
- Department of HaematologyUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUnited Kingdom
| | - Piero Carninci
- Cavendish Laboratory, Department of PhysicsUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUnited Kingdom
- Division of Genomic TechnologiesRIKEN Center for Life Science TechnologiesYokohamaJapan
| | - Menna Clatworthy
- Molecular Immunity Unit, Department of Medicine, MRC Laboratory of Molecular BiologyUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUnited Kingdom
| | - Hans Clevers
- Hubrecht Institute, Princess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology and University Medical Center UtrechtUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | - Bart Deplancke
- Institute of Bioengineering, School of Life SciencesSwiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL)LausanneSwitzerland
| | - Ian Dunham
- EMBL-European Bioinformatics InstituteWellcome Genome CampusHinxtonUnited Kingdom
| | - James Eberwine
- Department of Systems Pharmacology and Translational TherapeuticsPerelman School of Medicine, University of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUnited States
| | - Roland Eils
- Division of Theoretical Bioinformatics (B080)German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ)HeidelbergGermany
- Department for Bioinformatics and Functional Genomics, Institute for Pharmacy and Molecular Biotechnology (IPMB) and BioQuantHeidelberg UniversityHeidelbergGermany
| | - Wolfgang Enard
- Department of Biology IILudwig Maximilian University MunichMartinsriedGermany
| | - Andrew Farmer
- Takara Bio United States, Inc.Mountain ViewUnited States
| | - Lars Fugger
- Oxford Centre for Neuroinflammation, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, and MRC Human Immunology Unit, Weatherall Institute of Molecular MedicineJohn Radcliffe Hospital, University of OxfordOxfordUnited Kingdom
| | - Berthold Göttgens
- Department of HaematologyUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUnited Kingdom
- Wellcome Trust-MRC Cambridge Stem Cell InstituteUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUnited Kingdom
| | - Nir Hacohen
- Broad Institute of MIT and HarvardCambridgeUnited States
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer CenterBostonUnited States
| | - Muzlifah Haniffa
- Institute of Cellular MedicineNewcastle UniversityNewcastle upon TyneUnited Kingdom
| | - Martin Hemberg
- Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome CampusHinxtonUnited Kingdom
| | - Seung Kim
- Departments of Developmental Biology and of MedicineStanford University School of MedicineStanfordUnited States
| | - Paul Klenerman
- Peter Medawar Building for Pathogen Research and the Translational Gastroenterology Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical MedicineUniversity of OxfordOxfordUnited Kingdom
- Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research CentreJohn Radcliffe HospitalOxfordUnited Kingdom
| | - Arnold Kriegstein
- Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regeneration Medicine and Stem Cell ResearchUniversity of California, San FranciscoSan FranciscoUnited States
| | - Ed Lein
- Allen Institute for Brain ScienceSeattleUnited States
| | - Sten Linnarsson
- Laboratory for Molecular Neurobiology, Department of Medical Biochemistry and BiophysicsKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
| | - Emma Lundberg
- Science for Life Laboratory, School of BiotechnologyKTH Royal Institute of TechnologyStockholmSweden
- Department of GeneticsStanford UniversityStanfordUnited States
| | - Joakim Lundeberg
- Science for Life Laboratory, Department of Gene TechnologyKTH Royal Institute of TechnologyStockholmSweden
| | | | - John C Marioni
- Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome CampusHinxtonUnited Kingdom
- EMBL-European Bioinformatics InstituteWellcome Genome CampusHinxtonUnited Kingdom
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge InstituteUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUnited Kingdom
| | - Miriam Merad
- Precision Immunology InstituteIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNew YorkUnited States
| | - Musa Mhlanga
- Division of Chemical, Systems & Synthetic Biology, Institute for Infectious Disease & Molecular Medicine (IDM), Department of Integrative Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health SciencesUniversity of Cape TownCape TownSouth Africa
| | - Martijn Nawijn
- Department of Pathology and Medical Biology, GRIAC Research InstituteUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands
| | - Mihai Netea
- Department of Internal Medicine and Radboud Center for Infectious DiseasesRadboud University Medical CenterNijmegenThe Netherlands
| | - Garry Nolan
- Department of Microbiology and ImmunologyStanford UniversityStanfordUnited States
| | - Dana Pe'er
- Computational and Systems Biology ProgramSloan Kettering InstituteNew YorkUnited States
| | | | - Chris P Ponting
- MRC Human Genetics Unit, MRC Institute of Genetics & Molecular MedicineUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghUnited Kingdom
| | - Stephen Quake
- Department of Applied Physics and Department of BioengineeringStanford UniversityStanfordUnited States
- Chan Zuckerberg BiohubSan FranciscoUnited States
| | - Wolf Reik
- Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome CampusHinxtonUnited Kingdom
- Epigenetics ProgrammeThe Babraham InstituteCambridgeUnited Kingdom
- Centre for Trophoblast ResearchUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUnited Kingdom
| | | | - Joshua Sanes
- Center for Brain Science and Department of Molecular and Cellular BiologyHarvard UniversityCambridgeUnited States
| | - Rahul Satija
- Department of BiologyNew York UniversityNew YorkUnited States
- New York Genome CenterNew York UniversityNew YorkUnited States
| | - Ton N Schumacher
- Division of ImmunologyThe Netherlands Cancer InstituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Alex Shalek
- Broad Institute of MIT and HarvardCambridgeUnited States
- Institute for Medical Engineering & Science (IMES) and Department of ChemistryMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyCambridgeUnited States
- Ragon Institute of MGH, MIT and HarvardCambridgeUnited States
| | - Ehud Shapiro
- Department of Computer Science and Department of Biomolecular SciencesWeizmann Institute of ScienceRehovotIsrael
| | - Padmanee Sharma
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, Department of Immunology, MD Anderson Cancer CenterUniversity of TexasHoustonUnited States
| | - Jay W Shin
- Division of Genomic TechnologiesRIKEN Center for Life Science TechnologiesYokohamaJapan
| | - Oliver Stegle
- EMBL-European Bioinformatics InstituteWellcome Genome CampusHinxtonUnited Kingdom
| | - Michael Stratton
- Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome CampusHinxtonUnited Kingdom
| | | | - Fabian J Theis
- Institute of Computational BiologyGerman Research Center for Environmental Health, Helmholtz Center MunichNeuherbergGermany
- Department of MathematicsTechnical University of MunichGarchingGermany
| | - Matthias Uhlen
- Science for Life Laboratory and Department of ProteomicsKTH Royal Institute of TechnologyStockholmSweden
- Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for BiosustainabilityDanish Technical UniversityLyngbyDenmark
| | | | - Allon Wagner
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science and the Center for Computational BiologyUniversity of California, BerkeleyBerkeleyUnited States
| | - Fiona Watt
- Centre for Stem Cells and Regenerative MedicineKing's College LondonLondonUnited Kingdom
| | - Jonathan Weissman
- Howard Hughes Medical InstituteChevy ChaseUnited States
- Department of Cellular & Molecular PharmacologyUniversity of California, San FranciscoSan FranciscoUnited States
- California Institute for Quantitative Biomedical ResearchUniversity of California, San FranciscoSan FranciscoUnited States
- Center for RNA Systems BiologyUniversity of California, San FranciscoSan FranciscoUnited States
| | - Barbara Wold
- Division of Biology and Biological EngineeringCalifornia Institute of TechnologyPasadenaUnited States
| | - Ramnik Xavier
- Broad Institute of MIT and HarvardCambridgeUnited States
- Center for Computational and Integrative BiologyMassachusetts General HospitalBostonUnited States
- Gastrointestinal Unit and Center for the Study of Inflammatory Bowel DiseaseMassachusetts General HospitalBostonUnited States
- Center for Microbiome Informatics and TherapeuticsMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyCambridgeUnited States
| | - Nir Yosef
- Ragon Institute of MGH, MIT and HarvardCambridgeUnited States
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science and the Center for Computational BiologyUniversity of California, BerkeleyBerkeleyUnited States
| | - Human Cell Atlas Meeting Participants
- Broad Institute of MIT and HarvardCambridgeUnited States
- Department of BiologyMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyCambridgeUnited States
- Howard Hughes Medical InstituteChevy ChaseUnited States
- Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome CampusHinxtonUnited Kingdom
- EMBL-European Bioinformatics InstituteWellcome Genome CampusHinxtonUnited Kingdom
- Cavendish Laboratory, Department of PhysicsUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUnited Kingdom
- Department of Systems BiologyHarvard Medical SchoolBostonUnited States
- Department of ImmunologyWeizmann Institute of ScienceRehovotIsrael
- Division of Immunology, Department of Microbiology and ImmunobiologyHarvard Medical SchoolBostonUnited States
- Institute of Molecular Life SciencesUniversity of ZürichZürichSwitzerland
- Department of HaematologyUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUnited Kingdom
- Division of Genomic TechnologiesRIKEN Center for Life Science TechnologiesYokohamaJapan
- Molecular Immunity Unit, Department of Medicine, MRC Laboratory of Molecular BiologyUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUnited Kingdom
- Hubrecht Institute, Princess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology and University Medical Center UtrechtUtrechtThe Netherlands
- Institute of Bioengineering, School of Life SciencesSwiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL)LausanneSwitzerland
- Department of Systems Pharmacology and Translational TherapeuticsPerelman School of Medicine, University of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUnited States
- Division of Theoretical Bioinformatics (B080)German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ)HeidelbergGermany
- Department for Bioinformatics and Functional Genomics, Institute for Pharmacy and Molecular Biotechnology (IPMB) and BioQuantHeidelberg UniversityHeidelbergGermany
- Department of Biology IILudwig Maximilian University MunichMartinsriedGermany
- Takara Bio United States, Inc.Mountain ViewUnited States
- Oxford Centre for Neuroinflammation, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, and MRC Human Immunology Unit, Weatherall Institute of Molecular MedicineJohn Radcliffe Hospital, University of OxfordOxfordUnited Kingdom
- Wellcome Trust-MRC Cambridge Stem Cell InstituteUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUnited Kingdom
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer CenterBostonUnited States
- Institute of Cellular MedicineNewcastle UniversityNewcastle upon TyneUnited Kingdom
- Departments of Developmental Biology and of MedicineStanford University School of MedicineStanfordUnited States
- Peter Medawar Building for Pathogen Research and the Translational Gastroenterology Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical MedicineUniversity of OxfordOxfordUnited Kingdom
- Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research CentreJohn Radcliffe HospitalOxfordUnited Kingdom
- Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regeneration Medicine and Stem Cell ResearchUniversity of California, San FranciscoSan FranciscoUnited States
- Allen Institute for Brain ScienceSeattleUnited States
- Laboratory for Molecular Neurobiology, Department of Medical Biochemistry and BiophysicsKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
- Science for Life Laboratory, School of BiotechnologyKTH Royal Institute of TechnologyStockholmSweden
- Department of GeneticsStanford UniversityStanfordUnited States
- Science for Life Laboratory, Department of Gene TechnologyKTH Royal Institute of TechnologyStockholmSweden
- National Institute of Biomedical GenomicsKalyaniIndia
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge InstituteUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUnited Kingdom
- Precision Immunology InstituteIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNew YorkUnited States
- Division of Chemical, Systems & Synthetic Biology, Institute for Infectious Disease & Molecular Medicine (IDM), Department of Integrative Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health SciencesUniversity of Cape TownCape TownSouth Africa
- Department of Pathology and Medical Biology, GRIAC Research InstituteUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands
- Department of Internal Medicine and Radboud Center for Infectious DiseasesRadboud University Medical CenterNijmegenThe Netherlands
- Department of Microbiology and ImmunologyStanford UniversityStanfordUnited States
- Computational and Systems Biology ProgramSloan Kettering InstituteNew YorkUnited States
- MRC Human Genetics Unit, MRC Institute of Genetics & Molecular MedicineUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghUnited Kingdom
- Department of Applied Physics and Department of BioengineeringStanford UniversityStanfordUnited States
- Chan Zuckerberg BiohubSan FranciscoUnited States
- Epigenetics ProgrammeThe Babraham InstituteCambridgeUnited Kingdom
- Centre for Trophoblast ResearchUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUnited Kingdom
- Center for Brain Science and Department of Molecular and Cellular BiologyHarvard UniversityCambridgeUnited States
- Department of BiologyNew York UniversityNew YorkUnited States
- New York Genome CenterNew York UniversityNew YorkUnited States
- Division of ImmunologyThe Netherlands Cancer InstituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Institute for Medical Engineering & Science (IMES) and Department of ChemistryMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyCambridgeUnited States
- Ragon Institute of MGH, MIT and HarvardCambridgeUnited States
- Department of Computer Science and Department of Biomolecular SciencesWeizmann Institute of ScienceRehovotIsrael
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, Department of Immunology, MD Anderson Cancer CenterUniversity of TexasHoustonUnited States
- Institute of Computational BiologyGerman Research Center for Environmental Health, Helmholtz Center MunichNeuherbergGermany
- Department of MathematicsTechnical University of MunichGarchingGermany
- Science for Life Laboratory and Department of ProteomicsKTH Royal Institute of TechnologyStockholmSweden
- Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for BiosustainabilityDanish Technical UniversityLyngbyDenmark
- Hubrecht Institute and University Medical Center UtrechtUtrechtThe Netherlands
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science and the Center for Computational BiologyUniversity of California, BerkeleyBerkeleyUnited States
- Centre for Stem Cells and Regenerative MedicineKing's College LondonLondonUnited Kingdom
- Department of Cellular & Molecular PharmacologyUniversity of California, San FranciscoSan FranciscoUnited States
- California Institute for Quantitative Biomedical ResearchUniversity of California, San FranciscoSan FranciscoUnited States
- Center for RNA Systems BiologyUniversity of California, San FranciscoSan FranciscoUnited States
- Division of Biology and Biological EngineeringCalifornia Institute of TechnologyPasadenaUnited States
- Center for Computational and Integrative BiologyMassachusetts General HospitalBostonUnited States
- Gastrointestinal Unit and Center for the Study of Inflammatory Bowel DiseaseMassachusetts General HospitalBostonUnited States
- Center for Microbiome Informatics and TherapeuticsMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyCambridgeUnited States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Scaling single-cell genomics from phenomenology to mechanism. Nature 2017; 541:331-338. [PMID: 28102262 DOI: 10.1038/nature21350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 467] [Impact Index Per Article: 66.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2016] [Accepted: 11/14/2016] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Three of the most fundamental questions in biology are how individual cells differentiate to form tissues, how tissues function in a coordinated and flexible fashion and which gene regulatory mechanisms support these processes. Single-cell genomics is opening up new ways to tackle these questions by combining the comprehensive nature of genomics with the microscopic resolution that is required to describe complex multicellular systems. Initial single-cell genomic studies provided a remarkably rich phenomenology of heterogeneous cellular states, but transforming observational studies into models of dynamics and causal mechanisms in tissues poses fresh challenges and requires stronger integration of theoretical, computational and experimental frameworks.
Collapse
|
7
|
Benanti JA. Create, activate, destroy, repeat: Cdk1 controls proliferation by limiting transcription factor activity. Curr Genet 2015; 62:271-6. [PMID: 26590602 DOI: 10.1007/s00294-015-0535-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2015] [Revised: 10/28/2015] [Accepted: 10/29/2015] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Progression through the cell cycle is controlled by a network of transcription factors that coordinate gene expression with cell-cycle events. One transcriptional activator in this network in budding yeast is the forkhead protein Hcm1, which controls the expression of genes that are transcribed during S-phase. Hcm1 activity is coordinated with the cell cycle via its regulation by cyclin-dependent kinase (Cdk1), which both activates Hcm1 and targets it for degradation, through phosphorylation of distinct sites. The mechanisms controlling the differential phosphorylation timing of the activating and destabilizing phosphosites are not clear. However, a recent study shows that the phosphatase calcineurin specifically removes activating phosphates from Hcm1 when cells are exposed to environmental stress, thus extinguishing its activity and slowing proliferation under unfavorable growth conditions. This regulatory mechanism, whereby a phosphatase actively alters the distribution of phosphosites on a cell cycle-regulatory transcription factor to elicit a change in cellular proliferation, adds an additional layer of complexity to the regulatory network controlling the cell cycle. Furthermore, this regulatory paradigm is likely to be a conserved mode of phosphoregulation that controls the cell cycle in diverse systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer A Benanti
- Department of Molecular, Cell and Cancer Biology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, 01605, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Yu H, Zhao J, Li F, Tian H, Ma X. Characterization of Chinese rice wine taste attributes using liquid chromatographic analysis, sensory evaluation, and an electronic tongue. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 2015; 997:129-35. [PMID: 26113454 DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2015.05.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2014] [Revised: 05/04/2015] [Accepted: 05/14/2015] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
To evaluate the taste characteristics of Chinese rice wine, wine samples sourced from different vintage years were analyzed using liquid chromatographic analysis, sensory evaluation, and an electronic tongue. Six organic acids and seventeen amino acids were measured using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Five monosaccharides were measured using anion-exchange chromatography. The global taste attributes were analyzed using an electronic tongue (E-tongue). The correlations between the 28 taste-active compounds and the sensory attributes, and the correlations between the E-tongue response and the sensory attributes were established via partial least square discriminant analysis (PLSDA). E-tongue response data combined with linear discriminant analysis (LDA) were used to discriminate the Chinese rice wine samples sourced from different vintage years. Sensory evaluation indicated significant differences in the Chinese rice wine samples sourced from 2003, 2005, 2008, and 2010 vintage years in the sensory attributes of harmony and mellow. The PLSDA model for the taste-active compounds and the sensory attributes showed that proline, fucose, arabinose, lactic acid, glutamic acid, arginine, isoleucine, valine, threonine, and lysine had an influence on the taste characteristic of Chinese rice wine. The Chinese rice wine samples were all correctly classified using the E-tongue and LDA. The electronic tongue was an effective tool for rapid discrimination of Chinese rice wine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- HaiYan Yu
- School of Perfume and Aroma Technology, Shanghai Institute of Technology, 100 Haiquan Road, Shanghai 201418, China
| | - Jie Zhao
- School of Perfume and Aroma Technology, Shanghai Institute of Technology, 100 Haiquan Road, Shanghai 201418, China
| | - Fenghua Li
- School of Perfume and Aroma Technology, Shanghai Institute of Technology, 100 Haiquan Road, Shanghai 201418, China
| | - Huaixiang Tian
- School of Perfume and Aroma Technology, Shanghai Institute of Technology, 100 Haiquan Road, Shanghai 201418, China.
| | - Xia Ma
- School of Perfume and Aroma Technology, Shanghai Institute of Technology, 100 Haiquan Road, Shanghai 201418, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kocak M. Meta-analysis of bivariate P values. World J Meta-Anal 2014; 2:179-185. [DOI: 10.13105/wjma.v2.i4.179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2014] [Revised: 05/08/2014] [Accepted: 10/29/2014] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM: To propose a new meta-analysis method for bivariate P value which account for the paired structure.
METHODS: Studies that look to test two different features from the same sample gives rise to bivariate P value. A relevant example of this is testing for periodicity as well expression from time-course gene expression studies. Kocak et al (2010) uses George and Mudholkar’ (1983) “Difference of Two Logit-Sums” method to pool bivariate P value across independent experiments, assuming independence within a pair. As bivariate P value need not to be independent within a given study, we propose a new meta-analysis approach for pooling bivariate P value across independent experiments, which accounts for potential correlation between paired P-values. We compare the “Difference of Two Logit Sums”method with our novel approach in terms of their sensitivity and specificity through extensive simulations by generating P value samples from most commonly used tests namely, Z test, t test, chi-square test, and F test, with varying sample sizes and correlation structure.
RESULTS: The simulations results showed that our new meta-analysis approach for correlated and uncorrelated bivariate P value has much more desirable sensitivity and specificity features compared to the existing method, which treats each member of the paired P value as independent. We also compare these meta-analysis approaches on bivariate P value from periodicity and expression tests of 4936 S.Pombe genes from 10 independent time-course experiments and we showed that our new approach ranks the periodic, conserved, and cycling genes significantly higher, and detects many more periodic, “conserved” and “cycling” genes among the top 100 genes, compared to the ‘Difference of Two Logit-Sums’ method. Finally, we used our meta-analytic approach to compare the relative evidence in the association of pre-term birth with preschool wheezing versus pre-school asthma.
CONCLUSION: The new meta-analysis method has much better sensitivity and specific characteristics compared to the “Difference of Two-Logit Sums” method and it is not computationally more expensive.
Collapse
|
10
|
Abstract
Nearly 20% of the budding yeast genome is transcribed periodically during the cell division cycle. The precise temporal execution of this large transcriptional program is controlled by a large interacting network of transcriptional regulators, kinases, and ubiquitin ligases. Historically, this network has been viewed as a collection of four coregulated gene clusters that are associated with each phase of the cell cycle. Although the broad outlines of these gene clusters were described nearly 20 years ago, new technologies have enabled major advances in our understanding of the genes comprising those clusters, their regulation, and the complex regulatory interplay between clusters. More recently, advances are being made in understanding the roles of chromatin in the control of the transcriptional program. We are also beginning to discover important regulatory interactions between the cell-cycle transcriptional program and other cell-cycle regulatory mechanisms such as checkpoints and metabolic networks. Here we review recent advances and contemporary models of the transcriptional network and consider these models in the context of eukaryotic cell-cycle controls.
Collapse
|
11
|
Butler CL, Lucas O, Wuchty S, Xue B, Uversky VN, White M. Identifying novel cell cycle proteins in Apicomplexa parasites through co-expression decision analysis. PLoS One 2014; 9:e97625. [PMID: 24841368 PMCID: PMC4026381 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097625] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2013] [Accepted: 04/22/2014] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Hypothetical proteins comprise roughly half of the predicted gene complement of Toxoplasma gondii and Plasmodium falciparum and represent the largest class of uniquely functioning proteins in these parasites. Following the idea that functional relationships can be informed by the timing of gene expression, we devised a strategy to identify the core set of apicomplexan cell division cycling genes with important roles in parasite division, which includes many uncharacterized proteins. We assembled an expanded list of orthologs from the T. gondii and P. falciparum genome sequences (2781 putative orthologs), compared their mRNA profiles during synchronous replication, and sorted the resulting set of dual cell cycle regulated orthologs (744 total) into protein pairs conserved across many eukaryotic families versus those unique to the Apicomplexa. The analysis identified more than 100 ortholog gene pairs with unknown function in T. gondii and P. falciparum that displayed co-conserved mRNA abundance, dynamics of cyclical expression and similar peak timing that spanned the complete division cycle in each parasite. The unknown cyclical mRNAs encoded a diverse set of proteins with a wide range of mass and showed a remarkable conservation in the internal organization of ordered versus disordered structural domains. A representative sample of cyclical unknown genes (16 total) was epitope tagged in T. gondii tachyzoites yielding the discovery of new protein constituents of the parasite inner membrane complex, key mitotic structures and invasion organelles. These results demonstrate the utility of using gene expression timing and dynamic profile to identify proteins with unique roles in Apicomplexa biology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carrie L. Butler
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, United States of America
| | - Olivier Lucas
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, United States of America
| | - Stefan Wuchty
- National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Bin Xue
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, United States of America
| | - Vladimir N. Uversky
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, United States of America
| | - Michael White
- Department of Global Health, College of Public Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, United States of America
- Florida Center for Drug Discovery and Innovation, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Landry BD, Mapa CE, Arsenault HE, Poti KE, Benanti JA. Regulation of a transcription factor network by Cdk1 coordinates late cell cycle gene expression. EMBO J 2014; 33:1044-60. [PMID: 24714560 DOI: 10.1002/embj.201386877] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
To maintain genome stability, regulators of chromosome segregation must be expressed in coordination with mitotic events. Expression of these late cell cycle genes is regulated by cyclin-dependent kinase (Cdk1), which phosphorylates a network of conserved transcription factors (TFs). However, the effects of Cdk1 phosphorylation on many key TFs are not known. We find that elimination of Cdk1-mediated phosphorylation of four S-phase TFs decreases expression of many late cell cycle genes, delays mitotic progression, and reduces fitness in budding yeast. Blocking phosphorylation impairs degradation of all four TFs. Consequently, phosphorylation-deficient mutants of the repressors Yox1 and Yhp1 exhibit increased promoter occupancy and decreased expression of their target genes. Interestingly, although phosphorylation of the transcriptional activator Hcm1 on its N-terminus promotes its degradation, phosphorylation on its C-terminus is required for its activity, indicating that Cdk1 both activates and inhibits a single TF. We conclude that Cdk1 promotes gene expression by both activating transcriptional activators and inactivating transcriptional repressors. Furthermore, our data suggest that coordinated regulation of the TF network by Cdk1 is necessary for faithful cell division.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin D Landry
- Program in Gene Function and Expression, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Wierstra I. The transcription factor FOXM1 (Forkhead box M1): proliferation-specific expression, transcription factor function, target genes, mouse models, and normal biological roles. Adv Cancer Res 2013; 118:97-398. [PMID: 23768511 DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-407173-5.00004-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 125] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
FOXM1 (Forkhead box M1) is a typical proliferation-associated transcription factor, which stimulates cell proliferation and exhibits a proliferation-specific expression pattern. Accordingly, both the expression and the transcriptional activity of FOXM1 are increased by proliferation signals, but decreased by antiproliferation signals, including the positive and negative regulation by protooncoproteins or tumor suppressors, respectively. FOXM1 stimulates cell cycle progression by promoting the entry into S-phase and M-phase. Moreover, FOXM1 is required for proper execution of mitosis. Accordingly, FOXM1 regulates the expression of genes, whose products control G1/S-transition, S-phase progression, G2/M-transition, and M-phase progression. Additionally, FOXM1 target genes encode proteins with functions in the execution of DNA replication and mitosis. FOXM1 is a transcriptional activator with a forkhead domain as DNA binding domain and with a very strong acidic transactivation domain. However, wild-type FOXM1 is (almost) inactive because the transactivation domain is repressed by three inhibitory domains. Inactive FOXM1 can be converted into a very potent transactivator by activating signals, which release the transactivation domain from its inhibition by the inhibitory domains. FOXM1 is essential for embryonic development and the foxm1 knockout is embryonically lethal. In adults, FOXM1 is important for tissue repair after injury. FOXM1 prevents premature senescence and interferes with contact inhibition. FOXM1 plays a role for maintenance of stem cell pluripotency and for self-renewal capacity of stem cells. The functions of FOXM1 in prevention of polyploidy and aneuploidy and in homologous recombination repair of DNA-double-strand breaks suggest an importance of FOXM1 for the maintenance of genomic stability and chromosomal integrity.
Collapse
|
14
|
Abstract
Productive cell proliferation involves efficient and accurate splitting of the dividing cell into two separate entities. This orderly process reflects coordination of diverse cytological events by regulatory systems that drive the cell from mitosis into G1. In the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, separation of mother and daughter cells involves coordinated actomyosin ring contraction and septum synthesis, followed by septum destruction. These events occur in precise and rapid sequence once chromosomes are segregated and are linked with spindle organization and mitotic progress by intricate cell cycle control machinery. Additionally, critical paarts of the mother/daughter separation process are asymmetric, reflecting a form of fate specification that occurs in every cell division. This chapter describes central events of budding yeast cell separation, as well as the control pathways that integrate them and link them with the cell cycle.
Collapse
|
15
|
Bastajian N, Friesen H, Andrews BJ. Bck2 acts through the MADS box protein Mcm1 to activate cell-cycle-regulated genes in budding yeast. PLoS Genet 2013; 9:e1003507. [PMID: 23675312 PMCID: PMC3649975 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2012] [Accepted: 03/27/2013] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
The Bck2 protein is a potent genetic regulator of cell-cycle-dependent gene expression in budding yeast. To date, most experiments have focused on assessing a potential role for Bck2 in activation of the G1/S-specific transcription factors SBF (Swi4, Swi6) and MBF (Mbp1, Swi6), yet the mechanism of gene activation by Bck2 has remained obscure. We performed a yeast two-hybrid screen using a truncated version of Bck2 and discovered six novel Bck2-binding partners including Mcm1, an essential protein that binds to and activates M/G1 promoters through Early Cell cycle Box (ECB) elements as well as to G2/M promoters. At M/G1 promoters Mcm1 is inhibited by association with two repressors, Yox1 or Yhp1, and gene activation ensues once repression is relieved by an unknown activating signal. Here, we show that Bck2 interacts physically with Mcm1 to activate genes during G1 phase. We used chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) experiments to show that Bck2 localizes to the promoters of M/G1-specific genes, in a manner dependent on functional ECB elements, as well as to the promoters of G1/S and G2/M genes. The Bck2-Mcm1 interaction requires valine 69 on Mcm1, a residue known to be required for interaction with Yox1. Overexpression of BCK2 decreases Yox1 localization to the early G1-specific CLN3 promoter and rescues the lethality caused by overexpression of YOX1. Our data suggest that Yox1 and Bck2 may compete for access to the Mcm1-ECB scaffold to ensure appropriate activation of the initial suite of genes required for cell cycle commitment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nazareth Bastajian
- The Donnelly Centre and the Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Helena Friesen
- The Donnelly Centre and the Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Brenda J. Andrews
- The Donnelly Centre and the Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kristiansson E, Österlund T, Gunnarsson L, Arne G, Larsson DGJ, Nerman O. A novel method for cross-species gene expression analysis. BMC Bioinformatics 2013; 14:70. [PMID: 23444967 PMCID: PMC3679856 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-14-70] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2012] [Accepted: 02/13/2013] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Analysis of gene expression from different species is a powerful way to identify evolutionarily conserved transcriptional responses. However, due to evolutionary events such as gene duplication, there is no one-to-one correspondence between genes from different species which makes comparison of their expression profiles complex. Results In this paper we describe a new method for cross-species meta-analysis of gene expression. The method takes the homology structure between compared species into account and can therefore compare expression data from genes with any number of orthologs and paralogs. A simulation study shows that the proposed method results in a substantial increase in statistical power compared to previously suggested procedures. As a proof of concept, we analyzed microarray data from heat stress experiments performed in eight species and identified several well-known evolutionarily conserved transcriptional responses. The method was also applied to gene expression profiles from five studies of estrogen exposed fish and both known and potentially novel responses were identified. Conclusions The method described in this paper will further increase the potential and reliability of meta-analysis of gene expression profiles from evolutionarily distant species. The method has been implemented in R and is freely available at
http://bioinformatics.math.chalmers.se/Xspecies/.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erik Kristiansson
- Department of Mathematical Statistics, Chalmers University of Technology/University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Kocak M, George EO, Pyne S, Pounds S. An empirical Bayes approach for analysis of diverse periodic trends in time-course gene expression data. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2012; 29:182-8. [PMID: 23172863 DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts672] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
MOTIVATION There is a substantial body of works in the biology literature that seeks to characterize the cyclic behavior of genes during cell division. Gene expression microarrays made it possible to measure the expression profiles of thousands of genes simultaneously in time-course experiments to assess changes in the expression levels of genes over time. In this context, the commonly used procedures for testing include the permutation test by de Lichtenberg et al. and the Fisher's G-test, both of which are designed to evaluate periodicity against noise. However, it is possible that a gene of interest may have expression that is neither cyclic nor just noise. Thus, there is a need for a new test for periodicity that can identify cyclic patterns against not only noise but also other non-cyclic patterns such as linear, quadratic or higher order polynomial patterns. RESULTS To address this weakness, we have introduced an empirical Bayes approach to test for periodicity and compare its performance in terms of sensitivity and specificity with that of the permutation test and Fisher's G-test through extensive simulations and by application to a set of time-course experiments on the Schizosaccharomyces pombe cell-cycle gene expression. We use 'conserved' and 'cycling' genes by Lu et al. to assess the sensitivity and CESR genes by Chenet al. to assess the specificity of our new empirical Bayes method. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION The SAS Macro for our empirical Bayes test for periodicity is included in the supplementary materials along with a sample run of the MACRO program. CONTACT mkocak1@uthsc.edu SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mehmet Kocak
- Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center, Memphis, TN 38105, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Bar-Joseph Z, Gitter A, Simon I. Studying and modelling dynamic biological processes using time-series gene expression data. Nat Rev Genet 2012; 13:552-64. [PMID: 22805708 DOI: 10.1038/nrg3244] [Citation(s) in RCA: 291] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Biological processes are often dynamic, thus researchers must monitor their activity at multiple time points. The most abundant source of information regarding such dynamic activity is time-series gene expression data. These data are used to identify the complete set of activated genes in a biological process, to infer their rates of change, their order and their causal effects and to model dynamic systems in the cell. In this Review we discuss the basic patterns that have been observed in time-series experiments, how these patterns are combined to form expression programs, and the computational analysis, visualization and integration of these data to infer models of dynamic biological systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ziv Bar-Joseph
- Lane Center for Computational Biology and Machine Learning Department, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Vohradsky J. Stochastic simulation for the inference of transcriptional control network of yeast cyclins genes. Nucleic Acids Res 2012; 40:7096-103. [PMID: 22589416 PMCID: PMC3424571 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gks440] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Cell cycle is controlled by the activity of protein family of cyclins and cyclin-dependent kinases that are periodically expressed during cell cycle and that are conserved among different species. Genome-wide location analysis found that cyclins are controlled by a small number of transcription factors that form closed network of genes controlling each other. To investigate gene expression dynamics of this network, we developed a general procedure for stochastic simulation of gene expression process. Using the binding data, we simulated gene expression of all genes of the network for all possible combinations of regulatory interactions and by statistical comparison with experimentally measured time series excluded those interactions that formed gene expression temporal profiles significantly different from the measured ones. These experiments led to a new definition of the cyclins regulatory network coherent with the binding experiments which are kinetically plausible. Level of influence of individual regulators in control of the regulated genes is defined. Simulation results indicate particular mechanism of regulatory activity of protein complexes involved in the control of cyclins.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiri Vohradsky
- Laboratory of Bioinformatics, Institute of Microbiology ASCR, v.v.i., Videnska 1083, 14220 Prague, Czech Republic.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Benanti JA. Coordination of cell growth and division by the ubiquitin-proteasome system. Semin Cell Dev Biol 2012; 23:492-8. [PMID: 22542766 DOI: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2012.04.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2012] [Accepted: 04/13/2012] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
The coupling of cellular growth and division is crucial for a cell to make an accurate copy of itself. Regulated protein degradation by the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) plays an important role in the coordination of these two processes. Many ubiquitin ligases, in particular the Skp1-Cullin-F-box (SCF) family and the Anaphase-Promoting Complex (APC), couple growth and division by targeting cell cycle and metabolic regulators for degradation. However, many regulatory proteins are targeted by multiple ubiquitin ligases. As a result, we are only just beginning to understand the complexities of the proteolytic regulatory network that connects cell growth and the cell cycle.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer A Benanti
- Program in Gene Function and Expression, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 01605, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Kurat CF, Lambert JP, van Dyk D, Tsui K, van Bakel H, Kaluarachchi S, Friesen H, Kainth P, Nislow C, Figeys D, Fillingham J, Andrews BJ. Restriction of histone gene transcription to S phase by phosphorylation of a chromatin boundary protein. Genes Dev 2012; 25:2489-501. [PMID: 22156209 DOI: 10.1101/gad.173427.111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
The cell cycle-regulated expression of core histone genes is required for DNA replication and proper cell cycle progression in eukaryotic cells. Although some factors involved in histone gene transcription are known, the molecular mechanisms that ensure proper induction of histone gene expression during S phase remain enigmatic. Here we demonstrate that S-phase transcription of the model histone gene HTA1 in yeast is regulated by a novel attach-release mechanism involving phosphorylation of the conserved chromatin boundary protein Yta7 by both cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (Cdk1) and casein kinase 2 (CK2). Outside S phase, integrity of the AAA-ATPase domain is required for Yta7 boundary function, as defined by correct positioning of the histone chaperone Rtt106 and the chromatin remodeling complex RSC. Conversely, in S phase, Yta7 is hyperphosphorylated, causing its release from HTA1 chromatin and productive transcription. Most importantly, abrogation of Yta7 phosphorylation results in constitutive attachment of Yta7 to HTA1 chromatin, preventing efficient transcription post-recruitment of RNA polymerase II (RNAPII). Our study identified the chromatin boundary protein Yta7 as a key regulator that links S-phase kinases with RNAPII function at cell cycle-regulated histone gene promoters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph F Kurat
- The Donnelly Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3E1, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
LIU YAN, NICULESCU-MIZIL ALEXANDRU, LOZANO AURÉLIE, LU YONG. TEMPORAL GRAPHICAL MODELS FOR CROSS-SPECIES GENE REGULATORY NETWORK DISCOVERY. J Bioinform Comput Biol 2011; 9:231-50. [DOI: 10.1142/s0219720011005525] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2011] [Revised: 02/28/2011] [Accepted: 03/01/2011] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Many genes and biological processes function in similar ways across different species. Cross-species gene expression analysis, as a powerful tool to characterize the dynamical properties of the cell, has found a number of applications, such as identifying a conserved core set of cell cycle genes. However, to the best of our knowledge, there is limited effort on developing appropriate techniques to capture the causality relations between genes from time-series microarray data across species. In this paper, we present hidden Markov random field regression with L1penalty to uncover the regulatory network structure for different species. The algorithm provides a framework for sharing information across species via hidden component graphs and is able to incorporate domain knowledge across species easily. We demonstrate our method on two synthetic datasets and apply it to discover causal graphs from innate immune response data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- YAN LIU
- Computer Science Department, University of Southern California, 941 Bloom Walk SAL 300, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA
| | | | - AURÉLIE LOZANO
- IBM T. J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY 10598, USA
| | - YONG LU
- Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Garcia-Reyero N, Habib T, Pirooznia M, Gust KA, Gong P, Warner C, Wilbanks M, Perkins E. Conserved toxic responses across divergent phylogenetic lineages: a meta-analysis of the neurotoxic effects of RDX among multiple species using toxicogenomics. ECOTOXICOLOGY (LONDON, ENGLAND) 2011; 20:580-594. [PMID: 21516383 DOI: 10.1007/s10646-011-0623-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/14/2011] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
At military training sites, a variety of pollutants such as hexahydro-1,3,5-trinitro-1,3,5-triazine (RDX), may contaminate the area originating from used munitions. Studies investigating the mechanism of toxicity of RDX have shown that it affects the central nervous system causing seizures in humans and animals. Environmental pollutants such as RDX have the potential to affect many different species, therefore it is important to establish how phylogenetically distant species may respond to these types of emerging pollutants. In this paper, we have used a transcriptional network approach to compare and contrast the neurotoxic effects of RDX among five phylogenetically disparate species: rat (Sprague-Dawley), Northern bobwhite quail (Colinus virginianus), fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas), earthworm (Eisenia fetida), and coral (Acropora formosa). Pathway enrichment analysis indicated a conservation of RDX impacts on pathways related to neuronal function in rat, Northern bobwhite quail, fathead minnows and earthworm, but not in coral. As evolutionary distance increased common responses decreased with impacts on energy and metabolism dominating effects in coral. A neurotransmission related transcriptional network based on whole rat brain responses to RDX exposure was used to identify functionally related modules of genes, components of which were conserved across species depending upon evolutionary distance. Overall, the meta-analysis using genomic data of the effects of RDX on several species suggested a common and conserved mode of action of the chemical throughout phylogenetically remote organisms.
Collapse
|
24
|
Abstract
An internal time-keeping mechanism has been observed in almost every organism studied from archaea to humans. This circadian clock provides a competitive advantage in fitness and survival ( 18, 30, 95, 129, 137 ). Researchers have uncovered the molecular composition of this internal clock by combining enzymology, molecular biology, genetics, and modeling approaches. However, understanding the mechanistic link between the clock and output responses has been elusive. In three model organisms, Arabidopsis thaliana, Drosophila melanogaster, and Mus musculus, whole-genome expression arrays have enabled researchers to investigate how maintaining a time-keeping mechanism connects to an adaptive advantage. Here, we review the impacts transcriptomics have had on our understanding of the clock and how this molecular clock connects with system-level circadian responses. We explore the discoveries made possible by high-throughput RNA assays, the network approaches used to investigate these large transcript datasets, and potential future directions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Colleen J Doherty
- Section of Cell and Developmental Biology, Division of Biological Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
|
26
|
Large scale comparison of global gene expression patterns in human and mouse. Genome Biol 2010; 11:R124. [PMID: 21182765 PMCID: PMC3046484 DOI: 10.1186/gb-2010-11-12-r124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 98] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2010] [Revised: 12/03/2010] [Accepted: 12/23/2010] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Background It is widely accepted that orthologous genes between species are conserved at the sequence level and perform similar functions in different organisms. However, the level of conservation of gene expression patterns of the orthologous genes in different species has been unclear. To address the issue, we compared gene expression of orthologous genes based on 2,557 human and 1,267 mouse samples with high quality gene expression data, selected from experiments stored in the public microarray repository ArrayExpress. Results In a principal component analysis (PCA) of combined data from human and mouse samples merged on orthologous probesets, samples largely form distinctive clusters based on their tissue sources when projected onto the top principal components. The most prominent groups are the nervous system, muscle/heart tissues, liver and cell lines. Despite the great differences in sample characteristics and experiment conditions, the overall patterns of these prominent clusters are strikingly similar for human and mouse. We further analyzed data for each tissue separately and found that the most variable genes in each tissue are highly enriched with human-mouse tissue-specific orthologs and the least variable genes in each tissue are enriched with human-mouse housekeeping orthologs. Conclusions The results indicate that the global patterns of tissue-specific expression of orthologous genes are conserved in human and mouse. The expression of groups of orthologous genes co-varies in the two species, both for the most variable genes and the most ubiquitously expressed genes.
Collapse
|
27
|
Lu Y, Rosenfeld R, Nau GJ, Bar-Joseph Z. Cross species expression analysis of innate immune response. J Comput Biol 2010; 17:253-68. [PMID: 20377444 DOI: 10.1089/cmb.2009.0147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The innate immune response is the first line of host defense against infections. This system employs a number of different types of cells, which in turn activate different sets of genes. Microarray studies of human and mouse cells infected with various pathogens identified hundreds of differentially expressed genes. However, combining these datasets to identify common and unique response patterns remained a challenge. We developed methods based on probabilistic graphical models to combine expression experiments across species, cells, and pathogens. Our method analyzes homologous genes in different species concurrently overcoming problems related to noise and orthology assignments. Using our method, we identified both core immune response genes and genes that are activated in macrophages in both human and mouse but not in dendritic cells, and vice versa. Our results shed light on immune response mechanisms and on the differences between various types of cells that are used to fight infecting bacteria. For supporting website, see www.cs.cmu.edu/-lyongu/pub/immune/.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yong Lu
- School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Fan X, Pyne S, Liu JS. Bayesian meta-analysis for identifying periodically expressed genes in fission yeast cell cycle. Ann Appl Stat 2010. [DOI: 10.1214/09-aoas300] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
|
29
|
Pyne S, Gutman R, Kim CS, Futcher B. Phase Coupled Meta-analysis: sensitive detection of oscillations in cell cycle gene expression, as applied to fission yeast. BMC Genomics 2009; 10:440. [PMID: 19761608 PMCID: PMC2753555 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-10-440] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2009] [Accepted: 09/17/2009] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many genes oscillate in their level of expression through the cell division cycle. Previous studies have identified such genes by applying Fourier analysis to cell cycle time course experiments. Typically, such analyses generate p-values; i.e., an oscillating gene has a small p-value, and the observed oscillation is unlikely due to chance. When multiple time course experiments are integrated, p-values from the individual experiments are combined using classical meta-analysis techniques. However, this approach sacrifices information inherent in the individual experiments, because the hypothesis that a gene is regulated according to the time in the cell cycle makes two independent predictions: first, that an oscillation in expression will be observed; and second, that gene expression will always peak in the same phase of the cell cycle, such as S-phase. Approaches that simply combine p-values ignore the second prediction. RESULTS Here, we improve the detection of cell cycle oscillating genes by systematically taking into account the phase of peak gene expression. We design a novel meta-analysis measure based on vector addition: when a gene peaks or troughs in all experiments in the same phase of the cell cycle, the representative vectors add to produce a large final vector. Conversely, when the peaks in different experiments are in various phases of the cycle, vector addition produces a small final vector. We apply the measure to ten genome-wide cell cycle time course experiments from the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe, and detect many new, weakly oscillating genes. CONCLUSION A very large fraction of all genes in S. pombe, perhaps one-quarter to one-half, show some cell cycle oscillation, although in many cases these oscillations may be incidental rather than adaptive.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saumyadipta Pyne
- Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Li L, Lu Y, Qin LX, Bar-Joseph Z, Werner-Washburne M, Breeden LL. Budding yeast SSD1-V regulates transcript levels of many longevity genes and extends chronological life span in purified quiescent cells. Mol Biol Cell 2009; 20:3851-64. [PMID: 19570907 DOI: 10.1091/mbc.e09-04-0347] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Ssd1 is an RNA-binding protein that affects literally hundreds of different processes and is polymorphic in both wild and lab yeast strains. We have used transcript microarrays to compare mRNA levels in an isogenic pair of mutant (ssd1-d) and wild-type (SSD1-V) cells across the cell cycle. We find that 15% of transcripts are differentially expressed, but there is no correlation with those mRNAs bound by Ssd1. About 20% of cell cycle regulated transcripts are affected, and most show sharper amplitudes of oscillation in SSD1-V cells. Many transcripts whose gene products influence longevity are also affected, the largest class of which is involved in translation. Ribosomal protein mRNAs are globally down-regulated by SSD1-V. SSD1-V has been shown to increase replicative life span currency and we show that SSD1-V also dramatically increases chronological life span (CLS). Using a new assay of CLS in pure populations of quiescent prototrophs, we find that the CLS for SSD1-V cells is twice that of ssd1-d cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lihong Li
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Basic Sciences Division, Seattle, WA 98109, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Lu Y, Huggins P, Bar-Joseph Z. Cross species analysis of microarray expression data. Bioinformatics 2009; 25:1476-83. [PMID: 19357096 DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 75] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
MOTIVATION Many biological systems operate in a similar manner across a large number of species or conditions. Cross-species analysis of sequence and interaction data is often applied to determine the function of new genes. In contrast to these static measurements, microarrays measure the dynamic, condition-specific response of complex biological systems. The recent exponential growth in microarray expression datasets allows researchers to combine expression experiments from multiple species to identify genes that are not only conserved in sequence but also operated in a similar way in the different species studied. RESULTS In this review we discuss the computational and technical challenges associated with these studies, the approaches that have been developed to address these challenges and the advantages of cross-species analysis of microarray data. We show how successful application of these methods lead to insights that cannot be obtained when analyzing data from a single species. We also highlight current open problems and discuss possible ways to address them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yong Lu
- School of Computer Science and Lane Center for Computational Biology, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Lelandais G, Tanty V, Geneix C, Etchebest C, Jacq C, Devaux F. Genome adaptation to chemical stress: clues from comparative transcriptomics in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Candida glabrata. Genome Biol 2008; 9:R164. [PMID: 19025642 PMCID: PMC2614496 DOI: 10.1186/gb-2008-9-11-r164] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2008] [Accepted: 11/24/2008] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Comparative transcriptomics of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Candida glabrata revealed a remarkable conservation of response to drug-induced stress, despite underlying differences in the regulatory networks. Background Recent technical and methodological advances have placed microbial models at the forefront of evolutionary and environmental genomics. To better understand the logic of genetic network evolution, we combined comparative transcriptomics, a differential clustering algorithm and promoter analyses in a study of the evolution of transcriptional networks responding to an antifungal agent in two yeast species: the free-living model organism Saccharomyces cerevisiae and the human pathogen Candida glabrata. Results We found that although the gene expression patterns characterizing the response to drugs were remarkably conserved between the two species, part of the underlying regulatory networks differed. In particular, the roles of the oxidative stress response transcription factors ScYap1p (in S. cerevisiae) and Cgap1p (in C. glabrata) had diverged. The sets of genes whose benomyl response depends on these factors are significantly different. Also, the DNA motifs targeted by ScYap1p and Cgap1p are differently represented in the promoters of these genes, suggesting that the DNA binding properties of the two proteins are slightly different. Experimental assays of ScYap1p and Cgap1p activities in vivo were in accordance with this last observation. Conclusions Based on these results and recently published data, we suggest that the robustness of environmental stress responses among related species contrasts with the rapid evolution of regulatory sequences, and depends on both the coevolution of transcription factor binding properties and the versatility of regulatory associations within transcriptional networks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gaëlle Lelandais
- Equipe de Bioinformatique Génomique et Moléculaire, INSERM UMR S726, Université Paris 7, INTS, 6 rue Alexandre Cabanel, 75015 Paris, France.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Jensen LJ, de Lichtenberg U, Jensen TS, Brunak S, Bork P. Circular reasoning rather than cyclic expression. Genome Biol 2008; 9:403. [PMID: 18598377 PMCID: PMC2481420 DOI: 10.1186/gb-2008-9-6-403] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
A response to Combined analysis reveals a core set of cycling genes by Y Lu, S Mahony, PV Benos, R Rosenfeld, I Simon, LL Breeden and Z Bar-Joseph. Genome Biol 2007, 8:R146.
Collapse
|
34
|
Genome-wide transcriptional analysis of the human cell cycle identifies genes differentially regulated in normal and cancer cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008; 105:955-60. [PMID: 18195366 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0704723105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 134] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Characterization of the transcriptional regulatory network of the normal cell cycle is essential for understanding the perturbations that lead to cancer. However, the complete set of cycling genes in primary cells has not yet been identified. Here, we report the results of genome-wide expression profiling experiments on synchronized primary human foreskin fibroblasts across the cell cycle. Using a combined experimental and computational approach to deconvolve measured expression values into "single-cell" expression profiles, we were able to overcome the limitations inherent in synchronizing nontransformed mammalian cells. This allowed us to identify 480 periodically expressed genes in primary human foreskin fibroblasts. Analysis of the reconstructed primary cell profiles and comparison with published expression datasets from synchronized transformed cells reveals a large number of genes that cycle exclusively in primary cells. This conclusion was supported by both bioinformatic analysis and experiments performed on other cell types. We suggest that this approach will help pinpoint genetic elements contributing to normal cell growth and cellular transformation.
Collapse
|
35
|
Gauthier NP, Larsen ME, Wernersson R, de Lichtenberg U, Jensen LJ, Brunak S, Jensen TS. Cyclebase.org--a comprehensive multi-organism online database of cell-cycle experiments. Nucleic Acids Res 2007; 36:D854-9. [PMID: 17940094 PMCID: PMC2238932 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkm729] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
The past decade has seen the publication of a large number of cell-cycle microarray studies and many more are in the pipeline. However, data from these experiments are not easy to access, combine and evaluate. We have developed a centralized database with an easy-to-use interface, Cyclebase.org, for viewing and downloading these data. The user interface facilitates searches for genes of interest as well as downloads of genome-wide results. Individual genes are displayed with graphs of expression profiles throughout the cell cycle from all available experiments. These expression profiles are normalized to a common timescale to enable inspection of the combined experimental evidence. Furthermore, state-of-the-art computational analyses provide key information on both individual experiments and combined datasets such as whether or not a gene is periodically expressed and, if so, the time of peak expression. Cyclebase is available at http://www.cyclebase.org.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas Paul Gauthier
- Center for Biological Sequence Analysis, BioCentrum-DTU, Technical University of Denmark, Building 208, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|