1
|
Salim A, Biswas S, Sonneborn C, Hogue O, Hennessy E, Mays M, Suneja A, Ahmed Z, Mata IF. Efficacy and Tolerability of Anti-CGRP Monoclonal Antibodies in Patients Aged ≥ 65 Years With Daily or Nondaily Migraine. Neurol Clin Pract 2025; 15:e200373. [PMID: 39399553 PMCID: PMC11464238 DOI: 10.1212/cpj.0000000000200373] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2023] [Accepted: 06/18/2024] [Indexed: 10/15/2024]
Abstract
Background and Objectives Despite decreasing prevalence of migraine with advancing age, there remains a significant proportion of individuals aged ≥65 years with migraine. Treatment of this population is difficult and they are often excluded from clinical trials, limiting evidence regarding migraine treatment outcomes. Our objective is to assess the efficacy and tolerability of anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapies (erenumab, fremanezumab, and galcanezumab) in patients ≥65 years (O65) compared with patients <65 (U65) with daily or nondaily migraine. Methods This observational study uses retrospective data from the electronic medical records of patients who were treated with an anti-CGRP mAb between June 2018 and November 2021. Efficacy was determined through a reduction in monthly migraine days (MMDs) and Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) scores from baseline to posttreatment. Tolerability was examined through the number of adverse events reported per group. Mann-Whitney tests were used to compare the efficacy and tolerability of U65 and O65 patients overall and separated into daily and nondaily migraine groups. Results The dataset consisted of U65 (n = 2,707; median [interquartile range]; 45.4 [35.8-53.8] years) or O65 (n = 304; 69.5 [67.3-73.3] years) and further separated into daily (n = 1,303) and nondaily (n = 1,708) migraine. There was no difference (p = 0.57) in the median MMD reduction between U65 (10 days [0.0-17.0]) and O65 (10 days [0.0-16.5]). Similarly, no difference was found among patients with nondaily migraine (p = 0.82) and patients with daily migraine (p = 0.59). HIT-6 scores decreased from severe to moderate/substantial impact for all groups. The daily and nondaily groups showed differences in meeting the 50% improvement threshold (nondaily U65, 67% vs daily U65, 54%, p < 0.0001; nondaily O65, 65% vs daily O65, 49%, p = 0.008). Side effects were reported (829/3,011), with a higher incidence in the U65 (22% O65, 28% U65). The most common side effects for both groups were injection site reaction/rash (40%) and constipation (25%). Discussion This retrospective analysis provides real-world evidence that there is no difference in the efficacy and tolerability of treatment with erenumab, fremanezumab, and galcanezumab in patients O65 when compared with patients U65 both with daily or nondaily migraine. These data may help guide the choice of migraine treatment in older populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amira Salim
- Department of Molecular Medicine (A. Salim), Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University; Genomic Medicine Institute (A. Salim, IFM), Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic; Center for Neurological Restoration (SB, MM, A. Suneja, ZA), Cleveland Clinic Neurological Institute; Quantitative Health Sciences (CS, OH), Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, OH; and Neuroscience Institute (EH), Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA
| | - Sudipa Biswas
- Department of Molecular Medicine (A. Salim), Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University; Genomic Medicine Institute (A. Salim, IFM), Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic; Center for Neurological Restoration (SB, MM, A. Suneja, ZA), Cleveland Clinic Neurological Institute; Quantitative Health Sciences (CS, OH), Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, OH; and Neuroscience Institute (EH), Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA
| | - Claire Sonneborn
- Department of Molecular Medicine (A. Salim), Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University; Genomic Medicine Institute (A. Salim, IFM), Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic; Center for Neurological Restoration (SB, MM, A. Suneja, ZA), Cleveland Clinic Neurological Institute; Quantitative Health Sciences (CS, OH), Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, OH; and Neuroscience Institute (EH), Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA
| | - Olivia Hogue
- Department of Molecular Medicine (A. Salim), Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University; Genomic Medicine Institute (A. Salim, IFM), Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic; Center for Neurological Restoration (SB, MM, A. Suneja, ZA), Cleveland Clinic Neurological Institute; Quantitative Health Sciences (CS, OH), Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, OH; and Neuroscience Institute (EH), Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA
| | - Elise Hennessy
- Department of Molecular Medicine (A. Salim), Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University; Genomic Medicine Institute (A. Salim, IFM), Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic; Center for Neurological Restoration (SB, MM, A. Suneja, ZA), Cleveland Clinic Neurological Institute; Quantitative Health Sciences (CS, OH), Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, OH; and Neuroscience Institute (EH), Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA
| | - Maryann Mays
- Department of Molecular Medicine (A. Salim), Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University; Genomic Medicine Institute (A. Salim, IFM), Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic; Center for Neurological Restoration (SB, MM, A. Suneja, ZA), Cleveland Clinic Neurological Institute; Quantitative Health Sciences (CS, OH), Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, OH; and Neuroscience Institute (EH), Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA
| | - Aarushi Suneja
- Department of Molecular Medicine (A. Salim), Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University; Genomic Medicine Institute (A. Salim, IFM), Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic; Center for Neurological Restoration (SB, MM, A. Suneja, ZA), Cleveland Clinic Neurological Institute; Quantitative Health Sciences (CS, OH), Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, OH; and Neuroscience Institute (EH), Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA
| | - Zubair Ahmed
- Department of Molecular Medicine (A. Salim), Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University; Genomic Medicine Institute (A. Salim, IFM), Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic; Center for Neurological Restoration (SB, MM, A. Suneja, ZA), Cleveland Clinic Neurological Institute; Quantitative Health Sciences (CS, OH), Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, OH; and Neuroscience Institute (EH), Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA
| | - Ignacio F Mata
- Department of Molecular Medicine (A. Salim), Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University; Genomic Medicine Institute (A. Salim, IFM), Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic; Center for Neurological Restoration (SB, MM, A. Suneja, ZA), Cleveland Clinic Neurological Institute; Quantitative Health Sciences (CS, OH), Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, OH; and Neuroscience Institute (EH), Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Orlando B, Egeo G, Aurilia C, Fiorentini G, Barbanti P. Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Monoclonal Antibodies: Key Lessons from Real-World Evidence. Brain Sci 2024; 14:948. [PMID: 39335442 PMCID: PMC11429799 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci14090948] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2024] [Revised: 09/16/2024] [Accepted: 09/17/2024] [Indexed: 09/30/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The advent of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway has transformed the management of migraine, offering newfound optimism for clinicians and individuals with episodic migraine (EM) and chronic migraine (CM). While randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have provided crucial insights into the effectiveness and safety profiles of these treatments, their translation into real-world clinical practice remains a challenge. OBJECTIVE This review aims to conduct a comprehensive assessment of real-world studies, offering valuable insights tailored for practical application in clinical settings. METHODS We conducted a comprehensive literature search in PubMed, SCOPUS, and MEDLINE for real-life studies on erenumab, fremanezumab, and galcanezumab. Abstracts underwent rigorous screening by two reviewers for relevance. Data extraction from selected articles was performed using a standardized form, with verification by a second reviewer. Data synthesis was narrative, following PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS Our search included 61 pertinent studies conducted between 2019 and 1 March 2024. Real-world study designs demonstrated notable variability in the selection and inclusion of migraine patients, influenced by factors such as attack frequency, data collection criteria, and primary/secondary objectives. Key findings commonly reported considerable improvements in efficacy outcomes (migraine frequency, analgesic use, pain severity, and disability), high responder rates, and optimal safety and tolerability profiles. CONCLUSIONS Real-world evidence underscores the role of anti-CGRP mAbs as targeted therapies for both CM and EM patients. The overall results indicate that the effectiveness and tolerability of anti-CGRP mAbs in real-world applications may exceed those observed in RCTs, an extraordinary finding in clinical neurology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bianca Orlando
- Headache and Pain Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele, Via della Pisana 235, 00163 Rome, Italy; (B.O.); (G.E.); (C.A.); (G.F.)
| | - Gabriella Egeo
- Headache and Pain Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele, Via della Pisana 235, 00163 Rome, Italy; (B.O.); (G.E.); (C.A.); (G.F.)
| | - Cinzia Aurilia
- Headache and Pain Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele, Via della Pisana 235, 00163 Rome, Italy; (B.O.); (G.E.); (C.A.); (G.F.)
| | - Giulia Fiorentini
- Headache and Pain Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele, Via della Pisana 235, 00163 Rome, Italy; (B.O.); (G.E.); (C.A.); (G.F.)
- San Raffaele University, 00166 Rome, Italy
| | - Piero Barbanti
- Headache and Pain Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele, Via della Pisana 235, 00163 Rome, Italy; (B.O.); (G.E.); (C.A.); (G.F.)
- San Raffaele University, 00166 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Caronna E, Gallardo VJ, Egeo G, Vázquez MM, Castellanos CN, Membrilla JA, Vaghi G, Rodríguez-Montolio J, Fabregat Fabra N, Sánchez-Caballero F, Jaimes Sánchez A, Muñoz-Vendrell A, Oliveira R, Gárate G, González-Osorio Y, Guisado-Alonso D, Ornello R, Thunstedt C, Fernández-Lázaro I, Torres-Ferrús M, Alpuente A, Torelli P, Aurilia C, Pére RL, Castrillo MJR, Icco RD, Sances G, Broadhurst S, Ong HC, García AG, Campoy S, Sanahuja J, Cabral G, Beltrán Blasco I, Waliszewska-Prosół M, Pereira L, Layos-Romero A, Luzeiro I, Dorado L, Álvarez Escudero MR, May A, López-Bravo A, Martins IP, Sundal C, Irimia P, Lozano Ros A, Gago-Veiga AB, Juanes FV, Ruscheweyh R, Sacco S, Cuadrado-Godia E, García-Azorín D, Pascual J, Gil-Gouveia R, Huerta-Villanueva M, Rodriguez-Vico J, Viguera Romero J, Obach V, Santos-Lasaosa S, Ghadiri-Sani M, Tassorelli C, Díaz-de-Terán J, Díaz Insa S, Oria CG, Barbanti P, Pozo-Rosich P. Redefining migraine prevention: early treatment with anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies enhances response in the real world. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2024; 95:927-937. [PMID: 38777579 DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2023-333295] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2023] [Accepted: 03/13/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies (anti-CGRP MAbs) are approved and available treatments for migraine prevention. Patients do not respond alike and many countries have reimbursement policies, which hinder treatments to those who might respond. This study aimed to investigate clinical factors associated with good and excellent response to anti-CGRP MAbs at 6 months. METHODS European multicentre, prospective, real-world study, including high-frequency episodic or chronic migraine (CM) patients treated since March 2018 with anti-CGRP MAbs. We defined good and excellent responses as ≥50% and ≥75% reduction in monthly headache days (MHD) at 6 months, respectively. Generalised mixed-effect regression models (GLMMs) were used to identify variables independently associated with treatment response. RESULTS Of the 5818 included patients, 82.3% were females and the median age was 48.0 (40.0-55.0) years. At baseline, the median of MHD was 20.0 (14.0-28.0) days/months and 72.2% had a diagnosis of CM. At 6 months (n=4963), 56.5% (2804/4963) were good responders and 26.7% (1324/4963) were excellent responders. In the GLMM model, older age (1.08 (95% CI 1.02 to 1.15), p=0.016), the presence of unilateral pain (1.39 (95% CI 1.21 to 1.60), p<0.001), the absence of depression (0.840 (95% CI 0.731 to 0.966), p=0.014), less monthly migraine days (0.923 (95% CI 0.862 to 0.989), p=0.023) and lower Migraine Disability Assessment at baseline (0.874 (95% CI 0.819 to 0.932), p<0.001) were predictors of good response (AUC of 0.648 (95% CI 0.616 to 0.680)). These variables were also significant predictors of excellent response (AUC of 0.691 (95% CI 0.651 to 0.731)). Sex was not significant in the GLMM models. CONCLUSIONS This is the largest real-world study of migraine patients treated with anti-CGRP MAbs. It provides evidence that higher migraine frequency and greater disability at baseline reduce the likelihood of responding to anti-CGRP MAbs, informing physicians and policy-makers on the need for an earlier treatment in order to offer the best chance of treatment success.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edoardo Caronna
- Headache Clinic, Neurology Department, Vall d'Hebron Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Victor José Gallardo
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Gabriella Egeo
- Headache and Pain Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele, Roma, Italy, Italian Migraine Registry (IGRAINE) study group
| | | | | | - Javier A Membrilla
- Headache Unit, Department of Neurology, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
- La Paz Institute for Health Research (IdiPAZ), Autonomous University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Gloria Vaghi
- Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
- Headache Science & Neurorehabilitation Center, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | - Joana Rodríguez-Montolio
- Department of Neurology, Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spain
- Aragon Institute for Health Research (IIS Aragón), Zaragoza, Spain
| | | | | | - Alex Jaimes Sánchez
- Headache Unit, Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Albert Muñoz-Vendrell
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge-IDIBELL, Universitat de Barcelona, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Renato Oliveira
- Hospital da Luz Headache Center, Neurology Department, Hospital da Luz, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Gabriel Gárate
- Neurology Department, University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, Universidad de Cantabria, Santander, Spain
| | - Yésica González-Osorio
- Headache Unit, Department of Neurology, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain
| | | | - Raffaele Ornello
- Department of Applied Clinical Sciences and Biotechnology, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Cem Thunstedt
- Department of Neurology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Iris Fernández-Lázaro
- Headache Unit, Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitario La Princesa, Madrid, Spain
| | - Marta Torres-Ferrús
- Headache Clinic, Neurology Department, Vall d'Hebron Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alicia Alpuente
- Headache Clinic, Neurology Department, Vall d'Hebron Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Paola Torelli
- Neurology Unit, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Headache Center, University of Parma, Parma, Italy, Italian Migraine Registry (IGRAINE) study group
| | - Cinzia Aurilia
- Headache and Pain Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele, Roma, Italy, Italian Migraine Registry (IGRAINE) study group
| | - Raquel Lamas Pére
- Unidad de Cefaleas, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain
| | | | - Roberto De Icco
- Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
- Headache Science & Neurorehabilitation Center, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | - Grazia Sances
- Headache Science & Neurorehabilitation Center, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | | | - Hui Ching Ong
- The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Andrea Gómez García
- Headache Unit, Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Sergio Campoy
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge-IDIBELL, Universitat de Barcelona, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
- Neurology Department, Hospital de Viladecans-IDIBELL, Viladecans, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jordi Sanahuja
- Headache Unit, Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova-IRBLleida, Lleida, Spain
| | - Gonçalo Cabral
- Neurology Department, Hospital de Egas Moniz, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Ocidental, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Isabel Beltrán Blasco
- Headache Clinic, Neurology Departament, Hospital General Universitario Dr Balmis, ISABIAL, Alicante, Spain
| | | | - Liliana Pereira
- Department of Neurology, Hospital Garcia de Orta, Almada, Portugal
| | - Almudena Layos-Romero
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital General Universitario de Albacete, Albacete, Spain
| | - Isabel Luzeiro
- Headache Outpatient Unit, Hospitalar and University Centre of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
- Coimbra Health School/ESTeSC, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Laura Dorado
- Department of Neuroscience, Germans Trias i Pujol University Hospital, Badalona, Spain
| | | | - Arne May
- University Clinic Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Alba López-Bravo
- Aragon Institute for Health Research (IIS Aragón), Zaragoza, Spain
- Headache Unit, Department of Neurology, Hospital Reina Sofía, Tudela, Spain
| | - Isabel Pavão Martins
- Headache Outpatient Clinic, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitario Sta Maria, Faculty of Medicine University of Lisbon & Campus Neurologico, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Christina Sundal
- Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
- NorHEAD, Norwegian Headache Research Centre, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Neurology, NeuroClinic, Norway, Lillestrøm, Norway
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Pablo Irimia
- Department of Neurology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Alberto Lozano Ros
- Headache Unit, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ana Beatriz Gago-Veiga
- Headache Unit, Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitario La Princesa, Madrid, Spain
| | - Fernando Velasco Juanes
- Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitario Cruces, Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Bilbao, Spain
| | - Ruth Ruscheweyh
- Department of Neurology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Simona Sacco
- Department of Applied Clinical Sciences and Biotechnology, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Elisa Cuadrado-Godia
- Department of Neurology, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
- Neuroscience Research Program, Hospital del Mar Research Institute, Pompeu Fabra University, Barcelona, Spain
| | - David García-Azorín
- Headache Unit, Department of Neurology, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain
| | - Julio Pascual
- Neurology Department, University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, Universidad de Cantabria, Santander, Spain
| | - Raquel Gil-Gouveia
- Hospital da Luz Headache Center, Neurology Department, Hospital da Luz, Lisboa, Portugal
- Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Health, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Mariano Huerta-Villanueva
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge-IDIBELL, Universitat de Barcelona, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
- Neurology Department, Hospital de Viladecans-IDIBELL, Viladecans, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jaime Rodriguez-Vico
- Headache Unit, Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Victor Obach
- Neurology Department Headache Unit, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Sonia Santos-Lasaosa
- Department of Neurology, Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spain
- Aragon Institute for Health Research (IIS Aragón), Zaragoza, Spain
| | | | - Cristina Tassorelli
- Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
- Headache Science & Neurorehabilitation Center, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | - Javier Díaz-de-Terán
- Headache Unit, Department of Neurology, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
- La Paz Institute for Health Research (IdiPAZ), Autonomous University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Samuel Díaz Insa
- Headache Unit, Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | | | - Piero Barbanti
- Headache and Pain Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele, Roma, Italy, Italian Migraine Registry (IGRAINE) study group
- University San Raffaele, Rome, Italy
| | - Patricia Pozo-Rosich
- Headache Clinic, Neurology Department, Vall d'Hebron Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Fernández-Bravo-Rodrigo J, Cavero-Redondo I, Lucerón-Lucas-Torres M, Martínez-García I, Flor-García A, Barreda-Hernández D, Pascual-Morena C. Real-world effectiveness and safety of erenumab for the treatment of migraine: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Pharmacol 2024; 976:176702. [PMID: 38823758 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2024.176702] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2024] [Revised: 05/04/2024] [Accepted: 05/29/2024] [Indexed: 06/03/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Migraine is a common and disabling primary headache disorder. Several drugs targeting calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), such as erenumab (an anti-CGRP receptor mAb), have been developed recently. However, the real-world effects of erenumab are not well understood. OBJECTIVE To assess the clinical effectiveness and safety of erenumab for reducing migraine intensity and frequency in the real world. METHODS A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library was conducted from inception to December 2023. Studies estimating the real-world effect of erenumab on monthly migraine days (MMD), monthly headache days (MHD), headache impact test (HIT-6), number of days in medication (NDM), acute monthly intake (AMI), pain intensity (PI) and safety outcomes were included. Meta-analyses of proportions or mean differences were performed. RESULTS Fifty-three studies were included. At 3-months, the effect was -7.18 days for MMD, -6.89 days for MHD, -6.97 for HIT-6, -6.22 days for NDM, -15.75 for AMI, and -1.71 for PI. Generally, the effect at 6- and 12-months increased slightly and gradually. The MMD/MHD response rates revealed that approximately one-third of patients exhibited a response greater than 30%, while one-sixth demonstrated a response exceeding 50%. Additionally, 3-4% of patients achieved a response rate of 100%. Adverse event rates were 0.34 and 0.43 at 6- and 12-months, respectively. CONCLUSION This study provides strong evidence of the effectiveness and safety of erenumab in the real world; to our knowledge, this is the first real-world meta-analysis specific to erenumab. Erenumab represents a solid therapeutic option for physicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaime Fernández-Bravo-Rodrigo
- Health and Social Research Center, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Cuenca, 16071, Spain; Pharmacy Service, Hospital Virgen de la Luz, 16002, Cuenca, Spain; Pharmacy Service. Hospital Virgen del Castillo, 30510, Yecla, Murcia, Spain.
| | - Iván Cavero-Redondo
- Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Autónoma de Chile, Talca, 3460000, Chile.
| | | | - Irene Martínez-García
- Health and Social Research Center, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Cuenca, 16071, Spain.
| | | | | | - Carlos Pascual-Morena
- Health and Social Research Center, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Cuenca, 16071, Spain; Facultad de Enfermería de Albacete, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Albacete, 02006, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Stubberud A, Borkenhagen S, Oteiza F, Dueland AN, Bugge C, Sæther EM, Tronvik E, Stovner LJ, Bjørk MH. Patterns of migraine medication use in Norway: A nationwide registry-based observational study. Cephalalgia 2024; 44:3331024241268212. [PMID: 39149980 DOI: 10.1177/03331024241268212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/17/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to describe and discuss patterns of migraine medication use in the entire Norwegian population. METHODS In this nationwide, observational study, all individuals with a migraine-related prescription between 2010 and 2020 were identified using the Norwegian Prescription Database. The outcomes of interest were the incidence and 1-year prevalence of migraine medication users, as well as individuals with triptan overuse. Patterns of medication use were statistically compared between women and men adjusted for age, year of treatment start, comorbidities and county of residence calculating adjusted odds ratios (aOR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS We identified 327,904 migraine medication users. The incidence ranged from 0.39% to 0.46%, and the 1-year prevalence increased from 1.99% to 2.99%. Preventive use increased >50% during the study period. Preventives were significantly more often prescribed to women than to men (39.72% vs. 33.75%; aOR 1.41, 95% CI 1.38 to 1.44). Triptan overuse was significantly more common among women, but women with overuse were more often using preventives, as compared to men (56.64% vs 52.69%; aOR = 1.43, 95% CI 1.37 to 1.49). CONCLUSION The prevalence of medically treated migraine is low. Overuse of triptans is frequent, especially among women. Clinicians should be encouraged to try out different triptans, recognize triptan overuse, and prescribe preventives when indicated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anker Stubberud
- NorHEAD Norwegian Centre for Headache Research, Trondheim, Norway
- Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Sciences, NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | | | | | | | - Christoffer Bugge
- Oslo Economics, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Health Management and Health Economics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Erling Tronvik
- NorHEAD Norwegian Centre for Headache Research, Trondheim, Norway
- Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Sciences, NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
- Department of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, St Olavs University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Lars Jacob Stovner
- NorHEAD Norwegian Centre for Headache Research, Trondheim, Norway
- Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Sciences, NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
- Department of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, St Olavs University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Marte-Helene Bjørk
- NorHEAD Norwegian Centre for Headache Research, Trondheim, Norway
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Neurology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Pons-Fuster E, Lozano-Caballero O, Martín-Balbuena S, Lucas-Ródenas C, Mancebo-González A, De Gorostiza-Frías I, González-Ponce CM. Anti‑CGRP monoclonal antibodies in resistant migraine: preliminary real-world effectiveness and clinical predictors of response at two years. Int J Clin Pharm 2024:10.1007/s11096-024-01758-2. [PMID: 38990457 DOI: 10.1007/s11096-024-01758-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2024] [Accepted: 05/20/2024] [Indexed: 07/12/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Monoclonal antibodies targeting calcitonin gene-related peptide (anti-CGRP mAbs) have shown clinical effectiveness and safety in randomized clinical studies. However, long-term studies in clinical practice remain limited. AIM To assess the long-term effectiveness, clinical predictors and safety of three anti-CGRP mAbs (erenumab, galcanezumab, fremanezumab) in resistant migraine patients. METHOD A single-center retrospective study was conducted from December 2019 to June 2023 involving 120 resistant migraine patients who received at least a month of anti-CGRP mAbs treatment. Patients completed a headache diary that included monthly acute medication intake (MAM), monthly migraine days (MMD), adverse events as well as completed Patient-Reported Outcome questionnaires (MIDAS [Migraine Disability Assessment] and Headache Impact Test 6 [HIT-6]). The number of patients achieving a ≥ 50% reduction in monthly migraine days was determined and classified as ≥ 50% responders, and baseline parameters and logistic regression between responders and non-responders were analyzed to identify potential predictors of response. Adverse events were registered in every follow-up. RESULTS Treatment with anti-CGRP mAbs led to reductions in MIDAS, HIT-6, MMD and MAM from baseline to 6-24 months. At 6-12 months, responders (61% and 57%, respectively) exhibited lower baseline MMD and MAM. Medication overuse was associated with non-responders from 6 to 24 months and it was identified as a negative predictor of treatment effectiveness (OR 0.23, 95% CI 0.07-0.74; p = 0.014). CONCLUSION Anti-CGRP mAbs prove effectiveness and safety over a 24-month period in a RM population. Patients with no medication overuse and lower basal MMDs and MAM may respond better to anti-CGRP mAbs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Pons-Fuster
- Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics Research Group, Servicio de Farmacia Hospitalaria, Virgen de la Arrixaca University Clinical Hospital (HCUVA), Biomedical Research Institute of Murcia (IMIB), Ctra. Madrid-Cartagena, s/n, 30120, El Palmar, Murcia, Spain.
| | - O Lozano-Caballero
- Headache Unit, Virgen de la Arrixaca University Clinical Hospital (HCUVA), Murcia, Spain
| | - S Martín-Balbuena
- Headache Unit, Virgen de la Arrixaca University Clinical Hospital (HCUVA), Murcia, Spain
| | - C Lucas-Ródenas
- Headache Unit, Virgen de la Arrixaca University Clinical Hospital (HCUVA), Murcia, Spain
| | - A Mancebo-González
- Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics Research Group, Servicio de Farmacia Hospitalaria, Virgen de la Arrixaca University Clinical Hospital (HCUVA), Biomedical Research Institute of Murcia (IMIB), Ctra. Madrid-Cartagena, s/n, 30120, El Palmar, Murcia, Spain
| | - I De Gorostiza-Frías
- Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics Research Group, Servicio de Farmacia Hospitalaria, Virgen de la Arrixaca University Clinical Hospital (HCUVA), Biomedical Research Institute of Murcia (IMIB), Ctra. Madrid-Cartagena, s/n, 30120, El Palmar, Murcia, Spain
| | - C M González-Ponce
- Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics Research Group, Servicio de Farmacia Hospitalaria, Virgen de la Arrixaca University Clinical Hospital (HCUVA), Biomedical Research Institute of Murcia (IMIB), Ctra. Madrid-Cartagena, s/n, 30120, El Palmar, Murcia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Nisar MR, Kotha R, Saad-Omer SI, Singh S, Olayinka OT, Orelus J, Yu AK. Exploring Erenumab's Efficacy and Safety for Migraine Prevention in Real-World Settings: A Systematic Review. Cureus 2024; 16:e65571. [PMID: 39192922 PMCID: PMC11349244 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.65571] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2024] [Accepted: 07/28/2024] [Indexed: 08/29/2024] Open
Abstract
Migraine causes debilitating headaches and significantly impacts quality of life. Effective migraine-specific treatments have been lacking until the advent of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptors, which have expanded therapy options for migraine treatment. This study explores the short- and long-term efficacy and safety of erenumab in migraine treatment. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 criteria guided this systematic review. Five databases - PubMed, PubMed Central, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, and Sage Journal - were searched for published, freely accessible, full-text articles in English from the past five years. Eligible patients included those with episodic or chronic migraines who received erenumab intervention. From an initial search yielding 680 relevant studies, 12 prospective observational cohort studies were selected after assessing the risk of bias through the Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies. All included studies demonstrated a significant reduction in monthly migraine days (MMDs) by the end of the treatment period, with mild adverse effects observed. No significant short-term or long-term safety concerns were identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mah Rukh Nisar
- Neurology, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences and Psychology, Fairfield, USA
| | - Rudrani Kotha
- Internal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences and Psychology, Fairfield, USA
| | - Sabaa I Saad-Omer
- Internal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences and Psychology, Fairfield, USA
| | - Shivani Singh
- Internal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences and Psychology, Fairfield, USA
| | - Oluwatoba T Olayinka
- Clinical Sciences, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences and Psychology, Fairfield, USA
| | - Jaslin Orelus
- Emergency Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences and Psychology, Fairfield, USA
| | - Ann Kashmer Yu
- Internal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences and Psychology, Fairfield, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Zhao YJ, Ong JJY, Sonu SK, Dang J, Ng CC, Herr KJ, Bose R, Jion YI. A real-world prospective observational study of eptinezumab in Asian patients with migraine. Headache 2024; 64:810-824. [PMID: 38785386 DOI: 10.1111/head.14737] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2023] [Revised: 03/28/2024] [Accepted: 04/01/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the real-world effectiveness of eptinezumab for migraine prevention in Asian patients. BACKGROUND Eptinezumab is a monoclonal antibody that targets calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), a potent vasodilator with an important role in migraine pathophysiology. Although there is robust clinical evidence from pivotal Phase 3 placebo-controlled trials of the efficacy of eptinezumab for migraine prevention, there are limited data on the real-world effectiveness of eptinezumab in Asian patient cohorts. METHODS This was a non-interventional, prospective, multisite cohort study of adults with migraine (International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition criteria) in Singapore who were prescribed eptinezumab (100 mg at baseline and Month 3, administered intravenously) and were followed until Month 6. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in monthly migraine days (MMDs) at Month 3 and Month 6. Secondary endpoints were ≥30% and ≥50% responder rates, and change from baseline in the Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6), Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS), Migraine-Specific Quality of Life (MSQ), patient-identified most bothersome symptom (PI-MBS), acute medication use at Month 3 and Month 6, and safety. RESULTS Enrolled patients (completed = 29/30) had on average 3.4 (SD 2.9) previous preventive treatments; 29/30 of the patients had trialed at least one previous preventive treatment without benefit. Most had previously trialed oral preventives (87%, 26/30) and anti-CGRP (70%, 21/30). Relative to baseline, mean MMDs decreased by 4.3 days (95% CI 2.1-6.4; p < 0.001) at Month 3 and 4.9 days (95% CI 2.1-7.7; p < 0.001) at Month 6. At Month 3 and Month 6, 14/30 (47%) and 15/29 (52%) of the patients were ≥30% responders, and 6/30 (20%) and 8/29 (28%) patients were ≥50% responders, respectively. The number of patients with severe life impairment based on the HIT-6 score (total score 60-78) decreased from 24/30 (80%) at baseline to 19/30 (63%) at Month 3 and 19/29 (66%) at Month 6. The mean MIDAS score decreased by 24.6 points (95% CI 2.82-46.38; p = 0.028) at Month 6, and the mean MSQ score increased by 12.2 points (95% CI 5.18-19.20; p = 0.001) at Month 3 and 13.6 points (95% CI 4.58-22.66; p = 0.004) at Month 6. Most patients reported improvement in the PI-MBS at Month 3 (73%, 22/30) and Month 6 (55%, 16/29). Acute medication use for headache relief decreased by 3.3 days/month (95% CI 1.0-5.6; p = 0.007) at Month 3 and 4.7 days/month (95% CI 1.7-7.7; p = 0.003) at Month 6. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported in 16/30 (54%) patients, mostly mild/moderate in severity. No serious TEAEs led to treatment discontinuation. CONCLUSION Quarterly eptinezumab administration was effective and well-tolerated in Asian patients with chronic migraine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi Jing Zhao
- Mount Elizabeth Medical Centre, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Jonathan Jia Yuan Ong
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
- YLL School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Sumit Kumar Sonu
- Department of Neurology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Neurology, National Neuroscience Institute, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Jiaojiao Dang
- Department of Neurology, National Neuroscience Institute, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Chai Ching Ng
- Department of Neurology, National Neuroscience Institute, Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - Rohini Bose
- Lundbeck Singapore Pte. Ltd., Singapore, Singapore
| | - Yasmin Idu Jion
- Department of Neurology, National Neuroscience Institute, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Oliveira R, Gil-Gouveia R, Puledda F. CGRP-targeted medication in chronic migraine - systematic review. J Headache Pain 2024; 25:51. [PMID: 38575868 PMCID: PMC10996229 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-024-01753-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2023] [Accepted: 03/18/2024] [Indexed: 04/06/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic migraine is a highly debilitating condition that is often difficult to manage, particularly in the presence of medication overuse headache. Drugs targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), or its receptor have shown promising results in treating this disorder. METHODS We searched Pubmed and Embase to identify randomized clinical trials and real-world studies reporting on the use of medication targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide in patients with chronic migraine. RESULTS A total of 270 records were identified. Nineteen studies qualified for the qualitative analysis. Most studies reported on monoclonal antibodies targeting CGRP (anti-CGRP mAbs), that overall prove to be effective in decreasing monthly migraine days by half in about 27.6-61.4% of the patients. Conversion from chronic to episodic migraine was seen in 40.88% of the cases, and 29-88% of the patients stopped medication overuse. Obesity seems to be the main negative predictor of response to anti-CGRP mAbs. There is no evidence to suggest the superiority of one anti-CGRP mAb. Despite the lack of strong evidence, the combination of anti-CGRP medication with onabotulinumtoxinA in chronic migraine is likely to bring benefits for resistant cases. Atogepant is the first gepant to demonstrate a significant decrease in monthly migraine days compared to placebo in a recent trial. Further, anti-CGRP mAb and gepants have a good safety profile. CONCLUSION There is strong evidence from randomized trials and real-world data to suggest that drugs targeting CGRP are a safe and effective treatment for chronic migraine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renato Oliveira
- Headache Group, Wolfson SPaRRC, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, SE5 9PJ, UK
- Neurology Department, Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Raquel Gil-Gouveia
- Hospital da Luz Headache Center, Neurology Department, Hospital da Luz Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
- Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Health, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Francesca Puledda
- Headache Group, Wolfson SPaRRC, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, SE5 9PJ, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Suzuki K, Suzuki S, Shiina T, Haruyama Y, Kobayashi S, Shioda M, Hirata K. Real-world effectiveness of erenumab in Japanese patients with migraine. Heliyon 2024; 10:e26568. [PMID: 38420497 PMCID: PMC10900787 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26568] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2023] [Revised: 01/18/2024] [Accepted: 02/15/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Real-world evidence of erenumab effectiveness in migraine patients in Asia with various comorbidities and multiple previous medication failures is still limited. Methods A 6-month single-center cohort study of 45 patients with episodic or chronic migraine (CM) treated with erenumab was conducted. In the cohort, 60.0% were switching from other calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies (CGRP mAbs), and 66.7% had ≥4 prophylaxis failures. The change in monthly migraine days (MMDs) from baseline and percentages of responders after treatment were calculated. Weekly migraine days (WMDs) were obtained at baseline and at months 1, 2 and 3 and were compared between weeks 2 and 4. Results In total, 36%, 47%, and 63% of patients had a ≥30% response at 1, 3, and 6 months, respectively. The cumulative percentage of patients achieving a ≥30% response over 6 months was 85%. Early responders (average ≥ 30% response at 1-3 months) accounted for 37.8%, 55.6%, and 25.9% of the total, CGRP mAb-naïve, and CGRP mAb-switching groups, respectively. Late responders (average < 30% response at 1-3 months and average ≥ 30% response at 4-6 months) accounted for 46.4%, 37.5%, and 58.8% of nonearly responders in the total, CGRP mAb-naïve, and CGRP mAb-switching groups, respectively. Mild adverse reactions were observed in 5 patients (11.1%). Wearing-off, defined as an increase in the number of WMDs ≥2 between week 2 and week 4, was observed in 2.4-12.5% at months 1-3. Conclusion Erenumab was effective in migraine patients. At least 4-6 months may be preferable for efficacy evaluation in patients switching to erenumab from other CGRP mAbs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keisuke Suzuki
- Department of Neurology, Dokkyo Medical University, Japan
| | - Shiho Suzuki
- Department of Neurology, Dokkyo Medical University, Japan
| | | | - Yasuo Haruyama
- Integrated Research Faculty for Advanced Medical Sciences, Dokkyo Medical University, Japan
| | - Saro Kobayashi
- Department of Neurology, Dokkyo Medical University, Japan
| | - Mukuto Shioda
- Department of Neurology, Dokkyo Medical University, Japan
| | - Koichi Hirata
- Department of Neurology, Dokkyo Medical University, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Moskatel LS, Graber-Naidich A, He Z, Zhang N. The introduction of the CGRP monoclonal antibodies and their effect on the prescription patterns of chronic migraine preventive medications in a tertiary headache center: A retrospective, observational analysis. Headache 2024; 64:188-194. [PMID: 37882379 DOI: 10.1111/head.14642] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2023] [Revised: 09/04/2023] [Accepted: 09/10/2023] [Indexed: 10/27/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the effect of the introduction of the calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies (CGRP mAbs) in 2018 on the prescribing of older medications for the prevention of chronic migraine. BACKGROUND Prior to 2018, the preventive treatment of migraine borrowed from medications intended to treat other illnesses with the last medication, onabotulinumtoxinA, receiving Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for the prevention of chronic migraine in 2010. The FDA approval of three CGRP mAbs in 2018 provided the ideal natural experiment to assess how the introduction of these medications, and a fourth in 2020, affected the generally stable migraine preventive medications market. METHODS We performed a retrospective cohort analysis using the aggregated de-identified data of 6595 patients. The percentage of patients with chronic migraine who had been prescribed one of ten most prescribed oral preventive medications or onabotulinumtoxinA, or any of the four CGRP mAbs, were calculated relative to the total number of patients with chronic migraine who received a prescription for any medication from our clinic during the pre-CGRP mAb years of 2015-2017 and post-approval years of 2019-2021. RESULTS We observed a statistically significant decrease in the prescription of the top 10 most prescribed medications after the introduction of the CGRP mAbs overall (1456/3144, 46.3%, to 1995/4629, 43.1%, p = 0.001), as well as with most individual medications, including large decreases in verapamil (230/3144, 7.3%, to 125/4629, 2.7%; p < 0.001), the tricyclic antidepressants (494/3144, 15.7%, to 532/4629, 11.5%; p < 0.001), topiramate (566/3144, 18.0%, to 653/4629, 14.1%; p < 0.001), and onabotulinumtoxinA (861/3144, 27.4%, to 1134/4629, 24.5%; p = 0.001). CONCLUSION The introduction of the CGRP mAbs during 2018 resulted in a decrease in utilization of most oral medications and onabotulinumtoxinA for the prevention of migraine. Future work should continue to observe how the prescription patterns of these medications evolve with time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leon S Moskatel
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Anna Graber-Naidich
- Quantitative Sciences Unit, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Zihuai He
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
- Quantitative Sciences Unit, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Niushen Zhang
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Zovi A, Langella R, Aloisi AC, De Giorgio C, Del Vecchio M, Dondi C, Handschin G, Lauria C, Marchetti C, Martinazzoli O, Nozza R, Scalzi V, Tratta E, Jemos C, Lasala R. Real-World Effectiveness of Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide-Binding Monoclonal Antibodies for Migraine Prevention: A Systematic Review. Can J Hosp Pharm 2024; 77:e3382. [PMID: 38204506 PMCID: PMC10754415 DOI: 10.4212/cjhp.3382] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2022] [Accepted: 04/04/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024]
Abstract
Background Migraine is a neurological disease with a high incidence. The new anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies (anti-CGRP mAbs) have demonstrated effectiveness in preventing episodic and chronic migraine. Objective To collect evidence of the real-world effectiveness of anti-CGRP mAbs by assessing outcomes such as reduction in monthly migraine days (MMDs), reduction in monthly headache days (MHDs), and percentage of patients having a 50% reduction in MMDs. Data Sources The PubMed database was searched for the period from inception to October 20, 2021. Study Selection and Data Extraction Of interest for this review were studies that evaluated the real-world effectiveness of anti-CGRP mAbs in terms of MMDs and reduction in MHDs. The search terms included "migraine", "monthly migraine days", and various drug names. The data are reported in terms of patients' baseline characteristics and treatment effectiveness. Data Synthesis A total of 46 studies were evaluated, of which 30 (enrolling a total of 4273 patients across 10 countries) were included in the systematic review. The greatest absolute reduction in MMD was from 20.4 at baseline to 10.7 after 3 months of treatment. After 6 months, the greatest absolute difference was 10, relative to baseline. The largest absolute reduction in MHD at 3 months was from 22 to 8, whereas at 6 months, the greatest absolute reduction in MHD was 13. The treatment could be considered clinically effective (≥ 50% reduction in MMDs) for 41% of patients at 3 months and about 44% of patients at 6 months. Conclusions Despite substantial variability in baseline values, this review confirmed the effectiveness of anti-CGRP mAbs, which yielded important clinical reductions in both MMDs and MHDs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Zovi
- , PharmD, is with the Hospital Pharmacy, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Milan, Italy
| | - Roberto Langella
- , PharmD, is with the Lombardy Regional Section of SIFO (Società Italiana de Farmacia Ospedaliera e dei Servizi Farmaceutici delle Aziende Sanitarie), Milan, Italy
| | - Anna Chiara Aloisi
- , PharmD, is with the Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Cosimo De Giorgio
- , PharmD, is with the Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Marta Del Vecchio
- , PharmD, is with the Hospital Pharmacy, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Chiara Dondi
- , PharmD, is with the Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Handschin
- , PharmD, is with the Hospital Pharmacy, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Claudia Lauria
- , PharmD, is with the Hospital Pharmacy, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Carlotta Marchetti
- , PharmD, is with the Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Oscar Martinazzoli
- , PharmD, is with the Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Renata Nozza
- , PharmD, is with the Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Valentina Scalzi
- , PharmD, is with the Hospital Pharmacy, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Elena Tratta
- , PharmD, is with the Hospital Pharmacy, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, Milan, Italy
| | - Costantino Jemos
- , PharmD, is with the Hospital Pharmacy, IRCCS Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milan, Italy
| | - Ruggero Lasala
- , PharmD, is with the Hospital Pharmacy of Corato, Local Health Unit of Bari, Bari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Sun W, Li Y, Xia B, Chen J, Liu Y, Pang J, Liu F, Cheng H. Adverse event reporting of four anti-Calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies for migraine prevention: a real-world study based on the FDA adverse event reporting system. Front Pharmacol 2024; 14:1257282. [PMID: 38264523 PMCID: PMC10803415 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1257282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2023] [Accepted: 12/22/2023] [Indexed: 01/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: Anti-Calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies (anti-CGRP mAbs) have shown significant efficacy in preventing migraine. However, there have been limited reports of adverse events (AEs) after marketing, particularly for eptinezumab launched in 2020. The study aimed to mine and analyze the AE signals with four anti-CGRP mAbs from the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database to gain insights into the safety profile of these medications post-marketing. Methods: All AE reports on the four anti-CGRP mAbs (erenumab, galcanezumab, fremanezumab, and eptinezumab) were retrieved from the FAERS database from the first quarter (Q1) of 2018 to Q1 of 2023. Disproportionality analysis was measured by reporting odd ratio (ROR) and Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN) to identify potential AE signals. Comparisons were made between the four drugs in terms of AEs. Results: A total of 38,515 reports of erenumab, 19,485 reports of galcanezumab, 5,332 reports of fremanezumab, and 2,460 reports of eptinezumab were obtained, mostly reported in the second to third year after launch in the market. The common AEs to erenumab included constipation (17.93%), injection site pain (14.08%), and alopecia (7.23%). The AEs that occurred more frequently with galcanezumab included injection site pain (24.37%), injection site erythema (5.35%), and injection site haemorrhage (4.97%). Common AEs related to fremanezumab were injection site pain (13.10%), injection site erythema (7.02%), and injection site pruritus (5.47%). Fatigue (13.54%), throat irritation (9.02%), and pruritus (8.20%) were the most common AEs with eptinezumab. In addition, there are new AEs that were not listed in the drug instructions but occurred concurrently with multiple drugs, such as Raynaud's phenomenon, weight increase, menstrual disorders, throat tightness, and paraesthesia oral. Conclusion: Common AE signals of the four anti-CGRP mAbs and new AE signals were found to provide a reference for clinical drug selection in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Hua Cheng
- Department of Pharmacy, Beijing Luhe Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Pathak P, Yue L, Gupta S, Fang J, Cheadle MA, Tiwari S, Ferraris M, Joshi P, Thompson J, Shah R, Vo P. Real-world treatment satisfaction with erenumab in migraine: analysis of the US National Health and Wellness Survey. Curr Med Res Opin 2023; 39:1585-1591. [PMID: 36919462 DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2023.2191479] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2022] [Accepted: 03/13/2023] [Indexed: 03/16/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The treatment landscape for the prevention of migraine has rapidly evolved in recent years with the advent of calcitonin gene-related peptide therapy, including erenumab. The objective of this study was to assess patient-reported treatment satisfaction among erenumab users. METHODS This retrospective, cross-sectional study used data from the 2019 US National Health and Wellness Survey collected during March-July 2019. Respondents self-reporting physician-diagnosed migraine and currently using erenumab were analyzed. Treatment satisfaction was measured on a seven-point Likert scale. Data were further reported by the duration of erenumab treatment. Data on respondents' socio-demographic characteristics and treatment patterns were also collected. RESULTS Overall, 67 respondents using erenumab with or without other migraine preventives for up to 1 year were included in the analysis. The mean (standard deviation) age was 46.7 (12.9) years. Most of the respondents were women (86.6%), White (74.6%), and commercially-insured (67.2%). Notably, 40.3% had ≥1 comorbidity per the Charlson Comorbidity Index. Approximately half of the respondents were college graduates and employed (49.3% each). Among the 67 respondents, 46 received erenumab exclusively. Across both cohorts, the percentage of respondents who were satisfied with erenumab treatment was slightly higher among those with a longer treatment duration (overall erenumab cohort: 63.6%, 69.6%, and 75.8% for 0-<3, 3-<6, and 6-12 months, respectively; erenumab monotherapy cohort: 62.5%, 71.4%, and 87.5% for 0-<3, 3-<6, and 6-12 months, respectively). Treatment patterns before switching to erenumab revealed that most respondents had used ≥1 preventive treatment for migraine (80.6%; 54/67), over two-thirds (33/54) of whom had ≥2 treatment failures owing to nonresponse. CONCLUSION Satisfaction was high among long-term erenumab users, indicating that those using erenumab for a longer duration are more satisfied. Furthermore, this study provided insights on the basic socio-demographics, disease characteristics, and health behaviors of erenumab users as well as their treatment patterns before switching to erenumab.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Parth Joshi
- Novartis Healthcare Pvt. Ltd, Hyderabad, India
| | | | | | - Pamela Vo
- Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Alsaadi T, Kayed DM, Al-Madani A, Hassan AM, Terruzzi A, Krieger D, Riachi N, Sarathchandran P, Al-Rukn S. Consensus-Based Recommendations on the Use of CGRP-Based Therapies for Migraine Prevention in the UAE. Neurol Ther 2023; 12:1845-1865. [PMID: 37792218 PMCID: PMC10630270 DOI: 10.1007/s40120-023-00550-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2023] [Accepted: 09/19/2023] [Indexed: 10/05/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Migraine is a common debilitating neurological disorder affecting a large proportion of the general population. Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), a 37-amino acid neuropeptide, plays a key role in the pathophysiology of migraine, and the development of therapies targeting the anti-CGRP pathway has revolutionized the field of migraine treatment. METHODS An expert task force of neurologists in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) developed and critically assessed recommendations on the use of CGRP-based therapies in migraine treatment and management in the UAE, based on available published literature. A consensus was reached for each statement by means of an open-voting process, based on a predefined agreement level of at least 60%. RESULTS The consensus recommendations advocate the need for guidelines for the appropriate use of CGRP-based therapies by defining patient cohorts and appropriate monitoring of therapeutic response as well as standardizing the initiation, assessment, and cessation of treatment. The consensus recommendations were primarily formulated on the basis of international studies, because of the limited availability of regional and local data. As such, they may also act as guidelines for global healthcare providers. CONCLUSIONS These are the first consensus recommendations for the UAE that address the use of CGRP-based therapies in the treatment and management of migraine, integrating both clinical evidence and medical expertise to enhance clinical judgment and decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taoufik Alsaadi
- Department of Neurology, American Center for Psychiatry and Neurology, Abu Dhabi, UAE.
| | - Deeb M Kayed
- Neurology Department, Mediclinic City Hospital, Dubai, UAE
| | | | | | | | - Derk Krieger
- Neurology Department, Mediclinic Parkview Hospital, Dubai, UAE
| | - Naji Riachi
- Sheikh Shakhbout Medical City, Khalifa University College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Abu Dhabi, UAE
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Tepper SJ, Schwedt TJ, Vo P, Thompson J, Joshi P, Abdrabboh A, Ferraris M, Tiwari S. Healthcare costs and resource utilization in patients with migraine treated with erenumab: A retrospective, non-interventional study using claims data from the United States. Headache 2023; 63:1423-1436. [PMID: 37655551 DOI: 10.1111/head.14612] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2023] [Revised: 07/19/2023] [Accepted: 07/25/2023] [Indexed: 09/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess healthcare costs and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) among adult patients who newly initiated erenumab in the United States. METHODS This retrospective, non-interventional analysis included adult patients (aged ≥18 years) newly initiating erenumab and who had three consecutive monthly claims for erenumab (11/1/2017-9/1/2019) from the Komodo Health database. Outcomes included migraine-related and all-cause costs, use of other preventive/acute migraine medications, and HCRU. All outcomes were compared during the 180-day pre- versus the 180-day post-index periods. Cost outcomes were also assessed for longer periods including post-index Days 91-270 and monthly mean post-index costs for the longest time of continuous insurance enrollment. RESULTS Overall, 1839 patients with migraine were included for analysis. Compared to the 180-day pre-index period, an increase in total migraine-related costs (+$2639; p < 0.0001), migraine-related prescription costs (+$3435, p < 0.0001), all-cause total costs (+$2977; p < 0.001), and all-cause prescription costs (+$4102; p < 0.0001) were observed during the 180-day post-index period after adjusting for covariates. Conversely, reduction in migraine-related medical costs (-$896; p < 0.0001), and significantly lower odds of migraine-related emergency room visits (odds ratio [OR] 0.60, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.44-0.82; p = 0.001), migraine-related office visits (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.53-0.64; p < 0.0001), and migraine-related neurologist visits (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.63-0.75; p < 0.0001) were observed during the 180-days post-index period. There were significant decreases in the odds of having overall preventive migraine medications (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.75-0.87; p < 0.0001), acute-migraine medications (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.85-1.00; p = 0.038), and triptan (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.73-0.85; p < 0.0001) during the 180-day post-index period. Sensitivity analyses on cost outcomes found no statistically significant differences in pre-index migraine-related costs compared to post-index migraine-related costs when assessing longer post-index follow-up periods. CONCLUSION Initiation of therapy with a novel treatment is often associated with an increase in overall healthcare costs due to the entrance costs associated with novel therapy. For a chronic condition such as migraine, cost versus health benefits should be evaluated over a long period (e.g., ≥2 years) to better understand the true benefits of therapy. Data from this study suggest that the entrance cost for erenumab, the primary driver of the high post-index prescription costs gets mitigated by reduced medical costs over long-term follow-up. The results indicate better disease management in adult patients with migraine, which should be an important consideration for both patients and payors, as these findings have shown an offset between migraine-related prescription and medical costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stewart J Tepper
- Dartmouth-Hitchcock Department of Neurology, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
| | | | - Pamela Vo
- Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland
| | | | - Parth Joshi
- Novartis Healthcare Pvt. Ltd., Hyderabad, India
| | - Ahmad Abdrabboh
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, New Jersey, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Hyeraci G, Paoletti O, Iannone LF, Gini R, De Cesaris F, Geppetti P, Roberto G. Patterns of anti-CGRP mAbs use and variation of triptan consumption following treatment initiation: A descriptive drug utilization study in the Tuscany region, Italy. Headache 2023; 63:1391-1402. [PMID: 37830925 DOI: 10.1111/head.14639] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2023] [Revised: 09/07/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 10/14/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe the pattern of anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies (anti-CGRP mAbs) utilization in the Tuscany region, Italy, and the variation of triptan consumption after treatment initiation. BACKGROUND Given the recent commercialization of anti-CGRP mAbs as migraine preventive medications, real-world evidence on their patterns of utilization and their impact on migraine abortive medication use is still limited. METHODS A retrospective, descriptive, cohort study on the real-world utilization of anti-CGRP mAbs was performed using the population-based regional administrative database of Tuscany. Patients with ≥1 anti-CGRP mAb dispensing (namely erenumab, galcanezumab, fremanezumab) between April 1, 2019, and September 30, 2021, were identified. The first dispensing was the cohort entry (CE). New users (NUs) were patients with no anti-CGRP mAb dispensing before CE. Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves were plotted to describe the cumulative probability of remaining with the initial anti-CGRP mAb during a 15-month follow-up period as a measure of treatment persistence. Among NUs with ≥2 triptan dispensings during the 6 months before CE (i.e., baseline), the mean monthly number of triptan dosage units dispensed was measured in five consecutive follow-up time windows (months 1-3, 4-6, 7-9, 10-12, 13-15) and the difference from the baseline was calculated. RESULTS A total of 624 NUs (erenumab = 295, galcanezumab = 223, fremanezumab = 106) were identified, of whom 188 (78%) were women. Mean age was 49.2 years (standard deviation [SD] = 12.6). The survival to discontinuation at 6, 12, and 15 months was about 69%, 48%, and 6%, respectively. The survival to switch was about 6% at 15 months. The observed variation of triptan consumption at 3/6/9/12/15 months and the corresponding SD was -4.4 [8.2]/-5.2 [9.0]/-5.5 [9.2]/-5.4 [9.2]/-4.5 [10.0], respectively. CONCLUSION Patient demographics reflect the place of these medications in therapy. Overall, findings seem to indicate a favorable tolerability and effectiveness profile. Further studies are warranted to better establish the long-term comparative effectiveness, safety, and cost effectiveness of anti-CGRP mAbs compared to other preventive medications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulia Hyeraci
- Agenzia regionale di sanità della Toscana (ARS), Florence, Italy
| | - Olga Paoletti
- Agenzia regionale di sanità della Toscana (ARS), Florence, Italy
| | - Luigi Francesco Iannone
- Section of Clinical Pharmacology and Oncology, Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Headache Centre, Department of Health Sciences, Careggi University Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Rosa Gini
- Agenzia regionale di sanità della Toscana (ARS), Florence, Italy
| | - Francesco De Cesaris
- Headache Centre, Department of Health Sciences, Careggi University Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Pierangelo Geppetti
- Section of Clinical Pharmacology and Oncology, Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Headache Centre, Department of Health Sciences, Careggi University Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Roberto
- Agenzia regionale di sanità della Toscana (ARS), Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Moskatel LS, Zhang N. The Role of Step Therapy in the Treatment of Migraine. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2023; 27:571-577. [PMID: 37542597 DOI: 10.1007/s11916-023-01155-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/16/2023] [Indexed: 08/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This review examines recent evidence and applies bioethical principles to evaluate the benefits and risks of using step therapy in the treatment of migraine. RECENT FINDINGS With the CGRP mAbs, gepants, and lasmiditan now on the market for up to 5 years, new research, including network meta-analyses and long-term use studies, can evaluate the comparative efficacy, tolerability, and adherence of these medications relative to older acute and preventive medications for the treatment of migraine. Deciding how medications are chosen for patients requires accounting for many factors including sustainability, efficacy, tolerability, and preference. Newer research can help give clarity on the appropriateness of gating certain treatment options behind others.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leon S Moskatel
- Division of Headache, Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, 211 Quarry Road, Suite #206, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA.
| | - Niushen Zhang
- Division of Headache, Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, 211 Quarry Road, Suite #206, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Ferreira VL, Mainka FF, Wiens A, Pontarolo R. Effectiveness of Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Monoclonal Antibodies in the Prevention of Migraine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Cohort Studies. Clin Drug Investig 2023; 43:669-680. [PMID: 37665501 DOI: 10.1007/s40261-023-01301-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/13/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Migraine is a neurological disorder characterized by episodes of moderate-to-severe headache. The emergence of drugs derived from monoclonal antibodies specific for the calcitonin gene has brought forth a therapeutic option for patients in whom the traditional treatments have failed. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of calcitonin gene-related peptide antibodies in the prevention of migraine through a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational cohort studies. METHODS A literature search for evidence was performed in electronic databases for observational studies that evaluated adult patients with migraine receiving calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonists (e.g. erenumab, fremanezumab, galcanezumab and eptinezumab) and reported effectiveness outcomes (mean reduction in monthly migraine/headache days, and proportion of patients with 50% or greater reduction in migraine/headache days). RESULTS During the screening process, 47 records were included for data extraction and qualitative and quantitative analyses. The overall rate of patients with a reduction of at least 50% of mean monthly migraine days was 54% (95% CI 49-59%), and overall mean monthly migraine reduction was about 7.7 days (95% CI 8.4-7.0 days). Regarding the outcome ≥ 50% reduction in mean monthly headache reduction, the overall rate of patients with a reduction of at least 50% was 57% (95% CI 48-64%), and the overall mean monthly headache reduction was approximately 8.8 days (95% CI 10.1-7.5 days). Subgroup analyses considering the drug treatment used and type of migraine were consistent with previous results. CONCLUSIONS The use of calcitonin gene-related peptide antibodies in real-world studies to prevent migraine demonstrates promising effectiveness outcomes, in agreement with those reported in previously published randomized clinical trial reports.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vinicius L Ferreira
- Department of Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical Sciences Postgraduate Programme, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Av. Pref. Lothario Meissner, 632, Curitiba, Parana, Brazil
| | - Felipe F Mainka
- Department of Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical Sciences Postgraduate Programme, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Av. Pref. Lothario Meissner, 632, Curitiba, Parana, Brazil
| | - Astrid Wiens
- Department of Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical Sciences Postgraduate Programme, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Av. Pref. Lothario Meissner, 632, Curitiba, Parana, Brazil
| | - Roberto Pontarolo
- Department of Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical Sciences Postgraduate Programme, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Av. Pref. Lothario Meissner, 632, Curitiba, Parana, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Lambru G, Caponnetto V, Hill B, Ratti S, Sacco S, Murphy M, Briscoe J, Andreou AP. Long-Term Effect of Switching From an Anti-CGRP Receptor to an Anti-CGRP Ligand Antibody in Treatment-Refractory Chronic Migraine: A Prospective Real-World Analysis. Neurotherapeutics 2023; 20:1284-1293. [PMID: 37430146 PMCID: PMC10480365 DOI: 10.1007/s13311-023-01394-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/21/2023] [Indexed: 07/12/2023] Open
Abstract
In migraine patients with a poor response to a calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibody against the receptor, switching to a calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies against the ligand may be beneficial. This was a long-term real-world prospective analysis conducted in treatment-refractory chronic migraine patients coming from two large tertiary referral headache centres, who did not achieve a meaningful response to erenumab and were switched to fremanezumab. Responders to fremanezumab were considered those who achieved at least 30% reduction in monthly migraine days by month 3, compared to the post-erenumab baseline. Secondary efficacy and disability outcomes were analysed. Thirty-nine patients (female n = 32, 82.1%; median age: 49 years old, IQR = 29.0-56.0) were included. After three months of treatment with fremanezumab, ten out of 39 patients (25.6%) were considered responders. Four of the 11 patients who continued fremanezumab became responders at month 6, increasing the number of responders to 14 patients (35.9%). Responders received a median of 12 injections (IQR = 9.0-18.0) at the time of the analysis. After the last treatment, 13 patients (33.3%) remained responders. The number of mean monthly migraine days significantly decreased from 21.4 at baseline (IQR = 10.7-30.0) to 8.6 (IQR = 3.8-13.9) at the last follow-up. Painkillers intake and HIT-6 score were significantly reduced at the last follow-up. About 1/3 of patients with treatment refractory chronic migraine who have a disappointing response to erenumab and switch to fremanezumab, obtained a meaningful and sustained improvement of their migraine load over time, supporting the appropriateness of this therapeutic approach in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giorgio Lambru
- The Headache and Facial Pain Service, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
- Wolfson CARD, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, United Kingdom, London, UK.
| | - Valeria Caponnetto
- The Headache and Facial Pain Service, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Department of Applied Clinical Sciences and Biotechnology, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Bethany Hill
- The Headache and Facial Pain Service, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Susanna Ratti
- Department of Applied Clinical Sciences and Biotechnology, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Simona Sacco
- Department of Applied Clinical Sciences and Biotechnology, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Madeleine Murphy
- The Headache and Facial Pain Service, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Jessica Briscoe
- The Headache and Facial Pain Service, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Anna P Andreou
- The Headache and Facial Pain Service, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Headache Research‑Wolfson CARD, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Alpuente A, Torre-Sune A, Caronna E, Gine-Cipres E, Torres-Ferrús M, Pozo-Rosich P. Impact of anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies on migraine attack accompanying symptoms: A real-world evidence study. Cephalalgia 2023; 43:3331024231177636. [PMID: 37555331 DOI: 10.1177/03331024231177636] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinical trials on anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies poorly investigated their impact on migraine accompanying symptoms. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the impact of basal accompanying symptoms on anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies treatment response and their evolution after six months of treatment in migraine patients. METHODS Patients with migraine diagnosis seen in the Headache Clinic and treated with erenumab, galcanezumab or fremanezumab were prospectively recruited. They completed a daily eDiary which provided data on headache frequency and the following accompanying symptoms of each day: photophobia, phonophobia, nausea, dizziness, and aura. Patients were classified as responders or non-responders based on 50% or greater reduction in headache days per month at month 6 (≥50% response rate). Accompanying symptoms ratios based on headache days per month were assessed per patient at baseline and after three and six months. Comparisons for basal characteristics, basal accompanying symptoms ratios and their evolution after six months between responders and non-responders were performed. RESULTS One hundred and fifty-eight patients were included, 44% (69/158) showed ≥50% response rate after six months. A significant reduction in headache days per month in both groups was found at month 6 (-9.4 days/month in ≥50% response rate group; p < 0.001, -2.2 days/month in <50% response rate group; p = 0.004). Additionally, significant decreases in photophobia (-19.5%, p < 0.001), phonophobia (-12.1%, p = 0.010) and aura ratios (-25.1%, p = 0.008) were found in ≥50% response rate group. No statistically significant reductions were found in nausea and dizziness in any group since their reduction was correlated with the decrease in headache days per month. Higher photophobia ratios at baseline were predictive of an increased response between months 3 and 6 (Incidence Risk Ratio = 0.928, p = 0.040). CONCLUSIONS The days per month with photophobia, phonophobia and aura decreased at a higher rate than headache days per month after six months in the ≥50% response group. Higher photophobia ratios were associated with higher response rates between three and six months. It could indicate an involvement of peripheral CGRP in photophobia as well as a central modulation of migraine through these treatments which mainly act on the periphery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alicia Alpuente
- Headache Clinic, Neurology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Departament de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Anna Torre-Sune
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Departament de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Edoardo Caronna
- Headache Clinic, Neurology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Departament de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Eulalia Gine-Cipres
- Headache Clinic, Neurology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marta Torres-Ferrús
- Headache Clinic, Neurology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Departament de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Patricia Pozo-Rosich
- Headache Clinic, Neurology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Departament de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Hong JB, Lange KS, Overeem LH, Triller P, Raffaelli B, Reuter U. A Scoping Review and Meta-Analysis of Anti-CGRP Monoclonal Antibodies: Predicting Response. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2023; 16:934. [PMID: 37513846 PMCID: PMC10385131 DOI: 10.3390/ph16070934] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2023] [Revised: 06/15/2023] [Accepted: 06/23/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Calcitonin gene-related peptide-targeted monoclonal antibodies (CGRP mAbs) are increasingly being used as preventive treatments for migraine. Their effectiveness and safety were established through numerous randomized placebo-controlled trials and real-world studies, yet a significant proportion of patients do not respond to this treatment, and currently, there is a lack of accepted predictors of response to guide expectations, as data from studies so far are lacking and inconsistent. We searched Embase and MEDLINE databases for studies reporting on predictors of response to CGRP and/or CGRP-receptor (CGRP-R) mAbs, defined as a 30% or 50% reduction in monthly headache or migraine days at varying durations of follow-up. Quantitative synthesis was performed where applicable. We found 38 real-world studies that investigated the association between various predictors and response rates. Based on these studies, good response to triptans and unilateral pain with or without unilateral autonomic symptoms are predictors of a good response to CGRP(-R) mAbs. Conversely, obesity, interictal allodynia, the presence of daily headaches, a higher number of non-successful previous prophylactic medications, and psychiatric comorbidities including depression are predictive of a poor response to CGRP(-R) mAbs. Future studies should confirm these results and help to generate more tailored treatment strategies in patients with migraine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ja Bin Hong
- Department of Neurology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Humboldt University and Free University Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Kristin Sophie Lange
- Department of Neurology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Humboldt University and Free University Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Lucas Hendrik Overeem
- Department of Neurology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Humboldt University and Free University Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
- Doctoral Program, International Graduate Program Medical Neurosciences, Humboldt Graduate School, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Paul Triller
- Department of Neurology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Humboldt University and Free University Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Bianca Raffaelli
- Department of Neurology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Humboldt University and Free University Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
- Clinician Scientist Program, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité (BIH), 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Uwe Reuter
- Department of Neurology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Humboldt University and Free University Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
- Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, 17475 Greifswald, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Pilati L, Torrente A, Di Marco S, Ferlisi S, Notaro G, Romano M, Alonge P, Vassallo L, Ferraù L, Autunno M, Grugno R, Camarda C, Brighina F. Erenumab and Possible CGRP Effect on Chronotype in Chronic Migraine: A Real-Life Study of 12 Months Treatment. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12103585. [PMID: 37240692 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12103585] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2023] [Revised: 05/15/2023] [Accepted: 05/19/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023] Open
Abstract
The introduction of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) directed against the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), or its receptor (CGRPr), revolutionized migraine management due to their high efficacy and few side effects. Data suggest that the CGRP may even be implicated in circadian rhythm, but studies about the effect of anti-CGRP treatments on sleep are still lacking. The aim of the present study was to assess the effect of erenumab (70 and 140 mg per month), a human mAb directed against CGRPr, on chronotype in chronic migraineurs; secondly, we assessed its efficacy, safety, and the effects on anxiety and depression. Sleep was evaluated using self-administrable questionnaires investigating chronotype, sleep quality, and daytime sleepiness. Migraine diaries and several self-administrable questionnaires regarding headache impact and psychological correlates were evaluated every 3 months during 12 months of treatment. Eighty-eight patients were included; most of them showed a significant reduction in headache frequency and an improvement in psychological symptoms. Moreover, an initial change in chronotype was observed at the three-month assessment from a morning chronotype to an intermediate one; a similar trend remained in the other evaluations, even if it did not reach a statistical significance. Lastly, patients who responded to the treatment showed a progressive sleep efficiency reduction. The present real-life study hypothesized the influence of erenumab on chronotype, representing a link between circadian rhythm, CGRP, and migraine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Pilati
- Department of Biomedicine, Neurosciences and Advanced Diagnostics (Bi.N.D.), University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy
- Headache Center "Casa della Salute Cittadella San Rocco", Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale di Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy
| | - Angelo Torrente
- Department of Biomedicine, Neurosciences and Advanced Diagnostics (Bi.N.D.), University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy
| | - Salvatore Di Marco
- Department of Biomedicine, Neurosciences and Advanced Diagnostics (Bi.N.D.), University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy
- Headache Center "Casa della Salute Cittadella San Rocco", Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale di Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy
| | - Salvatore Ferlisi
- Department of Biomedicine, Neurosciences and Advanced Diagnostics (Bi.N.D.), University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy
- Azienda Sanitaria Locale di Collegno e Pinerolo, 10093 Collegno, Italy
| | - Giulia Notaro
- Department of Biomedicine, Neurosciences and Advanced Diagnostics (Bi.N.D.), University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy
| | - Marika Romano
- Department of Biomedicine, Neurosciences and Advanced Diagnostics (Bi.N.D.), University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy
| | - Paolo Alonge
- Department of Biomedicine, Neurosciences and Advanced Diagnostics (Bi.N.D.), University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy
| | - Lavinia Vassallo
- Department of Biomedicine, Neurosciences and Advanced Diagnostics (Bi.N.D.), University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy
| | - Ludovica Ferraù
- U.O.S.D. Stroke Unit, A.O.U. "G. Martino", 98124 Messina, Italy
| | - Massimo Autunno
- Centro Regionale Cefalee, U.O.C. Neurologia e Malattie Neuromuscolari, A.O.U. "G. Martino", 98124 Messina, Italy
| | - Rosario Grugno
- U.O.C. Neurologia, I.R.C.C.S. Centro Neurolesi "Bonino Pulejo", 98124 Messina, Italy
| | - Cecilia Camarda
- Department of Biomedicine, Neurosciences and Advanced Diagnostics (Bi.N.D.), University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy
| | - Filippo Brighina
- Department of Biomedicine, Neurosciences and Advanced Diagnostics (Bi.N.D.), University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Torrisi M, Corallo F, Lo Buono V, Di Cara M, Grugno R, Lo Presti R, Quartarone A, De Cola MC. Migraine Treatment Using Erenumab: Can Lead to a Cognitive and Psychological Qualitative Improvement? MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2023; 59:medicina59050936. [PMID: 37241168 DOI: 10.3390/medicina59050936] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2023] [Revised: 04/13/2023] [Accepted: 05/11/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
Migraine is one of the most disabling disorders in the world, associated with poor quality of life. Migraine prevention strategies have increasingly evolved since monoclonal antibodies against the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), or its receptor, were identified. CGRP is the ideal target of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). In particular, erenumab is the mAb that has shown good therapeutic efficacy in reducing pain intensity and having high tolerability. In this study, we aimed to investigate the efficacy of erenumab on both cognitive performance and psychological well-being. This was a pilot study with a retrospective design that included 14 subjects (2 males and 12 females), with a mean age of 52.29 ± 9.62, who attended the Headache and Migraine outpatient clinic of the IRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino-Pulejo of Messina. The evaluation consisted of measuring cognitive and psychological functioning. Comparing clinical and psychometric test scores between baseline and follow-up, we found a significant improvement in both cognitive performance and quality of life. We also observed a decrease in migraine disability. Our findings have shown improvements in global cognitive performance and quality of life in migraine patients taking erenumab.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michele Torrisi
- IRCCS Centro Neurolesi "Bonino-Pulejo" S.S. 113 Via Palermo, C/da Casazza, 98124 Messina, Italy
| | - Francesco Corallo
- IRCCS Centro Neurolesi "Bonino-Pulejo" S.S. 113 Via Palermo, C/da Casazza, 98124 Messina, Italy
| | - Viviana Lo Buono
- IRCCS Centro Neurolesi "Bonino-Pulejo" S.S. 113 Via Palermo, C/da Casazza, 98124 Messina, Italy
| | - Marcella Di Cara
- IRCCS Centro Neurolesi "Bonino-Pulejo" S.S. 113 Via Palermo, C/da Casazza, 98124 Messina, Italy
| | - Rosario Grugno
- IRCCS Centro Neurolesi "Bonino-Pulejo" S.S. 113 Via Palermo, C/da Casazza, 98124 Messina, Italy
| | - Riccardo Lo Presti
- IRCCS Centro Neurolesi "Bonino-Pulejo" S.S. 113 Via Palermo, C/da Casazza, 98124 Messina, Italy
| | - Angelo Quartarone
- IRCCS Centro Neurolesi "Bonino-Pulejo" S.S. 113 Via Palermo, C/da Casazza, 98124 Messina, Italy
| | - Maria Cristina De Cola
- IRCCS Centro Neurolesi "Bonino-Pulejo" S.S. 113 Via Palermo, C/da Casazza, 98124 Messina, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Bagherzadeh-Fard M, Amin Yazdanifar M, Sadeghalvad M, Rezaei N. Erenumab efficacy in migraine headache prophylaxis: A systematic review. Int Immunopharmacol 2023; 117:109366. [PMID: 37012858 DOI: 10.1016/j.intimp.2022.109366] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2022] [Revised: 09/25/2022] [Accepted: 10/15/2022] [Indexed: 03/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This systematic review aims to show the efficiency of Erenumab in the preventive therapy of episodic and chronic migraine, which is still under research. BACKGROUND Migraine is a chronic neurovascular disorder that causes disability and a social burden. There are various medications used for migraine prevention regimens, most of which have unwanted side effects and aren't often quite effective. Erenumab is a monoclonal antibody that targets calcitonin gene-related peptide receptors and was recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration for migraine prevention. METHODS For this systematic review, we searched through Scopus and PubMed databases using "Erenumab" or "AMG 334" and "migraine" as keywords, and all the studies from 2016 to March 18, 2022, were included. Original English articles assessing any outcomes referring to the efficacy of Erenumab in migraine headache treatment were included in this study. RESULTS We found 53 out of 605 papers eligible to be investigated. Erenumab in both dosages of 70 mg and 140 mg could decrease the mean of monthly migraine days and monthly acute migraine-specific medication days. Erenumab also has a higher rate of ≥ 50 %, ≥ 75 %, and 100 % reduction in monthly migraine days from the baseline in different regions. The efficacy of Erenumab was initiated in the first week of administration and sustained throughout and after treatment. Erenumab was also potent in the treatment of migraine with allodynia, aura, prior preventive therapy failure, medication overuse headache, and menstrual migraine. Erenumab also had favorable outcomes in combination therapy with other preventive drugs like Onabotulinumtoxin-A. CONCLUSION Erenumab had remarkable efficacy in the short and long-term treatment of episodic and chronic migraine, notably the patients with difficult-to-treat migraine headaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahsa Bagherzadeh-Fard
- Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran; Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Expert Group (SRMEG), Universal Scientific Education and Research Network (USERN), Tehran, Iran
| | - Mohammad Amin Yazdanifar
- Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran; Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Expert Group (SRMEG), Universal Scientific Education and Research Network (USERN), Tehran, Iran
| | - Mona Sadeghalvad
- Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Expert Group (SRMEG), Universal Scientific Education and Research Network (USERN), Tehran, Iran; Department of Immunology, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Nima Rezaei
- Department of Immunology, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; Network of Immunity in Infection, Malignancy and Autoimmunity (NIIMA), Universal Scientific Education and Research Network (USERN), Tehran,Iran; Research Center for Immunodeficiencies, Children's Medical Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Alpuente A, Torres-Ferrus M, Terwindt GM. Preventive CGRP-targeted therapies for chronic migraine with and without medication-overuse headache. Cephalalgia 2023. [DOI: 10.1177/03331024221150235] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/25/2023]
Abstract
Background: Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) targeted therapies are an important breakthrough in migraine prevention. Randomized clinical trials, post-hoc analyses, and phase IV studies have demonstrated their efficacy and safety in chronic migraine patients, including those with concomitant medication-overuse and medication-overuse headache. Real world evidence studies support these findings and provide realistic endpoints for estimation of effect. Methods and results We have performed a narrative review including results from double-blind placebo-controlled randomized clinical trials and real-world evidence studies regarding efficacy of the CGRP(-receptor) monoclonal antibodies and CGRP-receptor antagonists (gepants) in patients with chronic migraine with concomitant medication overuse (headache). We have included patient profiles and main efficacy endpoints (monthly migraine days, monthly headache days, monthly acute medication days and percentage responder rates). Conclusion The results of this review show that CGRP monoclonal antibodies are effective in chronic migraine patients, also in those with medication overuse (headache). At the time of this review, atogepant clinical trials in chronic migraine have not been communicated. Direct comparative studies are needed for comparison with other treatment options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alicia Alpuente
- Headache Clinic, Neurology Department, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d’Hebron Research Institute, Departament de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marta Torres-Ferrus
- Headache Clinic, Neurology Department, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d’Hebron Research Institute, Departament de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Gisela M. Terwindt
- Department of Neurology, Leiden Headache Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Observational Analysis of the Costs Associated with Acute Treatment of Breakthrough Migraine Attacks in Medicaid Patients Using Preventive Therapies. Adv Ther 2023; 40:1141-1152. [PMID: 36648736 PMCID: PMC9988741 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-022-02386-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Medications for preventive treatment of migraine reduce migraine frequency, usually measured by a reduction in monthly migraine days (MMD), but generally do not eliminate the need for acute treatment. To assess the economic impact of treatment-related reductions in frequency, methodological guidance recommends capturing cost differences along the spectrum of MMD. OBJECTIVE Characterize monthly migraine medication costs along the spectrum of MMD for patients using calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) for prevention. METHODS Medicaid State Drug Utilization Data (SDUD) were used to identify formulations and per-unit costs for oral, intranasal, and parenteral migraine-specific medications for acute and preventive treatment used by fee-for-service (FFS) Medicaid enrollees in 2020. National drug codes of relevant therapies were used to match SDUD to formulation characteristics including substance, route of administration, and branded/generic marketing status. Mean per-unit cost and the formulation's share of total prescriptions were estimated. Monthly medication costs were modeled based on formulations' per-unit costs and frequency of acute medication use during clinical trials of CGRP mAbs. RESULTS In the SDUD, there were 563,338 prescriptions for migraine-specific acute medications; triptans accounted for 97.37%. Triptan formulations prescribed were 83.78% oral tablet, 10.89% orally disintegrating tablet, 2.60% intranasal, and 2.73% parenteral. Dihydroergotamine accounted for < 1% of total prescriptions and had the highest per-unit cost ($443.50, branded intranasal). There were 97,119 prescriptions for CGRP mAbs, the majority for erenumab (45.73%) or galcanezumab (45.24%). Modeled monthly acute and preventive medication costs ranged from approximately $550 in patients with the fewest MMD treated with oral triptans to > $1500 in patients with the most MMD treated with dihydroergotamine. CONCLUSION In consideration of the migraine-specific acute medications used in FFS Medicaid 2020, for patients using CGRP mAbs for prevention, medication costs may vary significantly with the number of breakthrough attacks treated per month and the type of migraine-specific acute therapy used.
Collapse
|
28
|
Raffaelli B, Fitzek M, Overeem LH, Storch E, Terhart M, Reuter U. Clinical evaluation of super-responders vs. non-responders to CGRP(-receptor) monoclonal antibodies: a real-world experience. J Headache Pain 2023; 24:16. [PMID: 36843007 PMCID: PMC9969617 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-023-01552-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2022] [Accepted: 02/14/2023] [Indexed: 02/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinical trials and real-world studies revealed a spectrum of response to CGRP(-receptor) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) in migraine prophylaxis, ranging from no effect at all to total migraine freedom. In this study, we aimed to compare clinical characteristics between super-responders (SR) and non-responders (NR) to CGRP(-receptor) mAbs. METHODS We performed a retrospective cohort study at the Headache Center, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin. The definition of super-response was a ≥ 75% reduction in monthly headache days (MHD) in the third month after treatment initiation compared to the month prior to treatment begin (baseline). Non-response was defined as ≤ 25% reduction in MHD after three months of treatment with a CGRP-receptor mAb and subsequent three months of treatment with CGRP mAb, or vice versa. We collected demographic data, migraine disease characteristics, migraine symptoms during the attacks in both study groups (SR/NR) as well as the general medical history. SR and NR were compared using Chi-square test for categorical variables, and t-test for continuous variables. RESULTS Between November 2018 and June 2022, n = 260 patients with migraine received preventive treatment with CGRP(-receptor) mAbs and provided complete headache documentation for the baseline phase and the third treatment month. Among those, we identified n = 29 SR (11%) and n = 26 NR (10%). SR reported more often especially vomiting (SR n = 12/25, 48% vs. NR n = 4/22, 18%; p = 0.031) and typical migraine characteristics such as unilateral localization, pulsating character, photophobia and nausea. A subjective good response to triptans was significantly higher in SR (n = 26/29, 90%) than in NR (n = 15/25, 60%, p = 0.010). NR suffered more frequently from chronic migraine (NR n = 24/26, 92% vs. SR n = 15/29, 52%; p = 0.001), medication overuse headache (NR n = 14/24, 58% versus SR n = 8/29, 28%; p = 0.024), and concomitant depression (NR n = 17/26, 65% vs. SR n = 8/29, 28%; p = 0.005). CONCLUSION Several clinical parameters differ between SR and NR to prophylactic CGRP(-R) mAbs. A thorough clinical evaluation prior to treatment initiation might help to achieve a more personalized management in patients with migraine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bianca Raffaelli
- grid.6363.00000 0001 2218 4662Department of Neurology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, Berlin, 10117 Germany ,grid.484013.a0000 0004 6879 971XClinician Scientist Program, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité (BIH), Berlin, Germany
| | - Mira Fitzek
- grid.6363.00000 0001 2218 4662Department of Neurology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, Berlin, 10117 Germany
| | - Lucas H. Overeem
- grid.6363.00000 0001 2218 4662Department of Neurology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, Berlin, 10117 Germany
| | - Elisabeth Storch
- grid.6363.00000 0001 2218 4662Department of Neurology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, Berlin, 10117 Germany
| | - Maria Terhart
- grid.6363.00000 0001 2218 4662Department of Neurology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, Berlin, 10117 Germany
| | - Uwe Reuter
- Department of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, Berlin, 10117, Germany. .,Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Lee HC, Cho S, Kim BK. Predictors of response to galcanezumab in patients with chronic migraine: a real-world prospective observational study. Neurol Sci 2023:10.1007/s10072-023-06683-2. [PMID: 36826456 DOI: 10.1007/s10072-023-06683-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2022] [Accepted: 02/12/2023] [Indexed: 02/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite high efficacy and tolerability, not all patients with chronic migraine benefit from anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies. We aimed to identify the clinical predictors of the response to galcanezumab treatment in patients with chronic migraine from real-world data. METHODS We prospectively recruited patients with CM who underwent galcanezumab injections between December 2019 and February 2022. Treatment response was determined after three months of follow-up and was defined as ≥ 50% reduction in monthly headache days. The migraine characteristics, comorbidities, and other treatment responses were compared between the responder and non-responder groups. RESULTS Of 238 patients with CM, 153 (64.3%) showed treatment response. The responder group was younger, had lower frequency of baseline headache days, and had more accompanying symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, and photophobia. Better triptan response and less depression were also observed in the responder group. Multivariable regression analysis revealed that the everyday headache (OR = 0.351, 95% CI = 0.133-0.874, p = 0.017), depression (OR = 0.439, 95% CI = 0.216-0.896, p = 0.024) and absence of accompanying symptoms (OR = 0.314, 95% CI = 0.118-0.834, p = 0.020) were significantly associated with response to galcanezumab treatment. CONCLUSIONS Our real-world data showed the efficacy of galcanezumab in patients with CM, regardless of medication overuse. Everyday headache, presence of depression, and absence of accompanying symptoms of migraine were significant predictors of a poor response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyoung Cheol Lee
- Department of Neurology, Nowon Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University School of Medicine, Seoul, 01830, Korea
| | - Soohyun Cho
- Department of Neurology, Uijeongbu Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University School of Medicine, Uijeongbu, Korea
| | - Byung-Kun Kim
- Department of Neurology, Nowon Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University School of Medicine, Seoul, 01830, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Lee MJ, Al-Karagholi MAM, Reuter U. New migraine prophylactic drugs: Current evidence and practical suggestions for non-responders to prior therapy. Cephalalgia 2023; 43:3331024221146315. [PMID: 36759320 DOI: 10.1177/03331024221146315] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Monoclonal antibodies against calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) or its receptor (anti-CGRP(-R) mAbs) and small-molecule CGRP receptor antagonists (gepants) are new mechanism-based prophylactic drugs developed to address the unmet needs of pre-existing migraine prophylactic medications. However, several uncertainties remain in their real-world applications. METHODS This is a narrative review of the literature on the use of CGRP-targeting novel therapeutics in specific situations, including non-responders to prior therapy, combination therapy, switching, and treatment termination. In the case of lack of available literature, we made suggestions based on clinical reasoning. RESULTS High-quality evidence supports the use of all available anti-CGRP(-R) mAbs (erenumab, galcanezumab, fremanezumab, and eptinezumab) in non-responders to prior therapy. There is insufficient evidence to support or reject the efficacy of combining CGRP(-R) mAbs or gepants with oral migraine prophylactic agents or botulinum toxin A. Switching from one CGRP(-R) mAb to another might benefit a fraction of patients. Currently, treatment termination depends on reimbursement policies, and the optimal mode of termination is discussed. CONCLUSIONS New prophylactic drugs that target the CGRP pathway are promising treatment options for patients with difficult-to-treat migraine. Individualized approaches using a combination of new substances with oral prophylactic drugs or botulinum toxin A, switching between new drugs, and adjusting treatment duration could enhance excellence in practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mi Ji Lee
- Department of Neurology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Mohammad Al-Mahdi Al-Karagholi
- Danish Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Uwe Reuter
- Department of Neurology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Greifswald, Germany.,Board of Directors, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Kim N, Estrada J, Chow I, Ruseva A, Ramasamy A, Burudpakdee C, Blanchette CM. The Relative Value of Anti-Obesity Medications Compared to Similar Therapies. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res 2023; 15:51-62. [PMID: 36726966 PMCID: PMC9886521 DOI: 10.2147/ceor.s392276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2022] [Accepted: 01/11/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
Purpose To demonstrate a need for improved health insurance coverage for anti-obesity medications (AOMs) by comparing clinical and economic benefits of obesity treatments to covered medications for selected therapeutic areas. Methods Using a grey literature search, we identified and prioritized therapeutic areas and treatment analogues for comparison to obesity. A targeted literature review identified clinical and economic outcomes research across the therapeutic area analogues. Associated comorbidities, clinical evidence, indirect costs (ie, absenteeism and productivity loss), and direct medical costs were evaluated to determine the relative value of treating obesity. Results Four therapeutic areas/treatment analogues were selected for comparison to obesity: smoking cessation (varenicline), daytime sleepiness (modafinil), migraines (erenumab), and fibromyalgia (pregabalin). Obesity was associated with 17 comorbidities, more than migraine (9), smoking (8), daytime sleepiness (5), and fibromyalgia (2). Economic burden was greatest for obesity, followed by smoking, with yearly indirect and direct medical costs totaling $676 and $345 billion, respectively. AOMs resulted in cost savings of $2586 in direct medical costs per patient per year (PPPY), greater than that for varenicline at $930 PPPY, modafinil at $1045 PPPY, and erenumab at $468 PPPY; pregabalin utilization increased costs by $924 PPPY. AOMs were covered by 10-16% of United States health insurance plans, compared to 45-59% for the four comparators. Conclusion Compared to four therapeutic analogues, obesity represented the highest economic burden and was associated with more comorbidities. AOMs provide greater cost savings compared to selected analogues. However, AOMs have limited formulary coverage. Improved coverage of AOMs may increase access to these treatments and may help address the clinical and economic burden associated with obesity and its comorbidities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina Kim
- Novo Nordisk, Inc, Plainsboro, NJ, USA
| | | | | | - Aleksandrina Ruseva
- Novo Nordisk, Inc, Plainsboro, NJ, USA,Correspondence: Aleksandrina Ruseva, Novo Nordisk, Inc, 800 Scudders Mill Road, Plainsboro, NJ, 08536, USA, Tel +1 609-598-8146, Email
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Castrillo A, Mendoza A, Caballero L, Cerdán D, Rodríguez MF, Guerrero P, Tabernero C, Ferrero M, Benito I, Marín L, Duarte J. Effectiveness of anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies in the preventive treatment of migraine: A prospective study of 63 patients. Med Clin (Barc) 2023; 160:341-346. [PMID: 36623986 DOI: 10.1016/j.medcli.2022.09.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2022] [Revised: 09/08/2022] [Accepted: 09/09/2022] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Calcitonine Gen-Related Peptide (CGRP) established a revolution in migraine pathophysiology knowledge and has led to the development of new drugs specifically targeting this disease. METHODS We present a prospective study in which 63 episodic and chronic migraine patients have been treated with anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies describing their efficacy, security and relapses after their interruption. Response predictors have been analyzed such they can help us to create a better treatment plan. RESULTS Average age was 48.3 ± 11.81 years old, 84.1% of them being women. The average was of 15.59 migraine days per month (MDM). 63.5% of all patients suffered chronic migraine. The initial dose of Erenumab in all patient was 70 mg subcutaneous. This was increased to 140 mg in 47.6% of the patients. An MDM reduction between 49.85% and 59.53% was obtained within three to twelve months from the start of treatment. Constipation was present in 17.5% of the patients and 4.8% suffered injection site reaction. The treatment was changed to Galcanezumab in 17.9% of the patients. After interrupting the treatment, 23 patients relapsed with a good response on reintroduction of the treatment. It was not possible to establish a clear response predictor, however a statistically significant increase in the number of days of improvement was observed with more MDM at baseline level (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS Anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies are effective, safe, and well tolerated drugs. We have observed that their discontinuation, in some cases can lead to frequent and early relapses so we strongly recommend to extend the treatment in those patients with a higher MDM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Castrillo
- Sección de Neurología. Complejo Asistencial de Segovia.
| | | | | | - Débora Cerdán
- Sección de Neurología. Complejo Asistencial de Segovia
| | | | | | | | - Marta Ferrero
- Sección de Neurología. Complejo Asistencial de Segovia
| | - Inés Benito
- Sección de Neurología. Complejo Asistencial de Segovia
| | - Laura Marín
- Servicio de Farmacia. Complejo Asistencial de Segovia
| | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Overeem LH, Lange KS, Fitzek MP, Siebert A, Steinicke M, Triller P, Hong JB, Reuter U, Raffaelli B. Effect of switching to erenumab in non-responders to a CGRP ligand antibody treatment in migraine: A real-world cohort study. Front Neurol 2023; 14:1154420. [PMID: 37034092 PMCID: PMC10075077 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1154420] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2023] [Accepted: 02/28/2023] [Indexed: 04/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Therapeutic options for migraine prevention in non-responders to monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide (CGRP) and its receptor are often limited. Real-world data have shown that non-responders to the CGRP-receptor mAb erenumab may benefit from switching to a CGRP ligand mAb. However, it remains unclear whether, vice versa, erenumab is effective in non-responders to CGRP ligand mAbs. In this study, we aim to assess the efficacy of erenumab in patients who have previously failed a CGRP ligand mAb. Methods This monocentric retrospective cohort study included patients with episodic or chronic migraine in whom a non-response (< 30% reduction of monthly headache days during month 3 of treatment compared to baseline) to the CGRP ligand mAbs galcanezumab or fremanezumab led to a switch to erenumab, and who had received at least 3 administrations of erenumab. Monthly headache days were retrieved from headache diaries to assess the ≥30% responder rates and the absolute reduction of monthly headache days at 3 and 6 months of treatment with erenumab in this cohort. Results From May 2019 to July 2022, we identified 20 patients who completed 3 months of treatment with erenumab after non-response to a CGRP ligand mAb. Fourteen patients continued treatment for ≥6 months. The ≥30% responder rate was 35% at 3 months, and 45% at 6 months of treatment with erenumab, respectively. Monthly headache days were reduced from 18.6 ± 5.9 during baseline by 4.1 ± 3.1 days during month 3, and by 7.0 ± 4.8 days during month 6 compared to the month before treatment with erenumab (p < 0.001, respectively). Responders and non-responders to erenumab did not differ with respect to demographic or headache characteristics. Conclusion Switching to erenumab in non-responders to a CGRP ligand mAb might be beneficial in a subgroup of resistant patients, with increasing responder rates after 6 months of treatment. Larger prospective studies should aim to predict which subgroup of patients benefit from a switch.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucas Hendrik Overeem
- Department of Neurology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Doctoral Program, International Graduate Program Medical Neurosciences, Humboldt Graduate School, Berlin, Germany
- *Correspondence: Lucas Hendrik Overeem
| | | | - Mira Pauline Fitzek
- Department of Neurology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Anke Siebert
- Department of Neurology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Maureen Steinicke
- Department of Neurology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Paul Triller
- Department of Neurology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ja Bin Hong
- Department of Neurology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Uwe Reuter
- Department of Neurology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Bianca Raffaelli
- Department of Neurology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Clinician Scientist Program, Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Adverse Events Reported with Therapies Targeting the CGRP Pathway During the First 6 Months Post-launch: A Retrospective Analysis Using the FDA Adverse Events Reporting System. Adv Ther 2023; 40:445-459. [PMID: 36350532 PMCID: PMC9898337 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-022-02346-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2022] [Accepted: 09/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Through 2018, three calcitonin gene-related peptide pathway-targeted monoclonal antibodies (CGRP mAbs) had received US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for migraine prevention: erenumab, fremanezumab, and galcanezumab. METHODS This retrospective analysis evaluated adverse events (AEs) spontaneously reported to the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) safety surveillance database during the first 6 months post-approval of erenumab (May 2018 to November 2018), fremanezumab (September 2018 to March 2019), and galcanezumab (September 2018 to March 2019). Reporting rates (RR) per 1000 exposed patients were calculated from number of reported events (when product classified as "primary suspect") in each AE category and estimated number of treated patients based on de-identified prescription data (IQVIA database) and were ranked on the basis of frequency for each product. RESULTS RR per 1000 exposed patients for "migraine" (erenumab, 4.89; fremanezumab, 1.01; galcanezumab, 2.99), "headache" (3.32, 1.27, 3.07), and "drug ineffective" (3.68, 1.14, 1.69) were commonly reported for all three products, as were migraine-associated symptoms ("nausea": 2.94, 0.91, 1.09) and "injection-site" reactions ("pain": 2.94, 0.8, 4.9; "swelling": 0.56, 0.53, 1.25; "pruritus": 0.26, 0.63, 1.14; "erythema": 0.58, 0.71, 1.58). "Constipation" ranked second for erenumab (4.90) but did not make the top ten events for fremanezumab (0.46) or galcanezumab (0.76); cardiovascular events did not rank in the top ten AEs for any product. The frequency of serious outcomes was low, with ≤ 2% of AEs categorized as serious across the CGRP mAbs. CONCLUSION These results aid in supporting the safety profile of CGRP mAbs in the real-world setting and may provide clinicians and patients with additional insight when considering migraine preventive treatments.
Collapse
|
35
|
Long-Term Safety and Effectiveness of Erenumab in Patients with Migraine: A Systematic Review and Single-Arm Meta-analysis. Clin Drug Investig 2023; 43:45-59. [PMID: 36482037 DOI: 10.1007/s40261-022-01230-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Several studies on use of erenumab for migraine treatment have been published over recent years. However, its long-term safety and effectiveness have not been consistently established in the literature yet. We aimed to perform a qualitative and quantitative analysis of the long-term safety and effectiveness of erenumab for the treatment of migraine headaches. METHODS Long-term follow-up was defined as ≥ 1 year. PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library were systematically searched from inception to 14 June 2022 for studies meeting the inclusion criteria. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. RESULTS Fourteen studies, comprising 3574 patients, were included. The total follow-up period ranged from 48 to 268 weeks (i.e., 1 year to 5.6 years). Pooled estimate rates for all adverse events (AEs) were 63% (95% CI 46-78); for serious AEs, 3% (95% CI 1-7); and for AEs leading to discontinuation of erenumab, 3% (95% CI 2-5). Reduction in monthly migraine days (MMDs) was -6.98 (95% CI -8.90 to -5.05) and in migraine-specific medication days (MSMDs) was - 6.09 (95% CI - 9.43 to - 2.75). More than half (57%; 95% CI 51-63) and around one-third (35%; 95% CI 28-42) of patients presented with reductions of ≥ 50% and ≥ 75% in MMDs, respectively. Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6) score was decreased by -9.68 points (95% CI - 12.03 to - 7.34). Nine studies were considered of poor methodological quality and five of fair quality. CONCLUSIONS Erenumab has a favorable safety profile, with a low incidence of serious AEs, and sustained efficacy over ≥1 year of follow-up in the treatment of migraine.
Collapse
|
36
|
Pavelic AR, Wöber C, Riederer F, Zebenholzer K. Monoclonal Antibodies against Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide for Migraine Prophylaxis: A Systematic Review of Real-World Data. Cells 2022; 12:cells12010143. [PMID: 36611935 PMCID: PMC9819019 DOI: 10.3390/cells12010143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2022] [Revised: 12/22/2022] [Accepted: 12/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To perform a systematic review of real-world outcomes for anti-CGRP-mAbs. METHODS Following the PRISMA guidelines, we searched PubMed for real-world data of erenumab, galcanezumab, fremanezumab, or eptinezumab in patients with migraines. RESULTS We identified 134 publications (89 retrospective), comprising 10 pharmaco-epidemiologic and 83 clinic-based studies, 38 case reports, and 3 other articles. None of the clinic-based studies provided follow-up data over more than one year in more than 200 patients. Findings suggest that there are reductions in health insurance claims and days with sick-leave as well as better treatment adherence with anti-CGRP-mAbs. Effectiveness, reported in 77 clinic-based studies, was comparable to randomized controlled trials. A treatment pause was associated with an increase in migraine frequency, and switching to another antibody resulted in a better response in some of the patients. Adverse events and safety issues were addressed in 86 papers, including 24 single case reports. CONCLUSION Real-world data on anti-CGRP-mAbs are limited by retrospective data collection, small patient numbers, and short follow-up periods. The majority of papers seem to support good effectiveness and tolerability of anti-CGRP-mAbs in the real-world setting. There is an unmet need for large prospective real-world studies providing long-term follow-ups of patients treated with anti-CGRP-mAbs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antun R. Pavelic
- Department of Neurology, Hietzing Hospital, 1130 Vienna, Austria
| | - Christian Wöber
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
- Comprehensive Center for Clinical Neurosciences & Mental Health, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
- Correspondence:
| | - Franz Riederer
- Department of Neurology, Hietzing Hospital, 1130 Vienna, Austria
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Karin Zebenholzer
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
- Comprehensive Center for Clinical Neurosciences & Mental Health, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Lowe M, Murray L, Tyagi A, Gorrie G, Miller S, Dani K. Efficacy of erenumab and factors predicting response after 3 months in treatment resistant chronic migraine: a clinical service evaluation. J Headache Pain 2022; 23:86. [PMID: 35869443 PMCID: PMC9306036 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-022-01456-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2022] [Accepted: 07/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) inhibitors have been developed as options for treatment of chronic and episodic migraine. We present our experience of the use of erenumab in a tertiary headache centre. Methods This was a prospective clinical audit of all patients commenced on erenumab following a locally agreed pathway and criteria over a consecutive period. Patients received monthly erenumab 140 mg for 3 months. Data were collected prospectively at baseline and 3 months follow up. Results One hundred three patients were commenced on erenumab during the study period. Patients had tried a median of 7 previous prophylactics, including onabotulinum toxin A in 94%. At 3 months there was a reduction in median total (28 to 20, 29% reduction, p < 0.0001) and severe (15 to 5, 67% reduction, p < 0.0001) headache days. 39.8% of patients achieved at least a 30% reduction in total headache days; 61.8% of patients achieved at least a 50% reduction in severe headache days. Meeting either of these thresholds was considered a positive response, 68% of patients achieved this. Presence of daily headache pattern was negatively associated with response, (56% response vs. 90% without daily headache, p = 0.0003). There was no association between age, gender, presence of medication overuse or number of previously tried prophylactic treatments and response to erenumab. 43% of patients reported at least one adverse effect, most commonly constipation (26%); treatment was discontinued in 3 patients due to adverse effects. Conclusions Erenumab was an effective treatment for chronic migraine in this treatment resistant population over 3 months of follow up. Presence of daily headache predicted poorer response but there was still a significant positive response rate in this group.
Collapse
|
38
|
Hubig LT, Smith T, Chua GN, Lloyd AJ, Powell L, Johnston K, Harris L, L'Italien G, Coric V, Lo SH. A stated preference survey to explore patient preferences for novel preventive migraine treatments. Headache 2022; 62:1187-1197. [PMID: 36047857 PMCID: PMC9826196 DOI: 10.1111/head.14386] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2022] [Revised: 06/29/2022] [Accepted: 06/30/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to explore patient preference for attributes of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) inhibitors for the preventive treatment of migraine and to describe differences in treatment preferences between patients. BACKGROUND CGRP inhibitors are a novel class of migraine drugs specifically developed for the preventive treatment of migraine. Clinicians should understand patient preferences for CGRP inhibitors to inform and support prescribing choices. METHODS Patients with migraine in the US and Germany were recruited to participate in an online discrete choice experiment (DCE) survey, which presented hypothetical treatment choices using five attributes: mode of administration, side effects, migraine frequency, migraine severity, and consistency of treatment effectiveness. Attribute selection was informed by a literature review and semi-structured patient interviews (n = 35), and evaluated using patient cognitive debriefing interviews (n = 5). RESULTS Of 680 who consented to participate, 506 participants completed the survey and were included in the study (US = 257; Germany = 249). Overall, participants placed highest importance (preference weight, beta = 1.65, p < 0.001) on the treatment's ability to reduce the severity of migraine (mild vs. unchanged severity), followed by consistent treatment effectiveness (beta = 1.13, p < 0.001), and higher chance of reduced migraine frequency (beta = 1.00, p < 0.001). Participants preferred an oral tablet every other day (beta = 1.00, p < 0.001) over quarterly infusion, quarterly injections (p = 0.019), or monthly injection (p < 0.001). Preference for all treatment attributes were heterogeneous, and the subgroup analyses found that participants naïve to CGRP monoclonal antibody treatments had a stronger preference for oral therapy compared to those with such experience (p = 0.006). CONCLUSION In this DCE assessing CGRP inhibitors attributes, the main driver of patient choice was treatment effectiveness, specifically reduced migraine severity, and consistent treatment effectiveness. Further, patients exhibited an overall preference for an oral tablet every other day over injectables. Patients' experience with previous treatments informs the value they place on treatment characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Linda Harris
- Biohaven Pharmaceuticals IncNew HavenConnecticutUSA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
De Matteis E, Caponnetto V, Casalena A, Frattale I, Gabriele A, Affaitati G, Giamberardino MA, Maddestra M, Viola S, Pistoia F, Sacco S, Ornello R. Cranial autonomic symptoms and response to monoclonal antibodies targeting the Calcitonin gene-related peptide pathway: A real-world study. Front Neurol 2022; 13:973226. [PMID: 36212640 PMCID: PMC9538972 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.973226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2022] [Accepted: 08/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Cranial autonomic symptoms (CAS), including conjunctival injection, tearing, nasal congestion or rhinorrhea, eyelid edema, miosis or ptosis, and forehead or facial sweating ipsilateral to headache, are often reported by patients with migraine during headache attacks. CAS is a consequence of the activation of the trigeminovascular system, which is the target of monoclonal antibodies acting on the CGRP pathway. Therefore, we hypothesized that patients with CAS might have higher trigeminovascular activation than those without CAS leading to a better response to anti-CGRP treatments. Methods We performed a prospective analysis including patients with episodic or chronic migraine treated with anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies (i.e., erenumab, fremanezumab, and galcanezumab) between 2019 and 2021. The observation period included a 12-week baseline before treatment with anti-CGRP antibodies and a 12-week treatment follow-up. We evaluated the prevalence of CAS in our cohort and compared disease characteristics and treatment response (i.e., 12-week monthly headache days and 0–29, 30–49, 50–74, 75–99, and 100% monthly headache days reduction from baseline) among patients with and without CAS using the χ2 test, Kruskal–Wallis test, and Mann–Whitney U-test. Results Out of 136 patients, 88 (65%) had CAS. Both patients with and without CAS reported a significant decrease in monthly headache days from baseline. During the 12-week follow-up, the median difference in monthly headache days from baseline was higher in patients with CAS (-10, IQR−15 to−6) than in those without CAS (6, IQR 12 to 3; P = 0.009). However, the proportions of patients with 0 to 29, 30 to 49, 50 to 74, 75 to 99, and 100% response rates did not differ between the two groups. Conclusions In our cohort, the presence of CAS was associated with a greater response to monoclonal antibodies targeting the CGRP pathway. CAS could be a clinical marker of trigeminovascular activation and thus be related to a better response to CGRP treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleonora De Matteis
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Valeria Caponnetto
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | | | - Ilaria Frattale
- Department of Child Neurology and Psychiatry, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy
| | - Amleto Gabriele
- Neurology Service, 'SS. Annunziata' Hospital, Sulmona, Italy
| | - Giannapia Affaitati
- Department of Medicine and Science of Aging, 'G. D'Annunzio' University, Chieti, Italy
| | | | | | - Stefano Viola
- Department of Neurology, 'San Pio da Pietralcina' Hospital, Vasto, Italy
| | - Francesca Pistoia
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Simona Sacco
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
- *Correspondence: Simona Sacco
| | - Raffaele Ornello
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Murray AM, Stern JI, Robertson CE, Chiang CC. Real-World Patient Experience of CGRP-Targeting Therapy for Migraine: a Narrative Review. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2022; 26:783-794. [PMID: 36063264 DOI: 10.1007/s11916-022-01077-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To summarize available calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP)-targeting therapies for migraine and discuss their use in real-world populations. BACKGROUND CGRP has long been a topic of interest in migraine pathophysiology, with new therapies targeting CGRP since 2018 for both the preventive and acute treatment of migraine. METHODS We searched PubMed using keywords including "migraine," "CGRP," "real-world," "erenumab," "galcanezumab," "fremanezumab," "eptinezumab," "ubrogepant," "rimegepant," and "atogepant." We reviewed all pertinent studies and summarized main findings. We also compiled detailed patient characteristics (e.g., migraine diagnoses, medication overuse, prior treatment failures) and treatment outcome measures, such as 50% responder rates, reduction in migraine days, and adverse event rates in several tables. Overall, studies reporting real-world patient experiences of CGRP-targeting therapies suggested meaningful effectiveness for migraine treatment with response rates comparable to the numbers reported in clinical trials. Furthermore, studies suggested benefit in patients with multiple prior unsuccessful treatment trials, medication overuse, and complex medical comorbidities. In some studies, adverse event rates have been notably higher than reported in clinical trials. Additional long-term data is needed to further evaluate sustained efficacy, predictors of treatment response, and adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ann M Murray
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | | | | | - Chia-Chun Chiang
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Ornello R, Baraldi C, Ahmed F, Negro A, Miscio AM, Santoro A, Alpuente A, Russo A, Silvestro M, Cevoli S, Brunelli N, Vernieri F, Grazzi L, Pani L, Andreou A, Lambru G, Frattale I, Kamm K, Ruscheweyh R, Russo M, Torelli P, Filatova E, Latysheva N, Gryglas-Dworak A, Straburzyński M, Butera C, Colombo B, Filippi M, Pozo-Rosich P, Martelletti P, Guerzoni S, Sacco S. Excellent Response to OnabotulinumtoxinA: Different Definitions, Different Predictors. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:ijerph191710975. [PMID: 36078699 PMCID: PMC9518492 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191710975] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2022] [Revised: 08/30/2022] [Accepted: 08/31/2022] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
The identification of patients who can benefit the most from the available preventive treatments is important in chronic migraine. We explored the rate of excellent responders to onabotulinumtoxinA in a multicenter European study and explored the predictors of such response, according to different definitions. A pooled analysis on chronic migraineurs treated with onabotulinumtoxinA and followed-up for, at least, 9 months was performed. Excellent responders were defined either as patients with a ≥75% decrease in monthly headache days (percent-based excellent responders) or as patients with <4 monthly headache days (frequency-based excellent responders). The characteristics of excellent responders at the baseline were compared with the ones of patients with a <30% decrease in monthly headache days. Percent-based excellent responders represented about 10% of the sample, whilst frequency-based excellent responders were about 5% of the sample. Compared with non-responders, percent-based excellent responders had a higher prevalence of medication overuse and a higher excellent response rate even after the 1st and the 2nd injection. Females were less like to be frequency-based excellent responders. Chronic migraine sufferers without medication overuse and of female sex may find fewer benefits with onabotulinumtoxinA. Additionally, the excellent response status is identifiable after the first cycle.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raffaele Ornello
- Neuroscience Section, Department of Applied Clinical Sciences and Biotechnology, University of L’Aquila, Via Vetoio 1 Coppito, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy
| | - Carlo Baraldi
- Digital and Predictive Medicine, Pharmacology and Clinical Metabolic Toxicology-Headache Center and Drug Abuse-Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenomics, Department of Specialist Medicines, AOU Policlinico di Modena, 41125 Modena, Italy
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-0594222104
| | - Fayyaz Ahmed
- Department of Neurosciences, Hull University Teaching Hospitals, Hull HU3 2JZ, UK
| | - Andrea Negro
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University, 00189 Rome, Italy
| | - Anna Maria Miscio
- Headache Center, Unit of Neurology, Fondazione IRCCS “Casa Sollievo Della Sofferenza”, 71013 San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy
| | - Antonio Santoro
- Headache Center, Unit of Neurology, Fondazione IRCCS “Casa Sollievo Della Sofferenza”, 71013 San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy
| | - Alicia Alpuente
- Headache Unit, Department of Neurology, Vall D’Hebron University, 08035 Barcelona, Spain
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall D’Hebron Institute of Research (VHIR), Department of Medicine, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, 08193 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Antonio Russo
- Headache Center, Department of Medical, Surgical, Neurological, Metabolic and Aging Sciences, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 81100 Naples, Italy
| | - Marcello Silvestro
- Headache Center, Department of Medical, Surgical, Neurological, Metabolic and Aging Sciences, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 81100 Naples, Italy
| | - Sabina Cevoli
- IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, 40139 Bologna, Italy
| | - Nicoletta Brunelli
- Headache and Neurosonology Unit, Campus Bio-Medico University Hospital, 00128 Rome, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Vernieri
- Headache and Neurosonology Unit, Campus Bio-Medico University Hospital, 00128 Rome, Italy
| | - Licia Grazzi
- Headache Center, Neuroalgology Department, IRCCS Foundation “Carlo Besta” Neurological Institute, Via Celoria, 11, 20133 Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Pani
- Digital and Predictive Medicine, Pharmacology and Clinical Metabolic Toxicology-Headache Center and Drug Abuse-Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenomics, Department of Specialist Medicines, AOU Policlinico di Modena, 41125 Modena, Italy
- Pharmacology Unit, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41121 Modena, Italy
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL 33146, USA
- VeraSci, Durham, NC 27707, USA
| | - Anna Andreou
- Headache Service, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Giorgio Lambru
- Headache Service, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Ilaria Frattale
- Child Neurology and Psychiatry Unit, Systems Medicine Department, Tor Vergata University, 00133 Rome, Italy
| | - Katharina Kamm
- Department of Neurology, Ludwig Maximilians University München, 80539 Munich, Germany
| | - Ruth Ruscheweyh
- Department of Neurology, Ludwig Maximilians University München, 80539 Munich, Germany
| | - Marco Russo
- Headache Center, Neurology Unit, Neuromotor and Rehabilitation Department, Azienda USL-IRCCS Di Reggio Emilia, 42122 Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Paola Torelli
- Headache Center, University of Parma, 43121 Parma, Italy
| | - Elena Filatova
- Department of Neurology, Institute for Postgraduate Education, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 119435 Moscow, Russia
| | - Nina Latysheva
- Department of Neurology, Institute for Postgraduate Education, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 119435 Moscow, Russia
| | | | - Marcin Straburzyński
- Department of Family Medicine and Infectious Diseases, University of Warmia and Mazury, 10-719 Olsztyn, Poland
| | - Calogera Butera
- Neurophysiology Service, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 71013 Milan, Italy
| | - Bruno Colombo
- Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 71013 Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo Filippi
- Neurophysiology Service, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 71013 Milan, Italy
- Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 71013 Milan, Italy
- Neurorehabilitation Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 71013 Milan, Italy
| | - Patricia Pozo-Rosich
- Headache Unit, Department of Neurology, Vall D’Hebron University, 08035 Barcelona, Spain
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall D’Hebron Institute of Research (VHIR), Department of Medicine, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, 08193 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Paolo Martelletti
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University, 00189 Rome, Italy
| | - Simona Guerzoni
- Digital and Predictive Medicine, Pharmacology and Clinical Metabolic Toxicology-Headache Center and Drug Abuse-Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenomics, Department of Specialist Medicines, AOU Policlinico di Modena, 41125 Modena, Italy
| | - Simona Sacco
- Neuroscience Section, Department of Applied Clinical Sciences and Biotechnology, University of L’Aquila, Via Vetoio 1 Coppito, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Hubig LT, Smith T, Williams E, Powell L, Johnston K, Harris L, L’Italien G, Coric V, Lloyd AJ, Lo SH. Measuring interictal burden among people affected by migraine: a descriptive survey study. J Headache Pain 2022; 23:97. [PMID: 35941572 PMCID: PMC9358846 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-022-01467-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2022] [Accepted: 07/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous research has extensively documented the impact of migraine episodes ('ictal') on patients' health-related quality of life. Few studies have looked at the impact of migraine on migraine-free days ('interictal'). This study was designed to describe interictal burden of migraine in a mixed group of people affected by migraine and to explore patient characteristics associated with interictal burden. METHODS People with migraine in the United States (US) and Germany were recruited for a cross-sectional online survey, including a subgroup treated with calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibody (mAb). The survey included the Migraine Interictal Burden Scale (MIBS-4), Headache Impact Test (HIT-6), and items measuring patient demographics, clinical and treatment background. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and linear regression. RESULTS Five hundred six people with migraine completed the survey (US: n = 257; Germany: n = 249), of whom 195 had taken a CGRP mAb for three or more months. Participants had a mean of 8.5 (SD = 6.4) Monthly Migraine Days (MMD) and 10.4 (SD = 7.1) Monthly Headache Days (MHD). The mean MIBS-4 score was 6.3 (SD = 3.4), with 67% reporting severe interictal burden (MIBS-4: ≥5). The mean HIT-6 score was 65.3 (SD = 6.0), with 86% reporting severe migraine impact (HIT-6: ≥60). MIBS-4 was correlated with the HIT-6 (r = 0.37), MMD and MHD (both r = 0.27). The HIT-6, MMD, MHD, CGRP mAb treatment, and depression all had an independent positive association with the MIBS-4. CONCLUSION Two-thirds of the study sample reported substantial interictal burden. Whilst interictal burden was associated with migraine frequency and impact of migraine attacks, study results also show it represented a distinct aspect of the overall disease burden. Study findings further indicate unique associations between interictal burden and depression. A unique positive association between interictal burden and CGRP mAb treatment suggests a remaining unmet need among people affected by migraine treated with CGRP mAb.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lena T. Hubig
- Acaster Lloyd Consulting Ltd, 8th Floor, Lacon House, 84 Theobalds Road, London, WC1X 8NL UK
| | - Timothy Smith
- StudyMetrix LLC, 3862 Mexico Road, St. Peters, MO 63303 USA
| | - Emma Williams
- Acaster Lloyd Consulting Ltd, 8th Floor, Lacon House, 84 Theobalds Road, London, WC1X 8NL UK
| | - Lauren Powell
- Broadstreet HEOR, 201 – 343 Railway Street, Vancouver, British Columbia V6A 1A4 Canada
| | - Karissa Johnston
- Broadstreet HEOR, 201 – 343 Railway Street, Vancouver, British Columbia V6A 1A4 Canada
| | - Linda Harris
- Biohaven Pharmaceuticals Inc, 215 Church Street, New Haven, CT 06510 USA
| | - Gilbert L’Italien
- Biohaven Pharmaceuticals Inc, 215 Church Street, New Haven, CT 06510 USA
| | - Vladimir Coric
- Biohaven Pharmaceuticals Inc, 215 Church Street, New Haven, CT 06510 USA
| | - Andrew J. Lloyd
- Acaster Lloyd Consulting Ltd, 8th Floor, Lacon House, 84 Theobalds Road, London, WC1X 8NL UK
| | - Siu Hing Lo
- Acaster Lloyd Consulting Ltd, 8th Floor, Lacon House, 84 Theobalds Road, London, WC1X 8NL UK
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Reducing the Burden of Migraine: Safety and Efficacy of CGRP Pathway-Targeted Preventive Treatments. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11154359. [PMID: 35955976 PMCID: PMC9369309 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11154359] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2022] [Revised: 06/24/2022] [Accepted: 06/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Migraine is a highly disabling and often chronic neurological disease that affects more than one billion people globally. Preventive migraine treatment is recommended for individuals who have frequent and/or disabling attacks; however, many of the medications used for migraine prevention (e.g., antiepileptics, antidepressants, antihypertensives) were not specifically developed for migraine, and often have limited efficacy or poor tolerability. Four monoclonal antibodies targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway, which is believed to play a crucial role in the pathophysiology of migraine, have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the preventive treatment of migraine in adults. All four migraine-specific treatments have demonstrated efficacy based on reductions in monthly days with migraine for patients with both episodic and chronic migraine, including those with comorbidities. They have also demonstrated favorable safety and tolerability profiles. Based on these accounts, CGRP pathway-targeted monoclonal antibodies have the potential to revolutionize preventive treatment for patients with migraine.
Collapse
|
44
|
Fitzek M, Raffaelli B, Reuter U. Advances in pharmacotherapy for the prophylactic treatment of resistant and refractory migraine. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2022; 23:1143-1153. [PMID: 35698795 DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2022.2088281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Refractory migraine is associated with low quality of life and great socioeconomic burden. Despite high need for effective, tolerable preventive therapies, there has been little research on potential therapeutic options. Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide (CGRP) are the first preventive therapeutic approach for migraine based on the underlying pathophysiology. AREAS COVERED Following a brief introduction into the term 'refractory migraine,' the authors reviewavailable treatment options, focusing on current phase III trials of substances acting on the CGRP pathway. EXPERT OPINION No uniform definition for refractory migraine is available. The vast majority of proposals recommend treatment failure of 2-4 drug classes as a key diagnostic criterion. Phase III studies on CGRP-(receptor) mAbs demonstrated excellent efficacy and tolerability in patients with chronic and episodic migraine including subjects with multiple unsuccessful conventional therapy attempts. However, more comparator trials showing superiority of mAbs versus oral preventatives, such as the HER-MEs study are needed. In summary, with the CGRP antibodies, a group of drugs has entered the market which will most likely not only significantly improve the quality of life of many individual migraine patients but could also reduce indirect health-care costs associated with migraine by reducing recurrent medical consultations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mira Fitzek
- Department of Neurology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Bianca Raffaelli
- Department of Neurology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Clinician Scientist Programm, Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany
| | - Uwe Reuter
- Department of Neurology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Sacco S, Amin FM, Ashina M, Bendtsen L, Deligianni CI, Gil-Gouveia R, Katsarava Z, MaassenVanDenBrink A, Martelletti P, Mitsikostas DD, Ornello R, Reuter U, Sanchez-Del-Rio M, Sinclair AJ, Terwindt G, Uluduz D, Versijpt J, Lampl C. European Headache Federation guideline on the use of monoclonal antibodies targeting the calcitonin gene related peptide pathway for migraine prevention - 2022 update. J Headache Pain 2022; 23:67. [PMID: 35690723 PMCID: PMC9188162 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-022-01431-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 162] [Impact Index Per Article: 81.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2022] [Accepted: 04/29/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background A previous European Headache Federation (EHF) guideline addressed the use of monoclonal antibodies targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway to prevent migraine. Since then, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and real-world evidence have expanded the evidence and knowledge for those treatments. Therefore, the EHF panel decided to provide an updated guideline on the use of those treatments. Methods The guideline was developed following the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. The working group identified relevant questions, performed a systematic review and an analysis of the literature, assessed the quality of the available evidence, and wrote recommendations. Where the GRADE approach was not applicable, expert opinion was provided. Results We found moderate to high quality of evidence to recommend eptinezumab, erenumab, fremanezumab, and galcanezumab in individuals with episodic and chronic migraine. For several important clinical questions, we found not enough evidence to provide evidence-based recommendations and guidance relied on experts’ opinion. Nevertheless, we provided updated suggestions regarding the long-term management of those treatments and their place with respect to the other migraine preventatives. Conclusion Monoclonal antibodies targeting the CGRP pathway are recommended for migraine prevention as they are effective and safe also in the long-term. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s10194-022-01431-x.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simona Sacco
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences - University of L'Aquila, Via Vetoio 1, L'Aquila, Italy.
| | - Faisal Mohammad Amin
- Danish Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Neurorehabilitation/Traumatic Brain Injury, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Messoud Ashina
- Danish Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Lars Bendtsen
- Danish Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Christina I Deligianni
- Danish Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Raquel Gil-Gouveia
- Hospital da Luz Headache Center, Neurology Department, Hospital da Luz Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.,Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Health, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Zaza Katsarava
- Christian Hospital Unna, Unna, Germany.,University of Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany
| | | | - Paolo Martelletti
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Dimos-Dimitrios Mitsikostas
- 1st Department of Neurology, Aeginition Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Raffaele Ornello
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences - University of L'Aquila, Via Vetoio 1, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Uwe Reuter
- Department of Neurology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | | | - Alexandra J Sinclair
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.,Department of Neurology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, B15 2WB, UK
| | - Gisela Terwindt
- Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Derya Uluduz
- Department of Neurology Istanbul Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Jan Versijpt
- Department of Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Universitair, Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Christian Lampl
- Department of Neurology, Headache Medical Center at the Konventhospital BHB Linz, Linz, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Real-World experience of interictal burden and treatment in migraine: a qualitative interview study. J Headache Pain 2022; 23:65. [PMID: 35676636 PMCID: PMC9174626 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-022-01429-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2022] [Accepted: 04/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The debilitating nature of migraine attacks is widely established; however, less is known about how the interictal burden (i.e., how patients are affected in-between migraine episodes) of migraine impacts on patients’ health-related quality of life (HRQL). Acute and preventive treatments may lift the burden of the disease, but they often have unwanted side effects and limited effectiveness. The objective of this study was to understand the interictal burden of migraines, from the patient perspective, and to explore patient experience with migraine treatments. Methods Participants (n=35) with a self-reported diagnosis of migraine were recruited in the US, UK and Canada, including a subgroup of patients who had taken calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibody (CGRP mAb) treatment for at least three months. Participants completed a background questionnaire, followed by a semi-structured interview via telephone or video call. The interviews explored patients’ migraine symptoms, perception of interictal burden and treatment experience. The interview transcripts were analysed using thematic analysis. Results The most reported migraine symptom was migraine pain, followed by aura, sensory sensitivity and nausea. Most participants reported interictal impact on HRQL, lifestyle changes they made to avoid triggers or in anticipation of an attack, impacts on work, career, daily activities and relationships. Emotional impacts were reported by all participants, including anger, depression, anxiety and hopelessness. Many participants who took preventive treatments reported improvements in HRQL and functioning but still experienced breakthrough attacks. Among patients who took CGRP mAbs, participants noted varying consistency of treatment effectiveness between treatment administrations. Conclusion This study detailed the additional HRQL impact of migraine in-between migraine attacks and described the unmet need for effective treatment options to prevent and mitigate migraine attacks. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s10194-022-01429-5.
Collapse
|
47
|
Cullum CK, Do TP, Ashina M, Bendtsen L, Hugger SS, Iljazi A, Gusatovic J, Snellman J, Lopez-Lopez C, Ashina H, Amin FM. Real-world long-term efficacy and safety of erenumab in adults with chronic migraine: a 52-week, single-center, prospective, observational study. J Headache Pain 2022; 23:61. [PMID: 35655137 PMCID: PMC9164431 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-022-01433-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2022] [Accepted: 05/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinical trials have shown that erenumab is effective and well-tolerated for the preventive treatment of chronic migraine. To extend the results from clinical trials, we assessed the real-world efficacy and safety of erenumab in patients with chronic migraine from the outpatient clinic at the Danish Headache Center. METHODS A 52-week, single-center, prospective, observation study of erenumab in adults with chronic migraine who are eligible for treatment with monoclonal antibodies against CGRP or its receptor in Denmark. The primary outcome was defined as proportion of patients who achieved ≥ 30% reduction in monthly migraine days (MMDs) from baseline to weeks 9-12. RESULTS A total of 300 adult patients with chronic migraine were enrolled and received at least one dose of erenumab. At baseline, the mean (SD) number of monthly headache days was 23 ± 4.9 and mean number of MMDs was 16.8 ± 6.4. Of 300 enrolled patients, 273 (91.0%) patients completed 12 weeks of treatment, and 119 (39.7%) completed 52 weeks of treatment. The number of patients who achieved ≥ 30% reduction in MMDs from baseline to weeks 9-12 was 195 (71.4%) of 273 patients. Sustained ≥ 30% reduction in MMDs at all assessment periods throughout the 52-week treatment period was achieved by 102 (34%) of 300 patients. Adverse events occurred in 220 (73.3%) out of 300 patients. The most common adverse event was constipation. Treatment discontinuation due to lack of tolerability occurred in 41 (13.7%) patients. CONCLUSIONS Among adult patients with chronic migraine and previous failure of medications for migraine prevention, erenumab was found to be effective and well-tolerated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Kjaer Cullum
- Danish Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Thien Phu Do
- Danish Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Messoud Ashina
- Danish Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Lars Bendtsen
- Danish Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Sarah Sonja Hugger
- Danish Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Afrim Iljazi
- Danish Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Julia Gusatovic
- Danish Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Cristina Lopez-Lopez
- Roche Innovation Center Basel, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd Grenzacherstrasse 124, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Håkan Ashina
- Danish Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Neurorehabilitation / Traumatic Brain Injury, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Faisal Mohammad Amin
- Danish Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
- Department of Neurorehabilitation / Traumatic Brain Injury, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Ornello R, Rosignoli C, Caponnetto V, Pistoia F, Ferrara M, D'Atri A, Sacco S. Effectiveness of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Monoclonal Antibodies Acting on the CGRP as a Combined Treatment for Migraine (TACTIC): Protocol for a Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Trial. Front Neurol 2022; 13:890364. [PMID: 35620782 PMCID: PMC9127506 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.890364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2022] [Accepted: 04/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Migraine is a recurrent headache disorder that has a still unclear pathophysiology, involving several circuits of both the central and peripheral nervous system. Monoclonal antibodies acting on the calcitonin gene-related (CGRP) pathway (CGRP-MAbs) are the first drugs specifically designed for migraine; those drugs act peripherally on the trigeminal ganglion without entering the blood-brain barrier. Conversely, neuromodulation techniques such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) act centrally by increasing or decreasing the neuronal firing rate of brain cortical areas. The aim of the study will be to evaluate whether tDCS, in addition to CGRP-MAbs, is an effective add-on treatment in reducing headache frequency, intensity and acute medication use in patients with migraine. To demonstrate the biological effects of tDCS, the electroencephalographic (EEG) power changes after tDCS will be assessed. Methods We will include patients with migraine on treatment with CGRP-MAbs and reporting ≥8 monthly migraine days. During a prospective 28-day baseline period, patients will fill in a headache diary and questionnaires to evaluate migraine-related disability, anxiety and depressive symptoms, sleep quality, and health-related quality of life. Subjects will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to active or sham tDCS. The stimulation protocol will consist in five daily sessions, the cathodes will be applied bilaterally above the occipital areas, with the reference anode electrodes positioned above the primary motor areas. Before the first, and immediately after the last stimulation session, patients will perform a 10-min resting EEG recording. During a 28-day follow-up period following tDCS, patients will have to fill in a headache diary and questionnaires identical to those of the baseline period. Discussion This trial will evaluate the efficacy of an add-on treatment acting on the brain in patients with migraine, who are already treated with peripherally acting drugs, showing how tDCS acts in restoring the dysfunctional brain networks typical of the migraine patient. Clinical Trial Registration NCT05161871.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raffaele Ornello
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Chiara Rosignoli
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Valeria Caponnetto
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Francesca Pistoia
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Michele Ferrara
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Aurora D'Atri
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Simona Sacco
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Chua AL, Mehla S, Orlova YY. Drug Safety in Episodic Migraine Management in Adults. Part 2: Preventive Treatments. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2022; 26:493-504. [PMID: 35587859 DOI: 10.1007/s11916-022-01051-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The aim of this review is to aid in decision-making when choosing safe and effective options for preventive migraine medications. RECENT FINDINGS In Part 2, we have compiled clinically relevant safety considerations for commonly used migraine prophylactic treatments. Preventive treatment of episodic migraine includes nonspecific and migraine-specific drugs. While medications from several pharmacological classes-such as anticonvulsants, beta-blockers, and antidepressants-have an established efficacy in migraine prevention, they are associated with a number of side effects. The safety of migraine-specific treatments such as anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies and gepants are also discussed. This review highlights safety concerns of commonly used migraine prophylactic agents and offers suggestions on how to mitigate those risks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abigail L Chua
- Geisinger Health Systems, Neurology, 1000 E. Mountain Boulevard, Wilkes-Barre, PA, 18711, USA.
| | - Sandhya Mehla
- Ayer Neurosciences Institute, Hartford HealthCare Medical Group, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Norwich, CT, USA
| | - Yulia Y Orlova
- Neurology Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Driessen MT, Cohen JM, Thompson SF, Patterson-Lomba O, Seminerio MJ, Carr K, Totev TI, Sun R, Yim E, Mu F, Ayyagari R. Real-world effectiveness after initiating fremanezumab treatment in US patients with episodic and chronic migraine or difficult-to-treat migraine. J Headache Pain 2022; 23:56. [PMID: 35578182 PMCID: PMC9109352 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-022-01415-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2022] [Accepted: 03/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Fremanezumab, a fully humanized monoclonal antibody (mAb; IgG2Δa) that selectively targets calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), is approved for the preventive treatment of migraine in adults. The efficacy and safety of fremanezumab for migraine prevention have been demonstrated in randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials. Real-world effectiveness data are needed to complement clinical trial data. This study assessed the effectiveness of fremanezumab across different subgroups of adult patients with episodic migraine (EM), chronic migraine (CM), or difficult-to-treat (DTT) migraine in real-world clinical settings. Methods This retrospective, panel-based online chart review used electronic case report forms. Patient inclusion criteria were a physician diagnosis of EM or CM; age ≥ 18 years at the time of first fremanezumab initiation; ≥ 1 dose of fremanezumab treatment; ≥ 1 follow-up visit since first initiation; and ≥ 2 measurements of monthly migraine days (MMD; with 1 within a month before or at first initiation and ≥ 1 after first initiation). Changes in MMD and monthly headache days were assessed during the follow-up period. These endpoints were evaluated in subgroups of patients by migraine type (EM/CM) and in subgroups with DTT migraine (diagnosis of medication overuse [MO], major depressive disorder [MDD], generalized anxiety disorder [GAD], or prior exposure to a different CGRP pathway–targeted mAb [CGRP mAb]). Results Data were collected from 421 clinicians and 1003 patients. Mean (percent) reductions from baseline in MMD at Month 6 were − 7.7 (77.0%) in EM patients, − 10.1 (68.7%) in CM patients, − 10.8 (80.6%) in the MO subgroup, − 9.9 (68.3%) in the MDD subgroup, − 9.5 (66.4%) in the GAD subgroup, and − 9.0 (68.7%) in the prior CGRP mAb exposure subgroup. Improvements in MDD or GAD severity were reported by 45.5% and 45.8% of patients with comorbid MDD or GAD, respectively. Conclusions In this real-world study, fremanezumab demonstrated effectiveness for migraine regardless of migraine type or the presence of factors contributing to DTT migraine (MO, GAD, MDD, or prior exposure to a different CGRP mAb). Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s10194-022-01415-x.
Collapse
|