Literature review of vaccine-related adverse events reported from HPV vaccination in randomized controlled trials

Summary of the evidence on the safety, efficacy, and effectiveness of human papillomavirus vaccines: Umbrella review of systematic reviews

BACKGROUND

This objective of this umbrella review was to summarize the evidence on safety, efficacy, and effectiveness of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines in the general population.

METHODS

The authors conducted a literature search and selected systematic reviews if they were published from January 2006 through November 2018, included randomized controlled trials or observational studies, related to the general population, and evaluated HPV vaccine-related clinical outcomes. The authors independently and in duplicate screened literature, extracted data, and appraised reviews using AMSTAR 2, a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews.

RESULTS

The authors selected 30 systematic reviews that included male and female participants aged 9 through 76 years from multiple countries. Reviews evaluated postvaccine seroconversion, HPV infection rates, precancerous or benign lesions, and adverse events; none of the researchers reported on oral or oropharyngeal lesions. Results from the reviews showed that, compared with those who received a placebo or non-HPV-type vaccine, HPV-vaccinated participants had statistically significantly higher rates of seroconversion and local adverse events, statistically significantly lower rates of HPV infection and condylomata lesions, and decreased rates of HPV-related precancerous lesions, which did not always attain statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

Systematic reviews have found evidence that the available HPV vaccines are safe, effective, and efficacious against vaccine-type HPV infection and HPV-associated cellular changes, including precancerous and benign lesions.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

Dentists may use this resource to better understand the literature on the potential harms and benefits of HPV vaccination.

Knowledge and acceptability of the human papillomavirus vaccine among health professionals in Acre state, western Amazon

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the knowledge and acceptability of the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine among health professionals from western Amazonia.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted in the Sistema Assistencial è Saúde da Mulher e da Criança (Health Care System for Women and Children; SASMC) in Acre, Brazil, in 2017. The participants comprised 196 health professionals. The data collection instrument contained 31 questions about HPV, its clinical repercussions for women, and the HPV vaccine. Quantitative variables were presented as medians and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. For the analyses, chi-square tests and Mann-Whitney tests were used. The collected data were analyzed using Stata®11.0.

RESULTS

Of the 196 health professionals, 39.8% (n=76) were physicians and 61.2% (n=120) were other health professionals. The interviewees were mostly female (n=143, 73%, 95% CI 66.1 to 78.9%) who worked in the medical field (n=81, 41.3%, 95% CI 34.4 to 48.6%), and the median age was 38 years (95% CI 36.0 to 39.7). Physicians had increased knowledge regarding only the statement "cervical cancer is one of the main causes of cancer in women", with a proportion ratio of 0.88 (0.80; 0.97) and p<0.001. Regarding clinical knowledge of the HPV vaccine, a low proportion of correct answers was obtained for all the questions, and no significant differences were found between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Acceptability and knowledge of HPV and its vaccine were similar among health professionals, with knowledge gaps in questions about the relation between smoking and cervical cancer and specific clinical knowledge.

Risk of human papillomavirus infection in women with rheumatic disease: cervical cancer screening and prevention

Human Papillomavirus (HPV) is the most common sexually transmitted infection in the USA, with over 14 million people acquiring HPV each year. HPV is also the cause of most anogenital cancers. About 90% of HPV infections spontaneously resolve over 3 years. However, about 10% remain as persistent infection defined as repeatedly detected in cervical samples. As HPV is controlled by local and systemic immune responses, individuals with immunosuppression are at risk for cervical cancer. It is hypothesized that immunosuppressed individuals are more likely to have HPV persistence, which is necessary for malignant transformation. Accordingly, women with rheumatic diseases such as SLE and RA are likely vulnerable to HPV infection and the progression of cervical disease. The HPV vaccine, given as a series of vaccinations, is safe and effective that can prevent HPV infection and cervical cancer. There is no contraindication to HPV vaccination for women to age 26 with rheumatic disease, as it is not live. As in the general population, timing is key for the efficacy of the HPV vaccine as the goal is to vaccinate prior to sexual debut and exposure to HPV. There are no formal recommendations for cervical cancer screening in women with rheumatic disease but recommendations for the HIV-positive population can be adopted, meaning to screen with a Pap test annually for three consecutive years and if all normal, to extend the interval to every 3 years with the option of co-testing with HPV at 30 years and older.

[Analysis of the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System in Brazil, 2014 to 2016Análisis del Sistema de Información de Vigilancia de Eventos Adversos Posvacunación en Brasil, 2014 a 2016]

OBJECTIVE

To describe the characteristics of vaccine adverse events (VAE) reports in the online VAE Reporting System (VAE-RS) after 2 years of operation.

METHOD

A descriptive analysis of VAE reports entered into the VAE-RS between July 2014 and June 2016 was performed.

RESULTS

During the study period, 24 732 VAE were reported. Of 5 570 Brazilian municipalities, 2 571 (46.2%) reported at least one VAE; however, only 1 622 (6.6%) reports had been completed/closed at the end of the study period. Of these, 89.9% referred to mild VAE. Among the completed reports, 19.7% did not provide information on "type of medical care provided," and 98.7% had no information regarding laboratory tests. Systemic neurological symptoms were the most frequent serious VAE among closed reports (59.5% of serious signs/symptoms). Concerning age, the highest VAE reporting coefficients were recorded for children aged ≤ 4 years.

CONCLUSION

The VAE-RS is useful to monitor immunization safety. However, municipal services must increase adherence to the system and perform the required investigation and reporting of VAE, with timely and adequate completion of the VAE-RS form. Knowledge regarding VAE can be used in the daily routine of surveillance services, improving the safety of immunobiological agents.