Effect of increased positive end-expiratory pressure on intracranial pressure and cerebral oxygenation: impact of respiratory mechanics and hypovolemia

Treatment of intractable paradoxical herniation by invasive mechanical ventilation with increased positive end-expiratory pressure: a case report

OBJECTIVE

Paradoxical herniation (PH) is a rare but potentially life-threatening complication after decompressive craniectomy. The core treatment strategy for PH focuses on increasing intracranial pressure. Here, we present the treatment course of intractable PH in a 59-year-old patient with a traumatic acute subdural hematoma.

METHODS

The patient underwent two operations to evacuate intracranial hematomas followed by decompressive craniectomy within 48 h. Intractable PH was induced by persistent cerebrospinal fluid leakage due to multiple lumbar punctures. The condition was managed with conventional interventions, such as a supine position, intravenous fluid infusion, and multiple intrathecal saline injections, which have been proven to be inefficient. Owing to his unconsciousness and concurrent severe pneumonia, the patient underwent invasive mechanical ventilation with increased positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) to optimize oxygen delivery. PEEP was set at 10 cmH2O with the intention of facilitating alveolar recruitment.

RESULTS

Increased PEEP unexpectedly played a role in elevating intracranial pressure and, as a result, led to the complete resolution of PH. The patient gradually recovered and resumed his daily activities.

CONCLUSIONS

Applying invasive mechanical ventilation with increased PEEP for treating intractable PH can yield a favorable outcome. It represents a novel approach to dealing with such a rare complication.

Positive end-expiratory pressure increases intracranial pressure but not pressure reactivity index in supine and prone positions: a porcine model study

Introduction

Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and prone positioning can improve gas exchange by promoting uniform lung aeration. However, elevated ventilation pressures may increase intracranial pressure (ICP) and disrupt cerebral autoregulation. This study investigated the effects of PEEP on ICP and cerebral autoregulation in a porcine model with healthy lungs and normal ICP, comparing prone and supine positions. Cerebral autoregulation was assessed through cerebrovascular reactivity using the pressure reactivity index (PRx). We also explored whether other baseline variables influenced potential variances in ICP and PRx.

Methodology

Twelve anesthetized pigs were randomized to begin in either supine or prone position, across PEEP of 5, 10, 15, and 20 cmH2O. Continuous monitoring included esophageal pressure to calculate end-inspiratory and end-expiratory transpulmonary pressures. The ICM+® software (University of Cambridge Enterprise, Cambridge, United Kingdom) was used for high-resolution data collection, signal processing and ICP curve analysis. Linear mixed-effects models and ANOVA were used to analyze changes in ICP and PRx and the influence of position. An exploratory correlation analysis was conducted on baseline variables potentially related to the ICP increase.

Results

Mean ICP increase was 1.0 mmHg ± 0.9 at 10 cmH2O PEEP, 2.0 mmHg ± 1.7 at 15 cmH2O PEEP, and 3.1 mmHg ± 1.6 at 20 cmH2O PEEP compared to a baseline PEEP of 5 cmH2O (p < 0.001). The effect of PEEP increase on ICP was not influenced by body position. PRx remained unaffected by PEEP. PEEP-induced increases in ICP were higher in cases of higher baseline ICP, higher central venous pressure, lower respiratory system elastance and lower end-inspiratory and end-expiratory transpulmonary pressures.

Conclusion

Increasing PEEP elevates ICP regardless of body position without adversely affecting cerebral autoregulation in a healthy porcine model. Baseline ICP, central venous pressure, respiratory system elastance and end-inspiratory and end-expiratory transpulmonary pressure may influence the magnitude of ICP changes.

Impact of healthcare system strain on the implementation of ICU sedation practices and encephalopathy burden during the early COVID-19 pandemic

The COVID-19 pandemic posed unprecedented challenges to healthcare systems worldwide, particularly in managing critically ill patients requiring mechanical ventilation early in the pandemic. Surging patient volumes strained hospital resources and complicated the implementation of standard-of-care intensive care unit (ICU) practices, including sedation management. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of an evidence-based ICU sedation bundle during the early COVID-19 pandemic. The bundle was designed by a multi-disciplinary collaborative to reinforce best clinical practices related to ICU sedation. The bundle was implemented prospectively with retrospective analysis of electronic medical record data. The setting was the ICUs of a single-center tertiary hospital. The patients were the ICU patients requiring mechanical ventilation for confirmed COVID-19 between March and June 2020. A learning health collaborative developed a sedation bundle encouraging goal-directed sedation and use of adjunctive strategies to avoid excessive sedative administration. Implementation strategies included structured in-service training, audit and feedback, and continuous improvement. Sedative utilization and clinical outcomes were compared between patients admitted before and after the sedation bundle implementation. Quasi-experimental interrupted time-series analyses of pre and post intervention sedative utilization, hospital length of stay, and number of days free of delirium, coma, or death in 21 days (as a quantitative measure of encephalopathy burden). The analysis used the time duration between start of the COVID-19 wave and ICU admission to identify a "breakpoint" indicating a change in observed trends. A total of 183 patients (age 59.0 ± 15.9 years) were included, with 83 (45%) admitted before the intervention began. Benzodiazepine utilization increased for patients admitted after the bundle implementation, while agents intended to reduce benzodiazepine use showed no greater utilization. No "breakpoint" was identified to suggest the bundle impacted any endpoint measure. However, increasing time between COVID-19 wave start and ICU admission was associated with fewer delirium, coma, and death-free days (β =  - 0.044 [95% CI - 0.085, - 0.003] days/wave day); more days of benzodiazepine infusion (β = 0.056 [95% CI 0.025, 0.088] days/wave day); and a higher maximum benzodiazepine infusion rate (β = 0.079 [95% CI 0.037, 0.120] mg/h/wave day). The evidence-based practice bundle did not significantly alter sedation utilization patterns during the first COVID-19 wave. Sedation practices deteriorated and encephalopathy burden increased over time, highlighting that strategies to reinforce clinical practices may be hindered under conditions of extreme healthcare system strain.

The Effect of Recruitment Maneuvers on Cerebrovascular Dynamics and Right Ventricular Function in Patients with Acute Brain Injury: A Single-Center Prospective Study

BACKGROUND

Optimization of ventilatory settings is challenging for patients in the neurointensive care unit, requiring a balance between precise gas exchange control, lung protection, and managing hemodynamic effects of positive pressure ventilation. Although recruitment maneuvers (RMs) may enhance oxygenation, they could also exert profound undesirable systemic impacts.

METHODS

The single-center, prospective study investigated the effects of RMs (up-titration of positive end-expiratory pressure) on multimodal neuromonitoring in patients with acute brain injury. Our primary focus was on intracranial pressure and secondarily on cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) and other neurological parameters: cerebral autoregulation [pressure reactivity index (PRx)] and regional cerebral oxygenation (rSO2). We also assessed blood pressure and right ventricular (RV) function evaluated using tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion. Results are expressed as the difference (Δ) from baseline values obtained after completing the RMs.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients were enrolled in the study. RMs resulted in increased intracranial pressure (Δ = 4.8 mm Hg) and reduced CPP (ΔCPP = -12.8 mm Hg) and mean arterial pressure (difference in mean arterial pressure = -5.2 mm Hg) (all p < 0.001). Cerebral autoregulation worsened (ΔPRx = 0.31 a.u.; p < 0.001). Despite higher systemic oxygenation (difference in partial pressure of O2 = 4 mm Hg; p = 0.001) and unchanged carbon dioxide levels, rSO2 marginally decreased (ΔrSO2 = -0.5%; p = 0.031), with a significant drop in arterial content and increase in the venous content. RV systolic function decreased (difference in tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion = -0.1 cm; p < 0.001) with a tendency toward increased RV basal diameter (p = 0.06). Grouping patients according to ΔCPP or ΔPRx revealed that those with poorer tolerance to RMs had higher CPP (p = 0.040) and a larger RV basal diameter (p = 0.034) at baseline.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with acute brain injury, RMs appear to have adverse effects on cerebral hemodynamics. These findings might be partially explained by RM's impact on RV function. Further advanced echocardiography monitoring is required to prove this hypothesis.

Effects of positive end-expiratory pressure on intracranial pressure, cerebral perfusion pressure, and brain oxygenation in acute brain injury: Friend or foe? A scoping review

Background

Patients with acute brain injury (ABI) are a peculiar population because ABI does not only affect the brain but also other organs such as the lungs, as theorized in brain-lung crosstalk models. ABI patients often require mechanical ventilation (MV) to avoid the complications of impaired respiratory function that can follow ABI; MV should be settled with meticulousness owing to its effects on the intracranial compartment, especially regarding positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). This scoping review aimed to (1) describe the physiological basis and mechanisms related to the effects of PEEP in ABI; (2) examine how clinical research is conducted on this topic; (3) identify methods for setting PEEP in ABI; and (4) investigate the impact of the application of PEEP in ABI on the outcome.

Methods

The five-stage paradigm devised by Peters et al. and expanded by Arksey and O'Malley, Levac et al., and the Joanna Briggs Institute was used for methodology. We also adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) extension criteria. Inclusion criteria: we compiled all scientific data from peer-reviewed journals and studies that discussed the application of PEEP and its impact on intracranial pressure, cerebral perfusion pressure, and brain oxygenation in adult patients with ABI. Exclusion criteria: studies that only examined a pediatric patient group (those under the age of 18), experiments conducted solely on animals; studies without intracranial pressure and/or cerebral perfusion pressure determinations, and studies with incomplete information. Two authors searched and screened for inclusion in papers published up to July 2023 using the PubMed-indexed online database. Data were presented in narrative and tubular form.

Results

The initial search yielded 330 references on the application of PEEP in ABI, of which 36 met our inclusion criteria. PEEP has recognized beneficial effects on gas exchange, but it produces hemodynamic changes that should be predicted to avoid undesired consequences on cerebral blood flow and intracranial pressure. Moreover, the elastic properties of the lungs influence the transmission of the forces applied by MV over the brain so they should be taken into consideration. Currently, there are no specific tools that can predict the effect of PEEP on the brain, but there is an established need for a comprehensive monitoring approach for these patients, acknowledging the etiology of ABI and the measurable variables to personalize MV.

Conclusion

PEEP can be safely used in patients with ABI to improve gas exchange keeping in mind its potentially harmful effects, which can be predicted with adequate monitoring supported by bedside non-invasive neuromonitoring tools.

Effects of positive end-expiratory pressure on brain oxygenation, systemic oxygen cascade and metabolism in acute brain injured patients: a pilot physiological cross-sectional study

Patients with acute brain injury (ABI) often require the application of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) to optimize mechanical ventilation and systemic oxygenation. However, the effect of PEEP on cerebral function and metabolism is unclear. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of PEEP augmentation test (from 5 to 15 cmH2O) on brain oxygenation, systemic oxygen cascade and metabolism in ABI patients. Secondary aims include to determine whether changes in regional cerebral oxygenation are reflected by changes in oxygenation cascade and metabolism, and to assess the correlation between brain oxygenation and mechanical ventilation settings. Single center, pilot cross-sectional observational study in an Academic Hospital. Inclusion criteria were: adult (> 18 y/o) patients with ABI and stable intracranial pressure, available gas exchange and indirect calorimetry (IC) monitoring. Cerebral oxygenation was monitored with near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) and different derived parameters were collected: variation (Δ) in oxy (O2)-hemoglobin (Hb) (ΔO2Hbi), deoxy-Hb(ΔHHbi), total-Hb(ΔcHbi), and total regional oxygenation (ΔrSO2). Oxygen cascade and metabolism were monitored with arterial/venous blood gas analysis [arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2), arterial saturation of oxygen (SaO2), oxygen delivery (DO2), and lactate], and IC [energy expenditure (REE), respiratory quotient (RQ), oxygen consumption (VO2), and carbon dioxide production (VCO2)]. Data were measured at PEEP 5 cmH2O and 15 cmH2O and expressed as delta (Δ) values. Ten patients with ABI [median age 70 (IQR 62-75) years, 6 (60%) were male, median Glasgow Coma Scale at ICU admission 5.5 (IQR 3-8)] were included. PEEP augmentation from 5 to 15 cmH2O did not affect cerebral oxygenation, systemic oxygen cascade parameters, and metabolism. The arterial component of cerebral oxygenation was significantly correlated with DO2 (ΔO2HBi, rho = 0.717, p = 0.037). ΔrSO2 (rho = 0.727, p = 0.032), ΔcHbi (rho = 0.797, p = 0.013), and ΔHHBi (rho = 0.816, p = 0.009) were significantly correlated with SaO2, but not ΔO2Hbi. ΔrSO2 was significantly correlated with VCO2 (rho = 0.681, p = 0.049). No correlation between brain oxygenation and ventilatory parameters was found. PEEP augmentation test did not affect cerebral and systemic oxygenation or metabolism. Changes in cerebral oxygenation significantly correlated with DO2, SaO2, and VCO2. Cerebral oxygen monitoring could be considered for individualization of mechanical ventilation setting in ABI patients without high or instable intracranial pressure.

Papilledema Secondary to Barotrauma in a Young Adult With Severe Status Asthmaticus With Ventilatory Failure, Pneumothorax, and a Complex Clinical Course

Intubation and mechanical ventilation are common therapeutic interventions in intensive care unit settings. Barotrauma is a known complication of using positive pressures in a tissue defined by extra alveolar air in locations where it is not generally found in patients receiving mechanical ventilation. Several clinical manifestations of barotrauma include pneumothorax, subcutaneous emphysema, pneumoperitoneum, pneumomediastinum or pneumopericardium, air embolization, and hyperinflated left lower lobe. However, papilledema is an unreported and uncommon complication we observed in one of our patients, making it a unique presentation. We present the case of a young male patient intubated for asthma exacerbation requiring mechanical ventilation with subsequent development of papilledema. Our case report highlights the importance of knowing this rare complication of barotrauma as early commencement of lung-protective strategies will help prevent it.

Impact of Stepwise Recruitment Maneuvers on Cerebral Hemodynamics: Experimental Study in Neonatal Model

BACKGROUND

Lung recruitment maneuvers (LRMs) have been demonstrated to be effective in avoiding atelectasis during general anesthesia in the pediatric population. Performing these maneuvers is safe at the systemic hemodynamic and respiratory levels.

AIMS

We aimed to evaluate the impact of a stepwise LRM and individualized positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on cerebral hemodynamics in an experimental neonatal model.

METHODS

Eleven newborn pigs (less than 72 h old, 2.56 ± 0.18 kg in weight) were included in the study. The LRM was performed under pressure-controlled ventilation with a constant driving pressure (15 cmH2O) in a stepwise increasing PEEP model. The target peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) was 30 cmH2O and the PEEP was 15 cmH2O. The following hemodynamic variables were monitored using the PICCO® system: mean arterial pressure (MAP), central venous pressure (CVP), and cardiac output (CO). The cerebral hemodynamics variables monitored were intracranial pressure (ICP) (with an intraparenchymal Camino® catheter) and cerebral oxygen saturation (rSO2) (with the oximetry monitor INVOS 5100® system). The following respiratory parameters were monitored: oxygen saturation, fraction of inspired oxygen, partial pressure of oxygen, end-tidal carbon dioxide pressure, Pmean, PEEP, static compliance (Cstat), and dynamic compliance (Cdyn).

RESULTS

All LRMs were safely performed as scheduled without any interruptions. Systemic hemodynamic stability was maintained during the lung recruitment maneuver. No changes in ICP occurred. We observed an improvement in rSO2 after the maneuver (+5.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

Stepwise LRMs are a safe tool to avoid atelectasis. We did not observe an impairment in cerebral hemodynamics but an improvement in cerebral oxygenation.