Communicating incidental and reportable findings from research MRIs: considering factors beyond the findings in an underrepresented pediatric population

Strategies for Equitable Recruitment to Engage Underrepresented Youth and Their Families into Clinical Research: Findings from the BEAD-T1D Pilot Study

INTRODUCTION

To address disparities in clinical research, we present strategies to optimize recruitment of underrepresented families into the Building the Evidence to Address Disparities in Type 1 Diabetes (BEAD-T1D) study.

METHODS

A bilingual/bicultural Latino research assistant (RA) was hired to facilitate culturally congruent recruitment for pediatric type 1 diabetes families. The RA screened, approached, and consented families using their preferred language, time of contact, and answered personal concerns around research. Families were given the option to consent during outpatient clinic visits (in-person, or virtually via video/phone call) at a pace set by the parent/guardian to ensure understanding.

RESULTS

Sixty-four families (Hispanic-65%, Non-Hispanic White [NHW]-17%, Non-Hispanic Black-1%, and Other-4%) were eligible. Of 49 approached, 32 consented (39 ± 7.9 years; female-81%; Hispanic-72%, NHW-28%, <50K income-69%, Spanish-speaking-50%). Clinic approaches were important to successful consent: 87% of the clinic approaches resulted in consent. Barriers to clinic approaches for RA included late/no response from clinicians, care team ending visit, and bandwidth/connectivity issues. Facilitators to clinic approaches included collaborative clinic care teams, flexible RA hours, and patient screening days in advance. We exceeded our recruitment goals for surveys (31/30), focus groups/interviews (26/20), and advisory board (22/10).

CONCLUSIONS

We identified that culturally and linguistically congruent staff, flexible recruitment practices, and prioritizing participant availability were solutions to recruit a diverse study cohort resulting exceeding recruitment goals. Cultural interpersonal relationships formed with families addressed barriers to research participation within and outside of the medical system. These strategies suggest equitable clinical trial recruitment is feasible in diabetes research.

Participant perspectives on management and communication of incidental findings identified on radiographic imaging performed during a clinical research trial: A single site pilot study

Background

Incidental findings (IFs) in radiographic imaging are unexpected discoveries unrelated to the purpose of the scan. While the protocol for communicating IFs is better defined for clinical providers, little formal guidance on communicating IFs identified on research scans to participants is available. This study explored participants' experience with communication and management of IFs found on imaging identified in a clinical research trial.

Methods

Participants who completed the parent clinical trial, which included imaging, were invited to participate. A survey, developed by the study team, was administered telephonically, and consisted of multiple choice and open-ended questions.

Results

Thirty participants enrolled in the survey study. Ninety-three percent of all participants (with and without IFs) reported they would participate in another research study to learn information that was important to their health. Seventeen participants reported being notified about an IF on their study scan(s). Ninety-four percent of those participants with an IF were satisfied with how the IF was communicated, and 71 % were grateful to find out about a health problem before it became an issue. Forty-one percent reported that learning about the IF led to improved health. Content analysis of the data from the open-ended questions revealed categories and themes which enriched the quantitative data.

Conclusion

Participants generally wanted to know when an IF was discovered unexpectedly on their imaging scan, as they learned important information about their health. Findings underscore the importance of having a clear protocol for communicating IFs to research study participants that undergo evaluation with radiographic imaging.

Incidental Findings Among Youth Participating in Multimodal Imaging Research: Characteristics of Findings and Description of a Management Approach

Research imaging in healthy and clinical youth populations yields incidental findings that require a management strategy. Our primary objective was to document the frequency and nature of incidental findings within a research group integrating multiple imaging modalities. A second objective was to describe the evolution of an approach to handling incidental findings. A case example was included to display the intricacies of some of these scenarios. Youth, ages 13-20 years, with bipolar disorder, familial risk for bipolar disorder, or healthy controls, obtained one or a combination of neuroimaging, cardio-thoracic imaging, retinal imaging, and carotid imaging. All images were systematically reviewed for incidental findings. Overall, of 223 participants (n = 102 healthy controls), 59% (n = 131) had a brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) incidental finding and 27% (n = 60) had at least one incidental brain finding requiring non-urgent follow-up. In addition, of 109 participants with chest/cardiac MRI and carotid ultrasound, 3% (n = 3) had chest findings, 2% (n = 2) had cardiac findings, and 1% (n = 1) had a carotid finding. Of 165 youth with retinal imaging, 1% (n = 2) had incidental findings. While the vast majority of these incidental findings were of a non-serious, non-urgent nature, there were noteworthy exceptions. Imaging research groups need a system that emphasizes the value of clinical review of research images and one that is collaborative and responsive in order to inform follow-up plans. Rating systems that have been developed and used in neuroimaging for the classification of incidental findings can be adapted for use in areas other than the brain. Regardless of severity, incidental findings may raise anxiety in youth participants and their parents. The optimal threshold is one that balances transparency with utility.