Are German family practitioners and psychiatrists sufficiently trained to diagnose and treat patients with alcohol problems?

Physician Reluctance to Intervene in Addiction: A Systematic Review

Importance

The overdose epidemic continues in the US, with 107 941 overdose deaths in 2022 and countless lives affected by the addiction crisis. Although widespread efforts to train and support physicians to implement medications and other evidence-based substance use disorder interventions have been ongoing, adoption of these evidence-based practices (EBPs) by physicians remains low.

Objective

To describe physician-reported reasons for reluctance to address substance use and addiction in their clinical practices using screening, treatment, harm reduction, or recovery support interventions.

Data Sources

A literature search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, medRxiv, and SSRN Medical Research Network was conducted and returned articles published from January 1, 1960, through October 5, 2021.

Study Selection

Publications that included physicians, discussed substance use interventions, and presented data on reasons for reluctance to intervene in addiction were included.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

Two reviewers (L.N., M.C., L.F., J.P., C.S., and S.W.) independently reviewed each publication; a third reviewer resolved discordant votes (M.C. and W.C.). This systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines and the theoretical domains framework was used to systematically extract reluctance reasons.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was reasons for physician reluctance to address substance use disorder. The association of reasons for reluctance with practice setting and drug type was also measured. Reasons and other variables were determined according to predefined criteria.

Results

A total of 183 of 9308 returned studies reporting data collected from 66 732 physicians were included. Most studies reported survey data. Alcohol, nicotine, and opioids were the most often studied substances; screening and treatment were the most often studied interventions. The most common reluctance reasons were lack of institutional support (173 of 213 articles [81.2%]), knowledge (174 of 242 articles [71.9%]), skill (170 of 230 articles [73.9%]), and cognitive capacity (136 of 185 articles [73.5%]). Reimbursement concerns were also noted. Bivariate analysis revealed associations between these reasons and physician specialty, intervention type, and drug.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this systematic review of reasons for physician reluctance to intervene in addiction, the most common reasons were lack of institutional support, knowledge, skill, and cognitive capacity. Targeting these reasons with education and training, policy development, and program implementation may improve adoption by physicians of EBPs for substance use and addiction care. Future studies of physician-reported reasons for reluctance to adopt EBPs may be improved through use of a theoretical framework and improved adherence to and reporting of survey development best practices; development of a validated survey instrument may further improve study results.

Effect of family intervention on relapse rate of Chinese patients with alcohol-dependent

Objective

This study explored the impact of a family intervention on the relapse rate of Chinese patients with alcohol dependence.

Methods

A total of 151 male patients with alcohol dependence who were discharged from the Substance Dependence Department of the Wenzhou Seventh People's Hospital from January to December 2020 were selected. They were divided into the control (n = 73) and experimental (n = 78) groups. Patients in both groups received routine alcohol cessation treatment. Moreover, patients in the experimental group were followed up by a professional psychiatrist to carry out individual family intervention. The Family Function Rating Scale (FAD), a Self-made general information questionnaire, and the Chinese version of the Family Intimacy and Adaptability Scale (FACESI-CV) were performed. Re-drinking rate and readmission rate were assessed.

Results

Family intervention could reduce relapse rate (31, 39.74%) and rehospitalization (27, 34.62%) compared with the control group. After family training, FAD factor scores were improved in the experiment group in comparison with the control group. Family training improved communication (18.2 ± 3.7), role (20.8 ± 2.5), emotional response (10.8 ± 1.8), emotional involvement (13.7 ± 1.2), behavioral control (19.8 ± 1.2), and overall functionality (23.5 ± 2.1) in the experiment group in comparison with the control group. After family training, intimacy (70.5 ± 8.7) and adaptability (64.1 ± 6.9) in the experiment group was higher than in the control group. After family intervention, Michigan Alcohol Dependence Scale (MAST) (9.21 ± 0.68) and Short-Form 36 (SF-36) (80.32 ± 4.47) in the experiment group were higher than the control group.

Conclusion

Family intervention for families of patients with alcohol dependence can improve their family function, increase their family intimacy and adaptability, and reduce the rate of relapse.

High-mind wandering correlates with high risk for problematic alcohol use in China and Germany

Everyone experiences the natural ebb and flow of task-unrelated thoughts. Given how common the fluctuations in these thoughts are, surprisingly, we know very little about how they shape individuals' responses to alcohol use. Here, we investigated if mind wandering is associated with a risk of developing problematic alcohol use. We undertook an online survey among the general population in China (N = 1123) and Germany (N = 1018) from December 2021 to February 2022 and examined the subjective experience of mind wandering and problematic alcohol use through the Mind Wandering Questionnaire (MWQ) and the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT). We compared mind wandering and problematic alcohol use between two countries and investigated the association between MWQ scores with AUDIT scores. We found higher scores on the MWQ and a high percentage of problematic alcohol use (i.e., AUDIT score ≥ 8) in Germany (22.5%) as compared to in China (14.5%). Higher self-reported mind wandering was associated with higher AUDIT scores. AUDIT scores were increased mostly in male, elder, and high-mind wandering people. Our findings highlight that mind wandering and problematic alcohol use enhanced in Germany as compared to in China. Our study sheds light on the relationship between mind wandering and problematic alcohol use that may help to further investigate causal effects of interventions.

Estimating the prevalence of alcohol-related disorders and treatment utilization in Bremen 2016/2017 through routine data linkage

Background

In Germany, most individuals with alcohol dependence are recognized by the health care system and about 16% per year receive addiction-specific care. This paper aimed to analyze the prevalence and treatment utilization rate of people with alcohol dependence by type of addiction-specific care in the federal state of Bremen using routine and survey data.

Methods

The number of individuals with alcohol dependence was estimated using data from the 2018 Epidemiological Survey of Substance Abuse (ESA). Furthermore, linked routine data of two statutory health insurances (SHIs), the German pension insurance (GPI), and the communal hospital group Gesundheit Nord - Bremen Hospital Group (GeNo), from 2016/2017, were analyzed. Based on SHI data, the administrative prevalence of various alcohol-related diagnoses according to the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10), in various treatment settings, was extrapolated to the total population of Bremen. Based on all routine data sources, treatment and care services for individuals with alcohol dependence were also extrapolated to Bremen's total population. Care services included outpatient addiction care visits and addiction-specific treatments, [i.e., qualified withdrawal treatment (QWT), outpatient pharmacotherapy as relapse prevention, and rehabilitation treatment].

Results

Of the survey-estimated 15,792 individuals with alcohol dependence in Bremen, 72.4% (n = 11,427) had a diagnosis documented with an ICD-10 code for alcohol dependence (F10.2) or withdrawal state (F10.3-4). One in 10 individuals with alcohol dependence (n = 1,577) used one or more addiction-specific care services during the observation period. Specifically, 3.7% (n = 675) received outpatient addiction care, 3.9% (n = 736) initiated QWT, 0.8% (n = 133) received pharmacotherapy, and 2.6% (n = 405) underwent rehabilitation treatment. The share of seeking addiction-specific treatment after diagnosis was highest among younger and male patients.

Conclusion

Although more than half of the individuals with alcohol dependence are documented in the health system, utilization rates of addiction-specific treatments are low. These low utilization rates suggest that there are existing barriers to transferring patients with alcohol dependence into addiction-specific care. Strengthening primary medical care provision in dealing with alcohol-related disorders and improving networking within the addiction support system appear to be particularly appropriate.

Prevalence and characteristics of hazardous and harmful drinkers receiving general practitioners' brief advice on and support with alcohol consumption in Germany: results of a population survey

OBJECTIVE

The German treatment guideline on alcohol-related disorders recommends that general practitioners (GPs) offer brief advice on, and support with, reducing alcohol consumption to hazardous (at risk for health events) and harmful (exhibit health events) drinking patients. We aimed to estimate the implementation of this recommendation using general population data.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional analysis of data (2021/2022) of a nationwide, population-based household survey.

SETTING

Germany.

PARTICIPANTS

Population-based sample of 2247 adult respondents who reported hazardous or harmful drinking according to the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-Consumption (AUDIT-C; score women: 4-12 and men: 5-12).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Ever receipt of 'brief GP advice on, or support with, reducing alcohol consumption'. Differences in the likelihood of ever receiving advice and/or support (yes/no) relative to respondents' sociodemographic, smoking and alcohol consumption characteristics were estimated using logistic regressions.

RESULTS

Ever receipt of GP advice on/support with reducing drinking was reported among 6.3% (95% CI=5.3% to 7.4%), and the offer of support among 1.5% (95% CI=1.1% to 2.1%) of the hazardous and harmful drinking respondents. The likelihood of having ever received advice/support was positively associated with being older (OR=1.03 per year, 95% CI=1.01 to 1.04), a current or former (vs never) smoker (OR=2.36, 95% CI=1.46 to 3.80; OR=2.17, 95% CI=1.23 to 3.81) and with increasing alcohol consumption (OR=1.76 per score, 95% CI=1.59 to 1.95). One in two harmful drinking respondents (AUDIT-C score 10-12) reported appropriate advice/support. The likelihood was negatively associated with being woman (eg, OR=0.32, 95% CI=0.21 to 0.48), having a medium or high (vs low) education and with increasing household income.

CONCLUSIONS

A small proportion of hazardous and harmful drinking people in Germany report having ever received GP advice on, or support with, reducing alcohol consumption. The implementation of advice/support seems to be linked to specific socio-demographic characteristics, tobacco smoking and alcohol consumption level. Health policy measures should aim to increase alcohol screening, brief intervention rates and awareness for at-risk populations in primary care.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

DRKS00011322, DRKS00017157.

Primary care provider expectations of addiction services and patients in Spain

BACKGROUND

Primary care (PC) is crucial in the care of substance use disorder (SUD) patients. However, the relationship between PC and addiction settings is complex and collaboration issues stand out. Available evidence suggests that integration of SUD and PC services can improve physical and mental health of SUD patients and reduce health expenses.

OBJECTIVE

To explore the experiences, views and attitudes of PC professionals towards the interaction between PC and SUD services.

METHODS

Twenty-seven GPs took part in three focus groups. The focus group sessions were audio-taped, transcribed verbatim and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Recurrent themes were identified.

RESULTS

Four main themes were devised: (1) Differences and specificities of SUD patients, (2) Interaction between providers of PC and addiction services, (3) Patient management (4) Addiction stigma. These main themes reflect the consideration that SUD patients are a specific group with specific care needs that yield specific challenges to GPs themselves. Improved training, availability of a shared medical record system, increased feedback between GP and addiction specialists and the efficiency of the circuit are to be considered the main priority for the majority of the participants.

CONCLUSIONS

An efficient and effective referral circuit, with increased feedback and shared medical records is considered key to GPs. Its implementation should keep in mind the specific features of both SUD patients and GPs.

Barrieren und Umsetzungsstrategien für die Implementierung der S3-Leitlinie Screening, Diagnose und Behandlung alkoholbezogener Störungen aus Sicht von Behandlern und Betroffenen

Ziel der Studie Für die erfolgreiche Implementierung von Leitlinien sind kontextspezifische Umsetzungsstrategien, welche die spezifische Versorgungssituation sowie mögliche Umsetzungsbarrieren berücksichtigen, vielversprechend. Ziel dieser Untersuchung war es, mögliche Barrieren und präferierte Umsetzungsstrategien für die Implementierung der S3-Leitlinie „Screening, Diagnose und Behandlung alkoholbezogener Störungen“ aus der Perspektive von Behandlern und Betroffenen zu erfassen.

Methodik Als Teil des vom Bundesministerium für Gesundheit geförderten Projekts Implementierung und Evaluation der S3-Leitlinie zu Screening, Diagnose und Behandlung alkoholbezogener Störungen (IMPELA) wurden Barrieren und mögliche Strategien für die Umsetzung der Leitlinienempfehlungen mithilfe eines selbst entwickelten Fragebogens querschnittlich erhoben. Sowohl Gesundheitsfachpersonal aus Primärversorgung und Suchthilfe (Behandler) als auch Betroffene von alkoholbezogenen Störungen und deren Angehörige in der Modellregion Bundesland Bremen wurden mithilfe unterschiedlicher Rekrutierungsstrategien (postalisch, persönlich, über ausgelegte Flyer) zur Teilnahme eingeladen. Der Fragebogen konnte in Papierversion oder online bearbeitet werden. Zusätzlich wurde der Fragebogen online über relevante Fachgesellschaften und Patientenorganisationen mithilfe von E-Mailverteilern bundesweit verbreitet.

Ergebnisse Datensätze von 263 Behandlern wurden in die Auswertung eingeschlossen, davon 163 (62%) Behandler aus Bremen und 100 (38%) aus anderen Bundesländern. Die Behandler waren im Mittel zwischen 51,7 (Bremen) und 50,9 (Bundesweit) Jahre alt und hatten 22,8 (Bremen) bzw. 23,7 (Bundesweit) Jahre Berufserfahrung. Die Mehrheit der Befragten waren Ärzte (62,6% Bremen; 50% Bundesweit). Als Hauptbarrieren empfanden die Behandler das mangelnde Wissen über die Existenz der Leitlinie (65,6% Bremen; 44% Bundesweit) und die geringen zeitlichen Ressourcen im Behandlungsalltag (68,7% Bremen; 50% Bundesweit). Als mögliche Umsetzungsstrategien wurden u. a. die stärkere Information der Fachöffentlichkeit (33,7% Bremen; 39% Bundesweit) sowie Fact-Sheets (34,9% Bremen; 38% Bundesweit) genannt. Zusätzlich konnten Daten von 94 Betroffenen/Angehörigen ausgewertet werden (57,7% männlich; Alter M=44,7 Jahre). Von diesen gaben 51 Personen (54,3%) an, bereits selbst eine Suchtbehandlung in Anspruch genommen zu haben. Als Schwierigkeiten für die Versorgung benannten die Betroffenen/Angehörigen am häufigsten, dass Betroffene aus Angst vor Konsequenzen keine Hilfe suchen (n=51; 54%) oder ihre Probleme nicht wahrhaben wollen (n=49, 52,1%), sowie zu lange Wartezeiten auf Behandlungsplätze (n=45; 47,8%). Verbesserungspotential sahen die Betroffenen v. a. in den Bereichen Screening („Ansprechen des Alkoholkonsums“; n=44; 46,8%) und einem nahtlosen Übergang zwischen verschiedenen Behandlungssettings (n=42; 44,6%).

Schlussfolgerungen Zusätzlich zu den bisherigen Bemühungen zur Disseminierung der S3-Leitlinie Screening, Diagnose und Behandlung alkoholbezogener Störungen legen die Ergebnisse dieser Studie die Notwendigkeit einer kontextspezifischen Förderung der Leitlinienumsetzung nahe.