Albuminuria testing and nephrology care among insured US adults with chronic kidney disease: a missed opportunity

Making treatment guideline recommendations in chronic kidney disease and type 2 diabetes more accessible to primary care providers in the United States

Clinical practice guidelines for the management of chronic kidney disease (CKD) associated with type 2 diabetes (T2D) are designed to assist healthcare professionals with clinical decision making by providing recommendations on the screening, detection, management, and treatment of these conditions. However, primary care practitioners (PCPs) may have clinical inertia when it comes to routinely enacting CKD and T2D guideline recommendations in their clinical practices. Guideline developers have published a range of resources with the aim of facilitating easier access to guideline recommendations to support efficient and consistent implementation into clinical practice of PCPs. Challenges remain in providing strategies to reduce inertia in the application of guideline recommendations in primary care. In this review, we explore reasons behind the low level of awareness and poor uptake of published evidence-based care approaches to the optimal management of patients with T2D and CKD. Finally, we present suggestions on strategies to improve the implementation of guideline-directed recommendations in primary care.

Epidemiology of Diabetic Kidney Disease among US Veterans

Rationale

With a large number of patients and high mortality, diabetic kidney disease (DKD) imposes a significant burden on US health care. Although diabetes is the leading cause of chronic kidney disease and complications, the epidemiology of DKD in the contemporary US veteran population is generally unknown.

Objective

We aimed to estimate the rate of DKD progression and to measure the general epidemiology of DKD in the United States veteran population.

Study Design

We performed a retrospective observational research using electronic health-care records and administrative databases.

Setting

The DKD patient cohort was abstracted from the Veterans Health Administration health-record data from January 2016 to March 2022.

Participants

We defined DKD patients using the laboratory test data based on Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) clinical practice guidelines.

Analytic Approach

Summary statistics include the five-year cumulative incidence of progression to an advanced stage from the DKD stage at the cohort entry date and prevalence at a series of single time points.

Results

A total of 685,288 patients (male [96%], mean age 62 years, Caucasian [64%], non-Hispanic [87%]) met our eligibility criteria. The 5-year cumulative incidence of progression to an advanced DKD stage or all-cause death from DKD stages G1 A2/A3, G2 A2/A3, G3a, and G3b were 52.0%, 47.4%, 50.5%, and 60.9%, respectively. In sum, 594,082 patients were classified as moderate or high risk as per KDIGO guidelines in 2021, and stages G3a and G3b accounted for 51.2% and 25.3%, respectively, of cases.

Conclusion

More than half of DKD patients underwent a stage progression or death within 5 years. A substantial number of DKD patients at an earlier stage might be left undetermined. The study findings warrant a revision of DKD patient identification and management in US veterans.

General practitioners' representation of early-stage CKD is a barrier to adequate management and patient empowerment: a phenomenological study

BACKGROUND

In high-income countries, chronic kidney disease (CKD) affects over 10% of the population. Identifying these patients early is a priority, especially as new treatments are available to reduce the risk of cardiovascular and renal morbidity. We aimed at understanding the management and care pathway of patients with early-to-moderate CKD defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥ 45 mL/min/1.73 m2 (CKD-EPI), by analyzing the experience of general practitioners in a region in France.

METHODS

This qualitative semiopragmatic phenomenological study analyzed in-depth interviews held with a purposive sample (age, gender, training, type of practice, rural/urban context) of 24 general practitioners, with triangulation of research until data saturation.

RESULTS

From diagnostic, etiological and prognostic viewpoints, the general practitioners enrolled in our study perceived CKD as a complex, poorly-defined clinical entity in asymptomatic and multimorbid patients. They distinguished it from a rare condition they considered as 'mainly renal'. The fact that they did not perceive early-stage CKD as a disease was a hindrance to patient care, which should protect the kidneys with a preventive approach. Indeed, general practitioners perceived CKD patient management as a pathway requiring a personalized, integrative model, common to all chronic diseases, without necessarily involving a nephrologist, at least in the early stages.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows how the general practitioners' representations influence their attitudes and interventions. Clarifying the concept of early-stage CKD by taking factors like age and etiology into account would facilitate personalized management of this heterogeneous, often multimorbid, population. Finally, organizational models to support patient empowerment in an integrative care pathway must be established and validated.

Optimizing Care Delivery in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease in the United States: Proceedings of a Multidisciplinary Roundtable Discussion and Literature Review

BACKGROUND

Approximately 37 million individuals in the United States (US) have chronic kidney disease (CKD). Patients with CKD have a substantial morbidity and mortality, which contributes to a huge economic burden to the healthcare system. A limited number of clinical pathways or defined workflows exist for CKD care delivery in the US, primarily due to a lower prioritization of CKD care within health systems compared with other areas (e.g., cardiovascular disease [CVD], cancer screening). CKD is a public health crisis and by the year 2040, CKD will become the fifth leading cause of years of life lost. It is therefore critical to address these challenges to improve outcomes in patients with CKD.

METHODS

The CKD Leaders Network conducted a virtual, 3 h, multidisciplinary roundtable discussion with eight subject-matter experts to better understand key factors impacting CKD care delivery and barriers across the US. A premeeting survey identified topics for discussion covering the screening, diagnosis, risk stratification, and management of CKD across the care continuum. Findings from this roundtable are summarized and presented herein.

RESULTS

Universal challenges exist across health systems, including a lack of awareness amongst providers and patients, constrained care team bandwidth, inadequate financial incentives for early CKD identification, non-standardized diagnostic classification and triage processes, and non-centralized patient information. Proposed solutions include highlighting immediate and long-term financial implications linked with failure to identify and address at-risk individuals, identifying and managing early-stage CKD, enhancing efforts to support guideline-based education for providers and patients, and capitalizing on next-generation solutions.

CONCLUSIONS

Payers and other industry stakeholders have opportunities to contribute to optimal CKD care delivery. Beyond addressing the inadequacies that currently exist, actionable tactics can be implemented into clinical practice to improve clinical outcomes in patients at risk for or diagnosed with CKD in the US.

Advances in the management of chronic kidney disease

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) represents a global public health crisis, but awareness by patients and providers is poor. Defined as persistent abnormalities in kidney structure or function for more than three months, manifested as either low glomerular filtration rate or presence of a marker of kidney damage such as albuminuria, CKD can be identified through readily available blood and urine tests. Early recognition of CKD is crucial for harnessing major advances in staging, prognosis, and treatment. This review discusses the evidence behind the general principles of CKD management, such as blood pressure and glucose control, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockade, statin therapy, and dietary management. It additionally describes individualized approaches to treatment based on risk of kidney failure and cause of CKD. Finally, it reviews novel classes of kidney protective agents including sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, non-steroidal selective mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, and endothelin receptor antagonists. Appropriate, widespread implementation of these highly effective therapies should improve the lives of people with CKD and decrease the worldwide incidence of kidney failure.

Implementation of the Kidney Failure Risk Equation in a United States Nephrology Clinic

Introduction

The kidney failure risk equation (KFRE) estimates a person's risk of kidney failure and has great potential utility in clinical care.

Methods

We used mixed methods to explore implementation of the KFRE in nephrology clinics.

Results

KFRE scores were integrated into the electronic health record at Johns Hopkins Medicine and were displayed to nephrology providers. Documentation of KFRE scores increased over time, reaching 25% of eligible outpatient nephrology clinic notes at month 11. Three providers documented KFRE scores in >75% of notes, whereas 25 documented scores in <10% of notes. Surveys and focus groups of nephrology providers were conducted to probe provider views on the KFRE. Survey respondents (n = 25) reported variability in use of KFRE for decisions such as maintaining nephrology care, referring for transplant evaluation, or providing dialysis modality education. Provider perspectives on the use of KFRE, assessed in 2 focus groups of 4 providers each, included 3 common themes as follows: (i) KFRE scores may be most impactful in the care of specific subsets of people with chronic kidney disease (CKD); (ii) there is uncertainty about KFRE risk-based thresholds to guide clinical care; and (iii) education of patients, nephrology providers, and non-nephrology providers on appropriate interpretations of KFRE scores may help maximize their utility.

Conclusion

Implementation of the KFRE was limited by non-uniform provider adoption of its use, and limited knowledge about utilization of the KFRE in clinical decisions.

Community-Engaged Research (CEnR) to Address Gaps in Chronic Kidney Disease Education among Underserved Latines-The CARE Study

Ensuring equitable chronic kidney disease (CKD) education for Latine patients with low health literacy and low English proficiency stands as a critical challenge, and the "Caridad Awareness and Education" (CARE) initiative represents our ongoing effort to address this imperative issue. In collaboration with twenty-three patients living with CKD, diabetes and/or hypertension and twelve trained Community Health Workers (CHWs) from diverse Latine subgroups, we conducted a research initiative funded by the National Kidney Foundation. Our primary objective was to co-design and test culturally tailored patient education materials (PEMs) for underserved Latine adults at risk for or diagnosed with CKD. We effectively integrated Community-Engaged Research (CEnR) principles with a Human-Centered Design (HCD) approach to create a range of CKD-PEM prototypes in Spanish. Patient preferences for printed educational materials were clear. They favored printed materials that incorporated visual content with concise text over digital, email, texts, or online resources and personalized phone outreach and the involvement of CHWs. Additionally, patients identified their unwavering commitment to their families as a forceful motivator for caring for their kidney health. Currently, a culturally and linguistically tailored CKD flipchart for one-on-one education, led by CHWs, is undergoing a pilot testing phase involving a sample of one hundred Latine patients at risk for or diagnosed with CKD. This innovative approach signifies a commitment to amplifying the insights and expertise of the Latine community afflicted by kidney health disparities, effectively embracing a CEnR to forge meaningful and impactful CKD-PEMs.