First clinical experience in 14 patients treated with ADVOS: a study on feasibility, safety and efficacy of a new type of albumin dialysis

The ADVanced Organ Support (ADVOS) hemodialysis system removes IL-6: an in vitro proof-of-concept study

BACKGROUND

IL-6 is a pleiotropic cytokine modulating inflammation and metabolic pathways. Its proinflammatory effect plays a significant role in organ failure pathogenesis, commonly elevated in systemic inflammatory conditions. Extracorporeal blood purification devices, such as the Advanced Organ Support (ADVOS) multi hemodialysis system, might offer potential in mitigating IL-6's detrimental effects, yet its efficacy remains unreported.

METHODS

We conducted a proof-of-concept in vitro study to assess the ADVOS multi system's efficacy in eliminating IL-6. Varying concentrations of IL-6 were introduced into a swine blood model and treated with ADVOS multi for up to 12 h, employing different blood and concentrate flow rates. IL-6 reduction rate, clearance, and dynamics in blood and dialysate were analyzed.

RESULTS

IL-6 clearance rates of 0.70 L/h and 0.42 L/h were observed in 4 and 12-h experiments, respectively. No significant differences were noted across different initial concentrations. Reduction rates ranged between 40 and 46% within the first 4 h, increasing up to 72% over 12 h, with minimal impact from flow rate variations. Our findings suggest that an IL-6-albumin interaction and convective filtration are implicated in in vitro IL-6 elimination with ADVOS multi.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates for the first time an efficient and continuous in vitro removal of IL-6 by ADVOS multi at low blood flow rates. Initial concentration-dependent removal transitions to more consistent elimination over time. Further clinical investigations are imperative for comprehensive data acquisition.

Extracorporeal albumin dialysis in critically ill patients with liver failure: Comparison of four different devices-A retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

Besides standard medical therapy and critical care monitoring, extracorporeal liver support may provide a therapeutic option in patients with liver failure. However, little is known about detoxification capabilities, efficacy, and efficiency among different devices.

METHODS

Retrospective single-center analysis of patients treated with extracorporeal albumin dialysis. Generalized Estimating Equations with robust variance estimator were used to account for repeated measurements of several cycles and devices per patient.

RESULTS

Between 2015 and 2021 n = 341 cycles in n = 96 patients were eligible for evaluation, thereof n = 54 (15.8%) treatments with Molecular Adsorbent Recirculating System, n = 64 (18.7%) with OpenAlbumin, n = 167 (48.8%) Advanced Organ Support treatments, and n = 56 (16.4%) using Single Pass Albumin Dialysis. Albumin dialysis resulted in significant bilirubin reduction without differences between the devices. However, ammonia levels only declined significantly in ADVOS and OPAL. First ECAD cycle was associated with highest percentage reduction in serum bilirubin. With the exception of SPAD all devices were able to remove the water-soluble substances creatinine and urea and stabilized metabolic dysfunction by increasing pH and negative base excess values. Platelets and fibrinogen levels frequently declined during treatment. Periprocedural bleeding and transfusion of red blood cells were common findings in these patients.

CONCLUSIONS

From this clinical perspective ADVOS and OPAL may provide higher reduction capabilities of liver solutes (i.e. bilirubin and ammonia) in comparison to MARS and SPAD. However, further prospective studies comparing the effectiveness of the devices to support liver impairment (i.e. bile acid clearance or albumin binding capacity) as well as markers of renal recovery are warranted.

Superior Dialytic Removal of Bilirubin and Bile Acids by Free Fatty Acid Displacement and Its Synergy With Albumin-Based Dialysis

One of the cardinal features of any liver replacement therapy is the ability to remove accumulated metabolites. However, an unsolved problem is the low dialyzability of lipophilic toxins. This study aimed to explore whether bilirubin and bile acids removal can be increased by free fatty acid (FFA) displacement and its synergy with albumin dialysis. First, we found that the protein binding of both bilirubin and bile acids decreased significantly with increasing FFA concentrations when co-incubated directly. Then, in vitro dialysis showed that fatty acid mixtures infusion prefilter effectively increased the fractional removals of bilirubin and bile acids, showing higher efficiency compared with albumin-based hemodialysis (HD); in vivo dialysis in liver failure rats showed that lipid emulsion administration resulted in higher reduction ratios and more total solute removals for bilirubin and bile acids after 4 h HD compared with control, which were also superior to albumin-based HD. Finally, the highest dialysis efficacy was always observed by their synergy whether in vitro or in vivo . These findings highlight that FFA displacement-based HD could efficiently improve the dialytic removal of bilirubin and bile acids, which might even be more efficient than albumin-based HD. Their synergy may represent a promising strategy to maximize the removal of circulating bilirubin and bile acids accumulated in liver failure.

Fulminant Adenoviral-Induced Hepatitis in Immunosuppressed Patients

Human adenovirus (HAdV) can often lead to fulminant hepatitis in immunocompromised patients, mostly after reactivation of HAdV. Different risk factors, e.g., transplantation and chemotherapy, increase the risk of developing a HAdV hepatitis. We retrospectively analyzed three patients who showed the characteristics of a HAdV hepatitis observed in disseminated disease. In addition to PCR, diagnosis could be proven by pathology, CT scan, and markedly elevated transaminases. All patients had a hemato-oncologic underlying disease. Two had received a stem-cell transplant, and one was under chemotherapy including rituximab. Despite therapy with cidofovir, all patients died. As the incidence of HAdV hepatitis is low, diagnosis may be easily overlooked. No treatment approaches have yet been established. HAdV hepatitis should be considered as a differential diagnosis, especially when risk factors are present. To avoid dissemination, treatment should be initiated as soon as possible.

Influence of Advanced Organ Support (ADVOS) on Cytokine Levels in Patients with Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure (ACLF)

Background: ADVanced Organ Support (ADVOS) is a novel type of extracorporeal albumin dialysis that supports multiorgan function in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF). No data exist on whether ADVOS affects inflammatory cytokine levels, which play a relevant role in ACLF. Aim: Our aim was to quantify cytokine levels both before and after a single ADVOS treatment in patients with ACLF at a regular dialysis ward. Methods and results: In this prospective study, 15 patients (60% men) with ACLF and an indication for renal replacement therapy were included. Patient liver function was severely compromised, reflected by a median CLIF-consortium ACLF score of 38 (IQR 35; 40). Blood samples were directly taken before and after ADVOS dialysis. The concentration of cytokines for IL-1β, IFN-α2, IFN-γ, TNF-α, MCP-1, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12p70, IL-17A, IL-18, IL-23, IL-33 were quantified via a cytometric bead array. We found no significant (p > 0.05) change in cytokine levels, even when patients were stratified for dialysis time (<480 min versus ≥480 min). The relevance of the assessed cytokines in contributing to systemic inflammation in ACLF was demonstrated by Ingenuity pathway analysis®. Conclusion: Concentrations of pathomechanistically relevant cytokines remained unchanged both before and after ADVOS treatment in patients with ACLF.

Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy resistant to both therapeutic plasma exchange and albumin dialysis

Intrahepatic cholestasis in pregnancy (ICP) represents, depending on its severity, a serious risk for the fetus. Those cases with unusually high bile acid levels may be resistant to pharmaceutical treatment and can be treated with plasma exchange or albumin dialysis. However, the success rate of these therapeutic options and the factors influencing therapeutic response are unknown. Furthermore, if these options fail to improve ICP and serum bile acid levels are very high (>200 μm/L), there are no clear recommendations when delivery should be planned. Here, we report a patient with severe ICP resistant to both therapeutic plasma exchange and albumin dialysis. Caesarean section was performed at 32 weeks of gestation followed by rapid remission of ICP.

The role of the ADVanced Organ Support (ADVOS) system in critically ill patients with multiple organ failure

Background

Multi‐organ failure characterized by acute kidney injury, liver dysfunction, and respiratory failure is a complex condition associated with high mortality, for which multiple individual support devices may be simultaneously required. This review aims to appraise the current evidence for the ADVanced Organ Support (ADVOS) system, a novel device integrating liver, lung, and kidney support with blood detoxification.

Methods

We performed a literature review of the PubMed database to identify human and animal studies evaluating the ADVOS system.

Results

In porcine models of acute liver injury and small clinical studies in humans, ADVOS significantly enhanced the elimination of water‐soluble and protein‐bound toxins and metabolites, including creatinine, ammonia, blood urea nitrogen, and lactate. Cardiovascular parameters (mean arterial pressure, cerebral perfusion pressure, and cardiac index) and renal function were improved. ADVOS clears carbon dioxide (CO₂) effectively with rapid correction of pH abnormalities, achieving normalization of CO₂, and bicarbonate levels. In patients with COVID‐19 infection, ADVOS enables rapid correction of acid–base disturbance and respiratory acidosis. ADVOS therapy reduces mortality in multi‐organ failure and has been shown to be safe with minimal adverse events.

Conclusions

From the small observational studies analyzed, ADVOS demonstrates excellent detoxification of water‐soluble and protein‐bound substances. In particular, ADVOS permits the correction of metabolic and respiratory acidosis through the fluid‐based direct removal of acid and CO₂. ADVOS is associated with significant improvements in hemodynamic and biochemical parameters, a trend toward improved survival in multi‐organ failure, and is well‐tolerated. Larger randomized trials are now necessary to further validate these encouraging results.

Kinetics of Bilirubin and Ammonia Elimination during Hemadsorption Therapy in Secondary Sclerosing Cholangitis Following ECMO Therapy and Severe COVID-19

In critically ill patients, liver dysfunction often results in coagulopathy and encephalopathy and is associated with high mortality. Extracorporeal clearance of hepatotoxic metabolites, including bilirubin and ammonia, aims to attenuate further hepatocyte damage and liver injury, resulting in decreased mortality. The efficacy of hemadsorption combined with conventional hemodialysis to eliminate bilirubin and ammonia to support the liver's excretory function in acute liver injury has been described previously. However, the optimal use of liver support systems in chronic liver dysfunction due to secondary sclerosing cholangitis in critically ill patients (SSC-CIP) has not been defined yet. We herein describe the kinetics of successful bilirubin and ammonia elimination by hemadsorption in a patient with SSC-CIP after extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) therapy for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in a patient with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). During the course of the disease, the patient developed laboratory signs of liver injury during ECMO therapy before clinically detectable jaundice or elevated bilirubin levels. A diagnosis of SSC-CIP was confirmed by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) based on intraductal filling defects in the intrahepatic bile ducts due to biliary casts. The patient showed stable elevations of bilirubin and ammonia levels thereafter, but presented with progressive nausea, vomiting, weakness, and exhaustion. Based on these laboratory findings, hemadsorption was combined with hemodialysis treatment and successfully eliminated bilirubin and ammonia. Moreover, direct comparison revealed that ammonia is more efficiently eliminated by hemadsorption than bilirubin levels. Clinical symptoms of nausea, vomiting, weakness, and exhaustion improved. In summary, bilirubin and ammonia were successfully eliminated by hemadsorption combined with hemodialysis treatment in SSC-CIP following ECMO therapy and severe COVID-19. This observation is particularly relevant since it has been reported that a considerable subset of critically ill patients with COVID-19 suffer from liver dysfunction associated with high mortality.

Extracorporeal carbon dioxide Removal (ECCO2 R) with the Advanced Organ Support (ADVOS) system in critically ill COVID-19 patients

Disturbed oxygenation is foremost the leading clinical presentation in COVID‐19 patients. However, a small proportion also develop carbon dioxide removal problems. The Advanced Organ Support (ADVOS) therapy (ADVITOS GmbH, Munich, Germany) uses a less invasive approach by combining extracorporeal CO₂‐removal and multiple organ support for the liver and the kidneys in a single hemodialysis device. The aim of our study is to evaluate the ADVOS system as treatment option in‐COVID‐19 patients with multi‐organ failure and carbon dioxide removal problems. COVID‐19 patients suffering from severe respiratory insufficiency, receiving at least two treatments with the ADVOS multi system (ADVITOS GmbH, Munich, Germany), were eligible for study inclusion. Briefly, these included patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) according to KDIGO guidelines, and moderate or severe ARDS according to the Berlin definition, who were on invasive mechanical ventilation for more than 72 hours. In total, nine COVID‐19 patients (137 ADVOS treatment sessions with a median of 10 treatments per patient) with moderate to severe ARDS and carbon dioxide removal problems were analyzed. During the ADVOS treatments, a rapid correction of acid‐base balance and a continuous CO₂ removal could be observed. We observed a median continuous CO₂ removal of 49.2 mL/min (IQR: 26.9‐72.3 mL/min) with some treatments achieving up to 160 mL/min. The CO₂ removal significantly correlated with blood flow (Pearson 0.421; P < .001), PaCO₂ (0.341, P < .001) and HCO3‐ levels (0.568, P < .001) at the start of the treatment. The continuous treatment led to a significant reduction in PaCO₂ from baseline to the last ADVOS treatment. In conclusion, it was feasible to remove CO₂ using the ADVOS system in our cohort of COVID‐19 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome and multiorgan failure. This efficient removal of CO₂ was achieved at blood flows up to 300 mL/min using a conventional hemodialysis catheter and without a membrane lung or a gas phase.

Successful elimination of bilirubin in critically ill patients with acute liver dysfunction using a cytokine adsorber and albumin dialysis: a pilot study

There are different methods of artificial liver support for patients with acute liver dysfunction (ALD). However, CytoSorb (CS) might be a new approved option for those patients. Question of interest is whether the elimination performance of CS was comparable to that of advanced organ support (ADVOS). Patients, treated with CS (integrated into high-flux dialysis) or ADVOS and a total bilirubin > 10 mg/dl were included. Laboratory parameters were evaluated before starting therapy (d0) and 12–24 h thereafter (d1). The Wilcoxon-test with associated samples was used for statistical analysis. Thirty-nine patients (33 CS, 6 ADVOS) were included. The median bilirubin at d0 was 16.9 and 17.7 mg/dl and at d1 was 13.2 and 15.9 mg/dl, in the CS and ADVOS group, respectively. There was a significant bilirubin reduction as well in the CS group (p < 0.001, median relative reduction: 22.5%) as in the ADVOS group (p = 0.028, median relative reduction: 22.8%). There was no significant difference in the relative bilirubin reduction between CS and ADVOS therapies. The use of CytoSorb and ADVOS in patients with ALD led to a significant and comparable decrease in total bilirubin. The easy use of CS might be an advantage compared to other procedures.

Applicability and safety of discontinuous ADVanced Organ Support (ADVOS) in the treatment of patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) outside of intensive care

BACKGROUND

ADVanced Organ Support (ADVOS) is a novel type of extracorporeal albumin dialysis and holds promise to sustain liver function and recovery of patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF). Previously, ADVOS was tested as continuous treatment for intensive care patients with liver failure. Data related to the applicability and safety as discontinuous treatment outside of ICU is not available.

AIM

Evaluation of ADVOS as discontinuous treatment for patients with ACLF outside intensive care unit and comparison with a matched historic cohort.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In this retrospective study, 26 patients with ACLF and the indication for renal replacement therapy related to HRS-AKI were included. Majority of patients were male (65%) with alcoholic cirrhosis in 88% and infections as a trigger of ACLF in 96%. Liver function was severely compromised reflected by high median MELD and CLIF-C ACLF scores of 37 (IQR 32;40) and 56.5 (IQR 51;60), respectively. Patients were treated discontinuously with ADVOS over a median time of 12 days (IQR 8.25;17) and received 8 (IQR 4.25;9.75) treatment cycles on average. No treatment related adverse events were recorded, and safety laboratory parameters remained constant during the observation time. After 16 h cumulative dialysis therapy, ADVOS significantly reduced protein-bound bilirubin (14%), creatinine (11.8%) and blood urea nitrogen (BUN, 33%). Using a matched cohort with ACLF treated with hemodialysis, ADVOS achieved a stronger decrease in bilirubin (p = 0.01), while detoxification of water-soluble catabolites' including creatinine and BUN was comparable. The 28-days mortality in the ADVOS group was 56% (14/26) and was not inferior to predicted survival (predicted median 28-days mortality was 44%, IQR 30; 59).

CONCLUSION

Discontinuous ADVOS treatment was safe and effective in patients with ACLF outside intensive care and outperformed hemodialysis in reducing protein-bound metabolites.

Registry on extracorporeal multiple organ support with the advanced organ support (ADVOS) system: 2-year interim analysis

The objective of this registry is to collect data on real-life treatment conditions for patients for whom multiple organ dialysis with Advanced Organ Support (ADVOS) albumin hemodialysis is indicated.This registry was performed under routine conditions and without any study-specific intervention, diagnostic procedures, or assessments. Data on clinical laboratory tests, health status, liver function, vital signs, and examinations were collected (DRKS-ID: DRKS00017068). Mortality rates 28 and 90 days after the first ADVOS treatment, adverse events and ADVOS treatment parameters, including treatment abortions, were documented.This analysis was performed 2 years after the first patient was included on January 18, 2017. As of February 20, 2019, 4 clinical sites in Germany participated and enrolled 118 patients with a median age of 60 (IQR: 45, 69) of whom 70 were male (59.3%). Patients had a median SOFA Score of 14 (IQR: 11, 16) and a predicted mortality of 80%. The median number of failing organs was 3 (IQR: 2, 4).Four hundred twenty nine ADVOS treatments sessions were performed with a median duration of 17 hours (IQR: 6, 23). A 5.8% of the ADVOS sessions (25 of 429) were aborted due to device related errors, while 14.5% (62 of 429) were stopped for other reasons. Seventy nine adverse events were documented, 13 of them device related (all clotting, and all recovered without sequels).A significant reduction in serum creatinine (1.5 vs 1.2 mg/dl), blood urea nitrogen (24 vs 17 mg/dl) and bilirubin (6.9 vs 6.5 mg/dl) was observed following the first ADVOS treatment session. Blood pH, bicarbonate (HCO3-) and base excess returned to the physiological range, while partial pressure of carbon dioxide (pCO2) remained unchanged. At the time of the analysis, 28- and 90-day mortality were 60% and 65%, respectively, compared to an expected ICU-mortality rate of 80%. SOFA score was an independent predictor for outcome in a multivariable logistic regression analysis.The reported data show a high quality and completion of all participating centers. Data interpretation must be cautious due to the small number of patients, and the nature of the registry, without a control group. However, the data presented here show an improvement of expected mortality rates. Minor clotting events similar to other dialysis therapies occurred during the treatments.

Extracorporeal multiorgan support including CO2-removal with the ADVanced Organ Support (ADVOS) system for COVID-19: A case report

A substantial part of COVID-19-patients suffers from multi-organ failure (MOF). We report on an 80-year old patient with pulmonary, renal, circulatory, and hepatic failure. We decided against the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) due to old age and a SOFA-score of 13. However, the patient was continuously treated with the extracorporeal multi-organ- “ADVanced Organ Support” (ADVOS) device (ADVITOS GmbH, Munich, Germany). During eight 24h-treatment-sessions blood flow (100–300 mL/min), dialysate flow (160–320 mL/min) and dialysate pH (7.6–9.0) were adapted to optimize arterial PaCO₂ and pH. Effective CO₂ removal and correction of acidosis could be demonstrated by mean arterial- versus post-dialyzer values of pCO₂ (68.7 ± 13.8 vs. 26.9 ± 11.6 mmHg; p < 0.001). The CO₂-elimination rate was 48 ± 23mL/min. The initial vasopressor requirement could be reduced in parallel to pH-normalization. Interruptions of ADVOS-treatment repeatedly resulted in reversible deteriorations of p_aCO₂ and pH. After 95 h of continuous extracorporeal decarboxylating therapy the patient had markedly improved circulatory parameters compared to baseline. In the context of secondary pulmonary infection and progressive liver failure, the patient had a sudden cardiac arrest. In accordance with the presumed patient will, we decided against mechanical resuscitation. Irrespective of the outcome we conclude that extracorporeal CO₂ removal and multiorgan-support were feasible in this COVID-19-patient. Combined and less invasive approaches such as ADVOS might be considered in old-age-COVID-19 patients with MOF.

Advanced organ support (ADVOS) in the critically ill: first clinical experience in patients with multiple organ failure

Background

Prevalence of multiple organ failure (MOF) in critically ill patients is increasing and associated mortality remains high. Extracorporeal organ support is a cornerstone in the management of MOF. We report data of an advanced hemodialysis system based on albumin dialysis (ADVOS multi device) that can regulate acid–base balance in addition to the established properties of renal replacement therapy and albumin dialysis systems in critically ill patients with MOF.

Methods

34 critically ill patients with MOF received 102 ADVOS treatment sessions in the Department of Intensive Care Medicine of the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf. Markers of metabolic detoxification and acid–base regulation were collected and blood gas analyses were performed. A subgroup analyses were performed in patients with severe acidemia (pH < 7.2).

Results

Median number of treatment sessions was 2 (range 1–9) per patient. Median duration of treatment was 17.5 (IQR 11–23) hours per session. Treatment with the ADVOS multi-albumin dialysis device caused a significant decrease in bilirubin levels, serum creatinine, BUN and ammonia levels. The relative elimination rate of bilirubin was concentration dependent. Furthermore, a significant improvement in blood pH, HCO₃⁻ and PaCO₂, was achieved during ADVOS treatment including six patients that suffered from severe metabolic acidosis refractory to continuous renal replacement therapy. Delta pH, HCO₃⁻ and PaCO₂ were significantly affected by the ADVOS blood flow rate and pH settings. This improvement in the clinical course during ADVOS treatments allowed a reduction in norepinephrine during ADVOS therapy. Treatments were well tolerated. Mortality rates were 50% and 62% for 28 and 90 days, respectively.

Conclusions

In this case series in patients with MOF, ADVOS was able to eliminate water-soluble and albumin-bound substances. Furthermore, the device corrected severe metabolic and respiratory acid–base disequilibrium. No major adverse events associated with the ADVOS treatments were observed.

Comparison of albumin dialysis devices molecular adsorbent recirculating system and ADVanced Organ Support system in critically ill patients with liver failure-A retrospective analysis

Extracorporeal albumin dialysis (ECAD) represents a supplemental therapy for patients with liver failure. Most experience was gained with the molecular adsorbent recirculating system (MARS). However, the ADVanced Organ Support (ADVOS) system was recently introduced. This study aims to compare effects of MARS and ADVOS on biochemical and clinical parameters in critically ill patients with liver failure using a retrospective analysis of ECAD at Jena University Hospital. Laboratory parameters, health scoring values, and need for transfusion were recorded before and after treatment. Generalized estimating equations were used to account for repeated measurements of multiple ECAD cycles per patient. Between 2012 and 2017, n = 75 MARS and n = 58 ADVOS cycles were evaluated. Although ADVOS runs significantly longer, both devices provided comparable reduction rates of bilirubin (MARS: -48 [-80.5 to -18.5] μmol/L vs ADVOS: -35 [-87.8 to -2.0] μmol/L, P = .194), a surrogate for detoxification capacity, while urea and lactate levels were more significantly lowered by the ADVOS system. In cycles with similar treatment times, both systems provided comparable reduction rates for bilirubin, renal replacement, coagulation, and metabolic parameters. Citrate was the preferred anticoagulant in case of bleeding. Neither bleeding tendency nor fibrinogen levels or platelets were altered by the type of anticoagulation. No adverse events were reported, but two sessions (one MARS and one ADVOS) were terminated early due to filter clotting. Experience is needed in the application of ADVOS and more prospective trials comparing the detoxification capacity of ECAD devices are needed to support and enlarge the findings of the current evaluation.

Options in extracorporeal support of multiple organ failure

Multiorgan failure is among the most frequent reasons of death in critically ill patients. Based on extensive and long-term use of renal replacement therapy, extracorporeal organ support became available for other organ failures. Initially, most of these techniques (e.g. extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, extracorporeal CO₂ removal [ECCO2R] and extracorporeal liver support) were used as stand-alone single organ support systems. Considering multiple interactions between native organs (“crosstalk”), combined or integrated extracorporeal organ support (ECOS) devices are intriguing. The concept of multiple organ support therapy (MOST) providing simultaneous and combined support for different failing organs was described more than 15 years ago by Ronco and Bellomo. This concept also implicates overcoming the “compartmentalized” approach provided by different single organ specialized professionals by a multidisciplinary and multiprofessional strategy. The idea of MOST is supported by the failure of several recent studies on single organ support including liver and lung support. Improvement of outcome by ECOS necessarily depends on optimized patient selection, integrated organ support and limitation of its side effects. This implicates challenges for engineers, industry and healthcare professionals. From a technical viewpoint, modular combination of pre-existing technologies such as renal replacement, albumin-dialysis, ECCO2R and potentially cytokine elimination can be considered as a first step. While this allows for stepwise and individual combination of standard organ support facilities, it carries the disadvantage of large extracorporeal blood volume and surfaces as well as additive costs. The more intriguing next step is an integrated platform providing the capacity of multiple organ support within one device. (This article is freely available.)

End-stage liver failure: filling the treatment gap at the intensive care unit

End-stage liver failure is a condition of collapsing liver function with mortality rates up to 80. Liver transplantation is the only lifesaving therapy. There is an unmet need for therapy to extend the waiting time for liver transplantation or regeneration of the native liver. Here we review the state-of-the-art of non-cell based and cell-based artificial liver support systems, cell transplantation and plasma exchange, with the first therapy relying on detoxification, while the others aim to correct also other failing liver functions and/or modulate the immune response. Meta-analyses on the effect of non-cell based systems show contradictory outcomes for different types of albumin purification devices. For bioartificial livers proof of concept has been shown in animals with liver failure. However, large clinical trials with two different systems did not show a survival benefit. Two clinical trials with plasma exchange and one with transplantation of mesenchymal stem cells showed positive outcomes on survival. Detoxification therapies lack adequacy for most patients. Correction of additional liver functions, and also modulation of the immune system hold promise for future therapy of liver failure.

Respiratory and metabolic acidosis correction with the ADVanced Organ Support system

Background

The lung, the kidney, and the liver are major regulators of acid-base balance. Acidosis due to the dysfunction of one or more organs can increase mortality, especially in critically ill patients. Supporting compensation by increasing ventilation or infusing bicarbonate is often ineffective. Therefore, direct removal of acid may represent a novel therapeutic approach. This can be achieved with the ADVanced Organ Support (ADVOS) system, an enhanced renal support therapy based on albumin dialysis. Here, we demonstrate proof of concept for this technology.

Methods

An ex vivo model of either hypercapnic (i.e., continuous CO₂ supply) or lactic acidosis (i.e., lactic acid infusion) using porcine blood was subjected to hemodialysis with ADVOS. A variety of operational parameters including blood and dialysate flows, different dialysate pH settings, and acid and base concentrate compositions were tested. Comparisons with standard continuous veno-venous hemofiltration (CVVH) using high bicarbonate substitution fluid and continuous veno-venous hemodialysis (CVVHD) were also performed.

Results

Sixty-one milliliters per minute (2.7 mmol/min) of CO₂ was removed using a blood flow of 400 ml/min and a dialysate pH of 10 without altering blood pCO₂ and HCO₃⁻ (36 mmHg and 20 mmol/l, respectively). Up to 142 ml/min (6.3 mmol/min) of CO₂ was eliminated if elevated pCO₂ (117 mmHg) and HCO₃⁻ (63 mmol/l) were allowed. During continuous lactic acid infusion, an acid load of up to 3 mmol/min was compensated. When acidosis was triggered, ADVOS multi normalized pH and bicarbonate levels within 1 h, while neither CVVH nor CVVHD could. The major determinants to correct blood pH were blood flow, dialysate composition, and initial acid-base status.

Conclusions

In conclusion, ADVOS was able to remove more than 50% of the amount of CO₂ typically produced by an adult human. Blood pH was maintained stable within the physiological range through compensation of a metabolic acid load by albumin dialysate. These in vitro results will require confirmation in patients.

Artificial liver support systems: what is new over the last decade?

The liver is a complex organ that performs vital functions of synthesis, heat production, detoxification and regulation; its failure carries a highly critical risk. At the end of the last century, some artificial liver devices began to develop with the aim of being used as supportive therapy until liver transplantation (bridge-to-transplant) or liver regeneration (bridge-to-recovery). The well-recognized devices are the Molecular Adsorbent Recirculating System™ (MARS™), the Single-Pass Albumin Dialysis system and the Fractionated Plasma Separation and Adsorption system (Prometheus™). In the following years, experimental works and early clinical applications were reported, and to date, many thousands of patients have already been treated with these devices. The ability of artificial liver support systems to replace the liver detoxification function, at least partially, has been proven, and the correction of various biochemical parameters has been demonstrated. However, the complex tasks of regulation and synthesis must be addressed through the use of bioartificial systems, which still face several developmental problems and very high production costs. Moreover, clinical data on improved survival are conflicting. This paper reviews the progress achieved and new data published on artificial liver support systems over the past decade and the prospects for these devices.

Mandatory criteria for the application of variability-based parameters of fluid responsiveness: a prospective study in different groups of ICU patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Stroke volume variation (SVV) has high sensitivity and specificity in predicting fluid responsiveness. However, sinus rhythm (SR) and controlled mechanical ventilation (CV) are mandatory for their application. Several studies suggest a limited applicability of SVV in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. We hypothesized that the applicability of SVV might be different over time and within certain subgroups of ICU patients. Therefore, we analysed the prevalence of SR and CV in ICU patients during the first 24 h of PiCCO-monitoring (primary endpoint) and during the total ICU stay. We also investigated the applicability of SVV in the subgroups of patients with sepsis, cirrhosis, and acute pancreatitis.

METHODS

The prevalence of SR and CV was documented immediately before 1241 thermodilution measurements in 88 patients.

RESULTS

In all measurements, SVV was applicable in about 24%. However, the applicability of SVV was time-dependent: the prevalence of both SR and CV was higher during the first 24 h compared to measurements thereafter (36.1% vs. 21.9%; P<0.001). Within different subgroups, the applicability during the first 24 h of monitoring ranged between 0% in acute pancreatitis, 25.5% in liver failure, and 48.9% in patients without pancreatitis, liver failure, pneumonia or sepsis.

CONCLUSIONS

The applicability of SVV in a predominantly medical ICU is only about 25%-35%. The prevalence of both mandatory criteria decreases over time during the ICU stay. Furthermore, the applicability is particularly low in patients with acute pancreatitis and liver failure.

Nonacetaminophen Drug-Induced Acute Liver Failure

Acute liver failure of all causes is diagnosed in between 2000 and 2500 patients annually in the United States. Drug-induced acute liver failure is the leading cause of acute liver failure, accounting for more than 50% of cases. Nonacetaminophen drug injury represents 11% of all cases in the latest registry from the US Acute Liver Failure Study Group. Although rare, acute liver failure is clinically dramatic when it occurs, and requires a multidisciplinary approach to management. In contrast with acetaminophen-induced acute liver failure, non-acetaminophen-induced acute liver failure has a more ominous prognosis with a lower liver transplant-free survival.