Associations of low handgrip strength and hand laterality with cognitive function and functional mobility - the Yishun Study

Handgrip strength is associated with cognitive function in older patients with stage 3-5 chronic kidney disease: results from the NHANES

In this study, we aimed to investigate the association between handgrip strength (HGS) and cognitive performance in stage 3-5 chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients aged ≥ 60 years. This cross-sectional study analyzed data from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) database 2011-2014. Three tests were used to assess the cognitive performance, including consortium to establish a registry for Alzheimer's disease (CERAD), animal fluency test (AFT), and digit symbol substitution test (DSST). The multivariate linear regression analyses adjusting for confounding factors were utilized to evaluate the association of HGS with cognitive performance. A total of 678 older stage 3-5 CKD patients were included in this study. After adjusting for multiple factors, a higher HGS was positively associated with a higher CERAD-delayed recall and DSST score. In addition, our analysis indicated that HGS probably correlated with better performance of immediate learning ability in male, while working memory, sustained attention, and processing speed in female. HGS may be an important indicator for cognitive deficits in stage 3-5 CKD patients, especially for learning ability and executive function. Further research to explore the sex-specific and domain-specific and possible mechanisms are required.

Risk factors associated with weak and asymmetric handgrip strength in older Chinese adults

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to investigate the potential risk factors associated with weak and asymmetric handgrip strength (HGS) in older Chinese adults.

METHODS

A total of 2702 participants aged ≥65 years from the two waves of data (2011 and 2013) from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study were analyzed. The highest recorded HGS values (Method A) or the average HGS values (Method B) for the dominant hand were used to compute the HGS asymmetry (nondominant HGS/dominant HGS out of 0.9-1.1) and HGS weakness (male <28 kg, female <18 kg). Risk factors associated with the weak and asymmetric HGS were identified by logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Risk factors associated with weak and asymmetric HGS of varying severity differed between the two methods. Both methods identified age and illiteracy as risk factors for weak HGS with 10%-20% asymmetry. Method A also identified speech impediment, stroke, and sleep duration as additional risk factors. Similarly, both methods identified age, illiteracy, primary school education and below, diabetes, and stroke as risk factors for weak HGS and asymmetry over 30.1%. Method B additionally identified a history of falls as a risk factor. However, apart from age, the risk factors for weak HGS with 20.1%-30% asymmetry differed between the two methods-Method A identified kidney disease, while Method B identified illiteracy and asthma.

CONCLUSIONS

The results revealed that risk factors associated with the abnormal HGS in older adults varied based on the methods used to define these conditions.

Association of handgrip strength asymmetry and weakness with functional disability among middle-aged and older adults in China

Background

Little is known about the association of handgrip strength (HGS) asymmetry with functional disability in China. We aimed to examine the individual and combined association of HGS asymmetry and weakness with functional disability among middle-aged and older Chinese adults.

Methods

We included participants aged ≥45 years from two waves of the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (2011 and 2015). HGS weakness was defined as the maximal HGS<28 kg for men and <18 kg for women. HGS asymmetry was measured by dividing the maximal nondominant HGS (kg) by the maximal dominant HGS (kg), with the value <0.90 or >1.10 considered as asymmetry. Functional disability was assessed by activities of daily living (ADL) and instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) and was defined as encountering difficulty in completing one or more ADL/IADL tasks. The logistic regression models were used to explore the association between HGS measures and functional disability.

Results

11 950 (mean age 59.2 ± 9.6 years, 47.9% males) and 7540 (mean age 57.5 ± 8.6 years, 50.1% males) participants were included in the cross-sectional and prospective study, respectively. HGS asymmetry and weakness, individually or simultaneously, were associated with an increased prevalence of functional disability. During the four-year follow-up, 1822 (24.2%) participants had incident functional disability. The separate exposure to HGS asymmetry (odds ratio (OR) = 1.18; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.05-1.32) or weakness (OR = 1.59; 95% CI = 1.30-1.95) was independently associated with functional disability. For combined associations, those with both weakness and asymmetry showed the greatest risk of new-onset functional disability (OR = 1.91; 95% CI = 1.45-2.52).

Conclusions

HGS asymmetry and weakness were associated with a higher risk of functional disability. Assessing HGS asymmetry together with weakness may help to better identify those at risk of functional disability to enable early interventions.

The accuracy of different calculation methods when identifying handgrip strength asymmetry among middle-aged and older Chinese adults

At present, there is no uniform standard mean of identifying handgrip strength (HGS) asymmetry based on maximum or average HGS values. Therefore, this study aimed to explore the accuracy of different calculation methods in the evaluation of HGS asymmetry. Using the maximum reading of two trials from both hands (Method A) as the reference standard, the accuracy of the HGS asymmetry identified by the average value of two trials of both hands (Method B) was determined by using various indicators, including specificity, sensitivity, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), positive, and negative predictive values. Overall, 12,163 individuals were included in this study, of whom 47.61% (5791/12,163) were male. The percentages of individuals with HGS asymmetry differed as a function of age and sex when using these two different methods. When employing Method A, 38.52%, 41.57%, and 44.57% of males 45 ≤ age<60, 60 ≤ age<80, and ≥ 80 years of age exhibited HGS asymmetry as compared to 40.78%, 39%, and 39.63% of females. Using Method B, the corresponding proportions were 41.69%, 42.5%, and 40% in males and 42.01%, 41.18%, and 40.55% in females, respectively. When compared to Method A, Method B was found to be effective in identifying HGS asymmetry, with AUC values ranging from 0.844 to 0.877. However, there was only moderate agreement between the two methods in assessing HGS asymmetry. Specifically, the Kappa values for the two Methods were 0.692, 0.694, and 0.766 in males aged 45 to 60, 60 to 80, and 80 years and above, respectively. For females, the Kappa values were 0.674, 0.661, and 0.751, respectively. These results demonstrated that the maximal or average HGS values from two trials using both hands has a significant impact on the consequent identification of HGS asymmetry.

Associations of Handgrip Strength Weakness and Asymmetry with Lower Cognitive Function: Results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2011-2014)

Background

The joint associations of handgrip strength (HGS) weakness and asymmetry with cognitive decline remain understudied in older adults.

Objective

To investigate the associations between HGS weakness, asymmetry, and lower cognitive function in a nationally representative sample of older Americans.

Methods

This cross-sectional study utilized data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2011-2014. Weakness was defined as HGS <26 kg for men and <16 kg for women. Asymmetry was determined by calculating the ratio of dominant to non-dominant HGS. Participants with an HGS ratio <0.90 or >1.10 were classified as having any HGS asymmetry. Those with an HGS ratio >1.10 exhibited dominant HGS asymmetry, while those with an HGS ratio <0.90 displayed nondominant HGS asymmetry, respectively. Lower cognitive functioning was defined as global cognitive composite scores more than 1 standard deviation below the mean. Covariate-adjusted logistic regression models were used to analyze the associations between HGS asymmetry/weakness and lower cognitive functioning.

Results

Compared to individuals with non-weak and symmetric HGS, those with any HGS asymmetry alone and weakness alone had 1.017 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.707-1.463) and 1.391 (95% CI: 0.542-3.571) greater odds for cognitive decline, while co-occurrence of both HGS asymmetry and weakness was associated with 3.724 (95% CI: 1.711-8.107) greater odds for lower cognitive function after controlling for confounders.

Cnclusions

Individuals exhibiting both diminished and asymmetrical HGS demonstrated an elevated susceptibility to cognitive impairment, thereby implying that the inclusion of HGS asymmetry assessment in conjunction with weakness evaluation may enhance the accuracy of prognosticating cognitive decline.

Handgrip strength asymmetry and cognitive impairment risk: Insights from a seven-year prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to explore the links of handgrip strength and asymmetry with cognitive impairment.

DESIGN

This was a seven-year prospective cohort study.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

We used data from wave 3 (2015-2017) to wave 5 (2019-2022) from the ongoing Taiwan Initiative of Geriatric Epidemiological Research (TIGER), with wave 3 as the baseline (n = 446). The study included community-dwelling participants aged 65 years or older.

MEASUREMENTS

Handgrip strength was measured, and abnormalities were determined based on handgrip strength weakness and asymmetry. Handgrip strength asymmetry was categorized into three groups at baseline based on the handgrip strength ratio (left handgrip strength/right handgrip strength). Cognitive tests evaluating global and specific cognitive domains were conducted at baseline and two biennial follow-ups. Generalized linear mixed models were utilized to assess the associations of abnormal handgrip strength with global cognition and multiple cognitive domain progression over time.

RESULTS

This study included 392 dementia-free participants, with an average age of 75.8 years and 179 (45.7%) males. Mild handgrip strength asymmetry was present in 88 participants (22.4%), while 53 (13.5%) exhibited moderate asymmetry. In men, the coexistence of low handgrip strength and handgrip strength asymmetry was linked to cognitive impairment over time. These associations were observed in global cognition (β^ = -1.76, 95% CI: -2.79 to -0.74), memory (immediate free recall: β^ = -0.67, 95% CI: -1.17 to -0.17), executive function (Trail Making Test-A: β^ = -0.54, 95% CI: -0.94 to -0.13), and attention (Digit span-forward: β^ = -1.00, 95% CI: -1.46 to -0.54).

CONCLUSIONS

This study found that individuals with reduced handgrip strength and handgrip strength asymmetry had an increased risk of cognitive impairment across various domains. Moreover, this association appears to be more pronounced among men than women. Incorporating these simple assessments into regular clinical practice improves the allocation of limited screening resources and timely clinical interventions in older adults.

The relationship between low handgrip strength with or without asymmetry and fall risk among middle-aged and older males in China: evidence from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study

PURPOSE

This study sought to explore the potential correlation between low handgrip strength (HGS) with or without asymmetry and fall risk in middle-aged and older Chinese adults.

METHODS

Baseline characteristic data from participants 45+ years of age and data regarding fall events collected from two rounds (2011-2013) of the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study were utilized for the present analyses. HGS and HGS asymmetry was defined according to the updated American Society of Hand Therapist. Fall events were identified through self- or proxy-reported details. Logistic regression analyses were employed to gauge the potential relationship between abnormal HGS and fall risk.

RESULTS

In total, 10 563 participants were enrolled in this analysis, of whom 47.49% (5016/10 563) were male. The proportions of low HGS alone, HGS asymmetry alone, and low HGS with asymmetry were 22.23%, 18.34%, and 22.75%, respectively, in males, but just 3.64%, 35.12%, and 6.62% in females. A total of 693 and 1019 fall events were recorded for male (13.82%) and female (18.37%) participants over the 2-year follow-up period, respectively. Significant differences in fall event incidence among different HGS groups were only observed among males. An adjusted logistic regression analysis model confirmed that low HGS with dominant asymmetry was closely related to fall risk among middle-aged and older males [P = 0.014, odds ratio = 1.332, 95% confidence interval: 1.059-1.676).

CONCLUSION

These results demonstrated that low HGS with dominant asymmetry is a risk factor linked to increased fall risk among middle-aged and older Chinese males. What is already known on this topic Low HGS or HGS asymmetry is been reported to be linked to an increased risk of falls in middle-aged and older adults; however, little is known about the association between fall risk and low HGS and/or HGS asymmetry. Main messages The prevalence of low HGS alone and low HGS asymmetry in men was significantly higher than in women, while HGS alone asymmetry was more common in women than men. The risk factor for the increased risk of falls in Chinese middle-aged and older men is low and asymmetric HGS, rather than low or asymmetric HGS alone. Low HGS with dominant asymmetry rather than nondominant asymmetry is associated with future fall risk among middle-aged and older Chinese males. Current research questions What is the mechanism for the significant difference in the proportion of abnormal HGS components between the sexes? If female subjects with low HGS and asymmetric HGS were added, would an association be observed between low HGS and asymmetric HGS falls? Is there an association between the severity of asymmetric HGS with weakness and falls?

Low handgrip strength with or without asymmetry is associated with elevated all-cause mortality risk in older Chinese males

AIM

This study aimed to examine the link between handgrip strength (HGS) asymmetry and mortality risk among older Chinese adults.

METHODS

These analyses were conducted using data from adults aged 60 years and older from the 2011-2013 waves of the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study, using baseline participant data collected in 2011. Proxy-reported information was used to assess the mortality outcomes of the participants over a 2-year follow-up. The highest recorded HGS values for each hand were used to compute the HGS asymmetry ratio (non-dominant HGS/dominant HGS) and HGS weakness (Male<26 kg, Female<16 kg). Covariate-adjusted Cox models were employed to gauge the relationship between abnormal HGS and mortality risk.

RESULTS

Overall, 5083 adults were enrolled in this study, of whom 50.15% (2549/5083) were male. The proportions of low HGS alone, HGS asymmetry alone, and asymmetric and low HGS were 6.43%, 30.95%, and 9.22%, respectively, in males, and 4.81%, 35.87%, and 9.55%, respectively, in females. A total of 96 and 78 deaths were recorded for male (3.77%) and female (3.08%) participants, respectively, over the 2-year follow-up period. Significant differences in mortality were observed between the different HGS groups for both sexes. An adjusted Cox regression analysis model confirmed that only low HGS (P = 0.047, hazard ratio [HR] = 1.949, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 1.008-3.768) and low HGS with asymmetry (P = 0.007, HR = 2.152, 95% CI: 1.231-3.764) were significantly associated with mortality risk in older males.

CONCLUSIONS

The results revealed that low HGS with or without asymmetry was associated with a higher risk of death over a 2-year follow-up interval in older Chinese males. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2023; 23: 692-699.

Association between handgrip strength asymmetry and cognitive function across ethnicity in rural China: a cross-sectional study

Background

Recently, the association between handgrip strength (HGS) asymmetry and cognition has been revealed, but evidences are still scarce. Particularly, the association between asymmetric HGS and cognitive performance in various cognitive domains is unclear and whether this association is stable across ethnic groups is unknown.

Method

The population was from a longitudinal study in rural areas of Fuxin, Liaoning, China. The Chinese version of Montreal Cognitive Assessment-Basic (MOCA-BC) was used to evaluate the cognitive function. The HGS ratio was calculated as maximal non-dominant HGS divided by maximal dominant HGS. HGS ratio <0.9 or >1.1 was classified as asymmetric dominant/non-dominant HGS, respectively. Generalized linear models were used to analyze the relationship between asymmetric HGS and cognitive function adjusted for HGS, handedness, wave, age, sex, education, ethnicity, smoking, drinking, physical labor level, BMI, hypertension, diabetes and dyslipidemia.

Result

A total of 2,969 participants ≥50 years were included in this study. Adjusted for HGS and other confunding variables, there was an inverted U-shaped association between HGS ratio and MoCA-BC scores (P _non-linear = 0.004). The association between HGS ratio and MoCA-BC scores was inconsistent among ethnic groups (P _interaction = 0.048). In Han, only asymmetric non-dominant HGS was associated with lower cognitive scores [β = -0.67, 95% confidence interval (CI): -1.26 ∼-0.08, P = 0.027]; in Mongolians, asymmetric dominant HGS(β = -0.60, 95% CI: -1.35 ∼ 0.15, P = 0.115) and asymmetric non-dominant HGS (β = -0.56, 95% CI: -1.42 ∼ 0.31, P = 0.206) were all associated with lower cognitive scores, although no statistical significance was found. Asymmetric non-dominant HGS and lower HGS, but not asymmetric dominant HGS were all independently associated with impairment of Delayed Recall (OR = 1.35, 95% CI: 1.05 ∼ 1.74; OR _{per 5 kg decrease} = 1.10, 95% CI: 1.01 ∼ 1.21) and Fluency (OR = 1.43, 95% CI: 1.15 ∼ 1.78; OR _{per 5 kg decrease} = 1.10, 95% CI: 1.02 ∼ 1.19). Both asymmetric dominant HGS (OR = 1.34, 95% CI: 1.07 ∼ 1.67) and lower HGS (OR _{per 5 kg decrease} = 1.21, 95% CI: 1.10 ∼ 1.32) were associated with impairment of visuoperception.

Conclusion

HGS and HGS asymmetry were all independently related to lower global cognitive performance. The association between HGS asymmetry and cognitive function varies among ethnic groups.

Handgrip strength is associated with learning and verbal fluency in older men without dementia: insights from the NHANES

Low handgrip strength, a hallmark measure of whole-body strength, has been linked with greater odds of cognitive decline and dementia; however, conflicting findings, which could be due to population characteristics and choice of tools, such for the assessment of handgrip strength and cognitive function domains, also exist. Therefore, we examined the relationship of handgrip strength with a comprehensive list of tests to assess domains of cognitive function using a representative sample of US older men and women without neurodegenerative disorders such as dementia. We analyzed cross-sectional data from the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) between 2011 and 2014, with a study cohort of 777 older adults (380 men and 397 women) above 60 years of age. Handgrip strength was assessed using a handgrip dynamometer, while cognitive function was assessed through the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease (CERAD) Word List Learning Test (WLLT), Word List Recall Test (WLRT), Intrusion Word Count Test (WLLT-IC and WLRT-IC), the Animal Fluency Test (AFT), and the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST). Sex-stratified multiple linear regression analyses were performed upon covariate adjustment for age, ethnicity, socio-economic status, education, medical history, body mass index, physical activity, energy, protein, and alcohol intake. Maximal handgrip strength was positively associated with cognitive function scores, including CERAD WLLT (P = 0.009, R² = 0.146) and AFT (P = 0.022, R² = 0.024) in older men, but not in women (CERAD WLLT: P = 0.253, AFT: P = 0.370). No significant associations with CERAD WLLRT (men: P = 0.057, women: P = 0.976), WLLT-IC (men: P = 0.671, women: P = 0.869), WLLRT-IC (men: P = 0.111, women: P = 0.861), and DSST (men: P = 0.108, women: P = 0.091) were observed. Dose-response curves exhibited a prominent linear relationship between all significant associations after covariate adjustment, with no indication of a plateau in these relationships. In conclusion, higher handgrip strength was independently associated with better learning ability for novel verbal information and verbal fluency in US men over the age of 60 and without dementia. Longitudinal studies are required to confirm whether muscle strength independently predicts cognitive function changes in older adults in a sex-specific manner, and whether this connection is affirmed to the possibility of reverse causation due to declines in physical activity levels in the preclinical phase of dementia.