Rates and predictors of switching to tenofovir alafenamide-containing ART in a nationwide cohort

Progress in research of non-cirrhotic chronic viral hepatitis with osteoporosis

Osteoporosis is one of the complications of chronic viral hepatitis related cirrhosis, and the pathogenesis and treatment methods for osteoporosis have been extensively studied. However, whether chronic viral hepatitis is the risk factor for osteoporosis is still controversial. Some studies have demonstrated the relationship between them, but there is still no systematic judgment on its pathogenesis and treatment. In this review, we systematically summarize the risk, possible pathogenesis, and treatment scheme of osteoporosis secondary to non-cirrhosis chronic viral hepatitis, with an aim to clarify the relationship between chronic viral hepatitis and osteoporosis, remind clinicians to be alert to the possibility of osteoporosis complicated by chronic viral hepatitis, and provide support for clinical diagnosis and treatment.

Changes in alanine aminotransferase levels after switching from tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) to tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) in HIV-positive people without viral hepatitis in the Swiss HIV Cohort Study

OBJECTIVES

We previously demonstrated an association between tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and chronic liver enzyme elevation in the D:A:D study. The objective of the study was to assess changes in alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels after switching from TDF to tenofovir alafenamide (TAF).

METHODS

We included Swiss HIV Cohort Study participants who switched from TDF to TAF with two or more ALT values in the 24 months before and two or more values in the 24 months after replacing TDF with TAF. Individuals with replicating viral hepatitis were excluded. Uni- and multivariable linear mixed models were used to explore changes in ALT values associated with switching from TDF to TAF, and to assess potential modifying effects.

RESULTS

A total of 1712 participants were included, contributing 6169 ALT values before and 5482 after switching. Median (interquartile range, IQR) age was 50 (42-57) years, and 75% were male. Median (IQR) ALT was 28 (22-38) U/L before and 24 (19-32) U/L after replacing TDF with TAF. ALT values decreased by 3.7 U/L (95% confidence interval: 3.2-4.2) after the switch. The median drop was larger in patients with chronic ALT elevation (defined as two or more elevated values for ≥ 6 months) compared with patients with normal ALT values (17.8 vs. 3.3 U/L, P < 0.001). We did not identify any major effect modifications of the ALT change with any of the potential variables studied.

CONCLUSIONS

Replacing TDF with TAF in HIV-monoinfected people led to a significant decrease in ALT values. Findings were not significantly affected by known risk factors for hepatotoxicity.

Switching from tenofovir disoproxil fumarate to tenofovir alafenamide or dual therapy-based regimens in HIV-infected individuals with viral load ≤50 copies/mL: does estimated glomerular filtration rate matter?

Our aim was to evaluate the association between recent eGFR values and risk of switching from TDF to TAF or dual therapy (DT) in real life. HIV-positive patients achieving HIV-RNA ≤50 copies/mL for the first time after starting a TDF-based regimen were included. Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves and Cox regression models were used to estimate the time from TDF to switch to TAF or DT. 1486 participants were included: median (IQR) age 36 (30-42) years; baseline CKD-EPI eGFR 99.92 (86.47-111.4) mL/min/1.73m². We observed a consistently higher proportion of people with HIV-RNA ≤50 copies/mL who switched from TDF to TAF rather than to DT. By competing risk analysis, at 2 years from baseline, the probability of switching was 3.5% (95% CI 2.6-4.7%) to DT and 46.7% (42.8-48.5%) to TAF. A significantly higher probability of switching to TAF was found for patients receiving INSTI at baseline versus NNRTIs and PI/b [KM, 65.6% (61.7-69.4%) vs. 4.0% (1.8-6.1%) and 59.9% (52.7-67.2%), respectively; P < 0.0001]. eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73m² both as time-fixed covariate at baseline or as current value was associated with a higher risk of switching to DT [aHR 6.68 (2.69-16.60) and 8.18 (3.54-18.90); P < 0.001] but not to TAF-based cART [aHR 0.94 (0.39-2.31), P = 0.897; and 1.19 (0.60-2.38), P = 0.617]. Counter to our original hypothesis, current eGFR is used by clinicians to guide switches to DT but does not appear to be a key determinant for switching to TAF.

Comparative Pricing of Branded Tenofovir Alafenamide-Emtricitabine Relative to Generic Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate-Emtricitabine for HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

Background

Tenofovir alafenamide-emtricitabine (F/TAF) was recently approved as a noninferior and potentially safer option than tenofovir disoproxil fumarate-emtricitabine (F/TDF) for HIV preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in the United States.

Objective

To estimate the greatest possible clinical benefits and economic savings attributable to the improved safety profile of F/TAF and the maximum price payers should be willing to pay for F/TAF over generic F/TDF.

Design

Cost-effectiveness analysis.

Data Sources

Published literature on F/TDF safety (in persons with and those without HIV) and the cost and quality-of-life effects of fractures and end-stage renal disease (ESRD).

Target Population

Age-stratified U.S. men who have sex with men (MSM) using PrEP.

Time Horizon

Five years.

Perspective

Health care sector.

Intervention

Preexposure prophylaxis with F/TAF versus F/TDF.

Outcome Measures

Fractures averted, cases of ESRD averted, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) saved, costs, incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), and maximum justifiable price for F/TAF compared with generic F/TDF.

Results of Base-Case Analysis

Over a 5-year horizon, compared with F/TDF, F/TAF averted 2101 fractures and 25 cases of ESRD for the 123 610 MSM receiving PrEP, with an ICER of more than $7 million per QALY. At a 50% discount for generic F/TDF ($8300 per year) and a societal willingness to pay up to $100 000 per QALY, the maximum fair price for F/TAF was $8670 per year.

Results of Sensitivity Analysis

Among persons older than 55 years, the ICER for F/TAF remained more than $3 million per QALY and the maximum permissible fair price for F/TAF was $8970 per year. Results were robust to alternative time horizons and PrEP-using population sizes.

Limitation

Intermittent use and on-demand PrEP were not considered.

Conclusion

In the presence of a generic F/TDF alternative, the improved safety of F/TAF is worth no more than an additional $370 per person per year.

Primary Funding Source

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institute of Mental Health, and Massachusetts General Hospital Executive Committee on Research.