Hydroxychloroquine in the treatment of outpatients with mildly symptomatic COVID-19: a multi-center observational study

Potent Dual Polymerase/Exonuclease Inhibitory Activities of Antioxidant Aminothiadiazoles Against the COVID-19 Omicron Virus: A Promising In Silico/In Vitro Repositioning Research Study

Recently, natural and synthetic nitrogenous heterocyclic antivirals topped the scene as first choices for the treatment of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections and their accompanying disease, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Meanwhile, the mysterious evolution of a new strain of SARS-CoV-2, the Omicron variant and its sublineages, caused a new defiance in the continual COVID-19 battle. Hitting the two principal coronaviral-2 multiplication enzymes RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) and 3'-to-5' exoribonuclease (ExoN) synchronously using the same ligand is a highly effective novel dual pathway to hinder SARS-CoV-2 reproduction and stop COVID-19 progression irrespective of the SARS-CoV-2 variant type since RdRps and ExoNs are widely conserved among all SARS-CoV-2 strains. Herein, the present computational/biological study screened our previous small libraries of nitrogenous heterocyclic compounds, searching for the most ideal drug candidates predictably able to efficiently act through this double approach. Theoretical filtration gave rise to three promising antioxidant nitrogenous heterocyclic compounds of the 1,3,4-thiadiazole type, which are CoViTris2022, Taroxaz-26, and ChloViD2022. Further experimental evaluation proved for the first time, utilizing the in vitro anti-RdRp/ExoN and anti-SARS-CoV-2 bioassays, that ChloViD2022, CoViTris2022, and Taroxaz-26 could effectively inhibit the replication of the new virulent strains of SARS-CoV-2 with extremely minute in vitro anti-RdRp and anti-SARS-CoV-2 EC50 values of 0.17 and 0.41 μM for ChloViD2022, 0.21 and 0.69 μM for CoViTris2022, and 0.23 and 0.73 μM for Taroxaz-26, respectively, transcending the anti-COVID-19 drug molnupiravir. The preliminary in silico outcomes greatly supported these biochemical results, proposing that the three molecules potently strike the key catalytic pockets of the SARS-CoV-2 (Omicron variant) RdRp's and ExoN's vital active sites. Moreover, the idealistic pharmacophoric hallmarks of CoViTris2022, Taroxaz-26, and ChloViD2022 molecules relatively make them typical dual-action inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2 replication and proofreading, with their highly flexible structures open for various kinds of chemical derivatization. To cut it short, the present pivotal findings of this comprehensive work disclosed the promising repositioning potentials of the three 2-aminothiadiazoles, CoViTris2022, Taroxaz-26, and ChloViD2022, to successfully interfere with the crucial biological interactions of the coronaviral-2 polymerase/exoribonuclease with the four principal RNA nucleotides, and, as a result, cure COVID-19 infection, encouraging us to rapidly start the three drugs' broad preclinical/clinical anti-COVID-19 evaluations.

Hydroxychloroquine and COVID-19 story: is the low-dose treatment the missing link? A comprehensive review and meta-analysis

Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) has been repurposed and used for the treatment of COVID-19 patients; however, its efficacy remains controversial, maybe partly due to the dosage, ranging from 200 to 800 mg/day, reported in different studies. Indeed, HCQ low dose (≤ 2.4 g/5 days) showed a lower risk of side effects compared to high doses. In this study, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the effect of low-dose HCQ used alone on three outcomes including in-hospital mortality, the need for mechanical ventilation, and ICU admission in COVID-19 patients. A systematic review of English literature was conducted from January 2020 to April 2022, in PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar. Studies reporting a dosage of 400 mg twice the first day, followed by 200 mg twice for four days were included. Pooled odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated using random-effects models. Eleven studies (12,503 patients) were retained in the quantitative analysis, four observational cohort studies, and seven RCTs. When pooling both observational and RCTs, low-dose HCQ was associated with decreased mortality (OR = 0.73, 95% CI: [0.55-0.97], I2 = 58%), but not with mechanical ventilation need (OR = 1.03, 95% CI: [0.56-1.89], I2 = 67%) and ICU admission rate (OR = 0.70, 95% CI: [0.42-1.17], I2 = 47%). However, no effect was observed when pooling only RCTs. Despite RCTs limitations, treatment with low-dose HCQ was not associated with improvement in mortality, mechanical ventilation need and ICU admission rate in COVID-19 patients.

Promising Experimental Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Agent "SLL-0197800": The Prospective Universal Inhibitory Properties against the Coming Versions of the Coronavirus

Isoquinoline derivatives having some nucleosidic structural features are considered as candidate choices for effective remediation of the different severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections and their following disease, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). SLL-0197800 is a recently discovered isoquinoline compound with potential strong universal anticoronaviral activities against SARS-CoV-2 and its previous strains. SLL-0197800 nonspecifically hits the main protease (Mpro) enzyme of the different coronaviruses. Herein in the present study, we tested the probability of the previous findings of this experimental agent to be extended to comprise any coronavirus through concurrently disrupting the mutable-less replication enzymes like the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) protein as well as the 3'-to-5' exoribonuclease (ExoN) protein. The in vitro anti-RdRp/ExoN assay revealed the potent inhibitory activities of SLL-0197800 on the coronaviral replication with minute values of anti-RdRp and anti-RdRp/ExoN EC50 (about 0.16 and 0.27 μM, respectively). The preliminary in silico outcomes significantly supported these biochemical findings. To put it simply, the present important results of these extension efforts greatly reinforce and extend the SLL-0197800's preceding findings, showing that the restraining/blocking actions (i.e., inhibitory activities) of this novel investigational anti-SARS-CoV-2 agent against the Mpro protein could be significantly extended against other copying and multiplication enzymes such as RdRp and ExoN, highlighting the potential use of SLL-0197800 against the coming versions of the homicidal coronavirus (if any), i.e., revealing the probable nonspecific anticoronaviral features and qualities of this golden experimental drug against nearly any coronaviral strain, for instance, SARS-CoV-3.

Femoral head avascular necrosis in COVID-19 survivors: a systematic review

The current systematic review aimed to document published cases of femoral head avascular necrosis (FHAVN) post-COVID-19, to report the COVID-19 disease characteristics and management patients received, and to evaluate how the FHAVN were diagnosed and treated among various reports. A systematic literature review was performed per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines through a comprehensive English literature search on January 2023 through four databases (Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Scopus), including studies reporting on FHAVN post-COVID-19. Fourteen articles were included, ten (71.4%) were case reports, and four (28.6%) case series reported on 104 patients having a mean age of 42.2 ± 11.7 (14:74) years, in which 182 hip joints were affected. In 13 reports, corticosteroids were used during the COVID-19 management plan for a mean of 24.8 ± 11 (7:42) days, with a mean prednisolone equivalent dose of 1238.5 ± 492.8 (100:3520) mg. A mean of 142.1 ± 107.6 (7:459) days passed between COVID-19 diagnosis and FHAVN detection, and most of the hips were stage II (70.1%), and concomitant septic arthritis was present in eight (4.4%) hips. Most hips (147, 80.8%) were treated non-surgically, of which 143 (78.6%) hips received medical treatment, while 35 (19.2%) hips were surgically managed, 16 (8.8%) core decompression, 13 (7.1%) primary THA, five (2.7%) staged THA and three (1.6%) had first stage THA (debridement and application of antibiotic-loaded cement spacer). The outcomes were acceptable as regards hip function and pain relief. Femoral head avascular necrosis post-COVID-19 infection is a real concern, primarily attributed to corticosteroid usage, besides other factors. Early suspicion and detection are mandatory, as conservative management lines are effective during early stages with acceptable outcomes. However, surgical intervention was required for progressive collapse or patients presented in the late stage.

Dual computational and biological assessment of some promising nucleoside analogs against the COVID-19-Omicron variant

Nucleoside analogs/derivatives (NAs/NDs) with potent antiviral activities are now deemed very convenient choices for the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) arisen by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. At the same time, the appearance of a new strain of SARS-CoV-2, the Omicron variant, necessitates multiplied efforts in fighting COVID-19. Counteracting the crucial SARS-CoV-2 enzymes RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) and 3'-to-5' exoribonuclease (ExoN) jointly altogether using the same inhibitor is a quite successful new plan to demultiplicate SARS-CoV-2 particles and eliminate COVID-19 whatever the SARS-CoV-2 subtype is (due to the significant conservation nature of RdRps and ExoNs in the different SARS-CoV-2 strains). Successive in silico screening of known NAs finally disclosed six different promising NAs, which are riboprine/forodesine/tecadenoson/nelarabine/vidarabine/maribavir, respectively, that predictably can act through the planned dual-action mode. Further in vitro evaluations affirmed the anti-SARS-CoV-2/anti-COVID-19 potentials of these NAs, with riboprine and forodesine being at the top. The two NAs are able to effectively antagonize the replication of the new virulent SARS-CoV-2 strains with considerably minute in vitro anti-RdRp and anti-SARS-CoV-2 EC₅₀ values of 189 and 408 nM for riboprine and 207 and 657 nM for forodesine, respectively, surpassing both remdesivir and the new anti-COVID-19 drug molnupiravir. Furthermore, the favorable structural characteristics of the two molecules qualify them for varied types of isosteric and analogistic chemical derivatization. In one word, the present important outcomes of this comprehensive dual study revealed the anticipating repurposing potentials of some known nucleosides, led by the two NAs riboprine and forodesine, to successfully discontinue the coronaviral-2 polymerase/exoribonuclease interactions with RNA nucleotides in the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant (BA.5 sublineage) and accordingly alleviate COVID-19 infections, motivating us to initiate the two drugs' diverse anti-COVID-19 pharmacological evaluations to add both of them betimes in the COVID-19 therapeutic protocols.

Novel Investigational Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Agent Ensitrelvir "S-217622": A Very Promising Potential Universal Broad-Spectrum Antiviral at the Therapeutic Frontline of Coronavirus Species

Lately, nitrogenous heterocyclic antivirals, such as nucleoside-like compounds, oxadiazoles, thiadiazoles, triazoles, quinolines, and isoquinolines, topped the therapeutic scene as promising agents of choice for the treatment of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections and their accompanying ailment, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). At the same time, the continuous emergence of new strains of SARS-CoV-2, like the Omicron variant and its multiple sublineages, resulted in a new defiance in the enduring COVID-19 battle. Ensitrelvir (S-217622) is a newly discovered orally active noncovalent nonpeptidic agent with potential strong broad-spectrum anticoronaviral activities, exhibiting promising nanomolar potencies against the different SARS-CoV-2 variants. S-217622 effectively and nonspecifically hits the main protease (M^pro) enzyme of a broad scope of coronaviruses. Herein, in the present computational/biological study, we tried to extend these previous findings to prove the universal activities of this investigational agent against any coronavirus, irrespective of its type, through synchronously acting on most of its main unchanged replication enzymes/proteins, including (in addition to the M^pro), e.g., the highly conserved RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) and 3'-to-5' exoribonuclease (ExoN). Biochemical evaluation proved, using the in vitro anti-RdRp/ExoN bioassay, that S-217622 can potently inhibit the replication of coronaviruses, including the new virulent strains of SARS-CoV-2, with extremely minute in vitro anti-RdRp and anti-RdRp/ExoN half-maximal effective concentration (EC₅₀) values of 0.17 and 0.27 μM, respectively, transcending the anti-COVID-19 drug molnupiravir. The preliminary in silico results greatly supported these biochemical results, proposing that the S-217622 molecule strongly and stabilizingly strikes the key catalytic pockets of the SARS-CoV-2 RdRp's and ExoN's principal active sites predictably via the nucleoside analogism mode of anti-RNA action (since the S-217622 molecule can be considered as a uridine analog). Moreover, the idealistic druglikeness and pharmacokinetic characteristics of S-217622 make it ready for pharmaceutical formulation with the expected very good clinical behavior as a drug for the infections caused by coronaviruses, e.g., COVID-19. To cut it short, the current critical findings of this extension work significantly potentiate and extend the S-217622's previous in vitro/in vivo (preclinical) results since they showed that the striking inhibitory activities of this novel anti-SARS-CoV-2 agent on the M^pro could be extended to other replication enzymes like RdRp and ExoN, unveiling the possible universal use of the compound against the next versions of the virus (i.e., disclosing the nonspecific anticoronaviral properties of this compound against almost any coronavirus strain), e.g., SARS-CoV-3, and encouraging us to rapidly start the compound's vast clinical anti-COVID-19 evaluations.

Strong Dual Antipolymerase/Antiexonuclease Actions of Some Aminothiadiazole Antioxidants: A Promising In-Silico/In-Vitro Repurposing Research Study against the COVID-19 Omicron Virus (B.1.1.529.3 Lineage)

Currently, nitrogen-containing heterocyclic virucides take the lead as top options for treating the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections and their escorting disease, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). But unfortunately, the sudden emergence of a new strain of SARS-CoV-2, the Omicron variant and its lineages, complicated matters in the incessant COVID-19 battle. Goaling the two paramount coronaviral-2 multiplication enzymes RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) and 3'-to-5' exoribonuclease (ExoN) at synchronous times using single ligand is a quite effective new binary avenue to restrain SARS-CoV-2 reproduction and cease COVID-19 progression irrespective of the SARS-CoV-2 strain type, as RdRps and ExoNs are vastly conserved in all SARS-CoV-2 strains. The presented in-silico/in-vitro research winnowed our own small libraries of antioxidant nitrogenous heterocyclic compounds, inspecting for the utmost convenient drug candidates expectedly capable of effectively working through this dual tactic. Computational screening afforded three promising compounds of the antioxidant 1,3,4-thiadiazole class, which were named ChloViD2022, Taroxaz-26, and CoViTris2022. Subsequent biological examination, employing the in-vitro anti-RdRp/anti-ExoN and anti-SARS-CoV-2 assays, exclusively demonstrated that ChloViD2022, CoViTris2022, and Taroxaz-26 could efficiently block the replication of the new lineages of SARS-CoV-2 with considerably minute anti-RdRp and anti-SARS-CoV-2 EC50 values of about 0.18 and 0.44 μM for ChloViD2022, 0.22 and 0.72 μM for CoViTris2022, and 0.25 and 0.78 μM for Taroxaz-26, in the order, overtaking the standard anti-SARS-CoV-2 drug molnupiravir. These biochemical findings were optimally presupported by the results of the prior in-silico screening, suggesting that the three compounds might potently hit the catalytic active sites of the virus's RdRp and ExoN enzymes. Furthermore, the perfect pharmacophoric features of ChloViD2022, Taroxaz-26, and CoViTris2022 molecules make them typical dual inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2 replication and proofreading, with their relatively flexible structures eligible for diverse forms of chemical modification. In sum, the current important results of this thorough research work exposed the interesting repurposing potential of the three 2-amino-1,3,4-thiadiazole ligands, ChloViD2022, Taroxaz-26, and CoViTris2022, to effectively conflict with the vital biointeractions between the coronavirus's polymerase/exoribonuclease and the four essential RNA nucleotides, and, accordingly, arrest COVID-19 disease, persuading the relevant investigators to quickly begin the three agents' comprehensive preclinical and clinical anti-COVID-19 assessments.

Evaluation of a series of nucleoside analogs as effective anticoronaviral-2 drugs against the Omicron-B.1.1.529/BA.2 subvariant: A repurposing research study

Mysterious evolution of a new strain of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the Omicron variant, led to a new challenge in the persistent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) battle. Objecting the conserved SARS-CoV-2 enzymes RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) and 3'-to-5' exoribonuclease (ExoN) together using one ligand is a successful new tactic to stop SARS-CoV-2 multiplication and COVID-19 progression. The current comprehensive study investigated most nucleoside analogs (NAs) libraries, searching for the most ideal drug candidates expectedly able to act through this double tactic. Gradual computational filtration afforded six different promising NAs, riboprine/forodesine/tecadenoson/nelarabine/vidarabine/maribavir. Further biological assessment proved that riboprine and forodesine are able to powerfully inhibit the replication of the new virulent strains of SARS-CoV-2 with extremely minute in vitro anti-RdRp and anti-SARS-CoV-2 EC50 values of about 0.21 and 0.45 μM for riboprine and about 0.23 and 0.70 μM for forodesine, respectively, surpassing both remdesivir and the new anti-COVID-19 drug molnupiravir. These biochemical findings were supported by the prior in silico data. Additionally, the ideal pharmacophoric features of riboprine and forodesine molecules render them typical dual-action inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2 replication and proofreading. These findings suggest that riboprine and forodesine could serve as prospective lead compounds against COVID-19. Graphical abstract.

Forodesine and Riboprine Exhibit Strong Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Repurposing Potential: In Silico and In Vitro Studies

Lately, nucleos(t)ide antivirals topped the scene as top options for the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. Targeting the two broadly conserved SARS-CoV-2 enzymes, RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) and 3'-to-5' exoribonuclease (ExoN), together using only one shot is a very successful new tactic to stop SARS-CoV-2 multiplication irrespective of the SARS-CoV-2 variant type. Herein, the current studies investigated most nucleoside analogue (NA) libraries, searching for the ideal drug candidates expectedly able to act through this double tactic. Gradual computational filtration gave rise to six different promising NAs along with their corresponding triphosphate (TP) nucleotides. The subsequent biological assessment proved for the first time that, among the six NAs, riboprine and forodesine are able to hyperpotently inhibit the replication of the Omicron strain of SARS-CoV-2 with extremely low in vitro anti-RdRp, anti-ExoN, and anti-SARS-CoV-2 EC50 values of about 0.18, 0.28, and 0.40 μM for riboprine and about 0.20, 0.31, and 0.65 μM for forodesine, respectively, surpassing remdesivir and molnupiravir. The significant probability that both compounds may also act as prodrugs for their final TP nucleotides in vivo pushed us to examine the same activities for forodesine-TP and riboprine-TP. Both nucleotides similarly displayed very promising results, respectively, which are much better than those for the two reference TP nucleotides, GS-443902 and β-d-N4-hydroxycytidine 5'-TP (NHC-TP). The prior in silico data supported these biochemical findings, suggesting that riboprine and forodesine molecules and their expected active TP metabolites strongly hit the key catalytic pockets of the SARS-CoV-2 RdRp's and ExoN's main active sites. In brief, the current important results of this comprehensive study revealed the interesting repurposing potentials of, mainly, the two bioactive nucleosides forodesine and riboprine and their TP nucleotides to effectively shut down the polymerase/exoribonuclease-RNA nucleotide interactions of SARS-CoV-2 and consequently treat COVID-19 infections.

A Series of Adenosine Analogs as the First Efficacious Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Drugs against the B.1.1.529.4 Lineage: A Preclinical Repurposing Research Study

Given the rapid progression of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, an ultrafast response was urgently required to handle this major public crisis. To contain the pandemic, investments are required to develop diagnostic tests, prophylactic vaccines, and novel therapies. Lately, nucleoside analog (NA) antivirals topped the scene as top options for the treatment of COVID-19 caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections. Meanwhile, the continuous generation of new lineages of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant caused a new challenge in the persistent COVID-19 battle. Hitting the two crucial SARS-CoV-2 enzymes RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) and 3'-to-5' exoribonuclease (ExoN) collectively together using only one single ligand is a very successful new approach to stop SARS-CoV-2 multiplication and combat COVID-19 irrespective of the SARS-CoV-2 variant type because RdRps and ExoNs are broadly conserved among all SARS-CoV-2 strains. Herein, the current comprehensive study investigated most NAs libraries, searching for the most ideal drug candidates expectedly able to perfectly act through this double tactic. Gradual computational filtration gave rise to six different promising NAs, which are riboprine, forodesine, tecadenoson, nelarabine, vidarabine, and maribavir, respectively. Further biological assessment proved for the first time, using the in vitro anti-RdRp/ExoN and anti-SARS-CoV-2 bioassays, that riboprine and forodesine, among all the six tested NAs, are able to powerfully inhibit the replication of the new virulent strains of SARS-CoV-2 with extremely minute in vitro anti-RdRp and anti-SARS-CoV-2 EC₅₀ values of about 0.22 and 0.49 μM for riboprine and about 0.25 and 0.73 μM for forodesine, respectively, surpassing both remdesivir and the new anti-COVID-19 drug molnupiravir. The prior in silico data supported these biochemical findings, suggesting that riboprine and forodesine molecules strongly hit the key catalytic pockets of the SARS-CoV-2 (Omicron variant) RdRp's and ExoN's main active sites. Additionally, the ideal pharmacophoric features of riboprine and forodesine molecules render them typical dual-action inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2 replication and proofreading, with their relatively flexible structures open for diverse types of chemical derivatization. In Brief, the current important results of this comprehensive study revealed the interesting repurposing potentials of, mainly, the two nucleosides riboprine and forodesine to effectively shut down the polymerase/exoribonuclease-RNA nucleotides interactions of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant and consequently treat COVID-19 infections, motivating us to rapidly begin the two drugs' broad preclinical/clinical anti-COVID-19 bioevaluations, hoping to combine both drugs soon in the COVID-19 treatment protocols.

Hydroxychloroquine/chloroquine for the treatment of hospitalized patients with COVID-19: An individual participant data meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Results from observational studies and randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have led to the consensus that hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and chloroquine (CQ) are not effective for COVID-19 prevention or treatment. Pooling individual participant data, including unanalyzed data from trials terminated early, enables more detailed investigation of the efficacy and safety of HCQ/CQ among subgroups of hospitalized patients.

METHODS

We searched ClinicalTrials.gov in May and June 2020 for US-based RCTs evaluating HCQ/CQ in hospitalized COVID-19 patients in which the outcomes defined in this study were recorded or could be extrapolated. The primary outcome was a 7-point ordinal scale measured between day 28 and 35 post enrollment; comparisons used proportional odds ratios. Harmonized de-identified data were collected via a common template spreadsheet sent to each principal investigator. The data were analyzed by fitting a prespecified Bayesian ordinal regression model and standardizing the resulting predictions.

RESULTS

Eight of 19 trials met eligibility criteria and agreed to participate. Patient-level data were available from 770 participants (412 HCQ/CQ vs 358 control). Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. We did not find evidence of a difference in COVID-19 ordinal scores between days 28 and 35 post-enrollment in the pooled patient population (odds ratio, 0.97; 95% credible interval, 0.76-1.24; higher favors HCQ/CQ), and found no convincing evidence of meaningful treatment effect heterogeneity among prespecified subgroups. Adverse event and serious adverse event rates were numerically higher with HCQ/CQ vs control (0.39 vs 0.29 and 0.13 vs 0.09 per patient, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this individual participant data meta-analysis reinforce those of individual RCTs that HCQ/CQ is not efficacious for treatment of COVID-19 in hospitalized patients.

Hydroxychloroquine/chloroquine for the treatment of hospitalized patients with COVID-19: An individual participant data meta-analysis

Background

Results from observational studies and randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have led to the consensus that hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and chloroquine (CQ) are not effective for COVID-19 prevention or treatment. Pooling individual participant data, including unanalyzed data from trials terminated early, enables more detailed investigation of the efficacy and safety of HCQ/CQ among subgroups of hospitalized patients.

Methods

We searched ClinicalTrials.gov in May and June 2020 for US-based RCTs evaluating HCQ/CQ in hospitalized COVID-19 patients in which the outcomes defined in this study were recorded or could be extrapolated. The primary outcome was a 7-point ordinal scale measured between day 28 and 35 post enrollment; comparisons used proportional odds ratios. Harmonized de-identified data were collected via a common template spreadsheet sent to each principal investigator. The data were analyzed by fitting a prespecified Bayesian ordinal regression model and standardizing the resulting predictions.

Results

Eight of 19 trials met eligibility criteria and agreed to participate. Patient-level data were available from 770 participants (412 HCQ/CQ vs 358 control). Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. We did not find evidence of a difference in COVID-19 ordinal scores between days 28 and 35 post-enrollment in the pooled patient population (odds ratio, 0.97; 95% credible interval, 0.76-1.24; higher favors HCQ/CQ), and found no convincing evidence of meaningful treatment effect heterogeneity among prespecified subgroups. Adverse event and serious adverse event rates were numerically higher with HCQ/CQ vs control (0.39 vs 0.29 and 0.13 vs 0.09 per patient, respectively).

Conclusions

The findings of this individual participant data meta-analysis reinforce those of individual RCTs that HCQ/CQ is not efficacious for treatment of COVID-19 in hospitalized patients.

Antiparasitic Drugs against SARS-CoV-2: A Comprehensive Literature Survey

More than two years have passed since the viral outbreak that led to the novel infectious respiratory disease COVID-19, caused by the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus. Since then, the urgency for effective treatments resulted in unprecedented efforts to develop new vaccines and to accelerate the drug discovery pipeline, mainly through the repurposing of well-known compounds with broad antiviral effects. In particular, antiparasitic drugs historically used against human infections due to protozoa or helminth parasites have entered the main stage as a miracle cure in the fight against SARS-CoV-2. Despite having demonstrated promising anti-SARS-CoV-2 activities in vitro, conflicting results have made their translation into clinical practice more difficult than expected. Since many studies involving antiparasitic drugs are currently under investigation, the window of opportunity might be not closed yet. Here, we will review the (controversial) journey of these old antiparasitic drugs to combat the human infection caused by the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2.

Efficacious Preclinical Repurposing of the Nucleoside Analogue Didanosine against COVID-19 Polymerase and Exonuclease

Analogues and derivatives of natural nucleosides/nucleotides are considered among the most successful bioactive species of drug-like compounds in modern medicinal chemistry, as they are well recognized for their diverse and efficient pharmacological activities in humans, especially as antivirals and antitumors. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is still almost incurable, with its infectious viral microbe, the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), continuing to wreak devastation around the world. This global crisis pushed all involved scientists, including drug discoverers and clinical researchers, to try to find an effective and broad-spectrum anti-COVID-19 drug. Didanosine (2′,3′-dideoxyinosine, DDI) is a synthetic inosine/adenosine/guanosine analogue and highly active antiretroviral therapeutic agent used for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus infection and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (HIV/AIDS). This potent reverse-transcriptase inhibitor is characterized by proven strong pharmacological effects against the viral genome, which may successfully take part in the effective treatment of SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19. Additionally, targeting the pivotal SARS-CoV-2 replication enzyme, RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp), is a very successful tactic to combat COVID-19 irrespective of the SARS-CoV-2 variant type because RdRps are broadly conserved among all SARS-CoV-2 strains. Herein, the current study proved for the first time, using the in vitro antiviral evaluation, that DDI is capable of potently inhibiting the replication of the novel virulent progenies of SARS-CoV-2 with quite tiny in vitro anti-SARS-CoV-2 and anti-RdRp EC₅₀ values of around 3.1 and 0.19 μM, respectively, surpassing remdesivir together with its active metabolite (GS-441524). Thereafter, the in silico computational interpretation of the biological results supported that DDI strongly targets the key pocket of the SARS-CoV-2 RdRp main catalytic active site. The ideal pharmacophoric characteristics of the ligand DDI make it a typical inhibiting agent of SARS-CoV-2 multiplication processes (including high-fidelity proofreading), with its elastic structure open for many kinds of derivatization. In brief, the present results further uphold and propose the repurposing potentials of DDI against the different types of COVID-19 and convincingly motivate us to quickly launch its extensive preclinical/clinical pharmacological evaluations, hoping to combine it in the COVID-19 therapeutic protocols soon.

Serious Cardiovascular Adverse Events Associated with Hydroxychloroquine/Chloroquine Alone or with Azithromycin in Patients with COVID-19: A Pharmacovigilance Analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS)

BACKGROUND

The use of hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine (HCQ/CQ) as monotherapy or combined with azithromycin for the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) may increase the risk of serious cardiovascular adverse events (SCAEs).

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to describe and evaluate the risk of SCAEs with HCQ/CQ as monotherapy or combined with azithromycin compared with that for therapeutic alternatives.

METHODS

We performed a disproportionality analysis and descriptive case series using the US FDA Adverse Event Reporting System.

RESULTS

Compared with remdesivir, HCQ/CQ was associated with increased reporting of SCAEs (reporting odds ratio [ROR] 2.1; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.8-2.5), torsade de pointes (TdP)/QTc prolongation (ROR 35.4; 95% CI 19.4-64.5), and ventricular arrhythmia (ROR 2.5; 95% CI 1.6-3.9); similar results were found in comparison with other therapeutic alternatives. Compared with lopinavir/ritonavir, HCQ/CQ was associated with increased reporting of ventricular arrhythmia (ROR 10.5; 95% CI 3.3-33.4); RORs were larger when HCQ/CQ was used in combination with azithromycin. In 2020, 312 of the 575 reports of SCAEs listed concomitant use of HCQ/CQ and azithromycin, including QTc prolongation (61.4%), ventricular arrhythmia (12.0%), atrial fibrillation (8.2%), TdP (4.9%), and cardiac arrest (4.4%); 88 (15.3%) cases resulted in hospitalization and 79 (13.7%) resulted in death. In total, 122 fatal QTc prolongation-related cardiovascular reports were associated with 1.4 times higher odds of reported death than those induced by SCAEs; 87 patients received more than one QTc-prolonging agent.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients treated with HCQ/CQ monotherapy or HCQ/CQ + azithromycin may be at increased risk of SCAEs, TdP/QTc prolongation, and ventricular arrhythmia. Cardiovascular risks need to be considered when evaluating the benefit/harm balance of treatment with HCQ/CQ, especially with the concurrent use of QTc-prolonging agents and cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibitors when treating COVID-19.

Can anti-parasitic drugs help control COVID-19?

Novel COVID-19 is a public health emergency that poses a serious threat to people worldwide. Given the virus spreading so quickly, novel antiviral medications are desperately needed. Repurposing existing drugs is the first strategy. Anti-parasitic drugs were among the first to be considered as a potential treatment option for this disease. Even though many papers have discussed the efficacy of various anti-parasitic drugs in treating COVID-19 separately, so far, no single study comprehensively discussed these drugs. This study reviews some anti-parasitic recommended drugs to treat COVID-19, in terms of function and in vitro as well as clinical results. Finally, we briefly review the advanced techniques, such as artificial intelligence, that have been used to find effective drugs for the treatment of COVID-19.

Combination of doxycycline, streptomycin and hydroxychloroquine for short-course treatment of brucellosis: a single-blind randomized clinical trial

PURPOSE

Previous studies have shown the effect of hydroxychloroquine in the treatment and prevention of recurrence of brucellosis. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of 4 and 6 week regimen containing hydroxychloroquine in the treatment of brucellosis.

METHODS

In a single-blind randomized clinical trial, 92 patients with acute brucellosis were randomly divided in two treatment groups who received a triple drug regimen including doxycycline, streptomycin, and hydroxychloroquine (DSH] for 4 and 6 weeks. All patients were followed up for up to 6 months. Response to treatment, relapse rate, complications, and results of serological tests were compared in both groups. Data were analyzed by SPSS software version 16.

RESULTS

Of the 92 patients studied, 46 received a 4 week course and 46 received a 6 week course of therapy. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of age and sex distribution. The response rate, treatment failure, and relapse in the 4 week treatment group were 82.6%, 17.3%, and 7.89%, respectively, and in the 6 week treatment group were 91.3%, 8.7%, and 9.52%. The frequency of negative 2ME test at 24 weeks after treatment was 11.1% in the 4 week group and 8.7% in the 6 week group. No significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of response to treatment, treatment failure, relapse, and negative 2ME test.

CONCLUSION

The 4 week and 6 week courses of the combination of DSH are equally effective in treating brucellosis. We recommend further studies to support the use of the short-course 4 week regimen for the treatment of uncomplicated brucellosis.

Organoid technology and lung injury mouse models evaluating effects of hydroxychloroquine on lung epithelial regeneration

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) damages lung epithelial stem/progenitor cells. Ideal anti-SARS-CoV-2 drug candidates should be screened to prevent secondary injury to the lungs. Here, we propose that in vitro three-dimensional organoid and lung injury repair mouse models are powerful models for the screening antiviral drugs. Lung epithelial progenitor cells, including airway club cells and alveolar type 2 (AT2) cells, were co-cultured with supportive fibroblast cells in transwell inserts. The organoid model was used to evaluate the possible effects of hydroxychloroquine, which is administered as a symptomatic therapy to COVID-19 patients, on the function of mouse lung stem/progenitor cells. Hydroxychloroquine was observed to promote the self-renewal of club cells and differentiation of ciliated and goblet cells in vitro. Additionally, it inhibited the self-renewal ability of AT2 cells in vitro. Naphthalene- or bleomycin-induced lung injury repair mouse models were used to investigate the in vivo effects of hydroxychloroquine on the regeneration of club and AT2 cells, respectively. The naphthalene model indicated that the proliferative ability and differentiation potential of club cells were unaffected in the presence of hydroxychloroquine. The bleomycin model suggested that hydroxychloroquine had a limited effect on the proliferation and differentiation abilities of AT2 cells. These findings suggest that hydroxychloroquine has limited effects on the regenerative ability of epithelial stem/progenitor cells. Thus, stem/progenitor cell-derived organoid technology and lung epithelial injury repair mouse models provide a powerful platform for drug screening, which could possibly help end the pandemic.

Pulmonary Delivery of Aerosolized Chloroquine and Hydroxychloroquine to Treat COVID-19: In Vitro Experimentation to Human Dosing Predictions

In vitro screening for pharmacological activity of existing drugs showed chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine to be effective against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. Oral administration of these compounds to obtain desired pulmonary exposures resulted in dose-limiting systemic toxicity in humans. However, pulmonary drug delivery enables direct and rapid administration to obtain higher local tissue concentrations in target tissue. In this work, inhalable formulations for thermal aerosolization of chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine were developed, and their physicochemical properties were characterized. Thermal aerosolization of 40 mg/mL chloroquine and 100 mg/mL hydroxychloroquine formulations delivered respirable aerosol particle sizes with 0.15 and 0.33 mg per 55 mL puff, respectively. In vitro toxicity was evaluated by exposing primary human bronchial epithelial cells to aerosol generated from Vitrocell. An in vitro exposure to 7.24 μg of chloroquine or 7.99 μg hydroxychloroquine showed no significant changes in cilia beating, transepithelial electrical resistance, and cell viability. The pharmacokinetics of inhaled aerosols was predicted by developing a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model that included a detailed species-specific respiratory tract physiology and lysosomal trapping. Based on the model predictions, inhaling emitted doses comprising 1.5 mg of chloroquine or 3.3 mg hydroxychloroquine three times a day may yield therapeutically effective concentrations in the lung. Inhalation of higher doses further increased effective concentrations in the lung while maintaining lower systemic concentrations. Given the theoretically favorable risk/benefit ratio, the clinical significance for pulmonary delivery of aerosolized chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine to treat COVID-19 needs to be established in rigorous safety and efficacy studies. Graphical abstract.

Potent Inhibitory Activities of the Adenosine Analogue Cordycepin on SARS-CoV-2 Replication

Nucleoside analogues are among the most successful bioactive classes of druglike compounds in pharmaceutical chemistry as they are well-known for their numerous effective bioactivities in humans, especially as antiviral and anticancer agents. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is still untreatable, with its causing virus, the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), continuing to wreak havoc on the ground everywhere. This complicated international situation urged all concerned scientists, including medicinal chemists and drug discoverers, to search for a potent anti-COVID-19 drug. Cordycepin (3′-deoxyadenosine) is a known natural adenosine analogue of fungal origin, which could also be synthetically produced. This bioactive phytochemical compound is characterized by several proven strong pharmacological actions that may effectively contribute to the comprehensive treatment of COVID-19, with the antiviral activities being the leading ones. Some new studies predicted the possible inhibitory affinities of cordycepin against the principal SARS-CoV-2 protein targets (e.g., SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) protein, main protease (M^pro) enzyme, and RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) enzyme) based on the computational approach. Interestingly, the current research showed, for the first time, that cordycepin is able to potently inhibit the multiplication of the new resistant strains of SARS-CoV-2 with a very minute in vitro anti-SARS-CoV-2 EC₅₀ of about 2 μM, edging over both remdesivir and its active metabolite GS-441524. The ideal pharmacophoric features of the cordycepin molecule render it a typical inhibitor of SARS-CoV-2 replication, with its flexible structure open for most types of derivatization in the future. Briefly, the current findings further support and suggest the repurposing possibility of cordycepin against COVID-19 and greatly encourage us to confidently and rapidly begin its preclinical/clinical evaluations for the comprehensive treatment of COVID-19.

Teriflunomide: A possible effective drug for the comprehensive treatment of COVID-19

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has undoubtedly become a global crisis. Consequently, discovery and identification of new or known potential drug candidates to solve the health problems caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) have become an urgent necessity. This current research study sheds light on the possible direct repurposing of the antirheumatic drug teriflunomide to act as an effective and potent anti-SARS-CoV-2 agent. Herein, an interesting computational molecular docking study of teriflunomide, to investigate and evaluate its potential inhibitory activities on the novel coronaviral-2 RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (nCoV-RdRp) protein, was reported. The docking procedures were accurately carried out on nCoV-RdRp (with/without RNA) using the COVID-19 Docking Server, through adjusting it on the small molecule docking mode. Remdesivir and its active metabolite (GS-441524) were used as the active references for the comparison and evaluation purpose. Interestingly, the computational docking analysis of the best inhibitory binding mode of teriflunomide in the binding pocket of the active site of the SARS-CoV-2 RdRp revealed that teriflunomide may exhibit significantly stronger inhibitory binding interactions and better inhibitory binding affinities (teriflunomide has considerably lower binding energies of -9.70 and -7.80 ​kcal/mol with RdRp-RNA and RdRp alone, respectively) than both references. It was previously reported that teriflunomide strongly inhibits the viral replication and reproduction through two mechanisms of action, thus the results obtained in the present study surprisingly support the double mode of antiviral action of this antirheumatic ligand. In conclusion, the current research paved the way to practically prove the hypothetical theory of the promising abilities of teriflunomide to successfully attack the SARS-CoV-2 particles and inhibit their replication in a triple mode of action through integrating the newly-discovered nCoV-RdRp-inhibiting properties with the previously-known two anticoronaviral mechanisms of action. Based on the previous interesting facts and results, the triple SARS-CoV-2/sextet COVID-19 attacker teriflunomide can further undergo in vitro/in vivo anti-COVID-19 assays together with preclinical/clinical studies and trials in an attempt to evaluate and prove its comprehensive pharmacological activities against the different SARS-CoV-2 strains to be effectively used in COVID-19 therapy in the very near future.

G6PD distribution in sub-Saharan Africa and potential risks of using chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine based treatments for COVID-19

Chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine have been proposed as potential treatments for COVID-19. These drugs have warning labels for use in individuals with glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency. Analysis of whole genome sequence data of 458 individuals from sub-Saharan Africa showed significant G6PD variation across the continent. We identified nine variants, of which four are potentially deleterious to G6PD function, and one (rs1050828) that is known to cause G6PD deficiency. We supplemented data for the rs1050828 variant with genotype array data from over 11,000 Africans. Although this variant is common in Africans overall, large allele frequency differences exist between sub-populations. African sub-populations in the same country can show significant differences in allele frequency (e.g. 16.0% in Tsonga vs 0.8% in Xhosa, both in South Africa, p = 2.4 × 10-3). The high prevalence of variants in the G6PD gene found in this analysis suggests that it may be a significant interaction factor in clinical trials of chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine for treatment of COVID-19 in Africans.

Understanding the binding mechanism for potential inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 Mpro and exploring the modes of ACE2 inhibition by hydroxychloroquine

As per the World Health Organization report, around 226 844 344 confirmed positive cases and 4 666 334 deaths are reported till September 17, 2021 due to the recent viral outbreak. A novel coronavirus (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 [SARS‐CoV‐2]) is responsible for the associated coronavirus disease (COVID‐19), which causes serious or even fatal respiratory tract infection and yet no approved therapeutics or effective treatment is currently available to combat the outbreak. Due to the emergency, the drug repurposing approach is being explored for COVID‐19. In this study, we attempt to understand the potential mechanism and also the effect of the approved antiviral drugs against the SARS‐CoV‐2 main protease (Mpro). To understand the mechanism of inhibition of the malaria drug hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) against SARS‐CoV‐2, we performed molecular interaction studies. The studies revealed that HCQ docked at the active site of the Human ACE2 receptor as a possible way of inhibition. Our in silico analysis revealed that the three drugs Lopinavir, Ritonavir, and Remdesivir showed interaction with the active site residues of Mpro. During molecular dynamics simulation, based on the binding free energy contributions, Lopinavir showed better results than Ritonavir and Remdesivir.

Near-physiological-temperature serial crystallography reveals conformations of SARS-CoV-2 main protease active site for improved drug repurposing

The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in 198 million reported infections and more than 4 million deaths as of July 2021 (covid19.who.int). Research to identify effective therapies for COVID-19 includes: (1) designing a vaccine as future protection; (2) de novo drug discovery; and (3) identifying existing drugs to repurpose them as effective and immediate treatments. To assist in drug repurposing and design, we determine two apo structures of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) main protease at ambient temperature by serial femtosecond X-ray crystallography. We employ detailed molecular simulations of selected known main protease inhibitors with the structures and compare binding modes and energies. The combined structural and molecular modeling studies not only reveal the dynamics of small molecules targeting the main protease but also provide invaluable opportunities for drug repurposing and structure-based drug design strategies against SARS-CoV-2.

COVID-19: Failure of the DisCoVeRy Clinical Trial, and Now-New Hopes?

The DisCoVeRy clinical trial aimed at the evaluation of four treatments for patients suffering from severe to critical COVID-19: Hydroxychloroquine, eventually associated with azithromycin; the combination lopinavir/ritonavir; the combination with the addition of interferon β-1a; remdesivir. The trial was discontinued due to the lack of positive results. Meanwhile, many other potential options have been considered either to target the virus itself, the interactions with the host cells, or the cytokine storm frequently observed during the infection. Several of those options are briefly reviewed. They include vaccines, small molecules, antibodies, and stem cells.

Avascular necrosis as a part of 'long COVID-19'

‘Long COVID-19’ can affect different body systems. At present, avascular necrosis (AVN) as a sequalae of ‘long COVID-19’ has yet not been documented. By large-scale use of life-saving corticosteroids in COVID-19 cases, we anticipate that there will be a resurgence of AVN cases. We report a series of three cases in which patients developed AVN of the femoral head after being treated for COVID-19 infection. The mean dose of prednisolone used in these cases was 758 mg (400–1250 mg), which is less than the mean cumulative dose of around 2000 mg steroid, documented in the literature as causative for AVN. Patients were symptomatic and developed early AVN presentation at a mean of 58 days after COVID-19 diagnosis as compared with the literature which shows that it generally takes 6 months to 1 year to develop AVN post steroid exposure.

Clinical outcomes of patients with mild COVID-19 following treatment with hydroxychloroquine in an outpatient setting

The role of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) in early outpatient management of mild coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) needs further investigation. This study was a multicenter, population-based national retrospective-cohort investigation of 28,759 adults with mild COVID-19 seen at the network of Comprehensive Healthcare Centers (CHC) between March and September 2020 throughout Iran. The baseline characteristics and outcome variables were extracted from the national integrated health system database. A total of 7295 (25.37%) patients who presented with mild COVID-19 within 3-7 days of symptoms onset received HCQ (400 mg twice daily on day 1 followed by 200 mg twice daily for the next four days and were then followed for 14 days). The main outcome measures were hospitalization or death for six months follow-up. COVID-19-related hospitalizations or deaths occurred in 523 (7.17%) and 27 (0.37%) respectively, in HCQ recipients and 2382 (11.10%) and 287 (1.34%) respectively, in non-recipients. The odds of hospitalization or death was reduced by 38% (odds ratio [OR] = 0.62; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.56-0.68, p = < 0.001) and 73% (OR = 0.27; 95% CI: 0.18-0.41, p = < 0.001) in HCQ recipients and non-recipients. These effects were maintained after adjusting for age, comorbidities, and diagnostic modality. No serious HCQ-related adverse drug reactions were reported. In our large outpatient national cohort of adults with mild COVID-19 disease who were given HCQ early in the course of the disease, the odds of hospitalization or death was reduced significantly regardless of age or comorbidities.

The Rise and Fall of Hydroxychloroquine with the COVID-19 Pandemic: Narrative Review of Selected Data

Since the first outbreak of Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) in January 2020, the medical community has been pursuing effective countermeasures. Early in the pandemic, several small clinical and in vitro studies from France and China reported on the efficacy of chloroquine (CQ) and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) against SARS-CoV-2 infections, which generated global attention towards these decades-old antimalarials (AM) and heralded numerous studies investigating their role in treating COVID-19. Despite several observational studies early in the pandemic affirming their beneficial role in treating COVID-19, 12 clinical studies reported no mortality benefits for CQ/HCQ in COVID-19 patients. The excitement over CQ/HCQ was ultimately quenched after three large randomized clinical trials, the COALITION-I trial in Brazil, the RECOVERY trial in the United Kingdom (UK), and the SOLIDARITY trial from World Health Organization (WHO) consistently reported no beneficial effects for CQ/HCQ in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. While initial studies suggested that CQ/HCQ might have a role in treating the early phases of infection, the results from three rigorously designed studies investigating their role in non-hospitalized COVID-19 patients were equivocal and inconsistent. Here we review the major social events related to the therapeutic use of CQ/HCQ in COVID-19, and the data from selected clinical studies evaluating their efficacy in hospitalized and non-hospitalized COVID-19 patients along with the major safety concerns.

First and second waves of coronavirus disease-19: A comparative study in hospitalized patients in Reus, Spain

Many countries have seen a two-wave pattern in reported cases of coronavirus disease-19 during the 2020 pandemic, with a first wave during spring followed by the current second wave in late summer and autumn. Empirical data show that the characteristics of the effects of the virus do vary between the two periods. Differences in age range and severity of the disease have been reported, although the comparative characteristics of the two waves still remain largely unknown. Those characteristics are compared in this study using data from two equal periods of 3 and a half months. The first period, between 15th March and 30th June, corresponding to the entire first wave, and the second, between 1st July and 15th October, corresponding to part of the second wave, still present at the time of writing this article. Two hundred and four patients were hospitalized during the first period, and 264 during the second period. Patients in the second wave were younger and the duration of hospitalization and case fatality rate were lower than those in the first wave. In the second wave, there were more children, and pregnant and post-partum women. The most frequent signs and symptoms in both waves were fever, dyspnea, pneumonia, and cough, and the most relevant comorbidities were cardiovascular diseases, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and chronic neurological diseases. Patients from the second wave more frequently presented renal and gastrointestinal symptoms, were more often treated with non-invasive mechanical ventilation and corticoids, and less often with invasive mechanical ventilation, conventional oxygen therapy and anticoagulants. Several differences in mortality risk factors were also observed. These results might help to understand the characteristics of the second wave and the behaviour and danger of SARS-CoV-2 in the Mediterranean area and in Western Europe. Further studies are needed to confirm our findings.

Clinical Efficacy of Hydroxychloroquine in Patients with COVID-19: Findings from an Observational Comparative Study in Saudi Arabia

The aim of this study was to assess the clinical effectiveness of Hydroxychloroquine-based regimens versus standard treatment in patients with the coronavirus disease admitted in 2019 to a hospital in Saudi Arabia. A comparative observational study, using routine hospital data, was carried out in a large tertiary care hospital in Al Baha, Saudi Arabia, providing care to patients with COVID-19 between April 2019 and August 2019. Patients were categorized into two groups: the Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) group, treated with HCQ in a dose of 400 mg twice daily on the first day, followed by 200 mg twice daily; the non HCQ group, treated with other antiviral or antibacterial treatments according to protocols recommended by the Ministry of Health (MOH) at the time. The primary outcomes were the length of hospital stay, need for admission to the intensive care unit (ICU), time in ICU, and need for mechanical ventilation. Overall survival was also assessed. 568 patients who received HCQ (treatment group) were compared with 207 patients who did not receive HCQ (control group). HCQ did not improve mortality in the treated group (7.7% vs. 7.2%). There were no significant differences in terms of duration of hospitalization, need for and time in ICU, and need for mechanical ventilation among the groups. Our study provides further evidence that HCQ treatment does not reduce mortality rates, length of hospital stay, admission and time in ICU, and need for mechanical ventilation in patients hospitalized with COVID-19.

First and second waves of coronavirus disease-19: A comparative study in hospitalized patients in Reus, Spain

Many countries have seen a two-wave pattern in reported cases of coronavirus disease-19 during the 2020 pandemic, with a first wave during spring followed by the current second wave in late summer and autumn. Empirical data show that the characteristics of the effects of the virus do vary between the two periods. Differences in age range and severity of the disease have been reported, although the comparative characteristics of the two waves still remain largely unknown. Those characteristics are compared in this study using data from two equal periods of 3 and a half months. The first period, between 15^th March and 30^th June, corresponding to the entire first wave, and the second, between 1^st July and 15^th October, corresponding to part of the second wave, still present at the time of writing this article. Two hundred and four patients were hospitalized during the first period, and 264 during the second period. Patients in the second wave were younger and the duration of hospitalization and case fatality rate were lower than those in the first wave. In the second wave, there were more children, and pregnant and post-partum women. The most frequent signs and symptoms in both waves were fever, dyspnea, pneumonia, and cough, and the most relevant comorbidities were cardiovascular diseases, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and chronic neurological diseases. Patients from the second wave more frequently presented renal and gastrointestinal symptoms, were more often treated with non-invasive mechanical ventilation and corticoids, and less often with invasive mechanical ventilation, conventional oxygen therapy and anticoagulants. Several differences in mortality risk factors were also observed. These results might help to understand the characteristics of the second wave and the behaviour and danger of SARS-CoV-2 in the Mediterranean area and in Western Europe. Further studies are needed to confirm our findings.

Hydroxychloroquine / azithromycin in COVID-19: The association between time to treatment and case fatality rate

BACKGROUND

Currently, there is no formally accepted pharmacological treatment for COVID-19.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We included COVID-19 outpatients of a Peruvian primary care center from Lima, Peru, who were treated between April 30 - September 30, 2020, with hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin. Logistic regression was applied to determine factors associated with case-fatality rate.

RESULTS

A total of 1265 COVID-19 patients with an average age of 44.5 years were studied. Women represented 50.1% of patients, with an overall 5.9 symptom days, SpO2 97%, temperature of 37.3 °C, 41% with at least one comorbidity and 96.1% one symptom or sign. No patient treated within the first 72 h of illness died. The factors associated with higher case fatality rate were age (OR = 1.06; 95% CI 1.01-1.11, p = 0.021), SpO2 (OR = 0.87; 95% CI 0.79-0.96, p = 0.005) and treatment onset (OR = 1.16; 95% CI 1.06-1.27, p = 0.002), being the latter the only associated in the multivariate analysis (OR = 1.18; 95% CI 1.05-1.32, p = 0.005). 0.6% of our patients died.

CONCLUSIONS

The case fatality rate in COVID-19 outpatients treated with hydroxychloroquine/azithromycin was associated with the number of days of illness on which treatment was started.