An overview of systematic reviews on upper extremity outcome measures after stroke

Predictive factors and dose-response effect of rehabilitation for upper limb induced recovery after stroke: systematic review with proportional meta-analyses

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To date, factors with predictive value for upper limb (UL) recovery after stroke are acknowledged, but little is known on clinical features predicting outcome in response to rehabilitation. The purpose of this review is to investigate whether any factor allows identification of Responders to rehabilitation, and whether clinically important recovery of motor function relies on modalities and dose of intervention received, at different times after stroke.

METHODS

A systematic review with proportional meta-analysis was conducted. Longitudinal single-cohort studies on patients undergoing rehabilitation after stroke were included. Predictive features investigated in the included studies were reported. The primary outcome was the Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity, and effect sizes (ES) of different rehabilitation doses were calculated.

RESULTS

Only 6% of the included studies (n = 141) investigated predictive factors. Studies providing more than 30 hours of therapy induced small to large clinical effect (ES from 0.38 to 0.88). Task-oriented approach led to the largest effect, both in the subacute (ES = 0.88) and chronic (ES = 0.71) phases. Augmenting interventions provided higher effect in the chronic rather than subacute phase. Integrity of the corticospinal tract, preservation of arm motor function and specific genetic biomarkers were found to be associated with motor recovery DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Trials on motor recovery after stroke should incorporate analysis of factors associated with rehabilitation outcomes. Task-oriented interventions should be delivered more than 30 hours (high dose) to induce the greatest improvement.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER

Systematic Review Registration Number PROSPERO CRD42021258188. CONTRIBUTION OF THE PAPER.

A reliable and valid assessment of upper limb movement quality after stroke: the observational Drinking Task Assessment

OBJECTIVE

To develop and evaluate the reliability and validity of a new observational Drinking Task Assessment (DTA) designed to assess quality of movement in task performance after stroke.

DESIGN

Reliability and validity.

METHODS

The DTA measures movement time and movement quality (smoothness, trunk, shoulder, elbow, and grasp movements) on a 4-level ordinal scale. Thirty participants with chronic stroke were assessed independently by 2 therapists. Intra-class correlation (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimal real difference (MRD), weighted kappa, percentage of agreement, and Svensson method were used for reliability assessment. Motion capture-based kinematics and established clinical scales were used to evaluate validity.

RESULTS

The absolute SEM and MRD for movement time were 0.4 and 1 s (11%), respectively. The ICC (≥ 0.93) and weighted kappa (0.71-1.0) showed good to excellent agreement for intra- and inter-rater reliability. DTA showed strong correlations with Fugl-Meyer Assessment (0.74), Action Research Arm Test (0.93), and kinematic measures of smoothness (0.93), trunk displacement (0.91), elbow extension (0.73), and shoulder movements (0.56), indicating good construct validity.

CONCLUSIONS

The new DTA proved to be a reliable and valid tool for assessment of movement quality during task performance after stroke.

Muscle synergies in upper limb stroke rehabilitation: a scoping review

INTRODUCTION

Upper limb impairment is a common consequence of stroke, significantly affecting the quality of life and independence of survivors. This scoping review assesses the emerging field of muscle synergy analysis in enhancing upper limb rehabilitation, focusing on the comparison of various methodologies and their outcomes. It aims to standardize these approaches to improve the effectiveness of rehabilitation interventions and drive future research in the domain.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

Studies included in this scoping review focused on the analysis of muscle synergies during longitudinal rehabilitation of stroke survivors' upper limbs. A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases, until September 2023, and was guided by the PRISMA for scoping review framework.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Fourteen studies involving a total of 247 stroke patients were reviewed, featuring varied patient populations and rehabilitative interventions. Protocols differed among studies, with some utilizing robotic assistance and others relying on traditional therapy methods. Muscle synergy extraction was predominantly conducted using Non-Negative Matrix Factorization from electromyography data, focusing on key upper limb muscles essential for shoulder, elbow, and wrist rehabilitation. A notable observation across the studies was the heterogeneity in findings, particularly in the changes observed in the number, weightings, and temporal coefficients of muscle synergies. The studies indicated varied and complex relationships between muscle synergy variations and clinical outcomes. This diversity underscored the complexity involved in interpreting muscle coordination in the stroke population. The variability in results was also influenced by differing methodologies in muscle synergy analysis, highlighting a need for more standardized approaches to improve future research comparability and consistency.

CONCLUSIONS

The synthesis of evidence presented in this scoping review highlights the promising role of muscle synergy analysis as an indicator of motor control recovery in stroke rehabilitation. By offering a comprehensive overview of the current state of research and advocating for harmonized methodological practices in future longitudinal studies, this scoping review aspires to advance the field of upper limb rehabilitation, ensuring that post-stroke interventions are both scientifically grounded and optimally beneficial for patients.

Assessing impaired bed mobility in patients with Parkinson's disease: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Although most patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) experience difficulties in bed mobility, evidence on the suitability of the methods for assessing impaired bed mobility in PD are lacking.

OBJECTIVES

To identify objective methods for assessing impaired bed mobility in PD and to discuss their clinimetric properties and feasibility for use in clinical practice.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched between 1995 and 2022.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Studies were included if they described an objective assessment method for assessing impaired bed mobility in PD.

DATA EXTRACTION AND DATA SYNTHESIS

Characteristics of the identified measurement methods such as clinimetric properties and feasibility were extracted by two authors. The methodological quality of studies was evaluated using the Appraisal of studies tool.

RESULTS

Twenty-three studies were included and categorised into three assessment methods: sensor-based assessments (48%), rating scales (39%), and timed-tests (13%). The risk of bias was low for all but one study, which was medium.

LIMITATIONS

Despite applying wide selection criteria, a relatively small number of studies were identified in our results.

CONCLUSION

Rating scales may be the most preferred for assessing impaired bed mobility in PD in clinical practice, until clinimetric validity are adequately demonstrated in the other assessment methods. CONTRIBUTION OF PAPER.

Spanish translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Box and Block Test: a pilot study in adults with chronic acquired brain injury

Background The Box and Block Test (BBT) is a highly recommended outcome measure to assess unilateral gross motor activity of the upper limbs. The BBT has not previously been available in a version adapted to the Spanish context. Thus, this study aimed to cross-culturally adapt and translate the BBT's instructions and pilot test the Spanish version of BBT in adults with acquired brain injury (ABI). Methods The BBT was translated and cross-culturally adapted following standard procedures. An expert committee approved the final Spanish version of BBT and it was conceptually validated by four therapists with expertise in ABI. The tool was tested on 14 adults with ABI. Results The Spanish version of BBT included a new section of materials for the test and a record to count the number of blocks transferred from one compartment of the box to the other. Following the pilot study, a modification in terminology was implemented for referring to the dominant and non-dominant hands. Conclusions Our results suggest that the Spanish version of BBT is suitable for assessing manual dexterity in Spanish-speaking adults with ABI.

The association between dexterity and upper limb impairment during stroke recovery

Introduction

Stroke-induced upper limb disabilities can be characterized by both motor impairments and activity limitations, commonly assessed using Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment for Upper Extremity (FMMA-UE) and Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), respectively. The relationship between the two assessments during recovery is largely unstudied. Expectedly they diverge over time when recovery of impairment (restitution) plateaus, but compensation-driven improvements still occur. The objective of this study is to evaluate the alignment between FMMA-UE and ARAT in defining upper limb functional recovery categories by ARAT scores. We aimed to establish cut-off scores for both measures from the acute/early subacute, subacute and chronic stages of stroke recovery.

Methods

Secondary analysis of four prospective cohort studies (acute/early subacute: n = 133, subacute: n = 113, chronic: n = 92) stages post-stroke. Receiver operating characteristic curves calculated the area under the curve (AUC) to establish optimal FMMA-UE cut-offs based on predefined ARAT thresholds distinguishing five activity levels from no activity to full activity. Weighted kappa was used to determine agreement between the two assessments. We used minimally clinically important difference (MCID) and minimal detectable change (MDC95) for comparison.

Results

FMMA-UE and ARAT scores showed no relevant divergence across all recovery stages. Results indicated similar cut-off scores in all recovery stages with variability below MCID and MDC95 levels. Cut-off scores demonstrated robust AUC values from 0.77 to 0.86 at every recovery stage. Only in highly functional patients at the chronic stage, we found a reduced specificity of 0.55. At all other times sensitivity ranged between 0.68 and 0.99 and specificity between 0.71 and 0.99. Weighted kappa at the acute/early subacute, subacute and chronic stages was 0.76, 0.83, and 0.81, respectively.

Discussion

Our research shows a strong alignment between FMMA-UE and ARAT cut-off scores throughout stroke recovery, except among the subgroup of highly recovered patients at the chronic stage. Discrepancies in specificity potentially stem from fine motor deficits affecting dexterity outcomes that are not captured by FMMA-UE. Additionally, the high congruence of both measures suggests they are not suited to distinguish between restitution and compensation. Calling for more comprehensive assessment methods to better understand upper limb functionality in rehabilitation.

Stem cell therapy: a new hope for stroke and traumatic brain injury recovery and the challenge for rural minorities in South Carolina

Stroke and traumatic brain injury (TBI) are a significant cause of death and disability nationwide. Both are considered public health concerns in rural communities in the state of South Carolina (SC), particularly affecting the African American population resulting in considerable morbidity, mortality, and economic burden. Stem cell therapy (SCT) has emerged as a potential intervention for both diseases with increasing research trials showing promising results. In this perspective article, the authors aim to discuss the current research in the field of SCT, the results of early phase trials, and the utilization of outcome measures and biomarkers of recovery. We searched PubMed from inception to December 2023 for articles on stem cell therapy in stroke and traumatic brain injury and its impact on rural communities, particularly in SC. Early phase trials of SCT in Stroke and Traumatic Brain injury yield promising safety profile and efficacy results, but the findings have not yet been consistently replicated. Early trials using mesenchymal stem cells for stroke survivors showed safety, feasibility, and improved functional outcomes using broad and domain-specific outcome measures. Neuroimaging markers of recovery such as Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) and electroencephalography (EEG) combined with neuromodulation, although not widely used in SCT research, could represent a breakthrough when evaluating brain injury and its functional consequences. This article highlights the role of SCT as a promising intervention while addressing the underlying social determinants of health that affect therapeutic outcomes in relation to rural communities such as SC. It also addresses the challenges ethical concerns of stem cell sourcing, the high cost of autologous cell therapies, and the technical difficulties in ensuring transplanted cell survival and strategies to overcome barriers to clinical trial enrollment such as the ethical concerns of stem cell sourcing, the high cost of autologous cell therapies, and the technical difficulties in ensuring transplanted cell survival and equitable healthcare.

Brain-computer interface on wrist training with or without neurofeedback in subacute stroke: a study protocol for a double-blinded, randomized control pilot trial

Background

After a stroke, damage to the part of the brain that controls movement results in the loss of motor function. Brain-computer interface (BCI)-based stroke rehabilitation involves patients imagining movement without physically moving while the system measures the perceptual-motor rhythm in the motor cortex. Visual feedback through virtual reality and functional electrical stimulation is provided simultaneously. The superiority of real BCI over sham BCI in the subacute phase of stroke remains unclear. Therefore, we aim to compare the effects of real and sham BCI on motor function and brain activity among patients with subacute stroke with weak wrist extensor strength.

Methods

This is a double-blinded randomized controlled trial. Patients with stroke will be categorized into real BCI and sham BCI groups. The BCI task involves wrist extension for 60 min/day, 5 times/week for 4 weeks. Twenty sessions will be conducted. The evaluation will be conducted four times, as follows: before the intervention, 2 weeks after the start of the intervention, immediately after the intervention, and 4 weeks after the intervention. The assessments include a clinical evaluation, electroencephalography, and electromyography using motor-evoked potentials.

Discussion

Patients will be categorized into two groups, as follows: those who will be receiving neurofeedback and those who will not receive this feedback during the BCI rehabilitation training. We will examine the importance of motor imaging feedback, and the effect of patients' continuous participation in the training rather than their being passive.Clinical Trial Registration: KCT0008589.

Age- and sex-related changes in motor functions: a comprehensive assessment and component analysis

Age-related motor impairments often cause caregiver dependency or even hospitalization. However, comprehensive investigations of the different motor abilities and the changes thereof across the adult lifespan remain sparse. We, therefore, extensively assessed essential basic and complex motor functions in 444 healthy adults covering a wide age range (range 21 to 88 years). Basic motor functions, here defined as simple isolated single or repetitive movements in one direction, were assessed by means of maximum grip strength (GS) and maximum finger-tapping frequency (FTF). Complex motor functions, comprising composite sequential movements involving both proximal and distal joints/muscle groups, were evaluated with the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), the Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test (JTT), and the Purdue Pegboard Test. Men achieved higher scores than women concerning GS and FTF, whereas women stacked more pins per time than men during the Purdue Pegboard Test. There was no significant sex effect regarding JTT. We observed a significant but task-specific reduction of basic and complex motor performance scores across the adult lifespan. Linear regression analyses significantly predicted the participants' ages based on motor performance scores (R2 = 0.502). Of note, the ratio between the left- and right-hand performance remained stable across ages for all tests. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) revealed three motor components across all tests that represented dexterity, force, and speed. These components were consistently present in young (21-40 years), middle-aged (41-60 years), and older (61-88 years) adults, as well as in women and men. Based on the three motor components, K-means clustering analysis differentiated high- and low-performing participants across the adult life span. The rich motor data set of 444 healthy participants revealed age- and sex-dependent changes in essential basic and complex motor functions. Notably, the comprehensive assessment allowed for generating robust motor components across the adult lifespan. Our data may serve as a reference for future studies of healthy subjects and patients with motor deficits. Moreover, these findings emphasize the importance of comprehensively assessing different motor functions, including dexterity, force, and speed, to characterize human motor abilities and their age-related decline.

Neuroanatomical correlates of gross manual dexterity in children with unilateral spastic cerebral palsy

Unilateral spastic Cerebral Palsy (UCP) results from congenital brain injury, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) has a role in understanding the etiology and severity of brain insult. In UCP, functional impairment predominantly occurs in the upper limb (UL) of the more affected side, where manual ability and dexterity are typically reduced. Also, mirror movements (MMs), are often present in UCP, with a further possible negative functional impact. This study aims to investigate the relationships among neuroanatomical characteristics of brain injury at MRI, manual functional impairment and MMs, in children with UCP. Thirty-five children with UCP participated in the study (20, M = 15, F, mean age 9.2 ± 3.5 years). Brain lesions at MRI were categorized according to the Magnetic Resonance Classification System (MRICS) and by using a semi-quantitative MRI (sqMRI) scale. Gross manual performance was assessed through Manual Ability Classification System (MACS) and the Box and Block Test (BBT), and MMs by Woods and Teuber scale, for both hands. Non-parametric correlation analyses were run to determine the relationship between neuroanatomical and functional features. Regression models were run to explore the contribution of neuroanatomical features and MMs to UL function. Correlation analyses revealed moderate to strong associations between sqMRI scores contralateral to the more affected side and UL functional impairment on MACS and BBT, with more severe brain injuries significantly correlating with poorer function in the more affected hand. No association emerged between brain lesion severity scores and MMs. MRICS showed no association with MACS or BBT, while a significant correlation emerged between MRICS category and MMs in the more affected hand, with brain lesion category that are suggestive of presumed earlier injury being associated with more severe MMs. Finally, exploratory regression analyses showed that neuroanatomical characteristics of brain injury and MMs contributed to the variability of UL functional impairment. This study contributes to the understanding of the neuroanatomical and neurological correlates of some aspects of manual functional impairment in UCP by using a simple clinical brain MRI assessment.

The stratified effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in upper limb motor impairment recovery after stroke: a meta-analysis

Background

The recovery of upper extremity motor impairment after stroke remains a challenging task. The clinical effectiveness of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), which is believed to aid in the recovery process, is still uncertain.

Methods

A systematic search was conducted in Medline (Ovid), Cochrane and Embase electronic databases from March 28, 2014, to March 28, 2023. The inclusion criteria consisted of randomized controlled trials that assessed the effects of rTMS on the recovery of upper limb motor impairment among stroke patients. Various measurements, including the Fugl Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity Scale (FMA-UE), Brunnstrom recovery stage, Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), and Barthel index, were evaluated both before and after the intervention.

Results

Nineteen articles with 865 patients were included. When considering only the rTMS parameters, both inhibitory and excitatory rTMS improved FMA-UE (MD = 1.87, 95% CI = [0.88]-[2.86], p < 0.001) and Barthel index (MD = 9.73, 95% CI = [4.57]-[14.89], p < 0.001). When considering only the severity of upper limb hemiplegia, both less severe (MD = 1.56, 95% CI = [0.64]-[2.49], p < 0.001) and severe (MD = 2.05, 95% CI = [1.09]-[3.00], p < 0.001) hemiplegia benefited from rTMS based on FMA-UE. However, when considering the rTMS parameters, severity of hemiplegia and stroke stages simultaneously, inhibitory rTMS was found to be significantly effective for less severe hemiplegia in the acute and subacute phases (MD = 4.55, 95% CI = [2.49]-[6.60], p < 0.001), but not in the chronic phase based on FMA-UE. For severe hemiplegia, inhibitory rTMS was not significantly effective in the acute and subacute phases, but significantly effective in the chronic phase (MD = 2.10, 95% CI = [0.75]-[3.45], p = 0.002) based on FMA-UE. Excitatory rTMS was found to be significantly effective for less severe hemiplegia in the acute and subacute phases (MD = 1.93, 95% CI = [0.58]-[3.28], p = 0.005) based on FMA-UE. The improvements in Brunnstrom recovery stage and ARAT need further research.

Conclusion

The effectiveness of rTMS depends on its parameters, severity of hemiplegia, and stroke stages. It is important to consider all these factors together, as any single grouping method is incomplete.

Roles of Handedness and Hemispheric Lateralization: Implications for Rehabilitation of the Central and Peripheral Nervous Systems: A Rapid Review

IMPORTANCE

Handedness and motor asymmetry are important features of occupational performance. With an increased understanding of the basic neural mechanisms surrounding handedness, clinicians will be better able to implement targeted, evidence-based neurorehabilitation interventions to promote functional independence.

OBJECTIVE

To review the basic neural mechanisms behind handedness and their implications for central and peripheral nervous system injury.

DATA SOURCES

Relevant published literature obtained via MEDLINE.

FINDINGS

Handedness, along with performance asymmetries observed between the dominant and nondominant hands, may be due to hemispheric specializations for motor control. These specializations contribute to predictable motor control deficits that are dependent on which hemisphere or limb has been affected. Clinical practice recommendations for occupational therapists and other rehabilitation specialists are presented.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

It is vital that occupational therapists and other rehabilitation specialists consider handedness and hemispheric lateralization during evaluation and treatment. With an increased understanding of the basic neural mechanisms surrounding handedness, clinicians will be better able to implement targeted, evidence-based neurorehabilitation interventions to promote functional independence. Plain-Language Summary: The goal of this narrative review is to increase clinicians' understanding of the basic neural mechanisms related to handedness (the tendency to select one hand over the other for specific tasks) and their implications for central and peripheral nervous system injury and rehabilitation. An enhanced understanding of these mechanisms may allow clinicians to better tailor neurorehabilitation interventions to address motor deficits and promote functional independence.

Effectiveness of an Intensive, Functional, and Gamified Rehabilitation Program on Upper Limb Function in People With Stroke (EnteRtain): A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND1

Despite a growing interest in gaming rehabilitation for upper limb (UL) recovery post-stroke, studies investigating the effects of game-based rehabilitation incorporating functional games are lacking.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the efficacy of an intensive, functional, gamified rehabilitation program compared to task-based training on UL motor function in acute/sub-acute stroke survivors.

METHODS

This randomized, multicenter, single-blind, clinical trial comprises 120 participants with unilateral stroke who were randomized to receive either gamified training (n = 64) using the ArmAble™ [experimental group (EG)] or task-based training (n = 56) in conjunction with conventional therapy for 2 hours per day, 6 days per week for 2 weeks, followed by UL rehabilitation for another 4 weeks at home. Primary outcomes evaluated by a blinded assessor included the Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity (FM-UE), and Action Research Arm Test (ARAT). Data were analyzed using a linear mixed-effect regression model.

RESULTS

The mean (standard deviation) age of the participants was 54.4 ± 11.7 years (78.1% men) in the EG and 57.7 ± 10.9 years (73.2% men) in the comparator group (CG). The median (interquartile range) time since stroke was 30.0 (54.0) days in the EG and 22.5 (45.0) days in the CG. Following the 2-week intervention, a statistically significant improvement was observed in the EG for the FM-UE [between-group mean differences (95% confidence interval): -3.9 (-6.5, -1.3); P = .003]; but not for the ARAT [-2.9 (-5.8, 0.0); P = .051]. Gains at 6 weeks were significantly greater in the EG for both FM-UE [-3.9 (-6.5, -1.3); P = .003]; and ARAT [-3.0 (-5.9, -0.0); P = .046].

CONCLUSION

Gamified rehabilitation using the ArmAble™ device has shown immediate and short-term improvement in UL function after acute/sub-acute stroke.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRY NUMBER

CTRI/2020/09/027651.

Balance deficit is the domain of the Fugl-Meyer scale that best explain limitations in functional independence during hospitalization after a stroke

PURPOSE

To investigate which of the residual sensorimotor impairments, assessed by the Fugl-Meyer scale, would best explain functional independence during hospitalization after a stroke.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study retrieved data from medical records between January 2014 to December 2021. Explanatory independent variables were the following domains of the Fugl-Meyer scale: joint pain, joint range of motion, balance, sensory function, and motor function of the upper and lower limbs. Functional independence was measured by the Functional Independence Measure (FIM). Step-wise multiple linear regression analysis was used to identify which measures would explain functional independence (α=5%).

RESULTS

Data from 1,344 individuals, who had a mean age of 64 years, were retrieved. All included explanatory variables were significantly correlated with the FIM scores (0.24 ≤ r ≤ 0.87). Balance alone explained 76 % (F=4.24; p<0.001) of the variance in the FIM scores. When sensory function and upper-limb motor function scores were included in the model, the explained variance increased to 82 % (F = 1.935; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Balance, which is important for carrying-out self-care activities, is the domain of the Fugl-Meyer scale that best explained functional independence during hospitalization after a stroke. Although sensory function and motor function of the upper limb added little to the explained variance, they should not be underlooked. Future research is needed to determine whether progressive balance training interventions would enhance functional independence after a stroke.

Impact of Mobile Games-Aided Neurorehabilitation: A Systematic Literature Review

Neurological rehabilitation is a physician-supervised programme for individuals with nervous system diseases, injuries or disorders. Neurological rehabilitation, also known as neurorehabilitation, is part of the rehabilitation process that improves function, reduces severity and enhances a patient's well-being. Because neurological injuries occur in the brain, spine and nerves, affecting multiple body parts including organs, blood vessels, muscles and bones, rehabilitation requires a multidisciplinary approach. This study conducted a systematic literature review (SLR) on the use of mobile game in neurorehabilitation. The steps undertaken in the literature review included the collection, identification, categorisation, summarisation and synthesis of relevant studies in the research domain. A total of 50 related articles were reviewed. The study identified that the effects on cognitive skills, handgrip strength, memory, attention, visuospatial abilities, executive function tasks, motor functionality, and improvements in balance, visual perception, and functional mobility are impacts of the use of mobile games in neurological rehabilitation. Furthermore, several research challenges and recommendations for future research were identified.

The use of virtual reality in the rehabilitation of aphasia: a systematic review

PURPOSE

This systematic review explored how virtual reality (VR) has been used to rehabilitate aphasia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Empirical studies were included where VR was used to target language, well-being, or quality of life in adults with acquired language impairment. Degenerative communication disabilities were excluded. Seven health databases were searched in October 2021. Risk of Bias was assessed using published checklists and completeness of intervention reporting evaluated. Narrative synthesis described forms of VR, rationales given, outcome measures, communication functions targeted, characteristics of interventions, and outcomes achieved within the framework of impairment, activity, and participation.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies, involving 229 participants, met the criteria. The studies employed four forms of VR with various rationales given. Interventions used published and novel protocols. Primary outcomes targeted language impairment (12/14), activity (1/14), and well-being (1/14) and achieved positive outcomes in impairment and activity. All studies were exploratory. Risk of bias was high. Findings are discussed in the context of gains achieved by VR in other health contexts and the multi-user gaming literature.

CONCLUSIONS

Uses of VR in aphasia rehabilitation described in the literature are limited. Most applications target the remediation of language impairments. Opportunities to address activity, participation, and wider aspects of well-being are rare.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONResearch documenting the use of virtual reality (VR) to rehabilitate aphasia is limited and exploratory, so does not yet offer clear guidance for clinicians.Many of the identified studies have used known published protocols (e.g., naming therapy or scripts therapy) delivered through the novel VR format and focus on language impairment outcomes.VR offers clinicians a unique opportunity to address communication activity and participation through the use of multi-user virtual worlds, but this has only been explored by only two research teams.

Reliability of the Modified Frenchay Scale for the Assessment of Upper Limb Function in Adults With Hemiparesis

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the reliability of the Modified Frenchay Scale (MFS) in adults with hemiparesis.

DESIGN

Prospective analysis of videos.

SETTING

Study conducted in a Neurorehabilitation Unit of a University Hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Fifty-one patients (17 women [33%], age 46±15, time since injury 5.2±6.7 years) with hemiparesis secondary to stroke (N=47), tumor (N=3), or spinal cord injury (N=1) were enrolled.

INTERVENTION

The MFS measures active upper limb function in spastic hemiparesis based on a video recording of 10 daily living tasks, each rated from 0 to 10. Six tasks are bimanual and 4 are unimanual with the paretic hand. MFS videos performed in routine care of patients with hemiparesis between 2015 and 2021 were collected. After a 3-hour group training session, each MFS video was assessed twice, 1 week apart by 4 rehabilitation professionals with various levels of experience in using the scale.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Internal consistency was determined using Cronbach's alpha. Intra- and inter-rater reliability was measured using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC, mean [95% CI]), mean differences between ratings and minimal detectable change (MDC). Bland-Altman plots were also performed for inter-rater assessments.

RESULTS

The mean overall MFS score was 4.95±1.20 with no floor or ceiling effect. Cronbach's α was 0.97. For the overall MFS score, intra- and inter-rater ICCs were 0.99[0.99;1.00] and 0.97[0.95;0.98], respectively; mean intra- and inter-rater differences were 0.10±0.04 and 0.24±0.12, respectively; and MDC were 0.17 and 0.37, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The MFS is an internally consistent and reliable scale to assess upper limb function in adults with hemiparesis.

Intra- and inter-rater reliability of the Italian Fugl-Meyer assessment of upper and lower extremity

PURPOSE

To assess the intra- and inter-rater reliability motor and sensory functioning, balance, joint range of motion and joint pain subscales of the Italian Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) and Lower Extremity (FMA-LE) at the item- subtotal- and total-level in patients with sub-acute stroke.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The FMA was administered to 60 patients with sub-acute stroke (mean age ± SD = 75.4 ± 10.7 years; 58.3% men) and independently rated by two physiotherapists on two consecutive days. Intra- and inter-reliability was studied by a rank-based statistical method for paired ordinal data to detect any systematic or random disagreement.

RESULTS

The item-level intra- and inter-rater reliability was satisfactory (>70%). Reliability level >70% was achieved at subscale and total score level when one- or two-points difference was considered. Systematic disagreements were reported for five items of the FMA-UE, but not for FMA-LE.

CONCLUSIONS

The Italian version of the FMA showed to be a reliable instrument that can therefore be recommended for clinical and research purposes.Implications for rehabilitationThe FMA is the gold standard for assessing stroke patients' sensorimotor impairment worldwide.The Italian Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) and Lower Extremity (FMA-LE) is substantially reliable within and between two raters at the item, subtotal, and total score level in patients with sub-acute stroke.The use of FMA in the Italian context will provide an opportunity for international comparisons and research collaborations.

A Narrative Review on Multi-Domain Instrumental Approaches to Evaluate Neuromotor Function in Rehabilitation

In clinical scenarios, the use of biomedical sensors, devices and multi-parameter assessments is fundamental to provide a comprehensive portrait of patients' state, in order to adapt and personalize rehabilitation interventions and support clinical decision-making. However, there is a huge gap between the potential of the multidomain techniques available and the limited practical use that is made in the clinical scenario. This paper reviews the current state-of-the-art and provides insights into future directions of multi-domain instrumental approaches in the clinical assessment of patients involved in neuromotor rehabilitation. We also summarize the main achievements and challenges of using multi-domain approaches in the assessment of rehabilitation for various neurological disorders affecting motor functions. Our results showed that multi-domain approaches combine information and measurements from different tools and biological signals, such as kinematics, electromyography (EMG), electroencephalography (EEG), near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), and clinical scales, to provide a comprehensive and objective evaluation of patients' state and recovery. This multi-domain approach permits the progress of research in clinical and rehabilitative practice and the understanding of the pathophysiological changes occurring during and after rehabilitation. We discuss the potential benefits and limitations of multi-domain approaches for clinical decision-making, personalized therapy, and prognosis. We conclude by highlighting the need for more standardized methods, validation studies, and the integration of multi-domain approaches in clinical practice and research.

Rasch validation of a new scale to measure dependency in arm use in daily life: the Upper Limb Lucerne ICF-based Multidisciplinary Observation Scale

Introduction

About 77% of adults with stroke have upper limb impairments. Many scales are available to measure the impairment and activity level of the affected limb. However, an observational scale to assess dependency on others in upper limb performance during daily life activities instead of laboratory settings is lacking. Therefore, we developed a new 5-item Upper Limb Lucerne ICF-based Multidisciplinary Observation Scale (UL-LIMOS). As next step in the psychometric analysis, we evaluated the unidimensionality and structural validity of the UL-LIMOS with Rasch Measurement Theory and we calculated a cut-off score for independent arm use in daily life activities at discharge.

Methods

This is a single-center cross-sectional study in adults with (sub) acute stroke. We applied Rasch Measurement Theory (RMT) to analyze the structural validation and unidimensionality of the UL-LIMOS. The outputs provide evidence of unidimensionality, item and person fit, overall fit, differential item functioning (DIF), principal component analysis of residuals (PCAR), person separation reliability (PSR), and residual item correlations (to identify local item dependence). Person mean location, floor and ceiling effects identify proper targeting.

Results

We recruited 407 adults with (sub) acute stroke (median age 63 years, 157 women). All items and persons fit the Rasch model. The PSR of 0.90 indicates that clinicians and researchers can reliably use the scale for individual decision-making. There were small floor (2.70%) and ceiling (13.00%) effects. The average person mean location was 1.32 ± 2.99 logits. There was no DIF. PCAR eigenvalue was 2.46 with 49.23% explained variance. Paired t-tests revealed that 0.89% of person locations were significantly different, confirming unidimensionality. One pair of items (arm and hand use and fine hand use) showed residual item correlations. The ROC's AUC was 0.90, CI_95% = [0.85-0.96] with cut-off score of ≥14/20, and high sensitivity (87%, CI_95% = [81%-91%]), specificity (83%, CI_95% = [77%-87%]) for independent arm use in daily living at discharge.

Discussion

The new Rasch-based UL-LIMOS is a valid ICF-based observation performance scale at the ICF-activity level, to evaluate dependency during upper limb use in daily life in adults with stroke. Additional psychometric analyses are warranted. The UL-LIMOS would be a valuable addition to the core assessments of adults with (sub) acute stroke.

Quantitative measurement of finger usage in stroke hemiplegia using ring-shaped wearable devices

BACKGROUND

In post-stroke rehabilitation, positive use of affected limbs in daily life is important to improve affected upper-limb function. Several studies have quantitatively evaluated the amount of upper-limb activity, but few have measured finger usage. In this study, we used a ring-shaped wearable device to measure upper-limb and finger usage simultaneously in hospitalized patients with hemiplegic stroke and investigated the association between finger usage and general clinical evaluation.

METHODS

Twenty patients with hemiplegic stroke in an inpatient hospital participated in this study. All patients wore a ring-shaped wearable device on both hands for 9 h on the day of the intervention, and their finger and upper-limb usage were recorded. For the rehabilitation outcome assessments, the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the Upper Extremity (FMA-UE), Simple Test for Evaluating Hand Function (STEF), Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), Motor Activity Log-14 (MAL), and Functional Independence Measure Motor (FIM-m) were performed and evaluated on the same day as the intervention.

RESULTS

Finger usage of the affected hand was moderately correlated with STEF ([Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]) and STEF ratio ([Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]). The finger-usage ratio was moderately correlated with FMA-UE ([Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]) and ARAT ([Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]), and strongly correlated with STEF ([Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]) and STEF ratio ([Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]). The upper-limb usage of the affected side was moderately correlated with FMA-UE ([Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]), STEF ([Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]) and STEF ratio ([Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]), and strongly correlated with ARAT ([Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]). The upper-limb usage ratio was moderately correlated with ARAT ([Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]) and STEF ([Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]), and strongly correlated with the STEF ratio ([Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]). By contrast, there was no correlation between MAL and any of the measurements.

CONCLUSIONS

This measurement technique provided useful information that was not biased by the subjectivity of the patients and therapists.

Using immersive virtual reality to remotely examine performance differences between dominant and non-dominant hands

Circle drawing may be a useful task to study upper-limb function in patient populations. However, previous studies rely on expensive and bulky robotics to measure performance. For clinics or hospitals with limited budgets and space, this may be unfeasible. Virtual reality (VR) provides a portable and low-cost tool with integrated motion capture. It offers potentially a more feasible medium by which to assess upper-limb motor function. Prior to use with patient populations, it is important to validate and test the capabilities of VR with healthy users. This study examined whether a VR-based circle drawing task, completed remotely using participant's own devices, could capture differences between movement kinematics of the dominant and non-dominant hands in healthy individuals. Participants (n = 47) traced the outline of a circle presented on their VR head-mounted displays with each hand, while the positions of the hand-held controllers were continuously recorded. Although there were no differences observed in the size or roundness of circles drawn with each hand, consistent with prior literature our results did show that the circles drawn with the dominant hand were completed faster than those with the non-dominant hand. This provides preliminary evidence that a VR-based circle drawing task may be a feasible method for detecting subtle differences in function in clinical populations.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10055-023-00794-z.

Neural bases characterizing chronic and severe upper-limb motor deficits after brain lesion

Chronic and severe upper-limb motor deficits can result from damage to the corticospinal tract. However, it remains unclear what their characteristics are and whether only corticospinal tract damage determines their characteristics. This study aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics and neural bases of chronic and severe upper-limb motor deficits. Motor deficits, including spasticity, of 45 patients with brain lesions were assessed using clinical scales. Regarding their scores, we conducted a principal component analysis that statistically extracted the clinical characteristics as two principal components. Using these principal components, we investigated the neural bases underlying their characteristics through lesion analyses of lesion volume, lesion sites, corticospinal tract, or other regional white-matter integrity. Principal component analysis showed that the clinical characteristics of chronic and severe upper-limb motor deficits could be described as a comprehensive severity and a trade-off relationship between proximal motor functions and wrist/finger spasticity. Lesion analyses revealed that the comprehensive severity was correlated with corticospinal tract integrity, and the trade-off relationship was associated with the integrity of other regional white matter located anterior to the posterior internal capsule, such as the anterior internal capsule. This study indicates that the severity of chronic and severe upper-limb motor deficits can be determined according to the corticospinal tract integrity, and such motor deficits may be further characterized by the integrity of other white matter, where the corticoreticular pathway can pass through, by forming a trade-off relationship where patients have higher proximal motor functions but more severe wrist/finger spasticity, and vice versa.

Measures of Maximal Tactile Pressures during a Sustained Grasp Task Using a TactArray Device Have Satisfactory Reliability and Concurrent Validity in People with Stroke

Sensor-based devices can record pressure or force over time during grasping and therefore offer a more comprehensive approach to quantifying grip strength during sustained contractions. The objectives of this study were to investigate the reliability and concurrent validity of measures of maximal tactile pressures and forces during a sustained grasp task using a TactArray device in people with stroke. Participants with stroke (n = 11) performed three trials of sustained maximal grasp over 8 s. Both hands were tested in within- and between-day sessions, with and without vision. Measures of maximal tactile pressures and forces were measured for the complete (8 s) grasp duration and plateau phase (5 s). Tactile measures are reported using the highest value among three trials, the mean of two trials, and the mean of three trials. Reliability was determined using changes in mean, coefficients of variation, and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Pearson correlation coefficients were used to evaluate concurrent validity. This study found that measures of reliability assessed by changes in means were good, coefficients of variation were good to acceptable, and ICCs were very good for maximal tactile pressures using the average pressure of the mean of three trials over 8 s in the affected hand with and without vision for within-day sessions and without vision for between-day sessions. In the less affected hand, changes in mean were very good, coefficients of variations were acceptable, and ICCs were good to very good for maximal tactile pressures using the average pressure of the mean of three trials over 8 s and 5 s, respectively, in between-day sessions with and without vision. Maximal tactile pressures had moderate correlations with grip strength. The TactArray device demonstrates satisfactory reliability and concurrent validity for measures of maximal tactile pressures in people with stroke.

Upper Limb Function Recovery by Combined Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Occupational Therapy in Patients with Chronic Stroke According to Paralysis Severity

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) with intensive occupational therapy improves upper limb motor paralysis and activities of daily living after stroke; however, the degree of improvement according to paralysis severity remains unverified. Target activities of daily living using upper limb functions can be established by predicting the amount of change after treatment for each paralysis severity level to further aid practice planning. We estimated post-treatment score changes for each severity level of motor paralysis (no, poor, limited, notable, and full), stratified according to Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) scores before combined rTMS and intensive occupational therapy. Motor paralysis severity was the fixed factor for the analysis of covariance; the delta (post-pre) of the scores was the dependent variable. Ordinal logistic regression analysis was used to compare changes in ARAT subscores according to paralysis severity before treatment. We implemented a longitudinal, prospective, interventional, uncontrolled, and multicenter cohort design and analyzed a dataset of 907 patients with stroke hemiplegia. The largest treatment-related changes were observed in the Limited recovery group for upper limb motor paralysis and the Full recovery group for quality-of-life activities using the paralyzed upper limb. These results will help predict treatment effects and determine exercises and goal movements for occupational therapy after rTMS.

Comparison of Various Smoothness Metrics for Upper Limb Movements in Middle-Aged Healthy Subjects

BACKGOUND

Metrics for movement smoothness include the number of zero-crossings on the acceleration profile (N0C), the log dimensionless jerk (LDLJ), the normalized averaged rectified jerk (NARJ) and the spectral arc length (SPARC). Sensitivity to the handedness and movement type of these four metrics was compared and correlations with other kinematic parameters were explored in healthy subjects.

METHODS

Thirty-two healthy participants underwent 3D upper limb motion analysis during two sets of pointing movements on each side. They performed forward- and backward-pointing movements at a self-selected speed to a target located ahead at shoulder height and at 90% arm length, with and without a three-second pause between forward and backward movements. Kinematics were collected, and smoothness metrics were computed.

RESULTS

LDLJ, NARJ and N0C found backward movements to be smoother, while SPARC found the opposite. Inter- and intra-subject coefficients of variation were lowest for SPARC. LDLJ, NARJ and N0C were correlated with each other and with movement time, unlike SPARC.

CONCLUSION

There are major differences between smoothness metrics measured in the temporal domain (N0C, LDLJ, NARJ), which depend on movement time, and those measured in the frequency domain, the SPARC, which gave results opposite to the other metrics when comparing backward and forward movements.

Translation of the Fugl-Meyer assessment into Romanian: Transcultural and semantic-linguistic adaptations and clinical validation

Purpose

The Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) scale, which is widely used and highly recommended, is an appropriate tool for evaluating poststroke sensorimotor and other possible somatic deficits. It is also well-suited for capturing a dynamic rehabilitation process. The aim of this study was to first translate the entire sensorimotor FMA scale into Romanian using the transcultural and semantic-linguistic adaptations of its official afferent protocols and to then validate it using the preliminary clinical evaluation of inter- and intra-rater reliability and relevant concurrent validity.

Methods

Through three main steps, we completed a standardized procedure for translating FMA's official afferent evaluation protocols into Romanian and their transcultural and semantic-linguistic adaptation for both the upper and lower extremities. For relevant clinical validation, we evaluated 10 patients after a stroke two times: on days 1 and 2. All patients were evaluated simultaneously by two kinesi-physiotherapists (generically referred to as KFT1 and KFT2) over the course of 2 consecutive days, taking turns in the roles of an examiner and observer, and vice versa (inter-rater). Two scores were therefore obtained and compared for the same patient, i.e., being afferent to an inter-rater assay by comparing the assessment outcomes obtained by the two kinesi-physiotherapists, in between, and respectively, to the intra-rater assay: based on the evaluations of the same kinesi-physiotherapist, in two consecutive days, using a rank-based method (Svensson) for statistical analysis. We also compared our final Romanian version of FMA's official protocols for concurrent validity (Spearman's rank correlation statistical method) to both of the widely available assessment instruments: the Barthel Index (BI) and the modified Rankin scale (mRS).

Results

Svensson's method confirmed overall good inter- and intra-rater results for the main parts of the final Romanian version of FMA's evaluation protocols, regarding the percentage of agreement (≥80% on average) and for disagreement: relative position [RP; values outside the interval of (-0.1, 0.1) in only two measurements out of the 56 comparisons we did], relative concentration [RC; values outside the interval of (-0.1, 0.1) in only nine measurements out of the same 56 comparisons done], and relative rank variation [RV; all values within an interval of (0, 0.1) in only five measurements out of the 56 comparisons done]. High correlation values were obtained between the final Romanian version of FMA's evaluation protocols and the BI (ρ = 0.9167; p = 0.0002) for FMA-upper extremity (FMA-UE) total A-D (motor function) with ρ = 0.6319 and for FMA-lower extremity (FMA-LE) total E-F (motor function) with p = 0.0499, and close to the limit, with the mRS (ρ = -0.5937; p = 0.0704) for FMA-UE total A-D (motor function) and (ρ = -0.6615; p = 0.0372) for FMA-LE total E-F (motor function).

Conclusions

The final Romanian version of FMA's official evaluation protocols showed good preliminary reliability and validity, which could be thus recommended for use and expected to help improve the standardization of this assessment scale for patients after a stroke in Romania. Furthermore, this endeavor could be added to similar international translation and cross-cultural adaptations, thereby facilitating a more appropriate comparison of the evaluation and outcomes in the management of stroke worldwide.

Clinical interpretation and cutoff scores for manual ability measured by the ABILHAND questionnaire in people with stroke

BACKGROUND

The ABILHAND questionnaire is recommended to assess perceived manual ability after stroke; however, more knowledge on interpretability is needed to improve the clinical applicability.

OBJECTIVES

To determine clinically meaningful cutoff scores for different levels of perceived manual ability, assessed by ABILHAND, corresponding to established observed and perceived upper extremity assessments post stroke.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study, part of the Stroke Arm Longitudinal Study (SALGOT) at the University of Gothenburg, included 80 participants with upper extremity impairments after stroke. The self-reported upper extremity functioning was assessed with ABILHAND and Stroke Impact Scale Hand (SIS Hand), and the observed functioning was assessed by Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) and Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) at 3 months after stroke. Receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, and specificity analyses were used to determine the cutoffs.

RESULTS

The overall discriminating accuracy was excellent (AUC > 0.90) for most of the cutoffs and sensitivity and specificity values ranged from 0.73 to 1.0. The ABILHAND cutoff score 1.78 discriminated well between low and good functioning resulting in a 95% match with SIS Hand and 87.5% match with ARAT and FMA-UE.

CONCLUSIONS

The determined cutoff scores of the ABILHAND, validated through established upper extremity assessments, will provide a useful tool to clinicians when interpreting the logit scores and when selecting individualized treatment options. ABILHAND matched well with self-reported SIS Hand, but discrepancies found with observed scales implies that self-perceived assessments should be complemented with observed assessments.

Early prediction of upper limb functioning after stroke using clinical bedside assessments: a prospective longitudinal study

Early and accurate prediction of recovery is needed to assist treatment planning and inform patient selection in clinical trials. This study aimed to develop a prediction algorithm using a set of simple early clinical bedside measures to predict upper limb capacity at 3-months post-stroke. A secondary analysis of Stroke Arm Longitudinal Study at Gothenburg University (SALGOT) included 94 adults (mean age 68 years) with upper limb impairment admitted to stroke unit). Cluster analysis was used to define the endpoint outcome strata according to the 3-months Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) scores. Modelling was carried out in a training (70%) and testing set (30%) using traditional logistic regression, random forest models. The final algorithm included 3 simple bedside tests performed 3-days post stroke: ability to grasp, to produce any measurable grip strength and abduct/elevate shoulder. An 86-94% model sensitivity, specificity and accuracy was reached for differentiation between poor, limited and good outcome. Additional measurement of grip strength at 4 weeks post-stroke and haemorrhagic stroke explained the underestimated classifications. External validation of the model is recommended. Simple bedside assessments have advantages over more lengthy and complex assessments and could thereby be integrated into routine clinical practice to aid therapy decisions, guide patient selection in clinical trials and used in data registries.

Informing the development of an outcome set and banks of items to measure mobility among individuals with acquired brain injury using natural language processing

BACKGROUND

The sheer number of measures evaluating mobility and inconsistencies in terminology make it challenging to extract potential core domains and items. Automating a portion of the data synthesis would allow us to cover a much larger volume of studies and databases in a smaller fraction of the time compared to the usual process. Thus, the objective of this study was to identify a comprehensive outcome set and develop preliminary banks of items of mobility among individuals with acquired brain injury (ABI) using Natural Language Processing (NLP).

METHODS

An umbrella review of 47 reviews evaluating the content of mobility measures among individuals with ABI was conducted. A search was performed on 5 databases between 2000 and 2020. Two independent reviewers retrieved copies of the measures and extracted mobility domains and items. A pre-trained BERT model (state-of-the-art model for NLP) provided vector representations for each sentence. Using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health Framework (ICF) ontology as a guide for clustering, a k-means algorithm was used to retrieve clusters of similar sentences from their embeddings. The resulting embedding clusters were evaluated using the Silhouette score and fine-tuned according to expert input.

RESULTS

The study identified 246 mobility measures, including 474 domains and 2109 items. Encoding the clusters using the ICF ontology and expert knowledge helped in regrouping the items in a way that is more closely related to mobility terminology. Our best results identified banks of items that were used to create a 24 comprehensive outcome sets of mobility, including Upper Extremity Mobility, Emotional Function, Balance, Motor Control, Self-care, Social Life and Relationships, Cognition, Walking, Postural Transition, Recreation, and Leisure Activities, Activities of Daily Living, Physical Functioning, Communication, Work/Study, Climbing, Sensory Functions, General Health, Fatigue, Functional Independence, Pain, Alcohol and Drugs Use, Transportation, Sleeping, and Finances.

CONCLUSION

The banks of items of mobility domains represent a first step toward establishing a comprehensive outcome set and a common language of mobility to develop the ontology. It enables researchers and healthcare professionals to begin exposing the content of mobility measures as a way to assess mobility comprehensively.

Urdu translation and cross-cultural validation of the Fugl-Meyer assessment in people with stroke

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to translate the FMA for Upper and Lower Extremity into Urdu and determine the validity and reliability of the translated Urdu FMA in people with chronic stroke.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A Standardized step-wise forward-backward translation of FMA into Urdu was conducted with the help of bilingual translators, experts from Riphah International University, and experts familiar with the original FMA scale to ensure conceptual equivalency. The final version was constructed after pilot testing of the Urdu FMA on 10 stroke patients. Inter- and intra-rater reliability, content, concurrent and construct validity were determined in 50 individuals with chronic stroke (mean age 53.2 years).

RESULTS

Intra- and inter-rater reliability, determined by Weighted kappa was satisfactory (k = 0.75-0.99). Internal consistency determined by Cronbach alpha was above 0.80. The content validity Index was acceptable (0.92). Moderate correlations were found with Functional Independence Measure, Modified Rankin Scale, and National Institute of Health Stroke Severity (r = 0.69-0.79). The factor analysis showed that two factors (upper and lower extremity) explained 67.8% of the variance.

CONCLUSION

The Urdu FMA is reliable and valid for the assessment of sensorimotor function in people with chronic stroke and can therefore be recommended for use in clinical and research applications.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONThe Urdu FMA is now available for use in Pakistan.The Urdu FMA is reliable and valid for the assessment of sensorimotor function in people with chronic stroke.The use of Urdu FMA is recommended to clinicians to estimate stroke severity and motor recovery.

Myelin Water Imaging of Nerve Recovery in Rehabilitating Stroke Patients

BACKGROUND

Myelin water imaging (MWI) using MRI has been introduced as a method to quantify the integrity of myelin in vivo. However, the investigation of its potential to probe myelin changes has been limited.

PURPOSE

To determine the myelin change using MWI in the corticospinal tract (CST) during the rehabilitation of stroke patients.

STUDY TYPE

Longitudinal.

POPULATION

A total of 24 stroke patients within 6 months from the onset (64.3 ± 16.1 years, 14 women, 10 men) and 10 healthy volunteers (27.0 ± 2.2 years, 2 women, 8 men).

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

Three-dimensional multiecho gradient echo sequence and diffusion-weighted echoplanar imaging sequence at 3 T.

ASSESSMENT

The changes of myelin water fraction (MWF) and fractional anisotropy (FA) during rehabilitation were analyzed in the CST and other regions using tractography software and region of interest drawings by the radiologist.

STATISTICAL TESTS

A paired t-test was performed to investigate the change of MRI metrics during rehabilitation. In addition, an independent two-sample t-test was performed to investigate the effects of different rehabilitation protocols. A P-value <0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

In the CST, MWF significantly changed from 5.83 ± 0.91% to 6.23 ± 0.97% after rehabilitation while changes of FA (0.442 ± 0.038 to 0.443 ± 0.035) were not significant (P = 0.656). The rate of change in MWF and FA, which were 6.69% and 0.439% respectively, were significantly different. Other regions did not show significant changes (range of MWF change: -3.44% to -1.61%, range of FA change: -1.39% to 0.79%, and range of P-value: 0.144-0.761). Further analysis showed that those with additional robot-assisted rehabilitation had a significantly larger MWF change than those with conventional rehabilitation only (rate of change: 11.2% vs. 3.2%).

DATA CONCLUSION

The feasibility of using MWI to monitor myelin content was demonstrated by showing the MWF changes during rehabilitation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 2.

Validity and reliability of sensor system to measure trunk range of motion during Streamlined Wolf Motor Function Test in chronic stroke and aged-matched healthy participants

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the validity and reliability of using the Valedo® system to measure trunk Range of Motion (ROM) during performance of the streamlined Wolf Motor Function Test (SWMFT).

METHODS

Twenty chronic strokes and 20 age-matched healthy participants performed SWMFT while wearing Valedo® sensors on their trunks to capture trunk movements. A paired sample T-test was used to examine the validity of the system in distinguishing between the healthy and stroke group, and between the affected and unaffected sides in the stroke group. Interclass correlation coefficients were used to assess the inter-rater and intra-rater reliability (between-days) with 95% CI.

RESULTS

The Valedo® system was able to distinguish between stroke and healthy participants; stroke participants employed greater trunk range of movements than the healthy controls in all tasks (p < .01). Furthermore, the Valedo® system enabled differentiation between affected and unaffected hands of people within the stroke group. The reliability for the stroke group was good to excellent with intrarater reliability (ICC = 0.71-0.92) and interrater reliability (ICC = 0.63-0.95).

CONCLUSIONS

The Valedo system demonstrates an acceptable level of validity and reliability for measuring trunk ROM during the Streamlined Wolf Motor Function Test (SWMFT). Future studies with a larger sample size, different levels of upper limb impairment are warranted.

Quality of mobility measures among individuals with acquired brain injury: an umbrella review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

While several mobility measures exist, there is large variability across measures in how mobility is conceptualized, the source of information and the measurement properties making it challenging to select relevant mobility measures for individuals with acquired brain injury (ABI). Therefore, the objective was to conduct a comprehensive synthesis of existing evidence on the measurement properties, the interpretability and the feasibility of mobility measures from various sources of information (patients, clinicians, technology) using an umbrella review of published systematic reviews among individuals with ABI.

METHODS

Ovid MEDLINE, CINHAL, Cochrane Library and EMBASE electronic databases were searched from 2000 to March 2020. Two independent reviewers appraised the methodological quality of the systematic reviews using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklist. Measurement properties and quality of evidence were applied according to COnsensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instrument (COSMIN) guidelines. Mobility measures were categorized using international standards with the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF).

RESULTS

Thirty-five systematic reviews were included covering 147 mobility measures, of which 85% were mapped to the ICF Activity and Participation component. Results showed an acceptable overall "sufficient" rating for reliability, construct validity and responsiveness for 132 (90%), 127 (86%) and 76 (52%) of the measures, respectively; however, among these measures, ≤ 25% of the methods for evaluating these properties were rated as 'high' quality of evidence. Also, there was limited information that supports measure feasibility and scoring interpretability.

CONCLUSIONS

Future systematic reviews should report measures' content validity to support the use of the measure in clinical care and research. More evaluations of the minimal important difference and floor and ceiling effects are needed to help guide clinical interpretation.

REGISTRATION INFORMATION

International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO); ID: CRD42018100068.

Evaluation of Motion Segment Size as a New Sensor-based Functional Outcome Measure in Stroke Rehabilitation

Objective

To evaluate a novel parameter, motion segment size (MSS), in stroke patients with upper limb impairment and validate its clinical applicability by correlating results with a standard clinical task-based functional evaluation tool.

Methods

In this cross-sectional study, patients with hemiplegia and healthy controls equipped with multiple inertial measurement unit (IMU) sensors performed Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) and activities of daily living (ADL) tasks. Acceleration of the wrist and Euler angles of each upper limb segment were measured. The average and maximum MSS, accumulated motion, total performance time, and average motion speed (AMS) were extracted for analysis.

Results

Data from nine patients and 10 controls showed that the average MSS of forearm supination/pronation and elbow flexion/extension during full ARAT tasks showed a significant difference between patients and controls and a significant correlation with ARAT scores.

Conclusions

We suggest that MSS may provide clinically relevant information regarding upper limb functional status in stroke patients.

Muscle synergy analysis yields an efficient and physiologically relevant method of assessing stroke

The Fugl-Meyer Assessment is widely used to test motor function in stroke survivors. In the Fugl-Meyer Assessment, stroke survivors perform several movement tasks and clinicians subjectively rate the performance of each task item. The individual task items in the Fugl-Meyer Assessment are selected on the basis of clinical experience, and their physiological relevance has not yet been evaluated. In the present study, we aimed to objectively rate the performance of task items by measuring the muscle activity of 41 muscles from the upper body while stroke survivors and healthy participants performed 37 Fugl-Meyer Assessment upper extremity task items. We used muscle synergy analysis to compare muscle activity between subjects and found that 13 muscle synergies in the healthy participants (which we defined as standard synergies) were able to reconstruct all of the muscle activity in the Fugl-Meyer Assessment. Among the standard synergies, synergies involving the upper arms, forearms and fingers were activated to varying degrees during different task items. In contrast, synergies involving posterior trunk muscles were activated during all tasks, which suggests the importance of posterior trunk muscle synergies throughout all sequences. Furthermore, we noted the inactivation of posterior trunk muscle synergies in stroke survivors with severe but not mild impairments, suggesting that lower trunk stability and the underlying activity of posterior trunk muscle synergies may have a strong influence on stroke severity and recovery. By comparing the synergies of stroke survivors with standard synergies, we also revealed that some synergies in stroke survivors corresponded to merged standard synergies; the merging rate increased with the impairment of stroke survivors. Moreover, the degrees of severity-dependent changes in the merging rate (the merging rate–severity relationship) were different among different task items. This relationship was significant for 26 task items only and not for the other 11 task items. Because muscle synergy analysis evaluates coordinated muscle activities, this different dependency suggests that these 26 task items are appropriate for evaluating muscle coordination and the extent of its impairment in stroke survivors. Overall, we conclude that the Fugl-Meyer Assessment reflects physiological function and muscle coordination impairment and suggest that it could be performed using a subset of the 37 task items.

Evaluation of Changes in Kinematic Measures of Three Dimensional Reach to Grasp Movements in the Early Subacute Period of Recovery from Stroke

This study examines longitudinal data of subjects initially examined in the early subacute period of recovery following a stroke with a test of reach to grasp (RTG) kinematics in an attempt to identify changes in movement patterns during the period of heightened neural recovery following a stroke. Subjects (n=8) were a convenience sample of persons with stroke that participated in an intervention trial. Baseline Upper Extremity Fugl Meyer Assessment (UEFMA) scores ranged between 31 and 52 and ages were between 49 and 83. The UEFMA and RTG test were collected prior to intervention, immediately after the intervention (approximately 18 days later post baseline) and one month after the intervention. RTG data for the uninvolved UE was collected at the one-month session. Subjects reached for objects placed on a table 10 cm from their sternums, picking them up and placing them on a target 30 cm from their acromioclavicular joints. Data was collected using an optical motion capture system. Active makers were placed on each fingertip, metacarpophalangeal, and proximal interphalangeal joint. Four additional passive markers were placed on the dorsum of the hand, the elbow, the shoulder, and the sternum. Subjects demonstrated statistically significant improvements in reaching duration, reaching trajectory smoothness, time after peak velocity and peak grip aperture. All of these measures correlated significantly with improvements in UEFMA. Clinical Relevance- Kinematic measures of reaching and grasping collected early in the subacute period of recovery from stroke may offer insight into specific aspects of the recovery of upper extremity motor function that differ from the information gleaned from clinical scales.

Effects of Intensive Vibratory Treatment with a Robotic System on the Recovery of Sensation and Function in Patients with Subacute and Chronic Stroke: A Non-Randomized Clinical Trial

Background: Sensory–motor deficits are frequent and affect the functionality after stroke. The use of robotic systems to improve functionality and motor performance is advisable; therefore, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of intensive, high-frequency vibration treatment administered with a robotic system in subacute and chronic stroke patients in terms of upper limb sensitivity, motor function, quantity and quality of movement, and quality of life. Methods: A simple-blind, non-randomized controlled trial was conducted. The control group received conventional rehabilitation treatment and the experimental group received robotic treatment with an Amadeo^® robot in addition to their conventional rehabilitation sessions. Results: Intragroup analysis identified significant improvements in the experimental group in hand (p = 0.012), arm (p = 0.018), and shoulder (p = 0.027) sensitivity, as well as in motor function (FMA-UEmotor function, p = 0.028), integration of the affected limb (MAL-14amount scale, p = 0.011; MAL-14How well scale, p = 0.008), and perceived quality of life (SIS-16, p = 0.008). The measures between the control and experimental groups showed statistically significant differences in motor performance and spontaneous use of the affected limb (MAL-14amount scale, p = 0.021; MAL-14How well scale, p = 0.037). Conclusions: Intensive, high-frequency vibration with a robotic system, in combination with conventional intervention, improves the recovery of upper limb function in terms of quantity and quality of movement in patients with subacute and chronic stroke.

Using Wearable Inertial Sensors to Estimate Clinical Scores of Upper Limb Movement Quality in Stroke

Neurorehabilitation is progressively shifting from purely in-clinic treatment to therapy that is provided in both clinical and home-based settings. This transition generates a pressing need for assessments that can be performed across the entire continuum of care, a need that might be accommodated by application of wearable sensors. A first step toward ubiquitous assessments is to augment validated and well-understood standard clinical tests. This route has been pursued for the assessment of motor functioning, which in clinical research and practice is observation-based and requires specially trained personnel. In our study, 21 patients performed movement tasks of the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), one of the most widely used clinical tests of upper limb motor functioning, while trained evaluators scored each task on pre-defined criteria. We collected data with just two wrist-worn inertial sensors to guarantee applicability across the continuum of care and used machine learning algorithms to estimate the ARAT task scores from sensor-derived features. Tasks scores were classified with approximately 80% accuracy. Linear regression between summed clinical task scores (across all tasks per patient) and estimates of sum task scores yielded a good fit (R 2 = 0.93; range reported in previous studies: 0.61-0.97). Estimates of the sum scores showed a mean absolute error of 2.9 points, 5.1% of the total score, which is smaller than the minimally detectable change and minimally clinically important difference of the ARAT when rated by a trained evaluator. We conclude that it is feasible to obtain accurate estimates of ARAT scores with just two wrist worn sensors. The approach enables administration of the ARAT in an objective, minimally supervised or remote fashion and provides the basis for a widespread use of wearable sensors in neurorehabilitation.

Effectiveness of a Soft Robotic Glove to Assist Hand Function in Stroke Patients: A Cross-Sectional Pilot Study

Purpose

Stroke patients have difficulty performing tasks using their paretic hands. There are limited data on the effects of using a soft robotic glove to assist with hand function. The objective of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of a soft robotic glove in assisting hand function in stroke patients.

Methods

This study was a cross-sectional pilot study. Twenty stroke patients with partial or complete hand weakness were recruited from a rehabilitation centre. The Box and Block Test (BBT) and the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) were performed under two conditions: with and without use of the soft robotic glove. The order of the conditions was randomly assigned by a computer-generated program.

Results

BBT scores increased 6.4 blocks when using the soft robotic glove (p < 0.001). ARAT grasp, grip, pinch, and overall scores increased by 27.08% (p < 0.01), 28.75% (p < 0.001), 15.89% (p < 0.01), and 21.15% (p < 0.001), respectively, using the glove versus not using the glove.

Conclusions

The findings of this study suggest that using a soft robotic glove can assist a poststroke paretic hand in executing grasp, grip, and pinch.

Effectiveness and Success Factors of Bilateral Arm Training After Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Bilateral arm training (BAT) presents as a promising approach in upper extremity (UE) rehabilitation after a stroke as it may facilitate neuroplasticity. However, the effectiveness of BAT is inconclusive, and no systematic reviews and meta-analyses have investigated the impact of different factors on the outcomes of BAT. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to (1) compare the effects of bilateral arm training (BAT) with unilateral arm training (UAT) and conventional therapy (CT) on the upper limb (UL) motor impairments and functional performance post-stroke, and (2) investigate the different contributing factors that may influence the success of BAT. A comprehensive literature search was performed in five databases. Randomized control trials (RCTs) that met inclusion criteria were selected and assessed for methodological qualities. Data relating to outcome measures, characteristics of participants (stroke chronicity and severity), and features of intervention (type of BAT and dose) were extracted for meta-analysis. With 25 RCTs meeting the inclusion criteria, BAT demonstrated significantly greater improvements in motor impairments as measured by Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) than CT (MD = 3.94, p = < 0.001), but not in functional performance as measured by the pooled outcomes of Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), Box and Block Test (BBT), and the time component of Motor Function Test (WMFT-time) (SMD = 0.28, p = 0.313). The superior motor impairment effects of BAT were associated with recruiting mildly impaired individuals in the chronic phase of stroke (MD = 6.71, p < 0.001), and applying a higher dose of intervention (MD = 6.52, p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis showed that bilateral functional task training (BFTT) improves both motor impairments (MD = 7.84, p < 0.001) and functional performance (SMD = 1.02, p = 0.049). No significant differences were detected between BAT and UAT for motor impairment (MD = -0.90, p = 0.681) or functional performance (SMD = -0.09, p = 0.457). Thus, our meta-analysis indicates that BAT may be more beneficial than CT in addressing post-stroke UL motor impairment, particularly in the chronic phase with mild UL paresis. The success of BAT may be dose-dependent, and higher doses of intervention may be required. BFTT appears to be a valuable form of BAT that could be integrated into stroke rehabilitation programs. BAT and UAT are generally equivalent in improving UL motor impairments and functional performance.

Validity and Reliability of Kinect v2 for Quantifying Upper Body Kinematics during Seated Reaching

Kinematic analysis of the upper limbs is a good way to assess and monitor recovery in individuals with stroke, but it remains little used in clinical routine due to its low feasibility. The aim of this study is to assess the validity and reliability of the Kinect v2 for the analysis of upper limb reaching kinematics. Twenty-six healthy participants performed seated hand-reaching tasks while holding a dumbbell to induce behaviour similar to that of stroke survivors. With the Kinect v2 and with the VICON, 3D upper limb and trunk motions were simultaneously recorded. The Kinect assesses trunk compensations, hand range of motion, movement time and mean velocity with a moderate to excellent reliability. In contrast, elbow and shoulder range of motion, time to peak velocity and path length ratio have a poor to moderate reliability. Finally, instantaneous hand and elbow tracking are not precise enough to reliably assess the number of velocity peaks and the peak hand velocity. Thanks to its ease of use and markerless properties, the Kinect can be used in clinical routine for semi-automated quantitative diagnostics guiding individualised rehabilitation of the upper limb. However, engineers and therapists must bear in mind the tracking limitations of the Kinect.

Quantification of Movement in Stroke Patients under Free Living Conditions Using Wearable Sensors: A Systematic Review

Stroke is a main cause of long-term disability worldwide, placing a large burden on individuals and health care systems. Wearable technology can potentially objectively assess and monitor patients outside clinical environments, enabling a more detailed evaluation of their impairment and allowing individualization of rehabilitation therapies. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of setups used in literature to measure movement of stroke patients under free living conditions using wearable sensors, and to evaluate the relation between such sensor-based outcomes and the level of functioning as assessed by existing clinical evaluation methods. After a systematic search we included 32 articles, totaling 1076 stroke patients from acute to chronic phases and 236 healthy controls. We summarized the results by type and location of sensors, and by sensor-based outcome measures and their relation with existing clinical evaluation tools. We conclude that sensor-based measures of movement provide additional information in relation to clinical evaluation tools assessing motor functioning and both are needed to gain better insight in patient behavior and recovery. However, there is a strong need for standardization and consensus, regarding clinical assessments, but also regarding the use of specific algorithms and metrics for unsupervised measurements during daily life.

Changes in Cortical Activity in Stroke Survivors Undergoing Botulinum Neurotoxin Therapy for Treatment of Focal Spasticity

Background: Botulinum NeuroToxin-A (BoNT-A) relieves muscle spasticity and increases range of motion necessary for stroke rehabilitation. Determining the effects of BoNT-A therapy on brain neuroplasticity could help physicians customize its use and predict its outcome.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of Botulinum Toxin-A therapy for treatment of focal spasticity on brain activation and functional connectivity.

Design: We used functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) to track changes in blood oxygen-level dependent (BOLD) activation and functional connectivity associated with BoNT-A therapy in nine chronic stroke participants, and eight age-matched controls. Scans were acquired before BoNT-A injections (W0) and 6 weeks after the injections (W6). The task fMRI scan consisted of a block design of alternating mass finger flexion and extension. The voxel-level changes in BOLD activation, and pairwise changes in functional connectivity were analyzed for BoNT-A treatment (stroke W0 vs. W6).

Results: BoNT-A injection therapy resulted in significant increases in brain activation in the contralesional premotor cortex, cingulate gyrus, thalamus, superior cerebellum, and in the ipsilesional sensory integration area. Lastly, cerebellar connectivity correlated with the Fugl-Meyer assessment of motor impairment before injection, while premotor connectivity correlated with the Fugl-Meyer score after injection.

Conclusion: BoNT-A therapy for treatment of focal spasticity resulted in increased brain activation in areas associated with motor control, and cerebellar connectivity correlated with motor impairment before injection. These results suggest that neuroplastic effects might take place in response to improvements in focal spasticity.

Clinicians and individuals with acquired brain injury perspectives about factors that influence mobility: creating a core set of mobility domains among individuals with acquired brain injury

OBJECTIVES

To identify factors which may influence mobility and could be considered during the evaluation of mobility in individuals with acquired brain injury (ABI) following qualitative focus groups with both clinicians and individuals with ABI, to assess their needs and preferences in order to individualize their care management plans.

METHODS

Five focus groups were held, three with clinicians from 3 rehabilitation sites of CRIR (CRDM: n = 4; IURDPM: n = 3; JRH: n = 10) and two with individuals with ABI from one rehabilitation site (CRDM) (individuals with stroke: n = 5; individuals with TBI: n = 5). Focus group discussions were transcribed and analyzed using inductive and deductive thematic content approaches.

RESULTS

Four themes were identified: considering mobility holistically and individual needs, preferences, and unique experiences; assessment and intervention guidelines; support network; and uncertainty about symptoms and recovery. Using the ten-rule International Classification, Functioning, Disability, and Health framework linking process, codes were categorized into Body Functions Activity and Participation, and Environmental Factors exploring the prominent domains that mostly identify factors influencing mobility.

CONCLUSIONS

Comprehensive measurement of mobility remains an ongoing challenge owing to multiple contributing factors, ranging from personal and psychosocial factors to the influence of a myriad of environmental and community considerations. Preparing individuals with ABI for community mobility can be substantially improved if healthcare professionals employ communicative tools to facilitate shared decision making with patients and to deliver patient-centred rehabilitation care.

European evidence-based recommendations for clinical assessment of upper limb in neurorehabilitation (CAULIN): data synthesis from systematic reviews, clinical practice guidelines and expert consensus

BACKGROUND

Technology-supported rehabilitation can help alleviate the increasing need for cost-effective rehabilitation of neurological conditions, but use in clinical practice remains limited. Agreement on a core set of reliable, valid and accessible outcome measures to assess rehabilitation outcomes is needed to generate strong evidence about effectiveness of rehabilitation approaches, including technologies. This paper collates and synthesizes a core set from multiple sources; combining existing evidence, clinical practice guidelines and expert consensus into European recommendations for Clinical Assessment of Upper Limb In Neurorehabilitation (CAULIN).

METHODS

Data from systematic reviews, clinical practice guidelines and expert consensus (Delphi methodology) were systematically extracted and synthesized using strength of evidence rating criteria, in addition to recommendations on assessment procedures. Three sets were defined: a core set: strong evidence for validity, reliability, responsiveness and clinical utility AND recommended by at least two sources; an extended set: strong evidence OR recommended by at least two sources and a supplementary set: some evidence OR recommended by at least one of the sources.

RESULTS

In total, 12 measures (with primary focus on stroke) were included, encompassing body function and activity level of the International Classification of Functioning and Health. The core set recommended for clinical practice and research: Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) and Action Research Arm Test (ARAT); the extended set recommended for clinical practice and/or clinical research: kinematic measures, Box and Block Test (BBT), Chedoke Arm Hand Activity Inventory (CAHAI), Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT), Nine Hole Peg Test (NHPT) and ABILHAND; the supplementary set recommended for research or specific occasions: Motricity Index (MI); Chedoke-McMaster Stroke Assessment (CMSA), Stroke Rehabilitation Assessment Movement (STREAM), Frenchay Arm Test (FAT), Motor Assessment Scale (MAS) and body-worn movement sensors. Assessments should be conducted at pre-defined regular intervals by trained personnel. Global measures should be applied within 24 h of hospital admission and upper limb specific measures within 1 week.

CONCLUSIONS

The CAULIN recommendations for outcome measures and assessment procedures provide a clear, simple, evidence-based three-level structure for upper limb assessment in neurological rehabilitation. Widespread adoption and sustained use will improve quality of clinical practice and facilitate meta-analysis, critical for the advancement of technology-supported neurorehabilitation.

Self-Rehabilitation for Post-Stroke Motor Function and Activity-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background. Due to an increasing stroke incidence, a lack of resources to implement effective rehabilitation and a significant proportion of patients with remaining impairments after treatment, there is a rise in demand for effective and prolonged rehabilitation. Development of self-rehabilitation programs provides an opportunity to meet these increasing demands.Objective. The primary aim of this meta-analysis was to determine the effect of self-rehabilitation on motor outcomes, in comparison to conventional rehabilitation, among patients with stroke. The secondary aim was to assess the influence of trial location (continent), technology, time since stroke (acute/subacute vs chronic), dose (total training duration > vs ≤ 15 hours), and intervention design (self-rehabilitation in addition/substitution to conventional therapy) on effect of self-rehabilitation.Methods. Studies were selected if participants were adults with stroke; the intervention consisted of a self-rehabilitation program defined as a tailored program where for most of the time, the patient performed rehabilitation exercises independently; the control group received conventional therapy; outcomes included motor function and activity; and the study was a randomized controlled trial with a PEDro score ≥5.Results. Thirty-five trials were selected (2225 participants) and included in quantitative synthesis regarding motor outcomes. Trials had a median PEDro Score of 7 [6-8]. Self-rehabilitation programs were shown to be as effective as conventional therapy. Trial location, use of technology, stroke stage, and intervention design did not appear to have a significant influence on outcomes.Conclusion. This meta-analysis showed low to moderate evidence that self-rehabilitation and conventional therapy efficacy was equally valuable for post-stroke motor function and activity.

Measurement properties of the box and block test in children with unilateral cerebral palsy

This study aimed to examine the reliabilities (test-retest reliability and measurement error), construct validity, and the interpretability (minimal clinically important difference) of the Box and Block Test (BBT) to interpret test scores precisely for children with UCP. A total of 100 children with UCP were recruited and 50 children from the whole sample assessed the BBT twice within 2-week interval. The BBT, the Melbourne Assessment 2, the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency, 2nd Edition, and the Pediatric Motor Activity Log Revised were measured before and immediately after a 36-h intensive neurorehabilitation intervention. Measurement properties of the BBT were performed according to the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments checklist. The test-retest reliability of the BBT was high (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.98). The measurement error estimated by the MDC₉₅ value was 5.95. Construct validity was considered good that 4 of 4 (100%) hypotheses were confirmed. The interpretability estimated by the MCID ranged from 5.29 to 6.46. The BBT is a reliable and valid tool for children with UCP. For research and clinical applications, an improvement of seven blocks on the BBT is recommended as an indicator of statistically significant and clinically important change.