1
|
Xie X, Munos MK, Lama TP, Bryce E, Khatry SK, LeClerq SC, Katz J. Validation of maternal recall of number of antenatal care visits attended in rural Southern Nepal: a longitudinal cohort study. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e079029. [PMID: 38072474 PMCID: PMC10729047 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2023] [Accepted: 11/23/2023] [Indexed: 12/18/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aimed to examine the validity of maternal recall of total number of antenatal care (ANC) visits during pregnancy and factors associated with the accuracy of maternal recall. DESIGN This was a longitudinal cohort study conducted from December 2018 through November 2020. SETTING Five government health posts in the Sarlahi district of Southern Nepal. PARTICIPANTS 402 pregnant women between ages 15 and 49 who presented for their first ANC visit at the study health posts. MAIN OUTCOMES The observed number of ANC visits (gold standard) and the reported number of ANC visits at the postpartum interview (maternal recall). RESULTS On average, women in the study who had a live birth attended 4.7 ANC visits. About 65% of them attended four or more ANC visits during pregnancy as recommended by the Nepal government, and 38.3% of maternal report matched the categorical ANC visits as observed by the gold standard. The individual validity was poor to moderate, with the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) being 0.69 (95% CI: 0.65 to 0.74) in the 1-3 visits group. Population-level bias (as distinct from individual-level bias) was observed in the 1-3 visits and 4 visits groups, where 1-3 visits were under-reported (inflation factor (IF): 0.69) and 4 ANC visits were highly over-reported (IF: 2.12). The binary indicator ANC4+ (1-3 visits vs 4+ visits) showed better population-level validity (AUC: 0.69; IF: 1.17) compared with the categorical indicators (1-3 visits, 4 visits, 5-6 visits and more than 6 visits). Report accuracy was not associated with maternal characteristics but was related to ANC frequency. Women who attended more ANC visits were less likely to correctly report their total number of visits. CONCLUSION Maternal report of number of ANC visits during pregnancy may not be a valid indicator for measuring ANC coverage. Improvements are needed to measure the frequency of ANC visits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xinyu Xie
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Melinda K Munos
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Tsering P Lama
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Emily Bryce
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Subarna K Khatry
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Nepal Nutrition Intervention Project Sarlahi, Lalitpur, Nepal
| | - Steven C LeClerq
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Nepal Nutrition Intervention Project Sarlahi, Lalitpur, Nepal
| | - Joanne Katz
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nakamura-Pereira M, Takemoto MLS, Bittencourt SDDA, Viellas EF, do Carmo CN, Schilithz AOC, Theme Filha MM, Leal MDC. Agreement between maternal self-report of birth-related information and medical records in Brazil: A comparison study between public, mixed, and private hospitals. Birth 2023; 50:789-797. [PMID: 37256263 DOI: 10.1111/birt.12731] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2020] [Accepted: 05/12/2023] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The study aims to assess agreement between data obtained from interviews with postpartum women and their health records about labor and birth characteristics, newborn care, and reasons for cesarean birth. METHODS The present study analyzes the Birth in Brazil study dataset, a nationwide hospital-based survey that included 23,894 postpartum women. Reliability was assessed using kappa coefficients and 95% confidence intervals. We also calculated the proportion of specific agreement: the observed proportion of positive agreement (Ppos) and the observed proportion of negative agreement (Pneg). RESULTS In terms of labor and birth characteristics, more significant discrepancies in prevalence were observed for fundal pressure (1.4%-42.6%), followed by amniotomy, and augmentation. All of these variables were reported more frequently by women. Reliability was nearly perfect only for mode of delivery (kappa 0.99-1.00, Ppos and Pneg >99.0%). Higher discrepancies in reasons for cesarean prevalence were observed for previous cesarean birth (CB) (3.9%-10.4%) and diabetes mellitus (0.5%-8.5%). Most kappa coefficients for CB reasons were moderate to substantial. Lower coefficients were seen for diabetes mellitus, induction failure, and prelabor rupture of membranes and Pneg was consistently higher than Ppos. DISCUSSION Our findings raise relevant questions about the quality of information shared with women during and after the process of care for labor and birth, as well as the information recorded in medical charts. Not having access to full information about their own health status at birth may impair women's health promotion behaviors or clear disclosure of risk factors in future interactions with the healthcare system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcos Nakamura-Pereira
- National Institute of Women, Children and Adolescents Health Fernandes Figueira, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, FIOCRUZ/RJ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Maria do Carmo Leal
- National School of Public Health-Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, FIOCRUZ/RJ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
McCarthy KJ, Blanc AK, Warren CE, Bajracharya A, Bellows B. Exploring the accuracy of self-reported maternal and newborn care in select studies from low and middle-income country settings: do respondent and facility characteristics affect measurement? BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2023; 23:448. [PMID: 37328744 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-023-05755-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2021] [Accepted: 06/02/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Accurate data on the receipt of essential maternal and newborn health interventions is necessary to interpret and address gaps in effective coverage. Validation results of commonly used content and quality of care indicators routinely implemented in international survey programs vary across settings. We assessed how respondent and facility characteristics influenced the accuracy of women's recall of interventions received in the antenatal and postnatal periods. METHODS We synthesized reporting accuracy using data from a known sample of validation studies conducted in Sub-Saharan Africa and Southeast Asia, which assessed the validity of women's self-report of received antenatal care (ANC) (N = 3 studies, 3,169 participants) and postnatal care (PNC) (N = 5 studies, 2,462 participants) compared to direct observation. For each study, indicator sensitivity and specificity are presented with 95% confidence intervals. Univariate fixed effects and bivariate random effects models were used to examine whether respondent characteristics (e.g., age group, parity, education level), facility quality, or intervention coverage level influenced the accuracy of women's recall of whether interventions were received. RESULTS Intervention coverage was associated with reporting accuracy across studies for the majority (9 of 12) of PNC indicators. Increasing intervention coverage was associated with poorer specificity for 8 indicators and improved sensitivity for 6 indicators. Reporting accuracy for ANC or PNC indicators did not consistently differ by any other respondent or facility characteristic. CONCLUSIONS High intervention coverage may contribute to higher false positive reporting (poorer specificity) among women who receive facility-based maternal and newborn care while low intervention coverage may contribute to false negative reporting (lower sensitivity). While replication in other country and facility settings is warranted, results suggest that monitoring efforts should consider the context of care when interpreting national estimates of intervention coverage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharine J McCarthy
- Department of Population Health Science & Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
- Blavatnik Women's Health Research Institute, New York, NY, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kim SS, Ashok S, Avula R, Mahapatra T, Gokhale P, Walton S, Heidkamp RA, Munos MK. Moderate Accuracy of Survey Responses about Infant and Young Child Feeding Counseling Reported by Mothers with Children Less than 1 Year of Age in India. J Nutr 2023; 153:1220-1230. [PMID: 36796483 DOI: 10.1016/j.tjnut.2023.02.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2022] [Revised: 02/03/2023] [Accepted: 02/09/2023] [Indexed: 02/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Counseling on infant and young child feeding (IYCF) to support optimal breastfeeding and complementary feeding practices is an essential intervention, and accurate coverage data is needed to identify gaps and monitor progress. However, coverage information captured during household surveys has not yet been validated. OBJECTIVES We examined the validity of maternal reports of IYCF counseling received during community-based contacts and factors associated with reporting accuracy. METHODS Direct observations of home visits conducted by community workers in 40 villages in Bihar, India served as the "gold standard" to maternal reports of IYCF counseling received during 2-wk follow-up surveys (n = 444 mothers with children less than 1 y of age, interviews matched to direct observations). Individual-level validity was assessed by calculating sensitivity, specificity, and AUC. Population-level bias was measured using the inflation factor (IF). Multivariable regression models were used to examine factors associated with response accuracy. RESULTS Prevalence of IYCF counseling during home visits was very high (90.1%). Maternal report of any IYCF counseling received in the past 2 wk was moderate (AUC: 0.60; 95% CI: 0.52, 0.67), and population bias was low (IF = 0.90). However, the recall of specific counseling messages varied. Maternal report of any breastfeeding, exclusive breastfeeding, and dietary diversity messages had moderate validity (AUC > 0.60), but other child feeding messages had low individual validity. Child age, maternal age, maternal education, mental stress, and social desirability were associated with reporting accuracy of multiple indicators. CONCLUSIONS Validity of IYCF counseling coverage was moderate for several key indicators. IYCF counseling is an information-based intervention that may be received from various sources, and it may be challenging to achieve higher reporting accuracy over a longer recall period. We consider the modest validity results as positive and suggest that these coverage indicators may be useful for measuring coverage and tracking progress over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sunny S Kim
- Poverty, Health and Nutrition Division, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), Washington, DC, USA.
| | | | | | | | - Priya Gokhale
- CARE India Solutions for Sustainable Development, Bihar, India
| | - Shelley Walton
- Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Rebecca A Heidkamp
- Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Melinda K Munos
- Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Owais A, Wuehler S, Heidkamp R, Mehra V, Neufeld LM, Rogers LM, Saha KK. Critical assessment of the current indicator for antenatal iron‐containing supplementation coverage: Insights from a mixed‐methods study. MATERNAL & CHILD NUTRITION 2022; 18:e13314. [PMID: 35092159 PMCID: PMC8932708 DOI: 10.1111/mcn.13314] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2021] [Revised: 12/10/2021] [Accepted: 12/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Daily consumption of iron‐containing supplements is recommended for all pregnant women but there is no approved global standard indicator for assessing supplementation coverage. Furthermore, the validity of commonly used coverage indicators for iron‐containing supplement consumption is questionable. The WHO–UNICEF Technical Expert Advisory Group on Nutrition Monitoring, and partners, have systematically worked to identify a feasible and valid indicator of iron‐containing supplement coverage for reporting by countries. In 2019, we conducted key informant interviews with respondents in eight countries, fielded an online survey (in three languages using SurveyMonkey) to which 142 nutrition professionals from 52 countries responded, and used Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) data from four countries to assess determinants of the quality of iron‐containing supplement coverage data. Less than half (45%) of online survey respondents were satisfied with the current methods for collecting iron‐containing supplement coverage data in their context. Recommended changes by study respondents include recall period <5 years, adding questions about counselling, including other beneficiary groups, and assessing supply chain functionality. The DHS analysis suggested an association between time since pregnancy and data quality. Data heaping on multiples of 30 was observed in 40%–75% of data. There is a clear demand for a revised indicator and measurement guidance for coverage of iron‐containing supplementation during pregnancy. Future research should continue the development and validation of a global indicator, to more precisely validate the quality of recall data, including the distinction between distribution and consumption using various question formulations. Health and nutrition professionals have described concerns with current methods for reporting coverage of daily iron‐containing supplementation in pregnant women. The long recall period (5 years) of commonly used iron‐containing supplement consumption indicators calls into question the validity of these indicators. Our study indicates that there is demand for a revised indicator and guidance for data collection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aatekah Owais
- Nutrition International Ottawa Canada
- Centre for Global Child Health, Research Institute Hospital for Sick Children Toronto Canada
| | | | - Rebecca Heidkamp
- International Health, Bloomberg School of Public Health Johns Hopkins University Baltimore Maryland USA
| | - Vrinda Mehra
- Data and Analytics Section, Division of Data, Analysis, Planning and Monitoring UNICEF New York City New York USA
| | | | - Lisa M. Rogers
- Department of Nutrition and Food Safety World Health Organization Geneva Switzerland
| | - Kuntal Kumar Saha
- Department of Nutrition and Food Safety World Health Organization Geneva Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bryce E, Munos M, Lama TP, Khatry SK, LeClerq S, Katz J. Validation of Maternal Report of Receipt of Iron-Folic Acid Supplementation during Antenatal Care in Rural Southern Nepal. J Nutr 2022; 152:310-318. [PMID: 34549300 PMCID: PMC8754516 DOI: 10.1093/jn/nxab336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2021] [Revised: 08/17/2021] [Accepted: 09/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Coverage of iron-folic acid (IFA) supplementation is a key indicator for tracking programmatic progress within and across countries. However, the validity of maternal report of this information during household surveys has yet to be determined. OBJECTIVES This study aimed to examine the validity of maternal recall of receipt of IFA supplementation during antenatal care (ANC) and factors associated with accuracy of maternal recall. METHODS A longitudinal cohort design was employed. The direct observation of the IFA received during all ANC visits at the 5 study health posts served as the "gold standard" to the maternal report of IFA received during the postpartum interview. Individual-level validity was assessed by calculating indicator sensitivity, specificity, and AUC. The inflation factor (IF) measured population-level bias. A multivariable log-binomial model was used to assess factors associated with accurate recall. RESULTS The majority (95.8%) of women were observed receiving IFA during pregnancy. Women overreported the number of IFA tablets received compared with what was observed during ANC visits (mean difference: 45 tablets). Maternal report of any IFA receipt was moderate (AUC = 0.60; 95% CI: 0.50, 0.71), and population bias was low (IF = 1.01). However, the individual-level validity was poor across the 7 IFA tablet count categories; the AUC for categories ranged from misleading to moderate. Driven by the trend of maternal overreport, the IF indicated that maternal report drastically underestimated the coverage of lower tablet categories and overestimated the coverage of higher tablet counts. Accuracy of maternal report was not associated with months since last ANC observation nor any maternal characteristics. CONCLUSIONS Maternal report of the amount of IFA supplementation received during pregnancy produced extremely biased population coverage and performed poorly to moderately for individual-level validity. It is imperative to improve this indicator because it is used in global frameworks and national program planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Bryce
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Melinda Munos
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Subarna K Khatry
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Nepal Nutrition Intervention Project–Sarlahi, Kathmandu, Nepal
| | - Steve LeClerq
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Nepal Nutrition Intervention Project–Sarlahi, Kathmandu, Nepal
| | - Joanne Katz
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Nguyen PH, Singh N, Scott S, Neupane S, Jangid M, Walia M, Murira Z, Bhutta ZA, Torlesse H, Piwoz E, Heidkamp R, Menon P. Unequal coverage of nutrition and health interventions for women and children in seven countries. Bull World Health Organ 2022; 100:20-29. [PMID: 35017754 PMCID: PMC8722629 DOI: 10.2471/blt.21.286650] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2021] [Revised: 09/25/2021] [Accepted: 10/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To examine inequalities and opportunity gaps in co-coverage of health and nutrition interventions in seven countries. Methods We used data from the most recent (2015–2018) demographic and health surveys of mothers with children younger than 5 years in Afghanistan (n = 19 632), Bangladesh (n = 5051), India (n = 184 641), Maldives (n = 2368), Nepal (n = 3998), Pakistan (n = 8285) and Sri Lanka (n = 7138). We estimated co-coverage for a set of eight health and eight nutrition interventions and assessed within-country inequalities in co-coverage by wealth and geography. We examined opportunity gaps by comparing coverage of nutrition interventions with coverage of their corresponding health delivery platforms. Findings Only 15% of 231 113 mother–child pairs received all eight health interventions (weighted percentage). The percentage of mother–child pairs who received no nutrition interventions was highest in Pakistan (25%). Wealth gaps (richest versus poorest) for co-coverage of health interventions were largest for Pakistan (slope index of inequality: 62 percentage points) and Afghanistan (38 percentage points). Wealth gaps for co-coverage of nutrition interventions were highest in India (32 percentage points) and Bangladesh (20 percentage points). Coverage of nutrition interventions was lower than for associated health interventions, with opportunity gaps ranging from 4 to 54 percentage points. Conclusion Co-coverage of health and nutrition interventions is far from optimal and disproportionately affects poor households in south Asia. Policy and programming efforts should pay attention to closing coverage, equity and opportunity gaps, and improving nutrition delivery through health-care and other delivery platforms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Phuong Hong Nguyen
- Poverty, Health and Nutrition Division, International Food Policy Research Institute, 1201 I Street, NW, Washington DC, 20005, United States of America (USA)
| | - Nishmeet Singh
- International Food Policy Research Institute, New Delhi, India
| | - Samuel Scott
- International Food Policy Research Institute, New Delhi, India
| | - Sumanta Neupane
- International Food Policy Research Institute, Kathmandu, Nepal
| | - Manita Jangid
- International Food Policy Research Institute, New Delhi, India
| | - Monika Walia
- International Food Policy Research Institute, New Delhi, India
| | - Zivai Murira
- United Nations Children's Fund, Regional Office for South Asia, Kathmandu, Nepal
| | | | - Harriet Torlesse
- United Nations Children's Fund, Regional Office for South Asia, Kathmandu, Nepal
| | | | - Rebecca Heidkamp
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA
| | - Purnima Menon
- International Food Policy Research Institute, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Associations between Maternal Iron Supplementation in Pregnancy and Changes in Offspring Size at Birth Reflect Those of Multiple Micronutrient Supplementation. Nutrients 2021; 13:nu13072480. [PMID: 34371987 PMCID: PMC8308651 DOI: 10.3390/nu13072480] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2021] [Revised: 07/12/2021] [Accepted: 07/19/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
It was previously observed that in a population of a high-income country, dietary multiple micronutrient supplementation in pregnancy was associated with an increased risk of gestational diabetes (GDM) and increased offspring size at birth. In this follow-up study, we investigated whether similar changes are observed with dietary iron supplementation. For this we used the prospective Cambridge Baby Growth Study with records of maternal GDM status, nutrient supplementation, and extensive offspring birth size measurements. Maternal iron supplementation in pregnancy was associated with GDM development (risk ratio 1.67 (1.01-2.77), p = 0.048, n = 677) as well as offspring size and adiposity (n = 844-868) at birth in terms of weight (β' = 0.078 (0.024-0.133); p = 0.005), head circumference (β' = 0.060 (0.012-0.107); p = 0.02), body mass index (β' = 0.067 (0.014-0.119); p = 0.01), and various skinfold thicknesses (β' = 0.067-0.094; p = 0.03-0.003). In a subset of participants for whom GDM statuses were available, all these associations were attenuated by adjusting for GDM. Iron supplementation also attenuated the associations between multiple micronutrient supplementation and these same measures. These results suggest that iron supplementation may mediate the effects associated with multiple micronutrient supplementation in pregnancy in a high-income country, possibly through the increased risk of developing GDM.
Collapse
|
9
|
Bahati F, Kairu-Wanyoike S, Nzioki JM. Adherence to iron and folic acid supplementation during pregnancy among postnatal mothers seeking maternal and child healthcare at Kakamega level 5 hospital in Kenya: a cross-sectional study. Wellcome Open Res 2021; 6:80. [PMID: 34405117 PMCID: PMC8366300 DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16699.2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Maternal anaemia is a public health problem worldwide, and its aetiology is linked to iron deficiency. The high nutrient demand during pregnancy exacerbates the condition. To meet the increased nutritional demand, supplementation of iron and folic acid (IFA) is key. The supplements are provided freely to pregnant women during antenatal visits at public health facilities, however, their uptake and adherence in Kenya remain unacceptably low. Methods: A hospital-based cross-sectional study involving 241 postnatal mothers seeking maternal and child healthcare (MCH) care at Kakamega level 5 hospital was conducted. Both quantitative and qualitative data were collected. Quantitative data were collected from 241 eligible postnatal mothers, while qualitative data were obtained through key informant interviews with community health volunteers and healthcare providers. Results: There was a moderate adherence to IFA supplementation (60.6%) during pregnancy among postnatal mothers seeking MCH care at Kakamega level 5 hospital. Some of the reasons for non-adherence stated by the respondents included; IFA related side effects (41.3%), forgetfulness (37.3%) and bad smell of the IFA supplements (10.3%). Higher IFA adherence was noted among the primigravida participants (OR=2.704; 95% CI: 1.262, 5.793; p=0.010) compared to multigravida participants, and those with a higher knowledge level of anaemia (OR=3.215; 95% CI: 1.346, 7.68; p=0.009) compared to their counterparts with low anaemia knowledge. Other factors that showed correlation with IFA adherence were: IFA education, pregnancy counselling before conception and the number of antenatal care visits attained. Conclusion: There is a moderate adherence to IFA supplementation during pregnancy among mothers seeking MCH at Kakamega level 5 hospital. The greatest impediments of IFA compliance during pregnancy are IFA side effects, forgetfulness and the bad smell of the IFA tablets. Therefore, providing IFA education to pregnant mothers incorporated with probable ways of managing the IFA side effects would contribute to IFA supplementation adherence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felix Bahati
- Health Services Research Unit, KEMRI Wellcome Trust, Nairobi, Nairobi, 43640-00100, Kenya
- Environmental Health and Disease Control, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Nairobi, Nairobi, 62 000 – 00200, Kenya
| | - Salome Kairu-Wanyoike
- Directorate of Veterinary Services, Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock, Fisheries and Cooperatives, Nairobi, Nairobi, Kangemi 00605, Kenya
| | - Japheth Mativo Nzioki
- Environmental Health and Disease Control, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Nairobi, Nairobi, 62 000 – 00200, Kenya
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Heidkamp RA, Piwoz E, Gillespie S, Keats EC, D'Alimonte MR, Menon P, Das JK, Flory A, Clift JW, Ruel MT, Vosti S, Akuoku JK, Bhutta ZA. Mobilising evidence, data, and resources to achieve global maternal and child undernutrition targets and the Sustainable Development Goals: an agenda for action. Lancet 2021; 397:1400-1418. [PMID: 33691095 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(21)00568-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 92] [Impact Index Per Article: 30.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2020] [Revised: 07/28/2020] [Accepted: 09/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
As the world counts down to the 2025 World Health Assembly nutrition targets and the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals, millions of women, children, and adolescents worldwide remain undernourished (underweight, stunted, and deficient in micronutrients), despite evidence on effective interventions and increasing political commitment to, and financial investment in, nutrition. The COVID-19 pandemic has crippled health systems, exacerbated household food insecurity, and reversed economic growth, which together could set back improvements in undernutrition across low-income and middle-income countries. This paper highlights how the evidence base for nutrition, health, food systems, social protection, and water, sanitation, and hygiene interventions has evolved since the 2013 Lancet Series on maternal and child nutrition and identifies the priority actions needed to regain and accelerate progress within the next decade. Policies and interventions targeting the first 1000 days of life, including some newly identified since 2013, require renewed commitment, implementation research, and increased funding from both domestic and global actors. A new body of evidence from national and state-level success stories in stunting reduction reinforces the crucial importance of multisectoral actions to address the underlying determinants of undernutrition and identifies key features of enabling political environments. To support these actions, well-resourced nutrition data and information systems are essential. The paper concludes with a call to action for the 2021 Nutrition for Growth Summit to unite global and national nutrition stakeholders around common priorities to tackle a large, unfinished undernutrition agenda-now amplified by the COVID-19 crisis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ellen Piwoz
- Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Stuart Gillespie
- International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Emily C Keats
- Centre for Global Child Health, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Purnima Menon
- International Food Policy Research Institute, Delhi, India
| | - Jai K Das
- Division of Women and Child Health, The Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan
| | | | | | - Marie T Ruel
- International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Stephen Vosti
- Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, and Institute for Global Nutrition, University of California, Davis, CA, USA
| | | | - Zulfiqar A Bhutta
- Centre for Global Child Health, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada; Centre of Excellence in Women and Child Health and Institute for Global Health and Development, The Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Chopra M, Kaur N, Singh KD, Maria Jacob C, Divakar H, Babu GR, Hong Nguyen P, Bhanot A, Sabharwal M, Deb S, Baswal D, Louise Killeen S, McAuliffe FM, Hanson MA, Sethi V. Population estimates, consequences, and risk factors of obesity among pregnant and postpartum women in India: Results from a national survey and policy recommendations. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2020; 151 Suppl 1:57-67. [PMID: 32894592 PMCID: PMC7590096 DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.13319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine prevalence, risk factors, and consequences of maternal obesity; and provide evidence on current policies and programs to manage maternal obesity in India. METHODS This is a mixed-methods study. We analyzed the National Family Health Survey (NFHS)-4 data (2015-16) to estimate the prevalence and risk factors of obesity, followed by a desk review of literature and stakeholder mapping with interviews to develop policy guidance. RESULTS National prevalence of obesity (defined by WHO as body mass index ≥25) was comparable among pregnant (12%) and postpartum women (13%) ≥20 years of age. A high prevalence of obesity (>40%) was observed in over 30 districts in multiple states. Older maternal age, urban residence, increasing wealth quintile, and secondary education were associated with increased odds of obesity among pregnant and postpartum women; higher education increased odds among postpartum women only (OR 1.90; 95% CI, 1.44-2.52). Dietary variables were not associated with obesity. Several implementation challenges across healthcare system blocks were observed at policy level. CONCLUSION Overall prevalence of obesity in India during and after pregnancy is high, with huge variation across districts. Policy and programs must be state-specific focusing on prevention, screening, and management of obesity among pregnant and postpartum women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mansi Chopra
- National Centre of Excellence and Advanced Research on Diets, Department of Food and Nutrition, Lady Irwin College, University of Delhi, New Delhi, India
| | - Naman Kaur
- National Centre of Excellence and Advanced Research on Diets, Department of Food and Nutrition, Lady Irwin College, University of Delhi, New Delhi, India
| | - Konsam Dinachandra Singh
- National Centre of Excellence and Advanced Research on Diets, Department of Food and Nutrition, Lady Irwin College, University of Delhi, New Delhi, India
| | - Chandni Maria Jacob
- Institute of Developmental Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.,NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | | | - Giridhara R Babu
- Department of Epidemiology, Indian Institute of Public Health, Public Health Foundation of India, Bengaluru, India
| | | | - Arti Bhanot
- National Centre of Excellence and Advanced Research on Diets, Department of Food and Nutrition, Lady Irwin College, University of Delhi, New Delhi, India
| | - Manisha Sabharwal
- National Centre of Excellence and Advanced Research on Diets, Department of Food and Nutrition, Lady Irwin College, University of Delhi, New Delhi, India
| | - Sila Deb
- Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, New Delhi, India
| | - Dinesh Baswal
- Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, New Delhi, India
| | - Sarah Louise Killeen
- UCD Perinatal Research Centre, School of Medicine, National Maternity Hospital, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Fionnuala M McAuliffe
- UCD Perinatal Research Centre, School of Medicine, National Maternity Hospital, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Mark A Hanson
- Institute of Developmental Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.,NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Vani Sethi
- Nutrition Section, United Nations Children's Fund, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|