Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in pregnancies complicated by diabetes, and control pregnancies, in Kronoberg, Sweden

Associations of High BMI and Excessive Gestational Weight Gain With Pregnancy Outcomes in Women With Type 1 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The increased risk of pregnancy complications in type 1 diabetes is mainly attributed to maternal hyperglycemia. However, it is unclear whether other potentially modifiable factors also contribute to risk in this population.

PURPOSE

We sought to assess whether high BMI and excessive gestational weight gain (GWG) are associated with perinatal complications in type 1 diabetes.

DATA SOURCES

We searched Medline, Embase, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases to January 2024.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies examining associations between periconception BMI or GWG and perinatal complications in type 1 diabetes were included.

DATA EXTRACTION

We used a predesigned data extraction template to extract study data including year, country, sample size, participants' characteristics, exposure, and outcomes.

DATA SYNTHESIS

We included 29 studies (18,965 pregnancies; 1978-2019) in the meta-analysis. A 1 kg/m2/1 kg increase in preconception BMI or GWG was associated with a 3% and 11% increase, respectively, in perinatal complications (BMI odds ratio [OR] 1.03 [95% CI 1.01-1.06]; GWG OR 1.11 [95% CI 1.04-1.18]). Preconception BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 or excessive GWG was associated with a 22% and 50% increase, respectively, in perinatal complications (BMI OR 1.22 [95% CI 1.11-1.34]; GWG OR 1.50 [95% CI 1.31-1.73]). BMI was associated with congenital malformation, preeclampsia, and neonatal intensive care unit admission. Excessive GWG was associated with preeclampsia, cesarean delivery, large for gestational age, and macrosomia.

LIMITATIONS

Limitations included retrospective study design, variable measurement for exposures and outcomes, small number of studies for some outcomes, and no data from Asia and Africa.

CONCLUSIONS

Addressing maternal BMI prepregnancy and preventing excessive GWG should be key clinical priorities to improve outcomes in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes.

Gestational Diabetes in Women with Fetal Spina Bifida Repair-Influence of Perioperative Management

Background/Objectives: Fetal spina bifida (fSB) is the most common neural tube defect, and intrauterine repair has become a valid treatment option for selected cases. If fSB repair is offered, the ideal time for surgery is from 24 to 26 gestational weeks (GWs). The preoperative steroids for lung maturation and preoperative tocolytics that are administered are known to increase the prevalence of gestational diabetes (GD), which normally occurs in about 10-15% of all pregnant women. This study assessed the prevalence, possible influencing factors, and consequences on the course of pregnancy regarding GD in this cohort. Methods: Between 2010 and 2022, 184 fSB cases were operated. Those patients operated on after 24 0/7 GWs received steroids before surgery. All the patients received tocolysis, and an oral glucose tolerance test was performed between 26 and 28 GWs at least 7 days after steroid administration. In 2020, we established an early postoperative mobilization protocol. The perioperative management procedures of those patients with and without GD were compared to each other, and also, the patients treated according to the early mobilization protocol were compared to the remaining cohort. Results: Nineteen percent were diagnosed with GD. Corticosteroids were administered in 92%. Neither the corticoid administration nor the interval between the administration and glucose tolerance test was different in patients with or without GD. Further, 99.5% received postoperative tocolytics for at least 48 h. The women with GD had significantly longer administration of tocolytics. The length of stay (LOS) was higher in those patients with GD. The gestational age (GA) at delivery was significantly lower in the cohort with GD. In the early mobilized group, we found a significantly higher GA at delivery (37.1 GWs vs. 36.2 GWs, p = 0.009) and shorter LOS (p < 0.001), and their GD rate was lower (10% vs. 20%), although not statistically significant. Conclusions: The GD incidence in the women after fSB repair was higher than in the usual pregnant population. Early mobilization, rapid tocolytics decrease, and shorter LOS could benefit the pregnancy course after fSB repair and may decrease the risk for GD in this already high-risk cohort without increasing the risk for preterm delivery.

Prematurity and congenital malformations differ according to the type of pregestational diabetes

BACKGROUND

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is the most common metabolic disorder in pregnancy. Women with Type 2 DM seems to have no better perinatal outcomes than those with Type 1 DM.

METHODS

Single-center prospective cohort observational study. Pregnant women with diabetes (141 with Type 1 DM and 124 with Type 2 DM) that were followed in the university hospital between 2009 and 2021 were included in this study. Clinical data and obstetric and perinatal outcomes were collected.

RESULTS

As expected, women with Type 1 DM were younger and had a longer duration of diabetes than women with Type 2 DM. Obesity and chronic hypertension were higher in the group of women with Type 2 DM and their value of HbA1c in the second and third trimesters were lower than in Type 1 DM. No differences in prematurity were found, but more extreme prematurity was observed in Type 2 DM, as well as a higher rate of congenital malformations. The frequency of hypoglycemia and the weight of the newborn was higher in Type 1 DM. The maternal independent factors related to the weight of the newborn were: the glycemic control at the third trimester, the weight gain during pregnancy, and pregestational BMI.

CONCLUSIONS

Newborns born to mothers with Type 1 DM were larger and had a higher frequency of hypoglycemia, while congenital malformations and precocious preterm was more associated to Type 2 DM. Metabolic control, weight gain and pregestational weight were important determinants of both obstetric and neonatal complications.

Temporal Trends in Type 1, Type 2, and Gestational Diabetes in Pregnancy: Impact of Rural Residence, Ethnicity, and Material Deprivation

OBJECTIVE

Our aim in this study was to implement a newly validated algorithm to identify pregnant women with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), and to identify temporal trends in rates over the last decade. We also compared obstetric and neonatal outcomes of pregnancies with and without diabetes mellitus (DM).

METHODS

Among women with live births between 2005 and 2018 in Alberta, we calculated yearly rates of T1DM, T2DM, and GDM, overall, and stratified by ethnicity, urban or rural residence, material deprivation score, and maternal age.

RESULTS

Between 2005 and 2018, GDM rates increased from 42.3 to 101.8 per 1,000 deliveries (p<0.0001), T2DM rates increased from 2.6 to 6.4 per 1,000 deliveries (p<0.0001), whereas T1DM remained constant at 3.0 per 1,000 deliveries each year (p=0.4301). Higher GDM and T2DM rates were observed among Chinese and South Asian women, respectively, and among women who were materially deprived and living in urban areas. Women with T2DM were older and had the highest rates of pre-existing hypertension (16%). In contrast, women with T1DM were younger and had the highest rates of gestational hypertension (12%), pre-eclampsia (12%), and cesarean section deliveries (62%). Children of women with T1DM had the highest rates of large for gestational age (46%), neonatal hypoglycemia (41.1%), respiratory distress syndrome (7.7%), and jaundice (29.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

Diabetes-in-pregnancy rates have more than doubled over the last decade, driven primarily by increases in GDM and T2DM. These trends may have significant implications for the future health of mothers and children in Alberta.

Prediabetes in pregnancy - follow-up, treatment, and outcomes compared to overt pregestational diabetes

OBJECTIVE

There are limited data on follow-up, treatment, and maternal and fetal outcomes in women with prediabetes before or at the beginning of pregnancy. The aim of this study was to comprehensively characterize women with prediabetes compared to women with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort data from a single medical center treating women with pregestational prediabetes mellitus (PDM). Women were compared to pregestational overt type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

RESULTS

Data were collected from 120 women in the PDM group and 86 women in the T2DM group. Baseline characteristics were comparable, albeit women in the PDM group arrived at medical attention significantly later, 55% after 15 weeks gestation. Women with PDM needed significantly less treatment to achieve glycemic control and glycated hemoglobin remained lower throughout pregnancy. Maternal and fetal outcomes were similar between groups, although significantly higher rates of macrosomia and neonatal jaundice were observed in the T2DM group.

CONCLUSIONS

The lack of clear guidelines causes a delay in the first prenatal visit of women with PDM. Comparable pregnancy outcomes may tip the balance toward acceptance of early treatment. Establishing clear guidelines will enable primary caregivers to refer prediabetic women sooner for lifestyle modifications and treatment if needed.

Characteristics of pregnancy complicated with type 1 and type 2 diabetes

OBJECTIVE

Diabetes in pregnancy is a major risk factor for adverse perinatal outcomes such as congenital anomalies, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP), and macrosomia. For the mechanism of onset of type 1 and type 2 diabetes are different, we focused on the difference in perinatal outcomes between the type 1 and type 2 diabetes groups.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 22 pregnancies with type 1 diabetes and 15 pregnancies with type 2 diabetes, who were managed in our single center, with regard to maternal diabetes conditions during pregnancy and neonatal birthweight and blood glucose level. Furthermore, we checked the effect of continuous glucose monitoring and continuous subcutaneous insulin injection in pregnancies with type 1 diabetes.

RESULTS

Type 1 diabetes in pregnancy was less controllable and increased neonatal birth weight and neonatal hypoglycemia within 2 h after birth after neonatal care unit admission. Continuous glucose monitoring and continuous subcutaneous insulin injection that are convenient to use, had a similar effect in the management of type 1 diabetes during pregnancy, compared with conventional diabetes treatment. In contrast, maternal BMI and HDP were increased in women with type 2 diabetes.

CONCLUSION

In the management of pregnancy with diabetes, we should pay attention to the difference in pregnancy prognosis between type 1 and type 2 diabetes.

Trend of pregnancy outcomes in type 1 diabetes compared to control women: a register-based analysis in 1996-2018

Introduction

In 1989, the St Vincent declaration aimed to approximate pregnancy outcomes of diabetes to that of healthy pregnancies. We aimed to compare frequency and trends of outcomes of pregnancies affected by type 1 diabetes and controls in 1996-2018.

Methods

We used anonymized records of a mandatory nation-wide registry of all deliveries between gestational weeks 24 and 42 in Hungary. We included all singleton births (4,091 type 1 diabetes, 1,879,183 controls) between 1996 and 2018. We compared frequency and trends of pregnancy outcomes between type 1 diabetes and control pregnancies using hierarchical Poisson regression.

Results

The frequency of stillbirth, perinatal mortality, large for gestational age, caesarean section, admission to neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), and low Appearance, Pulse, Grimace, Activity, and Respiration (APGAR) score was 2-4 times higher in type 1 diabetes compared to controls, while the risk of congenital malformations was increased by 51% and SGA was decreased by 42% (all p<0.05). These observations remained significant after adjustment for confounders except for low APGAR scores. We found decreasing rate ratios comparing cases and controls over time for caesarean sections, low APGAR scores (p<0.05), and for NICU admissions (p=0.052) in adjusted models. The difference between cases and controls became non-significant after 2009. No linear trends were observed for the other outcomes.

Conclusions

Although we found that the rates of SGA, NICU care, and low APGAR score improved in pregnancies complicated by type 1 diabetes, the target of the St Vincent Declaration was only achieved for the occurrence of low APGAR scores.

The impact of maternal diabetes on the future health and neurodevelopment of the offspring: a review of the evidence

Maternal health during gestational period is undoubtedly critical in shaping optimal fetal development and future health of the offspring. Gestational diabetes mellitus is a metabolic disorder occurring in pregnancy with an alarming increasing incidence worldwide during recent years. Over the years, there is a growing body of evidence that uncontrolled maternal hyperglycaemia during pregnancy can potentially have detrimental effect on the neurodevelopment of the offspring. Both human and animal data have linked maternal diabetes with motor and cognitive impairment, as well as autism spectrum disorders, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, learning abilities and psychiatric disorders. This review presents the available data from current literature investigating the relationship between maternal diabetes and offspring neurodevelopmental impairment. Moreover, possible mechanisms accounting for the detrimental effects of maternal diabetes on fetal brain like fetal neuroinflammation, iron deficiency, epigenetic alterations, disordered lipid metabolism and structural brain abnormalities are also highlighted. On the basis of the evidence demonstrated in the literature, it is mandatory that hyperglycaemia during pregnancy will be optimally controlled and the impact of maternal diabetes on offspring neurodevelopment will be more thoroughly investigated.

Impact of pharmacological treatment of gestational diabetes on the mode of delivery and birth weight: a nationwide population-based study on a subset of singleton pregnant Portuguese women

AIMS

To access the impact of increasing use of metformin on cesarean section and large for gestational age rates, when compared to insulin.

METHODS

A retrospective observational study was developed using data from the Portuguese National Registry, between 2011 and 2019, of 5038 Portuguese women with single pregnancies and gestational diabetes treated with metformin and/or insulin. Three groups were defined according to the therapeutic regimen adopted: g1-insulin in monotherapy (n = 3027[60.1%]); g2-metformin in monotherapy (n = 1366[27.1%]); g3-metformin and insulin (n = 645[12.8%]). Multivariate analysis was adjusted for statistically significant covariates.

RESULTS

The cesarean section rate in g1 was similar to g2 (g1:36.9% vs. g2:37%, p = 0.982), although g3 was associated with cesarean delivery (g3:43.6% vs. g1:36.9%, p = 0.005; g3:43.6% vs. g1:37.0%, p = 0.002), with no differences reported in the multivariate analysis adjusted for year of delivery and pregestational body mass index. A delivery of a large for gestational age newborn was less frequently observed in g2 than in g1 (g2:4.1% vs. g1:5.4%, p = 0.044) and in g3 (g2:4.1% vs. g3:9.1%, p < 0.001), and in g1, when compared to g3 (g1:5.4% vs. g3:9.1%, p < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, g2 showed lower odds of delivering a large for gestational age newborn, compared to g1 (β = -0.511, OR = 0.596, CI95% = 0.428-0.832, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of metformin was not associated with higher cesarean section rates, compared to insulin. Instead, it was suggested a protective role of metformin on large gestational age rates. The concomitant use of dual therapy suggests more complex pregnancies, requiring closer surveillance that mitigate serious perinatal and obstetrical outcomes.

Glycemic Variability in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus Pregnancies—Novel Parameters in Predicting Large-for-Gestational-Age Neonates: A Prospective Cohort Study

Pregnancies with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) have a high incidence of large-for-gestational-age neonates (LGA) despite optimal glycemic control. In recent years, glycemic variability (GV) has emerged as a possible risk factor for LGA, but the results of the conducted studies are unclear. This study analyzed the association between GV and LGA development in pregnancies with T1DM. This was a prospective cohort study of patients with T1DM who used continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) during pregnancy. Patients were followed from the first trimester to birth. GV parameters were calculated for every trimester using the EasyGV calculator. The main outcomes were LGA or no-LGA. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess the association between GV parameters and LGA. In total, 66 patients were included. The incidence of LGA was 36%. The analysis extracted several GV parameters that were significantly associated with the risk of LGA. The J-index was the only significant parameter in every trimester of pregnancy (odds ratios with confidence intervals were 1.33 (1.02, 1.73), 3.18 (1.12, 9.07), and 1.37 (1.03, 1.82), respectively. Increased GV is a risk factor for development of LGA. The J-index is a possible novel GV parameter that may be assessed in all three trimesters of pregnancy together with glycated hemoglobin and time-in-range.

A Systematic Review to Compare Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in Women with Pregestational Diabetes and Gestational Diabetes

Pregestational type 1 (T1DM) and type 2 (T2DM) diabetes mellitus and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) are associated with increased rates of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Adverse outcomes are more common in women with pregestational diabetes compared to GDM; although, conflicting results have been reported. This systematic review aims to summarise and synthesise studies that have compared adverse pregnancy outcomes in pregnancies complicated by pregestational diabetes and GDM. Three databases, Pubmed, EBSCOhost and Scopus were searched to identify studies that compared adverse outcomes in pregnancies complicated by pregestational T1DM and T2DM, and GDM. A total of 20 studies met the inclusion criteria and are included in this systematic review. Thirteen pregnancy outcomes including caesarean section, preterm birth, congenital anomalies, pre-eclampsia, neonatal hypoglycaemia, macrosomia, neonatal intensive care unit admission, stillbirth, Apgar score, large for gestational age, induction of labour, respiratory distress syndrome and miscarriages were compared. Findings from this review confirm that pregestational diabetes is associated with more frequent pregnancy complications than GDM. Taken together, this review highlights the risks posed by all types of maternal diabetes and the need to improve care and educate women on the importance of maintaining optimal glycaemic control to mitigate these risks.

Linking the Perinatal Environment to Neonatal Cardiovascular Outcomes

Cases of high-risk pregnancies continue to rise throughout the United States and globally, increasing rates of maternal and neonatal morbidity. Common pregnancy complications and morbidities include preterm birth, hypertensive disorders, fetal growth restriction, diabetes mellitus, and chorioamnionitis. Exposure to these perinatal conditions contributes to cardiac morbidities in the fetus and neonate, including altered cardiac growth, congenital heart disease, and cardiac dysfunction. Significant research has demonstrated lasting effects of these pregnancy complications, with increased rates of cardiac morbidities seen in children and adults after these perinatal exposures. The link between the perinatal environment and long-term outcomes has not been fully elucidated. The aim of this review is to discuss the current understanding of the implications of a high-risk pregnancy on fetal and neonatal cardiac development.

Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in Europe: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prevalence Studies

Background

Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) is defined as the type of hyperglycemia diagnosed for the first-time during pregnancy, presenting with intermediate glucose levels between normal levels for pregnancy and glucose levels diagnostic of diabetes in the non-pregnant state. We aimed to systematically review and meta-analyze studies of prevalence of GDM in European countries at regional and sub-regional levels, according to age, trimester, body weight, and GDM diagnostic criteria.

Methods

Systematic search was conducted in five databases to retrieve studies from 2014 to 2019 reporting the prevalence of GDM in Europe. Two authors have independently screened titles and abstracts and full text according to eligibility using Covidence software. A random-effects model was used to quantify weighted GDM prevalence estimates. The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute criteria was used to assess the risk of bias.

Results

From the searched databases, 133 research reports were deemed eligible and included in the meta-analysis. The research reports yielded 254 GDM-prevalence studies that tested 15,572,847 pregnant women between 2014 and 2019. The 133 research reports were from 24 countries in Northern Europe (44.4%), Southern Europe (27.1%), Western Europe (24.1%), and Eastern Europe (4.5%). The overall weighted GDM prevalence in the 24 European countries was estimated at 10.9% (95% CI: 10.0-11.8, I2 : 100%). The weighted GDM prevalence was highest in the Eastern Europe (31.5%, 95% CI: 19.8-44.6, I2 : 98.9%), followed by in Southern Europe (12.3%, 95% CI: 10.9-13.9, I2 : 99.6%), Western Europe (10.7%, 95% CI: 9.5-12.0, I2 : 99.9%), and Northern Europe (8.9%, 95% CI: 7.9-10.0, I2 : 100). GDM prevalence was 2.14-fold increased in pregnant women with maternal age ≥30 years (versus 15-29 years old), 1.47-fold if the diagnosis was made in the third trimester (versus second trimester), and 6.79- fold in obese and 2.29-fold in overweight women (versus normal weight).

Conclusions

In Europe, GDM is significant in pregnant women, around 11%, with the highest prevalence in pregnant women of Eastern European countries (31.5%). Findings have implications to guide vigilant public health awareness campaigns about the risk factors associated with developing GDM.

Systematic Review Registration

PROSPERO [https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/], identifier CRD42020161857.

Early Pregnancy Glycemic Levels in Non-Diabetic Women and Pregnancy Outcome: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study

Background

Maternal fasting blood sugar (FBS) variations within normal range and lower than that in diabetes mellitus (DM) may be associated with adverse feto-maternal outcomes.

Objective

To find out if a rise of maternal FBS level above 80 but still below 120 mg/dL (group 2) has an influence on feto-maternal outcomes compared with a maternal FBS below 80 mg/dL (group 1).

Methods

Retrospective cross-sectional study. FBS was measured at the booking visit. Subjects whose FBS was measured before 20 weeks were categorized according to their FBS (>80 mg/dL or ≤80 mg/dL) and correlation between FBS levels in the two groups with several parameters were tested.

Results

Group 1 (130 healthy pregnant women) and group 2 (88 healthy pregnant women) did not show a statistical difference in age or BMI. More statistically significant cases were diagnosed with GDM in group 2 than in group 1 (39.8% vs 16.9%, P value 0.000). More cases that needed pharmacological intervention in the form of metformin or insulin or both were seen in group 2 than in group 1 (p value 0.007 and 0.061, respectively). More but not statistically significant polyhydramnios was seen more in group 2 than in group 1 (9.1% vs 3.1%, p value 0.056). There was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups in relation to all other fetomaternal outcome parameters that were studied.

Conclusion

Raised maternal fasting blood glucose level (80–120 mg/dL) in healthy primigravid women in early pregnancy was associated with significant diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus and need for pharmacological intervention. An association was found with polyhydramnios but this was not statistically significant. No influence was found on preterm birth, fetal weight, mode of delivery or APGAR score. More attention should be given to FBS levels early in pregnancy to reduce the risk for later complications.

A first trimester prediction model for large for gestational age infants: a preliminary study

Background

Large for gestational age infants (LGA) have increased risk of adverse short-term perinatal outcomes. This study aims to develop a multivariable prediction model for the risk of giving birth to a LGA baby, by using biochemical, biophysical, anamnestic, and clinical maternal characteristics available at first trimester.

Methods

Prospective study that included all singleton pregnancies attending the first trimester aneuploidy screening at the Obstetric Unit of the University Hospital of Modena, in Northern Italy, between June 2018 and December 2019.

Results

A total of 503 consecutive women were included in the analysis. The final prediction model for LGA, included multiparity (OR = 2.8, 95% CI: 1.6–4.9, p = 0.001), pre-pregnancy BMI (OR = 1.08, 95% CI: 1.03–1.14, p = 0.002) and PAPP-A MoM (OR = 1.43, 95% CI: 1.08–1.90, p = 0.013). The area under the ROC curve was 70.5%, indicating a satisfactory predictive accuracy. The best predictive cut-off for this score was equal to − 1.378, which corresponds to a 20.1% probability of having a LGA infant. By using such a cut-off, the risk of LGA can be predicted in our sample with sensitivity of 55.2% and specificity of 79.0%.

Conclusion

At first trimester, a model including multiparity, pre-pregnancy BMI and PAPP-A satisfactorily predicted the risk of giving birth to a LGA infant. This promising tool, once applied early in pregnancy, would identify women deserving targeted interventions.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04838431, 09/04/2021.

Pregnancy outcomes and maternal characteristics in women with pregestational and gestational diabetes: a retrospective study on 206,917 singleton live births

AIMS

To examine risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes, mothers' characteristics and incidence rate over time of pregestational type 1 (T1D), type 2 (T2D) or gestational diabetes (GDM).

METHODS

The study included all singleton live births born from women aged 15-45 year, in Tuscany, Italy from 2010 to 2018. Pregnancy outcomes were retrieved by certificates of care at delivery compiled by midwives. Pregestational diabetes and GDM were identified by regional administrative databases. Time course of pregestational diabetes and GDM across last decade was assessed by Poisson analysis. Logistic regression analysis was used to calculate adjusted odds ratios (OR; 95% CI) for maternal characteristics or neonatal outcomes.

RESULTS

Among 206,917 singleton live births, GDM was diagnosed in 21,613 pregnancies (10.46%) and pregestational diabetes in 979, being T2D more prevalent than T1D (606; 0.29% vs. 373; 0.18%). Pregestational T2D incidence progressively decreased over last decade, T1D remained stable while GDM progressively rose. Pre-pregnancy obesity, preterm deliveries or cesarean sections were common characteristics of pregestational diabetes and GDM. Risk of neonatal distress and neonatal malformations was higher in pregestational T1D. Risk of prior spontaneous abortions was higher in GDM and in pregestational T2D (OR: 4.19; 3.30-5.33), mostly treated with metformin. Risk of neonatal macrosomia was increased only in pregestational diabetes.

CONCLUSIONS

In our population, pregestational T2D was more prevalent than T1D. Neonatal complications were mostly associated with pregestational T1D. Increased risk of previous spontaneous abortions was the hallmark of pregestational T2D. GDM, even if sharing adverse outcomes with pregestational T2D, was unrelated to rise in risk of neonatal macrosomia.

Diabetes during Pregnancy: A Maternal Disease Complicating the Course of Pregnancy with Long-Term Deleterious Effects on the Offspring. A Clinical Review

In spite of the huge progress in the treatment of diabetes mellitus, we are still in the situation that both pregestational (PGDM) and gestational diabetes (GDM) impose an additional risk to the embryo, fetus, and course of pregnancy. PGDM may increase the rate of congenital malformations, especially cardiac, nervous system, musculoskeletal system, and limbs. PGDM may interfere with fetal growth, often causing macrosomia, but in the presence of severe maternal complications, especially nephropathy, it may inhibit fetal growth. PGDM may also induce a variety of perinatal complications such as stillbirth and perinatal death, cardiomyopathy, respiratory morbidity, and perinatal asphyxia. GDM that generally develops in the second half of pregnancy induces similar but generally less severe complications. Their severity is higher with earlier onset of GDM and inversely correlated with the degree of glycemic control. Early initiation of GDM might even cause some increase in the rate of congenital malformations. Both PGDM and GDM may cause various motor and behavioral neurodevelopmental problems, including an increased incidence of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Most complications are reduced in incidence and severity with the improvement in diabetic control. Mechanisms of diabetic-induced damage in pregnancy are related to maternal and fetal hyperglycemia, enhanced oxidative stress, epigenetic changes, and other, less defined, pathogenic mechanisms.

Maternal Hyperglycemia Induces Changes in Gene Expression and Morphology in Mouse Placentas

Background

Pregestational diabetes complicates one million pregnancies in the United States and is associated with placental dysfunction. Placental dysfunction can manifest as stillbirth, spontaneous abortions, fetal growth restriction, and preeclampsia in the mother. However, the underlying mechanisms of placental dysfunction are not well understood.

Objective

We hypothesize that maternal hyperglycemia disrupts cellular processes important for normal vascular development and function.

Study Design

Hyperglycemia, defined as a non-fasting glucose concentration of >250 mg/dL was induced in eight-week-old female CD1 mice by injecting a one-time intraperitoneal dose of 150mg/kg streptozotocin. Control mice received an equal volume of normal saline. Hyperglycemic and control females were mated with CD-1 males. At Embryonic Day 17.5, the pregnant mice were euthanized. Sixty-eight placentas were harvested from the six euglycemic dams and twenty-six placentas were harvested from three hyperglycemic dams. RNA was extracted from homogenized placental tissue (N=12/group; 2-4 placentas per litter of each group). Total RNA was prepared and sequenced. Differentially expressed genes that were >2-fold change was considered significant. Placentas (9-20/group) were fixed in paraffin wax and sectioned at 6 μm. Cross-sectional areas of placental zones were evaluated using slides stained for hematoxylin and eosin, glycogen, collagen, proliferation and apoptosis. Quantification of staining intensity and percent positive nuclei was done using Leica Image Hub Data software. Data were compared between the control and experimental group using t-tests. Values of p < 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.

Results

The average maternal blood glucose concentrations for control and diabetic dams were 112+/-24 and 473+/-47 respectively (p<0.0001). A higher rate of resorptions was noted in the hyperglycemia exposed placentas compared to euglycemic exposed placentas (24% vs 7%; p=0.04). A total of 24 RNA libraries (12/group) were prepared. Placentas from hyperglycemic pregnancies exhibited 1374 differentially expressed genes (DEGs). The 10 most significantly differentially expressed genes are Filip 1, Prom 2, Fam 78a, Pde4d, Pou3f1, Kcnk5, Dusp4, Cxcr4, Slc6a4 and D430019H16Rik. Their corresponding biologic functions are related to chemotaxis, ossification, cellular and vascular development. Histologically, we found that hyperglycemia exposed placentas demonstrated increased proliferation, apoptosis, and glycogen content and decreased collagen deposition.

Conclusion

There was a higher rate of resorptions in the pregnancies of hyperglycemic dams. Pregestational diabetes resulted in significant changes in placental morphology, including increased glycogen content in the spongiotrophoblast, decreased collagen deposition, increased apoptosis and proliferation in the junction zone. Maternal diabetes causes widespread disruption in multiple cellular processes important for normal vascular development and sets the platform for placenta dysfunction.

Dysglycemia in Pregnancy and Maternal/Fetal Outcomes

Maternal dysglycemia-including diabetes, impaired glucose tolerance, and impaired fasting glucose-affects one in six pregnancies worldwide and represents a significant health risk to the mother and the fetus. Maternal dysglycemia is an independent risk factor for perinatal mortality, major congenital anomalies, and miscarriages. Furthermore, it increases the longer-term risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus, metabolic syndrome, cardiovascular morbidity, malignancies, and ophthalmic, psychiatric, and renal diseases in the mother. The most commonly encountered form of maternal dysglycemia is gestational diabetes. Currently, international consensus does not exist for diagnostic criteria defining gestational diabetes at 24-28 weeks gestation, and potential diagnostic glucose thresholds earlier in gestation require further investigation. Likewise, recommendations regarding the timing and modality (e.g., lifestyle or pharmacological) of treatment vary greatly. Because a precise diagnosis determines the appropriate treatment and outcome of the pregnancy, it is imperative that a better definition of maternal dysglycemia and its treatment be achieved. This article will address some of the controversies related to diagnosing and managing maternal dysglycemia. In addition, the article will discuss the impact of maternal dysglycemia on complications experienced by the mother and infant, both at birth and in later life.

Metformin versus insulin use for treatment of gestational diabetes and delivery by caesarean section: A nationwide Swedish cohort study

OBJECTIVE

Pregnant women who develop gestational diabetes (GDM) are more likely to deliver by caesarean section (CS). Over the last decade, the use of metformin has increased as an alternative to insulin but it's unknown how this shift in treatment has influenced the mode of delivery. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the association between metformin use and CS and delivery of a large-for-gestational age (LGA) infant compared to insulin use for GDM.

STUDY DESIGN

The Swedish population health registers were linked to identify pregnant women from 2012 to 2016 without preexisting diabetes and with a first filled prescription of insulin or metformin in trimester 2 or 3 (n = 2467), categorized into those treated with insulin only (88%), metformin only (7.6%), or both insulin and metformin (4.3%). Logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Analyses were adjusted for relevant covariates and stratified by history of CS.

RESULTS

The proportion of women using metformin to treat GDM increased from 2.5% in 2012 to over 30% in 2016. Comparing insulin only to metformin only use, no association with delivery by CS (adjusted OR 0.79, 95% CI; 0.54-1.16) and lower odds of delivering a LGA infant (adjusted OR 0.44, 95% CI; 0.26-0.76) was found. Treatment with both insulin and metformin was associated with an increased risk of CS (adjusted OR 1.65, 95% CI; 1.06-2.56), which were more often unplanned. Estimates were further elevated in nulliparous (adjusted OR 2.32, 95% CI; 0.95-5.65) and multiparous women with a history of CS (adjusted OR 2.29, 95% CI; 0.60-8.74) but conclusions could not be drawn given the wide CIs.

CONCLUSION

There was no evidence of a higher association of metformin use alone with CS compared to insulin use for treatment of GDM but a protective effect for delivery of a LGA infant was shown. Women requiring treatment with both insulin and metformin had increased odds for delivery by CS which in turn may indicate that the need for the use of both medications to treat GDM suggests a pregnancy at higher risk.

Benefits of exercise in pregnancies with gestational diabetes

A significant proportion of pregnancies are complicated by diabetes mellitus. Most of them concern women with gestational diabetes mellitus, while proportionally are presented with preexisting DM 1 and DM 2. Metabolic derangements of the diabetic syndrome are likely to generate serious complications for both the mother and the fetus with a significant impact on their later health. Undoubtedly, all appropriate interventions that will contribute to the smoothest and most uncomplicated course of pregnancy are considered essential. Healthy diet adjustments, glucose monitoring and an appropriate insulin regimen, if needed, are considered effective tools for a safe gestation. Courses with aerobic, anaerobic stretching and relaxation exercises are presented with significant benefits in the therapeutic struggle for the general public. Extended research has been conducted assessing the role of exercise incorporation in a diabetic pregnancy. As evidence would support based on recent literature, exercise is an important mean in the prevention of carbohydrate intolerance during gestation and even more facilitates a smoother management of a diabetic pregnancy. Thus, exercise poses an essential role for maternal and neonatal health.

The Influence of Preeclampsia, Advanced Maternal Age and Maternal Obesity in Neonatal Outcomes Among Women with Gestational Diabetes

OBJECTIVE

 The present study aims to analyze adverse fetal or neonatal outcomes in women with gestational diabetes, including fetal death, preterm deliveries, birthweight, neonatal morbidity and mortality, as well as the synergic effect of concomitant pregnancy risk factors and poor obstetric outcomes, as advanced maternal age, maternal obesity and pre-eclampsia in their worsening.

METHODS

 The present cohort retrospective study included all pregnant women with gestational diabetes, with surveillance and childbirth at the Hospital da Senhora da Oliveira during the years of 2017 and 2018. The data were collected from the medical electronic records registered in health informatic programs Sclinico and Obscare, and statistical simple and multivariate analysis was done using IBM SPSS Statistics.

RESULTS

 The study participants included 301 pregnant women that contributed to 7.36% of the total institution childbirths of the same years, in a total of 300 live births. It was analyzed the influence of pre-eclampsia coexistence in neonatal morbidity (p = 0.004), in the occurrence of newborns of low and very low birthweight (p < 0.01) and in preterm deliveries (p < 0.01). The influence of maternal obesity (p = 0.270; p = 0.992; p = 0.684) and of advanced maternal age in these 3 outcomes was also analyzed (p = 0,806; p = 0.879; p = 0.985).Using a multivariate analysis, the only models with statistic significance to predict the three neonatal outcomes included only pre-eclampsia (p = 0.04; p < 0.01; p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

 Only coexistence of pre-eclampsia showed an association with adverse neonatal outcomes (neonatal morbidity, newborns of low and very low birthweight and preterm deliveries) and can be used as a predictor of them in women with gestational diabetes.

Adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes in pregnant women with abnormal glucose metabolism

AIMS

To assess the prevalence and risk of adverse perinatal outcomes in pregnant women with abnormal glucose metabolism.

METHODS

3269 Chinese pregnant women with singleton delivery were studied, including 787 diagnosed as gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), 115 pregnancy with diabetes (PWD), and 2367 normal glucose tolerance (NGT). The prevalence and risk of adverse maternal and fetal outcomes were compared and assessed among the three groups, and the related risk factors of the glucose metabolism for adverse pregnancy outcomes were evaluated by binary logistic regression.

RESULTS

Compared to NGT, maternal GDM and PWD faced increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes such as pregnancy-induced hypertension (odds ratio (OR) 1.78 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.17-2.72]; 4.31 [95% CI: 2.32-7.98]), low birth weight (OR 1.51 [95% CI: 1.01-2.28]; 4.05 [95% CI: 2.17-7.55]). And PWD group exhibited remarkably higher risk for preterm delivery (OR 2.88 [95% CI: 1.68-4.94]) and stillbirth (OR 7.78 [95% CI: 2.44-24.84]) than other two groups. The increased fasting insulin and glycated hemoglobin A1c were successively independent risk factors for maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Gestational abnormal glucose metabolism is associated with the remarkably increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes, and PWD has higher risk of adverse perinatal outcomes than GDM.

Reporting of offspring data in diabetes, HIV infection and hypertension trials during pregnancy: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Clinical trials are conducted during pregnancy to evaluate benefits and risks of medicines for mother and child. The safety of maternal treatments is a key issue for healthcare professionals and parents.

OBJECTIVE

To analyse offspring data reported in clinical trials in pregnant women with diabetes, HIV infection or hypertension (three of the most common diseases in women of childbearing potential) and either treated prior to pregnancy for these chronic diseases or diagnosed and treated during pregnancy.

METHODS

PubMed and Embase (1 January 1997 to 31 December 2017) were searched for drug trials in pregnant women with diabetes, HIV infection or hypertension. Titles and abstracts were screened, followed by a full-text review of eligible articles. Inclusion criteria were interventional clinical trials in pregnant women treated with medication and full text in English. Trial characteristics, maternal and offspring data were extracted. Data were summarised by disease and study. Twelve key items were considered for the offspring.

RESULTS

Overall, 196 articles reporting 132 clinical trials (diabetes n=55; HIV n=59; hypertension n=18) were included. Key offspring data were frequently not reported, for example, number of births (diabetes: 22/55, 40%; HIV: 14/59, 24%; hypertension: 10/18, 56%). Congenital malformations were often not reported with sufficient detail (diabetes: 40/55, 73%; HIV: 39/59, 66%; hypertension: 17/18, 94%). Similar observations were made for other key items (eg, fetal losses, neonatal deaths).

CONCLUSION

Under-reporting of key data for the offspring was frequent in publications of clinical trials in pregnant women with diabetes, HIV infection or hypertension making the assessment of the benefit-risk ratio of treatment options during pregnancy difficult.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42017057024.

A Population-Based Study of Diabetes During Pregnancy in Spain (2009-2015): Trends in Incidence, Obstetric Interventions, and Pregnancy Outcomes

(1) Background: We examined trends in incidence and outcomes in women with existing type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) compared with a control group without diabetes. (2) Methods: This was an observational, retrospective epidemiological study using the National Hospital Discharge Database. (3) Results: There were 2,481,479 deliveries in Spain between 2009 and 2015 (5561 mothers with T1DM, 4391 with T2DM, and 130,980 with GDM). Incidence and maternal age of existing diabetes and GDM increased over time. Women with T2DM were more likely to have obstetric comorbidity (70.12%) than those with GDM (60.28%), T1DM (59.45%), and no diabetes (41.82%). Previous cesarean delivery, preeclampsia, smoking, hypertension, and obesity were the most prevalent risk factors in all types of diabetes. Women with T1DM had the highest rate of cesarean delivery (Risk Ratio (RR) 2.34; 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 2.26-2.43) and prolonged maternal length of stay. Labor induction was higher in T2DM (RR 1.99; 95% CI 1.89-2.10). Women with T1DM had more severe maternal morbidity (RR 1.97; 95% CI 1.70-2.29) and neonatal morbidity (preterm birth, RR 3.32; 95% CI 3.14-3.51, and fetal overgrowth, RR 8.05; 95% CI 7.41-8.75). (4) Conclusions: existing and GDM incidence has increased over time. We found differences in the prevalence of comorbidities, obstetric risk factors, and the rate of adverse obstetric outcomes among women with different types of diabetes. Pregnant women with diabetes have the highest risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Outcomes, care utilization, and expenditures in adolescent pregnancy complicated by diabetes

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Adolescence and pregestational diabetes separately increase risks of adverse pregnancy outcomes, but little is known about their combined effect. To analyze pregnancy outcomes, healthcare utilization, and expenditures in adolescent pregnancies with and without pregestational diabetes using a national claims database.

METHODS

Retrospective study using Truven Health MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database, 2011 to 2015. Females 12 to 19 years old, continuously enrolled for at least 12 months before a livebirth until 2 months after, were included. Pregestational diabetes, diabetes complications (ketoacidosis, retinopathy, neuropathy, nephropathy), comorbidities, and pregnancy outcomes (preeclampsia, preterm delivery, high birthweight, cesarean delivery) were identified using claims data algorithms. Healthcare utilization and payer expenditure were tabulated per enrollee. Multivariate logistic regressions assessed pregnancy outcomes; multivariate OLS regression assessed payer expenditures.

RESULTS

About 33 502 adolescents were included. Adolescents without diabetes had pregnancy outcomes consistent with national estimates. Adolescents with uncomplicated diabetes had increased odds of preeclampsia adjusted odds ratios 2.41 (95% confidence interval 1.93-3.02), preterm delivery 1.50 (1.21-1.87), high birthweight 1.84 (1.50-2.27), and cesarean delivery 1.81 (1.52-2.15). Diabetes with ketoacidosis and/or end-organ damage had higher odds of preeclampsia 5.62 (2.77-11.41), preterm delivery 5.81 (3.00-11.25), high birthweight 2.38 (1.08-5.24), and cesarean delivery 3.43 (1.78-6.64). Adolescents with diabetes utilized significantly more outpatient and inpatient care during pregnancy. Payer expenditures increased by 45.3% (34.8-55.9%) among adolescents with diabetes and by 82.6% (49.1-116.0%) among adolescents with diabetes complicated by ketoacidosis and/or end-organ damage.

CONCLUSION

Compared with normal adolescent pregnancies, pregestational diabetes significantly increases risks of adverse pregnancy outcomes and significantly escalates healthcare utilization and cost.