Intraoperative cell salvage for obstetrics: a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial

Use of cell salvage in obstetrics in Germany: analysis of national database of 305 610 cases with peripartum haemorrhage

BACKGROUND

One of the leading causes of maternal death worldwide is severe obstetric haemorrhage after childbirth. Use of intraoperative cell salvage is strongly recommended by international guidelines on patient blood management. Recent data provide strong evidence that use of cell salvage in obstetrics is effective and safe in women with postpartum haemorrhage resulting in fewer transfusion-related adverse events and shorter hospital stay. We retrospectively analysed the use of cell salvage in bleeding women during delivery for a period of 10 yr in German hospitals.

METHODS

Data from the German Federal Statistical Office were used that covers all in-hospital birth deliveries from 2011 to 2020. Prevalence of peripartum haemorrhage (pre-, intra-, and post-partum haemorrhage), comorbidities, peripartum complications, administration of blood products, and use of cell salvage were analysed.

RESULTS

Of 6 356 046 deliveries in Germany, 305 610 women (4.8%) suffered from peripartum haemorrhage. Of all women with peripartum haemorrhage, postpartum haemorrhage was the main cause for major obstetric haemorrhage (92.33%). Cell salvage was used in only 228 (0.07%) of all women with peripartum haemorrhage (cell salvage group). In women undergoing Caesarean delivery with postpartum haemorrhage, cell salvage was used in only 216 out of 70 450 women (0.31%).

CONCLUSION

Cell salvage during peripartum haemorrhage is rarely used in Germany. There is tremendous potential for the increased use of cell salvage in peripartum haemorrhage nationwide.

Current concepts in the use of cell salvage in obstetrics

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The worldwide leading cause of maternal death is severe maternal hemorrhage. Maternal hemorrhage can be profound leading to an entire loss of blood volume. In the past two decades, Patient Blood Management has evolved to improve patient's care and safety. In surgeries with increased blood loss exceeding 500 ml, the use of cell salvage is strongly recommended in order to preserve the patient's own blood volume and to minimize the need for allogeneic red blood cell (RBC) transfusion. In this review, recent evidence and controversies of the use of cell salvage in obstetrics are discussed.

RECENT FINDINGS

Numerous medical societies as well as national and international guidelines recommend the use of cell salvage during maternal hemorrhage.

SUMMARY

Intraoperative cell salvage is a strategy to maintain the patient's own blood volume and decrease the need for allogeneic RBC transfusion. Historically, cell salvage has been avoided in the obstetric population due to concerns of iatrogenic amniotic fluid embolism (AFE) or induction of maternal alloimmunization. However, no definite case of AFE has been reported so far. Cell salvage is strongly recommended and cost-effective in patients with predictably high rates of blood loss and RBC transfusion, such as women with placenta accreta spectrum disorder. However, in order to ensure sufficient practical experience in a multiprofessional obstetric setting, liberal use of cell salvage appears advisable.

Effect of intraoperative blood transfusion during maternal cesarean section on serum electrolytes and inflammatory response plus cellular immune response: A retrospective study

Analyzing the effect of intraoperative autotransfusion on serum electrolytes, inflammatory response and cellular immune response in puerperae undergoing cesarean section. This study is a retrospective study of 60 women who underwent cesarean section in our hospital from January 2022 to January 2023. The subjects were divided into 2 groups according to the blood transfusion mode of the patients. The differences in blood transfusion volume, blood transfusion volume, serum electrolyte, inflammatory response, cellular immune function, coagulation function and prognosis were compared between the 2 groups. The intraoperative blood transfusion volume, postoperative feeding time, the activity time since getting out of bed, the time of physical recovery and hospital stay in the observation group were lower compared to those of the control group, but the intraoperative crystal infusion volume and the colloid infusion volume in the observation group were higher compared to those of the control group (P < .05). Ca2+ concentrations of the observation group and the control group were lower compared with those of their same groups before surgery (P < .05), however, there were no statistically significant differences in the comparison of the Ca2+ concentrations between the observation group and the control group (P > .05). At 1d postoperatively, IL-1β, IL-6 and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) were all higher (P < .05) and CD3+, CD4+ and CD4+/CD8+ were all lower (P < .05) in the observation group and the control group compared with those of their same groups before surgery. The IL-1 β, IL-6, and GM-CSF of the observation group were decreased compared to those of the control group (P < .05) and CD3+, CD4+, CD4+/CD8+ of the observation group were elevated compared to those of the control group (P < .05). Both autotransfusion and allogeneic blood transfusions during maternal cesarean section can attenuate the inflammatory response and have no significant inhibition of coagulation, and autotransfusion have less effect on the cellular immune response, are more effective in attenuating the inflammatory response, and significantly improve prognosis, although changes in Ca2+ concentration after transfusion require attention.

Effect of intraoperative cell salvage on coagulation function outcomes in patients with massive post-Cesarean section hemorrhage

OBJECTIVE

To examine the impact of using intraoperative cell salvage (ICS) for the restoration of coagulation function in cases of massive Post-Cesarean Section Hemorrhage (PCSH).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 60 cases of massive PCSH meeting inclusion criteria at Suqian Maternity and Children's Hospital from January 2020 to July 2022. Patients were divided into two groups: allogeneic blood transfusion group (Group A, n = 30) and ICS group (Group B, n = 30), based on transfusion methods. Blood parameters, coagulation function, and adverse reactions were assessed before (T0) and after (T1) transfusion. Patients were categorized into good prognosis (GP) and poor prognosis (PP) groups based on adverse reaction occurrence. Clinical profiles were compared between groups, and multivariate binary logistic regression analysis was employed to evaluate the factors that may affect the prognosis in women with PCSH.

RESULTS

No significant differences in routine blood parameters were observed between groups at T0 and T1 (P>0.05). At T0, no significant differences in PT, APTT, TT, or FIB were found between groups (P>0.05). Both groups showed a reduction in PT, APTT, and TT values at T1 compared to T0, with Group B experiencing a more significant decrease than Group A (P<0.05). FIB increased in both groups at T1 compared to T0, with Group B demonstrating a higher increase than Group A (P<0.05). Both groups showed increased blood pressure at T1 compared to T0, with Group B showing a more pronounced elevation than Group A (P<0.05). The occurrence of adverse reactions was significantly lower in Group B (1/30, 3.33%) compared to Group A (7/30, 23.33%) (P<0.05). Logistic regression analysis identified FIB<1.52 g/L and HR<45.35 times/min as factors associated with increased risk of unfavorable outcome in women with PCSH.

CONCLUSION

In patients experiencing significant PCSH, ICS may lead to better postoperative recovery of blood parameters, faster restoration of coagulation function, and reduced risk of adverse events compared to ABT. Moreover, early detection of coagulation function and blood gas indexes is crucial for clinicians to implement timely prevention and treatment measures.

Association between routine cell salvage use for lower segment caesarean section and post-operative iron infusion and anemia

PURPOSE

Intraoperative cell salvage is central to Patient Blood Management including for lower segment caesarean section. Prior to April 2020, we initiated intraoperative cell salvage during caesarean section based on risk assessment for hemorrhage and patient factors. As the pandemic broadened, we mandated intraoperative cell salvage to prevent peri-partum anemia and potentially reduce blood product usage. We examined the association of routine intraoperative cell salvage on maternal outcomes.

METHODS

We conducted a single-center non-overlapping before-after study of obstetric patients undergoing lower segment caesarean section in the 2 months prior to a change in practice ('usual care = selective intraoperative cell salvage', n = 203) and the 2 months following ('mandated intraoperative cell salvage', n = 228). Recovered blood was processed when a minimal autologous reinfusion volume of 100 ml was expected. Post-operative iron infusion and length of stay were modelled using logistic or linear regression, using inverse probability weighting to account for confounding.

RESULTS

More emergency lower-segment caesarean sections occurred in the Usual Care group. Compared to the Usual Care group, post-operative hemoglobin was higher and anemia cases fewer in the Mandated intraoperative cell salvage group. Rates of post-partum iron infusion were significantly lower in the Mandated intraoperative cell salvage group (OR = 0.31, 95% CI = 0.12 to 0.80, P = 0.016). No difference was found for length of stay.

CONCLUSION

Routine cell salvage provision during lower segment caesarean section was associated with a significant reduction in post-partum iron infusions, increased post-operative hemoglobin and reduced anemia prevalence.

Routine use of cell salvage during cesarean section: A practice evaluation

INTRODUCTION

Intraoperative cell salvage is a well-documented alternative to donor blood transfusion given the scarcity of donor blood pools and the incumbent risk of allogenic blood transfusion. Its use in obstetrics has been limited by concern over fetal alloimmunization due to the risk of fetomaternal hemorrhage. However, there are a paucity of studies reporting on outcome. The aim of this study was to report on a four-year experience of routine use of intraoperative cell salvage and the impact on subsequent pregnancy outcomes.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This was a tertiary center retrospective service evaluation cohort study and included all women undergoing cesarean section between December 2014 and November 2018 in a tertiary obstetric unit, identifying women who had reinfusion of intraoperative cell salvage. Data regarding index pregnancy as well as subsequent pregnancies at the hospital were extracted from hospital electronic records. Subsequent pregnancy outcome and maternal antibody status in that pregnancy were collected up until November 2022.

RESULTS

During the study period, 6656 cesarean sections were performed, with 436 (6.6%) receiving reinfusion of salvaged blood. The mean volume of reinfused blood was 396 mL. A total of 49 (0.7%) women received donor blood transfusion. Of those who received reinfusion of salvaged blood, 79 (18.1%) women had subsequent pregnancies over the eight-year follow-up period. There was one case (0.23%) of fetal cell alloimmunization demonstrated by the presence of anti-D antibodies on the subsequent pregnancy booking bloods.

CONCLUSIONS

Routine intraoperative cell salvage may be used to reduce the need for blood transfusion during cesarean section. The risk of fetal cell alloimmunization in a future pregnancy following reinfusion of intraoperative cell salvage is one in 436. Given an apparent small risk of fetal cell alloimmunization, further work is required to establish the safety profile of intraoperative cell salvage in pregnancy.

Use of cell salvage at the time of cesarean delivery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

Excess blood loss from obstetrical hemorrhage requires transfusion of donor blood, a finite resource. Intraoperative cell salvage collects a patient's own blood that has been lost during cesarean delivery and returns it to their own circulation. We performed a meta-analysis to examine the perioperative outcomes in patients receiving cell salvage at the time of cesarean delivery.

DATA SOURCES

Scopus, PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Ovid Medline, and clinicaltrials.gov were searched from database inception through October 2023.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials comparing the use of cell salvage to standard-of-care during cesarean delivery.

METHODS

Two authors independently extracted data. Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines were used for data extraction and quality assessment. The primary outcomes were the rate of donor blood transfusion and change in hemoglobin level. The secondary outcomes included transfusion reaction, amniotic fluid embolism, and length of hospital stay. Results were summarized as weighted mean difference or risk ratio with associated 95% confidence intervals. Heterogeneity was measured using Higgins I2.

RESULTS

A total of 5 randomized controlled trials (n=3361) comparing cell salvage to standard care during cesarean delivery met the inclusion criteria. Primary analysis showed a significant decrease in receiving allogeneic blood transfusion with intraoperative cell salvage use vs standard care (odds ratio, 0.32; 95% confidence interval, 0.23-0.46), with no change in hemoglobin drop (mean difference, -0.77; 95% confidence interval, -1.67 to -0.14). The secondary outcomes showed no difference in transfusion reaction (odds ratio, 0.56; 95% confidence interval, 0.06-5.59), and length of hospital stay (mean difference, -1.90; 95% confidence interval, -4.85 to 1.06). No cases of amniotic fluid embolism were reported among the 1685 patients who received cell salvage.

CONCLUSION

Use of cell salvage during cesarean delivery reduced the overall need for allogeneic blood transfusion without increasing the risk of complications, including no cases of amniotic fluid embolism.

Autologous blood transfusion reduces the requirement for perioperative allogenic blood transfusion in patients undergoing major hepatopancreatobiliary surgery: a retrospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Major hepatopancreatobiliary surgery is associated with a risk of major blood loss. The authors aimed to assess whether autologous transfusion of blood salvaged intraoperatively reduces the requirement for postoperative allogenic transfusion in this patient cohort.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this single centre study, information from a prospective database of 501 patients undergoing major hepatopancreatobiliary resection (2015-2022) was analysed. Patients who received cell salvage ( n =264) were compared with those who did not ( n =237). Nonautologous (allogenic) transfusion was assessed from the time of surgery to 5 days postsurgery, and blood loss tolerance was calculated using the Lemmens-Bernstein-Brodosky formula. Multivariate analysis was used to identify factors associated with allogenic blood transfusion avoidance.

RESULTS

32% of the lost blood volume was replaced through autologous transfusion in patients receiving cell salvage. Although the cell salvage group experienced significantly higher intraoperative blood loss compared with the noncell salvage group (1360 ml vs. 971 ml, P =0.0005), they received significantly less allogenic red blood cell units (1.5 vs. 0.92 units/patient, P =0.03). Correction of blood loss tolerance in patients who underwent cell salvage was independently associated with avoidance of allogenic transfusion (Odds ratio 0.05 (0.006-0.38) P =0.005). In a subgroup analysis, cell salvage use was associated with a significant reduction in 30-day mortality in patients undergoing major hepatectomy (6 vs. 1%, P =0.04).

CONCLUSION

Cell salvage use was associated with a reduction in allogenic blood transfusion and a reduction in 30-day mortality in patients undergoing major hepatectomy. Prospective trials are warranted to understand whether the use of cell salvage should be routinely utilised for major hepatectomy.

Comprehensive management of Jehovah's Witness in pregnancy

Jehovah's Witness (JW) is a denomination of Christianity which has many-fold higher morbidity and mortality compared to the general population as they refuse blood transfusion. Information is scanty regarding guidelines on the optimal approach to pregnant ladies of JW faith. In this review we have attempted to analyse the ways and techniques available which can be used to reduce the morbidity and mortality of these women. In antenatal care, haematological status can be optimised to reduce modifiable risk factors, namely anaemia by parenteral iron therapy from the second trimester onwards especially in patients who do not respond to oral iron therapy. In severe cases, erythropoietin serves as an effective alternative to blood transfusion. During the intrapartum period, using antifibrinolytics, cell salvage, bloodless surgical techniques, and uterine cooling for patients undergoing caesarean delivery have been proven effective. To conclude, complications of pregnant JW patients may be reduced if they comply with the preventives and targeted monitoring during the various phases of pregnancy. Further studies are warranted as this population exists as a minor group but is growing worldwide.

KEY MESSAGES

CURRENT RESEARCH QUESTIONS

Cell salvage for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion in adults undergoing elective surgery

BACKGROUND

Concerns regarding the safety and availability of transfused donor blood have prompted research into a range of techniques to minimise allogeneic transfusion requirements. Cell salvage (CS) describes the recovery of blood from the surgical field, either during or after surgery, for reinfusion back to the patient.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the effectiveness of CS in minimising perioperative allogeneic red blood cell transfusion and on other clinical outcomes in adults undergoing elective or non-urgent surgery.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, three other databases and two clinical trials registers for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews from 2009 (date of previous search) to 19 January 2023, without restrictions on language or publication status.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included RCTs assessing the use of CS compared to no CS in adults (participants aged 18 or over, or using the study's definition of adult) undergoing elective (non-urgent) surgery only.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 106 RCTs, incorporating data from 14,528 participants, reported in studies conducted in 24 countries. Results were published between 1978 and 2021. We analysed all data according to a single comparison: CS versus no CS. We separated analyses by type of surgery. The certainty of the evidence varied from very low certainty to high certainty. Reasons for downgrading the certainty included imprecision (small sample sizes below the optimal information size required to detect a difference, and wide confidence intervals), inconsistency (high statistical heterogeneity), and risk of bias (high risk from domains including sequence generation, blinding, and baseline imbalances). Aggregate analysis (all surgeries combined: primary outcome only) Very low-certainty evidence means we are uncertain if there is a reduction in the risk of allogeneic transfusion with CS (risk ratio (RR) 0.65, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.59 to 0.72; 82 RCTs, 12,520 participants). Cancer: 2 RCTs (79 participants) Very low-certainty evidence means we are uncertain whether there is a difference for mortality, blood loss, infection, or deep vein thrombosis (DVT). There were no analysable data reported for the remaining outcomes. Cardiovascular (vascular): 6 RCTs (384 participants) Very low- to low-certainty evidence means we are uncertain whether there is a difference for most outcomes. No data were reported for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Cardiovascular (no bypass): 6 RCTs (372 participants) Moderate-certainty evidence suggests there is probably a reduction in risk of allogeneic transfusion with CS (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.69 to 0.97; 3 RCTs, 169 participants). Very low- to low-certainty evidence means we are uncertain whether there is a difference for volume transfused, blood loss, mortality, re-operation for bleeding, infection, wound complication, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and hospital length of stay (LOS). There were no analysable data reported for thrombosis, DVT, pulmonary embolism (PE), and MACE. Cardiovascular (with bypass): 29 RCTs (2936 participants) Low-certainty evidence suggests there may be a reduction in the risk of allogeneic transfusion with CS, and suggests there may be no difference in risk of infection and hospital LOS. Very low- to moderate-certainty evidence means we are uncertain whether there is a reduction in volume transfused because of CS, or if there is any difference for mortality, blood loss, re-operation for bleeding, wound complication, thrombosis, DVT, PE, MACE, and MI, and probably no difference in risk of stroke. Obstetrics: 1 RCT (1356 participants) High-certainty evidence shows there is no difference between groups for mean volume of allogeneic blood transfused (mean difference (MD) -0.02 units, 95% CI -0.08 to 0.04; 1 RCT, 1349 participants). Low-certainty evidence suggests there may be no difference for risk of allogeneic transfusion. There were no analysable data reported for the remaining outcomes. Orthopaedic (hip only): 17 RCTs (2055 participants) Very low-certainty evidence means we are uncertain if CS reduces the risk of allogeneic transfusion, and the volume transfused, or if there is any difference between groups for mortality, blood loss, re-operation for bleeding, infection, wound complication, prosthetic joint infection (PJI), thrombosis, DVT, PE, stroke, and hospital LOS. There were no analysable data reported for MACE and MI. Orthopaedic (knee only): 26 RCTs (2568 participants) Very low- to low-certainty evidence means we are uncertain if CS reduces the risk of allogeneic transfusion, and the volume transfused, and whether there is a difference for blood loss, re-operation for bleeding, infection, wound complication, PJI, DVT, PE, MI, MACE, stroke, and hospital LOS. There were no analysable data reported for mortality and thrombosis. Orthopaedic (spine only): 6 RCTs (404 participants) Moderate-certainty evidence suggests there is probably a reduction in the need for allogeneic transfusion with CS (RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.63; 3 RCTs, 194 participants). Very low- to moderate-certainty evidence suggests there may be no difference for volume transfused, blood loss, infection, wound complication, and PE. There were no analysable data reported for mortality, re-operation for bleeding, PJI, thrombosis, DVT, MACE, MI, stroke, and hospital LOS. Orthopaedic (mixed): 14 RCTs (4374 participants) Very low- to low-certainty evidence means we are uncertain if there is a reduction in the need for allogeneic transfusion with CS, or if there is any difference between groups for volume transfused, mortality, blood loss, infection, wound complication, PJI, thrombosis, DVT, MI, and hospital LOS. There were no analysable data reported for re-operation for bleeding, MACE, and stroke.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In some types of elective surgery, cell salvage may reduce the need for and volume of allogeneic transfusion, alongside evidence of no difference in adverse events, when compared to no cell salvage. Further research is required to establish why other surgeries show no benefit from CS, through further analysis of the current evidence. More large RCTs in under-reported specialities are needed to expand the evidence base for exploring the impact of CS.

Management of severe peri-operative bleeding: Guidelines from the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care: Second update 2022

BACKGROUND

Management of peri-operative bleeding is complex and involves multiple assessment tools and strategies to ensure optimal patient care with the goal of reducing morbidity and mortality. These updated guidelines from the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (ESAIC) aim to provide an evidence-based set of recommendations for healthcare professionals to help ensure improved clinical management.

DESIGN

A systematic literature search from 2015 to 2021 of several electronic databases was performed without language restrictions. Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) was used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies and to formulate recommendations. A Delphi methodology was used to prepare a clinical practice guideline.

RESULTS

These searches identified 137 999 articles. All articles were assessed, and the existing 2017 guidelines were revised to incorporate new evidence. Sixteen recommendations derived from the systematic literature search, and four clinical guidances retained from previous ESAIC guidelines were formulated. Using the Delphi process on 253 sentences of guidance, strong consensus (>90% agreement) was achieved in 97% and consensus (75 to 90% agreement) in 3%.

DISCUSSION

Peri-operative bleeding management encompasses the patient's journey from the pre-operative state through the postoperative period. Along this journey, many features of the patient's pre-operative coagulation status, underlying comorbidities, general health and the procedures that they are undergoing need to be taken into account. Due to the many important aspects in peri-operative nontrauma bleeding management, guidance as to how best approach and treat each individual patient are key. Understanding which therapeutic approaches are most valuable at each timepoint can only enhance patient care, ensuring the best outcomes by reducing blood loss and, therefore, overall morbidity and mortality.

CONCLUSION

All healthcare professionals involved in the management of patients at risk for surgical bleeding should be aware of the current therapeutic options and approaches that are available to them. These guidelines aim to provide specific guidance for bleeding management in a variety of clinical situations.

Patient Blood Management programs for post-partum hemorrhage

Patient blood management (PBM) strategies aim to maintain hemoglobin concentration, optimize hemostasis, and minimize blood loss to improve patient outcomes. Because postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is a leading cause of maternal mortality and blood product utilization, PBM principles can be applied in its therapeutic approach. First, pre-operative identification of risk factors for PPH and identification of peri-delivery anemia should be conducted. Iron supplementation should be used to optimize hemoglobin concentration before delivery; it can also be used to treat anemia in the postpartum period after severe PPH. Both acute normovolemic hemodilution and intraoperative cell salvage can be effective techniques to reduce allogeneic blood transfusion during or after surgical procedures. Furthermore, these strategies appear to be safe when used in the pregnant population.

Use of cell salvage and HBOC-201 in a pregnant Jehovah's Witness with sickle beta+thalassaemia undergoing emergency caesarean section

Patients with severe anaemia who refuse or cannot safely receive red cell transfusion present challenges during pregnancy, delivery and the postpartum period. Strategies including HBOC-201 (Hemopure) and intraoperative use of cell salvage have been used in non-pregnant patients to improve oxygen carrying capacity; however, these products pose unique risks in pregnant patients, those with sickle cell disease (SCD) and those undergoing caesarean section (C-section). We describe a case of a pregnant sickle beta+thalasasaemia patient who presented at 27 weeks gestation with pre-eclampsia and severe anaemia. As a Jehovah's Witness, she declined allogenic blood transfusion. The patient successfully underwent emergent C-section with cell salvage and received HBOC-201 immediately after delivery, during the operative procedure. To our knowledge, this is the first published report documenting a Jehovah's Witness patient with SCD who successfully received cell salvage and then HBOC-201 immediately postdelivery.

Intraoperative cell salvage as an effective intervention for postpartum hemorrhage—Evidence from a prospective randomized controlled trial

Background

Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is one of the leading causes of maternal mortality. Promptly recovering blood loss is critical for PPH. Intraoperative cell salvage (ICS) is a method to collect and process red blood cells (RBCs) from the blood lost during surgery and transfuse them to the patient’s circulation during or immediately after surgery. Its effectiveness in reducing the demand for allogeneic blood transfusion has been proven, but its effectiveness and safety as a sole treatment for PPH during Cesarean sections are unclear. This is particularly important for patients who cannot or do not want to accept allogeneic blood transfusion.

Materials and methods

In this prospective randomized controlled study, patients with high risks of PPH were randomized into the ICS group or the control group, receiving ICS or allogeneic RBC transfusion if their hemoglobin level was less than 80 g/L during operation. Data collected include clinical examination, blood cell count, hemoglobin level, coagulation function, and plasma levels of fetal hemoglobin, tissue factor, and alpha-fetoprotein before and after fetal delivery and 0, 2, and 12 h after treatment. Adverse events were recorded.

Results

A total of 130 patients were enrolled, aged 33 ± 1 years with a mean gestation period of 37 ± 1 week. The most common cause of Cesarean section was placenta previa, followed by twin pregnancy, scarred uterus, preeclampsia, placental abruption, fetal distress, and placenta accreta spectrum. Bleeding amount was similar between the two groups. The ICS group, compared to controls, had more efficient increases in levels of hemoglobin, RBC, and hematocrit (all p < 0.05). Coagulation function was maintained in the ICS group but reduced in controls 24 h after transfusion, indicated by significantly reduced fibrinogen level and prolonged prothrombin time (PT), thrombin time (TT), and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) (all p < 0.05). There was a transient but significant decrease in plasma tissue factor and alpha-fetoprotein levels and an increase in plasma fetal hemoglobin level with ICS treatment in the postpartum period. No adverse event occurred with ICS intervention.

Conclusion

ICS is an effective and safe intervention for patients with a high risk of PPH during elective or emergency Cesarean section. It can effectively clear tissue factors and alpha-fetoprotein but not fetal hemoglobin.

Effect of intraoperative cell rescue on bleeding related indexes after cesarean section

BACKGROUND

Obstetric hemorrhage is the leading cause of maternal mortality globally, especially in China. The key to a successful rescue is immediate and rapid blood transfusion. Autotransfusion has become an integral part of clinical blood transfusion, with intraoperative cell salvage (IOCS) being the most widely used.

AIM

To investigate the application of IOCS in cesarean section.

METHODS

A total of 87 patients who underwent cesarean section and blood transfusion in our hospital from March 2015 to June 2020 were included in this prospective controlled study. They were divided into the observation (43 cases) and control (44 cases) groups using the random number table method. The patients in both groups underwent lower-segment cesarean section. The patients in the control group were treated with traditional allogeneic blood transfusion, whereas those in the observation group were treated with IOCS. Hemorheology [Red blood cell count, platelet volume, and fibrinogen (FIB)] and coagulation function (partial prothrombin time, prothrombin time (PT), platelet count, and activated coagula-tion time) were measured before and 24 h after transfusion. In the two groups, adverse reactions, such as choking and dyspnea, within 2 h after cesarean section were observed.

RESULTS

Before and after transfusion, no significant differences in hemorheology and coagulation function indices between the two groups were observed (P > 0.05). About 24 h after transfusion, the erythrocyte count, platelet ratio, and FIB value significantly decreased in the two groups (P < 0.05); the PLT value significantly decreased in the two groups; the activated partial thromboplastin time, PT, and activated clotting time significantly increased in the two groups (P < 0.05); and no statistical differences were observed in hemorheology and coagulation function indices between the two groups (P > 0.05). Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

In patients undergoing cesarean section, intraoperative cell salvage has a minimum effect on hemorheology and coagulation function and does not increase the risk of amniotic fluid embolism.

Obstetrical Hemorrhage

Obstetric hemorrhage is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. Prevention includes identifying patients with risk factors and actively managing the third stage of labor. The anesthesiologist should be ready to manage hemorrhage with general strategies as well as strategies tailored to the specific cause of hemorrhage. Both neuraxial anesthesia and general anesthesia are appropriate in different situations. Treatments proven to be effective include increasing the oxytocin infusion, administering tranexamic acid early, guiding transfusion with point-of-care tests, and using cell salvage. Utilization of protocols and checklists within systems that encourage effective communication between teams should be implemented.

Anemia in Pregnancy: ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 233

Anemia, the most common hematologic abnormality, is a reduction in the concentration of erythrocytes or hemoglobin in blood. The two most common causes of anemia in pregnancy and the puerperium are iron deficiency and acute blood loss. Iron requirements increase during pregnancy, and a failure to maintain sufficient levels of iron may result in adverse maternal-fetal consequences. The purpose of this document is to provide a brief overview of the causes of anemia in pregnancy, review iron requirements, and provide recommendations for screening and clinical management of anemia during pregnancy.