1
|
Kloka JA, Friedrichson B, Jasny T, Blum LV, Choorapoikayil S, Old O, Zacharowski K, Neef V. Anaemia and red blood cell transfusion in women with placenta accreta spectrum: an analysis of 38,060 cases. Sci Rep 2024; 14:4999. [PMID: 38424178 PMCID: PMC10904858 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-55531-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2023] [Accepted: 02/24/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) has become a significant life-threatening issue due to its increased incidence and associated morbidity and mortality. Pregnancy is often associated with states of anaemia, and severe maternal haemorrhage represents a major risk factor for red blood cell (RBC) transfusion. The present study retrospectively analyzed the prevalence of anaemia, transfusion requirements and outcome in women with PAS. Using data from the German Statistical Office pregnant patients with deliveries hospitalized between January 2012 and December 2021 were included. Primary outcome was the prevalence of anemia and administration of RBCs. Secondary outcome were complications in women with PAS who received RBC transfusion. In total 6,493,606 pregnant women were analyzed, of which 38,060 (0.59%) were diagnosed with PAS. The rate of anaemia during pregnancy (60.36 vs. 23.25%; p < 0.0001), postpartum haemorrhage (47.08 vs. 4.41%; p < 0.0001) and RBC transfusion rate (14.68% vs. 0.72%; p < 0.0001) were higher in women with PAS compared to women without PAS. Women with PAS who had bleeding and transfusion experienced significantly more peripartum complications than those who did not. A multiple logistic regression revealed that the probability for RBC transfusion in all pregnant women was positively associated with anaemia (OR 21.96 (95% CI 21.36-22.58)). In women with PAS, RBC transfusion was positively associated with the presence of renal failure (OR 11.27 (95% CI 9.35-13.57)) and congestive heart failure (OR 6.02 (95% CI (5.2-7.07)). Early anaemia management prior to delivery as well as blood conservation strategies are crucial in women diagnosed with PAS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Andreas Kloka
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Theodor-Stern Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Benjamin Friedrichson
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Theodor-Stern Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Thomas Jasny
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Theodor-Stern Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Lea Valeska Blum
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Theodor-Stern Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Suma Choorapoikayil
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Theodor-Stern Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Oliver Old
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Theodor-Stern Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Kai Zacharowski
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Theodor-Stern Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Vanessa Neef
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Theodor-Stern Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kugler S, Hahnefeld L, Kloka JA, Ginzel S, Nürenberg-Goloub E, Zinn S, Vehreschild MJ, Zacharowski K, Lindau S, Ullrich E, Burmeister J, Kohlhammer J, Schwäble J, Gurke R, Dorochow E, Bennett A, Dauth S, Campe J, Knape T, Laux V, Kannt A, Köhm M, Geisslinger G, Resch E, Behrens F. Short-term predictor for COVID-19 severity from a longitudinal multi-omics study for practical application in intensive care units. Talanta 2024; 268:125295. [PMID: 37866305 DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2023.125295] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2023] [Revised: 09/29/2023] [Accepted: 10/06/2023] [Indexed: 10/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The COVID-19 pandemic challenged the management of technical and human resources in intensive care units (ICU) across the world. Several long-term predictors for COVID-19 disease progression have been discovered. However, predictors to support short-term planning of resources and medication that can be translated to future pandemics are still missing. A workflow was established to identify a predictor for short-term COVID-19 disease progression in the acute phase of intensive care patients to support clinical decision-making. METHODS Thirty-two patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection were recruited on admission to the ICU and clinical data collected. During their hospitalization, plasma samples were acquired from each patient on multiple occasions, excepting one patient for which only one time point was possible, and the proteome (Inflammation, Immune Response and Organ Damage panels from Olink® Target 96), metabolome and lipidome (flow injection analysis and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry) analyzed for each sample. Patient visits were grouped according to changes in disease severity based on their respiratory and organ function, and evaluated using a combination of statistical analysis and machine learning. The resulting short-term predictor from this multi-omics approach was compared to the human assessment of disease progression. Furthermore, the potential markers were compared to the baseline levels of 50 healthy subjects with no known SARS-CoV-2 or other viral infections. RESULTS A total of 124 clinical parameters, 271 proteins and 782 unique metabolites and lipids were assessed. The dimensionality of the dataset was reduced, selecting 47 from the 1177 parameters available following down-selection, to build the machine learning model. Subsequently, two proteins (C-C motif chemokine 7 (CCL7) and carbonic anhydrase 14 (CA14)) and one lipid (hexosylceramide 18:2; O2/20:0) were linked to disease progression in the studied SARS-CoV-2 infections. Thus, a predictor delivering the prognosis of an upcoming worsening of the patient's condition up to five days in advance with a reasonable accuracy (79 % three days prior to event, 84 % four to five days prior to event) was found. Interestingly, the predictor's performance was complementary to the clinicians' capabilities to foresee a worsening of a patient. CONCLUSION This study presents a workflow to identify omics-based biomarkers to support clinical decision-making and resource management in the ICU. This was successfully applied to develop a short-term predictor for aggravation of COVID-19 symptoms. The applied methods can be adapted for future small cohort studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabine Kugler
- Fraunhofer Cluster of Excellence Immune Mediated Diseases CIMD, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596, Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Fraunhofer Institute for Intelligent Analysis and Information Systems IAIS, Schloss Birlinghoven 1, St. Augustin, Germany
| | - Lisa Hahnefeld
- Fraunhofer Cluster of Excellence Immune Mediated Diseases CIMD, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596, Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Fraunhofer Institute for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology ITMP, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
| | - Jan Andreas Kloka
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Clinic for Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Sebastian Ginzel
- Fraunhofer Cluster of Excellence Immune Mediated Diseases CIMD, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596, Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Fraunhofer Institute for Intelligent Analysis and Information Systems IAIS, Schloss Birlinghoven 1, St. Augustin, Germany
| | - Elina Nürenberg-Goloub
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Clinic for Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Sebastian Zinn
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Clinic for Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Fraunhofer Leistungszentrum TheraNova, Theodor-Stern-Kai 6, 60596, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Maria Jgt Vehreschild
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Department of Internal Medicine, Infectious Diseases, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Kai Zacharowski
- Fraunhofer Institute for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology ITMP, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596, Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Clinic for Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Simone Lindau
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Clinic for Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Evelyn Ullrich
- University Cancer Center Frankfurt (UCT), University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany; Frankfurt Cancer Institute (FCI), Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Goethe University Frankfurt, Department of Pediatrics, Experimental Immunology and Cell Therapy, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Jan Burmeister
- Fraunhofer Institute for Computer Graphics Research IGD, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Jörn Kohlhammer
- Fraunhofer Institute for Computer Graphics Research IGD, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Joachim Schwäble
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Institute of Transfusion Medicine and Immunohematology, German Red Cross Blood Transfusion Service Baden-Württemberg, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Robert Gurke
- Fraunhofer Cluster of Excellence Immune Mediated Diseases CIMD, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596, Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Fraunhofer Institute for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology ITMP, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Erika Dorochow
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Alexandre Bennett
- Fraunhofer Cluster of Excellence Immune Mediated Diseases CIMD, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596, Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Fraunhofer Institute for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology ITMP, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Stephanie Dauth
- Fraunhofer Cluster of Excellence Immune Mediated Diseases CIMD, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596, Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Fraunhofer Institute for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology ITMP, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Julia Campe
- Goethe University Frankfurt, Department of Pediatrics, Experimental Immunology and Cell Therapy, Frankfurt, Germany; Goethe University Frankfurt, Biological Sciences, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Tilo Knape
- Fraunhofer Cluster of Excellence Immune Mediated Diseases CIMD, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596, Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Fraunhofer Institute for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology ITMP, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Volker Laux
- Fraunhofer Institute for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology ITMP, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Aimo Kannt
- Fraunhofer Cluster of Excellence Immune Mediated Diseases CIMD, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596, Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Fraunhofer Institute for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology ITMP, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596, Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Fraunhofer Leistungszentrum TheraNova, Theodor-Stern-Kai 6, 60596, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Michaela Köhm
- Fraunhofer Cluster of Excellence Immune Mediated Diseases CIMD, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596, Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Fraunhofer Institute for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology ITMP, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596, Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Rheumatology, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Gerd Geisslinger
- Fraunhofer Cluster of Excellence Immune Mediated Diseases CIMD, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596, Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Fraunhofer Institute for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology ITMP, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Eduard Resch
- Fraunhofer Cluster of Excellence Immune Mediated Diseases CIMD, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596, Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Fraunhofer Institute for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology ITMP, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Frank Behrens
- Fraunhofer Cluster of Excellence Immune Mediated Diseases CIMD, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596, Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Fraunhofer Institute for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology ITMP, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596, Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Rheumatology, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Neef V, Friedrichson B, Jasny T, Old O, Raimann FJ, Choorapoikayil S, Steinbicker AU, Meybohm P, Zacharowski K, Kloka JA. Use of cell salvage in obstetrics in Germany: analysis of national database of 305 610 cases with peripartum haemorrhage. Br J Anaesth 2024:S0007-0912(23)00730-4. [PMID: 38267339 DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2023.12.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2023] [Revised: 12/11/2023] [Accepted: 12/12/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND One of the leading causes of maternal death worldwide is severe obstetric haemorrhage after childbirth. Use of intraoperative cell salvage is strongly recommended by international guidelines on patient blood management. Recent data provide strong evidence that use of cell salvage in obstetrics is effective and safe in women with postpartum haemorrhage resulting in fewer transfusion-related adverse events and shorter hospital stay. We retrospectively analysed the use of cell salvage in bleeding women during delivery for a period of 10 yr in German hospitals. METHODS Data from the German Federal Statistical Office were used that covers all in-hospital birth deliveries from 2011 to 2020. Prevalence of peripartum haemorrhage (pre-, intra-, and post-partum haemorrhage), comorbidities, peripartum complications, administration of blood products, and use of cell salvage were analysed. RESULTS Of 6 356 046 deliveries in Germany, 305 610 women (4.8%) suffered from peripartum haemorrhage. Of all women with peripartum haemorrhage, postpartum haemorrhage was the main cause for major obstetric haemorrhage (92.33%). Cell salvage was used in only 228 (0.07%) of all women with peripartum haemorrhage (cell salvage group). In women undergoing Caesarean delivery with postpartum haemorrhage, cell salvage was used in only 216 out of 70 450 women (0.31%). CONCLUSION Cell salvage during peripartum haemorrhage is rarely used in Germany. There is tremendous potential for the increased use of cell salvage in peripartum haemorrhage nationwide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vanessa Neef
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hopsital, Department of Anaesthesiologie, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, Frankfurt, Germany.
| | - Benjamin Friedrichson
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hopsital, Department of Anaesthesiologie, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Thomas Jasny
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hopsital, Department of Anaesthesiologie, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Oliver Old
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hopsital, Department of Anaesthesiologie, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Florian J Raimann
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hopsital, Department of Anaesthesiologie, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Suma Choorapoikayil
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hopsital, Department of Anaesthesiologie, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Andrea U Steinbicker
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hopsital, Department of Anaesthesiologie, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Patrick Meybohm
- University Hospital Würzburg, Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency and Pain Medicine, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Kai Zacharowski
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hopsital, Department of Anaesthesiologie, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Jan Andreas Kloka
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hopsital, Department of Anaesthesiologie, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, Frankfurt, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kloka JA, Holtmann SC, Nürenberg-Goloub E, Piekarski F, Zacharowski K, Friedrichson B. Expectations of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Professionals Toward Artificial Intelligence: Observational Study. JMIR Form Res 2023; 7:e43896. [PMID: 37307038 DOI: 10.2196/43896] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2022] [Revised: 03/27/2023] [Accepted: 04/19/2023] [Indexed: 06/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Artificial intelligence (AI) applications offer numerous opportunities to improve health care. To be used in the intensive care unit, AI must meet the needs of staff, and potential barriers must be addressed through joint action by all stakeholders. It is thus critical to assess the needs and concerns of anesthesiologists and intensive care physicians related to AI in health care throughout Europe. OBJECTIVE This Europe-wide, cross-sectional observational study investigates how potential users of AI systems in anesthesiology and intensive care assess the opportunities and risks of the new technology. The web-based questionnaire was based on the established analytic model of acceptance of innovations by Rogers to record 5 stages of innovation acceptance. METHODS The questionnaire was sent twice in 2 months (March 11, 2021, and November 5, 2021) through the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (ESAIC) member email distribution list. A total of 9294 ESAIC members were reached, of whom 728 filled out the questionnaire (response rate 728/9294, 8%). Due to missing data, 27 questionnaires were excluded. The analyses were conducted with 701 participants. RESULTS A total of 701 questionnaires (female: n=299, 42%) were analyzed. Overall, 265 (37.8%) of the participants have been in contact with AI and evaluated the benefits of this technology higher (mean 3.22, SD 0.39) than participants who stated no previous contact (mean 3.01, SD 0.48). Physicians see the most benefits of AI application in early warning systems (335/701, 48% strongly agreed, and 358/701, 51% agreed). Major potential disadvantages were technical problems (236/701, 34% strongly agreed, and 410/701, 58% agreed) and handling difficulties (126/701, 18% strongly agreed, and 462/701, 66% agreed), both of which could be addressed by Europe-wide digitalization and education. In addition, the lack of a secure legal basis for the research and use of medical AI in the European Union leads doctors to expect problems with legal liability (186/701, 27% strongly agreed, and 374/701, 53% agreed) and data protection (148/701, 21% strongly agreed, and 343/701, 49% agreed). CONCLUSIONS Anesthesiologists and intensive care personnel are open to AI applications in their professional field and expect numerous benefits for staff and patients. Regional differences in the digitalization of the private sector are not reflected in the acceptance of AI among health care professionals. Physicians anticipate technical difficulties and lack a stable legal basis for the use of AI. Training for medical staff could increase the benefits of AI in professional medicine. Therefore, we suggest that the development and implementation of AI in health care require a solid technical, legal, and ethical basis, as well as adequate education and training of users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Andreas Kloka
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Sophie C Holtmann
- Chair for Special Education V - Education for People with Behavioural Disorders, Faculty of Human Sciences, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - Elina Nürenberg-Goloub
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Florian Piekarski
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Kai Zacharowski
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Benjamin Friedrichson
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kloka JA, Friedrichson B, Wülfroth P, Henning R, Zacharowski K. Microvascular Leakage as Therapeutic Target for Ischemia and Reperfusion Injury. Cells 2023; 12:1345. [PMID: 37408180 DOI: 10.3390/cells12101345] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2023] [Revised: 05/03/2023] [Accepted: 05/07/2023] [Indexed: 07/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Reperfusion injury is a very common complication of various indicated therapies such as the re-opening of vessels in the myocardium or brain as well as reflow in hemodynamic shutdown (cardiac arrest, severe trauma, aortic cross-clamping). The treatment and prevention of reperfusion injury has therefore been a topic of immense interest in terms of mechanistic understanding, the exploration of interventions in animal models and in the clinical setting in major prospective studies. While a wealth of encouraging results has been obtained in the lab, the translation into clinical success has met with mixed outcomes at best. Considering the still very high medical need, progress continues to be urgently needed. Multi-target approaches rationally linking interference with pathophysiological pathways as well as a renewed focus on aspects of microvascular dysfunction, especially on the role of microvascular leakage, are likely to provide new insights.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Andreas Kloka
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Benjamin Friedrichson
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany
| | | | | | - Kai Zacharowski
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Blum LV, Zierentz P, Hof L, Kloka JA, Messroghli L, Zacharowski K, Meybohm P, Choorapoikayil S. The impact of intravenous iron supplementation in elderly patients undergoing major surgery. BMC Geriatr 2022; 22:293. [PMID: 35392839 PMCID: PMC8988356 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-022-02983-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2021] [Accepted: 03/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Age and preoperative anaemia are risk factors for poor surgical outcome and blood transfusion. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of iron supplementation in iron-deficient (ID) elderly patients undergoing major surgery. METHOD In this single-centre observational study, patients ≥ 65 years undergoing major surgery were screened for anaemia and ID. Patients were assigned to the following groups: A- (no anaemia); A-,ID+,T+ (no anaemia, iron-deficient, intravenous iron supplementation); A+ (anaemia); and A+,ID+,T+ (anaemia, iron-deficient, intravenous iron supplementation). RESULTS Of 4,381 patients screened at the anaemia walk-in clinic, 2,381 (54%) patients were ≥ 65 years old and 2,191 cases were included in analysis. The ID prevalence was 63% in patients with haemoglobin (Hb) < 8 g/dl, 47.2% in patients with Hb from 8.0 to 8.9 g/dl, and 44.3% in patients with Hb from 9 to 9.9 g/dl. In severely anaemic patients, an Hb increase of 0.6 (0.4; 1.2) and 1.2 (0.7; 1.6) g/dl was detected with iron supplementation 6-10 and > 10 days before surgery, respectively. Hb increased by 0 (-0.1; 0) g/dl with iron supplementation 1-5 days before surgery, 0.2 (-0.1; 0.5) g/dl with iron supplementation 6-10 days before surgery, and 0.2 (-0.2; 1.1) g/dl with supplementation > 10 days before surgery (p < 0.001 for 1-5 vs. 6-10 days). Overall, 58% of A+,ID+,T+ patients showed an Hb increase of > 0.5 g/dl. The number of transfused red blood cell units was significantly lower in patients supplemented with iron (0 (0; 3)) compared to non-treated anaemic patients (1 (0; 4)) (p = 0.03). Patients with iron supplementation > 6 days before surgery achieved mobility 2 days earlier than patients with iron supplementation < 6 days. CONCLUSIONS Intravenous iron supplementation increases Hb level and thereby reduces blood transfusion rate in elderly surgical patients with ID anaemia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lea Valeska Blum
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany.
| | - Philipp Zierentz
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Lotta Hof
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Jan Andreas Kloka
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Leila Messroghli
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Kai Zacharowski
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Patrick Meybohm
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - Suma Choorapoikayil
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany
| |
Collapse
|