1
|
Devi PU, Beake S, Chang YS. Women's views and experiences of breastfeeding during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: A systematic review of qualitative evidence. MATERNAL & CHILD NUTRITION 2024:e13708. [PMID: 39120558 DOI: 10.1111/mcn.13708] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2024] [Revised: 07/17/2024] [Accepted: 07/22/2024] [Indexed: 08/10/2024]
Abstract
The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic affected breastfeeding women in various ways. Understanding their experiences during the pandemic is crucial for informing actionable recommendations, evidence-based strategies and future policies to support breastfeeding during global pandemics. This review aimed to synthesise qualitative evidence on women's breastfeeding perceptions, experiences and support needs during the pandemic. The Joanna Briggs Institute's (JBI) guidelines on systematic reviews of qualitative evidence were followed. MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and Web of Science Core Collection databases were searched. Methodological quality of included papers was assessed using JBI's checklist for qualitative research. The synthesised findings were generated using JBI's meta-aggregation approach. The JBI ConQual process was used to rank each synthesised finding. Fifty-two papers were included. The synthesised findings included: (1) women's awareness and commitment to breastfeeding during the pandemic, (2) the multifaceted breastfeeding experiences of women during the pandemic, (3) breastfeeding practices and challenges for working women, (4) professional support during the pandemic: navigating breastfeeding in an evolving health care context and (5) family and peer support groups during the challenging times of the pandemic. Breastfeeding women require clear information, accessible in-person lactation support, family emotional support, food security and protection of psychological well-being. The review reported diverse breastfeeding experiences, from social support challenges to positive aspects like remote work. Breastfeeding support and lactation consultants should be considered as essential services in future pandemics. Food security is crucial for breastfeeding households. Lactation services could prioritise face-to-face consultations for physical challenges and providing online informational support. Future research could explore innovative breastfeeding education strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Padma Uma Devi
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Sarah Beake
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Yan-Shing Chang
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abdul-Fatah A, Bezanson M, Lopez Steven S, Tippins E, Jones S, MacDonald H, Ysseldyk R. COVID-19 Public Health Restrictions and New Mothers' Mental Health: A Qualitative Scoping Review. QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH 2024:10497323241251984. [PMID: 39030700 DOI: 10.1177/10497323241251984] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/21/2024]
Abstract
Public health restrictions to protect physical health during the COVID-19 pandemic had unintended effects on mental health, which may have disproportionately affected some potentially vulnerable groups. This scoping review of qualitative research provides a narrative synthesis of new mothers' perspectives on their mental health during COVID-19 pandemic restrictions through pregnancy to the postpartum period. Database searches in PubMed, CINAHL, and PsycINFO sought primary research studies published until February 2023, which focused on new mothers' self-perceived mental health during the pandemic (N = 55). Our synthesis found that new mothers' mental health was impacted by general public health restrictions resulting in isolation from family and friends, a lack of community support, and impacts on the immediate family. However, public health restrictions specific to maternal and infant healthcare were most often found to negatively impact maternal mental health, namely, hospital policies prohibiting the presence of birthing partners and in-person care for their infants. This review of qualitative research adds depth to previous reviews that have solely examined the quantitative associations between COVID-19 public health restrictions and new mothers' mental health. Here, our review demonstrates the array of adverse impacts of COVID-19 public health restrictions on new mothers' mental health throughout pregnancy into the postpartum period, as reported by new mothers. These findings may be beneficial for policy makers in future public health emergency planning when evaluating the impacts and unintended consequences of public health restrictions on new mothers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Michelle Bezanson
- Department of Health Sciences, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | | | - Emily Tippins
- Department of Health Sciences, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Sarah Jones
- Department of Health Sciences, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | | | - Renate Ysseldyk
- Department of Health Sciences, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jackson L, Davies SM, Gaspar M, Podkujko A, Harrold JA, Pascalis LDE, Fallon V, Soulsby LK, Silverio SA. The social and healthcare professional support drawn upon by women antenatally during the COVID-19 pandemic: A recurrent, cross-sectional, thematic analysis. Midwifery 2024; 133:103995. [PMID: 38608542 DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2024.103995] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2023] [Revised: 04/06/2024] [Accepted: 04/08/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore antenatal experiences of social and healthcare professional support during different phases of social distancing restriction implementation in the UK. DESIGN Semi-structured interviews were conducted via telephone or video-conferencing software between 13 July 2020 - 2 September 2020. Interviews were transcribed and a recurrent, cross-sectional, thematic analysis was conducted. PARTICIPANTS Twelve antenatal women were interviewed during UK social distancing restrictions (Timepoint 1; T1) and a separate sample of twelve women were interviewed in the initial easing of these restrictions (Timepoint 2; T2). FINDINGS T1 themes were: 'Maternity care as non-essential' and 'Pregnancy is cancelled'. T2 themes were: 'Technology is a polarised tool' and 'Clinically vulnerable, or not clinically vulnerable? That is the question'. KEY CONCLUSIONS At T1, anxieties were ascribed to the exclusion of partners from routine care, and to perceived insensitivity and aggression from the public. For T2, insufficient Governmental transparency led to disillusionment, confusion, and anger. Covert workplace discrimination also caused distress at T2. Across timepoints: deteriorated mental wellbeing was attributed to depleted opportunities to interact socially and scaled back maternity care. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Recommendations are made to: protect maternal autonomy; improve quality of mental health and routine care signposting; prioritise parental community support in the re-opening of 'non-essential' services; prioritise the option for face-to-face appointments when safe and legal; and protecting the rights of working mothers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leanne Jackson
- Department of Psychology, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, England
| | - Siân M Davies
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Health, Liverpool John Moores University, England; Department of Women & Children's Health, School of Life Course & Population Sciences, King's College London, England
| | - Monic Gaspar
- Department of Psychology, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, England
| | - Anastasija Podkujko
- Department of Psychology, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, England
| | - Joanne A Harrold
- Department of Psychology, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, England
| | - Leonardo DE Pascalis
- Department of Psychology, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, England
| | - Victoria Fallon
- Department of Psychology, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, England
| | - Laura K Soulsby
- Department of Psychology, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, England
| | - Sergio A Silverio
- Department of Women & Children's Health, School of Life Course & Population Sciences, King's College London, England.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tan A, Blair A, Homer CS, Digby R, Vogel JP, Bucknall T. Pregnant and postpartum women's experiences of the indirect impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic in high-income countries: a qualitative evidence synthesis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2024; 24:262. [PMID: 38605319 PMCID: PMC11007880 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-024-06439-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2023] [Accepted: 03/24/2024] [Indexed: 04/13/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pregnant and postpartum women's experiences of the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as the emotional and psychosocial impact of COVID-19 on perinatal health, has been well-documented across high-income countries. Increased anxiety and fear, isolation, as well as a disrupted pregnancy and postnatal period are widely described in many studies. The aim of this study was to explore, describe and synthesise studies that addressed the experiences of pregnant and postpartum women in high-income countries during the first two years of the pandemic. METHODS A qualitative evidence synthesis of studies relating to women's experiences in high-income countries during the pandemic were included. Two reviewers extracted the data using a thematic synthesis approach and NVivo 20 software. The GRADE-CERQual (Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research) was used to assess confidence in review findings. RESULTS Sixty-eight studies were eligible and subjected to a sampling framework to ensure data richness. In total, 36 sampled studies contributed to the development of themes, sub-themes and review findings. There were six over-arching themes: (1) dealing with public health restrictions; (2) navigating changing health policies; (3) adapting to alternative ways of receiving social support; (4) dealing with impacts on their own mental health; (5) managing the new and changing information; and (6) being resilient and optimistic. Seventeen review findings were developed under these themes with high to moderate confidence according to the GRADE-CERQual assessment. CONCLUSIONS The findings from this synthesis offer different strategies for practice and policy makers to better support women, babies and their families in future emergency responses. These strategies include optimising care delivery, enhancing communication, and supporting social and mental wellbeing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annie Tan
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
- Maternal, Child and Adolescent Health Program, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
- Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research, Institute of Health Transformation, Geelong, Australia.
| | - Amanda Blair
- Maternal, Child and Adolescent Health Program, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Caroline Se Homer
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
- Maternal, Child and Adolescent Health Program, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Robin Digby
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
- Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research, Institute of Health Transformation, Geelong, Australia
- Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Joshua P Vogel
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
- Maternal, Child and Adolescent Health Program, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Tracey Bucknall
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
- Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research, Institute of Health Transformation, Geelong, Australia
- Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Biringer A, Morson N, Walji S, Tregaskiss N, Merritt S, Makuwaza T, Forte M. Recreating the village: the patient experience with a hybrid model of Group Perinatal Care (GPPC) in an academic family health team. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2024; 24:227. [PMID: 38566095 PMCID: PMC10986064 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-024-06405-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2023] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Group prenatal care (GPC) has been shown to have a positive impact on social support, patient knowledge and preparedness for birth. We developed an interprofessional hybrid model of care whereby the group perinatal care (GPPC) component was co-facilitated by midwives (MW) and family medicine residents (FMR) and alternating individual visits were provided by family physicians (FP's) within our academic family health team (FHT) In this qualitative study, we sought to explore the impact of this program and how it supports patients through pregnancy and the early newborn period. METHODS Qualitative study that was conducted using semi-structured telephone interviews with 18 participants who had completed GPPC in the Mount Sinai Academic Family Health Team in Toronto, Canada and delivered between November 2016 and October 2018. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis was conducted by team members using grounded theory. RESULTS Four over-arching themes emerged from the data: (i) Participants highly valued information they received from multiple trusted sources, (ii) Participants felt well cared for by the collaborative and coordinated interprofessional team, (iii) The design of GPPC enabled a shared experience, allowing for increased support of the pregnant person, and (iv) GPPC facilitated a supportive transition into the community which positively impacted participants' emotional well- being. CONCLUSIONS The four constructs of social support (emotional, informational, instrumental and appraisal) were central to the value that participants found in GPPC. This support from the team of healthcare providers, peers and partners had a positive impact on participants' mental health and helped them face the challenges of their transition to parenthood.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Biringer
- Ray D. Wolfe Department of Family Medicine, Sinai Health, 60 Murray Street, Box 25, Toronto, ON, M5T 3L9, Canada.
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | - Natalie Morson
- Ray D. Wolfe Department of Family Medicine, Sinai Health, 60 Murray Street, Box 25, Toronto, ON, M5T 3L9, Canada
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sakina Walji
- Ray D. Wolfe Department of Family Medicine, Sinai Health, 60 Murray Street, Box 25, Toronto, ON, M5T 3L9, Canada
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Natalie Tregaskiss
- Ray D. Wolfe Department of Family Medicine, Sinai Health, 60 Murray Street, Box 25, Toronto, ON, M5T 3L9, Canada
| | - Susannah Merritt
- Ray D. Wolfe Department of Family Medicine, Sinai Health, 60 Murray Street, Box 25, Toronto, ON, M5T 3L9, Canada
| | - Tutsirai Makuwaza
- Ray D. Wolfe Department of Family Medicine, Sinai Health, 60 Murray Street, Box 25, Toronto, ON, M5T 3L9, Canada
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Milena Forte
- Ray D. Wolfe Department of Family Medicine, Sinai Health, 60 Murray Street, Box 25, Toronto, ON, M5T 3L9, Canada
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kusi Amponsah A, Boateng EA, Armah J, Dompim JK, Gyamfi D, Lomotey A, Annobil FA, Amankrah AE, Youshah RA, Beauty EU, Diji F, Bam V. The psychosocial experiences of pregnant women in the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic: A retrospective qualitative study. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0299219. [PMID: 38416742 PMCID: PMC10901345 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2023] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 03/01/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pregnant women are among the most vulnerable and suffer the most during pandemics, according to earlier studies. Pregnant women had to seek healthcare for both themselves and their unborn child(ren) in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, which was unprecedented. Pregnant women's psychosocial experiences during pandemics are crucial since they both directly and indirectly affect the course of pregnancy and childbirth. The study therefore sought to explore the psychosocial experiences of pregnant women during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS In this retrospective qualitative study, 15 nursing mothers who were attending a postnatal clinic at the Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (KNUST) hospital in Ghana were recruited. Individual interviews were conducted with mothers who were pregnant between March and December 2020. The audio-recorded interviews were transcribed verbatim and inductively analysed into themes. RESULTS Nursing mothers were aged 25-30 years and had infants ranging from 5 months to 15 months. Thirteen (13) were married and two were single. Two (2) major themes and five (5) subthemes emerged from the study. The unpleasant feelings connected to the potential for contracting COVID-19 and experiencing stress were described by the theme, "Fear and Stress". Participants' social experiences (support from significant others), alterations in daily routine and the economic impact because of the pandemic were presented as the "Socioeconomic impact". CONCLUSION Pregnant women go through several challenges during pregnancy such as perceived stress and anxiety. These are likely to heighten during a pandemic, as presented in the study. They therefore need emotional and psychosocial support in such uncertain times to improve outcomes of pregnancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abigail Kusi Amponsah
- Department of Nursing, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana
- Department of Nursing Sciences, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Edward Appiah Boateng
- Department of Nursing, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana
| | - Jerry Armah
- Department of Nursing, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana
| | - Joana Kyei Dompim
- Department of Nursing, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana
| | - Douglas Gyamfi
- Department of Nursing, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana
| | - Alberta Lomotey
- Department of Nursing, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana
| | - Faithful Adwoa Annobil
- Department of Nursing, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana
| | - Amena Ekua Amankrah
- Department of Nursing, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana
| | - Rifka Abdallah Youshah
- Department of Nursing, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana
| | - Elizabeth Uzoka Beauty
- Department of Nursing, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana
| | - Francis Diji
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital, Kumasi, Ghana
- St. Martins Catholic Hospital, Kumasi, Ghana
| | - Victoria Bam
- Department of Nursing, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Holdren S, Crook L, Lyerly A. Birth setting decisions during COVID-19: A comparative qualitative study. WOMEN'S HEALTH (LONDON, ENGLAND) 2024; 20:17455057241227363. [PMID: 38282515 PMCID: PMC10826375 DOI: 10.1177/17455057241227363] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2023] [Revised: 12/08/2023] [Accepted: 01/04/2024] [Indexed: 01/30/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in an increased number of out-of-hospital births in the United States and other nations. While many studies have sought to understand the experiences of pregnant and birthing people during this time, few have compared experiences across birth locations. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study is to compare the narratives and decision-making processes of those who gave birth in and out of hospitals during the pandemic. DESIGN We conducted semi-structured narrative interviews with 24 women who gave birth during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS Interviews were transcribed and coded, and a thematic narrative analysis was employed. Final themes and exemplary quotes were determined in discussion among the research team. RESULTS Results from narrative analysis revealed three themes that played into participants' birth location decisions: (1) birth efficacy and values, (2) diverse definitions of safety, and (3) childcare and other logistics. In each of these themes, participants who gave birth in birthing centers, at the hospital, and at home describe their individualized approach to achieving a supportive birth environment while mitigating the risk of labor complications and COVID-19 infection. CONCLUSION Our study suggests that for some childbearing people, the pandemic did not change birthing values or decisions but rather brought enhanced clarity to their individual needs during birth and perceived risks, benefits, and limitations of each birthing space. This study further highlights the need for improved structural support for birthing people to access a range of safe and supportive birthing environments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Holdren
- Department of Social Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Laura Crook
- Department of English and Comparative Literature, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Anne Lyerly
- Department of Social Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Pinheiro GSMA, Lemos SMA, Martins IDA, Januário GC, Cintra ML, Farias AVSR, Oliveira RMDS, Januário JN, Azevedo VMGDO, Bentes AA, Alves CRL. Effects of SARS-CoV-2 gestational exposure and risk factors on neurodevelopment until 12 months: A prospective cohort study in Brazil. Early Hum Dev 2024; 188:105918. [PMID: 38104363 DOI: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2023.105918] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2023] [Revised: 11/26/2023] [Accepted: 12/07/2023] [Indexed: 12/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The effects of SARS-CoV-2 gestational exposure on child development remain inconclusive. AIMS To analyze the effects of SARS-CoV-2 gestational exposure on neurodevelopment until 12 months. STUDY DESIGN Prospective cohort study conducted in five municipalities in Southeast Brazil from August 2021 to September 2022. SUBJECTS Infants were recruited from a serological survey performed during neonatal screening and followed up to 12 months old. We included 224 infants exposed to SARS-CoV-2 during pregnancy and 225 non-exposed, according to the serology results of the newborn as well as their mothers and the maternal antenatal RT-PCR results. OUTCOME MEASURES Developmental assessments were performed at 6 and 12 months using the Survey of Wellbeing of Young Children-Brazilian Version (SWYC-BR). Children with suspected developmental delay (SDD) at 6 and 12 months were considered at high risk for developmental delay (HRDD). Additionally, risk factors associated with SDD were examined. RESULTS There were 111 children identified with SDD and 52 with HRDD. SARS-CoV-2 gestational exposure was not associated with SDD. Exposure in the first gestational trimester increased SDD risk by 2.15 times compared to the third. Cesarean delivery predicted SDD (OR 1.56; 95%CI 1.01-2.42) and HRDD (OR 1.91; 95%CI 1.04-3.48). Additionally, suspected maternal depression predicted SDD (OR 1.76; 95%CI 1.01-3.10). CONCLUSION SARS-CoV-2 gestational exposure did not increase the developmental delay risk. However, our findings suggest that the earlier the gestational exposure, the greater the developmental delay risk at 12 months. Cesarean delivery and suspected maternal depression increased the developmental delay risk, independent of virus exposure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Stela Maris Aguiar Lemos
- Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Av. Prof. Alfredo Balena, 190 - Santa Efigênia, Belo Horizonte, MG 30130-100, Brazil
| | - Isadora de Araújo Martins
- Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Av. Prof. Alfredo Balena, 190 - Santa Efigênia, Belo Horizonte, MG 30130-100, Brazil
| | - Gabriela Cintra Januário
- Secretaria de Estado de Saúde de Minas Gerais, Rodovia Papa João Paulo II, 4143. Cidade Administrativa - Serra Verde, Belo Horizonte, MG 31630-900, Brazil
| | - Mila Lemos Cintra
- Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Av. Prof. Alfredo Balena, 190 - Santa Efigênia, Belo Horizonte, MG 30130-100, Brazil
| | | | | | - José Nélio Januário
- Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Av. Prof. Alfredo Balena, 190 - Santa Efigênia, Belo Horizonte, MG 30130-100, Brazil.
| | | | - Aline Almeida Bentes
- Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Av. Prof. Alfredo Balena, 190 - Santa Efigênia, Belo Horizonte, MG 30130-100, Brazil.
| | - Claudia Regina Lindgren Alves
- Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Av. Prof. Alfredo Balena, 190 - Santa Efigênia, Belo Horizonte, MG 30130-100, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Al-Mutawtah M, Campbell E, Kubis HP, Erjavec M. Women's experiences of social support during pregnancy: a qualitative systematic review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2023; 23:782. [PMID: 37950165 PMCID: PMC10638802 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-023-06089-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2023] [Accepted: 10/27/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Social support during pregnancy can alleviate emotional and physical pressures, improving the well-being of mother and child. Understanding women's lived experiences and perceptions of social support during pregnancy is imperative to better support women. This systematic review explores and synthesises the qualitative research on women's experiences of social support during pregnancy. METHODS Databases PubMed, CINAHL, MEDLINE, APA PsycInfo and Scopus were searched with no year limit. Eligible studies included pregnant women or women who were up to one year postpartum and were assessed on their experiences of social support during pregnancy. The data were synthesised using the thematic synthesis approach. RESULTS Fourteen studies were included with data from 571 participating women across ten countries; two studies used focus groups, and 12 used interviews to collect their data. Four main themes were developed ('a variety of emotional support', 'tangible and intangible instrumental support', 'traditional rituals and spiritual support', and 'the all-encompassing natal home'), and six sub-themes ('female network connections', 'care and affection from the husband', 'dissatisfaction with relationships', 'financial support from the husband and family', 'practical support from family and friends', 'health information support'). CONCLUSIONS This systematic review sheds light on women's experiences of social support during pregnancy. The results indicate a broad variety of emotional support experienced and valued by pregnant women from different sources. Additionally, women expressed satisfaction and dissatisfaction with tangible and intangible support forms. It was also highlighted that spirituality played an essential role in reducing stress and offering coping mechanisms for some, whereas spirituality increased stress levels for others.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mona Al-Mutawtah
- School of Human and Behavioural Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.
- Community Medicine- Clinical Psychology, Kuwait University, Kuwait City, Kuwait.
| | - Emma Campbell
- School of Human and Behavioural Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | - Hans-Peter Kubis
- School of Human and Behavioural Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | - Mihela Erjavec
- School of Human and Behavioural Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Gómez-López ME, Aldrete-Cortez V, González-Carpinteiro A, Mendizábal-Espinosa R, Bobadilla L. The Emotional Experience of Mexican Women with SARS-CoV-2 during Pregnancy-A Qualitative Study. Healthcare (Basel) 2023; 11:2785. [PMID: 37893859 PMCID: PMC10606424 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11202785] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2023] [Revised: 10/16/2023] [Accepted: 10/19/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Pregnant women have been considered a high-risk group for SARS-CoV-2 infection; the impact of the disease on the health of a mother and her child is still being studied. The emotional impact of the pandemic on pregnant women has been extensively studied. Emotional distress is proposed as a perspective to explain the emotional manifestations in women during this stage as something common rather than pathological. The objective of this study was to explore the emotional experience of women who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 towards the end of their pregnancy, during the first and second waves of COVID-19 in Mexico. A qualitative study was carried out: 18 pregnant women with COVID-19 were interviewed. A thematic analysis of the data was performed, resulting in 3 main themes and 14 subthemes. The COVID-19-infected mothers-to-be experienced mild to moderate emotional distress. It was more intense for those with comorbidities. This distress was aggravated during obstetrical complications and comorbidities, as well as during COVID-19 and postpartum. The emotional distress was appeased by both the perception of medical care and social support. The emotional distress of pregnant women with COVID-19 requires emotional support to reduce its impact.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Vania Aldrete-Cortez
- Laboratory of Neuroscience and Cognitive Development, School of Psychology, Universidad Panamericana, Mexico City 03920, Mexico; (V.A.-C.); (A.G.-C.)
| | - Aline González-Carpinteiro
- Laboratory of Neuroscience and Cognitive Development, School of Psychology, Universidad Panamericana, Mexico City 03920, Mexico; (V.A.-C.); (A.G.-C.)
| | - Rosa Mendizábal-Espinosa
- Social Research Institute of London, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK;
- Nacer Temprano, Vivir en Grande, Civil Association, Tlalnepantla de Baz 54080, Mexico
| | - Liliana Bobadilla
- Hospital of Gynecology and Obstetrics “Dr. Luis Castelazo Ayala”, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Mexico City 01090, Mexico;
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Stott D, Klobodu C, Chiarello LA, Posmontier B, Egohail M, Geller PA, Andrews Horowitz J, Milliron BJ. Nutrition-Related Experiences of Women With Perinatal Depression During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Study. J Patient Exp 2023; 10:23743735231199818. [PMID: 37693189 PMCID: PMC10486215 DOI: 10.1177/23743735231199818] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Women with perinatal depression are at a high risk for unhealthy dietary behaviors but whether the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has exacerbated this risk is unknown. Here we report the findings of a qualitative study exploring the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on nutrition-related experiences of women with perinatal depression. Using a qualitative descriptive approach, in-depth interviews were conducted with 18 women with a history of perinatal depression and 10 healthcare providers. A semistructured format elicited how food and nutrition-related behaviors of women with perinatal depression were affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. Thematic analysis identified 4 themes related to the COVID-19 pandemic: (1) Adaptations in shopping and cooking behaviors; (2) increases in stress and declines in respite; (3) declines in support and increases in isolation; and (4) low levels of breastfeeding guidance. Our findings confirm the importance of resilience among women with perinatal depression and future research is needed to elucidate the mechanisms connecting resilience and dietary behaviors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dahlia Stott
- Department of Nutrition Sciences, College of Nursing and Health Professions, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Cynthia Klobodu
- Department of Nutrition and Food Science, College of Natural Sciences, California State University, Chico, Chico, CA, USA
| | - Lisa A Chiarello
- Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Nursing and Health Professions, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Bobbie Posmontier
- PhD in Nursing Program, College of Nursing, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Pamela A Geller
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, College of Arts and Sciences, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - June Andrews Horowitz
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Dartmouth, Dartmouth, MA, USA
| | - Brandy-Joe Milliron
- Department of Nutrition Sciences, College of Nursing and Health Professions, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Saleh L, Canclini S, Mathison C, Combs S, Dickerson B. "This is not what I imagined motherhood would look like": pregnancy, postpartum, and parenting during COVID-19 - a qualitative analysis of the first year since birth. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2023; 23:578. [PMID: 37568087 PMCID: PMC10422746 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-023-05872-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2023] [Accepted: 07/24/2023] [Indexed: 08/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Childbearing is one of the most emotional and transformative events in a woman's life. This study aims to explore the impact COVID-19 had on childbirth, postpartum, and the first year since giving birth. METHODS This was a qualitative study using data previously collected for a larger study of women who had given birth during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States. The findings presented here are from an analysis of a subset of open-ended questions. Sixty-six participants completed questions about how COVID-19 affected childbearing and postpartum experiences. Data was analyzed using inductive thematic analysis. RESULTS Thematic analysis of the data identified five major themes and several subthemes, including: (1) amplification of new mother typical emotions (positive emotions and negative emotions), (2) financial impact on mothers and their families, (3) persistent impact of COVID-19, (4) new mom paradigm crash (first time mothers and experienced mothers faced different issues such as lack of education and support, adding a layer to the day-to-day, and negotiating time with others) and (5) validating the importance of maternal health. On the whole, participants were overwhelmed, isolated, and did not have enough physical and emotional support. There was a lack of supportive maternal healthcare both in the short-term and long-term, with an emphasis on poor postpartum support. CONCLUSIONS This study supports previous findings that women who gave birth and entered motherhood during the COVID-19 pandemic were impacted in many ways. These findings contribute to the understanding of women's experiences not just in the immediate postpartum period, but in their daily lives one year after childbirth. The results highlight that our nation's traditional maternal healthcare model may be insufficient, especially when facing a national crisis. Strain placed on the healthcare system by COVID-19 impacted both the physical and mental health of mothers who were often left with inadequate care, education, and support. Our findings point to the need for more supportive maternal health both during childbirth and postpartum.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Shanna Combs
- Anne Marion Burnett School of Medicine at Texas Christian University, Fort Worth, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Vanstone M, Correia RH, Howard M, Darling E, Bayrampour H, Carruthers A, Davis A, Hadid D, Hetherington E, Jones A, Kandasamy S, Kuyvenhoven C, Liauw J, McDonald SD, Mniszak C, Molinaro ML, Pahwa M, Patel T, Sadik M, Sanya N, Shen K, Greyson D. How do perceptions of Covid-19 risk impact pregnancy-related health decisions? A convergent parallel mixed-methods study protocol. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0288952. [PMID: 37561748 PMCID: PMC10414672 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288952] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2023] [Accepted: 07/24/2023] [Indexed: 08/12/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Pregnant people have a higher risk of severe COVID-19 disease. They have been disproportionately impacted by COVID-19 infection control policies, which exacerbated conditions resulting in intimate partner violence, healthcare access, and mental health distress. This project examines the impact of accumulated individual health decisions and describes how perinatal care and health outcomes changed during the COVID-19 pandemic. OBJECTIVES Quantitative strand: Describe differences between 2019, 2021, and 2022 birth groups related to maternal vaccination, perinatal care, and mental health care. Examine the differential impacts on racialized and low-income pregnant people.Qualitative strand: Understand how pregnant people's perceptions of COVID-19 risk influenced their decision-making about vaccination, perinatal care, social support, and mental health. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This is a Canadian convergent parallel mixed-methods study. The quantitative strand uses a retrospective cohort design to assess birth group differences in rates of Tdap and COVID-19 vaccination, gestational diabetes screening, length of post-partum hospital stay, and onset of depression, anxiety, and adjustment disorder, using administrative data from ICES, formerly the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Ontario) and PopulationData BC (PopData) (British Columbia). Differences by socioeconomic and ethnocultural status will also be examined. The qualitative strand employs qualitative description to interview people who gave birth between May 2020- December 2021 about their COVID-19 risk perception and health decision-making process. Data integration will occur during design and interpretation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This study received ethical approval from McMaster University and the University of British Columbia. Findings will be disseminated via manuscripts, presentations, and patient-facing infographics. TRIAL REGISTRATION Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov registration number: NCT05663762.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meredith Vanstone
- Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Rebecca H. Correia
- Health Research Methodology Graduate Program, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Michelle Howard
- Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Elizabeth Darling
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Hamideh Bayrampour
- Department of Family Practice, Midwifery Program, University of British Columbia, University Endowment Lands, Canada
| | - Andrea Carruthers
- Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Amie Davis
- Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Dima Hadid
- Health Policy PhD Program, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Erin Hetherington
- Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics & Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Aaron Jones
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Sujane Kandasamy
- Department of Child and Youth Health, Brock University, St. Catharines, Canada
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | | | - Jessica Liauw
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, University Endowment Lands, Canada
| | - Sarah D. McDonald
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
- Department of Radiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Caroline Mniszak
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, University Endowment Lands, Canada
| | | | - Manisha Pahwa
- Health Policy PhD Program, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Tejal Patel
- Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Marina Sadik
- Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Njideka Sanya
- Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Katrina Shen
- Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Devon Greyson
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, University Endowment Lands, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Mokhtari Zanjani P, Tehranian N, Changizi N, Mohammadi E, Farzinrad B, Kazemnejad A. Maternal mental health concerns during the COVID-19 pandemic in Iran: a content analysis study. Reprod Health 2023; 20:102. [PMID: 37434144 DOI: 10.1186/s12978-023-01645-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2023] [Accepted: 07/03/2023] [Indexed: 07/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND As crises occur, attention to physical health usually becomes more than mental health, neglecting mental health, especially in some vulnerable groups such as pregnant women and new mothers, can have adverse consequences. Therefore, it is imperative to recognize and comprehend their mental health needs, particularly during critical situations such as the recent COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of this study was to explain the understanding and experience of mental health concerns faced by pregnant and postpartum women during this pandemic. METHODS This qualitative study was conducted from March 2021 to November 2021 in Iran. Data were collected using semi-structured in-depth interviews to understand mental health concerns in pregnancy and the postpartum period during the COVID-19 pandemic. Twenty-five purposefully retrieved and participated in the study. Due to the prevalence of coronavirus, most of the participants preferred tele interviews. When data saturation was achieved, the data were codified manually and analyzed using Graneheim and Lundman's approach 2004. RESULTS Based on the content analysis of the interviews, 2 main themes, 8 categories 23 subcategories were identified. The identified themes were as follows: (1) Maternal mental health threats and (2) Inadequate access to the required information. CONCLUSION The results of this study showed that the main concern and fear of pregnant and postpartum women in the COVID-19 pandemic was the fear of the possibility of death for themselves and/or their fetus/infant. The knowledge that was obtained from the understanding of pregnant women and new mothers about the mental health concerns during the COVID-19 pandemic can help managers in planning to improve and promote women's mental health, especially in critical situations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pouran Mokhtari Zanjani
- Department of Reproductive Health and Midwifery, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
| | - Najmeh Tehranian
- Department of Reproductive Health and Midwifery, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
| | - Nasrin Changizi
- Maternal, Fetal and Neonatal Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Eesa Mohammadi
- Department of Nursing, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
| | - Banafsheh Farzinrad
- School of Behavioral Sciences and Mental Health, Iran Medical Science University, Tehran, Iran
| | - Anoshirvan Kazemnejad
- Department of Biostatistics, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Herdea V, Tarciuc P, Ghionaru R, Lupusoru M, Tataranu E, Chirila S, Rosu O, Marginean CO, Leibovitz E, Diaconescu S. Vaccine Hesitancy Phenomenon Evolution during Pregnancy over High-Risk Epidemiological Periods-"Repetitio Est Mater Studiorum". Vaccines (Basel) 2023; 11:1207. [PMID: 37515023 PMCID: PMC10384756 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11071207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2023] [Revised: 06/29/2023] [Accepted: 07/03/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: The recent epidemiological events were high-stress level generators for humanity, particularly for pregnant women, influencing their attitude, behavior, and decisions regarding vaccination during pregnancy or regarding their future child. The aim of this study was to analyze the anti-pertussis vaccination decision-shaping factors in pregnant women during two epidemiological periods: the measles epidemic and the COVID-19 pandemic. (2) Methods: Two groups of pregnant women were invited to be part of a medical education program, having as the main theme the infectious disease risks and their prevention through vaccination. Before launching the program, participants received a 12-item questionnaire. From a total number of 362 pregnant women enrolled in the study, 182 participated in 2019, and 180 participated in 2022. (3) Results: The socio-demographic data revealed that the age of pregnant women participating in medical education programs increased in 2022 by 1.7 years (p < 0.01). In vitro fertilization was reported in a significantly higher proportion (20% in 2022 vs 9.8% in 2019, p < 0.01). Participation in community-initiated educational programs almost doubled during the pandemic time from 18.7% in 2019 to 33.9% in 2022 (p < 0.01). Pertussis vaccine acceptancy (VA) dropped from 85% in 2019 to 44.4% in 2022 (p < 0.01) (4) Conclusions: In this study, we reported fast-growing vaccine hesitancy and severe declared vaccine reluctance. The results of this complex long-term study, which evaluated pregnant women over several years, showed a five-fold increase in the percentage of pregnant women who disagreed with personal pertussis vaccination. This draws attention to the risks of pertussis epidemic outbreaks in pregnant women and their future infants in the first couple of months of life before the initiation of vaccination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valeria Herdea
- Doctoral School, “George Emil Palade” University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science, and Technology of Targu Mures, 540142 Targu Mures, Romania
| | - Petruta Tarciuc
- Doctoral School, “George Emil Palade” University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science, and Technology of Targu Mures, 540142 Targu Mures, Romania
| | - Raluca Ghionaru
- Romanian Association for Pediatric Education in Family Medicine, 021507 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Mircea Lupusoru
- Department of Physiology, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Elena Tataranu
- Faculty of Medicine and Biological Sciences, “Stefan cel Mare” University of Suceava, 720229 Suceava, Romania
| | - Sergiu Chirila
- Faculty of Medicine, Ovidius University of Constanta, 900470 Constanta, Romania
| | - Oana Rosu
- Doctoral School, “George Emil Palade” University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science, and Technology of Targu Mures, 540142 Targu Mures, Romania
| | - Cristina Oana Marginean
- Department of Pediatrics, “George Emil Palade” University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science, andTechnology of Targu Mures, 540142 Targu Mures, Romania;
| | - Eugene Leibovitz
- The Pediatric Infectious Disease Unit, Soroka University Medical Center, Beer-Sheva 85025, Israel
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva 85025, Israel
| | - Smaranda Diaconescu
- Medical-Surgical Department, Faculty of Medicine, Titu Maiorescu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 031593 Bucharest, Romania;
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Skelton E, Smith A, Harrison G, Rutherford M, Ayers S, Malamateniou C. The effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on UK parent experiences of pregnancy ultrasound scans and parent-fetal bonding: A mixed methods analysis. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0286578. [PMID: 37267279 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286578] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2022] [Accepted: 05/18/2023] [Indexed: 06/04/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Companionship in antenatal care is important for facilitating positive parental experiences. During the COVID-19 pandemic, restrictions on partner attendance at fetal ultrasound scans were introduced nationally to minimise transmission of the virus. This study aimed to explore the effect of these restrictions on maternal and paternal experiences of pregnancy scans and evaluate their potential effect on parent-fetal bonding. METHODS A UK-wide, anonymous cross-sectional survey was completed by new and expectant parents (n = 714) who had, or were awaiting a pregnancy scan during the COVID-19 pandemic. The CORE-10 and an adapted version of the Prenatal Attachment Inventory were used to evaluate psychological distress and prenatal bonding. Additional survey questions captured parental experiences of scans. Separate statistical and thematic analyses of the data were undertaken. A joint display matrix was used to facilitate integration of quantitative and qualitative claims to generate a comprehensive interpretation of study findings. FINDINGS When fathers did not attend the scan, feelings of excitement and satisfaction were significantly reduced (p<0.001) and feelings of anxiety increased (p<0.001) in both parents. Mothers were concerned about receiving unexpected news alone and fathers felt excluded from the scan. Mean paternal bonding (38.22, SD 10.73) was significantly lower compared to mothers (47.01, SD 7.67) although no difference was demonstrated between those who had attended the scan and those who had not. CORE-10 scores suggested low-to-mild levels of psychological distress, although the mean difference between mothers and fathers was not significant. Key themes described both parents' sense of loss for their desired pregnancy scan experience and reflected on sonographers' central role in providing parent-centred care during scans. CONCLUSION Restrictions on partner attendance at scans during the COVID-19 pandemic had a negative effect on parental experiences of antenatal imaging. Provision of parent-centred care, which is inclusive of partners, is essential for improved parental experiences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Skelton
- Division of Radiography and Midwifery, School of Health and Psychological Sciences, City, University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Alison Smith
- Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Gill Harrison
- Society and College of Radiographers, London, United Kingdom
| | - Mary Rutherford
- Perinatal Imaging and Health, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Susan Ayers
- Centre for Maternal and Child Health Research, School of Health and Psychological Sciences, City, University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Christina Malamateniou
- Division of Radiography and Midwifery, School of Health and Psychological Sciences, City, University of London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Huynh T, Boise C, Kihntopf ME, Schaefer AA, Schafer M. "Fear and anxiety is what I recall the best.": A phenomenological examination of mothers' pregnancy experiences during COVID-19 in the United States. Midwifery 2023; 122:103700. [PMID: 37099827 PMCID: PMC10112943 DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2023.103700] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2022] [Revised: 04/10/2023] [Accepted: 04/14/2023] [Indexed: 04/28/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this phenomenological study is to understand mothers' lived pregnancy experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic. DESIGN A qualitative, phenomenological study SETTING: Participants completed the demographic survey online and semi-structured interviews, via video conferencing between November and December 2021 PARTICIPANTS: A sample of 28 mothers who were pregnant during the COVID-19 pandemic participated in the study. METHODS AND RESULTS An inductive, thematic approach was used to analyze the data. Two central themes and eight subthemes emerged from the six-phase thematic analysis. The first central theme, Depth of Knowledge About COVID-19, included the following subthemes: 1) Vaccines and 2) Uncertainty for Exposure. The second central theme, Impacts of COVID-19, had six subthemes: 1) Types of Support Received, 2) COVID-19 Restrictions, 3) Childcare, 4) Mental Health, 5) Spending More Time at Home, and 6) Isolation. CONCLUSIONS Findings of this study revealed mothers experienced a significant amount of stress and anxiety related to the coronavirus pandemic during their pregnancy. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Our findings highlight the need to provide pregnant mothers comprehensive care, including mental health services, adequate access to social support, and providing clear information regarding COVID-19 vaccination and its impacts on pregnancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tuyen Huynh
- Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
| | | | | | | | - Morgan Schafer
- University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Pinheiro GSMA, de Souza RC, de Oliveira Azevedo VMG, Guimarães NS, Pires LG, Lemos SMA, Alves CRL. Effects of intrauterine exposure to SARS-CoV-2 on infants' development: a rapid review and meta-analysis. Eur J Pediatr 2023; 182:2041-2055. [PMID: 36899144 PMCID: PMC10005921 DOI: 10.1007/s00431-023-04910-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2023] [Revised: 02/22/2023] [Accepted: 02/26/2023] [Indexed: 03/12/2023]
Abstract
Potential medium- and long-term neurodevelopmental sequelae of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection during pregnancy have not been ruled out. We aimed to systematically review and summarize the evidence regarding the effects of intrauterine exposure to SARS-CoV-2 on infant development and behavior. Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, and PsycNet databases were searched for studies published up to February 6, 2023, investigating the effects of gestational SARS-CoV-2 on infant development and behavior. We performed narrative synthesis according to updated protocols. Studies using comparison groups and with the Ages and Stages Questionnaires-Third Edition (ASQ-3) scores available were included in a meta-analysis performed according to Cochrane protocols. We used the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale to analyze the risk of bias. Heterogeneity was calculated using the I2 statistic. The search identified 2,782 studies. After removing duplicates and applying the eligibility criteria, we performed a narrative synthesis of 10 included studies and a meta-analysis of three. There was no evidence of higher developmental delay rates in infants exposed to SARS-CoV-2 during pregnancy compared to non-exposed infants. However, the exposed infants scored lower than either the non-exposed children or pre-pandemic cohorts in some domains. Pooled results from the random-effects model indicated that SARS-CoV-2-exposed infants had lower scores on fine motor (mean difference [MD] = -4.70, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -8.76; -0.63), and problem-solving (MD = -3.05, 95% CI: -5.88; -0.22) domains than non-exposed infants (heterogeneity: I2 = 69% and 88%, respectively). There was no difference between the exposed and non-exposed infants in the communication, gross motor, and personal-social ASQ-3 domains. Conclusion: We did not find evidence confirming the association between SARS-CoV-2 gestational exposure and neurodevelopmental delays. However, the meta-analysis indicated that gestational exposure negatively affected fine motor and problem-solving skills. Robust evidence on this topic is still incipient, and the available studies present methodological inconsistencies that limit the drawing of clear-cut conclusions. PROSPERO registration: #CRD42022308002; March 14, 2022. What is Known: • COVID-19 is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes potentially linked to neurodevelopmental delays. • SARS-CoV-2 vertical transmission is rare; however, infections during pregnancy can be deleterious to the fetus, possibly mediated by maternal immune activation and other inflammatory mechanisms. What is New: • No evidence of increased developmental delay rates among SARS-CoV-2 gestational-exposed infants was found. However, a meta-analysis of three studies showed lower scores in fine motor and personal social ASQ-3 domains among exposed infants. • SARS-CoV-2 gestational exposure and the pandemic can affect child development via many mechanisms. Potential neurodevelopmental sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 exposure during gestation have not been ruled out.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rayany Cristina de Souza
- Postgraduate Program in Health Sciences, Medicine School, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU), Uberlândia, Brazil
| | | | | | - Laura Gregório Pires
- Medicine School, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, Brazil
| | - Stela Maris Aguiar Lemos
- Speech Therapy and Audiology Department, Medicine School, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, Brazil
| | - Claudia Regina Lindgren Alves
- Pediatrics Department, Medicine School, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Av. Alfredo Balena, 190/247, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, 30130100, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Lalor JG, Sheaf G, Mulligan A, Ohaja M, Clive A, Murphy-Tighe S, Ng ED, Shorey S. Parental experiences with changes in maternity care during the Covid-19 pandemic: A mixed-studies systematic review. Women Birth 2023; 36:e203-e212. [PMID: 35973917 PMCID: PMC9364727 DOI: 10.1016/j.wombi.2022.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2022] [Revised: 08/01/2022] [Accepted: 08/08/2022] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND During the COVID-19 pandemic, pregnant women were identified as a high-risk and vulnerable group. To reduce risk of transmission, maternity healthcare services were modified to limit exposure but maintain services for pregnant women. However, the change in hospital practice may have compromised quality maternal care standards. Therefore, this review aims to explore parental experiences and views with maternity care received from healthcare institutions during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS A mixed studies systematic review was conducted. Six electronic databases (Medline, CINAHL, Embase, PsycInfo, Web of Science, and Maternity and Infant Care) were searched for qualitative, observational, and mixed method studies from the year 2019 to February 2022. Study quality was appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Quantitative findings were converted to narrative findings. Data was synthesised thematically using a convergent synthesis design. RESULTS Fifty-eight articles were included. Four themes were generated: (1) Distress associated with COVID-19 regulations (perception of hospital restrictions, confusion with ever changing policies), (2) adaptability with maternity services (prenatal: changes in birth plans, prenatal: altered antenatal appointments, education, and care, intrapartum: medicalization of birth, postpartum: varied views on care received and Breastfeeding woes, postpartum: skin-to-skin contact and mother infant bonding) (3) importance of support persons, and (4) future direction for maternity services. CONCLUSIONS Parental experiences highlighted how maternity care during the COVID-19 pandemic did not adhere to WHO standards of quality maternity care. This calls for healthcare institutions to continuously appraise the implementation of restrictive practices that deviate from evidence-based frameworks underpinning quality care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joan Gabrielle Lalor
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Trinity College Dublin, 24 D’Olier St, Dublin 2, Ireland
| | - Greg Sheaf
- The Library of Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland
| | - Andrea Mulligan
- School of Law, Trinity College Dublin, House 39, New Square, Dublin 2, Ireland
| | - Magdalena Ohaja
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, National University of Ireland Galway, Ireland
| | - Ashamole Clive
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Trinity College Dublin, 24 D’Olier St, Dublin 2, Ireland
| | | | - Esperanza Debby Ng
- Alice Lee Centre for Nursing Studies, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Level 2, Clinical Research Centre, Block MD11,10 Medical Drive, 117597, Singapore
| | - Shefaly Shorey
- Alice Lee Centre for Nursing Studies, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Level 2, Clinical Research Centre, Block MD11,10 Medical Drive, 117597, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Mari F, Capasso M, Caso D. Exploring the psychosocial impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on women's perinatal experiences and wellbeing: A qualitative study. SEXUAL & REPRODUCTIVE HEALTHCARE 2023; 35:100805. [PMID: 36502624 PMCID: PMC9712141 DOI: 10.1016/j.srhc.2022.100805] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2022] [Revised: 11/03/2022] [Accepted: 11/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE While many studies have investigated the clinical impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on pregnant women's mental health, little attention has been paid to the exploration of women's experiences during the perinatal period from a psychosocial perspective in the Italian context. Thus, the present study aimed to explore the psychosocial changes associated with the pandemic in the perinatal context. METHODS Twenty-one Italian women who gave birth between March and November 2020 took part in this research by participating in semi-structured interviews, exploring their childbirth experiences. Our data were analysed using a Grounded Theory approach. RESULTS Our findings revealed the enhanced importance of social support as a protective factor against uncertainties, which strongly characterised all phases of the perinatal period during the pandemic. Such uncertainties were mainly linked to the discontinuity in intrapartum care, as well as to concerns of being infected with Covid-19 combined with other pregnancy-specific worries. The main sources of social support were represented by loved ones - most of all partners - along with health care staff and peer networks. CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest the importance of implementing evidence-based policies and interventions to improve women's wellbeing in the perinatal period during the pandemic, as well as of guaranteeing intrapartum care continuity and the presence of social support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Federica Mari
- Department of Humanities, University of Naples Federico II, Italy
| | - Miriam Capasso
- Department of Humanities, University of Naples Federico II, Italy.
| | - Daniela Caso
- Department of Humanities, University of Naples Federico II, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Jaffe EF, Spach NC, Sullivan KA, Lyerly AD, Goldfarb IT. Experiences Navigating the Pregnancy Care Continuum During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Womens Health Issues 2022; 33:235-241. [PMID: 36496341 PMCID: PMC9640408 DOI: 10.1016/j.whi.2022.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2022] [Revised: 11/02/2022] [Accepted: 11/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The COVID-19 pandemic led to unprecedented changes in care delivery across the pregnancy care continuum. Our primary objective with this research was to characterize the range of ways that the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic affected pregnancy, childbirth, and postpartum care experiences. METHODS Pregnant and recently pregnant patients (n = 20) from obstetrics and gynecology clinical sites associated with Massachusetts General Hospital were interviewed about their experiences with prenatal care, childbirth, and postpartum care during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. Interview transcripts were analyzed for emergent themes. RESULTS This sample included 20 pregnant and postpartum people, including 11 individuals who tested positive for COVID-19 during pregnancy or postpartum and nine with suspected infection. The ways in which COVID-19 or suspected COVID-19 affected experiences of prenatal care, childbirth, and postpartum care were complex and varied. Three themes were identified across narratives of pregnancy, birth, and postpartum care: patient perceptions of diminished access to care, stigma due to COVID-19 infection, and limited capacity of providers to honor patient preferences. CONCLUSIONS A better understanding of pregnant and recently pregnant people's experiences during the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic can inform infection control policies and clinical care delivery practices that are more congruent with the needs and values of pregnant, birthing, and postpartum people as institutions craft responses to future pandemics. Approaches that maximize meaningful access across the pregnancy care continuum, center patients' priorities within adapted care models, and honor patient preferences as much as possible are important aspects of an appropriate response to future waves of COVID-19 and other pandemics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elana F. Jaffe
- University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina,University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Natalie C. Spach
- University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina,University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Kristen A. Sullivan
- University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina,Center for Bioethics, Department of Social Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Anne D. Lyerly
- University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina,Center for Bioethics, Department of Social Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Ilona T. Goldfarb
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts,Correspondence to: Ilona T. Goldfarb, MD, MPH, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114. Tel.: (617) 724-2229
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Zheng X, Zhang J, Ye X, Lin X, Liu H, Qin Z, Chen D, Zhan C. Navigating through motherhood in pregnancy and postpartum periods during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis. J Nurs Manag 2022; 30:3958-3971. [PMID: 36194367 PMCID: PMC9874529 DOI: 10.1111/jonm.13846] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2022] [Revised: 09/06/2022] [Accepted: 09/30/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
AIM The aim of this work is to critically appraise and synthesize the qualitative studies on the experiences, perspectives, and consequences of pregnant women experiencing motherhood during the COVID-19 pandemic. BACKGROUND The COVID-19 pandemic has posed a threat to the health of pregnant women. Such a pandemic disrupted their routine care, as well as normal daily life. However, little is known about their coping strategies to the changes brought by COVID-19. EVALUATION A qualitative systematic review was conducted according to the Enhancing Transparency in Reporting the Synthesis of Qualitative Research (ENTREQ) checklist. A meta-aggregative approach rooted in pragmatism and Husserlian transcendental phenomenology was used to synthesize the findings. Dependability and credibility of both study findings and synthesized findings were appraised by Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) ConQual process. KEY ISSUES Key issues include (a) pregnant women experienced changes in routine care, (b) pregnant women used a range of strategies to cope with the consequence of the pandemic, (c) pregnant women struggled to embrace motherhood, and (d) pregnant women received different levels of social support. CONCLUSION Facing challenges caused by the pandemic, pregnant women used a variety of strategies to cope with and adapt to the changes, but sometimes the adaption is limited. Emotional, instrumental, and informational support should be provided to them in an accessible way. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT As an essential part of policymakers, nursing managers should consider the balance between restriction and the accessibility of maternity care. It is also crucial for them to consider how to provide necessary support in an accessible way.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xutong Zheng
- Department of NursingMindong Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical UniversityNingdeChina,School of NursingFujian University of Traditional Chinese MedicineFuzhouChina
| | - Jiayu Zhang
- School of NursingFujian University of Traditional Chinese MedicineFuzhouChina
| | - Xinxin Ye
- School of Public HealthZhejiang University School of MedicineHangzhouChina
| | - Xiaoyi Lin
- School of NursingFujian University of Traditional Chinese MedicineFuzhouChina
| | - Huanju Liu
- Women's Hospital and the Institute of GeneticsZhenjiang University School of MedicineHangzhouChina
| | - Zhuzhu Qin
- School of NursingFujian University of Traditional Chinese MedicineFuzhouChina
| | - Danfeng Chen
- School of NursingFujian University of Traditional Chinese MedicineFuzhouChina
| | - Chenju Zhan
- Department of NursingMindong Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical UniversityNingdeChina
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Plagens-Rotman K, Merks P, Pisarska-Krawczyk M, Kędzia W, Justyna J, Czarnecka-Operacz M, Jarząbek-Bielecka G. Possible Interdisciplinar Standard for the Care of Pregnant Women Living with HIV-Polish Experience. Healthcare (Basel) 2022; 10:healthcare10101949. [PMID: 36292396 PMCID: PMC9602101 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10101949] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2022] [Revised: 09/25/2022] [Accepted: 09/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
HIV data for 2020 show a decline in the number and rate of new HIV cases diagnosed in the EU during the last decade. The COVID-19 pandemic has paralyzed the functioning of healthcare facilities in Poland and worldwide, also impacting the detection of HIV infection. Early diagnosis of HIV and implementation of antiretroviral treatment limit HIV transmission. A woman with HIV diagnosed during pregnancy should be under the care of a specialist in infectious diseases experienced in antiretroviral treatment. In this way, she will be properly protected during the delivery, and relevant medications can be implemented for the newborn baby. Taking these aspects into account, the medical team should consist of: A specialist in infectious diseases, an obstetrician, a neonatologist and pediatrician, a midwife, and a dermato-venereologist. Every effort should be made to increase the scope and quality of monitoring of the spread of the epidemic in Poland, with special emphasis on diagnostics based on specific tests among populations particularly exposed to HIV infections cooperating with non-governmental organizations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katarzyna Plagens-Rotman
- Center for Pediatric, Adolescent Gynecology and Sexology Division of Gynecology, Department of Perinatology and Gynecology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 61-758 Poznan, Poland
- Correspondence:
| | - Piotr Merks
- Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Collegium Medicum, Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski University in Warsaw, 01-938 Warszawa, Poland
| | | | - Witold Kędzia
- Division of Gynecology, Department of Perinatology and Gynecology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 61-758 Poznan, Poland
| | - Jaskulska Justyna
- Higher School of Strategic Planning in Dąbrowa Górnicza, Kościelna 4, 41-303 Dąbrowa Górnicza, Poland
| | - Magdalena Czarnecka-Operacz
- Allergic and Occupational Skin Diseases Unit, Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Poznań, 60-355 Poznan, Poland
| | - Grażyna Jarząbek-Bielecka
- Center for Pediatric, Adolescent Gynecology and Sexology Division of Gynecology, Department of Perinatology and Gynecology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 61-758 Poznan, Poland
- Division of Gynecology, Department of Perinatology and Gynecology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 61-758 Poznan, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Kolker S, Biringer A, Bytautas J, Kukan S, Carroll J. Psychological Distress and Behavioural Changes in Pregnant and Postpartum Individuals During the COVID-19 Pandemic. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA 2022; 44:1067-1075. [PMID: 35760333 PMCID: PMC9232263 DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2022.06.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2022] [Revised: 06/06/2022] [Accepted: 06/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To determine the psychological and behavioural effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on a Canadian cohort of individuals during pregnancy and the postpartum period. METHODS In 2020, individuals between 20 weeks gestation and 3 months postpartum receiving maternity care from an urban Canadian clinic were invited to complete a questionnaire. The purpose-built questionnaire used validated scales including the Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey (MOS), Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (DASS-21), Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS), and questions from a SARS study. RESULTS One hundred nine people completed the questionnaire (response rate, 55%) of whom 57% (n = 62) were postpartum. Most respondents (107, 98%) were married and had completed post-secondary education (104, 95%). Despite these protective factors, moderate to severe levels of depression (22%), anxiety (19%) and stress (27%), were recorded using the DASS-21, and 25% of participants (26) had depression (score ≥11) using the EPDS. Despite high social support in all MOS domains (median scores 84-100), a majority of participants reported loneliness (69, 67%) and were nearly or totally housebound (65, 64%). About half of participants worried about themselves (50, 46.3%) or their baby (59, 54%) contracting COVID-19, while the majority postponed (80, 74.1%) and cancelled (79, 73.2%) prenatal appointments. Being homebound or feeling lonely / lacking support were significant risk factors for psychological distress (P = 0.02) whereas exercise and strong social support were protective (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION Pregnant and postpartum individuals experienced moderate to severe depression, anxiety, and stress during the COVID-19 pandemic. Exercise and strong social support were protective. Health care provider enquiry of home circumstances and activity may identify individuals needing enhanced supports.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabrina Kolker
- Ray D. Wolfe Department of Family Medicine, Sinai Health, Toronto, ON; Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON.
| | - Anne Biringer
- Ray D. Wolfe Department of Family Medicine, Sinai Health, Toronto, ON; Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
| | - Jessica Bytautas
- Ray D. Wolfe Department of Family Medicine, Sinai Health, Toronto, ON; Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
| | - Sahana Kukan
- Ray D. Wolfe Department of Family Medicine, Sinai Health, Toronto, ON
| | - June Carroll
- Ray D. Wolfe Department of Family Medicine, Sinai Health, Toronto, ON; Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Evans C, Evans K, Booth A, Timmons S, Jones N, Nazmeen B, Sunney C, Clowes M, Clancy G, Spiby H. Realist inquiry into Maternity care @ a Distance (ARM@DA): realist review protocol. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e062106. [PMID: 36127105 PMCID: PMC9490633 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION One of the most commonly reported COVID-19-related changes to all maternity services has been an increase in the use of digital clinical consultations such as telephone or video calling; however, the ways in which they can be optimally used along maternity care pathways remain unclear. It is imperative that digital service innovations do not further exacerbate (and, ideally, should tackle) existing inequalities in service access and clinical outcomes. Using a realist approach, this project aims to synthesise the evidence around implementation of digital clinical consultations, seeking to illuminate how they can work to support safe, personalised and appropriate maternity care and to clarify when they might be most appropriately used, for whom, when, and in what contexts? METHODS AND ANALYSIS The review will be conducted in four iterative phases, with embedded stakeholder involvement: (1) refining the review focus and generating initial programme theories, (2) exploring and developing the programme theories in light of evidence, (3) testing/refining the programme theories and (4) constructing actionable recommendations. The review will draw on four sources of evidence: (1) published literature (searching nine bibliographic databases), (2) unpublished (grey) literature, including research, audit, evaluation and policy documents (derived from Google Scholar, website searches and e-thesis databases), (3) expertise contributed by service user and health professional stakeholder groups (n=20-35) and (4) key informant interviews (n=12). Included papers will consist of any study design, in English and from 2010 onwards. The review will follow the Realist and Meta-narrative Evidence Synthesis Evolving Standards quality procedures and reporting guidance. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval has been obtained from the University of Nottingham, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences Ethics Committee (FMHS 426-1221). Informed consent will be obtained for all key informant interviews. Findings will be disseminated in a range of formats relevant to different audiences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42021288702.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catrin Evans
- School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Kerry Evans
- School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Andrew Booth
- ScHARR, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | | | - Nia Jones
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Benash Nazmeen
- School of Allied Health Professionals and Midwifery, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK
| | | | - Mark Clowes
- ScHARR, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Georgia Clancy
- School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Helen Spiby
- School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
"I feel more protective over my body:" A brief report on pregnant women's embodied experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic. Body Image 2022; 42:197-204. [PMID: 35753096 PMCID: PMC9212952 DOI: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2022.06.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2022] [Revised: 05/24/2022] [Accepted: 06/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has dramatically altered the experiences of pregnant people. For example, the pandemic has disrupted access to healthcare, social distancing has reduced social support, and vaccine rollout has led to safety concerns. Consistent with the Developmental Theory of Embodiment, which posits that our experiences of our bodies are influenced by social factors, studies have revealed an uptick in body dissatisfaction and disordered eating during this time. However, research on pregnant people's experiences of their body and body image during the pandemic has been largely overlooked. In this exploratory qualitative study, we aimed to broadly understand how the pandemic and quarantine have impacted the way pregnant women (N = 190) in the US and UK relate to their bodies. We used Consensual Qualitative Research-Modified (CQR-M) to analyze pregnant women's brief textual accounts of their embodied experiences during the pandemic and identified eight core domains across the dataset. Some participants reported no change in their embodied experiences, whereas others reported accounts of appearance and weight concerns, health behavior self-judgment, gratitude for isolation, body appreciation, maternal healthcare concerns, COVID health concerns, and health and safety strategies. We conclude with implications and recommendations for supporting pregnant people and their embodied well-being during health crises.
Collapse
|
27
|
Ashby GB, Riggan KA, Huang L, Torbenson VE, Long ME, Wick MJ, Allyse MA, Rivera-Chiauzzi EY. "I had so many life-changing decisions I had to make without support": a qualitative analysis of women's pregnant and postpartum experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2022; 22:537. [PMID: 35787675 PMCID: PMC9251587 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-022-04816-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2022] [Accepted: 05/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The COVID-19 pandemic has posed profound challenges for pregnant patients and their families. Studies conducted early in the pandemic found that pregnant individuals reported increased mental health concerns in response to pandemic-related stress. Many obstetric practices changed their healthcare delivery models, further impacting the experiences of pregnant patients. We conducted a survey study to explore the ways in which COVID-19 impacted the lives of pregnant and newly postpartum people. METHODS A mixed-methods survey was distributed to all patients ≥18 years old who were pregnant between January 1st, 2020 - April 28, 2021 in a large Midwest health system. Open-ended survey responses were analyzed for common themes using standard qualitative methodology. RESULTS Among the 1182 survey respondents, 647 women provided an open-ended response. Of these, 77% were in the postpartum period. The majority of respondents identified as white, were partnered or married, and owned their own home. Respondents reported feeling greater uncertainty, social isolation, as though they had limited social and practical support, and negative mental health effects as a result of the pandemic. Many cited sudden or arbitrary changes to their medical care as a contributing factor. Though in the minority, some respondents also reported benefits from the changes to daily life, including perceived improvements to medical care, better work-life balance, and opportunities for new perspectives. CONCLUSIONS This large qualitative dataset provides insight into how healthcare policy and lifestyle changes impacted pregnant and postpartum people. Respondents expressed similar levels of uncertainty and mental health concerns compared to other cohorts but less overall positivity. Our findings suggest greater attention be given to the impact of pandemic-related stress on pregnant and postpartum women. As the pandemic continues, these data identify areas where investment in additional support may have the greatest impact.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kirsten A Riggan
- Biomedical Ethics Research Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Lily Huang
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | | | - Margaret E Long
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Myra J Wick
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Megan A Allyse
- Biomedical Ethics Research Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Laganà AS, Veronesi G, Ghezzi F, Ferrario MM, Cromi A, Bizzarri M, Garzon S, Cosentino M. Evaluation of menstrual irregularities after COVID-19 vaccination: Results of the MECOVAC survey. Open Med (Wars) 2022; 17:475-484. [PMID: 35350834 PMCID: PMC8919838 DOI: 10.1515/med-2022-0452] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2022] [Revised: 02/06/2022] [Accepted: 02/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
We investigated menstrual irregularities after the first and second doses of the COVID-19 vaccine. Women answered a customised online questionnaire (ClinicalTrial.gov ID: NCT05083065) aimed to assess the vaccine type, the phase of the menstrual cycle during which the vaccine was administered, the occurrence of menstrual irregularities after the first and second doses, and how long this effect lasted. We excluded women with gynaecological and non-gynaecological diseases, undergoing hormonal and non-hormonal treatments, in perimenopause or menopause, as well as those who had irregular menstrual cycles in the last 12 months before vaccine administration. According to our data analysis, approximately 50-60% of reproductive-age women who received the first dose of the COVID-19 vaccine reported menstrual cycle irregularities, regardless of the type of administered vaccine. The occurrence of menstrual irregularities seems to be slightly higher (60-70%) after the second dose. Menstrual irregularities after both the first and second doses of the vaccine were found to self-resolve in approximately half the cases within two months. Based on these results, we suggest to consider these elements during the counselling of women who receive the COVID-19 vaccine, letting them know about the potential occurrence of temporary and self-limiting menstrual cycle irregularities in the subsequent month(s).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Simone Laganà
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, “Filippo Del Ponte” Hospital, University of Insubria, 21100, Varese, Italy
| | - Giovanni Veronesi
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, School of Medicine, Research Center in Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University of Insubria, 21100, Varese, Italy
| | - Fabio Ghezzi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, “Filippo Del Ponte” Hospital, University of Insubria, 21100, Varese, Italy
| | - Marco Mario Ferrario
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, School of Medicine, Research Center in Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University of Insubria, 21100, Varese, Italy
- Occupational Medicine Unit, University Hospital of Varese, 21100, Varese, Italy
| | - Antonella Cromi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, “Filippo Del Ponte” Hospital, University of Insubria, 21100, Varese, Italy
| | - Mariano Bizzarri
- Department of Experimental Medicine, Systems Biology Group Lab, University La Sapienza, 00161, Rome, Italy
| | - Simone Garzon
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, AOUI Verona, University of Verona, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Marco Cosentino
- Center for Research in Medical Pharmacology, University of Insubria, 21100, Varese, Italy
| |
Collapse
|