1
|
Hirata K, Yoshida K, Katada C, Watanabe A, Tsushima T, Yamaguchi T, Yamamoto S, Ishikawa H, Sato Y, Imamura CK, Tanigawara Y, Ito Y, Kato K, Kitagawa Y, Hamamoto Y. Definitive chemoradiotherapy with paclitaxel for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in older patients (PARADISE-1): a phase I trial. BMC Cancer 2024; 24:873. [PMID: 39030570 PMCID: PMC11264717 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-12653-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2023] [Accepted: 07/17/2024] [Indexed: 07/21/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In older patients, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is difficult to treat using standard therapies, including surgery and cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy. Paclitaxel (PTX) has radiosensitizing activity. We conducted a phase I trial of PTX combined with radiotherapy to establish a standard therapy for locally advanced ESCC in older patients. METHODS Enrollment was conducted at six centers in Japan from April 2016 to September 2019. The participants were aged ≥ 70 years, had locally advanced ESCC, and were intolerant to surgery or unwilling. A fixed 60-Gy radiation dose was administered in 30 fractions. PTX dosing levels started at 30 mg/m2 weekly for 6 weeks. Depending on the number of DLTs, the dose was set to be increased by 10 mg/m2 or switched to biweekly. A geriatric assessment was performed before treatment using the Geriatric-8 screening tool. The primary endpoint was dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). RESULTS We enrolled 24 patients (6 per group); DLT was observed in one (grade 4 hypokalemia), one (grade 3 aspiration), two (grade 3 radiodermatitis, grade 3 esophageal hemorrhage), and two (grade 3 anorexia, grade 5 pneumonitis) patients in the weekly PTX 30, 40, 50, and 60 mg/m2 groups, respectively. All adverse events, except death in the 60 mg/m2 group, showed reversible improvement, and the safety profile was considered acceptable. The 2-year survival and complete response rates were 40.0% and 54.2%, respectively. There was a significant difference in survival between favorable and unfavorable Geriatric-8 scores. CONCLUSIONS The recommended PTX dose with concomitant radiation was determined to be 50 mg/m2 weekly. Phase II trials at this dose are underway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenro Hirata
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
- Keio Cancer Center, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| | - Kayo Yoshida
- Department of Radiology, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| | - Chikatoshi Katada
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minami, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 252-0374, Japan
| | - Akinori Watanabe
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minami, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 252-0374, Japan
| | - Takahiro Tsushima
- Division of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Shizuoka Cancer Center, 1007 , Nagaizumi-Cho, Sunto-Gun, Shizuoka, 411-8777, Japan
| | - Toshifumi Yamaguchi
- Cancer Chemotherapy Center, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 2-7, Daigaku-Cho, Takatsuki, Osaka, 569-8686, Japan
| | - Sachiko Yamamoto
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, 1-3-3Higashinari-Ku, NakamichiOsaka, 537-8511, Japan
| | - Hideki Ishikawa
- Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, 3-2-17-2F Imabashi, Chuo-Ku, Osaka, 541-0042, Japan
| | - Yasunori Sato
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| | - Chiyo K Imamura
- Advanced Cancer Translational Research Institute, Showa University, 1-5-8 Hatanodai, Shinagawa-Ku, Tokyo, 142-8555, Japan
| | - Yusuke Tanigawara
- Laboratory of Pharmacometrics and Systems Pharmacology, Keio Frontier Research & Education Collaborative Square at Tonomachi, Keio University, 3-25-10 Tonomachi, Kawasaki-Ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, 210-0821, Japan
| | - Yoshinori Ito
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Showa University School of Medicine, 1-5-8 Hatanodai, Shinagawa-Ku, Tokyo, 142-8555, Japan
| | - Ken Kato
- Department of Head and Neck, Esophageal Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-Ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan
| | - Yuko Kitagawa
- Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| | - Yasuo Hamamoto
- Keio Cancer Center, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bakas AT, Polinder-Bos HA, Streng F, Mattace-Raso FUS, Ziere G, de Jong RJB, Sewnaik A. Frailty in Non-geriatric Patients With Head and Neck cancer. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2023; 169:1215-1224. [PMID: 37264978 DOI: 10.1002/ohn.388] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2022] [Revised: 04/10/2023] [Accepted: 05/01/2023] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) are characterized by a poor lifestyle and comorbidity. The Geriatric 8 (G8) is an established screening tool to identify frail older patients with cancer. However, studies evaluating frailty in younger HNC patients are lacking. The aim of this study is to evaluate if the G8 can identify frailty and if it is related to mortality in younger HNC patients. STUDY DESIGN Case-control study design. SETTING Tertiary cancer center. METHODS We studied patients <70 years with HNC. Patients with G8 ≤ 14 were considered frail. Patients were matched to nonfrail (G8 > 14) control patients. Patients were matched according to sex, age, smoking, tumor location, and period of first consultation. Baseline health characteristics were compared between frail patients and nonfrail controls. Second, the treatment plan and adverse outcomes were compared. RESULTS Forty-five patients with G8 ≤ 14 were included and matched to 90 nonfrail controls. The median follow-up time was 357 days. Frail patients had a significantly lower body mass index and level of education, a worse World Health Organization performance status, and reported lower experienced overall health. 28.9% of the frail patients died after 1 year versus 10% of the nonfrail control patients (hazard ratio: 3.87 [95% confidence interval: 1.32-11.36], p = 0.014). CONCLUSION The G8 is a valid screening tool to identify frail patients in younger HNC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ajay T Bakas
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Harmke A Polinder-Bos
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Geriatric Medicine, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Fleur Streng
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Geriatric Medicine, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Gijsbertus Ziere
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Geriatric Medicine, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rob J Baatenburg de Jong
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Aniel Sewnaik
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tack L, Schofield P, Boterberg T, Chandler R, Parris CN, Debruyne PR. Practical Implementation of the Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment to Optimise Care for Older Adults with Cancer. Geriatrics (Basel) 2023; 8:geriatrics8010018. [PMID: 36826360 PMCID: PMC9957492 DOI: 10.3390/geriatrics8010018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2023] [Accepted: 01/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Whilst cancer remains a very serious health problem at any stage, cancer combined with increasing age creates an even more challenging situation for health care providers [...].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Tack
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kortrijk Cancer Centre, General Hospital Groeninge, 8500 Kortrijk, Belgium
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
| | - Patricia Schofield
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Health, University of Plymouth, Plymouth PL4 8AA, UK
| | - Tom Boterberg
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
| | - Rebecca Chandler
- School of Allied Health, Faculty of Health, Education, Medicine and Social Care, Chelmsford CM1 1SQ, UK
| | - Christopher N. Parris
- Medical Technology Research Centre (MTRC), School of Life Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge CB1 1PT, UK
| | - Philip R. Debruyne
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kortrijk Cancer Centre, General Hospital Groeninge, 8500 Kortrijk, Belgium
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Health, University of Plymouth, Plymouth PL4 8AA, UK
- Medical Technology Research Centre (MTRC), School of Life Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge CB1 1PT, UK
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dickstein DR, Powers AE, Vujovic D, Roof S, Bakst RL. Clinical and Therapeutic Considerations for Older Adults with Head and Neck Cancer. Clin Interv Aging 2023; 18:409-422. [PMID: 36959837 PMCID: PMC10029371 DOI: 10.2147/cia.s366155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2022] [Accepted: 03/04/2023] [Indexed: 03/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Approximately 30% of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) are at least 70 years of age, and this percentage is expected to increase as the population increases and lives longer. Elderly patients are underrepresented in head and neck oncology clinical trials, and there is minimal evidence on the management of HNSCC for this population. Subsequently, despite their best intentions, physicians may unknowingly recommend an ill-suited course of therapy, which may result in suboptimal oncological or functional outcomes or adverse events. Surgical approaches have the potential to carry a higher risk of morbidity and mortality in older adults, especially in patients with multiple comorbidities. Definitive radiation therapy treatment in patients with HNSCC frequently involves 7 weeks of daily radiation, sometimes with concurrent chemotherapy, and this demanding treatment can be difficult for older adult patients, which may lead to treatment interruptions, potential removal of concurrent systemic therapy, compromised outcomes, and diminished quality of life. There are clinical trials currently underway investigating altered fractionation regimens and novel, less toxic systemic treatments in this population. This review provides an overview of how best to approach an older adult with HNSCC, from initial work-up to treatment selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel R Dickstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ann E Powers
- Department of Otolaryngology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Dragan Vujovic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Scott Roof
- Department of Otolaryngology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Richard L Bakst
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
- Correspondence: Richard L Bakst, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1184 5th Avenue 1st Fl, Box 1236, New York, NY, 10029, USA, Tel/Fax +1 212 241 3545, Email
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Nonsurgical Treatment Strategies for Elderly Head and Neck Cancer Patients: An Emerging Subject Worldwide. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14225689. [PMID: 36428780 PMCID: PMC9688456 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14225689] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2022] [Revised: 11/12/2022] [Accepted: 11/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Consistent with the increasing rate of head and neck cancers among elderly adults, there has been an increase in the rate of those receiving nonsurgical treatments to maintain their function and quality of life. However, various problems, such as poor tolerance to chemoradiotherapy-related toxicity, are of greater concern in elderly adults than in younger individuals. In this review, we describe adverse events that should be particularly noted in elderly patients and provide an overview of countermeasures in nonsurgical treatments. We mainly focus on cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy-the primary treatment for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Furthermore, we review the molecular targeted drugs and immune checkpoint inhibitors for elderly patients with HNSCC. Although the number of older patients is increasing worldwide, clinical trials aimed at determining the standard of care typically enroll younger or well-conditioned elderly patients. There is still very little evidence for treating elderly HNSCC older patients, and the question of optimal treatment needs to be explored.
Collapse
|
6
|
Shah HP, Cohen O, Sukys J, Dibble J, Mehra S. The impact of frailty on adjuvant treatment in patients with head and neck free flap reconstruction-A retrospective study using two independent frailty scores. Oral Oncol 2022; 132:106006. [PMID: 35835056 DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2022.106006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2022] [Revised: 05/17/2022] [Accepted: 06/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Reconstructive surgery may result in prolonged postoperative recovery, especially in frail patients, which in turn may impact delivery of adjuvant therapy. To date, no studies have investigated potential associations between frailty and adjuvant treatment delivery after reconstructive surgery. We examine the impact of frailty on time to initiation, duration, and completion of adjuvant treatment after reconstructive surgery for head and neck cancers (HNCs). METHODS A retrospective review of patients who underwent free flap reconstruction for HNC at a single institution from 2015 to 2021 and received adjuvant radiation was performed. Frailty was assessed using two independent scales: the 11-item modified frailty index (mFI) score and binary Johns Hopkins Adjusted Clinical Groups (ACG) frailty indicator. Timely adjuvant initiation (within six weeks of surgery), duration of adjuvant treatment, and completion were compared between frail and non-frail patients. RESULTS Of the 163 patients included for analysis, 52 (31.9%) were identified as frail by the ACG indicator and 24 (14.7%) were identified as frail with an mFI score ≥ 3. Frail patients (mFI score ≥ 3) were significantly less likely than non-frail patients to initiate adjuvant treatment within six weeks (OR:0.21, CI:0.04-0.85, p = 0.046). Frailty designated by either frailty scale was not significantly associated with adjuvant treatment duration. Likelihood of adjuvant treatment completion was significantly lower for frail compared to non-frail patients by both scales: ACG indicator (OR 0.02, CI:9.05 × 10-4-0.25, p = 0.007) and mFI score ≥ 3 (OR:0.01, CI:6.85 × 10-4-0.13, p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS Frailty is associated with decreased likelihood of timely adjuvant treatment initiation and completion in patients with HNCs after free flap reconstruction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hemali P Shah
- Yale University School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology, Section of Head and Neck Surgery, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Oded Cohen
- Yale University School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology, Section of Head and Neck Surgery, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Jordan Sukys
- Yale University School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology, Section of Head and Neck Surgery, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Jacqueline Dibble
- Yale University School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology, Section of Head and Neck Surgery, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Saral Mehra
- Yale University School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology, Section of Head and Neck Surgery, New Haven, CT, USA; Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Dickstein DR, Lehrer EJ, Hsieh K, Hotca A, Jones BM, Powers A, Sharma S, Liu J, Gupta V, Mell L, Husain Z, Kirke D, Misiukiewicz K, Posner M, Genden E, Bakst RL. Management of Older Adults with Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14112809. [PMID: 35681789 PMCID: PMC9179912 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14112809] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2022] [Revised: 05/29/2022] [Accepted: 06/01/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Approximately one third of patients with head and neck cancer are older adults. The number of older adults with head and neck cancer continues to rise especially as life expectancy increases. However, this population remains significantly underrepresented in clinical trials. Due to this, there is no clear consensus regarding the optimal treatment for older adults with head and neck cancer. In general, older adults are a complex cohort due to variations in functional and performance status, medical comorbidities, and medication management. Treatment for head and neck cancer involves surgery, radiation therapy, systemic therapy, or a combination. These treatments are highly demanding. Additionally, they are associated with toxicity which can be especially difficult for older adults to tolerate. This may lead to treatment interruptions and compromised outcomes. In order to understand the optimal treatment for older adults with head and neck cancer, novel predictive scores are being developed. Additionally, ongoing clinical trials are investigating less intensive treatments for older adults. This review provides an overview of current clinical data, treatment considerations, and future areas of investigation for older adults with head and neck cancer. Abstract Thirty percent of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) are at least 70 years of age. This number continues to rise as life expectancy continues to increase. Still, older adults with HNSCC remain underrepresented in clinical trials, resulting in ambiguity on optimal management. Older adults are a complex patient population, often requiring increased support due to issues relating to functional and performance status, medical comorbidities, and medication management. Furthermore, in older adults with HNSCC, many of these conditions are independently associated with increased toxicity and worse outcomes. Toxicity in the older adult remains difficult to predict and to understand, and as treatment decisions are based on treatment tolerability, it is essential to understand the toxicities and how to minimize them. Novel predictive scores are being developed specifically for older adults with HNSCC to understand toxicity and to assist in personalized treatment decisions. There are clinical trials presently underway that are investigating shortened radiation courses and novel, less toxic systemic treatments in this population. In the forthcoming sections, we provide a detailed overview of the clinical data, treatment paradigms, and considerations in this population. This review provides a comprehensive overview of existing clinical data and clinical considerations in the older adult head and neck cancer population. Additionally, we provide a detailed overview of pertinent current and ongoing clinical trials, as well as future areas for investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel R. Dickstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA; (D.R.D.); (E.J.L.); (K.H.); (A.H.); (B.M.J.); (S.S.); (J.L.); (V.G.)
| | - Eric J. Lehrer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA; (D.R.D.); (E.J.L.); (K.H.); (A.H.); (B.M.J.); (S.S.); (J.L.); (V.G.)
| | - Kristin Hsieh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA; (D.R.D.); (E.J.L.); (K.H.); (A.H.); (B.M.J.); (S.S.); (J.L.); (V.G.)
| | - Alexandra Hotca
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA; (D.R.D.); (E.J.L.); (K.H.); (A.H.); (B.M.J.); (S.S.); (J.L.); (V.G.)
| | - Brianna M. Jones
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA; (D.R.D.); (E.J.L.); (K.H.); (A.H.); (B.M.J.); (S.S.); (J.L.); (V.G.)
| | - Ann Powers
- Department of Otolaryngology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA; (A.P.); (D.K.); (E.G.)
| | - Sonam Sharma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA; (D.R.D.); (E.J.L.); (K.H.); (A.H.); (B.M.J.); (S.S.); (J.L.); (V.G.)
| | - Jerry Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA; (D.R.D.); (E.J.L.); (K.H.); (A.H.); (B.M.J.); (S.S.); (J.L.); (V.G.)
| | - Vishal Gupta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA; (D.R.D.); (E.J.L.); (K.H.); (A.H.); (B.M.J.); (S.S.); (J.L.); (V.G.)
| | - Loren Mell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92110, USA;
| | - Zain Husain
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada;
| | - Diana Kirke
- Department of Otolaryngology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA; (A.P.); (D.K.); (E.G.)
| | - Krzysztof Misiukiewicz
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA; (K.M.); (M.P.)
| | - Marshall Posner
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA; (K.M.); (M.P.)
| | - Eric Genden
- Department of Otolaryngology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA; (A.P.); (D.K.); (E.G.)
| | - Richard L. Bakst
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA; (D.R.D.); (E.J.L.); (K.H.); (A.H.); (B.M.J.); (S.S.); (J.L.); (V.G.)
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Corry J, Ng WT, Ma SJ, Singh AK, de Graeff P, Oosting SF. Disadvantaged Subgroups Within the Global Head and Neck Cancer Population: How Can We Optimize Care? Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2022; 42:1-10. [PMID: 35439036 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_359482] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Within the global head and neck cancer population, there are subgroups of patients with poorer cancer outcomes independent from tumor characteristics. In this article, we review three such groups. The first group comprises patients with nasopharyngeal cancer in low- and middle-income countries where access to high-volume, well-resourced radiotherapy centers is limited. We discuss a recent study that is aiming to improve outcomes through the instigation of a comprehensive radiotherapy quality assurance program. The second group comprises patients with low socioeconomic status in a high-income country who experience substantial financial toxicity, defined as financial hardship for patients due to health care costs. We review causes and consequences of financial toxicity and discuss how it can be mitigated. The third group comprises older patients who may poorly tolerate and not benefit from intensive standard-of-care treatment. We discuss the role of geriatric assessment, particularly in relation to the use of chemotherapy. Through better recognition and understanding of disadvantaged groups within the global head and neck cancer population, we will be better placed to instigate the necessary changes to improve outcomes and quality of life for patients with head and neck cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- June Corry
- Division Radiation Oncology, GenesisCare Radiation OncologySt Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.,Department of MedicineThe University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Wai Tong Ng
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of MedicineThe University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.,Clinical Oncology CentreThe University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| | - Sung Jun Ma
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY
| | - Anurag K Singh
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY
| | - Pauline de Graeff
- University Center for Geriatric MedicineUniversity Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Sjoukje F Oosting
- Department of Medical OncologyUniversity Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Mady LJ, Baddour K, Hodges JC, Magaña LC, Schwarzbach HL, Borrebach JD, Nilsen ML, Johnson JT, Hall DE. The impact of frailty on mortality in non-surgical head and neck cancer treatment: Shifting the clinical paradigm. Oral Oncol 2022; 126:105766. [PMID: 35168191 PMCID: PMC9642850 DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2022.105766] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2021] [Revised: 01/11/2022] [Accepted: 02/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Compare survival of head and neck cancer (HNC) patients treated with surgical or non-surgical management according to frailty, quantify frailty with the Risk Analysis Index (RAI), a validated 14-item instrument. MATERIALS AND METHODS Prospective cohort study of newly diagnosed HNC patients (≥18 years) who had frailty assessment from April 13, 2016 to September 30, 2016. Primary outcome was overall survival at 1- and 3-years. Cox proportional hazard models were utilized to examine mortality with predictor variables. Adjusted and unadjusted (Kaplan-Meier) survival curves stratified by either RAI scores or treatment modality were plotted. Kruskal-Wallis and likelihood ratio chi-square tests were used for comparing clinicodemographic variables. RESULTS Of 165 patients, 54 (32.7%) were managed non-surgically, 49 (29.7%) were treated with definitive surgery only, and 62 (37.6%) were treated with multimodality (surgery + adjuvant) therapy. Among the full cohort and subgroup analysis of the frail/very frail (RAI ≥ 37), non-surgical patients had worse or similar 3-year survival than those treated with surgery +/- adjuvant therapy. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard models demonstrate that frail patients treated non-surgically experienced worse survival than their counterparts treated with surgery (HR = 2.50, p = 0.015, 95% CI: 1.19, 5.23) or multimodality therapy (HR = 3.91, p < 0.001, 95% CI: 1.94-7.89). CONCLUSION Across all levels of frailty, long term survival of HNC patients treated without surgery is either worse than or like those treated with surgery. These findings (1) challenge current practices of steering patients "too frail for surgery" towards non-surgical, "non-invasive" therapy, and (2) suggest equipoise warranting randomized trials to clarify treatment of frail patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leila J. Mady
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA,Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Khalil Baddour
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | - Linda C. Magaña
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Hannah L. Schwarzbach
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Marci L. Nilsen
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA,Department of Acute and Tertiary Care, University of Pittsburgh School of Nursing, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Jonas T. Johnson
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Daniel E. Hall
- Wolff Center at UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA, USA,Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA, USA,Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA, USA,Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Chan WL, Chow JCH, Xu ZY, Li J, Kwong WTG, Ng WT, Lee AWM. Management of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma in Elderly Patients. Front Oncol 2022; 12:810690. [PMID: 35178346 PMCID: PMC8844547 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.810690] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2021] [Accepted: 01/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) is one of the most difficult cancers in the head and neck region due to the complex geometry of the tumour and the surrounding critical organs. High-dose radical radiotherapy with or without concurrent platinum-based chemotherapy is the primary treatment modality. Around 10%–15% of NPC patients have their diagnosis at age after 70. The management of NPC in elderly patients is particularly challenging as they encompass a broad range of patient phenotypes and are often prone to treatment-related toxicities. Chronologic age alone is insufficient to decide on the management plan. Comprehensive geriatric assessment with evaluation on patients’ functional status, mental condition, estimated life expectancy, comorbidities, risks and benefits of the treatment, patients’ preference, and family support is essential. In addition, little data from randomized controlled trials are available to guide treatment decisions in elderly patients with NPC. In deciding which treatment strategy would be suitable for an individual elderly patient, we reviewed the literature and reviewed the analysis of primary studies, reviews, and guidelines on management of NPC. This review also summarises the current evidence for NPC management in elderly adults from early to late stage of disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wing Lok Chan
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - James Chung Hang Chow
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital (QEH), Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Zhi-Yuan Xu
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Shenzhen Hospital, University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, China
| | - Jishi Li
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Shenzhen Hospital, University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, China
| | - Wing Tung Gobby Kwong
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Wai Tong Ng
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Anne W M Lee
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong SAR, China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Haehl E, Rühle A, Spohn S, Sprave T, Gkika E, Zamboglou C, Grosu AL, Nicolay NH. Patterns-of-Care Analysis for Radiotherapy of Elderly Head-and-Neck Cancer Patients: A Trinational Survey in Germany, Austria and Switzerland. Front Oncol 2022; 11:723716. [PMID: 35047384 PMCID: PMC8761738 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.723716] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2021] [Accepted: 12/08/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The number of elderly head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients is increasing, and clinical trials defining the standard of care either excluded or underrepresented elderly patients. This leaves physicians with a challenging and highly individual treatment decision largely lacking clinical evidence. METHODS A tri-national patterns-of-care survey was sent to all members of the German (DEGRO), Austrian (ÖGRO), and Swiss (SRO/SSRO) national societies of radiation oncology. The online questionnaire consisted of 27 questions on the treatment of elderly HNSCC patients, including 6 case-based questions. Frequency distributions and subgroup comparisons were calculated using SPSS statistics software. RESULTS A total of 132 answers were collected, including 46(35%) form universities, 52(39%) from non-university-hospitals and 34(26%) from private practices. 83(63%) treat 1-5 and 42(32%) >5 elderly HNSCC patients per month. Target volumes are defined analog current guidelines by 65(50%) of responders and altered based on age/comorbidities or tumor stage by 36(28%) and 28(22%), respectively. Chemotherapy is routinely administered by 108(84%) if indicated, with weekly 40mg/m2 of cisplatin being the favored regimen by 68(53%) in the definitive situation and 60(47%) in the adjuvant setting. Hypofractionation and hyperfractionation/acceleration are used by 26(20%) and 11(9%), respectively. Only 7(5%) clinicians routinely recommend inpatient treatment for elderly HNSCC patients. In a typical definitive patient case, 73(63%) responders recommended chemoradiation with bilateral elective node irradiation analog current guidelines. In an adjuvant example case recommendations regarding elective volume and chemotherapy were heterogeneous. Differences between responders' institutions concern the frequency of PET-CT in staging, preventive port-catheter and PEG implantation, the choice of chemotherapy regimens and the use of alternative fractionations. CONCLUSION Treatment of elderly HNSCC-patients in the German-speaking countries mainly follows guidelines established for younger patients. Algorithms for patient stratification and treatment de-escalation for "unfit" elderly patients are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erik Haehl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Alexander Rühle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Simon Spohn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tanja Sprave
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eleni Gkika
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Anca-Ligia Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nils H Nicolay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Fasano M, D’Onofrio I, Belfiore MP, Angrisani A, Caliendo V, Della Corte CM, Pirozzi M, Facchini S, Caterino M, Guida C, Nardone V, Reginelli A, Cappabianca S. Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Elderly Patients: Role of Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:472. [PMID: 35158740 PMCID: PMC8833743 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14030472] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2021] [Revised: 01/13/2022] [Accepted: 01/13/2022] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC) constitute the sixth most common malignancy worldwide, with approximately 25-40% of the diagnosed patients older than 70 years. HNSCC patients are often frail and frequently have multiple comorbidities due to their unhealthy lifestyle, and evidence suggests that older patients may receive less aggressive and suboptimal treatment than younger patients with the same disease status. The aim of this review is to depict and summarize the evidence regarding the different strategies that can be used in the clinical management of elderly HNSCC patients. Key references were derived from a PubMed query. Hand searching and clinicaltrials.gov were also used. This paper contains a narrative report and a critical discussion of clinical approaches in the context of elderly HNSCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Morena Fasano
- Department of Precision Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Campania “L. Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy; (M.F.); (M.P.B.); (A.A.); (V.C.); (C.M.D.C.); (M.P.); (S.F.); (M.C.); (A.R.); (S.C.)
| | - Ida D’Onofrio
- Unit of Radiation Oncology, Ospedale del Mare, ASL Napoli 1 Centro, 80147 Naples, Italy; (I.D.); (C.G.)
| | - Maria Paola Belfiore
- Department of Precision Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Campania “L. Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy; (M.F.); (M.P.B.); (A.A.); (V.C.); (C.M.D.C.); (M.P.); (S.F.); (M.C.); (A.R.); (S.C.)
| | - Antonio Angrisani
- Department of Precision Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Campania “L. Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy; (M.F.); (M.P.B.); (A.A.); (V.C.); (C.M.D.C.); (M.P.); (S.F.); (M.C.); (A.R.); (S.C.)
| | - Valentina Caliendo
- Department of Precision Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Campania “L. Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy; (M.F.); (M.P.B.); (A.A.); (V.C.); (C.M.D.C.); (M.P.); (S.F.); (M.C.); (A.R.); (S.C.)
| | - Carminia Maria Della Corte
- Department of Precision Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Campania “L. Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy; (M.F.); (M.P.B.); (A.A.); (V.C.); (C.M.D.C.); (M.P.); (S.F.); (M.C.); (A.R.); (S.C.)
| | - Mario Pirozzi
- Department of Precision Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Campania “L. Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy; (M.F.); (M.P.B.); (A.A.); (V.C.); (C.M.D.C.); (M.P.); (S.F.); (M.C.); (A.R.); (S.C.)
| | - Sergio Facchini
- Department of Precision Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Campania “L. Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy; (M.F.); (M.P.B.); (A.A.); (V.C.); (C.M.D.C.); (M.P.); (S.F.); (M.C.); (A.R.); (S.C.)
| | - Marianna Caterino
- Department of Precision Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Campania “L. Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy; (M.F.); (M.P.B.); (A.A.); (V.C.); (C.M.D.C.); (M.P.); (S.F.); (M.C.); (A.R.); (S.C.)
| | - Cesare Guida
- Unit of Radiation Oncology, Ospedale del Mare, ASL Napoli 1 Centro, 80147 Naples, Italy; (I.D.); (C.G.)
| | - Valerio Nardone
- Department of Precision Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Campania “L. Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy; (M.F.); (M.P.B.); (A.A.); (V.C.); (C.M.D.C.); (M.P.); (S.F.); (M.C.); (A.R.); (S.C.)
| | - Alfonso Reginelli
- Department of Precision Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Campania “L. Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy; (M.F.); (M.P.B.); (A.A.); (V.C.); (C.M.D.C.); (M.P.); (S.F.); (M.C.); (A.R.); (S.C.)
| | - Salvatore Cappabianca
- Department of Precision Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Campania “L. Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy; (M.F.); (M.P.B.); (A.A.); (V.C.); (C.M.D.C.); (M.P.); (S.F.); (M.C.); (A.R.); (S.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Thom L, Lowe D, Rogers SN. Implications of the Quality of Life Metric in head and neck cancer. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2021; 60:810-816. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2021.12.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2021] [Revised: 11/29/2021] [Accepted: 12/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
14
|
Combination of the G-8 Screening Tool and Hand-Grip Strength to Predict Long-Term Overall Survival in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Undergoing Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13133363. [PMID: 34282772 PMCID: PMC8269387 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13133363] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2021] [Revised: 07/01/2021] [Accepted: 07/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
The Geriatric 8 (G-8) is a known predictor of overall survival (OS) in older cancer patients, but is mainly based on nutritional aspects. This study aimed to assess if the G-8 combined with a hand-grip strength test (HGST) in patients with NSCLC treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy can predict long-term OS better than the G-8 alone. A total of 46 SBRT-treated patients with NSCLC of stage T1-T2N0M0 were included. Patients were divided into three groups: fit (normal G-8 and HGST), vulnerable (abnormal G-8 or HGST), or frail (abnormal G-8 and HGST). Statistically significant differences were found in 4-year OS between the fit, vulnerable, and frail groups (70% vs. 46% vs. 25%, p = 0.04), as well as between the normal and abnormal G-8 groups (69% vs. 39%, p = 0.02). In a multivariable analysis of OS, being vulnerable with a hazard ratio (HR) of 2.03 or frail with an HR of 3.80 indicated poorer OS, but this did not reach statistical significance. This study suggests that there might be a benefit of adding a physical test to the G-8 for more precisely predicting overall survival in SBRT-treated patients with localized NSCLC. However, this should be confirmed in a larger study population.
Collapse
|
15
|
Predictive Value of Geriatric Oncology Screening and Geriatric Assessment in Older Patients with Solid Cancers: Protocol for a Danish prospective cohort study (PROGNOSIS-G8). J Geriatr Oncol 2021; 12:1270-1276. [PMID: 34176752 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2021.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2021] [Accepted: 06/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Older patients with cancer constitute a heterogeneous group with varying degrees of frailty; therefore, geriatric assessment with initial geriatric oncology screening is recommended. The Geriatric 8 (G8) and the modified Geriatric 8 (mG8) are promising screening tools with high accuracy and an association with survival. However, evidence is sparse regarding patient-centered outcomes. This protocol describes a study, which aims to address the predictive and prognostic value of the G8 and mG8, with quality of life (QoL) as the primary outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this single-center prospective cohort study, patients, age ≥70 years with solid malignancies, will be screened with the G8 and mG8 prior to receiving 1st line antineoplastic treatment. Patients will contribute medical record data including; cancer type, Charlson comorbidity index score, performance status, and treatment intent, type, and dosage, at baseline. Patients will complete QoL questionnaires (EORTC QLQ-C30 and ELD-14) at baseline, 3, 6, 9, and 12-months follow-up. Two functional measurements (the 30-s chair stand test and the handgrip strength test) will be conducted at baseline to assess the added predictive and prognostic value. At 12 months follow-up, initially administered treatment and treatment adherence will be recorded and assessed with generalized linear models, while overall survival and cancer-specific survival will be assessed using survival analysis models with time-varying covariates. The relationship between frailty (G8 ≤ 14, mG8 ≥ 6) and QoL within 12 months will be examined using mixed regression models. DISCUSSION Geriatric oncology screening may identify a subgroup of older patients with frailty, at risk of experiencing diminishing QoL and poor treatment adherence. With the proposed screening program, patients who require treatment modification and additional support to maintain their QoL may be identified. It is our hope, that these insights may facilitate the formation of national guidelines for the treatment of older patients with cancer. Registration:NCT04644874.
Collapse
|
16
|
Dharmarajan KV, Presley CJ, Wyld L. Care Disparities Across the Health Care Continuum for Older Adults: Lessons From Multidisciplinary Perspectives. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2021; 41:1-10. [PMID: 33956492 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_319841] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Older adults comprise a considerable proportion of patients with cancer in the world. Across multiple cancer types, cancer treatment outcomes among older age groups are often inferior to those among younger adults. Cancer care for older individuals is complicated by the need to adapt treatment to baseline health, fitness, and frailty, all of which vary widely within this age group. Rates of social deprivation and socioeconomic disparities are also higher in older adults, with many living on reduced incomes, further compounding health inequality. It is important to recognize and avoid undertreatment and overtreatment of cancer in this age group; however, simply addressing this problem by mandating standard treatment of all would lead to harms resulting from treatment toxicity and futility. However, there is little high-quality evidence on which to base these decisions, because older adults are poorly represented in clinical trials. Clinicians must recognize that simple extrapolation of outcomes from younger age cohorts may not be appropriate because of variance in disease stage and biology, variation in fitness and treatment tolerance, and reduced life expectancy. Older patients may also have different life goals and priorities, with a greater focus on quality of life and less on length of life at any cost. Health care professionals struggle with treatment of older adults with cancer, with high rates of variability in practice between and within countries. This suggests that better national and international recommendations that more fully address the needs of this special patient population are required and that primary research focused on the older age group is urgently required to inform these guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kavita V Dharmarajan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brookdale Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Carolyn J Presley
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, James Cancer Hospital & Solove Research Institute, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
| | - Lynda Wyld
- Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, United Kingdom.,Doncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals, National Health Service Foundation Trust, Doncaster, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Goshtasbi K, Birkenbeuel JL, Lehrich BM, Abiri A, Haidar YM, Tjoa T, Kuan EC. Association Between 5-Item Modified Frailty Index and Short-term Outcomes in Complex Head and Neck Surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2021; 166:482-489. [PMID: 33971756 DOI: 10.1177/01945998211010443] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the impact of preoperative frailty on short-term outcomes following complex head and neck surgeries (HNSs). STUDY DESIGN Cross-sectional database analysis. SETTING American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database. METHODS The 2005 to 2017 ACS-NSQIP was queried for patients undergoing complex HNS. Five-item modified frailty index (mFI) was calculated based on functional status and history of diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, and chronic hypertension. RESULTS A total of 2786 patients (73.1% male) with a mean age of 62.0 ± 11.6 years were included. Compared to nonfrail patients (41.2%), patients with mFI ≥1 (58.8%) had shorter length of operation (P = .021), longer length of stay (LOS) (P < .001), and higher rates of 30-day reoperation (P = .009), medical complications (P < .001), discharge to nonhome facility (DNHF) (P < .001), and mortality (P = .047). These parameters remained statistically significant when compared across all individual mFI scores (all P < .05). After adjusting for age, sex, race, body mass index, smoking, and American Society of Anesthesiologists score via multivariate logistic regression, patients with mFI ≥1 were significantly more likely to undergo reoperation (odds ratio [OR], 1.39), surgical complications (OR, 1.19), medical complications (OR, 1.55), prolonged LOS (OR, 1.29), and DNHF (OR, 1.56) (all P < .05). Multivariate logistic regression also demonstrated that after adjusting for confounders, compared to patients with mFI = 1, patients with mFI = 2-5 (18.7%) were more likely to undergo shorter operations (OR, 0.74), have medical (OR, 1.46) or any complications (OR, 1.27), and have DNHF (OR, 1.62) (all P < .05). CONCLUSION The 5-point mFI can independently predict short-term surgical outcomes following complex HNS. This simple and reliable metric can potentially lead to improved preoperative counseling and postoperative planning for complex HNS patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khodayar Goshtasbi
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Irvine, California, USA
| | - Jack L Birkenbeuel
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Irvine, California, USA
| | - Brandon M Lehrich
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Irvine, California, USA
| | - Arash Abiri
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Irvine, California, USA
| | - Yarah M Haidar
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Irvine, California, USA
| | - Tjoson Tjoa
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Irvine, California, USA
| | - Edward C Kuan
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Irvine, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Use of the Geriatric-8 screening tool to predict prognosis and complications in older adults with head and neck cancer: A prospective, observational study. J Geriatr Oncol 2021; 12:1039-1043. [PMID: 33757718 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2021.03.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2020] [Revised: 02/12/2021] [Accepted: 03/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To clarify the usefulness of geriatric assessment screening tools for predicting prognosis and complications in older adults with head and neck cancer (HNC). MATERIAL AND METHODS The geriatric-8 (G8) screening tool was administered to 78 older adults with HNC at their first visit to the hospital before any treatments. The ability of the G8 to predict survival was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and determining the cut-off value using Youden's Index. The G8 and other factors related to prognosis (age, performance status (PS), Charlson comorbidity index, number of oral medicines (polypharmacy), the controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score for biological nutrition status, and treatment intent (curative or palliative)) were validated by Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. The survival analysis was validated in a propensity score-weighting cohort to correct for confounding factors. Correlations between these factors and complications were examined using Fishers exact test. RESULTS The G8 cut-off value for overall survival was 10.5 (area under the curve (AUC) 0.69; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.56-0.82). In the propensity score-weighted cohort, on Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, the hazard ratio of an abnormal G8 (<11) was 3.70 [1.59-8.61 (p = 0.002)], and the hazard ratio of PS-abnormal (≥2) was 0.85 [0.09-7.60 (p = 0.88)]. Thirty-day mortality and all-complication rates were significantly higher in the G8-abnormal group. Neither major complications nor transfer to other institutions was correlated with an abnormal G8. CONCLUSION The G8 was a strong prognostic factor and a possible predictor of complications in older adults with HNC.
Collapse
|
19
|
Sgnaolin V, Sgnaolin V, Schneider RH. Implicações da avaliação geriátrica ampla na qualidade de vida em pessoas idosas com câncer: uma revisão integrativa. REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE GERIATRIA E GERONTOLOGIA 2021. [DOI: 10.1590/1981-22562021024.200297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Resumo A avaliação geriátrica ampla (AGA) melhora a qualidade do cuidado das pessoas idosas com câncer, pois permite a identificação de problemas geriátricos e fragilidades que tenham implicações na saúde do indivíduo. Apesar dos benefícios da AGA, dificuldades relacionadas ao tempo e gastos com essa ferramenta limitam sua implantação na prática. O objetivo desta revisão é avaliar a relação entre a AGA e a qualidade de vida (QV) de pessoas idosas com câncer, através de uma revisão integrativa da literatura. Foi realizada uma busca por artigos nas bases de dados PubMed, MEDLINE, IBECS e LILACS, publicados entre 2015 e 2020, que abordassem as implicações da AGA na QV de pessoas idosas com câncer e, dos 298 estudos encontrados, 21 foram selecionados para análise. Esses demonstraram que a AGA desempenha função importante ao identificar pessoas idosas com maior risco de comprometimento da QV durante a evolução da neoplasia e do tratamento oncológico, bem como ao orientar a indicação de intervenções geriátricas específicas que previnam a deterioração da QV. Assim, a presente revisão destaca a importância da avaliação integral das pessoas idosas com câncer que, através de diferentes âmbitos, sejam prognósticos ou intervencionistas, desenvolve um papel fundamental na preservação da QV dessa população. Compreende-se a necessidade de desenvolver estratégias para incorporação da AGA no cuidado das pessoas idosas com câncer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valéria Sgnaolin
- Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Brasil; Hospital Mãe de Deus, Brasil
| | - Vanessa Sgnaolin
- Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Brasil
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Jones AJ, Campiti VJ, Alwani M, Novinger LJ, Bonetto A, Sim MW, Yesensky JA, Moore MG, Mantravadi AV. Skeletal Muscle Index's Impact on Discharge Disposition After Head and Neck Cancer Free Flap Reconstruction. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2020; 165:59-68. [PMID: 33290190 DOI: 10.1177/0194599820973232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the role of skeletal muscle index (SMI) in the assessment of frailty and determination of discharge to post-acute care facilities (PACF) after head and neck cancer free flap reconstruction (HNCFFR). STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort. SETTING Single-institution, academic tertiary referral center. METHODS Adult patients undergoing HNCFFR from 2014 to 2019 with preoperative abdominal computed tomography imaging were retrospectively analyzed. Patient demographics, 5-factor modified frailty index (5-mFI), body mass index (BMI), SMI at the third lumbar vertebra, oncologic history, perioperative data, and Clavien-Dindo (CD) complications were collected. Binary logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of discharge disposition. RESULTS The cohort consisted of 206 patients, 62 (30.1%) of whom were discharged to PACF. Patients discharged to PACF were of older age (65.4 vs 57.1 years, P < .0001) and had a lower SMI (38.8 vs 46.8 cm2/m2, P < .0001), higher 5-mFI (≥3; 25.8% vs 4.2%, P < .0001), and greater incidence of stage IV (80.6% vs 64.1%, P = .0211) aerodigestive cancer (80.6% vs 66.7%, P = .0462). Patients discharged to PACF experienced more blood transfusions (74.2% vs 35.4%, P < .0001), major postoperative complications (CD ≥3, 40.3% vs 12.9%, P < .0001), and delirium (33.9% vs 4.2%, P < .0001). After adjusting for pre- and postoperative factors, multivariate binary logistic regression identified age (P = .0255), 5-mFI (P < .0042), SMI (P = .0199), stage IV cancer (P = .0250), aerodigestive tumor (P = .0366), delirium (P < .0001), and perioperative blood transfusion (P = .0144) as independent predictors of discharge to PACF. CONCLUSIONS SMI and 5-mFI are independently associated with discharge to PACF after HNCFFR and should be considered in preoperative planning and assessment of frailty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Joseph Jones
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.,Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | | | - Mohamedkazim Alwani
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.,Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Leah J Novinger
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.,Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Andrea Bonetto
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.,Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Michael W Sim
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.,Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Jessica A Yesensky
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.,Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Michael G Moore
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.,Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Avinash V Mantravadi
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.,Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Chou WC, Chang PH, Chen PT, Wang HM, Yeh KY, Lu CH, Hung YS, Tung-Chieh Chang J, Tsang NM, Ho YW, Chen SY, Lee SH, Hung CY, Wang LJ, Liao KC, Lin CH, Tang WR, Lin YC. Clinical Significance of Vulnerability Assessment in Patients with Primary Head and Neck Cancer Undergoing Definitive Concurrent Chemoradiation Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 108:602-611. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2019] [Revised: 12/05/2019] [Accepted: 01/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
|
22
|
Dharmarajan KV, Mohile SG. Can Geriatric Assessment Measures Be Used to Determine Cancer Treatment Vulnerability in Nongeriatric Patients? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 108:612-614. [PMID: 32976787 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.05.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2020] [Accepted: 05/21/2020] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Kavita V Dharmarajan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brookdale Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
| | - Supriya G Mohile
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Departments of Medicine and Surgery, Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Abstract
The number of older adults with cancer is growing in the United States, and there is a relative paucity of data relating the presence of frailty with its outcomes of interest. The authors present the surgical oncology, radiation oncology, and medical oncology literature with respect to the presence of frailty in older adults with cancer. More research is needed to understand how the presence of frailty should be used by surgical, radiation, and medical oncologists to guide patient counseling and treatment planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina A Minami
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Yawkey 1274, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Zara Cooper
- Division of Trauma, Burn, and Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 1620 Tremont Street, Suite 2-016, Boston, MA 02120, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Gogineni E, Rana Z, Vempati P, Karten J, Sharma A, Taylor P, Pereira L, Frank D, Paul D, Seetharamu N, Ghaly M. Stereotactic body radiotherapy as primary treatment for elderly and medically inoperable patients with head and neck cancer. Head Neck 2020; 42:2880-2886. [PMID: 32691496 DOI: 10.1002/hed.26342] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2019] [Revised: 04/23/2020] [Accepted: 05/30/2020] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) who are not candidates for definitive treatment represent an increasing challenge, with limited data to guide management. Conventional local therapies such as surgery and chemoradiation can significantly impact quality of life (QoL). There has been limited data published using stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) as primary treatment in previously unirradiated patients. We hypothesize that SBRT provides high rates of control while limiting toxicity. METHODS A total of 66 medically unfit previously unirradiated patients with HNC were treated with SBRT, consisting of 35-40 Gy to gross tumor volume and 30 Gy to clinical target volume in five fractions. RESULTS Median age was 80 years. Local control (LC) and overall survival (OS) at 1 year were 73% and 64%. Two patients experienced grade 3 toxicity. CONCLUSION SBRT shows acceptable outcomes with relatively low toxicity in previously unirradiated patients with HNC who are medically unfit for conventional treatment. SBRT may provide an aggressive local therapy with high rates of LC and OS while maintaining QoL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emile Gogineni
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Northwell Health, Lake Success, New York, USA
| | - Zaker Rana
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Northwell Health, Lake Success, New York, USA
| | - Prashant Vempati
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Northwell Health, Lake Success, New York, USA
| | - Jessie Karten
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Northwell Health, Lake Success, New York, USA
| | - Anurag Sharma
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Northwell Health, Lake Success, New York, USA
| | - Peter Taylor
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Northwell Health, Lake Success, New York, USA
| | - Lucio Pereira
- Department of Otolaryngology, Northwell Health, Lake Success, New York, USA
| | - Douglas Frank
- Department of Otolaryngology, Northwell Health, Lake Success, New York, USA
| | - Doru Paul
- Department of Medical Oncology, Northwell Health, Lake Success, New York, USA
| | | | - Maged Ghaly
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Northwell Health, Lake Success, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Gogineni E, Rana Z, Wotman M, Karten J, Riegel A, Marrero M, Maduro L, Kamdar D, Frank D, Paul D, Seetharamu N, Ghaly M. Impact of stereotactic body radiation therapy on geriatric assessment and management for older patients with head and neck cancer using G8. J Geriatr Oncol 2020; 12:122-127. [PMID: 32593669 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2020.06.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2020] [Revised: 05/11/2020] [Accepted: 06/18/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Management of head and neck cancers (HNC) in older adults is a common but challenging clinical scenario. We assess the impact of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) on survival utilizing the Geriatric-8 (G8) questionnaire. MATERIALS AND METHODS 171 HNC patients, deemed medically unfit for definitive treatment, were treated with SBRT ± systemic therapy. G8 questionnaires were collected at baseline, at 4-6 weeks, and at 2-3 months post-treatment. Patients were stratified according to their baseline G8 score: <11 as 'vulnerable', 11-14 as 'intermediate', and >14 as 'fit'. Overall survival (OS) was assessed through univariate Kaplan Meier analysis. Repeated measures ANOVA was used to determine if baseline characteristics affected G8 score changes. RESULTS Median follow-up was seventeen months. 60% of patients presented with recurrent HNC, 30% with untreated HNC primaries, and 10% with metastatic non-HNC primaries. Median age was 75 years. Median Charlson Comorbidity Index score was 2. 51% of patients were 'vulnerable', 37% were 'intermediate', and 12% were 'fit' at baseline, with median survival of 13.2, 24.3, and 41.0 months, respectively (p = .004). Patients who saw a decrease in their follow-up G8 score (n = 69) had significantly lower survival than patients who had stable or increased follow-up G8 scores (n = 102), with median survival of 8.6 vs 36.0 months (p < .001). CONCLUSION The G8 questionnaire may be a useful tool in upfront treatment decision-making to predict prognosis and prevent older patients from receiving inappropriate anti-cancer treatment. Decline in follow-up G8 scores may also predict worse survival and aid in goals of care following treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emile Gogineni
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Northwell Health, Lake Success, NY, USA
| | - Zaker Rana
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Northwell Health, Lake Success, NY, USA
| | - Michael Wotman
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Northwell Health, Lake Success, NY, USA
| | - Jessie Karten
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Northwell Health, Lake Success, NY, USA
| | - Adam Riegel
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Northwell Health, Lake Success, NY, USA
| | - Mihaela Marrero
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Northwell Health, Lake Success, NY, USA
| | - Luis Maduro
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Northwell Health, Lake Success, NY, USA
| | - Dev Kamdar
- Department of Otolarygology, Head / Neck Surgery, Northwell Health, Lake Success, NY, USA
| | - Douglas Frank
- Department of Otolarygology, Head / Neck Surgery, Northwell Health, Lake Success, NY, USA
| | - Doru Paul
- Department of Medical Oncology, Northwell Health, Lake Success, NY, USA
| | | | - Maged Ghaly
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Northwell Health, Lake Success, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Feasibility and safety of 1.5 T MR-guided and daily adapted abdominal-pelvic SBRT for elderly cancer patients: geriatric assessment tools and preliminary patient-reported outcomes. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2020; 146:2379-2397. [PMID: 32372146 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-020-03230-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2020] [Accepted: 04/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We present preliminary data of the first older cancer patients treated with Hybrid Linac for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) consisting of 1.5 T MRI-guided and daily-adapted treatment. The aim was to assess feasibility, safety and the role of G8 and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) questionnaires in predicting patients' QoL, evaluated by patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). METHODS Two groups of patients with localized prostate cancer or abdominal-pelvic oligometastases were analyzed. SBRT schedule consisted of 35 Gy delivered in 5 fractions. The primary endpoint was to measure the impact of G8 and CCI on PROMs. Both G8 and the CCI were performed at baseline, while the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) for PROMs assessment was prospectively performed at baseline and after SBRT. RESULTS Forty older patients were analyzed. The median age was 73 years (range 65-85). For the entire population, the median G8 score was 15 (10-17) and the median CCI score was 6 (4-11). Concerning the PROMS, the EORTC-QLQ C30 questionnaire reported no difference between the pre- and post-SBRT evaluation in all patients, except for the fatigue item that declined after SBRT, especially in the group of patients with a G8 score < 15 and with age < 75 years (p = 0.049). No grade 3 or higher acute toxicity occurred. CONCLUSION This is the first report documenting for older cancer patients that 1.5 T MRI-guided daily-adapted SBRT is feasible, safe and does not impact on the QoL at the end of treatment. Longer follow-up is advocated to report long-term outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION Date of approval April 2019 and numbered MRI/LINAC no. 23748.
Collapse
|
27
|
Ghiassi-Nejad Z, Sindhu KK, Moshier E, Zubizarreta N, Mazumdar M, Goldstein NE, Dharmarajan KV. Factors associated with the receipt and completion of whole brain radiation therapy among older adults in the United States from 2010-2013. J Geriatr Oncol 2020; 11:1096-1102. [PMID: 32245729 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2020.03.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2019] [Revised: 12/25/2019] [Accepted: 03/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) is widely used to treat patients with brain metastases. However, there is debate regarding its utility in patients with poor prognoses. In this study, we sought to characterize the use of WBRT in the United States, especially in adults aged 55 and above. MATERIAL AND METHODS Patients with brain metastases were identified using the National Cancer Database between 2010 and 2013. The receipt and completion of WBRT with various patient factors were correlated using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS 28,422 patients with brain metastases were identified, 23,362 of whom were aged 55 or above. 14,845 patients received WBRT and 12,310 patients completed treatment. Among adults aged 55 and above, 11,945 patients received WBRT, and 9812 patients completed treatment. Patients aged 60 and above were less likely to receive WBRT, while those aged 65 and above were less likely to complete WBRT. DISCUSSION These results suggest that WBRT may be over-utilized in the United States, especially among older adults. Better interventions to improve pre-WBRT decision-making in this population are needed to select patients who might derive benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zahra Ghiassi-Nejad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mount Sinai Hospital, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1184 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Kunal K Sindhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mount Sinai Hospital, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1184 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Erin Moshier
- Institute for Healthcare Delivery Science, Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1425 Madison Avenue (Box 1077), New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Nicole Zubizarreta
- Institute for Healthcare Delivery Science, Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1425 Madison Avenue (Box 1077), New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Madhu Mazumdar
- Institute for Healthcare Delivery Science, Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1425 Madison Avenue (Box 1077), New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Nathan E Goldstein
- Brookdale Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1470 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Kavita V Dharmarajan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mount Sinai Hospital, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1184 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10029, USA; Brookdale Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1470 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10029, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
González-Montalvo JI, Ramírez-Martín R, Menéndez Colino R, Alarcón T, Tarazona-Santabalbina FJ, Martínez-Velilla N, Vidán MT, Pi-Figueras Valls M, Formiga F, Rodríguez Couso M, Hormigo Sánchez AI, Vilches-Moraga A, Rodríguez-Pascual C, Gutiérrez Rodríguez J, Gómez-Pavón J, Sáez López P, Bermejo Boixareu C, Serra Rexach JA, Martínez Peromingo J, Sánchez Castellano C, González Guerrero JL, Martín-Sánchez FJ. [Cross-speciality geriatrics: A health-care challenge for the 21st century]. Rev Esp Geriatr Gerontol 2020; 55:84-97. [PMID: 31870507 DOI: 10.1016/j.regg.2019.10.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2019] [Accepted: 10/25/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Increasing numbers of older persons are being treated by specialties other than Geriatric Medicine. Specialists turn to Geriatric Teams when they need to accurately stratify their patients' risk and prognosis, predict the potential impact of their, often, invasive interventions, optimise their clinical status, and contribute to discharge planning. Oncology and Haematology, Cardiology, General Surgery, and other surgical departments are examples where such collaborative working is already established, to a varying extent. The use of the term "Cross-speciality Geriatrics" is suggested when geriatric care is provided in clinical areas traditionally outside the reach of Geriatric Teams. The core principles of Geriatric Medicine (comprehensive geriatric assessment, patient-centred multidisciplinary targeted interventions, and input at point-of-care) are adapted to the specifics of each specialty and applied to frail older patients in order to deliver a holistic assessment/treatment, better patient/carer experience, and improved clinical outcomes. Using Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment methodology and Frailty scoring in such patients provides invaluable prognostic information, helps in decision making, and enables personalised treatment strategies. There is evidence that such an approach improves the efficiency of health care systems and patient outcomes. This article includes a review of these concepts, describes existing models of care, presents the most commonly used clinical tools, and offers examples of excellence in this new era of geriatric care. In an ever ageing population it is likely that teams will be asked to provide Cross-specialty Geriatrics across different Health Care systems. The fundamentals for its implementation are in place, but further evidence is required to guide future development and consolidation, making it one of the most important challenges for Geriatrics in the coming years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan Ignacio González-Montalvo
- Servicio de Geriatría, Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPAZ, Madrid, España; Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, España.
| | | | | | - Teresa Alarcón
- Servicio de Geriatría, Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPAZ, Madrid, España; Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, España
| | | | - Nicolás Martínez-Velilla
- Navarrabiomed, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra (CHN), Universidad Pública de Navarra (UPNA), IDISNA, Pamplona, España
| | - María Teresa Vidán
- Servicio de Geriatría, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, IiSGM, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, CIBERFES, Madrid, España
| | | | - Francesc Formiga
- Unidad de Geriatría, Servicio de Medicina Interna, IDIBELL, Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge, ĹHospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, España
| | | | - Ana Isabel Hormigo Sánchez
- Servicio de Geriatría, Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, España; Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, España
| | - Arturo Vilches-Moraga
- Servicio de Geriatría, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Manchester, Manchester, Inglaterra
| | | | - José Gutiérrez Rodríguez
- Área de Gestión Clínica de Geriatría, Hospital Monte Naranco, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Principado de Asturias, Oviedo, España
| | - Javier Gómez-Pavón
- Servicio de Geriatría, Hospital Central de la Cruz Roja San José y Santa Adela, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Alfonso X el Sabio, Madrid, España
| | - Pilar Sáez López
- Unidad de Geriatría, Hospital Universitario Fundación de Alcorcón, IdiPAZ, Alcorcón, Madrid, España
| | | | - José Antonio Serra Rexach
- Servicio de Geriatría, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, IiSGM, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, CIBERFES, Madrid, España
| | | | | | - José Luis González Guerrero
- Servicio de Geriatría, Hospital San Pedro de Alcántara, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Cáceres, Cáceres, España
| | - Francisco Javier Martín-Sánchez
- Servicio de Urgencias, Hospital Universitario Clínico San Carlos, IdiSSC, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, España
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Tack L, Lefebvre T, Lycke M, Pottel L, Cool L, Ketelaars L, De Zutter J, Martens E, Pottel H, Stellamans K, Van Eygen K, Werbrouck P, Vergauwe P, Wildiers H, Schofield P, Boterberg T, Debruyne PR. Underrepresentation of vulnerable older patients with cancer in phase II and III oncology registration trials: A case-control study. J Geriatr Oncol 2020; 11:320-326. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2019.09.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2019] [Revised: 07/11/2019] [Accepted: 09/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
|
30
|
Yamada SI, Kurita H, Nakano R, Ohta R, Akita D, Hashidume M, Morishita K, Kondo E, Sakai H. Treatment strategies for and outcomes of older patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2020; 129:322-329. [PMID: 32102767 DOI: 10.1016/j.oooo.2019.10.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2019] [Revised: 07/17/2019] [Accepted: 10/09/2019] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to investigate factors that have a significant impact on decision making regarding treatment strategies and on the resultant outcomes in older patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). STUDY DESIGN To define fit, vulnerable, and frail patients, as well as treatment strategies/outcomes, in patients 75 years of age and older with primary OSCC were retrospectively reviewed from the medical records. RESULTS Among patients with stage I and II tumors, those with a Geriatric 8 (G8) score of 11.5 or greater had favorable outcomes and those with a score less than 11.5 had acceptable outcomes (5-year self-reliance [SR] rates: 80.8 and 53.5%, respectively). Among patients with stage III and IV tumors, those with the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-Performance status (ECOG-PS) score less than 2 and/or a G8 score 11.5 or greater mainly received standard therapy, had favorable outcomes (5-year SR rate: 66.7%). The 5-year SR rates of stage IV patients with an ECOG-PS score 2 or greater and those with a G8 score less than 11.5 were poor regardless of any treatment strategy. Although the 5-year SR rate of patients with standard therapy was 73.4%, that of patients receiving other curative therapies was 0%. CONCLUSIONS In patients with stage III/IV, ECOG-PS 2 or greater, and/or G8 score less than 11.5, treatment was difficult, and the prognosis was poor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shin-Ichi Yamada
- Department of Dentistry and Oral Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Kurita
- Department of Dentistry and Oral Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan.
| | - Ryoko Nakano
- Department of Dentistry and Oral Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan
| | - Ryosuke Ohta
- Department of Dentistry and Oral Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan
| | - Daisuke Akita
- Department of Dentistry and Oral Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan
| | - Masao Hashidume
- Department of Dentistry and Oral Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan
| | - Kota Morishita
- Department of Clinical Oral Oncology, Unit of Translational Medicine, Course of Medical and Dental Sciences, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Eiji Kondo
- Department of Dentistry and Oral Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan
| | - Hironori Sakai
- Department of Dentistry and Oral Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Health related quality of life in older patients with solid tumors and prognostic factors for decline. J Geriatr Oncol 2019; 10:895-903. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2019.03.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2018] [Revised: 01/18/2019] [Accepted: 03/25/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
32
|
van Walree IC, Scheepers E, van Huis-Tanja L, Emmelot-Vonk MH, Bellera C, Soubeyran P, Hamaker ME. A systematic review on the association of the G8 with geriatric assessment, prognosis and course of treatment in older patients with cancer. J Geriatr Oncol 2019; 10:847-858. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2019.04.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2019] [Revised: 04/17/2019] [Accepted: 04/20/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|
33
|
The added value of an assessment of the patient's hand grip strength to the comprehensive geriatric assessment in G8-abnormal older patients with cancer in routine practice. J Geriatr Oncol 2019; 10:931-936. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2019.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2018] [Revised: 09/13/2018] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
|
34
|
Oosting SF, Haddad RI. Best Practice in Systemic Therapy for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Front Oncol 2019; 9:815. [PMID: 31508372 PMCID: PMC6718707 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00815] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2019] [Accepted: 08/08/2019] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Treating head and neck cancer patients with systemic therapy is challenging because of tumor related, patient related and treatment related factors. In this review, we aim to summarize the current standard of care in the curative and palliative setting, and to describe best practice with regard to structural requirements, procedures, and monitoring outcome. Treatment advice for individual head and neck cancer patients is best discussed within a multidisciplinary team. Cisplatin is the drug of choice for concomitant chemoradiotherapy in the primary and postoperative setting, and also a main component of induction chemotherapy. However, acute and late toxicity is often significant. Checkpoint inhibitors have recently been proven to be active in the metastatic setting which has resulted in a shift of paradigm. Detailed knowledge, institution of preventive measures, early recognition, and prompt treatment of adverse events during systemic therapy is of paramount importance. Documentation of patient characteristics, tumor characteristics, treatment details, and clinical and patient reported outcome is essential for monitoring the quality of care. Participation in initiatives for accreditation and registries for benchmarking institutional results are powerful incentives for implementation of best practice procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sjoukje F Oosting
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Robert I Haddad
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Yamada SI, Hasegawa T, Okuyama K, Yamakawa N, Okura M, Hashidume M, Yanamoto S, Akashi M, Kirita T, Umeda M, Kurita H. Clinical significance of the G8 screening tool in elderly patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma. Clin Oral Investig 2019; 24:1953-1961. [PMID: 31410674 DOI: 10.1007/s00784-019-03056-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2019] [Accepted: 08/05/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The present study investigated the clinical significance of the G8 screening tool in elderly oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) patients using a multicenter analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS The medical records of 438 primary OSCC patients aged 75 years and older were retrospectively reviewed. To examine the clinical significance of the G8 screening tool in elderly OSCC patients, self-reliance (SR) rates and prognostic factors were statistically analyzed. RESULTS The mean score of the G8 screening tool was 10.9 ± 2.93. The SR cut-off value of the G8 score was 9.5 in a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Five-year overall survival rates were 40.1% in patients with a G8 score < 9.5 and 58.4% in those with a G8 score ≥ 9.5 (p < 0.01). Five-year cancer-specific rates were 34.3% in patients with a G8 score < 9.5 and 55.7% in those with a G8 score ≥ 9.5 (p < 0.01). Five-year SR rates were 40.7% in patients with a G8 score < 9.5 and 55.3% in those with a G8 score ≥ 9.5 (p < 0.05). A multivariate analysis identified an advanced age (≥ 80 vs < 80; HR, 1.437; 95%CI, 1.181-1.843; p < 0.01), poorer ECOG-PS (2-4 vs 0-1; HR, 1.560; 95%CI, 1.14-2.106; p < 0.01), and standard treatment (non-standard therapy vs standard therapy; HR, 0.598; 95%CI, 0.405-0.910; p < 0.05) as significant independent prognostic factors for SR. A lower G8 score was associated with poorer SR (≥ 9.5 vs < 9.5; HR, 0.765; 95%CI, 0.575-1.034; p = 0.081). CONCLUSION The clinical significance of the G8 score for elderly OSCC patients was demonstrated and its combination with ECOG-PS may be useful for assessing their prognoses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shin-Ichi Yamada
- Department of Dentistry and Oral Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, 3-1-1, Asahi, Matsumoto, 390-8621, Japan.
| | - Takumi Hasegawa
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| | - Kohei Okuyama
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Nobuhiro Yamakawa
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Japan
| | - Masaya Okura
- The 1st Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Graduate School of Dentistry, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Masao Hashidume
- Department of Dentistry and Oral Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, 3-1-1, Asahi, Matsumoto, 390-8621, Japan
| | - Souichi Yanamoto
- Department of Clinical Oral Oncology, Unit of Translational Medicine, Course of Medical and Dental Sciences, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Masaya Akashi
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| | - Tadaaki Kirita
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Japan
| | - Masahiro Umeda
- Department of Clinical Oral Oncology, Unit of Translational Medicine, Course of Medical and Dental Sciences, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Kurita
- Department of Dentistry and Oral Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, 3-1-1, Asahi, Matsumoto, 390-8621, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Schwarzinger M, Luchini S. Estimating health state utility from activities of daily living in the French National Hospital Discharge Database: a feasibility study with head and neck cancer. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2019; 17:129. [PMID: 31345227 PMCID: PMC6659251 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-019-1195-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2019] [Accepted: 07/10/2019] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Health state utility (HSU) is a core component of QALYs and cost-effectiveness analysis, although HSU is rarely estimated among a representative sample of patients. We explored the feasibility of assessing HSU in head and neck cancer from the French National Hospital Discharge database. Methods An exhaustive sample of 53,258 incident adult patients with a first diagnosis of head and neck cancer was identified in 2010–2012. We used a cross-sectional approach to define five health states over two periods: three "cancer stages at initial treatment" (early, locally advanced or metastatic stage); a "relapse state" and otherwise a "relapse-free state" in the follow-up of patients initially treated at early or locally advanced stage. In patients admitted in post-acute care, a two-parameter graded response model (Item Response Theory) was estimated from all 144,012 records of six Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and the latent health state scale underlying ADLs was calibrated with the French EQ-5D-3 L social value set. Following linear interpolation between all assessments of the patient, daily estimates of utility in post-acute care were averaged by health state, patient and month of follow-up. Finally, HSU was estimated by health state and month of follow-up for the whole patient population after controlling for survivorship and selection in post-acute care. Results Head and neck cancer was generally associated with poor HSU estimates in a real-life setting. As compared to “distant metastasis at initial treatment”, mean HSU was higher in other health states, although numerical differences were small (0.45 versus around 0.54). It was primarily explained by the negative effects on HSU of an older age (38.4% aged ≥70 years in “early stage at initial treatment”) and comorbidities (> 50% in other health states). HSU estimates significantly improved over time in the “relapse-free state” (from 8 to 12 months of follow-up). Conclusions HSU estimates in head and neck cancer were primarily driven by age at diagnosis, comorbidities, and time to assessment of cancer survivors. This feasibility study highlights the potential of estimating HSU within and across severe conditions in a systematic way at the national level. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12955-019-1195-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michaël Schwarzinger
- Translational Health Economics Network (THEN), 39 quai de Valmy, 75010, Paris, France. .,Infection Antimicrobials Modeling & Evolution (IAME), UMR 1137, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France.
| | - Stéphane Luchini
- Aix-Marseille University (Aix-Marseille School of Economics), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique and EHESS Marseille, Marseille, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Cuccia F, Mortellaro G, Mazzola R, Donofrio A, Valenti V, Tripoli A, Matranga D, Lo Casto A, Failla G, Di Miceli G, Ferrera G. Prognostic value of two geriatric screening tools in a cohort of older patients with early stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer treated with hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy. J Geriatr Oncol 2019; 11:475-481. [PMID: 31122872 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2019.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2018] [Revised: 03/16/2019] [Accepted: 05/02/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate whether assessment with two geriatric screening tools shows a correlation with clinical outcomes of patients aged 65 years or more, with early-stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (es-NSCLC) treated with hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy. METHODS From March 2014 to June 2018 we retrospectively evaluated 42 patients with stage I and II lung tumors. Patients were assessed with Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and G8 screening tool. Median age was 74 years (range, 65-91). Stereotactic radiotherapy was performed with Helical Tomotherapy delivering 50-70 Gray (Gy) in 8-10 fractions. Toxicity was evaluated using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0 criteria. RESULTS Median CCI and G8 scores were 6 (4-11) and 14 (12-17), respectively. With a median follow-up of 14 months (3-37), we observed: 3 cases of acute Grade 2 (G2) radiation pneumonitis, 1 late G2 non-cardiac chest pain, 1 late G2 dysphagia and 1 case of late G2 radiation pneumonitis. At statistical analysis, G8 scores ≤14 were significantly associated with late toxicity rates (p = .0073). Local failure was predictive of disease free survival and Overall Survival (p < .001 and p = .001). Death occurred in 12 patients, 6 for non-cancer related causes, with 1- and 2-yrs cancer specific survival rates of 94.8% and 90%, 1- and 2-yrs OS rates of 93% and 80%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Our experience shows a correlation between G8 scores and late toxicity in older patients treated with stereotactic radiotherapy for lung cancer, suggesting the need for prospective studies evaluating its use for the identification of patients at higher risk of adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Cuccia
- Radiation Oncology School, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy; Radiation Oncology Unit, ARNAS Ospedale Civico Di Cristina Benfratelli, Palermo, Italy
| | - Gianluca Mortellaro
- Radiation Oncology Unit, ARNAS Ospedale Civico Di Cristina Benfratelli, Palermo, Italy
| | - Rosario Mazzola
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCCS, Ospedale Sacro Cuore Don Calabria, Negrar, Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandra Donofrio
- Radiation Oncology School, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy; Radiation Oncology Unit, ARNAS Ospedale Civico Di Cristina Benfratelli, Palermo, Italy
| | - Vito Valenti
- Radiation Oncology School, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy; Radiation Oncology Unit, ARNAS Ospedale Civico Di Cristina Benfratelli, Palermo, Italy
| | - Antonella Tripoli
- Radiation Oncology School, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy; Radiation Oncology Unit, ARNAS Ospedale Civico Di Cristina Benfratelli, Palermo, Italy
| | | | - Antonio Lo Casto
- Radiation Oncology School, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy; Radiology Department, Di.Bi.Med., Radiation Oncology School, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Failla
- Interventional Endoscopic Unit, ARNAS Ospedale Civico Di Cristina Benfratelli, Palermo, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Di Miceli
- Chest Surgery Unit, ARNAS Civico-Di Cristina-Benfratelli Hospital, Palermo, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Ferrera
- Radiation Oncology Unit, ARNAS Ospedale Civico Di Cristina Benfratelli, Palermo, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Belgioia L, Bacigalupo A, Missale F, Vecchio S, Chiola I, Callegari S, Verzanini E, Peretti G, Corvò R. Individualized treatment of head neck squamous cell carcinoma patients aged 70 or older with radiotherapy alone or associated to cisplatin or cetuximab: impact of weekly radiation dose on loco-regional control. Med Oncol 2019; 36:42. [PMID: 30927146 DOI: 10.1007/s12032-019-1264-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2019] [Accepted: 03/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to evaluate if, in elderly HNC patients, loco-regional control (LRC) is influenced by average weekly radiation dose (AWD). From 2009 to 2017, 150 consecutive HNC elderly patients were analyzed. AWD was calculated by dividing total dose in Gray by overall treatment time in weeks. Patients were divided in 2 groups: Group 1 (70-75 years) and Group 2 (> 75 years). Primary endpoint was LRC; secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and compliance to treatment. The median age was 76 years (range 70-92), the distribution of patients by age was 72 and 78 patients in Group 1 and in Group 2, respectively; overall median follow-up was 23 months. Optimal cut-off of AWD for LRC was 9.236 (p = 0.018). Median OS was 73 months. In univariate survival analysis low PS (p = 0.005), T3-T4 (p = 0.021), Stage III-IV (p = 0.046) and AWDLow (< 9.236) (p = 0.018) were significantly associated with lower LRC; low PS (p < 0.001) and Group 2 (p = 0.006) were also associated with lower OS. Considering patients treated with radiotherapy alone AWDLow was significantly associated with lower LRC (p = 0.04) whereas among patient treated with chemoradiotherapy AWD did not affected LRC (p = 0.18). The multivariate analysis confirmed the significant value of PS for the prediction of LRC and OS (p = 0.035 and p < 0.001, respectively). In elderly patients an AWD of > 9.236 Gy was found to be beneficial for RT alone regimen. When radiotherapy alone is indicated in elderly patients an effort should be made to maintain an increased AWD in order to improve LRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liliana Belgioia
- Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy. .,Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.
| | - Almalina Bacigalupo
- Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Francesco Missale
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.,IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Stefania Vecchio
- Medical Oncology Department, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Ilaria Chiola
- Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Serena Callegari
- Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Elisa Verzanini
- Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Giorgio Peretti
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.,IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Renzo Corvò
- Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.,Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Lycke M, Martens E, Ketelaars L, Dezutter J, Lefebvre T, Pottel H, Van Eygen K, Cool L, Schofield P, Boterberg T, Debruyne PR. Detection of alcohol abuse in older patients with cancer: The integration of alcohol screening questionnaires in the comprehensive geriatric assessment. J Geriatr Oncol 2019; 10:819-823. [PMID: 30824223 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2019.02.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2018] [Revised: 01/21/2019] [Accepted: 02/14/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We aimed to evaluate the feasibility of implementing an alcohol screening questionnaire as part of the comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) by reporting the prevalence of alcohol abuse in a group of older patients with cancer in a Belgian cancer centre. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients were recruited at the Geriatric Oncology Clinic of the Kortrijk Cancer Centre and were evaluated by use of a CGA. Two alcohol screening questionnaires were integrated into the CGA: the Cutdown-Annoyed-Guilty-Eye-opener (CAGE) questionnaire and the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-screening version (AUDIT-C). RESULTS 193 patients with a mean age of 77.7 years were included in the analyses. Abnormal scores on the CAGE were detected in 6.3% of males and 1.2% of women. Abnormal results on the AUDIT-C were noticed in 30.0% of men, and in 21.7% of women. A regression analysis could not find a significant effect of the CAGE questionnaire when entered as predictor for CGA domain scores. Regarding the AUDIT-C, significant results were detected for predicting the score of the Geriatric-8 questionnaire and polypharmacy in men, and the Independent Activities of Daily Living questionnaire in women. No association with one-year survival was detected for either alcohol screening questionnaire. DISCUSSION It is feasible to implement an alcohol screening questionnaire as part of a CGA as results indicated a rather high level of alcohol abuse in this cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle Lycke
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Centre, General Hospital Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium; Department of Radiotherapy and Experimental Cancer Research, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Evi Martens
- Department of Psychology, General Hospital Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Lore Ketelaars
- Department of Psychology, General Hospital Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Jolien Dezutter
- Department of Psychology, General Hospital Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Tessa Lefebvre
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Centre, General Hospital Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium; Department of Radiotherapy and Experimental Cancer Research, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Hans Pottel
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care @ Kulak, Catholic University Leuven Kulak, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Koen Van Eygen
- Department of Haematology, Cancer Centre, General Hospital Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Lieselot Cool
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Centre, General Hospital Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium; Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Patricia Schofield
- Positive Ageing Research Institute, Anglia Ruskin University, Chelmsford, UK
| | - Tom Boterberg
- Department of Psychology, General Hospital Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Philip R Debruyne
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Centre, General Hospital Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium; Positive Ageing Research Institute, Anglia Ruskin University, Chelmsford, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Kirkhus L, Šaltytė Benth J, Grønberg BH, Hjermstad MJ, Rostoft S, Harneshaug M, Selbæk G, Wyller TB, Jordhøy MS. Frailty identified by geriatric assessment is associated with poor functioning, high symptom burden and increased risk of physical decline in older cancer patients: Prospective observational study. Palliat Med 2019; 33:312-322. [PMID: 30712456 PMCID: PMC6376598 DOI: 10.1177/0269216319825972] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Maintaining quality of life including physical functioning is highly prioritized among older cancer patients. Geriatric assessment is a recommended approach to identify patients with increased vulnerability to stressors (frailty). How frailty affects quality of life and physical functioning in older cancer patients has scarcely been investigated. AIM: Focusing on physical functioning and global quality of life, we investigated whether frailty identified by a geriatric assessment was associated with higher risk of quality-of-life deterioration during cancer treatment and follow-up. DESIGN: Prospective, observational study. Patients were classified as frail or non-frail by a modified geriatric assessment. Quality of life was measured using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality-of-Life Questionnaire at inclusion, 2, 4, 6 and 12 months. SETTING: Eight Norwegian outpatient cancer clinics. PARTICIPANTS: Patients ⩾70 years with solid tumours referred for palliative or curative systemic medical cancer treatment. RESULTS: Among 288 patients included, 140 (49%) were frail and 148 (51%) non-frail. Frail patients consistently reported poorer scores on all functioning and symptom scales. Independent of age, gender and major cancer-related factors, frail patients had significantly poorer physical functioning and global quality of life during follow-up, and opposed to non-frail patients they had both a clinically and statistically significant decline in physical functioning from baseline until 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: Geriatric assessment identifies frail patients with increased risk of physical decline, poor functioning and high symptom burden during and following cancer treatment. Frail patients should therefore receive early supportive or palliative care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lene Kirkhus
- 1 Centre for Old Age Psychiatric Research, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Ottestad, Norway.,2 Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Jūratė Šaltytė Benth
- 1 Centre for Old Age Psychiatric Research, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Ottestad, Norway.,3 HØKH, Research Centre, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.,4 Institute of Clinical Medicine, Campus Ahus, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Bjørn Henning Grønberg
- 5 The Cancer Clinic, St. Olav's Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.,6 Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
| | - Marianne Jensen Hjermstad
- 7 European Palliative Care Research Centre (PRC), Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Siri Rostoft
- 2 Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,8 Department of Geriatric Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Magnus Harneshaug
- 1 Centre for Old Age Psychiatric Research, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Ottestad, Norway.,2 Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Geir Selbæk
- 1 Centre for Old Age Psychiatric Research, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Ottestad, Norway.,9 Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Ageing and Health, Vestfold Hospital Trust, Tønsberg, Norway.,10 Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Torgeir Bruun Wyller
- 2 Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,8 Department of Geriatric Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Marit Slaaen Jordhøy
- 2 Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,11 The Cancer Unit, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Hamar Hospital, Hamar, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Noor A, Gibb C, Boase S, Hodge JC, Krishnan S, Foreman A. Frailty in geriatric head and neck cancer: A contemporary review. Laryngoscope 2018; 128:E416-E424. [PMID: 30329155 DOI: 10.1002/lary.27339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/14/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To provide a summary of the current frailty literature relating to head and neck cancer. DATA SOURCES Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, Google Scholar. METHODS A comprehensive review of the literature was performed from 2000 to 2017 using key words frailty, elderly, geriatric, surgery, otolaryngology, head and neck cancer. RESULTS The aging population has led to an increased diagnosis of head and neck cancer in elderly patients. The prevalence of comorbidities, disabilities, geriatric syndromes and social issues can make treatment planning and management in this population challenging. Chronological age alone may not be the optimal approach to guiding treatment decisions, as there is marked heterogeneity amongst this age group. Individualization of treatment can be achieved by assessing for the presence of frailty, which has growing evidence as an important marker of health status in geriatric oncology. Frailty is a complex geriatric syndrome characterized by a state of increased vulnerability to stressors and is associated with morbidity, mortality, and treatment toxicity. Screening for frailty may provide an efficient method to identify those who would benefit from further assessment or pretreatment optimization, and to provide prognostic information to assist clinicians and patients in formulating the most ideal treatment plan for the elderly individual with head and neck cancer. CONCLUSIONS Frailty has emerged as an important concept in geriatric oncology, with wide significance in head and neck cancer. Incorporating frailty assessments into clinical practice may provide otolaryngologists pertinent information regarding health status and outcomes leading to optimal care of the elderly cancer patient. Laryngoscope, 128:E416-E424, 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony Noor
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital and University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Catherine Gibb
- Department of Medicine, Royal Adelaide Hospital and University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Sam Boase
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital and University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - John-Charles Hodge
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital and University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Suren Krishnan
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital and University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Andrew Foreman
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital and University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Russo C, Giannotti C, Signori A, Cea M, Murialdo R, Ballestrero A, Scabini S, Romairone E, Odetti P, Nencioni A, Monacelli F. Predictive values of two frailty screening tools in older patients with solid cancer: a comparison of SAOP2 and G8. Oncotarget 2018; 9:35056-35068. [PMID: 30416679 PMCID: PMC6205549 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.26147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2018] [Accepted: 09/01/2018] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA), the gold standard for detecting frailty in elderly cancer patients, is time-consuming and hard to apply in routine clinical practice. Here we compared the performance of two screening tools for frailty, G8 and SAOP2 for their accuracy in identifying vulnerable patients. Material and Methods We tested G8 and SAOP2 in 282 patients aged 65 or older with a diagnosis of solid cancer and candidate to undergo surgical, medical and/or radiotherapy treatment. CGA, including functional and cognitive status, depression, nutrition, comorbidity, social status and quality of life was used as reference. ROC curves were used to compare two screening tools. Results Mean patient age was 79 years and 54% were female. Colorectal and breast cancer were the most common types cancer (49% and 24%). Impaired CGA, G8, and SAOP2 were found in 62%, 89%, and 94% of the patients, respectively. SAOP2 had a better sensitivity (AUC 0.85, p<0.032) than G8 (AUC 0.79), with higher performance in breast cancer patients (AUC 0.93) and in patients aged 70-80 years (AUC 0.87). Conclusions G8 and SAOP2 both showed good screening capacity for frailty in the cancer patient population we examined with SAOP2 showing a slightly better performance than G8.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiara Russo
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DIMI), Section of Geriatrics, Genoa, Italy
| | - Chiara Giannotti
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DIMI), Section of Geriatrics, Genoa, Italy
| | - Alessio Signori
- DISSAL, Section of Biostatistics, Department of Health Sciences, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy
| | - Michele Cea
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DIMI), Section of Geriatrics, Genoa, Italy
| | - Roberto Murialdo
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DIMI), Section of Geriatrics, Genoa, Italy
| | - Alberto Ballestrero
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DIMI), Section of Geriatrics, Genoa, Italy
| | - Stefano Scabini
- Hospital Policlinic San Martino, Oncological Surgery and Implantable Systems, Genoa, Italy
| | - Emanuele Romairone
- Hospital Policlinic San Martino, Oncological Surgery and Implantable Systems, Genoa, Italy
| | - Patrizio Odetti
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DIMI), Section of Geriatrics, Genoa, Italy
| | - Alessio Nencioni
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DIMI), Section of Geriatrics, Genoa, Italy
| | - Fiammetta Monacelli
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DIMI), Section of Geriatrics, Genoa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Szumacher E, Sattar S, Neve M, Do K, Ayala A, Gray M, Lee J, Alibhai S, Puts M. Use of Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment and Geriatric Screening for Older Adults in the Radiation Oncology Setting: A Systematic Review. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2018; 30:578-588. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2018.04.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2018] [Revised: 03/19/2018] [Accepted: 03/26/2018] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
|
44
|
Iqbal MS, Dua D, Kelly C, Bossi P. Managing older patients with head and neck cancer: The non-surgical curative approach. J Geriatr Oncol 2018; 9:411-417. [PMID: 29685382 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2018.03.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2017] [Revised: 02/27/2018] [Accepted: 03/28/2018] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Managing older patients with head and neck cancers poses a challenge due to the often reduced levels of physiological reserve, the frequent comorbidities and treatment related toxicity. These factors have implications on speech, breathing and swallowing functions. Treatment management plans in these patients may result in de-intensification strategies and as a result of this, use of non-standard treatments is increasing. There have been published reports that indicate the addition of concurrent systemic therapy to radiation in selected older patients is feasible, and produces outcomes comparable with younger patients. However, some other studies including meta-analyses suggest a lack of real survival benefit with the addition of chemotherapy. So, the key point appears to be the optimal patient selection. Appropriate geriatric and frailty assessments are required to help determine the optimal treatment for older patients with head and neck cancer. Treatment for this population still needs to be well defined and optimized in both modality and intensity. Qualitative studies are also required to address short and long-term post-treatment quality-of-life and survivorship issues in this specific patient population. This review summarizes the evidence available regarding the non-surgical management of older patients with head and neck cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammad Shahid Iqbal
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Northern Centre for Cancer Care, The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
| | - Divyanshu Dua
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Canberra Hospital, Garran ACT 2605, Australia
| | - Charles Kelly
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Northern Centre for Cancer Care, The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Paolo Bossi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Instituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Head and Neck Cancer in the Elderly: Frailty, Shared Decisions, and Avoidance of Low Value Care. Clin Geriatr Med 2018; 34:233-244. [PMID: 29661335 DOI: 10.1016/j.cger.2018.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Head and neck cancer (HNC) is a disease of older adults. Recurrent and metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma portends a poor prognosis, with median overall survival of less than 12 months. Within this vulnerable population, significant treatment-related toxicities and physical and psychosocial sequelae can be devastating to quality of life at the end of life. Shared decision making and early comprehensive palliative and support services are at the crux of the approach to older adults with HNC. In doing so, low-value care that fails to meet the goals of patients and their caregivers at the end-of-life may be avoided.
Collapse
|
46
|
Meregaglia M, Cairns J. A systematic literature review of health state utility values in head and neck cancer. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2017; 15:174. [PMID: 28865475 PMCID: PMC5581467 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-017-0748-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2017] [Accepted: 08/24/2017] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Health state utility values (HSUVs) are essential parameters in model-based economic evaluations. This study systematically identifies HSUVs in head and neck cancer and provides guidance for selecting them from a growing body of health-related quality of life studies. METHODS We systematically reviewed the published literature by searching PubMed, EMBASE and The Cochrane Library using a pre-defined combination of keywords. The Tufts Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Registry and the School of Health and Related Research Health Utilities Database (ScHARRHUD) specifically containing health utilities were also queried, in addition to the Health Economics Research Centre database of mapping studies. Studies were considered for inclusion if reporting original HSUVs assessed using established techniques. The characteristics of each study including country, design, sample size, cancer subsite addressed and demographics of responders were summarized narratively using a data extraction form. Quality scoring and critical appraisal of the included studies were performed based on published recommendations. RESULTS Of a total 1048 records identified by the search, 28 studies qualified for data extraction and 346 unique HSUVs were retrieved from them. HSUVs were estimated using direct methods (e.g. standard gamble; n = 10 studies), multi-attribute utility instruments (MAUIs; n = 13) and mapping techniques (n = 3); two studies adopted both direct and indirect approaches. Within the MAUIs, the EuroQol 5-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D) was the most frequently used (n = 11), followed by the Health Utility Index Mark 3 (HUI3; n = 2), the 15D (n = 2) and the Short Form-Six Dimension (SF-6D; n = 1). Different methods and types of responders (i.e. patients, healthy subjects, clinical experts) influenced the magnitude of HSUVs for comparable health states. Only one mapping study developed an original algorithm using head and neck cancer data. The identified studies were considered of intermediate quality. DISCUSSION This review provides a dataset of HSUVs systematically retrieved from published studies in head and neck cancer. There is currently a lack of research for some disease phases including recurrent and metastatic cancer, and treatment-related complications. In selecting HSUVs for cost-effectiveness modeling purposes, preference should be given to EQ-5D utility values; however, mapping to EQ-5D is a potentially valuable technique that should be further developed in this cancer population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michela Meregaglia
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London, WC1H 9SH, UK. .,CeRGAS (Research Centre on Health and Social Care Management), Bocconi University, Via Roentgen 1, 20136, Milan, Italy.
| | - John Cairns
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London, WC1H 9SH, UK.,CCBIO (Centre for Cancer Biomarkers), University of Bergen, Postboks 7804, N-5020, Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Maggiore R, Zumsteg ZS, BrintzenhofeSzoc K, Trevino KM, Gajra A, Korc-Grodzicki B, Epstein JB, Bond SM, Parker I, Kish JA, Murphy BA, VanderWalde NA. The Older Adult With Locoregionally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Knowledge Gaps and Future Direction in Assessment and Treatment. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2017; 98:868-883. [PMID: 28602414 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.02.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2016] [Revised: 01/23/2017] [Accepted: 02/13/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Older adults with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) pose unique treatment and supportive care challenges to oncologists and other cancer care providers. The majority of patients with HNSCC present with locoregionally advanced disease, for which combined-modality treatment integrating chemotherapy and radiation therapy is often necessary to maximize tumor control. However, applying these approaches to an older population with concomitant comorbidities and a higher risk of functional impairments remains challenging and is exacerbated by the paucity of studies involving older adults. The purpose of this article is to identify knowledge gaps in the evaluation and management of older adults with HNSCC-particularly those undergoing concurrent chemoradiation therapy-and their caregivers through a review of the literature conducted by clinicians, researchers, and patient advocates. The findings highlight the importance of a geriatric assessment and the therapeutic paradigms and challenges relevant to this population. Furthermore, we identify the need for additional research and interventions related to key supportive care issues that arise during and after treatment in older adults with locoregionally advanced HNSCC. On the basis of our findings, we prioritize these issues to guide future patient-oriented research endeavors to address these knowledge gaps and thus better serve this growing patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ronald Maggiore
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York
| | - Zachary S Zumsteg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | | | - Kelly M Trevino
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Ajeet Gajra
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, SUNY Upstate Medical University Cancer Center, Syracuse, New York
| | | | - Joel B Epstein
- Department of Oral Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Stewart M Bond
- Boston College William F. Connell School of Nursing, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts
| | - Ira Parker
- University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, California
| | - Julie A Kish
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Barbara A Murphy
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Noam A VanderWalde
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center-West Cancer Center, Memphis, Tennessee.
| | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Prognostic value of the G8 and modified-G8 screening tools for multidimensional health problems in older patients with cancer. Eur J Cancer 2017; 83:211-219. [PMID: 28750273 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.06.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2017] [Revised: 06/16/2017] [Accepted: 06/21/2017] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The G8 screening tool has been developed to identify older cancer patients requiring a geriatric assessment for tailoring therapy. Little is known about its prognostic value, particularly by tumour site. An optimised version has been recently developed, but no prognostic information is available. We compared the prognostic value of both instruments overall and by tumour site. METHODS Data were from a prospective cohort of cancer patients ≥70 years old referred to 1 of 6 French geriatric oncology clinics between 2007 and 2014 (n = 1333). Endpoints were overall 1- and 3-year survival. Cox proportional-hazards models were built to assess the predictive value of abnormal G8 and modified-G8 scores, based on published cut-offs or by classes of increasing risk. Sensitivity analyses involved adjusting for age, gender, treatment, metastasis, and tumour site (digestive, breast, urinary tract, prostate, other solid cancers, and haematological malignancies) and stratifying by tumour site and metastatic status. RESULTS Abnormal scores were independently associated with overall 1-year survival: adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 4.3[G8]/4.9[modified-G8] and 3-year survival: aHR = 2.9/2.6; all p <0.0001. Associations persisted after stratifying by metastatic status and in most cancer sites (exceptions: colorectal (G8) and upper digestive cancer (both tools) [1-year analysis]; digestive cancers (both tools) [3-year analysis]). For both tools, classes of increasing risk showed a graded relationship with mortality (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS Our results identified both abnormal G8 and modified-G8 scores as strong and consistent predictors of overall survival, regardless of metastatic status or tumour site. These findings strengthen the clinical utility of these instruments in the geriatric oncology setting.
Collapse
|
49
|
Toward Personalized Cancer Care for Elderly Head and Neck Cancer Patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2017; 98:965-966. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2016] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|
50
|
VanderWalde NA, Deal AM, Comitz E, Stravers L, Muss H, Reeve BB, Basch E, Tepper J, Chera B. Geriatric Assessment as a Predictor of Tolerance, Quality of Life, and Outcomes in Older Patients With Head and Neck Cancers and Lung Cancers Receiving Radiation Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2017; 98:850-857. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.11.048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2016] [Revised: 11/18/2016] [Accepted: 11/28/2016] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
|