Characterising timing and pattern of relapse following surgery for localised oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma: a retrospective study

Intraoperative esophageal washout reduces free intraluminal tumor cells during resection of carcinomas of the esophagus and cardia

OBJECTIVE

Intraluminally shed viable tumor cells might contribute to anastomotic recurrence in cancer of the esophagus and the cardia. The study aimed to establish a method of esophageal washout and, hence, to reduce intraluminal cancer cells before esophageal anastomosis.

METHODS

Forty-eight consecutive patients with esophago-gastric resection for histologically proven cancer of the esophagus or the cardia were included in a prospective, interventional study. Before transection, the esophagus was clamped proximally to the tumor and rinsed with 1:10 diluted povidone-iodine-solution (10 × 30 ml) applied by a transorally inserted 24F-Foley catheter. The first, fifth and tenth portion of the lavage fluid were sent to cytological examination.

RESULTS

Intraoperative frozen sections confirmed clear proximal resection margins of the esophagus. The cytological examination of the fluid recovered from the esophageal washout revealed malignant cells in 13/48 patients (27%). The presence of malignant cells was significantly less likely in patients with neoadjuvant treatment than in patients without neoadjuvant treatment: 2/23 (9%) vs. 11/25 (44%) (p = 0.009). Repetitive washout reduced the probability of detectable malignant cells from 13 to 8 (62%) patients after 5, and further to 4 patients (30%) after 10 washout maneuvers.

CONCLUSIONS

Free malignant cells may be present in the esophageal lumen following intraoperative manipulation of cancers of the esophagus or cardia. Transoral washout of the esophagus is novel, feasible and enables reduction or even elimination of these tumor cells. The reliability of this procedure raises with increasing washout volume. Esophageal washout might be especially worthwhile in patients who do not receive neoadjuvant therapy.

Pattern and time point of relapse in locally advanced esophagogastric adenocarcinoma after multimodal treatment: implications for a useful structured follow-up

PURPOSE

Despite improvements in multimodal treatment of locally advanced esophagogastric adenocarcinoma, the majority of patients still relapses. The impact of structured follow-up for early detection of recurrence is unclear and controversially discussed.

METHODS

Patients with locally advanced esophagogastric adenocarcinoma having received neoadjuvant/perioperative chemotherapy followed by tumor resection between 2009 and 2021, underwent a structured follow-up including three-monthly imaging during the first 2 years, followed by semiannual and annual examinations in year 3-4 and 5, respectively. Clinical outcome including pattern and time point of relapse was analyzed.

RESULTS

Two hundred fifty-seven patients were included in this analysis. In 50.2% (n = 129) of patients, recurrent disease was diagnosed, with the majority (94.6%) relapsing within the first 2 years. The most common site of relapse were lymph node metastases followed by peritoneal carcinomatosis and hepatic and pulmonary metastases. 52.7% of patients presented with symptoms at the time of relapse. Cumulative risk and time point of relapse differed significantly between patient with a node-positive tumor (ypN+) after neoadjuvant treatment (high-risk group) and patients with node-negative primary tumor (ypN0) (low-risk group). High-risk patients had a significantly inferior disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) with 11.1 and 29.0 months, respectively, whereas median DFS and OS were not reached for the low-risk group.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of relapse differs significantly between high- and low-risk patients. Only a part of relapses is associated with clinical symptoms. An individualized follow-up strategy is recommended for high- and low-risk patients considering the individual risk of relapse.

Single-center experience in implementation of endoscopic surveillance protocol after esophagectomy

Esophageal cancer has a notably high recurrence rate with a paucity of robust evidence in defining the optimal surveillance strategy. The surveillance protocol at our institution comprises of annual esophagogastroduodenoscopy (OGD) from years 1 to 5 postoperatively. This study aims to evaluate the implementation of the endoscopic surveillance at our center and ascertain the value of endoscopy in detecting local recurrence after esophagectomy. A retrospective cohort review of all patients (320 patients) who underwent esophagectomy between 2013 and 2018 was conducted. The local esophageal cancer database and corresponding OGD reports were accessed to obtain data on demographics, operation details, local recurrence, and endoscopy performed. 1086 OGDs were performed between 2014 and 2020, broadly categorized to surveillance and symptomatic OGDs; 555 and 531, respectively. Surveillance OGDs detected four asymptomatic local recurrences, of which only one was treated with curative intent. Symptomatic OGDs resulted in a higher yield for the detection of local recurrence compared with surveillance endoscopy; 5% versus 0.7%, with overall median time-to-recurrence of 11.5 months (95% confidence interval 9-17). Of local recurrences, 85.7% occurred within the first 2 years postoperatively. The proportion of endoscopic findings differed between intensive and ad hoc surveillance cohorts for strictures, esophagitis, Barrett's esophagus, and sloughing. Thirteen patients were diagnosed with histologically confirmed Barrett's with no subsequent local recurrences. Surveillance endoscopy had a low positive yield rate with subsequent minimal survival benefits. Therefore, it is prudent to consider an alternative protocol that focuses on the period with the highest risk of recurrence and symptom presentation.

Effect of Thoracic Surgery Regionalization on 1- and 3-Year Survival after Cancer Esophagectomy

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate whether our previously reported improvements in short-term cancer esophagectomy outcomes after large-scale regionalization in the United States translated to longer-term survival benefit.

BACKGROUND

Regionalization is associated with better early postoperative outcomes following cancer esophagectomy; however, data regarding its effect on long-term survival are mixed.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 461 patients undergoing cancer esophagectomy before (2009-2013, N = 272) and after (2014-2016, N = 189) regionalization. Kaplan-Meier curves and chi-square tests were used to describe 1- and 3-year survival in each era. Hierarchical logistic regression models examined the adjusted effect of regionalization on mortality.

RESULTS

Compared to pre-regionalization patients, post-regionalization patients had significantly higher 1-year survival (83.1% vs 73.9%, P = 0.02) but not 3-year survival (52.9% vs 58.2%, P = 0.26).Subgroup analysis by cancer stage revealed that 1-year survival benefit was only significant among mid-stage (IIB-IIIB) patients, whereas differences in 3-year survival only approached significance among early-stage (IA-IIA) patients.In multivariable analysis, only regionalization was a predictor of lower mortality at 1 year [odds ratio (OR) 0.54, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.29-1.00], and only thoracic specialty at 3years (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.38-0.99). Older age, more advanced stage, and complications were associated with higher 1- and 3-year mortality. Comorbidity, minimally invasive approach, surgeon volume, facility volume, and neoadjuvant treatment were not significant in this model.

CONCLUSIONS

Regionalization was associated with improved 1-year survival after cancer esophagectomy, independent of factors such as morbidity or volume in our adjusted models. This survival benefit did not persist at 3 years, likely due to the aggressive nature of the disease.

Detection of asymptomatic recurrence following curative surgery improves survival in patients with gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

To date, there is no evidence that intensive follow-up provides survival benefit in gastric cancer patients undergoing curative gastrectomy. The aim of this study is to investigate the efficacy of detection of asymptomatic recurrence using intensive surveillance strategy in long-term survival after curative gastric cancer surgery.

Methods

A systematic review of electronic databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library and China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Clinical Trials Registry and Google Scholar was performed up to April 2022. The primary outcomes were survival outcomes: overall survival, recurrence-free survival and post-recurrence survival. The secondary endpoints were clinicopathological features, recurrence patterns and treatment after recurrence. The registration number of this protocol is PROSPERO CRD42022327370.

Results

A total of 11 studies including 1898 participants were included. In the pooled analysis, the detection of asymptomatic recurrence was significantly associated with an improved overall survival compared to patients showing symptoms of recurrence (HR=0.67; 95%CI: 0.57-0.79; P<0.001), which was primarily driven by the prolongation of post-recurrence survival (HR=0.51; 95%CI: 0.42-0.61; P<0.001), since there was no significant difference observed in recurrence-free survival (HR=1.12; 95%CI: 0.81-1.55; P=0.48) between the two groups. Meanwhile, male sex and advanced T stage were more frequently observed in the symptomatic recurrence group. Furthermore, patients in the symptomatic recurrence group had a higher proportion of peritoneal relapse but lower proportion of distant lymph node metastasis. Additionally, patients in the symptomatic recurrence group were less likely to receive surgery treatment and post-recurrence chemotherapy.

Conclusion

The detection of asymptomatic recurrence using intensive follow-up was associated with an appreciable improvement in overall survival. However, more robust data from high-quality studies are still required to verify this issue.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=327370, identifier CRD42022327370.

Extragastric recurrence in patients who underwent surgical resection of stage I gastric cancer: Incidence, risk factors, and value of abdominal computed tomography as a postoperative surveillance method

Extragastric recurrence after radical resection of stage I gastric cancer is very rare. We investigated the incidence of extragastric recurrence and risk factors in patients who underwent surgical resection of stage I gastric cancer and evaluated the value of abdominal CT as a surveillance tool. This retrospective study enrolled 914 patients with stage I gastric cancer who underwent surgical resection at a single tertiary hospital. We investigated extragastric recurrence during the follow-up period, and disease-free survival (DFS) was assessed. Over a median follow-up period of 39 months, the overall incidence of extragastric recurrence was 2.2% (20/914). Risk factors for extragastric recurrence included deep submucosal invasion (SM2-3), muscularis propria invasion, and lymph node metastasis (hazard ratio [HR]=10.37, 28.101, and 6.843; P = .028, .002, and .001, respectively). Based on the number of risk factors, patients were stratified into 3 subgroups: low-risk (pT1aN0, pT1b(SM1)N0, 496/914), moderate-risk (pT1aN1, pT1b(SM1)N1, pT1b(SM2-3)N0, pT2N0, 369/914), and high-risk (pT1b(SM2-3)N1, 49/914). DFS was significantly longer in the low-risk group, followed by the moderate-risk and high-risk groups. We propose that postoperative CT surveillance should be omitted for stage 1A cases involving the mucosa and SM1 because of the extreme rarity of extragastric recurrence.

Symptomatic Recurrence and Survival Outcomes After Curative Treatment of Gastric Cancer: Does Intensive Follow-up Evaluation Improve Survival?

BACKGROUND

Intensive surveillance after treatment of gastric cancer patients with curative intent may lead to an earlier diagnosis of disease recurrence, but its impact on survival is uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate whether early diagnosis of disease recurrence among asymptomatic patients was associated with long-term survival.

METHODS

This retrospective study analyzed patients with stages 1 to 3C gastric adenocarcinoma treated between 1999 and 2018. All recurrence events were classified as symptomatic or asymptomatic (detected by follow-up tests), and their clinicopathologic characteristics, patterns of recurrence, and survival were analyzed.

RESULTS

The cohort consisted of 669 patients treated with a total gastrectomy in 48.6% and a D2-lymphadenectomy in 88.8% of the cases. Most of the tumors were pT3-4 (46.5%), with 45.5% involving lymph node metastases and 42.3% manifesting a diffuse histology. During a median follow-up period of 80.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 75.3-84.8 months), 166 patients had recurrences (24.8%), 65.7% of which were symptomatic. The peritoneum was the main site of recurrence (37.2%), and peritoneal recurrence was associated with worse overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio, 1.69; 95%CI, 1.2-2.37). The median disease-free, post-recurrence survival, and OS periods in the asymptomatic and symptomatic groups were respectively 13.4 versus 17.2 months (p = 0.04), 11.9 versus 4.7 months (p < 0.001), and 29.9 versus 26.4 months (p = 0.21). When OS was analyzed among the patients with non-peritoneal recurrence, no difference was observed between the two groups (31.3 vs 31.1 months; p = 0.46).

CONCLUSION

Early diagnosis of asymptomatic disease recurrence did not affect the OS of the gastric cancer patients treated with curative intent. The use of intensive surveillance strategies in this scenario still requires further evidence.

Treatment of anastomotic recurrence after esophagectomy

BACKGROUND

Isolated local recurrence after curative esophagectomy for esophageal cancer is a rare event. Although it is potentially curable, management can be challenging.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of all patients undergoing esophagectomy for esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) from 2000 to 2019. Date of recurrence was defined as the date at which the initial abnormal surveillance study or symptomatic presentation led to further workup and subsequent pathologic diagnosis of recurrence. Overall survival after recurrence was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods and compared between treatment groups using the log-rank test.

RESULTS

Of the 1370 patients with EAC who underwent esophagectomy in our cohort, 531 (39%) developed recurrence of their disease. The 5-year cumulative incidence of recurrence was 2.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.0%-3.6%) for local, 6.3% (95% CI, 5.2%-7.8%) for regional, and 22.0% (95% CI, 20.0%-24.4%) for distant recurrences. On univariable and multivariable competing-risk regression analysis, advanced pT stage, signet ring histology, and serious complication were independently associated with local recurrence. Patients with local recurrence treated with definitive therapy had a median survival after recurrence of 19.1 months (95% CI, 11.4-33.2 months), compared with 10.6 months (95% CI, 8.5-14.2 months) for chemotherapy or radiotherapy alone and 1.73 months (95% CI, 0.23-15.6 months) for no treatment (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Isolated local recurrence occurred in only 3% of patients. Advanced T stage, signet cell histology, and serious complication were risk factors for recurrence. Although complex surgical resection is required, in very select cases, more-aggressive treatment may be warranted.

Detection of asymptomatic recurrence improves survival of gastric cancer patients

Background

The effect of long‐term surveillance for asymptomatic patients after curative resection of gastric cancer is being debated. We compared the prognosis of Korean patients with recurrent gastric cancer according to the presence or absence of cancer‐related symptoms at the time of recurrence detection.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 305 Korean patients who experienced recurrence after curative resection of primary gastric cancer between March 2002 and February 2017 at Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Results

The median follow‐up duration was 169.8 months (1–267.2), and the median age at first recurrence was 58.1 years (23.4–81.9). Among 305 patients with recurrence, 97 of 231 (42.0%) patients with early recurrence (≤5 years after curative surgical resection) and 47 of 74 (63.5%) patients with late recurrence (>5 years after curative surgical resection) had cancer‐related symptoms at recurrence (p = 0.001). For survival after recurrence, detection of asymptomatic recurrence was an independent favorable factor (hazard ratio, 0.527; 95% confidence interval, 0.409–0.681; p < 0.001) accompanied with the possibility of subsequent treatment, targeted‐, or immunotherapy for recurrent disease, and locoregional recurrence only. In the late‐recurrence group, the patients with asymptomatic detection of recurrence showed favorable post‐recurrence survival (median, 33.3 months vs. 14.7 months; p = 0.002), overall survival (median, 136.3 months vs. 106.1 months; p = 0.010), and cancer‐specific survival (median, 177.5 months vs. 106.1 months; p = 0.005) than the patients with symptomatic detection.

Conclusion

The detection of gastric cancer recurrence in patients without cancer‐related symptoms may be related to improved survival, suggesting the potential benefit of long‐term surveillance.

Predictive factors of recurrence in adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction in the multimodal era

INTRODUCTION

Adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEGJ) represents a poor prognostic tumor. We evaluated the recurrence pattern and risk factors associated with recurrence in patients undergoing surgical resection by AEJG.

METHODS

Recurrences were categorized as locoregional, peritoneal, or distant. These three recurrence groups and a non-recurrence group were compared, and overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) for each one was obtained.

RESULTS

We analyzed 188 patients with curative surgical treatment. Recurrence was observed in 72 (38.3%) patients. Locoregional recurrence was observed in 17 (23.6%); 20 (27.8%) peritoneal recurrence and 35 (48.6%) distant metastasis. DFS was 9, 5, and 8 months, and OS was 21.8, 13.2, and 20.8, respectively. Tumors larger than 5 cm are risk factors for peritoneal recurrence (OR:2.88, p = 0.012). Positive lymph nodes were related to distant metastasis (OR:9.15, p = 0.040), and lymphatic invasion for locoregional recurrence (OR:3.81, p = 0.028).

CONCLUSION

AEGJ is associated with high rates of early recurrence.

Surveillance and outcomes after curative resection for gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma

Background

The goal of surveillance testing is to enable curative salvage therapy through early disease detection, however supporting evidence in gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma is limited. We evaluated frequency of successful salvage therapy and outcomes in patients who underwent surveillance.

Methods

A single‐site, retrospective cohort study was conducted to identify all patients who received curative resection for gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. Surveillance testing were those investigations not triggered by abnormal symptoms, physical examination, or blood tests. Successful salvage therapy was any potentially curative therapy for disease recurrence which resulted in postrecurrence disease‐free survival ≥2 years. Time‐to‐event data were analyzed using the Kaplan‐Meier method and log rank tests.

Results

Between 2011 and 2016, 210 consecutive patients were reviewed. Esophageal (14%), gastroesophageal junction (40%), and gastric adenocarcinomas (45%) were treated with surgery alone (29%) or multimodality therapy (71%). Adjuvant therapy was administered in 35%. At median follow‐up of 38.3 months, 5‐year overall survival (OS) rate was 56%. Among 97 recurrences, 53% were surveillance‐detected, and 46% were symptomatic. None was detected by surveillance endoscopy. Median time‐to‐recurrence (TTR) was 14.8 months. Recurrences included locoregional only (4%), distant (86%), and both (10%). Salvage therapy was attempted in 15 patients, 4 were successful. Compared to symptomatic recurrences, patients with surveillance‐detected recurrences had longer median OS (36.2 vs 23.7 months, P = .004) and postrecurrence survival (PRS, 16.5 vs 4.6 months, P < .001), but similar TTR (16.2 vs 13.3 months, P = .40) and duration of palliative chemotherapy (3.9 vs 3.3 months, P = .64).

Conclusions

Among patients surveyed, 96% of recurrences were distant, and salvage therapy was successful in only 1.9% of patients. Longer OS in patients with surveillance‐detected compared to symptomatic recurrences was not associated with significant earlier disease detection, and may be contributed by differences in disease biology. Further prospective data are warranted to establish the benefit of surveillance testing in gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma.

Adjuvant statin therapy for oesophageal adenocarcinoma: the STAT-ROC feasibility study

BACKGROUND

Statins inhibit proliferative signalling in oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OAC) and their use is associated with better survival in observational studies. The present study was undertaken to examine the feasibility of assessing adjuvant statin therapy in patients with operable OAC in a phase III RCT.

METHODS

For this multicentre, double-blind, parallel-group, randomized, placebo-controlled feasibility trial, adults with OAC (including Siewert I-II lesions) who had undergone oesophagectomy were centrally allocated (1 : 1) to simvastatin 40 mg or matching placebo by block randomization, stratified by centre. Participants, clinicians and investigators were blinded to treatment allocation. Patients received treatment for up to 1 year. Feasibility outcomes were recruitment, retention, drug absorption, adherence, safety, quality of life, generalizability and survival.

RESULTS

A total of 120 patients were assessed for eligibility at four centres, of whom 32 (26·7 per cent) were randomized, 16 in each group. Seven patients withdrew. Participants allocated to simvastatin had lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels by 3 months (adjusted mean difference -0·83 (95 per cent c.i. -1·4 to -0·22) mmol/l; P = 0·009). Median adherence to medication was greater than 90 per cent between 3 and 12 months' follow-up. Adverse events were similar between the groups. Quality-of-life data were complete for 98·3 per cent of questionnaire items. Cardiovascular disease, diabetes and aspirin use were more prevalent in the non-randomized group, whereas tumour site, stage and grade were similar between groups. Survival estimates were imprecise.

CONCLUSION

This RCT supports the conduct and informs the design considerations for a future phase III trial of adjuvant statin therapy in patients with OAC. Registration number: ISRCTN98060456 (www.isrctn/com).

Impact of postoperative complications on disease recurrence and long-term survival following oesophagogastric cancer resection

Background

Postoperative complications after resection of oesophagogastric carcinoma can result in considerable early morbidity and mortality. However, the long-term effects on survival are less clear.

Methods

All patients undergoing intentionally curative resection for oesophageal or gastric cancer between 2006 and 2016 were selected from an institutional database. Patients were categorized by complication severity according to the Clavien–Dindo classification (grades 0–V). Complications were defined according to an international consensus statement. The effect of leak and severe non-leak-related complications on overall survival, recurrence and disease-free survival was assessed using Kaplan–Meier analyses to evaluate differences between groups. All factors significantly associated with survival in univariable analysis were entered into a Cox multivariable regression model with stepwise elimination.

Results

Some 1100 patients were included, with a median age of 69 (range 28–92) years; 48·1 per cent had stage III disease and cancer recurred in 428 patients (38·9 per cent). Complications of grade III or higher occurred in 244 patients (22·2 per cent). The most common complications were pulmonary (29·9 per cent), with a 13·0 per cent incidence of pneumonia. Rates of atrial dysrhythmia and anastomotic leak were 10·0 and 9·6 per cent respectively. Patients with a grade III–IV leak did not have significantly reduced overall survival compared with those who had grade 0–I complications. However, patients with grade III–IV non-leak-related complications had reduced median overall survival (19·7 versus 42·7 months; P &lt; 0·001) and disease-free survival (18·4 versus 36·4 months; P &lt; 0·001). Cox regression analysis identified age, tumour stage, resection margin and grade III–IV non-leak-related complications as independent predictors of poor overall and disease-free survival.

Conclusion

Beyond the acute postoperative period, anastomotic leak does not adversely affect survival, however, other severe postoperative complications do reduce long-term overall and disease-free survival.

Changes in health-related quality of life in oesophagogastric cancer patients participating in palliative and curative therapies

Background: Various treatments are used to prolong survival and improve quality of life (QOL). The purpose of this study was to assess the change in QOL scores in patients with Oesophagogastric (OG) cancer undergoing curative intent and palliative therapy.

Methods: This was a mix-designed cohort study with a consecutive sampling of patients with OG cancer who underwent curative or palliative treatment regimens. The QOL, as a determinant of efficacy and impact of cancer care, was evaluated using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaires. QOL data were collected from the eligible subjects at three points of time. The repeated measurement test was used to compare the significance of change in scores.

Results: Overall, 149 patients (54.4% male, 61.1% curative intent, 52.3% esophageal, 37.6 % gastric, 10.1% OG junction cancer; with mean age 62 year) with OG cancer were eligible for inclusion in the study. Compared to the palliative group, the curative group was more likely to have an esophageal tumor site, Squamous Cell Carcinoma, and stage 2 (versus stomach, Adenocarcinoma, and stage 4 in the palliative group). In comparing the patients' functional, global health status, and cancer symptom, considering time, group of treatment, and their mutual effect the result indicated significant difference between the intervention groups.

Conclusion: Most patients with Oesophagogastric cancer are diagnosed with an incurable form of the disease. Hence in absence of curative treatment, palliative therapy is the most effective therapy to maintain patient independency and relieve pain and symptom in order to improve their QOL. The present study has shown that palliative similar to curative intervention can improve the QOL in cancer patient especially in short term.

Postoperative follow-up programs improve survival in curatively resected gastric and junctional cancer patients: a propensity score matched analysis

BACKGROUND

To date there is no evidence that more intensive follow-up after surgery for esophagogastric adenocarcinoma translates into improved survival. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of standardized surveillance by a specialized center after resection on survival.

METHODS

Data of 587 patients were analyzed who underwent curative surgery for esophagogastric adenocarcinoma in our institution. Based on their postoperative surveillance, patients were assigned to either standardized follow-up (SFU) by the National Center for Tumor Diseases (SFU group) or individual follow-up by other physicians (non-SFU group). Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to compensate for heterogeneity between groups. Groups were compared regarding clinicopathological findings, recurrence, and impact on survival before and after PSM.

RESULTS

Of 587 patients, 32.7% were in the SFU and 67.3% in the non-SFU group. Recurrence occurred in 39.4% of patients and 92.6% within the first 3 years; 73.6% were treated, and of those 17.1% underwent resection. In recurrent patients overall and post-recurrence survival (OS/PRS) was influenced by diagnostic tools (p < 0.05), treatment (p ≤ 0.001), and resection of recurrence (p ≤ 0.001). Standardized follow-up significantly improved OS (84.9 vs. 38.4 months, p = 0.040) in matched analysis and was an independent positive predictor of OS before and after PSM (p = 0.034/0.013, respectively).

CONCLUSION

After PSM, standardized follow-up by a specialized center significantly improved OS. Cross-sectional imaging and treatment of recurrence were associated with better outcome. Regular follow-up by cross-sectional imaging especially during the first 3 years should be recommended by national guidelines, since early detection might help select patients for treatment of recurrence and even resection in few designated cases.

Recurrence after surgery in esophago-gastric junction adenocarcinoma: Current management and future perspectives

Recurrent esophago-gastric junction adenocarcinoma is not a rare event and its correct management is still debated. Many approaches for the treatment of these patients exist, but only few studies compare the different techniques. Most of the studies are retrospectives series and describe the experiences of single institutions in the treatment of recurrent esophageal and esophago-gastric junction cancers. Nowadays surgery is still the main and only curative treatment. Other alternative palliative therapies could be endoscopic stent placement and balloon dilation, photodynamic therapy, thermal tumor ablation (laser photoablation and Argon plasma coagulation), radiation therapy and brachytherapy, and chemotherapy. The aim of this review is to investigate the different rates, patterns and timings of recurrence of this tumor, and to explain the various approaches used for the treatment of recurrent esophago-gastric junction cancer.