Heterogeneity of PD-L1 expression in primary tumors and paired lymph node metastases of triple negative breast cancer

Interrogating the roles of lymph node metastasis in systemic immune surveillance

Lymph nodes (LNs) are principal orchestrators of the adaptive immune response, yet in the context of malignancy, they are typically the first sites of metastasis. When tumors spread to LNs, they alter the immune repertoire, ultimately reconditioning it in a manner that suppresses anti-tumor immunity and promotes further metastatic dissemination. Conversely, activation of anti-tumor immunity within LNs is essential for immunotherapy, suggesting clinical approaches to radiotherapy in LNs and lymphadenectomy may need to be reconsidered in the context of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB). Herein, we discuss our understanding of the immune remodeling that coincides with LN metastasis as well as recent clinical studies exploring neoadjuvant immunotherapy and the roles of LNs in treatment of solid organ malignancies.

Development of Tumor Markers for Breast Cancer Immunotherapy

Although breast cancer treatment has been developed remarkably in recent years, it remains the primary cause of death among women. Immune checkpoint blockade therapy has significantly altered the way breast cancer is treated, although not all patients benefit from the changes. At present, the most effective mechanism of immune checkpoint blockade application in malignant tumors is not clear and efficacy may be influenced by many factors, including host, tumor, and tumor microenvironment dynamics. Therefore, there is a pressing need for tumor immunomarkers that can be used to screen patients and help determine which of them would benefit from breast cancer immunotherapy. At present, no single tumor marker can predict treatment efficacy with sufficient accuracy. Multiple markers may be combined to more accurately pinpoint patients who will respond favorably to immune checkpoint blockade medication. In this review, we have examined the breast cancer treatments, developments in research on the role of tumor markers in maximizing the clinical efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors, prospects for the identification of novel therapeutic targets, and the creation of individualized treatment plans. We also discuss how tumor markers can provide guidance for clinical practice.

CD24hiCD27+ Bregs within Metastatic Lymph Nodes Promote Multidrug Resistance in Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

Axillary lymph nodes (LN) are the primary and dominant metastatic sites in breast cancer. However, the interaction between tumor cells and immune cells within metastatic LNs (mLN) remains poorly understood. In our study, we explored the effect of CD24hiCD27+ regulatory B cells (Breg) within mLNs on orchestrating drug resistance of breast cancer cells.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We collected mLN samples from patients with breast cancer who had received standard neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) and analyzed the spatial features of CD24hiCD27+ Bregs through multicolor immunofluorescence staining. The effect of CD24hiCD27+ Bregs on drug resistance of breast cancer cells was evaluated via in vitro experiments. A mouse model with mLNs was used to evaluate the strategies with blocking the interactions between Bregs and breast cancer for improving tumor regression within mLNs.

RESULTS

In patients with breast cancer who had received NAT, there is a close spatial correlation between activated CD24hiCD27+ Bregs and residual tumor cells within mLNs. Mechanistically, CD24hiCD27+ Bregs greatly enhance the acquisition of multidrug resistance and stem-like features of breast cancer cells by secreting IL6 and TNFα. More importantly, breast cancer cells further promote the activation of CD24hiCD27+ Bregs via CD40L-dependent and PD-L1-dependent proximal signals, forming a positive feedback pattern. PD-L1 blockade significantly attenuates the drug resistance of breast cancer cells induced by CD24hiCD27+ Bregs, and addition of anti-PD-L1 antibody to chemotherapy improves tumor cell remission in mLNs.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study reveals the pivotal role of CD24hiCD27+ Bregs in promoting drug resistance by interacting with breast cancer cells in mLNs, providing novel evidence for an improved strategy of chemoimmunotherapy combination for patients with breast cancer with mLNs.

PD-1 Independent Role of PD-L1 in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Progression

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a type of breast malignancy characterized by a high proliferative rate and metastatic potential leading to treatment failure, relapse, and poor prognosis. Therefore, efforts are continuously being devoted to understanding its biology and identifying new potential targets. Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) is an immunosuppressive protein that inactivates T cells by binding to the inhibitory receptor programmed death-1 (PD-1). PD-L1 overexpression in cancer cells contributes to immune evasion and, subsequently, poor survival and prognosis in several cancers, including breast cancer. Apart from its inhibitory impact on T cells, this ligand is believed to have an intrinsic role in cancer cells. This study was performed to clarify the PD-1 independent role of PD-L1 in TNBC MDA-MB-231 cells by knocking out the PD-L1 using three designs of CRISPR-Cas9 lentiviral particles. Our study revealed that PD-L1 knockout significantly inhibited MDA-MB-231 cell proliferation and colony formation in vitro and tumor growth in the chick embryo chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) model in vivo. PD-L1 knockout also decreased the migration and invasion of MDA-MB-231 cells in vitro. We have shown that PD-L1 knockout MDA-MB-231 cells have low levels of p-Akt and p-ERK in addition to some of their downstream proteins, c-Fos, c-Myc, p21, survivin, and COX-2. Furthermore, PD-L1 knockout significantly decreased the expression of Snail and RhoA. This study shows the intrinsic role of PD-L1 in TNBC independently of its binding to PD-1 receptors on T cells. It may pave the way for developing novel therapeutic strategies using PD-L1 inhibitors alone and in combination to treat TNBC more effectively.

Heterogeneity of PD-L1 expression and CD8 lymphocyte infiltration in metastatic colorectal cancer and their prognostic significance

Purpose

In recent years, immune checkpoint inhibitors have become a major therapeutic method for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Growing evidence indicates that tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in the tumour microenvironment are a prerequisite for the effectiveness of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade therapy. In this study, we aimed to compare PD-L1 expression and cluster of differentiation 4 (CD4) and CD8 TIL infiltration in primary tumours and paired metastases.

Patients and methods

Altogether, 111 patients with mCRC who underwent surgery at our hospital were included. PD-L1, CD4, and CD8 expression were detected by immunohistochemistry in a tissue microarray. PD-L1 expression was assessed using the combined positivity score (CPS), and a score ≥1 was judged as positive. The area proportion of TILs with positive staining ≥10% was classified as "high", while <10% was classified as "low".

Results

We observed the discordance of PD-L1 expression between primary tumours and paired metastases in 35/111 (31.5%) patients (κ = 0.137, P = 0.142). This heterogeneity was significantly correlated with discordance of CD8 TIL infiltration between primary tumours and paired metastases (P = 0.003). Compared with corresponding colorectal cancer tumours, lung metastases showed more CD8 TIL infiltration (P = 0.022, median: 8.5% vs. 5.0%), whereas liver metastases exhibited less CD8 TIL infiltration (P = 0.028, median: 3.0% vs. 5.0%). Area proportion of CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ TIL infiltration in lung metastases were all higher than those in liver metastases (P = 0.005, median: 15.0% vs. 9.0%; P = 0.001, median: 8.5% vs. 3.0%). Compared with p MMR (MSI-L/MS-S) subgroup, area proportion of CD8 TIL infiltration in primary tumours and CD4, CD8 TIL infiltration in paired metastases were all higher in d MMR (MSI-H) group (P = 0.026, median: 15.0% vs 5.0%; P = 0.039, median: 15.0% vs 9.0%; P = 0.015, median: 15.0% vs 5.0%). Preoperative chemo/radiotherapy may increase CD8 TIL infiltration in primary tumours (P = 0.045, median: 10.0% vs. 5.0%). CD8 TIL infiltration in primary tumours was an independent predictive factor for overall survival (HR 0.28, 95% CI 0.09-0.93, P = 0.038).

Conclusion

Heterogeneity in PD-L1 expression and CD8 TIL infiltration was found between primary tumours and paired metastases in mCRC. CD8 TIL infiltration in primary tumours could independently forecast the overall survival of patients with mCRC.

PDJ amplicon in triple negative breast cancer

Amplification of chromosome 9p24.1 targeting PD-L1, PD-L2, and JAK2 (PDJ amplicon) is present in subsets of triple negative breast cancers (TNBCs) and is associated with poor clinical outcomes. However, the prevalence of PDJ+ TNBCs varies extensively across studies applying different methods for interrogating samples of interest. To rigorously assess the prevalence of PDJ amplicons in TNBC, its prognostic value and whether it is enriched by chemotherapy, we interrogated 360 TNBC samples including 74 surgical resections from patients treated in the neoadjuvant setting, and tissue microarrays (TMAs) with 31 cases from African American women and 255 resected non-metastatic cases, with a 3 color fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assay targeting the 9p24.1 PDJ amplicon, 9q24.3, and 9q34.1. Samples with mean PDJ signal of > 4.5 copies, and ratios of PDJ/9q24 ≥ 2 and/or PDJ/9q34.1 ≥ 2 were called amplified (PDJ+). Correlative analyses included the association of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) with PDJ amplicons in TNBCs. In addition, we investigated intratumor copy number of PDJ amplicons in PDJ+ and PDJ- TNBCs. Matched pre- and post-neoadjuvant treatment biopsies were available from patients (n = 6) to evaluate the effects of therapy on PDJ status. Our study provides a rigorous analysis of the prevalence, distribution, and clinical correlatives of the PDJ amplicon in TNBC.

Unexpected curative effect of PD-1 inhibitor in gastric cancer with brain metastasis: A case report

Background

Gastric cancer (GC) is the third most common cause of cancer-related death in the world. Several clinical trials have proven that the use of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors can improve the survival of late-stage GC patients and is suggested in NCCN and CSCO guidelines. However, the correlation between PD-L1 expression and the response to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors is still controversial. GC rarely develops brain metastasis (BrM) and currently there is no therapeutic protocol for GC BrMs.

Case presentation

We report a case of a 46-year-old male suffering from GC with PD-L1 negative BrMs 12 years after GC resection and 5 cycles of chemotherapy. We treated the patient with the immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) pembrolizumab and all metastatic tumors achieved a complete response (CR). A durable remission of the tumors is confirmed after 4 years of follow-up.

Conclusion

We shared a rare case with PD-L1 negative GC BrM responsive to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, the mechanism of which is still unclear. The protocol of therapeutic choice for late-stage GC with BrM is urgently needed. And we are expecting biomarkers other than PD-L1 expressions to predict the efficacy of ICI treatment.

Role of cytotoxic T cells and PD-1 immune checkpoint pathway in papillary thyroid carcinoma

Background

Lymphocytic thyroiditis (LT) is frequently seen in the tumor microenvironment (TME) of papillary thyroid carcinomas (PTCs). However, the characteristic of these tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) is not well understood.

Objective

We aim to define the TME of PTC cases by characterizing the TILs.

Design

This is a cross-sectional observational study.

Patients

We enrolled 29 PTC (23 having concurrent LT), 14 LT, and 13 hyperplastic nodules with LT (HN) patients from January 2016 to December 2020.

Measurements

Immunohistochemical (IHC) expression of CD8, FoxP3, PD-1, and PD-L1 was studied in PTC with LT and compared with HN. PD-1 and PD-L1 expression was correlated at the mRNA level by quantitative real-time PCR. Immunophenotyping of TILs was done in FNAC samples of PTC and LT by flow cytometry.

Results

IHC revealed the presence of CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) and FoxP3+ T regulatory cells (Tregs) in 83% and 52% of PTC with LT cases, respectively. Flow cytometric analysis of the PTC samples revealed a significant abundance of CTL compared with Treg and a higher CTL with lower Treg counts compared with LT. On IHC, PD-1 positivity was noted in 56.5% of PTC with LT cases, while intermediate PD-L1 positivity was found in 70% of the cases. There was a significant upregulation of PD-1 mRNA in PTC with LT. A significant correlation was noted with PD-L1 expression with lymph node metastasis and presence of Treg cells.

Conclusions

Increased expression of PD-1 and PD-L1 in the TME of PTC may provide a potential molecular mechanism for tumor survival despite the predominance of CTLs, possibly through their inactivation or exhaustion.

The prognostic importance of PD-L1, PTEN, PHH3, and KI-67 expressions in invasive breast carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship of PD-L1, PTEN, PHH3, and Ki-67 immunohistochemical stain expressions with prognostic clinicopathological parameters in breast cancer.

METHODS

Lumpectomy and mastectomy materials from 85 patients operated at the Department of Pathology, Bolu Abant Izzet Baysal University, Faculty of Medicine between 2014 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. PD-L1, PTEN, PHH3, and Ki-67 expressions were examined. Immunohistochemical staining results were compared with clinicopathological parameters and found to be associated with prognosis.

RESULTS

A statistically significant correlation was found between PD-L1 and large tumor size, high histological grade, multifocality, and lymphovascular invasion. A statistically significant correlation was found between the loss of PTEN and large tumor size and histological grade. There was a statistically significant correlation between PHH3 and advanced age, large tumor size, and high histological grade. A statistically significant correlation was found between Ki-67 and large tumor size, high histological grade, and lymphovascular invasion.

CONCLUSION

PD-L1, PTEN, PHH3, and Ki-67 are regarded as potential biomarkers that can be used to predict the prognosis of breast cancer and to develop targeted therapies.

PD-L1 Expression in Triple-negative Breast Cancer-a Comparative Study of 3 Different Antibodies

BACKGROUND

Assessment of programmed death protein-ligand 1 (PD-L1) in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) has entered daily practice to identify patients eligible for treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors. However, different antibodies and different cut-offs for PD-L1 positivity are used, and the interchangeability of these methods is not clear. The aim of our study was to analyze whether different PD-L1 antibodies can be used interchangeably to identify TNBC patients as PD-L1 positive.

METHODS

A tissue microarray encompassing 147 TNBC cases was immunohistochemically analyzed using 3 different antibodies against PD-L1: SP142, SP263, and E1L3N. PD-L1 positivity was determined as ≥1% of positive tumor-associated immune cells. The staining patterns of the 3 antibodies were compared and correlated with clinicopathological data.

RESULTS

A total of 84 cases were evaluable for PD-L1 analysis with all 3 antibodies. PD-L1 was positive in 50/84 patients (59.5%) with SP263, in 44/84 (52.4%) with E1L3N, and in 29/84 (34.5%) with SP142. There was no statistical difference between the performance of SP263 and E1L3N, but both antibodies stained significantly more cases than the SP142 antibody.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that the 3 PD-L1 antibodies identify different TNBC patient subgroups as PD-L1 positive and, therefore cannot be used interchangeably. Additional studies are needed to further investigate the use and impact of different PD-L1 antibody clones for predictive selection of TNBC patients for treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Atezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel for unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer: real-world results from a single academic center in Austria

Purpose

IMpassion130 led to the approval of atezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel as first-line treatment for patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic triple-negative, PD-L1 immune-cell positive breast cancer (BC) by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). The objective of the present study was to investigate the implementation, safety and efficacy of this combination in the initial phase after approval.

Methods

A retrospective data analysis including all BC patients who received atezolizumab and nab-paclitaxel between 1.1.2019 and 31.10.2020 at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and the Department of Medicine 1, respectively, at the Medical University of Vienna, Austria, was performed. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated with the Kaplan-Maier product-limit method. Owing to the retrospective nature of this study, all statistics must be considered exploratory.

Results

In total 20 patients were included in the study. Median follow-up was 7.1 months (IQR 5.2–9.1). Median PFS was 3.0 months (SE = .24; 95% CI [2.5; 3.5]). Median OS was 8.94 months (SE = 2.34, 95%CI [4.35; 13.53]). No new safety signals were observed.

Conclusion

The present study showed a considerably shorter PFS (3.0 vs. 7.5 months) and OS (8.94 vs. 25.0 months) than IMpassion130 putatively owing to the use of atezolizumab in later treatment lines, more aggressive tumors and a study population with higher morbidity compared to the pivotal trial.

CDK Inhibition Primes for Anti-PD-L1 Treatment in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Models

Triple-negative breast cancers (TNBC) expressing PD-L1 qualify for checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy. Cyclin E/CDK2 is a potential target axis in TNBC; however, small-molecule drugs at efficacious doses may be associated with toxicity, and treatment alongside immunotherapy requires investigation. We evaluated CDK inhibition at suboptimal levels and its anti-tumor and immunomodulatory effects. Transcriptomic analyses of primary breast cancers confirmed higher cyclin E/CDK2 expression in TNBC compared with non-TNBC. Out of the three CDK2-targeting inhibitors tested, the CDK 2, 7 and 9 inhibitor SNS-032 was the most potent in reducing TNBC cell viability and exerted cytotoxicity against all eight TNBC cell lines evaluated in vitro. Suboptimal SNS-032 dosing elevated cell surface PD-L1 expression in surviving TNBC cells. In mice engrafted with human immune cells and challenged with human MDA-MB-231 TNBC xenografts in mammary fat pads, suboptimal SNS-032 dosing partially restricted tumor growth, enhanced the tumor infiltration of human CD45⁺ immune cells and elevated cell surface PD-L1 expression in surviving cancer cells. In tumor-bearing mice engrafted with human immune cells, the anti-PD-L1 antibody avelumab, given sequentially following suboptimal SNS-032 dosing, reduced tumor growth compared with SNS-032 alone or with avelumab without prior SNS-032 priming. CDK inhibition at suboptimal doses promotes immune cell recruitment to tumors, PD-L1 expression by surviving TNBC cells and may complement immunotherapy.

Heterogeneity of the tumor immune microenvironment and its clinical relevance

During the course of tumorigenesis and subsequent metastasis, malignant cells gradually diversify and become more heterogeneous. Consequently, the tumor mass might be infiltrated by diverse immune-related components, including the cytokine/chemokine environment, cytotoxic activity, or immunosuppressive elements. This immunological heterogeneity is universally presented spatially or varies temporally along with tumor evolution or therapeutic intervention across almost all solid tumors. The heterogeneity of anti-tumor immunity shows a profound association with the progression of disease and responsiveness to treatment, particularly in the realm of immunotherapy. Therefore, an accurate understanding of tumor immunological heterogeneity is essential for the development of effective therapies. Facilitated by multi-regional and -omics sequencing, single cell sequencing, and longitudinal liquid biopsy approaches, recent studies have demonstrated the potential to investigate the complexity of immunological heterogeneity of the tumors and its clinical relevance in immunotherapy. Here, we aimed to review the mechanism underlying the heterogeneity of the immune microenvironment. We also explored how clinical assessments of tumor heterogeneity might facilitate the development of more effective personalized therapies.

Ephrin receptor A10 monoclonal antibodies and the derived chimeric antigen receptor T cells exert an antitumor response in mouse models of triple-negative breast cancer

Expression of the receptor tyrosine kinase ephrin receptor A10 (EphA10), which is undetectable in most normal tissues except for the male testis, has been shown to correlate with tumor progression and poor prognosis in several malignancies, including triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Therefore, EphA10 could be a potential therapeutic target, likely with minimal adverse effects. However, no effective clinical drugs against EphA10 are currently available. Here, we report high expression levels of EphA10 in tumor regions of breast, lung, and ovarian cancers as well as in immunosuppressive myeloid cells in the tumor microenvironment. Furthermore, we developed anti-EphA10 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) that specifically recognize cell surface EphA10, but not other EphA family isoforms, and target tumor regions precisely in vivo with no apparent accumulation in other organs. In syngeneic TNBC mouse models, we found that anti-EphA10 mAb clone #4 enhanced tumor regression, therapeutic response rate, and T cell–mediated antitumor immunity. Notably, the chimeric antigen receptor T cells derived from clone #4 significantly inhibited TNBC cell viability in vitro and tumor growth in vivo. Together, our findings suggest that targeting EphA10 via EphA10 mAbs and EphA10-specific chimeric antigen receptor–T cell therapy may represent a promising strategy for patients with EphA10-positive tumors.

The Lymph Node Microenvironment May Invigorate Cancer Cells With Enhanced Metastatic Capacities

Cancer metastasis, a typical malignant biological behavior involving the distant migration of tumor cells from the primary site to other organs, contributed majorly to cancer-related deaths of patients. Although constant efforts have been paid by researchers to elucidate the mechanisms of cancer metastasis, we are still far away from the definite answer. Recently, emerging evidence demonstrated that cancer metastasis is a continuous coevolutionary process mediated by the interactions between tumor cells and the host organ microenvironment, and epigenetic reprogramming of metastatic cancer cells may confer them with stronger metastatic capacities. The lymph node served as the first metastatic niche for many types of cancer, and the appearance of lymph node metastasis predicted poor prognosis. Importantly, multiple immune cells and stromal cells station and linger in the lymph nodes, which constitutes the complexity of the lymph node microenvironment. The active cross talk between cancer cells and immune cells could happen unceasingly within the metastatic environment of lymph nodes. Of note, diverse immune cells have been found to participate in the formation of malignant properties of tumor, including stemness and immune escape. Based on these available evidence and data, we hypothesize that the metastatic microenvironment of lymph nodes could drive cancer cells to metastasize to further organs through epigenetic mechanisms.

Biomarkers of response to PD-1 pathway blockade

The binding of T cell immune checkpoint proteins programmed death 1 (PD-1) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) to their ligands allows immune evasion by tumours. The development of therapeutic antibodies, termed checkpoint inhibitors, that bind these molecules or their ligands, has provided a means to release this brake on the host anti-tumour immune response. However, these drugs are costly, are associated with potentially severe side effects, and only benefit a small subset of patients. It is therefore important to identify biomarkers that discriminate between responders and non-responders. This review discusses the determinants for a successful response to antibodies that bind PD-1 or its ligand PD-L1, dividing them into markers found in the tumour biopsy and those in non-tumour samples. It provides an update on the established predictive biomarkers (tumour PD-L1 expression, tumour mismatch repair deficiency and tumour mutational burden) and assesses the evidence for new potential biomarkers.

Evaluation of PD-L1 Expression in Undifferentiated Pleomorphic Sarcomas, Liposarcomas and Chondrosarcomas

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) such as PD1/PD-L1 blockers are an established treatment for many solid cancers. There are currently no approved ICIs for sarcomas, but satisfactory results have been seen in some patients with disseminated disease in certain histological types. Most studies on PD-L1 in sarcoma have used small specimens and there are no clear cutoff values for scoring. We investigated PD-L1 immunoreactivity in high-grade chondrosarcomas (CS), abdominal liposarcoma (LS) and undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcomas (UPS). In total, 230 tumors were stained with SP142 and SP263 assays and evaluated by two clinical pathologists. Immunoreactivity in tumor and immune cells was correlated with clinical outcome. Overall, ≥1% PD-L1 immunoreactivity in tumor cells was found in 11 CS, 26 LS and 59 UPS (SP142 assay) and in 10 CS, 26 LS and 77 UPS (SP263 assay). Most tumors exhibited ≤10% PD-L1 immunoreactivity, but a subset across all three subtypes had >50%. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis showed no significant difference in metastasis-free or overall survival in relation to PD-L1 immunoreactivity in tumor or immune cells for any subtype. As there is a lack of clinical data regarding PD-L1/PD-1 status and therapy response, it is not currently possible to establish clear cutoff values. Patients with high (>50%) PD-L1 immunoreactivity in tumor cells (TC) with the SP263 assay would be a logical group to investigate for potentially beneficial PD1/PD-L1-targeted treatment.

CD68 and CD83 immune populations in non-metastatic axillary lymph nodes are of prognostic value for the survival and relapse of breast cancer patients

BACKGROUND

The foremost cause of death of breast cancer (BC) patients is metastasis, and the first site to which BC predominantly metastasizes is the axillary lymph node (ALN). Thus, ALN status is a key prognostic indicator at diagnosis. The immune system has an essential role in cancer progression and dissemination, so its evaluation in ALNs could have significant applications. In the present study we aimed to investigate the association of clinical-pathological and immune variables in the primary tumour and non-metastatic ALNs (ALNs^-) of a cohort of luminal A and triple-negative BC (TNBC) patients with cancer-specific survival (CSS) and time to progression (TTP).

METHODS

We analysed the differences in the variables between patients with different outcomes, created univariate and multivariate Cox regression models, validated them by bootstrapping and multiple imputation of missing data techniques, and used Kaplan-Meier survival curves for a 10-years follow-up.

RESULTS

We found some clinical-pathological variables at diagnosis (tumour diameter, TNBC molecular profile and presence of ALN metastasis), and the levels of several immune markers in the two studied sites, to be associated with worse CSS and TTP. Nevertheless, only CD68 and CD83 in ALNs^- were confirmed as independent prognostic factors for TTP.

CONCLUSIONS

The study identified the importance of macrophage and dendritic cell markers as prognostic factors of relapse for BC. We highlight the importance of studying the immune response in ALNs^-, which could be relevant to the prediction of BC patients' outcome.

Clinical significance of tumoral PD-L1 expression in Wilms tumors

BACKGROUND

Although cure rate for Wilms tumor (WT) is high recent years, there is still small fraction of patients suffering from tumor relapse or metastases. It is urgent to identify more valuable biomarkers associated with disease progression. Previous studies have shown that PD-L1 was abnormally expressed in various type of cancers and acted as predictor for poor prognosis for those cancers. PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors have achieved great success in various malignancies with correlation between PD-L1 expression and responses. We conducted this retrospective study to better understand the role of PD-L1 in WT development.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the expression rate of tumoral PD-L1 in WT and investigate the association of PD-L1 with tumor invasion and metastasis.

STUDY DESIGN

Seventy-seven patients with WT, including 20 cases of primary WTs with corresponding resected invasive/lymph node metastatic tumors were enrolled in the research. Immunohistochemistry was used to examine tumoral PD-L1 expression. Kaplan-Meier analysis with regard to the relationship between the expression of tumoral PD-L1 and follow-up information was performed.

RESULTS

Positive expression rate of tumoral PD-L1 was 28.6% in primary WT tissues, while 35% in associated invasive/metastatic ones. The tumoral PD-L1 expression in primary WTs were correlated with late stage and unfavorable histology (P = 0.007; P = 0.002). The expression rate of tumoral PD-L1 was higher in the progression group than that without distant metastasis or relapse (P = 0.038). The expression rate of PD-L1 between primary WTs and matched invasive/metastatic tissues was concordant (P = 0.435). Tumoral PD-L1 expression was associated with disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) (P = 0.02; P = 0.03). Tumor PD-L1 expression was associated with DFS and OS in univariable analyses but not in multivariable Cox regression, adjusting for histology and tumor stage.

DISCUSSION

We found that PD-L1 expression was associated with the late-stage of WT and unfavorable histology, which were tightly associated with disease relapse and progression, predicting poor prognosis. The subsequent survival analysis also showed that PD-L1 expression was linked to both shorter DFS and OS. After adjustment for WT stage and histology, PD-L1 expression was no longer an independent predictor of DFS/OS. The value of PD-L1 as predictor for prognosis and potential therapeutic target in WT still need to be validated in large cohort in future.

CONCLUSION

Although PD-L1 expression correlated with established prognostic factors in our dataset, its value as a prognostic marker and therapeutic target, if any, remains to be shown in future.

Predictive biomarkers for response to immune checkpoint inhibition

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have transformed the prognosis and treatment paradigm of many cancer types, through the potential for durable responses. However, the majority of patients still do not benefit. Response to checkpoint inhibition is determined by dynamic host, tumour and tumour microenvironment factors that display spatial and temporal variability, but our understanding of these interactions is incomplete. Through investigating biomarkers of resistance and response, opportunities arise to discover new therapeutic targets and shape personalised treatment strategies. Here we review approved and emerging biomarkers of response to immune checkpoint inhibitors, in particular the recent rapid progress in host and tumour genomics. It is unlikely that a single biomarker will precisely predict response, but multivariate multiomic markers may provide a balanced assessment of these factors and more accurately identify patients who will benefit. Further efforts are required to translate these groundbreaking discoveries into novel therapeutics and biomarker driven clinical trials, to provide durable treatment response to a greater population of patients.

A PD-L1 Negative Advanced Gastric Cancer Patient With a Long Response to PD-1 Blockade After Failure of Systematic Treatment: A Case Report

Background

It was widely accepted that programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) positive, tumor mutational burden-high (TMB-H) or microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) tumor are prone to have better treatment response to immune checkpoint blockade. The value of immune checkpoint blockade in PD-L1 negative gastric cancer patients has been questioned due to lower objective response rate (ORR).

Case Presentation

We report an unusual case of a PD-L1 negative, proficient mismatch repair (pMMR)/microsatellite stability (MSS), tumor mutational burden-low (TMB-L) gastric cancer patient who achieved good response to immune checkpoint blockade after failure of systematic treatment. Multiple lymph nodes and bone metastases are the main characteristics of this patient. The patient survived for more than 30 months after diagnosis.

Conclusions

This case suggested that PD-L1 negative gastric cancer patient may also benefit from immune checkpoint blockade. In gastric cancer, patients with lymph node metastasis may be potential beneficiaries.

Prognostic Role of PD-L1 Expression in Invasive Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Simple Summary

The role of PD-L1 expression in breast cancer remains controversial. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the association of PD-L1 expression with clinicopathological variables, overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS) in invasive breast cancer. PD-L1 expression was associated with age ≥ 50 years, lymph node status-negative, progesterone receptor-negative, Ki67 ≥ 20%, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative. PD-L1 positivity was associated with worse OS; however, there was no significant improvement in DFS. PD-L1 positivity was significantly associated with the clinicopathological characteristics of favorable and unfavorable prognoses. However, the final clinical outcome was associated with lower OS and had no significant association with DFS.

Abstract

Programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) has been investigated in various types of cancer; however, the role of PD-L1 expression in breast cancer remains controversial. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the association of PD-L1 expression with clinicopathological variables, overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS) in invasive breast cancer. A total of 965 articles were included from CINAHL, Embase, PubMed, and Scopus databases. Of these, 22 studies encompassing 6468 cases of invasive breast cancer were included in the systematic review, and 15 articles were included in the meta-analysis. PD-L1 expression was associated with age ≥ 50 years, lymph node status-negative, progesterone receptor-negative, Ki67 ≥ 20%, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative. PD-L1 positivity was associated with worse OS (hazard ratio, HR, 2.39; 95% confidence interval, CI, 1.26–3.52; p =< 0.000); however, there was no significant improvement in DFS (HR 0.17; 95% CI −0.12–0.46; p =< 0.252). PD-L1 positivity was significantly associated with the clinicopathological characteristics of favorable and unfavorable prognoses. However, the final clinical outcome was associated with lower OS and had no significant association with DFS.

Intertumoral Heterogeneity of Primary Breast Tumors and Synchronous Axillary Lymph Node Metastases Reflected in IHC-Assessed Expression of Routine and Nonstandard Biomarkers

Breast cancer (BC) remains a significant healthcare challenge. Routinely, the treatment strategy is determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC)-based assessment of the key proteins such as estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), and Ki-67. However, it is estimated that over 75% of deaths result from metastatic tumors, indicating a need to develop more accurate protocols for intertumoral heterogeneity assessment and their consequences on prognosis. Therefore, the aim of this preliminary study was the identification of the expression profiles of routinely used biomarkers (ER, PR, HER2, Ki-67) and additional relevant proteins [Bcl-2, cyclin D1, E-cadherin, Snail+Slug, gross cystic disease fluid protein 15 (GCDFP-15), programmed death receptor 1 (PD-L1), and phosphatase of regenerating liver 3 (PRL-3)] in breast primary tumors (PTs) and paired synchronous axillary lymph node (ALN) metastases. A total of 67 tissue samples met the inclusion criteria for the study. The expression status of biomarkers was assessed in PTs and ALN metastases using tissue microarrays followed by IHC. In 11 cases, the shift of intrinsic molecular BC subtype was noticed between PTs and paired ALN metastases. Moreover, a significant disproportion in E-cadherin presence (p = 0.0002) was noted in both foci, and the expression status of all proteins except for HER2 demonstrated considerable variance (k = 1, p < 0.0001). Importantly, in around 30% of cases, the ALN metastases demonstrated discordance, i.e., loss/gain of expression, compared to the PTs. Intertumoral synchronous heterogeneity in both foci (primary tumor and node metastasis) is an essential phenomenon affecting the clinical subtype and characteristics of BC. Furthermore, a greater understanding of this event could potentially improve therapeutic efficacy.

Research Progresses in Immunological Checkpoint Inhibitors for Breast Cancer Immunotherapy

Tumor immune escape refers to the phenomenon in which tumor cells escape the recognition and attack of the body’s immune system through various mechanisms so that they can survive and proliferate in vivo. The imbalance of immune checkpoint protein expression is the primary mechanism for breast cancer to achieve immune escape. Cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA4) and programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death protein-ligand 1 (PD-L1) are critical immune checkpoints for breast cancer. Immune checkpoint inhibitors block the checkpoint and relieve its inhibition effect on immune cells, reactivate T-cells and destroy cancer cells and restore the body’s ability to resist tumors. At present, immunological checkpoint inhibitors have made significant progress in breast cancer immunotherapy, and it is expected to become a new treatment for breast cancer.

PD-1/PD-L1 expression in pancreatic cancer and its implication in novel therapies

Pancreatic cancer is the seventh leading cause of death in developed countries and it still has a poor prognosis despite intense research in the last 20 years. Immunotherapy is a relatively new strategy in cancer treatment. The aim of immunotherapy is to block the immunosuppressive effect of tumoral cells. The PD1/PD-L1 axis has an important role in the inhibition of effector T cells and the development of regulatory T cells (Tregs). Blocking these checkpoints, and also inhibitory signals, leads to apoptosis of Tregs and increased immune response of effector T cells against tumoral antigens. Unfortunately, pancreatic cancer is generally considered to be a non-immunogenic tumor. Thus PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors demonstrated poor results in pancreatic cancer, excepting some patients with MSI/dMMR (microsatellite instability/deficient mismatch repair). Furthermore, pancreatic cancer has a particular microenvironment with a strong desmoplastic reaction, increased interstitial fluid pressure, hypoxic conditions, and acidic extracellular pH, which promote tumorigenesis and progression of the tumor. Mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) is correlated with a high level of mutation-associated neoantigens, most recognized by immune cells which could predict a favorable response to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy. PD-1/PD-L1 molecules could be also found as soluble forms (sPD-1, sPD-L1). These molecules have a potential role in the prognosis and treatment of pancreatic cancer.

Discordance of PD-L1 Expression at the Protein and RNA Levels in Early Breast Cancer

Simple Summary

Despite the increasing use of checkpoint inhibitors for early and metastatic breast cancer, Programmed Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) remains the only validated albeit imperfect predictive biomarker. Significant discordance in PD-L1 protein expression depending on the antibody used has been demonstrated, while the weak correlation and discordant prognostic information between protein and gene expression underscore its biologic heterogeneity. In this study, we use material from two patient cohorts of early breast cancer and multiple methodologies (immunohistochemistry, RNA fluorescent in situ hybridization, immunofluorescence, bulk gene expression, and multiplex fluorescent immunohistochemistry) to demonstrate the significant discordance in PD-L1 expression among various methods and between different areas of the same tumor, which hints toward the presence of spatial, intratumoral and biological heterogeneity.

Abstract

We aimed to assess if the discrepant prognostic information between Programmed Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) protein versus mRNA expression in early breast cancer (BC) could be attributed to heterogeneity in its expression. PD-L1 protein and mRNA expression in BC tissue microarrays from two clinical patient cohorts were evaluated (105 patients; cohort 1: untreated; cohort 2: neoadjuvant chemotherapy-treated). Immunohistochemistry (IHC) with SP142, SP263 was performed. PD-L1 mRNA was evaluated using bulk gene expression and RNA-FISH RNAscope^®, the latter scored in a semi-quantitative manner and combined with immunofluorescence (IF) staining for the simultaneous detection of PD-L1 protein expression. PD-L1 expression was assessed in cores as a whole and in two regions of interest (ROI) from the same core. The cell origin of PD-L1 expression was evaluated using multiplex fluorescent IHC. IHC PD-L1 expression between SP142 and SP263 was concordant in 86.7% of cores (p < 0.001). PD-L1 IF/IHC was weakly correlated with spatial mRNA expression (concordance 54.6–71.2%). PD-L1 was mostly expressed by lymphocytes intra-tumorally, while its stromal expression was mostly observed in macrophages. Our results demonstrate only moderate concordance between the various methods of assessing PD-L1 expression at the protein and mRNA levels, which may be attributed to both analytical performance and spatial heterogeneity.

Upregulated lncRNA Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2B antisense RNA 1 induces the proliferation and migration of colorectal cancer by miR-378b/CAPRIN2 axis

LncRNA Cyclin‐dependent kinase inhibitor 2B antisense RNA 1 (CDKN2B-AS1) plays a role in the progression of multiple cancers like cholangiocarcinoma, osteosarcoma and several gastrointestinal tumors. Few studies have linked its function and mechanism to the development of colorectal cancer (CRC). The expression of CDKN2B-AS1, microRNA (miR)-378b, and cytoplasmic activation/proliferation-associated protein 2 (CAPRIN2) was analyzed in CRC patients and cell lines. The proliferation and migration of CRC cells were evaluated after gain and loss-of function mutations. Interactions between CDKN2B-AS1 and miR-378b, miR-378b and CAPRIN2 were validated by luciferase reporter, RNA pull-down and RNA immunoprecipitation assays. The role of CDKN2B-AS1 was further confirmed in a xenograft mouse model. We found that the expression of CDKN2B-AS1 and CAPRIN2 was upregulated in CRC and they were linked to the poor differentiation and distant metastasis in CRC patients. CDKN2B-AS1 knockdown attenuated while CDKN2B-AS1 overexpression promoted CRC cell proliferation and migration. Notably, the results of Starbase 2.0 database analysis and in vitro experiments demonstrated that CDKN2B-AS1 could interact with miR-378b and regulate its expression. Furthermore, CAPRIN2 acted as a downstream target of CDKN2B-AS1/miR-378b that involved in modulating β-catenin expression in CRC cells. Upregulation of CDKN2B-AS1 contributed to CRC progression via regulating CAPRIN2 expression by binding to miR-378b. Downregulation of CDKN2B-AS1 suppressed tumor growth and Ki-67 staining in vivo that was related to the miR-378b/CAPRIN2 pathway. This study indicated that lncRNA CDKN2B-AS1 promoted the development of CRC through the miR-378b/CAPRIN2/β-catenin axis. CDKN2B-AS1 might serve as a potential and useful target in CRC diagnosis and treatment.

Breast Cancer Heterogeneity

Breast tumor heterogeneity is a major challenge in the clinical management of breast cancer patients. Both inter-tumor and intra-tumor heterogeneity imply that each breast cancer (BC) could have different prognosis and would benefit from specific therapy. Breast cancer is a dynamic entity, changing during tumor progression and metastatization and this poses fundamental issues to the feasibility of a personalized medicine approach. The most effective therapeutic strategy for patients with recurrent disease should be assessed evaluating biopsies obtained from metastatic sites. Furthermore, the tumor progression and the treatment response should be strictly followed and radiogenomics and liquid biopsy might be valuable tools to assess BC heterogeneity in a non-invasive way.

Determining PD-L1 Status in Patients with Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Lessons Learned from IMpassion130

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) accounts for approximately 12% to 17% of all breast cancers and has an aggressive clinical behavior. Increased tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte counts are prognostic for survival in TNBC, making this disease a potential target for cancer immunotherapy (CIT). Research on immunophenotyping of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes is revealing molecular and structural organization in the tumor microenvironment that may predict patient prognosis. The anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibody atezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel was the first CIT combination to demonstrate progression-free survival benefit and clinically meaningful overall survival benefit in the first-line treatment of metastatic TNBC (mTNBC) in patients with PD-L1-expressing tumor-infiltrating immune cells (IC) in ≥ 1% of the tumor area. This led to its US and EU approval for mTNBC and US approval of the VENTANA PD-L1 (SP142) assay as a companion diagnostic immunohistochemistry (IHC) assay. Subsequently, the anti- programmed death-1 (PD-1) antibody pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy was approved by the FDA for mTNBC based on progression-free survival benefit in patients with a combined positive score ≥10 by its concurrently approved 22C3 companion diagnostic assay. Treatment guidelines now recommend PD-L1 testing for patients with mTNBC, and the testing landscape will likely become increasingly complex as new anti-PD-L1/PD-1 agents and diagnostics are approved for TNBC. Integrating PD-L1 testing into current diagnostic workflows for mTNBC may provide more treatment options for these patients. Therefore, it is critical for medical oncologists and pathologists to understand the available assays and their relevance to therapeutic options to develop an appropriate workflow for IHC testing.

Emerging role of circulating tumor cells in immunotherapy

Over the last few years, immunotherapy, in particular, immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy, has revolutionized the treatment of several types of cancer. At the same time, the uptake in clinical oncology has been slow owing to the high cost of treatment, associated toxicity profiles and variability of the response to treatment between patients. In response, personalized approaches based on predictive biomarkers have emerged as new tools for patient stratification to achieve effective immunotherapy. Recently, the enumeration and molecular analysis of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) have been highlighted as prognostic biomarkers for the management of cancer patients during chemotherapy and for targeted therapy in a personalized manner. The expression of immune checkpoints on CTCs has been reported in a number of solid tumor types and has provided new insight into cancer immunotherapy management. In this review, we discuss recent advances in the identification of immune checkpoints using CTCs and shed light on the potential applications of CTCs towards the identification of predictive biomarkers for immunotherapy.

Tumor Microenvironment: Key Players in Triple Negative Breast Cancer Immunomodulation

Simple Summary

The tumor microenvironment (TME) is a complicated network composed of various cells, signaling molecules, and extra cellular matrix. TME plays a crucial role in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) immunomodulation and tumor progression, paradoxically, acting as an immunosuppressive as well as immunoreactive factor. Research regarding tumor immune microenvironment has contributed to a better understanding of TNBC subtype classification. Shall we treat patients precisely according to specific subtype classification? Moving beyond traditional chemotherapy, multiple clinical trials have recently implied the potential benefits of immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy. In this review, we aimed to elucidate the paradoxical role of TME in TNBC immunomodulation, summarize the subtype classification methods for TNBC, and explore the synergistic mechanism of chemotherapy plus immunotherapy. Our study may provide a new direction for the development of combined treatment strategies for TNBC.

Abstract

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a heterogeneous disease and is highly related to immunomodulation. As we know, the most effective approach to treat TNBC so far is still chemotherapy. Chemotherapy can induce immunogenic cell death, release of damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), and tumor microenvironment (TME) remodeling; therefore, it will be interesting to investigate the relationship between chemotherapy-induced TME changes and TNBC immunomodulation. In this review, we focus on the immunosuppressive and immunoreactive role of TME in TNBC immunomodulation and the contribution of TME constituents to TNBC subtype classification. Further, we also discuss the role of chemotherapy-induced TME remodeling in modulating TNBC immune response and tumor progression with emphasis on DAMPs-associated molecules including high mobility group box1 (HMGB1), exosomes, and sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 1 (S1PR1), which may provide us with new clues to explore effective combined treatment options for TNBC.

Discordance of PD-L1 status between primary and metastatic breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression is predictive for benefit from immunotherapy in several human malignancies including triple negative breast cancer. Lower positivity rates but a larger relative benefit from atezolizumab has been implied when PD-L1 status is assessed at metastatic sites. We aimed to study the discordance of PD-L1 expression between primary tumor and metastasis in breast cancer due to its potential clinical utility.

METHODS

Cochrane Library, Embase, Medline and Web of science were searched for studies reporting on PD-L1 expression in primary and metastatic breast cancer, followed by data extraction. Outcomes included pooled PD-L1 positivity rates in tumor cells, immune cells or both in primary tumor and metastasis, PD-L1 discordance between matched primary tumors and metastasis and direction of discordance.

RESULTS

Of 2552 identified entries following de-duplication, 20 studies fulfilled the predefined inclusion criteria. Pooled PD-L1 positivity rate was higher in primary tumors compared to metastasis when assessed in immune cells (51.2% vs 37.1% p < 0.001) and tumor/immune cells (30.1% vs 14.6% p < 0.001), but not in tumor cells (18.7% vs 17.8% p = 0.65). PD-L1 positivity was lowest when assessed in bone metastases (12%) and highest in lymph nodes (60%). Discordance between primary tumors and metastasis was bidirectional, with higher pooled discordance rates when PD-L1 expression was assessed in immune compared to tumor cells (39.5% vs 13.6%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The observed considerable discordance between PD-L1 status in primary and metastatic breast cancer emphasizes the importance of appropriate tissue sampling when selecting patients for immunotherapy.

Resistance mechanisms to programmed cell death protein 1 and programmed death ligand 1 inhibitors

Introduction: In the past few years, administrating monoclonal humanized antibodies, namely checkpoint inhibitors, against programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), and its ligand (PD-L1), has yielded reassuring tumor regression rates. Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors disrupt the engagement of PD-1 on T-cells and their ligands on tumor or other target cells and reactivate the tumor-specific T infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), which are mostly in a state of anergy before the PD-1/PD-L1 blockade. However, a limited number of patients initially respond, and the others show a primary (innate) resistance. Moreover, the rate of relapse and tumor progression after a partial, or even complete response (secondary or acquired resistance) is relatively considerable.Areas covered: This paper presents a comprehensive discussion on the mechanisms of primary and secondary resistance to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade. Loss of T-cell infiltration or T-cell exclusion, lack of PD-L1 or PD-1 expression, and also lack of tumor immunogenicity are among the most important mechanisms, and also biomarkers of resistance in patients undergoing PD-1/PD-L1 blockade. Several somatic mutations in tumors are known to be related to at least one of the resistance mechanisms.Expert opinion: Identification of the novel resistance mechanisms suggests further combinatorial therapies to tackle primary and secondary resistance to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade.

Clinicopathological and prognostic significance of programmed cell death ligand 1 expression in patients diagnosed with breast cancer: meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Uncertainty exists regarding the clinical relevance of programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in breast cancer.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Observational studies that compared high versus low expression of PD-L1 on breast cancer cells were identified. Log hazard ratios (HRs) for disease-free and overall survival and their standard errors were calculated from Kaplan-Meier curves or Cox regression analyses, and pooled using the inverse-variance method. Dichotomous variables were pooled as odds ratios (ORs) using the Mantel-Haenszel method.

RESULTS

Sixty-five studies with 19 870 patients were included; 14 404 patients were classified as having low and 4975 high PD-L1 expression. High PD-L1 was associated with achieving a pathological complete response following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (OR 3.30, 95 per cent confidence interval 1.19 to 9.16; P < 0.01; I2 = 85 per cent). Low PD-L1 expression was associated with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (OR 3.98, 1.81 to 8.75; P < 0.001; I2 = 96 per cent) and luminal (OR 14.93, 6.46 to 34.51; P < 0.001; I2 = 99 per cent) breast cancer subtypes. Those with low PD-L1 had favourable overall survival rates (HR 1.30, 1.05 to 1.61; P = 0.02; I2 = 85 per cent).

CONCLUSION

Breast cancers with high PD-L1 expression are associated with aggressive clinicopathological and immunohistochemical characteristics and are more likely to achieve a pathological complete response following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. These breast cancers are, however, associated with worse overall survival outcomes.

Clinical Correlations of Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1 Status in Liquid and Standard Biopsies in Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

Data regarding the prognostic value of programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression on circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are lacking. However, CTCs could represent an alternative approach to serial biopsies, allowing real-time monitoring of cancer phenotype.

METHODS

We evaluated, in a dedicated prospective clinical trial, the clinicopathological correlations and prognostic value of PD-L1(+)-CTCs in 72 patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC).

RESULTS

Eighteen of 56 patients with available archival tissue presented at least one positive (≥1%) PD-L1 tumor sample. Baseline CTCs and PD-L1(+)-CTCs were detected in 57 (79.2%) and 26 (36.1%) patients. No significant correlation was found between PD-L1 tumors and CTC expression. In univariate analysis, triple negative (TN) phenotype, number of metastatic treatments, >2 metastatic sites, ≥5 CTCs and PD-L1(+)-CTCs were significantly associated with progression-free survival, while tissue PD-L1 expression was not. In multivariate analysis, TN phenotype, number of metastatic treatments and of metastatic sites were the only 3 variables independently associated with progression-free survival. Progesterone receptor negativity, TN phenotype, >2 metastatic sites and ≥5 CTCs were significantly associated with overall survival in univariate analysis. In multivariable analysis, TN phenotype and >2 metastatic sites were the only 2 independent variables.

CONCLUSIONS

Unlike PD-L1(+)-tumor, PD-L1(+)-CTCs correlate to survival in MBC. Reappraisal of the role of PD-L1 expression by tumor tissue and by CTCs under anti-PD-1/PD-L1 treatment is necessary to evaluate its predictive value and potential role as a stratifying factor in strategies and trials for MBC patients with MBC.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT02866149.

The role of tumor heterogeneity in immune-tumor interactions

The development of cancer stems from genetic instability and changes in genomic sequences, and hence, the heterogeneity exhibited by tumors is integral to the nature of cancer itself. Tumor heterogeneity can be further altered by factors that are not cancer cell intrinsic, i.e., by the microenvironment, including the patient's immune responses to tumors and administered therapies (immunotherapies, chemotherapies, and/or radiation therapies). The focus of this review is the impact of tumor heterogeneity on the interactions between immune cells and the tumor, taking into account that heterogeneity can exist at several levels. These levels include heterogeneity within an individual tumor, within an individual patient (particularly between the primary tumor and metastatic lesions), among the subtypes of a specific type of cancer, or within cancers that originate from different tissues. Because of the potential for immunity (either the natural immune system or via immunotherapeutics) to halt the progression of cancer, major clinical significance exists in understanding the impact of tumor heterogeneity on the associations between immune cells and tumor cells. Increased knowledge of why, whether, and how immune-tumor interactions occur provides the means to guide these interactions and improve outcomes for patients.

Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Intact Mismatch Repair and Partial Co-Expression of PD-L1 and LAG-3

Background and Aim

Poor response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has been observed in most triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) cases (around 80%). Our aim was to investigate the status of mismatch repair (MMR), microsatellite instability (MSI), programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), and lymphocyte-activation gene 3 (LAG-3) in TNBC.

Methods

A total of 74 TNBC samples were retrospectively analyzed. MMR and MSI were evaluated by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using Promega 1.2 and NCI panels, respectively. PD-L1, LAG-3, and CD8 expression was assessed by IHC.

Results

None of the cases demonstrated deficient MMR (dMMR) or MSI. In total, 43/74 cases (58.1%) were PD-L1+, including 1 tumor PD-L1+, 25 tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) PD-L1+, and 17 cases involving concurrence of tumor and TIL PD-L1+. The rate of TIL PD-L1+ was remarkably higher than that of tumor PD-L1+ (P<0.001). We identified 20 LAG-3+ cases (27.0%, 20/74), all of which were PD-L1+. Co-expression of PD-L1 and LAG-3 was noted in 46.5% (20/43) of the PD-L1+ population. In the LAG-3+ subtype (co-expression of PD-L1 and LAG-3), high correlation between TILs PD-L1+ and LAG-3+ was observed (P<0.01). A high frequency of CD8+ (98.6%, 73/74) was observed.

Conclusion

dMMR/MSI characteristics may not be a practical predictive marker for ICIs in TNBC. PD-L1+ is more common in TILs than in tumors. In the PD-L1+ population, approximately half of the cases showed LAG-3 co-expression. For patients with a poor response to PD-1(L1) mono ICI, dual blockade of PD-1(L1) and LAG-3 may be a viable option for the management of TNBC.

Pan-Cancer Molecular Characterization of m6A Regulators and Immunogenomic Perspective on the Tumor Microenvironment

Purpose

N6-methyladenosine (m⁶A) methylation plays a critical role in diverse biological processes. However, knowledge regarding the constitution of m⁶A on tumor microenvironment (TME) and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) across cancer types is still lacking. We performed comprehensive immuno-genomic analyses to reveal molecular characterization of the m⁶A regulators and immune-related genes (IRGs) across TME and TIL heterogeneity.

Methods

We comprehensively analyzed the properties of m⁶A regulators in genomic profiles from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) according to expression perturbations of crucial IRGs, CD274, CD8A, GZMA, and PRF1. The four IRGs were proved to be reliable biomarkers of TILs and TME via CIBERSORT and ESTIMATE analyses, and their co-expression relationship was certified by TIMER analysis. Based on their median values, the samples from the pan-cancer tissues (N = 11,057) were classified into eight TME types. The RNA expression levels of 13 m⁶A regulators were compared across TME subtypes. Single-sample Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (ssGSEA) was also used to classify TME clusters, expression variants of IRGs and m⁶A regulators were verified among TME clusters. Meanwhile, the correlation between m⁶A regulators and tumor mutational burden (TMB) were tested. Finally, the impacts of IRGs and TME clusters in clinical characteristics and outcomes were revealed.

Results

CD274, CD8A, GZMA, and PRF1 showed similar TILs' characteristics, of which the level of T cells CD8 and T cells CD4 memory activated are consistent with the expression levels of the four IRGs and higher immune infiltration. Besides, CD274, CD8A, GZMA, and PRF1 were positively correlated with the stromal score or immune score in almost all 33 tumor types. All of four IRGs showed impact between tumor pathological stages or clinical outcomes. Among TME type I to type IV, m⁶A regulators' expression drift changed from high-level to low-level in ESCA, BLCA, HNSC, CESC, BRCA, and GBM. However among TME type V to type VIII, m⁶A regulators drew a shift from low-level to high-level expression in CESC, BLCA, ESCA, KIRP, HNSC, BRCA, KIRC, COAD, LAML, GBM, and KICH. In ssGSEA analyses, IRGs' expression levels were elevated with the immune infiltration degree and m⁶A regulators' expression level varied among three TIL subgroups. With different TMB levels, expression differences of m⁶A regulators were observed in BLCA, BRCA, COAD, LGG, LUAD, LUSC, STAD, THCA, and UCEC.

Conclusion

We identified four crucial IRGs affecting TILs, TME characteristics and clinical parameters. Expression variants of m⁶A regulators among the subgroups of TME types and ssGSEA clusters suggested that m⁶A regulators may be essential factors for phenotypic modifications of IRGs and thus affecting TME characteristics across multiple tumor types.

Survival Impact of Aggressive Treatment and PD-L1 Expression in Oligometastatic NSCLC

Background: Studies have shown that aggressive treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with oligometastatic disease improves the overall survival (OS) compared to a palliative approach and some immunotherapy checkpoint inhibitors, such as anti-programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1), anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), and T-Lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) inhibitors are now part of the standard of care for advanced NSCLC. However, the prognostic impact of PD-L1 expression in the oligometastatic setting remains unknown. Methods: Patients with oligometastatic NSCLC were identified from the patient database of the Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal (CHUM). “Oligometastatic disease” definition chosen is one synchronous metastasis based on the M1b staging of the eight IASLC (The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer) Classification (within sixth months of diagnosis) or up to three cerebral metastasis based on the methodology of the previous major phase II randomized study of Gomez et al. We compared the OS between patients receiving aggressive treatment at both metastatic and primary sites (Group A) and patients receiving non-aggressive treatment (Group B). Subgroup analysis was performed using tumor PD-L1 expression. Results: Among 643 metastatic NSCLC patients, we identified 67 patients with oligometastasis (10%). Median follow-up was 13.3 months. Twenty-nine patients (43%) received radical treatment at metastatic and primary sites (Group A), and 38 patients (57%) received non-aggressive treatment (Group B). The median OS (mOS) of Group A was significantly longer than for Group B (26 months vs. 5 months, p = 0.0001). Median progression-free survival (mPFS) of Group A was superior than Group B (17.5 months vs. 3.4 months, p = 0.0001). This difference was still significant when controlled for primary tumor staging: stage I (p = 0.316), stage II (p = 0.024), and stage III (p = 0.001). In the cohort of patients who were not treated with PD-L1 inhibitors, PD-L1 expression negatively correlated with mOS. Conclusions: Aggressive treatments of oligometastatic NSCLC significantly improve mOS and mPFS compared to a more palliative approach. PD-L1 expression is a negative prognostic factor which suggests a possible role for immunotherapy in this setting.

The recent advances of PD-1 and PD-L1 checkpoint signaling inhibition for breast cancer immunotherapy

Over the past decade, there has been sustained research activity on programmed death-1/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) immune checkpoint inhibitors for breast cancer (BC) immunotherapy. Several clinical studies have demonstrated the anti-tumor efficacy of monotherapy drugs targeting PD-1 and PD-L1 checkpoint signaling in BC. Besides, the combination of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents with other inhibitors, including poly-adenosine diphosphate-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, vaccines, mitogen-activated protein kinase (MEK) inhibitors, and cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4) inhibitors are being investigated to improve drug efficacy. These trials have performed well and have shown better and more sustainable therapeutic responses. As follows, the purpose of this review is to discuss the recent advances in BC immunotherapy targeting the inhibition of PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint signaling, when recommended as a monotherapy or in conjunction with other treatments. We look forward to providing new insights into the current state of BC research and the future direction of PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint signaling.

PD-L1 expression in liver metastasis: its clinical significance and discordance with primary tumor in colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

The outcomes of immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer patients with liver metastases are poor, which may be related to a different tumor microenvironment in liver metastases from primary tumors. This study was aimed to analyze PD-L1 expression and the immune microenvironment status in liver metastases and compare the differences of PD-L1 expression between primary tumors and liver metastases of colorectal cancer.

METHODS

74 cases of pathologically confirmed colorectal cancer with liver metastasis underwent resection from our hospital were included. Tissue microarrays were used for the interpretation of PD-L1 expression, cluster of differentiation 4 (CD4) and CD8 density by immunohistochemistry. We evaluated the disparity between primary tumor and liver metastasis in PD-L1 expression, CD4 and CD8 density and analyzed the factors associated with obvious PD-L1 disparity.

RESULTS

The expression of PD-L1 was positively related to the density of CD4 and CD8 in liver metastases. The expression of PD-L1 in liver metastases was higher than in primary tumors in certain subgroups, including patients with concurrent liver metastases (n = 63, p = 0.05), patients receiving concurrent resection of primary and metastatic tumors (n = 56, p = 0.04). The two subgroups generally reflected those without inconsistent external influences, such as treatment and temporal factors, between primary tumors and liver metastases. In these subgroups, the intrinsic differences of microenvironment between primary tumors and liver metastases could be identified. Furthermore, tumor differentiation [moderate vs. poor: OR = 0.23, 95% CI: 0.03-0.99, p = 0.05)] were demonstrated to be associated with obvious discordance of PD-L1 expression between primary tumors and liver metastases.

CONCLUSIONS

The expression of PD-L1 in liver metastases was higher than in primary tumors in subgroups, reflecting intrinsic microenvironment differences between primary and metastatic tumors. Obvious discordance of PD-L1 expression between primary tumor and liver metastasis was significantly related to the tumor differentiation.

Correlation of tumor microenvironment from biopsy and resection specimens in untreated colorectal cancer patients: a surprising lack of agreement

Background

Colorectal cancer (CRC) tumor microenvironment (TME) characteristics, such as tumor infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) densities and PD-L1 status, are predictive of recurrence, disease-free survival, and overall survival. In many malignancies, TME characteristics are also predictive of response to immunotherapy. As window of opportunity studies using neoadjuvant immunotherapy become more common and treatment guidelines incorporate TME features, accurate assessment of the pre-treatment TME using the biopsy specimen is critical. However, no study has thoroughly evaluated the correlation between the TMEs of the biopsy and resection specimens.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with stage I–III CRC with matched biopsy and resection specimens. CD3+, CD4+, CD8+, and FoxP3+ lymphocyte populations at the center of tumor (CT) and invasive margin (IM) and tumor PD-L1 status in the biopsy and resection specimens were evaluated. TIL populations were compared using Mann–Whitney U tests or Student’s t tests and correlated using Pearson r.

Results

CD3+ and CD4+ densities were significantly higher in the CT of the biopsy relative to the resection specimen Comparing biopsy and resection specimens, no TIL population at either the CT or IM had a correlation coefficient > 0.5. Determining PD-L1 status based on biopsy tissue resulted in a sensitivity of 37.1%, specificity of 81.4%, and accuracy of 61.5%.

Conclusions

These findings demonstrate significant discordance between the TME of the biopsy and resection specimens. Caution should be used when basing treatment decisions on pre-treatment endoscopic biopsy findings and when interpreting changes in the TME between pre-treatment biopsy and resection specimens after neoadjuvant therapy.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00262-020-02784-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

The impact of pre-analytical parameters on class II biomarkers by immunohistochemistry: concordance across four tissue processing protocols

In the modern era of precision medicine, a number of class II immunohistochemistry (IHC) biomarkers are routinely tested in pathologic laboratories to select cancer patients who may be candidates for hormonal, targeted, and immune therapies. Pre-analytical factors, including tissue processing, are critical components of biomarker testing and require validation to ensure reliable results. In this study, we aimed to study the impact of tissue processing on biomarkers (including ER, PR, HER2, mismatch repair (MMR) proteins, BRAF V600E, and PD-L1) in a large prospective cohort of 109 tumors. We found that ER and MMR were not impacted; PR, HER2, and BRAF V600E were minimally affected; and PD-L1 regardless of the antibody clone was strongly influenced by a combination of tissue processing procedures and intratumoral heterogeneity. Our findings suggest that validation of pre-analytical parameters, such as tissue processing, is important for certain class II biomarkers, in particular PD-L1 IHC.

Understanding PD-L1 Testing in Breast Cancer: A Practical Approach

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have changed therapy strategies for cancer patients tremendously. Some approved ICI acquire testing of PD-L1 expression on tumor and/or immune cells. However, since PD-L1 testing is a comprehensive issue with various assays, antibody clones, scoring methods, and cut-offs, we aimed to summarize the recommendations and technical and histopathological issues of diagnostic PD-L1 assessment with an emphasis on invasive breast cancer (IBC).

Summary

Besides other (pre)analytical considerations, selecting the most adequate PD-L1 immunohistochemical assay/antibody clone is important. In-house assay validation, prediagnostic training, and internal and external quality assurance should be implemented. The current most relevant PD-L1 assays and scores will be explained in this review. Moreover, recommendations for PD-L1 testing in IBC are outlined.

Key Messages

Atezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel therapy is approved for adult patients with locally advanced or metastatic triple negative breast cancer (mTNBC), if the tumor-associated immune cells express PD-L1. - This PD-L1 immune cell positivity is defined as an immune cell (IC) score, which refers to the area occupied by PD-L1 positive immune cells (lymphocytes, dendritic cells, macrophages, and granulocytes) as a percentage of the whole tumor area. The cut-off is an IC score ≥1%. In the approval study for atezolizumab in mTNBC, IC score was assessed using the Ventana PD-L1 SP142 assay. Other assays or laboratory developed tests may be used depending on country-specific drug approvals. However, harmonization studies have to show whether other PD-L1 tests are reliable and of clinical value to predict the response of breast cancer patients to ICI.

Protective effect of hsa-miR-570-3p targeting CD274 on triple negative breast cancer by blocking PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway

To find out the role of hsa-miR-570-3p targeting CD274 in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) via PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway. Hsa-miR-570-3p and CD274 expressions in 175 TNBC patients were detected by qRT-PCR and immunohistochemistry respectively. The human TNBC cell lines (MDA-MB-468 and MDA-MB-231) were used to verify the targeting relationship between hsa-miR-570-3p and CD274 via dual-luciferase reporter gene assay. Then, MDA-MB-468 and MDA-MB-231 cells were divided into Blank, miR-NC, miR-570-3p mimics, NC siRNA, CD274 siRNA, and miR-570-3p inhibitors + CD274 siRNA groups. Next, the biological activities of cells were detected by MTT, Cell-Light EdU, Annexin-V-FITC/PI, wound healing and Transwell invasion assays. Western blotting was conducted to detect protein expressions.MiR-570-3p expression was lower in tumor tissues than that in adjacent normal tissues, which was more obvious in CD274-positive TNBC patients, which targeted CD274 in TNBC cell lines. MiR-570-3p inhibited cell proliferation, invasion and migration, but induced cell apoptosis accompanying the upregulation of apoptotic proteins and downregulation of anti-apoptotic protein. CD274 siRNA had the similar results of miR-570-3p mimics, which could be reversed by miR-570-3p inhibitors. Besides, both miR-570-3p mimics and CD274 siRNA blocked PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway in TNBC cell lines. Hsa-miR-570-3p was downregulated and CD274 was upregulated in TNBC patients. Besides, hsa-miR-570-3p targeted CD274 to inhibit cell proliferation, invasion, migration, and induce cell apoptosis, which may be related to the suppression of PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway.

Fit-For-Purpose PD-L1 Biomarker Testing For Patient Selection in Immuno-Oncology: Guidelines For Clinical Laboratories From the Canadian Association of Pathologists-Association Canadienne Des Pathologistes (CAP-ACP)

Since 2014, programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) checkpoint inhibitors have been approved by various regulatory agencies for the treatment of multiple cancers including melanoma, lung cancer, urothelial carcinoma, renal cell carcinoma, head and neck cancer, classical Hodgkin lymphoma, colorectal cancer, gastroesophageal cancer, hepatocellular cancer, and other solid tumors. Of these approved drug/disease combinations, a subset also has regulatory agency-approved, commercially available companion/complementary diagnostic assays that were clinically validated using data from their corresponding clinical trials. The objective of this document is to provide evidence-based guidance to assist clinical laboratories in establishing fit-for-purpose PD-L1 biomarker assays that can accurately identify patients with specific tumor types who may respond to specific approved immuno-oncology therapies targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint. These recommendations are issued as 38 Guideline Statements that address (i) assay development for surgical pathology and cytopathology specimens, (ii) reporting elements, and (iii) quality assurance (including validation/verification, internal quality assurance, and external quality assurance). The intent of this work is to provide recommendations that are relevant to any tumor type, are universally applicable and can be implemented by any clinical immunohistochemistry laboratory performing predictive PD-L1 immunohistochemistry testing.

Blocking PD-1/PD-L1 by an ADCC enhanced anti-B7-H3/PD-1 fusion protein engages immune activation and cytotoxicity

Antibody therapy based on PD-1/PD-L1 blocking or ADCC effector has produced significant clinical benefit for cancer patients. We generated a novel anti-B7-H3 antibody (07B) and engineered the Fc fragment to enhance ADCC. To improve efficacy and tumor selectivity, we developed anti-B7-H3/PD-1 bispecific fusion proteins that simultaneously engaged tumor associate marker B7-H3 and immune suppressing ligand PD-L1 as well as enhanced ADCC to promote potent and highly selective tumor killing. Fusion proteins were designed by fusing human PD-1 extra domain to 07B in four different formats and showed good binding capacity to both targets. Indeed, the affinity of fusion proteins to B7-H3 is over 10,000 fold higher compared to that of the analogous PD-L1 and the blocking of fusion proteins to PD-L1 was worse but it greatly enhanced when bound to B7-H3, thus achieving directly PD-L1-blockade to B7-H3-expressing tumor cells. Importantly, IL-2 production was enhanced by fusion proteins from staphylococcal enterotoxin B (SEB) stimulated PBMC. Similarly, cytokines induced by fusion proteins was enhanced when co-cultured with stimulated CD8⁺ T cells and B7-H3/PD-L1 transfected raji cells. Additionally, fusion proteins improved activation to CD16a by Fc modification and delivered selective cytotoxicity to B7-H3 expressing tumor cells. In conclusion, fusion proteins blocked the PD-1/PD-L1 signal pathway and significantly increased potency of ADCC in a B7-H3-directed manner, thereby selectively activating CD8⁺ T cells and enhancing natural killing towards tumor. This novel fusion protein with its unique targeting preference may be useful to enhance efficacy and safety of immunotherapy for B7-H3-overexpressing malignancies.

Uptake of positron emission tomography tracers reflects the tumor immune status in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

The relationship between the local immune status and cancer metabolism regarding ¹⁸F‐FDG and ¹⁸F‐FAMT uptake in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) remains unknown. The present study examined the correlations between tumor immune status, clinicopathological factors, and positron emission tomography (PET) tracer uptake in ESCC. Forty‐one ESCC patients who underwent ¹⁸F‐FDG PET and ¹⁸F‐FAMT PET before surgery were enrolled in the study. Immunohistochemistry was conducted for programmed death 1 (PD‐1), CD8, Ki‐67, CD34, GLUT1 (¹⁸F‐FDG transporter) and LAT1 (¹⁸F‐FAMT transporter). ESCC specimens with high tumoral PD‐L1 and high CD8‐positive lymphocytes were considered to have “hot tumor immune status.” High PD‐L1 expression (53.7%) was significantly associated with tumor/lymphatic/venous invasion (P = 0.028, 0.032 and 0.018), stage (P = 0.041), CD8‐positive lymphocytes (P < 0.001), GLUT1 (P < 0.001), LAT1 expression (P = 0.006), Ki‐67 labelling index (P = 0.009) and CD34‐positive vessel counts (P < 0.001). SUVmax of ¹⁸F‐FDG was significantly higher in high PD‐L1 cases than in low PD‐L1 cases (P = 0.009). SUVmax of ¹⁸F‐FAMT was significantly higher in high PD‐L1 (P < 0.001), high CD8 (P = 0.012) and hot tumor groups (P = 0.028) than in other groups. High SUVmax of ¹⁸F‐FAMT (≥4.15) was identified as the only predictor of hot tumor immune status. High PET tracer uptake was significantly associated with cancer aggressiveness and hot tumor immune status in ESCC. PET imaging may be an effective tool to predict tumor immune status in ESCC with respect to immune checkpoint inhibitor sensitivity.