1
|
van Deursen L, van der Vaart R, Chavannes NH, Aardoom JJ. What is needed for improved uptake and adoption of digital aftercare programs by cancer survivors: a mixed methods study applying the COM-B model. J Cancer Surviv 2024:10.1007/s11764-024-01635-x. [PMID: 38965131 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-024-01635-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2023] [Accepted: 06/18/2024] [Indexed: 07/06/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cancer survivors face physical, lifestyle, psychological, and psychosocial challenges. Despite the availability of aftercare services, survivors still have unmet needs. Digital aftercare programs may offer support, but their use is limited. This study aimed to examine what is needed to improve uptake and adoption of these programs. Additionally, it explored sociodemographic and clinical variables that may influence these needs. METHODS A mixed-methods approach was used, involving qualitative interviews and a questionnaire. The research was guided by the COM-B model of behaviour, which considers capability, opportunity, and motivation crucial for behaviour. Qualitative analysis was performed using the framework method. Statistical analyses involved descriptive statistics and regression analysis. RESULTS Fourteen cancer survivors were interviewed, and 213 participants completed the questionnaire. Findings indicated that most respondents had a positive or neutral attitude towards digital aftercare programs, believing these could address their cancer-related challenges. Still, only a small percentage had experience with them, and most were unaware of their existence. Many expressed a desire to be informed about them. Some were uncertain about their effectiveness. Others were concerned about a lack of reimbursement. No significant influence of the sociodemographic and clinical variables was found. CONCLUSION Cancer survivors are generally positive about digital aftercare programs but are often unaware of their availability. Raising awareness, clarifying their value, and providing support and reimbursement could enhance uptake and adoption. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS The current insights can help improve participation in digital aftercare programs, ultimately fostering health, well-being, and quality of life of cancer survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liza van Deursen
- Department of National Health and Health Care, Center for Public Health, Health Care and Society, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Antonie Van Leeuwenhoeklaan 9, 3721 MA, Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
- National eHealth Living Lab, Leiden, the Netherlands.
| | - Rosalie van der Vaart
- Department of National Health and Health Care, Center for Public Health, Health Care and Society, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Antonie Van Leeuwenhoeklaan 9, 3721 MA, Bilthoven, the Netherlands
- Centre of Expertise Health Innovation, The Hague University of Applied Sciences, The Hague, the Netherlands
| | - Niels H Chavannes
- National eHealth Living Lab, Leiden, the Netherlands
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Jiska J Aardoom
- National eHealth Living Lab, Leiden, the Netherlands
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
van Deursen L, Versluis A, van der Vaart R, Standaar L, Struijs J, Chavannes N, Aardoom JJ. eHealth Interventions for Dutch Cancer Care: Systematic Review Using the Triple Aim Lens. JMIR Cancer 2022; 8:e37093. [PMID: 35699991 PMCID: PMC9240931 DOI: 10.2196/37093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2022] [Revised: 04/15/2022] [Accepted: 04/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Globally, the burden of cancer on population health is growing. Recent trends such as increasing survival rates have resulted in a need to adapt cancer care to ensure a good care experience and manageable expenditures. eHealth is a promising way to increase the quality of cancer care and support patients and survivors. OBJECTIVE The aim of this systematic review was 2-fold. First, we aimed to provide an overview of eHealth interventions and their characteristics for Dutch patients with and survivors of cancer. Second, we aimed to provide an overview of the empirical evidence regarding the impact of eHealth interventions in cancer care on population health, quality of care, and per capita costs (the Triple Aim domains). METHODS The electronic databases Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane, and Ovid PsycINFO were searched using 3 key search themes: eHealth interventions, cancer care, and the Netherlands. The identified interventions were classified according to predetermined criteria describing the intervention characteristics (eg, type, function, and target population). Their impact was subsequently examined using the Triple Aim framework. RESULTS A total of 38 interventions were identified. Most of these were web portals or web applications functioning to inform and self-manage, and target psychosocial factors or problems. Few interventions have been tailored to age, disease severity, or gender. The results of this study indicate that eHealth interventions could positively affect sleep quality, fatigue, and physical activity of patients with and survivors of cancer. Inconclusive results were found regarding daily functioning and quality of life, psychological complaints, and psychological adjustment to the disease. CONCLUSIONS eHealth can improve outcomes in the Triple Aim domains, particularly in the population health and quality of care domains. Cancer-related pain and common symptoms of active treatment were not targeted in the included interventions and should receive more attention. Further research is needed to fully understand the impact of eHealth interventions in cancer care on participation, accessibility, and costs. The latter can be examined in economic evaluations by comparing eHealth interventions with care as usual.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liza van Deursen
- Department of Quality of Care and Health Economics, Center for Nutrition, Prevention and Health Services, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, Netherlands
- National eHealth Living Lab, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Anke Versluis
- National eHealth Living Lab, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Rosalie van der Vaart
- Department of Quality of Care and Health Economics, Center for Nutrition, Prevention and Health Services, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, Netherlands
| | - Lucille Standaar
- Department of Quality of Care and Health Economics, Center for Nutrition, Prevention and Health Services, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, Netherlands
- Department of Quality and Organization of Care, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Jeroen Struijs
- Department of Quality of Care and Health Economics, Center for Nutrition, Prevention and Health Services, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, Netherlands
- Health Campus The Hague, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, The Hague, Netherlands
| | - Niels Chavannes
- National eHealth Living Lab, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Jiska J Aardoom
- National eHealth Living Lab, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Potiaumpai M, Doerksen SE, Chinchilli VM, Wu H, Wang L, Lintz R, Schmitz KH. Cost evaluation of an exercise oncology intervention: The exercise in all chemotherapy trial. Cancer Rep (Hoboken) 2022; 5:e1490. [PMID: 34236137 PMCID: PMC8955063 DOI: 10.1002/cnr2.1490] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2021] [Revised: 06/01/2021] [Accepted: 06/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is strong evidence supporting the efficacy of exercise oncology programs to improve physical and psychosocial outcomes during active treatment. However, there is a paucity of evidence on the effect of exercise on healthcare utilization and cost analyzes of exercise oncology programs. AIMS Our objective was to assess the effects of a pragmatic exercise oncology program (ENACT) during active chemotherapy treatment on healthcare utilization and associated costs. METHODS We conducted post-hoc analyzes on 160 ENACT participants and 75 comparison participants matched on cancer site, stage, age range, and gender. We obtained complete healthcare utilization histories for each patient (specific to emergency department [ED] visits and hospital admissions) coinciding with their participation in ENACT. A sub-analysis was conducted for advanced stage breast, gastrointestinal, and pancreatic cancer patients. RESULTS Healthcare costs for patients who participated in the ENACT exercise oncology intervention were numerically lower than healthcare costs for the comparison group, even after accounting for the cost of the intervention. However, the differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION Our findings suggest that an exercise oncology program during active chemotherapy treatment are at least cost neutral for all cancer patients, including advanced stage cancers. Additional research is warranted to evaluate the potential for exercise oncology programs to reduce healthcare utilization, particularly in advanced cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melanie Potiaumpai
- Public Health Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Shawna E Doerksen
- Public Health Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Vernon M Chinchilli
- Public Health Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Hongke Wu
- Public Health Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Li Wang
- Public Health Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Rachel Lintz
- Public Health Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Kathryn H Schmitz
- Public Health Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Keikha L, Maserat E, Mohammadzadeh Z. Telerehabilitation and Monitoring Physical Activity in Patient with Breast Cancer: Systematic Review. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF NURSING AND MIDWIFERY RESEARCH 2022; 27:8-17. [PMID: 35280190 PMCID: PMC8865237 DOI: 10.4103/ijnmr.ijnmr_472_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2021] [Revised: 05/10/2021] [Accepted: 10/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
Background Timely rehabilitation in patients with Breast Cancer (BC) has a great impact on improving their physical and mental conditions. Thus, the appropriate follow-up method is essential especially during the Covid-19 pandemic. The aim of this study was to review the different technology-assisted interventions for improving physical activity in BC patients. Materials And Methods In this systematic review, the original studies were extracted from the beginning of indexing in databases including PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Web of Science until 2019. Finally, 45 papers were included in this study based on the inclusion criteria for before the Covid-19 pandemic and 3 articles extracted for the Covid-19 period. Results The most widely used technologies for BC patients were in the United States (46.67%). Telephone, mobile application, and web with 28.89%, 15.56%, and 8.89% frequencies were the most common technologies, respectively. Although the majority of the participants were satisfied with the intervention method, in some cases, the patients were unsatisfied due to the complexity of the technology. These technologies were used for various purposes, such as physical activity and functions, control of pain severity, fitness, quality of life, diet behavior, fatigue, muscle strength, cardio-respiratory capacity, as well as arm and shoulder exercises. Conclusions In conclusion, virtual communication can improve the health of BC patients and also increases patients' desire and hope to continue treatment. It is worth noting that in the Covid-19 pandemic, with the strengthening of virtual communication infrastructure, more attention was paid to BC patients due to their sensitive conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leila Keikha
- Assistant Professor of Health Information Management, Department of Library and Information Sciences, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran
| | - Elham Maserat
- Department of Medical Informatics, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
| | - Zeinab Mohammadzadeh
- Department of Health Information Technology, School of Management and Medical Informatics, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ivankova NV, Rogers LQ, Herbey II, Martin MY, Pisu M, Pekmezi D, Thompson L, Schoenberger-Godwin YMM, Oster RA, Fontaine K, Anderson JL, Kenzik K, Farrell D, Demark-Wahnefried W. Features That Middle-aged and Older Cancer Survivors Want in Web-Based Healthy Lifestyle Interventions: Qualitative Descriptive Study. JMIR Cancer 2021; 7:e26226. [PMID: 34612832 PMCID: PMC8529475 DOI: 10.2196/26226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2020] [Revised: 04/05/2021] [Accepted: 08/10/2021] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Background With the increasing number of older cancer survivors, it is imperative to optimize the reach of interventions that promote healthy lifestyles. Web-based delivery holds promise for increasing the reach of such interventions with the rapid increase in internet use among older adults. However, few studies have explored the views of middle-aged and older cancer survivors on this approach and potential variations in these views by gender or rural and urban residence. Objective The aim of this study was to explore the views of middle-aged and older cancer survivors regarding the features of web-based healthy lifestyle programs to inform the development of a web-based diet and exercise intervention. Methods Using a qualitative descriptive approach, we conducted 10 focus groups with 57 cancer survivors recruited from hospital cancer registries in 1 southeastern US state. Data were analyzed using inductive thematic and content analyses with NVivo (version 12.5, QSR International). Results A total of 29 male and 28 female urban and rural dwelling Black and White survivors, with a mean age of 65 (SD 8.27) years, shared their views about a web-based healthy lifestyle program for cancer survivors. Five themes emerged related to program content, design, delivery, participation, technology training, and receiving feedback. Cancer survivors felt that web-based healthy lifestyle programs for cancer survivors must deliver credible, high-quality, and individually tailored information, as recommended by health care professionals or content experts. Urban survivors were more concerned about information reliability, whereas women were more likely to trust physicians’ recommendations. Male and rural survivors wanted information to be tailored to the cancer type and age group. Privacy, usability, interaction frequency, and session length were important factors for engaging cancer survivors with a web-based program. Female and rural participants liked the interactive nature and visual appeal of the e-learning sessions. Learning from experts, an attractive design, flexible schedule, and opportunity to interact with other cancer survivors in Facebook closed groups emerged as factors promoting program participation. Low computer literacy, lack of experience with web program features, and concerns about Facebook group privacy were important concerns influencing cancer survivors’ potential participation. Participants noted the importance of technology training, preferring individualized help to standardized computer classes. More rural cancer survivors acknowledged the need to learn how to use computers. The receipt of regular feedback about progress was noted as encouragement toward goal achievement, whereas women were particularly interested in receiving immediate feedback to stay motivated. Conclusions Important considerations for designing web-based healthy lifestyle interventions for middle-aged and older cancer survivors include program quality, participants’ privacy, ease of use, attractive design, and the prominent role of health care providers and content experts. Cancer survivors’ preferences based on gender and residence should be considered to promote program participation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nataliya V Ivankova
- Department of Health Services Administration, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| | - Laura Q Rogers
- Division of Preventive Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| | - Ivan I Herbey
- Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| | - Michelle Y Martin
- Health Science Center, University of Tennessee, Memphis, TN, United States
| | - Maria Pisu
- Division of Preventive Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| | - Dorothy Pekmezi
- Department of Health Behavior, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| | - Lieu Thompson
- Department of Health Services Administration, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| | | | - Robert A Oster
- Division of Preventive Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| | - Kevin Fontaine
- Department of Health Behavior, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| | - Jami L Anderson
- Department of Health Services Administration, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| | - Kelly Kenzik
- Division of Hematology & Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| | | | - Wendy Demark-Wahnefried
- Department of Nutrition Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Vd Wiel HJ, Stuiver MM, May AM, van Grinsven S, Benink MFA, Aaronson NK, Oldenburg HSA, van der Poel HG, van Harten WH, Groen WG. Characteristics of Participants and Nonparticipants in a Blended Internet-Based Physical Activity Trial for Breast and Prostate Cancer Survivors: Cross-sectional Study. JMIR Cancer 2021; 7:e25464. [PMID: 34609311 PMCID: PMC8527379 DOI: 10.2196/25464] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2020] [Revised: 12/24/2020] [Accepted: 07/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background As the number of cancer survivors is increasing, it is important to be able to offer exercise and physical activity (PA)–promoting interventions that are both effective and reasonably accessible. Internet-based interventions are typically less expensive and more accessible alternatives to on-site supervised interventions. Currently, little is known about the characteristics of nonparticipants in PA promotion trials in the cancer survivorship setting, both in general and specifically in trials using internet-supported interventions. Objective This study aims to gain insight into the characteristics associated with nonparticipation in a blended internet-based supported intervention trial to promote PA. Methods Breast and prostate cancer survivors, 3-36 months after primary curative treatment, were invited to participate in the PABLO trial; this trial compared an internet-based intervention to enhance PA levels, with or without additional support from a physical therapist, to usual care. Participants and nonparticipants were asked to complete a comprehensive questionnaire assessing sociodemographics, fatigue, and health-related quality of life. Baseline data for participants and nonparticipants were compared using the independent Student t test and chi-square test. Results The inclusion rate in the trial was 11.03% (137/1242). Of the nonparticipants, 13.95% (154/1104) completed the questionnaire. Participants were more highly educated (P=.04), had a paid job less often (P=.03), and were on sick leave more often (P=.03). They reported less PA per week, both moderate (P=.03) and vigorous (P<.01), before diagnosis and during leisure time (P<.01, effect size [ES]=0.44). They reported a significantly lower stage of change (P≤.01), lower self-efficacy (P<.01, ES=0.61), perceived barriers to PA (P<.01, ES=0.54), and more general fatigue (P<.01, ES=0.60). Participants reported lower health-related quality of life for most domains (ES ranging from 0.34 for mental health to 0.48 for social functioning). No significant differences were found for other sociodemographics, mood state, or attitudes toward or perceived social support for PA. Conclusions The participants who self-selected for trial participation reported lower PA levels before diagnosis and a stronger need for support compared with nonparticipants. The trial thus included those patients who might benefit the most from internet-based supportive PA interventions. Trial Registration Netherlands trial register NTR6911; https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/6733
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hester J Vd Wiel
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Martijn M Stuiver
- Center for Quality of Life, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.,Center of Expertise Urban Vitality, Faculty of Health, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Anne M May
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Marlou F A Benink
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Neil K Aaronson
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Hester S A Oldenburg
- Division of Surgical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Henk G van der Poel
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Wim H van Harten
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.,Rijnstate Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands.,Department of Health Technology and Services research, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
| | - Wim G Groen
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
van de Wiel HJ, Stuiver MM, May AM, van Grinsven S, Aaronson NK, Oldenburg HSA, van der Poel HG, Koole SN, Retèl VP, van Harten WH, Groen WG. Effects of and Lessons Learned from an Internet-Based Physical Activity Support Program (with and without Physiotherapist Telephone Counselling) on Physical Activity Levels of Breast and Prostate Cancer Survivors: The PABLO Randomized Controlled Trial. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13153665. [PMID: 34359567 PMCID: PMC8345041 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13153665] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2021] [Revised: 07/05/2021] [Accepted: 07/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We developed an Internet-based physical activity (PA) support program (IPAS), which is embedded in a patient portal. We evaluated the effectiveness and costs of IPAS alone (online only) or IPAS combined with physiotherapist telephone counselling (blended care), compared to a control group. METHODS Breast or prostate cancer survivors, 3-36 months after completing primary treatment, were randomized to 6-months access to online only, blended care, or a control group. At baseline and 6-month post-baseline, minutes of moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA) were measured by accelerometers. Secondary outcomes were self-reported PA, fatigue, mood, health-related quality of life, attitude toward PA, and costs. (Generalized) linear models were used to compare the outcomes between groups. RESULTS We recruited 137 survivors (participation rate 11%). We did not observe any significant between-group differences in MVPA or secondary outcomes. Adherence was rather low and satisfaction scores were low to moderate, with better scores for blended care. Costs for both interventions were low. CONCLUSIONS Recruitment to the study was challenging and the interventions were less efficacious than anticipated, which led to lessons learned for future trials. Suggestions for future research are as follows: improved accessibility of the support program, increased frequency of support, and use of activity trackers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H. J. van de Wiel
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (H.J.v.d.W.); (M.M.S.); (N.K.A.); (S.N.K.); (V.P.R.); (W.G.G.)
| | - M. M. Stuiver
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (H.J.v.d.W.); (M.M.S.); (N.K.A.); (S.N.K.); (V.P.R.); (W.G.G.)
- Center for Quality of Life, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Center of Expertise Urban Vitality, Faculty of Health, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Tafelbergweg 51, 1105 BD Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A. M. May
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands;
| | - S. van Grinsven
- Rijnstate Hospital, Wagnerlaan 55, 6815 AD Arnhem, The Netherlands;
| | - N. K. Aaronson
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (H.J.v.d.W.); (M.M.S.); (N.K.A.); (S.N.K.); (V.P.R.); (W.G.G.)
| | - H. S. A. Oldenburg
- Division of Surgical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - H. G. van der Poel
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - S. N. Koole
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (H.J.v.d.W.); (M.M.S.); (N.K.A.); (S.N.K.); (V.P.R.); (W.G.G.)
| | - V. P. Retèl
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (H.J.v.d.W.); (M.M.S.); (N.K.A.); (S.N.K.); (V.P.R.); (W.G.G.)
- Department of Health Technology and Services research, University of Twente, Drienerlolaan 5, 7522 NB Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - W. H. van Harten
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (H.J.v.d.W.); (M.M.S.); (N.K.A.); (S.N.K.); (V.P.R.); (W.G.G.)
- Rijnstate Hospital, Wagnerlaan 55, 6815 AD Arnhem, The Netherlands;
- Department of Health Technology and Services research, University of Twente, Drienerlolaan 5, 7522 NB Enschede, The Netherlands
- Correspondence:
| | - W. G. Groen
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (H.J.v.d.W.); (M.M.S.); (N.K.A.); (S.N.K.); (V.P.R.); (W.G.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Chan JM, Van Blarigan EL, Langlais CS, Zhao S, Ramsdill JW, Daniel K, Macaire G, Wang E, Paich K, Kessler ER, Beer TM, Lyons KS, Broering JM, Carroll PR, Kenfield SA, Winters-Stone KM. Feasibility and Acceptability of a Remotely Delivered, Web-Based Behavioral Intervention for Men With Prostate Cancer: Four-Arm Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22:e19238. [PMID: 33382378 PMCID: PMC7808895 DOI: 10.2196/19238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2020] [Revised: 08/07/2020] [Accepted: 11/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Diet and exercise may be associated with quality of life and survival in men with prostate cancer. Objective This study aimed to determine the feasibility and acceptability of a remotely delivered web-based behavioral intervention among men with prostate cancer. Methods We conducted a multi-site 4-arm pilot randomized controlled trial of a 3-month intervention (TrueNTH Community of Wellness). Eligibility included self-reported prostate cancer diagnosis, having a personal device that connected to the internet, age ≥18 years, and ability to read English and receive text messages and emails. Men receiving chemotherapy or radiation, or those who reported contraindications to exercise, could participate with physician clearance. Participants were randomized (1:1:1:1) to additive intervention levels: website; website and personalized diet and exercise prescription; website, personalized prescription, Fitbit, and text messages; and website, personalized prescription, Fitbit, text messages, and 2 30-minute phone calls—one with an exercise trainer and one with a registered dietician. Primary outcomes were feasibility (accrual and attrition) and acceptability (survey data and website use). We described self-reported diet and exercise behavior at the time of enrollment, 3 months, and 6 months as secondary outcomes. Results In total, 202 men consented and were randomized between August 2017 and September 2018 (level 1: 49, level 2: 51, level 3: 50, level 4: 52). A total of 160 men completed the onboarding process and were exposed to their randomly assigned intervention (38, 38, 42, and 42 in levels 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively). The follow-up rate was 82.7% (167/202) at 3 months and 77.2% (156/202) at 6 months. Participants had a median age of 70 years and were primarily White and college educated. Website visit frequency over the 3-month intervention period increased across levels (median: 2, 9, 11, and 16 visits for levels 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively). Most were satisfied or very satisfied with the intervention (20/39, 51%; 27/42, 64%; 23/44, 52%; and 27/42, 64% for levels 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively). The percentage of men who reported being very satisfied was highest among level 4 participants (10/42, 24% vs 4/39, 10%; 5/42, 12%; and 5/44, 11% for levels 1, 2, and 3, respectively). Dissatisfaction was highest in level 1 (5/39, 13% vs 1/42, 2%; 3/44, 7%; and 2/42, 5% for levels 2, 3, and 4, respectively). We observed small improvements in diet and physical activity at 3 months among men in level 4 versus those in level 1. Conclusions A web-based, remotely delivered, tailored behavioral intervention for men with prostate cancer is feasible. Future studies are warranted to increase the effect of the intervention on patient behavior while maintaining sustainability and scalability as well as to design and implement interventions for more diverse populations. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03406013; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03406013
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- June M Chan
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | | | - Crystal S Langlais
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Shoujun Zhao
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | | | - Kimi Daniel
- Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, United States
| | - Greta Macaire
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Elizabeth Wang
- Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States
| | - Kellie Paich
- Movember Foundation, Culver City, CA, United States
| | | | - Tomasz M Beer
- Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, United States
| | | | | | - Peter R Carroll
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Stacey A Kenfield
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Cost-effectiveness of an exercise and nutritional intervention versus usual nutritional care during adjuvant treatment for localized breast cancer: the PASAPAS randomized controlled trial. Support Care Cancer 2019; 28:2829-2842. [DOI: 10.1007/s00520-019-05078-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2019] [Accepted: 09/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
|