1
|
Li J, Wen L, Ma Y, Zhang G, Wang P, Huang C, Yao X. Survival prognostic in different age groups of patients undergoing local versus radical excision for rectal cancer: a study based on the SEER database. Updates Surg 2024; 76:975-988. [PMID: 38704811 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-024-01846-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2023] [Accepted: 04/10/2024] [Indexed: 05/07/2024]
Abstract
Age significantly affects the prognosis of patients with rectal cancer after radical excision (RE), and local excision (LE) is an alternative surgical procedure to RE. To compare the survival prognosis in different age groups of LE versus RE for rectal cancer. Patients diagnosed with rectal adenocarcinoma treated by LE or RE from 2010 to 2017 were obtained from the SEER database. The primary outcomes are 5-year OS and CSS. A total of 11,170 patients were eventually included, and there were 490 patients in LE and RE groups, respectively, after 1:1 propensity score matching. The 5-year OS and CSS after LE were significantly better in < 50 years and 50-66 years groups than in > 66 years group (5-year OS: 95.70% vs 88.40% vs 67.00%, P < 0.001; 5-year CSS: 95.70% vs 96.30% vs 82.60%, P < 0.001). No statistical significance was found for the differences in 5-year OS and CSS between LE and RE in < 50, 50-66, and > 66 years group (P > 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed age > 66 years, poorly differentiated or undifferentiated (Grade III/IV), and tumor size 3 to 5 cm was independent risk factors for 5-year OS after LE; age > 66 years, perineural invasion, and tumor size 3 to 5 cm were the 5-year CSS independent risk factors for after LE. We found that the survival prognosis of younger rectal cancer patients treated with LE was significantly better than older (> 66 years) patients, and the survival prognosis of rectal cancer patients in the three age groups was similar between LE and RE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jinghui Li
- Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, Jiangxi, China
- Ganzhou Hospital of Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Ganzhou Municipal Hospital, Ganzhou, Jiangxi, China
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510080, China
| | - Liang Wen
- Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, Jiangxi, China
- Ganzhou Hospital of Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Ganzhou Municipal Hospital, Ganzhou, Jiangxi, China
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510080, China
| | - Yongli Ma
- Ganzhou Hospital of Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Ganzhou Municipal Hospital, Ganzhou, Jiangxi, China
| | - Guosheng Zhang
- Ganzhou Hospital of Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Ganzhou Municipal Hospital, Ganzhou, Jiangxi, China
| | - Ping Wang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510080, China
| | - Chengzhi Huang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
| | - Xueqing Yao
- Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, Jiangxi, China.
- Ganzhou Hospital of Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Ganzhou Municipal Hospital, Ganzhou, Jiangxi, China.
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ibrahim IAA, Alzahrani AR, Alanazi IM, Shahzad N, Shahid I, Falemban AH, Azlina MFN, Arulselvan P. Carbohydrate polymers-based surface modified nano delivery systems for enhanced target delivery to colon cancer - A review. Int J Biol Macromol 2023; 253:126581. [PMID: 37652322 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.126581] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2023] [Revised: 08/24/2023] [Accepted: 08/27/2023] [Indexed: 09/02/2023]
Abstract
Carbohydrate polymers-based surface-modified nano-delivery systems have gained significant attention in recent years for enhancing targeted delivery to colon cancer. These systems leverage carbohydrate polymers' unique properties, such as biocompatibility, biodegradability, and controlled release. These properties make them suitable candidates for drug delivery applications. Nano-delivery systems loaded with bioactive compounds are well-studied for targeted colorectal cancer delivery. However, those drugs' target reach is still limited in various nano-delivery systems. To overcome this limitation, surface modification of nanoparticles with carbohydrate polymers like chitosan, pectin, alginate, and guar gum showed enhanced target-reaching capacity along with enhanced anticancer efficacy. Recently, a chitosan-decorated PLGA nanoparticle was constructed with tannic acid and vitamin E and showed long-term release of specific targets along with higher anticancer efficacy. Similarly, Chitosan-conjugated glucuronic acid-coated silica nanoparticles loaded with capecitabine were studied against colon cancer and found to be the pH-responsive controlled release of capecitabine with higher anticancer efficacy. Surface-modified carbohydrate polymers have promising potential for improving colon cancer target delivery. By leveraging the unique properties of these polymers, such as surface modification, pH responsiveness, mucoadhesion, controlled drug release, and combination therapy, researchers are working toward developing more effective and targeted treatment strategies for colon cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ibrahim Abdel Aziz Ibrahim
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.
| | - Abdullah R Alzahrani
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ibrahim M Alanazi
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Naiyer Shahzad
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Imran Shahid
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Alaa Hisham Falemban
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mohd Fahami Nur Azlina
- Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia
| | - Palanisamy Arulselvan
- Department of Chemistry, Saveetha School of Engineering, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS), Saveetha University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 602 105, India
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sonal S, Qwaider YZ, Boudreau C, Kunitake H, Goldstone RN, Bordeianou LG, Cauley CE, Francone TD, Ricciardi R, Berger DL. Association of age with outcomes in locally advanced rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery. Am J Surg 2023; 225:1029-1035. [PMID: 36535854 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2022.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2022] [Revised: 11/15/2022] [Accepted: 12/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We aimed to assess the association of age with outcomes in patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer (LARC) who received neoadjuvant therapy followed by major surgery. METHODS Retrospective review of 328 patients with LARC, N = 99 < 70 years (younger) versus N = 229 ≥ 70 years (elderly) from 2004 to 2018. RESULTS Elderly patients had a higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), length of stay and 30-day readmissions (p < 0.05). They also had worse overall survival (OS) & disease-free survival (DFS) (p < 0.001), but similar disease-specific survival (DSS) compared to younger group. Age was not associated with hazard of death (HR 1.01, 0.98-1.03). Rather, CCI (HR 1.29, 1.01-1.5), extramural vascular invasion (HR 4.98, 2.84-8.74), and adjuvant therapy (0.37, 0.21-0.64) were significantly associated with the hazard of death; when controlled for stage, tumor distance from anal verge, and neoadjuvant completion. CONCLUSION Comorbidities and lower rates of adjuvant therapy, and not chronologic age, are associated with poor OS of elderly patients with LARC treated with neoadjuvant therapy and major surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Swati Sonal
- Division of Gastrointestinal & Oncologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA; Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Yasmeen Z Qwaider
- Division of Gastrointestinal & Oncologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA; Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Chloe Boudreau
- Division of Gastrointestinal & Oncologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA; Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Hiroko Kunitake
- Division of Gastrointestinal & Oncologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA; Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Robert N Goldstone
- Division of Gastrointestinal & Oncologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA; Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Liliana G Bordeianou
- Division of Gastrointestinal & Oncologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA; Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Christy E Cauley
- Division of Gastrointestinal & Oncologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA; Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Todd D Francone
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Newton-Wellesley Hospital, MA, 02462, USA
| | - Rocco Ricciardi
- Division of Gastrointestinal & Oncologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA; Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - David L Berger
- Division of Gastrointestinal & Oncologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA; Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Liu R, Zhang J, Zhang Y, Yan J. Treatment paradigm and prognostic factor analyses of rectal squamous cell carcinoma. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1160159. [PMID: 37287925 PMCID: PMC10243597 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1160159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2023] [Accepted: 05/02/2023] [Indexed: 06/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Rectal squamous cell carcinoma (rSCC) is a rare pathological subtype of rectal cancer. There is no consensus on the treatment paradigm for patients with rSCC. This study aimed to provide a paradigm for clinical treatment and develop a prognostic nomogram. Methods Patients diagnosed with rSCC between 2010 and 2019 were identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. According to the TNM staging system, Kaplan-Meier (K-M) survival analysis was used to identify the survival benefits of different treatments in patients with rSCC. The Cox regression method was used to identify independent prognostic risk factors. Nomograms were evaluated by Harrell's concordance index (C-index), calibration curves, decision curve analysis (DCA) and K-M curves. Results Data for 463 patients with rSCC were extracted from the SEER database. Survival analysis showed that there was no significant difference in median cancer-specific survival (CSS) among patients with TNM stage 1 rSCC treated with radiotherapy (RT), chemoradiotherapy (CRT) or surgery (P = 0.285). In TNM stage 2 patients, there was a significant difference in median CSS among those treated with surgery (49.5 months), RT (24 months), and CRT (63 months) (P = 0.003). In TNM stage 3 patients, there was a significant difference in median CSS among those treated with CRT (58 months), CRT plus surgery (56 months) and no treatment (9.5 months) (P < 0.001). In TNM stage 4 patients, there was no significant difference in median CSS among those treated with CRT, chemotherapy (CT), CRT plus surgery and no treatment (P = 0.122). Cox regression analysis showed that age, marital status, T stage, N stage, M stage, PNI, tumor size, RT, CT, and surgery were independent risk factors for CSS. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year C-indexes were 0.877, 0.781, and 0.767, respectively. The calibration curve showed that the model had excellent calibration. The DCA curve showed that the model had excellent clinical application value. Conclusion RT or surgery is recommended for patients with stage 1 rSCC, and CRT is recommended for patients with stage 2, and stage 3 rSCC. Age, marital status, T stage, N stage, M stage, PNI, tumor size, RT, CT, and surgery are independent risk factors for CSS in patients with rSCC. The model based on the above independent risk factors has excellent prediction efficiency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rui Liu
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China
- Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute, Affiliated Cancer Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology, Chengdu, China
| | - Jiahui Zhang
- Respiratory Department, The First People's Hospital of Ziyang, Ziyang, China
| | - Yinjie Zhang
- Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute, Affiliated Cancer Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology, Chengdu, China
| | - Jin Yan
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gheybi K, Buckley E, Vitry A, Roder D. Variations in colorectal cancer pattern of care by age and comorbidity in South Australia. Cancer Med 2023. [PMID: 37084009 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.5901] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2022] [Revised: 03/14/2023] [Accepted: 03/23/2023] [Indexed: 04/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advanced age is associated with decreased likelihood of colorectal cancer treatment. Here, we investigated the extent to which comorbidities are accountable for this lesser treatment. METHODS Using population-based datasets, the pattern of care among CRC cases in South Australia during 2004-2013 was investigated. Models were used to investigate associations of age with each treatment type, and differences in these associations were explored by comorbidity and cancer site. RESULTS The presence of comorbidity was associated with a significantly weaker relationship of age with surgery and chemotherapy. The association of age with surgery also varied for colon and rectal primary cancer sites. Individual comorbidity types varied in their associations with each treatment category. For example, dementia was associated with less chemotherapy provision, however, it was not significantly related to the likelihood of surgery. CONCLUSION This study indicates that the association of age with surgical treatment differed significantly by the CRC subsite. Comorbidity moderated the negative association of age with chemotherapy, and less so, with extent of surgery. Results were novel in indicating associations of multiple individual comorbidity types with CRC treatment modalities. The data suggest that different individual comorbidity types may have different effects on treatment and should be studied separately.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kazzem Gheybi
- University of South Australia Allied Health and Human Performance, South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
- Cancer epidemiology and population health, University of South Australia, South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
- Charles Perkins Centre, School of Medical Sciences, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Elizabeth Buckley
- University of South Australia Allied Health and Human Performance, South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Agnes Vitry
- University of South Australia Clinical and Health Sciences, South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
| | - David Roder
- University of South Australia Allied Health and Human Performance, South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
- Cancer epidemiology and population health, University of South Australia, South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Withrow DR, Nicholson BD, Morris EJA, Wong ML, Pilleron S. Age-related differences in cancer relative survival in the United States: A SEER-18 analysis. Int J Cancer 2023; 152:2283-2291. [PMID: 36752633 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.34463] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2022] [Revised: 01/30/2023] [Accepted: 02/01/2023] [Indexed: 02/09/2023]
Abstract
Cancer survival has improved since the 1990s, but to different extents across age groups, with a disadvantage for older adults. We aimed to quantify age-related differences in relative survival (RS-1-year and 1-year conditioning on surviving 1 year) for 10 common cancer types by stage at diagnosis. We used data from 18 United States Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results cancer registries and included cancers diagnosed in 2012 to 2016 followed until December 31, 2017. We estimated absolute differences in RS between the 50 to 64 age group and the 75 to 84 age group. The smallest differences were observed for prostate and breast cancers (1.8%-points [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.5-2.1] and 1.9%-points [95% CI: 1.5-2.3], respectively). The largest was for ovarian cancer (27%-points, 95% CI: 24-29). For other cancers, differences ranged between 7 (95% CI: 5-9, esophagus) and 18%-points (95% CI: 17-19, pancreas). Except for pancreatic cancer, cancer type and stage combinations with very high (>95%) or very low (<40%) 1-year RS tended to have smaller age-related differences in survival than those with mid-range prognoses. Age-related differences in 1-year survival conditioning on having survived 1-year were small for most cancer and stage combinations. The broad variation in survival differences by age across cancer types and stages, especially in the first year, age-related differences in survival are likely influenced by amenability to treatment. Future work to measure the extent of age-related differences that are avoidable, and identify how to narrow the survival gap, may have most benefit by prioritizing cancers with relatively large age-related differences in survival (eg, stomach, esophagus, liver and pancreas).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diana R Withrow
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Brian D Nicholson
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Eva J A Morris
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, Big Data Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Melisa L Wong
- MAS Divisions of Hematology/Oncology and Geriatrics, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Sophie Pilleron
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, Big Data Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.,Ageing, Cancer, and Disparities Research Unit, Department of Precision Health, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Strassen, Luxembourg
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Variations in Patterns of Care of Rectal Cancer Patients in South Australia According to Sociodemographic Characteristics:A Registry Study. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2023. [DOI: 10.1155/2023/7974059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/10/2023]
Abstract
Objective. To explore variations in patterns of care over three decades for a subgroup of rectal cancer patients in South Australia according to sociodemographic characteristics. Methods. This study evaluated three decades of retrospective data from the South Australian Clinical Cancer Registry. A total of 4,131 patients diagnosed with rectal cancer between 1982 and 2015 and treated in South Australian public hospitals were included. Study outcomes were age at diagnosis, area of primary residence, cancer stage, and primary treatment (surgery, chemotherapy, or radiotherapy). Results. There was a significantly lower likelihood of conventional therapy for the elderly. Adjusted odds of receiving surgery or radiotherapy decreased by 70% and those of receiving chemotherapy by 90% in the 80+ age group, compared to the 50–59 age group. No significant variation was detected according to area-level socioeconomic status or remoteness. Conclusion. Socioeconomic factors showed little impact on the receipt of therapies for rectal cancer patients in South Australia. Variation in treatment by age, irrespective of disease stage or period of diagnosis, requires further investigation.
Collapse
|
8
|
To YH, Degeling K, McCoy M, Wong R, Jones I, Dunn C, Hong W, Loft M, Gibbs P, Tie J. Real‐world adjuvant chemotherapy treatment patterns and outcomes over time for resected stage II and III colorectal cancer. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 2022; 19:392-402. [DOI: 10.1111/ajco.13885] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2022] [Revised: 09/30/2022] [Accepted: 10/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Yat Hang To
- The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - Koen Degeling
- Cancer Health Services Research Centre for Cancer Faculty of Medicine Dentistry and Health Sciences University of Melbourne Melbourne Victoria Australia
- Cancer Health Services Research Centre for Health Policy Melbourne School of Population and Global Health Faculty of Medicine Dentistry and Health Sciences University of Melbourne Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - Melanie McCoy
- Colorectal Research Unit St John of God Subiaco Hospital Subiaco Western Australia Australia
- Medical School University of Western Australia Crawley Western Australia Australia
| | - Rachel Wong
- The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute Melbourne Victoria Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology Eastern Health Melbourne Victoria Australia
- Eastern Health Clinical School Monash University Melbourne Victoria Australia
- Epworth Healthcare Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - Ian Jones
- Department of Surgery University of Melbourne Parkville Victoria Australia
- Colorectal Surgery Unit Department of General Surgery Royal Melbourne Hospital Parkville Victoria Australia
| | - Catherine Dunn
- The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - Wei Hong
- The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute Melbourne Victoria Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology LaTrobe Regional Hospital Traralgon Victoria Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology St Vincent's Hospital Fitzroy Victoria Australia
| | - Matthew Loft
- The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute Melbourne Victoria Australia
- Department of Medical Biology University of Melbourne Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - Peter Gibbs
- The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute Melbourne Victoria Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology Western Health Melbourne Victoria Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences University of Melbourne Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - Jeanne Tie
- The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute Melbourne Victoria Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre Parkville Victoria Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Trends in Adjuvant Chemotherapy Use Among Stage III Colon Cancer in Non-Elderly and Low Comorbidity Patients. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2022; 21:315-324. [PMID: 36283915 DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2022.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2022] [Accepted: 09/14/2022] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III colon cancer is underutilized in the United States. The aim of this study was to assess the use of adjuvant chemotherapy in younger and medically fit patients and analyze the socioeconomic factors associated with its utilization. METHODS Using the National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2015, we selected stage III colon cancer patients between age 18 to 65, Charlson-Deyo Comorbidity Index (CDCI) of 0 or 1, and those that survived at least 12 months after surgery. We then compared patients that underwent surgery only with those that received adjuvant chemotherapy. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify variables associated with adjuvant chemotherapy use in the population. Overall survival was estimated by Kaplan-Meier curves. RESULTS Of the 48,336 patients that met inclusion criteria, 43,315 (90%) received adjuvant chemotherapy. The utilization of adjuvant chemotherapy increased from 87% in 2004 to 91% in 2015. On multivariable regression analysis, the use of adjuvant chemotherapy was lower among males, Non-Hispanic Blacks and Hispanics, low-grade cancer, left-sided tumors, CDCI 1, those who travel ≥ 50 miles, yearly income < $40,227, and uninsured patients. The most common reason for the omission of adjuvant chemotherapy was the patient or caregiver's choice (40% between 2013 and 2015). The 5-year and 10-year overall survival rates were 76.7% and 63.8% respectively, in those who received adjuvant chemotherapy as compared to 65.1% and 49.3% in those who underwent surgery only (P < .001). CONCLUSION In young and medically fit stage III colon cancer patients, most patients received guideline-compliant care in the United States. However, socioeconomic disparities adversely impacted the use of adjuvant chemotherapy. The patient or caregiver's decision was the most common reason for non-adherence to adjuvant chemotherapy and lead to poor survival outcomes. Emphasis should be placed on developing patient-centered strategies to improve adherence to chemotherapy in all patients.
Collapse
|
10
|
Pilleron S, Charvat H, Araghi M, Arnold M, Fidler-Benaoudia MM, Bardot A, Grønlie Guren M, Tervonen H, Little A, O'Connell DL, Gavin A, De P, Aagard Thomsen L, Møller B, Jackson C, Bucher O, Walsh PM, Vernon S, Bray F, Soerjomataram I. Age disparities in stage-specific colon cancer survival across seven countries: An International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership SURVMARK-2 population-based study. Int J Cancer 2021; 148:1575-1585. [PMID: 33006395 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.33326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2020] [Revised: 09/11/2020] [Accepted: 09/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
We sought to understand the role of stage at diagnosis in observed age disparities in colon cancer survival among people aged 50 to 99 years using population-based cancer registry data from seven high-income countries: Australia, Canada, Denmark, Ireland, New Zealand, Norway and the United Kingdom. We used colon cancer incidence data for the period 2010 to 2014. We estimated the 3-year net survival, as well as the 3-year net survival conditional on surviving at least 6 months and 1 year after diagnosis, by country and stage at diagnosis (categorised as localised, regional or distant) using flexible parametric excess hazard regression models. In all countries, increasing age was associated with lower net survival. For example, 3-year net survival (95% confidence interval) was 81% (80-82) for 50 to 64 year olds and 58% (56-60) for 85 to 99 year olds in Australia, and 74% (73-74) and 39% (39-40) in the United Kingdom, respectively. Those with distant stage colon cancer had the largest difference in colon cancer survival between the youngest and the oldest patients. Excess mortality for the oldest patients with localised or regional cancers was observed during the first 6 months after diagnosis. Older patients diagnosed with localised (and in some countries regional) stage colon cancer who survived 6 months after diagnosis experienced the same survival as their younger counterparts. Further studies examining other prognostic clinical factors such as comorbidities and treatment, and socioeconomic factors are warranted to gain further understanding of the age disparities in colon cancer survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Pilleron
- Section of Cancer Surveillance, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | - Hadrien Charvat
- Section of Cancer Surveillance, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | - Marzieh Araghi
- Section of Cancer Surveillance, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | - Melina Arnold
- Section of Cancer Surveillance, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | | | - Aude Bardot
- Section of Cancer Surveillance, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | - Marianne Grønlie Guren
- Department of Oncology and K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Hanna Tervonen
- Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, Australia
| | - Alana Little
- Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Anna Gavin
- Northern Ireland Cancer Registry, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK
| | - Prithwish De
- Surveillance and Cancer Registry, Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Bjørn Møller
- Cancer Registry of Norway, Department of Registration, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Oliver Bucher
- Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Registry, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | | | | | - Freddie Bray
- Section of Cancer Surveillance, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | - Isabelle Soerjomataram
- Section of Cancer Surveillance, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Oxaliplatin plus fluoropyrimidines as adjuvant therapy for colon cancer in older patients: A subgroup analysis from the TOSCA trial. Eur J Cancer 2021; 148:190-201. [PMID: 33744715 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.01.051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2020] [Revised: 01/19/2021] [Accepted: 01/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous studies on oxaliplatin and fluoropyrimidines as adjuvant therapy in older patients with stage III colon cancer (CC) produced conflicting results. PATIENTS AND METHODS We assessed the impact of age on time to tumour recurrence (TTR), disease-free survival (DFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS) in 2360 patients with stage III CC (1667 aged <70 years and 693 ≥ 70 years) randomised to receive 3 or 6 months of FOLFOX or CAPOX within the frame of the phase III, TOSCA study. RESULTS Older patients compared with younger ones presented more frequently an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status equal to 1 (10.5% vs 3.3%, p < 0.001), a greater number of right-sided tumours (40.9% vs 26.6%, p < 0.001), and were at higher clinical risk (37.2% vs 33.2%, p = 0.062). The treatments were almost identical in the two cohorts (p = 0.965). We found a greater proportion of dose reductions (46.7% vs 41.4%, p = 0.018), treatment interruptions (26.1% vs 19.3%, p < 0.001) and a higher proportion of recurrences (24.2% vs 20.3%, p = 0.033) in the older patients. The multivariable analysis of the TTR did not indicate a statistically significant effect of age (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.19; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.98-1.44; p = 0.082). The HR comparing older with younger patients was 1.34 (95% CI: 1.12-1.59; p = 0.001) for DFS, 1.58 (95% CI: 1.26-1.99; p < 0.001) for OS, and 1.28 (95% CI: 0.96-1.70; p = 0.089) for CSS. CONCLUSIONS Worse prognostic factors and reduced treatment compliance have a negative impact on the efficacy of oxaliplatin-based adjuvant therapy in older patients.
Collapse
|
12
|
Pilleron S, Gower H, Janssen-Heijnen M, Signal VC, Gurney JK, Morris EJ, Cunningham R, Sarfati D. Patterns of age disparities in colon and lung cancer survival: a systematic narrative literature review. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e044239. [PMID: 33692182 PMCID: PMC7949400 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To identify patterns of age disparities in cancer survival, using colon and lung cancer as exemplars. DESIGN Systematic review of the literature. DATA SOURCES We searched Embase, MEDLINE, Scopus and Web of Science through 18 December 2020. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA We retained all original articles published in English including patients with colon or lung cancer. Eligible studies were required to be population-based, report survival across several age groups (of which at least one was over the age of 65) and at least one other characteristic (eg, sex, treatment). DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Two independent reviewers extracted data and assessed the quality of included studies against selected evaluation domains from the QUIPS tool, and items concerning statistical reporting. We evaluated age disparities using the absolute difference in survival or mortality rates between the middle-aged group and the oldest age group, or by describing survival curves. RESULTS Out of 3047 references, we retained 59 studies (20 for colon, 34 for lung and 5 for both sites). Regardless of the cancer site, the included studies were highly heterogeneous and often of poor quality. The magnitude of age disparities in survival varied greatly by sex, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, stage at diagnosis, cancer site, and morphology, the number of nodes examined and treatment strategy. Although results were inconsistent for most characteristics, we consistently observed greater age disparities for women with lung cancer compared with men. Also, age disparities increased with more advanced stages for colon cancer and decreased with more advanced stages for lung cancer. CONCLUSIONS Although age is one of the most important prognostic factors in cancer survival, age disparities in colon and lung cancer survival have so far been understudied in population-based research. Further studies are needed to better understand age disparities in colon and lung cancer survival. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42020151402.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Pilleron
- Department of Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Helen Gower
- Department of Surgery and Anaesthesia, Surgical Cancer Research Group, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Maryska Janssen-Heijnen
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, VieCuri Medical Centre, Venlo, The Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Virginia Claire Signal
- Department of Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Jason K Gurney
- Department of Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Eva Ja Morris
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Big Data Institute, Oxford, UK
| | - Ruth Cunningham
- Department of Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Diana Sarfati
- New Zealand Cancer Control Agency, Wellington, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Boakye D, Nagrini R, Ahrens W, Haug U, Günther K. The association of comorbidities with administration of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage III colon cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2021; 13:1758835920986520. [PMID: 33613694 PMCID: PMC7841869 DOI: 10.1177/1758835920986520] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2020] [Accepted: 12/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Chemotherapy is an established treatment for stage III colon cancer cases. Older age is known to be associated with less chemotherapy use in these patients, but there might be other relevant factors besides age that influence treatment administration. We summarized evidence on associations between comorbidity and adjuvant chemotherapy administration in stage III colon cancer patients in a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: We searched the PubMed and Web of Science databases up to 2 June 2020 for studies on comorbidities and chemotherapy use in patients with stage III colon cancer. Summary odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were estimated using random-effects models. Subgroup analyses according to year of colon cancer diagnosis, timing of comorbidity assessment, and geographical region were also conducted. Results: Thirty-three studies were included in this review, including 219,406 stage III colon cancer patients overall. Chemotherapy administration was 60.9% (95% CI: 56.9% to 64.9%), increasing from 57.1% before 2001 to 66.3% after 2010. There were inverse associations between comorbidities and chemotherapy administration. Compared with patients with Charlson comorbidity score 0, those with scores 1 (OR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.72–0.87) and 2+ (OR = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.42–0.56) received chemotherapy less often. Among comorbidities, the strongest predictors of chemotherapy non-use were dementia (OR = 0.37, 95% CI = 0.33–0.54), followed by heart failure (OR = 0.44, 95% CI = 0.28–0.70) and stroke (OR = 0.56, 95% CI = 0.38–0.81). Conclusions: Merely 60% of stage III colon cancer patients receive chemotherapy. Comorbidities are strong predictors of chemotherapy non-use, but the association differs by comorbid condition and is strongest with dementia. Given the survival disadvantage of colon cancer patients with comorbidities, further evidence on the risk–benefit ratio of chemotherapy according to the type and severity of comorbidity and on the extent to which the survival disadvantage of comorbidity is explained by less use or lower tolerability of chemotherapy is needed to foster personalized medical care in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rajini Nagrini
- Department of Epidemiological Methods and Etiological Research, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology – BIPS, Bremen, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Ahrens
- Department of Epidemiological Methods and Etiological Research, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology – BIPS, Bremen, Germany
- Institute of Statistics, Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
| | - Ulrike Haug
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology – BIPS, Bremen, Germany
- Faculty of Human and Health Sciences, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
| | - Kathrin Günther
- Department of Epidemiological Methods and Etiological Research, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology – BIPS, Bremen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Zhu XQ, Yang H, Lin MH, Shang HX, Peng J, Chen WJ, Chen XZ, Lin JM. Qingjie Fuzheng Granules regulates cancer cell proliferation, apoptosis and tumor angiogenesis in colorectal cancer xenograft mice via Sonic Hedgehog pathway. J Gastrointest Oncol 2021; 11:1123-1134. [PMID: 33456987 DOI: 10.21037/jgo-20-213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Sonic Hedgehog (SHh) signaling pathway plays a critical role in cell proliferation, apoptosis, and tumor angiogenesis in various types of malignancies including colorectal cancer (CRC). Qingjie Fuzheng Granules (QFG) is a traditional Chinese medicinal formula, which has been clinically used in various cancer treatments, including CRC. In this study, we explored the potential molecular mechanisms of QFG treatment effects on CRC via the SHh pathway. Methods A CRC HCT-116 xenograft mouse model was utilized for all experiments. Mice were treated with intra-gastric administration of 1 g/kg of QFG or saline 6 days a week for 28 days (4 weeks). Body weight, length and shortest diameter of the tumor were measured every 3 days. At the end of the treatment, the tumor weight was measured. TUNEL staining assays were used to detect tumor apoptosis. Western blot and immunohistochemistry (IHC) assays were used to detect the expression of relative proteins. Results In our results, QFG inhibited the increase of tumor volume and weight, and exhibited no impact on mouse body weight. Furthermore, QFG significantly decreased the expression of SHh, Smo and Gli proteins, indicating the action of SHh signaling. Consequently, the expression of pro-proliferative survivin, Ki-67, Cyclin-D1 and CDK4 were decreased and expression of anti-proliferative p21 was increased. The pro-apoptotic Bax/Bcl-2 ratio, cle-caspase-3 and TUNEL-positive cell percentage in tumor tissues were increased. Meanwhile, the pro-angiogenic VEGF-A and VEGFR-2 expression was down-regulated. Conclusions QFG inhibited CRC cell proliferation and promoted CRC cell apoptosis and tumor angiogenesis in vivo through the suppression of SHh pathway, suggesting that QFG could be a potential therapeutic drug for CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiao-Qin Zhu
- Academy of Integrative Medicine, Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, China.,Fujian Key Laboratory of Integrative Medicine on Geriatrics, Fuzhou, China
| | - Hong Yang
- Academy of Integrative Medicine, Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, China.,Fujian Key Laboratory of Integrative Medicine on Geriatrics, Fuzhou, China
| | - Ming-He Lin
- Editorial Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, China
| | - Hai-Xia Shang
- Academy of Integrative Medicine, Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, China.,Fujian Key Laboratory of Integrative Medicine on Geriatrics, Fuzhou, China
| | - Jun Peng
- Academy of Integrative Medicine, Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, China.,Fujian Key Laboratory of Integrative Medicine on Geriatrics, Fuzhou, China
| | - Wu-Jin Chen
- Department of Oncology, Affiliated People's Hospital of Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, China
| | - Xu-Zheng Chen
- Academy of Integrative Medicine, Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, China.,Fujian Key Laboratory of Integrative Medicine on Geriatrics, Fuzhou, China
| | - Jiu-Mao Lin
- Academy of Integrative Medicine, Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, China.,Fujian Key Laboratory of Integrative Medicine on Geriatrics, Fuzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Oncological treatments of older patients have many unresolved questions mainly because of the fact that these patients were not eligible to be included in most clinical trials. The aim of this study was to evaluate the treatment approach to localized rectal cancer in the older population, including complication rates and overall survival in patients treated with curative intent. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective review of patients older than 80 years old (group A) who were treated for clinical stages II to III rectal cancer. The data collection included demographics, comorbidities, treatment protocols, adverse events, time of death, and a comparison with a group of patients aged 65 to 75 years (group B). RESULTS A total of 88 patients were included in the analysis (group A, 35; group B, 53). The groups were balanced with regards to sex, comorbidities, pretreatment albumin, and hemoglobin levels (for all categories P>0.05). More patients in group A (25%) received preoperative treatment as in-patients (P=0.022) and were treated with radiation only (P<0.0001) as the initial treatment approach. In group A, in 82% of patients the initial chemotherapy dose was reduced to 75% or less of the calculated dose compared with 7% in group B (P<0.001). Discontinuation of chemotherapy was needed in 55% in group A and 31% in group B (P=0.07). Median overall survival was 33 months in group A and 55 months in group B (P=0.06), 5-year overall survival was 27% and 60%, respectively (P=0.004). CONCLUSIONS The age has a significant implication on preoperative treatment, chemotherapy dose, hospitalization rates, and survival.
Collapse
|
16
|
Konradsen AA, Lund CM, Vistisen KK, Albieri V, Dalton SO, Nielsen DL. The influence of socioeconomic position on adjuvant treatment of stage III colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Oncol 2020; 59:1291-1299. [PMID: 32525420 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2020.1772501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with colon cancer (CC) with low socioeconomic position (SEP) have a worse survival than patients with high SEP. We investigated the association between different socioeconomic indicators and the steps in the treatment trajectory leading to initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) for patients with stage III CC. MATERIALS AND METHODS A systematic review and meta-analyses were conducted in accordance with the MOOSE checklist. MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched for eligible studies. Meta-analyses were performed on the separate socioeconomic indicators with the random-effects model. The heterogeneity across studies was assessed by the Q and the I 2 statistic. RESULTS In total, 27 observational studies were included. SEP was measured by insurance, income, poverty, employment, education, or an index on an area or individual level. SEP, regardless of indicator, was negatively associated with the steps in the treatment trajectory leading to initiation of ACT among patients with resected stage III CC. The meta-analyses showed that patients with low SEP had a significantly lower odds of receiving ACT and increased odds of delayed treatment start, whereas SEP had no impact on the choice of therapy: combination or single-agent therapy. CONCLUSION SEP was associated with less initiation of and higher risk for delayed initiation of ACT. Our findings suggest there is a social disparity in receipt of ACT in patients with stage III CC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A. A. Konradsen
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev and Gentofte, Denmark
| | - C. M. Lund
- Department of Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev and Gentofte, Denmark
- Copenage, Copenhagen Center for Clinical Age Research, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Copenhagen University, Denmark
| | - K. K. Vistisen
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev and Gentofte, Denmark
| | - V. Albieri
- Statistics and Data Analysis Department, Danish Cancer Society, Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - S. O. Dalton
- Department of Clinical Oncology & Palliative Services, Zealand University Hospital, Naestved, Denmark
- Suvivorship and Inequality in Cancer, Danish Cancer Society, Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - D. L. Nielsen
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev and Gentofte, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Copenhagen University, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Sarasqueta C, Zunzunegui MV, Enríquez Navascues JM, Querejeta A, Placer C, Perales A, Gonzalez N, Aguirre U, Baré M, Escobar A, Quintana JM. Gender differences in stage at diagnosis and preoperative radiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer. BMC Cancer 2020; 20:759. [PMID: 32795358 PMCID: PMC7427942 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-07195-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2020] [Accepted: 07/19/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Few studies have examined gender differences in the clinical management of rectal cancer. We examine differences in stage at diagnosis and preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer patients. Methods A prospective cohort study was conducted in 22 hospitals in Spain including 770 patients undergoing surgery for rectal cancer. Study outcomes were disseminated disease at diagnosis and receiving preoperative radiotherapy. Age, comorbidity, referral from a screening program, diagnostic delay, distance from the anal verge, and tumor depth were considered as factors that might explain gender differences in these outcomes. Results Women were more likely to be diagnosed with disseminated disease among those referred from screening (odds ratio, confidence interval 95% (OR, CI = 7.2, 0.9–55.8) and among those with a diagnostic delay greater than 3 months (OR, CI = 5.1, 1.2–21.6). Women were less likely to receive preoperative radiotherapy if they were younger than 65 years of age (OR, CI = 0.6, 0.3–1.0) and if their tumors were cT3 or cT4 (OR, CI = 0.5, 0.4–0.7). Conclusions The gender-specific sensitivity of rectal cancer screening tests, gender differences in referrals and clinical reasons for not prescribing preoperative radiotherapy in women should be further examined. If these gender differences are not clinically justifiable, their elimination might enhance survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristina Sarasqueta
- Biodonostia Health Research Institute - Donostia University Hospital, Paseo Dr. Beguiristain s/n (Gipuzkoa), 20014, Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain. .,Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Galdakao, Bizkaia, Spain.
| | - Mª Victoria Zunzunegui
- Professeure honoraire. École de santé publique (ESPUM) Departement de médecine sociale et préventive, Université de Montréal, Pavillon 7101, salle 3111 7101, Avenue du Parc Montréal, Québec, H3N 1X9, Canada
| | - José María Enríquez Navascues
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Donostia University Hospital, Paseo Dr. Beguiristain 109 (Gipuzkoa), 20014, Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain
| | - Arrate Querejeta
- Radiotherapic Oncology, Donostia University Hospital, Paseo Dr. Beguiristain 109 (Gipuzkoa), 20014, Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain
| | - Carlos Placer
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Donostia University Hospital, Paseo Dr. Beguiristain 109 (Gipuzkoa), 20014, Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain
| | - Amaia Perales
- Biodonostia Health Research Institute, Paseo Dr. Beguiristain s/n (Gipuzkoa), 20014, Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain
| | - Nerea Gonzalez
- Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Galdakao, Bizkaia, Spain.,Research Unit, Galdakao-Usansolo Hospital, Labeaga Auzoa, 48960, Galdakao, Bizkaia, Spain
| | - Urko Aguirre
- Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Galdakao, Bizkaia, Spain.,Research Unit, Galdakao-Usansolo Hospital, Labeaga Auzoa, 48960, Galdakao, Bizkaia, Spain
| | - Marisa Baré
- Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Galdakao, Bizkaia, Spain.,Clinical Epidemiology and Cancer Screening, Corporació Sanitaria Parc Taulí, Parc Taulí 1, 08208 Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Antonio Escobar
- Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Galdakao, Bizkaia, Spain.,Research Unit, Hospital Basurto, Avda Montevideo, 18, 48013, Bilbao, Bizkaia, Spain
| | - José María Quintana
- Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Galdakao, Bizkaia, Spain.,Research Unit, Galdakao-Usansolo Hospital, Labeaga Auzoa, 48960, Galdakao, Bizkaia, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Chow Z, Gan T, Chen Q, Huang B, Schoenberg N, Dignan M, Evers BM, Bhakta AS. Nonadherence to Standard of Care for Locally Advanced Colon Cancer as a Contributory Factor for High Mortality Rates in Kentucky. J Am Coll Surg 2020; 230:428-439. [PMID: 32062006 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2019.12.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2019] [Accepted: 12/17/2019] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Kentucky has one of the highest mortality rates for colon cancer, despite dramatic improvements in screening. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines recommend operation and adjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced (stage IIb/c and stage III) colon cancer (LACC). The purpose of this study was to determine the rate of nonadherence with current standard of care (SOC) and associated factors as possible contributors to mortality. METHODS The Kentucky Cancer Registry database linked with administrative health claims was queried for individuals (20 years and older) diagnosed with LACC from 2007 to 2012. Bivariate and logistic regression of nonadherence was performed. Survival analysis was performed with Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier plots. RESULTS A total of 1,404 patients with LACC were included. Approximately 42% of patients with LACC were noted to be nonadherent to SOC, with nearly all (95.7%) failing to receive adjuvant chemotherapy. After adjusting for all significant factors, we found the factors associated with nonadherence included the following: age older than 75 years, stage III colon cancer, high Charlson Comorbidity Index (3+), low poverty level, Medicaid coverage, and disability. Adherence to SOC is associated with a significant improvement in the 5-year survival rate compared with nonadherence (63.0% and 27.4%, respectively; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS Our study identified multiple factors associated with the failure of patients with LACC to receive SOC, particularly adjuvant chemotherapy, suggesting the need to focus on improving adjuvant chemotherapy compliance in specific populations. Nonadherence to LACC SOC is likely a major contributor to the persistently high mortality rates in Kentucky.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zeta Chow
- Department of Surgery, University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington, KY; Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington, KY
| | - Tong Gan
- Department of Surgery, University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington, KY; Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington, KY
| | - Quan Chen
- Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington, KY
| | - Bin Huang
- Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington, KY
| | - Nancy Schoenberg
- Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington, KY; Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington, KY
| | - Mark Dignan
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington, KY; Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington, KY
| | - B Mark Evers
- Department of Surgery, University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington, KY; Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington, KY
| | - Avinash S Bhakta
- Department of Surgery, University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington, KY; Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington, KY.
| |
Collapse
|