Tumor budding outperforms ypT and ypN classification in predicting outcome of rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

Tumour budding as a prognostic biomarker in biopsies and resections of neoadjuvant-treated rectal adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Tumour budding (TB) is a marker of tumour aggressiveness which, when measured in rectal cancer resection specimens, predicts worse outcomes and response to neoadjuvant therapy. We investigated the utility of TB assessment in the setting of neoadjuvant treatment.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A single-centre, retrospective cohort study was conducted. TB was assessed using the hot-spot International Tumour Budding Consortium (ITBCC) method and classified by the revised ITBCC criteria. Haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and AE1/AE3 cytokeratin (CK) stains for ITB (intratumoural budding) in biopsies with PTB (peritumoural budding) and ITB (intratumoural budding) in resection specimens were compared. Logistic regression assessed budding as predictors of lymph node metastasis (LNM). Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses investigated their utility as a predictor of disease-free (DFS) and overall (OS) survival. A total of 146 patients were included; 91 were male (62.3%). Thirty-seven cases (25.3%) had ITB on H&E and 79 (54.1%) had ITB on CK assessment of biopsy tissue. In univariable analysis, H&E ITB [odds (OR) = 2.709, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.261-5.822, P = 0.011] and CK ITB (OR = 2.165, 95% CI = 1.076-4.357, P = 0.030) predicted LNM. Biopsy-assessed H&E ITB (OR = 2.749, 95% CI = 1.258-6.528, P = 0.022) was an independent predictor of LNM. In Kaplan-Meier analysis, ITB identified on biopsy was associated with worse OS (H&E, P = 0.003, CK: P = 0.009) and DFS (H&E, P = 0.012; CK, P = 0.045). In resection specimens, CK PTB was associated with worse OS (P = 0.047), and both CK PTB and ITB with worse DFS (PTB, P = 0.014; ITB: P = 0.019). In multivariable analysis H&E ITB predicted OS (HR = 2.930, 95% CI = 1.261-6.809) and DFS (HR = 2.072, 95% CI = 1.031-4.164). CK PTB grading on resection also independently predicted OS (HR = 3.417, 95% CI = 1.45-8.053, P = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

Assessment of TB using H&E and CK may be feasible in rectal cancer biopsy and post-neoadjuvant therapy-treated resection specimens and is associated with LNM and worse survival outcomes. Future management strategies for rectal cancer might be tailored to incorporate these findings.

Predicting rectal cancer tumor budding grading based on MRI and CT with multimodal deep transfer learning: A dual-center study

Objective

To investigate the effectiveness of a multimodal deep learning model in predicting tumor budding (TB) grading in rectal cancer (RC) patients.

Materials and methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 355 patients with rectal adenocarcinoma from two different hospitals. Among them, 289 patients from our institution were randomly divided into an internal training cohort (n = 202) and an internal validation cohort (n = 87) in a 7:3 ratio, while an additional 66 patients from another hospital constituted an external validation cohort. Various deep learning models were constructed and compared for their performance using T1CE and CT-enhanced images, and the optimal models were selected for the creation of a multimodal fusion model. Based on single and multiple factor logistic regression, clinical N staging and fecal occult blood were identified as independent risk factors and used to construct the clinical model. A decision-level fusion was employed to integrate these two models to create an ensemble model. The predictive performance of each model was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC), DeLong's test, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Model visualization Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping (Grad-CAM) was performed for model interpretation.

Results

The multimodal fusion model demonstrated superior performance compared to single-modal models, with AUC values of 0.869 (95% CI: 0.761-0.976) for the internal validation cohort and 0.848 (95% CI: 0.721-0.975) for the external validation cohort. N-stage and fecal occult blood were identified as clinically independent risk factors through single and multivariable logistic regression analysis. The final ensemble model exhibited the best performance, with AUC values of 0.898 (95% CI: 0.820-0.975) for the internal validation cohort and 0.868 (95% CI: 0.768-0.968) for the external validation cohort.

Conclusion

Multimodal deep learning models can effectively and non-invasively provide individualized predictions for TB grading in RC patients, offering valuable guidance for treatment selection and prognosis assessment.

Neighboring macrophage-induced alteration in the phenotype of colorectal cancer cells in the tumor budding area

BACKGROUND

A higher number of tumor buds in the invasive front of colorectal cancer (CRC) specimens has been shown to contribute to a poor prognosis in CRC patients. Because macrophages (Mφs) have been demonstrated to alter the phenotype of cancer cells, we hypothesized that the phenotype of CRC cells in the tumor budding (TB) area might be changed by the interaction between CRC cells and Mφs.

METHODS

We assessed the expression of topoisomerase 1 in CRC cells to estimate the acquisition of chemoresistance in CRC. To demonstrate the tumor-stromal interaction between CRC cells and Mφs, we assessed two histological findings, the number of Mφs per single CRC cell and the proximity between CRC cells and Mφs by histological spatial analysis using HALO software.

RESULTS

The expression levels of topoisomerase 1 in CRC cells were decreased in deeper areas, especially in the TB area, compared to the surface area. Our histological spatial analysis revealed that 2.6 Mφs located within 60 μm of a single CRC cell were required to alter the phenotype of the CRC cell. Double-immunofluorescence staining revealed that higher Mφs were positive for interleukin-6 (IL-6) in the TB area and that AE1/AE3-positive CRC cells were also positive for phospho-STAT3 (pSTAT3) in the TB area; thus, the IL-6 receptor (IL-6R)/STAT3 signaling pathway in CRC cells was upregulated by IL-6 derived from neighboring Mφs.

CONCLUSION

IL-6 secreted from the neighboring Mφs would alter the phenotype of CRC cells via IL-6R/STAT3 signaling pathway.

Tumor Budding Assessment in Colorectal Carcinoma: Normalization Revisited

Tumor budding (TB) is a powerful prognostic factor in colorectal cancer (CRC). An internationally standardized method for its assessment (International Tumor Budding Consensus Conference [ITBCC] method) has been adopted by most CRC pathology protocols. This method requires that TB counts are reported by field area (0.785 mm 2 ) rather than objective lens and a normalization factor is applied for this purpose. However, the validity of this approach is yet to be tested. We sought to validate the ITBCC method with a particular emphasis on normalization as a tool for standardization. In a cohort of 365 stage I-III CRC, both normalized and non-normalized TB were significantly associated with disease-specific survival and recurrence-free survival ( P <0.0001). Examining both 0.95 and 0.785 mm 2 field areas in a subset of patients (n=200), we found that normalization markedly overcorrects TB counts: Counts obtained in a 0.95 mm 2 hotspot field were reduced by an average of 17.5% following normalization compared with only 3.8% when counts were performed in an actual 0.785 mm 2 field. This resulted in 45 (11.3%) cases being downgraded using ITBCC grading criteria following normalization, compared with only 5 cases (1.3%, P =0.0007) downgraded when a true 0.785 mm 2 field was examined. In summary, the prognostic value of TB was retained regardless of whether TB counts in a 0.95 mm 2 field were normalized. Normalization resulted in overcorrecting TB counts with consequent downgrading of most borderline cases. This has implications for risk stratification and adjuvant treatment decisions, and suggests the need to re-evaluate the role of normalization in TB assessment.

Prognostic significance of tumor budding in patients with pancreatic invasive ductal carcinoma who received neoadjuvant therapy

Neoadjuvant therapy is commonly used for invasive pancreatic ductal carcinoma (PDAC). Tumor budding and high podoplanin expression in cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) are prognostic factors in patients with various carcinomas including PDAC who have not received neoadjuvant therapy. In this study, we investigated whether tumor budding and podoplanin-positive CAFs are associated with outcomes in Japanese PDAC patients with neoadjuvant therapy. Histopathological findings of surgically resected PDACs with neoadjuvant therapy from 2005 to 2018 were reviewed (n = 97). With reference to International Tumor Budding Consensus Conference recommendations, tumors were evaluated for budding at 20 × magnification (/0.785 mm2) and at 40 × magnification (/0.237 mm2; mean number of fields: 3) for podoplanin expression in CAFs (%). Overall survival, disease-free survival, and disease-specific survival (DSS) were analyzed using the log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards model. After adjusting for T category, N category, resection margin, and adjuvant therapy, multivariate analyses demonstrated that tumor budding at 40 × magnification was an independent prognostic factor for worse DSS (hazard ratio: 2.41, p = 0.022). Tumor budding at 20 × magnification and podoplanin-positive CAFs tended to be associated with worse DSS; however, these findings were not statistically significant. Our findings indicate that tumor budding is an independent prognostic factor in PDAC patients with neoadjuvant therapy.

Prognostic impact of tumor budding in rectal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Tumor budding (TB) is a negative prognostic factor in colorectal cancer; however, its prognostic impact following neoadjuvant therapy for patients with rectal cancer remains unclear. This study aims to assess the prognostic impact of TB and the correlation between TB and other pathological features in patients with rectal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Scopus, CNKI, Wanfang, and ClinicalKey databases was conducted for studies on the prognosis of TB in rectal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy from the inception of the databases to January 2023, and the final literature included was determined using predefined criteria. Quality assessment of the studies included, extraction of general and prognostic information from them, and meta-analyses were carried out progressively.

RESULTS

A total of 11 studies were included, and the results of the meta-analysis showed that high-grade tumor budding (TB-1) increased the risk of poor 5-year disease-free survival (HR = 1.75, 95% CI 1.38-2.22, P < 0.00001), 5-year overall survival (HR = 1.77, 95% CI 1.21-2.59, P = 0.003), local recurrence (OR = 4.15, 95% CI 1.47-11.75, P = 0.007), and distant metastasis (OR = 5.36, 95% CI 2.51-11.44, P < 0.0001) in patients with rectal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy. TB-1 was significantly associated with poor differentiation and lymphatic, perineural, and venous invasion.

CONCLUSION

Tumor budding is significantly correlated with unfavorable prognosis and poor pathological characteristics following neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer. We anticipate more high-quality, prospective studies in the future to confirm our findings.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42022377564.

Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, PD-L1, and MMR-deficiency combined characterization may identify subgroups of rectal cancer patients who would benefit from immunotherapy

INTRODUCTION

Mismatch repair deficiency, immunological fertility, and PD-L1 expression status are key histopathological and molecular features defining tumor responsiveness to immunotherapy and, eventually, prognosis. These were investigated in a series of locally advanced rectal cancer patients treated with postoperative chemotherapy and radiotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) density was assessed in hematoxylin-eosin tissue sections. PD-L1 expression and the expression of MMR proteins (MLH1, PSM2, MSH2, and MSH6) were assessed with immunohistochemistry. Their association with histopathological variables (node involvement and tumor budding) and prognosis was assessed.

RESULTS

The TIL-density was significantly higher in the invading tumor front and was inversely related to tumor budding and directly with better overall survival (OS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) (p = 0.02 and 0.02, respectively). Cancer cell PD-L1 expression was related to high TIL-density (p < 0.01) but not to prognosis, although its overexpression defined a trend for poorer OS in patients with high TIL-density. High PD-L1 expression by stroma infiltrating immune cells was linked with better OS and DMFS (p = 0.007 and 0.001, respectively. MMR deficiency was recorded in 26.2 % of cases, and this was linked with higher TIL-density, but not with prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Dense intratumoral lymphocytic infiltration relates to a better prognosis in rectal cancer, although it is also linked with PD-L1 expression that may adversely modulate the anti-tumor effects of TILs. This latter subgroup of patients (high TIL-density/high cancer cell PD-L1 expression) could be an additional target for anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy, along with the established subgroup of MMR deficient patients.

Prognostic Impact of Lymphatic Invasion, Venous Invasion, Perineural Invasion, and Tumor Budding in Rectal Cancer Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Followed by Total Mesorectal Excision

BACKGROUND

The diagnostic implications of lymphatic invasion, venous invasion, perineural invasion, and tumor budding in rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy are unknown.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to identify the prognostic impact of lymphatic invasion, venous invasion, perineural invasion, and tumor budding in locally advanced rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort study.

SETTINGS

This study was conducted at the Samsung Medical Center. Grouping was performed on the basis of lymphatic invasion, venous invasion, perineural invasion, and tumor budding status: no-risk group with 0 factor (n = 299), low-risk group with any 1 factor (n = 131), intermediate-risk group with any 2 factors (n = 75), and high-risk group with 3 or 4 risk factors (n = 32).

PATIENTS

Patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, followed by radical operation for locally advanced rectal cancer, from January 2010 to December 2015 were included.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The main outcome measures were disease-free and overall survival.

RESULTS

Disease-free and overall survival varied significantly between the groups in stage III ( p < 0.001 and p < 0.001). Disease-free survival in stage I differed between the no-risk group and the intermediate-risk group ( p = 0.026). In stage II, disease-free and overall survival differed between the no-risk group and the intermediate-risk group ( p = 0.010 and p = 0.045). In multivariable analysis, risk grouping was an independent prognostic factor for both disease-free (p <0.001) and overall survival ( p < 0.001).

LIMITATIONS

The inherent limitations are associated with the retrospective single-center study design.

CONCLUSIONS

Lymphatic invasion, venous invasion, perineural invasion, and tumor budding are strong prognostic factors for disease-free and overall survival in locally advanced rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Therefore, adjuvant chemotherapy is strongly recommended in patients with positive lymphatic invasion, venous invasion, perineural invasion, and tumor budding. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B919 .

IMPACTO PRONSTICO DE LA INVASIN LINFTICA, LA INVASIN VENOSA, LA INVASIN PERINEURAL Y LA GEMACIN TUMORAL EN EL CNCER DE RECTO TRATADO CON QUIMIORRADIOTERAPIA NEOADYUVANTE SEGUIDA DE ESCISIN TOTAL DEL MESORRECTO

ANTECEDENTES:Se desconocen las implicaciones diagnósticas de la invasión linfática, la invasión venosa, la invasión perineural y el crecimiento tumoral en el cáncer de recto tratado con quimiorradioterapia neoadyuvante.OBJETIVO:Este estudio fue diseñado para identificar el impacto pronóstico de la invasión linfática, la invasión venosa, la invasión perineural y la gemación tumoral en el cáncer de recto localmente avanzado tratado con quimiorradioterapia neoadyuvante.DISEÑO:Este estudio fue un estudio de cohorte retrospectivo.AJUSTES:Este estudio se realizó en el Centro Médico Samsung. La agrupación se realizó en función de la invasión linfática, la invasión venosa, la invasión perineural y el estado de crecimiento del tumor: grupo sin riesgo con 0 factores (n = 299), grupo de bajo riesgo con cualquier factor 1 (n = 131), grupo de riesgo intermedio con 2 factores cualquiera (n = 75), y un grupo de alto riesgo con 3 o 4 factores de riesgo (n = 32).PACIENTES:Se incluyeron un total de 537 pacientes que se sometieron a quimiorradioterapia neoadyuvante seguida de operación radical por cáncer de recto localmente avanzado desde enero de 2010 hasta diciembre de 2015.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Las principales medidas de resultado fueron la supervivencia libre de enfermedad y la supervivencia general.RESULTADOS:La mediana del período de seguimiento fue de 77 meses, y la supervivencia libre de enfermedad a los 5 años y la supervivencia general a los 5 años variaron significativamente entre los grupos en el estadio III (p < 0,001, p < 0,001). La supervivencia libre de enfermedad a los 5 años en el estadio I difirió entre el grupo sin riesgo y el grupo de riesgo intermedio (p = 0,026). En el estadio II, la supervivencia libre de enfermedad a 5 años y la supervivencia global a 5 años difirieron entre el grupo sin riesgo y el grupo de riesgo intermedio p = 0,010, p = 0,045). En el análisis multivariable, la agrupación de riesgo fue un factor pronóstico independiente tanto para la supervivencia libre de enfermedad (p < 0,001) como para la supervivencia global (p < 0,001).LIMITACIÓN:Las limitaciones inherentes están asociadas con el diseño de estudio retrospectivo de un solo centro..CONCLUSIÓN:La invasión linfática, la invasión venosa, la invasión perineural y la gemación tumoral son fuertes factores pronósticos para la supervivencia libre de enfermedad y la supervivencia general en el cáncer de recto localmente avanzado tratado con quimiorradioterapia neoadyuvante. Por lo tanto, se recomienda fuertemente la quimioterapia adyuvante en pacientes con invasión linfática positiva, invasión venosa, invasión perineural y tumor en en formacion. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B919 . (Traducción-Dr Yolanda Colorado ).

Post-neoadjuvant assessment of tumour budding according to ITBCC subgroups delivers stage- and regression-grade independent prognostic information in intestinal-type gastric adenocarcinoma

Tumour budding (TB) has been associated with adverse clinicopathological factors and poor survival in a plethora of therapy‐naïve carcinoma entities including gastric adenocarcinoma (GC). As conventional histopathological grading is usually omitted in the post‐neoadjuvant setting of GC, our study aimed to investigate the prognostic impact of TB in GCs resected after neoadjuvant therapy. We evaluated TB according to the criteria from the International Tumour Budding Consensus Conference (ITBCC) in 167 post‐neoadjuvant resections of intestinal‐type GC and correlated the results with overall survival (OS) and clinicopathological parameters. GCs were categorised into Bd1 (0–4 buds, low TB), Bd2 (5–9 buds, intermediate TB), and Bd3 (≥10 buds, high TB). Carcinomas with intermediate and high TB were significantly enriched in higher ypTNM stages and strongly associated with reduced 5‐year OS in univariable analyses (p < 0.001). In multivariable analyses including sex, age, resection status, UICC stage, and tumour regression grading, TB remained a stage‐independent predictor of survival (p < 0.001, hazard ratio Bd2: 2.60, Bd3: 4.74). The assessment of TB according to the ITBCC criteria provides valuable prognostic information in the post‐neoadjuvant setting of intestinal‐type GC and may be a considerable substitute for the conventional grading system in GCs after neoadjuvant therapy.

A Novel Combined Tumor Budding-Poorly Differentiated Clusters Grading System Predicts Recurrence and Survival in Stage I-III Colorectal Cancer

Tumor budding (TB) and poorly differentiated clusters (PDCs) are powerful prognostic factors in colorectal cancer (CRC). Despite their morphologic and biological overlap, TB and PDC are assessed separately and are distinguished by an arbitrary cutoff for cell cluster size. This cutoff can be challenging to apply in practice and its biological significance remains unclear. We developed a novel scoring system that incorporates TB and PDC into a single parameter ("Combined Score"; CS), eliminating the need for such cutoffs and allowing the prognostic value of PDC to be captured alongside TB. In a cohort of 481 stage I-III CRC resections, CS was significantly associated with American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage, T-stage, N-stage, histologic grade, tumor deposits, lymphovascular invasion, and perineural invasion (P<0.0001). In addition, CS was significantly associated with decreased 5-year recurrence-free survival, overall survival, and disease-specific survival (P<0.0001). TB and PDC showed similar associations with oncologic outcomes, with hazard ratios consistently lower than for CS. The association between CS and oncologic outcomes remained significant in subgroup analyses stratified by AJCC stage, anatomic location (rectum/colon) and neoadjuvant therapy status. On multivariable analysis, CS retained its significant association with oncologic outcomes (P=0.0002, 0.005, and 0.009) for recurrence-free survival, disease-specific survival, and overall survival, respectively. In conclusion, CS provides powerful risk stratification in CRC which is at least equivalent to that of TB and PDC assessed individually. If validated elsewhere, CS has practical advantages and a biological rationale that may make it an attractive alternative to assessing these features separately.

Morphology Matters: A Critical Reappraisal of the Clinical Relevance of Morphologic Criteria From the 2019 WHO Classification in a Large Colorectal Cancer Cohort Comprising 1004 Cases

The 2019 World Health Organization (WHO) classification of colorectal carcinoma (CRC) profoundly reclassified CRC subtypes and introduces tumor budding as a second major grading criterion, while condensing conventional grade into a 2-tiered system. So far it remains largely unexplored how these parameters interact with each other and whether they truly have an independent impact on patient prognosis. We reclassified a large single-center cohort of 1004 CRCs spanning 2 decades for adjusted WHO grade (low vs. high), tumor budding (Bd1/Bd2/Bd3), and CRC subtype (adenocarcinoma not otherwise specified, micropapillary, mucinous, serrated, medullary, adenoma-like, signet-ring cell, mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma/neuroendocrine carcinoma, undifferentiated) according to the criteria of the 2019 WHO classification. We investigated the interaction of these parameters, their connection to stage/microsatellite status, and their significance for patient survival in the different subgroups. Specific subtypes other than adenocarcinoma not otherwise specified represented one third of all CRCs and were unevenly distributed throughout stage and microsatellite subgroups. Subtypes, WHO grade and tumor budding profoundly impacted all survival parameters (P<0.001 for all analyses), with CRC subtypes and tumor budding-but not WHO grade-being stage-independent prognosticators for all survival comparisons. WHO grade had very limited prognostic value in CRC subtypes, while tumor budding retained its strong prognostic impact in most scenarios. Accurate delineation of CRC subtypes introduced in the 2019 WHO classification provides strong stage-independent prognostic information, arguing that they should be considered in pathology reports and in clinical trials. Of the morphology-based grading schemes included in the 2019 WHO, tumor budding outperforms WHO grade.

Establishment and Clinical Application of an Artificial Intelligence Diagnostic Platform for Identifying Rectal Cancer Tumor Budding

Tumor budding is considered a sign of cancer cell activity and the first step of tumor metastasis. This study aimed to establish an automatic diagnostic platform for rectal cancer budding pathology by training a Faster region-based convolutional neural network (F-R-CNN) on the pathological images of rectal cancer budding. Postoperative pathological section images of 236 patients with rectal cancer from the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, China, taken from January 2015 to January 2017 were used in the analysis. The tumor site was labeled in Label image software. The images of the learning set were trained using Faster R-CNN to establish an automatic diagnostic platform for tumor budding pathology analysis. The images of the test set were used to verify the learning outcome. The diagnostic platform was evaluated through the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Through training on pathological images of tumor budding, an automatic diagnostic platform for rectal cancer budding pathology was preliminarily established. The precision–recall curves were generated for the precision and recall of the nodule category in the training set. The area under the curve = 0.7414, which indicated that the training of Faster R-CNN was effective. The validation in the validation set yielded an area under the ROC curve of 0.88, indicating that the established artificial intelligence platform performed well at the pathological diagnosis of tumor budding. The established Faster R-CNN deep neural network platform for the pathological diagnosis of rectal cancer tumor budding can help pathologists make more efficient and accurate pathological diagnoses.