Efficacy of platinum agents for stage III non-small-cell lung cancer following platinum-based chemoradiotherapy: a retrospective study

Real-World Insights into the Impact of Durvalumab on Stage III Unresectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer-A Narrative Review

INTRODUCTION AND AIM

Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) has a poor prognosis, with median survival ranging from 9 to 34 months. The PACIFIC trial demonstrated that durvalumab after platinum-based chemoradiotherapy (CRT) improves overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). This review evaluates real-world evidence (RWE) on durvalumab's efficacy and safety, focusing on patient characteristics, prognostic factors, treatment protocols, and outcomes beyond progression.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A literature search of PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar identified 49 observational studies published from January 2017 to August 2024 on unresectable stage III NSCLC. Clinical trials, early-stage disease, and alternative treatments were excluded.

RESULTS

Compared to the PACIFIC trial, real-world patients were older, had poorer ECOG performance (≥2), and more comorbidities like COPD. Despite this, durvalumab provided consistent survival benefits. Positive prognostic factors included non-squamous histology, high PD-L1 expression, and timely durvalumab initiation (≤42 days post-CRT). Most radiotherapy regimens mirrored PACIFIC (54-66 Gy). Concomitant CRT was used in 90% of cases, with sequential CRT for frail patients. Chemotherapy regimens varied. Immune-mediated pneumonitis was a major adverse event, with incidence rates between 15% and 100%. Severe cases led to treatment discontinuation, impacting survival. Treatment beyond progression remains uncertain, with limited benefits from immunotherapy rechallenge.

CONCLUSIONS

RWE supports durvalumab's efficacy, emphasizing the need for personalized treatment strategies and further research to improve long-term outcomes.

Clinical impact of hypomagnesemia induced by necitumumab plus cisplatin and gemcitabine treatment in patients with advanced lung squamous cell carcinoma: a subanalysis of the NINJA study

Background

The clinical impact of hypomagnesemia induced by necitumumab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin (GCN) as a second-line or later therapy is unclear.

Objective

We aimed to evaluate the clinical characteristics and survival impact of hypomagnesemia induced by this therapy.

Design

This was a sub-analysis of the retrospective multicenter NINJA study.

Methods

Among the 93 patients enrolled in the NINJA study, this subanalysis included 75 patients with baseline serum magnesium concentrations.

Results

The incidence of grade ⩾2 hypomagnesemia was 18.0% in the patients with normal baseline serum magnesium concentrations and 42.8% in those with low concentrations (p = 0.073). The discontinuation rates of GCN treatment owing to hypomagnesemia in each group were 0% and 7.1%, respectively (p = 0.187). The number of necitumumab doses and severity of hypomagnesemia were positively correlated (r = 0.389, p < 0.001). Patients who developed hypomagnesemia in fewer than 21 days after the first dose of GCN (n = 12) had significantly poorer progression-free survival (PFS) than those without the condition (n = 63; median: 4.1 vs 4.4 months, p = 0.048). A similar trend was observed for OS (median: 9.7 vs 15.7 months, p = 0.062). These results were maintained after multivariate analyses (PFS: hazard ratio (HR) 2.46, p = 0.014; OS: HR 2.78, p = 0.021).

Conclusion

GCN as a second-line or later therapy may be tolerable regardless of the patient's baseline serum magnesium concentration. On the other hand, early serum magnesium reduction with this therapy is associated with a poor prognosis. However, caution should be needed because our results lacked sufficient information for confounding variables other than those analyzed here that may influence the correlation between hypomagnesemia and survival.

Global estimates of prevalence of chronic painful neuropathy among patients with chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: systematic review and meta-analysis of data from 28 countries, 2000-24

INTRODUCTION

Although the prevalence of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) has been reported, the proportion of patients with CIPN who report chronic painful neuropathy remains poorly understood, despite its significant impact on patients' quality of life and treatment outcomes.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The primary outcome was the pooled prevalence of chronic (≥3 months) painful CIPN among patients diagnosed with CIPN. Estimates from each study were transformed using double arcsine transformation and pooled in a meta-analysis using an inverse variance heterogeneity model. Subgroup analysis was conducted based on geographical region, sex, chemotherapy regimen, primary cancer type, and funding source; meta-regression analysis was conducted based on study design, human development index (HDI), and publication year.

RESULTS

77 studies from 28 countries, encompassing 10 962 patients with CIPN, were included. Among patients diagnosed with CIPN, the pooled prevalence of those reporting chronic painful CIPN was estimated at 41.22% (95% CI 32.40 to 50.19; 95% prediction interval 23.71 to 61.28). Substantial heterogeneity was observed across studies (I²=95.27%; 95% CI for I2 94.58 to 95.86). Subgroup analysis revealed that patients treated with platinum based agents and taxanes had the highest prevalence of chronic painful CIPN (40.44% and 38.35%, respectively), and among primary cancers, those with lung cancer reported the highest prevalence of chronic painful CIPN (60.26%). Study design, HDI, and publication year were non-significant moderators of prevalence estimates. Based on our GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) assessment, the certainty of evidence was considered very low.

CONCLUSION

This study provides the first comprehensive global estimate of the prevalence of chronic painful CIPN, highlighting its significant burden on patients worldwide. The variation in prevalence across geographical regions, chemotherapy regimens, and primary cancers underscores the need for tailored pain management strategies and further research to address potential disparities.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42024579459.

Lung cancer, platinum analog-based frontline treatment and pharmacogenetic limitations

Lung cancer has the highest mortality rate among all the highly prevalent neoplasia globally. The major concern with its frontline treatment-cisplatin, is the rapid progression of chemoresistance and multi-organ-based toxicities including hearing loss and tinnitus, nephrotoxicity, hepatotoxicity and myelosuppression including anemia and neutropenia. In this review, studies concluding the association of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) in disparate genes with aforementioned toxicity points are summarized to observe the pharmacogenomic pattern. Especially, SNPs in ATP7B, ERCC-1, ERCC-2, MATE-1, OCT-2, ABCB-1, ABCC-1, ABCG-2, ABCC-2, SLC22A, ERCC-5, BRCA-1, GSTM-3, GSTM-4 and GSTM-5 genes appear to be associated with the therapeutic response and/or adverse effects of cisplatin. We recommend utilizing this information to minimize the risk of treatment failure due to chemoresistance and adverse effects on other organs.

Efficacy of subsequent treatment for unresectable locally-advanced non-small cell lung cancer after relapse of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with durvalumab consolidation therapy: A single-center retrospective study

OBJECTIVES

The current standard treatment for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) is concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT) followed by durvalumab consolidation therapy. Although the trial revealed the survival benefit of adding an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) to the population, the optimal treatment strategy and efficacy of subsequent treatment after relapse remain unclear.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively collected data from patients with unresectable LA-NSCLC who completed platinum-based CCRT as first-line treatment. Patients who received molecular-targeted therapy for driver gene alterations or did not receive durvalumab as consolidation therapy following the approval were excluded. We assessed differences in regimen and efficacy of subsequent treatment in patients who underwent durvalumab consolidation therapy (D group) and those who did not (CR group).

RESULTS

Among the 62 eligible patients, 32 were assigned to the D group and 30 to the CR group. Patients in the CR group were more frequently treated with an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-containing regimen than those in the D group (57 % vs. 13 %, p < 0.001). The median overall survival from initiation of subsequent treatment was shorter in the D group than in the CR group (13.0 months vs. 26.7 months, hazard ratio 2.60; 95 % confidence interval: 1.28-2.56, p = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with unresectable LA-NSCLC who relapsed after durvalumab consolidation therapy received an ICI-containing regimen less frequently, and the efficacy of the subsequent treatment was limited.

Real-World Outcomes of Subsequent Chemotherapy after Progression Following Chemoradiation and Consolidative Durvalumab Therapy in Locally Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: An Exploratory Analysis from the CRIMSON Study (HOPE-005)

BACKGROUND

The optimal subsequent treatment strategy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and consolidative durvalumab therapy remains unknown. We aimed to determine the optimal subsequent treatment strategy for this clinical population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively enrolled 523 consecutive patients with LA-NSCLC treated with CRT and analyzed the treatment outcomes of subsequent therapy after progression following CRT and consolidative durvalumab therapy. Patients who received tyrosine kinase inhibitors as subsequent therapy were excluded.

RESULTS

Out of 122 patients who received subsequent chemotherapy, 55% underwent platinum-based, 25% non-platinum-based, and 20% immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-containing therapies. In the platinum-based group, patients with a durvalumab-progression-free survival (Dur-PFS) ≥ 1 year had a significantly longer median subsequent therapy-PFS (SubTx-PFS) than those with Dur-PFS < 1 year (13.2 months vs. 4.7 months; hazard ratio, 0.45; 95% confidence interval, 0.21-0.97; P = .04). Furthermore, among patients receiving non-platinum-based chemotherapy, the median SubTx-PFS was longer in the combined with angiogenesis inhibitor group than in the without group, although the difference was not statistically significant. No significant difference of SubTx-PFS was observed between the reason for durvalumab discontinuation and the outcomes of ICI-containing therapy.

CONCLUSION

In clinical practice, platinum-based chemotherapy rechallenge is frequently employed following progression subsequent to CRT and consolidative durvalumab therapy for LA-NSCLC. Optimal treatment strategies may consider Dur-PFS and angiogenesis inhibitor feasibility. Further research is warranted to identify clinical biomarkers that can help identify patients who would benefit from ICI rechallenge.

Real world results of locally advanced and metastatic lung cancer patients treated with platinum doublet chemotherapy in first line: Moroccan cohort

BACKGROUND

Doublet platin-chemotherapy was the old standard treatment for different histology types of advanced and metastatic lung cancer (LC) and is still an option for patients who are not eligible for immune checkpoint inhibitors. However, in low- and middle-income countries, chemotherapy, either in monotherapy or in combination with platinum, is still the only accessible option in public institutions. The efficacy of different platin-based chemotherapy in patients with LC who are treatment-naïve is unknown.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, we selected patients with advanced and metastatic (IIIB-IVB) non-squamous non-small cell LC (NSCLC), squamous NSCLC, and lung neuroendocrine tumours (small cell LC (SCLC), large cell neuroendocrine, and atypical carcinoid) aged beyond 18 years who received first-line chemotherapy (docetaxel, gemcitabine, etoposide, paclitaxel, pemetrexed, and vinorelbine) combined with platinum between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2022. Within the population with non-squamous NSCLC, squamous NSCLC, and neuroendocrine tumours, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were the primary assessed endpoints. Hematologic safety was the secondary endpoint.

RESULTS

Overall, 611 patients were included. In the group of patients with non-squamous NSCLC (n = 390), there was no statistical difference between subgroups of patients who received first-line platin-chemotherapy. The median PFS was 182 (95 % confidence interval [CI], 167-208) days (hazard ratio for progression: NR [Not Reached]; p = 0.37), and the median OS was 446 (95 % CI, 405-559) days (hazard ratio for death: 1.31; 95 % CI, 0.94 - 1.82; p = 0.1). In the group of patients with squamous NSCLC (n = 149), we note the absence of statistical significance between subgroups of patients who received platin-based chemotherapy. The median PFS was 195 (95 % CI, 142-238; hazard ratio for progression: 1.21, 95 % CI, 0.29-5.02; p = 0.27), while the median OS was 428 (95 % CI, 324-940) days (hazard ratio for death: 1.76; 95 % CI, 0.93 to 3.3; p = 0.32). The absence of significance has been noticed in the neuroendocrine subgroup of patients who received first etoposide-platinum, vinorelbine-platinum, or paclitaxel-platinum (n = 72). The median PFS was 216 (95 % CI, 193-277) days; hazard ratio for progression: 1.74, 95 % CI, 0.41-7.27; p = 0.69, while the median OS was 273 (95 % CI, 241-459) days (hazard ratio for death: 2.95; 95 % CI, 0.4-21.7; p = 0.51). Grade 3-4 neutropenia grade was the predominant adverse event associated with chemotherapy in almost 11 % of patients.

CONCLUSION

Moving forward, treatment strategies must be refined for patients, with an emphasis on increasing the number of patients who can benefit from emergent approaches in order to guarantee a wider, deeper, and longer-lasting outcome.

Clinical Outcome of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab in Patients with Locally Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer with Relapse after Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy followed by Durvalumab

Nivolumab plus ipilimumab showed promising efficacy in patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The efficacy of the nivolumab plus ipilimumab combination regimen in NSCLC patients who relapse after durvalumab consolidation following concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) has not been determined. Between January 2021 and June 2022, clinical data were retrospectively extracted from the medical records of patients with NSCLC who received nivolumab plus ipilimumab after CCRT and durvalumab consolidation. A total of 30 patients were included in this analysis. The median number of durvalumab treatment cycles was 11. Median PFS and OS with nivolumab plus ipilimumab were 4.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.7-7.7) and 18.5 months (95% CI: 3.5-33.5), respectively. The 6-month and 12-month PFS rates were 46.7% (95% CI: 28.8-64.5) and 36.4% (95% CI: 19.0-53.7). In multivariate analysis, a significant correlation was observed between a durvalumab treatment duration of 6 months or more and PFS (p = 0.04) as well as OS (p = 0.001). Grade 3 adverse events, including pneumonitis, dermatitis, and colitis, occurred in 10% of the patients. This study suggests that nivolumab plus ipilimumab is effective, especially in patients who have received durvalumab for 6 months or more, and tolerable for patients who relapsed after durvalumab following CCRT.

Relevance of tumor markers for prognosis and predicting therapy response in non-small cell lung cancer patients: A CEPAC-TDM biomarker substudy

BACKGROUND

Protein tumor markers are released in high amounts into the blood in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the relevance of serum tumor markers (STM) for prognosis, prediction and monitoring of therapy response in NSCLC patients receiving chemotherapy.

METHODS

In a biomarker substudy of a prospective, multicentric clinical trial (CEPAC-TDM) on 261 advanced NSCLC patients, CYFRA 21-1, CEA, SCC, NSE, ProGRP, CA125, CA15-3 and HE4 were assessed in serial serum samples and correlated with radiological response after two cycles of chemotherapy and overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

While pretherapeutic STM levels at staging did not discriminate between progressive and non-progressive patients, CYFRA 21-1, CA125, NSE and SCC at time of staging did, and yielded AUCs of 0.75, 0.70, 0.69 and 0.67 in ROC curves, respectively. High pretherapeutic CA15-3 and CA125 as well as high CYFRA 21-1, SCC, CA125 and CA15-3 levels at staging were prognostic for shorter PFS and OS -also when clinical variables were added to the models.

CONCLUSIONS

STM at the time of first radiological staging and pretherapeutic CA15-3, CA125 are predictive for first-line treatment response and highly prognostic in patients with advanced NSCLC.