Early clinical outcomes and comparison between trans-PRK and PRK, regarding refractive outcome, wound healing, pain intensity and visual recovery time in a real-world setup

Comparison between a new transepithelial PRK vs. conventional alcohol-assisted PRK: Corneal densitometry and aberrometry study

PURPOSE

To describe and compare corneal densitometry, subjective refraction, visual acuity, and corneal higher order aberrations (HOA) after corneal refractive surgery using either alcohol-assisted photorefractive keratectomy (aaPRK) or single-step transepithelial PRK (tPRK).

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective and observational study. We analyzed 120 right eyes from 120 healthy consecutive myopic patients who underwent aaPRK or tPRK to correct myopia of up to 6 diopters and astigmatism of up to 2 diopters. The WaveLight EX500 excimer laser (Alcon Laboratories, Inc.) was used in all cases. Visual acuity, subjective refraction, and Pentacam AXL® measurements were performed at the preoperative visit and at 6-months follow-up visit. Pentacam AXL® software was used to assess corneal optical density in various annuli for different corneal depths and anterior corneal HOA (6 mm area of analysis).

RESULTS

Preoperative spherical equivalent values were similar between groups preoperatively (-3.07 ± 1.52 and -3.38 ± 1.46 in the aaPRK and tPRK groups, respectively). There were no statistically significant differences in visual acuity and postoperative refraction between groups. Postoperative corneal densitometry did not show statistically significant differences in any of the areas studied and both surgical procedures obtained similar results. However, analysis of HOA showed statistically significant differences between the techniques (1.42 ± 0.39 and 1.80 ± 0.62 for the aaPRK and tPRK groups, respectively; p = 0.000).

CONCLUSIONS

Both aaPRK and single-step tPRK gave comparable visual, refractive, and corneal density outcomes. Some differences were observed in HOA but were not clinically relevant.

Efficacy of single-step transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy in myopia, hyperopia and astigmatism-a systematic review

BACKGROUND

This systematic review assesses the efficacy of single-step transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (tPRK) in terms of postoperative pain, epithelial healing, postoperative haze and visual acuity. It also compares single tPRK to two-step tPRK where data is available.

METHODS

This systematic review adhered to the PRISMA reporting guidelines (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses). An electronic literature search was conducted on PUBMED, Scopus, and Google Scholar. The quality of the studies included in this systematic review was evaluated using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS). The protocol of this systematic review was registered on PROSPERO with ID CRD42024494717.

RESULTS

A total of 11 studies published between 2013 and 2023 were included in this systematic review. Studies revealed a significant improvement in visual acuity with both single-step tPRK and two-step tPRK. Two studies showed that single-step tPRK not only offers a better UDVA but also a significant improvement in the manifest sphere, cylinder, and spherical equivalent at various follow-up periods compared to two-step tPRK. One study demonstrated the broad effectiveness of single-step tPRK for myopia correction across low-, moderate-, and high-severity groups. Rapid epithelial healing was a consistent finding. Complete epithelial healing within 72 h was noted in 100% of eyes treated with single-step tPRK in one of the studies. The incidence of corneal haze following tPRK was generally low across the studies. Post-tPRK pain scores were initially lower in the single-step tPRK group. One study reported that the maximum pain level within the first four days after surgery was significantly lower in the single-step tPRK group than in the two-step tPRK group.

CONCLUSION

Both two-step and single-step tPRK are safe refractive procedures. Single-step tPRK, because of less haze formation, lower pain scores, faster healing, and greater effectiveness in improving visual acuity, is superior to the two-step technique.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The protocol of this systematic review was registered on PROSPERO with ID CRD42024494717.

Unilateral Corneal Ectasia After Bilateral Transepithelial Photorefractive Keratectomy

We present the case of a 23-year-old male who experienced vision loss in his left eye 15 months after undergoing bilateral transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (T-PRK). Despite the absence of any significant preoperative topographical risk factors in either eye, corneal ectasia was later confirmed in the left eye, while the right eye remained normal. Subtle asymmetry in topometric indices and a borderline high Index of vertical asymmetry (IVA) reading suggested the possibility of early subclinical keratoconus, potentially increasing the risk of post-refractive ectasia. The patient received corneal cross-linking (CXL) treatment in the affected eye to halt further progression, while the right eye remained under observation. This report reviews the rare instances of post-refractive ectasia. It highlights the potential role of subtle corneal irregularities in predisposing to ectasia, even without traditional risk factors.

Postoperative Pain Comparison Between Alcohol-Assisted and Transepithelial Photorefractive Keratectomy Using Nepafenac Treatment: A Novel Study

INTRODUCTION

The study aimed to compare postoperative pain between alcohol-assisted and transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy in patients who received the novel analgesic preoperative nepafenac treatment 2 days preoperatively and 3 days postoperatively. Pain, stinging, tearing, light sensitivity, and stress levels were evaluated.

METHODS

The study included a retrospective analysis of 55 patients divided into two groups: bilateral alcohol-assisted photorefractive keratectomy (aa-PRK) and transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (transepithelial-PRK). Nepafenac was administered for pain control for all patients, with patients receiving four drops for 2 days before the surgery and 3 days postoperatively per clinical instructions. Patients completed questionnaires on the day of the surgery and for the first 5 days postoperatively. Statistical analysis was performed using XLSTAT (version 2023.1.2). t-Test was used to analyze and compare pain and symptom levels and Fisher's exact test for categorical data. p-Values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

The study examined 55 patients (49% female) with a mean age of 25.11 ± 6.81 years who had undergone bilateral surface refractive surgery to correct myopic errors. The mean baseline standard error (SE) was -3.16 ± 2.20 D. Among these patients, 27 patients underwent aa-PRK and 28 patients underwent transepithelial-PRK. Higher levels of pain were significant in the aa-PRK group (p = 0.003). However, there was no significant difference between the groups in the average levels of stinging, tearing, or light sensation. Additionally, stress levels decreased over time in both groups, with levels becoming almost equal after 5 days, and there was no significant difference in the average stress levels between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The study found that patients who underwent the transepithelial-PRK procedure had significantly lower pain levels compared with those who underwent aa-PRK after being treated with nepafenac per protocol. However, there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of stinging, tearing, light sensation, and stress levels.

StreamLight Single-Step Transepithelial Photorefractive Keratectomy (PRK) for Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism

Background: To report the refractive outcomes of StreamLight transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). Methods: A retrospective case series was conducted which included a total of 205 eyes of 109 patients who underwent StreamLight transepithelial PRK using the Alcon Wavelight EX500 excimer laser. All eyes had myopia or myopic astigmatism, and the preoperative spherical equivalent (SEQ) ranged from -0.63D to -7.25D. The primary postoperative outcomes were UDVA, CDVA and subjective refraction measured at least 3 months postoperatively. Results: Postoperatively, 196 eyes (95.6%) had a UDVA of 20/20 or better. The mean SEQ was -0.05 ± 0.31D and 189 eyes (92.2%) were within ±0.50D of the target SEQ. The mean refractive astigmatism was -0.28 ± 0.27D, and 181 eyes (88.3%) had ≤ 0.50D of astigmatism. The mean safety and efficacy indices were 1.01 ± 0.08 and 0.97 ± 0.12, respectively. Eight eyes lost 1 line of CDVA. Six of these were noted to have significant dry eyes and 2 had corneal haze. No eye lost two or more lines of CDVA. Conclusions: StreamLight transepithelial PRK results in excellent refractive outcomes for myopia and myopic astigmatism.

A 6-Month Follow-Up Comparative Study of Single-Step Transepithelial Photorefractive Keratectomy (Trans-PRK) Using the StreamLight Software with and without Epithelial Thickness Customization

Purpose

To compare corneal aberrometry, densitometry, and refractive outcomes of single-step Transepithelial Photorefractive Keratectomy (Trans-PRK) with and without epithelial thickness customization.

Patients and Methods

This was a prospective, interventional, randomized controlled study. Patients undergoing Trans-PRK using the WaveLight EX500 laser with StreamLight software (Alcon Laboratories, Forth Worth, TX, USA) were randomly assigned to control (55 µm standard epithelial thickness) or customized (thinnest point of epithelial thickness for each patient) groups. MS-39 (CSO, Italy) anterior segment optical coherence tomography was used to measure the epithelial thickness. Inclusion criteria were spherical equivalent <6 diopters (D), astigmatism <4D, and CDVA 20/25 or better. The assessments were at baseline and 6 months post-op: visual acuity, refraction, aberrometry, and corneal densitometry.

Results

108 eyes were enrolled, [control group (n=56) and customized group (n=52)]. Mean epithelial ablation thickness in the customized group was 54.81±3.56µm (p=0.470 vs control group). Both groups experienced significant postoperative increases in higher-order aberrations (HOA) and spherical aberrations, with no significant intergroup differences. Mean HOA RMS (µm) of the frontal cornea and total cornea increased by 0.27, and 0.29, respectively, in the control group, and 0.26 and 0.28, respectively, in the customized group (p<0.001 for all). Mean change in spherical aberrations in the frontal cornea and total cornea was 0.23µm (p<0.001) and 0.25µm (p<0.001), in the control group, and 0.19µm (p<0.001) and 0.20µm (p<0.001), in the customized group. Mean corneal densitometry in anterior cornea decreased by 0.63GSU (p=0.021) and 1.18GSU (p<0.001) in the control and customized groups. In the posterior cornea, it increased by 1.67GSU (p=0.004) and 0.38GSU (p=0.006).

Conclusion

No significant differences in refractive and aberrometry outcomes between control and customized Trans-PRK groups, with corneal densitometry changes not affecting visual acuity.

Modified Transepithelial Phototherapeutic Keratectomy for Band Keratopathy

Objectives: To report the outcomes of novel modified transepithelial phototherapeutic keratectomy (PTK) in treating band keratopathy (BK). Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on patients who underwent PTK for BK at the Sussex Eye Laser Clinic, Nuffield Health, Brighton. Patients with BK obscuring the visual axis, affecting visual acuity, or causing discomfort were considered for PTK. All the patients underwent preoperative evaluation, including preoperative corneal topography and optical coherence tomography. Modified transepithelial PTK was performed without using EDTA for chelation or alcohol for epithelium debridement. Patients were followed up for one week and then every two weeks after that until two months. Preoperative and postoperative best corrected visual acuities (BCVA) were compared using a paired t-test. Results: We studied 15 eyes of nine patients undergoing novel PTK for BK. The mean age was 80 ± 5.73 years. The mean pre-treatment visual acuity was 0.68 ± 0.17 logMAR (range: 0.6 logMAR to 1 logMAR) and improved to 0.22 ± 0.09 logMAR (p < 0.05), ranging from 0.18 to 0.48 logMAR at two months following PTK. None of the patients complained of ocular discomfort following the procedure. A repeat procedure was not required for any of these patients. Conclusions: Modified transepithelial PTK is an effective procedure for improving visual outcomes in patients with band keratopathy and should be considered for the treatment of band keratopathy.

Nominal and achieved stromal ablation depth after myopic transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy: implications for residual stromal thickness calculation

BACKGROUND

The primary objective of this investigation was to compare the nominal central ablation depth with the achieved central corneal stromal ablation depth after StreamLight transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (tPRK) for myopia with WaveLight® laser by Alcon Laboratories, TX, USA.

METHODS

This ambispective study encompassed a retrospective analysis of 40 eyes who underwent treatment for myopia and astigmatism, followed by a prospective examination conducted 6-9 months postoperatively. Pre- and postoperative Avanti spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT; Optovue Inc., CA, USA) provided stromal and epithelial thickness maps. The difference between pre- and postoperative central stromal thicknesses at the corneal vertex was used to calculate the achieved stromal thickness ablation depth. This value was then compared with the corresponding central nominal depth on the laser ablation planning map.

RESULTS

A total of 40 eyes (OD/OS:18/22) of 40 patients (31.4 ± 9.2 years) were available for evaluation. The mean treated spherical equivalent was - 2.98 ± 1.46 D. The mean nominal and achieved central stromal ablation depths were 51.22 µm and 59.67 μm, respectively, showing a mean stromal excessive ablation of 16.50%. The mean pre- and postoperative central epithelial thicknesses were 53.74 μm and 59.31 μm, respectively, showing a mean postoperative thickness increase of 10.46%. This increase in the epithelial thickness rendered the mean postoperative pachymetry reduction to 54.11 μm, only 2.33% greater than the mean nominal ablation depth.

CONCLUSIONS

The study revealed a central stromal ablation 16.50% greater than the nominal ablation depth. This excessive stromal removal was largely compensated for by the increase in epithelial thickness, resulting in a mean difference between the nominal ablation depth and the achieved central corneal pachymetry reduction of only 2.33%. This significant excessive central stromal ablation must be taken into consideration in the calculation of the residual stromal thickness.

One-Year Results of a Phase I/II Randomized, Double-Masked, Placebo-Controlled Study of Processed Amniotic Fluid Drops After PRK

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the 1-year outcomes of using processed amniotic fluid (pAF) postoperatively after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).

METHODS

Sixty-one participants were randomized to receive either placebo or pAF drops. The drops were instilled 4 times daily for 1 week after PRK along with routine postoperative medications. The primary outcome measures included uncorrected visual acuity, topographic corneal irregularity measurement, and surface staining over 1 year.

RESULTS

A statistically significant difference in uncorrected distance visual acuity between the placebo and treatment groups was seen at 1 month post-PRK, with a visual advantage evident in the pAF group. A suggestive difference in corneal irregularity measurement was also seen between the placebo and treatment groups at 1 month postsurgery, with less irregularity noted in the pAF group. No differences in uncorrected distance visual acuity or corneal irregularity measurement were found at 3, 6, and 12 months. There was also no significant difference in corneal staining scores between the 2 groups at any of the measured time points.

CONCLUSIONS

This 1-year study evaluating the safety and efficacy of pAF as an additional postoperative topical medication after PRK demonstrated that pAF offered a mild visual advantage at 1 month post-PRK. There were no late adverse events, and the intervention proved safe at 1 year.

Tear Proteins Altered in Patients with Persistent Eye Pain after Refractive Surgery: Biomarker Candidate Discovery

Some patients develop persistent eye pain after refractive surgery, but factors that cause or sustain pain are unknown. We tested whether tear proteins of patients with pain 3 months after surgery differ from those of patients without pain. Patients undergoing refractive surgery (laser in situ keratomileusis or photorefractive keratectomy ) were recruited from 2 clinics, and tears were collected 3 months after surgery. Participants rated their eye pain using a numerical rating scale (NRS, 0-10; no pain-worst pain) at baseline, 1 day, and 3 months after surgery. Using tandem mass tag proteomic analysis, we examined tears from patients with pain [NRS ≥ 3 at 3 months (n = 16)] and patients with no pain [NRS ≤ 1 at 3 months (n = 32)] after surgery. A subset of proteins (83 of 2748 detected, 3.0%) were associated with pain 3 months after surgery. High-dimensional statistical models showed that the magnitude of differential expression was not the only important factor in classifying tear samples from pain patients. Models utilizing 3 or 4 proteins had better classification performance than single proteins and represented differences in both directions (higher or lower in pain). Thus, patterns of protein differences may serve as biomarkers of postsurgical eye pain as well as potential therapeutic targets.

Activating transcription factor 3 (ATF3) and calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) increase in trigeminal ganglion neurons in female rats after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK)-like corneal abrasion

Photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) is a type of eye surgery that involves removal of the corneal epithelium and its associated nerves, which causes intense acute pain in most people. We used a rat model of corneal epithelium removal (corneal abrasion) to examine underlying cellular and molecular mechanisms. In this study, we used immunohistochemistry of trigeminal ganglion (TG) to assess neuronal content of CGRP and ATF3, as well as orbital tightening (OT) to assess spontaneous pain behaviors. CGRP is an important neuropeptide in pain modulation and ATF3 is often used as a nerve injury marker. We found dynamic changes in CGRP and ATF3 in TG; both increased significantly at 24 h following corneal abrasion and females had a more pronounced increase at 24 h compared to males. Interestingly, there was no sex difference in OT behaviors. Additionally, the number of cells containing either CGRP or ATF3 in each animal correlate significantly with their OT behavior at the assessed timepoint. Since CGRP increased most in females, we tested the effectiveness of Olcegepant, a CGRP antagonist, at reducing OT behaviors following corneal abrasion in female rats. Olcegepant (1 mg/kg) was given prior to and again at 24 h after abrasion but did not change OT behaviors at any time over a 1-week period. Examination of CGRP and ATF3 together in TG showed that they rarely colocalized, indicating that the cells with upregulated CGRP are distinct from those responding to epithelial nerve injury. The studies also show that underlying molecular responses may be sex specific.

Comparison of Objective Visual Quality Following SMILE and SmartPulse Technology-Assisted TransPRK at a 1,050-Hz Ablation Frequency for Moderate-to-High Myopia

PURPOSE

To compare the objective visual quality of moderate-to-high myopia corrected by small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (TransPRK) at a 1,050-Hz ablation frequency, assisted by Smart-Pulse technology (SCHWIND eye-tech-solutions).

METHODS

This study involved 123 patients (123 eyes) with moderate-to-high myopia between July 2020 and January 2021. They were categorized into the SMILE group (67 patients, 67 eyes) and the TransPRK group (56 patients, 56 eyes). Follow-ups were conducted at 6 months postoperatively to record the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution visual acuity, and the Strehl ratio and higher order aberrations were measured using the Sirius anterior segment analysis device (SCHWIND eye-tech-solutions) under a 6-mm pupil diameter at various postoperative intervals.

RESULTS

At 1 week and 1 month postoperatively, the uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) in the SMILE group was superior to that in the TransPRK group (P < .05 for both). At 1 week and 1 month postoperatively, the Strehl ratio value in the SMILE group was higher than that in the TransPRK group (P < .05 for both). At 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively, coma was greater in the SMILE group than in the TransPRK group (P < .05 for all). Spherical aberrations were lower in the SMILE group than in the TransPRK group at 3 and 6 months postoperatively (P < .05). At 6 months postoperatively, UDVA was -0.09 ± 0.08 and -0.11 ± 0.05 logMAR in the SMILE and TransPRK groups, respectively, which exceeded their preoperative corrected distance visual acuity of -0.05 ± 0.04 and -0.09 ± 0.08 logMAR (all P < .001). Compared with preoperative values, the Strehl ratio, total higher order, coma, and spherical aberration differences were significantly increased postoperatively in both groups (all P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Both surgical methods improved UDVA and each had its advantages. The visual quality of SMILE was superior at 1 week and 1 month postoperatively (Strehl ratio values were higher than those of the TransPRK group), and its spherical aberration was lower than that of the TransPRK group at 3 and 6 months; TransPRK with SmartPulse technology with a 1,050-Hz ablation frequency showed that coma was significantly lower than that of the SMILE group at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(7):e490-e498.].

Clinical Outcomes of Transepithelial Photorefractive Keratectomy Performed with Smart Pulse Technology for the Correction of Moderate to High Myopia

Purpose: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (TransPRK) performed using smart pulse technology (SPT) in myopic eyes with refractive error ranging from -5.25 D to -9.75 D. Methods: This retrospective study evaluated the outcomes of SPT-assisted TransPRK in 150 eyes performed using a 1050 Hz AMARIS excimer laser. Results: At 6 months postoperative, 98% of eyes achieved uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) of 20/25 or better, and postoperative UDVA within one line of preoperative corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA). No eyes lost any line of CDVA. Residual spherical equivalent refraction and cylinder within ±0.50 D of intended correction were achieved in 72% and 67% of eyes, respectively. Ninety-seven percent of eyes reported no halos and glare. Conclusions: TransPRK using a 1050 Hz excimer laser with SPT showed excellent predictability, safety, and efficacy for moderate to high myopia correction.

Advances in Transepithelial Photorefractive Keratectomy versus Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis

(1) Background: Laser-assisted refractive surgery is a safe and effective surgical correction of refractive error. For most patients, both the newer Trans-PRK and the established LASIK technique can produce the required surgical correction, sparking the question of which technique should be opted for. (2) Methods: The study prospectively evaluated 121 patients (230 eyes) for at least one month postoperatively; 66 patients (126 eyes) and 45 patients (85 eyes) returned for 6 months and 1 year follow-up. (3) Results: No statistical difference was recorded at 1 week or 1 month post-operation. At 6 months, a difference was found for spherical diopters (Trans-PRK -0.0476 ± 0.7012 versus FS-LASIK +0.425 ± 0.874, p = 0.004) and spherical equivalent (Trans-PRK -0.1994 ± 0.0294 versus FS-LASIK +0.225 ± 0.646, p = 0.025) but not for CYL D (Trans-PRK -0.3036 ± 0.5251 versus FS-LASIK -0.4 ± 0.820, p = 0.499). Uncorrected visual acuity was better for Trans-PRK 6 months post-operation (UCVA logMAR 0.02523 versus 0.0768 logMAR; p = 0.015 logMAR). At 1-year, Trans-PRK was favored for spherical diopters (Trans-PRK -0.0294 ± 0.6493 versus FS-LASIK +0.646 ± 0.909, p < 0.001) and spherical equivalent (Trans-PRK -0.218 ± 0.784 versus FS-LASIK 0.372 ± 1.08, p = 0.007). Overall speed in visual recovery, variance of results and surgically induced astigmatism were in favor of Trans-PRK. (4) Conclusions: The study reported improvements for Trans-PRK patients, with both techniques found to be safe and effective.

Corneal Irregularity Induced by Transepithelial Photorefractive Keratectomy in a Patient With Partial Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to present a case of transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (trans-PRK) laser ablation in a patient with partial limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD) that resulted in corneal irregularity.

METHODS

A 23-year-old man with bilateral partial LSCD underwent trans-PRK for myopia correction 2 months before presentation to our department. Trans-PRK ablation was performed with a phototherapeutic keratectomy ablation profile set at 60 μm in the OD and 57 μm in the OS and 8 mm zone. At the time of presentation, the patient complained of decreased visual acuity. Corrected distant visual acuity was 20/20 (-3.25, -0.75 × 180 degrees) and 20/50 (-3.00, -3.00 × 180 degrees) in the OD and the OS, respectively. No further ocular history was reported other than prolonged soft contact lens use for myopia. Pre-trans-PRK tomography (WaveLight Oculyzer II diagnostic system, WaveLight GmbH, Germany) revealed bilateral superior steepening with corresponding epithelial thinning as obtained by the epithelial map using Optovue optical coherence tomography (Visionix Luneau technology). Slit-lamp examination showed bilateral superficial neovascularization, suggestive of early-stage LSCD.

RESULTS

A nonuniform laser stromal ablation resulting in corneal irregularity and decreased visual acuity was observed 2 months postoperatively. During the 6-month follow-up, corneal tomography was stable with only minimal improvement. At that time, corrected distant visual acuity remained 20/20 (-2.75, -0.75 × 160 degrees) in the OD and 20/50 (-3.00, -3.00 × 180 degrees) in the OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Trans-PRK seems to be a contraindication in cases with corneal epithelial irregularities and could lead to abnormal and nonuniform stromal ablation .

Investigation of corneal epithelial thickness and irregularity by optical coherence tomography after transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Corneal epithelial healing after refractive surgery is a clinically significant issue, especially for surface ablation procedures, and this can be monitored using optical coherence tomography (OCT).

BACKGROUND

The aim of this work is to investigate the corneal epithelial thickness and irregularity by OCT after transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (t-PRK) and analyse its correlation with visual and refractive outcomes.

METHODS

Patients aged ≥18 years with myopia, with or without astigmatism, who underwent t-PRK between May 2020 and August 2021 were included. All participants were subjected to complete ophthalmic examinations and OCT pachymetry at every follow-up visit. Patients were followed up at 1 week and 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

A total of 67 patients (126 eyes) were enrolled in this study. One month postoperatively, spherical equivalent refraction and visual acuity achieved preliminary stability. However, central corneal epithelial thickness (CCET) and standard deviation of the corneal epithelial thickness (SDcet) took 3-6 months to progressive recovery. Patients with higher baseline spherical equivalent refraction were associated with slower epithelial recovery. At every follow-up time point, a significant superior-inferior difference in the minimum corneal epithelial thickness area was observed. Higher stromal haze was correlated with higher spherical equivalent refraction (both baseline and residual) but had no relation with visual outcomes. There was a significant correlation between higher CCET with a better uncorrected distance visual acuity and lower corneal epithelial thickness irregularity.

CONCLUSIONS

CCET and SDcet measured by OCT seem to be a good auxiliary indicator for reflecting the status of corneal wound recovery after t-PRK surgery. However, a well-designed randomised control study is needed to confirm the study results.

Transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy: a prospective randomized comparative study between the two-step and the single-step techniques

OBJECTIVES

To assess and compare the six-month outcome of the two-step transepithelial phototherapeutic keratectomy- photorefractive keratectomy (PTK-PRK) and the single-step transepithelial PRK for myopia and myopic astigmatism.

METHODS

A prospective randomized study. The study enrolled 100 eyes of 50 patients with mild to moderate myopia or myopic astigmatism stratified into two groups, PTK-PRK (n = 50 eyes) and single step PRK (n = 50 eyes). Primary outcome measures were visual acuity and manifest refraction. Secondary outcome measures were epithelial healing duration, post-PRK pain scores and 3-month postoperative haze grading.

RESULTS

Preoperative characteristics were similar in both groups (p value > 0.05). The mean uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) at 1 week, 1 month, 3 and 6 months was significantly better in the single-step PRK group than in the two-step PTK-PRK group (p < 0.001). The mean manifest sphere, cylinder and spherical equivalent showed a significant difference at all follow up visits in favour of the single-step PRK (p value < 0.001). Epithelial healing duration was faster in single-step PRK (p value < 0.001). Pain scores were significantly lower following single-step PRK at 8 h, 1 day, 3 days (p value < 0.001) but were similar at the 7th day. Haze scores showed no statistical difference between the two groups at 3-month follow-up.

CONCLUSION

The two transepithelial PRK techniques were effective in correcting mild to moderate myopia and myopic astigmatism. However, Single-step transepithelial PRK achieved faster visual recovery, better refractive outcome and shorter epithelial healing time with less post-PRK pain.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRY

(Clinical Trials.gov Identifier): NCT04710082.

Outcomes of Single-Step Transepithelial Photorefractive Keratectomy Compared With Alcohol-Assisted Photorefractive Keratectomy Using Wave-Light EX500 Platform

Purpose To compare the visual outcome of transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) against alcohol-assisted PRK in treating low-to-moderate myopia with or without astigmatism. Setting Dhahran Eye Specialist Hospital, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia. Design This is a retrospective study. Methods Forty eyes of 22 patients with myopia from -0.75 to -6.00 diopters (D) with or without astigmatism from 0 to -3D were included in this study. Preoperative and postoperative data of 20 eyes from 11 patients who underwent transepithelial PRK were compared with 20 eyes from 11 patients who underwent alcohol-assisted PRK were collected and analyzed. The uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), manifest spherical equivalence (SE), manifest cylinder, vector analysis of astigmatism, and efficacy and safety indices were compared between the groups at a mean follow-up of one year postoperatively. Results Baseline characteristics were similar between groups, except the transepithelial PRK group had lower cylinder values than the alcohol-assisted PRK group by 0.69D. Regression analysis was used to control for the difference in the cylinder in all outcome parameters. Both groups had similar mean UDVA (p=0.73), CDVA (p=0.98), the proportion of eyes in either group achieved (20/20, 20/25, and 20/30) UDVA (p=0.72, 0.68 and 0.31 respectively) and percentage of eyes lost two lines of CDVA (p=1.0). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in regard to both efficacy and safety indices (p=0.55 and 0.67, respectively). Both groups had similar residual SE (p=0.72), the proportion of eyes within ±0.5D of SE (p=0.29), and residual refractive astigmatism (p=0.87). Both groups had similar difference vectors, surgically induced astigmatism, and correction index (p=0.82, 0.10, and 0.26, respectively). However, the transepithelial PRK group had lower target-induced astigmatism (TIA; p=0.01), higher magnitude of error (ME; p=0.05), and higher angle of error (AE; p=0.02) than the alcohol-assisted PRK group. Conclusion Transepithelial PRK had similar visual and refractive outcomes as alcohol-assisted PRK. This approach was considered as safe and effective as alcohol-assisted PRK in treating patients with low-to-moderate myopia with or without astigmatism.

Resveratrol increases tear production and ocular pain after corneal abrasion in male, but not female, rats using a photorefractive keratectomy model

Photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) is an alternative to LASIK and can cause intense acute pain that is often not relieved by standard treatments. To assess potential therapeutics for this type of acute pain, appropriate preclinical models are needed. We describe a preclinical corneal abrasion rat model that simulates the initial stages of PRK surgery and demonstrates similar pain and tear dysfunction as seen clinically. We used both behavioral and homeostatic assays to determine the therapeutic potential of resveratrol on pain and tear production. Studies were conducted in male and female Sprague-Dawley rats. Heptanol was applied to one eye and the superficial corneal epithelium was removed, mimicking the abrasion used in PRK. Spontaneous pain was assessed with orbital tightening (OT) scores for 7 days. Topical resveratrol increased OT scores sex-specifically in abraded males, but not females, at 72 h and 1 week after abrasion. Resveratrol increased tear production in abraded males, with no effect in abraded females. There was no correlation between OT score at 1 week and tear production measurements, demonstrating no relationship between spontaneous ocular pain and tear dysfunction in this model. These findings demonstrate the usefulness of our corneal abrasion preclinical PRK model for the assessment of ocular pain therapeutics and indicate that topical resveratrol may not be useful for managing PRK-induced pain.

Transepithelial Photorefractive Keratectomy Compared to Conventional Photorefractive Keratectomy: A Meta-Analysis

This meta-analysis review compares the primary and secondary outcomes of transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (TPRK) to the conventional photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), in terms of efficacy, predictability, safety, and patient perspectives. A total of 1711 eyes with PRK (811 eyes) and TPRK (900 eyes) from 12 studies were included through bibliographic searches. The main outcomes were efficacy, predictability, and safety parameters, and the secondary outcomes included visual and patient-reported parameters. The effect measures were weighted mean differences with 95% confidence intervals (CI) which were derived from the random-effects model of the meta-analysis to account for possible heterogeneity. TPRK procedure presents a comparable status in the main outcome and a very dominant significance in all the secondary outcomes in this meta-analysis. This study updates the evidence of the accuracy of TPRK procedure for surgical correction of all refractive errors and was deemed safer with less surgical time required and an early healing time.

Corneal Epithelial Removal with a Newly Designed Epithelial Brush

This study aimed to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of a newly developed epithelial removal brush with conventional methods in a rabbit model of corneal epithelial defects. The corneal epithelia of thirty-seven rabbits were removed by three different methods including blades (blade group), newly developed epithelial brushes (Ocu group), and conventional rotating brushes (Amo group). The defect area was measured with light microscopy immediately and at 4, 18, 24, and 50 hours after removal. Corneas were obtained immediately and at 24 and 50 hours and subjected to hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and immunofluorescence staining using proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) and phosphorylated heat shock protein 27 (pHSP27) antibodies. The residual stromal surface was observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). In the Ocu group, epithelia were significantly recovered at 18, 24, and 50 hours compared with immediately after removal, and in the blade and Amo groups, epithelia were significantly recovered only at 50 hours after epithelial removal. The expression levels of PCNA and pHSP27 did not differ among three groups. There was significantly more inflammatory cell infiltration in the blade group than in the other groups. SEM showed a more regular and uniform residual stromal surface in the Ocu group than in the other groups. The newly developed epithelial brush showed better polishing ability and led to earlier significant epithelial recovery and a more regular and uniform stromal surface than conventional methods in this rabbit model of epithelial defects. Accumulation of clinical data is expected to expand the scope of application of new brushes for laser surface ablation.

Single-Step Transepithelial Photorefractive Keratectomy in Low to Moderate Myopia: A One-Year Follow-Up Study

Aim

To evaluate predictability, safety, efficacy, and visual outcome of StreamLight. ™ (SL.), the newly released single-step transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy platform by Alcon WaveLight™ (WL).

Methods

In this prospective cohort study, photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) was conducted on 500 eyes of 250 patients seeking myopic refractive vision correction. The new single-step transepithelial PRK method was applied, using the SL. platform installed in the WL. Ex 500 excimer laser machine. Patients were followed up to monitor intensity and duration of postoperative pain, as well as speed of epithelial healing in the early post-operative period and visual acuity, postoperative refraction and development of postoperative haze for one year post-operatively.

Results

Average pain duration was 1.5 days, and the mean pain intensity score on a scale of 0–10 was 3.74 + 1.51. Mean postoperative spherical equivalence was 0.01 ± 0.38 D, and the final postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity (UCDVA) was 20/20 in 98% of eyes included in this study. None of the eyes lost more than one Snellen chart line or developed visually significant postoperative haze during the follow-up period.

Conclusion

The new SL. platform for transepithelial PRK is a safe, accurate platform, offering an easier early post-operative recovery, with no compromise in final visual outcome.

Point your SmartPhone at the code above. If you have a QR code reader the video abstract will appear. Or use:

https://youtu.be/_lJS9rzTWDk