Comparison of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio for the diagnosis of neonatal sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratios in bacterial infections: contributions to diagnostic strategies in a tertiary care hospital in Tunisia

BACKGROUND

Bacterial infections continue to pose a global health challenge, driven by antibiotic resistance and septicemia. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic utility of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in bacterial infections versus non-infectious causes of inflammation.

METHODS

A prospective study included 164 adult patients who were divided into two groups: a group of patients with confirmed bacterial infections and a second group of patients with other diagnoses (inflammatory pathologies, neoplasms, venous thromboembolic diseases, etc.). NLR and PLR values were compared between the bacterial infection group and the non-infectious causes group and the diagnostic performances of NLR and PLR for detecting bacterial infections were evaluated in comparison with other infection markers.

RESULTS

NLR and PLR were significantly higher in bacterial infections (p < 10 ^-6), and NLR was correlated positively with inflammation markers. NLR and PLR demonstrated significant potential in diagnosing bacterial infections, with an AUC of 0.72 and 0.60, respectively, using the following cutoff values: 4.3 for NLR and 183 for PLR.

CONCLUSION

These findings underscore the importance of NLR and PLR as adjunctive tools for bacterial infection diagnosis.

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratios in bacterial infections: contributions to diagnostic strategies in a tertiary care hospital in Tunisia

Background

Bacterial infections continue to pose a global health challenge, driven by antibiotic resistance and septicemia. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic utility of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in bacterial infections versus non-infectious causes of inflammation.

Methods

A prospective study included 164 adult patients who were divided into two groups: a group of patients with confirmed bacterial infections and a second group of patients with other diagnoses (inflammatory pathologies, neoplasms, venous thromboembolic diseases, etc.). NLR and PLR values were compared between the bacterial infection group and the non-infectious causes group and the diagnostic performances of NLR and PLR for detecting bacterial infections were evaluated in comparison with other infection markers.

Results

NLR and PLR were significantly higher in bacterial infections (p < 10 ^-6), and NLR was correlated positively with inflammation markers. NLR and PLR demonstrated significant potential in diagnosing bacterial infections, with an AUC of 0.72 and 0.60, respectively, using the following cutoff values: 4.3 for NLR and 183 for PLR.

Conclusion

These findings underscore the importance of NLR and PLR as adjunctive tools for bacterial infection diagnosis.

Comparison of the accuracy of hematological parameters in the diagnosis of neonatal sepsis: a network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Currently, there are hundreds of hematological parameters used for rapid diagnosis of neonatal sepsis, but there is no network meta-analysis to compare the diagnostic efficacy of these parameters.

METHODS

We searched for literature on the diagnostic neonatal sepsis and selected 20 of the most common parameters to compare their diagnostic efficacy. We used Bayesian network meta-analysis, Frequentist network meta-analysis, and individual traditional diagnostic meta-analysis to analyze the data and verify the stability of the results. Based on the above analysis, we ranked the diagnostic efficacy of 20 parameters and searched for the optimal indicator. We also conducted subgroup analysis based on different designs. GRADE was used to evaluate the quality of evidence.

RESULTS

311 articles were included in the analysis, of which 206 articles were included in the network meta-analysis. Bayesian models fond the top three of the advantage index were P-SEP, SAA, and CD64. In Individual model, P-SEP, SAA, and CD64 had the best sensitivity; ABC, SAA, and P-SEP had the best specificity. Frequentist model showed that CD64, P-SEP, and IL-10 ranked in the top three for sensitivity, while P-SEP, ABC, and I/M in specificity. Overall, P-SEP, SAA, CD64, and PCT have good sensitivity and specificity among all the three methods. The results of subgroup analysis were consistent with the overall analysis. All evidence was mostly of moderate or low quality.

CONCLUSIONS

P-SEP, SAA, CD64, and PCT have good diagnostic efficacy for neonatal sepsis. However, further studies are required to confirm these findings.

Assessment of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, platelet to lymphocyte ratio and systemic immune-inflammatory index, as diagnostic markers for neonatal sepsis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and systemic immune-inflammatory index (SII), as diagnostic markers for neonatal sepsis.

METHODS

This retrospective study involve neonates with sepsis and healthy neonates as controls. NLR, PLR, and SII were compared between groups.

RESULT

In total, 60 neonates with sepsis and 60 healthy controls were involved in the study. Compared with controls, the sepsis group had higher values for NLR, PLR and SII. Logistic regression analysis suggested that the NLR, PLR and SII were independent risk factors for neonatal sepsis. In addition, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis indicated that the NLR, PLR and SII were reliable predictors of neonatal sepsis and SII had the best predictive value.

CONCLUSIONS

NLR, PLR and SII appear to be useful indicators for predicting neonatal sepsis.

Role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio in diagnosing neonatal sepsis

Clinical manifestations of neonatal sepsis are often unspecified. Therefore, sepsis biomarkers could be used to support diagnosis while waiting for blood culture results, such as the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR). The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of NLR and PLR as diagnostic markers in neonatal sepsis. A cross-sectional study was conducted at Haji Adam Malik General Hospital, Medan, Indonesia, from April to October 2019. This study included neonates aged less than 28 days, diagnosed with suspected sepsis, and had no previous history of antibiotics administration. Patients underwent clinical assessment, laboratory examination, and blood culture. Patients were grouped into sepsis and non-sepsis based on the blood culture results. The median hematological examination and the range of NLR and PLR in both the sepsis and non-sepsis groups were subjected to analysis using the Mann-Whitney U test to assess differences. NLR and PLR optimal cut-off values were determined using a receiver operator curve (ROC) with a confidence interval of 95%. A total of 137 neonates were enrolled, of which 49 were classified as sepsis and 89 as non-sepsis based on blood culture results. The optimal cutoff values for NLR and PLR were 2.75 and 11.73. Using those cutoff values, NLR and PLR could predict neonatal sepsis with sensitivities of 52.1% and 47.9%, specificities of 50.6% and 47.2%, area under the curve (AUC) of 0.46 and 0.47, with p=0.525 and p=0.662, respectively. Further investigation is warranted to refine the NLR and PLR utility and enhance diagnostic accuracy in clinical practices.

Predictive Role of NLR, dNLR, PLR, NLPR, and Other Laboratory Markers in Diagnosing SIRS in Premature Newborns

BACKGROUND

Premature newborns are at a significant risk for Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome SIRS, a condition associated with high morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive and diagnostic capability of laboratory markers like Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR), derived Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio (dNLR), Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (PLR), and Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte-to-Platelet Ratio (NLPR) in diagnosing SIRS in premature newborns.

METHODS

Premature newborns with and without SIRS were evaluated in a prospective design during a one-year period. Among 136 newborns, early and 72 h post-birth analyses were performed.

RESULTS

At 24 h, NLR's cutoff value was 8.69, yielding sensitivity and specificity rates of 52.77% and 83.47% (p = 0.0429), respectively. The dNLR showed a cutoff of 5.61, with corresponding rates of 63.27% and 84.15% (p = 0.0011), PLR had a cutoff of 408.75, with rates of 51.89% and 80.22% (p = 0.1026), and NLPR displayed a cutoff of 0.24, with rates of 75.85% and 86.70% (p = 0.0002). At 72 h, notable sensitivity and specificity improvements were observed, particularly with NLPR having a cutoff of 0.17, showing sensitivity of 77.74% and specificity of 95.18% (p < 0.0001). NLR above the cutoff indicated a 33% increase in SIRS risk, with a hazard ratio (HR)of 1.33. The dNLR was associated with a twofold increase in risk (HR 2.04). NLPR demonstrated a significant, over threefold increase in SIRS risk (HR 3.56), underscoring its strong predictive and diagnostic value for SIRS development.

CONCLUSION

Integrating these findings into clinical practice could enhance neonatal care by facilitating the early identification and management of SIRS, potentially improving outcomes for this vulnerable population.

Abnormal neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in children with autism spectrum disorder and history of maternal immune activation

Maternal immune activation (MIA), related to autoimmune/inflammatory diseases or acute infections, during the two first trimesters of pregnancy is a risk factor for autism spectrum disorders (ASD) in offspring. In mice, MIA has a long-term impact on offspring's immune equilibrium resulting in a pro-inflammatory phenotype. We therefore hypothesized that children with ASD and a history of MIA could display a similar phenotype specifically assessed by a higher neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR). In this study, we used a retrospective sample of 231 dyads involving children with ASD and their mothers. Among ASD patients, 12% had a history of MIA. The multivariate analysis revealed a significant association between NLR in children with ASD and maternal history of MIA (F = 2.27, p = 0.03). Using a categorical approach, we observed an abnormal NLR (over 3) in 7.4% of children with ASD MIA+ compared to 1.9% for MIA-. Our study supports the hypothesis suggesting an impact of MIA on the risk of ASD. Further studies could contribute to the development of biomarkers in MIA+ ASD and enable the development of targeted immunomodulatory therapies.

The Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) Can Predict Sepsis's Presence and Severity in Malnourished Infants-A Single Center Experience

Sepsis represents one of the leading causes of death in newborns and infants, and prompt diagnosis is essential for achieving favorable outcomes. Regarding malnourished children with concurrent infection, most studies have focused, besides blood culture, on C-reactive protein and procalcitonin. Because malnutrition has a deleterious effect on cellular immune competence, the present study characterized the acute-phase response, including hematological indices, in response to sepsis. Among the examined laboratory biomarkers, procalcitonin and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio were the most accurate discriminators between sepsis patients and those with bacterial infection. Moreover, these two parameters showed a gradual increase between sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock patients (p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis of the sepsis group revealed positive correlations of NLR with prolonged ICU stay (<0.001), acute organ dysfunction (0.038), mechanical ventilation (<0.001), and fatality (<0.001). In summary, our results suggest that the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio can be used as an auxiliary diagnostic index in discriminating the presence and severity of bacterial sepsis in malnourished infants.