Development and implementation of the first national data quality standards for population-based birth defects surveillance programs in the United States

CDC COVID-19 Vaccine Pregnancy Registry: Design, data collection, response rates, and cohort description

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) developed and implemented the CDC COVID-19 Vaccine Pregnancy Registry (C19VPR) to monitor vaccine safety. Potential participants who received a COVID-19 vaccine in pregnancy or up to 30 days prior to their pregnancy-associated last menstrual period were eligible to participate in the registry, which monitored health outcomes of participants and their infants through phone interviews and review of available medical records. Data for select outcomes, including birth defects, were reviewed by clinicians. In certain cases, medical records were used to confirm and add detail to participant-reported health conditions. This paper serves as a description of CDC C19VPR protocol. We describe the development and implementation for each data collection aspect of the registry (i.e., participant phone interviews, clinical review, and medical record abstraction), data management, and strengths and limitations. We also describe the demographics and vaccinations received among eligible and enrolled participants. There were 123,609 potential participants 18-54 years of age identified from January 2021 through mid-June 2021; 23,339 were eligible and enrolled into the registry. Among these, 85.3 % consented to medical record review for themselves and/or their infants. Participants were majority non-Hispanic White (79.1 %), residents of urban areas (93.3 %), and 48.3 % were between 30 and 34 years of age. Most participants completed the primary series of vaccination by the end of pregnancy (89.7 %). Many participants were healthcare personnel (44.8 %), possibly due to the phased roll-out of the vaccination program. The registry continues to provide important information about the safety of COVID-19 vaccination among pregnant people, a population with higher risk of poor outcomes from COVID-19 who were not included in pre-authorization clinical trials. Lessons learned from the registry may guide development and implementation of future vaccine safety monitoring efforts for pregnant people and their infants.

12-Year Trends of Orofacial Clefts in the United States: Highlighting Racial/Ethnic Differences in Prevalence of Cleft Lip and Cleft Palate

OBJECTIVE

Discrepancies in prevalence among infants with orofacial clefts are public health research priorities. Our objective was to calculate updated estimated prevalence of orofacial clefts in the United States, with sub-analyses by racial/ethnic group.

DESIGN

The National Birth Defect Prevention Network database was used to evaluate trends in cases with orofacial cleft in the United States from 2006 to 2018. Cases with cleft lip with and without cleft palate (CL ± P) and cleft palate (CP) alone were sub-stratified by racial/ethnic category. Estimated prevalence was calculated using the total live births reported in each maternal racial/ethnic group. The odds ratio (OR) was calculated to measure the strength of association between racial/ethnic group and risk of orofacial clefts.

RESULTS

Estimated prevalence rates show that maternally-reported Native American/Alaskan Native individuals were 43.8% (p < 0.0001) and 36.0% (p < 0.0001) more likely to have CL ± P and CP alone, respectively, compared to maternally-reported non-Hispanic White individuals. Estimated prevalence of CL ± P in maternally-reported non-Hispanic Black individuals (OR = 0.64) and maternally-reported Asians/Pacific Islander individuals were significantly lower than in maternally-reported non-Hispanic White individuals (OR = 0.63, p < 0.0001). Estimated prevalence of CP alone was significantly lower in maternally-reported non-Hispanic Black individuals (OR = 0.64, p < 0.0001), maternally-reported Asians/Pacific Islander individuals (OR = 0.69, p < 0.0001), and maternally-reported Hispanic individuals (OR = 0.81, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Across the total population, there was no significant change in estimated orofacial cleft prevalence. However, there were significant disproportions in estimated orofacial cleft prevalence across racial/ethnic groups, which may guide further discussion among craniofacial health care providers and centers and their patients regarding differences in cleft risk factors.

Louis AM, Agopian AJ. Scientific impact of the National Birth Defects Prevention Network multistate collaborative publications

BACKGROUND

Given the lack of a national, population-based birth defects surveillance program in the United States, the National Birth Defects Prevention Network (NBDPN) has facilitated important studies on surveillance, research, and prevention of major birth defects. We sought to summarize NBDPN peer-reviewed publications and their impact.

METHODS

We obtained and reviewed a curated list of 49 NBDPN multistate collaborative publications during 2000-2022, as of December 31, 2022. Each publication was reviewed and classified by type (e.g., risk factor association analysis). Key characteristics of study populations and analytic approaches used, along with publication impact (e.g., number of citations), were tabulated.

RESULTS

NBDPN publications focused on prevalence estimates (N = 17), surveillance methods (N = 11), risk factor associations (N = 10), mortality and other outcomes among affected individuals (N = 6), and descriptive epidemiology of various birth defects (N = 5). The most cited publications were those that reported on prevalence estimates for a spectrum of defects and those that assessed changes in neural tube defects (NTD) prevalence following mandatory folic acid fortification in the United States.

CONCLUSIONS

Results from multistate NBDPN publications have provided critical information not available through other sources, including US prevalence estimates of major birth defects, folic acid fortification and NTD prevention, and improved understanding of defect trends and surveillance efforts. Until a national birth defects surveillance program is established in the United States, NBDPN collaborative publications remain an important resource for investigating birth defects and informing decisions related to health services planning of secondary disabilities prevention and care.

Racial and ethnic differences in infant survival for hydrocephaly-Texas, 1999-2017

BACKGROUND

Congenital hydrocephaly, an abnormal accumulation of fluid within the ventricular spaces at birth, can cause disability or death if untreated. Limited information is available about survival of infants born with hydrocephaly in Texas. Therefore, the purpose of the study was to calculate survival estimates among infants born with hydrocephaly without spina bifida in Texas.

METHODS

A cohort of live-born infants delivered during 1999-2017 with congenital hydrocephaly without spina bifida was identified from the Texas Birth Defects Registry. Deaths within 1 year of delivery were identified using vital and medical records. One-year infant survival estimates were generated for multiple descriptive characteristics using the Kaplan-Meier method. Crude hazard ratios (HRs) for one-year survival among infants with congenital hydrocephaly by maternal and infant characteristics and adjusted HRs for maternal race and ethnicity were estimated using Cox proportional hazard models.

RESULTS

Among 5709 infants born with congenital hydrocephaly without spina bifida, 4681 (82%) survived the first year. The following characteristics were associated with infant survival: maternal race and ethnicity, clinical classification (e.g., chromosomal or syndromic), preterm birth, birth weight, birth year, and maternal education. In the multivariable Cox proportional hazards model, differences in survival were observed by maternal race and ethnicity after adjustment for other maternal and infant characteristics. Infants of non-Hispanic Black (HR: 1.28, 95% CI: 1.04-1.58) and Hispanic (HR: 1.31, 95% CI: 1.12-1.54) women had increased risk for mortality, compared with infants of non-Hispanic White women.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed infant survival among a Texas cohort differed by maternal race and ethnicity, clinical classification, gestational age, birth weight, birth year, and maternal education in infants with congenital hydrocephaly without spina bifida. Findings confirm that mortality continues to be common among infants with hydrocephaly without spina bifida. Additional research is needed to identify other risk factors of mortality risk.

Enhancing Data Quality in a Statewide Birth Defects Registry: Insights from an Ongoing Quality Improvement Initiative

Background

Since 1999, the Texas Birth Defects Registry (TBDR) has conducted active statewide surveillance of congenital anomalies in Texas. The TBDR has established quality assurance procedures and protocols. With the aim of supplementing these existing procedures with a new approach to proactively identify operational issues impacting data quality, we sought to implement a survey to identify procedural and operational challenges and develop strategies to mitigate the effects of practices (eg, changes in reporting practices at hospitals), external events (eg, pandemics), and other issues that may impact data quality.

Methods

An open-text, anonymous survey was developed and distributed to TBDR staff. The survey elicited responses from staff related to TBDR operations, partnerships, and communication with external health care facilities. In years 2 and 3, the survey was abbreviated from 9 to 3 questions.

Results

Completion rates were 45%, 74%, and 49% in years 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Thematic analysis across all 3 years identified 7 primary themes: (1) data timeliness, (2) data quality improvements, (3) workflow optimization, (4) fundamental training needs, (5) specialized or technical training needs, (6) system challenges, and (7) internal communication and coordination.

Conclusions

This project provides a proof-of-concept that active surveillance birth defects registries can collect information on data quality-related staff experiences in a real-time, systematic manner and implement short- and long-term strategies to address data quality. The survey results prompted internal strategic planning, additional employee training initiatives, and data system enhancements. Additional work is needed to monitor the long-term improvements resulting from these strategic actions. The data quality survey results and implemented strategies may be useful to other surveillance programs.

Zika virus as a cause of birth defects: Were the teratogenic effects of Zika virus missed for decades?

Zika virus (ZIKV) was identified as a teratogen in 2016 when an increase in severe microcephaly and other brain defects was observed in fetuses and newborns following outbreaks in French Polynesia (2013-2014) and Brazil (2015-2016) and among travelers to other countries experiencing outbreaks. Some have questioned why ZIKV was not recognized as a teratogen before these outbreaks: whether novel genetic changes in ZIKV had increased its teratogenicity or whether its association with birth defects had previously been undetected. Here we examine the evidence for these two possibilities. We describe evidence for specific mutations that arose before the French Polynesia outbreak that might have increased ZIKV teratogenicity. We also present information on children born with findings consistent with congenital Zika syndrome (CZS) as early as 2009 and epidemiological evidence that suggests increases in CZS-type birth defects before 2013. We also explore reasons why a link between ZIKV and birth defects might have been missed, including issues with surveillance of ZIKV infections and of birth defects, challenges to ZIKV diagnostic testing, and the susceptibility of different populations to ZIKV infection at the time of pregnancy. Although it is not possible to prove definitively that ZIKV had teratogenic properties before 2013, several pieces of evidence support the hypothesis that its teratogenicity had been missed in the past. These findings emphasize the need for further investments in global surveillance for emerging infections and for birth defects so that infectious teratogens can be identified more expeditiously in the future.

The risk of major structural birth defects associated with seasonal influenza vaccination during pregnancy: A population-based cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Seasonal inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV) is routinely recommended during pregnancy to protect both mothers and infants from complications following influenza infection. While previous studies have evaluated the risk of major structural birth defects in infants associated with prenatal administration of monovalent pandemic IIV, fewer studies have evaluated the risk associated with prenatal seasonal IIV.

METHODS

We conducted a population-based cohort study of 125,866 singleton births between 2012 and 2016 in Western Australia. Birth registrations were linked to the state's registers for congenital anomalies and a state prenatal vaccination database. We estimated prevalence ratios (PR) of any major structural birth defect and defects by organ system. Vaccinated pregnancies were defined as those with a record of IIV in the first trimester. Inverse probability treatment weighting factored for baseline probability for vaccination. A Bonferroni correction was applied to account for multiple comparisons.

RESULTS

About 3.9% of births had a major structural birth defect. Seasonal IIV exposure during the first trimester was not associated with diagnosis of any major structural birth defect diagnosed within 1 month of birth (PR 0.98, 95% CI: 0.77, 1.28) or within 6 years of life (PR 1.02, 95% CI: 0.78, 1.35). We identified no increased risk in specific birth defects associated with seasonal IIV.

CONCLUSION

Based on registry data for up to 6 years of follow-up, results suggest there is no association between maternal influenza vaccination and risk of major structural birth defects. These results support the safety of seasonal IIV administration during pregnancy.

Frequency of chromosomal syndromes in the Brazilian population between 2017 and 2021

Objective: To evaluate the frequency of chromosomal syndromes in the Brazilian population between 2017 and 2021. Methods: This is an active search of open access databases of the Information System on Live Births (SINASC) from the Brazilian Ministry of Health from 2017 to 2021. For statistical analysis, Analysis of Variance (One-way ANOVA) was followed by the Bonferroni post-test, considering a significant level of p < 0,05. The chi-square test was used for correlation analysis. Results: The underreporting of congenital anomalies in Brazil has decreased over the last few years, showing significant values; however, those numbers varied between regions. The chromosomal syndromes with the highest incidence were Down Syndrome (76.15%), Edwards and Patau Syndromes (14.59%) grouped in the same ICD-10, with the South and Southeast regions, with an average frequency of 0.07%, as the leader in notifications. The maternal variables with a higher incidence of chromosomal syndromes were women over 35 years of age, with 8 to 11 years of schooling, and married. Conclusion: There was a decrease in the value related to underreporting over the years. The data show a disparity in the notification of chromosomal syndromes between regions and outline the maternal profile of a higher incidence of chromosomal syndromes.

Inadequacies of hospital-level critical congenital heart disease screening data reports: implications for research and quality efforts

OBJECTIVE

Assess the quality of critical congenital heart disease (CCHD) screening data reports in California, where CCHD screening is not mandatory but reporting is.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review of California hospital-level CCHD screening data to evaluate data reliability and adherence to state screening and reporting recommendations. Data were evaluated for internal consistency and compared to two databases.

RESULTS

Over one-third of hospitals did not submit data. Only 70.7% of the Vital Records live births were reported in CCHD screening data. Only 46% of reporting hospitals submitted data with matching numbers of completed screens and results, and 22% matched their respective live births in a second database.

CONCLUSION

CCHD data reporting in California is incomplete, which may miss 359 CCHD cases/year from non-reporting. Data inconsistencies may miss additional cases. Mandatory screening, reporting, and improvements in data reliability are urgently needed to inform screening modifications and enhance timely detection and disease surveillance.

Risk of Stillbirth for Fetuses With Specific Birth Defects

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the risk of stillbirth (fetal death at 20 weeks of gestation or more) associated with specific birth defects.

METHODS

We identified a population-based retrospective cohort of neonates and fetuses with selected major birth defects and without known or strongly suspected chromosomal or single-gene disorders from active birth defects surveillance programs in nine states. Abstracted medical records were reviewed by clinical geneticists to confirm and classify all birth defects and birth defect patterns. We estimated risks of stillbirth specific to birth defects among pregnancies overall and among those with isolated birth defects; potential bias owing to elective termination was quantified.

RESULTS

Of 19,170 eligible neonates and fetuses with birth defects, 17,224 were liveborn, 852 stillborn, and 672 electively terminated. Overall, stillbirth risks ranged from 11 per 1,000 fetuses with bladder exstrophy (95% CI 0-57) to 490 per 1,000 fetuses with limb-body-wall complex (95% CI 368-623). Among those with isolated birth defects not affecting major vital organs, elevated risks (per 1,000 fetuses) were observed for cleft lip with cleft palate (10; 95% CI 7-15), transverse limb deficiencies (26; 95% CI 16-39), longitudinal limb deficiencies (11; 95% CI 3-28), and limb defects due to amniotic bands (110; 95% CI 68-171). Quantified bias analysis suggests that failure to account for terminations may lead to up to fourfold underestimation of the observed risks of stillbirth for sacral agenesis (13/1,000; 95% CI 2-47), isolated spina bifida (24/1,000; 95% CI 17-34), and holoprosencephaly (30/1,000; 95% CI 10-68).

CONCLUSION

Birth defect-specific stillbirth risk was high compared with the U.S. stillbirth risk (6/1,000 fetuses), even for isolated cases of oral clefts and limb defects; elective termination may appreciably bias some estimates. These data can inform clinical care and counseling after prenatal diagnosis.

Relationship of databases of live births and infant deaths for analysis of congenital malformations

Abstract Objectives: to describe the prevalence of congenital malformations in live births in Recife, based on the relationship of birth and infant death data. Methods: a cross-sectional study with data from the Live Birth Information System (Sinasc) and Mortality (MIS) of residents in Recife-PE between 2013 and 2015. The deterministic linkage of deaths and live births (LB) with malformation and the prevalence rate were calculated. Results: 545 (95.1%) deaths and live births were matched. According to the Sinasc, the prevalence of congenital malformations was 10.4 per 1,000 LB. After the linkage, the rate was 12.4. Malformations of the musculoskeletal system (42.1%) among live births were high-lighted, as well as malformations of the circulatory system (35.3%) found in infant deaths. Conclusions: linkage increased the prevalence of congenital malformations in the studied cohort. This demonstrates the potential of this strategy for the monitoring of congenital malformations, which can be used to monitor infant death.

National population-based estimates for major birth defects, 2010-2014

BACKGROUND

Using the National Birth Defects Prevention Network (NBDPN) annual data report, U.S. national prevalence estimates for major birth defects are developed based on birth cohort 2010-2014.

METHODS

Data from 39 U.S. population-based birth defects surveillance programs (16 active case-finding, 10 passive case-finding with case confirmation, and 13 passive without case confirmation) were used to calculate pooled prevalence estimates for major defects by case-finding approach. Fourteen active case-finding programs including at least live birth and stillbirth pregnancy outcomes monitoring approximately one million births annually were used to develop national prevalence estimates, adjusted for maternal race/ethnicity (for all conditions examined) and maternal age (trisomies and gastroschisis). These calculations used a similar methodology to the previous estimates to examine changes over time.

RESULTS

The adjusted national birth prevalence estimates per 10,000 live births ranged from 0.62 for interrupted aortic arch to 16.87 for clubfoot, and 19.93 for the 12 critical congenital heart defects combined. While the birth prevalence of most birth defects studied remained relatively stable over 15 years, an increasing prevalence was observed for gastroschisis and Down syndrome. Additionally, the prevalence for atrioventricular septal defect, tetralogy of Fallot, omphalocele, and trisomy 18 increased in this period compared to the previous periods. Active case-finding programs generally had higher prevalence rates for most defects examined, most notably for anencephaly, anophthalmia/microphthalmia, trisomy 13, and trisomy 18.

CONCLUSION

National estimates of birth defects prevalence provide data for monitoring trends and understanding the impact of these conditions. Increasing prevalence rates observed for selected conditions warrant further examination.

Identification of the essential components of quality in the data collection process for public health information systems

This study identifies essential components in the data collection process for public health information systems based on appraisal and synthesis of the reported factors affecting this process in the literature. Extant process assessment instruments and studies of public health data collection from electronic databases and the relevant institutional websites were reviewed and analyzed following a five-stage framework. Four dimensions covering 12 factors and 149 indicators were identified. The first dimension, data collection management, includes data collection system and quality assurance. The second dimension, data collector, is described by staffing pattern, skill or competence, communication and attitude toward data collection. The third, information system, is assessed by function and technology support, integration of different data collection systems, and device. The fourth dimension, data collection environment, comprises training, leadership, and funding. With empirical testing and contextual analysis, these essential components can be further used to develop a framework for measuring the quality of the data collection process for public health information systems.

A proposal for the systematic assessment of data quality indicators in birth defects surveillance

BACKGROUND

Quality control and improvement are a key part of the implementation of an effective surveillance program. Data quality indicators (DQI) are key tools but have not been widely used, especially in a low-resource setting.

METHODS

We developed a list of data quality indicators of birth defects surveillance. These DQI address ascertainment, description, coding, and classification.

RESULTS

We developed 40 DQI that can be used widely to assess the quality of data relative to birth defects of major clinical and public health impact.

CONCLUSIONS

DQI have to be both comprehensive (e.g., assess all main surveillance processes) and practical (not require sophisticated or costly data elements), so that they can be used effectively in many different settings. We propose this list of DQI for use in surveillance program as a way to document the quality of the program; detect variations within and between programs, and support quality improvements.

Status of population-based birth defects surveillance programs before and after the Zika public health response in the United States

BACKGROUND

The 2016 Zika public health response in the United States highlighted the need for birth defect surveillance (BDS) programs to collect population-based data on birth defects potentially related to Zika as rapidly as possible through enhanced case ascertainment and reporting. The National Birth Defects Prevention Network (NBDPN) assessed BDS program activities in the United States before and after the Zika response.

METHODS

The NBDPN surveyed 54 BDS programs regarding activities before and after the Zika response, lessons learned, and programmatic needs. Follow-up emails were sent and phone calls were held for programs with incomplete or no response to the online survey. Survey data were cleaned and tallied, and responses to open-ended questions were placed into best-fit categories.

RESULTS

A 100% response rate was achieved. Of the 54 programs surveyed, 42 reported participation in the Zika public health response that included BDS activities. Programs faced challenges in expanding their surveillance effort given the response requirements but reported mitigating factors such as establishing and enhancing partnerships and program experience with surveillance and clinical activities. Beyond funding, reported program needs included training, surveillance tools/resources, and availability of clinical experts.

CONCLUSIONS

Existing BDS programs with experience implementing active case-finding and case verification were able to adapt their surveillance efforts rapidly to collect and report data necessary for the Zika response. Program sustainability for BDS remains challenging; thus, continued support, training, and resource development are important to ensure that the infrastructure built during the Zika response is available for the next public health response.

Population-based pregnancy and birth defects surveillance in the era of Zika virus

BACKGROUND

Zika virus is a newly recognized human teratogen; monitoring its impact on the birth prevalence of microcephaly and other adverse pregnancy outcomes will continue to be an urgent need in the United States and worldwide.

METHODS

When the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) activated the Emergency Operations Center for the Zika virus outbreak response in January of 2016, public health leadership recognized that a joint, coordinated effort was required between activities focused on the effects of the infection among pregnant women and those focused on birth defects in fetuses and infants. Before the introduction of Zika virus in the Americas, population-based birth defects surveillance occurred independently of pregnancy surveillance activities.

RESULTS

The coordination of pregnancy surveillance and birth defects surveillance implemented through the CDC Zika virus response represents a paradigm shift.

CONCLUSION

Coordination of these surveillance systems provides an opportunity to capture information from both a prospective and retrospective approach. This relatively modest investment in the public health infrastructure can continue to protect pregnant women and their infants during the ongoing response to Zika virus and in the next emergent threat to maternal and child health. Birth Defects Research 109:372-378, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Identifying Algorithms to Improve the Accuracy of Unverified Diagnosis Codes for Birth Defects

OBJECTIVES

We identified algorithms to improve the accuracy of passive surveillance programs for birth defects that rely on administrative diagnosis codes for case ascertainment and in situations where case confirmation via medical record review is not possible or is resource prohibitive.

METHODS

We linked data from the 2009-2011 Florida Birth Defects Registry, a statewide, multisource, passive surveillance program, to an enhanced surveillance database with selected cases confirmed through medical record review. For each of 13 birth defects, we calculated the positive predictive value (PPV) to compare the accuracy of 4 algorithms that varied case definitions based on the number of diagnoses, medical encounters, and data sources in which the birth defect was identified. We also assessed the degree to which accuracy-improving algorithms would affect the Florida Birth Defects Registry's completeness of ascertainment.

RESULTS

The PPV generated by using the original Florida Birth Defects Registry case definition (ie, suspected cases confirmed by medical record review) was 94.2%. More restrictive case definition algorithms increased the PPV to between 97.5% (identified by 1 or more codes/encounters in 1 data source) and 99.2% (identified in >1 data source). Although PPVs varied by birth defect, alternative algorithms increased accuracy for all birth defects; however, alternative algorithms also resulted in failing to ascertain 58.3% to 81.9% of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that surveillance programs that rely on unverified diagnosis codes can use algorithms to dramatically increase the accuracy of case finding, without having to review medical records. This can be important for etiologic studies. However, the use of increasingly restrictive case definition algorithms led to a decrease in completeness and the disproportionate exclusion of less severe cases, which could limit the widespread use of these approaches.

Accuracy of birth certificate head circumference measurements: Massachusetts, 2012-2013

BACKGROUND

Zika virus has recently emerged as a novel cause of microcephaly. CDC has asked states to rapidly ascertain and report cases of Zika-linked birth defects, including microcephaly. Massachusetts added head circumference to its birth certificate (BC) in 2011. The accuracy of head circumference measurements from state vital records data has not been reported.

METHODS

We sought to assess the accuracy of Massachusetts BC head circumference measurements by comparing them to measurements for 2,217 infants born during 2012-2013 captured in the Massachusetts Birth Defects Monitoring Program (BDMP) data system. BDMP contains information abstracted directly from infant medical records and served as the true head circumference value (i.e., gold standard) for analysis. We calculated the proportion of head circumference measurements in agreement between the BC and BDMP data. We assigned growth chart head circumference percentile categories to each BC and BDMP measurement, and calculated the sensitivity and specificity of BC-based categories to predict BDMP-based categories.

RESULTS

No difference was found in head circumference measurements between the two sources in 77.9% (n = 1,727) of study infants. The sensitivity of BC-based head circumference percentile categories ranged from 85.6% (<3rd percentile) to 92.7% (≥90th percentile) and the specificity ranged from 97.6% (≥90th percentile) to 99.3% (<3rd percentile).

CONCLUSIONS

BC head circumference measurements agreed with those abstracted from the medical chart the majority of the time. Head circumference measurements on the BC were more specific than sensitive across all standardized growth chart percentile categories.

Using State Birth Defects Registries to Evaluate Regional Critical Congenital Heart Disease Newborn Screening

BACKGROUND

Most states have now passed legislation mandating pulse oximetry for all newborns, or have promulgated regulations or guidelines to encourage use of routine pulse oximetry. State-based birth defects registries may be well positioned to track and evaluate critical congenital heart disease (CCHD) screening coverage and outcomes. This purpose of this study was to determine: (1) the proportion of cases detected by screening, (2) health services use by children with CCHDs during the first year of life, and (3) mortality outcomes.

METHODS

Records of children born in 2012 to 2013 with any of seven CCHD lesions were identified in New England birth defects databases. Information was abstracted from each child's medical record. Descriptive statistics were used to report results.

RESULTS

From nearly 160,000 live births, 208 CCHD diagnoses were noted in the records of 157 children. Screening was noted in 67% of records of confirmed cases of CCHDs. Data completeness varied by state; for example, information was available regarding prenatal diagnosis in 91% of records and age at first surgery in 85% among states with active surveillance compared with 35% and 75%, respectively, with passive surveillance. Documentation of screening results in medical records was inconsistent. The one year survival was 85% (77/91).

CONCLUSION

Birth defects surveillance systems can provide information on outcomes for infants with CCHDs. However, information varies by surveillance method and by hospital practices. Engaging hospitals in standardizing recording procedures and enhancing training and quality control could increase the value of birth defects registries records in assessing outcomes for children identified through CCHD screening. Birth Defects Research 109:1414-1422, 2017.© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

The prevalence of selected major birth defects in the United States

Although collectively they are fairly common, birth defects receive limited attention as a group of outcomes either clinically or from a public health perspective. This article provides an overview of the prevalence, trends and selected socio-demographic risk factors for several major birth defects, including neural tube defects, cranio-facial anomalies, congenital heart defects, trisomies 13, 18, and 21, and gastroschisis and omphalocele. Attention should focus on strengthening existing registries, creating birth defects surveillance programs in states that do not have them, and standardizing registry methods so that broadly national data to monitor these trends are available.

Evaluation of the Sensitivity and Accuracy of Birth Defects Indicators on the 2003 Revision of the U.S. Birth Certificate: Has Data Quality Improved?

BACKGROUND

The 2003 revision of the U.S. Birth Certificate was restricted to birth defects readily identifiable at birth. Despite being the lone source of birth defects cases in some studies, we lack population-based information on the quality of birth defects data from the most recent revision of the birth certificate.

METHODS

We linked birth certificate data to confirmed cases from the Florida Birth Defects Registry (FBDR) to assess the sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) of birth defects indicators on the birth certificate. Descriptive statistics and log-binomial regression were used to examine variation in data quality measures by defect type and other characteristics. We also evaluated the contribution of birth certificates as a case ascertainment source for the FBDR.

RESULTS

Sensitivity of the birth certificate was poor (19.1%) with variation across defects ranging from 55% for anencephaly and 54% for gastroschisis, to <10% for other defects. PPV was better (87.1%) and ranged from >93% for orofacial clefts and gastroschisis to <55% for anencephaly and limb reduction defects. We also observed variation in data quality across maternal, infant, and hospital characteristics. Of cases identified by the birth certificate and not any other FBDR data source, 54.9% were false-positive diagnoses.

CONCLUSIONS

Efforts to restrict the 2003 revision of the birth certificate to defects identifiable at birth have not improved the likelihood that birth certificates will identify infants born with those defects. We do not recommend the use of birth certificates as a source of birth defects data without case verification strategies.