1
|
Qin L, Fan Z, Shi Q, Hu H, Ma F, Huang Y, Tan F. Relationship between life's essential 8 and the risk of gestational diabetes among us adults. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2024; 37:2407037. [PMID: 39313412 DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2024.2407037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2024] [Revised: 08/18/2024] [Accepted: 09/16/2024] [Indexed: 09/25/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study is to explore the relationship between Life's Essential 8 (LE8) and the risk of gestational diabetes among US adults. METHOD We used National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys 2007-2018 data to perform this study. LE8 scores comprised 4 health behaviors (diet, physical activity, nicotine exposure, and sleep duration) and 4 health factors (BMI, non-high-density lipoprotein [HDL] cholesterol, blood glucose, and blood pressure). Then, LE8 were categorized into low CVH (0 to 49 scores), moderated CVH (50 to 79 scores), and high CVH (80 to 100 scores). Weighted multivariate Logistic regression analysis model were used to estimate the relationship between LE8 and gestational diabetes. RESULT A total of 3,189 participants were included, and the portion of gestational diabetes was 15.33%, 11.46%, 7.71% in low CVH, moderate CVH, and high CVH, respectively. Adjustment for covariates, we found that high CVH (OR: 0.49, 95%CI: 0.29-0.83, p = 0.01) was associated with decreased of gestational diabetes, not moderate CVH (OR: 0.78, 95%CI: 0.50-1.20, p = 0.25). This inverse associations were dose-response dependent (p-nonlinear = 0.982). This inverse associations were significant in subgroup. Significant interaction between CVH and family diabetes with the risk of gestational diabetes was found (P for interaction = 0.04). High CVH (OR: 0.357, 95%CI: 0.176-0.724, p = 0.005) could significantly decrease the risk of gestational diabetes in the population with family diabetes. The results were generally robust in sensitivity analyses after excluding of ASCVD participants. CONCLUSION The high CVH could decrease the risk of gestational diabetes, especially in the population of family diabetes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lu Qin
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Maternal and Child Health and Family Planning Service Center of Enshi Tujia and Miao Autonomous Prefecture, Enshi, China
| | - Zhixing Fan
- Department of Cardiology, the First College of Clinical Medical Sciences, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, China
| | - Qian Shi
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Lichuan People's Hospital, Enshi, China
| | - Hao Hu
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Lichuan People's Hospital, Enshi, China
| | - Fang Ma
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Lichuan People's Hospital, Enshi, China
| | - Yanlin Huang
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Maternal and Child Health and Family Planning Service Center of Enshi Tujia and Miao Autonomous Prefecture, Enshi, China
| | - Fengzhi Tan
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Maternal and Child Health and Family Planning Service Center of Enshi Tujia and Miao Autonomous Prefecture, Enshi, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nilsson I, Busck-Rasmussen M, Villadsen SF. Development of a complex intervention to strengthen municipality-based breastfeeding support to reduced social inequity in breastfeeding. Arch Public Health 2024; 82:174. [PMID: 39358759 PMCID: PMC11447984 DOI: 10.1186/s13690-024-01401-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2024] [Accepted: 09/17/2024] [Indexed: 10/04/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breastfeeding is the ideal nutrition for infants and protects infants and mothers from a range of adverse health outcomes during their lifespan. In Denmark, while the breastfeeding initiation rate is high, only 14% of mothers meet the World Health Organization's recommendation of exclusive breastfeeding at six months. Furthermore, a notable social inequity exists among those who achieve this recommendation. Knowledge of effective interventions to reduce breastfeeding inequity is limited. A previous hospital-based intervention succeeded in increasing breastfeeding duration. However, most breastfeeding support is provided in Danish municipalities by health visitors. This called for adapting the intervention to the health visiting program and developing an intensified intervention addressing the social inequity in breastfeeding. This article describes the adaptation and development process of a municipality-based intervention. METHODS During a 15-month period in 2020-21, the municipal intervention was iteratively developed using a three-stage framework for developing complex health interventions described by Hawkins et al. The three stages were 1) need assessment and stakeholder consultation, 2) co-production and 3) prototyping. The process was inspired by O'Cathain et al.'s principles for a user-centred, co-created and theory- and evidence-based approach, involving parents and health visitors. RESULTS In stage 1, we identified the needs and priorities of the target groups of the intervention. In stage 2, the intervention was developed through action research design and inspired by Duus' 'learning cycles' as the method to enhance motivation and ownership and to strengthen the implementation process by creating a joint room for learning and reflection with health visitors and developers. In stage 3, the intervention was tested for feasibility and usefulness during a 2.5-month period accompanied by monthly dialogue meetings with health visitors and developers. In this period, the intervention was refined based on the gathered experiences and was subsequently prepared for evaluation. CONCLUSION The description of the development of this complex intervention, aimed at increasing breastfeeding duration and reducing inequity, offers breastfeeding practitioners and researchers a transparent foundation for continuously improving breastfeeding support and a methodology for complex intervention development. TRIAL REGISTRATION Registered at Clinical Trials NCT05311631.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ingrid Nilsson
- Danish Committee for Health Education, Classensgade 71, 5, Copenhagen, 2100, Denmark.
| | | | - Sarah Fredsted Villadsen
- Section of Social Medicine, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, CCS, Øster Farimagsgade 5A, Copenhagen, 1353, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Simmons D, Gupta Y, Hernandez TL, Levitt N, van Poppel M, Yang X, Zarowsky C, Backman H, Feghali M, Nielsen KK. Call to action for a life course approach. Lancet 2024; 404:193-214. [PMID: 38909623 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(24)00826-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2024] [Revised: 04/08/2024] [Accepted: 04/19/2024] [Indexed: 06/25/2024]
Abstract
Gestational diabetes remains the most common medical disorder in pregnancy, with short-term and long-term consequences for mothers and offspring. New insights into pathophysiology and management suggest that the current gestational diabetes treatment approach should expand from a focus on late gestational diabetes to a personalised, integrated life course approach from preconception to postpartum and beyond. Early pregnancy lifestyle intervention could prevent late gestational diabetes. Early gestational diabetes diagnosis and treatment has been shown to be beneficial, especially when identified before 14 weeks of gestation. Early gestational diabetes screening now requires strategies for integration into routine antenatal care, alongside efforts to reduce variation in gestational diabetes care, across settings that differ between, and within, countries. Following gestational diabetes, an oral glucose tolerance test should be performed 6-12 weeks postpartum to assess the glycaemic state. Subsequent regular screening for both dysglycaemia and cardiometabolic disease is recommended, which can be incorporated alongside other family health activities. Diabetes prevention programmes for women with previous gestational diabetes might be enhanced using shared decision making and precision medicine. At all stages in this life course approach, across both high-resource and low-resource settings, a more systematic process for identifying and overcoming barriers to preventative care and treatment is needed to reduce the current global burden of gestational diabetes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Simmons
- School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - Yashdeep Gupta
- Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Teri L Hernandez
- College of Nursing, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA; Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism, and Diabetes, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA; Children's Hospital Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Naomi Levitt
- Chronic Disease Initiative for Africa, Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Mireille van Poppel
- Department of Human Movement Science, Sport and Health, University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Xilin Yang
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - Christina Zarowsky
- Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada; CReSP Public Health Research Centre, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Helena Backman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Maisa Feghali
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Karoline Kragelund Nielsen
- Department of Prevention, Health Promotion and Community Care, Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Fehsenfeld M, Maindal HT, Burau V. Rethinking organizational culture in intersectoral coordination: the perspective of boundary work. J Health Organ Manag 2024; ahead-of-print. [PMID: 38796749 DOI: 10.1108/jhom-03-2023-0063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/28/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this paper is to rethink the concept of organizational culture as something that emerges bottom-up by using the sociological concepts of boundary object and boundary work as an analytical lens and to show how this approach can help understand and facilitate intersectoral coordination. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH We used observations and qualitative interviews to develop "deep" knowledge about processes of intersectoral coordination. The study draws on a conceptual framework of "boundary work" and "boundary objects" to show how a bottom-up perspective on organizational culture can produce better understanding of and pave the way for intersectoral coordination. We use a case of health professionals engaged in two Danish intersectoral programs developing and providing health promotion services for women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). FINDINGS The study showed how boundary work revolves around negotiations on how to define, understand and act on the diagnosis of GDM. This diagnosis has the characteristics of a "boundary object", being more loosely structured in general terms, but strongly structured in local settings. Boundary objects help connect different professionals and facilitate coordination. The analysis showed how the introduction of time and the concept of "lifelong health promotion" helped to transgress existing organizational and professional boundaries. RESEARCH LIMITATIONS/IMPLICATIONS The findings contribute to the literature on organizational culture and intersectoral coordination. We highlight the benefits of a practice-oriented, bottom-up perspective for a better understanding of how shared meaning is produced in cross professional coordination and collaboration. While the theoretical implications will be general applicable when studying organizational culture, the implications for practice are sensitive to context and the processes we have described as the outcomes of boundary work are generated from cases that were most likely to provide deep insight into our research topic. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS For practice this can build bridges between organizational and professional boundaries. ORIGINALITY/VALUE The findings contribute to the literature on organizational culture and intersectoral coordination. We highlight the benefits of a practice-oriented, bottom-up perspective for a better understanding of how shared meaning is produced in cross professional coordination. This may build bridges between organizational and professional boundaries in practice settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Helle Terkildsen Maindal
- Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Health Promotion Unit, Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Gentofte, Denmark
| | - Viola Burau
- Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Pfledderer CD, von Klinggraeff L, Burkart S, da Silva Bandeira A, Lubans DR, Jago R, Okely AD, van Sluijs EMF, Ioannidis JPA, Thrasher JF, Li X, Beets MW. Consolidated guidance for behavioral intervention pilot and feasibility studies. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2024; 10:57. [PMID: 38582840 PMCID: PMC10998328 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-024-01485-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2023] [Accepted: 03/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/08/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the behavioral sciences, conducting pilot and/or feasibility studies (PFS) is a key step that provides essential information used to inform the design, conduct, and implementation of a larger-scale trial. There are more than 160 published guidelines, reporting checklists, frameworks, and recommendations related to PFS. All of these publications offer some form of guidance on PFS, but many focus on one or a few topics. This makes it difficult for researchers wanting to gain a broader understanding of all the relevant and important aspects of PFS and requires them to seek out multiple sources of information, which increases the risk of missing key considerations to incorporate into their PFS. The purpose of this study was to develop a consolidated set of considerations for the design, conduct, implementation, and reporting of PFS for interventions conducted in the behavioral sciences. METHODS To develop this consolidation, we undertook a review of the published guidance on PFS in combination with expert consensus (via a Delphi study) from the authors who wrote such guidance to inform the identified considerations. A total of 161 PFS-related guidelines, checklists, frameworks, and recommendations were identified via a review of recently published behavioral intervention PFS and backward/forward citation tracking of a well-known PFS literature (e.g., CONSORT Ext. for PFS). Authors of all 161 PFS publications were invited to complete a three-round Delphi survey, which was used to guide the creation of a consolidated list of considerations to guide the design, conduct, and reporting of PFS conducted by researchers in the behavioral sciences. RESULTS A total of 496 authors were invited to take part in the three-round Delphi survey (round 1, N = 46; round 2, N = 24; round 3, N = 22). A set of twenty considerations, broadly categorized into six themes (intervention design, study design, conduct of trial, implementation of intervention, statistical analysis, and reporting) were generated from a review of the 161 PFS-related publications as well as a synthesis of feedback from the three-round Delphi process. These 20 considerations are presented alongside a supporting narrative for each consideration as well as a crosswalk of all 161 publications aligned with each consideration for further reading. CONCLUSION We leveraged expert opinion from researchers who have published PFS-related guidelines, checklists, frameworks, and recommendations on a wide range of topics and distilled this knowledge into a valuable and universal resource for researchers conducting PFS. Researchers may use these considerations alongside the previously published literature to guide decisions about all aspects of PFS, with the hope of creating and disseminating interventions with broad public health impact.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher D Pfledderer
- Department of Health Promotion and Behavioral Sciences, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Public Health in Austin, Austin, TX, 78701, USA.
- Michael and Susan Dell Center for Healthy Living, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Public Health in Austin, Austin, TX, 78701, USA.
| | | | - Sarah Burkart
- Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, 29205, USA
| | | | - David R Lubans
- College of Human and Social Futures, The University of Newcastle Australia, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia
| | - Russell Jago
- Bristol Medical School, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1QU, UK
| | - Anthony D Okely
- Faculty of Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities, School of Health and Society, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, 2522, Australia
| | | | - John P A Ioannidis
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
- Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
- Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
- Department of Statistics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
- Meta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford (METRICS), Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - James F Thrasher
- Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, 29205, USA
| | - Xiaoming Li
- Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, 29205, USA
| | - Michael W Beets
- Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, 29205, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Minschart C, Myngheer N, Maes T, De Block C, Van Pottelbergh I, Abrams P, Vinck W, Leuridan L, Driessens S, Mathieu C, Billen J, Matthys C, Laenen A, Bogaerts A, Benhalima K. Effectiveness of a blended mobile-based lifestyle intervention in women with glucose intolerance after a recent history of gestational diabetes (MELINDA): a 1-year, prospective, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. EClinicalMedicine 2024; 70:102523. [PMID: 38495521 PMCID: PMC10940944 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102523] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2023] [Revised: 02/02/2024] [Accepted: 02/20/2024] [Indexed: 03/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Women with glucose intolerance after gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) are at high risk to develop type 2 diabetes. Traditional lifestyle interventions in early postpartum have limited impact. We investigated the efficacy of a blended mobile-based lifestyle intervention in women with glucose intolerance after a recent history of GDM. Methods Prospective, double-arm, non-masked, multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT) in which women with glucose intolerance, diagnosed 6-16 weeks after a GDM-complicated pregnancy, were assigned 1:1 to a one-year blended-care, telephone- and mobile-based lifestyle program (intervention) or usual care (control). Primary endpoint was the proportion of women able to achieve their weight goal (≥5% weight loss if prepregnancy BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 or return to prepregnancy weight if prepregnancy BMI < 25 kg/m2) in the intention-to-treat sample. Key secondary outcomes were frequency of glucose intolerance, diabetes and metabolic syndrome, and lifestyle-related outcomes assessed with self-administered questionnaires. The study was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03559621). Findings Between April 10th 2019 and May 13th 2022, 240 participants were assigned to the intervention (n = 121) or control group (n = 119), of which 167 (n = 82 in intervention and n = 85 in control group) completed the study. Primary outcome was achieved by 46.3% (56) of intervention participants compared to 43.3% (52) in the control group [odds ratio (OR) 1.13, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.63-2.03, p = 0.680; risk ratio 1.07, 95% CI (0.78-1.48)]. Women in the intervention group developed significantly less often metabolic syndrome compared to the control group [7.3% (6) vs. 16.5% (14), OR 0.40, CI (0.22-0.72), p = 0.002], reported less sedentary behaviour and higher motivation for continuing healthy behaviours. In the intervention group, 84.1% (69) attended at least eight telephone sessions and 70.7% (58) used the app at least once weekly. Interpretation A blended, mobile-based lifestyle intervention was not effective in achieving weight goals, but reduced the risk to develop metabolic syndrome. Funding Research fund of University Hospitals Leuven, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, AstraZeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Lilly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caro Minschart
- Department of Endocrinology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium
| | - Nele Myngheer
- Department of Endocrinology, General Hospital Groeninge, Kortrijk 8500, Belgium
| | - Toon Maes
- Department of Endocrinology, Imelda Hospital, Bonheiden 2820, Belgium
| | - Christophe De Block
- Department of Endocrinology-Diabetology-Metabolism, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem 2650, Belgium
| | | | - Pascale Abrams
- Department of Endocrinology, ZAS Sint-Vincentius, Antwerp 2018, Belgium
- Department of Endocrinology, ZAS Sint-Augustinus, Wilrijk 2610, Belgium
| | - Wouter Vinck
- Department of Endocrinology, ZAS Sint-Augustinus, Wilrijk 2610, Belgium
| | - Liesbeth Leuridan
- Department of Endocrinology, General Hospital Klina, Brasschaat 2930, Belgium
| | - Sabien Driessens
- Department of Endocrinology, General Hospital Klina, Brasschaat 2930, Belgium
| | - Chantal Mathieu
- Department of Endocrinology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium
- Clinical and Experimental Endocrinology, Department of Chronic Diseases and Metabolism, KU Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium
| | - Jaak Billen
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium
| | - Christophe Matthys
- Department of Endocrinology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium
- Clinical and Experimental Endocrinology, Department of Chronic Diseases and Metabolism, KU Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium
| | - Annouschka Laenen
- Centre of Biostatics and Statistical Bioinformatics, KU Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium
| | - Annick Bogaerts
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium
- Faculty of Health, University of Plymouth, Devon PL4 8AA, United Kingdom
| | - Katrien Benhalima
- Department of Endocrinology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium
- Clinical and Experimental Endocrinology, Department of Chronic Diseases and Metabolism, KU Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Thornton JM, Shah NM, Lillycrop KA, Cui W, Johnson MR, Singh N. Multigenerational diabetes mellitus. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2024; 14:1245899. [PMID: 38288471 PMCID: PMC10822950 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1245899] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2023] [Accepted: 12/27/2023] [Indexed: 02/01/2024] Open
Abstract
Gestational diabetes (GDM) changes the maternal metabolic and uterine environment, thus increasing the risk of short- and long-term adverse outcomes for both mother and child. Children of mothers who have GDM during their pregnancy are more likely to develop Type 2 Diabetes (T2D), early-onset cardiovascular disease and GDM when they themselves become pregnant, perpetuating a multigenerational increased risk of metabolic disease. The negative effect of GDM is exacerbated by maternal obesity, which induces a greater derangement of fetal adipogenesis and growth. Multiple factors, including genetic, epigenetic and metabolic, which interact with lifestyle factors and the environment, are likely to contribute to the development of GDM. Genetic factors are particularly important, with 30% of women with GDM having at least one parent with T2D. Fetal epigenetic modifications occur in response to maternal GDM, and may mediate both multi- and transgenerational risk. Changes to the maternal metabolome in GDM are primarily related to fatty acid oxidation, inflammation and insulin resistance. These might be effective early biomarkers allowing the identification of women at risk of GDM prior to the development of hyperglycaemia. The impact of the intra-uterine environment on the developing fetus, "developmental programming", has a multisystem effect, but its influence on adipogenesis is particularly important as it will determine baseline insulin sensitivity, and the response to future metabolic challenges. Identifying the critical window of metabolic development and developing effective interventions are key to our ability to improve population metabolic health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer M. Thornton
- Department of Academic Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Chelsea & Westminster NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion & Reproduction, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Nishel M. Shah
- Department of Academic Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Chelsea & Westminster NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion & Reproduction, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Karen A. Lillycrop
- Institute of Developmental Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Wei Cui
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion & Reproduction, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Mark R. Johnson
- Department of Academic Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Chelsea & Westminster NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion & Reproduction, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Natasha Singh
- Department of Academic Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Chelsea & Westminster NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion & Reproduction, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Pfledderer CD, von Klinggraeff L, Burkart S, da Silva Bandeira A, Lubans DR, Jago R, Okely AD, van Sluijs EM, Ioannidis JP, Thrasher JF, Li X, Beets MW. Expert Perspectives on Pilot and Feasibility Studies: A Delphi Study and Consolidation of Considerations for Behavioral Interventions. RESEARCH SQUARE 2023:rs.3.rs-3370077. [PMID: 38168263 PMCID: PMC10760234 DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3370077/v1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
Background In the behavioral sciences, conducting pilot and/or feasibility studies (PFS) is a key step that provides essential information used to inform the design, conduct, and implementation of a larger-scale trial. There are more than 160 published guidelines, reporting checklists, frameworks, and recommendations related to PFS. All of these publications offer some form of guidance on PFS, but many focus on one or a few topics. This makes it difficult for researchers wanting to gain a broader understanding of all the relevant and important aspects of PFS and requires them to seek out multiple sources of information, which increases the risk of missing key considerations to incorporate into their PFS. The purpose of this study was to develop a consolidated set of considerations for the design, conduct, implementation, and reporting of PFS for interventions conducted in the behavioral sciences. Methods To develop this consolidation, we undertook a review of the published guidance on PFS in combination with expert consensus (via a Delphi study) from the authors who wrote such guidance to inform the identified considerations. A total of 161 PFS-related guidelines, checklists, frameworks, and recommendations were identified via a review of recently published behavioral intervention PFS and backward/forward citation tracking of well-know PFS literature (e.g., CONSORT Ext. for PFS). Authors of all 161 PFS publications were invited to complete a three-round Delphi survey, which was used to guide the creation of a consolidated list of considerations to guide the design, conduct, and reporting of PFS conducted by researchers in the behavioral sciences. Results A total of 496 authors were invited to take part in the Delphi survey, 50 (10.1%) of which completed all three rounds, representing 60 (37.3%) of the 161 identified PFS-related guidelines, checklists, frameworks, and recommendations. A set of twenty considerations, broadly categorized into six themes (Intervention Design, Study Design, Conduct of Trial, Implementation of Intervention, Statistical Analysis and Reporting) were generated from a review of the 161 PFS-related publications as well as a synthesis of feedback from the three-round Delphi process. These 20 considerations are presented alongside a supporting narrative for each consideration as well as a crosswalk of all 161 publications aligned with each consideration for further reading. Conclusion We leveraged expert opinion from researchers who have published PFS-related guidelines, checklists, frameworks, and recommendations on a wide range of topics and distilled this knowledge into a valuable and universal resource for researchers conducting PFS. Researchers may use these considerations alongside the previously published literature to guide decisions about all aspects of PFS, with the hope of creating and disseminating interventions with broad public health impact.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Sarah Burkart
- University of South Carolina Arnold School of Public Health
| | | | | | - Russ Jago
- University of Bristol Population Health Sciences
| | | | | | | | | | - Xiaoming Li
- University of South Carolina Arnold School of Public Health
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
O'Reilly SL, McAuliffe FM, Geraghty AA, Burden C, Davies A. Implementing weight management during and after pregnancy to reduce diabetes and CVD risk in maternal and child populations. Proc Nutr Soc 2023:1-12. [PMID: 38037711 DOI: 10.1017/s0029665123004883] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2023]
Abstract
Maintaining a healthy weight during pregnancy is critical for both women's and children's health. Excessive gestational weight gain (GWG) can lead to complications such as gestational diabetes, hypertension and caesarean delivery. Insufficient GWG can cause fetal growth restriction and increase infant mortality risk. Additionally, postpartum weight retention raises risk of obesity, type 2 diabetes and other chronic diseases for both mother and child. This review seeks to identify current obstacles in weight management research during and after pregnancy and explore evidence-based strategies to overcome them. Pregnancy offers a window of opportunity for health behaviour changes as women are more receptive to education and have regular contact with health services. Staying within Institute of Medicine's recommended GWG ranges is associated with better maternal and fetal outcomes. Systematic review evidence supports structured diet and physical activity pregnancy interventions, leading to reduced GWG and fewer complications. Health economic evaluation indicates significant returns from implementation, surpassing investment costs due to decreased perinatal morbidity and adverse events. However, the most effective way to implement interventions within routine antenatal care remains unclear. Challenges increase in the postpartum period due to competing demands on women physically, mentally and socially, hindering intervention reach and retention. Flexible, technology-supported interventions are needed, requiring frameworks such as penetration-implementation-participation-effectiveness and template-for-intervention-description-and-replication for successful implementation. Greater research efforts are necessary to inform practice and investigate fidelity aspects through pragmatic implementation trials during the pregnancy and postpartum periods. Understanding the best ways to deliver interventions will empower women to maintain a healthy weight during their reproductive years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sharleen L O'Reilly
- School of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin College of Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland
- UCD Perinatal Research Centre, National Maternity Hospital, University College Dublin School of Medicine, Dublin 2, Ireland
| | - Fionnuala M McAuliffe
- UCD Perinatal Research Centre, National Maternity Hospital, University College Dublin School of Medicine, Dublin 2, Ireland
| | - Aisling A Geraghty
- School of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin College of Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland
- UCD Perinatal Research Centre, National Maternity Hospital, University College Dublin School of Medicine, Dublin 2, Ireland
| | - Christy Burden
- Academic Women's Health Unit, Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Anna Davies
- Academic Women's Health Unit, Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Jensen NH, Kragelund Nielsen K, Dahl-Petersen IK, Kampmann U, Damm P, Ovesen P, Mathiesen ER, Vinter CA, Davidsen E, Thøgersen M, Timm A, Andersen LLT, Knorr S, Jensen DM, Maindal HT. Health promotion intervention among women with recent gestational diabetes mellitus: penetration, participation, and baseline findings from the Face-it randomized controlled trial. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care 2023; 11:e003529. [PMID: 37793679 PMCID: PMC10551966 DOI: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2023-003529] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2023] [Accepted: 08/24/2023] [Indexed: 10/06/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Face-it is a randomized controlled trial for women with recent gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and their families designed to evaluate the effect of a health promotion intervention on type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) risk and quality of life. This study examined (1) the penetration and participation rates for the Face-it trial, (2) the characteristics of the participating women and the potential differences in characteristics according to partner participation status, and (3) representativity of the women at baseline. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We identified women with GDM during pregnancy and invited them and their partners to a baseline examination 10-14 weeks after delivery. Representativity was assessed by comparing the baseline participants with non-participating women, the general population of women with GDM delivering in Denmark, and populations from other intervention trials. RESULTS The penetration rate was 38.0% (867/2279) and the participation rate was 32.9% (285/867). The 285 women who attended baseline had a mean age of 32.7 (±4.8) years and body mass index (BMI) of 28.1 (±5.4) kg/m2, and 69.8% had a partner who participated. The women participating with a partner were more often primiparous, born in Denmark (82.8% vs 68.2%), were younger, and more often had a BMI ≤24.9 kg/m2 (35.7% vs 21.2%) compared with women without a partner. Compared with the general population of women with GDM in Denmark, these women broadly had similar degree of heterogeneity, but had higher rates of primiparity and singleton deliveries, and lower rates of preterm delivery and prepregnancy obesity. CONCLUSIONS The penetration and participation rates were acceptable. We found a high rate of partner participation. Overall, women participating with a partner were comparable with those participating without a partner. Participating women were broadly similar to the general national GDM population, however with prepregnancy obesity, multiparity, preterm delivery, and multiple pregnancy being less represented. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT03997773.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Karoline Kragelund Nielsen
- Health Promotion Research, Copenhagen University Hospital - Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Inger Katrine Dahl-Petersen
- Health Promotion Research, Copenhagen University Hospital - Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Ulla Kampmann
- Steno Diabetes Center Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Peter Damm
- Center for Pregnant Women with Diabetes, Departments of Endocrinology and Obstetrics, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Per Ovesen
- Steno Diabetes Center Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Obstetrics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Elisabeth Reinhardt Mathiesen
- Center for Pregnant Women with Diabetes, Departments of Endocrinology and Obstetrics, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Christina Anne Vinter
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Emma Davidsen
- Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Health Promotion Research, Copenhagen University Hospital - Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Maja Thøgersen
- Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Health Promotion Research, Copenhagen University Hospital - Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Anne Timm
- Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Health Promotion Research, Copenhagen University Hospital - Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark
| | | | - Sine Knorr
- Steno Diabetes Center Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Dorte Møller Jensen
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Steno Diabetes Center Odense, Odense, Denmark
| | - Helle Terkildsen Maindal
- Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Health Promotion Research, Copenhagen University Hospital - Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Timm A, Kragelund Nielsen K, Alvesson HM, Jensen DM, Maindal HT. Motivation for Behavior Change among Women with Recent Gestational Diabetes and Their Partners-A Qualitative Investigation among Participants in the Face-It Intervention. Nutrients 2023; 15:3906. [PMID: 37764690 PMCID: PMC10535498 DOI: 10.3390/nu15183906] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2023] [Revised: 08/26/2023] [Accepted: 09/06/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Promoting diet and physical activity is important for women with recent gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and their partners to reduce the risk of future type 2 diabetes (T2D). The study aimed to understand how motivation for changing diet and physical activity behaviors among women with recent GDM and their partners was experienced after participation in the Danish Face-it intervention. Fourteen couples' interviews were conducted. Data analysis followed a reflexive thematic analysis. Guided by self-determination theory and interdependence theory, we identified four themes affecting couples' motivation for health behavior change: (1) The need to feel understood after delivery; (2) adjusting health expectations; (3) individual and mutual preferences for health behaviors; and (4) the health threat of future T2D as a cue to action. We found that couples in general perceived the Face-it intervention as useful and motivating. Using couple interviews increased our understanding of how the women and partners influenced each other's perspectives after a GDM-affected pregnancy and thus how targeting couples as opposed to women alone may motivate health behavior change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Timm
- Health Promotion Research, Copenhagen University Hospital—Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, 2730 Herlev, Denmark; (K.K.N.); (H.T.M.)
- Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Karoline Kragelund Nielsen
- Health Promotion Research, Copenhagen University Hospital—Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, 2730 Herlev, Denmark; (K.K.N.); (H.T.M.)
| | | | - Dorte Møller Jensen
- Steno Diabetes Center Odense, Odense University Hospital, 5000 Odense, Denmark;
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Odense University Hospital, 5000 Odense, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, 5000 Odense, Denmark
| | - Helle Terkildsen Maindal
- Health Promotion Research, Copenhagen University Hospital—Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, 2730 Herlev, Denmark; (K.K.N.); (H.T.M.)
- Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Murphy K, Berk J, Muhwava-Mbabala L, Booley S, Harbron J, Ware L, Norris S, Zarowsky C, Lambert EV, Levitt NS. Using the COM-B model and Behaviour Change Wheel to develop a theory and evidence-based intervention for women with gestational diabetes (IINDIAGO). BMC Public Health 2023; 23:894. [PMID: 37189143 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-15586-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2021] [Accepted: 04/02/2023] [Indexed: 05/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In South Africa, the prevalence of gestational diabetes (GDM) is growing, concomitant with the dramatically increasing prevalence of overweight/obesity among women. There is an urgent need to develop tailored interventions to support women with GDM to mitigate pregnancy risks and to prevent progression to type 2 diabetes post-partum. The IINDIAGO study aims to develop and evaluate an intervention for disadvantaged GDM women attending three large, public-sector hospitals for antenatal care in Cape Town and Soweto, SA. This paper offers a detailed description of the development of a theory-based behaviour change intervention, prior to its preliminary testing for feasibility and efficacy in the health system. METHODS The Behaviour Change Wheel (BCW) and the COM-B model of behaviour change were used to guide the development of the IINDIAGO intervention. This framework provides a systematic, step-by-step process, starting with a behavioural analysis of the problem and making a diagnosis of what needs to change, and then linking this to intervention functions and behaviour change techniques to bring about the desired result. Findings from primary formative research with women with GDM and healthcare providers were a key source of information for this process. RESULTS Key objectives of our planned intervention were 1) to address women's evident need for information and psychosocial support by positioning peer counsellors and a diabetes nurse in the GDM antenatal clinic, and 2) to offer accessible and convenient post-partum screening and counselling for sustained behaviour change among women with GDM by integrating follow-up into the routine immunisation programme at the Well Baby clinic. The peer counsellors and the diabetes nurse were trained in patient-centred, motivational counselling methods. CONCLUSIONS This paper offers a rich description and analysis of designing a complex intervention tailored to the challenging contexts of urban South Africa. The BCW was a valuable tool to use in designing our intervention and tailoring its content and format to our target population and local setting. It provided a robust and transparent theoretical foundation on which to develop our intervention, assisted us in making the hypothesised pathways for behaviour change explicit and enabled us to describe the intervention in standardised, precisely defined terms. Using such tools can contribute to improving rigour in the design of behavioural change interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION First registered on 20/04/2018, Pan African Clinical Trials Registry (PACTR): PACTR201805003336174.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine Murphy
- Department of Medicine, Chronic Disease Initiative for Africa (CDIA), University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
| | - Jamie Berk
- Department of Medicine, Chronic Disease Initiative for Africa (CDIA), University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Lorrein Muhwava-Mbabala
- Department of Medicine, Chronic Disease Initiative for Africa (CDIA), University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Sharmilah Booley
- Department of Human Biology, Division of Human Nutrition, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Janetta Harbron
- Department of Human Biology, Division of Human Nutrition, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Lisa Ware
- Department of Paediatrics, MRC/WITS Developmental Pathways for Health Research Unit (DPHRU), University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Shane Norris
- Department of Paediatrics, MRC/WITS Developmental Pathways for Health Research Unit (DPHRU), University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
- South African Medical Research Council (SAMRC), Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Christina Zarowsky
- Public Health Research Centre (CReSP - Centre de recherche en santé publique de l'Université de Montréal et du CIUSSS de Centre-Sud de Montréal), Montreal, Canada
- Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada
- School of Public Health, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Estelle V Lambert
- Department of Human Biology, Division of Physiological Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Research Centre for Health Through Physical Activity, Lifestyle and Sport (HPALS), University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Naomi S Levitt
- Department of Medicine, Chronic Disease Initiative for Africa (CDIA), University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
McIntyre HD, Fuglsang J, Kampmann U, Knorr S, Ovesen P. Hyperglycemia in Pregnancy and Women's Health in the 21st Century. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:16827. [PMID: 36554709 PMCID: PMC9779688 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192416827] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2022] [Revised: 12/07/2022] [Accepted: 12/12/2022] [Indexed: 05/09/2023]
Abstract
Hyperglycemia is the commonest medical condition affecting pregnancy and its incidence is increasing globally in parallel with the twin epidemics of diabetes and obesity. Both pre-pregnancy diabetes and gestational diabetes are associated with short term pregnancy complications, with the risk of immediate complications generally broadly rising with more severe hyperglycemia. In this article we firstly consider these risks and their optimal management during pregnancy and then broaden our scope to consider the long-term implications of hyperglycemia in pregnancy as it relates to overall maternal and offspring health in a life course perspective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harold David McIntyre
- Mater Research, The University of Queensland, South Brisbane, QLD 4101, Australia
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Jens Fuglsang
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark
- Steno Diabetes Center Aarhus, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Aarhus University Hospital, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Ulla Kampmann
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark
- Steno Diabetes Center Aarhus, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Sine Knorr
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark
- Steno Diabetes Center Aarhus, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Per Ovesen
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark
- Steno Diabetes Center Aarhus, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Aarhus University Hospital, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
OUP accepted manuscript. Health Promot Int 2022; 37:ii60-ii72. [DOI: 10.1093/heapro/daac031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|