"The missing ingredient": the patient perspective of health related quality of life in bronchiectasis: a qualitative study

Patient perspectives of airway clearance techniques in bronchiectasis

INTRODUCTION

While airway clearance techniques (ACTs) are recommended for individuals with bronchiectasis, data suggests the use of and adherence to ACTs is poor.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to identify patient perceptions regarding ACTs, the barriers and facilitators to ACTs, and factors affecting adherence.

METHODS

A multi-center qualitative study using in-depth semi-structured interviews of individuals with bronchiectasis was undertaken. All interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data was analyzed using the thematic framework approach described by Braun and Clark. NVIVO™ 12 software assisted with coding and thematic analysis of the interview transcripts. Data saturation was achieved when no new common themes were identified. Findings were summarized into major conceptual themes. Participant demographic data was also obtained.

RESULTS

Twenty-four participants participated in semi-structured interviews. The main facilitators to using ACTs included a perceived health and quality of life benefit, a tailored approach to ACTs and the use of self-management strategies. Main barriers included lack of time and motivation, lack of access to resources, and a lack of perceived health benefit. A number of factors were identified by participants that may help promote adherence including combining and trialing different ACTs, receiving regular ACT reviews and education from physiotherapists, and having good social support.

CONCLUSION

To assist the personalized prescription of ACTs, these facilitators and barriers should be considered by clinicians to help promote adherence and improve patient outcomes.

COPD Assessment Test and risk of readmission in patients with bronchiectasis: a prospective cohort study

Introduction

Readmission following bronchiectasis exacerbation is a common and challenging clinical problem and few simple predictive tools exist. The COPD Assessment Test (CAT) is an easy-to-use questionnaire. This study aims to evaluate the predictive value of CAT scores in determining the risk of readmission in patients with bronchiectasis exacerbation.

Methods

We conducted a prospective cohort study in 106 bronchiectasis patients admitted with exacerbation. All patients completed the CAT at admission and at discharge. Patients were followed-up for 12 months to collect data on readmission. The area under the curve was used to measure the predictive value of CAT at admission, CAT at discharge and change in CAT for readmission due to bronchiectasis exacerbation.

Results

46 patients were readmitted for bronchiectasis exacerbation within 12 months. High CAT at admission was an independent risk factor for readmission within 12 months in patients with acute exacerbation of bronchiectasis (hazard ratio 3.201, 95% CI 1.065-9.624; p<0.038) after adjustment for confounding variables. The cut-off value of CAT at admission and CAT at discharge to predict 12-month readmission in patients with acute exacerbation of bronchiectasis was 23.5 (sensitivity 62.2%, specificity 83.6%) and 15.5 (sensitivity 52.2%, specificity 87.0%).

Conclusions

CAT at admission is a strong predictor of readmission in patients with bronchiectasis exacerbation.

Outcomes of physiotherapy for people living with bronchiectasis: qualitative study to inform development of a core outcome set

INTRODUCTION

Evidence of the effectiveness of physiotherapy for bronchiectasis is inconsistent, partly due to variation in the selection and reporting of outcomes in clinical trials. This qualitative study is a component of the development of a core outcome set (COS). The COS will identify a minimum group of outcomes for use in clinical trials of physiotherapy considering the views of researchers, patients, and clinicians.

OBJECTIVES

To identify outcomes for use in physiotherapy research that are important to patients and physiotherapists and to explain their significance.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with adult patients with bronchiectasis who received physiotherapy, in addition to physiotherapists clinically involved in bronchiectasis care. Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis was used to identify, classify, and explain the significance of outcomes. Outcomes were mapped into the list created from literature review and classified into domains.

RESULTS

We interviewed 18 participants from four countries covering a range of experiences in different settings. Seventy outcomes were identified and grouped into 15 domains. Thirty-three outcomes were not previously reported in the literature. Thematic analysis revealed exacerbations, quality of life, use of healthcare resources, patient-reported symptoms, physical functioning, and sputum as the prominent themes reported by both patients and physiotherapists.

CONCLUSIONS

This qualitative study highlighted the importance of considering stakeholder perspectives when planning research trials. Outcomes identified will be used to inform the next phase of COS development.

REGISTRATION

This study is part of the COS development project registered with the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials initiative (COMET) https://www.comet-initiative.org/Studies/Details/1931 CONTRIBUTION OF THE PAPER.

Sore and tired. A qualitative study exploring the symptom experience of youth with bronchiectasis

This qualitative study was conducted to explore the experiences of youth living with bronchiectasis in New Zealand (NZ). Semi-structured interviews were conducted with youth with bronchiectasis. Key themes were identified using an inductive approach through constant comparative analysis and guided by Thorne's interpretive description (ID). Fifteen young people of mixed ethnicity (nine females and six males) aged between 13 and 23 years participated. Three key themes 'sore and tired', 'life interrupted and 'looking after self' were identified. This paper will focus on 'sore and tired' and its three subthemes which describe the participants symptom experience. While there was variability in physical symptom patterns, cough, soreness and fatigue were prominent features impacting physical, emotional and social aspects of day-to-day life. All identified pervasive and profound fatigue as significant. The identification of prodromal symptoms provides opportunity for greater appreciation of the varied and personal symptom experience of young people with bronchiectasis. Early identification of these symptoms and inclusion within management plans for escalating treatment has the potential to improve outcomes, reducing delays in seeking additional medical management and preventing further exacerbation.

Measurement properties of physical activity in adults with bronchiectasis: A systematic review protocol

People with bronchiectasis reduce their physical activity (PA) due to muscle weakness, dyspnea, fatigue, reduced exercise capacity and frequent cough with expectoration. Patient-reported and objective physical assessment methods have been used to evaluate PA in people with bronchiectasis. In the literature, significant differences in the PA measured using patient-reported outcome measures when compared with the objective methods. Given the availability of many PA assessment tools, it is tedious for the clinician or researcher to choose an outcome measure for clinical practice or research. The evidence on validity and reliability in bronchiectasis are unclear. Objectives: To identify the PA assessment tools, describe and evaluate the literature on psychometric properties of instruments measuring and analyzing PA. Methods: The search will be conducted in PubMed/Medline, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Studies, Scopus and EMBASE databases. The keywords, index terms and synonyms of the following words will be used: bronchiectasis, physical activity, and outcome measures. Published studies of adult with clinical and/ or radiologically diagnosed bronchiectasis, aged >18 years, any gender and studies that assessed PA and/or if there are reports on measurement properties of PA will be included in the review. Studies using qualitative research methods, narrative reviews, letters to editors and editorials will be excluded. The quality of the study will be assessed and data will be extracted. Any disagreement will be resolved in the presence of an author not involved in the screening or selecting studies. Discussion: By assessing the quality of studies on measurement properties, this review will help researchers choose the outcome measure to evaluate the effects of interventions on PA. This review will identify the suite of outcome measures of PA for people with bronchiectasis that can be used for research and clinical purpose.

Development of a core outcome set and outcome measurement set for physiotherapy trials in adults with Bronchiectasis (COS-PHyBE study): A protocol

Background

Bronchiectasis is a chronic respiratory disease characterised by airways widening and recurrent infections, resulting in episodes of chronic cough, sputum expectoration, and dyspnoea. This leads to deterioration in daily function, repeated hospital admissions and poor quality of life. The prevalence and mortality related to bronchiectasis is increasing worldwide with growing economic burden on healthcare systems. Physiotherapy for bronchiectasis aims to decrease accumulation of sputum, dyspnoea, and improve exercise capacity and daily function. A robust evidence base to support physiotherapy in bronchiectasis is currently lacking. This is partly because of inconsistency and poor reporting of outcomes in available studies.

A core outcome set is the minimum acceptable group of outcomes that should be used in clinical trials for a specific condition. This decreases research waste by improving consistency and reporting of key outcomes and facilitates the synthesis of study outcomes in systematic reviews and guidelines.

The aim of the study is therefore to develop a core outcome set and outcome measurement set for physiotherapy research in adults with bronchiectasis. This will ensure outcomes important to key stakeholders are consistently used and reported in future research.

Methods and analysis

This project will use the COMET Initiative and COSMIN guidelines of core outcome set development and will include three phases. In the first phase, a comprehensive list of outcomes will be developed using systematic review of reported outcomes and qualitative interviews with patients and physiotherapists. Then consensus on key outcomes will be established in phase two using a Delphi survey and a consensus meeting. Finally, in phase three, we will identify appropriate instruments to measure the core outcomes by evaluating the psychometric properties of available instruments and a stakeholders’ meeting to establish consensus.

Ethics

The study was reviewed and has received ethical approval from the health-related Research Ethics Committee- Edge Hill University (ETH2021-0217).

Registration

This study is registered with the COMET database. https://www.comet-initiative.org/Studies/Details/1931.

The full systematic review protocol is registered in PROSPERO under the number CRD42021266247.

The clinical impact of self-reported symptoms of chronic rhinosinusitis in people with bronchiectasis

BACKGROUND

Chronic rhinosinusitis affects 62% of adults with bronchiectasis and is linked to greater bronchiectasis severity. However, the impact of symptoms of chronic rhinosinusitis on disease-specific and cough-related quality of life is unknown.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, adults with stable bronchiectasis and chronic rhinosinusitis symptoms completed the sinonasal outcome test-22 (SNOT-22), quality of life-bronchiectasis questionnaire, and Leicester cough questionnaire. Bronchiectasis severity was assessed using the bronchiectasis severity index (BSI) and chest high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT).

RESULTS

Sixty participants with bronchiectasis (mean [SD] forced expiratory volume in 1 s of 73.2 [25.5] %predicted) were included. Greater severity of chronic rhinosinusitis symptoms (based on SNOT-22) was moderately associated with impaired cough-related quality of life (according to the Leicester cough questionnaire; all r > -.60) and impaired bronchiectasis-specific quality of life (based on the quality of life-bronchiectasis questionnaire), with impaired physical function (r = -.518), less vitality (r = -.631), reduced social function (r = -.546), greater treatment burden (r = -.411), and increased severity of respiratory symptoms (r = -.534). Chronic rhinosinusitis symptoms were unrelated to disease severity according to the BSI (r = .135) and HRCT scoring (all r < .200). The severity of chronic rhinosinusitis symptoms was not affected by sputum color (p = .417) or the presence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa colonization (p = .73).

CONCLUSIONS

In adults with bronchiectasis, chronic rhinosinusitis has a consistent and negative impact on both cough-related and bronchiectasis-specific quality of life.

Burden of Care for Children with Bronchiectasis from Parents/Carers Perspective

Bronchiectasis is a neglected chronic respiratory condition. In children optimal appropriate management can halt the disease process, and in some cases reverse the radiological abnormality. This requires many facets, including parental/carer bronchiectasis-specific knowledge, for which there is currently no such published data. Further, the importance of patient voices in guiding clinical research is becoming increasingly appreciated. To address these issues, we aimed to describe the voices of parents of children with bronchiectasis relating to (a) burden of illness and quality of life (QoL), (b) their major worries/concerns and (c) understanding/management of exacerbations. The parents of 152 children with bronchiectasis (median age = 5.8 years, range 3.5-8.4) recruited from the Queensland Children's Hospital (Australia) completed questionnaires, including a parent-proxy cough-specific QoL. We found that parents of children with bronchiectasis had impaired QoL (median 4.38, range 3.13-5.63) and a high disease burden with median 7.0 (range 4.0-10.0) doctor visits in 12-months. Parental knowledge varied with only 41% understanding appropriate management of an exacerbation. The highest worry/concern expressed were long-term effects (n = 42, 29.8%) and perceived declining health (n = 36, 25.5%). Our study has highlighted the need for improved education, high parental burden and areas of concern/worry which may inform development of a bronchiectasis-specific paediatric QoL tool.

Validation of the Bronchiectasis Impact Measure (BIM): a novel patient-reported outcome measure

INTRODUCTION

Existing quality-of-life and symptom tools used in bronchiectasis trials are either not disease specific or are complex and have not been consistently responsive. We developed a simple patient-reported visual analogue outcome measure, the Bronchiectasis Impact Measure (BIM), for use in clinical research, including clinical trials.

METHODS

Patients with bronchiectasis attending a tertiary referral clinic in the east of Scotland were invited to complete the BIM questionnaire and the quality-of-life bronchiectasis questionnaire at baseline with repeat questionnaires after 2 weeks and 6 months. We assessed internal consistency, test-retest reliability, construct validity and responsiveness by evaluating change during an acute exacerbation.

RESULTS

173 patients were included. The eight domains (cough, sputum, breathlessness, tiredness, activity, general health, control, exacerbations) showed excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α 0.93). The intraclass correlation coefficient demonstrated excellent reliability over a 2-week period: cough (0.79, 95% CI 0.70-0.85), sputum (0.86, 95% CI 0.80-0.90), dyspnoea (0.82, 95% CI 0.74-0.87), tiredness (0.88, 95% CI 0.82-0.91), activity (0.84, 95% CI 0.77-0.89), general health (0.81, 95% CI 0.74-0.87), control (0.83, 95% CI 0.75-0.88) and exacerbation (0.71, 95% CI 0.60-0.79). Domains correlated strongly with bronchiectasis severity and exacerbation history. Both distribution and patient-based methods estimated the minimal clinically important difference for each domain as 1.5 points on a 10-point scale. Statistically significant changes in all BIM domains were observed during an acute exacerbation.

CONCLUSION

The BIM is a simple patient-reported outcome. This study validates the internal consistency, reliability, construct validity and response of the tool at acute exacerbation. Further validation of the tool is now required.

Psychometrics of HRQoL questionnaires in bronchiectasis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction

Understanding the psychometric properties of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) questionnaires can help inform selection in clinical trials. Our objective was to assess the psychometric properties of HRQoL questionnaires in bronchiectasis using a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature.

Methods

A literature search was conducted. HRQoL questionnaires were assessed for psychometric properties (reliability, validity, minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and floor/ceiling effects). Meta-analyses assessed the associations of HRQoL with clinical measures and responsiveness of HRQoL in clinical trials.

Results

166 studies and 12 HRQoL questionnaires were included. The Bronchiectasis Health Questionnaire (BHQ), Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Assessment Test (CAT) and Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) had good internal consistency in all domains reported (Cronbach's α≥0.7) across all studies, and the Quality of Life-Bronchiectasis (QOL-B), St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire (CRDQ) and Seattle Obstructive Lung Disease Questionnaire (SOLQ) had good internal consistency in all domains in the majority of (but not all) studies. BHQ, SGRQ, LCQ and CAT had good test–retest reliability in all domains reported (intraclass correlation coefficient ≥0.7) across all studies, and QOL-B, CRDQ and SOLQ had good test–retest reliability in all domains in the majority of (but not all) studies. HRQoL questionnaires were able to discriminate between demographics, important markers of clinical status, disease severity, exacerbations and bacteriology. For HRQoL responsiveness, there was a difference between the treatment and placebo effect.

Conclusions

SGRQ was the most widely used HRQoL questionnaire in bronchiectasis studies and it had good psychometric properties; however, good psychometric data are emerging on the bronchiectasis-specific HRQoL questionnaires QOL-B and BHQ. Future studies should focus on the medium- to long-term test–retest reliability, responsiveness and MCID in these HRQoL questionnaires which show potential in bronchiectasis.

The psychometric properties of health-related quality of life questionnaires should inform the selection of patient-reported outcomes in bronchiectasis clinical trialshttps://bit.ly/3wQuSrm

The Effect of a High-Intensity PrO2Fit Inspiratory Muscle Training Intervention on Physiological and Psychological Health in Adults with Bronchiectasis: A Mixed-Methods Study

Bronchiectasis is characterised by airflow obstruction and hyperinflation resulting in respiratory muscle weakness, and decreased exercise capacity. Inspiratory muscle training (IMT) is potentially an alternative treatment strategy to enhance respiratory muscle strength and endurance. Therefore, the aim was to investigate the effects of IMT on those with bronchiectasis. Eighteen participants (10 bronchiectasis) took part in an eight-week, three times a week IMT programme at 80% sustained maximal inspiratory pressure (SMIP). Lung function, respiratory muscle strength and endurance, exercise capacity, physical activity and self-determination theory measures were taken. Participants also took part in a semi-structured interview to assess their perceptions and experience of an IMT intervention. After eight weeks of IMT, bronchiectasis and healthy participants exhibited significant increases in MIP (27% vs. 32%, respectively), SMIP (16% vs. 17%, respectively) and inspiratory duration (36% vs. 30%, respectively). Healthy participants exhibited further improvements in peak expiratory flow and maximal oxygen consumption. Bronchiectasis participants reported high levels of perceived competence and motivation, reporting higher adherence and improved physical ability. Eight weeks of IMT increased inspiratory muscle strength and endurance in those with bronchiectasis. IMT also had a positive effect on perceived competency and autonomy, with bronchiectasis participants reporting improved physical ability and motivation, and high adherence.

'It's not one size fits all': a qualitative study of patients' and healthcare professionals' views of self-management for bronchiectasis

Background

Bronchiectasis is a chronic respiratory condition that impacts significantly on individuals and healthcare services. Self-management is recommended in clinical guidelines for bronchiectasis as an intervention to enable patients to manage their condition, yet there is little evidence to support it.

Methods

Three face to face focus groups (17 adults with bronchiectasis) were conducted at three National Health Service (NHS) sites in North West England. Additionally, semi-structured telephone interviews were undertaken with 11 healthcare professionals (HCPs), including doctors, nurses and physiotherapists. Thematic analysis identified common themes and occurrences verified by independent audit.

Findings

Four common overarching themes were identified: the meaning of self-management; benefits; barriers and influencers to self-management; subthemes varied. Both groups recognised component interventions. Patients highlighted that self-management enabled them to learn what works and moderate behaviour. Aspects of delivery and structure were important to HCPs but a ‘make do’ culture was evident. Benefits for both groups included empowering patients. Common barriers for patients were time, mood and lack of access to support which could mitigate engagement with self-management. HCPs identified barriers including patient characteristics and lack of resources. Influencers for patients were peer, carer and psychosocial support, for HCPs influencers were individual patient attributes, including ability and motivation, and HCP characteristics such as knowledge and understanding about bronchiectasis.

Summary

This is the first study to explore patients’ and HCPs’ views of self-management for bronchiectasis. The need for an individual, flexible and responsive self-management programme specific to bronchiectasis was evident. Personal characteristics of patients and HCPs could affect the uptake and engagement with self-management and HCPs knowledge of the disease is a recognised precursor to effective self-management. The study identified key aspects for consideration during development, delivery and sustainability of self-management programmes and findings suggest that patients’ psychosocial and socioeconomic circumstances may affect adoption and activation of self-management behaviours.

Inhaled aztreonam improves symptoms of cough and sputum production in patients with bronchiectasis: a post hoc analysis of the AIR-BX studies

INTRODUCTION

Inhaled antibiotics may improve symptom scores, but it is not known which specific symptoms improve with therapy. Item-level analysis of questionnaire data may allow us to identify which specific symptoms respond best to treatment.

METHODS

Post hoc analysis of the AIR-BX1 studies and two trials of inhaled aztreonam versus placebo in bronchiectasis. Individual items from the quality of life bronchiectasis (QOL-B) respiratory symptom scale, were extracted as representing severity of nine distinct symptoms. Generalised linear models were used to evaluate changes in symptoms with treatment versus placebo from baseline to end of first on-treatment cycle and mixed models were used to evaluate changes across the full 16-week trial.

RESULTS

Aztreonam improved cough (difference 0.22, 95% CI 0.08-0.37; p=0.002), sputum production (0.30, 95% CI 0.15-0.44; p<0.0001) and sputum colour (0.29, 95% CI 0.15-0.43; p<0.0001) versus placebo equating to a 20% improvement in cough and 25% improvement in sputum production and colour. Similar results were observed for cough, sputum production and sputum purulence across the trial duration (all p<0.05). Patients with higher sputum production and sputum colour scores had a greater response on the overall QOL-B (difference 4.82, 95% CI 1.12-8.53; p=0.011 for sputum production and 5.02, 95% CI 1.19-8.86; p=0.01 for sputum colour). In contrast, treating patients who had lower levels of bronchitic symptoms resulted in shorter time to next exacerbation (hazard ratio 1.83, 95% CI 1.02-3.28; p=0.042).

CONCLUSION

Baseline bronchitic symptoms predict response to inhaled aztreonam in bronchiectasis. More sensitive tools to measure bronchitic symptoms may be useful to better identify inhaled antibiotic responders and to evaluate patient response to treatment.

Measuring airway clearance outcomes in bronchiectasis: a review

While airway clearance techniques (ACTs) are recommended for individuals with bronchiectasis, many trials have demonstrated inconsistent benefits or failed to reach their primary outcome. This review determined the most common clinical and patient-reported outcome measures used to evaluate the efficacy of ACTs in bronchiectasis. A literature search of five databases using relevant keywords and filtering for studies published in English, up until the end of August 2019, was completed. Studies included randomised controlled trials, using crossover or any other trial design, and abstracts. Studies were included where the control was placebo, no intervention, standard care, usual care or an active comparator. Adults with bronchiectasis not related to cystic fibrosis were included. Extracted data comprised study authors, design, duration, intervention, outcome measures and results. The search identified 27 published studies and one abstract. The most common clinical outcome measures were sputum volume (n=23), lung function (n=17) and pulse oximetry (n=9). The most common patient-reported outcomes were health-related quality of life (measured with St George's Respiratory Questionnaire, n=4), cough-related quality of life (measured with Leicester Cough Questionnaire, n=4) and dyspnoea (measured with Borg/modified Borg scale, n=8). Sputum volume, lung function, dyspnoea and health- and cough-related quality of life appear to be the most common clinical and patient-reported measures of airway clearance treatment efficacy.

Quality of Life Questionnaire-Bronchiectasis: a study of the psychometric properties of the Brazilian Portuguese version

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the psychometric properties of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the Quality of Life Questionnaire-Bronchiectasis.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Outpatient clinic.

SUBJECTS

Clinically stable individuals with a diagnosis of bronchiectasis.

MEASURES

The evaluations performed were spirometry, incremental shuttle walk test, Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire, and the modified Medical Research Council dyspnea scale. The Quality of Life Questionnaire-Bronchiectasis was administered twice (seven to 14 days apart). Psychometric analyses were performed as follows: reliability, construct validity, criterion validity, and interpretability.

RESULTS

In total, 108 individuals (48 ± 14 years, 61 women) participated in the study. Internal consistency was considered adequate (Cronbach's alpha ⩾ 0.70) for the majority of scales (from 0.58 to 0.93). Test-retest coefficients were moderate to excellent (intraclass correlation coefficients from 0.70 to 0.93). In the construct validity, 35 of 37 items correlated more strongly with their assigned scale than a competing scale. The convergent validity showed significant correlations between scales of the Quality of Life Questionnaire-Bronchiectasis with modified Medical Research Council dyspnea scale, and incremental shuttle walk test (r from 0.20 to 0.59). A low to moderate correlations was revealed between all scales of the Quality of Life Questionnaire-Bronchiectasis and the Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire domains (r from 0.26 to 0.70). The standard error of measurement was acceptable. Ceiling effects were found for the Social Functioning and Treatment Burden scales.

CONCLUSIONS

The Quality of Life Questionnaire-Bronchiectasis is a reliable, valid instrument with adequate internal consistency for the evaluation of the impact of bronchiectasis on the health-related quality of life of Brazilian adults.

Development and initial validation of the bronchiectasis exacerbation and symptom tool (BEST)

Background

Recurrent bronchiectasis exacerbations are related to deterioration of lung function, progression of the disease, impairment of quality of life, and to an increased mortality. Improved detection of exacerbations has been accomplished in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease through the use of patient completed diaries. These tools may enhance exacerbation reporting and identification. The aim of this study was to develop a novel symptom diary for bronchiectasis symptom burden and detection of exacerbations, named the BEST diary.

Methods

Prospective observational study of patients with bronchiectasis conducted at Ninewells Hospital, Dundee. We included patients with confirmed bronchiectasis by computed tomography, who were symptomatic and had at least 1 documented exacerbation of bronchiectasis in the previous 12 months to participate. Symptoms were recorded daily in a diary incorporating cough, sputum volume, sputum colour, dyspnoea, fatigue and systemic disturbance scored from 0 to 26.

Results

Twenty-one patients were included in the study. We identified 29 reported (treated exacerbations) and 23 unreported (untreated) exacerbations over 6-month follow-up. The BEST diary score showed a good correlation with the established and validated questionnaires and measures of health status (COPD Assessment Test, r = 0.61, p = 0.0037, Leicester Cough Questionnaire, r = − 0.52,p = 0.0015, St Georges Respiratory Questionnaire, r = 0.61,p < 0.0001 and 6 min walk test, r = − 0.46,p = 0.037). The mean BEST score at baseline was 7.1 points (SD 2.2). The peak symptom score during exacerbation was a mean of 16.4 (3.1), and the change from baseline to exacerbation was a mean of 9.1 points (SD 2.5). Mean duration of exacerbations based on time for a return to baseline symptoms was 15.3 days (SD 5.7). A minimum clinically important difference of 4 points is proposed.

Conclusions

The BEST symptom diary has shown concurrent validity with current health questionnaires and is responsive at onset and recovery from exacerbation. The BEST diary may be useful to detect and characterise exacerbations in bronchiectasis clinical trials.

Validation of the COPD Assessment Test (CAT) as an Outcome Measure in Bronchiectasis

BACKGROUND

Objective assessment of symptoms in bronchiectasis is important for research and in clinical practice. The COPD Assessment Test (CAT) is a short, simple assessment tool widely used in COPD. The items included in the CAT are not specific to COPD and also reflect the dominant symptoms of bronchiectasis. We therefore performed a study to validate the CAT as an outcome measure in bronchiectasis.

METHODS

The CAT was administered to two cohorts of bronchiectasis patients along with other quality of life questionnaires. Patients underwent comprehensive clinical assessment. One cohort had repeated questionnaires collected before-and-after treatment of acute exacerbations. We analyzed convergent validity, repeatability, and responsiveness of the score and calculated the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) using a combination of distribution and anchor-based methods.

RESULTS

In both cohorts there were positive correlations between the CAT and the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (r = 0.90, P < .0001 and r = 0.87, P < .0001). There was an inverse relationship between CAT and Quality of Life - Bronchiectasis Respiratory Symptoms Scale (r = -0.75, P < .0001) and Leicester Cough Questionnaire score (r = -0.77, P < .0001). Patients with more severe disease, based on the bronchiectasis severity index, had significantly higher CAT scores. CAT also correlated with FEV₁ % predicted and 6-min walk distance (6MWD). CAT increased significantly at exacerbation and fell at recovery. The intraclass correlation coefficient for two measurements four-weeks apart while clinically stable was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.73-0.95, P < .0001). An MCID of 4 was most consistent.

CONCLUSIONS

CAT is a valid, responsive symptom assessment tool in bronchiectasis. The MCID is estimated as 4 points.

Australian adults with bronchiectasis: The first report from the Australian Bronchiectasis Registry

BACKGROUND

/objective: There are no large, multi-centre studies of Australians with bronchiectasis. The Australian Bronchiectasis Registry (ABR) was established in 2015 to create a longitudinal research platform. We aimed to describe the baseline characteristics of adult ABR participants and assess the impact of disease severity and exacerbation phenotype on quality of life (QoL).

METHODS

The ABR is a centralised database of patients with radiologically confirmed bronchiectasis unrelated to cystic fibrosis. We analysed the baseline data of adult patients (≥18 years).

RESULTS

From March 2016-August 2018, 799 adults were enrolled from 14 Australian sites. Baseline data were available for 589 adults predominantly from six tertiary centres (420 female, median age 71 years (interquartile range 64-77), 14% with chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection). Most patients had moderate or severe disease based on the Bronchiectasis Severity Index (BSI) (84%) and FACED (59%) composite scores. Using Global Lung function Initiative-2012 reference equations, the majority of patients (48%) had normal spirometry; only 34% had airflow obstruction (FEV₁/FVC < LLN). Disease severity scores (BSI and FACED) were negatively correlated with QoL-Bronchiectasis domain scores (r_s between -0.09 and -0.58). The frequent exacerbator phenotype (≥3 in the preceding year) was identified in 23%; this group had lower scores in all QoL-B domains (p ≤ 0.001) and more hospitalisations (p < 0.001) than those with <3 exacerbations.

CONCLUSIONS

The largest cohort of Australian adults with bronchiectasis has been described. Using contemporary criteria, most patients with bronchiectasis did not have airflow obstruction. The frequent exacerbation trait connotes poorer QoL and greater health-care utilisation.

Extrapulmonary associations of health status in severe asthma and bronchiectasis: Comorbidities and functional outcomes

BACKGROUND

Severe asthma and bronchiectasis are heterogeneous diseases that contribute to disability beyond the pulmonary system. The magnitude of the impact that these extrapulmonary features has on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is unknown.

METHODS

We analysed the cross-sectional relationships between HRQoL (St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire; SGRQ) and extrapulmonary characteristics, including physical activity (steps/day), anxiety and depression, isometric leg strength, systemic inflammation, and several comorbidities in adults with severe asthma (n = 70) and bronchiectasis (n = 61).

RESULTS

Participants with severe asthma and bronchiectasis had similar SGRQ total scores (mean scores 43.7 and 37.8 for severe asthma and bronchiectasis; p > 0.05), and similar pulmonary and extrapulmonary characteristics. The associations between extrapulmonary variables and HRQoL did not differ according to diagnosis (all interactions p > 0.05). Greater anxiety and depressive symptoms, fewer steps/day and greater systemic inflammation were statistically associated with poorer HRQoL in both diseases (p < 0.05). Lower isometric leg strength in severe asthma, and greater Charlson Comorbidity Index in bronchiectasis were also associated with poorer HRQoL (p < 0.05). In the multivariable regression model performed in the combined disease groups, anxiety and depression, steps/day, systemic inflammation and isometric leg strength remained independently associated with HRQoL. Associations between extrapulmonary characteristics and SGRQ domains were stronger for the activity and impact domains, than symptoms.

CONCLUSION

In severe asthma and bronchiectasis, extrapulmonary features including physical activity and leg strength have a significant impact on HRQoL, especially within the activity and impact domains. These features should be considered as part of the assessment of these conditions, and they may represent additional treatment targets to improve HRQoL.

A systematic review of pharmacotherapeutic clinical trial end-points for bronchiectasis in adults

Bronchiectasis is an increasing clinical problem, but multiple recent clinical trials have failed to reach their primary end-point. Difficulties in achieving “positive” bronchiectasis trials is reflected in a lack of agreement from trialists and regulators on what are the optimal end-points.

To evaluate the use of end-points in bronchiectasis trials, we conducted a systematic review of published bronchiectasis trials from 2008 to 2018 and extracted end-points used, definitions, methods of analysis and responsiveness.

Our analysis shows that quality of life and exacerbation end-points are most frequently used. Trials using exacerbation end-points have been characterised by varying definitions, multiple methods of analysis and durations of follow-up. There are multiple quality of life tools for bronchiectasis (Quality of Life – Bronchiectasis questionnaire, St George's Respiratory Questionnaire, etc.). The majority of studies measure lung function (e.g. forced expiratory volume in 1 s), but this is shown to be nonresponsive to the majority of interventions. Microbiology end-points frequently show statistically significant differences in phase 2 antibiotic studies but their correlation with clinical end-points is unknown.

This systematic review demonstrates a need for guidance to standardise definitions and design features to improve reproducibility and increase the likelihood of demonstrating statistically significant benefits with new therapies.

There is an urgent need to standardise clinical trial end-points in bronchiectasis. This systematic review shows the diversity of end-points used in bronchiectasis and suggests approaches that may improve the success rate and reproducibility of trials.http://ow.ly/d4HR30nvvS3

Bronchiectasis: Treatment decisions for pulmonary exacerbations and their prevention

Interest in bronchiectasis has increased over the past two decades, as shown by the establishment of disease-specific registries in several countries, the publication of management guidelines and a growing number of clinical trials to address evidence gaps for treatment decisions. This review considers the evidence for defining and treating pulmonary exacerbations, the approaches for eradication of newly identified airway pathogens and the methods to prevent exacerbations through long-term treatments from a pragmatic practice-based perspective. Areas for future studies are also explored. Watch the video abstract.

The European Multicentre Bronchiectasis Audit and Research Collaboration (EMBARC): experiences from a successful ERS Clinical Research Collaboration

In contrast to airway diseases like chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma, and rare diseases such as cystic fibrosis, there has been little research and few clinical trials in bronchiectasis. Guidelines are primarily based on expert opinion and treatment is challenging because of the heterogeneous nature of the disease. In an effort to address decades of underinvestment in bronchiectasis research, education and clinical care, the European Multicentre Bronchiectasis Audit and Research Collaboration (EMBARC) was established in 2012 as a collaborative pan-European network to bring together bronchiectasis researchers. The European Respiratory Society officially funded EMBARC in 2013 as a Clinical Research Collaboration, providing support and infrastructure to allow the project to grow. EMBARC has now established an international bronchiectasis registry that is active in more than 30 countries both within and outside Europe. Beyond the registry, the network participates in designing and facilitating clinical trials, has set international research priorities, promotes education and has participated in producing the first international bronchiectasis guidelines. This manuscript article the development, structure and achievements of EMBARC from 2012 to 2017.

EDUCATIONAL AIMS

To understand the role of Clinical Research Collaborations as the major way in which the European Respiratory Society can stimulate clinical research in different disease areasTo understand some of the key features of successful disease registriesTo review key epidemiological, clinical and translational studies of bronchiectasis contributed by the European Multicentre Bronchiectasis Audit and Research Collaboration (EMBARC) project in the past 5 yearsTo understand the key research priorities identified by EMBARC for the next 5 years.