1
|
Khorami AK, Chiarotto A, Kongsted A, Hartvigsen J, Koes BW. Characteristics and outcomes of patients with low back pain with and without radiating leg pain following the GLA:D back program. Musculoskelet Sci Pract 2024; 73:103144. [PMID: 39038395 DOI: 10.1016/j.msksp.2024.103144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2024] [Revised: 06/25/2024] [Accepted: 07/10/2024] [Indexed: 07/24/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Some patients with low back pain (LBP) also report radiating leg pain which is a prognostic factor for poorer clinical outcomes. We aimed: 1) to compare the baseline characteristics of patients with LBP with - (LBP + leg pain) and without radiating leg pain (LBP - alone); 2) to investigate whether patients with LBP + leg pain show similar post-treatment outcomes as compared to LBP - alone, after participation in an exercise and patient education program, i.e. the GLA:D Back program. METHODS The patient sample included 3508 patients in the GLA:D Back program between March 2018 and August 2022. The outcomes were mean changes in LBP intensity, back-related activity limitation, self-efficacy and fear of movement measured from baseline to 3, 6 and 12 months. Baseline characteristics were compared with descriptive statistics, and linear mixed models were used to estimate group differences in changes from baseline to 3-, 6- and 12 months. RESULTS 1915 (55%) of the patients were in the group LBP- alone and 1593 (45%) in the LBP + leg pain. The LBP + leg pain group displayed higher STarT back classification (greater risk of chronicity) compared to the LBP-alone. The LBP + leg pain group showed almost similar improvements in all outcomes compared to LBP - alone after the GLA:D Back program. CONCLUSION In long-lasting (chronic) LBP patients, the LBP + leg pain group improved to the same extent as LBP - alone regarding LBP intensity, disability, and fear of movement following an exercise and patient education program, GLA:D Back.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Khoshal Khorami
- Department of General Practice, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Alessandro Chiarotto
- Department of General Practice, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Alice Kongsted
- Center for Muscle and Joint Health, Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; Chiropractic Knowledge Hub, Odense, Denmark
| | - Jan Hartvigsen
- Center for Muscle and Joint Health, Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; Chiropractic Knowledge Hub, Odense, Denmark
| | - Bart W Koes
- Department of General Practice, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Center for Muscle and Joint Health, Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; Research Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gregersen MHM, Nielsen KR, Lynge NH, Heiberg BD, Hartvigsen J, Kawchuk G, Kongsted A. Goal setting in people with low back pain attending an education and exercise program (GLA:D Back) and the impact of demographic factors. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2024; 25:339. [PMID: 38678259 PMCID: PMC11055288 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-07450-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2024] [Accepted: 04/16/2024] [Indexed: 04/29/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Individual goal setting is a fundamental element in self-management supportive interventions, serving to guide actions and enhance motivation for engagement. Despite this, little is known about the goals people with back pain have and to what extent these differ across genders, age groups and geographical location. This study aimed to elucidate this by first describing individual goals set by Danish and Canadian participants in a self-management intervention for people with back pain using the ICF framework; then, determining what proportion of these goals met criteria for being specific, measurable, acceptable, and time bound, and finally, by investigating differences between countries, sexes, and age groups. METHODS In a cross-sectional study conducted August 2018 to June 2020, 394 Danish and 133 Canadian (Alberta Province) participants defined their individual goals of participating in a self-management programme involving patient education and supervised exercises. The goals were linked to the ICF framework. Distribution of goals was compared between countries, sexes, and age groups. RESULTS Goals most often related to the ICF component of 'Activity and Participation'. The most prevalent goals were "Walking" (DK: 20%; CA: 15%) and "Maintaining a body position" (DK: 17%; CA: 22%). Only few goals differed between populations, age and sex. All elements of SMART goal setting were recorded for 88% of Danish and 94% of Alberta participants. CONCLUSIONS People with low back pain attending a self-management programme established goals according to the SMART criteria and focused primarily on activity. Goals were similar across countries and showed few differences across sex and age groups. The high number of different goals points to the need for individualised person-centred care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mette H M Gregersen
- Center for Muscle and Joint Health, Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, Odense M, 5230, Denmark
| | - Kristine R Nielsen
- Center for Muscle and Joint Health, Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, Odense M, 5230, Denmark
| | - Nana H Lynge
- Center for Muscle and Joint Health, Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, Odense M, 5230, Denmark
| | - Bibi D Heiberg
- Center for Muscle and Joint Health, Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, Odense M, 5230, Denmark
| | - Jan Hartvigsen
- Center for Muscle and Joint Health, Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, Odense M, 5230, Denmark
- Chiropractic Knowledge Hub, Campusvej 55, Odense, Denmark
| | - Greg Kawchuk
- Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, Corbett Hall, 8205 114 St NW, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Alice Kongsted
- Center for Muscle and Joint Health, Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, Odense M, 5230, Denmark.
- Chiropractic Knowledge Hub, Campusvej 55, Odense, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wood L, Foster NE, Dean SG, Booth V, Hayden JA, Booth A. Contexts, behavioural mechanisms and outcomes to optimise therapeutic exercise prescription for persistent low back pain: a realist review. Br J Sports Med 2024; 58:222-230. [PMID: 38176852 DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2023-107598] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/15/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Therapeutic exercises are a core treatment for low back pain (LBP), but it is uncertain how rehabilitative exercise facilitates change in outcomes. Realist reviews explore how the context (C) of certain settings or populations and underlying mechanisms (M) create intended or unintended outcomes (O). Our objective was to explore and understand the behavioural mechanisms by which therapeutic exercise creates change in outcomes of adherence, engagement and clinical outcomes for patients with LBP. METHODS This was a realist review reported following the Realist and Meta-narrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards guidance. We developed initial programme theories, modified with input from a steering group (experts, n=5), stakeholder group (patients and clinicians, n=10) and a scoping search of the published literature (n=37). Subsequently, an information specialist designed and undertook an iterative search strategy, and we refined and tested CMO configurations. RESULTS Of 522 initial papers identified, 75 papers were included to modify and test CMO configurations. We found that the patient-clinician therapeutic consultation builds a foundation of trust and was associated with improved adherence, engagement and clinical outcomes, and that individualised exercise prescription increases motivation to adhere to exercise and thus also impacts clinical outcomes. Provision of support such as timely follow-up and supervision can further facilitate motivation and confidence to improve adherence to therapeutic exercises for LBP. CONCLUSIONS Engagement in and adherence to therapeutic exercises for LBP, as well as clinical outcomes, may be optimised using mechanisms of trust, motivation and confidence. These CMO configurations provide a deeper understanding of ways to optimise exercise prescription for patients with LBP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lianne Wood
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Nadine E Foster
- STARS Education and Research Alliance, Surgical Treatment and Rehabilitation Service (STARS), The University of Queensland and Metro North Health, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | | | - Vicky Booth
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
- University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Jill A Hayden
- Department of Community Health & Epidemiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Andrew Booth
- Information Resources Group, University of Sheffield Faculty of Medicine Dentistry and Health, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wirth B, Schweinhardt P. Personalized assessment and management of non-specific low back pain. Eur J Pain 2024; 28:181-198. [PMID: 37874300 DOI: 10.1002/ejp.2190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2023] [Revised: 08/22/2023] [Accepted: 09/27/2023] [Indexed: 10/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Low back pain (LBP), and in particular non-specific low back pain (NSLBP), which accounts for approximately 90% of LBP, is the leading cause of years lived with disability worldwide. In clinical trials, LBP is often poorly categorized into 'specific' versus 'non-specific' and 'acute' versus 'chronic' pain. However, a better understanding of the underlying pain mechanisms might improve study results and reduce the number of NSLBP patients. DATABASES AND DATA TREATMENT Narrative review. RESULTS NSLBP is a multi-dimensional, biopsychosocial condition that requires all contributing dimensions to be assessed and prioritized. Thereby, the assessment of the contribution of nociceptive, neuropathic and nociplastic pain mechanisms forms the basis for personalized management. In addition, psychosocial (e.g. anxiety, catastrophizing) and contextual factors (e.g. work situation) as well as comorbidities need to be assessed and individually weighted. Personalized treatment of NSLBP further requires individually choosing treatment modalities, for example, exercising, patient education, cognitive-behavioural advice, pharmacotherapy, as well as tailoring treatment within these modalities, for example, the delivery of tailored psychological interventions or exercise programs. As the main pain mechanism and psychosocial factors may vary over time, re-assessment is necessary and treatment success should ideally be assessed quantitatively and qualitatively. CONCLUSIONS The identification of the main contributing pain mechanism and the integration of the patients' view on their condition, including beliefs, preferences, concerns and expectations, are key in the personalized clinical management of NSLBP. In research, particular importance should be placed on accurate characterization of patients and on including outcomes relevant to the individual patient. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Here, a comprehensive review of the challenges associated with the diagnostic label 'non-specific low back pain' is given. It outlines what is lacking in current treatment guidelines and it is summarized what is currently known with respect to individual phenotyping. It becomes clear that more research on clinically meaningful subgroups is needed to best tailor treatment approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brigitte Wirth
- Department of Chiropractic Medicine, Integrative Spinal Research Group, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Petra Schweinhardt
- Department of Chiropractic Medicine, Integrative Spinal Research Group, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Young JJ, Kongsted A, Hartvigsen J, Ammendolia C, Jensen RK. Similar improvements in patient-reported outcomes for non-specific low back pain patients with and without lumbar spinal stenosis symptoms following a structured education and exercise therapy program. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2023; 24:839. [PMID: 37880624 PMCID: PMC10599001 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-023-06950-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2023] [Accepted: 10/09/2023] [Indexed: 10/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND People with nonspecific low back pain (NSLBP) can also experience overlapping symptoms of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS), but the impact on treatment outcomes is unknown. This study investigated differences in treatment outcomes for disability, back pain intensity, and leg pain intensity following an education and exercise therapy program for NSLBP patients with and without comorbid LSS symptoms. METHODS This was a longitudinal analysis of 655 Danish participants in the GLA:D® Back program; an education and exercise therapy program for people with persistent NSLBP. Participants were classified as having comorbid LSS symptoms based on self-report. Linear mixed models were used to assess differences in change in disability (Oswestry Disability Index [0-100]) and back and leg pain intensity (Numeric Rating Scale [0-10]) at 3-, 6-, and 12-months between those with and without LSS symptoms. RESULTS 28% of participants reported LSS symptoms. No certain differences in change in disability or back pain intensity improvement were observed at any time-point between those with and without LSS symptoms. Participants with LSS symptoms had slightly greater improvement in leg pain intensity at 6- (-0.7, 95% CI -1.2 to -0.2) and 12-months (-0.6, 95% CI -1.2 to -0.1). CONCLUSION Compared to those without LSS symptoms, patients with persistent NSLBP and LSS symptoms can expect similar improvements in disability and back pain intensity, and slightly greater improvements in leg pain intensity with treatment. Therefore, education and exercise therapy programs designed for NSLBP are likely helpful for those also experiencing LSS symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James J Young
- Schroeder Arthritis Institute, Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
- Centre for Muscle and Joint Health, Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, 5230, Denmark.
| | - Alice Kongsted
- Centre for Muscle and Joint Health, Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, 5230, Denmark
- Chiropractic Knowledge Hub, Odense, 5230, Denmark
| | - Jan Hartvigsen
- Centre for Muscle and Joint Health, Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, 5230, Denmark
- Chiropractic Knowledge Hub, Odense, 5230, Denmark
| | - Carlo Ammendolia
- Rebecca MacDonald Centre for Arthritis and Autoimmune Diseases, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Canada
- Institute for Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Rikke Krüger Jensen
- Centre for Muscle and Joint Health, Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, 5230, Denmark
- Chiropractic Knowledge Hub, Odense, 5230, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wood L, Foster NE, Lewis M, Bronfort G, Groessl EJ, Hewitt C, Miyamoto GC, Reme SE, Bishop A. Matching the Outcomes to Treatment Targets of Exercise for Low Back Pain: Does it Make a Difference? Results of Secondary Analyses From Individual Patient Data of Randomised Controlled Trials and Pooling of Results Across Trials in Comparative Meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2023; 104:218-228. [PMID: 35934047 DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2022.07.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2022] [Revised: 07/19/2022] [Accepted: 07/21/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore whether using a single matched or composite outcome might affect the results of previous randomized controlled trials (RCTs) testing exercise for non-specific low back pain (NSLBP). The first objective was to explore whether a single matched outcome generated greater standardized mean differences (SMDs) when compared with the original unmatched primary outcome SMD. The second objective was to explore whether a composite measure, composed of matched outcomes, generated a greater SMD when compared with the original primary outcome SMD. DESIGN We conducted exploratory secondary analyses of data. SETTING Seven RCTs were included, of which 2 were based in the USA (University research clinic, Veterans Affairs medical center) and the UK (primary care clinics, nonmedical centers). One each were based in Norway (clinics), Brazil (primary care), and Japan (outpatient clinics). PARTICIPANTS The first analysis comprised 1) 5 RCTs (n=1033) that used an unmatched primary outcome but included (some) matched outcomes as secondary outcomes, and the second analysis comprised 2) 4 RCTs (n=864) that included multiple matched outcomes by developing composite outcomes (N=1897). INTERVENTION Exercise compared with no exercise. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The composite consisted of standardized averaged matched outcomes. All analyses replicated the RCTs' primary outcome analyses. RESULTS Of 5 RCTs, 3 had greater SMDs with matched outcomes (pooled effect SMD 0.30 [95% confidence interval {CI} 0.04, 0.56], P=.02) compared with an unmatched primary outcome (pooled effect SMD 0.19 [95% CI -0.03, 0.40] P=.09). Of 4 composite outcome analyses, 3 RCTs had greater SMDs in the composite outcome (pooled effect SMD 0.28 [95% CI 0.05, 0.51] P=.02) compared with the primary outcome (pooled effect SMD 0.24 [95% CI -0.04, 0.53] P=.10). CONCLUSIONS These exploratory analyses suggest that using an outcome matched to exercise treatment targets in NSLBP RCTs may produce greater SMDs than an unmatched primary outcome. Composite outcomes could offer a meaningful way of investigating superiority of exercise than single domain outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lianne Wood
- Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Keele University, Newcastle-under-Lyme, UK; Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Queens Medical Centre, Derby Road, Nottingham, UK.
| | - Nadine E Foster
- Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Keele University, Newcastle-under-Lyme, UK
| | - Martyn Lewis
- Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Keele University, Newcastle-under-Lyme, UK
| | - Gert Bronfort
- Earl E Bakken Centre for Spirituality and Healing, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Erik J Groessl
- University of California San Diego, Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health and UCSD Health Services Research Centre, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Catherine Hewitt
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, UK
| | - Gisela C Miyamoto
- Master's and Doctoral Program in Physical Therapy, Universidade Cidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Silje E Reme
- Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Annette Bishop
- Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Keele University, Newcastle-under-Lyme, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Liew BXW, Hartvigsen J, Scutari M, Kongsted A. Data-driven network analysis identified subgroup-specific low back pain pathways: a cross-sectional GLA:D Back study. J Clin Epidemiol 2023; 153:66-77. [PMID: 36396075 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.11.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2022] [Revised: 11/02/2022] [Accepted: 11/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To understand the physical, activity, pain, and psychological pathways contributing to low back pain (LBP) -related disability, and if these differ between subgroups. METHODS Data came from the baseline observations (n = 3849) of the "GLA:D Back" intervention program for long-lasting nonspecific LBP. 15 variables comprising demographic, pain, psychological, physical, activity, and disability characteristics were measured. Clustering was used for subgrouping, Bayesian networks (BN) were used for structural learning, and structural equation model (SEM) was used for statistical inference. RESULTS Two clinical subgroups were identified with those in subgroup 1 having worse symptoms than those in subgroup 2. Psychological factors were directly associated with disability in both subgroups. For subgroup 1, psychological factors were most strongly associated with disability (β = 0.363). Physical factors were directly associated with disability (β = -0.077), and indirectly via psychological factors. For subgroup 2, pain was most strongly associated with disability (β = 0.408). Psychological factors were common predictors of physical factors (β = 0.078), pain (β = 0.518), activity (β = -0.101), and disability (β = 0.382). CONCLUSIONS The importance of psychological factors in both subgroups suggests their importance for treatment. Differences in the interaction between physical, pain, and psychological factors and their contribution to disability in different subgroups may open the doors toward more optimal LBP treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bernard X W Liew
- School of Sport, Rehabilitation and Exercise Sciences, University of Essex, Colchester, Essex, UK.
| | - Jan Hartvigsen
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; Chiropractic Knowledge Hub, Odense, Denmark
| | - Marco Scutari
- Istituto Dalle Molle di Studi sull'Intelligenza Artificiale (IDSIA), Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Alice Kongsted
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; Chiropractic Knowledge Hub, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Joyce C, Kelly KC, Gurnani S, Sherman KJ, Roseen EJ, Saper RB. "In Class We Were All One." A Qualitative Exploration of Yoga and Educational Interventions for Predominantly Low-Income and Minority Adults with Chronic Low Back Pain. JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE AND COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE 2022; 28:870-877. [PMID: 35914101 PMCID: PMC9835301 DOI: 10.1089/jicm.2022.0557] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
Introduction: Chronic low back pain (cLBP) can be physically and psychologically debilitating and disproportionally afflicts vulnerable populations. Yoga and education are increasingly common interventions for cLBP yet are understudied in low-income and minority adults. The objective of this qualitative study was to understand the yoga and self-care experience of adults with cLBP from urban, underserved communities who were enrolled in a randomized controlled trial that included these treatments. Methods: We interviewed 26 (18 yoga and 8 education) participants. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using thematic analysis with codes developed inductively from data. Results: Participants from both yoga and education groups reported initial apprehension and ambivalence toward their respective intervention. However, physical and psychological benefits were noted, mainly in the form of improved pain self-management. Communal support and camaraderie reported by the yoga group was absent and desired by education participants. Social factors impeding the ability to sustain yoga practice included transportation, access, and cost, whereas education participants described literacy and language challenges and a general lack of motivation to read the book. Conclusion: Yoga and education are viable treatments for adults with cLBP who live in underserved neighborhoods. However, social stigma and socioeconomic barriers may hinder their uptake. Communal support in group-based nonpharmacological treatments is valued and may contribute to participation and clinical outcomes. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01343927.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Joyce
- School of Physical Therapy, Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Worcester, MA, USA
| | | | | | - Karen J. Sherman
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Eric J. Roseen
- Department of Family Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine and Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Rehabilitation Science, MGH Institute of Health Professions, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Robert B. Saper
- Department of Wellness and Preventive Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hartvigsen J, Kamper SJ, French SD. Low-value care in musculoskeletal health care: Is there a way forward? Pain Pract 2022; 22 Suppl 2:65-70. [PMID: 36109843 PMCID: PMC9545107 DOI: 10.1111/papr.13142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2022] [Revised: 05/02/2022] [Accepted: 06/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Low-value care that wastes resources and harms patients is prevalent in health systems everywhere. METHODS As part of an invited keynote presentation at the Pain in Motion IV conference held in Maastricht, Holland, in May 2022, we reviewed evidence for low-value care in musculoskeletal conditions and discussed possible solutions. RESULTS Drivers of low-value care are diverse and affect patients, clinicians, and health systems everywhere. We show that low-value care for back pian, neck pain, and osteoarthritis is prevalent in all professional groups involved in caring for people who seek care for these conditions. Implementation efforts that aim to reverse low-value care seem to work better if designed using established conceptual and theoretical frameworks. CONCLUSION Low-value care is prevalent in the care of people with musculoskeletal conditions. Reducing low-value care requires behaviour change among patients and clinicians as well as in health systems. There is evidence that behaviour change can be facilitated through good conceptual and theoretical frameworks but not convincing evidence that it changes patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Hartvigsen
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, Center for Muscle and Joint Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense M, Denmark.,Chiropractic Knowledge Hub, Odense M, Denmark
| | - Steven J Kamper
- School of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Nepean Blue Mountains Local Health District, Penrith, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Simon D French
- Department of Chiropractic, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
de Luca K, Yanz M, Downie A, Kendall J, Skou ST, Hartvigsen J, French SD, Ferreira ML, Bierma-Zeinstra SMA. A mixed-methods feasibility study of a comorbidity-adapted exercise program for low back pain in older adults (COMEBACK): a protocol. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2022; 8:133. [PMID: 35780222 PMCID: PMC9250189 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-022-01097-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2021] [Accepted: 06/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The prevalence of low back pain increases with age and has a profound impact on physical and psychosocial health. With increasing age comes increasing comorbidity, and this also has pronounced health consequences. Whilst exercise is beneficial for a range of health conditions, trials of exercise for low back pain management often exclude older adults. It is currently unknown whether an exercise program for older adults with low back pain, tailored for the presence of comorbidities, is acceptable for participants and primary healthcare providers (PHCPs). Therefore, this mixed-methods study will assess the feasibility of an 8-week comorbidity-adapted exercise program for older people with low back pain and comorbid conditions. METHODS The 3-phased feasibility study will be performed in a primary healthcare setting. PHCPs will be trained to deliver a comorbidity-adapted exercise program for older people with low back pain and comorbidities. Healthcare-seeking adults > 65 will be screened for eligibility over telephone, with a recruitment target of 24 participants. Eligible participants will attend an initial appointment (diagnostic phase). During this initial appointment, a research assistant will collect patient demographics, self-reported outcome measurement data, and perform a physical and functional examination to determine contraindications and restrictions to an exercise program. During the development phase, PHCPs will adapt the exercise program to the individual and provide patient education. During the intervention phase, there will be two supervised exercise sessions per week, over 8 weeks (total of 16 exercise sessions). Each exercise session will be approximately 60 min in duration. A qualitative evaluation after the last exercise program session will explore the feasibility of the exercise program for participants and PHCPs. Progression criteria will determine the suitability for a fully powered randomised controlled trial. DISCUSSION This mixed-methods feasibility study will assess an exercise program for older adults with low back pain and comorbidities. Once assessed for feasibility, the exercise program may be tested for effectiveness in a larger, fully powered randomised controlled trial. This information will add to the sparse evidence base on appropriate options for managing back pain in older adults. TRIAL REGISTRATION Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry registration number: ACTRN12621000379819p (06/04/2021; https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?ACTRN=12621000379819p ). TRIAL SPONSOR Macquarie University, Department of Chiropractic, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, NSW 2109, Australia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katie de Luca
- Department of Chiropractic, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia. .,Discipline of Chiropractic, School of Health, Medical and Applied Sciences, CQUniversity, Brisbane, Australia.
| | - Megan Yanz
- Department of Chiropractic, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Aron Downie
- Department of Chiropractic, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Julie Kendall
- Discipline of Chiropractic, School of Health and Biomedical Sciences, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Søren T Skou
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, Centre for Muscle and Joint Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.,Department of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Næstved-Slagelse-Ringsted Hospital, Slagelse, Denmark
| | - Jan Hartvigsen
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, Centre for Muscle and Joint Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.,Nordic Institute of Chiropractic and Clinical Biomechanics, Odense, Denmark
| | - Simon D French
- Department of Chiropractic, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Manuela L Ferreira
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Institute of Bone and Joint Research, The Kolling Institute, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Sita M A Bierma-Zeinstra
- Department of General Practice and Department of Orthopaedics, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
GLA:D® Back Australia: a mixed methods feasibility study for implementation. Chiropr Man Therap 2022; 30:17. [PMID: 35392935 PMCID: PMC8989099 DOI: 10.1186/s12998-022-00427-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2021] [Accepted: 03/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Practice-based guidelines recommend patient education and exercise as first-line care for low back pain (LBP); however, these recommendations are not routinely delivered in practice. GLA:D® Back, developed in Denmark to assist clinicians to implement guideline recommendations, offers a structured education and supervised exercise program for people with LBP in addition to a clinical registry to evaluate patient outcomes. In this study we evaluated the feasibility of implementing the GLA:D® Back program in Australia. We considered clinician and patient recruitment and retention, program fidelity, exploring clinicians’ and patients’ experiences with the program, and participant outcome data collection. Methods Clinicians (chiropractors and physiotherapists) were recruited and participated in a 2-day GLA:D® Back training course. Patients were eligible to participate if they had persistent or recurrent LBP. Feasibility domains included the ability to: (1) recruit clinicians to undergo training; (2) recruit and retain patients in the program; (3) observe program fidelity; and (4) perceive barriers and facilitators for GLA:D® Back implementation. We also collected data related to: (5) clinician confidence, attitudes, and behaviour; and (6) patient self-reported outcomes related to pain, disability, and performance tests. Results Twenty clinicians (8 chiropractors, 12 physiotherapists) participated in the training, with 55% (11/20) offering GLA:D® Back to their patients. Fifty-seven patients were enrolled in the program, with 67% (38/57) attending the final follow-up assessment. Loss to follow up was mainly due to the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. We observed program fidelity, with clinicians generally delivering the program as intended. Interviews revealed two clinician themes related to: (i) intervention acceptability; and (ii) barriers and facilitators to implementation. Patient interviews revealed themes related to: (i) intervention acceptability; and (ii) program efficacy. At 3 months follow-up, clinicians demonstrated high treatment confidence and biomedical orientation. Patient outcomes trended towards improvement. Conclusion GLA:D® Back implementation in Australia appears feasible based on clinician recruitment, program acceptability and potential benefits for patient outcomes from the small sample of participating clinicians and patients. However, COVID-19 impacted patient recruitment, retention, and data collection. To scale-up GLA:D® Back in private and public settings, further work is warranted to address associated barriers, and to leverage facilitators. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12998-022-00427-3.
Collapse
|
12
|
Areso-Bóveda PB, Mambrillas-Varela J, García-Gómez B, Moscosio-Cuevas JI, González-Lama J, Arnaiz-Rodríguez E, Del Barco MBA, Teodoro-Blanco PS. Effectiveness of a group intervention using pain neuroscience education and exercise in women with fibromyalgia: a pragmatic controlled study in primary care. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2022; 23:323. [PMID: 35379222 PMCID: PMC8978762 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-05284-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2021] [Accepted: 03/29/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Very positive effects have been described in the application of pain neuroscience education (PNE) to chronic pain and migraine. However, there are few data on the applicability of this therapeutic approach in actual clinical practice in a primary care (PC) setting. The aim of this study was to explore the efficacy in fibromyalgia (FM) of an intervention based on PNE and exercise compared to treatment as usual (TAU). METHODS Pragmatic nonrandomised controlled trial set in 5 healthcare centres and one physiotherapy centre in PC. Fifty-three women with FM (2010 American College of Rheumatology Diagnostic Criteria for Fibromyalgia) were studied, 35 in the intervention group (IG) and 18 in the control group (CG). The women in the IG were interviewed individually and then received 6 weekly sessions plus one review session (1 month later): those in the CG received their TAU. The subject assignation to the CG or the IG was determined according to their availability to attend the sessions. They all filled in several questionnaires (prior to and 1 year after the intervention) to evaluate the impact of FM in their daily lives, catastrophism, anxiety and depression, severity and impact of pain in daily personal performance and functional capacity. RESULTS The reductions (improvements) in the scores of all tests (baseline-final) were greater in the IG (p < 0.05) when adjusted for age and baseline values, with moderate or high effect size. After 1 year, 20% (CI - 1 to 42%) more women in the IG, compared to the CG, had a FIQ score < 39 (mild functional impairment). 17/38 (49%) women in the IG no longer met FM criteria at the end of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS An intervention based on PNE and exercise in patients with FM is feasible and seems effective in PC. TRIAL REGISTRATION The study was retrospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (Trial Registration NCT04539171 ), on 04/09/2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paula B Areso-Bóveda
- Burgos Centre Physiotherapy Unit in Burgos Centre, GAP (Primary Care Management) Burgos (SACYL: Castille and Leon Health Service), C/ José María de la Puente 1, 09006, Burgos, Spain
| | - Julia Mambrillas-Varela
- Burgos Centre Physiotherapy Unit in Burgos Centre, GAP (Primary Care Management) Burgos (SACYL: Castille and Leon Health Service), C/ José María de la Puente 1, 09006, Burgos, Spain
| | - Bárbara García-Gómez
- López Sáiz Health Centre, GAP (Primary Care Management) Burgos (SACYL: Castille and Leon Health Service), C/ José María de la Puente 1, 09006, Burgos, Spain
| | - José Ignacio Moscosio-Cuevas
- Fuensanta Health Centre, Córdoba-Guadalquivir Primary Care District (SAS: Andalusian Health Service), C/ Núñez de Balboa 2, 14010, Córdoba, Spain.,Group-Program Communication and Health -GPCyS- (semFYC), c/ Diputació, 320 Bajo, 08009, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jesús González-Lama
- Group-Program Communication and Health -GPCyS- (semFYC), c/ Diputació, 320 Bajo, 08009, Barcelona, Spain. .,Clinical Management Unit in Cabra, Matrona Antonia Mesa Fernández Health Centre, South Córdoba Health Management Area (SAS: Andalusian Health Service), Avda. Góngora s/n, 14940-Cabra, Córdoba, Spain. .,Prevention and Health Promotion Program -PAPPS- (semFYC), c/ Diputació, 320 Bajo, 08009, Barcelona, Spain. .,Clinical Epidemiology Research Group in Primary Care (GICEAP), Maimónides Biomedical Research Institute of Córdoba (IMIBIC), Reina Sofía University Hospital / University of Córdoba, Avda. Menéndez Pidal s/n, 14004, Córdoba, Spain.
| | - Eva Arnaiz-Rodríguez
- San Agustín Physiotherapy Unit, C/ Bonifacio Zamora de Usabel, 09001, Burgos, Spain
| | | | - Pilar San Teodoro-Blanco
- López Sáiz Health Centre, GAP (Primary Care Management) Burgos (SACYL: Castille and Leon Health Service), C/ José María de la Puente 1, 09006, Burgos, Spain.,Group-Program Communication and Health -GPCyS- (socalemFYC), C/ Veinte de Febrero 6, 47001, Valladolid, Spain.,Healthcare Ethics Committee in the Burgos University Hospital, Avda. de las Islas Baleares 3, 09006, Burgos, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Joern L, Kongsted A, Thomassen L, Hartvigsen J, Ravn S. Pain cognitions and impact of low back pain after participation in a self-management program: a qualitative study. Chiropr Man Therap 2022; 30:8. [PMID: 35189908 PMCID: PMC8862196 DOI: 10.1186/s12998-022-00416-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2021] [Accepted: 01/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Benefits from low back pain (LBP) treatments seem to be related to patients changing their pain cognitions and developing an increased sense of control. Still, little is known about how these changes occur. The objective of this study was to gain insights into possible shifts in the understanding of LBP and the sense of being able to manage pain among patients participating in a LBP self-management intervention. Methods Using a qualitative study and a content analytic framework, we investigated the experiences of patients with LBP who participated in ‘GLA:D® Back’, a group-based structured patient education and exercise program. Data were generated through qualitative semi-structured interviews conducted between January 2019 and October 2019. Interviews focused on experiences with pain and were analysed using a thematic analytical approach. The Common Sense Model and self-efficacy theory formed the theoretical framework for the interpretations. Participants were sampled to represent people who were either dissatisfied or satisfied with their participation in GLA:D® Back. Fifteen participants aged 26–62, eight women and seven men, were interviewed from February to April 2020. Results Four main themes, corresponding to the characterisation of four patient groups, were identified: ‘Feeling miscast, ‘Maintaining reservations', ‘Struggling with habits’ and ‘Handling it’. The participants within each group differed in how they understood, managed, and communicated about their LBP. Some retained the perception of LBP as a threatening disease, some expressed a changed understanding that did not translate into new behaviors, while others had changed their understanding of pain and their reaction to pain. Conclusions The same intervention was experienced very differently by different people dependent on how messages and communication resonated with the individual patient's experiences and prior understanding of LBP. Awareness of the ways that individuals’ understanding of LBP interact with behaviour and physical activities appear central for providing adaptive professional support and meeting the needs of individual patients. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12998-022-00416-6.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lise Joern
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230, Odense M, Denmark
| | - Alice Kongsted
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230, Odense M, Denmark. .,Chiropractic Knowledge Hub, 5230, Odense M, Denmark.
| | - Line Thomassen
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230, Odense M, Denmark
| | - Jan Hartvigsen
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230, Odense M, Denmark.,Chiropractic Knowledge Hub, 5230, Odense M, Denmark
| | - Susanne Ravn
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230, Odense M, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Svendsen MJ, Sandal LF, Kjær P, Nicholl BI, Cooper K, Mair F, Hartvigsen J, Stochkendahl MJ, Søgaard K, Mork PJ, Rasmussen C. Using Intervention Mapping to Develop a Decision Support System–Based Smartphone App (selfBACK) to Support Self-management of Nonspecific Low Back Pain: Development and Usability Study. J Med Internet Res 2022; 24:e26555. [PMID: 35072645 PMCID: PMC8822424 DOI: 10.2196/26555] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2020] [Revised: 03/07/2021] [Accepted: 11/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background
International guidelines consistently endorse the promotion of self-management for people with low back pain (LBP); however, implementation of these guidelines remains a challenge. Digital health interventions, such as those that can be provided by smartphone apps, have been proposed as a promising mode of supporting self-management in people with chronic conditions, including LBP. However, the evidence base for digital health interventions to support self-management of LBP is weak, and detailed descriptions and documentation of the interventions are lacking. Structured intervention mapping (IM) constitutes a 6-step process that can be used to guide the development of complex interventions.
Objective
The aim of this paper is to describe the IM process for designing and creating an app-based intervention designed to support self-management of nonspecific LBP to reduce pain-related disability.
Methods
The first 5 steps of the IM process were systematically applied. The core processes included literature reviews, brainstorming and group discussions, and the inclusion of stakeholders and representatives from the target population. Over a period of >2 years, the intervention content and the technical features of delivery were created, tested, and revised through user tests, feasibility studies, and a pilot study.
Results
A behavioral outcome was identified as a proxy for reaching the overall program goal, that is, increased use of evidence-based self-management strategies. Physical exercises, education, and physical activity were the main components of the self-management intervention and were designed and produced to be delivered via a smartphone app. All intervention content was theoretically underpinned by the behavior change theory and the normalization process theory.
Conclusions
We describe a detailed example of the application of the IM approach for the development of a theory-driven, complex, and digital intervention designed to support self-management of LBP. This description provides transparency in the developmental process of the intervention and can be a possible blueprint for designing and creating future digital health interventions for self-management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Malene Jagd Svendsen
- The National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Louise Fleng Sandal
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Per Kjær
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Health Sciences Research Centre, UCL University College, Odense, Denmark
| | - Barbara I Nicholl
- Institute of Health and Wellbeing, General Practice & Primary Care, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Kay Cooper
- School of Health Sciences, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, United Kingdom
| | - Frances Mair
- Institute of Health and Wellbeing, General Practice & Primary Care, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Jan Hartvigsen
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Chiropractic Knowledge Hub, Odense, Denmark
| | - Mette Jensen Stochkendahl
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Chiropractic Knowledge Hub, Odense, Denmark
| | - Karen Søgaard
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Paul Jarle Mork
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Charlotte Rasmussen
- The National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Rolving N, Agerbo K, Aalkjær Clausen S, Denby KAR, Jacobsen AP, Langagergaard V. Does group-based cognitive therapy improve functional ability, pain, catastrophic thoughts and quality of life in patients with persistent low back pain and psychological risk factors? A randomised controlled trial in a secondary care setting. Clin Rehabil 2021; 36:317-330. [PMID: 34967224 DOI: 10.1177/02692155211056202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the effects of a group-based cognitive behavioural intervention for patients with persistent low back pain (LBP) and psychological risk factors referred to secondary care. DESIGN A randomised controlled trial. SETTING Silkeborg Regional Hospital, Denmark. SUBJECTS A total of 136 participants with chronic LBP and psychological risk factors. INTERVENTIONS Participants were randomised to the standard care group, including examination by a rheumatologist and/or a physiotherapist, or the intervention group, including standard care plus a multidisciplinary group-based pain management programme. MAIN MEASURES Patient-reported outcomes were collected at baseline and after 6 and 12 months. The primary outcome was disability (Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire). Secondary outcomes included low back pain intensity, pain catastrophising, health-related quality of life, and sick leave. RESULTS Among 136 participants, 68 (mean age: 41.7 years (SD 11.8)) were randomised to standard care and 68 (mean age: 46.0 years (SD 10.8)) were randomised to the intervention group. Except for age, baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. 12-month follow-up was completed by 92.6% in the intervention group and 80.9% in the standard care group. Both groups achieved significant improvements on disability, with a reduction of -4.8 points (SD 6.1) in the intervention group compared to -3.7 points (SD 5.2), resulting in an insignificant difference between groups. No significant differences were found in the secondary outcomes. CONCLUSION A group-based pain management programme was no more effective than standard care for patients with persistent LBP and psychological risk factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nanna Rolving
- 224712DEFACTUM, Corporate Quality, Central Denmark Region, Aarhus, Denmark.,Spine Center, Diagnostic Center, 53179Silkeborg Regional Hospital, Silkeborg, Denmark.,Department of Public Health, 1006Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Karina Agerbo
- Spine Center, Diagnostic Center, 53179Silkeborg Regional Hospital, Silkeborg, Denmark
| | - Stine Aalkjær Clausen
- Spine Center, Diagnostic Center, 53179Silkeborg Regional Hospital, Silkeborg, Denmark
| | - Kate Ane Rauff Denby
- Spine Center, Diagnostic Center, 53179Silkeborg Regional Hospital, Silkeborg, Denmark
| | - Anna Puk Jacobsen
- Department of Social Affairs and Employment, Aarhus Municipality, Aarhus, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Social Medicine & Rehabilitation, Gødstrup Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Vivian Langagergaard
- Spine Center, Diagnostic Center, 53179Silkeborg Regional Hospital, Silkeborg, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Social Medicine & Rehabilitation, Gødstrup Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Diener I. Physiotherapy support for self-management of persisting musculoskeletal pain disorders. SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOTHERAPY 2021; 77:1564. [PMID: 34859158 PMCID: PMC8603210 DOI: 10.4102/sajp.v77i1.1564] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2021] [Accepted: 07/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Musculoskeletal pain (MSKP) is an extremely common pain disorder in almost all populations. Self-management (SM) support is a programme to prepare people to self-manage their health condition effectively, while maintaining quality of life. SM is a cost-effective and context-specific strategy to address the global public health burden. OBJECTIVES Self-management needs a change in behaviour from seeking unnecessary medical care to safely self-managing symptoms. As changing individuals' behaviour is challenging, the objective of my literature review was to identify the characteristics, in both therapist and patient, to successfully engage in SM. METHOD A narrative literature review, that could inform evidence-based support programmes for SM of MSKP. RESULTS Studies on successful implementation of SM of MSKP do not report strong outcomes. However, in more recent years a few positive outcomes were reported, possibly as a result of research evidence for the application of psychosocial skills and contemporary pain neuroscience in the management of persistent MSKP. CONCLUSION Psychologically-informed physiotherapy, addressing psychosocial barriers to the maintenance of SM programmes, could facilitate more successful outcomes. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS Before engaging in a SM support programme, obstacles to behaviour change must be identified and addressed in a SM support programme, to facilitate individuals towards taking safe responsibility for their healthcare. Therapists working with patients with persistent MSKP, should upskill themselves to be in line with the latest pain and psychosocial research literature. Moreover, communication skills training seems to be a priority for effective SM support programmes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ina Diener
- Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Kvale G, Frisk B, Jürgensen M, Børtveit T, Ødegaard-Olsen ØT, Wilhelmsen-Langeland A, Aarli BB, Sandnes K, Rykken S, Haugstvedt A, Hystad SW, Søfteland E. Evaluation of Novel Concentrated Interdisciplinary Group Rehabilitation for Patients With Chronic Illnesses: Protocol for a Nonrandomized Clinical Intervention Study. JMIR Res Protoc 2021; 10:e32216. [PMID: 34505838 PMCID: PMC8500350 DOI: 10.2196/32216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2021] [Revised: 09/08/2021] [Accepted: 09/08/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND An aging population with a growing burden of chronic complex illnesses will seriously challenge the public health care system. Consequently, novel and efficacious treatment approaches are highly warranted. Based on our experiences with concentrated treatment formats for other health challenges, we developed a highly concentrated interdisciplinary group rehabilitation approach for chronic illnesses. OBJECTIVE We aim to explore the acceptability of the intervention and describe potential changes in functional impairment at follow-up. METHODS The cornerstones of the intervention are as follows: (1) prepare the patient for change prior to treatment, (2) focus on health promoting microchoices instead of symptoms, and (3) expect the patient to integrate the changes in everyday living with limited hands-on follow-up. The intervention will be delivered to patients with highly diverse primary symptoms, namely patients with low back pain, post-COVID-19 symptoms, anxiety and depression, and type 2 diabetes. RESULTS Recruitment started between August 2020 and January 2021 (according to the illness category). For initial 3-month results, recruitment is expected to be completed by the end of 2021. CONCLUSIONS If successful, this study may have a substantial impact on the treatment of low back pain, post-COVID-19 symptoms, anxiety and depression, and type 2 diabetes, which together constitute a major socioeconomic cost. Further, the study may widen the evidence base for the use of the concentrated treatment format in a diverse group of medical conditions. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/32216.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gerd Kvale
- Helse i Hardanger, Øystese, Norway
- Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
- Division of Psychiatry, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Bente Frisk
- Helse i Hardanger, Øystese, Norway
- Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, Norway
| | - Marte Jürgensen
- Helse i Hardanger, Øystese, Norway
- Division of Psychiatry, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | | | - Øystein Theodor Ødegaard-Olsen
- Helse i Hardanger, Øystese, Norway
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Ane Wilhelmsen-Langeland
- Helse i Hardanger, Øystese, Norway
- Division of Psychiatry, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Bernt Bøgvald Aarli
- Helse i Hardanger, Øystese, Norway
- Department of Thoracic Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | | | | | - Anne Haugstvedt
- Helse i Hardanger, Øystese, Norway
- Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, Norway
| | | | - Eirik Søfteland
- Helse i Hardanger, Øystese, Norway
- Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Kongsted A, Ris I, Kjaer P, Hartvigsen J. Self-management at the core of back pain care: 10 key points for clinicians. Braz J Phys Ther 2021; 25:396-406. [PMID: 34116904 PMCID: PMC8353288 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2021.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2021] [Revised: 04/26/2021] [Accepted: 05/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A paradigm shift away from clinician-led management of people with chronic disorders to people playing a key role in their own care has been advocated. At the same time, good health is recognised as the ability to adapt to changing life circumstances and to self-manage. Under this paradigm, successful management of persistent back pain is not mainly about clinicians diagnosing and curing patients, but rather about a partnership where clinicians help individuals live good lives despite back pain. OBJECTIVE In this paper, we discuss why there is a need for clinicians to engage in supporting self-management for people with persistent back pain and which actions clinicians can take to integrate self-management support in their care for people with back pain. DISCUSSION People with low back pain (LBP) self-manage their pain most of the time. Therefore, clinicians and health systems should empower them to do it well and provide knowledge and skills to make good decisions related to LBP and general health. Self-management does not mean that people are alone and without health care, rather it empowers people to know when to consult for diagnostic assessment, symptom relief, or advice. A shift in health care paradigm and clinicians' roles is not only challenging for individual clinicians, it requires organisational support in clinical settings and health systems. Currently, there is no clear evidence showing how exactly LBP self-management is most effectively supported in clinical practice, but core elements have been identified that involve working with cognitions related to pain, behaviour change, and patient autonomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alice Kongsted
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense M, Denmark; Chiropractic Knowledge Hub, Odense M, Denmark.
| | - Inge Ris
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense M, Denmark
| | - Per Kjaer
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense M, Denmark; Health Sciences Research Center, UCL University College, Odense M, Denmark
| | - Jan Hartvigsen
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense M, Denmark; Chiropractic Knowledge Hub, Odense M, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Ris I, Schröder K, Kongsted A, Abbott A, Nilsen P, Hartvigsen J, Öberg B. Adapting the determinants of implementation behavior questionnaire to evaluate implementation of a structured low back pain programme using mixed-methods. Health Sci Rep 2021; 4:e266. [PMID: 33842696 PMCID: PMC8020443 DOI: 10.1002/hsr2.266] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2020] [Revised: 01/17/2021] [Accepted: 02/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Best-practice low back pain (LBP) primary care programmes have been developed based on evidence-based clinical guidelines and implemented in Sweden and Denmark. The theoretical domains framework (TDF) was utilized in the design of the implementation strategy. Based on the TDF domains, the Determinants of Implementation Behavior Questionnaire (DIBQ) has been developed to evaluate implementation determinants, but its feasibility and validity need to be tested and adapted to study specific contexts. This study aimed to tailor the DIBQ for evaluation of implementation for LBP primary care programmes. The objectives were to (a) translate the DIBQ into Swedish and Danish, (b) adapt the DIBQ into DIBQ-tailored (DIBQ-t) to study content validity, (c) test the DIBQ-t for feasibility, and (d) perform validity testing of DIBQ-t. METHODS We used a mixed-methods design. First, forward translation of the DIBQ, then adaptation into DIBQ-t using qualitative face validity and quantitative content validity was done. Finally, to determine feasibility and construct validity using confirmatory factor analyses, we used data from DIBQ-t collected after the programmes' 2-day course. RESULTS The final DIBQ-t included 28 items describing 10 of the original 18 DIBQ domains and was considered feasible. A total of 598 clinicians out of 609 responded to the DIBQ-t, with only 2‰ of the items missing. The confirmatory factor analyses showed a good fit after removing two items with the lowest domain loading. The DIBQ-t maintained linkage to all domains within the Behavioral Change Wheel. The clinicians' expectations, according to the DIBQ-t, indicate facilitating determinants outweighing barriers at the initiation of implementation processes. CONCLUSIONS The study resulted in a feasible and valid version of a questionnaire for evaluating clinicians' expectations regarding implementation determinants of best-practice LBP primary care programmes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Inge Ris
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical BiomechanicsUniversity of Southern DenmarkOdense MDenmark
- Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Division of Prevention, Rehabilitation and Community Medicine, Unit of PhysiotherapyLinköping UniversityLinköpingSweden
| | - Karin Schröder
- Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Division of Prevention, Rehabilitation and Community Medicine, Unit of PhysiotherapyLinköping UniversityLinköpingSweden
| | - Alice Kongsted
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical BiomechanicsUniversity of Southern DenmarkOdense MDenmark
- Chiropractic Knowledge HubOdense MDenmark
| | - Allan Abbott
- Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Division of Prevention, Rehabilitation and Community Medicine, Unit of PhysiotherapyLinköping UniversityLinköpingSweden
| | - Per Nilsen
- Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Division of Prevention, Rehabilitation and Community Medicine, Unit of PhysiotherapyLinköping UniversityLinköpingSweden
| | - Jan Hartvigsen
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical BiomechanicsUniversity of Southern DenmarkOdense MDenmark
- Chiropractic Knowledge HubOdense MDenmark
| | - Birgitta Öberg
- Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Division of Prevention, Rehabilitation and Community Medicine, Unit of PhysiotherapyLinköping UniversityLinköpingSweden
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Morsø L, Bogh SB, Ris I, Kongsted A. Mind the gap - Evaluation of the promotion initiatives for implementation of the GLA:D® back clinician courses. Musculoskelet Sci Pract 2021; 53:102373. [PMID: 33823485 DOI: 10.1016/j.msksp.2021.102373] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2020] [Revised: 03/06/2021] [Accepted: 03/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Translation of research into practice is a methodological challenge. The GLA:D® Back program was initiated to implement evidence-based care for people with low back pain inspired by GLA:D® (Good Life with osteoArthritis in Denmark) that has succeeded in implementing evidence-based care for knee and hip osteoarthritis. This study evaluates the spread and reach of promotion initiatives for GLA:D® Back clinician courses, and the adoption of the GLA:D® Back intervention in clinical practice. METHODS Pre-defined success criteria addressed; i) spread; achievement of intended promotion activities (e.g. social media), ii) reach; recruitment of clinicians with certain profiles (e.g. gender balance). Adoption was defined as patient enrollment in the GLA:D® Back registry by course participants. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was used to investigate associations between adoption and clinician characteristics. RESULTS Most clinicians signed up based on information from colleagues (22%). Pre-defined goals for reach, except one, was obtained. 23% (140) of clinicians initiated the GLA:D® Back program in clinical practice within <90 days of course participation; mainly physiotherapists (p < 0.001). The odds ratio for starting GLA:D® Back patient care in a chiropractic setting was 7.4 [2.5; 21.4], indicating that physiotherapists employed by chiropractors mostly handled the intervention. CONCLUSION Future promotion strategies should recognize the influence of colleagues and professional networks. Converting clinician courses into patient care was mostly adopted physiotherapists. Although, evaluation processes were less useful in this study, future evaluation of health care processes has potential to inform the implementation of new models in future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lars Morsø
- Open Patient Explorative Network (OPEN), Region of Suothern Denmark, Denmark; Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
| | - Søren Bie Bogh
- Open Patient Explorative Network (OPEN), Region of Suothern Denmark, Denmark; Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Inge Ris
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Alice Kongsted
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; Nordic Institute of Chiropractic and Clinical Biomechanics (NIKKB), Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Ris I, Broholm D, Hartvigsen J, Andersen TE, Kongsted A. Adherence and characteristics of participants enrolled in a standardised programme of patient education and exercises for low back pain, GLA:D® Back - a prospective observational study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2021; 22:473. [PMID: 34022826 PMCID: PMC8141215 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-021-04329-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2020] [Accepted: 05/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Low back pain is often long-lasting, and implementation of low-cost interventions to improve care and minimise its burden is needed. GLA:D® Back is an evidence-based programme consisting of patient education and supervised exercises for people with low back pain, which was implemented nationwide in primary care clinics in Denmark. To assess how the intervention was received and factors influencing adherence to the program, we aimed to evaluate participants' adherence to the intervention and identified characteristics related to the completion of GLA:D® Back. Specifically, we investigated: 1) level of attendance of participants enrolled in the programme, and 2) participant-related factors associated with low attendance. METHODS Primary care clinicians delivered GLA:D® Back, a standardised 10-week programme of 2 educational and 16 supervised exercise sessions, to patients with low back pain. Attendance was defined as low, medium or high based on self-reported number of attended sessions. Additional participant-reported data included demographic characteristics, pain, prognostic risk profiles, self-efficacy, illness-beliefs, function and clinician-reported physical performance tests. Results for high, medium, low, and unknown attendance were reported descriptively. Odds ratios for low attendance compared to medium/high attendance were calculated by including all baseline factors in a mixed-model logistic regression model. RESULTS Of 1730 participants, 52% had high, 23% medium, and 25% low levels of attendance. Level of attendance was not strongly associated with participants' individual factors, but in combination, prediction of low attendance was fair (AUC 0.77; 95% CI 0.74-0.79). The strongest indicator of low attendance was not completing the baseline questionnaire. CONCLUSIONS Most participants of a 10-week low back pain programme attended almost all session. Non-response to the baseline questionnaire was strongly associated with low attendance, whereas individual patient characteristics were weakly related to attendance. Not completing baseline questionnaires might be an early indicator of poor adherence in programs for people with persistent low back pain. TRIAL REGISTRATION The Health Research Ethics for Southern Denmark decided there was no need for ethical approval (S-20172000-93). The Danish data collection has obtained authorisation from the Danish Data Protection Agency as part of the University of Southern Denmark's institutional authorisation (DPA no. 2015-57-0008 SDU no. 17/30591). The trial was registred at ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03570463 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Inge Ris
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230 Odense M, Denmark
| | - Daniel Broholm
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230 Odense M, Denmark
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Multidisciplinary Pain Centre, Vejle and Middelfart Hospitals, Østre Hougvej 55, 5500 Middelfart, Denmark
| | - Jan Hartvigsen
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230 Odense M, Denmark
- Chiropractic Knowledge Hub, Campusvej 55, 5230 Odense M, Denmark
| | - Tonny Elmose Andersen
- Department of Psychology, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230 Odense M, Denmark
| | - Alice Kongsted
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230 Odense M, Denmark
- Chiropractic Knowledge Hub, Campusvej 55, 5230 Odense M, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Lewis J, Ridehalgh C, Moore A, Hall K. This is the day your life must surely change : Prioritising behavioural change in musculoskeletal practice. Physiotherapy 2021; 112:158-162. [PMID: 34111808 DOI: 10.1016/j.physio.2021.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2020] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Behavioural change is the modification or transformation of behaviour. Health behaviour has been defined as, 'any activity undertaken for the purpose of preventing or detecting disease or for improving health and wellbeing' (Bennell et al., 2019 [1]). For a smoker it is acting on the decision to stop or reduce the number of cigarettes smoked, for someone with a higher than ideal body mass index, it is acting to reduce weight and for someone who isn't achieving ideal levels of exercise (Briggs et al., 2020 [2]) it is the decision and action to increase metabolic activity. With increased understanding of the importance of self-management and impact of lifestyle, clinicians supporting people presenting with musculoskeletal symptoms have recognized that behavioural change is an essential component of the care we need to prioritize. It is about sharing the benefits of lifestyle choices that promote health, discussing how to introduce and maintain them, and supporting people through their journey of change, so the change becomes the new normal. Behavioural change science assumes that (i) morbidity and mortality are due in part to certain behaviours and (ii) these behaviours are modifiable. The aim of this debate article is to discuss reasons why clinicians must include long term behavioural change into their management plan and methods they may use to facilitate the change ensuring recipients are empowered to act and make today the day their 'lives will surely change'.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeremy Lewis
- Department of Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation Science, College of Health Sciences, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar; School of Health and Social Work, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield AL10 9AB, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom; Therapy Department, Central London Community Healthcare National Health Service Trust, London, United Kingdom.
| | - Colette Ridehalgh
- School of Health Sciences, University of Brighton, Eastbourne BN20 7UR, East Sussex, United Kingdom
| | - Ann Moore
- School of Health Sciences, University of Brighton, Eastbourne BN20 7UR, East Sussex, United Kingdom
| | - Kevin Hall
- School of Health Sciences, University of Brighton, Eastbourne BN20 7UR, East Sussex, United Kingdom; Western Sussex Hospitals NHS Trust, Lyndhurst Rd, Worthing, West Sussex BN11 2DH, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Factors influencing implementation of the GLA: D Back, an educational/exercise intervention for low back pain: a mixed-methods study. JBI Evid Implement 2021; 19:394-408. [PMID: 33965996 PMCID: PMC8635265 DOI: 10.1097/xeb.0000000000000284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Introduction and aims: Guidelines for low back pain (LBP) management recommend patient education and exercises. GLA:D Back, a structured group-based patient-education exercise program for LBP, facilitates evidence-based care implementation. This study aimed to inform on the implementation processes, assessing clinician-related factors. Objectives were to describe profiles of implementers and nonimplementers by demographics, and responses to the tailored version of the Determinants of Implementation Behaviour Questionnaire (DIBQ-t) qualitatively explore clinician perspectives on implementation, and compare the results of the DIBQ-t with the interview data to evaluate their fit of integration for facilitators, barriers, and new insights. Methods: A mixed-methods parallel design study was conducted. Physiotherapists and chiropractors, educated in the GLA:D Back program, were asked to complete the DIBQ-t (measuring theoretical determinants of implementation) 6 months after their training. Implementers and nonimplementers of the program were selected for interviews. Qualitative data were used to understand clinicians’ viewpoints on implementation, providing a broader perspective on the quantitative data and exploring new aspects. Results: More physiotherapists than chiropractors implemented the program. Implementers responded more positively on most domains of the DIBQ-t. The interviews revealed three themes important for implementation: personal gain, practicalities, and buying-in on the program. Clinicians’ attitudes to the program appeared additionally as relevant to implementation. Conclusion: The profession of the clinician was associated with implementation behavior. Implementers and nonimplementers identified the same themes but perceived them as either positive or negative. Both groups reported high levels of knowledge and skills, indicating that training alone is insufficient for implementation.
Collapse
|
24
|
|
25
|
Molgaard Nielsen A, Hartvigsen J, Kongsted A, Öberg B, Enthoven P, Abbott A, Lauridsen HH. The patient enablement instrument for back pain: reliability, content validity, construct validity and responsiveness. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2021; 19:116. [PMID: 33836764 PMCID: PMC8033700 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-021-01758-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2020] [Accepted: 03/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Currently, there are no outcome measures assessing the ability of people with non-specific low back pain to self-manage their illness. Inspired by the ‘Patient Enablement Instrument’, we developed the Patient Enablement Instrument for Back Pain (PEI-BP). The aim of this study was to describe the development of the Patient Enablement Instrument for Back Pain (PEI-BP) and investigate content validity, construct validity, internal consistency, test–retest reliability, measurement error, responsiveness and floor and ceiling effects. Methods The PEI-BP consists of 6 items that are rated on a 0–10 Numeric Rating Scale. Measurement properties were evaluated using the COSMIN taxonomy and were based on three cohorts from primary care with low back pain: The content validity cohort (N = 14) which participated in semi-structured interviews, the GLA:D® Back cohort (N = 272) and the test–retest cohort (N = 37) which both completed self-reported questionnaires. For construct validity and responsiveness, enablement was compared to disability (Oswestry Disability Index), back pain beliefs (Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire), fear avoidance (Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire—physical activity), mental health (SF-36), educational level and number of previous episodes of low back pain. Results The PEI-BP was found to have acceptable content validity, construct validity, reliability (internal consistency, test–retest reliability and measurement error) and responsiveness. The Smallest Detectable Change was 10.1 points illustrating that a patient would have to change more than 1/6 of the scale range for it to be a true change. A skewed distribution towards the high scores were found at baseline indicating a potentially problematic ceiling effect in the current population. Conclusions The PEI-BP can be considered a valid and reliable tool to measure enablement on people seeking care for non-specific LBP. Further testing of the PEI-BP in populations with more severe LBP is recommended. Trial registration: Not applicable. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12955-021-01758-0.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Molgaard Nielsen
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230, Odense M, Denmark.
| | - J Hartvigsen
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230, Odense M, Denmark.,Chiropractic Knowledge Hub, Campusvej 55, 5230, Odense M, Denmark
| | - A Kongsted
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230, Odense M, Denmark.,Chiropractic Knowledge Hub, Campusvej 55, 5230, Odense M, Denmark
| | - B Öberg
- Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Division of Prevention, Rehabilitation and Community Medicine, Unit of Physiotherapy, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - P Enthoven
- Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Division of Prevention, Rehabilitation and Community Medicine, Unit of Physiotherapy, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - A Abbott
- Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Division of Prevention, Rehabilitation and Community Medicine, Unit of Physiotherapy, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - H H Lauridsen
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230, Odense M, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Dimmek DJ, Korallus C, Buyny S, Christoph G, Lichtinghagen R, Jacobs R, Nugraha B. Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor and Immune Cells in Osteoarthritis, Chronic Low Back Pain, and Chronic Widespread Pain Patients: Association with Anxiety and Depression. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2021; 57:327. [PMID: 33915758 PMCID: PMC8065931 DOI: 10.3390/medicina57040327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2021] [Revised: 03/17/2021] [Accepted: 03/25/2021] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Musculoskeletal dysfunction can induce several types of chronic pain syndromes. It is of particular interest to elucidate the pathomechanism of different forms of chronic pain. It is possible that patients who have developed chronic widespread pain (CWP) may endure different pathomechanisms as compared to those who suffer from local pain (osteoarthritis, OA) and regional pain (chronic low back pain, cLBP), especially with regard to pain regulation and its related biomediators. The aim of this study was to determine the differences in pathomechanisms among these patients by measuring pain-related biomediators, particularly brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF). Additionally, subpopulations of immune cells were determined in parallel. Materials and Methods: Patients and healthy subjects (HSs) were recruited (age and gender-matched). BDNF was measured from serum samples of patients and HSs and the data of body composition parameters were recorded. Additionally, both patients and HSs were asked to fill in questionnaires related to pain intensity, anxiety, and depression. Results: Our results highlight that the levels of both free and total BDNF are significantly lower in pain patients compared to HSs, with p values of 0.041 and 0.024, respectively. The number of CD3- CD56bright natural killer (NK) cells shows significant differences between the groups. Comparing all chronic pain patients with HSs reveals a significantly lower number of CD4+ CD8+ T cells (p = 0.031), CD3- CD56bright NK cells (p = 0.049) and CD20+ CD3- cells (p = 0.007). Conclusions: To conclude, it seems that a general conformity between the pathomechanisms of different chronic pain diseases exists, although there are unique findings only in specific chronic pain patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dominique Josephine Dimmek
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str.1, 30625 Hannover, Germany; (D.J.D.); (C.K.); (G.C.)
| | - Christoph Korallus
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str.1, 30625 Hannover, Germany; (D.J.D.); (C.K.); (G.C.)
| | - Sabine Buyny
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str.1, 30625 Hannover, Germany; (S.B.); (R.J.)
| | - Gutenbrunner Christoph
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str.1, 30625 Hannover, Germany; (D.J.D.); (C.K.); (G.C.)
| | - Ralf Lichtinghagen
- Institute of Clinical Chemistry, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str.1, 30625 Hannover, Germany;
| | - Roland Jacobs
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str.1, 30625 Hannover, Germany; (S.B.); (R.J.)
| | - Boya Nugraha
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str.1, 30625 Hannover, Germany; (D.J.D.); (C.K.); (G.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Skovbo MH, Agerbo K, Jakobsen A, Clausen SA, Langagergaard V, Rolving N. Description of content, structure and theoretical model of a group-based pain management programme in the treatment of patients with persistent non-specific low back pain and psychological risk factors in a secondary sector setting. Clin Rehabil 2021; 35:1077-1088. [PMID: 33586476 DOI: 10.1177/0269215521995185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To present the theoretical foundation and methodological considerations for a group-based pain management programme for patients with persistent non-specific low back pain and psychosocial risk factors. METHOD The Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist was used as a framework for describing the content, structure and context of the program. The theoretical rationale underlying the pain management programme was described using the first three steps of the Intervention Mapping framework. The Fear-avoidance model and the Self-efficacy Theory were identified as the two main theories. These were used to establish specific factors addressed by the pain management programme as well as expected outcomes. INTERVENTION DESCRIPTION A multidisciplinary, group-based programme using a cognitive-behavioural approach was developed. The programme consisting of six sessions of two hours duration, took place at a spine clinic at a regional hospital in Denmark. Psychoeducation and cognitive restructuring were specific strategies hypothesised to induce changes in outcome measures. The outcomes expected to change as a result of the intervention were disability, quality of life, sick leave and physical activity. A pilot study was performed, subsequent adjustments made and the final content and educational materials completed by January 2017. CONCLUSION The theoretical foundation and underlying evidence for the hypothesised change mechanisms in the use of a cognitive-behavioural approach was presented. A theoretically sound and practically feasible intervention has been developed and its effectiveness is being determined in a randomised controlled trial, including 130 low back pain patients, which is currently underway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mette Høj Skovbo
- Spine Clinic, Diagnostic Centre, Silkeborg Regional Hospital, Silkeborg, Denmark
| | - Karina Agerbo
- Spine Clinic, Diagnostic Centre, Silkeborg Regional Hospital, Silkeborg, Denmark
| | - Anna Jakobsen
- Department of Clinical Social Medicine and Rehabilitation, Gødstrup Hospital, Herning, Denmark
| | | | - Vivian Langagergaard
- Department of Clinical Social Medicine and Rehabilitation, Gødstrup Hospital, Herning, Denmark.,University Research Clinic for Innovative Patient Pathways, Diagnostic Center, Silkeborg Regional Hospital, Silkeborg, Denmark
| | - Nanna Rolving
- Spine Clinic, Diagnostic Centre, Silkeborg Regional Hospital, Silkeborg, Denmark.,Center of Rehabilitation Research, DEFACTUM, Central Denmark Region, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Lemieux J, Kawchuk G, Kongsted A, Hartvigsen J, Abdollah V, Jones A. The feasibility of implementing an English language version of GLA:D Back. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2021; 7:38. [PMID: 33522956 PMCID: PMC7849100 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-020-00758-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2020] [Accepted: 12/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evidenced-based clinical guidelines for the treatment of low back pain (LBP) consistently suggest educating patients about their back pain, its natural course, and providing advice to keep active and continue working. Despite this evidence, clinicians routinely do not follow these recommendations resulting in ineffective and fragmented care. GLA:D® Back, a standardized care package, was originally developed in Denmark to assist clinicians in implementing evidence-based care. This study will evaluate the feasibility of implementing the English version of the Danish GLA:D® Back program in Alberta, Canada. METHODS Thirty-five clinicians from nineteen clinics in Alberta, Canada, participated. Feasibility of program implementation, our primary objective, was evaluated within 3 months. Feasibility success was defined as 50% clinician/clinic adoption in addition to 66-88 enrolled participants registered in the database. Our secondary objectives included collecting data pertaining to clinician confidence, attitudes and behaviour of treating patients, perceived barriers and facilitators of program in addition to collecting patient-data regarding pain, function, general health and self-efficacy. RESULTS The majority of the clinics (15/19, 79%) offered GLA:D® Back to their patients within the study period. Of the participating clinicians, GLA:D® Back was delivered by (25/35, 71%) of clinicians. In total, 78 patients were enrolled in the program and (69/78, 88%) participants attended the final assessment. Secondarily, clinicians demonstrated a biomedical and behavioural orientation along with high confidence when treating LBP patients while patient outcomes trended toward improvement. CONCLUSION The English translation of the Danish GLA:D Back program was feasible for Albertan clinicians to implement into practice in both urban and rural settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Lemieux
- Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - G Kawchuk
- Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
| | - A Kongsted
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - J Hartvigsen
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - V Abdollah
- Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - A Jones
- Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Auliffe SM, Korakakis V, Hilfiker R, Whiteley R, O'Sullivan K. Participant characteristics are poorly reported in exercise trials in tendinopathy: A systematic review. Phys Ther Sport 2020; 48:43-53. [PMID: 33360409 DOI: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2020.12.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2020] [Revised: 12/11/2020] [Accepted: 12/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the reporting of eligibility criteria and baseline participant characteristics in randomised controlled trials investigating the effects of exercise interventions in tendinopathy. METHODS Randomised controlled trials investigating the effects of exercise therapy compared to a non-exercising intervention in upper and lower limb tendinopathy were included. Data extraction was categorised into the following domains: participant demographics, tendinopathy descriptors, general health, participant recruitment and eligibility criteria. RESULTS The review included the following tendinopathies: Achilles (n = 9), gluteal (n = 2), lateral elbow tendinopathy (n = 15), patellar (n = 3) plantar (n = 3), and rotator cuff (n = 13). Age, sex, duration of symptoms and symptom severity were commonly reported across the review, while prior history of tendinopathy was poorly reported (6/45). Variables such as physical activity level (17/45), sleep (0/45), psychological factors (2/45), medication at baseline (8/45), co morbid health complaints (10/45) and sociodemographic factors (11/45) were poorly reported across the included studies. Substantial variation existed between studies in the specific eligibility criteria used. CONCLUSION The findings of this systematic review demonstrate that participant characteristics are poorly reported in exercise trials in tendinopathy. To improve effectiveness of exercise interventions in tendinopathy, improved reporting of participant characteristics may allow better comparisons and targeted interventions for specific subgroups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seán Mc Auliffe
- Department of Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation Science, College of Health Sciences, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.
| | | | - Roger Hilfiker
- School of Health Sciences, HES-SO Valais-Wallis, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland Valais, Leukerbad, Switzerland
| | - Rodney Whiteley
- Aspetar Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Hospital, Doha, Qatar
| | - Kieran O'Sullivan
- School of Allied Health, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland; Ageing Research Centre, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Mendonça CR, Noll M, Castro MCR, Silveira EA. Effects of Nutritional Interventions in the Control of Musculoskeletal Pain: An Integrative Review. Nutrients 2020; 12:nu12103075. [PMID: 33050122 PMCID: PMC7601187 DOI: 10.3390/nu12103075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2020] [Revised: 08/27/2020] [Accepted: 08/31/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Food consumption has significant positive effects on an individual’s health status, including the reduction of symptoms associated with musculoskeletal pain. However, specific food groups indicated for the treatment of pain are not yet determined. Hence, this review aimed to analyze the effects of nutritional interventions with specific diets, oils and/or fatty acids, and foodstuffs in natura in the reduction of musculoskeletal pain. An integrative review was conducted in the following databases: Embase, PubMed, LILACS, and Google Scholar. Clinical trials written in English, Spanish, and Portuguese and published between 2000 and March 2020 were included in this review. Seventeen studies were included. Among these, a reduction of musculoskeletal pain with different types of nutritional interventions, such as vegan and Mediterranean diets and the consumption of blueberry, strawberry, passion fruit peel extract, argan oil, fish oil (omega-3), olive oil, and undenatured type II collagen and vitamin D gel capsules, was observed in 14 studies. Eight studies evaluated the profiles of several inflammatory markers, and of these, decreased interleukin (IL)-6, IL-1β, and tumor necrosis factor-α levels were observed in two studies. This review suggests that different nutritional interventions with specific diets, oils and/or fatty acids, and foodstuffs in natura reduce musculoskeletal pain, specifically in adults with osteoarthritis. Besides pain improvement, nutritional interventions, including the consumption of strawberry and vitamin D gel capsules, decrease the levels of several inflammatory markers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolina Rodrigues Mendonça
- Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia 74605-050, Goiás, Brazil; (M.N.); (M.C.R.C.); (E.A.S.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Matias Noll
- Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia 74605-050, Goiás, Brazil; (M.N.); (M.C.R.C.); (E.A.S.)
- Instituto Federal Goiano, Campus Ceres, Ceres 76300-000, Goiás, Brazil
| | - Maria Clara Rezende Castro
- Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia 74605-050, Goiás, Brazil; (M.N.); (M.C.R.C.); (E.A.S.)
| | - Erika Aparecida Silveira
- Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia 74605-050, Goiás, Brazil; (M.N.); (M.C.R.C.); (E.A.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Åkesson KE, Buchbinder R, Nordin M, Hurley MV, Overgaard S, Chang LY, Yang RS, Chan DC, Dahlberg L, Nero H, Woolf A. Advances in delivery of health care for MSK conditions. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2020; 34:101597. [DOI: 10.1016/j.berh.2020.101597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|
32
|
Taulaniemi A, Kankaanpää M, Rinne M, Tokola K, Parkkari J, Suni JH. Fear-avoidance beliefs are associated with exercise adherence: secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) among female healthcare workers with recurrent low back pain. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil 2020; 12:28. [PMID: 32391158 PMCID: PMC7197113 DOI: 10.1186/s13102-020-00177-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2019] [Accepted: 04/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Background Exercise is recommended for the treatment and management of low back pain (LBP) and the prevention of chronicity. Exercise adherence has been only modest in intervention studies among people with musculoskeletal pain. Fear-avoidance beliefs (FABs) are known to affect exercise adherence. The purpose was twofold: to examine which bio-psycho-social factors contributed to exercise adherence during a 6-month neuromuscular exercise intervention among female healthcare workers with recurrent LBP, and to investigate how exercising affects FABs at 6 and 12 months’ follow-up. Methods Some 219 healthcare workers aged 30–55 years with mild-to-moderate re-current non-specific LBP were originally allocated into: 1) exercise, 2) counselling, 3) combined exercise and counselling, and 4) control groups. In the present secondary analysis, groups 1 and 3 (exercise only and exercise+counselling) were merged to be exercisers and groups 2 and 4 were merged to be non-exercisers. Baseline variables of the exercise compliers (≥24 times over 24 weeks; n = 58) were compared to those of the non-compliers (< 1 time/week, 0–23 times; n = 52). The effects of the exercise programme on FABs were analysed by a generalised linear mixed model according to the intention-to-treat principle (exercisers; n = 110 vs non-exercisers; n = 109) at three measurement points (baseline, 6, and 12 months). A per-protocol analysis compared the more exercised to the less exercised and non-exercisers. Results A low education level (p = 0.026), shift work (p = 0.023), low aerobic (p = 0.048) and musculoskeletal (p = 0.043) fitness, and high baseline physical activity-related FABs (p = 0.019) were related to low exercise adherence. The exercise programme reduced levels of both physical activity- and work-related FABs, and there was a dose response: FABs reduced more in persons who exercised ≥24 times compared to those who exercised 0–23 times. Conclusion Healthcare workers who had lower education and fitness levels, worked shifts, and had high physical activity-related FABs had a lower adherence to the 6-month neuromuscular exercise programme. Exercising with good adherence reduced levels of FABs, which have been shown to be linked with prolonged LBP. Motivational strategies should be targeted at persons with low education and fitness levels and high FABs in order to achieve better exercise adherence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Markku Kankaanpää
- 2Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| | - Marjo Rinne
- 1UKK Institute for Health Promotion Research, Tampere, Finland
| | - Kari Tokola
- 1UKK Institute for Health Promotion Research, Tampere, Finland
| | - Jari Parkkari
- 1UKK Institute for Health Promotion Research, Tampere, Finland
| | - Jaana H Suni
- 1UKK Institute for Health Promotion Research, Tampere, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Kongsted A, Hartvigsen J, Boyle E, Ris I, Kjaer P, Thomassen L, Vach W. GLA:D® Back: group-based patient education integrated with exercises to support self-management of persistent back pain - feasibility of implementing standardised care by a course for clinicians. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2019; 5:65. [PMID: 31086676 PMCID: PMC6507160 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-019-0448-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2018] [Accepted: 04/12/2019] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinical guidelines for management of low back pain (LBP) are not routinely implemented in practice, and guidelines rarely offer tools for implementation. Therefore, we developed GLA:D® Back, a standardised intervention of patient education and supervised exercises. This pilot study tested the feasibility of implementing GLA:D Back in clinical practice in Denmark by delivering a course for physiotherapists and chiropractors. It should further inform the planning of an implementation-effectiveness study using a pre-post group design alongside nation-wide implementation. METHODS Thirty-one clinicians from nine clinics participated. Feasibility of implementation was evaluated in terms of adoption and through focus group interviews and a feedback meeting. Patient-level data, including pain, disability, and pain enablement, were collected from (1) LBP patients visiting the clinics during a pre-specified 2-week period 2 months prior to clinicians attending the GLA:D Back course (n = 84), (2) LBP patients consulting during a 2-week period 2 months after the course (n = 77), and (3) those enrolled in GLA:D Back during 4 months after implementation (n = 89). Patient data were collected at baseline and at 4 months. RESULTS Clinicians' evaluations of the course were positive and resulted in several modifications. The clinical intervention was adopted by all test sites. Most patient characteristics were similar across groups. Patients mainly had persistent LBP (73% > 3 months) and most had been treated for more than 4 weeks at inclusion. Patients in GLA:D Back were more often retired (30% vs. 16% before implementation) and at high risk of poor prognosis (25% vs. 13%). Procedures for data collection were feasible, and outcomes after implementation, especially with GLA:D Back, were as good as or better than before implementation. Recruiting patients and achieving comparable pre- and post-groups was difficult. CONCLUSIONS Implementation of the GLA:D Back clinical intervention in Danish primary care physiotherapy and chiropractic clinics was feasible through a 2-day clinician course. Both clinicians and patients were satisfied with the programme, and patient-reported outcomes were slightly better than outcomes in patients registered before implementation. It was not deemed possible to conduct an implementation-effectiveness trial as part of a nation-wide implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alice Kongsted
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Nordic Institute of Chiropractic and Clinical Biomechanics, Odense, Denmark
| | - Jan Hartvigsen
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Nordic Institute of Chiropractic and Clinical Biomechanics, Odense, Denmark
| | - Eleanor Boyle
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Inge Ris
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Per Kjaer
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Health Sciences Research Centre, University College Lillebaelt, Odense, Denmark
| | - Line Thomassen
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Werner Vach
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Kongsted A, Ris I, Kjaer P, Vach W, Morsø L, Hartvigsen J. GLA:D ® Back: implementation of group-based patient education integrated with exercises to support self-management of back pain - protocol for a hybrid effectiveness-implementation study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2019; 20:85. [PMID: 30777049 PMCID: PMC6380042 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-019-2443-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2018] [Accepted: 01/30/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Reassuring patient education and exercise therapy are widely recommended interventions for back pain in clinical guidelines. However, many patients are offered non-guideline endorsed options, and strategies for effective implementation of guideline-based care have not yet been developed. This protocol outlines the evaluation of a strategy for nationwide implementation of standardised patient education and exercise therapy for people with persistent or recurrent back pain in a hybrid implementation-effectiveness design. The strategy and the evaluation were planned using the framework of the Behaviour Change Wheel. METHODS The main activity of the implementation strategy is a two-days course for physiotherapists and chiropractors in delivering patient education and exercise therapy that is aimed at supporting patient self-management. This comes with ready-to-use patient education materials and exercise programs. The clinical intervention is a group-based program consisting of two sessions of patient education and 8 weeks of supervised exercises. The program uses a cognitive-behavioural approach and the aim of the exercise component is to restore the patient's ability and confidence to move freely. The implementation process is evaluated in a dynamic process monitoring the penetration, adoption and fidelity of the clinical intervention. The clinical intervention and potential effect mechanisms will be evaluated at the patient-level using measures of knowledge, skills, beliefs, performance, self-efficacy and success in self-management. The education of clinicians will be evaluated via clinician-level outcomes, including the Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Scale, the Practitioner Confidence Scale, and the Determinants of Implementation Behaviour Questionnaire. Effects at a national level will be investigated via data from national registries of health care utilisation and sick-leave. DISCUSSION This implementation-effectiveness study is designed to evaluate the process of implementing an evidence-based intervention for back pain. It will inform the development of strategies for implementing evidence-based care for musculoskeletal pain conditions, it will enhance the understanding of mechanisms for developing patient self-management skills, and it will demonstrate the outcomes that are achievable in everyday clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03570463 . Registered 27 June 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alice Kongsted
- The Nordic Institute of Chiropractic and Clinical Biomechanics, Campusvej 55, 5230 Odense M, Denmark
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Inge Ris
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Per Kjaer
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Applied Health Science, University College Lillebaelt, Odense, Denmark
| | - Werner Vach
- The Nordic Institute of Chiropractic and Clinical Biomechanics, Campusvej 55, 5230 Odense M, Denmark
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Lars Morsø
- Centre for Quality, Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Middelfart, Denmark
| | - Jan Hartvigsen
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|