Prevalence of hypodontia and supernumerary teeth in a German cleft lip with/without palate population

Food Texture Preference and Oral Clefts: A New Perspective from a Case-Control Study

ObjectiveAccording to food texture preference (FTP), children can be categorized as soft likers (SL) or hard likers. This study explored the relationship between FTP and having an oral cleft in children of the mixed dentition stage. The hypothesis stated that having an oral cleft phenotype would shift a child's FTP toward soft-food textures.DesignA case-control study that employed a validated child food texture preference questionnaire (CFTPQ) to assess FTP. Children's general demographics, food neophobia, and food intake data were collected using validated questionnaires. A pediatric dentist evaluated the children's dental status.SettingData was collected in a dental teaching center and 5 public schools for cases and controls, respectively.ParticipantsThis study included 6- to 13-year-old children with treated oral clefts (n = 87) and their non-cleft peers (n = 413).Main outcome measureCFTPQ index.ResultsCases demonstrated a significantly lower mean CFTPQ index (31.97 ± 16.20) compared to controls (42.07 ± 16.42, P < .001). A total of 45 cases (51%) and 94 (23%) controls were identified as SL (P < .001). Cases were more food neophobic (42.67 ± 9.03) compared to controls (39.03 ± 11.62, P = .002). The final linear regression model identified age and oral cleft phenotype as variables of significant impact on FTP. Moreover, the cleft type, the type, and the number of surgical interventions received did not significantly influence their FTP.ConclusionsThis study offers new insight into a potential relationship between FTP and oral clefts in 6- to 13-year-old children. Children with cleft lip and/or palate demonstrate a preference for soft food textures and are more food-neophobic compared to their non-cleft counterparts.

Tooth Anomalies in Patients With Nonsyndromic Orofacial Cleft: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the frequency of tooth anomalies (TA) in the deciduous and permanent dentition of patients with nonsyndromic orofacial clefts (NSOC), both inside and outside the cleft area.

METHODS

The following databases were searched for the relevant literature: Cochrane, OVID, SciELO, Embase, Livivo, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. The risk of bias was analyzed using the Joanna Briggs Institute. Fixed and random-effects meta-analysis was performed comparing the presence and absence of NSOC subtypes. The certainty of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE approach.

RESULTS

Out of 1939 articles identified, after applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 75 articles were included (46 cohort and 29 case-control), including 27,703 patients (16,450 with NSOC and 11,253 healthy controls) from 34 countries. The meta-analyses revealed higher odds for tooth agenesis (ORNSOC: 3.72; p = 0.001) and macrodontia (ORNSOC: 8.04; p = 0.04) across the different cleft subtypes outside the cleft area compared with the control group in the permanent dentition, whereas the frequency of root dilaceration was significantly lower in nonsyndromic cleft lip only (NSCLO) (ORNSCLO: 0.38; p < 0.0001) and in nonsyndromic cleft lip and palate (NSCLP) (ORNSCLP: 0.44; 95% p < 0.0001). The results also demonstrated a higher risk of tooth agenesis (ORNSOC: 16.49; p < 0.0001), microdontia (ORNSOC: 17.14; p < 0.0001), macrodontia (ORNSOC: 10.41; p = 0.02), supernumerary tooth (ORNSOC: 10.03; p < 0.0001), and enamel hypoplasia (ORNSOC: 5.62; p < 0.0001) in the permanent dentition inside the cleft area of patients with NSOC. However, for the deciduous dentition, outside the cleft area, microdontia was the only TA significantly more frequent in patients with NSOC (ORNSOC: 6.24; p = 0.006) and nonsyndromic cleft palate only (NSCPO) (ORNSCPO: 8.45; p = 0.02) compared with the control group. TA associations varied across populations. In Europe, no significant associations were found for NSOC, while in Asia, strong associations were observed for NSCLP and NSCL ± P (ORNSCLP and NSCL±P: 139.19; p < 0.0001). In South America, significant associations were identified for NSCLP (ORNSCLP: 2.16; p < 0.0001), NSCL ± P (ORNSCL±P: 2.48; p < 0.0001), and NSOC (ORNSOC: 2.72; p < 0.0001). In North America, tooth agenesis was more frequent in NSCL ± P (ORNSCL±P: 4.75; p < 0.0001), though no significant associations were found for NSCLP or NSOC. In the cleft area, significant associations were observed in European populations for NSOC, including increased frequencies of tooth agenesis (ORNSOC: 19.57; p = 0.003) and supernumerary teeth (ORNSOC: 9.77; p < 0.0001). Asian populations showed similar patterns (ORNSOC: 19.23; p = 0.002), while no significant associations were noted in South America due to limited data. Root dilaceration remained less frequent in NSCLO (ORNSCLO: 0.38; p < 0.0001) and NSCLP (ORNSCLP: 0.44; p < 0.0001), with no associations identified for microdontia, taurodontism, supernumerary tooth, impacted tooth, or transposition.

CONCLUSION

The results confirm a higher frequency of TA in the permanent dentition of patients with NSOC compared to controls, regardless of cleft subtype. However, significant differences were observed depending on whether the TA occurred inside or outside the cleft area. Although only a limited number of studies were included, microdontia was the only TA significantly more prevalent in the cleft area of patients with NSOC in the deciduous dentition. Variations in the frequency of TA across populations highlight the complex interplay of genetic, environmental, and methodological factors influencing these associations. Despite these findings, the quality of the existing evidence is moderate, with limitations stemming from small sample sizes, methodological variations, and study heterogeneity. These results emphasize the importance of tailored dental management and early intervention strategies for individuals with different cleft subtypes to effectively address and mitigate the impact of these tooth anomalies on oral health and development.

Prevalence of tooth agenesis and supernumerary teeth related to different Thai cleft lip and cleft palate populations

BACKGROUND

Pattern of dental anomalies encountered in cleft patients shows subtle signs of genetic involvement. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence and pattern of tooth agenesis and supernumerary teeth in Thai cleft population according to the cleft type.

METHODS

Data collected from patients with cleft lip and palate, who had been treated at Tawanchai Cleft Center, Khon Kaen University, Thailand, available during year 2012-2022, were investigated. Records from 194 patients with non-syndromic clefts met the inclusion criteria. Standard dental records, and at least either orthopantomogram (OPG) or cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), were examined. Statistical analysis was performed using chi-square and binominal test (p ≤ 0.05).

RESULTS

Prevalence of tooth agenesis was higher (77.3%) than that of supernumerary teeth (5.7%) and was more common in bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP) (88.1%) than in unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) (72.6%) (p = 0.017). The upper lateral incisor was more frequently affected (46.4%), followed by the upper second premolar. The number of missing teeth observed on the left side was significantly higher. Patients with left UCLP (ULCLP) had the highest prevalence of tooth agenesis. A total of 41 tooth agenesis code (TAC) patterns was found. The prevalence of supernumerary teeth was comparable with 6.6% of ULCLP, 5.1% of BCLP, and 4.5% of URCLP. Tooth-number anomalies were observed more often in the BCLP and were most likely to occur on the left side of the maxilla. Both types of anomalies could be featured in a small proportion of cleft patients.

CONCLUSIONS

More than half of the patients with non-syndromic cleft lip and palate in this study, presented with tooth-number anomalies. Tooth agenesis was approximately 10-time more prevalent than supernumerary teeth. Tooth agenesis was likely to appear on the left-side of the maxilla regardless of the laterality of the cleft.

Dental anomalies in cleft lip and/or palate children at age 10 - a retrospective review across three cleft centres: Part 1

Introduction Children with oral clefts often present with dental anomalies which can impact function, aesthetics and complicate the patient's dental treatment and needs. An understanding of potential anomalies, along with early recognition and planning, is thus essential for effective care.Aim This paper is the first in a two-part three-centre series. This paper will assess the dental anomalies identified in 10-year-old patients attending three cleft centres in the UK.Method Retrospective review was undertaken of the clinical notes of 10-year-old patients attending South Wales (SW), Cleft NET East (CNE) and West Midlands (WM) cleft units, for their ten-year audit record appointment in 2016/2017.Results In total, 144 patients were reviewed (SW = 42; CNE = 52; WM = 50). Dental anomalies were recorded for 80.6% of patients (n = 116).Discussion The review gives insight into the dental complexities of UK oral cleft patients. These patients require specialist paediatric dental input and intensive preventive regimes.Conclusion Shared care between cleft team specialists and general dental practitioners is important when providing holistic care for cleft patients.

Tooth number abnormality: from bench to bedside

Tooth number abnormality is one of the most common dental developmental diseases, which includes both tooth agenesis and supernumerary teeth. Tooth development is regulated by numerous developmental signals, such as the well-known Wnt, BMP, FGF, Shh and Eda pathways, which mediate the ongoing complex interactions between epithelium and mesenchyme. Abnormal expression of these crutial signalling during this process may eventually lead to the development of anomalies in tooth number; however, the underlying mechanisms remain elusive. In this review, we summarized the major process of tooth development, the latest progress of mechanism studies and newly reported clinical investigations of tooth number abnormality. In addition, potential treatment approaches for tooth number abnormality based on developmental biology are also discussed. This review not only provides a reference for the diagnosis and treatment of tooth number abnormality in clinical practice but also facilitates the translation of basic research to the clinical application.

Dental anomalies and their therapeutic implications: retrospective assessment of a frequent finding in patients with cleft lip and palate

BACKGROUND

Orofacial clefts are characterized by a frequent occurrence of dental anomalies. Numerous studies demonstrate the high prevalence of dental aplasia, supernumerary teeth, and hypoplastic teeth in patients with cleft lip with/without cleft palate (CL/P), yet the therapeutic consequences are rarely discussed. This study explores prevalence, localization, and association between primary and secondary dentition in a large European collective and begins to evaluate the significance of dental anomalies in the therapeutic course of patients with CL/P.

METHODS

The medical reports of 1070 patients with different entities of CL/P who presented to our clinic within a 15-year investigation period were evaluated retrospectively. Dental anomalies were classified into three different diagnostic groups: dental aplasia, supernumerary teeth and hypoplastic teeth. The statistical analyses included studies of the frequency and localization of dental anomalies in different cleft entities as well as of the association between primary and secondary dentition and the therapeutic consequences.

RESULTS

Uni- or bilateral cleft lip and palate (CLP) (47.5%) occurred most frequently, followed by cleft palate only (CPO) (32.9%) and cleft lip with or without alveolus (CL ± A) (19.6%). Dental anomalies were found significantly more often on the side of the cleft. Aplastic permanent teeth were mostly found in patients with CLP (54.8%), while supernumerary permanent teeth occurred primarily in patients with CL ± A (21.7%). Patients with CPO presented dental aplasia but no patient with CPO showed supernumerary teeth. The occurrence of dental aplasia in the primary dentition significantly increases the probability of aplastic teeth in the permanent dentition. Dental anomalies, in particular dental aplasia, significantly increase patients' need for subsequent orthodontic therapy and orthognathic surgery.

CONCLUSION

Dental aplasia and hypoplasia are common in patients with CL/P not only in the cleft area but in the whole dentition. In the event of dental aplasia in the primary dentition, the frequency of aplastic teeth in the permanent dentition is significantly higher. Additionally, the need for therapeutic interventions, especially concerning orthognathic surgery, seems to be significantly higher in patients with CL/P who are affected by dental anomalies. Clinicians should take this into account when creating long-term treatment plans.

Novel Candidate Genes for Non-Syndromic Tooth Agenesis Identified Using Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing

Non-syndromic tooth agenesis (ns-TA) is one of the most common dental anomalies characterized by the congenital absence of at least one permanent tooth (excluding third molars). Regarding the essential role of genetic factors in ns-TA aetiology, the present study aimed to identify novel pathogenic variants underlying hypodontia and oligodontia. In a group of 65 ns-TA patients and 127 healthy individuals from the genetically homogenous Polish population, the coding sequences of 423 candidate genes were screened using targeted next-generation sequencing. Pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants were identified in 37 (56.92%) patients, including eight nucleotide alternations of genes not previously implicated in ns-TA (CHD7, CREBBP, EVC, LEF1, ROR2, TBX22 and TP63). However, since only single variants were detected, future research is required to confirm and fully understand their role in the aetiology of ns-TA. Additionally, our results support the importance of already known ns-TA candidate genes (AXIN2, EDA, EDAR, IRF6, LAMA3, LRP6, MSX1, PAX9 and WNT10A) and provide additional evidence that ns-TA might be an oligogenic condition involving the cumulative effect of rare variants in two or more distinct genes.

Dental anomalies in cleft lip and palate: A case-control comparison of total and outside the cleft prevalence

This study's objective was to compare the total and outside the cleft prevalence of dental anomalies (DA) between patients with cleft lip and palate (CLP) and a control group. This retrospective cross-sectional study was done under a case-control design. The case group consisted of 192 non-syndromic patients with complete CLP, while the control group included 411 patients. All subjects had orthopantomography, intra, and extraoral photographs. The prevalence of dental agenesis, supernumerary teeth, impacted teeth, dental transposition, and microdontia were compared using a chi-squared test (P < .05). Next, a second test was made, but only the anomalies outside the cleft were considered for this study. Total prevalence was 89.1% for cases, and 20.9% for controls (P < .01). The prevalence of each DA was significantly higher for the case group. In the analysis of DAs outside the cleft, the total prevalence was still significantly associated (P < .01); however, only dental agenesis was statistically significant (P < .01). Further analysis found that a high rate of upper premolar absence (P < .01) could explain this event. Patients with CLP have a higher prevalence of DAs compared to controls. After considering only the DAs outside the cleft, the total prevalence remains significantly higher. However, this phenomenon is explained mainly by the elevated prevalence of upper premolars' agenesis. This study's results suggest that environmental factors are behind the high prevalence of DAs in subjects with CLP.

Tooth abnormalities associated with non-syndromic cleft lip and palate: systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association between orofacial clefts (OFC) and tooth abnormalities (TA).

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, LILACS, and BBO, and in the gray literature and selected observational studies that evaluated the association between TA and OFC. The risk of bias was analyzed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed comparing the presence and absence of OFC, cleft type-cleft palate (CP) and cleft lip with or without palate (CL/P)-and cleft laterality-unilateral and bilateral. The certainty of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE approach.

RESULTS

A total of 99 studies were included in the qualitative analysis, and 37 were included in the meta-analysis. Only four studies were classified as low risk of bias. Significant associations were observed between the presence of OFC and tooth agenesis (OR = 19.46; 95%CI = 4.99-75.96), supernumerary teeth (OR = 4.04; 95%CI = 1.26-12.99), developmental defects of enamel (OR = 3.15; 95%CI = 1.28-7.80), microdontia (OR = 15.57; 95%CI = 1.06-228.51), and taurodontism (OR = 1.74; 95%CI = 1.74-2.86). Individuals with CP had a lower frequency of supernumerary teeth (OR = 0.22; 95%CI = 0.08-0.64), peg-shaped tooth (OR = 0.31; 95%CI = 0.12-0.80), and morphological TA (OR = 0.13; 95%CI = 0.04-0.45) than individuals with CL/P. No TA was significantly associated with cleft laterality (p > 0.05). The quality of the evidence was very low in all analyses.

CONCLUSION

Individuals with OFC had a higher frequency of TA than those without OFC. Individuals with CP had a lower frequency of TA than individuals with CL/P. No TA was associated to cleft laterality.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Help to identify the treatment needs of individuals affected by OFC, improving the services provided to this population.

Tooth agenesis in German orthodontic patients with non-syndromic craniofacial disorder: a retrospective evaluation of panoramic radiographs

Objectives

The study objective was to evaluate the tooth agenesis in German orthodontic patients with non-syndromic cleft lip and/or palate and Robin sequence compared to a control group without craniofacial disorder.

Materials/methods

A total of 108 panoramic radiographs were examined using the binary system of Tooth Agenesis Code (TAC) (excluding the third molar). Patients were divided into the craniofacial disorder group 1 (n = 43) and the healthy control group 2 (n = 65). Parameters such as skeletal class malformation, sex, localization of the cleft, craniofacial disorder, and interobserver reliability were assessed.

Results

Permanent tooth agenesis was observed in 44% of group 1 and 14% in group 2 with a statistically significant higher prevalence (p = 0.00162 (χ²)). Fourteen different TAC patterns were observed in group 1, ten of these occurring only once in separate patients. The distribution of the TAC codes in group 2 showed nine different possibilities of TAC code patterns; seven TACs were unique. In group 1, the most frequently absent teeth were the maxillary lateral incisor of the left side (30%); in group 2, the second premolar of the lower jaw on the right side (9%). Male patients with craniofacial disorder showed a higher percentage of tooth agenesis than female.

Conclusion

The data presented here shows a statistically significant higher prevalence of tooth agenesis in German patients with non-syndromic craniofacial disorder.

Clinical relevance

Radiographic evaluation enables the diagnosis of tooth agenesis. Recognizing early on the higher prevalence of tooth agenesis in patients exhibiting a craniofacial disorder is an important issue when developing long-term and comprehensive interdisciplinary treatment.