1
|
Guerville F, Pépin M, Garnier-Crussard A, Beuscart JB, Citarda S, Hocine A, Villain C, Tannou T. How to make a shared decision with older persons for end-stage kidney disease treatment: the added value of geronto-nephrology. Clin Kidney J 2024; 17:sfae281. [PMID: 39372237 PMCID: PMC11450468 DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfae281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2024] [Indexed: 10/08/2024] Open
Abstract
Improving care for older people with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) requires the adaptation of standards to meet their needs. This may be complex due to their heterogeneity in terms of multimorbidity, frailty, cognitive decline and healthcare priorities. As benefits and risks are uncertain for these persons, choosing an appropriate treatment is a daily challenge for nephrologists. In this narrative review, we aimed to describe the issues associated with healthcare for older people, with a specific focus on decision-making processes; apply these concepts to the context of ESKD; identify components and modalities of shared decision-making and suggest means to improve care pathways. To this end, we propose a geronto-nephrology dynamic, described here as the necessary collaboration between these specialties. Underscoring gaps in the current evidence in this field led us to suggest priority research orientations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florent Guerville
- Clinical Gerontology Department, Bordeaux University Hospital, Pessac, France
- Immunoconcept Lab, CNRS UMR 5164, Inserm ERL 1303, Bordeaux University, Bordeaux, France
| | - Marion Pépin
- Geriatrics Department, Ambroise Paré Hospital, APHP, Versailles St Quentin University, Boulogne-Billancourt, France
- Clinical Epidemiology, INSERM U1018, Epidemiology and Population Health Center, Paris Saclay University, Villejuif, France
| | - Antoine Garnier-Crussard
- Clinical and Research Memory Centre of Lyon, Lyon Institute For Aging, Charpennes Hospital, Clinical Research Center Ageing-Brain-Frailty, University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Villeurbanne, France
- Normandie Université, UNICAEN, INSERM, U1237, PhIND “Physiopathology and Imaging of Neurological Disorders”, Neuropresage Team, Cyceron, Caen, France
| | - Jean-Baptiste Beuscart
- Université de Lille, CHU Lille, ULR 2694 - METRICS : Évaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales, Lille, France
| | | | - Aldjia Hocine
- Nephrology, Clinique du Landy, Saint-Ouen sur Seine, Nephrology Department, Hôpital Bichat, APHP, Paris, France
| | - Cédric Villain
- Normandie Université UNICAEN, INSERM U1075 COMETE, service de Gériatrie, CHU de Caen, Caen, France
| | - Thomas Tannou
- Centre de recherche de l’Institut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal, CIUSSS Centre-sud-de l’île-de-Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mussie KM, Kaba M, Setchell J, Elger BS. "I Do Not Believe We Should Disclose Everything to an Older Patient": Challenges and Ethical Concerns in Clinical Decision-Making in Old-Age Care in Ethiopia. HEALTH CARE ANALYSIS 2024:10.1007/s10728-024-00494-y. [PMID: 39354236 DOI: 10.1007/s10728-024-00494-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/16/2024] [Indexed: 10/03/2024]
Abstract
Clinical decision-making in old-age care is a complex and ethically sensitive process. Despite its importance, research addressing the challenges of clinical decision-making in old-age care within this cultural context is limited. This study aimed to explore the challenges and ethical concerns in clinical decision-making in old-age care in Ethiopia. This qualitative study employed an inductive approach with data collected via semi-structured interviews with 20 older patients and 26 health professionals recruited from healthcare facilities in Ethiopia. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Our analysis identified three key themes. First, participants highlighted perceptions that older patients' religious beliefs interfere with the clinical decisions both older patients and health professionals make. Second, older patients often receive limited information from health professionals about their diagnosis and treatment. Third, families of older patients appear to strongly influence clinical decisions made by older patients or health professionals. This research enhances the understanding of clinical decision-making in old-age care within Ethiopia, a context where such research is scarce. As a result, this study contributes towards advancing the deliberation of ethical dilemmas that health professionals who work with older patients in Ethiopia might face. A key implication of the study is that there is a need for more ethics and cultural competence training for health professionals working with older patients in Ethiopia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kirubel Manyazewal Mussie
- Institute for Biomedical Ethics, University of Basel, Bernoullistrasse 28, 4056, Basel, Switzerland.
| | - Mirgissa Kaba
- School of Public Health, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Jenny Setchell
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Bernice Simone Elger
- Institute for Biomedical Ethics, University of Basel, Bernoullistrasse 28, 4056, Basel, Switzerland
- Center for Legal Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Doan TTT, Kim J, Kim H, An W, Seo E, Park M. Decision Regret and Decision-Making Process among Caregivers of Older Adults Receiving Home Care: A Cross-Sectional Study. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2024; 25:105166. [PMID: 39043248 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2024] [Revised: 06/11/2024] [Accepted: 06/14/2024] [Indexed: 07/25/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Family caregivers of older adults receiving home care often find themselves in situations in which they must make important and difficult decisions, which can cause conflict and regret. To tailor shared decision making in this context, we aimed to identify the most difficult decisions they faced, assess their levels of decision regret, and explore the associated factors. DESIGN This study used a cross-sectional design. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS Participants included 165 caregivers of older adults who received home care services in Korea. METHODS We identified difficult decisions perceived by family caregivers of older adults and evaluated decision regret using the Decision Regret Scale (DRS), decisional conflict using the Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS), burden of care using the Short Zarit Burden Inventory, and Preference Control Scale (PCS). We then performed descriptive, bivariate, and multivariate linear regression analyses to identify factors predicting decision regret. RESULTS The most frequently reported difficult decisions were related to place of living (71.6%), management of health conditions (15.1%), and end-of-life decisions (13.3%). The mean DCS score was 37.09 (12.67), the DRS score was 32.33 (15.91), and the burden score was 21.81 (8.25). Matching decisions with preferences and aligning decision-making roles significantly reduced regret, while decision conflicts increased regret. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS The positive associations between decision regret, decision conflict, and the alignment of decision-making roles highlight the intricate dynamics involved in the decision-making process for family caregivers. These findings emphasize the need for tailored interventions that recognize and address the diverse factors influencing caregivers' decision-making experiences. Future research exploring the efficacy of targeted interventions such as decision-support programs or caregiver education initiatives could offer valuable insights into mitigating decision-related challenges and improving the overall well-being of both caregivers and care recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thao Thi-Thu Doan
- CNU Community Care Center, College of Nursing, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea; Faculty of Nursing, Hai Phong University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Haiphong, Vietnam
| | - Jinju Kim
- CNU Community Care Center, College of Nursing, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
| | - Heejung Kim
- CNU Community Care Center, College of Nursing, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
| | - Wonmi An
- CNU Community Care Center, College of Nursing, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
| | - Eunkyung Seo
- CNU Community Care Center, College of Nursing, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
| | - Myonghwa Park
- CNU Community Care Center, College of Nursing, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pel-Littel RE, Buurman BM, Minkman MM, Scholte Op Reimer WJM, Twisk JWR, van Weert JCM. The influence of health literacy, anxiety and education on shared decision making and decisional conflict in older adults, and the mediating role of patient participation: A video observational study. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2024; 124:108274. [PMID: 38547640 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2024.108274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2023] [Revised: 02/23/2024] [Accepted: 03/21/2024] [Indexed: 05/06/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore the relationship between personal characteristics of older adults with multiple chronic conditions (MCCs) and perceived shared decision making (SDM) resp. decisional conflict. METHODS In a video-observational study (N = 213) data were collected on personal characteristics. The main outcomes were perceived level of SDM and decisional conflict. The mediating variable was participation in the SDM process. A twostep mixed effect multilinear regression and a mediation analysis were performed to analyze the data. RESULTS The mean age of the patients was 77.3 years and 56.3% were female. Health literacy (β.01, p < .001) was significantly associated with participation in the SDM process. Education (β = -2.43, p = .05) and anxiety (β = -.26, p = .058) had a marginally significant direct effect on the patients' perceived level of SDM. Education (β = 12.12, p = .002), health literacy (β = -.70, p = .005) and anxiety (β = 1.19, p = .004) had a significant direct effect on decisional conflict. The effect of health literacy on decisional conflict was mediated by participation in SDM. CONCLUSION Health literacy, anxiety and education are associated with decisional conflict. Participation in SDM during consultations plays a mediating role in the relationship between health literacy and decisional conflict. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Tailoring SDM communication to health literacy levels is important for high quality SDM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruth E Pel-Littel
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Geriatric Medicine, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Vilans, Centre of expertise for long-term care, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | - Bianca M Buurman
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Geriatric Medicine, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; ACHIEVE, Centre of Applied Research, Faculty of Health, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Mirella M Minkman
- Vilans, Centre of expertise for long-term care, Utrecht, the Netherlands; TIAS School for Business and Society, Tilburg University, Tilburg, the Netherlands
| | | | - Jos W R Twisk
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Julia C M van Weert
- Amsterdam School of Communication Research/ASCoR, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Dai J, Hua Y, Chen Y, Huang J, Zhang X, Sun Y, Chen C, Chen Y, Zhou K. Current Status of Shared Decision-Making in Intraocular Lens Selection for Cataract Surgery: A Cross-Sectional Study. Patient Prefer Adherence 2024; 18:1311-1321. [PMID: 38947871 PMCID: PMC11212811 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s468452] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2024] [Accepted: 06/12/2024] [Indexed: 07/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose To explore 1) the level of shared decision-making (SDM) participation in intraocular lens (IOL) selection in cataract patients and the factors that influence this participation and 2) the relationships between preparation for decision-making (PrepDM)and the level of SDM participation and satisfaction with the decision (SWD). Provide guidance for improving SDM in ophthalmology. Patients and Methods 176 cataract patients were asked to complete the PrepDM scale, the 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) and the SWD instrument in IOL decision-making process. Multiple linear regression was used to analyze the influencing factors of the level of SDM. The Process program and bootstrap sampling method was used to test whether the level of participation in SDM was a mediating variable among the three. Results The SDM-Q-9 median score was 77.78 (IQR 31.11-88.89). Patients with a history of surgery in the operative eye (P=0.022) or PrepDM <60 points (P<0.001) had lower SDM-Q-9 scores than patients with no history of surgery in the operative eye or PrepDM ≥60 points. Patients with an education level lower than primary school had lower SDM-Q-9 scores than patients with other education levels (P<0.05). The PrepDM of cataract patients was positively correlated with the level of SDM (r=0.768, P<0.001) and with the SWD (r=0.727, P<0.001), and the level of SDM was positively correlated with the SWD (r=0.856, P<0.001). The level of SDM fully mediated PrepDM and SDW, with a mediating effect value of 0.128 and a mediating effect of 86.66% of the total effect. Conclusion The SDM of cataract patients involved in IOL selection was in the upper middle range. Education, history of surgery in the operated eye, and PrepDM were factors that influenced the level of SDM. The level of participation in SDM fully mediated the relationship between PrepDM and SWD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jingyao Dai
- School of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yiting Hua
- School of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yijie Chen
- School of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, People’s Republic of China
| | - Jiali Huang
- School of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, People’s Republic of China
| | - Xiaoxian Zhang
- School of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yiwen Sun
- School of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, People’s Republic of China
| | - Chen Chen
- School of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yanyan Chen
- National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, People’s Republic of China
| | - Kaijing Zhou
- National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lorenc T, Stokes G, Fulbright H, Sutcliffe K, Sowden A. Communicating cardiovascular risk: Systematic review of qualitative evidence. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2024; 123:108231. [PMID: 38471312 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2024.108231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2023] [Revised: 02/19/2024] [Accepted: 02/26/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cardiovascular risk prediction models are widely used to help individuals understand risk and make decisions. METHODS Systematic review of qualitative evidence. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and CINAHL. We included English-language qualitative studies on the communication of cardiovascular risk. We assessed study quality using Hawker et al.'s tool and synthesised data thematically. RESULTS Thirty-seven studies were included. Many patients think that risk scores are of limited practical value. Other sources of information feed into informal estimates of risk, which may lead patients to reject the results of clinical risk assessment when the two conflict. Clinicians identify a number of barriers to risk communication, including patients' limited understanding of risk and excessive anxiety. They use a range of strategies for adapting risk communication. Both clinicians and individuals express specific preferences for risk communication formats. DISCUSSION Ways of communicating risk that provide some comparison or reference point seem more promising. The broader context of communication around risk may be more important than the risk scoring instrument. Risk communication interventions, in practice, may be more about appeals to emotion than a rationalistic model of decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theo Lorenc
- Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York YO10 5DD, UK.
| | - Gillian Stokes
- EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK
| | - Helen Fulbright
- Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Katy Sutcliffe
- EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK
| | - Amanda Sowden
- Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York YO10 5DD, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Chan WT, Wu D, Lim XH, Du R, Jeyabal P, Ng L, Nabhan TI, Lim DKA, Stapleton F, Lim HL. Visual supplementation is an effective tool in cataract surgery counselling by eye-care practitioners. J Fr Ophtalmol 2024; 47:104175. [PMID: 38603893 DOI: 10.1016/j.jfo.2024.104175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2023] [Revised: 09/18/2023] [Accepted: 10/04/2023] [Indexed: 04/13/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Informed consent constitutes an important aspect of eye care. However, patients often experience difficulties understanding and retaining information presented to them during consultations. This study investigates the efficacy of pictorial aids in supplementing preoperative counselling of patients undergoing cataract surgery. METHODS Patients attending routine pre-cataract surgery counselling were randomized to receive either a standard verbal consultation (control) or a verbal consultation with a digitalized pictorial aid illustrating key surgical steps (intervention). Patients were assessed after the consultation on their knowledge, satisfaction, anxiety and preparedness using an anonymous questionnaire. RESULTS Seventy-six patients were recruited and randomized into the control and intervention groups. The intervention group attained better Knowledge Scores (control: 5 [2-6] vs. intervention: 6 [6]), and more patients "strongly agreed" that they were more prepared (control: 78.9% vs. intervention: 97.4%, P=0.028). A higher proportion of patients in the control group either "disagreed" or "neither disagree nor agreed (neutral)" that they were less worried (control: 15.8% vs. intervention: 0.0%, Fisher's Exact Test P=0.025). Although the consultation duration was shorter in the intervention group (21±4mins vs. 27±6mins, P<0.001), the use of digital pictorial aids during consultation resulted in more effective counselling with increased patient knowledge, easier decision-making process and reduced patient anxiety. CONCLUSION Pictorial aids add to the repository of tools available to eye-care practitioners and are low-cost, easy to implement, and can effectively augment existing preoperative counselling processes to ensure accurate and effective preoperative counselling of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W T Chan
- Department of Ophthalmology, National University Hospital, NUHS Tower Block, Level 7, 119228 Singapore
| | - D Wu
- Department of Ophthalmology, National University Hospital, NUHS Tower Block, Level 7, 119228 Singapore
| | - X H Lim
- Department of Ophthalmology, National University Hospital, NUHS Tower Block, Level 7, 119228 Singapore; Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - R Du
- Biostatistics Unit, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - P Jeyabal
- Department of Ophthalmology, National University Hospital, NUHS Tower Block, Level 7, 119228 Singapore
| | - L Ng
- Department of Ophthalmology, National University Hospital, NUHS Tower Block, Level 7, 119228 Singapore
| | - T I Nabhan
- College of Optometry, University of Missouri-St. Louis, St. Louis, USA
| | - D K-A Lim
- Department of Ophthalmology, National University Hospital, NUHS Tower Block, Level 7, 119228 Singapore; Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - F Stapleton
- School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - H L Lim
- Department of Ophthalmology, National University Hospital, NUHS Tower Block, Level 7, 119228 Singapore; Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore; School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia; Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Park M, Doan TTT, Jung J, Giap TTT, Kim J. Decision aids for promoting shared decision-making: A review of systematic reviews. Nurs Health Sci 2024; 26:e13071. [PMID: 38356102 DOI: 10.1111/nhs.13071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2023] [Revised: 11/03/2023] [Accepted: 12/03/2023] [Indexed: 02/16/2024]
Abstract
In the context of shared decision-making (SDM), experts have advocated the use of validated decision aids (DAs) as valuable tools for facilitating SDM in various healthcare scenarios. This comprehensive review attempts to analyze a vast corpus of DA research by performing thorough searches across four prominent databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, and Web of Science). Independent reviewers selected relevant reviews, extracted data, and assessed review quality using the AMSTAR II tool. A total of 34 systematic reviews were identified and evaluated in this review, encompassing a wide range of outcomes associated with using DAs. These outcomes include patient knowledge, patient involvement in SDM, decision conflict, decision regret, satisfaction, and adherence. In addition, DAs positively affect healthcare provider outcomes by increasing satisfaction, reducing decision conflicts, and lengthening clinical consultations. This review highlights the need for additional research in specific contexts such as long-term care, mental health, and reproductive health to better understand the benefits and challenges of implementing DAs in these settings. Such research can contribute to the improvement of SDM practices and patient-centered care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Myonghwa Park
- Education and Research Center for Evidence-Based Nursing Knowledge, College of Nursing, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
| | - Thao Thi-Thu Doan
- Education and Research Center for Evidence-Based Nursing Knowledge, College of Nursing, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
- Faculty of Nursing, Hai Phong University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hai Phong, Vietnam
| | - Jihye Jung
- Education and Research Center for Evidence-Based Nursing Knowledge, College of Nursing, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
| | - Thi-Thanh-Tinh Giap
- Education and Research Center for Evidence-Based Nursing Knowledge, College of Nursing, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
- College of Health Sciences, Vin University, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Jinju Kim
- Education and Research Center for Evidence-Based Nursing Knowledge, College of Nursing, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lawless MT, Archibald MM, Ambagtsheer RC, Pinero de Plaza MA, Kitson AL. My Wellbeing Journal: Development of a communication and goal-setting tool to improve care for older adults with chronic conditions and multimorbidity. Health Expect 2024; 27:e13890. [PMID: 37830439 PMCID: PMC10726145 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13890] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2023] [Revised: 09/21/2023] [Accepted: 10/02/2023] [Indexed: 10/14/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic conditions and multimorbidity, the presence of two or more chronic conditions, are increasingly common in older adults. Effective management of chronic conditions and multimorbidity in older adults requires a collaborative and person-centred approach that considers the individual's goals, preferences and priorities. However, ensuring high-quality personalised care for older adults with multimorbidity can be challenging due to the complexity of their care needs, limited time and a lack of patient preparation to discuss their personal goals and preferences with their healthcare team. OBJECTIVE To codesign a communication and goal-setting tool, My Wellbeing Journal, to support personalised care planning for older adults with chronic conditions and multimorbidity. DESIGN We drew on an experience-based codesign approach to develop My Wellbeing Journal. This article reports on the final end-user feedback, which was collected via an online survey with older adults and their carers. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS Older adults with chronic conditions, multimorbidity and informal carers living in Australia. Personalised care planning was considered in the context of primary care. RESULTS A total of 88 participants completed the online survey. The survey focused on participants' feedback on the tool in terms of effectiveness, efficiency, satisfaction and errors encountered. This feedback resulted in modifications to My Wellbeing Journal, which can be used during clinical encounters to facilitate communication, goal setting and progress tracking. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS Clinicians and carers can use the tool to guide discussions with older adults about their care planning and help them set realistic goals that are meaningful to them. The findings of this study could be used to inform the development of recommendations for healthcare providers to implement person-centred, goal-oriented care for older adults with chronic conditions and multimorbidity. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION Older adults living with chronic conditions and multimorbidity and their carers have contributed to the development of a tool that has the potential to significantly enhance the experience of personalised care planning. Their direct involvement as collaborators has ensured that the tool is optimised to meet the standards of effectiveness and usability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael T. Lawless
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health SciencesFlinders UniversityBedford ParkSouth AustraliaAustralia
| | - Mandy M. Archibald
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health SciencesFlinders UniversityBedford ParkSouth AustraliaAustralia
- Helen Glass Centre for NursingCollege of NursingWinnipegManitobaCanada
| | | | | | - Alison L. Kitson
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health SciencesFlinders UniversityBedford ParkSouth AustraliaAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Smith S, Travers C, Roberts N, Martin‐Khan M. Development of person-centred quality indicators for aged care assessment services in Australia: A mixed methods study. Health Expect 2024; 27:e13958. [PMID: 39102731 PMCID: PMC10768856 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13958] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2023] [Revised: 12/15/2023] [Accepted: 12/18/2023] [Indexed: 08/07/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study developed a proposed set of person-centred quality indicators (PC-QIs) for services that assess older adults' care and support needs to determine their eligibility to receive government-funded aged care services in Australia. Individual proposed PC-QIs amenability for change within current organizational structures were explored. Barriers and opportunities to adapt service elements of the aged care assessment service to better align with the intent of the proposed PC-QIs were identified. METHODS A mixed methods study was conducted over five phases. A scoping review identified domains of quality for aged care services as perceived by older adults. Service elements of an aged care assessment service were mapped alongside quality domains informing key attributes of each quality domain. Self-determination theory was used to formulate each proposed PC-QI to align with key attributes and quality domains. Consultation with a consumer group enabled revision of the proposed PC-QIs. A focus group with clinicians evaluated the amenability of each proposed PC-QI for change and identified barriers and opportunities to better align service elements with older adults' perceptions of quality. Results were informed by qualitative and quantitative data from a structured focus group. Focus group discussions were audio recorded and subsequently transcribed verbatim. Qualitative data were analyzed using a deductive thematic approach by two independent researchers. RESULTS Twenty-four proposed PC-QIs were developed. Refinement to descriptors of the proposed PC-QIs were made by the consumer group (n = 18) and all were affirmed as being amenable to change by aged care assessors. Barriers in meeting the intent of the proposed PC-QIs were identified across five domains including: health care staff knowledge (18.7%; n = 3); clear communication (31%; n = 5); person-centred approach (18.7%; n = 3); respect for client (18.7%; n = 3); and collaborative partnership with client (12%; n = 2). Participants made 21 recommendations. Of the five service elements in delivering an aged care assessment service, barriers in meeting the intent of the proposed PC-QIs were identified at the intake and booking of an assessment and during the assessment. CONCLUSIONS Recommendations identified provide assessment services guidance on ways to adapt service elements to better align with older adults' perceptions of quality. PATIENT AND PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION Patients and carers were involved as collaborators in this project at the protocol stage which included participating in discussions regarding the refining and modification of the protocol, refinement of the proposed PC-QIs, data collection forms and supplementary information for participants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra Smith
- Centre for Health Services ResearchThe University of QueenslandBrisbaneQueenslandAustralia
| | - Catherine Travers
- School of Health and Rehabilitation SciencesThe University of QueenslandBrisbaneQueenslandAustralia
| | - Natasha Roberts
- Centre for Clinical ResearchThe University of QueenslandBrisbaneQueenslandAustralia
- STARS Education and Research Alliance, Surgical Treatment and Rehabilitation Service (STARS)The University of Queensland and Metro North HealthBrisbaneQueenslandAustralia
| | - Melinda Martin‐Khan
- Centre for Health Services ResearchThe University of QueenslandBrisbaneQueenslandAustralia
- College of Medicine and HealthUniversity of ExeterDevonUK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Aoki Y, Nakayama K, Yonekura Y. A randomized controlled trial on the effects of decision aids for choosing discharge destinations of older stroke patients. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0272115. [PMID: 38271437 PMCID: PMC10810461 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2022] [Accepted: 12/22/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In Japanese medical practice, older stroke survivors are overwhelmed with information regarding their discharge locations, creating more decision-making challenges. A randomized controlled trial evaluated the influence of decision aids (DAs) for matching older stroke patients and their families' values concerning decisional conflict and participation in discharge destination decisions. METHODS Participants were randomly allocated to intervention and control groups. The intervention spanned two months, from admission to discharge, at which times participants were surveyed. DAs were provided to the intervention group, and brochures to the control group. The primary endpoint was decisional conflict, assessed using the Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS). The secondary endpoint decision-making participation was assessed using the Control Preference Scale (CPS) decision-making roles and a 10-point Visual Analog Scale for participation rate. An independent t-test analyzed decisional conflict scores and participation rates to examine between-group differences. The chi-square independence test evaluated roles in decision-making scores. Post hoc subgroup analyses were performed. RESULTS Ninety-nine participants (intervention group n = 51; control group n = 48) were included in the full analysis set, with a dropout rate of 38.4%. No significant group differences were found in decision-making conflict [t (99) = 0.69, p = 0.49, d = 0.14] and roles in decision-making scores [χ2 (5) = 3.65, p = 0.46]. However, a significant group difference was found in the participation rate [t (99) = 2.24, p = 0.03, d = 0.45]. DA tended to reduce uncertainty and promote participation rates, especially in participants living alone and unable to decide their discharge destination. CONCLUSIONS The use of DA with older stroke patients did not significantly decrease decisional conflicts. In addition, the participation rate in decision-making increased, but their active role did not. Further studies should be conducted to understand the methods of offering DA, their ideal durations, and identify their beneficiaries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoriko Aoki
- Department of Gerontological Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan
| | - Kazuhiro Nakayama
- Graduate School of Nursing Science, St. Luke’s International University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yuki Yonekura
- Graduate School of Nursing Science, St. Luke’s International University, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Guay-Bélanger S, Aubin E, Cimon M, Archambault P, Blanchette V, Giguere A, Gogovor A, Morin M, Ben Charif A, Ben Gaied N, Bickerstaff J, Chénard N, Emond J, Gilbert J, Violet I, Légaré F. Engagement of Older Adults Receiving Home Care Services and Their Caregivers in Health Decisions in Partnership With Clinical Teams: Protocol for a Multimethod Study to Prioritize and Culturally Adapt Decision Aids for Home Care. JMIR Res Protoc 2023; 12:e53150. [PMID: 37889512 PMCID: PMC10696497 DOI: 10.2196/53150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2023] [Revised: 10/20/2023] [Accepted: 10/23/2023] [Indexed: 10/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Older adults (people aged 65 years and older) face many difficult decisions. Patient decision aids (PtDAs) can help them and their families make informed value-congruent decisions. Some PtDAs have been developed for the home care context, but little is known about scaling them for use with older adults in a different culture. OBJECTIVE This study aims to (1) assess the scalability of existing PtDAs for older adults in the home care context; (2) prioritize those that best match the decisional needs of older adults in home care; and (3) culturally adapt the prioritized PtDAs so they can be scaled successfully to the Quebec health care system. METHODS This multimethod study includes 3 phases. All phases will be overseen by a steering committee of older adults, caregivers, health professionals, decision makers, community organization representatives, and researchers with the needed expertise. In phase 1, we will use the Innovation Scalability Self-administered Questionnaire, a validated scalability self-assessment tool, to assess the scalability of 33 PtDAs previously identified in a systematic review. Based on their scalability, their quality (based on the International Patient Decision Aids Standards), and the importance of the decision point, we will retain approximately a third of these. In phase 2, we will conduct a 2-round web-based Delphi to prioritize the PtDAs selected in phase 1. Using a snowball recruitment strategy, we aim to recruit 60 Delphi participants in the province of Quebec, including older adults, caregivers, health professionals, decision makers involved in home care services, and PtDA experts. In the first round, we will ask participants to rate the importance of several PtDA decision points according to various criteria such as prevalence and difficulty on a 5-point Likert scale (1=not important to 5=very important). Approximately 6 of the highest-rated PtDAs will be retained for presentation in the second round, and we will select up to 3 PtDAs judged as having the highest priority for cultural adaptation. In phase 3, using the Chenel framework and user-centered design methods, we will update and adapt the PtDAs to the Quebec health care system and integrate these PtDAs into an interprofessional shared decision-making training program for home care teams. The adapted PtDAs will respect the International Patient Decision Aids Standards criteria. RESULTS This study was funded in March 2022 by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. Data collection for the web-based Delphi began in October 2023. Results are expected to be published in May 2024. CONCLUSIONS This project will provide relevant and culturally appropriate decision support tools for older adults making difficult decisions and their home care teams that will be ready for scaling across the province of Quebec. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) PRR1-10.2196/53150.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabrina Guay-Bélanger
- VITAM - Centre de recherche en santé durable, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec, QC, Canada
| | - Emmanuelle Aubin
- VITAM - Centre de recherche en santé durable, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec, QC, Canada
| | - Marie Cimon
- VITAM - Centre de recherche en santé durable, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec, QC, Canada
| | - Patrick Archambault
- VITAM - Centre de recherche en santé durable, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec, QC, Canada
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada
- Centre de recherche intégrée pour un système apprenant en santé et services sociaux, Centre intégré de santé et de services sociaux de Chaudière-Appalaches, Lévis, QC, Canada
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada
| | - Virginie Blanchette
- VITAM - Centre de recherche en santé durable, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec, QC, Canada
- Department of Human Kinetics and Podiatric Medicine, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, QC, Canada
| | - Anik Giguere
- VITAM - Centre de recherche en santé durable, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec, QC, Canada
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada
| | - Amédé Gogovor
- VITAM - Centre de recherche en santé durable, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec, QC, Canada
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada
| | - Michèle Morin
- VITAM - Centre de recherche en santé durable, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec, QC, Canada
- Centre de recherche intégrée pour un système apprenant en santé et services sociaux, Centre intégré de santé et de services sociaux de Chaudière-Appalaches, Lévis, QC, Canada
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada
| | | | | | | | - Nancy Chénard
- Centre intégré de santé et de services sociaux de Chaudière-Appalaches, Lévis, QC, Canada
| | - Julie Emond
- Centre intégré de santé et de services sociaux de Chaudière-Appalaches, Lévis, QC, Canada
| | - Julie Gilbert
- Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec, QC, Canada
| | - Isabelle Violet
- Ministère de la santé et des services sociaux du Québec, Quebec, QC, Canada
| | - France Légaré
- VITAM - Centre de recherche en santé durable, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec, QC, Canada
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Gans EA, van Mun LAM, de Groot JF, van Munster BC, Rake EA, van Weert JCM, Festen S, van den Bos F. Supporting older patients in making healthcare decisions: The effectiveness of decision aids; A systematic review and meta-analysis. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2023; 116:107981. [PMID: 37716242 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.107981] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2023] [Revised: 08/25/2023] [Accepted: 09/10/2023] [Indexed: 09/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To systematically review randomized controlled trials and clinical controlled trials evaluating the effectiveness of Decision Aids (DAs) compared to usual care or alternative interventions for older patients facing treatment, screening, or care decisions. METHODS A systematic search of several databases was conducted. Eligible studies included patients ≥ 65 years or reported a mean of ≥ 70 years. Primary outcomes were attributes of the choice made and decision making process, user experience and ways in which DAs were tailored to older patients. Meta-analysis was conducted, if possible, or outcomes were synthesized descriptively. RESULTS Overall, 15 studies were included. Using DAs were effective in increasing knowledge (SMD 0.90; 95% CI [0.48, 1.32]), decreasing decisional conflict (SMD -0.15; 95% CI [-0.29, -0.01]), improving patient-provider communication (RR 1.67; 95% CI [1.21, 2.29]), and preparing patients to make an individualized decision (MD 35.7%; 95% CI [26.8, 44.6]). Nine studies provided details on how the DA was tailored to older patients. CONCLUSION This review shows a number of favourable results for the effectiveness of DAs in decision making with older patients. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Current DAs can be used to support shared decision making with older patients when faced with treatment, screening or care decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma A Gans
- University Center of Geriatric Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands; Knowledge Institute of the Dutch Association of Medical Specialists, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | - Liza A M van Mun
- Knowledge Institute of the Dutch Association of Medical Specialists, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Janke F de Groot
- Knowledge Institute of the Dutch Association of Medical Specialists, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Barbara C van Munster
- University Center of Geriatric Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Ester A Rake
- Knowledge Institute of the Dutch Association of Medical Specialists, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Julia C M van Weert
- Amsterdam School of Communication Research/ASCoR, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Suzanne Festen
- University Center of Geriatric Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Frederiek van den Bos
- Department of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Dennison Himmelfarb CR, Beckie TM, Allen LA, Commodore-Mensah Y, Davidson PM, Lin G, Lutz B, Spatz ES. Shared Decision-Making and Cardiovascular Health: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation 2023; 148:912-931. [PMID: 37577791 DOI: 10.1161/cir.0000000000001162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/15/2023]
Abstract
Shared decision-making is increasingly embraced in health care and recommended in cardiovascular guidelines. Patient involvement in health care decisions, patient-clinician communication, and models of patient-centered care are critical to improve health outcomes and to promote equity, but formal models and evaluation in cardiovascular care are nascent. Shared decision-making promotes equity by involving clinicians and patients, sharing the best available evidence, and recognizing the needs, values, and experiences of individuals and their families when faced with the task of making decisions. Broad endorsement of shared decision-making as a critical component of high-quality, value-based care has raised our awareness, although uptake in clinical practice remains suboptimal for a range of patient, clinician, and system issues. Strategies effective in promoting shared decision-making include educating clinicians on communication techniques, engaging multidisciplinary medical teams, incorporating trained decision coaches, and using tools (ie, patient decision aids) at appropriate literacy and numeracy levels to support patients in their cardiovascular decisions. This scientific statement shines a light on the limited but growing body of evidence of the impact of shared decision-making on cardiovascular outcomes and the potential of shared decision-making as a driver of health equity so that everyone has just opportunities. Multilevel solutions must align to address challenges in policies and reimbursement, system-level leadership and infrastructure, clinician training, access to decision aids, and patient engagement to fully support patients and clinicians to engage in the shared decision-making process and to drive equity and improvement in cardiovascular outcomes.
Collapse
|
15
|
Jiang Y, Guo J, Chen M, Zou X, Sun P, Gao J, Nuerdawulieti B, Wang S. Development of a Pulmonary Rehabilitation Patient Decision Aid for Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Mixed Methods Study. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2023; 18:1377-1389. [PMID: 37465820 PMCID: PMC10350428 DOI: 10.2147/copd.s392191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2022] [Accepted: 06/14/2023] [Indexed: 07/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Pulmonary rehabilitation is an important part of the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), but the participation rate of pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD patients is low. Patient decision aids can facilitate patient participation in pulmonary rehabilitation decisions by providing information and incorporating patient values. The aim of this study was to develop a pulmonary rehabilitation decision aid for patients with COPD. Objective The aim of this study was to develop a WeChat-based pulmonary rehabilitation patient decision aid to help older patients with COPD participate in pulmonary rehabilitation decision-making. Methods We developed the decision aid in 3 stages: (1) a literature review was performed to determine the evidence for pulmonary rehabilitation options and outcomes for patients with COPD. (2) a semi-structured interview study was conducted to develop and iterate patient decision aids. (3) usability, acceptability and language expression testing in patients and healthcare professionals. Results A total of 16 randomized controlled studies were included in the literature review. Thirty-six participants received semi-structured interviews. The results of interview include four themes: key points of age-friendly design, content of the tool, presentation requirements of contents and study evidence of the tool and other views and suggestions. The resultant goals-of-care decision aid achieved good usability and acceptability. The frequency of language expression increased in both patients and healthcare professionals. Conclusion This study uses a systematic development process to develop the first pulmonary rehabilitation decision aid for patients with COPD. It has good usability, acceptability and increased communication between patients and healthcare professionals in the pulmonary rehabilitation decision-making process. Trial Registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR): ChiCTR1900028563; http://apps.who.int/trialsearch/default.aspx.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuyu Jiang
- Research Office of Chronic Disease Management and Rehabilitation, Wuxi School of Medicine, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, People’s Republic of China
| | - Jianlan Guo
- Department of Nursing, Wuxi Higher Health Vocational Technology School, Wuxi, People’s Republic of China
| | - Mengjie Chen
- Research Office of Chronic Disease Management and Rehabilitation, Wuxi School of Medicine, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, People’s Republic of China
| | - Xueqiong Zou
- Research Office of Chronic Disease Management and Rehabilitation, Wuxi School of Medicine, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, People’s Republic of China
| | - Pingping Sun
- Research Office of Chronic Disease Management and Rehabilitation, Wuxi School of Medicine, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, People’s Republic of China
| | - Jing Gao
- Research Office of Chronic Disease Management and Rehabilitation, Wuxi School of Medicine, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, People’s Republic of China
| | - Baiyila Nuerdawulieti
- Research Office of Chronic Disease Management and Rehabilitation, Wuxi School of Medicine, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, People’s Republic of China
| | - Shanshan Wang
- Research Office of Chronic Disease Management and Rehabilitation, Wuxi School of Medicine, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Van Bostraeten P, Aertgeerts B, Bekkering G, Delvaux N, Haers A, Vanheeswyck M, Vandekendelaere A, Van der Auwera N, Dijckmans C, Ostyn E, Soontjens W, Matthysen W, Schenk N, Mertens L, Jaeken J, Agoritsas T, Vermandere M. Digital encounter decision aids linked to clinical practice guidelines: results from user testing SHARE-IT decision aids in primary care. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2023; 23:97. [PMID: 37217915 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-023-02186-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2022] [Accepted: 04/27/2023] [Indexed: 05/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Encounter decision aids (EDAs) are tools that can support shared decision making (SDM), up to the clinical encounter. However, adoption of these tools has been limited, as they are hard to produce, to keep up-to-date, and are not available for many decisions. The MAGIC Evidence Ecosystem Foundation has created a new generation of decision aids that are generically produced along digitally structured guidelines and evidence summaries, in an electronic authoring and publication platform (MAGICapp). We explored general practitioners' (GPs) and patients' experiences with five selected decision aids linked to BMJ Rapid Recommendations in primary care. METHODS We applied a qualitative user testing design to evaluate user experiences for both GPs and patients. We translated five EDAs relevant to primary care, and observed the clinical encounters of 11 GPs when they used the EDA with their patients. We conducted a semi-structured interview with each patient after the consultation and a think-aloud interview with each GPs after multiple consultations. We used the Qualitative Analysis Guide (QUAGOL) for data analysis. RESULTS Direct observations and user testing analysis of 31 clinical encounters showed an overall positive experience. The EDAs created better involvement in decision making and resulted in meaningful insights for patients and clinicians. The design and its interactive, multilayered structure made the tool enjoyable and well-organized. Difficult terminology, scales and numbers hindered understanding of certain information, which was sometimes perceived as too specialized or even intimidating. GPs thought the EDA was not suitable for every patient. They perceived a learning curve was required and the need for time investment was a concern. The EDAs were considered trustworthy as they were provided by a credible source. CONCLUSIONS This study showed that EDAs can be useful tools in primary care by supporting actual shared decision making and enhancing patient involvement. The graphical approach and clear representation help patients better understand their options. To overcome barriers such as health literacy and GPs attitudes, effort is still needed to make the EDAs as accessible, intuitive and inclusive as possible through use of plain language, uniform design, rapid access and training. TRIAL REGISTRATION The study protocol was approved by the The Research Ethics Committee UZ/KU Leuven (Belgium) on 31-10-2019 with reference number MP011977.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pieter Van Bostraeten
- Academic Center for General Practice, department of PH&PC, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 7 block h, box 7001, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Bert Aertgeerts
- Academic Center for General Practice, department of PH&PC, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 7 block h, box 7001, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Geertruida Bekkering
- Academic Center for General Practice, department of PH&PC, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 7 block h, box 7001, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Nicolas Delvaux
- Academic Center for General Practice, department of PH&PC, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 7 block h, box 7001, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Anna Haers
- Academic Center for General Practice, department of PH&PC, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 7 block h, box 7001, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Matisse Vanheeswyck
- Academic Center for General Practice, department of PH&PC, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 7 block h, box 7001, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Alexander Vandekendelaere
- Academic Center for General Practice, department of PH&PC, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 7 block h, box 7001, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Niels Van der Auwera
- Academic Center for General Practice, department of PH&PC, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 7 block h, box 7001, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Charlotte Dijckmans
- Academic Center for General Practice, department of PH&PC, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 7 block h, box 7001, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Elise Ostyn
- Academic Center for General Practice, department of PH&PC, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 7 block h, box 7001, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Willem Soontjens
- Academic Center for General Practice, department of PH&PC, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 7 block h, box 7001, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Wout Matthysen
- Academic Center for General Practice, department of PH&PC, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 7 block h, box 7001, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Noémie Schenk
- Academic Center for General Practice, department of PH&PC, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 7 block h, box 7001, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Lien Mertens
- Academic Center for General Practice, department of PH&PC, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 7 block h, box 7001, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jasmien Jaeken
- Academic Center for General Practice, department of PH&PC, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 7 block h, box 7001, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Thomas Agoritsas
- Division General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Mieke Vermandere
- Academic Center for General Practice, department of PH&PC, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 7 block h, box 7001, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Goto Y, Miura H. Evaluation of an Advanced Care Planning Training Program Incorporating Online Skills in Shared Decision Making: A Preintervention and Postintervention Comparative Study. Healthcare (Basel) 2023; 11:1356. [PMID: 37174898 PMCID: PMC10178132 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11091356] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2023] [Revised: 03/20/2023] [Accepted: 05/06/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM This study evaluated an advanced care planning (ACP) training program incorporating online skills in shared decision making (SDM). METHOD The New World Kirkpatrick Model was employed to assess the efficacy of the training program at four levels: reaction, learning, behavior, and results. Reaction measured the participants' satisfaction and difficulty with the training program alongside the status of support received from workplaces engaging in ACP. Learning evaluated the changes in SDM skills. Behavior assessed the changes in the relationship between patients and healthcare professionals when the latter were involved in the SDM process. Results evaluated whether the participants were willing to participate in ACP educational programs as a facilitator and whether their motivation for continuous learning changed through throughout the training program. The relationships among patients, healthcare providers, and third-party roles were analyzed in SDM role-playing via structural equation modeling (SEM). RESULTS Between September 2020 and June 2022, 145 multidisciplinary participants completed the entirety of the training program. The most common responses to the training were "satisfied", "slightly difficult", and "I received some support from my workplace". The SDM skills significantly improved from the first to the third workshop, evaluated using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. In the first workshop, SDM was primarily performed by healthcare providers; however, in the third workshop, patient-centered SDM was adopted. Of the participants who completed the program, 63% intended to participate in future ACP educational programs as ACP education facilitators. CONCLUSION This study ascertained the validity of this training.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuko Goto
- Department of Home Care and Regional Liaison Promotion, Hospital, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Obu 474-8511, Aichi, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Dunér A, Bångsbo A, Olsson TM. TalkingMats as a decision aid to promote involvement in choice and decision-making around home care services for older people with mild to moderate dementia - study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. BMC Geriatr 2023; 23:244. [PMID: 37085759 PMCID: PMC10120496 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-023-03956-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2023] [Accepted: 04/05/2023] [Indexed: 04/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In Sweden, 72% of people with dementia live in ordinary housing. Of these, 50% receive home care services. Older people with dementia may benefit from developments in decision-making support which aim to facilitate their ability to communicate their personal needs and preferences with care managers and staff in home care services. In this study, we will test and evaluate the use of TalkingMats in Swedish municipal home care services for older people with mild to moderate dementia. TalkingMats is a low-technology communication tool, to help people with communication difficulties express their views. It uses a simple system of picture symbols which are placed on a textured mat. This study will provide insight into the extent to which TalkingMats benefits older people with dementia to feel more involved in decisions related to home care services. In addition, this study will assess the extent to which the use of TalkingMats promotes service providers' efforts to involve service recipients in decision making. The implementation of TalkingMats in home care services will also be studied. METHODS A parallel group, two-armed randomized controlled trial design in which TalkingMats and Usual Conversation Method will be compared. Two specific situations where older people with dementia must make decisions about home care services will be studied. First, a follow-up needs-assessment conversation between study participants and care managers will be studied. Second, a conversation between participants and home care staff regarding the delivery of the decided home care services will be studied. In addition, a qualitative approach will be used to gain an understanding of study participant and service provider experiences of the impact and implementation of TalkingMats. DISCUSSION The combined exploratory, descriptive, and experimental study design is considered an important strength which will facilitate multi-facetted knowledge production concerning the involvement and communication needs of older people with dementia generally and within the context of home care services specifically. Combining qualitative and quantitative methods will maximize our ability to assess the effects of TalkingMats. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT05561998 . Registered in September 28, 2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Dunér
- Department of Social Work, University of Gothenburg, PO Box 720, SE 405 30, Göteborg, Sweden.
| | - Angela Bångsbo
- Department of Work Life and Social Welfare, University of Borås, Borås, Sweden
| | - Tina M Olsson
- Department of Social Work, University of Gothenburg, PO Box 720, SE 405 30, Göteborg, Sweden
- School of Health and Welfare, Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Bernabeu-Wittel M, Para O, Voicehovska J, Gómez-Huelgas R, Václavík J, Battegay E, Holecki M, van Munster BC. Competences of internal medicine specialists for the management of patients with multimorbidity. EFIM multimorbidity working group position paper. Eur J Intern Med 2023; 109:97-106. [PMID: 36653235 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejim.2023.01.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2022] [Accepted: 01/10/2023] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Patients with multimorbidity increasingly impact healthcare systems, both in primary care and in hospitals. This is particularly true in Internal Medicine. This population associates with higher mortality rates, polypharmacy, hospital readmissions, post-discharge syndrome, anxiety, depression, accelerated age-related functional decline, and development of geriatric syndromes, amongst others. Internists and Hospitalists, in one of their roles as Generalists, are increasingly asked to attend to these patients, both in their own Departments as well as in surgical areas. The management of polypathology and multimorbidity, however, is often complex, and requires specific clinical skills and corresponding experience. In addition, patients' needs, health-care environment, and routines have changed, so emerging and re-emerging specific competences and approaches are required to offer the best coordinated, continuous, and comprehensive integrated care to these populations, to achieve optimal health outcomes and satisfaction of patients, their relatives, and staff. This position paper proposes a set of emerging and re-emerging competences for internal medicine specialists, which are needed to optimally address multimorbidity now and in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Bernabeu-Wittel
- Department of Medicine, Internal Medicine Department. Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, University of Sevilla, Spain
| | - O Para
- Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Firenze, Italy
| | - J Voicehovska
- Internal Diseases Department, Nephrology and Renal replacement therapy clinics, Riga Stradins University, Riga East University hospital, Riga, Latvia
| | - R Gómez-Huelgas
- Internal Medicine Department. Department of Medicine, Hospital Universitario Regional de Málaga, University of Málaga, Spain
| | - J Václavík
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, University Hospital Ostrava and Ostrava University Faculty of Medicine, Ostrava, Czech Republic
| | - E Battegay
- International Center for Multimorbidity and Complexity (ICMC), University of Zurich, Zurich, University Hospital Basel (Department of Psychosomatic Medicine) and Merian Iselin Klinik Basel. Switzerland
| | - M Holecki
- Department of Internal, Autoimmune and Metabolic Diseases. Medical University of Silesia, Katowice. Poland
| | - B C van Munster
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Pel-Littel RE, Buurman BM, van de Pol MH, Twisk JWR, Tulner LR, Minkman MM, Scholte Op Reimer WJM, van Weert JCM. Effects of a shared decision making intervention for older adults with multiple chronic conditions: the DICO study. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2023; 23:42. [PMID: 36859287 PMCID: PMC9976432 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-023-02099-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2022] [Accepted: 01/03/2023] [Indexed: 03/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To evaluate the effects of a shared decision making (SDM) intervention for older adults with multiple chronic conditions (MCCs). METHODS A pragmatic trial evaluated the effects of the SDMMCC intervention, existing of SDM training for nine geriatricians in two hospitals and a preparatory tool for patients. A prospective pre-intervention post-intervention multi-center clinical study was conducted in which an usual care group of older patients with MCC and their informal caregivers was included before the implementation of the intervention and a new cohort of patients and informal caregivers after the implementation of the intervention. SDM was observed using the OPTIONMCC during video-recorded consultations. Patient- and caregivers reported outcomes regarding their role in SDM, involvement, perceived SDM and decisional conflict were measured. The differences between groups regarding the level of observed SDM (OPTIONMCC) were analyzed with a mixed model analysis. Dichotomous patient-reported outcomes were analyzed with a logistic mixed model. RESULTS From two outpatient geriatric clinics 216 patients with MCCs participated. The mean age was 77.3 years, and 56.3% of patients were female. No significant difference was found in the overall level of SDM as measured with the OPTIONMCC or in patient-reported outcomes. However, at item level the items discussing 'goals', 'options', and 'decision making' significantly improved after the intervention. The items discussing 'partnership' and 'evaluating the decision-making process' showed a significant decrease. Fifty-two percent of the patients completed the preparatory tool, but the results were only discussed in 12% of the consultations. CONCLUSION This study provides scope for improvement of SDM in geriatrics. Engaging older adults with MCCs and informal caregivers in the decision making process should be an essential part of SDM training for geriatricians, beyond the SDM steps of explaining options, benefits and harms. More attention should be paid to the integration of preparatory work in the consultation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruth E Pel-Littel
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Geriatric Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Vilans, Center of Expertise for Long-Term Care, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Bianca M Buurman
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Geriatric Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- ACHIEVE, Center of Applied Research, Faculty of Health, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marjolein H van de Pol
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Jos W R Twisk
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Linda R Tulner
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mirella M Minkman
- Vilans, Center of Expertise for Long-Term Care, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- TIAS School for Business and Society, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Wilma J M Scholte Op Reimer
- ACHIEVE, Center of Applied Research, Faculty of Health, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Julia C M van Weert
- Amsterdam School of Communication Research/ASCoR, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 15791, 1001 NG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Porto CM, Leão RDCH, Sousa RAD, Diniz PRB, Silva TDPSD, Sougey EB. Brain changes in neuroimaging of adult patients with vitamin D deficiency: systematic review protocol. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e052524. [PMID: 36849215 PMCID: PMC9972426 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052524] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/01/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Brain abnormalities detected through neuroimaging are described in patients with vitamin D deficiency, however, it is still not clear which cerebral alterations are more frequent and characteristic in this population. Thus, this review aims to identify and classify which are the main and most frequent brain changes found by neuroimaging in patients with vitamin D deficiency. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The study protocol was constructed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols and the leading research question was formulated through Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome, Setting. The evidence will be researched at the following electronic databases: PubMed, PsycINFO, Scopus, Web of Science and EMBASE. Two researchers will work in the selection, analysis and inclusion phases of the articles. In the case of divergence, a third-party reviewer will be contacted. The following studies will be included: (1) cohort studies, case-control studies and cross-sectional studies; (2) studies carried out on patients with serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels below 30 ng/mL; (3) studies conducted with an adult population; (4) studies using neuroimaging methods. Articles considered eligible will be analysed by the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale/cross-section studies to evaluate study quality. The survey will be conducted from June to December 2022. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The identification of the main and most frequent brain alterations found through neuroimaging in patients with vitamin D deficiency can guide professionals as to the identification which of the main cerebral pathologies detected through neuroimaging are related to vitamin D deficiency, in choosing more sensitive and specific neuroimaging tests to detect these brain changes, in addition to emphasising the importance of monitoring and maintaining adequate serum levels of vitamin D, in order to reduce possible cognitive sequelae. Results will be announced at national and international conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42018100074.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Renata Alves de Sousa
- Neuropsychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Federal University of Pernambuco, UFPE, Recife, Brazil
| | | | | | - Everton Botelho Sougey
- Neuropsychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Federal University of Pernambuco, UFPE, Recife, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Shi SM, Palmer JA, Newmeyer N, Carroll D, Steinberg N, Olivieri-Mui B, Kim DH. Restricted mean survival time versus conventional effect summary for treatment decision-making: A mixed-methods study. J Am Geriatr Soc 2023; 71:528-537. [PMID: 36318788 PMCID: PMC9957827 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.18107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2022] [Revised: 10/03/2022] [Accepted: 10/10/2022] [Indexed: 02/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Treatment effect is typically summarized in terms of relative risk reduction or number needed to treat ("conventional effect summary"). Restricted mean survival time (RMST) summarizes treatment effect in terms of a gain or loss in event-free days. Older adults' preference between the two effect summary measures has not been studied. METHODS We conducted a mixed methods study using a quantitative survey and qualitative semi-structured interviews. For the survey, we enrolled 102 residents with hypertension at five senior housing facilities (mean age 81.3 years, 82 female, 95 white race). We randomly assigned respondents to either RMST-based (n = 49) or conventional decision aid (n = 53) about the benefits and harms of intensive versus standard blood pressure-lowering strategies and compared decision conflict scale (DCS) responses (range: 0 [no conflict] to 100 [maximum conflict]; <25 is associated with implementing decisions). We used a purposive sample of 23 survey respondents stratified by both their random assignment and DCS from the survey. Inductive qualitative thematic analysis explored complementary perspectives on preferred ways of summarizing treatment effects. RESULTS The mean (standard deviation) total DCS was 22.0 (14.3) for the conventional decision aid group and 16.7 (14.1) for the RMST-based decision aid group (p = 0.06), but the proportion of participants with a DCS <25 was higher in the RMST-based group (26 [49.1%] vs 34 [69.4%]; p = 0.04). Qualitative interviews suggested that, regardless of effect summary measure, older individuals' preference depended on their ability to clearly comprehend quantitative information, clarity of presentation in the visual aid, and inclusion of desired information. CONCLUSIONS When choosing a blood pressure-lowering strategy, older adults' perceived uncertainty may be reduced with a time-based effect summary, although our study was underpowered to detect a statistically significant difference. Given highly variable individual preferences, it may be useful to present both conventional and RMST-based information in decision aids.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra M. Shi
- Hinda and Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jennifer A. Palmer
- Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Natalie Newmeyer
- Hinda and Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Danette Carroll
- Hinda and Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Nessa Steinberg
- Hinda and Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Brianne Olivieri-Mui
- Hinda and Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Health Sciences, Bouvé College of Health Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Dae Hyun Kim
- Hinda and Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Drost LE, Stegeman M, Gerritse MBE, Franx A, Vos MC, Lamers RED, Ezendam NPM, Dam A, Schrickx J, van Wijk HF. A web-based decision aid for shared decision making in pelvic organ prolapse: the SHADE-POP trial. Int Urogynecol J 2023; 34:79-86. [PMID: 36378318 PMCID: PMC9665015 DOI: 10.1007/s00192-022-05405-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2022] [Accepted: 10/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS Among women worldwide, pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a common problem. There are three different treatment options for POP: pelvic floor muscle therapy, pessary treatment and prolapse surgery. As none of the three treatment options is clearly superior, shared decision making (SDM) is very important. A decision aid (DA) is known to facilitate patient participation and SDM. We hypothesise that the use of a web-based DA for POP increases patients' satisfaction with information and care and reduces decisional conflict. METHODS This two-arm, multicentre, cluster randomised controlled trial was performed in women with POP in five different Dutch hospitals. The control group received usual care (UC) and the intervention group received the DA in addition to UC. Primary outcome measures were satisfaction with treatment decision making and satisfaction with information. Analyses were performed using independent sample t tests, Chi-squared tests, and multilevel linear regression analyses. RESULTS Between the DA group (n=40) and the UC group (n=56) no differences were found concerning patients' satisfaction with information, with scores of 45.63 and 46.14 out of 50 respectively (p=0.67). Also, no differences were found concerning the perceived role in decision making, as patients scored 46.83 in the DA group and 46.41 in the UC group, out of a maximum of 54 (n=0.81). CONCLUSIONS No differences were found concerning patients' satisfaction with information and treatment decision making between the DA and UC. However, both groups scored high on the questionnaires, which suggests that the decision process is already of high quality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Larissa Esmeralda Drost
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Elisabeth-Tweesteden Hospital, PO Box 90151, 5000, LC, Tilburg, the Netherlands.
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Marjan Stegeman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Elisabeth-Tweesteden Hospital, PO Box 90151, 5000, LC, Tilburg, the Netherlands
| | - Maria B E Gerritse
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Gelderse Vallei Hospital, Ede, the Netherlands
| | - Arie Franx
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M Caroline Vos
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Elisabeth-Tweesteden Hospital, PO Box 90151, 5000, LC, Tilburg, the Netherlands
| | | | - Romy E D Lamers
- Department of Urology, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Nicole P M Ezendam
- CoRPS-Center of Research on Psychology in Somatic diseases, Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands and Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Anika Dam
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, VieCuri Medical Center, Venlo, the Netherlands
| | - Jan Schrickx
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Rivas Beatrix Hospital, Gorinchem, The Netherlands
| | - Heidy F van Wijk
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Bravis Hospital, Roosendaal, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Fenton L, Han SD, DiGuiseppi CG, Fowler NR, Hill L, Johnson RL, Peterson RA, Knoepke CE, Matlock DD, Moran R, Karlawish J, Betz ME. Mild Cognitive Impairment is Associated with Poorer Everyday Decision Making. J Alzheimers Dis 2023; 94:1607-1615. [PMID: 37458034 DOI: 10.3233/jad-230222] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Older adults are faced with many unique and highly consequential decisions such as those related to finances, healthcare, and everyday functioning (e.g., driving cessation). Given the significant impact of these decisions on independence, wellbeing, and safety, an understanding of how cognitive impairment may impact decision making in older age is important. OBJECTIVE To examine the impact of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) on responses to a modified version of the Short Portable Assessment of Capacity for Everyday Decision making (SPACED). METHODS Participants were community-dwelling, actively driving older adults (N = 301; M age = 77.1 years, SD = 5.1; 69.4% with a college degree or higher; 51.2% female; 95.3% White) enrolled in the Advancing Understanding of Transportation Options (AUTO) study. A generalized linear model adjusted for age, education, sex, randomization group, cognitive assessment method, and study site was used to examine the relationship between MCI status and decision making. RESULTS MCI status was associated with poorer decision making; participants with MCI missed an average of 2.17 times more points on the SPACED than those without MCI (adjusted mean ratio: 2.17, 95% CI: 1.02, 4.61, p = 0.044). CONCLUSION This finding supports the idea that older adults with MCI exhibit poorer decision-making abilities than cognitively normal older adults. It also suggests that older adults with MCI may exhibit poorer decision making across a wide range of decision contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Fenton
- Department of Psychology, USC Dornsife College of Letters, Arts, and Sciences, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - S Duke Han
- Department of Psychology, USC Dornsife College of Letters, Arts, and Sciences, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Rush Alzheimer's Disease Center, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
- Department of Family Medicine, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Alhambra, CA, USA
- Department of Medicine, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Neurology, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- USC School of Gerontology, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Carolyn G DiGuiseppi
- Department of Epidemiology, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Nicole R Fowler
- Center for Aging Research, Indiana University School of Medicine, Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Linda Hill
- School of Public Health, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Rachel L Johnson
- Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Ryan A Peterson
- Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Christopher E Knoepke
- Adult & Child Consortium for Outcomes Research & Delivery Science, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
- Division of Cardiology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Daniel D Matlock
- Adult & Child Consortium for Outcomes Research & Delivery Science, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
- VA Eastern Colorado Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Aurora, CO, USA
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Ryan Moran
- School of Public Health, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Jason Karlawish
- Penn Memory Center, Departments of Medicine, Medical Ethics and Health Policy, and Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Marian E Betz
- Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
- VA Eastern Colorado Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Aurora, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Leu S, Cahill J, Grundy PL. A prospective study of shared decision-making in brain tumor surgery. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2023; 165:15-25. [PMID: 36576561 PMCID: PMC9795149 DOI: 10.1007/s00701-022-05451-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2022] [Accepted: 09/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Shared decision-making (SDM) is a key tenet of personalized care and is becoming an essential component of informed consent in an increasing number of countries. The aim of this study is to analyze patient and healthcare staff satisfaction with the SDM process before and after SDM was officially introduced as the standard of care. Decision grids are important tools in the SDM process, and we developed them for three different types of intracranial tumors. METHODS This prospective study was conducted in a high-volume neuro-oncological center on all consecutive eligible patients undergoing consideration of treatment for intracranial glioma and metastases. Twenty-two patients participated before and 74 after the introduction of SDM. Six and 5 staff members respectively participated in the analysis before and after team training and the introduction of SDM. The main outcome was patient and healthcare staff satisfaction with the SDM process. RESULTS Patients reported high satisfaction with the SDM process before (mean CollaboRATE score 26 of 27 points) and after (mean CollaboRATE score 26.3 of 27 points, p = 0.23) the introduction of SDM. Interestingly, staff attitude toward SDM improved significantly from 61.68 before to 90.95% after the introduction of SDM (p-value < 0.001). Decision grids that were developed for three different types of intracranial tumors are presented. CONCLUSIONS Team training in SDM and the introduction of techniques into daily practice can increase staff satisfaction with the SDM process. High levels of patient satisfaction were observed before, with a non-significant increase after the introduction of SDM. Decision grids are an important tool to facilitate the conveyance and understanding of complex information and to achieve SDM in daily clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Severina Leu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Wessex Neurological Centre, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, UK.
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Basel, Spitalstrasse 21, 4031, Basel, Switzerland.
| | - Julian Cahill
- Department of Neurosurgery, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, UK
- The National Centre for Stereotactic Radiosurgery, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, UK
| | - Paul L Grundy
- Department of Neurosurgery, Wessex Neurological Centre, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, UK
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Aoki Y, Nakayama K. Development of a values-based decision aid to determine discharge destination: Case reports of older stroke survivors and their families. Medicine (Baltimore) 2022; 101:e30934. [PMID: 36254089 PMCID: PMC9575811 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000030934] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Older adults affected by stroke must face a difficult choice between receiving post-discharge care at home or in a facility. This study aimed to develop a decision aid (DA) to help older adults and their families choose the place of post-discharge care based on their values. METHODS Values and data for designing the DA were obtained through interviews with older stroke patients and their families, a questionnaire survey of various health professionals, and a review of patients' medical records. Next, a prototypic DA was prepared and tested for comprehensibility and usability using the 12-item International Patient Decision Aid Standards instrument. RESULTS The DA was developed based on the following 6 values that were common among older stroke patients and their families: "activities of daily living," "services and fees," "emergencies," "family support," "environment," and "home renovation." The prototype met the criteria in the comprehensibility and usability tests. CONCLUSION Older stroke patients can use the DA to think through the evidence-based information matching their own values to make a more satisfactory decision. The effectiveness of this DA should further be investigated in clinical settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoriko Aoki
- Department of Gerontological Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toyama, Toyama-shi, Toyama-ken, Japan
- *Correspondence: Yoriko Aoki, Department of Gerontological Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toyama, 2630 Sugitani, Toyama-shi, Toyama-ken 930-0194, Japan (e-mail: )
| | - Kazuhiro Nakayama
- Graduate School of Nursing Science, St. Luke’s International University, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Lognon T, Plourde KV, Aubin E, Giguere AMC, Archambault PM, Stacey D, Légaré F. Decision aids for home and community care: a systematic review. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e061215. [PMID: 36129731 PMCID: PMC9362828 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061215] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Decision aids (DAs) for clients in home and community care can support shared decision-making (SDM) with patients, healthcare teams and informal caregivers. We aimed to identify DAs developed for home and community care, verify their adherence to international DA criteria and explore the involvement of interprofessional teams in their development and use. DESIGN Systematic review reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. DATA SOURCES Six electronic bibliographic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL Plus, Web of Science, PsycINFO and the Cochrane Library) from inception to November 2019, social media and grey literature websites up to January 2021. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA DAs designed for home and community care settings or including home care or community services as options. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Two reviewers independently reviewed citations. Analysis consisted of a narrative synthesis of outcomes and a thematic analysis. DAs were appraised using the International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS). We collected information on the involvement of interprofessional teams, including nurses, in their development and use. RESULTS After reviewing 10 337 database citations and 924 grey literature citations, we extracted characteristics of 33 included DAs. DAs addressed a variety of decision points. Nearly half (42%) were relevant to older adults. Several DAs did not meet IPDAS criteria. Involvement of nurses and interprofessional teams in the development and use of DAs was minimal (33.3% of DAs). CONCLUSION DAs concerned a variety of decisions, especially those related to older people. This reflects the complexity of decisions and need for better support in this sector. There is little evidence about the involvement of interprofessional teams in the development and use of DAs in home and community care settings. An interprofessional approach to designing DAs for home care could facilitate SDM with people being cared for by teams. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42020169450.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tania Lognon
- Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec, Quebec, Canada
- VITAM-Centre de recherche en santé durable, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec, Quebec, Canada
| | - Karine V Plourde
- VITAM-Centre de recherche en santé durable, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec, Quebec, Canada
| | - Emmanuelle Aubin
- Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Patient-partner, Quebec, Quebec, Canada
| | - Anik M C Giguere
- VITAM-Centre de recherche en santé durable, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec, Quebec, Canada
- Quebec Centre for Excellence on Aging, Quebec, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec, Quebec, Canada
| | - Patrick M Archambault
- VITAM-Centre de recherche en santé durable, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec, Quebec, Canada
- Centre intégré de santé et de services sociaux de Chaudière-Appalaches, Lévis, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec, Quebec, Canada
| | - Dawn Stacey
- School of Nursing, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Patient Decision Aids Research Group, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - France Légaré
- VITAM-Centre de recherche en santé durable, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Ageing, the accrual of molecular and cellular damage over a lifetime confers progressive physiologic dysfunction of bodily systems, leaving the body in a heightened state of vulnerability to biophysical and psychosocial stressors. The inflection point is frailty which easily leads to disability and death. Interstitial lung disease (ILD) creates biophysical and psychosocial stresses difficult for even optimally fit patients to cope with. With evolving ILD treatment pathways, people with ILD are living longer. RECENT FINDINGS ILD and ageing are bi-directionally influential: ILD, its treatments, complications, and collateral systemic extra-pulmonary damage (hypoxic and oxidative stress) wear on the ageing person and ageing impacts a person's tolerance of ILD. ILD extent may proportionally accelerate age-related vulnerabilities. ILD related to inflammatory systemic diseases, e.g. connective tissue diseases or sarcoidosis, exert an even more complex biophysical impact on the body. SUMMARY The present review stresses goals of preventing frailty in ILD and preserving general health and well being of people living with ILD of any age, from time of diagnosis and as they age. The development of a prediction score is proposed to classify those at risk of frailty and guide interventions that preserve successful ageing for all levels of ILD severity. VIDEO ABSTRACT http://links.lww.com/COPM/A32.
Collapse
|
29
|
LoBrutto LR, Fix G, Wiener RS, Linsky AM. Leveraging the timing and frequency of patient decision aids in longitudinal shared decision-making: A narrative review and applied model. Health Expect 2022; 25:1246-1253. [PMID: 35652372 PMCID: PMC9327840 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13531] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2022] [Revised: 05/09/2022] [Accepted: 05/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Shared decision‐making (SDM) is intended to increase patient‐centredness of medical decision‐making for patients with acute and chronic conditions. Concurrently, patient decision aids (PtDAs) can supplement SDM by providing information to guide communication between patients and healthcare providers. Because of the prevalence of chronic conditions, where decisions may be extended or recurring, we sought to explore how effectively these tools have been leveraged in this context. Methods We conducted a narrative review of the literature on both SDM and PtDAs, searching PubMed and Boston University's library database search tool for English‐language articles published from January 2005 until March 2021. Additional search terms focused on temporality. Drawing from our findings, we developed a combined framework to highlight areas for future research using the discussion of end‐of‐life decisions as an exemplar to illustrate its relevance to chronic care contexts. Results After screening 57 articles, we identified 25 articles that fulfilled the inclusion criteria on SDM, PtDA use and temporality for chronic care. The literature on SDM highlighted time outside of the medical visit and opportunity to include outside decision partners as important elements of the process. PtDAs were commonly evaluated for process‐related and proximal outcomes, but less often for distal outcomes. Early evidence points to the value of comparative outcome evaluation based on the timing of PtDA distribution. Conclusion Our review of the literature on SDM and PtDAs reveals less attention to the timing of PtDAs relative to that of SDM. We highlight the need for further study of timing in PtDA use to improve longitudinal SDM for chronic care. The model that we propose in our discussion provides a starting point for future research on PtDA efficacy. Patient or Public Contribution Five patient consultants provided input and feedback on the development and utility of our model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lara R LoBrutto
- Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, VA Boston & VA Bedford Healthcare Systems, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Gemmae Fix
- Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, VA Boston & VA Bedford Healthcare Systems, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Renda S Wiener
- Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, VA Boston & VA Bedford Healthcare Systems, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Amy M Linsky
- Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, VA Boston & VA Bedford Healthcare Systems, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Schoon Y. Shared decision-making is not common in clinical practice. BRITISH HEART JOURNAL 2022; 108:498-499. [PMID: 35110386 DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2021-320519] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Yvonne Schoon
- Geriatrics, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Tooth LR. Shared decision making and patient decision aids: an update and tips for health care providers working in midlife health and beyond. Maturitas 2022; 160:68-69. [DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2022.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2022] [Accepted: 02/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
32
|
Tsai CB, Fang CL, Chen MS, Yen MY, Yeh CY, Lai ZM, Hsu ML, Wang ST. Development and Pilot Usefulness Testing of an Interactive Computerized Patient Decision Aid for Intraocular Lens Selection Before Cataract Surgery. Patient Prefer Adherence 2022; 16:189-196. [PMID: 35115767 PMCID: PMC8800869 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s343655] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2021] [Accepted: 01/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Modern cataract surgeries aim to treat impaired vision and also improve quality of life. An appropriate pre-operative selection of the intraocular lens is important to post-operative quality of life. Patients often have difficulty in choosing the best fit for individual needs. Patient decision aids (PDAs) are useful tools to assist patients in such decision-making process. However, most PDAs are paper-based and lack user interaction. This study is aimed to develop and evaluate an interactive computerized patient decision aid (cPDA) to help patients in the selection of an appropriate intraocular lens model before cataract surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients and their families who were making the decision regarding intraocular lens selection before cataract surgeries were eligible to participate in this study. A cPDA was built on an interactive robot, to help the patients in the decision-making process. The usefulness of the cPDA was measured with the Decision Self-Efficacy (DSE) scale and Preparation for Decision Making (PrepDM) scale. RESULTS A total of 50 participants (18 men and 32 women) were enrolled in the pilot test. The mean pre-cPDA DSE score was 46.5 ± 13.6, and the post-cPDA DSE score was 72.6 ±12.8. The average gain score on DSE was 26.1, and the standard deviation was 8.0. The gain score on DSE was statistically significant, and the effect size was bigger than 3. The patients with junior or senior high degrees had the highest gain score on DSE, and the ones with college or above degrees had the lowest. The patients with college or above degrees had the highest PrepDM score, and the ones with elementary school or below had the lowest. Age and sex were not significant correlates of PrepDM. The patients with college or above degrees had the highest preparedness, but the lowest gain on DSE. CONCLUSION Education levels are associated with the usefulness of cPDA, both for the preparedness and decision efficacy of patients. The results provide insight into the feasibility of cPDA for the decision-making of pre-operative intraocular lens selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chong-Bin Tsai
- Department of Ophthalmology, Ditmanson Medical Foundation Chiayi Christian Hospital, Chiayi City, Taiwan
- Department of Optometry, College of Medical and Health Science, Asia University, Taichung, Taiwan
- Correspondence: Chong-Bin Tsai, Department of Ophthalmology, Ditmanson Medical Foundation Chiayi Christian Hospital, No. 539 Zhongxiao Road, East District, Chiayi City, 60002, Taiwan, Tel +886-5-2765041 ext 8503, Fax +886-5-2774511, Email
| | - Chien-Liang Fang
- Division of Plastic and Reconstruction Surgery, Department of Surgery, Ditmanson Medical Foundation Chia-Yi Christian Hospital, Chiayi City, Taiwan
- Department of Food Nutrition and Health Biotechnology, College of Medical and Health Science, Asia University, Taichung City, Taiwan
| | - Ming-Shan Chen
- Department of Anesthesiology, Ditmanson Medical Foundation Chiayi Christian Hospital, Chiayi City, Taiwan
- Department of Biotechnology, Asia University, Taichung City, Taiwan
| | - Min-Yueh Yen
- Department of Ophthalmology, Ditmanson Medical Foundation Chiayi Christian Hospital, Chiayi City, Taiwan
| | - Chi-Yen Yeh
- Department of Information Technology, Ditmanson Medical Foundation Chiayi Christian Hospital, Chiayi City, Taiwan
| | - Zhi-Ming Lai
- Department of Information Technology, Ditmanson Medical Foundation Chiayi Christian Hospital, Chiayi City, Taiwan
| | - Mei-Ling Hsu
- Department of Information Technology, Ditmanson Medical Foundation Chiayi Christian Hospital, Chiayi City, Taiwan
| | - Shan-Tair Wang
- Department of Medical Research, Ditmanson Medical Foundation Chiayi Christian Hospital, Chiayi City, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Nordin S, Sturge J, Ayoub M, Jones A, McKee K, Dahlberg L, Meijering L, Elf M. The Role of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) for Older Adults' Decision-Making Related to Health, and Health and Social Care Services in Daily Life-A Scoping Review. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 19:ijerph19010151. [PMID: 35010408 PMCID: PMC8750227 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19010151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2021] [Revised: 12/15/2021] [Accepted: 12/17/2021] [Indexed: 05/08/2023]
Abstract
Information and communication technology (ICT) can potentially support older adults in making decisions and increase their involvement in decision-making processes. Although the range of technical products has expanded in various areas of society, knowledge is lacking on the influence that ICT has on older adults' decision-making in everyday situations. Based on the literature, we aimed to provide an overview of the role of ICT in home-dwelling older adults' decision-making in relation to health, and health and social care services. A scoping review of articles published between 2010 and 2020 was undertaken by searching five electronic databases. Finally, 12 articles using qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-method designs were included. The articles were published in journals representing biology and medicine, nursing, informatics, and computer science. A majority of the articles were published in the last five years, and most articles came from European countries. The results are presented in three categories: (i) form and function of ICT for decision-making, (ii) perceived value and effect of ICT for decision-making, and (iii) factors influencing ICT use for decision-making. According to our findings, ICT for decision-making in relation to health, and health and social care services was more implicitly described than explicitly described, and we conclude that more research on this topic is needed. Future research should engage older adults and health professionals in developing technology based on their needs. Further, factors that influence older adults' use of ICT should be evaluated to ensure that it is successfully integrated into their daily lives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susanna Nordin
- School of Health and Welfare, Dalarna University, 791 88 Falun, Sweden; (M.A.); (K.M.); (L.D.); (M.E.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Jodi Sturge
- Population Research Center, Urban and Regional Studies Institute, Faculty of Spatial Sciences, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 800, 9700 AV Groningen, The Netherlands; (J.S.); (L.M.)
| | - Maria Ayoub
- School of Health and Welfare, Dalarna University, 791 88 Falun, Sweden; (M.A.); (K.M.); (L.D.); (M.E.)
| | - Allyson Jones
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2G4, Canada;
| | - Kevin McKee
- School of Health and Welfare, Dalarna University, 791 88 Falun, Sweden; (M.A.); (K.M.); (L.D.); (M.E.)
| | - Lena Dahlberg
- School of Health and Welfare, Dalarna University, 791 88 Falun, Sweden; (M.A.); (K.M.); (L.D.); (M.E.)
- Aging Research Center, Karolinska Institutet & Stockholm University, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Louise Meijering
- Population Research Center, Urban and Regional Studies Institute, Faculty of Spatial Sciences, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 800, 9700 AV Groningen, The Netherlands; (J.S.); (L.M.)
| | - Marie Elf
- School of Health and Welfare, Dalarna University, 791 88 Falun, Sweden; (M.A.); (K.M.); (L.D.); (M.E.)
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Hibino M, Hamashima C, Iwata M, Terasawa T. Effectiveness of decision aids on cancer-screening decision-making: an umbrella review protocol. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e051156. [PMID: 34880016 PMCID: PMC8655570 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Although systematic reviews have shown how decision aids about cancer-related clinical decisions improve selection of key options and shared decision-making, whether or not particular decision aids, defined by their specific presentation formats, delivery methods and other attributes, can perform better than others in the context of cancer-screening decisions is uncertain. Therefore, we planned an overview to address this issue by using standard umbrella review methods to repurpose existing systematic reviews and their component comparative studies. METHODS AND ANALYSIS We will search PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects from inception through 31 December 2021 with no language restriction and perform full-text evaluation of potentially relevant articles. We will include systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials or non-randomised studies of interventions that assessed a decision aid about cancer-screening decisions and compared it with an alternative tool or conventional management in healthy average-risk adults. Two reviewers will extract data and rate the study validity according to standard quality assessment measures. Our primary outcome will be intended and actual choice and adherence to selected options. The secondary outcomes will include attributes of the option-selection process, achieving shared decision-making and preference-linked psychosocial outcomes. We will qualitatively assess study, patient and intervention characteristics and outcomes. We will also take special care to investigate the presentation format, delivery methods and quality of the included decision aids and assess the degree to which the decision aid was delivered and used as intended. If appropriate, we will perform random-effects model meta-analyses to quantitatively synthesise the results. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethics approval is not applicable as this is a secondary analysis of publicly available data. The review results will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42021235957.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masaya Hibino
- Department of Emergency Medicine and General Internal Medicine, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan
| | - Chisato Hamashima
- Health Policy Section, Department of Nursing, Faculty of Medical Technology, Teikyo University, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mitsunaga Iwata
- Department of Emergency Medicine and General Internal Medicine, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan
| | - Teruhiko Terasawa
- Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine and General Internal Medicine, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Ozdemir S, Choong LHL, Gan SWS, Lim LW, Malhotra C, Jafar TH, Yee ACP, Vishwanath P, Tan SNG, Finkelstein EA. Patient Decision Aid Development for Older Adults With End-Stage Kidney Disease in Singapore. Kidney Int Rep 2021; 6:2885-2896. [PMID: 34805639 PMCID: PMC8589693 DOI: 10.1016/j.ekir.2021.08.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2021] [Revised: 08/20/2021] [Accepted: 08/30/2021] [Indexed: 10/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction In managing end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), older adults face a decision regarding whether to undergo dialysis or manage symptoms through kidney supportive care (KSC). This article describes the development of a patient decision aid (PDA) that is designed specifically for older adults with ESKD. Methods The decision context of the PDA was to choose a treatment between hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, and KSC. The development process used insights obtained from qualitative interviews with patients, informal caregivers, and health care providers. The PDA was then developed in English and Mandarin and was pilot-tested with patients, caregivers, and health care providers. We finalized the PDA based on feedback from pilot testing and performed a preliminary evaluation based on the International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDASi v4.0) criteria. Results The final PDA consists of 2 booklets and a video. During pilot testing, patients and caregivers reported high levels of ease of understanding and usefulness with ≥92.5% providing agree/strongly agree responses for the "Content"-related criteria, and ≥75% providing agree/strongly agree responses for the "Development Process and Effectiveness"-related criteria. The final PDA met 10 of 12 IPDASi v4.0 criteria. Conclusions This PDA was found useful during pilot-testing. It will be used during renal counseling in Singapore to help older adults with ESKD and their caregivers make informed decisions on which treatment option is best for the patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Semra Ozdemir
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.,Signature Programme in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.,Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | | | | | - Lydia Wei Lim
- Department of Renal Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Chetna Malhotra
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.,Signature Programme in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Tazeen H Jafar
- Signature Programme in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | | | | | | | - Eric Andrew Finkelstein
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.,Signature Programme in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.,Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Effectiveness of patient decision aids for total hip and knee arthroplasty decision-making: a systematic review. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2021; 29:1399-1411. [PMID: 34302958 DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2021.07.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2021] [Revised: 06/22/2021] [Accepted: 07/08/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To determine the effectiveness of patient decision aids (PtDAs) compared to alternative interventions (including usual care) on decision quality and quality of the decision-making process for adults with hip and knee osteoarthritis considering primary elective total joint arthroplasty. METHODS A systematic review guided by Cochrane methods and PRISMA reporting guidelines. Studies were searched in five databases. Included studies were RCTs evaluating the effect of PtDAs on total joint arthroplasty decision-making. Study quality was appraised with Cochrane's risk of bias tool. Quality and strength of recommendations were appraised with GRADE. RESULTS Ten included studies were conducted in North American using the same PtDA. Compared to usual care, PtDA groups demonstrated increased decision quality (e.g., higher knowledge, more informed values-based choices) and quality of the decision making process (e.g., decreased decisional conflict) (6 trials). Secondary outcomes showed increased surgeon satisfaction within the consultation and no difference in patient satisfaction or uptake of the chosen option (surgery: RR 1.03, 95% CI = 0.84 to 1.25; I2 = 66%; 4 trials). When PtDAs formtats were compared, there were similar effects but no difference between PtDAs (4 trials). CONCLUSIONS There was low to very low GRADE certainty of evidence for the effect of PtDAs on decision quality and quality of the decision-making process compared to usual care. No differences were found when different formats of PtDAs were compared (moderate to very low GRADE certainty of evidence).
Collapse
|
37
|
Hart L, Polášková A, Schalek P. Clinical decision support system RHINA in the diagnosis and treatment of acute or chronic rhinosinusitis. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2021; 21:239. [PMID: 34372852 PMCID: PMC8350307 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-021-01599-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2020] [Accepted: 07/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Rhinosinusitis is an inflammation of the sinonasal cavity which affects roughly one in seven people per year. Acute rhinosinusitis (ARS) is mostly, apart from allergic etiology, caused by a viral infection and, in some cases (30–50%), by a bacterial superinfection. Antibiotics, indicated only in rare cases according to EPOS guidelines, are nevertheless prescribed in more than 80% of ARS cases, which increases the resistant bacterial strains in the population. Methods We have designed a clinical decision support system (CDSS), RHINA, based on a web application created in HTML 5, using JavaScript, jQuery, CCS3 and PHP scripting language. The presented CDSS RHINA helps general physicians to decide whether or not to prescribe antibiotics in patients with rhinosinusitis. Results In a retrospective study of a total of 1465 patients with rhinosinusitis, the CDSS RHINA presented a 90.2% consistency with the diagnosis and treatment made by the ENT specialist. Conclusion Patients assessed with the assistance of our CDSS RHINA would decrease the over-prescription of antibiotics, which in turn would help to reduce the bacterial resistance to the most commonly prescribed antibiotics. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12911-021-01599-3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Hart
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, 3rd Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Královské Vinohrady, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
| | - A Polášková
- Charles University Computer Centre, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - P Schalek
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, 3rd Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Královské Vinohrady, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Skyring TA, Mansfield KJ, Mullan JR. Factors Affecting Satisfaction with the Decision-Making Process and Decision Regret for Men with a New Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer. Am J Mens Health 2021; 15:15579883211026812. [PMID: 34261353 PMCID: PMC8287369 DOI: 10.1177/15579883211026812] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
For men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer the decisions about
treatment options are complex and difficult. The aim of this study was
to investigate any association between the extent to which men wanted
to be involved in the decision making process, their satisfaction with
that process, and their levels of decision regret after treatment. The
study population consisted of men diagnosed with prostate cancer at a
regional center in Australia. Men (n = 324) were
invited to complete a mail out survey which included demographic
questions, the treatment chosen, and three validated tools: The
Control Preference Scale to measure the degree of control assumed when
making decisions about medical interventions; the Treatment
Decision-Making Satisfaction Scale (TDM- SAT) to assess satisfaction
with the treatment decision making process; and the Decision Regret
Scale to assess the level of regret after treatment. The majority of
the 151 respondents (47% response rate) expressed an active decision
control preference. There was no correlation between age and the
treatment chosen or the degree of control men exerted over the
decision-making process. Men who preferred a passive role were less
satisfied with the decision-making process than were those who took an
active or collaborative approach. A strong inverse correlation was
demonstrated between regret experienced and satisfaction with the
decision-making process. In conclusion, for men newly diagnosed with
prostate cancer, taking an active role in the treatment decision
making process led to greater satisfaction with that process, which in
turn reduced their chances of experiencing regret following
treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy A Skyring
- School of Medicine, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.,South Coast Urology, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
| | - Kylie J Mansfield
- School of Medicine, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
| | - Judy R Mullan
- School of Medicine, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.,CHRISP, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW Australia
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Koreli A, Briassoulis G, Sideris M, Philalithis A, Papagrigoriadis S. Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery (TEMS) for Rectal Cancer: Patient Decision-making, Postoperative Experience and Quality of Life. In Vivo 2021; 35:1235-1245. [PMID: 33622926 DOI: 10.21873/invivo.12374] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2021] [Revised: 01/22/2021] [Accepted: 01/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEMS) is a form of minimally invasive surgery for selected rectal cancers. The aim of this study was to explore the factors affecting patients' decision-making concerning the choice of surgical treatment as well as to measure the Quality of Life (QoL) post-TEMS. PATIENTS AND METHODS Thirty-four patients with rectal cancer stage T1/T2-N0-M0 that underwent TEMS were studied. The questionnaires used included the Short Form SF12v2, Wexner Score (CCF-FIS) and the Sexual Function Questionnaire (SFQ). The patients' views on experience and treatment decision were obtained with a custom-designed questionnaire. Questionnaires were completed at a mean of 6.9 years following treatment. RESULTS The factors that influenced the patients' decisions were: experience satisfaction (p=0.003), postoperative bowel function (p<0.001), lower incontinence score (p=0.020) and agreement of TEMS experience with preoperative information (p=0.049). Treatment experience satisfaction was associated with family support (p=0.034) and agreement with preoperative information (p=0.047), better bowel function (p=0.026) and mental QoL (MCS) (p=0.003). CONCLUSION factors important to patients when reflecting on treatment experience are adequate and reliable information, a good QoL and the presence of family support. Clinicians should incorporate those parameters in their practice when assisting patients in making a surgical treatment choice and provide informed consent on TEMS for rectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Koreli
- Medical School, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece; .,Nursing Department, University of West Attica, Athens, Greece
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Bowen E, Nayfe R, Milburn N, Mayo H, Reid MC, Fraenkel L, Weiner D, Halm EA, Makris UE. Do Decision Aids Benefit Patients with Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain? A Systematic Review. PAIN MEDICINE 2021; 21:951-969. [PMID: 31880805 DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnz280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To review the effect of patient decision aids for adults making treatment decisions regarding the management of chronic musculoskeletal pain. METHODS We performed a systematic review of randomized controlled trials of adults using patient decision aids to make treatment decisions for chronic musculoskeletal pain in the outpatient setting. RESULTS Of 477 records screened, 17 met the inclusion criteria. Chronic musculoskeletal pain conditions included osteoarthritis of the hip, knee, or trapeziometacarpal joint and back pain. Thirteen studies evaluated the use of a decision aid for deciding between surgical and nonsurgical management. The remaining four studies evaluated decision aids for nonsurgical treatment options. Outcomes included decision quality, pain, function, and surgery utilization. The effects of decision aids on decision-making outcomes were mixed. Comparing decision aids with usual care, all five studies that examined knowledge scores found improvement in patient knowledge. None of the four studies that evaluated satisfaction with the decision-making process found a difference with use of a decision aid. There was limited and inconsistent data on other decision-related outcomes. Of the eight studies that evaluated surgery utilization, seven found no difference in surgery rates with use of a decision aid. Five studies made comparisons between different types of decision aids, and there was no clearly superior format. CONCLUSIONS Decision aids may improve patients' knowledge about treatment options for chronic musculoskeletal pain but largely did not impact other outcomes. Future efforts should focus on improving the effectiveness of decision aids and incorporating nonpharmacologic and nonsurgical management options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Bowen
- Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Rabih Nayfe
- Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Nathaniel Milburn
- Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Helen Mayo
- Health Sciences Digital Library and Learning Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - M C Reid
- Division of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, New York
| | - Liana Fraenkel
- Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Debra Weiner
- Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, Veterans Administration Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.,Department of Medicine, Psychiatry, Anesthesiology and Clinical & Translational Science, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Ethan A Halm
- Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Una E Makris
- Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.,Department of Medicine, VA North Texas Health Care System, Dallas, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Jhaveri A, Sibley RA, Spatz ES, Dodson J. Aspirin, Statins, and Primary Prevention: Opportunities for Shared Decision Making in the Face of Uncertainty. Curr Cardiol Rep 2021; 23:67. [PMID: 33961154 DOI: 10.1007/s11886-021-01499-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The utility of aspirin and statins for primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease remains ambiguous in older adults. Current guidelines and recent data are vague and inconclusive. This review seeks to summarize the landscape of primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in older adults and explore the role of shared decision making. RECENT FINDINGS Observational data suggest potential benefit of statin therapy in older adults. Aspirin is presently not recommended for primary prevention based on evidence from recent clinical trials. The implementation of shared decision making and decision aids in routine clinical practice remains challenging but may rise in coming years. Clinical trial data on the horizon may aid in solidifying guideline therapy for statin use. However, in the face of uncertainty, shared decision making between provider and patient should be utilized to determine whether pharmacotherapy may benefit older adults. Decision aids are an effective tool to guide this process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amit Jhaveri
- Department of Medicine, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rachel A Sibley
- Department of Medicine, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Erica S Spatz
- Divison of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - John Dodson
- Leon H. Charney Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, 227 East 30th Street, TRB 851, New York, NY, 10016, USA. .,Division of Healthcare Delivery Science, Department of Population Health, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Kim DH, Shi SM, Carroll D, Najafzadeh M, Wei LJ. Restricted mean survival time versus conventional measures for treatment decision-making. J Am Geriatr Soc 2021; 69:2282-2289. [PMID: 33901300 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.17195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2021] [Revised: 03/17/2021] [Accepted: 04/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES Restricted mean survival time (RMST) summarizes treatment effect in terms of a gain or loss in the event-free days. It remains uncertain whether communicating treatment benefit and harm using RMST-based summary is more effective than conventional summary based on absolute and relative risk reduction. We compared the effect of RMST-based approach and conventional approach on decisional conflict using an example of intensive versus standard blood pressure-lowering strategies. DESIGN On-line survey. SETTING A convenience sample of patients in the United States. PARTICIPANTS Two hundred adults aged 65 and older with hypertension requiring anti-hypertensive treatment (response rate 85.5%). INTERVENTIONS Participants were randomly assigned to either RMST-based summary or conventional summary about the benefit and harm of blood pressure-lowering strategies. MEASUREMENTS Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS), ranging from 0 (no conflict) to 100 (high conflict), and preference for intensive blood pressure-lowering strategy. RESULTS Participants assigned to RMST-based approach (n = 100) and conventional approach (n = 100) had similar age (mean [standard deviation, SD]: 72.3 [5.6] vs 72.8 [5.5] years) and proportions of female (50 [50.0%] vs 61 [61.0%]) and white race (92 [92.0%] vs 92 [92.0%]). The mean (SD) DCS score was 25.2 (15.0) for RMST-based approach and 25.6 (14.1) for conventional approach (p = 0.84). The number (%) of participants who preferred intensive strategy was 10 (10.0%) for RMST-based approach and 14 (14.0%) for conventional approach (p = 0.52). The results were consistent in subgroups defined by age, sex, education level, cardiovascular disease status, and predicted mortality risk categories. CONCLUSION In a sample of relatively healthy older adults with hypertension, RMST-based approach was as effective as conventional approach on decisional conflict about choosing a blood pressure-lowering strategy. This study provides proof-of-concept evidence that RMST-based approach can be used in conjunction with absolute and relative risk reduction for communicating treatment benefit and harm in a decision aid.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dae Hyun Kim
- Hinda and Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Division of Gerontology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Sandra M Shi
- Hinda and Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Division of Gerontology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Danette Carroll
- Hinda and Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Mehdi Najafzadeh
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Lee-Jen Wei
- Department of Biostatistics, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
King SJ, Raine KA, Peel NM, Hubbard RE. Interventions for frail older inpatients: A systematic review of frailty measures and reported outcomes in randomised controlled trials. Australas J Ageing 2021; 40:129-144. [PMID: 33876880 DOI: 10.1111/ajag.12951] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2020] [Revised: 02/22/2021] [Accepted: 02/28/2021] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To summarise frailty measures and outcomes reported in trials involving frail older inpatients. METHODS Databases were searched for randomised controlled trials enrolling frail older inpatients. RESULTS Twenty-four articles describing twelve trials were included. Seven trials applied six tools to measure frailty, whilst five trials employed ad hoc measures. Eighty outcomes were examined with survival and functional status reported most commonly. Nine studies trialled multidisciplinary, geriatrician-led interventions. Statistically significant between-group differences were detected for at least one outcome in ten trials. All studies represented high risk of bias within at least one domain. CONCLUSIONS Heterogeneity of interventions, measurement of frailty and outcomes reported limit generalisability of findings. Many articles purport to study frail patients, yet do not enrol patients using any frailty measurement tool. Utilising validated instruments to measure frailty and a standard set of health outcomes relevant to older people would assist consistent reporting and evaluation of future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shannon J King
- Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Qld, Australia
| | | | - Nancye M Peel
- Centre for Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
| | - Ruth E Hubbard
- Centre for Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Qld, Australia.,Princess Alexandra Hospital Southside Clinical Unit, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Lin LH, Cheng HC, Chen YC, Chien LY. Effectiveness of a video-based advance care planning intervention in hospitalized elderly patients: A randomized controlled trial. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2021; 21:478-484. [PMID: 33860972 DOI: 10.1111/ggi.14158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2020] [Revised: 02/09/2021] [Accepted: 03/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
AIM This study aimed to develop a video-based advance care planning intervention, and examine the effectiveness of the intervention on knowledge, behavioral intentions and advance directive signing among older patients admitted to a geriatric unit in Taiwan. METHODS This randomized controlled trial was carried out in two geriatric wards of a medical center in northern Taiwan, between June 2014 and June 2015. The participants were randomly assigned to the intervention (n = 39) or control (n = 43) group. Participants in the intervention group watched a 5-min video regarding advance care planning. The control group received usual care. Structured questionnaires on advance care planning knowledge and behavioral intentions were administered to both groups before and after the intervention. Advance directive signing was carried out until 2 weeks after hospital discharge through a chart review. RESULTS The intervention group showed a significantly higher advance care planning knowledge score and behavioral intention score than the control group post-intervention. The rate of advance directive signing was 33.3% in the intervention group and 9.3% in the control group (P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS This study showed the effectiveness of video-based interventions in increasing advance care planning knowledge, behavioral intention and advance directive signing among hospitalized older patients. Geriatric wards could use our model to promote advance care planning among older patients. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2021; 21: 478-484.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li-Hwa Lin
- Department of Nursing, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,Institute of Public Health, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hui-Chuan Cheng
- Department of Nursing, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,College of Nursing, National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Chih Chen
- Department of Medical Research, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Li-Yin Chien
- Institute of Community Health Care, College of Nursing, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Cadet T, Aliberti G, Karamourtopoulos M, Jacobson A, Siska M, Schonberg MA. Modifying a Mammography Decision Aid for Older Adult Women with Risk Factors for Low Health Literacy. Health Lit Res Pract 2021; 5:e78-e90. [PMID: 34213995 PMCID: PMC8082954 DOI: 10.3928/24748307-20210308-01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Guidelines recommend that before being offered mammography screening, women age 75 years and older be informed of the uncertainty of benefit and potential for harm (e.g., being diagnosed with a breast cancer that would otherwise never have shown up in one's lifetime); however, few older women are informed of the risks of mammography screening and most overestimate its benefits. Objective: The aim of this study was to learn from women older than age 75 years who have predisposing risk factors for low health literacy (LHL) how they make decisions about mammography screening, whether an existing decision aid (DA) on mammography screening for them was acceptable and helpful, and suggestions for improving the DA. Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with 18 women who were between ages 75 and 89 years and had predisposing risk factors for LHL (i.e., answered somewhat to not at all confident to the health literacy screening question “How confident are you filling out medical forms by yourself?” and/or had an education level of some college or less). Key Results: Findings indicate that women in this study lacked knowledge and understanding that one can decide on mammography screening based on their personal values. Women were enthusiastic about screening based on an interest in taking care of themselves but rely on their providers for health care decisions. Overall, most women found the DA helpful and would recommend the use of the DA. Conclusions: Findings from this study provide formative data to test the efficacy of the modified DA in practice. Failing to consider the informational needs of adults with LHL in design of DAs could inadvertently exacerbate existing inequalities in health. It is essential that DAs consider older women's diverse backgrounds and educational levels to support their decision-making. [HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice. 2021;5(2):e78–e90.] Plain Language Summary: The goal of this research was to understand how women older than age 75 years with risk factors for low health literacy made decisions about getting mammograms, whether an educational pamphlet was helpful, and suggestions for improving it. This research helps in understanding how to involve this population in the process of designing patient-related materials for mammogram decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tamara Cadet
- Address correspondence to Tamara Cadet, PhD, MSW, MPH, Simmons University College of Social Sciences and Policy Practice, School of Social Work, 300 The Fenway, Boston, MA 02115;
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Ke LS, Hu WY, Chen CY, Liu CY, Chiu TY. A quasi-experimental evaluation of advance care planning improves consistency between elderly individuals and their surrogates regarding end-of-life care preferences: Development and application of a decision aid with cartoon pictures. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2021; 104:815-825. [PMID: 33010998 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.09.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2020] [Revised: 09/10/2020] [Accepted: 09/18/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study sought to develop a decision aid with cartoon pictures and evaluate its effectiveness in increasing consistency between elderly individuals and their surrogates regarding end-of-life care. METHODS A pre-post quasi-experimental design was adopted using the Life Support Preferences Questionnaire. The intervention had two components: (1) increasing participants' knowledge of medical treatments related to end-of-life care, and (2) sharing their end-of-life wishes. The experimental group received an intervention, whereas the control group received usual care. RESULTS A total of 110 participants in 55 pairs of elderly individuals with average aged 86.4 and their surrogates (27 in the experimental group, 28 in the control group) were recruited from a veterans hospital in northern Taiwan. Nearly 90 % of elderly individuals were male. The multiple linear regression showed that the inconsistent gap between elderly individuals and their surrogates in the experimental group decreased 12 points than the control group after controlling the covariances (B = -12.116, p = 0.032). CONCLUSION The intervention improved the consistency between elderly individuals and their surrogates regarding end-of-life care. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS A decision aid with cartoon pictures may support the discussion of end-of-life care in older Asian populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li-Shan Ke
- National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences, School of Nursing, Taipei, Taiwan; Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Department of Nursing, Taipei, Taiwan; National Taiwan University, College of Medicine, School of Nursing, Taipei, Taiwan.
| | - Wen-Yu Hu
- National Taiwan University, College of Medicine, School of Nursing, Taipei, Taiwan; National Taiwan University Hospital, Department of Nursing, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ching-Yu Chen
- National Taiwan University, College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan; National Taiwan University Hospital, Department of Family Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chieh-Yu Liu
- National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences, Department of Speech Language Pathology and Audiology, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Tai-Yuan Chiu
- National Taiwan University, College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan; National Taiwan University Hospital, Department of Family Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Hoffmann TC, Bakhit M, Durand MA, Perestelo-Pérez L, Saunders C, Brito JP. Basing Information on Comprehensive, Critically Appraised, and Up-to-Date Syntheses of the Scientific Evidence: An Update from the International Patient Decision Aid Standards. Med Decis Making 2021; 41:755-767. [PMID: 33660539 DOI: 10.1177/0272989x21996622] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients and clinicians expect the information in patient decision aids to be based on the best available research evidence. The objectives of this International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS) review were to 1) check the currency of, and where needed, update evidence for the domain of "basing the information in decision aids on comprehensive, critically appraised, and up-to-date syntheses of the evidence"; 2) analyze the evidence characteristics of decision aids; and 3) propose updates to relevant IPDAS criteria. METHODS We searched MEDLINE and PubMed to inform updates of this domain's definitions, justifications, and components. We also searched 5 sources to identify all publicly available decision aids (N = 471). Two assessors independently extracted each aid's evidence characteristics. RESULTS Minor updates to the definitions and theoretical justifications of this IPDAS domain are provided and changes to relevant IPDAS criteria proposed. Nearly all aids (97%) provided a year of creation/update, but most (81%) did not report an explicit update or expiration policy. No scientific references were cited in 33% of aids. Of the 314 that cited at least 1 reference, 39% cited at least 1 guideline, 44% cited at least 1 systematic review, and 23% cited at least 1 randomized trial. In 35%, it was unclear what statement in the aid the citations referred to. Only 14% reported any of the processes used to find and decide on evidence inclusion. Only 14% reported the evidence quality. Many emerging issues and future research areas were identified. CONCLUSIONS Although many emerging issues need to be addressed, this IPDAS domain is validated and criteria refined. High-quality patient decision aids should be based on comprehensive and up-to-date syntheses of critically appraised evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tammy C Hoffmann
- Institute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Mina Bakhit
- Institute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Marie-Anne Durand
- Universite Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France.,The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | | | - Catherine Saunders
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Lebanon, NH, USA.,Department of Psychiatry, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Centre, Lebanon NH, USA
| | - Juan P Brito
- Knowledge Evaluation and Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, Minnesota, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Pel-Littel RE, Snaterse M, Teppich NM, Buurman BM, van Etten-Jamaludin FS, van Weert JCM, Minkman MM, Scholte Op Reimer WJM. Barriers and facilitators for shared decision making in older patients with multiple chronic conditions: a systematic review. BMC Geriatr 2021; 21:112. [PMID: 33549059 PMCID: PMC7866443 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-021-02050-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2020] [Accepted: 01/25/2021] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The aim of this study was to describe barriers and facilitators for shared decision making (SDM) as experienced by older patients with multiple chronic conditions (MCCs), informal caregivers and health professionals. Methods A structured literature search was conducted with 5 databases. Two reviewers independently assessed studies for eligibility and performed a quality assessment. The results from the included studies were summarized using a predefined taxonomy. Results Our search yielded 3838 articles. Twenty-eight studies, listing 149 perceived barriers and 67 perceived facilitators for SDM, were included. Due to poor health and cognitive and/or physical impairments, older patients with MCCs participate less in SDM. Poor interpersonal skills of health professionals are perceived as hampering SDM, as do organizational barriers, such as pressure for time and high turnover of patients. However, among older patients with MCCs, SDM could be facilitated when patients share information about personal values, priorities and preferences, as well as information about quality of life and functional status. Informal caregivers may facilitate SDM by assisting patients with decision support, although informal caregivers can also complicate the SDM process, for example, when they have different views on treatment or the patient’s capability to be involved. Coordination of care when multiple health professionals are involved is perceived as important. Conclusions Although poor health is perceived as a barrier to participate in SDM, the personal experience of living with MCCs is considered valuable input in SDM. An explicit invitation to participate in SDM is important to older adults. Health professionals need a supporting organizational context and good communication skills to devise an individualized approach for patient care. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12877-021-02050-y.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruth E Pel-Littel
- Vilans, Centre of Expertise for Long-term Care, PO Box 8228, Utrecht, RE, 3503, the Netherlands. .,Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Geriatric Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Marjolein Snaterse
- ACHIEVE, Centre of Applied Research, Faculty of Health, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Nelly Marela Teppich
- Vilans, Centre of Expertise for Long-term Care, PO Box 8228, Utrecht, RE, 3503, the Netherlands
| | - Bianca M Buurman
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Geriatric Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,ACHIEVE, Centre of Applied Research, Faculty of Health, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Julia C M van Weert
- Amsterdam School of Communication Research/ASCoR, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Mirella M Minkman
- Vilans, Centre of Expertise for Long-term Care, PO Box 8228, Utrecht, RE, 3503, the Netherlands.,University of Tilburg/TIAS School for Business and Society, Tilburg, the Netherlands
| | - Wilma J M Scholte Op Reimer
- ACHIEVE, Centre of Applied Research, Faculty of Health, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Cardiology, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
van Weert JCM, Alblas MC, van Dijk L, Jansen J. Preference for and understanding of graphs presenting health risk information. The role of age, health literacy, numeracy and graph literacy. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2021; 104:109-117. [PMID: 32727670 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.06.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2019] [Revised: 04/27/2020] [Accepted: 06/29/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate 1) younger (< 65) and older (> 65) adults' preference for and understanding of graph formats presenting risk information, and 2) the contribution of age, health literacy, numeracy and graph literacy in understanding information. MATERIALS AND METHODS To assess preferences, participants (n = 219 < 65 and n = 227>65) were exposed to a storyboard presenting six types of graphs. Understanding (verbatim and gist knowledge) was assessed in an experiment using a 6 (graphs: clock, bar, sparkplug, table, pie vs pictograph) by 2 (age: younger [<65] vs older [>65]) between-subjects design. RESULTS Most participants preferred clock, pie or bar chart. Pie was not well understood by both younger and older people, and clock not by older people. Bar was fairly well understood in both groups. Table yielded high knowledge scores, particularly in the older group. Lower age, higher numeracy and higher graph literacy contributed to higher verbatim knowledge scores. Higher health literacy and graph literacy were associated with higher gist knowledge. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION Although not the preferred format, tables are best understood by older adults. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Graph literacy skills are essential for both verbatim and gist understanding, and are important to take into account when developing risk information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia C M van Weert
- Amsterdam School of Communication Research / ASCoR, Department of Communication Science, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Monique C Alblas
- Amsterdam School of Communication Research / ASCoR, Department of Communication Science, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Liset van Dijk
- Nivel, Netherlands Institute of Health Services Research, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Dept. of PharmacoTherapy, Epidemiology & -Economics (PTEE), Groningen Research Institute of Pharmacy, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
| | - Jesse Jansen
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, 2006, Australia; Department of Family Medicine, CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Tappen RM, Worch SM, Newman DO, Hain D. Evaluation of a Novel Decision Guide "Go to the Hospital or Stay Here?" for Nursing Home Residents and Families: A Randomized Trial. Res Gerontol Nurs 2020; 13:309-319. [PMID: 33034651 DOI: 10.3928/19404921-20201002-01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2019] [Accepted: 03/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Initiatives to reduce potentially preventable hospitalizations of nursing home residents have focused on staff response to changes in condition and advance care planning. Yet, resident and family insistence on transfer has been one of the most intractable sources of these hospitalizations, although not the target of active intervention until now. Consented residents and family members in the intervention group received a newly developed decision aid entitled, "Go to the Hospital or Stay Here?," providing information on the risks and benefits of transfer versus remaining in the nursing home. This person-centered decision aid was developed from the results of 271 interviews of residents, families, and providers to identify what they wanted to know and any misunderstandings surrounding the transfer process. Engaging residents in the decision respects their right to participate and provides the information they need to make a deliberative decision. The intervention group showed a gain in knowledge and reduction in decisional conflict but reported decreased decisional preparation. There was no decrease in transfers compared to the control group. Evaluation of the decision guide by residents and families was positive. TARGETS Nursing home residents and their family members. INTERVENTION To provide information regarding the decision to stay in the nursing home or transfer to acute care due to a change in condition. MECHANISMS OF ACTION Decision aid "Go the "Hospital or Stay Here?" to impart knowledge regarding the decision to remain in the nursing home or transfer to acute care. OUTCOMES Use of the Guide was found to increase residents' and family members' knowledge and decrease decisional conflict, but it did not increase decisional preparation. No reduction in transfers was found. Residents and families rated the Guide as very helpful. [Research in Gerontological Nursing, 13(6), 309-319.].
Collapse
|