Practical issues in clinical scenarios involving CKD patients requiring antithrombotic therapy in light of the 2017 ESC guideline recommendations

[Heart and diabetes : Platelet function and antiplatelet therapy in chronic kidney disease]

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) have an increased risk of thrombosis and approximately 50% of patients with advanced CKD die because of a cardiovascular disease. In addition to an increased risk of thrombosis, patients with CKD and particularly with advanced CKD, have an increased risk of hemorrhage, which increases parallel to the decline of kidney function. Due to this parallel existence of the prohemorrhagic and prothrombotic phenotype, antiplatelet treatment is difficult in the daily routine and data show that CKD patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are less likely to receive guideline-conform treatment. The underlying mechanisms are currently insufficiently understood and both platelet-dependent mechanisms and also platelet-independent mechanisms are under discussion. Accordingly, there is currently no specific treatment or treatment strategy for patients with CKD. In addition, CKD patients are underrepresented in registration studies on antiplatelet treatment and there are no data from randomized trials for patients with advanced CKD (CKD ≥ 4). Current guideline recommendations are therefore based on subgroup analyses and observational studies. In addition, questions on the duration of treatment, on risk scores for estimation of the risk of hemorrhage and on potential benefits of escalation and de-escalation strategies remain largely unanswered and should therefore be the focus of future studies.

Challenges of long-term dual antiplatelet therapy use following acute coronary syndromes

An acute coronary syndrome (ACS) event is associated with a high risk of recurrent ACS, stroke, and death. To ameliorate the risk of subsequent events, current guidelines for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and non-ST-segment elevation ACS recommend long-term management strategies for secondary prevention including risk factor modification and anti-ischemic and antiplatelet therapies. Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), comprising aspirin plus a P2Y₁₂ inhibitor, is a critical component of secondary prevention therapy following ACS. However, despite the importance of DAPT for secondary prevention after ACS, questions remain over the optimal duration of therapy. Clinical evidence is emerging that maintenance DAPT >12 months lowers the risk of recurrent ACS events; however, this benefit must be considered against any potential risks of prolonged DAPT such as bleeding. Several tools for bleeding risk assessment have shown promise; however, their limited accuracy and discriminative power necessitates further development. Assessment of patient ischemic risk should consider the complexity of the percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedure, anatomic burden of coronary artery disease, and additional underlying risk factors. Consequently, identifying patients in whom the risk:benefit ratio favors prolonged DAPT may prove invaluable for clinicians in deciding which patients should continue or stop taking DAPT at 12 months after PCI, or consider P2Y₁₂ inhibitor monotherapy as an option. This article reviews the most recent information about the risks and benefits of DAPT continued for >12 months after ACS and provides critical guidance to assist physicians in identifying patients most likely to benefit from a secondary prevention strategy with DAPT.

Coronary Artery Disease in Chronic Kidney Disease: Need for a Heart-Kidney Team-Based Approach

Chronic kidney disease and coronary artery disease are co-prevalent conditions with unique epidemiological and pathophysiological features, that culminate in high rates of major adverse cardiovascular outcomes, including all-cause mortality. This review outlines a summary of the literature, and nuances pertaining to non-invasive risk assessment of this population, medical management options for coronary heart disease and coronary revascularisation. A collaborative heart-kidney team-based approach is imperative for critical management decisions for this patient population, especially coronary revascularisation; this review outlines specific periprocedural considerations pertaining to coronary revascularisation, and provides a proposed algorithm for approaching revascularisation choices in patients with end-stage kidney disease based on available literature.

Outcomes after ticagrelor versus clopidogrel treatment in end-stage renal disease patients with acute myocardial infarction: a nationwide cohort study

Clinical outcomes are unknown after ticagrelor treatment in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) who are diagnosed with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). ESRD patients who were on hemodialysis and received dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for AMI between July 2013 and December 2016 were identified in Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database. Using stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting, patients receiving aspirin plus ticagrelor (n = 530) were compared with those receiving aspirin plus clopidogrel (n = 2462) for the primary efficacy endpoint, a composite of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke, and bleeding, defined according to the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium. Study outcomes were compared between the two groups using Cox proportional hazards model or competing risk model for the hazard ratio or subdistribution hazard ratio (SHR). During 9 months of follow-up, ticagrelor was comparable to clopidogrel with respect to the risks of primary efficacy endpoint [11.69 vs. 9.28/100 patient-months; SHR, 1.16; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.97–1.4] and bleeding (5.55 vs. 4.36/100 patient-months; SHR 1.14; 95% CI 0.88–1.47). In conclusion, among hemodialysis patients receiving DAPT for AMI, ticagrelor was comparable to clopidogrel with regard to the composite efficacy endpoint and bleeding.

Antithrombotic therapy in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement: the complexity of the elderly

Along with epidemiologic transitions of the global population, the burden of aortic stenosis (AS) is rapidly increasing and transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has quickly spread; indeed, it is nowadays also employed in treating patients with AS at intermediate operative risk. Nonetheless, the less invasive interventional strategy still carries relevant issues concerning post-procedural optimal antithrombotic strategy, given the current indications provided by guidelines are not completely supported by evidence-based data. Geriatric patients suffer from high bleeding and thromboembolic risks, whose balance is particularly subtle due to the presence of concomitant conditions, such as atrial fibrillation and chronic kidney disease, that make the post-TAVR antithrombotic management particularly insidious. This scenario is further complicated by the lack of specific evidence regarding the 'real-life' complex conditions typical of the geriatric syndromes, thus, the management of such a heterogeneous population, ranging from healthy ageing to frailty, is far from being defined. The aim of the present review is to summarize the critical points and the most updated evidence regarding the post-TAVR antithrombotic approach in the geriatric population, with a specific focus on the most frequent clinical settings.

Development and validation of a prognostic prediction model for antithrombotic-related chronic subdural hematoma in patients with recent acute myocardial infarction

Background

Antithrombotic therapy is a cornerstone of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) treatment and is thought to be associated with an increased risk of chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH). However, no well-established model exists to predict subsequent antithrombotic treatment outcomes after CSDH in patients with recent AMI. We aimed to identify a prognostic model to predict the 6-month outcome of treatment with antithrombotic therapy.

Methods

This multicenter retrospective analysis involved 553 patients with recent AMI with antithrombotic-related CSDH. Several candidate clinical variables and biomarkers were examined in the training cohort (Chengdu training cohort; n=368). Patients with unfavorable outcomes had experienced at least 1 of the following: major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), recurrence, or a modified Rankin scale (mRS) score of 2 to 6. To develop a 6-month outcome prediction model, three approaches were used: (I) a demographic variable model, (II) a clinical marker model and (III) a decision-driven model. A clinical outcome prediction model based on the superior predictors was assessed by logistic regression analysis. The nomogram for the final model was internally validated using a bootstrap procedure and externally validated in an independent cohort (Anhui cohort; n=185).

Results

Model A produced 7 predictors of unfavorable outcomes, while models B and C yielded 2 and 1 predictors, respectively. The areas under the curve (AUC) increased from 0.743 [model A; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.680-0.782] to 0.889 (model A + B + C; 95% CI: 0.851-0.916). The final prediction model included age, systolic blood pressure (SBP), body mass index (BMI), the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), the early resumption of antithrombotic therapy, hematoma thickness and the presence of abdominal obesity, frailty and previous bleeding. Internal and external validation of the selected final model revealed adequate C-statistics and calibration slope values (internal validation: 0.81 and 0.78; external validation: 0.80 and 0.76, respectively).

Conclusions

This model provided a risk stratification tool to predict unfavorable outcomes in patients with recent AMI with antithrombotic-related CSDH. Because the study was based on ten readily practical and available variables, it may be widely applicable to guide management and complement clinical assessment.

Barthel Index as a Predictor of Mortality in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome: Better Activities of Daily Living, Better Prognosis

Background

The Barthel index (BI) is a widely used assessment tool for evaluating physical performance in activities of daily living (ADL). The association between BI scores and mortality in hospital and during follow-up of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients remains unclear. The present study investigated whether the BI score could be used as a predictor for mortality of ACS.

Methods

We investigated ACS patients from the multi-center Retrospective Evaluation of Acute Chest Pain (REACP) study. The association between BI scores and all-cause mortality of patients with ACS was analyzed by Cox proportional hazards models. The primary endpoint was all-cause death and the secondary endpoint was cardiac death during follow-up.

Results

Among 2908 patients with ACS enrolled, 277 (9.5%) patients died within a median follow-up time of 10.6 months. Patients with lower BI had higher risks of mortality, compared with those with higher BI in ACS patients. Kaplan–Meier analysis revealed that patients with lower BI had worse survival rates than patients with higher BI (P < 0.001). After adjustment for potential influencing factors, multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that the BI was independently associated with all-cause mortality and cardiac mortality, respectively.

Conclusion

The BI at admission has the powerful potential to provide useful prognostic information of early risk stratification, and routine recording of the BI at the ED visit may help in decision-making and health care planning for patients with ACS.

Trends of Antithrombotic Treatment in Atrial Fibrillation Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights from the GReek-AntiPlatElet Atrial Fibrillation (GRAPE-AF) Registry

PURPOSE

Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are a high-risk subset of patients, whose optimal antithrombotic treatment strategy, involving a combination of anticoagulant and antiplatelet agents, has not been well defined. Our study aims to investigate contemporary "real-world" trends of antithrombotic treatment strategies in AF patients undergoing PCI, as well as identify factors affecting decision-making at hospital discharge.

METHODS

"Real-world" data were retrieved from the GReek-AntiPlatElet Atrial Fibrillation (GRAPE-AF) registry, a contemporary, nationwide, multicenter, observational study of AF patients undergoing PCI. Characteristics of patients discharged on triple antithrombotic therapy (TAT) or dual antithrombotic therapy (DAT) were compared in order to identify factors that could influence treatment decisions.

RESULTS

A total of 654 patients were enrolled (42% with stable coronary artery disease, 58% with acute coronary syndrome). TAT was adopted in 49.9% and DAT in 49.2% of patients at discharge. Regarding anticoagulants, the vast majority of patients (92.9%) received non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) and only 7.1% received vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). Dyslipidemia, insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, prior myocardial infarction, acute coronary syndrome at presentation, and regional variations were predictive of TAT adoption, whereas the use of NOACs or ticagrelor was predictive of DAT adoption.

CONCLUSION

Contemporary "real-world" data concerning antithrombotic treatment in AF patients undergoing PCI indicate a strong shift towards the use of NOACs instead of VKAs, along with a large subset of patients adopting an aspirin-free strategy early after index PCI, with clinical as well as treatment characteristics affecting decision-making.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03362788 (First Posted: December 5, 2017).

Longer or shorter dual antiplatelet therapy in dialysis patients receiving a coronary drug-eluting stent? A rope game still ongoing

In this issue of Clinical Kidney Journal, Park et al. presents the results of a nationwide population-based trial that included >5000 dialysis patients receiving a drug-eluting stent (DES). The main objective was to evaluate the effectiveness and the safety of prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). The primary outcome was a composite of mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization and stroke, significantly lowered by a longer DAPT regimen at 12, 15 and 18 months, respectively. Longer DAPT tended to be correlated with higher bleeding events at all landmarks, with no statistical significance. An important element was that almost 75% of the index events were acute coronary syndromes. This study presents the first solid evidence for a significant benefit of prolonged DAPT in dialysis patients receiving a DES. We believe that end-stage renal disease is still in the middle of a rope game, being pulled to one side or another by other features, inclining towards a higher bleeding risk or towards higher ischaemic risk. The acute versus elective presentation seems to weigh in choosing the antiplatelet regimen. The 'one-size-fits-all strategy' is not suitable for this particular group. Probably in the future, practitioners will be provided with decision pathways generated by artificial intelligence algorithms yielding 'truly individualized' DAPT protocols for every single patient.

Pros and cons of antithrombotic therapy in end-stage kidney disease: a 2019 update

Dialysis patients manifest both an increased thrombotic risk and a haemorrhagic tendency. A great number of patients with chronic kidney disease requiring dialysis have cardiovascular comorbidities (coronary artery disease, atrial fibrillation or venous thromboembolism) and different indications for treatment with antithrombotics (primary or secondary prevention). Unfortunately, few randomized controlled trials deal with antiplatelet and/or anticoagulant therapy in dialysis. Therefore cardiology and nephrology guidelines offer ambiguous recommendations and often exclude or ignore these patients. In our opinion, there is a need for an expert consensus that provides physicians with useful information to make correct decisions in different situations requiring antithrombotics. Herein the European Dialysis Working Group presents up-to-date evidence about the topic and encourages practitioners to choose among alternatives in order to limit bleeding and minimize atherothrombotic and cardioembolic risks. In the absence of clear evidence, these clinical settings and consequent therapeutic strategies will be discussed by highlighting data from observational studies for and against the use of antiplatelet and anticoagulant drugs alone or in combination. Until new studies shed light on unclear clinical situations, one should keep in mind that the objective of treatment is to minimize thrombotic risk while reducing bleeding events.

Prognostic nutritional index may not be a good prognostic indicator for acute myocardial infarction

The prognostic nutritional index (PNI) has been applied in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) recently.However, the application of PNI in AMI needs verification. This was a prospective cohort study. Patients diagnosed with AMI were enrolled. PNI was calculated as (serum albumin (SA in g/L)) + (5 × total lymphocyte count (TLC) × 10⁹/L). Modified PNI (mPNI) was analyzed by logistic regression analysis to reset the proportion of SA and TLC. The primary outcome was all-cause death. A total of 598 patients were enrolled; 73 patients died during follow-up. The coefficient of SA and TLC in the mPNI formula was approximately 2:1. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of SA, TLC, PNI, mPNI and GRACE in predicting death for patients with AMI was 0.718, 0.540, 0.636, 0.721 and 0.825, respectively. Net reclassification improvement (NRI) between PNI and mPNI was 0.230 (p < 0.001). Integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) was 0.042 (p = 0.001). Decision curve analysis revealed that mPNI had better prognostic value for patients with AMI than PNI; however, it was not superior to SA. Thus, PNI may not a reliable prognostic predictor of AMI; after resetting the formula, the value of PNI in predicting prognosis of AMI is almost entirely due to SA.

Atherosclerosis in Chronic Kidney Disease: More, Less, or Just Different?

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at an increased risk of premature mortality, mainly from cardiovascular causes. The association between CKD on hemodialysis and accelerated atherosclerosis was described >40 years ago. However, more recently, it has been suggested that the increase in atherosclerosis risk is actually observed in early CKD stages, remaining stable thereafter. In this regard, interventions targeting the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis, such as statins, successful in the general population, have failed to benefit patients with very advanced CKD. This raises the issue of the relative contribution of atherosclerosis versus other forms of cardiovascular injury such as arteriosclerosis or myocardial injury to the increased cardiovascular risk in CKD. In this review, the pathophysiogical contributors to atherosclerosis in CKD that are shared with the general population, or specific to CKD, are discussed. The NEFRONA study (Observatorio Nacional de Atherosclerosis en NEFrologia) prospectively assessed the prevalence and progression of subclinical atherosclerosis (plaque in vascular ultrasound), confirming an increased prevalence of atherosclerosis in patients with moderate CKD. However, the adjusted odds ratio for subclinical atherosclerosis increased with CKD stage, suggesting a contribution of CKD itself to subclinical atherosclerosis. Progression of atherosclerosis was closely related to CKD progression as well as to the baseline presence of atheroma plaque, and to higher phosphate, uric acid, and ferritin and lower 25(OH) vitamin D levels. These insights may help design future clinical trials of stratified personalized medicine targeting atherosclerosis in patients with CKD. Future primary prevention trials should enroll patients with evidence of subclinical atherosclerosis and should provide a comprehensive control of all known risk factors in addition to testing any additional intervention or placebo.