1
|
Dahlberg M, Lek M, Malmqvist Castillo M, Bylund A, Hasson H, Riggare S, Reinius M, Wannheden C. Objectives and outcomes of patient-driven innovations published in peer-reviewed journals: a qualitative analysis of publications included in a scoping review. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e071363. [PMID: 37263703 PMCID: PMC10255190 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071363] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2022] [Accepted: 05/20/2023] [Indexed: 06/03/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to gain a deeper understanding of the objectives and outcomes of patient-driven innovations that have been published in the scientific literature, focusing on (A) the unmet needs that patient-driven innovations address and (B) the outcomes for patients and healthcare that have been reported. METHODS We performed an inductive qualitative content analysis of scientific publications that were included in a scoping review of patient-driven innovations, previously published by our research group. The review was limited to English language publications in peer-reviewed journals, published in the years 2008-2020. RESULTS In total, 83 publications covering 21 patient-driven innovations were included in the analysis. Most of the innovations were developed for use on an individual or community level without healthcare involvement. We created three categories of unmet needs that were addressed by these innovations: access to self-care support tools, open sharing of information and knowledge, and patient agency in self-care and healthcare decisions. Eighteen (22%) publications reported outcomes of patient-driven innovations. We created two categories of outcomes: impact on self-care, and impact on peer interaction and healthcare collaboration. CONCLUSIONS The patient-driven innovations illustrated a diversity of innovative approaches to facilitate patients' and informal caregivers' daily lives, interactions with peers and collaborations with healthcare. As our findings indicate, patients and informal caregivers are central stakeholders in driving healthcare development and research forward to meet the needs that matter to patients and informal caregivers. However, only few studies reported on outcomes of patient-driven innovations. To support wider implementation, more evaluation studies are needed, as well as research into regulatory approval processes, dissemination and governance of patient-driven innovations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie Dahlberg
- Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Madelen Lek
- Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Moa Malmqvist Castillo
- Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ami Bylund
- Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Henna Hasson
- Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
- Unit for Implementation and Evaluation, Center for Epidemiology and Community Medicine, Region Stockholm, Stockholms Lans Landsting, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Sara Riggare
- Participatory eHealth and Health Data, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala Universitet, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Maria Reinius
- Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Carolina Wannheden
- Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Khalili-Mahani N, Woods S, Holowka EM, Pahayahay A, Roy M. Toward a digital citizen lab for capturing data about alternative ways of self-managing chronic pain: An attitudinal user study. FRONTIERS IN REHABILITATION SCIENCES 2022; 3:942822. [PMID: 36188996 PMCID: PMC9397864 DOI: 10.3389/fresc.2022.942822] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2022] [Accepted: 07/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
BackgroundMyriad psychosocial and cultural factors influence personal ways of coping with chronic pain (CP). Mobile health (mHealth) apps facilitate creation of citizen laboratories outside clinical frameworks. However, issues of safety, privacy and technostress must be addressed. This attitudinal user study aimed to assess whether persons with persistent pain (PwPP) would be open to sharing qualitative and quantitative data about their self-management of CP via mHealth platforms.MethodsIn March 2020, we invited PwPPs, their personal or medical caregivers, or those interested in the development of an app for researching alternative ways of self-managing CP to complete an anonymous survey. We formulated an attitudinal survey within the theoretical framework of stress to estimate whether the novelty, unpredictability, and risks of data-sharing via mHealth apps concerned users. Descriptive statistics (% Part/Group) were used to interpret the survey, and open comments were reflectively analyzed to identify emerging themes.ResultsOf 202 responses (June 2021), 127 identified as PwPPs (average age 43.86 ± 14.97; 100/127 female), and listed several primary and secondary CP diagnoses. In almost 90% of PwPPs, physical and emotional wellbeing were affected by CP. More than 90% of PwPPs used alternative therapies (acupuncture, homeopathy, massage therapy, etc.). Attitude toward mHealth apps were positive even though nearly half of PwPPs were unfamiliar with them. More than 72% of respondents were open to using a health-related app as a research tool for data collection in real life situations. Comprehensive data collection (especially about psychosocial factors) was the most important requirement. More respondents (especially medical professionals) were concerned about health hazards of misinformation communicated via health-related information and communication systems (maximum 80%) than about privacy (maximum 40%). Qualitative analyses revealed several promises and impediments to creation of data-sharing platforms for CP.ConclusionsThis study shows a general willingness among PwPPs to become partners in studying alternative pain management. Despite a generally positive attitude toward the concept of sharing complex personal data to advance research, heterogeneity of attitudes shaped by personal experiences must be considered. Our study underlines the need for any digital strategy for CP research to be person-centered and flexible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Najmeh Khalili-Mahani
- McGill Centre for Integrative Neuroscience, Montreal Neurological Institute, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Department of Design and Computation Arts, Faculty of Fine Arts, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- PERFORM Centre, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Quebec Pain Research Network (QPRN), Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
- *Correspondence: Najmeh Khalili-Mahani
| | - Sandra Woods
- Quebec Pain Research Network (QPRN), Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
- Patient Partner, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Eileen Mary Holowka
- Department of Communication Studies, Faculty of Arts and Science, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Amber Pahayahay
- School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
| | - Mathieu Roy
- Quebec Pain Research Network (QPRN), Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Science, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Riggare S, Hägglund M, Bredenoord AL, de Groot M, Bloem BR. Ethical Aspects of Personal Science for Persons with Parkinson's Disease: What Happens When Self-Tracking Goes from Selfcare to Publication? JOURNAL OF PARKINSON'S DISEASE 2022; 11:1927-1933. [PMID: 34120915 PMCID: PMC8609698 DOI: 10.3233/jpd-212647] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Using Parkinson's disease as an exemplary chronic condition, this Commentary discusses ethical aspects of using self-tracking for personal science, as compared to using self-tracking in the context of conducting clinical research on groups of study participants. Conventional group-based clinical research aims to find generalisable answers to clinical or public health questions. The aim of personal science is different: to find meaningful answers that matter first and foremost to an individual with a particular health challenge. In the case of personal science, the researcher and the participant are one and the same, which means that specific ethical issues may arise, such as the need to protect the participant against self-harm. To allow patient-led research in the form of personal science in the Parkinson field to evolve further, the development of a specific ethical framework for self-tracking for personal science is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Riggare
- Uppsala University, Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Healthcare Sciences and e-Health, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Maria Hägglund
- Uppsala University, Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Healthcare Sciences and e-Health, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Annelien L. Bredenoord
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Department of Medical Humanities, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Martijn de Groot
- Radboud University Medical Centre, Health Innovation Labs, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Bastiaan R. Bloem
- Radboud University Medical Centre, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Department of Neurology, Centre of Expertise for Parkinson & Movement Disorders, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Reinius M, Mazzocato P, Riggare S, Bylund A, Jansson H, Øvretveit J, Savage C, Wannheden C, Hasson H. Patient-driven innovations reported in peer-reviewed journals: a scoping review. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e053735. [PMID: 35074818 PMCID: PMC8788234 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053735] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2021] [Accepted: 12/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Awareness of patients' innovative capabilities is increasing, but there is limited knowledge regarding the extent and nature of patient-driven innovations in the peer-reviewed literature. OBJECTIVES The objective of the review was to answer the question: what is the nature and extent of patient-driven innovations published in peer-reviewed scientific journals? ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA We used a broad definition of innovation to allow for a comprehensive review of different types of innovations and a narrow definition of 'patient driven' to focus on the role of patients and/or family caregivers. The search was limited to years 2008-2020. SOURCES OF EVIDENCE Four electronic databases (Medline (Ovid), Web of Science Core Collection, PsycINFO (Ovid) and Cinahl (Ebsco)) were searched in December 2020 for publications describing patient-driven innovations and complemented with snowball strategies. CHARTING METHODS Data from the included articles were extracted and categorised inductively. RESULTS A total of 96 articles on 20 patient-driven innovations were included. The number of publications increased over time, with 69% of the articles published between 2016 and 2020. Author affiliations were exclusively in high income countries with 56% of first authors in North America and 36% in European countries. Among the 20 innovations reported, 'Do-It-Yourself Artificial Pancreas System' and the online health network 'PatientsLikeMe', were the subject of half of the articles. CONCLUSIONS Peer-reviewed publications on patient-driven innovations are increasing and we see an important opportunity for researchers and clinicians to support patient innovators' research while being mindful of taking over the work of the innovators themselves.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Reinius
- Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Medical Management Centre, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Pamela Mazzocato
- Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Medical Management Centre, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Sara Riggare
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Healthcare Sciences and E-Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Ami Bylund
- Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Medical Management Centre, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Hanna Jansson
- Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Medical Management Centre, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - John Øvretveit
- Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Medical Management Centre, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Research Development and Education, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Carl Savage
- Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Medical Management Centre, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Carolina Wannheden
- Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Medical Management Centre, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Henna Hasson
- Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Medical Management Centre, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Unit for Implementation and Evaluation, Center for Epidemiology and Community Medicine, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Khalili-Mahani N, Holowka E, Woods S, Khaled R, Roy M, Lashley M, Glatard T, Timm-Bottos J, Dahan A, Niesters M, Hovey RB, Simon B, Kirmayer LJ. Play the Pain: A Digital Strategy for Play-Oriented Research and Action. Front Psychiatry 2021; 12:746477. [PMID: 34975566 PMCID: PMC8714795 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.746477] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2021] [Accepted: 11/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
The value of understanding patients' illness experience and social contexts for advancing medicine and clinical care is widely acknowledged. However, methodologies for rigorous and inclusive data gathering and integrative analysis of biomedical, cultural, and social factors are limited. In this paper, we propose a digital strategy for large-scale qualitative health research, using play (as a state of being, a communication mode or context, and a set of imaginative, expressive, and game-like activities) as a research method for recursive learning and action planning. Our proposal builds on Gregory Bateson's cybernetic approach to knowledge production. Using chronic pain as an example, we show how pragmatic, structural and cultural constraints that define the relationship of patients to the healthcare system can give rise to conflicted messaging that impedes inclusive health research. We then review existing literature to illustrate how different types of play including games, chatbots, virtual worlds, and creative art making can contribute to research in chronic pain. Inspired by Frederick Steier's application of Bateson's theory to designing a science museum, we propose DiSPORA (Digital Strategy for Play-Oriented Research and Action), a virtual citizen science laboratory which provides a framework for delivering health information, tools for play-based experimentation, and data collection capacity, but is flexible in allowing participants to choose the mode and the extent of their interaction. Combined with other data management platforms used in epidemiological studies of neuropsychiatric illness, DiSPORA offers a tool for large-scale qualitative research, digital phenotyping, and advancing personalized medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Najmeh Khalili-Mahani
- McGill Centre for Integrative Neuroscience, Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Division of Social & Transcultural Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Culture and Mental Health Research Unit, Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Technoculture, Arts and Game Centre, Milieux Institute for Art, Culture and Technology, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Eileen Holowka
- Technoculture, Arts and Game Centre, Milieux Institute for Art, Culture and Technology, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | | | - Rilla Khaled
- Technoculture, Arts and Game Centre, Milieux Institute for Art, Culture and Technology, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Mathieu Roy
- Department of Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Myrna Lashley
- Division of Social & Transcultural Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Culture and Mental Health Research Unit, Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Tristan Glatard
- Department of Computer Science, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- PERFORM Centre, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Janis Timm-Bottos
- Department of Creative Art Therapies, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Albert Dahan
- Department of Anesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Marieke Niesters
- Department of Anesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands
| | | | - Bart Simon
- Technoculture, Arts and Game Centre, Milieux Institute for Art, Culture and Technology, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Department of Sociology, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Laurence J. Kirmayer
- Division of Social & Transcultural Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Culture and Mental Health Research Unit, Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Guzmen-Carmeli S, Rier DA. Entrepreneurial treatment activism for undone science: mannitol and Parkinson's disease. BIOSOCIETIES 2021; 18:128-155. [PMID: 34721649 PMCID: PMC8536910 DOI: 10.1057/s41292-021-00258-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
This paper describes CliniCrowd, a patient-designed, entrepreneurial, crowd-sourced citizen-science approach to evaluating mannitol-essentially, an orphan drug-as a Parkinson's disease treatment. As such, CliniCrowd addresses 'undone science', and our paper contributes to the sociological literature thereon. Based on 38 qualitative interviews, fieldwork, and content analyses (2017-2020), we trace CliniCrowd's background and rationale. We: discuss undone science and its wider contexts; present earlier iterations of citizen-science and treatment activism; examine CliniCrowd's application of crowd-sourced citizen-science to address undone science around 'orphan drug' treatment for Parkinson's disease; explore how CliniCrowd has evolved, and re-framed its work, since its founding; ponder its future; and consider whether their approach can guide future citizen-science treatment research. Our paper contributes to the existing literature in four ways. First, we focus on medical treatment issues, an under-studied area of undone science. Second, we highlight orphan drugs as both major source of, and fruitful area for research on, undone science. Third, we describe CliniCrowd's pragmatic, entrepreneurial-rather than the more common activist-citizen-science approach to addressing undone treatment science. Finally, from our data on CliniCrowd we distil a preliminary model for future treatment activism around undone science.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shlomo Guzmen-Carmeli
- grid.22098.310000 0004 1937 0503Department of Sociology & Anthropology, Bar-Ilan University, 5290002 Ramat-Gan, Israel
| | - David A. Rier
- grid.22098.310000 0004 1937 0503Department of Sociology & Anthropology, Bar-Ilan University, 5290002 Ramat-Gan, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Asarani NAM, Reynolds AN, Elbalshy M, Burnside M, de Bock M, Lewis DM, Wheeler BJ. Efficacy, safety, and user experience of DIY or open-source artificial pancreas systems: a systematic review. Acta Diabetol 2021; 58:539-547. [PMID: 33128136 DOI: 10.1007/s00592-020-01623-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2020] [Accepted: 10/14/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The do-it-yourself artificial pancreas system (DIYAPS) is a patient-driven initiative with the potential to revolutionise diabetes management, automating insulin delivery with existing pumps and CGM combined with open-source algorithms. Given the considerable interest in this topic within the diabetes community, we have conducted a systematic review of DIYAPS efficacy, safety, and user experience. Following recognised procedures and reporting standards, we identified 10 eligible publications of 730 participants within the peer-reviewed literature. Overall, studies reported improvements in time in range, HbA1c (glycated haemoglobin), reduced hypoglycaemia, and improved quality of life with DIYAPS use. While results were positive, the identified studies were small, and the majority were observational and at high risk of bias. Further research including well-designed randomised trials comparing DIYAPS with appropriate comparators is recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N A M Asarani
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin, 9054, New Zealand
| | - A N Reynolds
- Department of Medicine, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin, 9054, New Zealand
| | - M Elbalshy
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin, 9054, New Zealand
| | - M Burnside
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - M de Bock
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | | | - B J Wheeler
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin, 9054, New Zealand.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
McCorkell L, S Assaf G, E Davis H, Wei H, Akrami A. Patient-Led Research Collaborative: embedding patients in the Long COVID narrative. Pain Rep 2021; 6:e913. [PMID: 33987484 DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/n9e75] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2020] [Revised: 02/01/2021] [Accepted: 02/04/2021] [Indexed: 05/23/2023] Open
Abstract
A large subset of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are experiencing symptoms well beyond the claimed 2-week recovery period for mild cases. These long-term sequelae have come to be known as Long COVID. Originating out of a dedicated online support group, a team of patients formed the Patient-Led Research Collaborative and conducted the first research on Long COVID experience and symptoms. This article discusses the history and value of patient-centric and patient-led research; the formation of Patient-Led Research Collaborative as well as key findings to date; and calls for the following: the acknowledgement of Long COVID as an illness, an accurate estimate of the prevalence of Long COVID, publicly available basic symptom management, care, and research to not be limited to those with positive polymerase chain reaction and antibody tests, and aggressive research and investigation into the pathophysiology of symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Gina S Assaf
- Patient-Led Research Collaborative, Washington DC, USA
| | | | - Hannah Wei
- Patient-Led Research Collaborative, Washington DC, USA
| | - Athena Akrami
- Patient-Led Research Collaborative, Washington DC, USA
- Sainsbury Wellcome Centre, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Patient-Led Research Collaborative: embedding patients in the Long COVID narrative. Pain Rep 2021; 6:e913. [PMID: 33987484 PMCID: PMC8112577 DOI: 10.1097/pr9.0000000000000913] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2020] [Revised: 02/01/2021] [Accepted: 02/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
This article discusses the value of patient-led research, the formation of Patient-Led Research for COVID-19, and how to improve Long COVID care and research. A large subset of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are experiencing symptoms well beyond the claimed 2-week recovery period for mild cases. These long-term sequelae have come to be known as Long COVID. Originating out of a dedicated online support group, a team of patients formed the Patient-Led Research Collaborative and conducted the first research on Long COVID experience and symptoms. This article discusses the history and value of patient-centric and patient-led research; the formation of Patient-Led Research Collaborative as well as key findings to date; and calls for the following: the acknowledgement of Long COVID as an illness, an accurate estimate of the prevalence of Long COVID, publicly available basic symptom management, care, and research to not be limited to those with positive polymerase chain reaction and antibody tests, and aggressive research and investigation into the pathophysiology of symptoms.
Collapse
|
10
|
Schwartz SM, Wildenhaus K, Bucher A, Byrd B. Digital Twins and the Emerging Science of Self: Implications for Digital Health Experience Design and “Small” Data. FRONTIERS IN COMPUTER SCIENCE 2020. [DOI: 10.3389/fcomp.2020.00031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
11
|
Kesavadev J, Srinivasan S, Saboo B, Krishna B M, Krishnan G. The Do-It-Yourself Artificial Pancreas: A Comprehensive Review. Diabetes Ther 2020; 11:1217-1235. [PMID: 32356245 PMCID: PMC7261300 DOI: 10.1007/s13300-020-00823-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Diabetes technology (DT) has accomplished tremendous progress in the past decades, aiming to convert these technologies as viable treatment options for the benefit of patients with diabetes (PWD). Despite the advances, PWD face multiple challenges with the efficient management of type 1 diabetes. Most of the promising and innovative technological developments are not accessible to a larger proportion of PWD. The slow pace of development and commercialization, overpricing, and lack of peer support are few such factors leading to inequitable access to the innovations in DT. Highly motivated and tech-savvy members of the diabetes community have therefore come up with the #WeAreNotWaiting movement and started developing their own do-it-yourself artificial pancreas systems (DIYAPS) integrating continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), insulin pumps, and smartphone technology to run openly shared algorithms to achieve appreciable glycemic control and quality of life (QoL). These systems use tailor-made interventions to achieve automated insulin delivery (AID) and are not commercialized or regulated. Online social network megatrends such as GitHub, CGM in the Cloud, and Twitter have been providing platforms to share these open source technologies and user experiences. Observational studies, anecdotal evidence, and real-world patient stories revealed significant improvements in time in range (TIR), time in hypoglycemia (TIHypo), HbA1c levels, and QoL after the initiation of DIYAPS. But this unregulated do-it-yourself (DIY) approach is perceived with great circumspection by healthcare professionals (HCP), regulatory bodies, and device manufacturers, making users the ultimate risk-bearers. The use of the regularized CGM and insulin pump with unauthorized algorithms makes them off-label and has been a matter of great concern. Besides these, lack of safety data, funding or insurance coverage, ethical, and legal issues are roadblocks to the unanimous acceptance of these systems among patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D). A multi-agency approach is necessary to evaluate the risks, and to delineate the incumbency and liability of clinicians, regulatory bodies, and manufacturers associated with the use of DIYAPS. Understanding the potential of DIYAPS as the need of the present time, many regional and international agencies have come with strategies to appraise its safety as well as to support education and training on its use. Here we provide a comprehensive description of the DIYAPS-including their origin, existing literature, advantages, and disadvantages that can help the industry leaders, clinicians, and PWD to make the best use of these systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jothydev Kesavadev
- Jothydev's Diabetes Research Centre, Mudavanmugal, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India.
| | - Seshadhri Srinivasan
- Kalasalingam Academy of Research and Education, Srivilliputtur, Tamil Nadu, India
| | | | - Meera Krishna B
- Jothydev's Diabetes Research Centre, Mudavanmugal, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India
| | - Gopika Krishnan
- Jothydev's Diabetes Research Centre, Mudavanmugal, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Häikiö J, Yli-Kauhaluoma S, Pikkarainen M, Iivari M, Koivumäki T. Expectations to data: Perspectives of service providers and users of future health and wellness services. HEALTH AND TECHNOLOGY 2020. [DOI: 10.1007/s12553-020-00410-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
AbstractThe healthcare and wellness sector currently attempts to provide more proactive service models with data-driven solutions. This study examines the expectations and values related to personal data i.e. data valences from the perspective of service providers and individual users. The study is based on the analysis of extensive empirical material collected through interviews and a collaborative workshop. The data was collected in one cultural context, Finland. The results suggest that the potential service providers and users have similar expectations regarding self-evidence of data while the main differences concern the expectations of transparency. The results of the study propose some basic requirements for the development of personalised data-driven services in future. The study suggests that basic requirements for the development of future data driven services concern expectations to usable data visualisations, data as a motivator, data accuracy and data transparency. Even though there are varying expectations to personal health data and even some concerns, it can be seen that here different ecosystem actors primarily perceived the wider use of personal health and wellness data as a positive trend. It can be concluded that collaborative personal data-driven service ecosystems are an integral part of development towards proactive service models in healthcare.
Collapse
|
13
|
Virtual Care 2.0—a Vision for the Future of Data-Driven Technology-Enabled Healthcare. CURRENT TREATMENT OPTIONS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE 2019; 21:21. [DOI: 10.1007/s11936-019-0727-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|