Renal hemodynamic effects differ between antidiabetic combination strategies: randomized controlled clinical trial comparing empagliflozin/linagliptin with metformin/insulin glargine

Is GFR decline induced by SGLT2 inhibitor of clinical importance?

BACKGROUND

Use of sodium-glucose-cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors often causes an initial decline in glomerular filtration rate (GFR). This study addresses the question whether the initial decline of renal function with SGLT2 inhibitor treatment is related to vascular changes in the systemic circulation.

METHODS

We measured GFR (mGFR) and estimated GFR (eGFR) in 65 patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment randomized either to a combination of empagliflozin and linagliptin (SGLT2 inhibitor based treatment group) (n = 34) or metformin and insulin (non-SGLT2 inhibitor based treatment group) (n = 31). mGFR was measured using the gold standard clearance technique by constant infusion of inulin. In addition to blood pressure (BP), we measured pulse wave velocity (PWV) under standardized conditions reflecting vascular compliance of large arteries, as PWV is considered to be one of the most reliable vascular parameter of cardiovascular (CV) prognosis.

RESULTS

Both mGFR and eGFR decreased significantly after initiating treatment, but no correlation was found between change in mGFR and change in eGFR in either treatment group (SGLT2 inhibitor based treatment group: r=-0.148, p = 0.404; non-SGLT2 inhibitor based treatment group: r = 0.138, p = 0.460). Noticeably, change in mGFR correlated with change in PWV (r = 0.476, p = 0.005) in the SGLT2 inhibitor based treatment group only and remained significant after adjustment for the change in systolic BP and the change in heart rate (r = 0.422, p = 0.018). No such correlation was observed between the change in eGFR and the change in PWV in either treatment group.

CONCLUSIONS

Our main finding is that after initiating a SGLT2 inhibitor based therapy an exaggerated decline in mGFR was related with improved vascular compliance of large arteries reflecting the pharmacologic effects of SGLT2 inhibitor in the renal and systemic vascular bed. Second, in a single patient with T2D, eGFR may not be an appropriate parameter to assess the true change of renal function after receiving SGLT2 inhibitor based therapy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02752113).

Effects of Empagliflozin in Type 2 Diabetes With and Without Chronic Kidney Disease and Nondiabetic Chronic Kidney Disease: Protocol for 3 Crossover Randomized Controlled Trials (SiRENA Project)

BACKGROUND

Sodium-glucose-cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) have revolutionized the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2) and chronic kidney disease (CKD), reducing the risk of cardiovascular and renal end points by up to 40%. The underlying mechanisms are not fully understood.

OBJECTIVE

The study aims to examine the effects of empagliflozin versus placebo on renal hemodynamics, sodium balance, vascular function, and markers of the innate immune system in patients with DM2, DM2 and CKD, and nondiabetic CKD.

METHODS

We conducted 3 double-blind, crossover, randomized controlled trials, each with identical study protocols but different study populations. We included patients with DM2 and preserved kidney function (estimated glomerular filtration rate >60 mL/min/1.73 m2), DM2 and CKD, and nondiabetic CKD (both with estimated glomerular filtration rate 20-60 mL/min/1.73 m2). Each participant was randomly assigned to 4 weeks of treatment with either 10 mg of empagliflozin once daily or a matching placebo. After a wash-out period of at least 2 weeks, participants were crossed over to the opposite treatment. End points were measured at the end of each treatment period. The primary end point was renal blood flow measured with 82Rubidium positron emission tomography-computed tomography (82Rb-PET/CT). Secondary end points include glomerular filtration rate measured with 99mTechnetium-diethylene-triamine-pentaacetate (99mTc-DTPA) clearance, vascular function assessed by forearm venous occlusion strain gauge plethysmography, measurements of the nitric oxide (NO) system, water and sodium excretion, body composition measurements, and markers of the complement immune system.

RESULTS

Recruitment began in April 2021 and was completed in September 2022. Examinations were completed by December 2022. In total, 49 participants completed the project: 16 participants in the DM2 and preserved kidney function study, 17 participants in the DM2 and CKD study, and 16 participants in the nondiabetic CKD study. Data analysis is ongoing. Results are yet to be published.

CONCLUSIONS

This paper describes the rationale, design, and methods used in a project consisting of 3 double-blind, crossover, randomized controlled trials examining the effects of empagliflozin versus placebo in patients with DM2 with and without CKD and patients with nondiabetic CKD, respectively.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

EU Clinical Trials Register 2019-004303-12; https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/search?query=2019-004303-12, EU Clinical Trials Register 2019-004447-80; https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/search?query=2019-004447-80, EU Clinical Trials Register 2019-004467-50; https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/search?query=and+2019-004467-50.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)

DERR1-10.2196/56067.

Evaluation of glomerular hemodynamic changes by sodium-glucose-transporter 2 inhibition in type 2 diabetic rats using in vivo imaging

The mechanisms responsible for glomerular hemodynamic regulation with sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors in kidney disease due to type 2 diabetes remain unclear. Therefore, we investigated changes in glomerular hemodynamic function using an animal model of type 2 diabetes, treated with an SGLT2 inhibitor alone or in combination with a renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitor using male Zucker lean (ZL) and Zucker diabetic fatty (ZDF) rats. Afferent and efferent arteriolar diameter and single-nephron glomerular filtration rate (SNGFR) were evaluated in ZDF rats measured at 0, 30, 60, 90, or 120 minutes after the administration of a SGLT2 inhibitor (luseogliflozin). Additionally, we assessed these changes under the administration of the adenosine A1 receptor (A1aR) antagonist (8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine), along with coadministration of luseogliflozin and an angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB), telmisartan. ZDF rats had significantly increased SNGFR, and afferent and efferent arteriolar diameters compared to ZL rats, indicating glomerular hyperfiltration. Administration of luseogliflozin significantly reduced afferent vasodilatation and glomerular hyperfiltration, with no impact on efferent arteriolar diameter. Urinary adenosine levels were increased significantly in the SGLT2 inhibitor group compared to the vehicle group. A1aR antagonism blocked the effect of luseogliflozin on kidney function. Co-administration of the SGLT2 inhibitor and ARB decreased the abnormal expansion of glomerular afferent arterioles, whereas the efferent arteriolar diameter was not affected. Thus, regulation of afferent arteriolar vascular tone via the A1aR pathway is associated with glomerular hyperfiltration in type 2 diabetic kidney disease.

Relation between waist circumference and the renal hemodynamic in healthy individuals

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Obesity has been shown to be an independent risk factor for the development of CKD. Little is known about pathways of interaction of visceral fat mass estimated by waist circumference (WC) and metabolic factors with the renal and intraglomerular hemodynamic profile in healthy, non-obese individuals.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The study population of this post-hoc analysis in 80 healthy individuals, who participated in a randomized, controlled clinical trial (www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov: NCT02783456) was divided into two groups based on median of WC (high WC and low WC group). Renal hemodynamic profiles were analyzed using steady state input clearance (infusion of para-amino-hippuric acid and inulin). Intraglomerular pressure (IGP) and resistances of the afferent (RA) and efferent (RE) arterioles were calculated (Gomez equation). The analysis included healthy, non-smoking individuals, aged 27 ± 9 years with median WC of 84.75 ± 9 cm. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) (110 ± 15 vs. 127 ± 16 ml/min/m2, p < 0.001), renal plasma flow (RPF) (620 ± 109 vs. 700 ± 104 ml/min, p = 0.001) and IGP (36.7 ± 2.3 vs. 38.5 ± 3.1 mmHg, p = 0.003) were lower in the high WC compared to the low WC group. Patients in the high WC group showed higher renal vascular resistance (RVR) (85 ± 19 vs. 70 ± 12 mmHg/(ml/min), p < 0.001), higher RA (4034 ± 1177 vs. 3069 ± 786 dyn∗s/cm5, p < 0.001) and higher RE (2283 ± 339 vs. 2118 ± 280 dyn∗s/cm5, p = 0.021) compared to the low WC group. Individuals in the high WC group showed higher leptin levels (p = 0.003) and higher HOMA-IR (p = 0.024) compared to the low WC group.

CONCLUSION

Increased WC in healthy young individuals was associated with reduced GFR and RPF likely mediated by increased RVR.

SGLT2 Inhibitors in the Treatment of Diabetic Kidney Disease: More than Just Glucose Regulation

Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is a severe and common complication and affects a quarter of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Oxidative stress and inflammation related to hyperglycemia are interlinked and contribute to the occurrence of DKD. It was shown that sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, a novel yet already widely used therapy, may prevent the development of DKD and alter its natural progression. SGLT2 inhibitors induce systemic and glomerular hemodynamic changes, provide metabolic advantages, and reduce inflammatory and oxidative stress pathways. In T2DM patients, regardless of cardiovascular diseases, SGLT2 inhibitors may reduce albuminuria, progression of DKD, and doubling of serum creatinine levels, thus lowering the need for kidney replacement therapy by over 40%. The molecular mechanisms behind these beneficial effects of SGLT2 inhibitors extend beyond their glucose-lowering effects. The emerging studies are trying to explain these mechanisms at the genetic, epigenetic, transcriptomic, and proteomic levels.

Renal hemodynamic changes in patients with type 2 diabetes and their clinical impact

The dysfunction of the internal mechanics within the kidney's filtering units, known as glomeruli, has been linked to the emergence and progression of diabetic kidney disease (DKD). To better understand this crucial aspect of kidney function and the pathology of DKD, a variety of methods are employed in research, from the introduction of external compounds, such as inulin, iohexol, iothalamate and p-aminohippurate, to cutting-edge imaging techniques and computational analysis. Given the significance of intraglomerular hemodynamic dysfunction in the pathogenesis and treatment of DKD, it is essential to thoroughly examine the available data on this topic. Accordingly, the aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive appraisal of the role of intraglomerular hemodynamic dysfunction in the development of DKD and the effects of current therapies used to mitigate DKD. Through this analysis, we can gain a deeper understanding of the complex pathogenesis of DKD and potentially discover new avenues for tailored therapeutic management of patients with DKD.

Angiotensin pathways under therapy with empagliflozin in patients with chronic heart failure

AIMS

Large outcome studies demonstrated a reduction of heart failure hospitalization or cardiovascular death in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). The renin-angiotensin system (RAS) is a key player in fluid and sodium regulation. The classic angiotensin-converting enzyme-angiotensin II-angiotensin-1 receptor axis (Ang I-ACE-Ang II receptor axis) is predominantly angiotensin II (Ang-II) induced and promotes vasoconstriction. In contrast, the angiotensin-converting-enzyme-2-angiotensin-(1-7)-Mas axis (Mas-axis) is mediated by the metabolites angiotensin-1-7 (Ang-(1-7)) and angtiotensin-1-5 (Ang-(1-5)) and exerts cardioprotective effects.

METHODS

We previously investigated the effect of empagliflozin on the systemic haemodynamic in patients with stable CHF (NYHA II-III) in a randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial 'Analysing the Effect of Empagliflozin on Reduction of Tissue Sodium Content in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure (ELSI)'. In a post hoc analysis, we now analysed whether empagliflozin has an effect on the RAS by measuring detailed RAS profiles (LC-MS/MS-based approach) in 72 patients from ELSI. We compared RAS parameters after 1-month and 3-months treatment with empagliflozin or placebo to baseline. The secondary goal was to analyse whether the effect of empagliflozin on RAS parameters was dependent on angiotensin-receptor-blocking (ARB) or angiotensin-converting-enzyme-inhibitor (ACEI) co-medication.

RESULTS

Empagliflozin medication induced a significant rise in Ang-II [68.5 pmol/L (21.3-324.2) vs. 131.5 pmol/L (34.9-564.0), P = 0.001], angiotensin-I (Ang-I) [78.7 pmol/L (21.5-236.6) vs. 125.9 pmol/L (52.6-512.9), P < 0.001], Ang-(1-7) [3.0 pmol/L (3.0-15.0) vs. 10.1 pmol/L (3.0-31.3), P = 0.006], and Ang-(1-5) [5.4 pmol/L (2.0-22.9) vs. 9.9 pmol/L (2.8-36.4), P = 0.004], which was not observed in the placebo group (baseline to 3-months treatment). A significant rise in Ang-II (206.4 pmol/L (64.2-750.6) vs. 568.2 pmol/L (164.7-1616.4), P = 0.001), Ang-(1-7) (3.0 pmol/L (3.0-14.1) vs. 15.0 pmol/L (3.0-31.3), P = 0.017), and Ang-(1-5) [12.2 pmol/L (3.8-46.6) vs. 36.4 pmol/L (11.1-90.7), P = 0.001] under empagliflozin treatment was only seen in the subgroup of patients with ARB co-medication, whereas no change of Ang-II (16.7 pmol/L (2.0-60.8) vs. 26.4 pmol/L (10.7-63.4), P = 0.469), Ang-(1-7) (6.6 pmol/L (3.0-20.7) vs. 10.5 pmol/L (3.0-50.5), P = 0.221), and Ang-(1-5) (2.7 pmol/L (2.0-8.4) vs. 2.8 pmol/L (2.0-6.9), P = 0.851) was observed in patients with empagliflozin that were on ACEI co-medication (baseline to 3-months treatment).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data indicate that empagliflozin might lead to an activation of both the Ang I-ACE-Ang II receptor axis and the Mas-axis pathway. Activation of the Ang I-ACE-Ang II receptor axis and the protective Mas-axis pathway after initiating treatment with empagliflozin was only seen in patients with ARB co-medication, in contrast to co-medication with ACEI.

SGLT2 Inhibitors: The Sweet Success for Kidneys

Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2 inhibitors) were originally developed as antidiabetic agents, with cardiovascular (CV) outcome trials demonstrating improved CV outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D). Secondary analyses of CV outcome trials and later dedicated kidney outcome trials consistently reported improved kidney-related outcomes independent of T2D status and across a range of kidney function and albuminuria. Importantly, SGLT2 inhibitors are generally safe and well tolerated, with clinical trials and real-world analyses demonstrating a decrease in the risk of acute kidney injury. The kidney protective effects of SGLT2 inhibitors generally extend across different members of the class, possibly on the basis of hemodynamic, metabolic, anti-inflammatory, and antifibrotic mechanisms. In this review, we summarize the effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on kidney outcomes in diverse patient populations.

Sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors protect the cardiorenal axis: Update on recent mechanistic insights related to kidney physiology

Sodium glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have acquired a central role in the treatment of type 2 diabetes, chronic kidney disease including diabetic kidney disease, and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. SGLT2 inhibitors lower glucose levels by inducing glycosuria. In addition, SGLT2 inhibitors improve cardiovascular outcomes (3-point MACE), end-stage kidney disease, hospitalization for heart failure, and cardiovascular mortality in people with and without diabetes. The mechanisms underlying these benefits have been extensively investigated, but remain poorly understood. In this review, we first summarize recent trial evidence and subsequently focus on (1) the mechanisms by which SGLT2 inhibitors improve kidney outcomes and (2) the potential role of the kidneys in mediating the cardioprotective effects of SGLT2 inhibitors.

Deciphering the Roles of Metformin in Alzheimer's Disease: A Snapshot

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a prevalent neurodegenerative disease predominantly affecting millions of elderly people. To date, no effective therapy has been identified to reverse the progression of AD. Metformin, as a first-line medication for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM), exerts multiple beneficial effects on various neurodegenerative disorders, including AD. Evidence from clinical studies has demonstrated that metformin use contributes to a lower risk of developing AD and better cognitive performance, which might be modified by interactors such as diabetic status and APOE-ε4 status. Previous mechanistic studies have gradually unveiled the effects of metformin on AD pathology and pathophysiology, including neuronal loss, neural dysfunction, amyloid-β (Aβ) depositions, tau phosphorylation, chronic neuroinflammation, insulin resistance, impaired glucose metabolism and mitochondrial dysfunction. Current evidence remains ambiguous and even conflicting. Herein, we review the current state of knowledge concerning the mechanisms of metformin in AD pathology while summarizing current evidence from clinical studies.

Understanding the protective effects of SGLT2 inhibitors in type 2 diabetes patients with chronic kidney disease

INTRODUCTION

Sodium-glucose co-transporter type 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) were developed as glucose-lowering agents for the management of type 2 diabetes (T2D). Unexpectedly, they showed a significant reduction in hospitalization for heart failure and hard renal outcomes in patients with and without T2D. Underlying mechanisms remain a matter of debate.

AREAS COVERED

We summarize the protective renal effects of SGLT2is in patients with cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease (CKD, especially with albuminuria) or heart failure; a description of the safety of SGLT2is, with a special focus on the risk/benefit balance in people with stage 3 CKD; a comprehensive discussion of mechanisms that could explain nephro-protection; a reappraisal of the positioning of SGLT2is in recent international guidelines.

EXPERT OPINION

Several mechanisms could contribute to improved renal prognosis with SGLT2is, among which a reduction in intraglomerular pressure by restoring the tubuloglomerular feedback, a diuretic effect that contributes to lower albuminuria and renal decongestion, especially if fluid overload is present, a reduction in renal oxygen consumption, an improvement of heart failure status with less cardiorenal syndrome and a lower risk of acute renal injury. All these effects may be mutually not exclusive, and their respective contribution may differ according to patient characteristics.