1
|
Chatterjee A, Baker T, Rudorf M, Walt G, Stotz C, Martin A, Kinnard EN, McAlearney AS, Bosak J, Medley B, Pinkhover A, Taylor JL, Samet JH, Lunze K. Mobile treatment for opioid use disorder: Implementation of community-based, same-day medication access interventions. JOURNAL OF SUBSTANCE USE AND ADDICTION TREATMENT 2024; 159:209272. [PMID: 38128649 PMCID: PMC10947870 DOI: 10.1016/j.josat.2023.209272] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2023] [Revised: 09/20/2023] [Accepted: 12/13/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Medications for Opioid Use Disorder (MOUD) are lifesaving, but <20 % of individuals in the US who could benefit receive them. As part of the NIH-supported HEALing Communities Study (HCS), coalitions in several communities in Massachusetts and Ohio implemented mobile MOUD programs to overcome barriers to MOUD receipt. We defined mobile MOUD programs as units that provide same-day access to MOUD at remote sites. We aimed to (1) document the design and organizational structure of mobile programs providing same-day or next-day MOUD, and (2) explore the barriers and facilitators to implementation as well as the successes and challenges of ongoing operation. METHODS Program staff from five programs in two states (n = 11) participated in semi-structured interviews. Two authors conducted thematic analysis of the transcripts based on the domains of the social-ecological model and the semi-structured interview guide. RESULTS Mobile MOUD units sought to improve immediate access to MOUD ("Our answer is pretty much always, 'Yes, we'll get you started right here, right now,'"), advance equity ("making sure that we have staff who speak other languages, who are on the unit and have some resources that are in different languages,"), and decrease opioid overdose deaths. Salient program characteristics included diverse staff, including staff with lived experience of substance use ("She just had that personal knowledge of where we should be going"). Mobile units offered harm reduction services, broad medical services (in particular, wound care), and connection to transportation programs and incorporated consistency in service provision and telemedicine access. Implementation facilitators included trusting relationships with partner organizations (particularly pharmacies and correctional facilities), nuanced understanding of local politics, advertising, protocol flexibility, and on-unit prescriber hours. Barriers included unclear licensing requirements, staffing shortages and competing priorities for staff, funding challenges due to inconsistency in grant funding and low reimbursement ("It's not really possible that billing in and of itself is going to be able to sustain it"), and community stigma toward addiction services generally. CONCLUSIONS Despite organizational, community, and policy barriers, participants described mobile MOUD units as an innovative way to expand access to life-saving medications, promote equity in MOUD treatment, and overcome stigma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Avik Chatterjee
- Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States of America; Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States of America.
| | - Trevor Baker
- Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Maria Rudorf
- Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Galya Walt
- Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Caroline Stotz
- Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Anna Martin
- Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | | | - Ann Scheck McAlearney
- The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, United States of America
| | - Julie Bosak
- Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Bethany Medley
- Columbia University School of Social Work, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Allyson Pinkhover
- Brockton Neighborhood Health Center, Brockton, MA, United States of America; Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States of America
| | - Jessica L Taylor
- Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States of America; Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Jeffrey H Samet
- Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States of America; Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Karsten Lunze
- Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States of America; Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Russell DM, Meyerson BE, Mahoney AN, Garnett I, Ferrell C, Newgass K, Agley JD, Crosby RA, Bentele KG, Vadiei N, Frank D, Linde-Krieger LB. Come back when you're infected: pharmacy access to sterile syringes in an Arizona Secret Shopper Study, 2023. Harm Reduct J 2024; 21:49. [PMID: 38388463 PMCID: PMC10885601 DOI: 10.1186/s12954-024-00943-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2023] [Accepted: 01/22/2024] [Indexed: 02/24/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pharmacies are critical healthcare partners in community efforts to eliminate bloodborne illnesses. Pharmacy sale of sterile syringes is central to this effort. METHODS A mixed methods "secret shopper" syringe purchase study was conducted in the fall of 2022 with 38 community pharmacies in Maricopa and Pima Counties, Arizona. Pharmacies were geomapped to within 2 miles of areas identified as having a potentially high volume of illicit drug commerce. Daytime venue sampling was used whereby separate investigators with lived/living drug use experience attempted to purchase syringes without a prescription. Investigator response when prompted for purchase rationale was "to protect myself from HIV and hepatitis C." A 24-item instrument measured sales outcome, pharmacy staff interaction (hostile/neutral/friendly), and the buyer's subjective experience. RESULTS Only 24.6% (n = 28) of 114 purchase attempts across the 38 pharmacies resulted in syringe sale. Less than one quarter (21.1%) of pharmacies always sold, while 44.7% never sold. Independent and food store pharmacies tended not to sell syringes. There emerged distinct pharmacy staff interactions characterized by body language, customer query, normalization or othering response, response to purchase request and closure. Pharmacy discretion and pharmacy policy not to sell syringes without a prescription limited sterile syringe access. Investigators reported frequent and adverse emotional impact due to pharmacy staff negative and stigmatizing interactions. CONCLUSIONS Pharmacies miss opportunities to advance efforts to eliminate bloodborne infections by stringent no-sale policy and discretion about syringe sale. State regulatory policy facilitating pharmacy syringe sales, limiting pharmacist discretion for syringe sales, and targeting pharmacy-staff level education may help advance the achievement of public health goals to eliminate bloodborne infections in Arizona.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle M Russell
- Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA
- Harm Reduction Research Lab, University of Arizona College of Medicine-Tucson, Tucson, AZ, USA
- Drug Policy Research and Advocacy Board (DPRAB), University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Beth E Meyerson
- Harm Reduction Research Lab, University of Arizona College of Medicine-Tucson, Tucson, AZ, USA.
- Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
- Center for Comprehensive Pain and Addiction, University of Arizona Health Sciences, Tucson, AZ, USA.
| | - Arlene N Mahoney
- Harm Reduction Research Lab, University of Arizona College of Medicine-Tucson, Tucson, AZ, USA
- Southwest Recovery Alliance, Phoenix, AZ, USA
- Drug Policy Research and Advocacy Board (DPRAB), University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Irene Garnett
- Harm Reduction Research Lab, University of Arizona College of Medicine-Tucson, Tucson, AZ, USA
- Drug Policy Research and Advocacy Board (DPRAB), University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
- Center for Comprehensive Pain and Addiction, University of Arizona Health Sciences, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Chris Ferrell
- Drug Policy Research and Advocacy Board (DPRAB), University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
- CAN Community Health, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Kylee Newgass
- Southwest Recovery Alliance, Phoenix, AZ, USA
- Drug Policy Research and Advocacy Board (DPRAB), University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Jon D Agley
- Harm Reduction Research Lab, University of Arizona College of Medicine-Tucson, Tucson, AZ, USA
- Indiana University School of Public Health-Bloomington, Bloomington, IN, USA
| | - Richard A Crosby
- Harm Reduction Research Lab, University of Arizona College of Medicine-Tucson, Tucson, AZ, USA
- University of Kentucky College of Public Health, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Keith G Bentele
- Harm Reduction Research Lab, University of Arizona College of Medicine-Tucson, Tucson, AZ, USA
- Southwest Institute for Research On Women, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Nina Vadiei
- Harm Reduction Research Lab, University of Arizona College of Medicine-Tucson, Tucson, AZ, USA
- College of Pharmacy, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - David Frank
- Harm Reduction Research Lab, University of Arizona College of Medicine-Tucson, Tucson, AZ, USA
- School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, USA
| | - Linnea B Linde-Krieger
- Harm Reduction Research Lab, University of Arizona College of Medicine-Tucson, Tucson, AZ, USA
- Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
German D, Glick JL, Yenokyan K, Genberg B, Sawyer A, Gribbin M, Flynn C. Injection Behaviors and Use of Syringe Service Programs over Time among People Who Inject Drugs in Baltimore, Maryland. Subst Use Misuse 2023; 59:651-664. [PMID: 38115628 DOI: 10.1080/10826084.2023.2294966] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2023]
Abstract
Introduction: People who inject drugs (PWID) are at increased risk for infectious disease transmission, including hepatitis C and HIV. Understanding trends in injection risk behaviors and syringe service program (SSP) use over time can help improve infectious disease prevention and other harm reduction services. Methods: Using National HIV Behavioral Surveillance System data from Baltimore, Maryland, we examined changes in receptive sharing of (1) syringes, (2) injection equipment, (3) syringes to divide drugs; and (4) receipt of syringes from SSPs among PWID from 2009 to 2018 (n = 518 in 2009, n = 638 in 2012, n = 586 in 2015, and n = 575 in 2018) using unadjusted and adjusted logistic models calculated across time for the total sample. Results: The conditional probability of receptive sharing of syringes and receipt of syringes from SSPs remained relatively stable, while receptive sharing of injection equipment and receptive sharing of syringes to divide drugs dropped substantially after 2009. White race and daily injection frequency were positively associated with sharing syringes and injection equipment and negatively associated with SSP use over time. In 2015, there was a notable shift such that women were twice as likely as men to receive syringes from SSPs and less likely than men to report the use of shared syringes or equipment. Conclusion: Findings indicate overall steady or decreasing trends in injection risk and steady trends in SSP usage over time, with some notable improvements among women and indications of shifting drug market patterns. Injection-related risk behaviors remain high among White PWID and may require targeted outreach and interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle German
- Department of Health, Behavior, and Society, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Jennifer L Glick
- Department of Health, Behavior, and Society, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Karine Yenokyan
- Department of Epidemiology, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Becky Genberg
- Department of Epidemiology, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Anne Sawyer
- Department of Health, Behavior, and Society, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Molly Gribbin
- Maryland Department of Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Colin Flynn
- Maryland Department of Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Frank D, Elliott L, Cleland CM, Walters SM, Joudrey PJ, Russell DM, Meyerson BE, Bennett AS. "As safe as possible": a qualitative study of opioid withdrawal and risk behavior among people who use illegal opioids. Harm Reduct J 2023; 20:158. [PMID: 37891630 PMCID: PMC10605476 DOI: 10.1186/s12954-023-00893-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2023] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Opioid withdrawal is a regular occurrence among many people who use illicit opioids (PWUIO) that has also been shown to increase their willingness to engage in risk-involved behavior. The proliferation of fentanyl in the illicit opioid market may have amplified this relationship, potentially putting PWUIO at greater risk of negative health outcomes. Understanding the relationship between withdrawal and risk-involved behavior may also have important implications for the ways that problematic drug use is conceptualized, particularly in disease models of addiction, which position risk behavior as evidence of pathology that helps to justify ontological distinctions between addicts and non-addicts. Examining withdrawal, and its role in PWUIO's willingness to engage in risk, may aid in the development of alternative theories of risk involvement and create discursive spaces for de-medicalizing and de-othering people who use illegal drugs. METHODS This article is based on 32 semi-structured interviews with PWUIO in the New York City area who also reported recent withdrawal experience. Interviews were conducted remotely between April and August 2022 and recorded for later transcription. Data were then coded and analyzed based on a combination of inductive and deductive coding strategies and informed by the literature. RESULTS Participants described a strong relationship between withdrawal and their willingness to engage in risk-involved behavior that was exacerbated by the proliferation of fentanyl. Yet, their descriptions did not align with narratives of risk as a product of bad decisions made by individuals. Rather, data demonstrated the substantial role of social and structural context, particularly drug policies like prohibition and criminalization, in the kinds of risks that PWUIO faced and their ability to respond to them. CONCLUSIONS Withdrawal should be taken more seriously both from an ethical perspective and as an important catalyst of risk behavior. However, theories that position activities taken to avoid withdrawal as irrational and as evidence of pathology are poorly aligned with the complexity of PWUIO's actual lives. We recommend the use of less deterministic and less medicalized theories of risk that better account for differences between how people view the world, and for the role of socio-structural forces in the production of risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Frank
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY, 10003, USA.
- Center for Drug Use and HIV/HCV Research, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY, 10003, USA.
- , Woodside, NY, 11377, USA.
| | - Luther Elliott
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY, 10003, USA
- Center for Drug Use and HIV/HCV Research, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY, 10003, USA
| | - Charles M Cleland
- Center for Drug Use and HIV/HCV Research, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY, 10003, USA
- Department of Population Health, Grossman School of Medicine, New York University, New York, NY, 10003, USA
| | - Suzan M Walters
- Center for Drug Use and HIV/HCV Research, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY, 10003, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY, 10003, USA
| | - Paul J Joudrey
- Division of General Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA
| | - Danielle M Russell
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 85711, USA
- Harm Reduction Research Lab, Department of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 85711, USA
| | - Beth E Meyerson
- Harm Reduction Research Lab, Department of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 85711, USA
| | - Alex S Bennett
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY, 10003, USA
- Center for Drug Use and HIV/HCV Research, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY, 10003, USA
- Center for Anti-Racism, Social Justice, and Public Health, 708 Broadway, 9th floor, New York, NY, 10003, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gionfriddo MR, Owens KM, Leist SE, Schrum LT, Covvey JR. Attitudes, beliefs, knowledge, and practices for over-the-counter syringe sales in community pharmacies: A systematic review. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) 2023; 63:1472-1489.e3. [PMID: 37429389 DOI: 10.1016/j.japh.2023.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2023] [Revised: 06/02/2023] [Accepted: 07/06/2023] [Indexed: 07/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Community pharmacies are an important resource for people who inject drugs (PWID) to purchase over-the-counter (OTC) syringes. Access to sterile injection equipment can reduce the transmission of blood-borne illnesses. However, pharmacists and their staff ultimately use discretion over sales. OBJECTIVE To identify staff attitudes, beliefs, knowledge, and practices in the sale of OTC syringes in community pharmacies. METHODS This systematic review was reported according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) and registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022363040). We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Scopus from inception to September 2022. The review included peer-reviewed empirical studies regarding OTC syringe sales among community pharmacy staff (pharmacists, interns, and technicians). We screened records and extracted data using a predefined data extraction form. Findings were narratively synthesized, and critical appraisal was conducted using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. RESULTS A total of 1895 potentially relevant articles were identified, and 35 were included. Most studies (23; 63.9%) were cross-sectional descriptive designs. All studies included pharmacists, with seven (19.4%) also including technicians, two (5.6%) including interns, and four (11.1%) including other staff. Studies found relatively high support among respondents for harm reduction-related services within community pharmacies, but less common reports of staff engaging in said services themselves. When studies investigated the perceived positive or negative impacts of OTC syringe sales, prevention of blood-borne illness was widely understood as a benefit, while improper syringe disposal and safety of the pharmacy and its staff commonly reported as concerns. Stigmatizing attitudes/beliefs toward PWID were prevalent across studies. CONCLUSION Community pharmacy staff report knowledge regarding the benefits of OTC syringes, but personal attitudes/beliefs heavily influence decisions to engage in sales. Despite support for various syringe-related harm reduction activities, offerings of services were less likely due to concerns around PWID.
Collapse
|
6
|
Chatterjee A, Bannister M, Hill LG, Davis CS. Prescribing Syringes to People Who Inject Drugs: Advancing Harm Reduction in Primary Care. J Gen Intern Med 2023; 38:1980-1983. [PMID: 37020124 PMCID: PMC10271981 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-023-08183-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2022] [Accepted: 03/20/2023] [Indexed: 04/07/2023]
Abstract
Access to new syringes can reduce the risk of HIV and hepatitis C transmission, skin and soft tissue infections, and infectious endocarditis for people who inject drugs (PWID). Syringe service programs (SSPs) and other harm reduction programs are a good source of syringes. However, they are sometimes not accessible due to limited hours, geographic barriers, and other factors. In this perspective, we argue that when PWID faces barriers to syringes physicians and other providers should prescribe, and pharmacists should dispense, syringes to decrease health risks associated with syringe re-use. This strategy is endorsed by professional organizations and is legally permissible in most states. Such prescribing has numerous benefits, including insurance coverage of the cost of syringes and the sense of legitimacy conveyed by a prescription. We discuss these benefits as well as the legality of prescribing and dispensing syringes and address practical considerations such as type of syringe, quantity, and relevant diagnostic codes, if required. In the face of an unprecedented overdose crisis with many associated health harms, we also make the case for advocacy to change state and federal laws to make access to prescribed syringes uniform, smooth, and universal as part of a suite of harm reduction efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Avik Chatterjee
- Boston Health Care for the Homeless Program, Boston, MA, USA.
- Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
- Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
| | | | - Lucas G Hill
- The University of Texas at Austin College of Pharmacy, Austin, TX, USA
| | - Corey S Davis
- Network for Public Health Law, Edina, MN, USA
- NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York City, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Britton TR, Clague MR, Zagorski CM, Hill LG, Loera LJ. A wound care and immunization needs assessment for participants of a mobile syringe services program in Austin, TX. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) 2023; 63:361-365.e1. [PMID: 36549930 DOI: 10.1016/j.japh.2022.10.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2022] [Revised: 10/03/2022] [Accepted: 10/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND People who inject drugs (PWID) are subject to injection-related harm, including skin and soft tissue infections. Syringe services programs (SSPs) provide sterile syringes, disposal of used syringes, and other supportive services. Given their contact and credibility with PWID, SSPs could facilitate triage and treatment of wounds and access to immunizations for communicable diseases. OBJECTIVE This work aimed to assess wound care and immunization needs among participants accessing mobile SSP services in Austin, TX. METHODS A 21-item mixed-methods survey was created to assess frequency and severity of wounds, wound care approaches, and vaccination status. Participants were included if they reported injection drug use and experienced a related wound in the previous 6 months. Interview sections included screening, demographics, wound care, and immunization status. RESULTS A total of 21 participants completed the semistructured interview. A majority identified as male (n = 13, 61.9%), white (n = 12, 57.1%), and were unhoused (n = 12, 57.1%). The primary drug of injection was heroin alone (n = 14, 66.7%). Many avoided seeking wound care from health care providers (n = 16, 76.2%) owing to stigmatization (n = 13, 61.9%) and previous negative experiences (n = 7, 33.3%). Self-treatment of wounds included over-the-counter medications (n = 10, 47.6%), over-the-counter supplies (n = 10, 47.6%), and antibiotics (n = 9, 42.8%). In the past 5 years, few had received vaccination for hepatitis A and B (n = 3, 14.3%) or tetanus (n = 7, 33.3%), and many expressed interest in receiving vaccinations through the SSP. Interest for other expanded services included access to antibiotics, an on-site provider, wound care supplies, and education. CONCLUSIONS PWID may avoid professional health care for wound care or immunizations owing to perceived stigma. Expanding availability of wound care services and immunizations directly through mobile SSPs is desired by participants and could positively affect public health.
Collapse
|
8
|
Hayes BT, Favaro J, Behrends CN, Coello D, Jakubowski A, Fox AD. NEXT: description, rationale, and evaluation of a novel internet-based mail-delivered syringe service program. JOURNAL OF SUBSTANCE USE 2022; 29:129-135. [PMID: 38577252 PMCID: PMC10994146 DOI: 10.1080/14659891.2022.2144500] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2021] [Accepted: 10/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Background Despite proven health benefits, harm reduction services provided through in-person syringe services programs (SSPs) and pharmacies are largely unavailable to most people who inject drugs (PWID). Internet-based mail-delivered harm reduction services could overcome barriers to in-person SSPs. This manuscript describes Needle Exchange Technology (NEXT) Harm Reduction, the first formal internet-based mail delivery SSP in the US. Methods We examined the trajectory of NEXT's growth between February 2018 and August 2021. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize program participants. All analysis were run using STATA statistical software. Results Over the course of 42 months, 1,669 unique participants enrolled in NEXT. The program distributed 1,648,162 total syringes with a median of 79,449 syringes per month. Most participants ordered multiple times (61%); 31% had more 5 or more orders (upper range = 48 orders). The total number of syringes per month and total number of first-time syringe orders per month increased steadily over time, particularly after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Conclusions The online platform and mail-delivery model appears successful in reaching PWID at high risk for harms from IDU. Changes to state laws and additional funding support are needed to make mail-delivery harm reduction more widely available throughout the US.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin T. Hayes
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | | | | | | | - Andrea Jakubowski
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Aaron D. Fox
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Eldridge LA, Agley J, Meyerson BE, Golzarri-Arroyo L. The PharmNet Harm Reduction Intervention for Community Pharmacies: Protocol for a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Res Protoc 2022; 11:e42373. [PMID: 36279161 PMCID: PMC9641511 DOI: 10.2196/42373] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2022] [Revised: 10/10/2022] [Accepted: 10/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The overdose epidemic in the United States has continued to worsen despite substantial efforts to mitigate its harms. The opioid antagonist naloxone has been identified as a key means of reducing the prevalence of fatal overdoses. An important evidence-based approach to optimizing naloxone’s impact is to seed it throughout the community, because bystanders are often able to reverse overdoses more quickly than first responders and sometimes are the only possible means of overdose reversal. As part of a multipronged approach to distributing naloxone nationwide, community pharmacies have been identified as ideal venues for naloxone dispensing, especially under standing orders. However, dispensing rates remain surprisingly low, and there is a need to understand how best to engage community pharmacies in naloxone-based harm reduction services. Objective The objective of this trial is to determine whether a tailored, pragmatic pharmacy intervention (PharmNet) results in greater naloxone dispensing relative to baseline (the prior 3 months) compared to a control condition. This pilot trial is intended to determine whether it is appropriate to invest the substantial resources that would be required to conduct a full-scale, randomized controlled study of PharmNet. Methods We will conduct a 3-month randomized controlled pilot trial consisting of 2 parallel groups with a 4:3 allocation ratio. A group of 7 independent pharmacies from rural areas in Indiana will be randomly assigned to either the PharmNet intervention arm (n=4) or the control arm (n=3). The primary outcome will be overall naloxone dispensing (both at cost and free), and secondary outcomes will include the distribution of referral cards and multiple variables at the level of individual staff members. Dispensing data will be collected for the 3 months prior to the intervention and the 3 months of the intervention, and all other data will be collected using a pretest-posttest design. The primary analysis will be a generalized linear mixed model with a Poisson distribution with fixed effects for group, time, and their interaction and a random effect for pharmacy ID to account for repeated measures within pharmacies. Results This study was approved by the Indiana University institutional review board in 2 phases (August 2, 2021, and April 26, 2022) and was funded by the Indiana University Grand Challenge: Responding to the Addictions Crisis. Conclusions If this study produces evidence that the PharmNet intervention results in increased naloxone dispensing relative to control pharmacies, it will be both appropriate and important to study it in a large, full-scale randomized controlled trial. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) PRR1-10.2196/42373
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jon Agley
- Prevention Insights, Department of Applied Health Science, School of Public Health Bloomington, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, IN, United States
| | - Beth E Meyerson
- Harm Reduction Research Lab, Southwest Institute for Research on Women, College of Social & Behavioral Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States
- Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States
| | - Lilian Golzarri-Arroyo
- Biostatistics Consulting Center, School of Public Health Bloomington, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, IN, United States
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Spector AL, Galletly CL, Christenson EA, Montaque HDG, Dickson-Gomez J. A qualitative examination of naloxone access in three states: Connecticut, Kentucky, and Wisconsin. BMC Public Health 2022; 22:1387. [PMID: 35854278 PMCID: PMC9295344 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-13741-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2021] [Accepted: 07/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prevention of opioid-involved overdose deaths remains a public health priority in the United States. While expanding access to naloxone is a national public health strategy, it is largely implemented at the state and local level, where significant variability in policies, resources, and norms exist. The aims of the current study were to examine the social context of naloxone access in three different states (Connecticut, Kentucky, Wisconsin) from the perspectives of key informants (first responders, harm reduction personnel, and pharmacists), who play some role in dispensing or administering naloxone within their communities. METHODS Interviews were conducted with key informants who were in different local areas (urban, suburban, rural) across Connecticut, Kentucky, and Wisconsin. Interview guides explored the key informants' experiences with administering or dispensing naloxone, and their perspectives on opioid overdose prevention efforts in their areas. Data analysis was conducted using multistage inductive coding and comparative methods to identify dominant themes within the data. RESULTS Key informants in each of the three states noted progress toward expanding naloxone access, especially among people who use opioids, but also described inequities. The key role of harm reduction programs in distributing naloxone within their communities was also highlighted by participants, as well as barriers to increasing naloxone access through pharmacies. Although there was general consensus regarding the effectiveness of expanding naloxone access to prevent overdose deaths, the results indicate that communities are still grappling with stigma associated with drug use and a harm reduction approach. CONCLUSION Findings suggest that public health interventions that target naloxone distribution through harm reduction programs can enhance access within local communities. Strategies that address stigmatizing attitudes toward people who use drugs and harm reduction may also facilitate naloxone expansion efforts, overall, as well as policies that improve the affordability and awareness of naloxone through the pharmacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antoinette L. Spector
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Technology, College of Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, P.O. Box 413, Milwaukee, WI 53201 USA
| | - Carol L. Galletly
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine, Center for AIDS Intervention Research, Medical College of Wisconsin, 2701 N. Summit Ave, Milwaukee, WI 53202 USA
| | - Erika A. Christenson
- Center of Excellence in Women’s Health, Boston, Medical Center/BUSM, 801 Massachusetts Avenue, Boston, MA 02118 USA
| | - H. Danielle Green Montaque
- Institute for Community Research, 2 Hartford Square West, 146 Wyllys St., Suite 100, Hartford, CT 06106 USA
| | - Julia Dickson-Gomez
- Division of Epidemiology, Institute for Health and Equity, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 W. Watertown Plank Rd, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Austin EJ, Tsui JI, Barry MP, Tung E, Glick SN, Ninburg M, Williams EC. Health care-seeking experiences for people who inject drugs with hepatitis C: Qualitative explorations of stigma. J Subst Abuse Treat 2022; 137:108684. [PMID: 34911656 PMCID: PMC10586539 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsat.2021.108684] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2021] [Revised: 08/13/2021] [Accepted: 11/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION People who inject drugs (PWID) have complex health needs and often experience poor health outcomes. For PWID, intersectional experiences of stigma and other social vulnerabilities may influence their experiences navigating medical care. We conducted a targeted subanalysis of qualitative interview data collected to inform development of a community-pharmacist care model for hepatitis C (HCV) among PWID to explore intersectional influences on health care-seeking experiences. METHODS The study recruited participants from community organizations in Seattle, Washington, and participants were eligible if they reported injection drug use within 3 months and having HCV. Study staff conducted semi-structured interviews and two independent coders transcribed and initially analyzed them using a Rapid Assessment Process, guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Themes emerged regarding intersections of stigma and social vulnerabilities; thus, we conducted a targeted subanalysis guided by Fundamental Cause Theory and Earnshaw et al.'s Stigma Framework. RESULTS Forty participants (65% male; 47% non-white) reported multiple social vulnerabilities (e.g., regarding unstable housing and food insecurity). Qualitative analysis identified that receiving health care in the context of social vulnerability is challenging and burdensome (Theme 1); health care interactions are fraught with stigma stemming from intersectional vulnerabilities (Theme 2); and the belief that abstaining from drug use is needed to prove worthiness for care (Theme 3). PWID described experiencing multiple social vulnerabilities (e.g., unmet basic needs) that made seeking health care burdensome. Interactions with health care teams further reinforced participants' feelings of shame about their drug use, which influenced how participants expressed their care preferences and felt heard by providers. And as PWID navigated health care, they felt that their status as an active drug user was used to control and sometimes coerce their access to services, discouraging PWID from seeking needed care. CONCLUSIONS Stigma and social vulnerabilities play a pervasive and intersecting role in the health care-seeking experiences of PWID and negatively impact their ability to navigate and receive care they need. Evidence-based stigma reduction interventions at multiple levels, coupled with person-centered approaches to care delivery, may help to mitigate negative impacts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth J Austin
- Department of Health Systems and Population Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America
| | - Judith I Tsui
- Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America.
| | - Michael P Barry
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America; HIV/STD Program, Public Health - Seattle & King County, Seattle, WA, United States of America
| | - Elyse Tung
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America; Kelley-Ross Pharmacy Group, Seattle, WA, United States of America
| | - Sara N Glick
- HIV/STD Program, Public Health - Seattle & King County, Seattle, WA, United States of America; Department of Medicine, Division of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America
| | - Michael Ninburg
- Hepatitis Education Project, Seattle, WA, United States of America
| | - Emily C Williams
- Department of Health Systems and Population Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America; Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Health Services Research & Development, VA Puget Sound, Seattle, WA, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Fadanelli M, Cooper HLF, Freeman PR, Ballard AM, Ibragimov U, Young AM. A qualitative study on pharmacy policies toward over-the-counter syringe sales in a rural epicenter of US drug-related epidemics. Harm Reduct J 2022; 19:1. [PMID: 34996466 PMCID: PMC8742380 DOI: 10.1186/s12954-021-00569-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2021] [Accepted: 11/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Expanding access to sterile syringes in rural areas is vital, as injection-related epidemics expand beyond metropolitan areas globally. While pharmacies have potential to be an easily accessible source of sterile syringes, research in cities has identified moral, legal and ethical barriers that preclude over-the-counter (OTC) sales to people who inject drugs (PWID). The current study builds on prior urban-based research by elucidating (1) pharmacy OTC policies and (2) pharmacists’ rationale for, and barriers and facilitators to, OTC syringe sales in a US rural area hard hit by drug-related epidemics. Methods We conducted 14 semi-structured interviews with pharmacists recruited from two Eastern Kentucky health districts. Interview domains included experiences with, and attitudes toward, selling OTC syringes to PWID. Constructivist grounded theory methods were used to analyze verbatim transcripts. Results Most pharmacists operated “restrictive OTC” pharmacies (n = 8), where patients were required to have a prescription or proof of medical need to purchase a syringe. The remainder (n = 6) operated “open OTC” pharmacies, which allowed OTC syringe sales to most patients. Both groups believed their pharmacy policies protected their community and pharmacy from further drug-related harm, but diverging policies emerged because of stigma toward PWID, perceptions of Kentucky law, and belief OTC syringe sales were harmful rather than protective to the community. Conclusion Our results suggest that restrictive OTC pharmacy policies are rooted in stigmatizing views of PWID. Anti-stigma education about substance use disorder (SUD), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), and Hepatitis C (HCV) is likely needed to truly shift restrictive pharmacy policy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monica Fadanelli
- Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, 1518 Clifton Rd, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
| | - Hannah L F Cooper
- Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, 1518 Clifton Rd, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA
| | | | - April M Ballard
- Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, 1518 Clifton Rd, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA
| | - Umed Ibragimov
- Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, 1518 Clifton Rd, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA
| | - April M Young
- University of Kentucky College of Public Health, Lexington, KY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Green TC, Bratberga J, Irwin AN, Boggisb J, Gray M, Leichtling G, Bolivar D, Floyd A, Al-Jammali Z, Arnold J, Hansen R, Hartung D. Study protocol for the Respond to Prevent Study: a multi-state randomized controlled trial to improve provision of naloxone, buprenorphine and nonprescription syringes in community pharmacies. Subst Abus 2022; 43:901-905. [PMID: 35213293 PMCID: PMC9720900 DOI: 10.1080/08897077.2021.2010162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Access to the opioid antidote naloxone is a critical component of addressing the opioid crisis. Naloxone is a population-level prevention intervention associated with substantial reductions in overdose mortality and reduction of nonfatal overdose. Pharmacies' pivotal role in dispensing medications like buprenorphine for the treatment of opioid use disorder and selling nonprescription syringes places them at the crossroads of opioid access and risk mitigation methods like naloxone provision. Testing ways to optimize pharmacy-based naloxone provision will be key as the country expands the implementation of naloxone through the medical system. In the Respond to Prevent Study, we conducted a large, practical study of a pharmacy-focused intervention in a sample of Washington, Oregon, Massachusetts and New Hampshire community chain pharmacies to increase naloxone dispensing and improve opioid safety. The intervention integrated two evidence-based educational toolkits and streamlined materials to enhance the focus on naloxone policy, stigma reduction, and patient communications around naloxone, nonprescription syringes and buprenorphine access. The real-world study implemented a stepped wedge, clustered randomized trial design across 175 community chain pharmacies to evaluate the effectiveness of the Respond to Prevent intervention in increasing: (a) pharmacy based naloxone distribution rates, naloxone-related patient engagement, and pharmacist and technicians' attitudes, knowledge, perceived behavioral control and self-efficacy toward naloxone; and (b) pharmacy nonprescription syringe sales, and pharmacist and technicians' attitudes, knowledge, perceived behavioral control and self-efficacy toward dispensing buprenorphine for opioid use disorder (secondary outcomes). This commentary provides a brief narrative about the study and presents insights on the design and adaptations to our study protocol, including those adopted during the unprecedented COVID-19 pandemic further compounded by Western wildfires in 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Traci C Green
- Brandeis University, Opioid Policy Research Collaborative, The Heller School for Social Policy and Management, 415 South Street, Heller-Brown Building, Waltham, MA 02453 USA
| | - Jeffrey Bratberga
- University of Rhode Island College of Pharmacy, 7 Greenhouse Road, Kingston, RI 02881 USA
| | - Adriane N Irwin
- Oregon State University College of Pharmacy, 1601 SW Jefferson Way, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA
| | - Jesse Boggisb
- Brandeis University, Opioid Policy Research Collaborative, The Heller School for Social Policy and Management, 415 South Street, Heller-Brown Building, Waltham, MA 02453 USA
| | - Mary Gray
- Comagine Health, 650 NE Holladay St # 1700, Portland, OR 97232 USA
| | | | - Derek Bolivar
- Brandeis University, Opioid Policy Research Collaborative, The Heller School for Social Policy and Management, 415 South Street, Heller-Brown Building, Waltham, MA 02453 USA
| | - Anthony Floyd
- University of Washington, University of Washington, Box 357631, H364 Health Sciences Building, Seattle WA 98195-7631 USA
| | - Zain Al-Jammali
- Oregon State University College of Pharmacy, 1601 SW Jefferson Way, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA
| | - Jenny Arnold
- Washington State Pharmacy Association, 411 Williams Ave S, Renton, WA 98057 USA
| | - Ryan Hansen
- University of Washington, University of Washington, Box 357631, H364 Health Sciences Building, Seattle WA 98195-7631 USA
| | - Daniel Hartung
- Oregon State University College of Pharmacy, 1601 SW Jefferson Way, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Hayes BT, Favaro J, Coello D, Behrends CN, Jakubowski A, Fox AD. Participants of a mail delivery syringe services program are underserved by other safe sources for sterile injection supplies. THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DRUG POLICY 2022; 99:103474. [PMID: 34619446 PMCID: PMC8755579 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2021.103474] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2021] [Revised: 09/02/2021] [Accepted: 09/19/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the United States, accessing sterile injection supplies remains challenging for many people who inject drugs (PWID). Although women are less likely to inject drugs than men, women who do inject are disproportionately affected by IDU-related complications. Needle Exchange Technology (NEXT), the first formal online accessed mail delivery syringe services program (SSP) in the US, may overcome access barriers. We evaluated whether NEXT was reaching women participants and people without access to other safe sources of sterile injection supplies. METHODS This cross-sectional study examined NEXT participants who enrolled in the mail-delivery SSP from February 2018 through March 2021. All NEXT participants completed an online questionnaire during enrollment, which included sociodemographic and clinical characteristics and injection-related risk factors (including prior sources of sterile injection supplies). Multivariable logistic regression (MVR) was used to examine associations between gender and prior use of safe sources of injection supplies (i.e., SSPs or pharmacies). RESULTS 1,032 participants received injection supplies. Median age was 34 and participants were mostly cis-gendered women (55%) and white (93%). 34% reported infection with HCV; women were more likely to report HCV infection than men (38% vs 28%; p < 0.01). 68% of participants acquired injection supplies from less safe sources. Few participants exclusively used safe sources for injection supplies (26%). In adjusted MVR analysis, women participants had significantly lower odds than men of having exclusively used safe sources for injection supplies (adjusted OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.52, 0.98). CONCLUSION Our findings suggest that NEXT services are utilized by women and people without prior access to sterile injection supplies. Women participants were less likely than men to have exclusively used safe sources for sterile injection supplies. Future research should explore women's preference for mail-delivery over in-person SSPs and determine whether online accessed mail delivery services can reach other underserved populations of PWID.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin T Hayes
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Montefiore Medical
Center, Bronx, NY, USA,Corresponding author at: Montefiore Medical
Center, 3300 Kossuth Ave., Bronx, NY, 10467 United States. Tel.: +1
718-920-7102; fax: +1 718-561-5165.
| | | | | | | | - Andrea Jakubowski
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Montefiore Medical
Center, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Aaron D. Fox
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Montefiore Medical
Center, Bronx, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Agley J, Meyerson BE, Eldridge LA, Crosby RA, Bentele KG, Jun M, Vadiei N, Kennedy A, Anderson K. Exploration of pharmacist comfort with harm reduction behaviors: Cross-sectional latent class analysis. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) 2021; 62:432-440. [PMID: 34742654 DOI: 10.1016/j.japh.2021.10.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2021] [Revised: 10/14/2021] [Accepted: 10/14/2021] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pharmacists are positioned to play important roles in implementing evidence-based prevention and harm reduction approaches for opioid misuse and related health care outcomes such as human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis C. More research is needed to understand how best to facilitate harm reduction practices among pharmacists. OBJECTIVES This hypothesis-generating study investigated (1) whether subgroups (latent classes) were observable among pharmacists based on self-reported comfort with specific harm reduction behaviors, (2) whether having reported expertise in key content areas was associated with any latent classes that might be identified, and (3) whether comfort and training were associated with actually having dispensed syringes for likely nonprescription drug use. METHODS This was a statewide census of community managing pharmacists in Arizona conducted from December 2018 to May 2019. Participants reported their degree of comfort with 10 harm reduction behaviors, their expertise (e.g., recent continuing pharmacy education or specialization) in selected content areas, and their syringe dispensing behavior. Additional sociodemographic information was also collected. Subgroups related to harm reduction were computed using latent class analysis, and associations between study variables were assessed using the Fisher's exact tests. RESULTS Data suggested the existence of 4 latent, comfort-based harm reduction classes: high comfort, moderate comfort, and clinical comfort, and opioid prevention only. Reported expertise in pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV was likely associated with harm reduction class. However, class membership was not associated with reporting having dispensed nonprescription syringes, although the single comfort item for syringe dispensing, by itself, was associated therewith. CONCLUSION Comfort with harm reduction likely clusters, so pharmacists may be broadly comfortable with topics or methods of harm reduction; however, comfort with a specific harm reduction pharmacy practice may be a better predictor of engaging in that behavior than harm reduction comfort class. In contrast, strategies to improve comfort, such as intervention development, might successfully be informed by pharmacists' latent class.
Collapse
|
16
|
Antoniou T, Pritlove C, Shearer D, Martins D, Tadrous M, Munro C, Gomes T. A qualitative study of a publicly funded pharmacy-dispensed naloxone program. THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DRUG POLICY 2021; 92:103146. [PMID: 33568317 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2021.103146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2020] [Revised: 01/26/2021] [Accepted: 01/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
AIMS To characterize the experiences of individuals accessing pharmacy-based naloxone and relate these experiences to the risk environments and discourses in which they are embedded. METHODS We conducted a qualitative study using in-depth interviews of 37 adults aged 18 years and over who had accessed pharmacy-dispensed naloxone. Participants were recruited from across Ontario, Canada, and comprised individuals taking opioids for chronic pain, those taking opioids for reasons other than chronic pain, and individuals acquiring naloxone to act as bystanders in an opioid overdose setting. We drew upon risk environment theory to interpret participants' accounts. RESULTS Following analysis and interpretation, we generated five theoretically-informed themes characterizing the experiences of individuals accessing pharmacy-dispensed naloxone: 'intersection of naloxone narrative with pharmacy environment', 'individual risk environment and pharmacy-dispensed naloxone uptake', 'safe spaces: creating an enabling environment for pharmacy-dispensed naloxone', 'individuation: becoming a first responder' and 'beyond naloxone: the macro risk environment'. Specifically, participants described how judgement and stereotyping associated with the broader naloxone narrative can be amplified in the space of the pharmacy, leading to fears of reprisals and strategies to mitigate social risk. In addition, the social construction of naloxone as a drug for 'problematic' opioid use and a lack of pharmacist awareness regarding the risk environments in which opioid use occurs was perceived to limit opportunities for optimizing naloxone distribution and training. Finally, participants described approaches that could create enabling environments in the space of the pharmacy while remaining cognizant of the structural changes required in the macro risk environments of people who take opioids. CONCLUSIONS Despite increasing the availability of naloxone, participants characterized several social and environmental factors that could limit the accessibility of the drug from pharmacies. Strategies to address these factors could create enabling environments within pharmacies that optimize the reach and impact of pharmacy-dispensed naloxone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tony Antoniou
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, Unity Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Family and Community Medicine, Unity Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Ontario Drug Policy Research Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Cheryl Pritlove
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, Unity Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; School of Kinesiology and Health Science, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Dana Shearer
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, Unity Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Ontario Drug Policy Research Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Diana Martins
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, Unity Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Ontario Drug Policy Research Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mina Tadrous
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, Unity Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Ontario Drug Policy Research Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Women's College Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Charlotte Munro
- Ontario Drug Policy Research Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Tara Gomes
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, Unity Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Ontario Drug Policy Research Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institute for Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Macias-Konstantopoulos W, Heins A, Sachs CJ, Whiteman PJ, Wingkun NJG, Riviello RJ. Between Emergency Department Visits: The Role of Harm Reduction Programs in Mitigating the Harms Associated With Injection Drug Use. Ann Emerg Med 2021; 77:479-492. [PMID: 33579588 DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2020.11.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2019] [Revised: 10/05/2020] [Accepted: 11/12/2020] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
Injection drug use is a major public health problem in the United States. Cocaine, heroin, and methamphetamine are the most commonly injected illicit drugs, whereas opioids are responsible for the majority of overdose fatalities. Although recent emergency department (ED) efforts have focused on expanding capacity for buprenorphine induction for opioid use disorder treatment, the injection of illicit drugs carries specific health risks that require acknowledgment and management, particularly for patients who decline substance use treatment. Harm reduction is a public health approach that aims to reduce the harms associated with a health risk behavior, short of eliminating the behavior itself. Harm-reduction strategies fundamental to emergency medicine include naloxone distribution for opioid overdose. This clinical Review Article examines the specific health complications of injection drug use and reviews the evidence base for 2 interventions effective in reducing morbidity and mortality related to drug injection, irrespective of the specific drug used, that are less well known and infrequently leveraged by emergency medicine clinicians: syringe service programs and supervised injection facilities. In accordance with the recommendations of health authorities such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, emergency clinicians can promote the use of harm-reduction programs in the community to reduce viral transmission and other risks of injection drug use by providing patients with information about and referrals to these programs after injection drug use-related ED visits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Alan Heins
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of South Alabama College of Medicine, Mobile, AL
| | - Carolyn J Sachs
- David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Paula J Whiteman
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Neil-Jeremy G Wingkun
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center and Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX
| | - Ralph J Riviello
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, TX
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Pollini RA, Ozga JE, Blanchard D, Syvertsen JL. Consider the Source: Associations between Syringe Sources and Risky Injection Behaviors in California's Central Valley. Subst Use Misuse 2021; 56:2007-2016. [PMID: 34379030 DOI: 10.1080/10826084.2021.1963987] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sterile syringe access is critical to prevent serious viral and bacterial infections among people who inject drugs (PWID) but many areas across the United States lack sufficient access. Although California law allows nonprescription pharmacy syringe sales and syringe services programs (SSPs), access gaps remain in the largely rural Central Valley. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to examine syringe access and related injection behaviors among PWID in Fresno, California. METHODS We used respondent driven sampling to recruit 494 individuals for a survey about syringe access and injection behaviors between April and September 2016. Participants were ≥18 years old and injected at least twice in the past 30 days. Descriptive statistics examined syringe access and logistic regression determined if discrete syringe source categories were significantly associated with syringe sharing and/or reuse. RESULTS A majority (67%) obtained syringes from an authorized source; SSPs were most common (59%), while few reported pharmacy purchase (14%). Unauthorized sources were even more common (79%), primarily friends (64%) or someone on the street (37%). Compared to PWID who used only authorized sources, those using only unauthorized sources had a higher odds of syringe sharing (AOR = 3.40, 95% CI: 1.66, 6.95) and syringe reuse (AOR = 6.22; 95% CI: 2.24, 17.29), as did those who reported mixed sources (AOR = 3.78; 95% CI: 1.90, 7.54 and AOR = 4.64; 95% CI: 2.08, 10.35). CONCLUSIONS Our findings demonstrate a need to expand syringe access in nonurban California to prevent the syringe sharing and reuse that contributes to serious viral and bacterial infections among PWID.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robin A Pollini
- Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, Calverton, Maryland, USA.,Department of Behavioral Medicine & Psychiatry, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA.,Department of Epidemiology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA
| | - Jenny E Ozga
- Department of Behavioral Medicine & Psychiatry, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA
| | | | - Jennifer L Syvertsen
- Department of Anthropology, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Antoniou T, McCormack D, Campbell T, Sutradhar R, Tadrous M, Lum-Wilson N, Leece P, Munro C, Gomes T. Geographic variation in the provision of naloxone by pharmacies in Ontario, Canada: A population-based small area variation analysis. Drug Alcohol Depend 2020; 216:108238. [PMID: 32891910 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2020] [Revised: 07/15/2020] [Accepted: 08/11/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Regional variation in pharmacy-dispensed naloxone rates could create access disparities that undermine the effectiveness of this approach. We explored individual and public health unit (PHU)-level determinants of regional variation in naloxone distribution through the Ontario Naloxone Program for Pharmacies. METHODS We conducted a population-based study between April 1, 2017 and March 31, 2018. We calculated age- and sex-standardized pharmacy-dispensed naloxone rates for the 35 Ontario PHUs, and identified determinants of these rates using generalized estimating equations negative binomial regression. RESULTS The age- and sex-standardized pharmacy-dispensed naloxone rate in Ontario was 5.5 (range 1.8-11.6) kits per 1000 population. Variables associated with higher naloxone dispensing rates included opioid use disorder history [rate ratio (RR) 2.27; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.75-2.96], opioid agonist therapy (RR 11.17; 95% CI 7.15-17.44), and PHU opioid overdose rate (RR 1.09 per 10 deaths; 95% CI 1.06-1.13). Pharmacy-dispensed naloxone rates were lower in rural areas (RR 0.83; 95% CI 0.73-0.94) and among individuals dispensed one (RR 0.72; 95% CI 0.65-0.79), two to five (RR 0.67; 95% CI 0.54-0.84) or 6-10 (RR 0.92; 95% CI 0.74-1.14) opioids in the prior year relative to those receiving no opioids. CONCLUSION Pharmacy-dispensed naloxone programs are important components of a public health response to the opioid overdose crisis. We found considerable variation in pharmacy-dispensed naloxone rates that could limit program effectiveness, particularly in rural settings with limited access to health and harm reduction services..
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tony Antoniou
- ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Family and Community Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, Canada; Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Ontario Drug Policy Research Network, Canada
| | | | | | - Rinku Sutradhar
- ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institute for Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mina Tadrous
- ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Ontario Drug Policy Research Network, Canada
| | | | - Pamela Leece
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Public Health Ontario Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Tara Gomes
- ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institute for Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Ontario Drug Policy Research Network, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|