Pathological findings in rotation thromboelastometry associated with thromboembolic events in COVID-19 patients

Persistent hypofibrinolysis in severe COVID-19 associated with elevated fibrinolysis inhibitors activity

Hypercoagulability and reduced fibrinolysis are well-established complications associated with COVID-19. However, the timelines for the onset and resolution of these complications remain unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate, in a cohort of COVID-19 patients, changes in coagulation and fibrinolytic activity through ROTEM assay at different time points during the initial 30 days following the onset of symptoms in both mild and severe cases. Blood samples were collected at five intervals after symptoms onset: 6-10 days, 11-15 days, 16-20 days, 21-25 days, and 26-30 days. In addition, fibrinogen, plasminogen, PAI-1, and alpha 2-antiplasmin activities were determined. Out of 85 participants, 71% had mild COVID-19. Twenty uninfected individuals were evaluated as controls. ROTEM parameters showed a hypercoagulable state among mild COVID-19 patients beginning in the second week of symptoms onset, with a trend towards reversal after the third week of symptoms. In severe COVID-19 cases, hypercoagulability was observed since the first few days of symptoms, with a tendency towards reversal after the fourth week of symptoms onset. A hypofibrinolytic state was identified in severe COVID-19 patients from early stages and persisted even after 30 days of symptoms. Elevated activity of PAI-1 and alpha 2-antiplasmin was also detected in severe COVID-19 patients. In conclusion, both mild and severe cases of COVID-19 exhibited transient hypercoagulability, reverted by the end of the first month. However, severe COVID-19 cases sustain hypofibrinolysis throughout the course of the disease, which is associated with elevated activity of fibrinolysis inhibitors. Persistent hypofibrinolysis could contribute to long COVID-19 manifestations.

Point-of-care diagnosis and monitoring of fibrinolysis resistance in the critically ill: results from a feasibility study

BACKGROUND

Fibrinolysisis is essential for vascular blood flow maintenance and is triggered by endothelial and platelet release of tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA). In certain critical conditions, e.g. sepsis, acute respiratory failure (ARF) and trauma, the fibrinolytic response is reduced and may lead to widespread thrombosis and multi-organ failure. The mechanisms underpinning fibrinolysis resistance include reduced t-PA expression and/or release, reduced t-PA and/or plasmin effect due to elevated inhibitor levels, increased consumption and/or clearance. This study in critically ill patients with fibrinolysis resistance aimed to evaluate the ability of t-PA and plasminogen supplementation to restore fibrinolysis with assessment using point-of-care ClotPro viscoelastic testing (VET).

METHODS

In prospective, observational studies, whole-blood ClotPro VET evaluation was carried out in 105 critically ill patients. In 32 of 58 patients identified as fibrinolysis-resistant (clot lysis time > 300 s on the TPA-test: tissue factor activated coagulation with t-PA accelerated fibrinolysis), consecutive experimental whole-blood VET was carried out with repeat TPA-tests spiked with additional t-PA and/or plasminogen and the effect on lysis time determined. In an interventional study in a patient with ARF and fibrinolysis resistance, the impact of a 24 h intravenous low-dose alteplase infusion on coagulation and fibrinolysis was prospectively monitored using standard ClotPro VET.

RESULTS

Distinct response groups emerged in the ex vivo experimental VET, with increased fibrinolysis observed following supplementation with (i) t-PA only or (ii) plasminogen and t-PA. A baseline TPA-test lysis time of > 1000 s was associated with the latter group. In the interventional study, a gradual reduction (25%) in serial TPA-test lysis times was observed during the 24 h low-dose alteplase infusion.

CONCLUSIONS

ClotPro viscoelastic testing, the associated TPA-test and the novel experimental assays may be utilised to (i) investigate the potential mechanisms of fibrinolysis resistance, (ii) guide corrective treatment and (iii) monitor in real-time the treatment effect. Such a precision medicine and personalised treatment approach to the management of fibrinolysis resistance has the potential to increase treatment benefit, while minimising adverse events in critically ill patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

VETtiPAT-ARF, a clinical trial evaluating ClotPro-guided t-PA (alteplase) administration in fibrinolysis-resistant patients with ARF, is ongoing (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05540834 ; retrospectively registered September 15th 2022).

Investigation of differences in coagulation characteristics between hospitalized patients with SARS-CoV-2 Alpha, Delta, and Omicron variant infection using rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM): A single-center, retrospective, observational study

BACKGROUND

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 Omicron variant has a low rate of serious illness, is highly contagious, and has spread rapidly since January 2022. The number of severe cases and deaths remains problematic. Here, we aimed to elucidate the coagulation pathology of Omicron-infected patients using rotational thromboelastometry.

METHODS

Patients with coronavirus disease 2019, hospitalized and treated from January 2021 to April 2022, were included. The Alpha-Delta and Omicron groups were defined during admission. Blood tests, clinical course, and rotational thromboelastometry measurements were compared using a propensity score-matched cohort.

RESULTS

Both groups had 21 patients each. Lactate dehydrogenase (Alpha-Delta group [interquartile range] vs. Omicron group [interquartile range]; 449 [368-518] U/L vs. 241 [196-398] U/L, p = 0.01) and ferritin (1428 [1145-3061] ng/dl vs. 481 [188-881] ng/dl, p = 0.0002) levels were significantly lower in the Omicron group. In rotational thromboelastometry, the thrombus hardness indexes FIBTEM A5 (29 [23-34] mm vs. 23 [18-28] mm, p = 0.034) and maximum clot firmness (34 [27-40] mm vs. 26 [21-33] mm, p = 0.021) were significantly lower in the Omicron group, whereas the fibrinolysis index FIBTEM LI60 (98 [92-100] % vs. 100 [100-100] %, p = 0.0082) was higher.

CONCLUSION

Severe coagulation abnormalities may be less likely in Omicron-infected patients than in those infected with the previous Alpha and Delta variants.

Predictive ability of viscoelastic testing using ClotPro® for short-term outcome in patients with severe Covid-19 ARDS with or without ECMO therapy: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

SARS-CoV-2 infections are suspected to trigger the coagulation system through various pathways leading to a high incidence of thromboembolic complications, hypercoagulation and impaired fibrinolytic capacity were previously identified as potentially mechanisms. A reliable diagnostic tool for detecting both is still under discussion. This retrospective study is aimed to examine the prognostic relevance of early viscoelastic testing compared to conventional laboratory tests in COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).

METHODS

All mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19 related ARDS treated in our intensive care unit (ICU) between January and March 2021 were included in this study. Viscoelastic testing (VET) was performed using the ClotPro® system after admission to our ICU. Prevalence of thromboembolic events was observed by standardized screening for venous and pulmonary thromboembolism using complete compression ultrasound and thoracic computed tomography pulmonary angiography at ICU admission, respectively. We examined associations between the severity of ARDS at admission to our ICU, in-hospital mortality and the incidence of thromboembolic events comparing conventional laboratory analysis and VET. ECMO related coagulopathy was investigated in a subgroup analysis. The data were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test.

RESULTS

Of 55 patients enrolled in this study, 22 patients required treatment with ECMO. Thromboembolic complications occurred in 51% of all patients. Overall hospital mortality was 55%. In patients with thromboembolic complications, signs of reduced fibrinolytic capacity could be detected in the TPA assay with prolonged lysis time, median 460 s (IQR 350-560) vs 359 s (IQR 287-521, p = 0.073). Patients with moderate to severe ARDS at admission to our ICU showed increased maximum clot firmness as a sign of hypercoagulation in the EX-test (70 vs 67 mm, p < 0.05), FIB-test (35 vs 24 mm, p < 0.05) and TPA-test (52 vs 36 mm, p < 0.05) as well as higher values of inflammatory markers (CRP, PCT and IL6). ECMO patients suffered more frequently from bleeding complications (32% vs 15%).

CONCLUSION

Although, the predictive value for thromboembolic complications or mortality seems limited, point-of-care viscoelastic coagulation testing might be useful in detecting hypercoagulable states and impaired fibrinolysis in critically ill COVID-19 ARDS patients and could be helpful in identifying patients with a potentially very severe course of the disease.

Suppression of Fibrinolysis and Hypercoagulability, Severity of Hypoxemia, and Mortality in COVID-19 Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

COVID-19 causes hypercoagulability, but the association between coagulopathy and hypoxemia in critically ill patients has not been thoroughly explored. This study hypothesized that severity of coagulopathy would be associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome severity, major thrombotic events, and mortality in patients requiring intensive care unit-level care.

METHODS

Viscoelastic testing by rotational thromboelastometry and coagulation factor biomarker analyses were performed in this prospective observational cohort study of critically ill COVID-19 patients from April 2020 to October 2020. Statistical analyses were performed to identify significant coagulopathic biomarkers such as fibrinolysis-inhibiting plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 and their associations with clinical outcomes such as mortality, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation requirement, occurrence of major thrombotic events, and severity of hypoxemia (arterial partial pressure of oxygen/fraction of inspired oxygen categorized into mild, moderate, and severe per the Berlin criteria).

RESULTS

In total, 53 of 55 (96%) of the cohort required mechanical ventilation and 9 of 55 (16%) required extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation-naïve patients demonstrated lysis indices at 30 min indicative of fibrinolytic suppression on rotational thromboelastometry. Survivors demonstrated fewer procoagulate acute phase reactants, such as microparticle-bound tissue factor levels (odds ratio, 0.14 [0.02, 0.99]; P = 0.049). Those who did not experience significant bleeding events had smaller changes in ADAMTS13 levels compared to those who did (odds ratio, 0.05 [0, 0.7]; P = 0.026). Elevations in plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 (odds ratio, 1.95 [1.21, 3.14]; P = 0.006), d-dimer (odds ratio, 3.52 [0.99, 12.48]; P = 0.05), and factor VIII (no clot, 1.15 ± 0.28 vs. clot, 1.42 ± 0.31; P = 0.003) were also demonstrated in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation-naïve patients who experienced major thrombotic events. Plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 levels were significantly elevated during periods of severe compared to mild and moderate acute respiratory distress syndrome (severe, 44.2 ± 14.9 ng/ml vs. mild, 31.8 ± 14.7 ng/ml and moderate, 33.1 ± 15.9 ng/ml; P = 0.029 and 0.039, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Increased inflammatory and procoagulant markers such as plasminogen activator inhibitor 1, microparticle-bound tissue factor, and von Willebrand factor levels are associated with severe hypoxemia and major thrombotic events, implicating fibrinolytic suppression in the microcirculatory system and subsequent micro- and macrovascular thrombosis in severe COVID-19.

EDITOR’S PERSPECTIVE

Thromboprophylaxis with argatroban in critically ill patients with sepsis: a review

During sepsis, an initial prothrombotic shift takes place, in which coagulatory acute-phase proteins are increased, while anticoagulatory factors and platelet count decrease. Further on, the fibrinolytic system becomes impaired, which contributes to disease severity. At a later stage in sepsis, coagulation factors may become depleted, and sepsis patients may shift into a hypo-coagulable state with an increased bleeding risk. During the pro-coagulatory shift, critically ill patients have an increased thrombosis risk that ranges from developing micro-thromboses that impair organ function to life-threatening thromboembolic events. Here, thrombin plays a key role in coagulation as well as in inflammation. For thromboprophylaxis, low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) and unfractionated heparins (UFHs) are recommended. Nevertheless, there are conditions such as heparin resistance or heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), wherein heparin becomes ineffective or even puts the patient at an increased prothrombotic risk. In these cases, argatroban, a direct thrombin inhibitor (DTI), might be a potential alternative anticoagulatory strategy. Yet, caution is advised with regard to dosing of argatroban especially in sepsis. Therefore, the starting dose of argatroban is recommended to be low and should be titrated to the targeted anticoagulation level and be closely monitored in the further course of treatment. The authors of this review recommend using DTIs such as argatroban as an alternative anticoagulant in critically ill patients suffering from sepsis or COVID-19 with suspected or confirmed HIT, HIT-like conditions, impaired fibrinolysis, in patients on extracorporeal circuits and patients with heparin resistance, when closely monitored.

Impaired fibrinolysis in severe Covid-19 infection is detectable in early stages of the disease

BACKGROUND

A significant degree of mortality and morbidity in Covid-19 is due to thromboembolic disease. Coagulopathy has been well described in critically unwell patients on ICU. There is less clear evidence regarding these changes at the time of presentation to the Emergency Department and the progression of disease over time.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to investigate whether coagulation markers can predict severity and how they change over the disease course.

METHODS

Patients presenting to a single University Teaching Hospital were recruited and followed up if PCR was positive. Alongside routine blood testing, Rotational Thromboelastometry (ROTEM) was performed. Outcome data was recorded for all patients, and ROTEM values were compared across outcome groups.

RESULTS

Extem and Intem Maximum Lysis were significantly reduced in those who died or required an ICU admission, indicating a reduced ability to break down clot mass in the most critically unwell patients.

CONCLUSION

Comparisons between groups demonstrated that one distinguishing feature between those who require ICU admission or die of Covid-19 compared with those who survive a hospital stay to discharge was the extent to which fibrinolysis could occur. Mortality and morbidity in Covid-19 infection appears in part driven by an inability to break down clot mass.

Investigation of predictors of bleeding complications in COVID-19 using rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEMⓇ): A retrospective study

Background

Hemorrhagic complications in patients with coronavirus 19 disease (COVID-19) are infrequent but associated with a prognosis. This study aimed to elucidate the risk factors for bleeding complications in patients with COVID-19 using rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) parameters and blood tests performed at admission.

Methods

In total, 31 patients with severe COVID-19 treated intensively at Saga University Hospital were included in this study. Patients were divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of hemorrhagic complications. Results from the blood tests performed at admission and during hospitalization, and ROTEM values acquired upon admission, were compared between the two groups.

Results

There were significant differences in ROTEM values upon admission between the bleeding and non-bleeding groups. Receiver operating curve analysis showed that the area under the curve for prothrombin time international normalized ratio (PT-INR) and extrinsically-activated test with tissue factor (EXTEM) amplitude at 10 min (A10) were 0.82 (0.52-0.92) and 0.81 (0.58-0.93), respectively. Logistic regression analysis with PT-INR and EXTEM A10 as factors calculated an odds ratio of 1.94 (1.04-3.62) and EXTEM A10 0.86 (0.71-1.05) for bleeding complications occurrence.

Conclusion

ROTEM may be a sensitive predictor for bleeding complications in patients with COVID-19.

Point of care coagulation management in anesthesiology and critical care

Point of care (POC) devices are increasingly used in the ICU and in anesthesia. Besides POC-devices for blood gas analysis, several devices are available for coagulation measurements. Although basic principles for thromboelastographic measurements are not novel, some promising developments were made during the last decade improving both user-friendliness and measurement reliability. For instance, POC measurements of activated clotting time (ACT) for heparin monitoring is still regarded as standard-of-care in cardiac interventions and surgery. In the field of anesthesia and intensive care medicine, POC-devices for thromboelastographic and platelet aggregation measurements are widely used. Their impact in case of bleeding and patient blood management for cardiothoracic and trauma surgery is well known. Moreover, there are promising concepts for anticoagulation monitoring including new oral anticoagulant drugs. Coagulation POC-devices may also identify patients at specific risk for thromboembolic events quickly. On the other hand, benefits of POC-devices need to be balanced against limitations, which include technical restrictions and operator related errors, mainly affecting reproducibility and interpretation of results. Therefore, it is recommendable to consider results of POC-coagulation testing in comparison to standard laboratory tests (SLT). Nevertheless, in urgent or emergency situations POC results enable fast decision making to optimize patient care.

Routine and Advanced Laboratory Tests for Hemostasis Disorders in COVID-19 Patients: A Prospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Thrombosis is frequent during COVID-19 disease, and thus, identifying predictive factors of hemostasis associated with a poor prognosis is of interest. The objective was to explore coagulation disorders as early predictors of worsening critical conditions in the intensive care unit (ICU) using routine and more advanced explorations.

MATERIALS

Blood samples within 24 h of ICU admission for viscoelastic point-of-care testing, (VET), advanced laboratory tests: absolute immature platelet count (A-IPC), von Willebrand-GPIb activity (vWF-GpIb), prothrombin fragments 1 + 2 (F1 + 2), and the thrombin generation assay (TGA) were used. An association with worse outcomes was explored using univariable and multivariable analyses. Worsening was defined as death or the need for organ support.

RESULTS

An amount of 85 patients with 33 in critical condition were included. A-IPC were lower in worsening patients (9.6 [6.4-12.5] vs. 12.3 [8.3-20.7], p = 0.02) while fibrinogen (6.9 [6.1-7.7] vs. 6.2 [5.4-6.9], p = 0.03), vWF-GpIb (286 [265-389] vs. 268 [216-326], p = 0.03) and F1 + 2 (226 [151-578] vs. 155 [129-248], p = 0.01) were higher. There was no difference observed for D-dimer, TGA or VET. SAPS-II and A-IPC were independently associated with worsening (OR = 1.11 [1.06-1.17] and OR = 0.47 [0.25-0.76] respectively). The association of a SAPS-II ≥ 33 and an A-IPC ≤ 12.6 G/L predicted the worsening of patients (sensitivity 58%, specificity 89%).

CONCLUSIONS

Immature platelets are early predictors of worsening in severe COVID-19 patients, suggesting a key role of thrombopoiesis in the adaption of an organism to SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Increased blood viscosity and red blood cell aggregation in patients with COVID-19

The aim of this study was to (1) analyze blood viscosity, red blood cell (RBC) deformability, and aggregation in hospitalized patients with Coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19); (2) test the associations between impaired blood rheology and blood coagulation; and (3) test the associations between impaired blood rheology and several indicators of clinical severity. A total of 172 patients with COVID-19, hospitalized in COVID-unit of the Internal Medicine Department (Lyon, France) participated in this study between January and May 2021. Clinical parameters were collected for each patient. Routine hematological/biochemical parameters, blood viscosity, RBC deformability and aggregation, and RBC senescence markers were measured on the first day of hospitalization. A control group of 38 healthy individuals was constituted to compare the blood rheological and RBC profile. Rotational thromboelastography was performed in 76 patients to study clot formation dynamics. Our study demonstrated that patients with COVID-19 had increased blood viscosity despite lower hematocrit than healthy individuals, as well as increased RBC aggregation. In-vitro experiments demonstrated a strong contribution of plasma fibrinogen in this RBC hyper-aggregation. RBC aggregation correlated positively with clot firmness, negatively with clot formation time, and positively with the length of hospitalization. Patients with oxygen supplementation had higher RBC aggregation and blood viscosity than those without, and patients with pulmonary lesions had higher RBC aggregation and enhanced coagulation than those without. This study is the first to demonstrate blood hyper-viscosity and RBC hyper-aggregation in a large cohort of patients with COVID-19 and describe associations with enhanced coagulation and clinical outcomes.

The Composition and Physical Properties of Clots in COVID-19 Pathology

Hemostasis is a finely tuned process of which dysregulation can lead either to bleeding or thrombotic complications. The latter is often caused by the hypercoagulable state as it is also seen in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, i.e., in COVID-19 patients. COVID-19 patients requiring hospitalization often suffer from thrombotic events that could not be predicted using routine coagulation assays. Recently, several studies have reported ROtational ThromboElastoMetry (ROTEM) as a promising tool to predict outcomes in COVID-19 patients. In this review we give an overview of ROTEM with a particular focus on the interpretation of the symmetrical clot formation curve in relation to coagulopathy in COVID-19 patients. Furthermore, we have introduced new parameters that might help to better distinguish between COVID-19 patients and outcomes.

Questions about COVID-19 associated coagulopathy: possible answers from the viscoelastic tests

Abnormal coagulation parameters are often observed in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and the severity of derangement has been associated with a poor prognosis. The COVID-19 associated coagulopathy (CAC) displays unique features that include a high risk of developing thromboembolic complications. Viscoelastic tests (VETs), such as thromboelastometry (ROTEM), thromboelastography (TEG) and Quantra Hemostasis Analyzer (Quantra), provide "dynamic" data on clot formation and dissolution; they are used in different critical care settings, both in hemorrhagic and in thrombotic conditions. In patients with severe COVID-19 infection VETs can supply to clinicians more information about the CAC, identifying the presence of hypercoagulable and hypofibrinolysis states. In the last year, many studies have proposed to explain the underlying characteristics of CAC; however, there remain many unanswered questions. We tried to address some of the important queries about CAC through VETs analysis.

Use of rotational thromboelastometry to predict the outcome of COVID-19 patients: A retrospective observational study

Background and Aims:

Material and Methods:

Results:

Conclusion:

Safety of COVID-19 vaccines administered in the EU: Should we be concerned?

•

mRNA and viral vector vaccines are currently used in the EU for COVID-19 prophylaxis.

•

EMA has assessed the safety of the three vaccines currently used in the EU.

•

Local and systemic reactions are reported during vaccinations campaigns.

•

Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia has been linked to Vaxzevria.

•

Follow-up and surveillance studies for vaccines’ safety monitoring will be needed.

The COVID-19 pandemic has had an unprecedented and devastating impact on public health, society and economics around the world. As a result, the development of vaccines to protect individuals from symptomatic COVID-19 infections has represented the only feasible health tool to combat the spread of the disease. However, at the same time the development and regulatory assessment of different vaccines has challenged pharmaceutical industries and regulatory agencies as this process has occurred in the shorter time ever though. So far, two mRNA and two adenovirus-vectored vaccines have received a conditional marketing authorisation in the EU and other countries. This review summarized and discusses the assessment reports of the European Medicine Agency (EMA) concerning the safety of the 3 vaccines currently used in the EU (Pfizer, Moderna and Astra-Zeneca). A particular focus has been paid to safety information from pre-clinical (animal) and clinical (phase 3 trials) studies. Overall, the most frequent adverse effects reported after the administration of these vaccines consisted of local reactions at the injection site (sore arm and erythema) followed by non-specific systemic effects (myalgia, chills, fatigue, headache, and fever), which occurred soon after vaccination and resolved shortly. Rare cases of vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia have been reported for Vaxzevria. Data on long-term studies, interaction with other vaccines, use in pregnancy/breast-feeding, use in immunocompromised subjects, and in subjects with comorbidities, autoimmune or inflammatory disorders are still missing for these vaccines. Therefore, careful follow-up and surveillance studies for continued vaccine safety monitoring will be needed to ascertain the potential risks of such adverse events or diseases. In conclusion, the benefits and risks of current COVID-19 vaccines must be weighed against the real possibility of contract the disease and develop complications and long-term sequels; all this on the basis of the available scientific evidence and in the absence of unmotivated biases.