1
|
Gillioz E, Gentaz E, Lejeune F. The Effect of Screen Habits and Alternative Activities on Tactile Exploration Skills in 6- to 36-Month-Old Toddlers. CHILDREN (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2024; 11:1027. [PMID: 39201961 PMCID: PMC11352288 DOI: 10.3390/children11081027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2024] [Revised: 08/19/2024] [Accepted: 08/20/2024] [Indexed: 09/03/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES With the rising ubiquity of digital media and screens in everyday life, toddlers are increasingly exposed to different screens from an early age (i.e., television, computer, tablet, phone). However, few studies have examined the effect of these screens on toddlers' perceptual development. Since tactile exploration skills are necessary for environmental discovery and overall development, the current research investigates the links between screen-use habits and the tactile exploration skills (with visual control) of 6- to 36-month-old toddlers. METHODS The study involved observing the interactions of 135 toddlers with various objects and assessing the complexity of their visuo-tactile exploration strategies through two original experimental tasks. Data concerning screen habits and other relevant factors, such as socio-economic level, were collected using a parental questionnaire. RESULTS Toddlers with greater screen exposure time demonstrated weaker tactile exploration skills and employed less age-appropriate exploration strategies. Socio-economic factors and parental engagement in alternative activities significantly influenced these developmental outcomes. CONCLUSIONS These findings emphasize the importance of reducing screen time and promoting interactive co-viewing and alternative activities to mitigate the negative effects of screen exposure. Further longitudinal research is needed to determine the long-term impacts of early screen exposure on tactile exploration and overall psychological development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Estelle Gillioz
- Department of Psychology, University of Geneva,1205 Geneva, Switzerland; (E.G.); (F.L.)
| | - Edouard Gentaz
- Department of Psychology, University of Geneva,1205 Geneva, Switzerland; (E.G.); (F.L.)
- Swiss Center for Affective Sciences, University of Geneva, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), 75116 Paris, France
| | - Fleur Lejeune
- Department of Psychology, University of Geneva,1205 Geneva, Switzerland; (E.G.); (F.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Poncet L, Saïd M, Yang S, Müller-Riemenschneider F, Berticat C, Raymond M, Barkat-Defradas M, Charles MA, Bernard JY. Associations between screen viewing at 2 and 3.5 years and drawing ability at 3.5 years among children from the French nationwide Elfe birth cohort. Sci Rep 2024; 14:348. [PMID: 38172606 PMCID: PMC10764867 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-50767-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2023] [Accepted: 12/25/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024] Open
Abstract
The effect of screen viewing on children's cognitive development has been of concern among parents and researchers. This study investigated the association between children screen time, as reported by parents, and drawing ability, and the confounding effects of socioeconomic characteristics (such as parental education, household income, migration status) and children's competing activities (such as drawing practice, extracurricular activity, outdoor time, sleep time, time playing with parents). Participants included 7577 children aged 3.5 years (50% girls) who underwent the Draw-a-person test (McCarthy score [range = 0-12 points]) in the French nationwide Elfe birth cohort, initiated in 2011. Sex-stratified zero-inflated Poisson regression models were used. Increased screen time was associated with a higher likelihood to obtain a null score in boys (OR 1.15, 95% CI 1.07-1.23) and girls (1.13 [1.03-1.24]) and a lower score in girls only (β = - 0.02, 95% CI - 0.04; - 0.01). After adjusting for SES, associations were no longer observed, indicating that the association between screen time and drawing abilities was confounded by socioeconomic characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorraine Poncet
- Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Statistics (CRESS), Université Paris Cité, Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Inserm, INRAE, 75004, Paris, France
| | - Mélèa Saïd
- Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Statistics (CRESS), Université Paris Cité, Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Inserm, INRAE, 75004, Paris, France
| | - Shuai Yang
- Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Statistics (CRESS), Université Paris Cité, Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Inserm, INRAE, 75004, Paris, France
| | - Falk Müller-Riemenschneider
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Berlin Institute of Health, Charite University Medical Centre, Berlin, Germany
| | - Claire Berticat
- ISEM, CNRS, EPHE, IRD, University of Montpellier, 34095, Montpellier, France
| | - Michel Raymond
- ISEM, CNRS, EPHE, IRD, University of Montpellier, 34095, Montpellier, France
| | | | - Marie-Aline Charles
- Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Statistics (CRESS), Université Paris Cité, Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Inserm, INRAE, 75004, Paris, France
- Unité mixte Elfe, Ined, Inserm, EFS, 93322, Aubervilliers, France
| | - Jonathan Y Bernard
- Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Statistics (CRESS), Université Paris Cité, Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Inserm, INRAE, 75004, Paris, France.
- Singapore Institute for Clinical Sciences (SICS), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Morawska A, Mitchell AE, Tooth LR. Managing Screen Use in the Under-Fives: Recommendations for Parenting Intervention Development. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev 2023; 26:943-956. [PMID: 37171529 PMCID: PMC10640456 DOI: 10.1007/s10567-023-00435-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/24/2023] [Indexed: 05/13/2023]
Abstract
The impact of excessive screen use on children's health and development is a public health concern and many countries have published recommendations to limit and guide the use of screen media in childhood. Despite this, international studies report that the majority of parents and children do not adhere to screen use recommendations. Existing research aiming to understand children' screen use has largely focused on older children, and on demographic and structural aspects of the child's environment. Parents play a central role in determining young children's screen use and identify numerous barriers to developing healthy screen use practices with their children. However, no clear models exist that incorporate key parenting factors in understanding children's screen use, which presents an impediment to intervention development. Likewise, while some evidence exists for interventions to improve children's screen use behaviours, most are focused on older children and parental involvement has generally been limited. In this paper, we overview key factors associated with screen use in young children (< 5 years) and summarise the existing evidence base for interventions designed to support healthy screen use. This paper proposes a conceptual model linking aspects of parenting and the socio-ecological environment to young children's screen use. Our proposed model could be used to design longitudinal studies of screen use predictors and outcomes, and inform intervention development. Finally, the paper provides key recommendations for future research, intervention development and testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alina Morawska
- Parenting and Family Support Centre, School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, 13 Upland Road, St Lucia, Brisbane, Qld, 4072, Australia.
| | - Amy E Mitchell
- School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Leigh R Tooth
- School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dieu Osika S, Issaeva L, Boutin E, Osika E. Screen time of toddlers in Paris suburbs: Quantitative and qualitative analysis. Arch Pediatr 2023; 30:558-562. [PMID: 37798216 DOI: 10.1016/j.arcped.2023.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2022] [Revised: 06/13/2023] [Accepted: 09/01/2023] [Indexed: 10/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Our aim was to describe the exposure of French children aged 12-36 months to screens (time, content, age of first exposure) and to analyze different moderating factors: sociodemographic data, parents' screen time, and other factors (childcare arrangements, language spoken at home, book reading). POPULATION AND METHODS We conducted an observational, cross-sectional, descriptive and analytical study based on 171 questionnaires from parents of children aged 12-36 months who consulted different hospitals in the Paris region during the summer of 2020. RESULTS The median screen time was 1 h per day and was essentially television time. The median age of first exposure for children was 12 months. Among the most-watched sites, YouTube was in first place. One third of the children chose the content they watched alone, and the majority did so without any parental guidance (66%). Children watched a screen during mealtime every day in 25% of cases, before bedtime in 12.3% of cases, and 8.8% had a screen in their bedroom. More than one third of families left the television on in the background most of the time. In the multivariate analysis, a high level of screen time was notably linked to the child's age, the parents' screen time, and background television. However, the parental reason for exposure "to calm the child" was the most strongly correlated factor with significant child screen time. Reading books appeared to be a determining factor for less screen exposure. CONCLUSION These results emphasize the importance of raising parents' awareness about the potential negative effects of screen exposure (particularly on children's cognitive and emotional development) as early as possible during the maternity period. Implementing this prevention in the maternity wards could be an effective way of informing and educating parents about the potential negative effects of screen time on their child's development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Eric Osika
- Saint Camille Hospital, Bry-sur-Marne, France.
| |
Collapse
|