Treatment of lumbar degenerative disc disease-associated radicular pain with culture-expanded autologous mesenchymal stem cells: a pilot study on safety and efficacy

High impact works on stem cell transplantation in intervertebral disc degeneration

BACKGROUND

Low back pain is a major disorder that causes disability and is strongly associated with intervertebral disc degeneration (IDD). Because of the limitations of contemporary interventions, stem cell transplantation (SCT) has been increasingly used to regenerate degenerative discs. Nevertheless, analyses of high-impact papers in this field are rare. This study aimed to determine and analyze the 100 highest-cited documents on SCT in IDD.

METHODS

The 100 highest-cited documents were retrieved from the Web of Science (WoS) database. Descriptive statistics were calculated and correlation analysis was conducted to determine the relationship between WoS citations, the Altmetric Attention Score (AAS), and Dimensions citations.

RESULTS

The citation counts of the top 100 most cited papers ranged from 13 to 372. These studies were conducted in 17 countries and were published in 48 journals between 2003 and 2021. The top three contributing countries were the China (31), United States (22), and Japan (14). Bone marrow-derived stem cells were the most common type of stem cells (70.00%), followed by adipose-derived stem cells (13.75%), and nucleus pulposus-derived stem cells (7.50). Rabbit was the most studied species (41.25%), followed by rat (21.25%), human (13.75%), sheep (8.75%), dog (8.75%), and pig (6.25%). Tokai University School of Medicine (11) had the largest number of documents, followed by The University of Hong Kong (8), and Southeast University (4). Sakai D (10) was the most fruitful author, followed by Cheung KMC (6), Melrose J (3), Pettine K (3), Lotz JC (3), and Murphy MB (3). We observed a very high correlation between the WoS and Dimensions citations (p < 0.001, r = 0.994).

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the highest impact works on SCT in IDD, thereby providing a deeper understanding of the historical works related to SCT in IDD, as well as benefits for future studies in this field.

Intradiscal Autologous Biologics for the Treatment of Chronic Discogenic Low Back Pain

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this narrative review is to evaluate the efficacy of the most commonly studied intradiscal biologics used for the treatment and alleviation of chronic intractable discogenic low back pain. Additionally, it explores the therapeutic potential and durability of these novel treatment options. RECENT FINDINGS: Recently published literature highlights the therapeutic potential of intradiscal biologics, such as mesenchymal stem cells, platelet-rich plasma, and alpha-2-macroglobulin, in promoting chondrogenesis within the lumbar intervertebral discs to treat discogenic low back pain. Studies demonstrate significant improvements in pain relief, physical function, and quality of life post-treatment. A comprehensive review of the literature evaluating the efficacy of intradiscal biologics suggests some evidence supporting its efficacy in treating discogenic low back pain. However, more rigorous studies into mechanistic modulation and large-scale randomized trials as well as a more thorough understanding of adverse events will be instrumental for including these therapies into clinical practice paradigms.

CellKine clinical trial: first report from a phase 1 trial of allogeneic bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells in subjects with painful lumbar facet joint arthropathy

Background

Lumbar facet joint arthropathy (LFJA) is a major cause of low back pain (LBP), with current treatments offering limited long-term benefits. Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSCs) show promise due to their immunomodulatory and trophic effects, potentially addressing underlying degenerative processes in LFJA.

Objectives

This initial report describes the outcomes of the first treated patient in an ongoing mutidisciplinary phase 1 clinical trial evaluating the safety and feasibility of intra-articular allogeneic BM-MSCs for painful LFJA.

Methods

Following enrollment in our IRB-approved protocol, symptomatic LFJA was confirmed through double blocks on L4 and L5 medial branches. Two 1-mL syringes, each containing 10 million BM-MSCs, were prepared in the cGMP facility and administered bilaterally to the patient's L4-L5 lumbar facet joints. The patient underwent standardized follow-ups, including clinical examinations and functional and imaging assessments for 2 years, utilizing patient-reported outcomes measurement information system-computer adaptive tests (PROMIS CATs), visual analogue scale, Oswestry disability index, work functional status and opioid pain medication use, and MR imaging Fenton-Czervionke score.

Results

The patient tolerated the procedure well, with no drug-related adverse events during the study period. Pain, spine function, and work functional status improved at multiple follow-ups. This patient also reported improvements in mental and social health, along with a notable improvement in the grade of facet synovitis observed at the one-year follow-up MRI evaluation.

Conclusions

This case report suggests the safety and feasibility of administering intra-articular allogeneic BM-MSCs, offering therapeutic benefits for pain management and functional activities.

Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines on Regenerative Medicine Treatment for Chronic Pain: A Consensus Report from a Multispecialty Working Group

Purpose

Injectable biologics have not only been described and developed to treat dermal wounds, cardiovascular disease, and cancer, but have also been reported to treat chronic pain conditions. Despite emerging evidence supporting regenerative medicine therapy for pain, many aspects remain controversial.

Methods

The American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN) identified the educational need for an evidence-based guideline on regenerative medicine therapy for chronic pain. The executive board nominated experts spanning multiple specialties including anesthesiology, physical medicine and rehabilitation, and sports medicine based on expertise, publications, research, and clinical practice. A steering committee selected preliminary questions, which were reviewed and refined. Evidence was appraised using the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) criteria for evidence level and degree of recommendation. Using a modified Delphi approach, consensus points were distributed to all collaborators and each collaborator voted on each point. If collaborators provided a decision of "disagree" or "abstain", they were invited to provide a rationale in a non-blinded fashion to the committee chair, who incorporated the respective comments and distributed revised versions to the committee until consensus was achieved.

Results

Sixteen questions were selected for guideline development. Questions that were addressed included type of injectable biologics and mechanism, evidence in treating chronic pain indications (eg, tendinopathy, muscular pathology, osteoarthritis, intervertebral disc disease, neuropathic pain), role in surgical augmentation, dosing, comparative efficacy between injectable biologics, peri-procedural practices to optimize therapeutic response and quality of injectate, federal regulations, and complications with mitigating strategies.

Conclusion

In well-selected individuals with certain chronic pain indications, use of injectable biologics may provide superior analgesia, functionality, and/or quality of life compared to conventional medical management or placebo. Future high-quality randomized clinical trials are warranted with implementation of minimum reporting standards, standardization of preparation protocols, investigation of dose-response associations, and comparative analysis between different injectable biologics.

Orthobiologic Management Options for Degenerative Disc Disease

Degenerative disc disease (DDD) is a pervasive condition that limits quality of life and burdens economies worldwide. Conventional pharmacological treatments primarily aimed at slowing the progression of degeneration have demonstrated limited long-term efficacy and often do not address the underlying causes of the disease. On the other hand, orthobiologics are regenerative agents derived from the patient's own tissue and represent a promising emerging therapy for degenerative disc disease. This review comprehensively outlines the pathophysiology of DDD, highlighting the inadequacies of existing pharmacological therapies and detailing the potential of orthobiologic approaches. It explores advanced tools such as platelet-rich plasma and mesenchymal stem cells, providing a historical overview of their development within regenerative medicine, from foundational in vitro studies to preclinical animal models. Moreover, the manuscript delves into clinical trials that assess the effectiveness of these therapies in managing DDD. While the current clinical evidence is promising, it remains insufficient for routine clinical adoption due to limitations in study designs. The review emphasizes the need for further research to optimize these therapies for consistent and effective clinical outcomes, potentially revolutionizing the management of DDD and offering renewed hope for patients.

Image-Guided Minimally Invasive Treatment Options for Degenerative Lumbar Spine Disease: A Practical Overview of Current Possibilities

Lumbar back pain is one of the main causes of disability around the world. Most patients will complain of back pain at least once in their lifetime. The degenerative spine is considered the main cause and is extremely common in the elderly population. Consequently, treatment-related costs are a major burden to the healthcare system in developed and undeveloped countries. After the failure of conservative treatments or to avoid daily chronic drug intake, invasive treatments should be suggested. In a world where many patients reject surgery and prefer minimally invasive procedures, interventional radiology is pivotal in pain management and could represent a bridge between medical therapy and surgical treatment. We herein report the different image-guided procedures that can be used to manage degenerative spine-related low back pain. Particularly, we will focus on indications, different techniques, and treatment outcomes reported in the literature. This literature review focuses on the different minimally invasive percutaneous treatments currently available, underlining the central role of radiologists having the capability to use high-end imaging technology for diagnosis and subsequent treatment, allowing a global approach, reducing unnecessary surgeries and prolonged pain-reliever drug intake with their consequent related complications, improving patients' quality of life, and reducing the economic burden.

Hotspot Analysis and Frontier Exploration of Stem Cell Research in Intervertebral Disc Regeneration and Repair: A Bibliometric and Visualization Study

BACKGROUND

Stem cells have shown tremendous potential and vast prospects in the research of intervertebral disc (IVD) regeneration and repair, attracting considerable attention in recent years. In this study, a bibliometric analysis and visualization techniques were employed to probe and analyze the hotspots and frontiers of stem cell research in IVD regeneration and repair, aiming to provide valuable references and insights for further investigations.

METHODS

This study utilized the Science Citation Index Expanded from the Web of Science Core Collection database to retrieve and extract relevant literature records as research samples. Visual analysis tools such as VOSviewer 1.6.19, CiteSpace 6.2.R4, and bibliometric online analysis platforms were employed to construct scientific knowledge maps, providing a comprehensive and systematic exposition from various perspectives including collaboration networks, cocitation networks, and co-occurrence networks.

RESULTS

A total of 1075 relevant studies have been published in 303 journals by 4181 authors from 1198 institutions across 54 countries/regions. Over the past 20 years, the field of research has witnessed a significant growth in annual publications and citations. China and the United States have emerged as the primary participants and contributors, with the AO Research Institute Davos, Zhejiang University, and Tokai University being the top 3 leading research institutions. The most productive and highly cited author is Sakai D, who is regarded as a key leader in this research field. The journals with the highest number of publications and citations are Spine and Biomaterials, which are considered to be high-quality and authoritative core journals in this field. The current research focuses primarily on the sources and selection of stem cells, optimization of transplantation strategies, mechanisms of IVD regeneration, and the combined application of stem cells and biomaterials. However, there are still some challenges that need to be addressed, including posttransplantation stability, assessment of regenerative effects, and translation into clinical applications. Future research will concentrate on the diversity of stem cell sources, the application of novel biomaterials, personalized treatments, and the development of gene editing technologies, among other cutting-edge directions.

CONCLUSIONS

This study utilized bibliometric analysis and visualization techniques to unveil the hotspots and frontiers in the research on stem cells for IVD regeneration and repair. These research findings provide essential guidance and references for further experimental design and clinical applications. However, additional experiments and clinical studies are still needed to address the challenges and difficulties faced in the field of IVD regeneration and repair, thus offering novel strategies and approaches for the treatment of IVD diseases.

Stem cell therapy for degenerative disc disease: Bridging the gap between preclinical promise and clinical potential

Stem cell therapy has gained attention in the field of regenerative medicine due to its potential to restore damaged tissue. This article focuses on the application of stem cell therapy for treating spinal pathologies, particularly intervertebral disc degeneration. Disc degeneration is a major cause of low back pain and is characterized by changes in the matrix and inflammation. Animal studies have demonstrated that the implantation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) yields promising results, including increased disc height, improved hydration, and reduced inflammation. However, the number of clinical trials remains limited, necessitating further research to optimize MSCs therapy. Although preclinical studies offer valuable insights, caution is needed when extrapolating these findings to clinical practice. Stem cell therapy still faces multiple challenges, such as the durability and survival of MSCs upon implantation, uncertain pathways to discogenic differentiation, and the adverse impact of a harsh microenvironment on cell survival. The avascular nature of the intervertebral disc and dynamic loading conditions also affect the adaptation of transplanted cells. Despite these obstacles, stem cell therapy holds promise as a potential treatment for disc degeneration, and ongoing research aims to fill the current gap in conclusive data.

Biological Therapeutic Modalities for Intervertebral Disc Diseases: An Orthoregeneration Network (ON) Foundation Review

Orthoregeneration is defined as a solution for orthopaedic conditions that harnesses the benefits of biology to improve healing, reduce pain, improve function, and, optimally, provide an environment for tissue regeneration. Options include drugs, surgical intervention, scaffolds, biologics as a product of cells, and physical and electromagnetic stimuli. The goal of regenerative medicine is to enhance the healing of tissue after musculoskeletal injuries as both isolated treatment and adjunct to surgical management, using novel therapies to improve recovery and outcomes. Various orthopaedic biologics (orthobiologics) have been investigated for the treatment of pathology involving the spine, including lower back pain, with or without numbness and/or dysfunction in the lower extremities, disc herniation, spinal stenosis, and spondylolisthesis. Promising and established treatment modalities include repair of the annulus fibrosis, injection of expanded or nonexpanded autologous or allogenic cells that are chondrogenic or from a stem cell lineage used to promote matrix tissue regeneration of the intervertebral disc, including nucleus pulpous cells and mesenchymal stem cells isolated from bone marrow, umbilical cord blood, or adipose tissue; and injection of platelet-rich plasma, platelet-rich fibrin, or fibrin sealant. Early clinical studies show promise for pain reduction and functional recovery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V, expert opinion.

Neochlorogenic Acid Combined with Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells Encapsulated into GelMA Hydrogel for Transplantation to Repair Intervertebral Disk Degeneration

Intervertebral disk degeneration is a common disease with an unknown etiology. Currently, tissue engineering is considered to be an important method for intervertebral disk repair. Although transplanted stem cells may disrupt the repair process because of apoptosis caused by the oxidative microenvironment. Herein, bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell (BMSC) and Neochlorogenic acid (Ncg) were encapsulated into a GelMA hydrogel as a carrier to protect transplanted stem cells. Ncg effectively inhibited the oxidative stress process and reduced the apoptosis rate. A 5% GelMA hydrogel had a large pore size and porosity that provided an enhanced survival space for cells. An in vivo assessment showed that treatment with GelMA + BMSC + Ncg produced greater repair of degenerated intervertebral disks than that found in other model groups. Thus, this study may help contribute to improving stem cell transplantation for treating intervertebral disk degeneration.

Safety of bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cell extracellular vesicle injection for lumbar facet joint pain

Aim: A 3-month pilot study to evaluate the safety of injecting a bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cell extracellular vesicle advanced investigational product (IP) into the lumbar facet joint space as a treatment for chronic low back pain. Methods: 20 healthy adults were treated with IP injections (0.5 ml/joint) and evaluated by three functional assessments 1, 3, 7, 14, 30, 60 and 90 days later. Results: No adverse effects or complications occurred across the 3-month follow-up. There were no reports of worsening pain. After 3 months group average scores improved significantly (p < 0.0001) in the Severity Index (65.04%), Interference Index (72.09%) and Oswestry Disability Index (58.43%) assessments. Conclusion: IP injections were safe and associated with significant functional improvements.

Safety and Feasibility of Intradiscal Administration of Matrilin-3-Primed Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stromal Cell Spheroids for Chronic Discogenic Low Back Pain: Phase 1 Clinical Trial

Functionally enhanced mesenchymal stromal cells participate in the repair of intervertebral disc. This study aimed to assess the safety and tolerability of intradiscal administration of matrilin-3-primed adipose-derived stromal cell (ASC) spheroids with hyaluronic acid (HA) in patients with chronic discogenic low back pain (LBP). In this single-arm, open-label phase I clinical trial, eight patients with chronic discogenic LBP were observed over 6 months. Each patient underwent a one-time intradiscal injection of 1 mL of 6.0 × 106 cells/disc combined with HA under real-time fluoroscopic guidance. Safety and feasibility were gauged using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores and magnetic resonance imaging. All participants remained in the trial, with no reported adverse events linked to the procedure or stem cells. A successful outcome-marked by a minimum 2-point improvement in the VAS pain score and a 10-point improvement in ODI score from the start were observed in six participants. Although the modified Pfirrmann grade remained consistent across all participants, radiological improvements were evident in four patients. Specifically, two patients exhibited reduced high-intensity zones while another two demonstrated decreased disc protrusion. In conclusion, the intradiscal application of matrilin-3-primed ASC spheroids with HA is a safe and feasible treatment option for chronic discogenic LBP.

Osteoarthritis—The Role of Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Cartilage Regeneration

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a condition that can cause substantial pain, loss of joint function, and a decline in quality of life in patients. Numerous risk factors, including aging, genetics, and injury, have a role in the onset of OA, characterized by structural changes within the joints. Most therapeutic approaches focus on the symptoms and try to change or improve the structure of the joint tissues. Even so, no treatments have been able to stop or slow the progression of OA or give effective and long-lasting relief of symptoms. In the absence of disease-modifying drugs, regenerative medicine is being investigated as a possible treatment that can change the course of OA by changing the structure of damaged articular cartilage. In regenerative therapy for OA, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been the mainstay of translational investigations and clinical applications. In recent years, MSCs have been discovered to be an appropriate cell source for treating OA due to their ability to expand rapidly in culture, their nontumorigenic nature, and their ease of collection. MSCs’ anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory capabilities may provide a more favorable local environment for the regeneration of injured articular cartilage, which was thought to be one of the reasons why they were seen as more suited for OA. In addition to bone marrow, MSCs have also been isolated from adipose tissue, synovium, umbilical cord, cord blood, dental pulp, placenta, periosteum, and skeletal muscle. Adipose tissue and bone marrow are two of the most essential tissues for therapeutic MSCs. Positive preclinical and clinical trial results have shown that, despite current limitations and risks, MSC-based therapy is becoming a promising approach to regenerative medicine in treating OA.

Innovative design of minimal invasive biodegradable poly(glycerol-dodecanoate) nucleus pulposus scaffold with function regeneration

Minimally invasive biodegradable implants with regeneration have been a frontier trend in clinic. Degeneration of nucleus pulposus (NP) is irreversible in most of spine diseases, and traditional spinal fusion or discectomy usually injure adjacent segments. Here, an innovative minimally invasive biodegradable NP scaffold with function regeneration inspired by cucumber tendril is developed using shape memory polymer poly(glycerol-dodecanoate) (PGD), whose mechanical property is controlled to the similar with human NP by adjusting synthetic parameters. The chemokine stromal cell-derived factor-1α (SDF-1α) is immobilized to the scaffold recruiting autologous stem cells from peripheral tissue, which has better ability of maintaining disc height, recruiting autologous stem cells, and inducing regeneration of NP in vivo compared to PGD without chemokine group and hydrogel groups significantly. It provides an innovative way to design minimally invasive implants with biodegradation and functional recovery, especially for irreversible tissue injury, including NP, cartilage and so on.

Stem cells and discogenic back pain

BACKGROUND

Chronic low back pain, common from the sixth decade, negatively impacts the quality of life of patients and health care systems. Recently, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been introduced in the management of degenerative discogenic pain. The present study summarizes the current knowledge on the effectiveness of MSCs in patients with discogenic back pain.

SOURCES OF DATA

We performed a systematic review of the literature following the PRISMA guidelines. We searched PubMed and Google Scholar database, and identified 14 articles about management of chronic low back pain with MSCs injection therapy. We recorded information on type of stem cells employed, culture medium, clinical scores and MRI outcomes.

AREAS OF AGREEMENT

We identified a total of 303 patients. Ten studies used bone marrow stem cells. In the other four studies, different stem cells were used (of adipose, umbilical, or chondrocytic origin and a pre-packaged product). The most commonly used scores were Visual Analogue Scale and Oswestry Disability Index.

AREAS OF CONTROVERSY

There are few studies with many missing data.

GROWING POINTS

The studies analysed demonstrate that intradiscal injections of MSCs are effective on discogenic low-back pain. This effect may result from inhibition of nociceptors, reduction of catabolism and repair of injured or degenerated tissues.

AREAS TIMELY FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH

Further research should define the most effective procedure, trying to standardize a single method.

Mesenchymal stem cells can improve discogenic pain in patients with intervertebral disc degeneration: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: The meta-analysis aimed to estimate the efficacy of mesenchymal stem cells on lumbar discogenic pain in patients with intervertebral disc degeneration. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in the PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and Cochrane Library databases with predetermined search strategy up to 18 September 2022. The clinical studies focusing on evaluating the efficacy and safety of mesenchymal stem cells in patients with intervertebral disc degeneration were identified. The primary outcomes were changes of pain score and Oswestry Disability Index. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for cohort studies was used for quality assessment. Review Manager was used to conduct the statistical analysis. Pooled risk ratios were calculated based on the random effect model. Heterogeneity, subgroup, and publication bias analyses were also performed. Results: There were 2,392 studies were identified in the initial search, and 9 eligible studies with 245 patients were eventually included in this review. The Visual Analogue Scale score was significantly lower in patients after receiving mesenchymal stem cells therapy (mean difference = 41.62; 95% confidence interval 24.32 to 58.93; Heterogeneity: I² = 98%; p < 0.01). And the pooled mean difference of Oswestry Disability Index was 22.04 from baseline to final follow-up points (95% confidence interval 8.75 to 35.33; p = 0.001; Heterogeneity: I² = 98%; p < 0.001). The pooled reoperation proportion was 0.074 (95% confidence interval 0.009 to 0.175; Heterogeneity: I² = 72%; p < 0.01). There were no serious related adverse events associated with the therapy. Conclusion: The findings of this meta-analysis indicated that mesenchymal stem cells therapy may be effective in relieving pain and improving Oswestry Disability Index significantly in patients with lumbar discogenic pain. Mesenchymal stem cells therapy may also be associated with a lower risk of adverse events and reoperation rates.

FactFinders for patient safety: Understanding potential procedure-related complications: RFN/multifidus atrophy, intradiscal biologics, and facet cyst rupture

This series of FactFinders presents a brief summary of the evidence and outlines recommendations to improve our understanding and management of several potential procedure-related complications. The evidence in support of the following facts is presented: (1) Multifidus Atrophy After Lumbar Medial Branch Radiofrequency Neurotomy (LMBRFN) -- There is no conclusive published literature indicating that LMBRFN leads to increased multifidus atrophy relative to natural history. High-quality prospective studies with a natural history comparison group evaluating immediate pre-procedure as well as post-procedure longitudinal cross-sectional imaging are needed to accurately assess for any possible influence of LMBRFN on multifidus atrophy as well as the clinical relevance. (2) Intradiscal Biologics -- Although the available evidence on intradiscal biologic interventions is limited, it nonetheless shows a non-zero risk of complications. Until larger sample sizes are reported, the actual magnitude of the risk cannot be ascertained. In the meantime, physicians who perform intradiscal injections of biologics should conscientiously consider the risk-benefit of these procedures. (3) Lumbar Facet Synovial Cyst Rupture -- There have been few reports of complications secondary to lumbar facet synovial cyst rupture. Risks of may include increased pain, infection, and nerve root compression.

Potential Role for Stem Cell Regenerative Therapy as a Treatment for Degenerative Disc Disease and Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review

Back pain is the single leading cause of disability worldwide. Despite the prevalence and morbidity of lower back pain, we still lack a gold-standard treatment that restores the physiological function of degenerated intervertebral discs. Recently, stem cells have emerged as a promising strategy for regenerative therapy for degenerative disc disease. In this study, we review the etiology, pathogenesis, and developing treatment strategies for disc degeneration in low back pain with a focus on regenerative stem cell therapies. A systematic search of PubMed/MEDLINE/Embase/Clinical Trials.gov databases was conducted for all human subject abstracts or studies. There was a total of 10 abstracts and 11 clinical studies (1 RCT) that met the inclusion criteria. The molecular mechanism, approach, and progress of the different stem cell strategies in all studies are discussed, including allogenic bone marrow, allogenic discogenic cells, autologous bone marrow, adipose mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), human umbilical cord MSC, adult juvenile chondrocytes, autologous disc derived chondrocytes, and withdrawn studies. Clinical success with animal model studies is promising; however, the clinical outcomes of stem cell regenerative therapy remain poorly understood. In this systematic review, we found no evidence to support its use in humans. Further studies on efficacy, safety, and optimal patient selection will establish whether this becomes a viable, non-invasive therapeutic option for back pain.

Research trends and hotspots of mesenchymal stromal cells in intervertebral disc degeneration: a scientometric analysis

Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) are important potential candidates for regenerative therapy for intervertebral disc degeneration (IDD). This scientometric study aimed to summarize the main research trends, identify current research hotspots, and measure the networks of the contributors and their scientific productivity. A total of 1102 publications regarding MSC in IDD were recognized from January 2000 to April 2022. The number of records every year followed an overall uptrend with fluctuations. The main trend of research demonstrated the practice of gradually applying MSC-based therapy to IDD with the assistance of advances in biomaterials and IDD pathology. A recent focus on MSC-derived exosomes and notochordal cells was detected. The basic studies in this field were mainly contributed to by Japan, the USA, and European countries, while China dominated in the number of recent publications. Tokai University with Daisuke Sakai was the most productive contributor. Cell biology, tissue engineering, and biomaterials were the categories with deep engagement in research of this field.

Comprehensive narrative review on the analysis of outcomes from cell transplantation clinical trials for discogenic low back pain

Background

Intervertebral disc (IVD) degeneration is one of the primary causes of low back pain (LBP) and despite a prominent prevalence, present treatment options remain inadequate for a large portion of LBP patients. New developments in regenerative therapeutics offer potentially powerful medical tools to modify this pathology, with specific focus on (stem) cell transplantations. Multiple clinical trials have since reported overall beneficial outcomes favoring cell therapy. Nonetheless, the significance of these improvements is often not (clearly) discussed. As such, this narrative review aims to summarize the significance of the reported improvements from human clinical trials on IVD-targeted cell therapy.

Methods

Through a comprehensive narrative review we discuss the improvements in pain, disability, quality of life, and imaging modalities and reported adverse events following cell therapy for discogenic pain.

Results

Most clinical trials were able to report clear and significant improvements in pain and disability outcomes. Imaging and quality of life improvements however were not as clearly reported but did present some enhancements for a select number of patients. Finally, whether cell therapy can outperform placebo treatment remains intangible.

Conclusions

Our review highlights the clinical significance of observed trends in pain and disability improvement. Nevertheless, reporting quality was found unsatisfactory and large-scale randomized controlled studies remain small in number. Future studies and articles should put more emphasis on improvements in imaging modalities and compare outcomes to (placebo) control groups to fully elucidate the efficacy and safety of cellular therapeutics against LBP.

The American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN) Evidence-Based Clinical Guideline of Interventional Treatments for Low Back Pain

Introduction

Painful lumbar spinal disorders represent a leading cause of disability in the US and worldwide. Interventional treatments for lumbar disorders are an effective treatment for the pain and disability from low back pain. Although many established and emerging interventional procedures are currently available, there exists a need for a defined guideline for their appropriateness, effectiveness, and safety.

Objective

The ASPN Back Guideline was developed to provide clinicians the most comprehensive review of interventional treatments for lower back disorders. Clinicians should utilize the ASPN Back Guideline to evaluate the quality of the literature, safety, and efficacy of interventional treatments for lower back disorders.

Methods

The American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN) identified an educational need for a comprehensive clinical guideline to provide evidence-based recommendations. Experts from the fields of Anesthesiology, Physiatry, Neurology, Neurosurgery, Radiology, and Pain Psychology developed the ASPN Back Guideline. The world literature in English was searched using Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, BioMed Central, Web of Science, Google Scholar, PubMed, Current Contents Connect, Scopus, and meeting abstracts to identify and compile the evidence (per section) for back-related pain. Search words were selected based upon the section represented. Identified peer-reviewed literature was critiqued using United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) criteria and consensus points are presented.

Results

After a comprehensive review and analysis of the available evidence, the ASPN Back Guideline group was able to rate the literature and provide therapy grades to each of the most commonly available interventional treatments for low back pain.

Conclusion

The ASPN Back Guideline represents the first comprehensive analysis and grading of the existing and emerging interventional treatments available for low back pain. This will be a living document which will be periodically updated to the current standard of care based on the available evidence within peer-reviewed literature.

The Analgesic Efficacy of Intradiscal Injection of Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate and Culture-Expanded Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stromal Cells in Discogenic Pain: A Systematic Review

Pain originating from the intervertebral disc (discogenic pain) is a prevalent manifestation of low back pain and is often challenging to treat. Of recent interest, regenerative medicine options with injectable biologics have been trialed in discogenic pain and a wide variety of other painful musculoskeletal conditions. In particular, the role of bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) and culture-expanded bone marrow derived mesenchymal stromal cells (BM-MSCs) in treating discogenic pain remains unclear. The primary objective of this systematic review was to appraise the evidence of intradiscal injection with BMAC and culture-expanded BM-MSCs in alleviating pain intensity from discogenic pain. Secondary outcomes included changes in physical function after intradiscal injection, correlation between stromal cell count and pain intensity, and anatomical changes of the disc assessed by radiographic imaging after intradiscal injection. Overall, 16 studies consisting of 607 participants were included in qualitative synthesis without pooling. Our synthesis revealed that generally intradiscal autologous or allogeneic BMAC and culture-expanded BM-MSCs improved discogenic pain compared to baseline. Intradiscal injection was also associated with improvements in physical functioning and positive anatomical changes on spine magnetic resonance imaging (improved disc height, disc water content, Pfirrmann grading) although anatomical findings were inconsistent across studies. However, the overall GRADEscore for this study was very low due to heterogeneity and poor generalizability. There were no serious adverse events reported post intradiscal injection except for a case of discitis.

The role of microenvironment in stem cell-based regeneration of intervertebral disc

Regenerative medicine for intervertebral disc (IVD) disease, by utilizing chondrocytes, IVD cells, and stem cells, has progressed to clinical trials in the treatment of back pain, and has been studied in various animal models of disc degeneration in the past decade. Stem cells exist in their natural microenvironment, which provides vital dynamic physical and chemical signals for their survival, proliferation and function. Long-term survival, function and fate of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) depend on the microenvironment in which they are transplanted. However, the transplanted MSCs and the endogenous disc cells were influenced by the complicated microenvironment in the degenerating disc with the changes of biochemical and biophysical components. It is important to understand how the MSCs and endogenous disc cells survive and thrive in the harsh microenvironment of the degenerative disc. Furthermore, materials containing stem cells and their natural microenvironment have good clinical effects. However, the implantation of tissue engineering IVD (TE-IVD) cannot provide a complete and dynamic microenvironment for MSCs. IVD graft substitutes may need further improvement to provide the best engineered MSC microenvironment. Additionally, the IVD progenitor cells inside the stem cell niches have been regarded as popular graft cells for IVD regeneration. However, it is still unclear whether actual IVD progenitor cells exist in degenerative spinal conditions. Therefore, the purpose of this review is fourfold: to discuss the presence of endogenous stem cells; to review and summarize the effects of the microenvironment in biological characteristics of MSC, especially those from IVD; to explore the feasibility and prospects of IVD graft substitutes and to elaborate state of the art in the use of MSC transplantation for IVD degeneration in vivo as well as their clinical application.

Mesenchymal stromal/stem cells and their exosomes application in the treatment of intervertebral disc disease: A promising frontier

Today, the application of mesenchymal stromal/stem cells (MSCs) and their exosomes to treat degenerative diseases has received attention. Due to the characteristics of these cells, such as self-renewability, differentiative and immunomodulatory effects, their use in laboratory and clinical studies shows promising results. However, the allogeneic transplantation problems of MSCs limit the use of these cells in the clinic. Scientists propose the application of exosomes to use from the therapeutic effect of MSCs and overcome their defects. These vesicles change the target cell behaviour and transcription profile by transferring various cargo such as proteins, mi-RNAs, and lipids. One of the degenerative tissue diseases in which MSCs and their exosomes are used in their treatment is intervertebral disc disease (IDD). Different factors such as genetics, nutrition, ageing, and environmental factors play a significant role in the onset and progression of this disease. These factors affect the cellular and molecular properties of the disc, leading to tissue destruction. Nucleus pulposus cells (NPCs) are among the most important cells involved in the pathogenesis of disc degeneration. MSCs exert their therapeutic effects by differentiating, reducing apoptosis, increasing proliferation, and decreasing senescence in NPCs. In addition, the use of MSCs and their exosomes also affects the annulus fibrosus and cartilaginous endplate cells in disc tissue and prevents disc degeneration progression.

The involvement of immune system in intervertebral disc herniation and degeneration

Intervertebral disc (IVD) herniation and degeneration contributes significantly to low back pain (LBP), of which the molecular pathogenesis is not fully understood. Disc herniation may cause LBP and radicular pain, but not all LBP patients have disc herniation. Degenerated discs could be the source of pain, but not all degenerated discs are symptomatic. We previously found that disc degeneration and herniation accompanied by inflammation. We further found that anti-inflammatory molecules blocked immune responses, alleviated IVD degeneration and pain. Based on our recent findings and the work of others, we hypothesize that immune system may play a prominent role in the production of disc herniation or disc degeneration associated pain. While the nucleus pulposus (NP) is an immune-privileged organ, the damage of the physical barrier between NP and systemic circulation, or the innervation and vascularization of the degenerated NP, on one hand exposes NP as a foreign antigen to immune system, and on the other hand presents compression on the nerve root or dorsal root ganglion (DRG), which both elicit immune responses induced by immune cells and their mediators. The inflammation can remain for a long time at remote distance, with various types of cytokines and immune cells involved in this pain-inducing process. In this review, we aim to revisit the autoimmunity of the NP, immune cell infiltration after break of physical barrier, the inflammatory activities in the DRG and the generation of pain. We also summarize the involvement of immune system, including immune cells and cytokines, in degenerated or herniated IVDs and affected DRG.

Intradiscal injection for the management of low back pain

Low back pain (LBP) is a common clinical problem and a major cause of physical disability, imposing a prominent socioeconomic burden. Intervertebral disc degeneration (IDD) has been considered the main cause of LBP. The current treatments have limited efficacy because they cannot address the underlying degeneration. With an increased understanding of the complex pathological mechanism of IDD, various medications and biological reagents have been used for intradiscal injection for the treatment of LBP. There is increasing clinical evidence showing the benefits of these therapies on symptomatic relief and their potential for disc repair and regeneration by targeting the disrupted pathways underlying the cause of the disease. A brief overview of the potential and limitations for these therapies are provided in this review, based on the recent and available data from clinical trials and systematic reviews. Finally, future perspectives are discussed.

Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Extracellular Vesicles: Immunomodulatory Effects and Potential Applications in Intervertebral Disc Degeneration

Intervertebral disc (IVD) degenerative disease is a common health problem worldwide. Administration of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in intervertebral disc degeneration (IVDD) has been widely explored in recent years. However, transplantation of MSCs is restricted by several factors. Currently, paracrine signaling is one of the main mechanisms by which MSCs play a therapeutic role in disc regeneration. Extracellular vehicles (EVs) are the main paracrine products of MSCs. They show great potential as an effective alternative to MSCs and play immunomodulation roles such as anti-inflammatory effects, antioxidative stress, antiapoptosis, and antiextracellular matrix (ECM) degradation during treatment of IVDD. This review focuses on the immunomodulatory effect of MSC EVs and their potential applications.

Application of stem cells in the repair of intervertebral disc degeneration

Intervertebral disc degeneration (IDD) is a common disease that increases with age, and its occurrence is stressful both psychologically and financially. Stem cell therapy for IDD is emerging. For this therapy, stem cells from different sources have been proven in vitro, in vivo, and in clinical trials to relieve pain and symptoms, reverse the degeneration cascade, delay the aging process, maintain the spine shape, and retain mechanical function. However, further research is needed to explain how stem cells play these roles and what effects they produce in IDD treatment. This review aims to summarize and objectively analyse the current evidence on stem cell therapy for IDD.

Clinical Development of Regenerative Medicine Targeted for Intervertebral Disc Disease

Low back pain is critical health, social, and economic issue in modern societies. This disease is often associated with intervertebral disc degeneration; however, contemporary treatments are unable to target this underlying pathology to alleviate the pain symptoms. Cell therapy offers a promising novel therapeutic that, in theory, should be able to reduce low back pain through mitigating the degenerative disc environment. With the clinical development of cell therapeutics ongoing, this review aims to summarize reporting on the different clinical trials and assess the different regenerative strategies being undertaken to collectively obtain an impression on the potential safety and effectiveness of cell therapeutics against intervertebral disc-related diseases.

Biomaterials and Cell-Based Regenerative Therapies for Intervertebral Disc Degeneration with a Focus on Biological and Biomechanical Functional Repair: Targeting Treatments for Disc Herniation

Intervertebral disc (IVD) degeneration is a common cause of low back pain and most spinal disorders. As IVD degeneration is a major obstacle to the healthy life of so many individuals, it is a major issue that needs to be overcome. Currently, there is no clinical treatment for the regeneration of degenerated IVDs. However, recent advances in regenerative medicine and tissue engineering suggest the potential of cell-based and/or biomaterial-based IVD regeneration therapies. These treatments may be indicated for patients with IVDs in the intermediate degenerative stage, a point where the number of viable cells decreases, and the structural integrity of the disc begins to collapse. However, there are many biological, biomechanical, and clinical challenges that must be overcome before the clinical application of these IVD regeneration therapies can be realized. This review summarizes the basic research and clinical trials literature on cell-based and biomaterial-based IVD regenerative therapies and outlines the important role of these strategies in regenerative treatment for IVD degenerative diseases, especially disc herniation.

The effectiveness of intradiscal biologic treatments for discogenic low back pain: a systematic review

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

There are limited treatments for discogenic low back pain. Intradiscal injections of biologic agents such as platelet-rich plasma (PRP) or stem cells (SC) are theorized to have regenerative properties and have gained increasing interest as a possible treatment, but the evidence supporting their use in clinical practice is not yet well-defined.

PURPOSE

Determine the effectiveness of intradiscal biologics for treating discogenic low back pain.

STUDY DESIGN

PRISMA-compliant systematic review.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Patients with discogenic low back pain confirmed by provocation discography or clinical and imaging findings consistent with discogenic pain.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was the proportion of individuals with ≥50% pain relief after intradiscal biologic injection at 6 months. Secondary outcomes included ≥2-point pain score reduction on NRS; patient satisfaction; functional improvement; decreased use of other health care, including analgesics and surgery; and structural disc changes on MRI.

METHODS

Comprehensive literature search performed in 2018 and updated in 2020. Interventions included were biologic therapies including mesenchymal stem cells, platelet rich plasma, microfragmented fat, amniotic membrane-based injectates, and autologous conditioned serum. Any other treatment (sham or active) was considered for comparative studies. Studies were independently reviewed.

RESULTS

The literature search yielded 3,063 results, 37 studies were identified for full-text review, and 12 met established inclusion criteria for review. The quality of evidence on effectiveness of intradiscal biologics was very low. A single randomized controlled trial evaluating platelet-rich plasma reported positive outcomes but had significant methodological flaws. A single trial that evaluated mesenchymal stem cells was negative. Success rates for platelet-rich plasma injectate in aggregate were 54.8% (95% Confidence Interval: 40%-70%). For mesenchymal stem cells, the aggregate success rate at six months was 53.5% (95% Confidence Interval: 38.6%-68.4%), though using worst-case analysis this decreased to 40.7% (95% Confidence Interval: 28.1%-53.2%). Similarly, ≥30% functional improvement was achieved in 74.3% (95% Confidence Interval: 59.8%-88.7%) at six months but using worst-case analysis, this decreased to 44.1% (95% Confidence Interval: 28.1%-53.2%).

CONCLUSION

Limited observational data support the use of intradiscal biologic agents for the treatment of discogenic low back pain. According to the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation System, the evidence supporting use of intradiscal mesenchymal stem cells and platelet-rich plasma is very low quality.

Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Exosomes as a Novel Strategy for the Treatment of Intervertebral Disc Degeneration

Intervertebral disc degeneration (IVDD) has been reported to be the most prevalent contributor to low back pain, posing a significant strain on the healthcare systems on a global scale. Currently, there are no approved therapies available for the prevention of the progressive degeneration of intervertebral disc (IVD); however, emerging regenerative strategies that aim to restore the normal structure of the disc have been fundamentally promising. In the last decade, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have received a significant deal of interest for the treatment of IVDD due to their differentiation potential, immunoregulatory capabilities, and capability to be cultured and regulated in a favorable environment. Recent investigations show that the pleiotropic impacts of MSCs are regulated by the production of soluble paracrine factors. Exosomes play an important role in regulating such effects. In this review, we have summarized the current treatments for disc degenerative diseases and their limitations and highlighted the therapeutic role and its underlying mechanism of MSC-derived exosomes in IVDD, as well as the possible future developments for exosomes.

Innovative Biological Treatment Methods for Degenerative Disc Disease

Low back pain is the leading cause of work absences and years lived with disability, and it is often associated with degenerative disc disease. In recent years, biological treatment approaches such as the use of growth factors, cell injections, annulus fibrosus (AF) repair, nucleus pulposus replacement, and tissue-engineered discs have been explored as means for preventing or reversing degenerative disc disease. Both animal and clinical studies have shown promising results for cell-based therapy on the grounds of its regenerative potential. Clinical data also indicate that stem cell injection is safe when appropriately performed, albeit its long-term safety and efficacy are yet to be explored. Numerous challenges also remain to be overcome, such as isolating, differentiating, and preconditioning the disc cells, as well as managing the nutrient-deficient and oxygen-deficient micromilieu of the intervertebral disc (IVD). AF repair methods including devices used in clinical trials have shown success in decreasing reherniation rates and improving overall clinical outcomes. In addition, recent studies that combined AF repair and nucleus pulposus replacement have shown improved biomechanical stability in IVDs after the combined treatment. Tissue-engineered IVDs for total disc replacement are still being developed, and future studies are necessary to overcome the challenges in their delivery, efficacy, and safety.

Regenerative Medicine Modalities for the Treatment of Degenerative Disk Disease

Degenerative disk disease is a pathologic state associated with axial skeletal pain, radiculopathy, and myelopathy, and will inevitably increase in prevalence in parallel with an aging population. The objective of regenerative medicine is to convert the inflammatory, catabolic microenvironment of degenerative disease into an anti-inflammatory, anabolic environment. This comprehensive review discusses and outlines both in vitro and in vivo efficacy of regenerative treatment modalities for degenerative disk disease, such as; mesenchymal stem cells, gene therapy, tissue engineering, and biologic treatments. To date, clinical applications have been limited secondary to a lack of standardized high quality clinical data. Additional research should focus on determining the optimal cellular makeup and concentration for each of these interventions. Nevertheless, modern medicine provides a new avenue of confronting disease, with methods surpassing traditional methods of removing the pathology in question, as regenerative medicine provides the opportunity to recover from the diseased state.

Cell sources proposed for nucleus pulposus regeneration

Lower back pain (LBP) occurs in 80% of adults in their lifetime; resulting in LBP being one of the biggest causes of disability worldwide. Chronic LBP has been linked to the degeneration of the intervertebral disc (IVD). The current treatments for chronic back pain only provide alleviation of symptoms through pain relief, tissue removal, or spinal fusion; none of which target regenerating the degenerate IVD. As nucleus pulposus (NP) degeneration is thought to represent a key initiation site of IVD degeneration, cell therapy that specifically targets the restoration of the NP has been reviewed here. A literature search to quantitatively assess all cell types used in NP regeneration was undertaken. With key cell sources: NP cells; annulus fibrosus cells; notochordal cells; chondrocytes; bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells; adipose-derived stromal cells; and induced pluripotent stem cells extensively analyzed for their regenerative potential of the NP. This review highlights: accessibility; expansion capability in vitro; cell survival in an IVD environment; regenerative potential; and safety for these key potential cell sources. In conclusion, while several potential cell sources have been proposed, iPSC may provide the most promising regenerative potential.

Patient-specific apparent diffusion maps used to model nutrient availability in degenerated intervertebral discs

INTRODUCTION

In this study, magnetic resonance imaging data was used to (1) model IVD-specific gradients of glucose, oxygen, lactate, and pH; and (2) investigate possible effects of covariate factors (i.e., disc geometry, and mean apparent diffusion coefficient values) on the IVD's microenvironment. Mathematical modeling of the patient's specific IVD microenvironment could be important when selecting patients for stem cell therapy due to the increased nutrient demand created by that treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Disc geometry and water diffusion coefficients were extracted from MRIs of 37 patients using sagittal T1-weighted images, T2-weighted images, and ADC Maps. A 2-D steady state finite element mathematical model was developed in COMSOL Multiphysics® 5.4 to compute concentration maps of glucose, oxygen, lactate and pH.

RESULTS

Concentration of nutrients (i.e., glucose, and oxygen) dropped with increasing distance from the cartilaginous endplates (CEP), whereas acidity levels increased. Most discs experienced poor nutrient levels along with high acidity values in the inner annulus fibrosus (AF). The disc's physiological microenvironment became more deficient as degeneration progressed. For example, minimum glucose concentration in grade 4 dropped by 31.1% compared to grade 3 (p < 0.0001). The model further suggested a strong effect of the following parameters: disc size, AF and CEP diffusivities, metabolic reactions, and cell density on solute concentrations in the disc (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The significance of this work implies that the individual morphology and physiological conditions of each disc, even among discs of the same Pfirrmann grade, should be evaluated when modeling IVD solute concentrations.

Placental Mesenchymal Stromal Cells: Preclinical Safety Evaluation for Fetal Myelomeningocele Repair

BACKGROUND

Myelomeningocele (MMC) is the congenital failure of neural tube closure in utero, for which the standard of care is prenatal surgical repair. We developed clinical-grade placental mesenchymal stromal cells seeded on a dural extracellular matrix (PMSC-ECM), which have been shown to improve motor outcomes in preclinical ovine models. To evaluate the long-term safety of this product prior to use in a clinical trial, we conducted safety testing in a murine model.

METHODS

Clinical grade PMSCs obtained from donor human placentas were seeded onto a 6 mm diameter ECM at a density of 3 × 105 cells/cm2. Immunodeficient mice were randomized to receive either an ECM only or PMSC-ECM administered into a subcutaneous pocket. Mice were monitored for tumor formation until two study endpoints: 4 wk and 6 mo. Pathology and histology on all tissues was performed to evaluate for tumors. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) was performed to evaluate for the presence of human DNA, which would indicate persistence of PMSCs.

RESULTS

Fifty-four mice were included; 13 received ECM only and 14 received PMSC-ECM in both the 4-wk and 6-mo groups. No mice had gross or microscopic evidence of tumor development. A nodular focus of mature fibrous connective tissue was identified at the subcutaneous implantation pocket in the majority of mice with no significant difference between ECM only and PMSC-ECM groups (P = 0.32 at 4 wk, P > 0.99 at 6 mo). Additionally, no human DNA was detected by qPCR in any mice at either time point.

CONCLUSIONS

Subcutaneous implantation of the PMSC-ECM product did not result in tumor formation and we found no evidence that PMSCs persisted. These results support the safety of the PMSC-ECM product for use in a Phase 1/2a human clinical trial evaluating fetal MMC repair augmented with PMSC-ECM.

Influence of extracellular nanovesicles derived from adipose-derived stem cells on nucleus pulposus cell from patients with intervertebral disc degeneration

An increasing number of individuals are suffering from lower back and neck pain caused by intervertebral disc degeneration each year. Although the application of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) has provided desirable results in the treatment of intervertebral disc degeneration, there are multiple risks associated with the directed application of MSCs. An increasing number of studies have suggested that stem cells, through the release of extracellular nanovesicles, have vital functions in tissue regeneration and repair with low risk. The present study investigated the effect of extracellular nanovesicles derived from adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) on nucleus pulposus (NP) cells from patients with intervertebral disc degeneration. Human NP cells were obtained from patients with intervertebral disc degeneration undergoing surgical procedures in addition to ADSCs from liposuction patients. ADSC-derived extracellular nanovesicles were isolated and characterized. The differentiation and biological activity of NP cells cultured with or without ADSC-derived extracellular nanovesicles were assessed and inflammatory factors and intervertebral disc degeneration-associated markers were also measured. The results indicated that extracellular nanovesicles derived from ADSCs increased the migration and proliferation of NP cells and inhibited inflammatory activity, suggesting their utility for the treatment of intervertebral disc degeneration.

Integrins, cadherins and channels in cartilage mechanotransduction: perspectives for future regeneration strategies

Articular cartilage consists of hyaline cartilage, is a major constituent of the human musculoskeletal system and has critical functions in frictionless joint movement and articular homoeostasis. Osteoarthritis (OA) is an inflammatory disease of articular cartilage, which promotes joint degeneration. Although it affects millions of people, there are no satisfying therapies that address this disease at the molecular level. Therefore, tissue regeneration approaches aim at modifying chondrocyte biology to mitigate the consequences of OA. This requires appropriate biochemical and biophysical stimulation of cells. Regarding the latter, mechanotransduction of chondrocytes and their precursor cells has become increasingly important over the last few decades. Mechanotransduction is the transformation of external biophysical stimuli into intracellular biochemical signals, involving sensor molecules at the cell surface and intracellular signalling molecules, so-called mechano-sensors and -transducers. These signalling events determine cell behaviour. Mechanotransducing ion channels and gap junctions additionally govern chondrocyte physiology. It is of great scientific and medical interest to induce a specific cell behaviour by controlling these mechanotransduction pathways and to translate this knowledge into regenerative clinical therapies. This review therefore focuses on the mechanotransduction properties of integrins, cadherins and ion channels in cartilaginous tissues to provide perspectives for cartilage regeneration.

Selective Retention of Bone Marrow Stromal Cells with Gelatin Sponge for Repair of Intervertebral Disc Defects after Microendoscopic Discectomy: A Prospective Controlled Study and 2-Year Follow-Up

Objective

Discectomy remains the classic procedure for treating lumbar intervertebral disc (IVD) herniation, but the occurrence of defects after discectomy is thought to be an important cause generating recurrent and accelerated IVD degeneration. Previous studies attempted suture of the annulus fissure, but the validity of this technique on restraining the degenerative process is controversial. On the other hand, cell therapies have been shown in multiple clinical and basic studies. Our purpose was to investigate the effectiveness of selective retention of autologous Bone Marrow Stromal Cells (BMSCs) with gelatin sponge in combination with annulus fibrosus suture (AFS) for the repair of IVD defects following mobile microendoscopic discectomy (MMED).

Methods

This prospective, two-armed, and controlled clinical study was conducted from December 2016 to December 2018. Written informed consent was obtained from each patient. Forty-five patients with typical symptoms, positive signs of radiculopathy, and obvious lumbar disc herniation observed by MRI were enrolled. Patients were divided into 3 groups with different treating methods: MMED (n = 15), MMED+AFS (n = 15), and MMED+AFS+BMSCs (n = 15). A postoperative 2-year follow-up was performed to evaluate the patient-reported outcomes of VAS, ODI, and SF-36. The improvement rate of VAS and ODI was calculated as [(latest‐preoperative)/preoperative] to evaluate the therapeutic effect of the three groups. Assessment parameters included Pfirrmann grade, intervertebral disc height (IDH), and disc protrusion size (DPS), as measured by MRI to evaluate the morphological changes.

Results

All patients enrolled had a postoperative follow-up at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. VAS and ODI scores were significantly improved compared to the preoperative status in all three groups with a mean DPS reduction rate over 50%. At the final follow-up, the improvement rate of the VAS score in the MMED+AFS+BMSCs group was significantly higher than the MMED+AFS and MMED groups (80.1% ± 7.6% vs. 71.3% ± 7.0% vs. 70.1% ± 7.8%), while ODI improvement showed a significant change (65.6% ± 8.8% vs. 59.9% ± 5.5% vs. 57.8% ± 8.1%). All participants showed significant improvement in SF-36 PCS and MCS; the differences between each group were not significant. The mean IDH loss rate of the MMED+AFS+BMSCs group was also significantly lower than other groups (−17.2% ± 1.3% vs. −27.6% ± 0.7% vs. −29.3% ± 2.2%). The Pfirrmann grade was aggravated in the MMED and MMED+AFS groups while maintained at the preoperative grade in the MMED+AFS+BMSCs group. No adverse events of cell transplantation or recurrence were found in all patients during the postoperative follow-up period.

Conclusions

It is feasible and effective to repair lumbar IVD defects using SCR-enriched BMSCs with gelatin sponges, which warrants further study and development as a cell-based therapy for IVD repair.

Proper animal experimental designs for preclinical research of biomaterials for intervertebral disc regeneration

Low back pain is a vital musculoskeletal disease that impairs life quality, leads to disability and imposes heavy economic burden on the society, while it is greatly attributed to intervertebral disc degeneration (IDD). However, the existing treatments, such as medicines, chiropractic adjustments and surgery, cannot achieve ideal disc regeneration. Therefore, advanced bioactive therapies are implemented, including stem cells delivery, bioreagents administration, and implantation of biomaterials etc. Among these researches, few reported unsatisfying regenerative outcomes. However, these advanced therapies have barely achieved successful clinical translation. The main reason for the inconsistency between satisfying preclinical results and poor clinical translation may largely rely on the animal models that cannot actually simulate the human disc degeneration. The inappropriate animal model also leads to difficulties in comparing the efficacies among biomaterials in different reaches. Therefore, animal models that better simulate the clinical charateristics of human IDD should be acknowledged. In addition, in vivo regenerative outcomes should be carefully evaluated to obtain robust results. Nevertheless, many researches neglect certain critical characteristics, such as adhesive properties for biomaterials blocking annulus fibrosus defects and hyperalgesia that is closely related to the clinical manifestations, e.g., low back pain. Herein, in this review, we summarized the animal models established for IDD, and highlighted the proper models and parameters that may result in acknowledged IDD models. Then, we discussed the existing biomaterials for disc regeneration and the characteristics that should be considered for regenerating different parts of discs. Finally, well-established assays and parameters for in vivo disc regeneration are explored.

Advantages and challenges of stem cell therapy for osteoarthritis (Review)

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a degenerative disorder of the cartilage and is one of the leading causes of disability, particularly amongst the elderly, wherein patients with advanced-stage OA experience chronic pain and functional impairment of the limbs, thus resulting in a significantly reduced quality of life. The currently available treatments primarily revolve around symptom management, and is thus palliative rather than curative. The aim of the present review is to briefly discuss the limitations of some of the currently available treatments for patients with OA, and highlight the value of the potential use of stem cells in cellular therapy, which is widely regarded as the breakthrough that can address the present unmet medical needs for treatment of degenerative diseases, such as OA. The advantages of stem cell therapy, particularly mesenchymal stem cells, and the challenges involved are also discussed in this review.

MicroRNA-124-3p inhibits the differentiation of precartilaginous stem cells into nucleus pulposus-like cells via targeting FSTL1

MicroRNA (miRNA/miR)-124-3p has been extensively studied in tumor biology and stem cells. However, little is known regarding its functional roles in the differentiation of precartilaginous stem cells (PSCs) into nucleus pulposus-like cells (NPLCs). In the present study, using miRNA microarray screening, it was demonstrated that the miRNA expression profiles differed between rat primary PSCs and TGF-β1-induced differentiated NPLCs, and that miR-124-3p was significantly differentially expressed during the differentiation of PSCs to NPLCs. Furthermore, RT-qPCR analysis verified that miR-124-3p expression was decreased during PSC differentiation, with the lowest levels being detected at the later stages. Subsequent experiments revealed that miR-124-3p overexpression significantly decreased the expression of the extracellular matrix proteins, aggrecan and collagen type II, which was accompanied by a significant decrease in follistatin-related protein 1 (FSTL1) expression levels. Moreover, bioinformatics analysis indicated that FSTL1 was a potential target of miR-124-3p, which was additionally verified using luciferase reporter assays. Taken together, these data revealed a specific regulatory pathway of miR-124-3p, which negatively regulated its target gene, FSTL1, during the differentiation of PSCs to NPLCs, and suggested a functional role for miR-124-3p in the differentiation of PSCs.

Risks of Intradiscal Orthobiologic Injections: A Review of the Literature and Case Series Presentation

BACKGROUND

Intervertebral disc disease (IDD) is responsible for a large portion of back pain with historically suboptimal treatments for long-term improvement. IDD pathogenesis is thought to arise at a cellular and biochemical level, making biologically based injections an area of clinical interest. Although human studies have shown promise, emerging data suggest there may be risks inherent to such injections that were previously unrecognized. The aim of this review is to summarize the known risks to date and provide mitigation steps to reduce potential complications in the future. In addition, we present a small case series of serious adverse events (SAEs) from our clinical practice.

METHODS

A literature review was performed to identify human intradiscal autologous biologic injection studies to date, including mesenchymal signaling cells (MSCs) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) preparations, which were reviewed for complications. Cases of complication following intradiscal orthobiologic injection were identified from a single outpatient center and reviewed.

RESULTS

Publications of MSC-based intradiscal injection documented 136 total patients treated with two SAEs reported, one infection and one progressive disc herniation. Publications of PRP intradiscal injection included 194 patients with one SAE reported. We also review three cases of previously unpublished SAEs, including one case of confirmed infection with Cutibacterium acnes (C acnes) and two presumed cases of discitis without pathogen confirmation. Bone marrow concentrate was the injectate in all three cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Although biologic intradiscal injection shows promise for the treatment of discogenic back pain, there are inherent risks to be considered and mitigated. We currently recommend a leukocyte-rich PRP and a two-needle delivery technique coupled with intradiscal gentamicin to mitigate the risk of postinjection spondylodiscitis. Further research is needed using large registries to not only track clinical outcomes but also complication rates.

The Application of Mesenchymal Stromal Cells and Their Homing Capabilities to Regenerate the Intervertebral Disc

Chronic low back pain (LBP) remains a challenging condition to treat, and especially to cure. If conservative treatment approaches fail, the current “gold standard” for intervertebral disc degeneration (IDD)-provoked back pain is spinal fusion. However, due to its invasive and destructive nature, the focus of orthopedic research related to the intervertebral disc (IVD) has shifted more towards cell-based therapeutic approaches. They aim to reduce or even reverse the degenerative cascade by mimicking the human body’s physiological healing system. The implementation of progenitor and/or stem cells and, in particular, the delivery of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) has revealed significant potential to cure the degenerated/injured IVD. Over the past decade, many research groups have invested efforts to find ways to utilize these cells as efficiently and sustainably as possible. This narrative literature review presents a summary of achievements made with the application of MSCs for the regeneration of the IVD in recent years, including their preclinical and clinical applications. Moreover, this review presents state-of-the-art strategies on how the homing capabilities of MSCs can be utilized to repair damaged or degenerated IVDs, as well as their current limitations and future perspectives.

Cellular transplantation and platelet-rich plasma injections for discogenic pain: a contemporary review

Degenerative disc disease (DDD) is the leading cause of chronic back pain. It is a pathologic condition associated with aging and is believed to result from catabolic excess in the intervertebral discs' (IVD) extracellular matrix. Two new treatment options are intradiscal cellular transplantation and growth factor therapy. Recent investigations on the use of these therapies are discussed and compared with emerging evidence supporting novel cellular injections. At present, human and animal studies provide a compelling rationale for the use of cellular injections in the treatment of discogenic pain. Since DDD results from the IVD extracellular matrix's unmitigated catabolism, cellular injections are used to induce regeneration and homeostasis in the IVD. Here, we review intervertebral disc anatomy, DDD pathophysiology and clinical considerations, as well as the current and emerging literature investigating outcomes associated with cellular transplantation and platelet-rich plasma for discogenic pain. Further high-quality trials are certainly warranted.

Advances in Tissue Engineering for Disc Repair

Intervertebral disc (IVD) degeneration is a leading cause of chronic low back pain (LBP) that results in serious disability and significant economic burden. IVD degeneration alters the disc structure and spine biomechanics, resulting in subsequent structural changes throughout the spine. Currently, treatments of chronic LBP due to IVD degeneration include conservative treatments, such as pain medication and physiotherapy, and surgical treatments, such as removal of herniated disc without or with spinal fusion. However, none of these treatments can completely restore a degenerated disc and its function. Thus, although the exact pathogenesis of disc degeneration remains unclear, there are studies examining the effectiveness of biological approaches, such as growth factor injection, gene therapy, and cell transplantation, in promoting IVD regeneration. Furthermore, tissue engineering using a combination of cell transplantation and biomaterials has emerged as a promising new approach for repair or restoration of degenerated discs. The main purpose of this review was to provide an overview of the current status of tissue engineering applications for IVD regenerative therapy by performing literature searches using PubMed. Significant advances in tissue engineering have opened the door to a new generation of regenerative therapies for the treatment of chronic discogenic LBP.