Gene expression profiling in uveal melanoma: technical reliability and correlation of molecular class with pathologic characteristics

15-Gene Expression Profile and PRAME as Integrated Prognostic Test for Uveal Melanoma: First Report of Collaborative Ocular Oncology Group Study No. 2 (COOG2.1)

PURPOSEValidated and accurate prognostic testing is critical for precision medicine in uveal melanoma (UM). Our aims were to (1) prospectively validate an integrated prognostic classifier combining a 15-gene expression profile (15-GEP) and PRAME RNA expression and (2) identify clinical variables that enhance the prognostic accuracy of the 15-GEP/PRAME classifier.MATERIALS AND METHODSThis study included 1,577 patients with UM of the choroid and/or ciliary body who were enrolled in the Collaborative Ocular Oncology Group Study Number 2 (COOG2) and prospectively monitored across 26 North American centers. Test results for 15-GEP (class 1 or class 2) and PRAME expression status (negative or positive) were available for all patients. The primary end point was metastasis-free survival (MFS).RESULTS15-GEP was class 1 in 1,082 (68.6%) and class 2 in 495 (31.4%) patients. PRAME status was negative in 1,106 (70.1%) and positive in 471 (29.9%) patients. Five-year MFS was 95.6% (95% CI, 93.9 to 97.4) for class 1/PRAME(-), 80.6% (95% CI, 73.9 to 87.9) for class 1/PRAME(+), 58.3% (95% CI, 51.1 to 66.4) for class 2/PRAME(-), and 44.8% (95% CI, 37.9 to 52.8) for class 2/PRAME(+). By multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis, 15-GEP was the most important independent predictor of MFS (hazard ratio [HR], 5.95 [95% CI, 4.43 to 7.99]; P < .001), followed by PRAME status (HR, 1.82 [95% CI, 1.42 to 2.33]; P < .001). The only clinical variable demonstrating additional prognostic value was tumor diameter.CONCLUSIONIn the largest prospective multicenter prognostic biomarker study performed to date in UM to our knowledge, the COOG2 study validated the superior prognostic accuracy of the integrated 15-GEP/PRAME classifier over 15-GEP alone and clinical prognostic variables. Tumor diameter was found to be the only clinical variable to provide additional prognostic information. This prognostic classifier provides an advanced resource for risk-adjusted metastatic surveillance and adjuvant trial stratification in patients with UM.

Clinical Implications of Ultrasound-Based Morphology in Choroidal Melanoma

OBJECTIVE

To describe the frequency of different B-scan morphologies and their association with clinical features and outcomes.

DESIGN

Cohort study of patients enrolled in the Prospective Ocular Tumor Study from January 2000 to January 2024 initially seen at Mayo Clinic Rochester.

PARTICIPANTS

Consecutive inclusion of patients with posterior uveal melanoma.

METHODS

B-scan ultrasounds were performed by an experienced technician and treatment modalities were implemented by the attending oncologist.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Tumors were classified by shape as observed on B-scan. Enucleation-, metastasis, -and overall survival (EFS, MTS, and OS) rates were analyzed using Cox-regression models and Kaplan-Meier curves.

RESULTS

Among 1021 cases of uveal melanoma, 739 (72.4%) were dome-shaped, 119 (11.7%) mushroom-shaped, 85 (8.3%) multilobulated, 77 (7.5%) minimally elevated, and 1 (0.1%) diffuse. The median follow-up duration after presentation was 37 months (3-324). The macula was more commonly involved in minimally elevated tumors compared to the other groups (63.6% vs. 13.8%, p<0.001). These tumors also exhibited a larger proportion of high internal reflectivity (13% vs. 2.3%, p<0.001). The multilobulated group exhibited a significantly larger diameter at baseline (median 15 mm, IQR 6.1-30), whereas the mushroom-shaped group had greater thickness (median 7.9 mm, IQR 1.3 - 17.3) compared to the other groups (p<0.001). EFS at 36 months was lower for mushroom-shaped [60.1% (95% CI, 47.7-70.3)] and multilobulated tumors [71.1% (95% CI, 55.7-82.7)]. At 36 months, multilobulated tumors had lower MFS [68.2% (95%, CI 55-78.2)] and OS [73.9% (95%, CI 59.9-83.64)]. On multivariate analysis adjusted for tumor thickness and diameter, multilobulated melanomas had a higher risk of metastasis (HR 2.08, p=0.003) and death (HR 2.38, p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Choroidal melanoma configuration by B-scan can vary from minimally elevated to dome-shaped to mushroom-shaped or multilobulated. Independent of presenting tumor size, multilobulated morphology was identified as a predictor for metastasis and death. Multilobulated melanomas, identified by a readily available tool such as ultrasonography, warrant a vigilant approach and close monitoring due to a potential association with poor prognosis.

Uveal melanoma: Current evidence on prognosis, treatment and potential developments

Uveal Melanoma (UM) is a rare disease, yet it is the most common primary intraocular malignancy in adult patients. Despite continuous advancements and research, the risk of metastasis remains high. It is possible to stratify patients according to their risk of metastases using a variety of known risk factors. Even though there is no gold standard for the prognostication of patients with uveal melanoma, it is becoming increasingly clear that combining histo-pathological, patient-related and molecular prognostic markers allows a more accurate prediction of the metastatic risk than by using one parameter. Primary UM in the eye are treated very effectively with eye-sparing radiation-based techniques or enucleation. However, it is not yet possible to prevent or treat metastases with the current therapeutic options. Nonetheless, the efforts to find new therapeutic targets continue and progress is being made, especially in the field of targeted therapy, as exemplified by the anti-gp100 bispecific molecule Tebentafusp. This review delves into the history of uveal melanoma, its incidence, presentation and diagnosis, the known prognostic factors and the treatment options, both for the primary tumour and for metastases. We show that different populations may have different risks for developing UM, and that each country should evaluate their own patients.

PRAME Expression: A Target for Cancer Immunotherapy and a Prognostic Factor in Uveal Melanoma

Purpose

Uveal melanoma (UM) is a rare disease with a high mortality, and new therapeutic options are being investigated. Preferentially Expressed Antigen in Melanoma (PRAME) is a cancer testis antigen, expressed in the testis, but also in cancers, including uveal melanoma. PRAME is considered a target for immune therapy in several cancers, and PRAME-specific T cell clones have been shown to kill UM cells.

Methods

We studied the literature on PRAME expression in hematological and solid malignancies, including UM, and its role as a target for immunotherapy. The distribution of tumor features was compared between PRAME-high and PRAME-low UM in a 64-patient cohort from the Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) and in the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) cohort of 80 cases and differential gene expression analysis was performed in the LUMC cohort.

Results

PRAME is expressed in many malignancies, it is frequently associated with a negative prognosis, and can be the target of T cell receptor (TCR)-transduced T cells, a promising treatment option with high avidity and safety. In UM, PRAME is expressed in 26% to 45% of cases and is correlated with a worse prognosis. In the LUMC and the TCGA cohorts, high PRAME expression was associated with larger diameter, higher Tumor-Node-Metastasis (TNM) stage, more frequent gain of chromosome 8q, and an inflammatory phenotype.

Conclusions

We confirm that PRAME is associated with poor prognosis in UM and has a strong connection with extra copies of 8q. We show that PRAME-specific immunotherapy in an adjuvant setting is promising in treatment of malignancies, including UM.

Investigating Vitreous Cytokines in Choroidal Melanoma

Due to the close relationship between the vitreous and posterior eye layers, the microenvironment of these layers can affect the composition of the vitreous. Molecular analysis of the vitreous may therefore provide important insights into the pathogenesis of chorioretinal diseases. In this study, vitreous cytokines (n = 41) were evaluated to gain further insights into the tumor microenvironment in uveal melanoma (UM) arising from the choroid (CM). Cytokine levels were measured using a bead-based multiplex immunoassay panel in vitreous samples obtained from 32 eyes, including 18 with CM and 14 controls. Median fluorescence intensity values were extracted and used as relative quantification of the cytokine abundance. Vitreous cytokine levels were compared between the CM and non-CM groups and between different prognostic categories within the CM group (classified as having low or high metastatic risk using tumor biopsy-based gene expression profiling). Correlations between vitreous cytokine levels and tumor dimensions were also evaluated. Our analysis revealed twenty-six vitreous cytokines significantly upregulated in CM-affected eyes compared to the control eyes. Within the CM group, six vitreous cytokines showed altered levels (five upregulated and one downregulated) in eyes with high- vs. low-risk tumors. Levels of these six plus several other cytokines showed correlations with the tumor dimensions. In conclusion, our study has uncovered several UM-relevant vitreous cytokines, worthy of follow-up in larger studies as potential candidates for liquid biopsy-based biomarker development and/or new therapeutic targeting.

Validation of the Prognostic Usefulness of the Gene Expression Profiling Test in Patients with Uveal Melanoma

PURPOSE

To validate the prognostic usefulness of gene expression profile (GEP) testing in patients with uveal melanoma. To determine whether combining tumor size with the GEP classification provides additional prognostic value.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with a diagnosis of choroidal melanoma examined at Yale New Haven Hospital; University of California, San Diego; and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.

METHODS

Patients' demographic and clinical data and tumor characteristics were collected. Univariate and multivariate Cox hazard regression analysis were used to assess the association between tumor characteristics and GEP classification with metastasis as an outcome.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Metastasis-free survival (MFS).

RESULTS

Of the 337 individuals included in the study, 87 demonstrated metastases. The mean follow-up time was 37.2 (standard deviation [SD], 40.2) months for patients with metastases and 55.0 (SD, 49.3) months for those without metastases. Tumors of larger thickness and GEP class 2 (vs. class 1) were associated significantly with increased risk of metastasis. Tumor thickness showed better prognostic usefulness than GEP classification (Wald statistic, 40.7 and 24.2, respectively). Class 2 tumors with a thickness of 7.0 mm or more were associated with increased risk of metastasis than tumors with a thickness of < 7.0 mm (hazard ratio [HR], 3.23; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.61-6.51), whereas class 1 tumors with a thickness of 9.0 mm or more were associated with increased risk of metastasis than tumors with a thickness of < 9.0 mm (HR, 2.07; 95% CI, 0.86-4.99). No difference in MFS was found between patients with class 1A tumors compared with those with class 1B tumors (P = 0.8). Patients with class 2 tumors showed an observed 5-year MFS of 47.5% (95% CI, 36.0%-62.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

Tumor size was the most significant predictor of metastasis and provided additional prognostic value independent of GEP classification. In addition, rates of metastasis for class 2 tumors were lower than estimates reported by Castle Bioscience, and no difference in rates of metastasis were found between class 1A and 1B tumors. This indicates that tumor size should be accounted for when relying on GEP for prognostication and that patients with GEP class 1A or 1B tumors may benefit from the same metastatic surveillance protocols.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

Diagnostic Aqueous Humor Proteome Predicts Metastatic Potential in Uveal Melanoma

Gene expression profiling (GEP) is clinically validated to stratify the risk of metastasis by assigning uveal melanoma (UM) patients to two highly prognostic molecular classes: class 1 (low metastatic risk) and class 2 (high metastatic risk). However, GEP requires intraocular tumor biopsy, which is limited by small tumor size and tumor heterogeneity; furthermore, there are small risks of retinal hemorrhage, bleeding, or tumor dissemination. Thus, ocular liquid biopsy has emerged as a less-invasive alternative. In this study, we seek to determine the aqueous humor (AH) proteome related to the advanced GEP class 2 using diagnostic AH liquid biopsy specimens. Twenty AH samples were collected from patients with UM, grouped by GEP classes. Protein expression levels of 1472 targets were analyzed, compared between GEP classes, and correlated with clinical features. Significant differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) were subjected to analysis for cellular pathway and upstream regulator identification. The results showed that 45 DEPs detected in the AH could differentiate GEP class 1 and 2 at diagnosis. IL1R and SPRY2 are potential upstream regulators for the 8/45 DEPs that contribute to metastasis-related pathways. AH liquid biopsy offers a new opportunity to determine metastatic potential for patients in the absence of tumor biopsy.

Genetics and RNA Regulation of Uveal Melanoma

Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common intraocular malignant tumor and the most frequent melanoma not affecting the skin. While the rate of UM occurrence is relatively low, about 50% of patients develop metastasis, primarily to the liver, with lethal outcome despite medical treatment. Notwithstanding that UM etiopathogenesis is still under investigation, a set of known mutations and chromosomal aberrations are associated with its pathogenesis and have a relevant prognostic value. The most frequently mutated genes are BAP1, EIF1AX, GNA11, GNAQ, and SF3B1, with mutually exclusive mutations occurring in GNAQ and GNA11, and almost mutually exclusive ones in BAP1 and SF3B1, and BAP1 and EIF1AX. Among chromosomal aberrations, monosomy of chromosome 3 is the most frequent, followed by gain of chromosome 8q, and full or partial loss of chromosomes 1 and 6. In addition, epigenetic mechanisms regulated by non-coding RNAs (ncRNA), namely microRNAs and long non-coding RNAs, have also been investigated. Several papers investigating the role of ncRNAs in UM have reported that their dysregulated expression affects cancer-related processes in both in vitro and in vivo models. This review will summarize current findings about genetic mutations, chromosomal aberrations, and ncRNA dysregulation establishing UM biology.

Uveal melanoma patient attitudes towards prognostic testing using gene expression profiling

Aim:

This study explored uveal melanoma patient experiences and regret following molecular prognostic testing using a 15-gene expression profile (GEP) test.

Materials & methods:

A retrospective, cross-sectional survey study was conducted through an online questionnaire capturing patient-reported experiences with prognostic biopsy/molecular testing.

Results:

Of 177 respondents, 159 (90%) wanted prognostic information at diagnosis. Most 15-GEP-tested patients who shared their results (99%) reported gaining value from testing, as did patients tested with other methods. Patients who received prognostic testing experienced lower decision regret than those who opted out. Decision regret did not differ based on GEP class.

Conclusion:

Most uveal melanoma patients desire prognostic testing and gain value from the GEP, independent of a high- or low-risk result.

Uveal melanoma is a rare but aggressive eye cancer, resulting in distant metastasis in nearly 50% of patients. Molecular prognostic testing is often employed to determine who is at high or low risk of developing metastatic disease. A prognostic 15-gene expression profiling (GEP) test is commonly used throughout the USA and parts of Canada. The goal of this survey was to assess patient experiences with the 15-GEP and other prognostic methods. Of the 177 patients who participated in the survey, the majority reported that they wanted prognostic information at the time of diagnosis. Of patients who underwent 15-GEP testing, nearly all reported gaining value from their test result, regardless of their individual risk profile. This study supports prior findings using other prognostic methods that patients prefer information about their risk of metastasis and reinforces the importance of discussing prognostic testing options with newly diagnosed uveal melanoma patients.

Analytical Validation and Performance of a 7-Gene Next-Generation Sequencing Panel in Uveal Melanoma

INTRODUCTION

Gene expression profiling (GEP) is widely used for prognostication in patients with uveal melanoma (UM). Because biopsy tissue is limited, it is critical to obtain as much genomic information as possible from each sample. Combined application of both GEP and next-generation sequencing (NGS) allows for analysis of RNA and DNA from a single biopsy sample, offers additional prognostic information, and can potentially inform therapy selection. This study evaluated the analytical performance of a targeted custom NGS panel for mutational profiling of 7 genes commonly mutated in UM.

METHODS

One hundred five primary UM tumors were analyzed, including 37 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) and 68 fine-needle aspiration biopsy specimens. Sequencing was performed on the Ion GeneStudio S5 platform to an average read depth of >500X per region of interest.

RESULTS

The 7-gene panel achieved a positive percent agreement of 100% for detection of both single-nucleotide variants and insertions/deletions, with a technical positive predictive value of 98.8% and 100%, respectively. Intra-assay and inter-assay concordance studies confirmed the assay's reproducibility and repeatability.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION

The 7-gene panel is a robust, highly accurate NGS test that can be successfully performed, along with GEP, from a single small-gauge needle biopsy sample or FFPE specimen.

Enhanced metastatic risk assessment in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma with the 40-gene expression profile test

Aim: To clinically validate the 40-gene expression profile (40-GEP) test for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma patients and evaluate coupling the test with individual clinicopathologic risk factor-based assessment methods. Patients & methods: In a 33-site study, primary tumors with known patient outcomes were assessed under clinical testing conditions (n = 420). The 40-GEP results were integrated with clinicopathologic risk factors. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were performed for metastasis. Results: The 40-GEP test demonstrated significant prognostic value. Risk classification was improved via integration of 40-GEP results with clinicopathologic risk factor-based assessment, with metastasis rates near the general cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma population for Class 1 and ≥50% for Class 2B. Conclusion: Combining molecular profiling with clinicopathologic risk factor assessment enhances stratification of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma patients and may inform decision-making for risk-appropriate management strategies.

Gene Expression Profiling in Uveal Melanoma: Five-Year Prospective Outcomes and Meta-Analysis

Introduction

The prognostic 15-gene expression profile (15-GEP) test for uveal melanoma (UM) predicts metastatic risk based on primary tumor biology. Here we report outcomes from a prospective registry of 15-GEP-tested patients, and a meta-analysis with published cohorts.

Objectives

Management and 5-year clinical outcomes following 15-GEP testing were evaluated.

Methods

Eighty-nine patients with 15-GEP results were prospectively enrolled at four centers. Physician-recommended management plans were collected, and clinical outcomes tracked every 6 months.

Results

Eighty percent of Class 1 (low-risk) patients underwent low-intensity management; all Class 2 (high-risk) patients underwent high-intensity management (p < 0.0001). Median follow-up for event-free patients was 4.9 years. Five Class 1 (10%) and 23 Class 2 (58%) tumors metastasized (p < 0.0001). Five-year Class 1 and 2 metastasis-free survival rates were 90% (81-100%) and 41% (27-62%; p < 0.0001), and melanoma-specific survival rates were 94% (87-100%) and 63% (49-82%; p = 0.0007). Class 2 was the only independent predictor of metastasis and was associated with increased risk for metastasis and mortality by meta-analysis.

Conclusions

UM patient management is guided by 15-GEP testing. Class 2 patients were managed more intensely, in accordance with an observed metastatic rate of >50%; Class 1 patients were safely spared intensive surveillance, resulting in appropriate utilization of healthcare resources.

Prospective evaluation of risk-appropriate management of uveal melanoma patients informed by gene expression profiling

Aim:

The Clinical Application of DecisionDx-UM Gene Expression Assay Results study aimed to evaluate the clinical utility of the prognostic 15-gene expression profile (15-GEP) test for uveal melanoma (UM) patients in a large, prospective multicenter cohort.

Patients & methods:

Nine centers prospectively enrolled 138 UM patients clinically tested with the 15-GEP. Physician-recommended specialty referrals and metastatic surveillance regimens were collected.

Results:

A total of 93% of high-risk class 2 patients were referred to medical oncology for follow-up, compared with 51% of class 1 patients. A majority (62%) of class 2 patients were recommended overall high-intensity metastatic surveillance, while 85% of class 1 patients were recommended low-intensity metastatic surveillance.

Conclusion:

Treatment plan recommendations for UM patients are aligned with GEP-informed metastatic risk, consistent with prior studies.

CORRELATION OF GENE EXPRESSION PROFILE STATUS AND AMERICAN JOINT COMMISSION ON CANCER STAGE IN UVEAL MELANOMA

PURPOSE

To study the relationship between gene expression profile (GEP) subclass and American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage in patients with uveal melanoma (UM).

METHODS

A retrospective, multicenter study was undertaken with patients entered from nine major ocular oncology centers from across the United States. Three hundred sixty eligible patients had UM and underwent I-125 plaque brachytherapy with concurrent tumor biopsy with GEP testing between January 1, 2010, and October 28, 2014. Patient demographics and UM features were analyzed by both GEP and AJCC status.

RESULTS

Gene expression profile class divided the cohort into three groups: Class 1a (n = 186), Class 1b (n = 77), and Class 2 (n = 113). When classified using AJCC staging criteria, we found the following: Stage I in 91 cases (25.3%), Stage IIA in 143 cases (39.7%), Stage IIB in 89 cases (24.7%), Stage IIIA in 36 cases (10%), and Stage IIIB in 1 case (0.3%). There were no Stage IV cases, as lymph node and metastatic data were not collected as a part of this study. Among Stage I tumors, both high tumor height and high largest basal diameter were associated with a higher frequency of Class 2 status (P < 0.05). As UMs progress to a larger AJCC tumor group (T1-T4), the odds ratio of having a worse prognosis based on GEP class was 1.75 (95% CI, 1.36-2.25; P < 0.001). Similarly, as UMs progress to a higher AJCC stage, the odds ratio of having a worse prognosis based on GEP class was 1.69 (95% CI, 1.36-2.10; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This report details the differences in clinical features between GEP subclasses and how they are distributed among the AJCC stages. When the tumors were grouped by AJCC staging criteria, both larger AJCC tumor (T) group and worsening AJCC stage were associated with worsening predicted prognosis, based on GEP subclass.

ECHO-7 oncolytic virus Rigvir® in an adjuvant setting for stage I uveal melanoma; A retrospective case report

Purpose

To describe a case of choroidal melanoma treated with Rigvir® virotherapy in an adjuvant setting.

Observations

A female patient born in 1956 presented with a small choroidal melanoma in October 2007. 34 months after transpupillary thermotherapy the state of her eye worsened until tumor growth was visualized. Despite photodynamic therapy and transpupillary thermotherapy the tumor continued to grow locally. In October 2016 enucleation was performed. Since gene expression profile testing disclosed a tumor (class 2) with a high risk of metastasis formation in 5 years, the patient sought options to prevent progression of the disease. In December 2016 virotherapy with Rigvir® was started with 3 administrations for 3 consecutive days. Therapy was continued once per week until March 2017, when the administrations were changed to once per month. The patient is being monitored by an ophthalmologist. She is stable with the virotherapy ongoing and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (7 May 2018) and abdominal ultrasound (23 March 2019) imaging excludes metastasis formation. The quality of life is high.

Conclusions

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first documented case of uveal melanoma treatment with virotherapy as an adjuvant therapy. Considering the few if any available treatments and the encouraging results of the present treatment, virotherapy should be evaluated more extensively as a potential treatment of uveal melanoma.

BAP1 Immunoreactivity Correlates with Gene Expression Class in Uveal Melanoma

Background

Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common intraocular tumour in adults. Currently there are different tests available to determine the risk of UM for metastasis, among which include BRCA1-associated protein-1 (BAP1) immunohistochemistry (IHC) and gene expression profiling (GEP). BAP1 is a deubiquitylating enzyme (DUB) that has tumour suppressor activity, the loss of which therefore is associated with higher risk for tumour growth and metastasis.

Objectives

To compare and correlate the prognostic significance of BAP1-IHC staining patterns and GEP in the prediction of UM's risk for metastasis.

Methods

This is a retrospective chart review with prospective follow-up of patients with primary UM who underwent enucleation from the year 2008 to 2018. Clinical history, histopathologic findings, GEP classification, BAP1-IHC of the formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues, and follow-up data for metastasis were collected and statistically analysed.

Results

A total of 30 enucleated eyes with UM were included in the study. All class 1a tumours had high nuclear BAP1 expression and all class 2 had low nuclear BAP1 expression. Fifty percent of the class 1b tumours had low nuclear BAP1 expression. Among the tumours with low nuclear BAP1 expression, 68% developed metastasis, while 9% developed metastasis among high nuclear expression. Fifty-five percent developed metastasis in tumours with high cytoplasmic expression and 42% for low cytoplasmic expression. Predictive values for metastasis (positive predictive value, negative predictive value) are as follows: (1) nuclear BAP1-IHC (68%, 91%), (2) cytoplasmic BAP1-IHC (55%, 58%), and (3) GEP (73%, 80%). Nuclear BAP1-IHC and GEP had the same accuracy rate of 77% and cytoplasmic BAP1-IHC had an accuracy of 57%.

Conclusion

Low nuclear BAP1-IHC strongly correlates with GEP class 2 and was equally accurate in the prediction of metastasis.

Are Risk Factors for Growth of Choroidal Nevi Associated With Malignant Transformation? Assessment With a Validated Genomic Biomarker

PURPOSE

To test the hypothesis that widely used clinical risk factors for growth of choroidal nevi are associated with malignant transformation.

METHODS

Fine needle biopsy for assignment of gene expression profile (class 1 or class 2) was performed in 207 choroidal melanocytic tumors < 3.5 mm in thickness. The class 2 profile was employed as a validated biomarker for malignant transformation. The following data were collected: patient age and sex, tumor diameter and thickness, distance of posterior tumor margin from the optic disc, and the presence or absence of serous retinal detachment, orange lipofuscin pigment, drusen, retinal pigment epithelial fibrosis, retinal pigment epithelial atrophy, visual symptoms, and documented tumor growth.

RESULTS

Clinical features associated with the class 2 profile included patient age > 60 years and tumor thickness > 2.25 mm (Fisher exact test, P = .002 for both). Documented growth was not associated with the class 2 profile (P = .5). The odds ratio of a tumor having the class 2 profile was 2.8 (95% confidence interval 1.3-5.9) for patient age > 60 years and 3.5 (95% confidence interval 1.4-8.8) for tumor thickness > 2.25 mm. For patients with both risk factors, the "number needed to treat" to identify 1 patient with a class 2 tumor was 4.3 (P = .0002). No other clinical feature or combination of features was associated with the class 2 profile.

CONCLUSIONS

None of the widely used choroidal nevus risk factors for tumor growth, nor documented growth itself, is pathognomonic of malignant transformation as defined by class 2 gene expression profile. Patient age and tumor thickness may be helpful for identifying small choroidal melanocytic tumors that are more likely to have the class 2 profile. Observation for growth prior to treatment continues to be reasonable for most patients with suspicious choroidal nevi. NOTE: Publication of this article is sponsored by the American Ophthalmological Society.

Gene Expression Profiling and PRAME Status Versus Tumor-Node-Metastasis Staging for Prognostication in Uveal Melanoma

PURPOSE

To compare the prognostic accuracy of gene expression profiling (GEP) combined with PRAME status vs the clinical Tumor-Node-Metastasis (TNM) staging in patients with uveal melanoma (UM).

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

METHODS

The study included 240 consecutive patients with UM. Tumors were assessed for GEP status (Class 1 or Class 2) using a validated 15-gene assay and PRAME expression status using quantitative polymerase chain reaction. TNM staging was according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th edition. Statistical analysis included univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models. Metastasis was the primary endpoint.

RESULTS

GEP was Class 1 in 128 (53.3%) cases and Class 2 in 112 (46.7%) cases. PRAME status was negative in 157 (65.4%) cases and positive in 83 (34.6%) cases. TNM was stage I in 26 (10.8%) cases, IIA in 67 (27.9%) cases, IIB in 50 (20.8%) cases, IIIA in 59 (24.6%) cases, and IIIB in 38 (15.8%) cases. Metastatic disease was detected in 59 (24.6%) cases after median follow-up of 29 months (mean 42 months; range 1-195 months). Variables associated with metastasis included (in order of decreasing significance): GEP class (P = 1.5 × 10-8), largest basal tumor diameter (P = 2.5 × 10-6), PRAME status (P = 2.6 × 10-6), and TNM stage (P = 3.7 × 10-6). The prognostic accuracy of an optimized 3-category GEP/PRAME model (P = 8.6 × 10-14) was superior to an optimized TNM model (P = 1.3 × 10-5).

CONCLUSIONS

In UM, molecular prognostic testing using GEP and PRAME provides prognostic accuracy that is superior to TNM staging.