Concordance between sequential transbronchial lung cryobiopsy and surgical lung biopsy in patients with diffuse interstitial lung disease

Concordance between transbronchial lung cryobiopsy and surgical lung biopsy in patients with idiopathic multicentric Castleman disease: A report of four cases

BACKGROUND

Idiopathic multicentric Castleman disease (iMCD) is a rare polyclonal lymphoproliferative disease often associated with pulmonary involvement. Recently, transbronchial lung cryobiopsy (TBLC) has been reported to be useful for the diagnosis of diffuse interstitial lung disease. However, there have been no reports of pathological assessment of TBLC for iMCD.

METHOD

To clarify the efficacy of TBLC in the diagnosis of iMCD, we retrospectively reviewed four iMCD patients who had undergone both TBLC and surgical lung biopsy (SLB).

RESULTS

The median age was 44 years; 2 males and 2 females. Two or three TBLC specimens were taken from each patient. All patients had no complications other than minimal bleeding. The size of the TBLC specimens was approximately 5-6 × 3-4 mm, and the alveolar region, and centrilobular and perilobular areas were adequately sampled. As with SLB, the extent of lung lesions and inflammatory cell infiltration could be sufficiently evaluated by TBLC. The presence of lymphoid follicles could also be assessed by TBLC; however, the germinal centers with lymphoid follicles were difficult to evaluate. The TBLC specimens could also be evaluated for immunostaining, especially IgG4 immunostaining, to rule out IgG4-related lung disease. Pulmonary pathological grading showed a high concordance rate between major pathological findings of TBLC and SLB. The pathologist's confidence level of TBLC for the diagnosis of iMCD was high in all cases.

CONCLUSIONS

TBLC exhibits a high concordance rate with SLB in the pathological evaluation of iMCD, which may be useful for the diagnosis of iMCD.

[Transbronchial lung cryobiopsy in interstitial lung diseases]

In some cases of interstitial lung disease (ILD), clinical and biological findings associated with CT scan pattern during multidisciplinary discussion (MDD) fail to yield a confident diagnosis. In these cases, histology may be necessary. Transbronchial lung cryobiopsy (TBLC) is a bronchoscopic procedure that has been developed in recent years and currently contributes to diagnostic work-up in patients with ILD. TBLC provides tissue samples for histological analysis with an acceptable risk of complications, consisting mainly in pneumothorax or bleeding. In addition to higher diagnostic yield than conventional forceps biopsies, the procedure shows a better safety profile than surgical biopsies. The indication to perform TBLC is decided during a 1st MDD and during a 2nd MDD, results can provide a diagnostic yield approximating 80%. TBLC appears to be an attractive, minimally invasive technique to be proposed as a first-line procedure in selected patients in experienced centers, while surgical lung biopsy may be considered as a second-line solution.

The Characteristic of Transbronchial Lung Cryobiopsy in the Pathological Diagnosis of Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis

BACKGROUND

Transbronchial lung cryobiopsy (TBLC) has widely used for the diagnosis of diffuse lung disease. However, it remains unclear whether TBLC is useful for the diagnosis in hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP).

METHODS

We investigated 18 patients who underwent TBLC and were diagnosed with HP based on pathology or multidisciplinary discussion (MDD). Of the 18 patients, 12 had fibrotic HP (fHP), 2 had non-fibrotic HP (non-fHP) diagnosed with MDD. The remaining 4 patients were diagnosed with fHP by pathology but not by MDD because of clinical features. The radiology and pathology of these cases were compared.

RESULTS

All patients with fHP showed radiological findings of inflammation, fibrosis, and airway disease. Conversely, pathology showed fibrosis and inflammation in 11 of 12 cases (92%), but airway disease was significantly less common with 5 cases (42%) (p = 0.014). Non-fHP showed inflammatory cell infiltration mainly in the centrilobule on pathology, which was consistent with radiology. Granulomas were found in 5 patients with HP (36%). In the non-HP group, airway-centered interstitial fibrosis was observed in 3 patients (75%) with pathology.

CONCLUSIONS

The pathology with TBLC is difficult to evaluate airway disease of HP. We need to understand this characteristic of TBLC to make a MDD diagnosis of HP.

Transbronchial lung cryobiopsy and pulmonary fibrosis: A never-ending story?

Background

The diagnostic process of pulmonary fibrosis (PF) is often challenging, requires a collaborative effort of several experts, and often requires bioptic material, which can be difficult to obtain, both in terms of quality and technique. The main procedures available to obtain such samples are transbronchial lung cryobiopsy (TBLC) and surgical lung biopsy (SLB).

Objective

The purpose of this paper is to review the evidence for the role of TBLC in the diagnostic-therapeutic process of PF.

Methods

A comprehensive review was performed to identify articles to date that addressed the role of TBLC in the diagnostic-therapeutic process of PF using the PubMed® database.

Results

The reasoned search identified 206 papers, including 21 manuscripts (three reviews, one systematic review, two guidelines, two prospective studies, three retrospective studies, one cross-sectional study, one original article, three editorials, three clinical trials, and two unclassifiable studies), which were included in the final review.

Conclusions

TBLC is gaining increasing efficacy and improving safety profile; however, there are currently no clear data demonstrating its superiority over SLB. Therefore, the two techniques should be considered with careful rationalization on a case-by-case basis. Further research is needed to further optimize and standardize the procedure and to thoroughly study the histological and molecular characteristics of PF.

Transbronchial cryobiopsy in unexplained, severe ARDS: a single center retrospective case series

BACKGROUND

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) deptics an acute form of lung infjury with often severe respiratory impairment that requires invasive mechanical ventilation. Since ARDS can be caused by several distinct etiologies, correct characterization is desired and frequently challenging. Surgical lung biopsy was previously reported to be of additive value. We describe our institutional experience using transbronchial cryobiopsy (TBCB) for further characterization of severe and unexplained ARDS cases.

CASE PRESENTATION

We retrospectively collected data of TBCB in patients with unexplained ARDS, whether with or without ECMO-support. Between 2019 and 2020 TBCB was performed in eight patients. Decision for the intervention was decided in multidisciplinary discussion. Five patients were treated with ECMO. The median duration of invasive ventilation before TBCB was 24 days. TBCB was performed in one segment, that was prophylactically occluded by Watanabe spigot or swab after the procedure. Histology results and their contribution to further therapeutic decisions were analyzed. Histology revealed five diffuses alveolar damage, one acute fibrinoid organizing pneumonia, one cryptogenic organizing pneumonia and one lung cancer. All results contributed to the decision of further management. While no pneumothorax or severe endobronchial bleeding occurred, two delayed hematothoraces needed surgical treatment. No patients died due to TBCB.

CONCLUSION

TBCB is feasible in ARDS even during ECMO treatment. Histologic results can play a significant role in therapeutic and ethic discussion to guide the patients' care. Side effects should be considered and monitored.

Sensitivity of transbronchial lung cryobiopsy in the diagnosis of different interstitial lung diseases

The accuracy of transbronchial lung cryobiopsy (TBLC) in each disease for pathological and multidisciplinary discussion (MDD) diagnosis is not yet established.

METHOD

We investigated 431 patients who were classified by MDD diagnosis and were grouped into the disease categories. For each category or disease, we used TBLC samples to calculate the sensitivities of the pathological diagnosis compared with MDD diagnoses. Further, we compared these sensitivities to pathological diagnoses with all clinical/radiological information.

RESULT

The sensitivity for diagnosing idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIPs) with TBLC was higher than connective tissue disease associated ILD (CTD-ILD). Idiopathic nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (iNSIP), fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis, and some CTD-ILDs were diagnosed with lower sensitivities compared to IPF. The sensitivity of pathological diagnosis with all clinical/radiological information in IPF was higher than in iNSIP, but not significantly different from other diseases. The overall sensitivity of the pathological diagnosis with clinical/radiological information was 69.0%, significantly higher than without clinical/radiological information.

CONCLUSION

The sensitivity of pathological diagnosis with TBLC was low for some diseases except IPF. The addition of all clinical/radiological information increased the sensitivity of pathology diagnosis by TBLC, which was no less sensitive than IPF for all diseases except iNSIP.

Idiopathic desquamative interstitial pneumonia diagnosed using transbronchial lung cryobiopsy: A case report

A 60-year-old Japanese man with a history of heavy smoking came to our hospital for a detailed examination, suspecting interstitial pneumonia because of gradually increasing dyspnea on exertion over a period of one year. Chest high-resolution computed tomography revealed ground-glass shadows with emphysematous changes. Pathological analysis of samples obtained using transbronchial lung cryobiopsy revealed an accumulation of alveolar macrophages with abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm in the alveolar space. Following a multidisciplinary discussion, the patient was diagnosed with desquamative interstitial pneumonia. To our knowledge, this is the first detailed report of desquamative interstitial pneumonia diagnosed using transbronchial lung cryobiopsy.

Unclassifiable, or simply unclassified interstitial lung disease?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Unclassifiable interstitial lung disease (ILD) comprises a subset of ILDs which cannot be classified according to the current diagnostic framework. This is a likely a heterogeneous group of diseases rather than a single entity and it is poorly defined and hence problematic for prognosis and therapy.

RECENT FINDINGS

With increased treatment options for progressive fibrosing ILD it is increasingly relevant to correctly categorise ILD.

SUMMARY

This review article will summarise the definition and reasons for a diagnosis of unclassifiable ILD, the current management options and possible future approaches to improve diagnosis and differentiation within this broad subset. Finally, we will describe the implications of the labelling of unclassifiable ILD in clinical practice and research and whether the term 'unclassified' should be used, implying a less definitive diagnosis.

Feasibility, utility, and safety of transbronchial cryobiopsy for interstitial lung diseases in Japan

BACKGROUND

Transbronchial lung cryobiopsy (TBLC) is a new technique that enables larger tissue collection than can be obtained by conventional transbronchial lung biopsy. TBLC is becoming popular worldwide and is performed for diffuse lung disease and lung cancer. However, only a few reports of TBLC have been published in Japan. This study was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TBLC at our hospital and compare these findings with past reports.

METHODS

From April 2018 to January 2020, 38 patients who underwent TBLC for diffuse lung disease at our hospital were evaluated with respect to age, sex, biopsy site, biopsy size, diagnostic disease, and complications.

RESULTS

The patients who underwent TBLC were 20 men and 18 women with an average age of 63.7 years. The average sample size was 5.7 mm, and the diagnostic rate was 65.7% (25/38). Grade ≥2 complications included bleeding (15.8%), pneumothorax (2.6%), and atrial fibrillation (2.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

TBLC was considered to be useful for the diagnosis of diffuse lung disease and could be safely performed.

Diagnostic and Therapeutic Applications of Extracellular Vesicles in Interstitial Lung Diseases

Interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) are chronic irreversible pulmonary conditions with significant morbidity and mortality. Diagnostic approaches to ILDs are complex and multifactorial. Effective therapeutic interventions are continuously investigated and explored with substantial progress, thanks to advances in basic understanding and translational efforts. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) offer a new paradigm in diagnosis and treatment. This leads to two significant implications: new disease biomarker discovery that enables reliable diagnosis and disease assessment and the development of regenerative medicine therapeutics that target fibroproliferative processes in diseased lung tissue. In this review, we discuss the current understanding of the role of diseased tissue-derived EVs in the development of interstitial lung diseases, the utility of these EVs as diagnostic and prognostic tools, and the existing therapeutic utility of EVs. Furthermore, we review the potential therapeutic application of EVs derived from various cellular sources.

Usefulness of surgical lung biopsies after cryobiopsies when pathological results are inconclusive or show a pattern suggestive of a nonspecific interstitial pneumonia

Background

Although increasing data supports the use of transbronchial lung cryobiopsies (TBLCs) for the diagnosis of diffuse parenchymal lung diseases (DPLDs), its role as an alternative to surgical lung biopsy (SLB) is still under debate. The aim of this study was to assess the benefit of additional SLBs performed in selected patients after TBLCs.

Method

We conducted a multicentric Belgian prospective trial in which SLBs were performed after TBLCs when the pathological diagnosis was uncertain or if a nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) pattern was observed hypothesizing that SLB could provide additional information and that a co-existent UIP pattern could be missed.

Results

Eighty-one patients with TBLCs performed for a DPLD were included in the study between April 2015 and December 2019. A specific histological diagnosis was obtained in 52 patients (64%) whereas no pathological diagnosis following TBLCs was obtained in 13 patients (16%) and a pattern suggestive of a NSIP was observed in 16 patients (20%). Fourteen out of these 29 patients had SLBs after TBLCs. SLBs showed a UIP pattern in 11 (79%), a pattern suggestive of a hypersensitivity pneumonitis in two (14%) and a NSIP pattern in one patient (7%). Among the 16 patients with pathological NSIP following TBLCs, six underwent a SLBs showing a UIP in five and confirming a NSIP in one patient only. A retrospective pathological analysis of patients having both procedures showed a lower diagnostic confidence and agreement among pathologists for TBLCs compared to SLBs. Major factors underlying the added value of SLBs were the bigger size of the sample as well as the subpleural localization of the biopsies.

Conclusions

TBLCs are useful in the setting of DPLDs with a good diagnostic yield. However, our study suggests that SLB provides critical additional information in case TBLCs are inconclusive or show a pattern suggestive of a NSIP, questioning the accuracy of TBLC to adequately identify this histological pattern.