1
|
Song Y, Zhang J, Luo Z, Wu L, Cai Z, Zhong X, Zeng X, Cao T, Chen HE, Xu S, Wang CY. Association between dietary branched-chain amino acids and multiple chronic conditions among older adults in Chinese communities. Nutr Metab (Lond) 2024; 21:56. [PMID: 39080679 PMCID: PMC11290232 DOI: 10.1186/s12986-024-00825-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2024] [Accepted: 07/08/2024] [Indexed: 08/02/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The association of BCAAs (isoleucine, leucine, and valine) with cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases has been widely recognized by researchers, but there is limited evidence to support the relationship between BCAAs and multiple chronic conditions (MCCs) in older adults. This study aimed to explore the correlation between BCAA levels in the diets of older adults and MCCs. METHODS Based on a health management cohort project in Nanshan District of Shenzhen, 4278 individuals over 65 years old were selected as participants via multi-stage stratified sampling from May 2018 to December 2019. Data were collected using a validated semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire, as well as anthropometric and chronic disease reports. MCC was defined as the coexistence of two or more chronic diseases, namely, hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes, CAD, stroke, CKD, and CLD. Multivariate unconditional logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the relationship between dietary BCAAs and MCCs in older adults, and then, gender stratification analysis was performed. A restricted cubic spline model (a fitted smooth curve) was used to determine the dose-response relationship of isoleucine with MCCs. RESULTS A total of 4278 older adults aged 65 and above were included in this study, with an average age of 72.73 ± 5.49 years. The cohort included 1861 males (43.50%). Regardless of whether confounding factors were corrected, isoleucine was a risk factor for MCCs (OR = 3.388, 95%CI:1.415,8.109). After gender stratification, the relationships between dietary isoleucine and MCCs (OR = 6.902, 95%CI:1.875,25.402) and between leucine (OR = 0.506,95%CI:0.309,0.830) and MCCs were significant in women, but not in men. No significant association between valine and MCCs was observed. In addition, isoleucine was a risk factor for MCCs when its intake was greater than 4.297 g/d. CONCLUSION Isoleucine may play an important role in regulating age-related diseases. BCAAs such as isoleucine can be used as risk markers for MCCs in older adults.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuanfeng Song
- Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, 563000, China
- Department of Non-communicable Disease Prevention and Control, Shenzhen Nanshan Center for Chronic Disease Control, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518000, China
| | - Ji Zhang
- Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, 563000, China
- Department of Non-communicable Disease Prevention and Control, Shenzhen Nanshan Center for Chronic Disease Control, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518000, China
| | - Ziqiang Luo
- Department of Non-communicable Disease Prevention and Control, Shenzhen Nanshan Center for Chronic Disease Control, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518000, China
| | - Lanlan Wu
- Department of Non-communicable Disease Prevention and Control, Shenzhen Nanshan Center for Chronic Disease Control, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518000, China
| | - Zhaopei Cai
- Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, 563000, China
- Department of Non-communicable Disease Prevention and Control, Shenzhen Nanshan Center for Chronic Disease Control, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518000, China
| | - Xiaoqi Zhong
- Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, 563000, China
- Department of Non-communicable Disease Prevention and Control, Shenzhen Nanshan Center for Chronic Disease Control, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518000, China
| | - Xiaoxue Zeng
- Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, 563000, China
- Department of Non-communicable Disease Prevention and Control, Shenzhen Nanshan Center for Chronic Disease Control, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518000, China
| | - Tingxi Cao
- Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, 563000, China
- Department of Non-communicable Disease Prevention and Control, Shenzhen Nanshan Center for Chronic Disease Control, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518000, China
| | - Hong-En Chen
- Department of Non-communicable Disease Prevention and Control, Shenzhen Nanshan Center for Chronic Disease Control, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518000, China
| | - Shan Xu
- Department of Non-communicable Disease Prevention and Control, Shenzhen Nanshan Center for Chronic Disease Control, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518000, China
| | - Chang-Yi Wang
- Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, 563000, China.
- Department of Non-communicable Disease Prevention and Control, Shenzhen Nanshan Center for Chronic Disease Control, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518000, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Daniels SI, Cave S, Wagner TH, Perez TA, Edmond SN, Becker WC, Midboe AM. Implementation, intervention, and downstream costs for implementation of a multidisciplinary complex pain clinic in the Veterans Health Administration. Health Serv Res 2024. [PMID: 38956400 DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.14345] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/04/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the budget impact of implementing multidisciplinary complex pain clinics (MCPCs) for Veterans Health Administration (VA) patients living with complex chronic pain and substance use disorder comorbidities who are on risky opioid regimens. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SETTING We measured implementation costs for three MCPCs over 2 years using micro-costing methods. Intervention and downstream costs were obtained from the VA Managerial Cost Accounting System from 2 years prior to 2 years after opening of MCPCs. STUDY DESIGN Staff at the three VA sites implementing MCPCs were supported by Implementation Facilitation. The intervention cohort was patients at MCPC sites who received treatment based on their history of chronic pain and risky opioid use. Intervention costs and downstream costs were estimated with a quasi-experimental study design using a propensity score-weighted difference-in-difference approach. The healthcare utilization costs of treated patients were compared with a control group having clinically similar characteristics and undergoing the standard route of care at neighboring VA medical centers. Cancer and hospice patients were excluded. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS Activity-based costing data acquired from MCPC sites were used to estimate implementation costs. Intervention and downstream costs were extracted from VA administrative data. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS Average Implementation Facilitation costs ranged from $380 to $640 per month for each site. Upon opening of three MCPCs, average intervention costs per patient were significantly higher than the control group at two intervention sites. Downstream costs were significantly higher at only one of three intervention sites. Site-level differences were due to variation in inpatient costs, with some confounding likely due to the COVID-19 pandemic. This evidence suggests that necessary start-up investments are required to initiate MCPCs, with allocations of funds needed for implementation, intervention, and downstream costs. CONCLUSIONS Incorporating implementation, intervention, and downstream costs in this evaluation provides a thorough budget impact analysis, which decision-makers may use when considering whether to expand effective programming.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah I Daniels
- Center for Innovation to Implementation (Ci2i), VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, California, USA
| | - Shayna Cave
- Center for Innovation to Implementation (Ci2i), VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, California, USA
| | - Todd H Wagner
- Health Economics and Research Center, Center for Policy Evaluation, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California, USA
- Department of Surgery, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Taryn A Perez
- Center for Innovation to Implementation (Ci2i), VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, California, USA
| | - Sara N Edmond
- Pain Research, Informatics, Multimorbidities and Education (PRIME) Center for Innovation, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - William C Becker
- Pain Research, Informatics, Multimorbidities and Education (PRIME) Center for Innovation, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Amanda M Midboe
- Center for Innovation to Implementation (Ci2i), VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, California, USA
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Division of Health Policy and Management, University of California Davis-School of Medicine, Davis, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Black AC, Edmond SN, Frank JW, Abelleira A, Snow JL, Wesolowicz DM, Becker WC. Pain Care at Home to Amplify Function: Protocol Article. SUBSTANCE USE & ADDICTION JOURNAL 2024:29767342241236032. [PMID: 38469833 DOI: 10.1177/29767342241236032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/13/2024]
Abstract
Guidelines recommend strategies to optimize opioid medication safety, including frequent reassessment of the benefits and harms of long-term opioid therapy. Prescribers, who are predominantly primary care providers (PCPs), may lack the training or resources to implement these guideline-concordant practices. Two interventions have been designed to assist PCPs and tested within the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). Telemedicine Collaborative Management (TCM) provides primarily medication management support via care manager-prescriber teams. Cooperative Pain Education and Self-Management (COPES) promotes self-management strategies for chronic pain via cognitive behavior therapy techniques. Each intervention has been shown to improve prescribing and/or patient outcomes. The added value of combining these interventions is untested. With funding and central coordination by the Integrative Management of Chronic Pain and Opioid Use Disorder for Whole Recovery (IMPOWR) Network of the National Institutes of Health Helping to End Addiction Long-term (HEAL) Initiative, we will conduct a multisite patient-level randomized hybrid II effectiveness-implementation trial within VHA to compare TCM to TCM + COPES on the primary composite outcome of pain interference and opioid safety, secondary outcomes of alcohol use, anxiety, depression, and sleep, and other consensus IMPOWR Network measures. Implementation facilitation strategies informed by interviews with healthcare providers will target site-specific needs. The impact of these strategies on TCM implementation will be assessed via established formative and summative evaluation techniques. Economic analyses will evaluate intervention cost-effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne C Black
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, USA
- Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Sara N Edmond
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, USA
- Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Joseph W Frank
- VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Denver, CO, USA
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Audrey Abelleira
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, USA
- Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | | | - Danielle M Wesolowicz
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, USA
- Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - William C Becker
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, USA
- Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Griffin AC, Perez T, Avoundjian T, Becker W, Midboe AM. A Tool to Identify and Engage Patients on Risky Opioid Regimens. Appl Clin Inform 2023; 14:1018-1026. [PMID: 38151042 PMCID: PMC10752654 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1777126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2023] [Accepted: 10/30/2023] [Indexed: 12/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Concerns around opioid safety for patients living with chronic pain have led to a growing number of collaborative and multimodal pain care initiatives. A major challenge in these efforts has been identifying and engaging patients on high-risk opioid regimens in a timely manner. OBJECTIVES In this clinical informatics case report, we describe the development and implementation of a web-based tool to support providers as they implement an integrated pain support clinical initiative at primary care clinics across three health care systems. METHODS The tool identifies patients on risky opioid medication regimens and generates autopopulated patient outreach letters. It contains three core functions that: (1) identify patients prescribed high-dose opioids or coprescribed opioids and benzodiazepines, (2) generate automated letters for patients with an upcoming primary care appointment, and (3) allow clinic staff to write back to a database to track outreach and referrals. Qualitative stakeholder feedback was gathered through interviews and user testing to assess perceived usefulness and ease of use of the tool. RESULTS Over a 24-month period, the tool identified 1,125 patients prescribed risky medication regimens and generated 1,315 total letters as some patients became reeligible. Stakeholder feedback revealed that the tool was useful to quickly find patients on risky medication regimens and efficient in generating prepopulated letters that could be mailed in large batches. Additional feedback led to iterative refinements and improved system capabilities that varied across clinics. CONCLUSION Deploying clinical informatics tools that prioritize, engage, and track high-risk patient populations supports reduction of risky medication regimens. Such tools can reduce workload burden on busy primary care staff, particularly during implementation studies, and enhance patient-centered care through the use of direct-to-consumer outreach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley C. Griffin
- Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California, United States
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States
| | - Taryn Perez
- Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California, United States
| | - Tigran Avoundjian
- Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California, United States
| | - William Becker
- Veterans Affairs Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Connecticut, United States
- Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States
| | - Amanda M. Midboe
- Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California, United States
- Division of Health Policy and Management, University of California Davis—School of Medicine, Davis, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Portillo EC, Maurer MA, Kettner JT, Bhardwaj SD, Zhang Z, Sedgwick C, Gilson AM, Stone JA, Jacobson N, Hennessy-Garza R, Will S, McFarland MS, Ourth H, Chui MA. Applying RE-AIM to examine the impact of an implementation facilitation package to scale up a program for Veterans with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. RESEARCH SQUARE 2023:rs.3.rs-2809287. [PMID: 37333195 PMCID: PMC10275052 DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2809287/v1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/20/2023]
Abstract
Background U.S. Veterans are four-times more likely to be diagnosed with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) compared to the civilian population with no care model that consistently improves Veteran outcomes when scaled. COPD Coordinated Access to Reduce Exacerbations (CARE) is a care bundle intended to improve the delivery of evidence-based practices to Veterans. To address challenges to scaling this program in the Veterans' Health Administration (VA), the COPD CARE Academy (Academy), an implementation facilitation package comprised of four implementation strategies was designed and implemented. Methods This evaluation utilized a mixed-methods approach to assess the impact of the Academy's implementation strategies on the RE-AIM framework implementation outcomes and the extent to which they were effective at increasing clinicians' perceived capability to implement COPD CARE. A survey was administered one week after Academy participation and a semi-structured interview conducted eight to 12 months later. Descriptive statistics were calculated for quantitative items and thematic analysis was used to analyze open-ended items. Results Thirty-six clinicians from 13 VA medical centers (VAMCs) participated in the Academy in 2020 and 2021 and 264 front-line clinicians completed COPD CARE training. Adoption of the Academy was indicated by high rates of Academy completion (97%), session attendance (90%), and high utilization of Academy resources. Clinicians reported the Academy to be acceptable and appropriate as an implementation package and clinicians from 92% of VAMCs reported long-term utilization of Academy resources. Effectiveness of the Academy was represented by clinicians' significant increases (p < 0.05) in their capability to complete ten implementation tasks after Academy participation. Conclusions This evaluation found that the use of implementation facilitation paired with additional strategies seemed to demonstrate positive implementation outcomes across all RE-AIM domains and identified areas for potential improvement. Future assessments are needed to explore post-academy resources that would help VAMCs to strategize localized approaches to overcome barriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Ziting Zhang
- University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Pharmacy
| | - Cassie Sedgwick
- VA Medical Center Madison: William S Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital
| | | | | | - Nora Jacobson
- University of Wisconsin-Madison Institute for Clinical and Translational Reserach
| | - Rose Hennessy-Garza
- UWM Joseph J Zilber School of Public Health: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Joseph J Zilber School of Public Health
| | - Sarah Will
- Department of Veterans Affairs Pharmacy Benefits Management Clinical Pharmacy Practice Office
| | - M Shawn McFarland
- Department of Veterans Affairs Pharmacy Benefits Management Clinical Pharmacy Practice Office
| | - Heather Ourth
- Department of Veterans Affairs Pharmacy Benefits Management Clinical Pharmacy Practice Office
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Piazza KM, Ashcraft LE, Rose L, Hall DE, Brown RT, Bowen MEL, Mavandadi S, Brecher AC, Keddem S, Kiosian B, Long JA, Werner RM, Burke RE. Study protocol: Type III hybrid effectiveness-implementation study implementing Age-Friendly evidence-based practices in the VA to improve outcomes in older adults. Implement Sci Commun 2023; 4:57. [PMID: 37231459 PMCID: PMC10209584 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-023-00431-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2023] [Accepted: 04/23/2023] [Indexed: 05/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Unmet care needs among older adults accelerate cognitive and functional decline and increase medical harms, leading to poorer quality of life, more frequent hospitalizations, and premature nursing home admission. The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) is invested in becoming an "Age-Friendly Health System" to better address four tenets associated with reduced harm and improved outcomes among the 4 million Veterans aged 65 and over receiving VA care. These four tenets focus on "4Ms" that are fundamental to the care of older adults, including (1) what Matters (ensuring that care is consistent with each person's goals and preferences); (2) Medications (only using necessary medications and ensuring that they do not interfere with what matters, mobility, or mentation); (3) Mentation (preventing, identifying, treating, and managing dementia, depression, and delirium); and (4) Mobility (promoting safe movement to maintain function and independence). The Safer Aging through Geriatrics-Informed Evidence-Based Practices (SAGE) Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI) seeks to implement four evidence-based practices (EBPs) that have shown efficacy in addressing these core tenets of an "Age-Friendly Health System," leading to reduced harm and improved outcomes in older adults. METHODS We will implement four EBPs in 9 VA medical centers and associated outpatient clinics using a type III hybrid effectiveness-implementation stepped-wedge trial design. We selected four EBPs that align with Age-Friendly Health System principles: Surgical Pause, EMPOWER (Eliminating Medications Through Patient Ownership of End Results), TAP (Tailored Activities Program), and CAPABLE (Community Aging in Place - Advancing Better Living for Elders). Guided by the Pragmatic Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (PRISM), we are comparing implementation as usual vs. active facilitation. Reach is our primary implementation outcome, while "facility-free days" is our primary effectiveness outcome across evidence-based practice interventions. DISCUSSION To our knowledge, this is the first large-scale randomized effort to implement "Age-Friendly" aligned evidence-based practices. Understanding the barriers and facilitators to implementing these evidence-based practices is essential to successfully help shift current healthcare systems to become Age-Friendly. Effective implementation of this project will improve the care and outcomes of older Veterans and help them age safely within their communities. TRIAL REGISTRATION Registered 05 May 2021, at ISRCTN #60,657,985. REPORTING GUIDELINES Standards for Reporting Implementation Studies (see attached).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kirstin Manges Piazza
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, 3900 Woodland Ave, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| | - Laura Ellen Ashcraft
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, 3900 Woodland Ave, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Liam Rose
- Stanford-Surgery Policy Improvement Research & Education Center, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
- Health Economics Resource Center, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Daniel E Hall
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Wolff Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Rebecca T Brown
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, 3900 Woodland Ave, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Geriatrics and Extended Care Program, Corporal Michael Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Mary Elizabeth Libbey Bowen
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, 3900 Woodland Ave, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Education, and Clinical Center, VISN4 Mental Illness Research, Corporal Michael JCrescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Shahrzad Mavandadi
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, 3900 Woodland Ave, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- School of Nursing, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA
| | | | - Shimrit Keddem
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, 3900 Woodland Ave, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Family Medicine & Community Health, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Bruce Kiosian
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, 3900 Woodland Ave, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Geriatrics and Extended Care Program, Corporal Michael Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Judith A Long
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, 3900 Woodland Ave, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Rachel M Werner
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, 3900 Woodland Ave, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Robert E Burke
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, 3900 Woodland Ave, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
O’Grady MA, Kapoor S, Harrison L, Kwon N, Suleiman AO, Muench FJ. Implementing a text-messaging intervention for unhealthy alcohol use in emergency departments: protocol for implementation strategy development and a pilot cluster randomized implementation trial. Implement Sci Commun 2022; 3:86. [PMID: 35933560 PMCID: PMC9356403 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-022-00333-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2022] [Accepted: 07/25/2022] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Unhealthy alcohol use (UAU) is a leading cause of premature mortality among adults in the USA. Emergency departments (EDs) are key intervention settings for UAU but often have limited time and resources. One low-burden, scalable approach to address UAU is text-messaging interventions. Despite strong research support and promise for scalability, there is little research on how to implement such interventions in healthcare settings. The process of providers making them available to patients in an efficient way within already busy and overburdened ED workflows and patients adopting them remains a new area of research. The purpose of this three-phase study is to develop and test an implementation strategy for UAU text-messaging interventions in EDs. METHOD Our first aim is to examine barriers and facilitators to staff offering and patients accepting a text-messaging intervention in the ED using an explanatory, sequential mixed methods approach. We will examine alcohol screening data in the electronic health records of 17 EDs within a large integrated health system in the Northeast and conduct surveys among chairpersons in each. This data will be used to purposively sample 4 EDs for semi-structured interviews among 20 clinical staff, 20 patients, and 4 chairpersons. Our second aim is to conduct a stakeholder-engaged intervention mapping process to develop a multi-component implementation strategy for EDs. Our third aim is to conduct a mixed method 2-arm cluster randomized pilot study in 4 EDs that serve ~11,000 UAU patients per year to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effectiveness of the implementation strategy. The Integrated Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services framework will guide study activities. DISCUSSION Low-burden technology, like text messaging, along with targeted implementation support and strategies driven by identified barriers and facilitators could sustain large-scale ED-based alcohol screening programs and provide much needed support to patients who screen positive while reducing burden on EDs. The proposed study would be the first to develop and test this targeted implementation strategy and will prepare for a larger, fully powered hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial. Findings may also be broadly applicable to implementation of patient-facing mobile health technologies. TRIAL REGISTRATION This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05350878) on 4/28/2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan A. O’Grady
- grid.208078.50000000419370394Department of Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Connecticut, 263 Farmington Ave, Farmington, CT 06030-6325 USA
| | - Sandeep Kapoor
- grid.416477.70000 0001 2168 3646Northwell Health, 350 Community Drive, Manhasset, NY 11030 USA ,grid.512756.20000 0004 0370 4759Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, 500 Hofstra Blvd, Hempstead, NY 11549 USA
| | - Laura Harrison
- grid.416477.70000 0001 2168 3646Northwell Health, 350 Community Drive, Manhasset, NY 11030 USA
| | - Nancy Kwon
- grid.416477.70000 0001 2168 3646Northwell Health, 350 Community Drive, Manhasset, NY 11030 USA ,grid.512756.20000 0004 0370 4759Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, 500 Hofstra Blvd, Hempstead, NY 11549 USA
| | - Adekemi O. Suleiman
- grid.208078.50000000419370394Department of Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Connecticut, 263 Farmington Ave, Farmington, CT 06030-6325 USA
| | - Frederick J. Muench
- grid.475801.fPartnership to End Addiction, 711 Third Avenue, 5th Floor, Suite 500, New York, NY 10017 USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Block H, Annesley A, Lockwood K, Xu L, Cameron ID, Laver K, Crotty M, Sherrington C, Kifley A, Howard K, Pond D, Nguyen TA, Kurrle SE. Frailty in older people: Rehabilitation Treatment Research Examining Separate Settings (FORTRESS): protocol for a hybrid type II stepped wedge, cluster, randomised trial. BMC Geriatr 2022; 22:527. [PMID: 35761212 PMCID: PMC9235164 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-022-03178-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2022] [Accepted: 05/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Frailty in older people is associated with increased risk of falls, longer length of stay in hospital, increased risk of institutionalisation and death. Frailty can be measured using validated tools. Multi-component frailty interventions are recommended in clinical practice guidelines but are not routinely implemented in clinical practice. Methods The Frailty in Older people: Rehabilitation, Treatment, Research Examining Separate Settings (FORTRESS) trial is a multisite, hybrid type II, stepped wedge, cluster, randomised trial with blinded assessment and intention-to-treat analysis being conducted in Australia. The study aims to determine the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of an embedded individualised multicomponent frailty intervention (commencing in hospital and continuing in the community) on readmissions, frailty and quality of life when compared with usual care. Frail older people admitted to study wards with no significant cognitive impairment, who are expected to return home after discharge, will be eligible to participate. Participants will receive extra sessions of physiotherapy, pharmacy, and dietetics during their admission. A Community Implementation Facilitator will coordinate implementation of the frailty management strategies and primary network liaison. The primary outcome is number of days of non-elective hospital readmissions during 12 month follow-up period. Secondary outcomes include frailty status measured using the FRAIL scale; quality of life measured using the EQ-5D-5L; and time-to-event for readmission and readmission rates. The total cost of delivering the intervention will be assessed, and cost-effectiveness analyses will be conducted. Economic evaluation will include analyses for health outcomes measured in terms of the main clinical outcomes. Implementation outcomes will be collected as part of a process evaluation. Recruitment commenced in 2020 and we are aiming to recruit 732 participants over the three-year duration of the study. Discussion This study will reveal whether intervening with frail older people to address factors contributing to frailty can reduce hospital readmissions and improve frailty status and quality of life. If the FORTRESS intervention provides a clinically significant and cost-effective result, it will demonstrate an improved approach to treating frail patients, both in hospital and when they return home. Trial Registration Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR): ACTRN12620000760976p. ANZCTR registered 24 July 2020. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12877-022-03178-1.
Collapse
|
9
|
Lui JHL, Brookman-Frazee L, Smith A, Lind T, Terrones L, Rodriguez A, Motamedi M, Villodas M, Lau AS. Implementation facilitation strategies to promote routine progress monitoring among community therapists. Psychol Serv 2022; 19:343-352. [PMID: 33793283 PMCID: PMC8484366 DOI: 10.1037/ser0000456] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
Despite substantial support for the importance of routine progress monitoring (RPM) as part of evidence-based practice, few providers utilize measurement-based care. This study sought to identify the relative importance of facilitation strategies viewed as most helpful for increasing intention to use RPM among 388 ethnically diverse community therapists serving children and families. Four types of facilitation strategies were examined: language/interpretability, automation, staffing/access, and requirements. Mixed analyses of variance found that therapists' reported intentions to use RPM were more influenced by strategies of automating assessment administration, provision of clerical assistance, and agency requirements than by making linguistically appropriate measures available. However, the importance of strategies differed depending on therapist race/ethnicity and current RPM use. Language/interpretability of RPM assessments was less emphasized for non-Hispanic White therapists and therapists who have not yet or only minimally adopted RPM compared with ethnic minority therapists and therapists who regularly use RPM, respectively. Furthermore, therapists who were not current RPM users emphasized automation more than staffing/access. Results may inform prioritization of implementation facilitation strategies for agencies to encourage RPM. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Ashley Smith
- Department of Psychology, University of California
| | - Teresa Lind
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California
| | | | | | | | | | - Anna S Lau
- Department of Psychology, University of California
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Triplett NS, Munson S, Mbwayo A, Mutavi T, Weiner BJ, Collins P, Amanya C, Dorsey S. Applying human-centered design to maximize acceptability, feasibility, and usability of mobile technology supervision in Kenya: a mixed methods pilot study protocol. Implement Sci Commun 2021; 2:2. [PMID: 33413688 PMCID: PMC7792108 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-020-00102-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2020] [Accepted: 12/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although research continues to support task-shifting as an effective model of delivering evidence-based practices (EBPs), little scholarship has focused how to scale up and sustain task-shifting in low- and middle-income countries, including how to sustainably supervise lay counselors. Ongoing supervision is critical to ensure EBPs are delivered with fidelity; however, the resources and expertise required to provide ongoing supervision may limit the potential to scale up and sustain task shifting. Opportunities may exist to leverage mobile technology to replace or supplement in-person supervision in low-resource contexts, but contextual variables, such as network connectivity and lay counselor preferences surrounding mobile technology, must be examined and considered when designing and implementing mobile technology supervision. METHODS This study builds from an existing randomized trial in Kenya, wherein teachers and community health volunteers have been trained to provide trauma-focused cognitive behavioral therapy as lay counselors. The study will use an iterative and mixed methods approach, with qualitative interviews and a Human-Centered Design (HCD) workshop informing a non-randomized pilot trial. Semi-structured interviews will be conducted with lay counselors and supervisors to understand how mobile technology is currently being used for supervision and determine the barriers and facilitators to mobile technology supervision. Data from these interviews will inform an HCD workshop, where lay counselors and supervisors "re-design" supervision to most effectively leverage mobile technology. Workshop participants will also participate in focus groups to gather perceptions on the use of HCD techniques. The final outcome of the workshop will be a set of refined workflows, which will be tested in a mixed method, nonrandomized pilot with newly trained lay counselors and existing supervisors. The pilot trial will evaluate the acceptability, feasibility, and usability of mobile technology supervision through self-report questionnaires as well as perceptions of effectiveness through qualitative interviews with a subset of lay counselors and all supervisors. DISCUSSION This study will provide a launching point for future research on supervision and methods to engage stakeholders to design and tailor interventions and implementation supports to fit low-resourced contexts. TRIAL REGISTRATION The parent trial from which this study builds was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov on August 9, 2017 ( NCT03243396 ).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noah S. Triplett
- Department of Psychology, University of Washington, Guthrie Hall 119A, Box 351525, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
| | - Sean Munson
- Department of Human Centered Design & Engineering, University of Washington, 428 Sieg Hall, Box 352315, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
| | - Anne Mbwayo
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Nairobi, P.O. Box 19676, Nairobi, 00202 Kenya
| | - Teresia Mutavi
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Nairobi, P.O. Box 19676, Nairobi, 00202 Kenya
| | - Bryan J. Weiner
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Harris Hydraulics Laboratory, 1510 San Juan Road, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
- Department of Health Services, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Box 357965, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
| | - Pamela Collins
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Harris Hydraulics Laboratory, 1510 San Juan Road, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Box 356560, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
| | - Cyrilla Amanya
- Research Department, Ace Africa Kenya, P.O. Box 1185, Bungoma, 50200 Kenya
| | - Shannon Dorsey
- Department of Psychology, University of Washington, Guthrie Hall 119A, Box 351525, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Edelman EJ, Dziura J, Esserman D, Porter E, Becker WC, Chan PA, Cornman DH, Rebick G, Yager J, Morford K, Muvvala SB, Fiellin DA. Working with HIV clinics to adopt addiction treatment using implementation facilitation (WHAT-IF?): Rationale and design for a hybrid type 3 effectiveness-implementation study. Contemp Clin Trials 2020; 98:106156. [PMID: 32976995 PMCID: PMC7511156 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2020.106156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2020] [Revised: 09/16/2020] [Accepted: 09/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tobacco, alcohol and opioid misuse are associated with substantial morbidity and mortality among people with HIV (PWH). Despite existence of evidence-based counseling and medications for addiction, these treatments are infrequently offered in HIV clinics. The Working with HIV clinics to adopt Addiction Treatment using Implementation Facilitation (WHAT-IF?) study was conducted to address this implementation challenge. The study's goals were to conduct a formative evaluation of barriers to and facilitators of implementing addiction treatment for PWH followed by an evaluation of the impact of Implementation Facilitation (IF) on promoting adoption of addiction treatments and clinical outcomes. METHODS The study was conducted at four HIV clinics in the northeast United States, using a hybrid type 3 effectiveness-implementation stepped wedge design and guided by the Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services Research (PARiHS) framework. A mixed-methods approach was used to identify evidence, context, and facilitation-related barriers to and facilitators of integration of addiction treatments into HIV clinics and to help tailor IF for each clinic. An evaluation was then conducted of the impact of IF on implementation outcomes, including provision of addiction treatment (primary outcome), organizational and clinician and staff readiness to adopt addiction treatment, and changes in organizational models of care used to deliver addiction treatment. The evaluation also included IF's impact on effectiveness outcomes, specifically HIV-related outcomes among patients eligible for addiction treatment. CONCLUSIONS Results will generate important information regarding the impact of IF as a reproducible strategy to promote addiction treatment in HIV clinics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Jennifer Edelman
- Program in Addiction Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States of America; Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States of America; Center for Interdisciplinary Research on AIDS, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, United States of America.
| | - James Dziura
- Yale Center for Analytic Sciences, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, United States of America; Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States of America
| | - Denise Esserman
- Yale Center for Analytic Sciences, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, United States of America; Department of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, United States of America
| | - Elizabeth Porter
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States of America
| | - William C Becker
- Program in Addiction Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States of America; Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States of America; VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, United States of America
| | - Philip A Chan
- Department of Medicine, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States of America
| | - Deborah H Cornman
- Institute for Collaboration on Health, Intervention, and Policy (InCHIP), University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, United States of America
| | - Gabriel Rebick
- New York University, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Jessica Yager
- SUNY Downstate, Brooklyn, NY, United States of America
| | - Kenneth Morford
- Program in Addiction Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States of America; Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States of America
| | - Srinivas B Muvvala
- Program in Addiction Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States of America; Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States of America
| | - David A Fiellin
- Program in Addiction Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States of America; Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States of America; Center for Interdisciplinary Research on AIDS, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, United States of America; Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|